WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.120 --> 00:00:02.200
<v Speaker 1>The black rocks of the world don't make bad bets,

2
00:00:02.240 --> 00:00:04.879
<v Speaker 1>like they understand, they do an incredible amount of due diligence.

3
00:00:05.200 --> 00:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>So it's nice to kind of see them endorsing the

4
00:00:07.160 --> 00:00:09.480
<v Speaker 1>technology in this way, like it will just get to

5
00:00:09.480 --> 00:00:12.080
<v Speaker 1>a point where I go to my brokerage account, I

6
00:00:12.160 --> 00:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>buy eth and in the background it's automatically staken and

7
00:00:14.880 --> 00:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a given.

8
00:00:15.679 --> 00:00:18.920
<v Speaker 2>So do you see eight continuing to hold that mantle

9
00:00:18.960 --> 00:00:22.359
<v Speaker 2>of being let's say, the top enterprise blockchain. Oh?

10
00:00:22.399 --> 00:00:24.039
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, I think there's no doubt.

11
00:00:24.120 --> 00:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Etherium has kind of two key selling points like security

12
00:00:27.480 --> 00:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent of time, and then like you mentioned, liquidity.

13
00:00:35.799 --> 00:00:38.000
<v Speaker 2>This episode is brought to you by Proppy, which is

14
00:00:38.079 --> 00:00:41.640
<v Speaker 2>leading the charge in putting real estate on chain. Propy

15
00:00:41.759 --> 00:00:44.200
<v Speaker 2>is a game changer. You can buy and sell real

16
00:00:44.280 --> 00:00:48.359
<v Speaker 2>estate with cryptocurrencies using the Property platform, which is powered

17
00:00:48.399 --> 00:00:51.039
<v Speaker 2>by a blockchain, of course, and they have a native

18
00:00:51.079 --> 00:00:54.240
<v Speaker 2>token call pro And I've been an investor in the

19
00:00:54.399 --> 00:00:57.840
<v Speaker 2>Propy token since twenty eighteen. So Propy is a licensed

20
00:00:57.840 --> 00:01:01.719
<v Speaker 2>Web three pioneer operating since twenty seven They have facilitated

21
00:01:01.759 --> 00:01:05.439
<v Speaker 2>over four billion dollars in transactions. They're putting titles and

22
00:01:05.480 --> 00:01:09.159
<v Speaker 2>deeds on chain. They use Coinbase for their crypto escro service,

23
00:01:09.519 --> 00:01:12.239
<v Speaker 2>so this is a great platform and once again they

24
00:01:12.239 --> 00:01:14.079
<v Speaker 2>are ahead of the curve when it comes to putting

25
00:01:14.120 --> 00:01:16.799
<v Speaker 2>real estate on chain. And they just launch a great

26
00:01:16.799 --> 00:01:19.519
<v Speaker 2>campaign where you can earn some of the Propy tokens

27
00:01:19.959 --> 00:01:23.159
<v Speaker 2>and it's simply by doing tasks such as sharing their

28
00:01:23.239 --> 00:01:26.560
<v Speaker 2>vision video, signing up and inviting a friend, and much

29
00:01:26.640 --> 00:01:29.120
<v Speaker 2>more so. If you'd like to learn more about Propy,

30
00:01:29.319 --> 00:01:32.879
<v Speaker 2>visit the link in the description. Hey, folks, welcome into

31
00:01:32.879 --> 00:01:35.640
<v Speaker 2>the Thinking Crypto Podcast. I'm your host, Tony Edward and

32
00:01:35.760 --> 00:01:38.400
<v Speaker 2>joining me today is Keen Gilbert, who is the head

33
00:01:38.439 --> 00:01:43.560
<v Speaker 2>of institutional Relations at the Loto Ecosystem Foundation. Keen, great

34
00:01:43.560 --> 00:01:43.840
<v Speaker 2>to have.

35
00:01:43.879 --> 00:01:46.159
<v Speaker 3>You, Ay, thanks so much for having me. It's great

36
00:01:46.200 --> 00:01:46.959
<v Speaker 3>to connect.

37
00:01:47.200 --> 00:01:50.239
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, Keen. I think it's very timely that we're speaking.

38
00:01:50.239 --> 00:01:52.319
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of demand for etherorem, a lot of

39
00:01:52.319 --> 00:01:55.480
<v Speaker 2>demand for etherorem staking and Loto is playing a big

40
00:01:55.519 --> 00:01:59.359
<v Speaker 2>part in the staking aspect for etherorem. And then recently

41
00:01:59.400 --> 00:02:02.840
<v Speaker 2>the SEC gave some clarity around liquid staking. So I

42
00:02:02.879 --> 00:02:05.000
<v Speaker 2>got a lot of questions for you, But let's kick

43
00:02:05.040 --> 00:02:06.680
<v Speaker 2>it off with your background. Tell us a bit about

44
00:02:06.680 --> 00:02:08.199
<v Speaker 2>yourself and your professional background.

45
00:02:08.719 --> 00:02:10.520
<v Speaker 3>Sure, yeah so ours boy.

46
00:02:10.800 --> 00:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I kind of grew up in Dublin like business background,

47
00:02:13.199 --> 00:02:16.400
<v Speaker 1>did marketing management consultancy. From a professional point of view,

48
00:02:16.479 --> 00:02:18.919
<v Speaker 1>I started my career in Deloitte doing like FS capital

49
00:02:19.000 --> 00:02:21.840
<v Speaker 1>markets consulting on crypto so I did that for around

50
00:02:21.840 --> 00:02:26.759
<v Speaker 1>a year. After my time time in Deloitte, I joined Consensus.

51
00:02:26.840 --> 00:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I was in Consensus for around five and a half years,

52
00:02:29.840 --> 00:02:33.879
<v Speaker 1>mainly working on like meta mask institutional and fur staking tokenization,

53
00:02:34.360 --> 00:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>like a number of different products, so I kind of

54
00:02:36.080 --> 00:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>got good exposure there. After my time in Consensus, I

55
00:02:39.319 --> 00:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>joined a small startup for a while that was doing

56
00:02:41.280 --> 00:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>like portfolio and risk management for crypto funds. And now

57
00:02:44.560 --> 00:02:47.319
<v Speaker 1>currently I'm at Liido for just over a year, so

58
00:02:47.319 --> 00:02:49.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm head of institutional relations and I would look after

59
00:02:50.280 --> 00:02:52.360
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of institutional clients. So by that I

60
00:02:52.400 --> 00:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>mean different crypto funds, asset managers, hedge funds, like really

61
00:02:55.879 --> 00:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>anyone who has a significant mental eat and we had

62
00:02:58.439 --> 00:03:00.360
<v Speaker 1>obviously encouraged them to take it with a love for

63
00:03:00.400 --> 00:03:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the added benefits of liquidity and capital efficiency.

64
00:03:03.240 --> 00:03:06.800
<v Speaker 2>Very cool and at your time at Deloitte, what was

65
00:03:06.840 --> 00:03:09.840
<v Speaker 2>your first encounter with crypto. Was it Deloitte? You know,

66
00:03:10.280 --> 00:03:13.000
<v Speaker 2>were they researching this technology and then you kind of

67
00:03:13.039 --> 00:03:15.039
<v Speaker 2>got into it or did you find out about it

68
00:03:15.080 --> 00:03:17.000
<v Speaker 2>outside while at Deloitte?

69
00:03:17.599 --> 00:03:19.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was kind of an interesting one. So in

70
00:03:19.560 --> 00:03:22.159
<v Speaker 1>college when I was doing my master's in consultancy, we

71
00:03:22.240 --> 00:03:25.240
<v Speaker 1>had to do a consulting project and my client was Deloitte,

72
00:03:25.560 --> 00:03:28.360
<v Speaker 1>So that was kind of my first I suppose aha

73
00:03:28.360 --> 00:03:30.919
<v Speaker 1>a moment for crypto and blockchain. So we did the

74
00:03:30.960 --> 00:03:33.439
<v Speaker 1>consulting project for deloittte and this would have been I

75
00:03:33.479 --> 00:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>think twenty seventeen, so the technology would have been quite nascent,

76
00:03:37.719 --> 00:03:39.639
<v Speaker 1>So all the work that Deloitte was doing at that

77
00:03:39.639 --> 00:03:43.039
<v Speaker 1>time was very educational based, like just getting people to

78
00:03:43.120 --> 00:03:45.919
<v Speaker 1>understand that like blockchain and bitcoin wasn't the same thing.

79
00:03:46.240 --> 00:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>One is the technology and the other's use case. So yeah,

80
00:03:50.000 --> 00:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>college would have been the main dip to kind of

81
00:03:52.000 --> 00:03:54.479
<v Speaker 1>getting into that kind of crypto part. After that, a

82
00:03:54.479 --> 00:03:57.159
<v Speaker 1>lot of the proof of concept based, so nothing was

83
00:03:57.159 --> 00:03:59.479
<v Speaker 1>really going into production at that point. You were doing

84
00:03:59.520 --> 00:04:01.879
<v Speaker 1>a lot of use cases around like trade finance, which

85
00:04:01.919 --> 00:04:05.039
<v Speaker 1>is quite popular, and eating from a process and improvement

86
00:04:05.080 --> 00:04:09.199
<v Speaker 1>point of view around smart contracts and fast forward kind

87
00:04:09.199 --> 00:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of ten years later, nothing really goes down that proof

88
00:04:11.599 --> 00:04:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of concept rabbit hole. It's all straight into productions with

89
00:04:13.840 --> 00:04:15.479
<v Speaker 1>people that bought into the idea.

