Speaker 1: The following presentation Isadel Marvis Studio's production.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the fact Hunter Radio Network. Here is
your host, George Hobbs.
Speaker 3: Welcome back truth seekers from around the world. It's time
for another edition of the fact Hunter podcast. As we
record on this Tuesday, October the seventh, twenty twenty five.
I'm your host is always George Hobbs. It's great day weather.
We'll be in the sixties and seventies going forward. Favorite
time of year. Get outside, take a walk, enjoy this
beautiful weather. Winter will be here before you know it.
Thank you all for all your emails the fact Hunter
at mail dot com, and I am I'm still pretty
far behind.
Speaker 4: I appreciate all your.
Speaker 3: Thoughts and messages, I really do, and I will get
to them. Originally, today, like I said, was going to
be all encompassing the agents of infiltration, if you will,
you know, the people who are looking to subvert this
country and tear it down from the inside. And we
are still going to cover that at the end. But
there are a few other things I wanted to touch
on as well, and between these particular topics, I do
have some audio clips to share with you as well,
so I hope.
Speaker 4: You enjoy it.
Speaker 3: Maybe a little different today, but lots to talk about
and wanted to get a little deeper because next week
I'm looking to present to you. Right, we talk about
how these people at the top of the food chain,
they're Luciferians, right, well, how do they communicate, you know,
with these entities like Satan like lucifer. Right, We're going
to talk about the Kapala, the history of the Kabbala,
and some of these things we're going to talk about
today tie into all of that, the power of words
and things of that nature.
Speaker 4: So I think you'll enjoy today's episode.
Speaker 3: Let's kick it off, and I thought I would start
it off on a light note. There's a band I've
been listening to for a while. I've as you know,
as I've mentioned, I've really backed off of the big
time secular music. Growing up, I was a big led Zeppelin,
Iron Maiden, that type of thing. But then as you
get older, you realize that it's just not beneficial.
Speaker 5: Right.
Speaker 3: The Beatles, right, they had Alistair Crawley and backward masking
they had on their records led Zeppelin. Jimmy Page bought
Alistair Crowley's house and you read you know Dave McGowan's
book Weird Scenes, and you start to understand that they
use every facet of everything against us, even pop culture.
And I found this band years ago called The Call,
and I came up with this little thing, The Call
that Wasn't Answered. So back in the eighties, great time
in music, there was a band that came along and
they didn't exactly fit the mold. They weren't plastered across
MTV and Neon suits, right, they weren't chasing trends or
cheap radio hooks like all the popular ones. My Angel
Is the Centerfold and these type of things that Motley
crue right.
Speaker 4: This group that I listened to, they're still to this day.
Speaker 3: They're called The Call, and their front man, I believe
it's pronounced Michael bean Ban. And they sang lyrics that
really had meaning to them, like I still believe, and
Let the Day Begin weren't just rock anthems, which they
should have been, but they were really proclamations of hope
and longing for something higher.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 3: It wasn't girls, girls, girls, right, wasn't We're not going
to take it right? Those were the anthems that were
championed by the people who run the music industry back then,
And when you listen to the Call, you didn't have
to dig deep to hear their echoes of faith, whispers
of scripture and the call to something beyond this fleeting world.
And as far as eighties music go, they're probably the cleanest,
best sounding group that you'll find. Yet The Call never
came close to the heights of their peers. They toured
with Peter Gabriel, Simple Minds the Band, and despite the
admiration of you know, well known musicians like Bono and
Jim Kerr, they never became a household name. Their records
barely got any radio play. The critics love them, if
you go back and look at their album reviews are
great and they sound great, but why did the industry
never truly back them? And if you take the time
to look through music, there's still good music out there.
But what they push on the mainstream is trash.
Speaker 4: There's a reason for it, right.
Speaker 3: Some people will say it was bad timing, right, but
ask yourself this did the music industry? Did did the
music industry who were always eager to promote rebellion? You
know what was eighties about? Xs nihilism? Quietly Sideline, a
group whose message hinted at Christ who hinted it truth
and moral clarity. So can or this Around the same
time that their albums were coming out, You two was
rising to global fame. And what did you two carry?
Speaker 1: Right?
Speaker 3: Similar anthems, but more worldly, much more broader that can
be presented in a marketable package. Right now, They had
the industry and machine behind them too, Right, there's a
lot of trash that gets pushed and pushed and people
still buy their music. But then you had groups like
The Call with a message that was too direct, it
was too convicting, and they were left in the shadows.
Speaker 4: One was elevated, the other was buried. Is it a
coincidence or.
Speaker 3: Was this another case where the gatekeepers of culture decided
what messages were safe for the masses and what truths
needed to be suppressed. So they will tell you, they
in the music industry will tell you that The Call
existed in what they called no man's land. They were
too rock and roll for the Christian market, and they
were too Christian for the rock market. Even though striper
they took off, right, But that's where the most honest
voices get lost, because truth and we all know this
truth rarely gets fit into these neat little categories, right.
And if you know the history of the music industry,
which most of you do, with its deep ties to politics,
hidden agendas, and spiritual manipulation, then you know that the
voices pointing people toward God don't get the microphone, and
in cases like the call, they get completely cut off.
So I hope tonight or tomorrow, if you enjoy music,
you'll go to your Spotify or your Amazon Music or
YouTube music, whatever, take some time and listen to the call.
You're not just hearing another eighties band. You're hearing a
reminder that messages matter, that songs have power, and that
sometimes the industry would rather drown out the truth than
let it echo in the ears for generations. And that
begs the question, how many of the voices in music
and culture in history have been silenced because they pointed
people toward God? And with that being said, we all
know that this guy bad Bunny is doing the halftime show,
and if you just put bad money into Google images,
that's the guy they're pushing. Jason Whitlock was having a
conversation with TMZ's Harvey eleven.
Speaker 4: And This is what they had to say. How's it demonic?
Speaker 2: Bad Bunny's music is demonic, like most commercial rap music
is demonic. It promotes things antithetical to Jesus Christ.
Speaker 5: That's demonic.
Speaker 2: This guy is a.
Speaker 6: Let me ask you something. I don't believe in Jesus Christ. Okay,
I'm Jewish. I am Jewish, and are you saying that
every Jew is by definition than demonic.
Speaker 5: I'm talking about music. You made your point.
Speaker 6: You and I definitely live in different world Bason.
Speaker 7: You know, and.
Speaker 5: More power to you.
Speaker 6: But I ain't going into your world if I can
help it.
Speaker 8: I got to say, look out for the.
Speaker 6: Chair of the line off the rooftops there in Nashville
and Harvey.
Speaker 2: I want to enter into a world where Jesus Christ reigns.
So yeah, we've got different points of view.
Speaker 6: We do, indeed, and I don't say that with any embarrassment.
Speaker 4: Jason.
Speaker 3: There you go. The truth isn't plain sight, folks. The
truth is in plain sight.
Speaker 4: All right.
