Speaker 1: You see somethings going to happen.
Speaker 2: What what's going to happen?
Speaker 3: Ie?
Speaker 2: What help?
Speaker 4: What is up? Everybody? Welcome to another installment of seven
Speaker 4: seven seven. We're going over Jimatria tonight. Uh Nick number,
Speaker 4: they can find you and tell them what you're up to.
Speaker 2: Yes, Uh the Occult Rejects obviously.
Speaker 3: Uh on Bitch you rumble, Uh, YouTube and all major podcasts.
Speaker 3: One thing just to let the listener is know, we
Speaker 3: are going to switch back and forth on each other's
Speaker 3: youtubes as we do this, you know, just to make
Speaker 3: you have to go and check out headlesses, just to
Speaker 3: be a pain.
Speaker 2: In the ass, you know. So definitely do that.
Speaker 3: This weekend coming up for people that are catching this
Speaker 3: live now, Uh, Friday night, we do have Arrows up
Speaker 3: is coming on to present a topic on Hercules, the
Speaker 3: twelve labors and Hercules.
Speaker 2: I think I'm saying like correctly. So definitely check that out.
Speaker 3: And then the Friday after that we will be all
Speaker 3: be getting together again the team to look at auntmya
Speaker 3: Park and we'll be covering that. Got plenty of drone
Speaker 3: footage and uh you know, professional looking camera footage, so
Speaker 3: it should be cool. So definitely check out that stuff.
Speaker 3: We got that all coming up soon.
Speaker 4: And we have a big announcement. Also, we are the
Speaker 4: number two a podcast in the world in the universe. Yes, yes,
Speaker 4: we are number.
Speaker 2: Two last year.
Speaker 3: Unfortunately on that site. We were number one this year,
Speaker 3: you know, not for nothing.
Speaker 2: But I was just like, yo, we beat We got
Speaker 2: beat by that guy, Like it is what it is.
Speaker 2: But I'm like, yo, the motherfuckers never even practice magic.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Well, I mean you know, it's just like it's like
Speaker 3: this dude has never even stepped in the fucking ring
Speaker 3: and he's number one.
Speaker 2: It is what it is.
Speaker 3: But I was like, yo, yeah, number two though, I'm
Speaker 3: fucking happy with that. Definitely happy with that.
Speaker 4: We got number one last year and we're coming back
Speaker 4: with a bullet.
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, next year will be number two. I mean
Speaker 3: we'll be number one for sure. We're gonna make that happen.
Speaker 4: We will be number one again. Yes, just mark my words.
Speaker 4: All right, So let's hit it, Jamatria.
Speaker 3: Yes, if you want to, I'll start it off. Uh yeah, Jamatria.
Speaker 3: This has taken verbatim from Alista Crowley's Equinox Volume one,
Speaker 3: number five, and just some of the words in here.
Speaker 3: I'm sure we're gonna have to just spell it out.
Speaker 3: I'm not even gonna know how the fuck.
Speaker 2: To say it.
Speaker 3: It must it must first be here, Uh, it must
Speaker 3: first here be spoken of the exotic Kabbala to be
Speaker 3: found in books a shell of that perfect fruit of
Speaker 3: the tree of life. Next we will deal with the
Speaker 3: esoteric teachings of it, as fred er p was able
Speaker 3: to understand them. I'm assuming that's freda Pearl Rabo. And
Speaker 3: of these we shall give examples showing the falsity and
Speaker 3: absurdity of the uninitiated path, the pure truth and reasonables
Speaker 3: of the hidden way for the student unequated with the
Speaker 3: rudiments of the cup. We recommend that the study of S. L.
Speaker 3: Mather's Introduction to his Translation of the Three Principle Books
Speaker 3: of the Zohar and Westcott's Introduction to the Study of
Speaker 3: the Kabbala. We venture to append a few quotations from
Speaker 3: the former document, which will show the elementary principles of calculation.
Speaker 3: Doctor Westcott's little book is principally valuable for its able
Speaker 3: defense of the Kabbala as against exoterrorism and literalism.
Speaker 2: If you want to take it over yeah.
Speaker 4: The literal Kabbala is divided into three parts G M
Speaker 4: t r i A Jematria notaraquin n v t r
Speaker 4: I q v n and timura or th mv r h. Right,
Speaker 4: Jamatria is a metathesis of the Greek word, which is
Speaker 4: based on the relative numerical value. That's really sad. I
Speaker 4: got to learn my Greek better, I'm sorry, relative numerical
Speaker 4: values of words. Right, So I think what that word
Speaker 4: is is going to be the isopsophy, but I'm not
Speaker 4: sure exactly. That's a g in front r A M,
Speaker 4: M A t e I A which jimachia I guess,
Speaker 4: but no, it came from isopsaphe. So anyways, words relative
Speaker 4: numerical values of words. Words of similar numerical values are
Speaker 4: considered to be explanatory of each other, and thus and
Speaker 4: this theory is extended to phrases. Thus, the letter shin
Speaker 4: s H is three hundred and is equivalent to the
Speaker 4: number obtained by adding the numerical values of the letters
Speaker 4: of the words r v c H roch Elaheim rock
Speaker 4: Eloheim the spirit of Eloheim, and is therefore a symbol
Speaker 4: of the spirit of Eloheim. For our equals two hundred
Speaker 4: V equals six c h eq was eight A equals one,
Speaker 4: L equals thirty, eight equals five, I equals ten M
Speaker 4: equals forty, totaling three hundred. Similarly, the words ahad or
Speaker 4: unity one and a bah love each thirteen for a
Speaker 4: equals one h eight D equals four, totaling thirteen. Hey,
Speaker 4: what's that I'm saying? Okay, a let me see.
