WEBVTT

1
00:00:02.799 --> 00:00:06.759
<v Speaker 1>Well with they come and take my pain, the moneys,

2
00:00:06.879 --> 00:00:09.119
<v Speaker 1>my rain, Oh whiskey.

3
00:00:10.000 --> 00:00:12.400
<v Speaker 2>Why think alone when you can drink it all? In

4
00:00:12.519 --> 00:00:17.440
<v Speaker 2>with Ricochet's Three Whiskey Happy Hour, join your bartenders, Steve Hayward,

5
00:00:17.640 --> 00:00:25.879
<v Speaker 2>John U and the International Woman of Mystery, Lucretia, where.

6
00:00:25.800 --> 00:00:30.039
<v Speaker 3>The slap happen David hain't easy on the should tap,

7
00:00:30.239 --> 00:00:32.920
<v Speaker 3>got a giving and let that whiskey.

8
00:00:32.600 --> 00:00:35.439
<v Speaker 2>Flo So settle in everyone for what may be the

9
00:00:35.479 --> 00:00:38.439
<v Speaker 2>most gonzo episode ever of the Three Whiskey Happy Hour.

10
00:00:38.640 --> 00:00:40.600
<v Speaker 2>In fact, you might want to call it the Three

11
00:00:40.600 --> 00:00:44.759
<v Speaker 2>Whiskey Happy Hour squared because it was taped live during

12
00:00:44.759 --> 00:00:47.679
<v Speaker 2>a happy hour at the Washington Hilton at the annual

13
00:00:47.719 --> 00:00:50.280
<v Speaker 2>meeting of the Federal Society, where John, You and I

14
00:00:50.399 --> 00:00:52.679
<v Speaker 2>are present and annoying everyone in sight.

15
00:00:53.200 --> 00:00:54.200
<v Speaker 4>We did this last year.

16
00:00:54.280 --> 00:00:56.840
<v Speaker 2>What we did was just wrangle up whoever happened to

17
00:00:56.880 --> 00:00:59.520
<v Speaker 2>be wandering by the most quiet spot we could find

18
00:00:59.560 --> 00:01:04.120
<v Speaker 2>in the Hilton, which wasn't that quiet. And this year

19
00:01:04.200 --> 00:01:08.359
<v Speaker 2>we are pleased to highlight several luminaries from the legal world.

20
00:01:09.000 --> 00:01:11.599
<v Speaker 4>In particular, we are joined by Akil.

21
00:01:11.319 --> 00:01:14.799
<v Speaker 2>Almar of Yale Law School and Yale University to talk

22
00:01:14.840 --> 00:01:19.719
<v Speaker 2>about his brand new book Born Equal, remaking America's Constitution

23
00:01:19.879 --> 00:01:22.959
<v Speaker 2>from eighteen forty to nineteen twenty. But along the way

24
00:01:23.040 --> 00:01:26.680
<v Speaker 2>we're joined by Roger Palan, the longtime director of Constitutional

25
00:01:26.719 --> 00:01:30.480
<v Speaker 2>Studies at the Cato Institute. Judge William Pryor, the Chief

26
00:01:30.560 --> 00:01:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Judge of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, drops by

27
00:01:33.200 --> 00:01:36.680
<v Speaker 2>briefly to say a couple of things. Elan Worman, one

28
00:01:36.719 --> 00:01:40.000
<v Speaker 2>of the rising young stars of the Conservative Legal Academy

29
00:01:40.000 --> 00:01:43.280
<v Speaker 2>from the University of Minnesota, wanders by and treats us

30
00:01:43.319 --> 00:01:46.680
<v Speaker 2>to a delightful discussion of the issue of birthright citizenship.

31
00:01:47.000 --> 00:01:47.480
<v Speaker 4>And then of.

32
00:01:47.439 --> 00:01:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Course our old pal Hadley Arcis drops by. Hadley of

33
00:01:51.040 --> 00:01:54.560
<v Speaker 2>course needs no introduction. John Yu floats in and out,

34
00:01:54.920 --> 00:01:59.879
<v Speaker 2>of course, doing his usual loitering and quips.

35
00:01:59.760 --> 00:02:00.680
<v Speaker 4>Ingests and so forth.

36
00:02:01.359 --> 00:02:05.120
<v Speaker 2>But I'm going to pick up with our discussion with

37
00:02:05.200 --> 00:02:06.879
<v Speaker 2>a ki La mar about his book.

38
00:02:08.000 --> 00:02:10.439
<v Speaker 4>And unfortunately we had to let a number of people.

39
00:02:10.199 --> 00:02:12.919
<v Speaker 2>Who wandered by the law fall to the cutting room floor,

40
00:02:13.039 --> 00:02:15.120
<v Speaker 2>just because we don't have enough time for that long

41
00:02:15.159 --> 00:02:15.800
<v Speaker 2>an episode.

42
00:02:16.280 --> 00:02:18.400
<v Speaker 4>And you'll just have to bear with the rough.

43
00:02:18.159 --> 00:02:21.520
<v Speaker 2>And raw and authentic I'll call it a character of

44
00:02:21.520 --> 00:02:24.719
<v Speaker 2>the sound and some of the abrupt transitions, but without

45
00:02:24.840 --> 00:02:27.840
<v Speaker 2>further ado, let's get started right away with the ki

46
00:02:27.919 --> 00:02:30.919
<v Speaker 2>lamr so.

47
00:02:31.120 --> 00:02:33.120
<v Speaker 4>So kil I can't.

48
00:02:33.280 --> 00:02:36.000
<v Speaker 2>I only had your book Born Equal for two hours.

49
00:02:36.479 --> 00:02:39.199
<v Speaker 2>I have flipped through a few pages to realize that, oh,

50
00:02:39.599 --> 00:02:42.520
<v Speaker 2>this is a rival to maybe Gary Wills about the

51
00:02:42.520 --> 00:02:46.240
<v Speaker 2>centrality of the Gettysburg address really and also to my

52
00:02:46.840 --> 00:02:50.479
<v Speaker 2>teacher controversial with many of Harry Jaffa, who was always

53
00:02:50.479 --> 00:02:51.360
<v Speaker 2>trying to work up who.

54
00:02:51.199 --> 00:02:52.800
<v Speaker 4>Would never got to the Gettysburg address.

55
00:02:52.800 --> 00:02:56.520
<v Speaker 2>But right he has all the teachings about equality and

56
00:02:56.560 --> 00:03:00.400
<v Speaker 2>so forth. And I also was expecting I'm not sure

57
00:03:00.400 --> 00:03:01.199
<v Speaker 2>why I was expecting this.

58
00:03:01.919 --> 00:03:03.680
<v Speaker 4>I thought, oh, it's going to be one of those

59
00:03:03.759 --> 00:03:05.479
<v Speaker 4>legal now, so go through the cases and all the

60
00:03:05.479 --> 00:03:05.759
<v Speaker 4>rest of that.

61
00:03:05.879 --> 00:03:06.159
<v Speaker 5>It's not.

62
00:03:06.280 --> 00:03:08.479
<v Speaker 4>There's a narrative here. Sorry, I'm being too long.

63
00:03:08.840 --> 00:03:13.039
<v Speaker 2>You want to give us a you know, the abstract,

64
00:03:13.400 --> 00:03:15.680
<v Speaker 2>the summary of what you're doing in this book, and

65
00:03:15.719 --> 00:03:17.680
<v Speaker 2>maybe two or three key takeaways.

66
00:03:18.319 --> 00:03:21.240
<v Speaker 6>What you said was brilliant. You've looked at it, and

67
00:03:21.280 --> 00:03:24.840
<v Speaker 6>you've got me just right. If you ask me which

68
00:03:25.199 --> 00:03:30.080
<v Speaker 6>ten or fifteen books were most influential for me, which

69
00:03:30.120 --> 00:03:33.120
<v Speaker 6>I was most trying to be Like Gary Willis's Lincoln

70
00:03:33.120 --> 00:03:35.639
<v Speaker 6>at Gettysburg would have been on that list, and Harry

71
00:03:35.719 --> 00:03:39.080
<v Speaker 6>Jaffers Crisis of the House Divided would have been on

72
00:03:39.120 --> 00:03:41.960
<v Speaker 6>that list. Harry Jaffer wrote the best book about the

73
00:03:42.000 --> 00:03:47.120
<v Speaker 6>Lincoln Douglas Debates. I say in the PostScript, I've written

74
00:03:47.159 --> 00:03:49.759
<v Speaker 6>the best single chapter, so you don't have to read.

75
00:03:49.800 --> 00:03:52.240
<v Speaker 7>The whole Harry Jaffer book.

76
00:03:52.719 --> 00:03:56.319
<v Speaker 6>You know, one stop shopping for the Lincoln Douglas Debates.

77
00:03:56.360 --> 00:03:59.879
<v Speaker 6>And in a nutshell, I'm trying to tell the story

78
00:04:00.439 --> 00:04:05.039
<v Speaker 6>of eighty years of American history from eighteen forty to

79
00:04:05.159 --> 00:04:10.039
<v Speaker 6>nineteen twenty, and the big idea is birth equality. We

80
00:04:10.240 --> 00:04:14.560
<v Speaker 6>begin in eighteen forty with millions of Americans enslaved, and

81
00:04:15.039 --> 00:04:21.600
<v Speaker 6>we experience a civil war and four Linconian amendments that

82
00:04:21.639 --> 00:04:25.240
<v Speaker 6>affirm this idea that we're all created equal, we're all

83
00:04:25.279 --> 00:04:30.759
<v Speaker 6>born equal, we're born equally free. That's the thirteenth Amendment.

84
00:04:30.800 --> 00:04:33.759
<v Speaker 6>No one's born a slave, no one's born a slave master.

85
00:04:34.920 --> 00:04:38.759
<v Speaker 6>People in America under the American flag, born on American soil,

86
00:04:38.879 --> 00:04:43.000
<v Speaker 6>are born equal citizens with civil rights, whether they're black

87
00:04:43.079 --> 00:04:43.759
<v Speaker 6>or white.

88
00:04:43.920 --> 00:04:44.879
<v Speaker 7>Male or female.

89
00:04:45.360 --> 00:04:47.879
<v Speaker 6>A fifteenth Amendment comes along and says, whether you're black

90
00:04:47.959 --> 00:04:51.959
<v Speaker 6>or white, you have equal voting rights, political rights, and

91
00:04:52.000 --> 00:04:57.199
<v Speaker 6>eventually by nineteen twenty a fourth amendment. It's often people

92
00:04:57.199 --> 00:04:59.439
<v Speaker 6>often talk about the three Reconstruction Amendments.

93
00:04:59.519 --> 00:05:01.720
<v Speaker 7>This is a four fifty years later also.

94
00:05:01.480 --> 00:05:05.240
<v Speaker 6>Linconian saying, whether you're born male or female, you have.

95
00:05:05.480 --> 00:05:07.800
<v Speaker 7>Equal voting rights, equal political rights.