90
00:04:15.680 --> 00:04:18.920
<v Speaker 2>It's amazing to see the amount of adoption taking place

91
00:04:19.000 --> 00:04:22.800
<v Speaker 2>of blockchain technology and the crypto acid class. You have

92
00:04:23.000 --> 00:04:26.399
<v Speaker 2>almost all of tradify here, the banks, the stock exchanges,

93
00:04:26.519 --> 00:04:30.680
<v Speaker 2>the payment companies, they're all here. What does it mean

94
00:04:30.720 --> 00:04:32.160
<v Speaker 2>to you or you know, how do you see that

95
00:04:32.279 --> 00:04:34.959
<v Speaker 2>with all these folks coming in? Is it just you

96
00:04:35.000 --> 00:04:38.680
<v Speaker 2>can't ignore this technology? This is the future pretty much?

97
00:04:38.759 --> 00:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Like it's just been insane that it's kind of

98
00:04:41.680 --> 00:04:44.560
<v Speaker 1>been this almost light switch moment. I felt like for

99
00:04:44.600 --> 00:04:47.160
<v Speaker 1>a long time we were talking about institutions coming and

100
00:04:47.240 --> 00:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>regulations coming, and now it finally feels like it's arrived.

101
00:04:51.040 --> 00:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>And so the starting pistol has sounded in my mind, like,

102
00:04:53.839 --> 00:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>by no means do I think we're kind of nearing

103
00:04:56.240 --> 00:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the end of the race. It just feels like the

104
00:04:57.680 --> 00:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>race is starting, and I'm quite fortunate I'm in New

105
00:04:59.639 --> 00:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>York this week, like the financial powerhouse of the world.

106
00:05:02.600 --> 00:05:06.079
<v Speaker 1>And when you meet with the likes of black Rock, Fidelity,

107
00:05:06.079 --> 00:05:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Franklin Templeton, like you understand that they're taking this technology

108
00:05:09.439 --> 00:05:12.959
<v Speaker 1>incredibly seriously and they're making these big investments. And my

109
00:05:13.079 --> 00:05:15.279
<v Speaker 1>view in these things is like the black Rocks of

110
00:05:15.279 --> 00:05:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the world don't make bad bets, like they understand, they

111
00:05:17.639 --> 00:05:20.199
<v Speaker 1>do an incredible amount of due diligence. So it's nice

112
00:05:20.240 --> 00:05:22.639
<v Speaker 1>to kind of see them endorsing the technology in this way.

113
00:05:23.800 --> 00:05:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Absolutely, So give us an overview of lido. What islido,

114
00:05:28.920 --> 00:05:30.720
<v Speaker 2>your mission, your services, and much.

115
00:05:30.639 --> 00:05:31.959
<v Speaker 3>More for your listeners.

116
00:05:32.000 --> 00:05:34.160
<v Speaker 1>You can think of Lido as a liquid staking protocol,

117
00:05:34.920 --> 00:05:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and there's effectively kind of different levels. I would say

118
00:05:37.040 --> 00:05:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the one that's most common are the one that gets

119
00:05:38.720 --> 00:05:40.959
<v Speaker 1>the most amount of attention right now is native staking,

120
00:05:41.519 --> 00:05:44.279
<v Speaker 1>so effectively with ethereum as the proof of state blockchain.

121
00:05:44.360 --> 00:05:46.279
<v Speaker 1>So what that means is you take your eath, you

122
00:05:46.399 --> 00:05:49.279
<v Speaker 1>secure it in the network, and as a reward for

123
00:05:49.399 --> 00:05:52.040
<v Speaker 1>taking your eath securing in the network, you're given rewards.

124
00:05:52.439 --> 00:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>So I believe the rewards rate right now is around

125
00:05:54.600 --> 00:05:58.319
<v Speaker 1>three percent. The issue with native staking is that you're

126
00:05:58.399 --> 00:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>basically taking your capital in the form of eath, you're

127
00:06:01.720 --> 00:06:04.959
<v Speaker 1>locking it away, So from a capital efficiency perspective, that's

128
00:06:05.040 --> 00:06:07.519
<v Speaker 1>not terrific or it's not ideal. I suppose then the

129
00:06:07.560 --> 00:06:10.199
<v Speaker 1>whole selling point of LIDO and liquid staking is we're

130
00:06:10.240 --> 00:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>solving that problem. So the whole process with LIDO is

131
00:06:13.360 --> 00:06:15.279
<v Speaker 1>basically you would take your eth, you would go to

132
00:06:15.399 --> 00:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the DApp take your eath, stake it, and in return

133
00:06:18.879 --> 00:06:21.959
<v Speaker 1>you're giving steeth or st eth in return. And you

134
00:06:22.000 --> 00:06:24.920
<v Speaker 1>can think of Steith as a certificate of deposit, and

135
00:06:25.040 --> 00:06:28.600
<v Speaker 1>that certificate basically represents two things, the east you've just

136
00:06:28.680 --> 00:06:32.279
<v Speaker 1>staked and your staking rewards. What's really cool about Steith

137
00:06:32.399 --> 00:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>is effectively the network effects of it. So you can

138
00:06:35.079 --> 00:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>take Steith, use it as collateral, deployed into defied generally yield.

139
00:06:39.680 --> 00:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>But added benefit is that instant liquidity, so you can

140
00:06:43.079 --> 00:06:46.439
<v Speaker 1>take that steeth and swap it into stables and that's

141
00:06:46.480 --> 00:06:48.519
<v Speaker 1>the key selling point. For a lot of institutions. They

142
00:06:48.560 --> 00:06:51.079
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be beholden to the withdraw queue. So

143
00:06:51.120 --> 00:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I think the withdrawal queue right now from a native

144
00:06:53.120 --> 00:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>staking perspective is around two weeks, so it's only like,

145
00:06:56.639 --> 00:06:58.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, like the market can change quite a lot

146
00:06:58.519 --> 00:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>in an hour, let alone two weeks. So for a

147
00:07:01.040 --> 00:07:03.759
<v Speaker 1>lot of institutions, they don't really want that exposure to time.

148
00:07:04.240 --> 00:07:07.480
<v Speaker 1>So again from liquids taking point of view. The ability

149
00:07:07.560 --> 00:07:10.360
<v Speaker 1>to take steeth and go into stables is a tremendous

150
00:07:10.399 --> 00:07:12.680
<v Speaker 1>selling point for what Loido is and what Steeth is.

151
00:07:13.240 --> 00:07:15.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Absolutely, and you can put your capital to work

152
00:07:15.800 --> 00:07:17.839
<v Speaker 2>and it's great to have that liquidity that you said

153
00:07:17.839 --> 00:07:20.519
<v Speaker 2>in soil liquidity. So talk to us about the mechanics

154
00:07:20.680 --> 00:07:23.519
<v Speaker 2>of how this is all set up. I'm assuming it's

155
00:07:23.600 --> 00:07:27.560
<v Speaker 2>using smart contracts. How's the custody done and security and

156
00:07:27.600 --> 00:07:29.319
<v Speaker 2>all these things, because that's going to be a big

157
00:07:29.439 --> 00:07:30.519
<v Speaker 2>question for a lot of folks.

158
00:07:31.279 --> 00:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I should say, Likelido is adeo so to

159
00:07:33.800 --> 00:07:37.319
<v Speaker 1>centralized autonomous organization. So one of the cool things about

160
00:07:37.360 --> 00:07:40.519
<v Speaker 1>loido is that really practice what it preaches. So it's

161
00:07:40.560 --> 00:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>all around decentralization. Solido is effectively a middleware. Nothing is

162
00:07:44.639 --> 00:07:48.480
<v Speaker 1>actually staked with Laider directly. So there's over six hundred

163
00:07:48.519 --> 00:07:52.319
<v Speaker 1>different note operators and operating with LODO today or true

164
00:07:52.399 --> 00:07:55.079
<v Speaker 1>that's to middleware. So there's a couple of different elements

165
00:07:55.160 --> 00:07:57.279
<v Speaker 1>to that, Like you would have what's called the curated set,

166
00:07:57.360 --> 00:07:59.959
<v Speaker 1>so this is like professional note operators, so that would

167
00:08:00.079 --> 00:08:03.240
<v Speaker 1>be the p tops of the world, figments, kills, course ones.

168
00:08:03.600 --> 00:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Then we also have a community staking module to again

169
00:08:06.319 --> 00:08:10.319
<v Speaker 1>driving that decentralized element, Like there's a big focus WITHINLIDO

170
00:08:10.399 --> 00:08:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and all the contributors that you want to make Etherium

171
00:08:12.839 --> 00:08:15.439
<v Speaker 1>as decentralized as possible, because ultimately that was the goal

172
00:08:15.519 --> 00:08:17.879
<v Speaker 1>of the technology from the very beginning. Again at a

173
00:08:17.959 --> 00:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>high level on like the setup and then from the

174
00:08:20.600 --> 00:08:22.519
<v Speaker 1>custody point of view, this would come up quite a

175
00:08:22.600 --> 00:08:24.879
<v Speaker 1>lot with the institutions that we deal with, so the

176
00:08:24.920 --> 00:08:29.439
<v Speaker 1>asset managers, liquid funds, metfissuers. From custody point of view,

177
00:08:29.480 --> 00:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>we've quite good coverage. So that would be the likes

178
00:08:31.759 --> 00:08:35.799
<v Speaker 1>of fire Blocks, Copper, cefu x Trust and the one

179
00:08:35.879 --> 00:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>that's most recently been announced is with Bitco. So I

180
00:08:40.039 --> 00:08:41.840
<v Speaker 1>would say like when we go and speak to these

181
00:08:41.879 --> 00:08:45.759
<v Speaker 1>different asset managers, like unless you have custody support, they're

182
00:08:45.919 --> 00:08:49.440
<v Speaker 1>very unlikely to go touch the asset because ultimately the

183
00:08:49.480 --> 00:08:53.559
<v Speaker 1>custodium provides a terrific service, especially on the of the

184
00:08:53.559 --> 00:08:56.919
<v Speaker 1>structure side. So a big priority for me is making

185
00:08:56.960 --> 00:09:01.039
<v Speaker 1>sure that steeth this institutional ecosystem added thindational level is

186
00:09:01.080 --> 00:09:06.200
<v Speaker 1>supported with many different custodians, NPC, water providers and tech

187
00:09:06.240 --> 00:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>partners possible.