Speaker 3: One thing I didn't say it. It adds up to
Speaker 3: three hundred. Yeah, that's interesting. I mean, make me think
Speaker 3: of the movie The three hundred.
Speaker 4: Yeah, there is that, right. I mean a lot of
Speaker 4: what they say in Greek about the myths are are
Speaker 4: very numerically coded, very very much like the nine muses, right,
Speaker 4: the three hundred, the ten thousand, like these are all
Speaker 4: major stories in Greek history, and I think the there's
Speaker 4: a lot of isopsophy that goes into those. Oh right again,
Speaker 4: the name of the angel Metatron Metatron or Metha Methra
Speaker 4: Tom and the name of the deity should die each
Speaker 4: make three fourteen, so the one is taken as symbolical
Speaker 4: of the other. The angel Metatron is said to have
Speaker 4: been given the conductor of the children of Israel, through
Speaker 4: the wilderness of whom God says, my name is in Him.
Speaker 4: With regard to jamatri of phrases generate Genesis, let's see
Speaker 4: ten fifty I at nine ten fifty nine ten Iba Shillah,
Speaker 4: ibra Shiloh, Shiloh shall come is three fifty eight, which
Speaker 4: is the numeration of the word Messiah. So Shiloh has
Speaker 4: come three fifty eight. Also is the numerical value of Messiah.
Speaker 4: So that's that's important. This is where you get the
Speaker 4: recursiveness of the Bible. Thus also the passage of the
Speaker 4: numeration of the word Messiah. Also the passage Genesis No.
Speaker 2: Eighteen.
Speaker 4: Yeah, it looks like twenty eight two eighteen. Yeah, well
Speaker 4: it's the X in front of it, so yeah, it
Speaker 4: would be eighteen eighteen two Venia shut Shalah, shall ish, Shalicia,
Speaker 4: and lo free men equals the numerical value of Alif Mikail, Gabriel,
Speaker 4: vaparral Elo, Michael Gabriel ver Rafael. These are Michael, Gabriel
Speaker 4: and Raphael for each phrase seven oh one. I think
Speaker 4: these instances will suffice to make clear the nature of Jamatria,
Speaker 4: notaraquin is derived from the Latin word notarious shorthand writer
Speaker 4: of the notaroquin. There are two forms. In the first,
Speaker 4: every letter of the word is taken from the initial
Speaker 4: or abbreviation of another word, so that from the letters
Speaker 4: of a word a sentence may be formed. Thus, every
Speaker 4: letter of the word barashath, the first word in Genesis,
Speaker 4: is made the initial of a word, and we obtained
Speaker 4: Barasha ra alahim shiba Israel. Was that basha Rahai Eloheim
Speaker 4: seya qui bello Israel Torah. In the beginning, Elohem saw
Speaker 4: that Israel would accept the law. In this connection, I
Speaker 4: may give six very interesting specimens of notaroquin formed from
Speaker 4: the s word Braschith by Solomon Meir ben Moses, a
Speaker 4: Jewish cabbalist who emerged who embraced the Christian faith in
Speaker 4: sixteen sixty five, one year before sixteen sixty six, and
Speaker 4: it took the name of Prosper Ruger. These all have
Speaker 4: a Christian tendency, and by their names Prosper converted another
Speaker 4: Jew who had previously been bitterly opposed to Christianity. You
Speaker 4: want to take over from there?
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, you only take they all have
Speaker 3: Christian tendency.
Speaker 2: Is that where you slept or yes, okay.
Speaker 4: The first that's I'm on. The first is in r
Speaker 4: vc H. Now these are all Hebrew words, right, This
Speaker 4: is why they don't have any vowels in them, and
Speaker 4: they're printed into English. So that's why it's sort of
Speaker 4: confusing because these are all Hebrew words that they're not
Speaker 4: using Hebrew to spell out.
Speaker 2: All right, So the fig the first is U b N.
Speaker 2: I don't even know how you say that, r.
Speaker 5: V c h A b s h l V s
Speaker 5: H t h M, and then I c h d
Speaker 5: t h M, I M.
Speaker 3: Ben ruak ab shalloh Chatham yakad talboto the son, this
Speaker 3: spirit the Father, ye shall equally worship their trinity.
Speaker 2: The third is.
Speaker 3: Bikori Rashuni asher Shamo yeshuah Talboto. Ye shall worship my
Speaker 3: first born, my first.