Speaker 3: Let's get into Part two. English spelling and the power
of word magic. Okay, So let's talk about English. It's
our common tongue right here in the United States for
the most part, but it's what we used to communicate ideas,
We tell stories, we sing songs as we were just
talking about, and sign contracts, which contracts in itself. You
could do a whole episode on right the wordsmithing in that.
But how often have you ever stopped to think about
how strange it is?
Speaker 4: Right?
Speaker 3: English is full of contradictions, double meanings, silent letters, bizarre
spellings that don't even match the sounds. It's almost if,
as if pardon me, the language will designed not to
clarify the truth, but to obscure it. And here's where
it gets interesting. In English, we just don't write, we spell.
Why is that? Why is it called spelling? Why does
a word that once meant incantation or enchantment now describe
the basic act of arranging letters into a meaning. Could
it be that our language is itself a system of
spells designed to shape how we think, to bind us
and maybe just maybe enslave us. So let's explore this question.
Let's look into the biblical foundation of word power. And
this is kind of our introduction to.
Speaker 4: Next week's podcast.
Speaker 3: We're going to talk about the we'll call it interesting
overlaps between spelling and casting spells. The bizarre history of
English as a language, and the conspiratorial way elites have
used words to dominate culture. And most importantly, we'll see
how God's word, pure, unchanging and true can break every
human spell. So remember the Bible begins not with action,
but with words. Genesis one three says, and God said,
let there be light, and there was light. So God
is speaking, and reality obeys. Creation itself is the product
of divine speech. Genesis repeats the pattern, and God said,
and it was so, over and over. The texts show
us that words are not just communication creation, and the
Gospel of John drives this home. In the beginning, as
was the Word, and the Word was with God, and
the Word was God. Right the opening of John, verse fourteen,
the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us. Right
that Jesus Christ the living Word. That is Jesus Christ,
the living Word. The power of God's word is embodied
in the Son of God himself. So the Bible doesn't
shy away from warning us about the misuse of words.
Proverbs eighteen twenty one says that death and life are
in the power of the tongue. James three tells us
the tongue is like a fire, a tiny spark that
can ignite a great forest fire. So what does this mean, Well,
it means that the words are not neutral. They are
never neutral. They either bring life or they bring death.
They either reveal truth or obscure it, or it can
be a full outlie. And Satan knows this. The serpent
didn't attack Eve with a sword. He attacked her with
a sentence. Hath God said, right, that's.
Speaker 4: What he does.
Speaker 3: He twists God's words, He plants doubts. He is casting
a spell of confusion. So when we talk about the
language today, especially English, we must keep this biblical backdrop
in mind. Words are powerful and if words are corrupted,
they can be used to enslave. Right, and we see
that with they live.
Speaker 4: Right. Now, Let's think about the word spelling.
Speaker 5: Right.
Speaker 3: We don't say letter words, we don't say we arrange letters, right,
we spell? Now, this comes from Old English. I think
I said it last week, and the word spell meant
a tell a story, a word, and over time, in
pagan traditions it came to mean an incantation, which is
cast spells. Right, Shamans recited spells, and here we are,
five hundred years later, sending our children to spelling class. Right,
there was a reason that Rockefeller hijacked the education system.
It's not a coincidence. Maybe you believe it is.
Speaker 4: That's fine, But.
Speaker 3: In the worldview of occultists and the elites, coincidence don't exist.
Speaker 4: They just don't.
Speaker 3: Words are energy and words can be used as magic
with a k. You know, everybody knows. Everybody who listens
to this podcasts knows who Alistair Crowley is. This is
the third time we've mentioned on this podcast alone. He
said that the purpose of magic is to reshape reality
according to your will, and he believed that words, spells
were the vehicle for that. That's why I do this
podcast in a certain order. There's a reason they mock
you by putting Alistair Crowley on the front of an
album because by listening to this music that the machine
gets behind, they can propagate you. You can say chance
and put yourself in a more vulnerable position. You had
loosest trust, which we just talked about recently. The Freemasons,
who we always talk about, Theosophists, they all taught that symbols, numbers,
and words could channel spiritual forces. So let me ask
you this. When you spell a word. Are you simply
writing or are you participating in a system that was
built to carry deeper hidden power? When you vote, are
you participating in a system that was built to carry
deeper hidden power? When you pay taxes? Are you participating
in a system that was built to carry deeper hidden power.
When you send your child to public school, are you
participating in a system that was built to carry deeper
hidden power. This matrix is built for systems to overlap,
where double words hide double truths, where sound and symbols
are disconnected. That's why the English language feels cursed. It's
not just communication, it's incantation. And once you see it,
you can't unsee it. So take a step back. Why
is English so confusing? So if you take time and
look at the history of English, you'll see that it's
a Frankenstein if you will, of language right, Germanic roots,
French and Latin vocabulary, Norse borrowings, Greek scientific terms, right,
pharmaciea words stolen from Arabic, Sanskrit, Dutch, Spanish.
Speaker 4: Then came the great vowel shift, and.
Speaker 3: That's something that doesn't get taught in the education system.
So one of the strangest events in linguistic history. Between
fourteen hundred and seventeen hundred, the way English speakers pronounced
vowels shifted dramatically. Now, if you look at you'll be,
you're not really going to find exactly why You'll you'll have.
Some people say, well, it was the Black Death, it
was the migration patterns.
Speaker 4: It was a big one. People say, is social class
distinction one distinctions?
Speaker 3: Pardon me, but here's the key. Spelling stayed the same
even as pronunciation changed. And what was the result. It
was a chaotic mess. Words that look the same sounded different.
Words that sound the same look different different.
Speaker 4: Cough.
Speaker 3: Think of all the ough cough though through tough And
do you remember being a child and seeing those words
and thinking about what are we doing here? They don't
make any sense. If I spell something one way, it
should sound the same way, but it does not.
Speaker 4: And I know I'm going to.
Speaker 3: Have a tenth grade teacher email me and give me
the detailed reason why.
Speaker 4: But there's just something deeper to it. I truly believe.
How is it's.
Speaker 3: Difficult for children to learn right? But how do they
learn that? How do they learn that? By memorization, by repetition,
by regurgitation. I knew who held the keys to literacy
during those centuries we just mentioned the elites, bribes and
the priests. Language became a gatekeeper.
Speaker 7: Listen to this.
Speaker 3: If you couldn't read the contract, if you couldn't read
the law, if you couldn't read the Bible, you were
dependent on someone else to interpret it for you. Now
step back and think about everything we've talked about over
the last five years. Our education system is intentionally set
to fail your child, so they don't bother reading contracts,
so they depend on the system. The Catholic Church right
conducting Mass in Latin while the people spoke English. So
the priests are holding the monopoly on meaning. That's control
which reads that raised This is another question. Was the
chaos of England or English I should say not England.
Was it accidental or was it a feature? Was it
engineered to create a gap between the ruling class and
the common man? Is there a reason that ninety five
percent of the people sitting in Congress are lawyers? Are
they trying to create a gap between the ruling class
and the common man? Because a language that confuses is
a language that enslaves and satan is the author of confusion.