188
00:09:07.720 --> 00:09:09.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that definitely makes sense. And custody is such a

189
00:09:09.879 --> 00:09:13.200
<v Speaker 2>big aspect for trust and making sure assets are secure.

190
00:09:13.480 --> 00:09:15.320
<v Speaker 2>It's great to hear you're using some of the biggest

191
00:09:15.440 --> 00:09:18.360
<v Speaker 2>names in the industry like Bidgo and so forth. So

192
00:09:18.519 --> 00:09:21.759
<v Speaker 2>on that note, you know, in pitching liquid staking and

193
00:09:21.840 --> 00:09:25.320
<v Speaker 2>your services to institutions like black Rock, many of them

194
00:09:25.399 --> 00:09:28.919
<v Speaker 2>are bullish on etherorem They have it in ETF format

195
00:09:29.000 --> 00:09:31.559
<v Speaker 2>there some our companies are holding it as a corporate

196
00:09:31.600 --> 00:09:34.519
<v Speaker 2>treasury and then they want to earn that yield right

197
00:09:34.799 --> 00:09:37.279
<v Speaker 2>from the staking rewards and so forth. How are you

198
00:09:37.519 --> 00:09:40.399
<v Speaker 2>pitching this to them? Are they open mind? Are they

199
00:09:40.440 --> 00:09:43.879
<v Speaker 2>being open to the idea? I know some folks it's

200
00:09:43.960 --> 00:09:46.519
<v Speaker 2>a matter of education, right and getting familiar with all

201
00:09:46.559 --> 00:09:49.799
<v Speaker 2>these things. But how has it been pitching this service

202
00:09:49.879 --> 00:09:53.320
<v Speaker 2>to those institutions. It's been quite good, Like you said,

203
00:09:53.360 --> 00:09:55.200
<v Speaker 2>like education is a big part of this. Like at

204
00:09:55.200 --> 00:09:57.440
<v Speaker 2>the end of the day, people are not going to

205
00:09:57.519 --> 00:10:00.919
<v Speaker 2>engage with the technology or ease any the service unless

206
00:10:00.919 --> 00:10:03.600
<v Speaker 2>they're comfortable with it. But maybe the kind of taking

207
00:10:03.600 --> 00:10:06.240
<v Speaker 2>example you mentioned there, so like the ETF issuers, like

208
00:10:06.360 --> 00:10:08.679
<v Speaker 2>there's obviously a huge amount of work happening behind the

209
00:10:08.720 --> 00:10:11.879
<v Speaker 2>scenes with these issuers to get staking added to these products.

210
00:10:13.440 --> 00:10:15.320
<v Speaker 2>One of the key things that comes up quite a

211
00:10:15.360 --> 00:10:18.200
<v Speaker 2>lot in the conversations that we're having is that what

212
00:10:18.399 --> 00:10:22.039
<v Speaker 2>will the staking rate be of these ETFs. So if

213
00:10:22.080 --> 00:10:24.399
<v Speaker 2>you take kind of Europe as an example, so Europe

214
00:10:24.440 --> 00:10:27.039
<v Speaker 2>has had staking in these products for quite a long time,

215
00:10:27.679 --> 00:10:29.840
<v Speaker 2>and there's a number of quite successful ones like twenty

216
00:10:29.919 --> 00:10:32.879
<v Speaker 2>one shares a bit wise to etc. Group, but the

217
00:10:32.919 --> 00:10:35.879
<v Speaker 2>staking rate of these products tends to be at fifty percent,

218
00:10:36.639 --> 00:10:40.039
<v Speaker 2>and the reason for that is again liquidity. So when

219
00:10:40.879 --> 00:10:44.080
<v Speaker 2>a client wants to take money out of their ETP

220
00:10:44.279 --> 00:10:47.200
<v Speaker 2>or ETF, it's typically operated on like a TA plus

221
00:10:47.240 --> 00:10:49.039
<v Speaker 2>two basis, so they want to get their money backward

222
00:10:49.080 --> 00:10:51.759
<v Speaker 2>in two days. The issue when you have a natively

223
00:10:51.840 --> 00:10:55.159
<v Speaker 2>staked ETP or an ETF is that it typically could

224
00:10:55.200 --> 00:10:58.200
<v Speaker 2>take around two weeks. So from the issuers point of view,

225
00:10:58.279 --> 00:11:00.440
<v Speaker 2>that's why they have to have a certain amount liquidity.

226
00:11:00.720 --> 00:11:03.600
<v Speaker 2>And by liquidity, I mean unstaked eath. Back to your

227
00:11:03.639 --> 00:11:06.240
<v Speaker 2>point around like what's the sales pitch. The sales pitch

228
00:11:06.320 --> 00:11:06.879
<v Speaker 2>for most would be.

229
00:11:06.919 --> 00:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>You could actually launch a one hundred percent stake product.

230
00:11:09.519 --> 00:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>You can have a product that's now one hundred percent staked,

231
00:11:12.279 --> 00:11:14.919
<v Speaker 1>which means you're getting the full three percent yield compared

232
00:11:14.960 --> 00:11:17.039
<v Speaker 1>to say a fifty percent stake product where it's only

233
00:11:17.080 --> 00:11:20.200
<v Speaker 1>getting one point five percent. So from the issuer's point

234
00:11:20.200 --> 00:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>of view, that's obviously quite attractive. You can launch a

235
00:11:22.320 --> 00:11:24.759
<v Speaker 1>better product, and then from the investor's point of view,

236
00:11:24.799 --> 00:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>you're getting higher returns and you're again getting a better product.

237
00:11:28.080 --> 00:11:31.919
<v Speaker 2>Is totality, that's really great and a huge incentive to

238
00:11:32.080 --> 00:11:34.360
<v Speaker 2>your point. And then I'm assuming it would be very

239
00:11:34.399 --> 00:11:37.159
<v Speaker 2>similar for if your treasury companies as well, if they

240
00:11:37.200 --> 00:11:39.200
<v Speaker 2>want to do the same thing exactly.

241
00:11:39.399 --> 00:11:39.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

242
00:11:40.000 --> 00:11:41.399
<v Speaker 1>So I think one of the big reasons why the

243
00:11:41.519 --> 00:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>treasury companies have been such a popular topic right now

244
00:11:44.159 --> 00:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>is again because ETS still has staking yet. So I

245
00:11:47.200 --> 00:11:49.519
<v Speaker 1>think you have the likes of sharp Link Gaming and

246
00:11:49.600 --> 00:11:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the trust Machine and the eath machine, like they're seeing

247
00:11:52.639 --> 00:11:56.759
<v Speaker 1>a significant amount of attention because ETS don stake, and

248
00:11:57.120 --> 00:11:59.159
<v Speaker 1>I do think there is a world where both will

249
00:11:59.240 --> 00:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of sit in parma low like these treasury codes

250
00:12:02.039 --> 00:12:03.639
<v Speaker 1>can be a lot more aggressive in terms of the

251
00:12:03.679 --> 00:12:07.679
<v Speaker 1>strategies they deploy. They might have a defied strategy, they

252
00:12:07.720 --> 00:12:09.639
<v Speaker 1>might have a liquid staking strategy, they might have a

253
00:12:09.679 --> 00:12:12.840
<v Speaker 1>loop link strategy, and whereas the ETFs, for staking, it

254
00:12:12.879 --> 00:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>will be relatively straightforward. It will just be wholly staked,

255
00:12:17.159 --> 00:12:21.039
<v Speaker 1>so from returns perspective, it probably will be lower compared

256
00:12:21.120 --> 00:12:23.200
<v Speaker 1>to say a treasury co who could be a little

257
00:12:23.240 --> 00:12:25.679
<v Speaker 1>bit more aggressive depending on the strategy that they want

258
00:12:25.759 --> 00:12:26.159
<v Speaker 1>to deploy.

259
00:12:26.480 --> 00:12:29.000
<v Speaker 2>So that's interesting, and I can see why the etherom

260
00:12:29.080 --> 00:12:31.639
<v Speaker 2>treasury companies there's kind of a race to get as

261
00:12:31.720 --> 00:12:34.080
<v Speaker 2>much eath as possible because if the ETFs are not

262
00:12:34.200 --> 00:12:36.240
<v Speaker 2>offering this yet and we're still waiting for the SEC

263
00:12:36.360 --> 00:12:38.519
<v Speaker 2>to actually do something and you know, tell us if

264
00:12:38.519 --> 00:12:41.840
<v Speaker 2>they're going to. But also the eat treasury companies seem

265
00:12:41.919 --> 00:12:44.919
<v Speaker 2>to have more play so to speak, or more wiggle

266
00:12:45.000 --> 00:12:47.279
<v Speaker 2>room to do more versus the ETFs.