Speaker 2: Whose name is Jesus.
Speaker 3: The fourth is Bebo Raban asher Shamo Yeshuah Talboto. When
Speaker 3: the Master shall come, whose name is Jesus, we shall worship.
Speaker 2: The fifth is.
Speaker 3: Bethole ravea of a car Shahaled Yeshua thash Roha.
Speaker 2: I will choose a virgin worthy to bring forth Jesus,
Speaker 2: and ye shall call her blessed.
Speaker 3: The sixth is uh b goth ratzophim astar shiko pie
Speaker 3: yeshua thakalo, I will hide myself in cake baked with coals,
Speaker 3: for ye shall.
Speaker 2: Eat Jesus my body.
Speaker 3: The cabalistic importance of these sentences are bearing upon the
Speaker 3: doctrines of Christianity can hardly be overrated. The second form
Speaker 3: of the notochron of the notocon is the exact reverse
Speaker 3: of the first. By this, the initials or finals or
Speaker 3: both of the or both sorry. By this the initials
Speaker 3: or finals, or both or the or the medials of
Speaker 3: a sentence are taken to form a word words. This
Speaker 3: thus the Kabbala is called Chokma Nasrath the secret wisdom.
Speaker 3: And if we take the initials of these two words
Speaker 3: h and n, we form the second kind of noticon.
Speaker 3: The word hn chen grace similarly formed the similarly from these,
Speaker 3: from the initials and finals of the words.
Speaker 2: Am i I O l h I can forget what
Speaker 2: hold on mose from.
Speaker 3: The initials and finals of the words me, lua la
Speaker 3: lino ha shamayama, who shall go up for us to
Speaker 3: heaven are formed, and then you get.
Speaker 2: Milla.
Speaker 3: Circumcism and YadA was that yady the tetragrammaton implying that
Speaker 3: God hath ordained circumcision as the way to heaven. Timura
Speaker 3: is pure tmurr is permeation according to certain according to
Speaker 3: certain rules, one letter is substituted for another letter proceding
Speaker 3: or following it in the alphabet, and thus from one
Speaker 3: and thus from one word another word of totality different.
Speaker 2: Thus sorry, well.
Speaker 4: This would be this would be considered to be the
Speaker 4: first coding, right, so this would be the what's it called?
Speaker 4: There's something code. I think it's like the Napoleon code.
Speaker 4: I could be wrong on that, but the Napoleon code
Speaker 4: is where you're just transferring one letter or the next
Speaker 4: letter in the sequence. So you can also have it
Speaker 4: be you know, a sixteen letter gap, or these could
Speaker 4: be letter specific number differences, so you know, based upon
Speaker 4: the number of the letter you get, you could also
Speaker 4: make that the gap between the next letter. And so
Speaker 4: you've got the entire thing coded out based off of
Speaker 4: the numbers and the letters as they switch between the
Speaker 4: two things. So you're getting different words in different phrases
Speaker 4: from adding the gap. So originally it was just one
Speaker 4: letter over and so you would have to know that
Speaker 4: that's what it was to get it.
Speaker 2: Let me try this all over again. According to certain rules,
Speaker 2: one letter is substituted for another letter preceding or following
Speaker 2: it in the alphabet, and thus from one word another
Speaker 2: word of totally different orthography may be formed. Thus the
Speaker 2: alphabet is bent exactly in half in the middle, and
Speaker 2: one half is put over the other half, and then
Speaker 2: by changing alternately the first letter of the first two
Speaker 2: letters at the beginning of the second line, twenty two
Speaker 2: computations are produced.
Speaker 3: These are called the table of the combinations of tz, ir, VP, TISRUP.
Speaker 3: For example's sake, I will give the method called all
Speaker 3: bath us al bath and that would be eleven with
Speaker 3: equal K and M ten would equal I and N
Speaker 3: nine would equal TS, eight would equal c h N
Speaker 3: O seven would equals z and P six would equal
Speaker 3: V and tz five would.
Speaker 4: Equal was that h, H and q it looks like
Speaker 4: an H with missing Yeah.
Speaker 3: Four would be D and R it's interesting, doctor Uh.
Speaker 3: Three would be G and U c h S. Two
Speaker 3: would be uh, was that B and th h and
Speaker 3: then one would be A and l A and l
Speaker 3: L The row eth med yeah. Each method takes its
Speaker 3: name from the first two pairs composing it, the system
Speaker 3: of pairs of letters being the groundwork of the whole
Speaker 3: as either letter and a pair is substituted for the
Speaker 3: other letter. Thus by Albeth from R V c h
Speaker 3: rewock is formed that su these names. The name of
Speaker 3: the other twenty one methods are World, Jesus Christ A
Speaker 3: B G A B G t H A G d
Speaker 3: t h A d g b a h d b
Speaker 3: A v b h A z b v A c
Speaker 3: h b z A t b c h A I
Speaker 3: b t A k b i A l b k
Speaker 3: a m b l a n b n asbn AOBS
Speaker 3: a p b o A t z b p a
Speaker 3: q s t z a r b q a s
Speaker 3: h b R, and at h b s h to
Speaker 3: these must be added the modes A, B, G, D
Speaker 3: and A l b M. Then comes the rational table
Speaker 3: of Tizeroth, another set of twenty two combinations. There are
Speaker 3: also three table of computations, nor respectively as the right,
Speaker 3: the adverse, and the irregular. To make any of these,
Speaker 3: a square containing four hundred and eighty four squares should
Speaker 3: be made, and the letters written in. For the right
Speaker 3: table right the alphabet across from right to left, and
Speaker 3: the second row of squares do the same, but begin
Speaker 3: with B and end with A, and the third begin
Speaker 3: with G and end with B, and so on. For
Speaker 3: the adverse table, write the alphabet from right to left backwards,
Speaker 3: beginning with THH and ending with A, and the second
Speaker 3: row begin with SH and end with THH and so on.