96
00:05:07.839 --> 00:05:10.759
<v Speaker 6>And I try to tell the story of what these

97
00:05:10.800 --> 00:05:13.079
<v Speaker 6>amendments mean and how they happen.

98
00:05:13.279 --> 00:05:13.879
<v Speaker 8>Let me break in.

99
00:05:14.000 --> 00:05:17.639
<v Speaker 3>So this is John you co host with Steve and

100
00:05:18.160 --> 00:05:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Akill was my teacher at Yale. I have to say

101
00:05:22.040 --> 00:05:24.399
<v Speaker 3>this is the only book of Acquelles I haven't read yet,

102
00:05:24.519 --> 00:05:26.199
<v Speaker 3>because I've read all the other ones, but this one's

103
00:05:26.240 --> 00:05:29.079
<v Speaker 3>hot off the press. And rogers, do you want sticking

104
00:05:29.079 --> 00:05:34.360
<v Speaker 3>around to be a participant slash heckler? And so I

105
00:05:34.399 --> 00:05:37.600
<v Speaker 3>know you go full more agreeing with Lincoln. Yes, also

106
00:05:37.639 --> 00:05:41.720
<v Speaker 3>agree with him that fundamental equality and nation had started

107
00:05:41.800 --> 00:05:44.600
<v Speaker 3>not in seventeen eighty seven or eighty nine, or even

108
00:05:44.680 --> 00:05:49.160
<v Speaker 3>really eighteen sixty eight, but in seventeen seventy six.

109
00:05:49.560 --> 00:05:53.279
<v Speaker 6>So the first words of the book are from his

110
00:05:53.279 --> 00:05:54.920
<v Speaker 6>Gettysburg address.

111
00:05:55.639 --> 00:05:55.959
<v Speaker 7>And.

112
00:05:57.839 --> 00:06:05.759
<v Speaker 6>He says that the union precedes the Constitution. He may

113
00:06:05.759 --> 00:06:09.319
<v Speaker 6>be right, it's not an indivisible union in my view

114
00:06:09.399 --> 00:06:15.079
<v Speaker 6>until the Constitution. But he begins very famously in eighteen

115
00:06:15.160 --> 00:06:19.240
<v Speaker 6>sixty three saying, eighty seven years earlier, four scorn seven

116
00:06:19.319 --> 00:06:22.839
<v Speaker 6>years ago, our father's brought forth upon this continent a

117
00:06:22.959 --> 00:06:25.759
<v Speaker 6>new nation. So he's saying it is seventeen seventy six,

118
00:06:26.399 --> 00:06:32.360
<v Speaker 6>no conceived in liberty, not slavery. Roger and his friends

119
00:06:32.439 --> 00:06:38.319
<v Speaker 6>emphasize right before government. It's conceived in liberty and dedicated

120
00:06:38.319 --> 00:06:41.319
<v Speaker 6>to the proposition that all men are created equals. So

121
00:06:41.399 --> 00:06:44.560
<v Speaker 6>that's Lincoln's idea. It's a contested idea.

122
00:06:44.800 --> 00:06:45.199
<v Speaker 4>You're right.

123
00:06:45.279 --> 00:06:46.800
<v Speaker 3>So this is the question. I want to press you

124
00:06:46.839 --> 00:06:49.160
<v Speaker 3>on a quiel and forgive me. I've got my Glenn

125
00:06:49.160 --> 00:06:52.439
<v Speaker 3>Buran g ten year Steve is drinking martini, so he's

126
00:06:52.480 --> 00:06:56.040
<v Speaker 3>not actually having whiskey. Roger's red wine a kiel as

127
00:06:56.079 --> 00:07:01.040
<v Speaker 3>always is sober so also, but I want to know

128
00:07:01.079 --> 00:07:04.000
<v Speaker 3>it kills what you think I'm When did the nation start?

129
00:07:04.040 --> 00:07:05.120
<v Speaker 4>When did the American keep?

130
00:07:05.319 --> 00:07:06.240
<v Speaker 7>Okay, I think the.

131
00:07:08.000 --> 00:07:12.519
<v Speaker 6>Idea of an America, the United States of America is

132
00:07:12.560 --> 00:07:17.720
<v Speaker 6>seventeen seventy six. But they're free and equal states. They're

133
00:07:19.000 --> 00:07:22.480
<v Speaker 6>free and independent states. They're independent even of each other

134
00:07:23.120 --> 00:07:24.639
<v Speaker 6>until the Constitution.

135
00:07:24.959 --> 00:07:26.399
<v Speaker 7>They could choose to leave.

136
00:07:26.279 --> 00:07:29.800
<v Speaker 6>To brexit. It's merely a confederation. Each state is sovereign

137
00:07:29.879 --> 00:07:34.600
<v Speaker 6>under the articles. So the Constitution takes USA one point zero,

138
00:07:34.839 --> 00:07:38.240
<v Speaker 6>which begins in seventeen seventy six, and makes it two

139
00:07:38.319 --> 00:07:43.240
<v Speaker 6>point zho. It's like a corporate merger, a union that's indivisible.

140
00:07:42.759 --> 00:07:48.160
<v Speaker 3>And they're one American people with all equal rights before

141
00:07:48.199 --> 00:07:48.879
<v Speaker 3>the Constitution.

142
00:07:48.959 --> 00:07:49.399
<v Speaker 7>This is real.

143
00:07:49.839 --> 00:07:52.519
<v Speaker 3>This is what's confronting the Supreme Court in several issues.

144
00:07:52.560 --> 00:07:52.720
<v Speaker 9>Now.

145
00:07:52.920 --> 00:07:56.680
<v Speaker 6>See so I go through in my chapter on the

146
00:07:56.759 --> 00:08:00.720
<v Speaker 6>Lincoln Douglas debates and give you the reader no fewer

147
00:08:00.759 --> 00:08:05.240
<v Speaker 6>than ten different ways in which these five words all

148
00:08:05.240 --> 00:08:08.160
<v Speaker 6>men are created equal could be read and were read

149
00:08:08.519 --> 00:08:12.000
<v Speaker 6>in the middle of the nineteenth century. And Lincoln himself

150
00:08:12.079 --> 00:08:17.199
<v Speaker 6>evolves along this radiant He initially says, all men are

151
00:08:17.279 --> 00:08:22.480
<v Speaker 6>born or created equally free, They're equal in life, liberty,

152
00:08:22.480 --> 00:08:26.079
<v Speaker 6>and the pursuit of happiness. And he says, I Abraham Lincoln.

153
00:08:26.240 --> 00:08:28.800
<v Speaker 6>He says this in eighteen fifty eight in Lincoln Negalice space.

154
00:08:29.000 --> 00:08:34.039
<v Speaker 6>I'm not in favor of Negro citizenship. But he evolves yes, yes,

155
00:08:34.360 --> 00:08:36.360
<v Speaker 6>and then by the end of his life he's going

156
00:08:36.399 --> 00:08:40.440
<v Speaker 6>to be in favor of equal citizenship, equal voting rights.

157
00:08:40.519 --> 00:08:44.840
<v Speaker 6>So these amendments thirteen, fourteen, fifteen are going to track

158
00:08:45.039 --> 00:08:48.279
<v Speaker 6>Lincoln's own evolution in a way. If you're if you're

159
00:08:48.320 --> 00:08:53.000
<v Speaker 6>inclined to the biological we say ontogeny recapitulates phylogical aid,

160
00:08:53.559 --> 00:08:57.759
<v Speaker 6>you know, but the thirteenth, fourteenth, and fifteenth recapitulate Abe's

161
00:08:57.799 --> 00:09:01.679
<v Speaker 6>own evolution on equal quality, and you the reader will

162
00:09:01.679 --> 00:09:04.759
<v Speaker 6>be able to trace how he moves from equally free,

163
00:09:05.120 --> 00:09:08.480
<v Speaker 6>to equally citizens to equal voters black and white, and

164
00:09:08.519 --> 00:09:12.320
<v Speaker 6>eventually even though he's dead, you know, I think he

165
00:09:12.399 --> 00:09:15.639
<v Speaker 6>would have embraced the idea of equal voting male and female.

166
00:09:15.759 --> 00:09:18.039
<v Speaker 8>So Steve, can I jump in here?

167
00:09:18.159 --> 00:09:20.159
<v Speaker 2>No, wait a minute, Hold on a second, because there's

168
00:09:20.159 --> 00:09:20.799
<v Speaker 2>something he said.

169
00:09:20.879 --> 00:09:23.519
<v Speaker 4>I'm very kind of particular about it. Just quick digression.

170
00:09:24.000 --> 00:09:26.720
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it's in your book that if maybe I expect

171
00:09:26.759 --> 00:09:29.600
<v Speaker 2>you know it. Even if it's not there, there's an

172
00:09:29.600 --> 00:09:32.840
<v Speaker 2>equivocation about Lincoln that I think is significant. You mentioned it,

173
00:09:32.919 --> 00:09:36.600
<v Speaker 2>So I'm not for negro equality. The way you actually

174
00:09:36.639 --> 00:09:39.200
<v Speaker 2>put it is very only if you're paying attention. Do

175
00:09:39.240 --> 00:09:41.440
<v Speaker 2>we notice that he would say I'm not now, nor

176
00:09:41.519 --> 00:09:42.480
<v Speaker 2>have I ever been.

177
00:09:43.679 --> 00:09:45.360
<v Speaker 4>He didn't say what he would.

178
00:09:45.080 --> 00:09:50.639
<v Speaker 7>Be exactly okay, and he does. He grows, he's a ratchet.

179
00:09:50.840 --> 00:09:56.519
<v Speaker 6>He never actually regresses political opportunities open up. I think

180
00:09:56.559 --> 00:10:00.679
<v Speaker 6>he wants to move in certain directions. He's never the

181
00:10:00.720 --> 00:10:04.960
<v Speaker 6>most forward leaning politician at any moment in his life,

182
00:10:04.960 --> 00:10:08.320
<v Speaker 6>but at every moment I think he's the most forward

183
00:10:08.399 --> 00:10:10.399
<v Speaker 6>leaning who has the chance of getting elected.

184
00:10:10.480 --> 00:10:13.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay, right now we're in we're in complete agreem

185
00:10:13.440 --> 00:10:15.480
<v Speaker 2>about let me do once more more sequel. I just

186
00:10:15.519 --> 00:10:17.840
<v Speaker 2>want to get your opinion. I'd mentioned, you know, Jeffung,

187
00:10:17.840 --> 00:10:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Gary Wills. I think the John Burke Burt book Lincoln's

188
00:10:22.080 --> 00:10:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Tragic Pragmatism.

189
00:10:23.440 --> 00:10:24.360
<v Speaker 7>Which I don't know.

190
00:10:24.519 --> 00:10:27.240
<v Speaker 4>Oh, it's worth reading. I'll just say it's a magnificent book.