And once you understand, once you can see language as
a power, the conspiracy side of this becomes unavoidable. All right,
let's talk about a few different examples here a legal language,
A judge pronounces a sense. A sentence is both grammar
and punishment. You receive a summons, a word that also
means conjuring a spirit. You stand before a black robed
figure in a temple like courtroom where the priestly cast
of lawyers interpret the hidden code. How about political language,
government's free brand reality with words? What are civilian deaths
considered in war? Collateral damage? Printing money becomes quantitative easing.
What did we see recently? Right, tyranny became public safety.
Each phrase is a spell designed to make you accept
what you would otherwise resist. And how about the recent
media language? Right, watch the news you'll see how every
single news outlet repeats the same phrase safe and effective,
the new normal, and of course, build back better. That's
not journalism, it's chanting. Repetition is enchantment. This isn't just propaganda,
it's sorcery. It's word magic, and it thrives in English
because the language itself is a web of contradictions, double meanings,
and traps. But let's go back to the good news.
God's word breaks every spell. Psalm twelve to six says
the words of the Lord are pure words as silver
tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times, So
unlike human words, his word is pure. It's been tested
and unchanging. Jesus said in John eight thirty two, and
ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make
you free. And look at the Reformation. For centuries the
Church of Rome monopolized scripture, keeping it locked away in Latin.
But men like Wycliffe and Tyndale and Luther translated the
Bible into the common tongue. It was like breaking a
century's old spell. Suddenly ordinary people could hear God's word directly,
and once they did, the monopoly of the priests collapse.
By the way, I should mention yesterday October sixth William Tyndale,
that was the oh geez, I guess it would be
the four hundred and eighty ninth anniversary of him being
burned alive for ensuring that ordinary people like you and
I could read the Bible. And we're going to talk
more in future episodes. More about Luther a book that
he wrote that you're really hard pressed to find one
of the later books he wrote. And it's very much
a subject that we'll tell that is talked about today.
But that's for I think two weeks from now. But
again that's the difference between human words and God's word. Right,
God's words sets us free. Think about this. Look around
you today, the same system is alive and well. War
has become peacekeeping, right, war through peace. Spying becomes surveillance,
censorship becomes content moderation, and propaganda becomes public information. These
are all spells. They bypass their critical mind by softening reality.
Pop culture does the same thing. You saw the Travis
Scott concert. Chance at concerts, repeated refrains and songs, slogans
and advertising. All of it is modern enchantment. You're not
just entertained, you're entrained even at you. Cation plays along
by enforcing proper spelling. It doesn't just teach communication again,
it really teaches conformity. Step outside the lines and you're
marked as deficient. Right, that's what they do. But remember
Jesus said, let your AA bea and your nay for
whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil? So he
taught simplicity, honesty, and clarity. That is the antidote to
word magic, not this nonsense of content moderation and peacekeeping
and surveillance. No, that's double speak. So remember words aren't neutral.
English isn't just merely quirky, but probably engineered. And that
spelling is more than learning letters. It's a part of
a system of spells, and that the elites, whether it's
in courts, governments, or the media, continue to use a
language to enchant, confuse, an enslave. So that's that portion
for today. I have a audio clip for you. This
is CIA.
Speaker 4: Or an x CIA chase.
Speaker 3: Use explains the reality of our world and how syops work.
Speaker 9: I'm the guy that teaches siops telling you that we
are in a syop. One thousand percent. We are in
a big time siop. And that does not mean that
I have some kind of X ray vision and I
can see the puppet masters up above the stage.
Speaker 4: I don't know. I'm not saying I.
Speaker 9: Don't research that stuff, but I do research these techniques
and they're definitely here. And it looks like this is
the same process that's happened all over the world where
siops were sped up and weren't allowed to chure before
the next phase began. And I think people are saying, well,
this is bonkers or this is ridiculous, just crazy, like
in your it's just in your face. It's from the left,
from the right, from everywhere, and it has nothing to
do with left or right. And I think that is
in itself a whole nother discussion. Yes, but we're seeing
a timeline being sped up. We're seeing things done more
and more in the open because there's probably not time
for the previous step to ma sure to get our
minds ready to receive the next one.
Speaker 4: I see, That's what it is. There, you go. That's
why you have to keep your head on a swivel. Folks.
Speaker 3: We're going to talk briefly about the Insurrection Act that's
been a topic of conversation down at the White House
and the shadow of martial law. Remember they keep this
in the back pocket, right, the Insurrection activating seven. From
Jefferson to Lincoln, from Eisenhower to H. W.
Speaker 4: Bush.
Speaker 3: This law has been used to put boots on American streets.
But here's the big question. Are we watching history repeat
itself again? And could these moves be laying the groundwork
for something bigger martial law. Let's yeah, and I know
we've talked about this before, but let's for the new listeners,
let's just talk about the origins of the Insurrection Act.
Seventeen ninety two, Congress passed the calling Fourth Act, letting
presidents summon state militias to put down insurrections. And if
you have never heard of the Bonus Army, we have
done a podcast on it and do a little research
on the Bonus Army. But Jefferson wanted more because Aaron Burr,
right as former Vice president, was a cue so scheming
to create his own empire out of West out West,
pardon me so. To deal with the threat, Jefferson signed
the Insurrection Act in eighteen oh seven, giving presidents a
permanent mechanism to use the military inside US borders. So remember,
you know, we become a nation officially in seventeen eighty seven.
Twenty years later, we're having this level problems. Why because
what was supposed to start out as this tiny little government.
Once you give the elites a little bit of power,
it's over. And that's what happened, right, So fast forward
to today, the law lives in Title ten of the
US Code, sections two fifty one to two fifty five,
it says the president can deploy troops in three scenarios.
Number one, if a state asked for help to crush
an insurrection. Number two, if law in four can't enforced
federal law. Number three, if citizens being denied their rights
in the state won't step in. Now it sounds narrow,
but there's a kicker. As always, we just got done
talking about words smithing right, terms like domestic violence or
insurrection aren't defined. They intentionally leave a lot of room
for interpretation or misrepresentation. So the Act has only been
invoked a handful of times, and it's usually in dire moments.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 3: Lincoln used federal troops in the Civil War era. Eisenhower
sent the hundred and first into Little Rock in nineteen
fifty seven to enforce desegregation. Both Kennedy and Johnson used
it again in the South during the Civil rights movement
of the sixties. And you know, as you remember, HW
Bush deployed to la during the nineteen ninety two Rodney
King riots. But again, the big one, which you know,
we're just going to touch on it briefly. I hope
you all take the time to research here, to go
back and listen to the podcast we did several years ago,
nineteen thirty two, the so called Bonus Army. So what
happened was you had thousands of World War One veterans
camping out in Washington, d C. They were demanding the
payment of their promised bonuses. You know who drove them out?
Federal troops. Do you know who they were led by?
Remember this is nineteen thirty two, a guy named Douglas MacArthur.
And if you go back and look at the names
associated with that, a lot of them went on to
be big names.
Speaker 4: In World War Two.
Speaker 3: You had tanks rolling through American streets. Veterans were tear gassed.