Speaker 3: The irregular table would take too long to describe. Besides,
Speaker 3: besides all these, there is the method called t H
Speaker 3: s h r Q thrashic, which is simply writing a
Speaker 3: word backwards. There is one more very important form called
Speaker 3: Kabbala of the nine Chambers, or ike Baker.
Speaker 2: It is thus formed, and then real quick, I'll just
Speaker 2: go over this, and then you can take over. Three
Speaker 2: hundred would be SH, thirty would be L, three would
Speaker 2: be G. Two hundred is R.
Speaker 3: Twenty is K two is B one hundred is Q
Speaker 3: ten is I and one is A. Six hundred is
Speaker 3: M final, sixty is S six is V. Five hundred
Speaker 3: is K final, fifty is N five is H four
Speaker 3: hundred is thh forty is M and four is D.
Speaker 3: Nine hundred is TZ final ninety is TZ nine is
Speaker 3: T eight hundred is P final ADP eight ch seven
Speaker 3: hundred is N final seven zero and seven phy z.
Speaker 4: Now there's something to be noted about both Hebrew letters
Speaker 4: and Greek letters is they have different forms for different
Speaker 4: letters that come at the end of the words. So
Speaker 4: when they're talking about the tz final versus the tz,
Speaker 4: those would be two different letters. Now they're not showing
Speaker 4: it in the text because they probably didn't have the
Speaker 4: print for these letters. Again, so they're not giving you
Speaker 4: the full you know, context of these letters because they've
Speaker 4: simplified it and given you kind of the basic outlines.
Speaker 4: But what I think is interesting is this ike Baker right,
Speaker 4: the nine chambers right. So this is the common form
Speaker 4: of numbering for the Hebrew alphabet. Because the Hebrew alphabet
Speaker 4: is backwards right, it's backwards from us. They read from
Speaker 4: right to left instead are from left to right. So
Speaker 4: I think it's kind of interesting. I have put the
Speaker 4: numeration of each letter above to show the affinity between
Speaker 4: the letters and each chamber. Sometimes this is used as
Speaker 4: a cipher by taking the portions of the figure to
Speaker 4: show the letters they contain, putting one point for the
Speaker 4: first letter, two for the second et cetera. Thus, the
Speaker 4: right angle containing iaq will answer for the letter Q
Speaker 4: it have three dots or points within it. Again, this
Speaker 4: is for the Hebrew letters, because they have the dots
Speaker 4: and the points on top of it. Again, a square
Speaker 4: will answer for H, N or K final according to
Speaker 4: whether it has one, two, or three points respectively placed
Speaker 4: within it. So also with the regard to the other letters.
Speaker 4: But there are many other ways of employing the Kabbala
Speaker 4: of the nine Chambers, which I have not space to describe.
Speaker 4: I will merely mention as an example that by the
Speaker 4: mode of the Timura old at the bash at bash
Speaker 4: it is found in Jeremiah twenty five, twenty six, the
Speaker 4: word shishka shishka symbolizes BBL or babel.
Speaker 2: Shishka fuck back then the Brazilian butt lifts back.
Speaker 1: Then.
Speaker 4: Well, it's it's funny because they call goy women shiskas,
Speaker 4: and so there's a little bit of a shiska in there,
Speaker 4: and then you got the BBL.
Speaker 3: It's interesting, how again, going by what he's saying, now,
Speaker 3: technically every time I'm some chick is out there talking
Speaker 3: about their BBL, that is saying, is babel actually being said?
Speaker 4: They are talking about the whrror of Babel.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you're going to make sure you got a fat
Speaker 2: is if you want to be a war right, right.
Speaker 4: Besides all these rules, there are certain meanings hidden in
Speaker 4: the shape of the letters of the Hebrew autum that
Speaker 4: we've talked about this world. We talk about the tarot,
Speaker 4: like these are actually from you know what they I
Speaker 4: guess it would be they you know, they abstract from
Speaker 4: you know, animals, from certain events. They kind of look
Speaker 4: like the Hebrew letters hidden in the shape of the
Speaker 4: letters of the Hebrew alphabet, in the form a particular
Speaker 4: letter at the end of a word being different from
Speaker 4: that which it generally bears when it is a final letter,
Speaker 4: or in a letter being written in the middle of
Speaker 4: a word, in a character generally used only at the
Speaker 4: end in any letters, or a letter being written in
Speaker 4: a size smaller or larger than the rest of the manuscript,
Speaker 4: or in a letter being written upside down like that.