191
00:10:27.279 --> 00:10:30.600
<v Speaker 3>Steve enough talking about what you read a new guests

192
00:10:30.639 --> 00:10:34.080
<v Speaker 3>along with a killed Judge William Pryor, who is I

193
00:10:34.120 --> 00:10:37.440
<v Speaker 3>think in many ways responsible oh for originalism.

194
00:10:37.679 --> 00:10:40.960
<v Speaker 4>So, by the way, Judge Pryor, you you were this sorry,

195
00:10:41.000 --> 00:10:42.879
<v Speaker 4>sorry you, no, no no, I did want to get

196
00:10:42.879 --> 00:10:43.679
<v Speaker 4>back to the literary.

197
00:10:43.720 --> 00:10:47.200
<v Speaker 6>But my friend Judge Pryor has actually started reading the book,

198
00:10:47.519 --> 00:10:48.399
<v Speaker 6>so he's.

199
00:10:48.159 --> 00:10:50.039
<v Speaker 4>In your pagent. It's awesome.

200
00:10:50.159 --> 00:10:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, thank you so, Judge pryor when I think you

201
00:10:52.639 --> 00:10:54.679
<v Speaker 2>were just like this is twenty eight years ago, when

202
00:10:54.679 --> 00:10:56.679
<v Speaker 2>you were just a lawyer prior or something.

203
00:10:56.840 --> 00:11:01.120
<v Speaker 4>Was attorney general. Attorney General. A fabulous review of my

204
00:11:01.240 --> 00:11:01.919
<v Speaker 4>the first volume.

205
00:11:01.960 --> 00:11:05.000
<v Speaker 2>My Reagan did two volumes. It was I was bowled

206
00:11:05.000 --> 00:11:09.399
<v Speaker 2>over by how nice it was. He finally great to

207
00:11:09.440 --> 00:11:11.039
<v Speaker 2>meet you in person, Thank you, et cetera.

208
00:11:12.080 --> 00:11:13.080
<v Speaker 4>As well. I enjoyed.

209
00:11:13.840 --> 00:11:15.840
<v Speaker 10>I enjoyed the sequel as well.

210
00:11:15.840 --> 00:11:16.159
<v Speaker 4>Thank you.

211
00:11:16.480 --> 00:11:19.519
<v Speaker 2>Right, well, let me do one last question for you.

212
00:11:19.559 --> 00:11:21.799
<v Speaker 2>Maybe not last question, but and then Roger wants to

213
00:11:21.799 --> 00:11:22.080
<v Speaker 2>get in.

214
00:11:22.120 --> 00:11:23.759
<v Speaker 4>But I would like to ask a.

215
00:11:23.679 --> 00:11:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Literary question, which is because having written some long narratives myself,

216
00:11:29.480 --> 00:11:31.440
<v Speaker 2>are there any discoveries along the way?

217
00:11:31.519 --> 00:11:33.200
<v Speaker 4>Did does something surprise you?

218
00:11:33.360 --> 00:11:36.080
<v Speaker 2>Is it something jump out as something you hadn't expected

219
00:11:36.159 --> 00:11:37.399
<v Speaker 2>or you thought is more important?

220
00:11:37.440 --> 00:11:38.440
<v Speaker 4>It needed to be brought out.

221
00:11:38.840 --> 00:11:44.600
<v Speaker 6>So many things I try to categalog category catalog them

222
00:11:44.639 --> 00:11:46.600
<v Speaker 6>in the PostScript.

223
00:11:46.679 --> 00:11:48.399
<v Speaker 7>Well, let me mention two or three.

224
00:11:49.279 --> 00:11:56.000
<v Speaker 6>One, since we talked about literary interests, I introduced the

225
00:11:56.039 --> 00:12:02.320
<v Speaker 6>reader to America's first female superstar. Everyone's talking about her,

226
00:12:02.639 --> 00:12:06.559
<v Speaker 6>and she's fallen out of the can and the conversation

227
00:12:07.440 --> 00:12:11.159
<v Speaker 6>Harriet Beecher Stowe is huge, and she's a literary figure.

228
00:12:11.240 --> 00:12:14.080
<v Speaker 6>She writes a book it sells more copies than any

229
00:12:14.120 --> 00:12:17.440
<v Speaker 6>other book by an American of the century, and we've

230
00:12:17.440 --> 00:12:22.559
<v Speaker 6>forgotten about her. So before Taylor Swift or Beyonce or

231
00:12:22.679 --> 00:12:26.480
<v Speaker 6>Hillary Clinton or Kamala Harris or even eleanor Roosevelt, there

232
00:12:26.600 --> 00:12:30.080
<v Speaker 6>is Harriet Beecher Stowe, and no woman at the founding

233
00:12:30.399 --> 00:12:32.679
<v Speaker 6>is the center of political discourse.

234
00:12:32.720 --> 00:12:33.919
<v Speaker 7>Abigail is off stage.

235
00:12:33.960 --> 00:12:37.879
<v Speaker 6>So that's the women in the in who read the

236
00:12:37.879 --> 00:12:42.159
<v Speaker 6>book are gonna really love getting to know Harriet Beecher

237
00:12:42.200 --> 00:12:45.799
<v Speaker 6>Stowe and Elizabeth Katy Stanton, who's amazing. The second big

238
00:12:45.840 --> 00:12:49.919
<v Speaker 6>thing that I think is really important to emphasize is

239
00:12:50.240 --> 00:12:55.679
<v Speaker 6>there is an abolition project in the North that begins

240
00:12:56.000 --> 00:13:00.000
<v Speaker 6>as early as seventeen seventy six. The ancient world has slavery,

241
00:13:00.080 --> 00:13:03.720
<v Speaker 6>it has the idea of freeing individual slaves. Sixteen nineteen,

242
00:13:03.759 --> 00:13:06.799
<v Speaker 6>in my view, is not that significant to date because

243
00:13:06.919 --> 00:13:09.320
<v Speaker 6>there was slavery in the New World and the old

244
00:13:09.320 --> 00:13:12.879
<v Speaker 6>world before sixteen nineteen. Here's the new thing in the world,

245
00:13:13.440 --> 00:13:18.639
<v Speaker 6>not freeing slaves, but ending slavery, and that's an American idea.

246
00:13:19.000 --> 00:13:22.759
<v Speaker 6>It begins in Philadelphia, in seventeen seventy five and seventeen

247
00:13:22.840 --> 00:13:28.559
<v Speaker 6>seventy six, and by seventeen seventy six, northern state constitutions

248
00:13:28.840 --> 00:13:32.600
<v Speaker 6>are committing themselves in Pennsylvania and three years later, four

249
00:13:32.679 --> 00:13:36.759
<v Speaker 6>years later in Massachusetts to this concept that all men

250
00:13:36.840 --> 00:13:42.080
<v Speaker 6>are born free and born equally free and independent, and

251
00:13:42.159 --> 00:13:45.000
<v Speaker 6>that is going to lead to not freeing slaves, but

252
00:13:45.360 --> 00:13:50.960
<v Speaker 6>abolishing slavery in Pennsylvania in Massachusetts very early on. And

253
00:13:51.039 --> 00:13:54.759
<v Speaker 6>most Americans don't know about that abolition project, which is

254
00:13:54.759 --> 00:13:57.000
<v Speaker 6>an American project, which is, of course, since I'm in

255
00:13:57.039 --> 00:14:01.279
<v Speaker 6>the presence of Roger Pielant, a libertarian project. It's about

256
00:14:01.440 --> 00:14:06.720
<v Speaker 6>liberty and and Abe Lincoln channels all that when he

257
00:14:06.960 --> 00:14:13.080
<v Speaker 6>goes back and says, yes, they didn't eliminate slavery, and

258
00:14:13.120 --> 00:14:16.120
<v Speaker 6>they said all men are created equal, but they committed

259
00:14:16.159 --> 00:14:21.399
<v Speaker 6>themselves in effect to an abolitionist project. Say here is

260
00:14:21.480 --> 00:14:24.159
<v Speaker 6>true North, this is the North Star. And people like

261
00:14:24.200 --> 00:14:27.759
<v Speaker 6>Harry Jaffa understand that. So Jaffa is important for me.

262
00:14:27.960 --> 00:14:32.279
<v Speaker 6>Now I'm told I'm told he was a cantankerous Fellows

263
00:14:32.559 --> 00:14:34.440
<v Speaker 6>and I never met him in the flesh, and I'm

264
00:14:34.440 --> 00:14:37.440
<v Speaker 6>told that Bill Buckley once said, you think disagreeing with

265
00:14:37.480 --> 00:14:38.360
<v Speaker 6>Harry Jaff is hard.

266
00:14:38.399 --> 00:14:39.200
<v Speaker 7>Try agreeing with that.

267
00:14:41.279 --> 00:14:44.399
<v Speaker 6>But he did influence me, and so did Gary Wills,

268
00:14:44.600 --> 00:14:49.799
<v Speaker 6>so did Gordon Wood, so did Ed Larson, and so

269
00:14:49.879 --> 00:14:50.919
<v Speaker 6>did the great Jim Oaks.

270
00:14:51.399 --> 00:14:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Quick factual question is the famous story of Lincoln saying

271
00:14:56.000 --> 00:14:56.399
<v Speaker 2>to HARRYT.

272
00:14:56.399 --> 00:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Beecher Stowe, so you're the little lady who causes great

273
00:14:58.639 --> 00:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>big war?

274
00:14:59.080 --> 00:14:59.559
<v Speaker 4>Is that true?

275
00:15:00.000 --> 00:15:01.960
<v Speaker 7>It is? And some people have said it's not.

276
00:15:02.279 --> 00:15:05.519
<v Speaker 6>And actually there's a fellow whom you know, I believe,

277
00:15:05.639 --> 00:15:10.919
<v Speaker 6>Roger Tim Sandefern, who writes a review saying that I

278
00:15:11.000 --> 00:15:14.679
<v Speaker 6>got that wrong. And I'm telling your audience here now

279
00:15:14.919 --> 00:15:18.080
<v Speaker 6>I'm doubling down on that. Since that review came out,

280
00:15:18.279 --> 00:15:23.039
<v Speaker 6>I quadruple checked all my sources, and he cites something

281
00:15:23.279 --> 00:15:27.919
<v Speaker 6>that actually misses a lot that actually I believe happened.

282
00:15:28.240 --> 00:15:31.519
<v Speaker 6>And here's some of my evidence for it. Because I

283
00:15:31.720 --> 00:15:37.559
<v Speaker 6>am always interested in trying to find primary sources and

284
00:15:37.639 --> 00:15:43.840
<v Speaker 6>contemporaneous sources to confirm the legends. So I have contemporaneous

285
00:15:43.879 --> 00:15:48.159
<v Speaker 6>sources saying Harry Beecherstowe was there that week, and it's

286
00:15:48.200 --> 00:15:52.639
<v Speaker 6>the newspapers. She clearly was there, and the first published

287
00:15:52.720 --> 00:15:56.360
<v Speaker 6>reports that this is what she said came out within

288
00:15:56.840 --> 00:16:02.039
<v Speaker 6>weeks of her own death in the Atlanta magazine, when

289
00:16:02.120 --> 00:16:06.039
<v Speaker 6>her children were still alive. And if this reporter is

290
00:16:06.080 --> 00:16:08.960
<v Speaker 6>making all that up, her children are immediately going to say, no.