267
00:12:47.679 --> 00:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. So, like I think Sharplink gaming is probably

268
00:12:51.000 --> 00:12:53.279
<v Speaker 1>the best example. I want to again, the largest in

269
00:12:53.360 --> 00:12:57.080
<v Speaker 1>space right now. I think that just is giving an

270
00:12:57.120 --> 00:12:59.799
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for investors to get the exposure they want right

271
00:12:59.840 --> 00:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>now instead of waiting for the SEC. At clarity around

272
00:13:03.159 --> 00:13:05.960
<v Speaker 1>staking and ETFs and at the end of the day,

273
00:13:06.559 --> 00:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>liquid funds, asset managers they do act as kind of

274
00:13:09.039 --> 00:13:12.039
<v Speaker 1>mercenary capital. They want to go and get exposure to

275
00:13:12.120 --> 00:13:14.639
<v Speaker 1>the market, especially since now is quite a good time

276
00:13:14.840 --> 00:13:17.639
<v Speaker 1>for eth. It does feel like the narrative has really

277
00:13:17.720 --> 00:13:20.440
<v Speaker 1>changed compared to say, the beginning of the year, where

278
00:13:20.480 --> 00:13:22.399
<v Speaker 1>I always quite honestly say I don't think Eath was

279
00:13:22.440 --> 00:13:25.279
<v Speaker 1>getting enough load. Now things have really changed where we're

280
00:13:25.320 --> 00:13:27.840
<v Speaker 1>in nearly the end of August and it's getting the

281
00:13:27.919 --> 00:13:29.799
<v Speaker 1>attention it deserves. And a big part of that is

282
00:13:29.840 --> 00:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously regulars are clarity coming out of the US and

283
00:13:33.120 --> 00:13:36.200
<v Speaker 1>again what these Treasury codes are doing and how aggressively

284
00:13:36.240 --> 00:13:39.200
<v Speaker 1>they're buying Eath like it is a terrific endorsement that, look,

285
00:13:39.279 --> 00:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>this is now a strategy that's being deployed so actively.

286
00:13:42.720 --> 00:13:44.879
<v Speaker 2>You know, one of the things I was curious about,

287
00:13:44.960 --> 00:13:46.480
<v Speaker 2>and I don't know if you can speak to this

288
00:13:46.559 --> 00:13:48.759
<v Speaker 2>is because it depends on the companies. But you know,

289
00:13:48.879 --> 00:13:53.039
<v Speaker 2>could they offer the treasury companies the stake and rewards

290
00:13:53.120 --> 00:13:57.120
<v Speaker 2>as a dividend to the shareholders or maybe just simply

291
00:13:57.200 --> 00:14:01.120
<v Speaker 2>reinvest the amount to drive more value on the stock side.

292
00:14:01.440 --> 00:14:02.240
<v Speaker 2>What do you think about that?

293
00:14:02.679 --> 00:14:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I know this goes more into the companies themselves. Yeah,

294
00:14:06.519 --> 00:14:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right at the end there, Like it

295
00:14:08.639 --> 00:14:11.679
<v Speaker 1>ultimately depends on the company. So in the strategy they

296
00:14:11.720 --> 00:14:14.879
<v Speaker 1>want to have. Like, it was quite interesting listening to

297
00:14:15.039 --> 00:14:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the different investor calls for these e treasury companies. And again,

298
00:14:19.039 --> 00:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of a green field space, like nothing

299
00:14:21.279 --> 00:14:23.279
<v Speaker 1>has been around for twenty years and there's no real

300
00:14:23.360 --> 00:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>standards yet everyone is still trying to find what works

301
00:14:26.360 --> 00:14:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and what doesn't work. So I would say there's no

302
00:14:28.480 --> 00:14:31.279
<v Speaker 1>real right answer, there's no real rom answer. I would

303
00:14:31.279 --> 00:14:33.200
<v Speaker 1>say from the investor's point of view, the right answer

304
00:14:33.320 --> 00:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>is the one that makes the most amount of money

305
00:14:34.919 --> 00:14:35.679
<v Speaker 1>or the highest return.

306
00:14:36.240 --> 00:14:39.320
<v Speaker 2>Now, the SEC recently gave some guidance on liquid stakings

307
00:14:39.399 --> 00:14:42.399
<v Speaker 2>saying some of these activities are not securities. What does

308
00:14:42.480 --> 00:14:45.399
<v Speaker 2>that mean for your business and even the future of

309
00:14:45.480 --> 00:14:46.200
<v Speaker 2>liquid staking.

310
00:14:47.120 --> 00:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, at a high level, it's terrific because this

311
00:14:50.639 --> 00:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>has again been something that comes up quite frequently. So

312
00:14:53.600 --> 00:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>like when you speak to these big asset managers or issuers,

313
00:14:56.600 --> 00:14:59.399
<v Speaker 1>they want one thing and that is clarity. They want

314
00:14:59.440 --> 00:15:01.559
<v Speaker 1>to know what the rules of the game are. Like

315
00:15:01.679 --> 00:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>it's very easy for me to go and have all

316
00:15:03.519 --> 00:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>these different conversations, but if there's any kind of regulatory

317
00:15:07.440 --> 00:15:10.639
<v Speaker 1>doubt in the background, they're very hesitant to get involved.

318
00:15:11.120 --> 00:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's quite fair and like these are big institutions

319
00:15:14.679 --> 00:15:17.799
<v Speaker 1>Tier one have probably been around hundreds of years. They

320
00:15:17.879 --> 00:15:20.200
<v Speaker 1>have quite a low risk appetite and they don't want

321
00:15:20.240 --> 00:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to offend the regulator. So when this news came out

322
00:15:23.159 --> 00:15:26.559
<v Speaker 1>around clarity around liquid saking, it was terrific because now

323
00:15:26.639 --> 00:15:28.480
<v Speaker 1>we know what we can do and what we can't do.

324
00:15:28.840 --> 00:15:31.399
<v Speaker 1>So liquid staking not falling under securities law is a

325
00:15:31.440 --> 00:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>big part of that.

326
00:15:32.600 --> 00:15:35.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Absolutely, And I know there's still more that they

327
00:15:35.320 --> 00:15:37.799
<v Speaker 2>need to provide, but this was a good start, and

328
00:15:38.600 --> 00:15:41.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, hopefully maybe with the Clarity Bill, the Market

329
00:15:41.960 --> 00:15:45.120
<v Speaker 2>Structure Bill that's coming to be passed by Congress, maybe

330
00:15:45.159 --> 00:15:47.440
<v Speaker 2>there's some additional language there, or maybe not, maybe the

331
00:15:47.600 --> 00:15:51.120
<v Speaker 2>SEC provides the full guidance later this year. Yeah.

332
00:15:51.159 --> 00:15:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, like that's what everyone wants.

333
00:15:53.440 --> 00:15:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Like again, kind of going back to my Deloitte days,

334
00:15:56.000 --> 00:15:58.519
<v Speaker 1>Like it was funny, no one really wanted like regulation.

335
00:15:58.759 --> 00:16:01.120
<v Speaker 1>They didn't want like the government to come in and

336
00:16:01.279 --> 00:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>like dampen innovation. But I think people soon realize that, look,

337
00:16:05.320 --> 00:16:07.679
<v Speaker 1>like regulation is not a bad word, it's a good thing.

338
00:16:07.879 --> 00:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Everyone just wants to know what you can and can't do.

339
00:16:10.120 --> 00:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>And ultimately the structure is the foundation of how big

340
00:16:13.960 --> 00:16:16.639
<v Speaker 1>things happen, and I think if there wasn't this regulatory

341
00:16:16.679 --> 00:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>clarity and less will be happening in the market today.

342
00:16:21.159 --> 00:16:23.519
<v Speaker 1>And like it's again kind of going back to the

343
00:16:23.559 --> 00:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the year. I was here in January, the

344
00:16:26.279 --> 00:16:28.879
<v Speaker 1>week of the inauguration, and it did feel like there's

345
00:16:28.919 --> 00:16:32.279
<v Speaker 1>this like terrific energy in New York where Okay, things

346
00:16:32.320 --> 00:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>are opening up, innovation is happening, whereas I think maybe

347
00:16:35.519 --> 00:16:38.759
<v Speaker 1>two or three years ago that energy wasn't there. And

348
00:16:38.879 --> 00:16:41.759
<v Speaker 1>a big part of this new energy is obviously new administrations.

349
00:16:42.120 --> 00:16:45.200
<v Speaker 1>And again that regulatory clarity that's now starting to CAMA

350
00:16:45.240 --> 00:16:47.919
<v Speaker 1>or is at least quite close to being kind of

351
00:16:48.120 --> 00:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>launched their live.

352
00:16:50.120 --> 00:16:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure. And I think, you know, I think

353
00:16:52.279 --> 00:16:55.759
<v Speaker 2>people sometimes think that if there's regulation is coming in,

354
00:16:55.879 --> 00:16:58.840
<v Speaker 2>that it's going to stifle innovation. But it's just a balance.

355
00:16:58.960 --> 00:17:01.559
<v Speaker 2>I think if you get the balance right where you're

356
00:17:01.600 --> 00:17:06.000
<v Speaker 2>not stifling innovation but you're protecting consumers and users, that's fine, right.

357
00:17:06.119 --> 00:17:08.720
<v Speaker 2>You allow the entrepreneurs to build, the innovators to do

358
00:17:08.880 --> 00:17:11.720
<v Speaker 2>their thing, and there's protections for consumers. And I think

359
00:17:11.759 --> 00:17:14.039
<v Speaker 2>that's the balance we just have to strite. But I know,

360
00:17:14.200 --> 00:17:17.039
<v Speaker 2>to your point. Some people think, oh, you let the

361
00:17:17.079 --> 00:17:18.880
<v Speaker 2>government come take over, we won't be able to do anything,

362
00:17:18.920 --> 00:17:20.720
<v Speaker 2>But it's not true as long as you are able

363
00:17:20.759 --> 00:17:22.039
<v Speaker 2>to get balance regulations.

364
00:17:22.599 --> 00:17:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I think like once the regulators are actually

365
00:17:25.440 --> 00:17:28.319
<v Speaker 1>listening to the market, like it would be quite bad

366
00:17:28.640 --> 00:17:32.240
<v Speaker 1>if the regulators went into a black box. They did

367
00:17:32.319 --> 00:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>all their research and they didn't engage with people on

368
00:17:34.559 --> 00:17:37.039
<v Speaker 1>the front line. I think that's when you have big issues,

369
00:17:37.559 --> 00:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>whereas like what the SEC is doing with the crypto

370
00:17:40.839 --> 00:17:43.839
<v Speaker 1>daask force, speaking to as many different people on the

371
00:17:43.880 --> 00:17:47.240
<v Speaker 1>front line as possible, that's where you start getting meaningful regulation.