Speaker 4: H could have actually just been two ones and we're
Speaker 4: not getting the code because we think it's an H
Speaker 4: that sort of thing. So these could be printing errors,
Speaker 4: or they could be very intentional.
Speaker 2: That is true, Yeah, because there's H is in here.
Speaker 4: That look like hs, yeah, exactly, you never know, let's see,
Speaker 4: or a letter being size larger or smaller in the manuscript,
Speaker 4: or in a letter being written upside down, and the
Speaker 4: variations found in the spelling of certain words. If you
Speaker 4: guys have been paying attention to the book review show
Speaker 4: that we've been doing on Grapehill, they had all of
Speaker 4: these f's and s's switched. Very good example of maybe
Speaker 4: a code being used by this standard.
Speaker 3: Well even think about when they were like throwing vs
Speaker 3: in for a w's or us. I mean, you know,
Speaker 3: you're still wondering, like why is that even being done?
Speaker 3: Is it to keep like a thing going with them
Speaker 3: numerical value or.
Speaker 4: Something absolutely like there are codes that are being written
Speaker 4: down and all of these things that are shaping other things,
Speaker 4: and we're not getting the full view of what's being written,
Speaker 4: especially with the V to U sort of thing that
Speaker 4: happens in a lot of the older manuscripts. In variations
Speaker 4: found in the spelling of certain words which have a
Speaker 4: letter more in some places than they have in others. Again,
Speaker 4: like that F to s in particularities observed in the
Speaker 4: position of any of the points or accents, and in
Speaker 4: certain expressions supposed to be elliptic or redundant. For example,
Speaker 4: the shape of the Hebrew letter alph a is said
Speaker 4: to symbolize a vow between a yode and a doaloth,
Speaker 4: and thus the letter itself represents the word iv d yode. Summarily,
Speaker 4: the shape of the letter represents a dalith with yode
Speaker 4: written at the lower left hand corner, et cetera. In
Speaker 4: Isaiah nine six and seven, the word marlemarma lamar before
Speaker 4: multiplying is written with the character for M in the
Speaker 4: final in the middle of the word, instead of with
Speaker 4: the ordinary initial and the medial M. The consequence of
Speaker 4: this is that the total numerical value of the word,
Speaker 4: instead of being thirty plus forty plus two hundred plus
Speaker 4: two plus five equals two to seventy seven, is actually
Speaker 4: thirty plus six hundred plus two hundred plus two plus
Speaker 4: five eight thirty seven. By Jamatria, the thiszle tetzal, the
Speaker 4: profuse giver thus is writing by the M final instead
Speaker 4: of the ordinary character. The word is made to bear
Speaker 4: a different Kabbalistic meaning.
Speaker 2: Very well said, I like that, all right? You want
Speaker 2: me to go? You've been reading a long Yeah?
Speaker 4: Go ahead? Uh?
Speaker 3: It is to be further noted with regard to the
Speaker 3: first word in the Bible russiath yeah russieth, that the
Speaker 3: first three letters B R A Bra are the initial
Speaker 3: letters of the names of the three persons of the Trinity.
Speaker 3: B N Ben the son, r v h Roack the spirit,
Speaker 3: and A B A b the father. Furthermore, Yeah Abba
Speaker 3: and Ama, actually yeah Amas would be the great mother. Furthermore,
Speaker 3: the first letter of the Bible is B, which is
Speaker 3: the initial letter letter of barika blessing, and not a,
Speaker 3: which is that of A R r arar cursing. Again,
Speaker 3: the letters of Beershith, taking their numerical powers, expressed the
Speaker 3: number of the years between the creation and the birth
Speaker 3: of Christ. Thus B equals two thousand, R equals two hundred,
Speaker 3: E equals one thousand, sh equals three hundred, I equals
Speaker 3: ten and thh equals four hundred total three nine hundred
Speaker 3: and ten years being the town being the time in
Speaker 3: round numbers. Being the time in round numbers. Pikas d mirandola.
Speaker 2: That's interesting.
Speaker 3: Gives the following working out of bearshith. By joining the
Speaker 3: third letter A to the first letter B A B
Speaker 3: A B equals father, is obtained. If to the first
Speaker 3: letter B doubled, the second letter R be added, it
Speaker 3: makes b b r be bare in or through the
Speaker 3: son be bare equals in or through the sun. If
Speaker 3: all the letters be read except the first, it makes rawschith,
Speaker 3: which equals the beginning. If the fourth letter s H,
Speaker 3: the first B and the last thhb connected, it makes
Speaker 3: shebbeth the end or rest. If the first three letters
Speaker 3: be taken, they make brah Behrah equals created. If omitting
Speaker 3: the first three five admitting the first. If omitting the first,
Speaker 3: the three following be taken, they make rash, which equals head.