291
00:16:09.000 --> 00:16:09.840
<v Speaker 7>You made that up.

292
00:16:09.879 --> 00:16:13.799
<v Speaker 6>So I have every reason to think that actually she

293
00:16:13.879 --> 00:16:21.159
<v Speaker 6>said that the canonical accounts of this famous exchange come

294
00:16:21.279 --> 00:16:25.480
<v Speaker 6>from her own children, saying that we got this from

295
00:16:25.519 --> 00:16:25.960
<v Speaker 6>our mom.

296
00:16:26.519 --> 00:16:28.240
<v Speaker 7>And I don't think she was a liar, right.

297
00:16:28.759 --> 00:16:31.320
<v Speaker 2>It's always seemed metaphysically right to me. And I know

298
00:16:31.360 --> 00:16:33.799
<v Speaker 2>Tim Sanderfer. He's a stubborn guy, so I get it.

299
00:16:34.399 --> 00:16:38.720
<v Speaker 6>And it sounds like Lincoln, see, because little Lady is

300
00:16:38.759 --> 00:16:41.080
<v Speaker 6>the kind of formulation that he used.

301
00:16:41.080 --> 00:16:43.960
<v Speaker 7>He you know, he called you know, his wife Lila.

302
00:16:44.399 --> 00:16:46.440
<v Speaker 6>And Harriet might not know that, but but I know

303
00:16:46.559 --> 00:16:50.120
<v Speaker 6>that from diary entries and letters and and all the rest.

304
00:16:50.799 --> 00:16:53.519
<v Speaker 7>She comments on a certain phrase that he uses.

305
00:16:53.679 --> 00:16:55.440
<v Speaker 6>I like to fight like I like to have a

306
00:16:55.440 --> 00:16:59.080
<v Speaker 6>fire at home to home rather than at hom she has.

307
00:16:59.200 --> 00:17:03.039
<v Speaker 6>There are all these little extraneous details that have nothing

308
00:17:03.120 --> 00:17:07.160
<v Speaker 6>to do with the famous quote that to me give it.

309
00:17:07.200 --> 00:17:08.880
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely the feel of.

310
00:17:10.480 --> 00:17:15.000
<v Speaker 6>Very simility, in a very similitude accuracy.

311
00:17:16.039 --> 00:17:17.279
<v Speaker 7>Do I have a tape recording.

312
00:17:17.759 --> 00:17:22.720
<v Speaker 6>No, but I do believe that this is far more

313
00:17:22.880 --> 00:17:27.119
<v Speaker 6>likely than not. And again those who disagree have to

314
00:17:27.240 --> 00:17:32.480
<v Speaker 6>call someone a liar, the first journalist, or the daughter

315
00:17:32.680 --> 00:17:35.559
<v Speaker 6>and the son or Harriet herself. At least one of

316
00:17:35.559 --> 00:17:39.559
<v Speaker 6>those four has to be a liar for this conventional

317
00:17:39.799 --> 00:17:40.759
<v Speaker 6>view to be false.

318
00:17:41.119 --> 00:17:43.240
<v Speaker 4>All right, I have to let you go, but Roger

319
00:17:43.279 --> 00:17:44.480
<v Speaker 4>gets give him your best shot.

320
00:17:44.640 --> 00:17:50.680
<v Speaker 9>Oh well, after listening to Akiel a patiate on this

321
00:17:50.759 --> 00:17:54.519
<v Speaker 9>and Sundry, I was going to conclude with the quote

322
00:17:54.559 --> 00:17:58.599
<v Speaker 9>of Buckley. If you think it's difficult I agree with

323
00:17:59.240 --> 00:18:04.079
<v Speaker 9>or disagreeing with Harry, try agreeing with them.

324
00:18:04.480 --> 00:18:05.920
<v Speaker 7>We academics can be order.

325
00:18:06.119 --> 00:18:07.079
<v Speaker 8>Oh I know it, I know it.

326
00:18:07.480 --> 00:18:15.039
<v Speaker 5>But judge the the the point, the point that John

327
00:18:15.160 --> 00:18:19.279
<v Speaker 5>you made about when the question he raised when did

328
00:18:19.359 --> 00:18:20.119
<v Speaker 5>America begin?

329
00:18:20.400 --> 00:18:23.119
<v Speaker 9>I think I'm with a Kiel on that. With the

330
00:18:23.160 --> 00:18:27.119
<v Speaker 9>declaration of independence, but let's remember they saw it as

331
00:18:27.200 --> 00:18:30.440
<v Speaker 9>a league of friends under the articles.

332
00:18:30.519 --> 00:18:31.880
<v Speaker 8>Not exactly.

333
00:18:31.599 --> 00:18:35.039
<v Speaker 6>Yes, each state is sovereign, it's a mere treaty, it's

334
00:18:35.039 --> 00:18:38.759
<v Speaker 6>a confederation, and then when you switch to a constitution,

335
00:18:39.039 --> 00:18:40.839
<v Speaker 6>it's going to be a different But.

336
00:18:40.920 --> 00:18:43.799
<v Speaker 10>One of the things that the professor explains is when

337
00:18:43.799 --> 00:18:48.200
<v Speaker 10>they get to the Constitutional Convention and they're making these compromises,

338
00:18:49.480 --> 00:18:54.200
<v Speaker 10>this backdrop of northern abolition is already ongoing. Yes, and

339
00:18:54.240 --> 00:18:57.799
<v Speaker 10>this is why they think that this is, in its

340
00:18:57.880 --> 00:19:02.240
<v Speaker 10>natural course, going to lead to total abolition. And what

341
00:19:02.279 --> 00:19:06.440
<v Speaker 10>they did not anticipate was what would happen in the South.

342
00:19:07.440 --> 00:19:09.880
<v Speaker 7>And especially after the cotton project.

343
00:19:10.160 --> 00:19:12.079
<v Speaker 10>That's right, particularly South Carolina.

344
00:19:12.359 --> 00:19:14.279
<v Speaker 7>Yes, and South Carolina.

345
00:19:14.279 --> 00:19:18.559
<v Speaker 9>And Omar has Akil has raised the issue of women.

346
00:19:18.839 --> 00:19:25.960
<v Speaker 9>Let's not forget John adams wife.

347
00:19:24.319 --> 00:19:25.599
<v Speaker 7>Abigail, is amazed.

348
00:19:26.720 --> 00:19:29.559
<v Speaker 8>She was opposed to slavery.

349
00:19:30.279 --> 00:19:34.079
<v Speaker 6>She was the most anti slavery from the McCulloch book on.

350
00:19:34.079 --> 00:19:35.559
<v Speaker 4>John, she's in the book.

351
00:19:35.599 --> 00:19:39.559
<v Speaker 10>Everybody, Yeah, thank you, thank you so.

352
00:19:40.559 --> 00:19:42.799
<v Speaker 2>But this morning, on the immigration panel you were on,

353
00:19:43.680 --> 00:19:46.559
<v Speaker 2>I was very glad you brought up the importance of the.

354
00:19:46.440 --> 00:19:48.359
<v Speaker 4>Omission of the word expressly.

355
00:19:49.480 --> 00:19:51.640
<v Speaker 2>And that was beaten into me by my teacher of

356
00:19:51.680 --> 00:19:54.000
<v Speaker 2>cost social history was Leonard Levy.

357
00:19:55.640 --> 00:19:57.279
<v Speaker 4>Was absolutely fabulous.

358
00:19:57.519 --> 00:19:59.880
<v Speaker 6>So here's what's really interesting. I don't think I have

359
00:20:00.319 --> 00:20:04.200
<v Speaker 6>met him. I did blurb a book that he wrote

360
00:20:04.240 --> 00:20:09.079
<v Speaker 6>about the Bill of I blurbed a book that he

361
00:20:09.160 --> 00:20:14.480
<v Speaker 6>wrote about the Bill of Rights. But in the last

362
00:20:15.519 --> 00:20:20.640
<v Speaker 6>fifty years. I believe there are really only two scholars

363
00:20:21.000 --> 00:20:26.400
<v Speaker 6>who tried to write about each amendment of the first ten,

364
00:20:27.000 --> 00:20:28.880
<v Speaker 6>and the only two that I could find that really

365
00:20:28.920 --> 00:20:32.759
<v Speaker 6>had done kind of original and deep thought about each amendment,

366
00:20:32.759 --> 00:20:38.640
<v Speaker 6>where Leonard Levy and yours truly And because we have

367
00:20:39.319 --> 00:20:42.279
<v Speaker 6>First Amendment experts, although many of them are only religion

368
00:20:42.359 --> 00:20:45.119
<v Speaker 6>folks or only speech and press folks, we got Second

369
00:20:45.160 --> 00:20:48.240
<v Speaker 6>Amendment folks, we got Fourth Amendment folks. We have some

370
00:20:48.440 --> 00:20:52.640
<v Speaker 6>criminal procedure folks. Levy tried to actually write about everything

371
00:20:53.240 --> 00:20:55.519
<v Speaker 6>in the Bill of Rights, and I've tried to do

372
00:20:55.559 --> 00:20:58.599
<v Speaker 6>the same thing. And what I said even earlier today

373
00:20:58.680 --> 00:21:01.279
<v Speaker 6>is if you really want to be an originalist, you

374
00:21:01.319 --> 00:21:06.119
<v Speaker 6>have to do originalism across a wide range of issues,

375
00:21:06.240 --> 00:21:10.240
<v Speaker 6>rights and structure, criminal and civil, just to get a

376
00:21:10.279 --> 00:21:14.519
<v Speaker 6>proper sense of what kind of evidence you know is

377
00:21:14.559 --> 00:21:18.039
<v Speaker 6>good enough to be confident, just like, how much evidence

378
00:21:18.039 --> 00:21:20.960
<v Speaker 6>do I need in order to say I think actually

379
00:21:21.279 --> 00:21:24.599
<v Speaker 6>that Lincoln said that to Elizabeth Caston, You're going to

380
00:21:24.680 --> 00:21:27.160
<v Speaker 6>be much better at answering that if you try to

381
00:21:27.200 --> 00:21:30.839
<v Speaker 6>ask questions like that in eighty other situations.

382
00:21:30.960 --> 00:21:33.480
<v Speaker 8>Aequille, we even have ninth Amendment.

383
00:21:34.240 --> 00:21:38.319
<v Speaker 7>Yes, we do, absolutely farmer, Rogers.

384
00:21:40.519 --> 00:21:43.960
<v Speaker 9>After all, if you're a textualist, you cannot ignore.

385
00:21:44.240 --> 00:21:47.599
<v Speaker 8>I agree, And we know why it's there.