372
00:17:47.400 --> 00:17:50.559
<v Speaker 1>And that's where again that confidence starts to grow that Okay,

373
00:17:50.720 --> 00:17:53.240
<v Speaker 1>this is a serious technology and serious players will want

374
00:17:53.240 --> 00:17:53.880
<v Speaker 1>to get avolved.

375
00:17:54.480 --> 00:17:56.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, you mentioned engaging with regulators. I don't know

376
00:17:56.880 --> 00:17:59.240
<v Speaker 2>if you're able to talk about this, but have you

377
00:17:59.400 --> 00:18:02.720
<v Speaker 2>and and poks on your team spoken to the SEC

378
00:18:02.880 --> 00:18:06.319
<v Speaker 2>about your services and you know, giving them feedback and

379
00:18:06.400 --> 00:18:06.839
<v Speaker 2>things like that.

380
00:18:07.920 --> 00:18:10.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's definitely conversations and there's engagement there. Like there's

381
00:18:10.839 --> 00:18:13.039
<v Speaker 1>a number of different kind of liquid staking groups and

382
00:18:13.119 --> 00:18:16.319
<v Speaker 1>staking groups, where as effectively, collective we would go and

383
00:18:16.400 --> 00:18:19.480
<v Speaker 1>we would speak to say the task force or if

384
00:18:19.480 --> 00:18:22.759
<v Speaker 1>there's kind of open questions and given that Lido is

385
00:18:22.799 --> 00:18:26.559
<v Speaker 1>the largest liquid staking protocol, like our guidance would hopefully

386
00:18:26.599 --> 00:18:28.400
<v Speaker 1>have some weight, and we just give feedback on what

387
00:18:28.480 --> 00:18:29.799
<v Speaker 1>we think is the most appropriate.

388
00:18:30.559 --> 00:18:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Will Liido expand beyond Etherorem? There are other proof of

389
00:18:33.680 --> 00:18:36.480
<v Speaker 2>steak blockchains out there, other services that offer or other

390
00:18:36.640 --> 00:18:41.400
<v Speaker 2>blockchains that have staking integrated, like Solona for example. Are

391
00:18:41.440 --> 00:18:43.680
<v Speaker 2>you just going to stay with Etherorem in the ecosystem

392
00:18:43.720 --> 00:18:44.839
<v Speaker 2>around Etherorem?

393
00:18:45.279 --> 00:18:47.359
<v Speaker 1>I think, like my view on this is like, if

394
00:18:47.400 --> 00:18:49.400
<v Speaker 1>you want to do something incredibly well, you have to

395
00:18:49.480 --> 00:18:52.559
<v Speaker 1>focus on doing that one thing incredibly well, and for us,

396
00:18:52.640 --> 00:18:56.200
<v Speaker 1>that's Ethereum is taking So in the past there was

397
00:18:56.279 --> 00:18:59.960
<v Speaker 1>some liquid staking and offerings Withinlido, but that was effective.

398
00:19:00.079 --> 00:19:02.799
<v Speaker 1>Is sunsash again kind of based on that decision you

399
00:19:02.960 --> 00:19:05.359
<v Speaker 1>want to do something well, you just focus on doing that.

400
00:19:06.240 --> 00:19:08.359
<v Speaker 1>And again kind of my own personal opinion on this,

401
00:19:09.039 --> 00:19:12.519
<v Speaker 1>like Etherium is probably one of the only kind of

402
00:19:12.599 --> 00:19:15.960
<v Speaker 1>institutional grade blockchains out there today, so like why not

403
00:19:16.079 --> 00:19:18.160
<v Speaker 1>focus on the one that's getting the most attention on

404
00:19:18.240 --> 00:19:19.079
<v Speaker 1>that is Ethereum.

405
00:19:20.039 --> 00:19:22.039
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a great point because and we could talk

406
00:19:22.079 --> 00:19:25.359
<v Speaker 2>a bit about this Etherorem usually seems to be the

407
00:19:25.559 --> 00:19:29.799
<v Speaker 2>first platform or blockchain that it's being used for tokenization,

408
00:19:30.119 --> 00:19:32.599
<v Speaker 2>and there's the majority of stable coins out there are

409
00:19:32.759 --> 00:19:35.160
<v Speaker 2>on Etherorem. When black Rock and some of these other

410
00:19:35.200 --> 00:19:38.200
<v Speaker 2>funds launched their tokenized money market funds, it was on Etherorem,

411
00:19:38.519 --> 00:19:41.240
<v Speaker 2>and yes they branched out, but eth seems to be

412
00:19:41.359 --> 00:19:45.119
<v Speaker 2>the starting point that it's the most trusted the ecosystem

413
00:19:45.279 --> 00:19:48.000
<v Speaker 2>with maybe the most liquidity, a lot of network effects

414
00:19:48.039 --> 00:19:50.799
<v Speaker 2>obviously and things like that. So do you see ETH

415
00:19:50.920 --> 00:19:54.200
<v Speaker 2>continuing to hold that mantle of being let's say, the

416
00:19:54.319 --> 00:19:55.960
<v Speaker 2>top enterprise blockchain.

417
00:19:56.279 --> 00:19:58.119
<v Speaker 3>Oh, absolutely, I think there's no doubt.

418
00:19:58.279 --> 00:20:02.519
<v Speaker 1>Like obviously, Ethereum secus second larger blockchain after Bitcoin, like

419
00:20:03.119 --> 00:20:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Etherium has kind of two key selling points like security

420
00:20:06.480 --> 00:20:09.480
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent of time, and then like you mentioned, liquidity,

421
00:20:10.079 --> 00:20:13.119
<v Speaker 1>Like the type of conversations aren't dealing with conversations I'm

422
00:20:13.160 --> 00:20:15.319
<v Speaker 1>having with people, they really do care about those two

423
00:20:15.359 --> 00:20:18.759
<v Speaker 1>things quite a lot. Like institutions, they're not going to

424
00:20:18.839 --> 00:20:21.599
<v Speaker 1>engage unless they feel it's secure. And then a liquidity

425
00:20:21.640 --> 00:20:24.160
<v Speaker 1>point of view, they're not dealing in hundreds of millions,

426
00:20:24.200 --> 00:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>they're dealing in billions, so they want to know how

427
00:20:27.039 --> 00:20:28.759
<v Speaker 1>much they can sell, how long it takes to sell,

428
00:20:29.119 --> 00:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and there's really no one else kind of operating at

429
00:20:31.319 --> 00:20:34.079
<v Speaker 1>that scale or that size where big institutions can get evolved.

430
00:20:34.319 --> 00:20:36.279
<v Speaker 1>And then on the final point around network effects, like

431
00:20:36.319 --> 00:20:40.039
<v Speaker 1>again you have Visa and MasterCard, black Rock, Fidelity. These

432
00:20:40.079 --> 00:20:42.720
<v Speaker 1>are all big players and for me, I think they

433
00:20:42.799 --> 00:20:46.240
<v Speaker 1>place big long term bets. It's never about a quick win.

434
00:20:46.720 --> 00:20:49.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think again, depending on the strategy of like

435
00:20:49.519 --> 00:20:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the firm you're dealing with, quick wins can be quite good,

436
00:20:52.000 --> 00:20:54.599
<v Speaker 1>whereas if you want to make meaningful changes, that long

437
00:20:54.720 --> 00:20:57.480
<v Speaker 1>term bet is far more important. And Etherium has been

438
00:20:57.519 --> 00:20:59.640
<v Speaker 1>around for quite a long time now. It's proven that

439
00:21:00.160 --> 00:21:03.119
<v Speaker 1>it's battle tested, it can handle a lot. It's changing

440
00:21:03.200 --> 00:21:05.160
<v Speaker 1>with the times, like the move from proof of work

441
00:21:05.240 --> 00:21:08.039
<v Speaker 1>to proof stake Like these are all endorsements that look,

442
00:21:08.119 --> 00:21:10.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a very future focused technology.

443
00:21:10.880 --> 00:21:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Usually there's I see these comments online on social media,

444
00:21:14.039 --> 00:21:18.240
<v Speaker 2>people criticize, oh, gas fees are high, But I would

445
00:21:18.240 --> 00:21:22.119
<v Speaker 2>love to get your perspective on the institutions kind of

446
00:21:22.200 --> 00:21:24.799
<v Speaker 2>look past that, because to your point, they look at security,

447
00:21:25.200 --> 00:21:29.119
<v Speaker 2>network effects, liquidity. Is it that or is there more

448
00:21:29.160 --> 00:21:29.359
<v Speaker 2>to it?

449
00:21:31.440 --> 00:21:33.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's funny, like the gas fees, I would say,

450
00:21:33.440 --> 00:21:35.400
<v Speaker 1>comes up more from a retail point of view, which

451
00:21:35.440 --> 00:21:37.400
<v Speaker 1>is incredibly fair. Like if there's a high amount of

452
00:21:37.440 --> 00:21:40.319
<v Speaker 1>congestion on the network, paying thirty dollars to process the

453
00:21:40.359 --> 00:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>transaction not exactly ideal, and I think we all know that,

454
00:21:43.480 --> 00:21:46.759
<v Speaker 1>and the YEF is doing a significant amount of work

455
00:21:46.799 --> 00:21:49.480
<v Speaker 1>to make those changes. So yeah, I would say from

456
00:21:49.519 --> 00:21:52.960
<v Speaker 1>an institutional side, it doesn't come up along conversation and

457
00:21:54.119 --> 00:21:56.519
<v Speaker 1>like if you look at kind of traditional finance world,

458
00:21:57.200 --> 00:21:59.079
<v Speaker 1>thirty dollars transaction on a couple of million, and it

459
00:21:59.119 --> 00:22:02.599
<v Speaker 1>would be incredible, be cheap, yeah, Whereas it's so yeah,

460
00:22:02.599 --> 00:22:04.720
<v Speaker 1>you're not really comparing Apple to apples in that sense

461
00:22:04.799 --> 00:22:05.160
<v Speaker 1>or apples.