This wasn't technically under the Insurrection Act. But why I'm
saying this is because it shows you just how quickly
the line blurs when a president decides that the military
should restore order. And because we have a system in place,
those in charge, the police, the National Guards, et cetera.
If they don't comply, then they use they lose their
personal income and in some cases their freedom. So the elites,
the one percent of the one percent, set up a
system where we turn each other. We turn on each
other because if we don't, we lose our income, the
ability to feed our family. It's it can mess with
your head when you actually sit down and think about
how well designed it is. It's something I'll tell you what.
So again, there's an important distinction we need to make here.
Invoking the Insurrection Act is not the same as declaring
martial law. So martial law means civilian government is suspended
in the military rules outright, So we have to be
careful when we talk about that. I'm just talking about
this as a prelude to a possible martial law. If
they have all these people in place in all these cities,
then they declare martial law that they have everything set
up ready to go.
Speaker 4: You understand.
Speaker 3: But I wanted to make that clear. So on the
Insurrection Act, on paper, it allows the military to quote
assist civilian authorities. But again, when soldiers patrol your streets,
when humvies block intersections, when rifles are aimed at citizens,
does it really matter what label you slap on it.
Let's go to present day. Okay, We've already seen Trump
just as recently as yesterday, threatened to use the Insurrection Act.
We saw it back in twenty twenty. Judges pushback, governors resisted,
you know, for theater. But here we are October of
twenty twenty five. We have seen National Guard troops sent
to Chicago, threatening to go to Portland, Los Angeles. Courts
are weighing in blah blah blah. But listen to what
Trump says, and not just him thinking about pardoning Glayne Maxwell.
Speaker 4: Oh wow, what a world we live in. But what
did he say.
Speaker 3: He's described the unrest in our cities as a war
from within. So think about that. Once you start framing
dissent protests or even crime as war, then you have
already primed people mentally for a military And there's a
lot of people who are that want Trump to do this,
and it's because we're being slowly conditioned to accept soldiers
on our street as normal. Remember how crazy it was
to go through the airport after nine to eleven taking
off our shoes.
Speaker 4: Now it's just like anything else, it's routine.
Speaker 3: And they want to normalize the federal government from stepping
over local authorities. So let's connect a few dots before
we get into our main topic. The Insurrection Act has
always been vague, and the courts historically defer to presidents.
Past presidents used it rarely and debatable, But today we'll
see it tested, We'll see it floated in these scenarios
that look like political showdowns, then more than really true insurrections.
But it's again, if you're rooting for this, that means
you're too lazy to take back your own streets and
your own cities. You have no community. Stop begging the
government to take care of your problem, get to know
your neighbors, find like minded people and make things happen,
and expecting other people don't complain about paying taxes. And
then you still want the government to do everything. I'm
telling you. If enough of these deployments happen, the extraordinary
becomes routine. And once it's routine, it's one short step
towards a de facto martial law, even if nobody declares
it so. In conclusion, is Trump setting us up for
martial law? Listen, that's up to each and every one
of you to decide. The Insurrection Act is legal, yes,
but remember, legality isn't the same as legitimacy. Right mandates
aren't law. So here's the big thing. If the military
is used as a political tool. History tells us that
the line between order and authoritarianism can vanquish overnight, and
the Founders warned us eternal vigilance is the price of liberty.
But the question remains, are you vigilant enough today? We'll
be back in three minutes.
Speaker 5: Dallas, Texas, Ladies and gentlemen, is on the thirty third parallel.
This is significant. We have three shots and three wounds.
Kennedy was killed on November twenty second. November is the
eleventh month, at eleven to twenty two, and again you
have thirty three.
Speaker 10: Just last night, the suspect was taking in the custody
attention all over time in less than thirty six hours
thirty three to be precise. The suspect was apprehended in
his historic time here thirty three to be precise.
Speaker 7: Charlie Kirk's memorial flyer had the thirty three the two
sees the third letter on the thirty third lay line.
In Phoenix, Arizona, on Cardinals.
Speaker 5: Way, John F. Kennedy was murdered on the anniversary date
of Pope Clement the Fifth's papal bull, condemning the Knight's
templar to torture by the Dominican monks under the Inquisition.
For when you find out that the Knights of Malta,
the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, the Order of Saint John
of Jerusalem, the ancient Order of the Rosen Cross are
all different branches of the Knight's Templar, then you will
understand that John Kennedy was assassinated in an outdoor temple
of the Sun by the Knight's Templar at the time
of day when the sun is most high. Now, John F.
Kennedy suffered three wounds, one in the back, one in
the throat, one in the head, the exact same wounds
suffered by Hiram Abiff in the Masonic initiation. But Hiram
Abiff is the representation of Jacques d Malay, who was
burned at the stake by the Pope and Philip the Fifth,
and he was the grand master of the Knight's Templar.
Speaker 11: The same is true in your belief systems. If you're
going to believe something, you better do your homework and
find out where what the words really mean. Because the
men who run this world from behind the scenes are
telling you something and they're doing something and Unless you
know how to read the code, you're never going to
figure out what's going on here. A classic example is
the word church. Many people use the word church and
have no concept in their mind where it comes from.
The word church comes from a Scottish word Kirk, which
gives us Captain Kirk of the good ship enterprise. Okay,
we're talking money enterprise, Captain Kirk. You think that's silly,
it's very serious. Kirk and Scottish is church in English.
But Kirk and Scottish goes back to a Greek goddess
named Mother Circe. Mother Circe becomes Mother Circe in Rome,
and then the Knights Templars took the worship of Mother
Circe from Rome into Scotland and called it Mother Kirk.
Speaker 4: There you go interesting with kirk. Huh.
Speaker 3: Let's get to our main topic, back to the individuals
responsible for subverting this country, the agents of infiltration. And
remember communism never just appear heared in America.
Speaker 4: It was imported.
Speaker 3: It was cultivated and shielded by people who believed in
its cause. They thought they could ride its waves for
their own advantage. These agents of infiltration, they weren't all
bomb throwers or union radicals. Like we mentioned last week,
many were polished lawyers, bureaucrats and academics. Listen, academia is
widely responsible for communist ideology today. But they wore suits,
they carried briefcases, and they shaped policy from inside our government.
Speaker 4: So we'll take it back.
Speaker 3: Just in nineteen seventeen, Vladimir Lenin and his Bolsheviks seized
power in Russia. They didn't see they didn't see their
revolution as just a Russian event. They saw it as
a spark for a worldwide right. In nineteen nineteen, Lenin
created the Common Tern that's Communist International, with its explicit
goal to struggle by all means available, including armed forces,
the overthrow of the international bourgeois, and the creation of
an international Soviet republic. So from Moscow the orders went
out form communist parties in every nation, infiltrate the labor unions,
create front organizations, and recruit intellectuals, and so it came
to America. By nineteen nineteen, the Communist Party USA was
formed under the watchful eye of Moscow and others. It
was never truly independent, It was always loyal to the Kremlin,
So no story of infiltration begins without John Reid. He
was born in Portland eighteen eighty seven, educated at Harvard,
and he was no working class labor. He was a
man of privilege who turned revolutionary. By nineteen seventeen. He
traveled to Russia as a journalist, and he truly fell
in love with the Bolshevik cause. He stood in the
streets of Petrograd during the October Revolution, had his notebook
in hand, and wrote the book that would immortalize him
Ten Days that Shook the World. Lenin himself wrote a
forward praising Reid's account as truthful and the most vivid exposition.