386
00:21:47.519 --> 00:21:50.960
<v Speaker 7>Don't there's so many reasons over determined.

387
00:21:51.160 --> 00:21:54.200
<v Speaker 8>Of course, we know exactly why it's there.

388
00:21:54.279 --> 00:22:01.720
<v Speaker 11>It's because, okay, sorry, it's it's because they understood that

389
00:22:02.240 --> 00:22:07.039
<v Speaker 11>once you start enumerting members of a class, the failure

390
00:22:07.119 --> 00:22:08.440
<v Speaker 11>to enumerate all.

391
00:22:08.359 --> 00:22:12.759
<v Speaker 9>Such members will be construed by ordinary principles of legal

392
00:22:12.839 --> 00:22:17.839
<v Speaker 9>construction as meaning only those that are enumerated are meant

393
00:22:17.839 --> 00:22:21.559
<v Speaker 9>to be protected, in contradistinction from those that are not.

394
00:22:22.000 --> 00:22:26.200
<v Speaker 9>So to make that crystal clear, they wrote, the enumeration

395
00:22:26.359 --> 00:22:29.599
<v Speaker 9>in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed

396
00:22:29.880 --> 00:22:34.640
<v Speaker 9>to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

397
00:22:34.920 --> 00:22:40.319
<v Speaker 8>You can't retain what you don't first have to be retained.

398
00:22:40.599 --> 00:22:44.240
<v Speaker 9>I don't know how you can state it anymore simply,

399
00:22:44.599 --> 00:22:45.880
<v Speaker 9>more clearly than.

400
00:22:45.720 --> 00:22:46.319
<v Speaker 1>That, Roger.

401
00:22:46.359 --> 00:22:49.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to declare culture on your filibuster for a moment, because.

402
00:22:50.160 --> 00:22:52.960
<v Speaker 8>Well it's a filibuster with a point, I know.

403
00:22:53.000 --> 00:22:53.799
<v Speaker 7>And a good point.

404
00:22:53.880 --> 00:22:55.440
<v Speaker 2>But let me let me bring it back to a

405
00:22:55.519 --> 00:23:00.400
<v Speaker 2>Kiel's book. As I'd read read a books, I'm this

406
00:23:00.440 --> 00:23:01.200
<v Speaker 2>one just briefly.

407
00:23:02.000 --> 00:23:04.480
<v Speaker 4>So Roger and I are a little unusual.

408
00:23:04.559 --> 00:23:07.200
<v Speaker 2>Maybe not unusual, but I miss some of those mid

409
00:23:07.319 --> 00:23:10.319
<v Speaker 2>century constitutionalists.

410
00:23:09.680 --> 00:23:11.039
<v Speaker 4>Like Charles Howard mcilwaine.

411
00:23:11.480 --> 00:23:13.880
<v Speaker 3>He's still talking about last book he read.

412
00:23:16.319 --> 00:23:17.559
<v Speaker 7>University of Minnesota.

413
00:23:18.039 --> 00:23:20.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm just gonna say you, I'm going to throwback of

414
00:23:20.200 --> 00:23:22.519
<v Speaker 2>people like Levy, like Charles Howard mcelwayne.

415
00:23:22.839 --> 00:23:25.519
<v Speaker 4>Yes, people that he has total contempt for.

416
00:23:25.920 --> 00:23:30.839
<v Speaker 7>Because okay, thank you so much, thank you very much.

417
00:23:30.839 --> 00:23:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Roger, I need your microphone back from your panel.

418
00:23:36.519 --> 00:23:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I do wish you guys had had two hours. Oh yes,

419
00:23:38.759 --> 00:23:42.359
<v Speaker 1>absolutely this morning, because like that's too much. Where's John?

420
00:23:42.359 --> 00:23:45.039
<v Speaker 1>I thought I was gonna he'll come back with are

421
00:23:45.039 --> 00:23:48.440
<v Speaker 1>we talking tout? So he's he's literally ambushing us and

422
00:23:48.480 --> 00:23:49.359
<v Speaker 1>saying come come.

423
00:23:49.680 --> 00:23:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's I'm glad you've wandered by this sort of

424
00:23:53.200 --> 00:23:56.640
<v Speaker 2>gonzo uh format we do every year at the Federal

425
00:23:56.720 --> 00:23:59.920
<v Speaker 2>Society for the three Whiskey Happy Hour podcast. Roger polanist

426
00:24:00.119 --> 00:24:01.759
<v Speaker 2>with us because he likes to hackle everybody.

427
00:24:02.119 --> 00:24:05.119
<v Speaker 1>Oh indeed, he just likes whiskey. He's on his second.

428
00:24:04.960 --> 00:24:07.359
<v Speaker 4>Found treating read. We've done a red.

429
00:24:07.240 --> 00:24:11.519
<v Speaker 2>Wine episode or two. But so elon, I'm blanking on

430
00:24:11.559 --> 00:24:13.200
<v Speaker 2>your books. I have them on my shelf. I read

431
00:24:13.240 --> 00:24:15.880
<v Speaker 2>them that there was some originalism art I had recently

432
00:24:15.960 --> 00:24:17.400
<v Speaker 2>I thought was quite good.

433
00:24:17.799 --> 00:24:19.960
<v Speaker 4>Well man, what are your sort of leading things you're doing?

434
00:24:19.960 --> 00:24:21.839
<v Speaker 4>The first of all, give us just a very like

435
00:24:21.880 --> 00:24:22.880
<v Speaker 4>thirty second bio.

436
00:24:23.319 --> 00:24:25.359
<v Speaker 1>So I taught at Arizona State for six years. Now

437
00:24:25.359 --> 00:24:27.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm at the University of Minnesota, very happy to be there.

438
00:24:28.000 --> 00:24:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I write on separation of powers, federalism, administrative law, constitucialism.

439
00:24:31.799 --> 00:24:34.119
<v Speaker 1>My first book was A Debt against the Living, an

440
00:24:34.119 --> 00:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>introduction to originalism. That's the book, not, just to be clear,

441
00:24:38.160 --> 00:24:40.599
<v Speaker 1>not the Debt against the Living, although it's not a

442
00:24:40.680 --> 00:24:43.519
<v Speaker 1>zombie flick, although some people have suggested it could have

443
00:24:43.519 --> 00:24:45.519
<v Speaker 1>been titled The Dead Versus the Living, But it's actually

444
00:24:45.559 --> 00:24:48.799
<v Speaker 1>a Debt against Living, which comes from Madison's response to

445
00:24:48.839 --> 00:24:51.079
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Jefferson's Dead Hand of the Past letter. I have

446
00:24:51.079 --> 00:24:53.400
<v Speaker 1>a book on the Fourteenth Amendment called The Second Founding,

447
00:24:53.839 --> 00:24:56.759
<v Speaker 1>and right now I am causing some controversy on topics

448
00:24:56.759 --> 00:24:59.759
<v Speaker 1>like borthward citizenship. I've been out there somewhat defending the

449
00:25:00.000 --> 00:25:03.119
<v Speaker 1>Innistration's position from a constitutional perspective, and I knew a

450
00:25:03.119 --> 00:25:05.839
<v Speaker 1>little bit about the removal power and Humphrey's Executor, and

451
00:25:05.920 --> 00:25:08.720
<v Speaker 1>so happy to you know, throw some grenades and a

452
00:25:08.720 --> 00:25:10.119
<v Speaker 1>conversation if you'd like.

453
00:25:10.319 --> 00:25:12.519
<v Speaker 4>Well, now John You has run away again because he

454
00:25:12.599 --> 00:25:13.000
<v Speaker 4>knows that.

455
00:25:13.079 --> 00:25:15.200
<v Speaker 2>The funny thing is he always likes to assemble people who,

456
00:25:15.920 --> 00:25:17.759
<v Speaker 2>as I do, disagree with him on these things. So

457
00:25:18.200 --> 00:25:20.640
<v Speaker 2>I think if I do a checkboxes, I think I'm

458
00:25:20.640 --> 00:25:23.799
<v Speaker 2>probably in agreement with you on birthright citizenship, on Humphrey's Executor.

459
00:25:24.000 --> 00:25:25.480
<v Speaker 4>But take those briefly from the top.

460
00:25:25.559 --> 00:25:28.920
<v Speaker 1>And so John You, interestingly, since you gave me the

461
00:25:28.920 --> 00:25:32.359
<v Speaker 1>bait here, he's famously defended sort of a broader conception

462
00:25:32.400 --> 00:25:35.599
<v Speaker 1>of birthrad citizenship, but he was also responding to a

463
00:25:35.680 --> 00:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>John Eastman and argument in Rogers Smith and Peter Truck

464
00:25:42.000 --> 00:25:44.160
<v Speaker 1>that sort of reject the common law. I don't reject

465
00:25:44.160 --> 00:25:46.519
<v Speaker 1>the common law. I think the question rather is what

466
00:25:46.640 --> 00:25:48.640
<v Speaker 1>is the scope of the common law rule of birthright

467
00:25:48.680 --> 00:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>citizenship to begin with? And actually I don't think the

468
00:25:52.000 --> 00:25:55.480
<v Speaker 1>common law rule itself would have extended to unlawfully present aliens.

469
00:25:55.559 --> 00:25:58.279
<v Speaker 1>Harder question for temporary visitors. And if you want to give, like,

470
00:25:58.319 --> 00:26:00.640
<v Speaker 1>if I may just take a minute to this out,

471
00:26:00.759 --> 00:26:03.079
<v Speaker 1>because everybody thinks that the test is mere birth alone,

472
00:26:03.079 --> 00:26:04.759
<v Speaker 1>mere birth on soil. But what do you do with

473
00:26:04.880 --> 00:26:08.519
<v Speaker 1>children born of ambassadors or to the soldiers of invading armies.

474
00:26:08.559 --> 00:26:09.839
<v Speaker 1>And they come up with all sort of well, just

475
00:26:09.880 --> 00:26:12.160
<v Speaker 1>an exception and maybe an exception for this that reason.