462
00:22:06.200 --> 00:22:09.839
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that's a great perspective because I think to your point,

463
00:22:09.920 --> 00:22:13.359
<v Speaker 2>retail just thinks about their little mini transaction, which I

464
00:22:13.519 --> 00:22:15.759
<v Speaker 2>get right, But if you're a black Rock and these

465
00:22:16.079 --> 00:22:19.799
<v Speaker 2>other institutions, you're moving billions or millions and you pay

466
00:22:20.559 --> 00:22:22.640
<v Speaker 2>even one hundred dollars in fees, that's nothing.

467
00:22:23.359 --> 00:22:26.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, exactly, And like it's it's peer to peer

468
00:22:26.880 --> 00:22:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and whereas compared to like traditional kind of payments model,

469
00:22:29.920 --> 00:22:31.839
<v Speaker 1>like if I want to send money from Dublin to

470
00:22:32.039 --> 00:22:33.799
<v Speaker 1>New York. It probably has to go through two or

471
00:22:33.839 --> 00:22:36.039
<v Speaker 1>three different banks before it gets there, and it takes

472
00:22:36.079 --> 00:22:39.799
<v Speaker 1>four or five days. Whereas again the efficiency provement and

473
00:22:40.319 --> 00:22:43.319
<v Speaker 1>with etherium, again we all acknowledge it can be expensive.

474
00:22:43.359 --> 00:22:45.559
<v Speaker 1>With that efficiency I provement where it happens in minutes

475
00:22:45.640 --> 00:22:48.000
<v Speaker 1>not days, it's terrific and it will only get better

476
00:22:48.359 --> 00:22:50.759
<v Speaker 1>as more and more people join the ecosystem and they

477
00:22:50.839 --> 00:22:54.160
<v Speaker 1>build kind of different technologies on top of ether or ethereum.

478
00:22:55.039 --> 00:22:56.960
<v Speaker 2>So speaking of that, the technology is on top of you,

479
00:22:57.119 --> 00:22:59.000
<v Speaker 2>you've got a lot of roll ups, right, get lt

480
00:22:59.119 --> 00:23:01.640
<v Speaker 2>u's and we're seeing adoption of L two is like

481
00:23:01.720 --> 00:23:04.160
<v Speaker 2>I just spoke to a vlat Tina at Robinhood and

482
00:23:04.240 --> 00:23:08.279
<v Speaker 2>they're using Arbitrum you know, to base their blockchain and

483
00:23:08.359 --> 00:23:11.279
<v Speaker 2>tokenization effort. And you have a whole bunch of other

484
00:23:11.799 --> 00:23:14.519
<v Speaker 2>layer twos right that are getting adoption in different ways,

485
00:23:14.559 --> 00:23:17.400
<v Speaker 2>even by institutions. But maybe those could serve the retail

486
00:23:17.599 --> 00:23:19.720
<v Speaker 2>who are worried about the high fees. Go to a

487
00:23:19.799 --> 00:23:22.599
<v Speaker 2>layer two that is still using the security from the

488
00:23:22.680 --> 00:23:25.319
<v Speaker 2>base layer of eth and that would be the you know,

489
00:23:25.400 --> 00:23:26.680
<v Speaker 2>the nice fit so to speak.

490
00:23:27.400 --> 00:23:29.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, of course, and then, especially like when you have

491
00:23:29.200 --> 00:23:31.599
<v Speaker 1>the big exchange is like coin base, I think has

492
00:23:31.680 --> 00:23:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the base L two, crack In has their own L two,

493
00:23:35.319 --> 00:23:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and consensus is linear, Like a big part of the

494
00:23:39.000 --> 00:23:41.920
<v Speaker 1>success for L two's and like my opinion is distribution.

495
00:23:42.480 --> 00:23:44.319
<v Speaker 1>So when you're a coin baser, when you crack in

496
00:23:44.400 --> 00:23:46.920
<v Speaker 1>and you have a new L two that you launched,

497
00:23:47.319 --> 00:23:50.559
<v Speaker 1>and you already have excellent distribution, like, it really is

498
00:23:50.640 --> 00:23:54.039
<v Speaker 1>set up for success right from the very beginning. Let's

499
00:23:54.039 --> 00:23:56.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about the future of staking, right, I know it's

500
00:23:56.519 --> 00:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>still early. I know a lot we're still getting clarity, right,

501
00:23:59.000 --> 00:24:00.920
<v Speaker 1>We're still waiting on certain alority from like the SEC

502
00:24:01.039 --> 00:24:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. But let's say ten years from now,

503
00:24:04.799 --> 00:24:07.640
<v Speaker 1>what does staking look like. Is it just simply built

504
00:24:07.680 --> 00:24:10.079
<v Speaker 1>in and if I'm whether I'm a retail or I'm

505
00:24:10.079 --> 00:24:13.359
<v Speaker 1>an institution, I'm earning these passive rewards if I hold

506
00:24:13.559 --> 00:24:14.599
<v Speaker 1>the respective token.

507
00:24:15.480 --> 00:24:17.039
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So I would.

508
00:24:16.880 --> 00:24:21.839
<v Speaker 1>Say future of staking like big kind of idea right now,

509
00:24:22.000 --> 00:24:24.680
<v Speaker 1>or at least from our point of view, is institutional

510
00:24:24.680 --> 00:24:27.880
<v Speaker 1>adoption is only going to increase, like once we get

511
00:24:27.920 --> 00:24:33.440
<v Speaker 1>more regulatory charity mons, there's a maturity of infrastructure and

512
00:24:34.079 --> 00:24:35.880
<v Speaker 1>education of course is a big part of that, like,

513
00:24:35.960 --> 00:24:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to only increase, and that is

514
00:24:38.680 --> 00:24:42.759
<v Speaker 1>going to go up other big elements, I would say decentralization.

515
00:24:43.240 --> 00:24:45.559
<v Speaker 1>So again that's something light I was doing a trimific

516
00:24:45.640 --> 00:24:49.559
<v Speaker 1>amount of work on to make sure that Aterium remains decentralized.

517
00:24:50.200 --> 00:24:52.160
<v Speaker 1>There's been a lot of concern where you have big

518
00:24:52.279 --> 00:24:56.680
<v Speaker 1>centralized exchanges, they have a tremendous amount of control, so

519
00:24:56.839 --> 00:24:59.480
<v Speaker 1>may say too much, they may not be the most transferrent,

520
00:25:00.000 --> 00:25:02.079
<v Speaker 1>whereas if you were to use say someone like Glido

521
00:25:02.200 --> 00:25:05.599
<v Speaker 1>and it's middleware, it's incredibly transparent because it's the dough

522
00:25:05.680 --> 00:25:07.480
<v Speaker 1>where everyone can make a vote if they want to

523
00:25:07.519 --> 00:25:11.960
<v Speaker 1>bring changes to the doll And again around having six

524
00:25:12.079 --> 00:25:15.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred plus different note operators like really none is doing

525
00:25:16.440 --> 00:25:19.599
<v Speaker 1>and anything compared to Lido in terms of making Materium

526
00:25:19.640 --> 00:25:21.119
<v Speaker 1>stronger and more decentralized.

527
00:25:21.720 --> 00:25:24.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that makes sense. And then I wonder if with

528
00:25:24.799 --> 00:25:28.559
<v Speaker 2>all these institutions like banks and so forth adopting eth

529
00:25:29.000 --> 00:25:32.160
<v Speaker 2>and doing liquid staking, using Blido and whatever, it may

530
00:25:32.240 --> 00:25:36.920
<v Speaker 2>be that the average user, the average Joe and Jane,

531
00:25:37.880 --> 00:25:40.680
<v Speaker 2>they don't necessarily go buy crypto on coinbase and hold

532
00:25:40.720 --> 00:25:43.079
<v Speaker 2>it directly. They're going through the banks, and the banks

533
00:25:43.119 --> 00:25:46.279
<v Speaker 2>are giving them some of these staking rewards and it's

534
00:25:46.440 --> 00:25:49.680
<v Speaker 2>better than the traditional interest that's being paid out and

535
00:25:49.799 --> 00:25:53.319
<v Speaker 2>checking and savings accounts, right, so it gives more opportunity

536
00:25:53.400 --> 00:25:57.319
<v Speaker 2>to earn higher yield and better returns, and institutions can

537
00:25:57.359 --> 00:25:57.720
<v Speaker 2>share some.

538
00:25:57.799 --> 00:25:59.160
<v Speaker 3>Of that absolutely.

539
00:25:59.359 --> 00:26:02.279
<v Speaker 1>Like for me, think real adoption and like mainstream will

540
00:26:02.319 --> 00:26:04.839
<v Speaker 1>happen when you're not gonna be talking about staking your

541
00:26:04.880 --> 00:26:07.960
<v Speaker 1>decentralization or where the nodes are located, Like it will

542
00:26:08.039 --> 00:26:09.960
<v Speaker 1>just get to a point where I go to my

543
00:26:10.039 --> 00:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>brokerage account, I buy ether and in the background it's

544
00:26:12.680 --> 00:26:15.599
<v Speaker 1>automatically staken and it's a given. And I think that's

545
00:26:15.640 --> 00:26:18.319
<v Speaker 1>probably what like black Rock seeds like based on an

546
00:26:18.359 --> 00:26:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Ether product, like, they're not gonna launch a second ETF.