Speaker 4: Of the events.
Speaker 3: Reid comes back to America. He helps found the Communist
Labor Party, which was a precursor to CPUSA. He became
the conduit between Moscow and the American movement. When Reid
died of typhus in nineteen twenty, the Soviets him with
burial inside the Kremlin Wall Necropolis. To this day, one
hundred years later, he remains the only American to receive
such a tribute. That fact alone tells you that Moscow
saw him as one of their own. So think about it.
While America was celebrating victory in World War One, one
of our own citizens was being enshrined in Moscow as
a revolutionary hero. The seed has been planeted. Now we knew,
we know. I should say that this Wear Group and
the New Deal infiltration was another just cog in the
wheel for this one world government and the Great Depression
opened the door wider. As Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal expanded
government agencies, it also created fertile soil for ideological infiltration.
One of the most notorious networks was the Were Group,
named after Harold Ware, a committed communist working in the
Agricultural Adjustment Administration. The Wear Group was more than just
a social circle. It was a secret cell of communists
inside the US government. Members included, and they eventually became
household names. By the way in congressional hearings, algerhiss Lee, Pressman,
John apt Nathan Witt, and Charles Kramer. They were young,
they were brilliant, they were credentialed, you know, Harvard Columbia,
prestigious law firms. But they were all loyal to Moscow's
cause and the Bolsheviks cause. Whitiker Chambers, who he himself
had been part of the underground, later described the War Group,
as quote, the nucleus of the Communist Party in Washington.
They weren't passing out pamphlets on street corners. They were
drafting memos. They were shaping policies, whispering advice to officials
who never suspected where their true allegiance lay. So the
genius of the War Group was subtle. Okay, Their members
didn't read, they don't wave read communist flags. They buried
their ideology under the paperwork of the New Deal. And
that's what happens, right. The members of our Congress don't
walk around most of them these days. Some do, but
it's always under the guise of good But behind closed
doors they report to their handlers, right Apec today, back
then a lot in Moscow. But the trailers back then
and listen, yeah, you know Israel. Well, they weren't Israel yet,
but the Jewish mafia certainly played a huge part in
the Bolshevik Revolution. But then you had the silver Master Cell,
and the infiltration of our government reached really a new
height in the nineteen forties with the silver Master Cell,
and many people consider it the most important espionage network
in American history. Led by economist Nathan silver Master, this
cell operated inside the very machinery of wartime Washington, the
silver Master Network, and queued figures like Harry Dexter White,
who was Assistant Secretary to the Treasury and one of
the architects of the Breton Woods monetary system.
Speaker 4: So here's this guy who's.
Speaker 3: In a position the shape not only American finance, but
a post war global economy. Right when they rebuild after
a war, that's where the big money is. And the
Venona Decrips later confirmed his cooperation with Soviet intelligence. Then
you had others in the cell work for the Board
of Economic Warfare, the War Production Board, and even some
people even had ties to the White House. Yeah shocking,
I know. But moreover, they had access to classified documents
military planning and economic strategy, and all of it flowed
out to their handlers. You had Elizabeth Bentley, a defector
from the Communist underground, blew the whistle on the silver
Master network in nineteen forty five, and her testimony before
Congress named names and outlined the flow of documents, and
of course what do we see Like we saw with McCarthy.
H Skeptics tried to dismiss her as unstable, but decades later,
and unfortunately it's decades later. In real time she went
through hell, but decades later the Verona decrypts vindicated her.
The silver Master Cell was real, and it and its
damages just incalculable. Then you had the Rosenberg Ring, right.
If the were group in the Silver Master Cell represented
this policy infiltration, the Rosenberg Ring represented the straight out espionage.
Speaker 4: And it has.
Speaker 3: Said that Julius and Ethel Rosenberg recruited a network of
spies inside the Manhattan Project through contacts like Claus Fuchs
and German board physicist Theodore Hall, a young prodigy at
Los Alamos. They delivered to Moscow blueprints to the atomic bomb.
The carrier Harry Gold carried the secrets, and by the
time the Soviets tested their first device in nineteen forty nine,
American officials were stunned. How could they have advanced so quickly?
And as you all know, the Rosenbergs were tried and
executed in nineteen fifty three. Still insisting on their innocence
in itself would be an interesting deep dive because there's
a whole flip side to that that I'm not going
to get into today, but it ties into some of
my thoughts of nuclear technology. For decades, sympathizers painted them
as victims of hysteria. But once again, many many plants
within our government. And it's done through corruption, and it's
done through greed. So let's close this part.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 3: You had John Reid's glorification of Lenin, you had the
Wear Group and the New Deal, you had the Silver
Master sell in wartime Washington, right, communism was not outside
the gates. It was in the offices. It was inside
the agencies and even in the White House. Right now,
let's talk about Alger hisss right, and again thanks to Don.
If there is one name that crystallizes the story of
communist infiltration in America, it's algerr Hiss. His case shattered illusions,
divided the nation and proved that communism wasn't just in
pamphlets or in picket lines, it was polished offices in
the government right inside. So Alger Hiss was born in
nineteen oh four in Baltimore a respectable middle class family.
His father was a businessman, mother raised him in the
Episcopal church. By all accounts, he had the pedigree of
an American success story. Then he attended JOHNS Hopkins University,
Cia works in there. Back then oss Harvard Law School,
where he studied Pardon me under the famous legal scholar
Felix Frankfurter. That's right, the same guy who would go
on to be a Supreme Court justice. So this was brilliant, articulate,
very well connected. And after graduation he served as a
clerk for Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, one of the most
respected jurists in American history. Now, this was not the
resume of a radical agitator, right, this is a resume
of a proud man that was destined for power. And
by the nineteen thirties he was working in Roosevelt's New
Deal agencies. He first served in the Agricultural Ageist Justment Administration,
then moved into the State Department, and by nineteen thirty
six he was assistant to Assistant Secretary of State Francis B. Sair,
And by the forties he was climbing higher and advising
on international affairs through the halls of DC. He was
well liked, he was polished, He played tennis with the elite,
He dined at the Georgetown parties. He moved in the
circles of Washington insiders. Right, you could say He was
the Jeffrey Epstein of this time, but kind of different
in the things that he was dealing in, right, But
he was that kind of guy who was swab he
was polished, He knew how to mingle, he knew how
to talk right. And if you told anyone in nineteen
forty four that Alger Hiss was a Soviet spy, they
would have laughed in your face. Fast forward one year
to nineteen forty five. Alger Hiss isn't just some rising star.
He was in the room where the world was being reshaped.
He was at the Yalta Conference in February of nineteen
forty five. He served as an advisor to President Roosevelt.