476
00:26:12.200 --> 00:26:14.559
<v Speaker 1>Well what did they say? What do they say? If

477
00:26:14.559 --> 00:26:16.799
<v Speaker 1>you look at Calvin's case, if you look at Blackstone,

478
00:26:16.960 --> 00:26:19.279
<v Speaker 1>Well it turns out that the rule itself was born

479
00:26:19.319 --> 00:26:22.359
<v Speaker 1>on the soil of the sovereign, under the protection of

480
00:26:22.400 --> 00:26:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the sovereign. Someone born to an invading armies not under

481
00:26:25.279 --> 00:26:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the protection of the sovereign. Someone born to an ambassador

482
00:26:27.559 --> 00:26:29.519
<v Speaker 1>is born under the protection of and within the allegiance

483
00:26:29.519 --> 00:26:31.480
<v Speaker 1>of a foreign sovereign. Well, what if I told you

484
00:26:31.640 --> 00:26:34.599
<v Speaker 1>that a common law you needed a safe conduct from

485
00:26:34.599 --> 00:26:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the king, a formal legal document giving you permission to

486
00:26:37.240 --> 00:26:41.319
<v Speaker 1>enter the realm, which document extended the king's protection to

487
00:26:41.400 --> 00:26:45.039
<v Speaker 1>that alien. Eventually, these safe conducts came into disuse when

488
00:26:45.119 --> 00:26:48.519
<v Speaker 1>statutes like Magna Carta cardon Mergatoria and a statute from

489
00:26:48.519 --> 00:26:51.200
<v Speaker 1>fifteen thirteen fifty three in the reign of Edward the

490
00:26:51.240 --> 00:26:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Third said generally opened up trade and said merchants strangers

491
00:26:55.119 --> 00:26:58.799
<v Speaker 1>may safely and securely and under our protection, come and

492
00:26:58.880 --> 00:27:02.200
<v Speaker 1>dwell in our set real So why did Cook and

493
00:27:02.400 --> 00:27:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Blackstone presume that children born to aliens friendly aliens were

494
00:27:06.279 --> 00:27:09.799
<v Speaker 1>birthright subjects well because their parents were there legally under

495
00:27:09.839 --> 00:27:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the king's protection according to the statutes. What does that

496
00:27:13.000 --> 00:27:15.400
<v Speaker 1>mean for a world today where there are immigration prohibitions

497
00:27:15.400 --> 00:27:17.880
<v Speaker 1>which they have been under the protection of the sovereign?

498
00:27:18.160 --> 00:27:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I argue not that. What does that have to do

499
00:27:19.880 --> 00:27:22.160
<v Speaker 1>with the fourtieth Amendment and subject to the jurisdiction. How

500
00:27:22.240 --> 00:27:25.599
<v Speaker 1>much time do you have? Probably not enough, Roger You.

501
00:27:26.039 --> 00:27:29.720
<v Speaker 9>Well, I'm struck by this idea of under the protection

502
00:27:29.839 --> 00:27:33.160
<v Speaker 9>of the sovereign, which would not apply, if I understand

503
00:27:33.160 --> 00:27:38.359
<v Speaker 9>you correctly, to the children of invading armies. Well, suppose

504
00:27:38.440 --> 00:27:43.599
<v Speaker 9>children of those invading armies were subject to towards various kinds,

505
00:27:44.200 --> 00:27:47.839
<v Speaker 9>then would that child be subject to the protection of

506
00:27:47.880 --> 00:27:48.440
<v Speaker 9>the sovereign?

507
00:27:49.319 --> 00:27:52.839
<v Speaker 1>No, and oh you mean you can do whatever you Well,

508
00:27:52.920 --> 00:27:56.599
<v Speaker 1>we've got another scholar coming. You can come, come, come,

509
00:27:56.680 --> 00:28:00.319
<v Speaker 1>come on, Professor Ailey Arcis is joining us. We're on

510
00:28:00.319 --> 00:28:07.880
<v Speaker 1>on a podcast. But no, hardy us. Come on. Here's

511
00:28:07.920 --> 00:28:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the difference with you, Yes, here's here's here's the difference.

512
00:28:11.119 --> 00:28:14.400
<v Speaker 1>So discussion on birthright citizenship, and I'm wondering what your

513
00:28:14.480 --> 00:28:17.119
<v Speaker 1>take on it is, since I'm defending under the common

514
00:28:17.160 --> 00:28:21.960
<v Speaker 1>lawson asked your question.

515
00:28:20.920 --> 00:28:28.240
<v Speaker 9>Okay, argued that can I stay the the children of

516
00:28:28.559 --> 00:28:32.680
<v Speaker 9>invading armies would not be under the protection of the sovereign. Well,

517
00:28:32.720 --> 00:28:36.079
<v Speaker 9>suppose one of those children were the victim of a

518
00:28:36.200 --> 00:28:40.319
<v Speaker 9>tour of various kinds, including an attentional tour by the

519
00:28:40.359 --> 00:28:45.960
<v Speaker 9>residents or even members of the invading Would that child.

520
00:28:45.759 --> 00:28:48.319
<v Speaker 8>Not be under the protection of the sovereign?

521
00:28:48.680 --> 00:28:51.359
<v Speaker 4>Or can one do anything one wants to.

522
00:28:51.359 --> 00:28:54.200
<v Speaker 1>That child, the child of the invader.

523
00:28:54.359 --> 00:28:56.880
<v Speaker 12>The protection under the protection of the law, that would

524
00:28:56.920 --> 00:28:58.720
<v Speaker 12>make him. That would not make him a citizen.

525
00:28:58.799 --> 00:29:02.200
<v Speaker 1>No, that's right, but it would at least give him

526
00:29:02.279 --> 00:29:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the coadly doesn't even know. Professor Arkis doesn't even know

527
00:29:04.759 --> 00:29:06.319
<v Speaker 1>what I said to begin with, since she walked in later.

528
00:29:06.359 --> 00:29:10.839
<v Speaker 1>But he gave a great answer. Actually what they answer,

529
00:29:10.920 --> 00:29:11.400
<v Speaker 1>You are right?

530
00:29:11.480 --> 00:29:13.000
<v Speaker 4>Well, I don't want to get away off of that.

531
00:29:13.000 --> 00:29:15.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean subject this is this is an interesting question.

532
00:29:15.920 --> 00:29:17.960
<v Speaker 1>So let me just if you if I may say

533
00:29:18.000 --> 00:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>one thing about this right the reason lawfully present aliens

534
00:29:22.240 --> 00:29:25.960
<v Speaker 1>were subject to treason prosecutions is because they were under

535
00:29:25.960 --> 00:29:28.519
<v Speaker 1>the protection and within the allegiance of the sovereign, and

536
00:29:28.559 --> 00:29:31.359
<v Speaker 1>they violated their allegiance by engaging an active treason, and

537
00:29:31.400 --> 00:29:33.480
<v Speaker 1>so they were subject to the municipal law of treason,

538
00:29:33.519 --> 00:29:36.720
<v Speaker 1>including the protections of the common law for treason prosecutions.

539
00:29:37.000 --> 00:29:39.200
<v Speaker 1>If you came in contrary, if you were an enemy alien,

540
00:29:39.440 --> 00:29:41.519
<v Speaker 1>if you were an invader, or someone who came contrary

541
00:29:41.519 --> 00:29:44.440
<v Speaker 1>to the King's protection, you could not actually be prosecuted

542
00:29:44.480 --> 00:29:47.480
<v Speaker 1>for treason. You were subject to martial law, to the

543
00:29:47.559 --> 00:29:49.799
<v Speaker 1>law of nations, to the military law. So of course

544
00:29:49.839 --> 00:29:52.960
<v Speaker 1>we could exercise power over you. You the king could

545
00:29:52.960 --> 00:29:55.440
<v Speaker 1>subject them to his military court, to the power of

546
00:29:55.440 --> 00:29:57.880
<v Speaker 1>his armies, but they were not subject to the protection

547
00:29:58.200 --> 00:30:02.240
<v Speaker 1>of the ordinary legal rules. Lawfully present aliens were subject to,

548
00:30:02.359 --> 00:30:04.680
<v Speaker 1>or alien friends were subject to. All sorts of questions

549
00:30:04.720 --> 00:30:06.759
<v Speaker 1>emerged from this. Please, No, that's right.

550
00:30:06.799 --> 00:30:08.480
<v Speaker 4>I just want to know this is you.

551
00:30:08.440 --> 00:30:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Had no idea what he was getting into his question?

552
00:30:12.880 --> 00:30:14.519
<v Speaker 4>What No, Roger, No, sorry.

553
00:30:14.359 --> 00:30:16.960
<v Speaker 12>I'm just I was just looking for Costco and I said.

554
00:30:19.599 --> 00:30:22.519
<v Speaker 4>I just wait. No, no, Roger, no, no, nope, we're

555
00:30:22.519 --> 00:30:23.039
<v Speaker 4>not I know.

556
00:30:23.000 --> 00:30:27.039
<v Speaker 1>What let's do you came to a Wendy's instead.

557
00:30:27.799 --> 00:30:31.440
<v Speaker 4>I am I am on Nylon's sign on. Yeah, okay,

558
00:30:31.519 --> 00:30:34.319
<v Speaker 4>well so let's uh let me do it this way.

559
00:30:34.400 --> 00:30:37.759
<v Speaker 2>Let's do you know, thirty seconds is way too ambitious

560
00:30:37.759 --> 00:30:40.839
<v Speaker 2>about Humphrey's executor. I always wish Humphrey's executor applied to

561
00:30:40.880 --> 00:30:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Hubert Humphrey.

562
00:30:42.680 --> 00:30:43.960
<v Speaker 4>But I know the other.

563
00:30:43.880 --> 00:30:47.279
<v Speaker 2>Famous story about uh stant Avage is telling Hubert Humphrey

564
00:30:47.839 --> 00:30:50.640
<v Speaker 2>he fought in the war. He was captured by the Germans.

565
00:30:50.960 --> 00:30:52.799
<v Speaker 2>They have him in the interrogation room. They come in

566
00:30:52.839 --> 00:30:57.079
<v Speaker 2>and say, you are Hubert Humphrey. We have vays of

567
00:30:57.160 --> 00:30:58.640
<v Speaker 2>making you not talk.

568
00:31:01.079 --> 00:31:02.279
<v Speaker 4>You're too young for that.

569
00:31:05.039 --> 00:31:05.400
<v Speaker 8>One thing.

570
00:31:05.519 --> 00:31:09.359
<v Speaker 9>It's one thing to say that this child would not

571
00:31:09.519 --> 00:31:13.319
<v Speaker 9>be protected by the sovereign. It's quite a different question

572
00:31:13.480 --> 00:31:15.599
<v Speaker 9>whether this child.

573
00:31:15.440 --> 00:31:18.359
<v Speaker 8>Being born in.

574
00:31:17.599 --> 00:31:23.440
<v Speaker 9>The domain of the sovereign is a citizens.

575
00:31:23.799 --> 00:31:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that.

576
00:31:24.400 --> 00:31:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all right, moving on for listeners who don't know

577
00:31:27.920 --> 00:31:30.440
<v Speaker 2>Humphrey's executors. Is the New Deal air case that said

578
00:31:30.480 --> 00:31:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Franklin Roosevelt could not fire.

579
00:31:32.759 --> 00:31:34.960
<v Speaker 4>I think it was the Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission.

580
00:31:35.160 --> 00:31:37.039
<v Speaker 2>By the way, I have great fun with my lefty

581
00:31:37.079 --> 00:31:38.799
<v Speaker 2>friends saying, you know, Trump was just wants to do

582
00:31:38.880 --> 00:31:40.119
<v Speaker 2>what Franklin Roosevelt want to do.

583
00:31:40.240 --> 00:31:41.519
<v Speaker 4>What's the problem.