Speaker 3: If omitting the first, If emitting the two first the
Speaker 3: next two be taken, they give ash or ash equals fire.
Speaker 3: If the fourth and the last be joined, they give seth,
Speaker 3: which equals foundation. Again the second letter be put before
Speaker 3: the first, it makes rb rob equals great. If after
Speaker 3: the third be placed the fifth and the fourth, it
Speaker 3: gives ash, which equals man. If the two first be
Speaker 3: joined and the last and the two last, they give birth,
Speaker 3: which equals covening. And if the first be added to
Speaker 3: the last, it gives theb, which is sometimes used for
Speaker 3: TVB thob, which equals.
Speaker 4: Good, right, And so just to throw in here, most
Speaker 4: Hebrew letters are based off of these three syllable combinations.
Speaker 4: So when he's talking about making these substitutions and taking
Speaker 4: out these certain letters and then giving you other words
Speaker 4: from it, that's how the Hebrew language is constructed, is
Speaker 4: around these three primary letters for every word. So by
Speaker 4: dividing it up and mixing it around, you do get
Speaker 4: all these other words, which would be an indicator in
Speaker 4: Hebrew language that there are different values to these words.
Speaker 2: Oh no, if you want to. If you want to,
Speaker 2: I'll do this whole next one, and then you can
Speaker 2: do this one. Looks like it should be a little
Speaker 2: bit easier.
Speaker 3: There are three Kabbalistic veils of the negative existence, and
Speaker 3: in themselves they formulate the hidden ideas of the Sepheroth
Speaker 3: not yet called into being, and they are consecrated, and
Speaker 3: they are concentrated in Kether, which in this sense is
Speaker 3: the malcouth of the hidden ideas of the Sepheroth.
Speaker 2: I will explain this.
Speaker 3: The first veil of the negative existence is ain ain negativity,
Speaker 3: the word of three letters, which thus shadow forth the
Speaker 3: first three sephar oath or numbers. The second veil is
Speaker 3: the A SVP the Limitless. This title consists of six
Speaker 3: letters and shadows forth the idea of the first six
Speaker 3: Sepharoth or numbers. The third veil is in AI N SVP,
Speaker 3: A v r einsoft er the limitless light. This again
Speaker 3: consists of nine letters and symbolizes the first nine Sepharoath,
Speaker 3: but of course in their hidden idea only. But when
Speaker 3: we reach the number nine, we cannot progress farther without
Speaker 3: returning to the unity or the number one, For the
Speaker 3: number ten is but a repetition of unity, freshly derived
Speaker 3: from the negative, as is evident from a glance at
Speaker 3: its ordinary representation in Arabic numerals, where the circle, where
Speaker 3: the circle represents the negative and the one and the
Speaker 3: one the unity. Thus, then the limitless ocean of negative
Speaker 3: light does not proceed from a center, for it is
Speaker 3: sent to list, but it concentrates a center, which is
Speaker 3: the number one of the sephar Kether, the crown the
Speaker 3: first suffer, which therefore may be said to be the malcouth,
Speaker 3: or the number ten of the hidden sphero.
Speaker 2: Thus kether is.
Speaker 3: In malcouth, and malcouth is in kether or as an
Speaker 3: alchemical author great of a great repute, Thomas Vaughan, better
Speaker 3: known as Eugenius Uh.
Speaker 2: I don't even have to say his name.
Speaker 3: Whatever says, apparently quoting from Proclus, that the heaven is
Speaker 3: in the earth, but after an earthly manner, and that
Speaker 3: the earth is in the heaven, but after a heavenly manner.
Speaker 3: But inasmuch as negative existence is the subject incapable of definition,
Speaker 3: as I have before shown, it is rather considered by
Speaker 3: the cabalists as depending back from the number of unity
Speaker 3: than a separate consideration therefrom Therefore, they frequently apply the
Speaker 3: same terms and epitaphs indiscriminately to either. Such epithets are
Speaker 3: the concealed of the concealed, the ancient of the ancient ones,
Speaker 3: the most wholly ancient one, et cetera.
Speaker 4: There you go, sir, Well, that's interesting. So this einsoft
Speaker 4: hour is the repetition they kind of brushed over that part,
Speaker 4: the repetition of the kabbolatry on different levels of dimensionality, right,
Speaker 4: So these would be the veils that would expose the
Speaker 4: rest of the universe at the same time being the
Speaker 4: veils on the outside of the Kabala tree. So you
Speaker 4: could see many different diagrams, showing that the kabolatry that
Speaker 4: we know of is repeated or mirrored in all these
Speaker 4: other different forms. So it's not just you know, within
Speaker 4: the spheres, right, it's also without the spheres and going
Speaker 4: on into non existence.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 4: I must explain the real meaning of the terms separa
Speaker 4: and sepharote. First, the first is singular, the second is plural.
Speaker 4: The best rendering of the word is numerical emanation. There
Speaker 4: are ten sepharote, which are the most abstract forms of
Speaker 4: the ten numbers the decimal scale, i e. The numbers one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine,
Speaker 4: and ten. Therefore, as in the higher mathematics we reason
Speaker 4: of numbers in their abstract sense, so in the Kabbala
Speaker 4: we reason of the deity by the abstract forms of
Speaker 4: the numbers, in other words, the sephero as it is.