Yalta was where the Allies divided Europe into post war
zones of influence, effective handing I'm sorry, effectively handing Eastern
Europe to Stalin's control. So here's a guy inside our government,
stabbing thus in the back. Right, he's taking notes, whispering
and ears and shaping the drafts. And later that year
he plays a critical role in the San Francisco Conference
that founded I mean, is there anything more Communists than
the United Nations? Remember, he served as acting Secretary general
of the conference. He was a key organizer. Imagine it,
a man later revealed as a Soviet spy, helped design
the very structure of the post war order.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 3: If you ever wondered why the United Nation so often
drifts towards collectivism, redistribution and status solutions, look no further
than ruts, folks.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 3: But then you had the Chambers revelation. The mask began
to crack when Whittaker Chambers, a former Communist courier who
had defected, went public. Chambers had once been part of
the underground, delivering documents from men like his to Soviet contacts,
but by the late thirties, Chambers had broken with the party.
He was horrified by Stalin's purges and the brutality of communism.
And that's the thing with communism. Most people think, oh, it's,
you know, to help the smaller guy, and then you
see people, you know, fifty million people getting killed.
Speaker 4: Oh, maybe it's not a good idea.
Speaker 3: Nineteen thirty nine, Chambers quietly approached Assistant Secretary of State
and Off Burle with information about Communist penetration. Burl took notes,
but as always, the warning was largely ignored. Only years
later after the war did chambers testimony really become headlines.
In nineteen forty eight, Chambers appeared before the House Unamerican
Activities Committee, the HUAC. Calmly and deliberately, he named Alger
hisss as part of the underground. Now, of course it's
denied it with absolute confidence, like a Bill Clinton, Wood
Ah did not write. He was charming, articulate and convincing,
and many in Washington simply could not believe that such
a man could be guilty, as they say, But wait,
there's more. The Pumpkin papers. And Chambers was smart because
he knew if he was going to put himself out there,
he'd better have proof, for he would disappear in the
middle of the night. So his turns around sues him
for libel. And what does Chambers do. He produces documents,
both handwritten and typewritten copies of State Department papers that
Hiss had passed to him in the nineteen thirties, And
most dramatic of all, Chambers produced microfilm of government documents
that he had hidden in a hollow pumpkin on his
Maryland farm, and these would become known as the Pumpkin Papers.
And when the pumpkin papers came out. The country collectively gasped, Right,
here's physical evidence pull out of a pumpkin patch showing
that someone in his circle had passed testified information. So
here's the thing. The statute of limitations on espionage had expired.
Speaker 4: So what did they do?
Speaker 3: They turn around and charged him with perjury for lying
under oath when he denied giving documents to Chambers. The
first trial ended in a hung jury, so obviously they
were able to get to a few people. The second,
in nineteen fifty, they convicted him. He was sentenced to
five years in prison, served about three and three quarters.
Speaker 4: He never admitted guilt.
Speaker 3: Did the day he died in nineteen ninety six, Alger
Hiss insisted he was innocent, the victim of a smear campaign,
and for decades these progressive lunatic academia defended him, painting
Chambers as an unstable and Nixon Nixon. I've got some
audio for you from Nixon that I'm going to play
for you sometime. They were all cynical opportunists, right, But
history has a way of vindicting the truth. But unfortunately,
in so many cases, right, it takes years for the
truth to come out. In the nineteen nineties, the United
States government declassified the Venona Dacryps intercepted Soviet cables from
the nineteen forties. Among them was a cable describing a
source pardon me, with the code name als Ales, a
high ranking State Department official president at Yalta, who flew
from the conference to Moscow, and who had been a
long time Soviet source. And all the descriptions matched alger
Hiss precisely. For unbiased serious historians, I was game over.
It was case closed. Alger Hiss had been a Soviet agent.
So why does it matter today? Right, listen the spy network,
it's all around. But that case, Algeriss's case proves that
infiltration isn't paranoia, it's real, and our government is infiltrated,
probably ninety five percent of it. But he wasn't a
simple pamphleteer, you know, standing on the street corner pushing
out the Communist Party USA propaganda. He was in jeez.
He was a clerk to Justice Holmes, State Department official,
key organizer of the United Nations. He sat at the
table with Roosevelt and Stalin, and he was working for Moscow.
And his case shows that whatever the evil is, it
can cloak itself in respectability dress and suits and speak
perfect English and smiles at cocktail parties. Right the old
time i'm describing him, I'm just thinking of Jeffrey Epstein,
because how many of these elites have pictures with him? Right,
let's kind of talk about the Scousin reminder, right, W
Cleon Scousin.
Speaker 4: And now that we're finished without your hiss.
Speaker 3: The trader who proved that infiltration wasn't just a rumor,
it was a fact. Again, I want to pause and
thank one of our own listeners.
Speaker 4: Don reached out.
Speaker 3: And reminded me of a book that really is a
great book. It's called The Naked Communist by W. Cleon Scousen.
It was first published in nineteen fifty eight. He was
written by a former FBI agent who had spent years
studying communist methods, and Skusin's work laid the strategies, the goals,
and subversion tactics of the movement in plain, accessible language,
and for decades his book was really a lightning rod. Now,
like everything else, dismissed by elites, but it was really
treasured by true patriots who could see its warnings unfolding
in real time now. In chapter seven, Skalzin makes two
points that tied directly into tonight's episode Chambers and his associates. First,
Skalzin reminds us that Whittaker Chambers, the man who exposed Algeriss,
wasn't just involved with fringe radicals and dark basements. Chambers
new men who would go on to be I mean,
we're talking about top officials in the United States government.
Think about the weight of that fact. Chambers wasn't accusing
you know, lobbyists or you know, guys who were running
errands for these people. He was calling out lawyers from
Harvard and Columbia, administrators in federal agencies, and advisors in
the halls of power. And when he'd defected and told
his story, he wasn't describing some underground club in New
York City. He was describing a pipeline from Moscow into
the highest echelons of Washington, d C. And that's why
his testimony it really shook the establishment. And I think
that's why the sixties had to happen, right from eleven
twenty two to seventy four. Really, if you think about it,
to shake the tree, right, if Chambers had been pointing
fingers that labor organizers or street agitators, it would have
been brushed aside. But again, when you name men like
Alger Hiss, not just with him, but his credentials, his careers,
his connections, people who drafted policy and shaped the future.
Speaker 4: It's a huge deal. Right.
Speaker 3: And the second point Scalzon reminds us of in chapter seven,
and I'll put the link in the show notes. The
book was like eleven ninety nine, and again it's been
around since fifty eight. Everybody should read it. But the
silver Master cell is big time. And I know we've
already touched on it, but scos And lays it out
in unmistakable clarity.
Speaker 4: The silver Master.
Speaker 3: Network, led by again economists Nathan silver Master, wasn't some
fringe operation. It was a coordinated espionage ring operating during
World War Two and embedded in some of the most
sensitive parts of the United States government.
Speaker 4: And we've talked about Harry Dexter White et cetera.
Speaker 3: Architecting the post world post war financial system at Brenton Woods.