584
00:31:41.799 --> 00:31:45.599
<v Speaker 1>So Robin's Humphrey's Executor was a nine zero opinion, because

585
00:31:45.599 --> 00:31:50.319
<v Speaker 1>you've got because of all the four horsemen of the Arch,

586
00:31:50.359 --> 00:31:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Conservatives wanted to stop Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal policy, so

587
00:31:53.480 --> 00:31:56.400
<v Speaker 1>they voted a lot with the Liberals to rewrite the Constitution.

588
00:31:56.440 --> 00:31:58.240
<v Speaker 4>I missed that little detail of that significant.

589
00:31:58.319 --> 00:32:01.079
<v Speaker 2>So look, I mean, just give our verdict without going

590
00:32:01.240 --> 00:32:04.000
<v Speaker 2>through the lines here, and then I'm gonna bring Hadley

591
00:32:04.039 --> 00:32:04.759
<v Speaker 2>in the new.

592
00:32:04.720 --> 00:32:11.599
<v Speaker 12>Vectory because my friend George who wrote that opinion, and.

593
00:32:10.640 --> 00:32:13.400
<v Speaker 7>Yes, okay, we didn't even get to the real of.

594
00:32:13.319 --> 00:32:15.720
<v Speaker 4>Course we didn't. But you know, well there'll be more

595
00:32:15.799 --> 00:32:16.200
<v Speaker 4>we didn't.

596
00:32:16.720 --> 00:32:20.400
<v Speaker 12>Oh, come on, we're gonna don't Roger and I made

597
00:32:20.519 --> 00:32:21.440
<v Speaker 12>Roger to me to do that.

598
00:32:21.480 --> 00:32:24.039
<v Speaker 8>We're both natural wrong, yeah, rights men.

599
00:32:24.119 --> 00:32:25.720
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, so it's eon.

600
00:32:27.240 --> 00:32:29.039
<v Speaker 8>Is more of a natural right.

601
00:32:29.480 --> 00:32:35.359
<v Speaker 12>But but Richard but Epstein did a fine piece on this, Richard, Okay, Richard,

602
00:32:35.440 --> 00:32:41.440
<v Speaker 12>Richardstein did a fine piece on right. See I will no,

603
00:32:41.480 --> 00:32:45.400
<v Speaker 12>I would do Okay, I love what you did today.

604
00:32:46.119 --> 00:32:47.000
<v Speaker 4>Can get a text of that.

605
00:32:48.640 --> 00:32:51.279
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I don't check my phone okay, okay, oh.

606
00:32:51.200 --> 00:32:53.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, good idea to leave me that John you walked

607
00:32:53.400 --> 00:32:53.880
<v Speaker 2>out earlier.

608
00:32:55.640 --> 00:32:57.240
<v Speaker 4>He's gonna get all kinds of crowd noise.

609
00:32:57.279 --> 00:32:59.200
<v Speaker 1>That's gonna be a night when we start, Humphreys.

610
00:32:59.400 --> 00:33:01.839
<v Speaker 4>Since I'll do that, I'll do that.

611
00:33:01.960 --> 00:33:03.839
<v Speaker 12>So I have to go back and read my book

612
00:33:03.920 --> 00:33:06.759
<v Speaker 12>on George Southland, right exactly, So.

613
00:33:07.519 --> 00:33:09.119
<v Speaker 2>Wait, no, stop having I want I don't want to

614
00:33:09.200 --> 00:33:11.079
<v Speaker 2>leave this in the green room. But Elon's right one,

615
00:33:11.079 --> 00:33:14.480
<v Speaker 2>who's orderly? All right, So let's resume our discussion, uh

616
00:33:14.559 --> 00:33:17.079
<v Speaker 2>wherever it left off on Humphrey's executor. I mean, just

617
00:33:17.119 --> 00:33:19.440
<v Speaker 2>briefly that this is a case about can the executive

618
00:33:19.440 --> 00:33:22.559
<v Speaker 2>remove someone? And what the court ruled in some strange

619
00:33:22.559 --> 00:33:26.400
<v Speaker 2>way that well, the Federal Craik Commission it's not really executive,

620
00:33:26.440 --> 00:33:28.160
<v Speaker 2>it's not really it's sort of halfway between.

621
00:33:28.200 --> 00:33:28.799
<v Speaker 4>And I don't.

622
00:33:28.720 --> 00:33:31.440
<v Speaker 2>Nobody buys that logic today, I don't think right.

623
00:33:31.720 --> 00:33:35.680
<v Speaker 1>So Humphy's executor is obviously wrong on its reasoning. They said, well,

624
00:33:35.759 --> 00:33:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Trade Commission exercises what we call quasi legislative

625
00:33:39.039 --> 00:33:41.640
<v Speaker 1>quasi judicial power. There's no such power under the Constitution.

626
00:33:41.680 --> 00:33:43.720
<v Speaker 1>If it's legislative power, Congress has to do it. The

627
00:33:43.720 --> 00:33:46.720
<v Speaker 1>commission was in Congress. If it's judicial power, the courts

628
00:33:46.720 --> 00:33:48.559
<v Speaker 1>have to do it. The commission wasn't a court. The

629
00:33:48.640 --> 00:33:51.440
<v Speaker 1>question is, if it's executive power, which it was, what

630
00:33:51.559 --> 00:33:54.759
<v Speaker 1>is the president's relationship to the principal officers running the agency?

631
00:33:54.799 --> 00:33:57.279
<v Speaker 1>And the court upheld in Hemprey's executor what we call

632
00:33:57.359 --> 00:34:00.799
<v Speaker 1>independent agencies. What makes them independence, we think is that

633
00:34:00.839 --> 00:34:04.440
<v Speaker 1>they're insulated from the president's at will removal. In other words,

634
00:34:04.519 --> 00:34:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the president must have cause to remove them, and mere

635
00:34:07.279 --> 00:34:10.719
<v Speaker 1>policy disagreements are insufficient to remove them. So the question

636
00:34:10.840 --> 00:34:14.199
<v Speaker 1>really now is okay, putting aside quasi nonsense, the CAUSI

637
00:34:14.239 --> 00:34:16.880
<v Speaker 1>powers nonsense? What is the answer? What is the answer?

638
00:34:17.280 --> 00:34:20.719
<v Speaker 1>And in my view I have quite a quirky idiosyncretic view.

639
00:34:21.079 --> 00:34:24.599
<v Speaker 1>I think the president has an unfettered constitutional right to

640
00:34:24.639 --> 00:34:28.079
<v Speaker 1>remove principal officers. It doesn't follow he has the constitutional

641
00:34:28.119 --> 00:34:30.400
<v Speaker 1>right to direct and control them in the exercise of

642
00:34:30.400 --> 00:34:33.039
<v Speaker 1>their discussion. Now, he can always fire them, but firing

643
00:34:33.119 --> 00:34:36.199
<v Speaker 1>them comes at a higher political cost, which cost goes

644
00:34:36.320 --> 00:34:38.760
<v Speaker 1>up even more to the degree we think it is

645
00:34:38.800 --> 00:34:42.119
<v Speaker 1>impermissible to interfere in the duties, which maybe is why

646
00:34:42.239 --> 00:34:45.920
<v Speaker 1>President Trump hasn't actually fired drum Powell. Maybe there isn't

647
00:34:45.960 --> 00:34:48.480
<v Speaker 1>a FED exception. It's just we understand that it would

648
00:34:48.519 --> 00:34:51.960
<v Speaker 1>be untoward or impermissible or contrary to Congress's intent to

649
00:34:52.000 --> 00:34:54.159
<v Speaker 1>do this, and there's no constitutional right to interfere with

650
00:34:54.199 --> 00:34:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the Fed's duties. So there's a real payoff between this distinction.

651
00:34:57.039 --> 00:34:58.719
<v Speaker 1>But most foremost think I'm crazy.

652
00:34:59.000 --> 00:35:03.199
<v Speaker 2>Well, I long thought that the proper term in the

653
00:35:03.239 --> 00:35:07.079
<v Speaker 2>Constitution has not been carefully thought about.

654
00:35:07.119 --> 00:35:10.639
<v Speaker 4>Necessary and proper. Okay, that's a subject for another day.

655
00:35:11.320 --> 00:35:14.039
<v Speaker 1>I mean it is related to this question, sure, sure, right,

656
00:35:14.119 --> 00:35:15.800
<v Speaker 1>though in this case it kind of begs the question,

657
00:35:15.920 --> 00:35:18.440
<v Speaker 1>because if the president has the power to remove then

658
00:35:18.440 --> 00:35:21.320
<v Speaker 1>it isn't necessary and proper to derogate from that power, right,

659
00:35:21.440 --> 00:35:22.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of question begging.

660
00:35:23.000 --> 00:35:24.800
<v Speaker 2>It also occurs to me, I have to think about this,

661
00:35:24.920 --> 00:35:27.920
<v Speaker 2>But you're saying that he might not be able to

662
00:35:28.039 --> 00:35:29.719
<v Speaker 2>direct the people of points.

663
00:35:30.800 --> 00:35:32.920
<v Speaker 4>It sounds to me a little bit like cabinet government.

664
00:35:32.960 --> 00:35:35.960
<v Speaker 2>Parliamentary democracies have to think about that, which is okay.

665
00:35:36.239 --> 00:35:38.920
<v Speaker 2>That may bring Hadley in at this point, and I

666
00:35:38.920 --> 00:35:40.840
<v Speaker 2>think you will have interesting things to say about this.

667
00:35:40.880 --> 00:35:45.039
<v Speaker 4>So Hadley this morning, Oh, let me preface it this.

668
00:35:45.000 --> 00:35:47.000
<v Speaker 12>Way, or are we are we leaving this subject?

669
00:35:47.800 --> 00:35:48.280
<v Speaker 1>No?

670
00:35:51.840 --> 00:35:52.719
<v Speaker 4>No, I think it's just no.

671
00:35:53.599 --> 00:35:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Elion is right.

672
00:35:54.320 --> 00:35:54.360
<v Speaker 7>No.

673
00:35:54.440 --> 00:35:56.880
<v Speaker 12>I think I think right now we look, it comes

674
00:35:56.920 --> 00:36:02.000
<v Speaker 12>back to uh Scalia and Morrison versus LS. You know,

675
00:36:02.599 --> 00:36:04.800
<v Speaker 12>he's the only one who took the line for the

676
00:36:04.840 --> 00:36:09.320
<v Speaker 12>for the the complete complete executive power. I think uh

677
00:36:09.559 --> 00:36:12.639
<v Speaker 12>suddenly just recognized this was the statute. And I think

678
00:36:12.760 --> 00:36:17.880
<v Speaker 12>I think say in Morrison versus I think Renquist regardless

679
00:36:18.400 --> 00:36:21.360
<v Speaker 12>as a political problem, that the that the the the

680
00:36:21.360 --> 00:36:25.679
<v Speaker 12>the the the president did not have to acquiescens The

681
00:36:25.719 --> 00:36:29.800
<v Speaker 12>president signed onto this, He signed onto this legislation. So

682
00:36:29.840 --> 00:36:32.039
<v Speaker 12>if you want this fixed, Congress has to And of

683
00:36:32.039 --> 00:36:34.599
<v Speaker 12>course it was fixed politically as soon as the Independent

684
00:36:34.639 --> 00:36:36.639
<v Speaker 12>Council statue was applied.