Speaker 4: It was from this ancient oriental theory that Pythagoras derived
Speaker 4: his numerical symbolic ideas. Again, this is where we get
Speaker 4: sacred geometry from is from the idea of one through ten.
Speaker 4: Among the separa jointly and severely we find development of
Speaker 4: the persons and the attributes of God of these are
Speaker 4: male and some female. Now, for some reason or other,
Speaker 4: the best known to themselves, the translators of the Bible
Speaker 4: have carefully crowded out of existence and smothered up every
Speaker 4: reference to the fact that the deity is both masculine
Speaker 4: and feminine. Not in the Kabbala tree, they have translated
Speaker 4: a feminine plural by masculine singular. In the case of
Speaker 4: the word eloheim, they have, however, left an inadvertent admission
Speaker 4: of their knowledge that it was plural in Genesis four
Speaker 4: twenty six, and Eloheim said, let us make man again
Speaker 4: verse twenty seven. How could Adam be made in the
Speaker 4: image of the elohem male and female unless the elohem
Speaker 4: were male and female. Also, the word eloheim is plural,
Speaker 4: formed from the feminine singular a l h elo by
Speaker 4: adding i am to the word. But inasmuch as i
Speaker 4: am is usually a termination of the masculine plural, and
Speaker 4: here is added to a feminine noun, it gives to
Speaker 4: the word eloheim the sense of the female potency united
Speaker 4: with a masculine idea, and thereby capable of producing an offspring.
Speaker 4: And again that's where we also get the emanation's idea from.
Speaker 4: Is that there's you know, different offsprings from this one source.
Speaker 4: So let me see here Eloheen the sense of female
Speaker 4: potency united to a masculine idea, and thereby capable of
Speaker 4: producing offspring. Now we hear much of the father and
Speaker 4: the son, but we hear nothing of the mother in
Speaker 4: the ordinary religions of the day. But in the Kabbalah
Speaker 4: we find the Ancient of days conforms himself simultaneously in
Speaker 4: to the Father and the mother, and thus begets the son.
Speaker 4: Now this mother is Eloheim. And again we are usually
Speaker 4: told that the Holy Spirit is masculine, but the word
Speaker 4: rauch is spirit is feminine, as appears from the following
Speaker 4: passage from the Sepher yatsak Achta. Rauk Elohim sachem a
Speaker 4: chah a chas feminine, not a had masculine ralph Elohim
Speaker 4: him one is she the spirit of the Elohim of life.
Speaker 4: Now we find that before the Deity conformed himself thus
Speaker 4: as male and female, the words of the universe could
Speaker 4: not subsist, or in the words of Genesis, the earth
Speaker 4: was formless and void. These prior worlds are considered to
Speaker 4: be symbolized by the kings who reigned in Edom before
Speaker 4: they're reigned a king in Israel, and they are therefore
Speaker 4: spoken of in the Kabbalah as the Edomite Kings. This
Speaker 4: will be found fully explained in various parts of this work.
Speaker 4: Now we come to the consideration of the first sufferer,
Speaker 4: the number one, the monad of Pythiagoras. In this number
Speaker 4: are the other nine hidden? Do you want to take
Speaker 4: it from there?
Speaker 2: Yeah, if you want. Because of the time, I just
Speaker 2: realize what time it is.
Speaker 3: I'll finish off this whole paragraph, and then maybe I'll
Speaker 3: finish off like this big paragraph and the last one,
Speaker 3: and then we'll continue off like halfway through untill.
Speaker 4: The good place to stop. Because there is the introduction
Speaker 4: of masculine and feminine numbers to these different words, which
Speaker 4: is not something that is normally talked about, but is
Speaker 4: very vital for understanding what's going on in our world today.
Speaker 2: And you know what's really interesting. Sorry to interrupt you.
Speaker 3: I know with Italian, and I could be wrong with
Speaker 3: other ones, but when you start looking at other languages
Speaker 3: that are like Latin based, they all have ways, like
Speaker 3: with Italian, depending on the vowel, it's going to specify
Speaker 3: if it's male feminine, you know, Like they do have
Speaker 3: that like in other languages where it's like it specifies
Speaker 3: that depending on how you spell it, you know, like
Speaker 3: my name is Nicolo, could be nick or it could
Speaker 3: be nicola for nicole, you know what I'm saying, Like
Speaker 3: it does specify the you know, masculine and feminine even.
Speaker 4: Very same, yeah, very same with Hebrew. They have again,
Speaker 4: like he's talking about, the elo would be a feminine
Speaker 4: now and the i am would be a masculine plural.
Speaker 4: So they're merging the masculine plural with the feminine singular
Speaker 4: to create alohe So in the case it would be
Speaker 4: a different plural form for multiple women, but in this
Speaker 4: case it would be multiple men plus singular female. Kind
Speaker 4: of interested, Yeah, that could be a code.