547
00:26:22.480 --> 00:26:25.400
<v Speaker 1>They're not gonna have one that's staked versus unstaked, like

548
00:26:25.519 --> 00:26:28.400
<v Speaker 1>based on the filing that I've seen, and it's just

549
00:26:28.519 --> 00:26:31.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna be one product with staking. Like so for me,

550
00:26:32.559 --> 00:26:34.559
<v Speaker 1>that just makes sense, Like why would you want to

551
00:26:34.640 --> 00:26:37.720
<v Speaker 1>leave all those rewards on the table. It's just again

552
00:26:37.799 --> 00:26:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that capital efficiency element is just critical.

553
00:26:40.599 --> 00:26:44.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that makes sense, And I know some people had talked, well,

554
00:26:44.400 --> 00:26:46.920
<v Speaker 2>we're putting the idea out there that maybe there's a

555
00:26:46.960 --> 00:26:49.519
<v Speaker 2>separate ETF, but to your point, doesn't really make sense.

556
00:26:50.119 --> 00:26:52.400
<v Speaker 2>And then it's better just keep it in that same

557
00:26:52.480 --> 00:26:54.759
<v Speaker 2>ETF and then you can either pay it out in

558
00:26:54.839 --> 00:26:57.119
<v Speaker 2>some sort of reward or dividen or just keep it

559
00:26:57.200 --> 00:26:58.960
<v Speaker 2>keeps reinvesting in compounding.

560
00:27:00.160 --> 00:27:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and of course then it's obviously a case of

561
00:27:02.640 --> 00:27:05.119
<v Speaker 1>like how much of it is staked. So again back

562
00:27:05.119 --> 00:27:07.559
<v Speaker 1>to that analogy of like in Europe, like only fifty

563
00:27:07.599 --> 00:27:11.960
<v Speaker 1>percent of the the au n estaked. When we go

564
00:27:12.119 --> 00:27:15.759
<v Speaker 1>only speak to different ASCID managers, we're really leaning on that. Look, Okay,

565
00:27:15.880 --> 00:27:19.119
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent is good, one hundred percent is far better.

566
00:27:19.759 --> 00:27:22.880
<v Speaker 1>So you could almost have potentially a combination. You could

567
00:27:22.920 --> 00:27:27.160
<v Speaker 1>have fifty percent natively staked, fifty percent liquid staked, or

568
00:27:27.279 --> 00:27:29.759
<v Speaker 1>you could have one hundred percent liquid state product. So

569
00:27:29.839 --> 00:27:33.079
<v Speaker 1>again you're kind of offering customization, and that's a big

570
00:27:33.200 --> 00:27:36.200
<v Speaker 1>part of what these institutions want. They want to have flexibility.

571
00:27:36.480 --> 00:27:38.119
<v Speaker 1>And one of the new products that lied Up is

572
00:27:38.160 --> 00:27:40.599
<v Speaker 1>working on is st vaults and like lighter V three

573
00:27:41.000 --> 00:27:44.799
<v Speaker 1>and part of that is offering that customization where different

574
00:27:44.839 --> 00:27:47.319
<v Speaker 1>asset managers can pick the custodian they work will pick

575
00:27:47.359 --> 00:27:50.119
<v Speaker 1>the note operator and choose if and when they mintsteeth.

576
00:27:50.480 --> 00:27:53.200
<v Speaker 1>So again, this kind of goes back to the future

577
00:27:53.200 --> 00:27:56.200
<v Speaker 1>of staking. That's why I really believe that institutional adoption

578
00:27:56.400 --> 00:27:57.319
<v Speaker 1>is only going to grow.

579
00:27:58.319 --> 00:28:00.880
<v Speaker 2>I love that customization so they can shoes what they

580
00:28:00.960 --> 00:28:04.519
<v Speaker 2>want to do. That's really great. Are there any criticisms

581
00:28:04.640 --> 00:28:07.839
<v Speaker 2>out there or things people have said that maybe this

582
00:28:08.039 --> 00:28:11.559
<v Speaker 2>is risky that you would want to address, or are

583
00:28:11.599 --> 00:28:15.319
<v Speaker 2>there common themes you know people put us on social media.

584
00:28:15.359 --> 00:28:17.039
<v Speaker 2>What it may be is saying, hey, this is risky.

585
00:28:18.359 --> 00:28:19.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, I know you mentioned like you're trying to

586
00:28:19.920 --> 00:28:24.119
<v Speaker 2>be more decentralized, avoid centralization. So how would you address

587
00:28:24.160 --> 00:28:26.920
<v Speaker 2>some of the critics and about certain risks and things

588
00:28:26.960 --> 00:28:28.200
<v Speaker 2>they may have highlighted.

589
00:28:28.680 --> 00:28:31.119
<v Speaker 1>I would say, like the biggest criticism that comes up,

590
00:28:31.160 --> 00:28:32.799
<v Speaker 1>and again I think this is just more from like

591
00:28:32.839 --> 00:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a lack of knowledge, is that like Lido has too

592
00:28:35.119 --> 00:28:39.720
<v Speaker 1>much control and like there's a centralization risk from Lido,

593
00:28:40.279 --> 00:28:42.599
<v Speaker 1>And I think like Glido's market share is around twenty

594
00:28:42.680 --> 00:28:45.519
<v Speaker 1>five percent right now. But one of the key things

595
00:28:45.599 --> 00:28:48.400
<v Speaker 1>that people forget is that Lodo is a middleware. Nothing

596
00:28:48.440 --> 00:28:51.160
<v Speaker 1>has actually staked with Lido. When you go on the

597
00:28:51.279 --> 00:28:54.000
<v Speaker 1>DAT you take your each you stake it. It's distributed

598
00:28:54.039 --> 00:28:57.920
<v Speaker 1>across six hundred different note operators. So yes, the headline

599
00:28:58.039 --> 00:29:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Lido has twenty five percent market good share is terrific

600
00:29:01.079 --> 00:29:02.559
<v Speaker 1>and that sells clicks.

601
00:29:02.640 --> 00:29:03.119
<v Speaker 3>That's true.

602
00:29:03.559 --> 00:29:06.160
<v Speaker 1>But in reality, when you start looking at it, like

603
00:29:06.519 --> 00:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Ido is doing a terrific amount of work to make

604
00:29:09.240 --> 00:29:12.559
<v Speaker 1>sure it's being distributed as much as it possibly can.

605
00:29:13.319 --> 00:29:16.400
<v Speaker 1>So I think the curated set, like I mentioned professional

606
00:29:16.480 --> 00:29:20.480
<v Speaker 1>note operators, we have community staking module, we have solo stakers.

607
00:29:20.839 --> 00:29:24.160
<v Speaker 1>We're trying to remove those barriers for community sakers and

608
00:29:24.240 --> 00:29:27.119
<v Speaker 1>solo stakers to get involved and making it as easy

609
00:29:27.119 --> 00:29:30.039
<v Speaker 1>as possible then for them to run notes. So I

610
00:29:30.079 --> 00:29:32.359
<v Speaker 1>would say that's the criticism that comes up quite a lot,

611
00:29:32.839 --> 00:29:35.680
<v Speaker 1>but it's not founded on any real merriage. It's more

612
00:29:35.799 --> 00:29:38.440
<v Speaker 1>someone has seen a headline and they haven't decided to

613
00:29:38.480 --> 00:29:39.519
<v Speaker 1>read the actual article.

614
00:29:40.200 --> 00:29:41.759
<v Speaker 2>That's a good one. Yeah, I've seen that one. So

615
00:29:41.920 --> 00:29:44.720
<v Speaker 2>I appreciate your addressing that. Are you able to share

616
00:29:45.240 --> 00:29:47.759
<v Speaker 2>the names of any institutions that are using your service?

617
00:29:48.039 --> 00:29:50.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, TRADFI institutions. It's okay if you can't, but

618
00:29:50.319 --> 00:29:51.720
<v Speaker 2>I got to ask, no.

619
00:29:51.759 --> 00:29:54.599
<v Speaker 1>It's fair question, but my answer will be quite high level.

620
00:29:54.799 --> 00:29:57.640
<v Speaker 1>So the usual kind of tier one asset managers' funds.

621
00:29:58.279 --> 00:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>We have a number of different liquid funds that use

622
00:30:00.480 --> 00:30:04.400
<v Speaker 1>us every day, and I would say on the collateral

623
00:30:04.519 --> 00:30:07.160
<v Speaker 1>side of things, you would see Steith used as collateral

624
00:30:09.160 --> 00:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>by these major kind of liquid funds. But unfortunately my

625
00:30:12.759 --> 00:30:14.559
<v Speaker 1>answer is going to have to be quite high level.

626
00:30:14.400 --> 00:30:18.799
<v Speaker 2>On that one. Totally understand what's on your road map.

627
00:30:18.880 --> 00:30:20.960
<v Speaker 2>I know you mentioned some things that you're working on,

628
00:30:21.039 --> 00:30:23.200
<v Speaker 2>customization so forth, anything else you want to highlight.

629
00:30:23.640 --> 00:30:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the big one for us right now is kind

630
00:30:25.319 --> 00:30:29.319
<v Speaker 1>of light of E three and st vaults. So, like, again,

631
00:30:29.400 --> 00:30:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it's kind of beating the drum on this.