Speaker 4: Right, it's a big deal.
Speaker 3: And what does this prove Again, it proves that infiltration
wasn't just theoretical. It wasn't a matter of speculation. It
was documented. It was confirmed and operating at the highest
levels of government. So this is why the Naked Communist
is still worth reading. Scalzen didn't just write about Marxist theory.
He wrote about practical mechanics of subversion that is still
being used today. The cells, the fronts, the recruitment of intellectuals,
the infiltration of agencies. He documented how communism always cloaks
itself in a language that sounds noble. What did we
talk about at the top of the show, wordsmithing, progress, equality, peace, justice,
And then he showed how behind the curtain, the real
agenda is always the same, centralized power, destroy tradition and
and erode liberty. And don was right to point me
back to chapter seven because it's a reminder that Chambers
story wasn't isolated. The Silver Master network wasn't isolated. They
were part of a much larger design when that Scowson
mapped out decades ago, and we can still see it
unfolding today. So again, thanks Don for the reminder. Remember
iron sharpen's iron, truth seekers sharpen each other, and Donnie
sharpened us all tonight. Thanks brother, And you know we
could talk briefly about the warners. For every Alger Hiss,
there's a Whittaker Chambers. For every silver Master cell, there
was an Elizabeth Bentley. For every infiltration, there is a
voice crying out and warning. Right, we've been doing this
for over five years now. But for those who really
had a platform and risked it all to speak, those
are the ones who we should mention, right, because history
will mock these people while they're alive, then after they dead. Oh,
it turns out it was true. Shame on us for
allowing that to happen. How about the guy who invented
Morse code, Samuel Moose, great painter, long before the Cold War,
even before Marx was famous, Samuel F. B. Morse invented
the telegraph. Right a few people did they remember that?
He was also a writer, and in eighteen thirty five
he published a series of essays later collected as Foreign
Conspiracy against the Liberties of the United States.
Speaker 4: Oh, how many people knew that?
Speaker 3: And those pages Moose worn that America's freedom was being
undermined by foreign ideologies and movements seeking to infiltrate our institutions.
His target at the time was not to communism, okay,
because it hasn't even been systematized at that time. Right,
the ideology, sure, but the principle was the same, foreign
powers using subversion, not armies, to change the soul of
the republic. And what happened to Morse He was ridiculed
hardback in his day, and he was dismissed as paranoid.
But again when you look back, when we see he
was really the first to put in print with so
many would later learn firsthand, right, and he was let's
say he was I should say the first in America, right,
because I want to go back here in a few
weeks to Martin Luther in a certain book he wrote
that you can't find You can find many of his writings,
but a certain one that don't want to let you
know exists. And then again Elizabeth Bentley, once a courier
for Soviet intelligence, she broke ranks in nineteen forty five
and walked into the FBI with a bombshell. She revealed
the existence of espionage networks in Washington, the silver Master
Cell among them, and she named dozens of individuals that
were feeding information in Moscow. She testified before Congress describing
how she ferried documents from government officials to Soviet handlers.
She wasn't guessing, she was confessing, and she had the papers.
And we talked about Whittaker Chambers and listen. This might
be a little controversial.
Speaker 5: But.
Speaker 3: To be frank, no list of warners would be complete
without Jay Edgar Hoover. No matter what else you think
of him, he did understand the communist threat for decades.
He tracked communist cells and organizes, ations and subversive networks.
Is that mean I championed how he did things? Absolutely not,
But it's worth his book is worth a read. The
nineteen fifty eight book called Master of Deceit and laid
out the communists Playbrook right, the infiltration of union schools
and government, which when I read the.
Speaker 4: Book, i'm.
Speaker 3: It's interesting, right, how much is disclosure and how much
is really coming from him?
Speaker 4: Right?
Speaker 3: He warned Americans that communists would always cloak themselves a
noble language peace, justice, and equality, while pushing an agenda
of control and remember it was widely read. But as
that cultural tie turned into the sixties, like many people,
he was dismissed as an alarmist. And then with the
Beatles and the culture shift.
Speaker 4: They didn't care about that stuff Vietnam. It was.
Speaker 3: So much going on it was hard for people to
focus on one thing. Then, you know, we couldn't not
have this episode and not mentioned Senator Joseph McCarthy very
few names. Is polarizing and probably in the history books
the most well listen, they're all distorted, but a very
distorted story. In the nineteen fifties, McCarthy declared that communists
had infiltrated the State Department. He waived list of names,
demanded investigations, certainly became a lightning rod for controversy. The
press painted him is reckless. Right, McCarthyism became a synonym
for witch hunts.
Speaker 4: But here's the truth.
Speaker 3: The core of his claim was correct because the Venona decrips,
released decades later, absolutely confirmed that communists had indeed infiltrated
government agencies. So, you know, people argue that he overreached,
he handled things poorly, but was his central warning was
spot on right. And then again you have to ignore acknowledge.
Speaker 4: Pardon me.
Speaker 3: George Lincoln Brockwell, and he was the founder of the
American Nazi Party, And yes, much of his ideology was
kind of twisted, and I don't agree with but he
too recognized communism as a global conspiracy and rallied against it,
and for that he was targeted and eventually assassinated in
nineteen sixty seven. We had so many assassinations in the
nineteen sixties, and when you ask Joe on the street,
he remembers JFK. Maybe a few of them will remember RFK.
But the slew of assassinations in the sixties, I mean
it was wild. But now they figured out that they
could control people with the television, so they stopped knocking
people off with assassinations. And yeah, they still take people out.
Look at Brandy Vaughan. They took her out, you know,
the guy who came up Stanley Myers hydro engine took
him out. The other guy at the top shooting took
him out. So yeah, they still do as much. I
don't know, but I think they have got the matrix
so big they know nobody's going to do anything about it.
Let's talk a little bit before we close about the
parallel revolutions from the what we say the origins of
our country, right, and history often rhymes, and sometimes it
delivers striking coincidences that make you stop and ask whether
something deeper is going on. Right, go back to seventeen
seventy six. Most Americans think that only one event that
was really big event took place during that timeframe. That
was the declaration of independence July fourth, seventeen seventy six.
Our colonies break free from Britain, and we assert that
our rights do not come from kings, They come from
the Creator himself. Right, all men are created equal, Jefferson wrote,
endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights.
Speaker 12: Right.
Speaker 3: That phrase struck like a thunderbolt against centuries of monarchy
and tyranny. But if you look closer, you'll see that
seventeen seventy six wasn't just the year liberty was declared
in Philadelphia, right, the original capital of this country. It
was also the year other movements were born, movements that
pointed in very different directions. What happened sixty three days
prior to that May first, seventeen seventy six, Just two
months before Jefferson put quilled a parchment, a Bavarian professor
named Adam Wishop founded the Order of the Illuminati. His
goal was to undermine monarchies and churches not in the
name of God given liberty, but in the name of
Hugh's human reason alone right the strip of transcendence. In
the Illuminatis, they sought secrecy, manipulation. But what's the theme
for this episode infiltration. They aimed to place their people
inside governments, universities, and religious institutions, shaping thought from within.