Speaker 2: I just wanted to finish this baragraph fourth and then
Speaker 2: we'll wrap it up. Yep, all right.
Speaker 3: It is indivisible. It is also incapable of multiplication. Divide
Speaker 3: one by itself, and it still remains one. Multiply one
Speaker 3: by itself, and it's still multiply one by itself, and
Speaker 3: it is still one and unchanged. Thus it is a
Speaker 3: fitting representative of the unchangeable father of all Now This
Speaker 3: number of unity has a twofold nature, and thus forms,
Speaker 3: as it were, the link between the negative and the positive.
Speaker 3: In its unchangeable oneness, it is scarcely a number, but
Speaker 3: in its property of capability of addition, it may be
Speaker 3: called the first number of a numerical series. Now, the
Speaker 3: zero is capable even of addition, just as also is
Speaker 3: negative existence. How then, if I can neither be multiplied
Speaker 3: nor divided, is another one to be attained to add
Speaker 3: to it? In other words, how is the number two
Speaker 3: to be found by reflection of itself? For through zero
Speaker 3: can be incapable. For those zero can be a cap
Speaker 3: can be incapable of definition, one is definable, and the
Speaker 3: effect of a definition is to form an etylin duplicate
Speaker 3: or image of the thing defined. Thus, then we obtain
Speaker 3: a due ad composed of I and its reflection. Now
Speaker 3: also we have the commencement of a vibration establishment, for
Speaker 3: the number one vibrates alternately from changelessness to definition, and
Speaker 3: back to changelessness again. Thus, then it is the father
Speaker 3: of all numbers, and a fitting type of the father
Speaker 3: of all kings. The name of the first Sepherer is
Speaker 3: k T hr Kether the crown. The divine name attributed
Speaker 3: to it is the name of the Father given in
Speaker 3: Exodus three four A H I h A I am.
Speaker 3: It signifies existence.
Speaker 4: I think therefore I am, yes, I reflect therefore I
Speaker 4: am yeah. I think thinking is reflective.
Speaker 2: Yeah, sometimes I wonder if that has anything that has
Speaker 2: anything to do with like why mirrors used to be
Speaker 2: like you know how they used to say that used
Speaker 2: to be you know, bad?
Speaker 4: Fuck the spirit mirror right where you're standing between the
Speaker 4: two mirrors, and your reflection is then moved out into
Speaker 4: infinite infinite space on either side that is reflected back
Speaker 4: and forth. Right, this is the reflection and the individual Father, son,
Speaker 4: holy Spirit right there, all being observed at the same time. Right,
Speaker 4: it's the spirit mirror.
Speaker 3: You know how humanity, you know how humanity probably must
Speaker 3: have been like without like when you only really have
Speaker 3: like I guess, what are a certain reflective things to
Speaker 3: even look at yourself? You probably get zero fox about impressing.
Speaker 4: Everybody except there was Narcissus, right, the myth of Narcissus,
Speaker 4: he was so taken by his his view in the
Speaker 4: in the water where he fell in and drowned.
Speaker 2: That's what you get.
Speaker 4: That's where we get narcissism from. Is narcissus staring into
Speaker 4: the pool of water and then drowning himself.
Speaker 1: Nice.
Speaker 2: Well, uh, that was good. That was good, sir. I
Speaker 2: enjoyed that one.
Speaker 3: I think the rest of the reading should be a
Speaker 3: little bit easier to those those those things taken out
Speaker 3: of the old the books are even harder to fucking read.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, the West scott ship he pulled into.
Speaker 4: Yah, it is rough. But you got to remember this
Speaker 4: isn't even in the right typeface.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 4: If we had the right typeface, it might make a
Speaker 4: little bit more sense, but probably not, because you have
Speaker 4: to have a really good grounding and Hebrew know the letters,
Speaker 4: know the language to actually kind of understand what they're
Speaker 4: what they're talking about in this stuff, and it becomes
Speaker 4: even harder in Greek. Actually, Isosophy is harder than Kabbala,
Speaker 4: which is odd because you think it would be getting
Speaker 4: easier the further back you go, actually gets harder.
Speaker 2: Well, I mean, if you want to look at humanity now,
Speaker 2: it makes sense. Everybody's getting dumber.
Speaker 4: Everybody's getting dumber, exactly. You guys are the smartest audience
Speaker 4: in the world. That's why you're gonna like and share
Speaker 4: this stream.
Speaker 2: You know funny, that is great.
Speaker 4: That we're coming all right, guys, well we'll see again
Speaker 4: next time. This is seven seven seven, and we share
Speaker 4: this with your friends. Let's get to number one, number one, baby,
Speaker 4: let's go.
Speaker 2: Let's do it.
Speaker 1: You got it.
Speaker 4: Next week we're coming back by everybody.
Speaker 1: Close your eyes, look into the darkness, find the blazing star,
Speaker 1: focus on and it become the eclipse. Don't fear that
Speaker 1: the show will be dead.
Speaker 3: In death, very show, baby girl.
Speaker 1: I don