632
00:30:31.440 --> 00:30:35.039
<v Speaker 1>Like the whole decentralization narrative for Lido or Liido Core

633
00:30:35.160 --> 00:30:38.279
<v Speaker 1>is terrific. But one of the big pieces of feedback

634
00:30:38.319 --> 00:30:40.519
<v Speaker 1>we've gotten from asset managers is that, look, we love

635
00:30:40.599 --> 00:30:43.599
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing supporting decentralization. We love the liquidity you

636
00:30:43.640 --> 00:30:47.000
<v Speaker 1>w get for Steeth, but for our internal risk department,

637
00:30:47.480 --> 00:30:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that's a bit of a challenge to kind of get

638
00:30:49.200 --> 00:30:52.000
<v Speaker 1>them over that hump. So the whole idea what sc

639
00:30:52.160 --> 00:30:55.359
<v Speaker 1>vaults is that customization piece. So again, the idea that

640
00:30:55.480 --> 00:30:57.720
<v Speaker 1>you can choose the custodian that you work with, whether

641
00:30:57.799 --> 00:31:00.759
<v Speaker 1>it's bit Go, copper, fire blocks, you can choose a

642
00:31:00.839 --> 00:31:03.440
<v Speaker 1>note operator that you work with figmunt Kill and Course

643
00:31:03.519 --> 00:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>one or whatever it may be. And then the final

644
00:31:05.720 --> 00:31:08.480
<v Speaker 1>part that's really attractive is that you can side if

645
00:31:08.519 --> 00:31:10.759
<v Speaker 1>and when you miss teeth, so you could have a

646
00:31:10.759 --> 00:31:14.480
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent natively state vault. Maybe your attempation quest

647
00:31:14.519 --> 00:31:16.640
<v Speaker 1>comes in. That's when you decide to mince teeth and

648
00:31:16.640 --> 00:31:18.759
<v Speaker 1>get out of your position. What I would say, the

649
00:31:18.880 --> 00:31:21.839
<v Speaker 1>customization part is amazing, Like I kind of look at

650
00:31:21.880 --> 00:31:23.880
<v Speaker 1>it as I have an extra tool in the toolbox

651
00:31:23.920 --> 00:31:26.039
<v Speaker 1>when I go and speak to these asset managers where

652
00:31:26.079 --> 00:31:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I can say, look, if you're comfortable using lider Core,

653
00:31:28.799 --> 00:31:31.359
<v Speaker 1>get all the benefits there, go down that route like

654
00:31:31.400 --> 00:31:33.920
<v Speaker 1>that as terrific. Whereas if we speak to kind of

655
00:31:33.960 --> 00:31:36.839
<v Speaker 1>institutions where they're more risk adverse, we can say, look,

656
00:31:37.200 --> 00:31:38.279
<v Speaker 1>here's a custom setup.

657
00:31:38.440 --> 00:31:39.200
<v Speaker 3>You can work with the.

658
00:31:39.200 --> 00:31:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Custodian you've been dealing with for the past ten to

659
00:31:41.200 --> 00:31:44.440
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years. Here is the node operator that you're already

660
00:31:44.480 --> 00:31:46.880
<v Speaker 1>on boarded, you have an SLA with, you have an

661
00:31:46.880 --> 00:31:49.480
<v Speaker 1>insurance policy in place, and then we come along with

662
00:31:49.559 --> 00:31:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the added benefit of liquidity.

663
00:31:51.559 --> 00:31:54.240
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to get your thoughts on the general crypto

664
00:31:54.319 --> 00:31:56.079
<v Speaker 2>market at large. You know, there's a lot happening with

665
00:31:56.160 --> 00:31:59.880
<v Speaker 2>tokenization and stable coins. Obviously we got the Genius Act pass,

666
00:32:00.279 --> 00:32:02.359
<v Speaker 2>and it seems like everyone's going to launch a stable coin,

667
00:32:02.480 --> 00:32:04.759
<v Speaker 2>banks and much more. Let's start with stable coins. What

668
00:32:04.799 --> 00:32:06.559
<v Speaker 2>are your thoughts on that market and do you expect

669
00:32:06.599 --> 00:32:07.359
<v Speaker 2>a massive boom?

670
00:32:07.720 --> 00:32:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I think yeah, at a high level, Like anyone who

671
00:32:10.039 --> 00:32:12.160
<v Speaker 1>says different, like where there's not going to be a

672
00:32:12.200 --> 00:32:15.200
<v Speaker 1>big boom is probably just crazy. Like again going back

673
00:32:15.200 --> 00:32:19.039
<v Speaker 1>to the point of like regulatory clarity is the terrific thing,

674
00:32:19.200 --> 00:32:22.119
<v Speaker 1>Like people know the rules of the game, and once

675
00:32:22.200 --> 00:32:25.880
<v Speaker 1>you get to a point where you're not expecting kind

676
00:32:25.920 --> 00:32:29.640
<v Speaker 1>of negative regulation or penalties in place, innovation will usually follow.

677
00:32:30.079 --> 00:32:33.079
<v Speaker 1>And I think, like what USDC is doing circle all

678
00:32:33.119 --> 00:32:36.799
<v Speaker 1>these huge successful IPOs, it does highlight that to a

679
00:32:36.880 --> 00:32:39.720
<v Speaker 1>significant demand for the capital markets to actually get involved

680
00:32:39.759 --> 00:32:41.920
<v Speaker 1>in these type of use cases. So I would be

681
00:32:42.039 --> 00:32:45.039
<v Speaker 1>very surprised if, like stable coins is not the next

682
00:32:45.160 --> 00:32:46.759
<v Speaker 1>killer use case for blockchain.

683
00:32:47.720 --> 00:32:49.759
<v Speaker 2>On the lines of stable coins, you get the tokenization

684
00:32:50.160 --> 00:32:52.559
<v Speaker 2>we were talking about black rocks and money market fun.

685
00:32:53.079 --> 00:32:56.319
<v Speaker 2>There's tokenization of real world assets happening. That market is

686
00:32:56.400 --> 00:32:58.880
<v Speaker 2>growing as well. What are your thoughts on that. Do

687
00:32:59.000 --> 00:33:01.839
<v Speaker 2>you see a lot of traditional asset stocks, real estate

688
00:33:01.880 --> 00:33:03.799
<v Speaker 2>and so forth being tokenized on the blockchain?

689
00:33:04.680 --> 00:33:06.799
<v Speaker 1>I think so, like black Rocks, biddle phone, it has

690
00:33:06.839 --> 00:33:11.200
<v Speaker 1>been hugely successful. Like real world assets, Again, tokenizing makes

691
00:33:11.200 --> 00:33:13.319
<v Speaker 1>a huge amount of sense from a liquidity point of view,

692
00:33:14.759 --> 00:33:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Like everyone wants liquidity. So when you especially take an

693
00:33:17.240 --> 00:33:21.160
<v Speaker 1>asset like property a liquid for centuries and suddenly a

694
00:33:21.240 --> 00:33:23.960
<v Speaker 1>technology has come along with blockchain and tokenization where you

695
00:33:24.000 --> 00:33:27.319
<v Speaker 1>can make it liquid. Fractionalized ownership like these just make

696
00:33:27.359 --> 00:33:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a huge amount of sense. And then I'm neither side

697
00:33:29.960 --> 00:33:33.200
<v Speaker 1>of that around like bonds and commodities, like the trading

698
00:33:33.240 --> 00:33:36.720
<v Speaker 1>of that automating with Smern contracts making more efficient, like

699
00:33:37.000 --> 00:33:38.400
<v Speaker 1>it kind of sells itself.

700
00:33:39.240 --> 00:33:43.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, Yeah, It's exciting. A lot happening in the industry,

701
00:33:43.839 --> 00:33:45.839
<v Speaker 2>and I think as we get the Clarity Act in

702
00:33:45.960 --> 00:33:48.440
<v Speaker 2>place passed by Congress here in the United States, I

703
00:33:48.519 --> 00:33:51.160
<v Speaker 2>think the innovation is just gonna surge. It's gonna be

704
00:33:51.200 --> 00:33:54.920
<v Speaker 2>a lot of building keen, great stuff. Love what Leto

705
00:33:55.079 --> 00:33:58.599
<v Speaker 2>is doing and you know, I might eat holder and

706
00:33:58.680 --> 00:34:01.680
<v Speaker 2>a steaker myself. Sell This is really really great stuff.

707
00:34:02.200 --> 00:34:05.200
<v Speaker 2>But I got some wrap up questions here for you. First,

708
00:34:05.240 --> 00:34:06.839
<v Speaker 2>If you could create your own metaverse, what would the

709
00:34:06.880 --> 00:34:07.160
<v Speaker 2>theme be.

710
00:34:07.759 --> 00:34:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm a big golfer, so probably golf related.

711
00:34:10.599 --> 00:34:15.199
<v Speaker 2>Rapid fire questions, favorite food steak, favorite musician or band.

712
00:34:16.079 --> 00:34:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Beatles, favorite movie Interstellar, favorite book, how to make friends

713
00:34:21.320 --> 00:34:22.119
<v Speaker 1>and influence people?

714
00:34:22.519 --> 00:34:24.079
<v Speaker 2>And when you're not working at Lighter, what are you

715
00:34:24.119 --> 00:34:24.840
<v Speaker 2>doing for fun.

716
00:34:25.760 --> 00:34:28.199
<v Speaker 3>Golf when I can? Yeah, that makes sense.

717
00:34:28.599 --> 00:34:31.039
<v Speaker 2>Keen, great stuff, man. I love again what you guys

718
00:34:31.079 --> 00:34:33.960
<v Speaker 2>are doing, and I absolutely believe in it. I'm looking

719
00:34:34.000 --> 00:34:38.079
<v Speaker 2>forward to hearing some big announcements of your service being

720
00:34:38.159 --> 00:34:39.960
<v Speaker 2>used by some of the biggest firms in the world

721
00:34:39.960 --> 00:34:41.679
<v Speaker 2>and would love to have you back on in the future.

722
00:34:41.719 --> 00:34:43.239
<v Speaker 2>But thank you so much for joining me.