Where America's Revolution shouted liberty in public, the Illuminati whispered
control in the shadows. Now, the Illuminati was officially suppressed
by the Bavarian government within a decade, but its methods secrecy,
infiltration and control echo Ford and they influenced later secret
societies and revolutionary movements. And the fact that it was
founded just sixty three days before American independence remains one
of history's great ironies. But White there's more. Eastern Europe,
another movement was taking shape.
Speaker 4: The Shabad Lubovich.
Speaker 3: Founded in the late seventeen seventies by Rabbi Schneer Zaman
of Lighty. It was a Hasidic movement within Judaism that
emphasized mystical interpretation of scripture, strict rabbinical authority, and a
spiritual worldview that has persisted to this day. It is
very striking that within that same time, while America was
proclaiming liberty under God and the Illuminati were preaching human
reason as the new master, Shabad was codifying a form
of mystical control and obedience to spiritual authority. Write three revolutions,
each with its own vision of order. Okay, well, think
about it this way, liberty versus control. Think about the juxtaposition.
In Philadelphia, a revolution based on God given rights, limited government, wink,
and liberty. In Bavaria, you had a secret society built
on infiltration, manipulation and human reason as supreme. In Eastern Europe,
a religious movement strengthening hierarchy, mysticism and authority. Were these coincidences? Listen, maybe,
but we've been doing this long enough to know that
it's probably not right. America said writes from God, and
they tried to say government limited, but that hasn't worked
out well. But the other two said order from men
through secrecy or mysticism. So from the very beginning, seventeen
seventy six set the stage for the struggles that would
define the centuries to come. America stood for liberty under God.
The rival visions, whether through secret societies, ideological revolutions, or
spiritual mysticism stood for control. That's what they want. And
is it any wonder that the battle has raged ever since,
We've had two hundred and fifty years pretty much of
NonStop war. Right, every generation must decide are you going
to lean toward liberty or are you're going to take
toward control? Well, if it means me being safer, that's that.
That's what gets us every time. A one world government
is the ultimate system of control right under the banners
of equality and progress. But it's always the same goal
as Adam Wishop's Illuminati, infiltration, manipulation, and domination. So as
we look back to seventeen seventy six, people should see
more than fireworks and patriotic speeches. You should see that
the very year our republic was born, rival revolutions were
born as well. One side said we try God, the
other says we only trust ourselves. And ever since that time,
the struggle has been which vision will triumph. Our founding
was no accident. It was well planned, very very well planned.
So remember the patterns with the liberty and control. Crisis
becomes the excuse, control becomes the solution, and liberty becomes
the casualty. Every single time the Federal Reserve used the
Panic of nineteen oh seven disease control of our money.
The New Deal used the Great Depression to centralize the economy,
and World War two and the Cold War gave cover
for infiltration into our agencies. The nineteen sixties used the
liberation rhetoric to just to dismantle I should say, tradition,
to weaken the family right in her own time, the
COVID pandemic, climate emergency. They've all been used to justify lockdowns, mandates, surveillance,
and digital censorship. The methods never change, the vocabulary changes,
the packaging changes, but the endgame is always the same,
more control, less liberty. Remember when Samuel Morse wrote his
Foreign Conspiracy in eighteen thirty five, he was mocked. And
this is a guy that had done so much for
this country. Remember, history laughs at the watchmen until time
proves them right. And for many of you, just five
years ago, you went through the same thing, from March
to the end of the year. You were mocked, you
were told you were going to kill Grandma.
Speaker 4: Welcome to parties. Five years later you were right.
Speaker 3: Don't ever forget, you know, they said nine to eleven,
never forget, Never forget.
Speaker 4: Because the truth is in plain sight.
Speaker 3: Communism, socialism, Marxism, whatever name you want to give it.
It's about infiltration, subversion, and it's always about using a
crisis to justify control. And it's been going on for
two hundred and fifty years, and we're coming to a climax.
So the question is do you have the courage to
face what's coming?
Speaker 4: Right?
Speaker 3: And I think that's where we're going to end the
podcast tonight, and I don't ever like to end it
with despair. We're ending it with resolve, right, because if
this infiltration has been relentless, then some must our vigilance
be relentless. If the agents of control have been patient,
then some must Our defense of liberty shall endure crisis control,
liberty loss unless we stand, unless we speak, unless we refuse,
unless we do not comply. That'll put a rap on
today's episode. I hope everyone has a tremendous week. Our
email address is the fact Hunter at mail dot com.
I'll have the link to The Naked Communist in the
show notes if you'd like to check it out again.
I got it from Amazon for eleven dollars and ninety
nine cents. I'm pretty sure, you could probably find it
on the Internet or an archive dot org. But I
am a physical guy because we know when the time
comes all the behold a pale horse, and these type
of books will be fahrenheit four fifty one.
Speaker 4: Right, So there you go.
Speaker 3: God bless each and every one of you. Have a
great week. Keep your head on a swivel, and until
we meet again, my friends, we will see you.
Speaker 4: I know it's been a struggle.
Speaker 1: I don't know you've had some pain. I don't know
you feel the tie, tell doubt about all the way?
Speaker 13: Yeah, I know you feeling.
Speaker 3: You smile.
Speaker 1: Ain't the same. I saw a way to go for
a year. I feel like you've lost your way. Yeah,
don't give it.
Speaker 14: No, don't give in.
Speaker 1: Never in this home.
Speaker 14: Don't let call the primise.
Speaker 4: It ain't done yet.
Speaker 7: He's got up, glad.
Speaker 4: Why it's a way got up?
Speaker 2: Let me come.
Speaker 8: Why it's right, God, mcle.
Speaker 12: I can see the straight beside you.
Speaker 1: Child's are putting up the five. Oh, you're stronger than
a thing. You are.
Speaker 13: Guy, You're gonna be all right. You're accepting a bad
bound beautiful you're shoving ride. Yeah, you're living, breathing, moving,
You can hold your head a pie.
Speaker 14: Don't give up, Oh, don't give in, never loves home.
Don't let go on the primies. It ain't Donion's god
or Clay.
Speaker 15: Why some raintail the God of maby come, don't give up, No,
don't give in you never lose home, don't let go
on the primise.
Speaker 14: It ain't gon life, It's worth living? What's a waytail?
The god of baby court?
Speaker 8: Why surprise? Don God steaming cold? Oh yes, what sur
pray down the god baby come? Oh yeah, got steam called?
Oh God, don't.
Speaker 12: Give up, No, don't give in, never use hold, don't
let go of the.
Speaker 1: Primise and done?
Speaker 12: Yes God a plan watch, God of if it costs,
and don't give up?
Speaker 1: No dog giving but never the hole. Don't let go
of the crimes.
Speaker 8: It ain't done.
Speaker 12: Love's worth living. Wats and died? The God of every
cos all, the God of need cos whats done?
Speaker 1: The God of a.
Speaker 4: You're listening to the Fact Hunter Radio Network. Just the facts, Mammy,