685
00:36:36.280 --> 00:36:39.119
<v Speaker 4>To Clinton, to Democrats and they and they lost her.

686
00:36:39.360 --> 00:36:41.320
<v Speaker 12>They lost their passion for this thing. But you know,

687
00:36:41.639 --> 00:36:44.280
<v Speaker 12>going back to that first book of mine, of the

688
00:36:44.280 --> 00:36:46.840
<v Speaker 12>Marshall Plan, as George Will said, a book that has

689
00:36:46.840 --> 00:36:52.159
<v Speaker 12>sold dozens. Okay that I'm out of my dissertation. Here

690
00:36:52.320 --> 00:36:56.679
<v Speaker 12>here they're trying trying to get the Marshall Plan outside

691
00:36:56.719 --> 00:37:00.960
<v Speaker 12>the State Department to make more sensitive to the interests

692
00:37:00.960 --> 00:37:03.960
<v Speaker 12>of agriculture and business and so on.

693
00:37:04.760 --> 00:37:07.079
<v Speaker 7>This is ever the move to take.

694
00:37:08.519 --> 00:37:12.119
<v Speaker 12>Agencies out of the executive to make them more responsive

695
00:37:12.159 --> 00:37:15.920
<v Speaker 12>to different kinds of constituencies. And the value of having

696
00:37:15.920 --> 00:37:18.719
<v Speaker 12>it all in is that it forces the person to

697
00:37:18.760 --> 00:37:21.239
<v Speaker 12>make a judgment just what is important?

698
00:37:21.599 --> 00:37:21.840
<v Speaker 4>What?

699
00:37:21.840 --> 00:37:25.559
<v Speaker 12>What is my stand in relation to taking all export

700
00:37:25.599 --> 00:37:28.079
<v Speaker 12>controls away from the state Department?

701
00:37:28.760 --> 00:37:28.840
<v Speaker 3>What?

702
00:37:29.599 --> 00:37:30.000
<v Speaker 4>How much?

703
00:37:30.039 --> 00:37:31.599
<v Speaker 12>What is worth to me here?

704
00:37:32.159 --> 00:37:32.519
<v Speaker 4>What?

705
00:37:32.519 --> 00:37:35.599
<v Speaker 7>What is what's the rank of my own judgments here?

706
00:37:35.599 --> 00:37:36.639
<v Speaker 4>But what is important to me?

707
00:37:37.079 --> 00:37:40.320
<v Speaker 12>But by bringing everything under the control of the executive,

708
00:37:40.599 --> 00:37:43.400
<v Speaker 12>you force them to you force them to face that

709
00:37:43.480 --> 00:37:44.159
<v Speaker 12>kind of question.

710
00:37:44.360 --> 00:37:48.519
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, but I want to change subjects. Okay, great, Uh,

711
00:37:48.599 --> 00:37:51.960
<v Speaker 2>there's frame set up this way. So there's a we're

712
00:37:51.960 --> 00:37:55.559
<v Speaker 2>talking Friday night. There's a panel tomorrow on the question

713
00:37:55.679 --> 00:38:00.320
<v Speaker 2>of should parents have a right to control or know

714
00:38:00.400 --> 00:38:04.400
<v Speaker 2>about and make decisions about the gender choices of their children?

715
00:38:04.480 --> 00:38:05.639
<v Speaker 4>And that's not quite the question.

716
00:38:05.840 --> 00:38:07.639
<v Speaker 1>The question is there a constitutional right?

717
00:38:08.119 --> 00:38:11.599
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well to know, Okay, that doesn't actually change the

718
00:38:11.599 --> 00:38:12.079
<v Speaker 2>the way I'm.

719
00:38:12.000 --> 00:38:14.039
<v Speaker 4>Going to make it to a question. That's the question.

720
00:38:14.199 --> 00:38:14.920
<v Speaker 4>That's the question.

721
00:38:15.320 --> 00:38:19.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Okay, So I was imprecise, that's fine, But There's

722
00:38:19.800 --> 00:38:22.119
<v Speaker 2>been some criticism of it, saying, wait a minute, why

723
00:38:22.119 --> 00:38:24.159
<v Speaker 2>are we debating whether there's a legal right to do

724
00:38:24.199 --> 00:38:29.039
<v Speaker 2>that when we ought to be four square debating Why

725
00:38:29.079 --> 00:38:31.119
<v Speaker 2>are we talking about this question in the first place,

726
00:38:31.440 --> 00:38:32.559
<v Speaker 2>because what are we taught?

727
00:38:32.599 --> 00:38:35.760
<v Speaker 4>We're talking about something radical and insane.

728
00:38:36.480 --> 00:38:38.360
<v Speaker 2>And this gets back to what you and Jerry Bradley

729
00:38:38.400 --> 00:38:40.440
<v Speaker 2>were saying this morning at breakfast, Hadley, which.

730
00:38:40.239 --> 00:38:43.440
<v Speaker 4>Is, uh, you know, we're well, you know, there's a

731
00:38:43.519 --> 00:38:44.760
<v Speaker 4>legal reason, all the rest.

732
00:38:44.559 --> 00:38:47.119
<v Speaker 2>Of that, but we're abandoning the moral ground of human

733
00:38:47.239 --> 00:38:49.719
<v Speaker 2>nature and saying, wait a minute, this is so far

734
00:38:49.719 --> 00:38:51.880
<v Speaker 2>out of bounds that why is this a problem at all?

735
00:38:52.119 --> 00:38:54.800
<v Speaker 12>He's going back to the argument we had over this

736
00:38:55.320 --> 00:38:57.719
<v Speaker 12>umatic grammatic case about the.

737
00:38:58.400 --> 00:39:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Maybe you disagree with you guys go you guys go,

738
00:39:01.519 --> 00:39:03.119
<v Speaker 2>Sorry I interrupted.

739
00:39:02.960 --> 00:39:05.119
<v Speaker 12>No, no, no, you set it up here with this

740
00:39:05.239 --> 00:39:07.320
<v Speaker 12>chromatic case about a year ago. We're arguing over this

741
00:39:07.440 --> 00:39:10.480
<v Speaker 12>that just Sutton for the Sixth Circuit or a fine

742
00:39:10.519 --> 00:39:16.440
<v Speaker 12>opinion sustaining the law in tendency even though it barred

743
00:39:16.480 --> 00:39:19.000
<v Speaker 12>those surgeries, even though the surgeries were ordered up. Five

744
00:39:19.119 --> 00:39:21.960
<v Speaker 12>parents who were responding to what they thought the felt

745
00:39:22.039 --> 00:39:25.079
<v Speaker 12>needs of their kids work and some of us took

746
00:39:25.119 --> 00:39:28.079
<v Speaker 12>the line that, Okay, you want to argue on the

747
00:39:28.079 --> 00:39:30.679
<v Speaker 12>base of the legislature making adjustment and kinds of the

748
00:39:30.719 --> 00:39:34.320
<v Speaker 12>harms you think may arise from these disfiguring surgeries. But

749
00:39:34.320 --> 00:39:37.000
<v Speaker 12>there's a there's a deeper reason here that is that

750
00:39:37.039 --> 00:39:40.440
<v Speaker 12>the whole scheme is predicated on falsehoods. There's no way

751
00:39:40.519 --> 00:39:43.440
<v Speaker 12>search you can convert males and the females.

752
00:39:42.960 --> 00:39:43.920
<v Speaker 4>It feels meant to male.

753
00:39:44.119 --> 00:39:48.400
<v Speaker 12>These are cosmetic surgeries with vast disfiguring and permanent effects.

754
00:39:48.960 --> 00:39:52.760
<v Speaker 12>And so the question what if we're simply casting this

755
00:39:52.920 --> 00:39:56.800
<v Speaker 12>as a judgment of the legislature, then the question we're

756
00:39:56.880 --> 00:40:01.519
<v Speaker 12>posing this, can we do no better than an opinion?

757
00:40:02.000 --> 00:40:04.559
<v Speaker 12>There will be the equivalent of a concurring opinion in

758
00:40:04.840 --> 00:40:10.039
<v Speaker 12>BUCKFERSUS Bill on compulsory sterilization of thought. Look, this hoses line.

759
00:40:10.239 --> 00:40:14.920
<v Speaker 12>This lawless passed by a legislature composed of literate lawyers

760
00:40:15.840 --> 00:40:18.599
<v Speaker 12>working with a sense of what's been accomplished by medicine

761
00:40:18.599 --> 00:40:25.400
<v Speaker 12>and our time with it advanced sense of ugenics. I

762
00:40:25.440 --> 00:40:28.760
<v Speaker 12>completely the problem say arguments, Yeah, you could why not

763
00:40:28.840 --> 00:40:32.320
<v Speaker 12>take why not look for the most compelling ground of

764
00:40:32.519 --> 00:40:36.480
<v Speaker 12>the argument. Now, to our surprise, we heard from Scremtti

765
00:40:36.559 --> 00:40:41.159
<v Speaker 12>later saying, you know, we think you're right that we should,

766
00:40:41.159 --> 00:40:43.679
<v Speaker 12>but we were We didn't think that court, the judges

767
00:40:43.719 --> 00:40:47.119
<v Speaker 12>could handle that, so now they wanted maybe we should

768
00:40:47.159 --> 00:40:51.079
<v Speaker 12>have gone back to the web. Is to appeal to

769
00:40:51.119 --> 00:40:55.480
<v Speaker 12>an inescapable objective truth about the way we're I was

770
00:40:55.519 --> 00:40:57.800
<v Speaker 12>just recalling the Congregation of the Doctor of Faith with

771
00:40:57.960 --> 00:41:00.800
<v Speaker 12>Ratzingers saying, there's not always been an italy or hungry,

772
00:41:01.159 --> 00:41:04.159
<v Speaker 12>but as long as there are are human beings, there

773
00:41:04.239 --> 00:41:07.519
<v Speaker 12>must be males and fem males. That's how we must speak.

774
00:41:07.599 --> 00:41:11.559
<v Speaker 12>So because why not appeal to an a This gets

775
00:41:12.159 --> 00:41:14.719
<v Speaker 12>to to Stay's point before I argue about the rights

776
00:41:14.719 --> 00:41:16.800
<v Speaker 12>of parents, what about this thing that you're asking them

777
00:41:16.840 --> 00:41:17.920
<v Speaker 12>to agree to?

778
00:41:18.519 --> 00:41:19.039
<v Speaker 4>Show's over.

779
00:41:19.639 --> 00:41:24.800
<v Speaker 2>No John has returned to the chat.

780
00:41:25.199 --> 00:41:28.119
<v Speaker 4>We've been getting so many speakers. I'm exhausted.

781
00:41:28.400 --> 00:41:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Hadley is winding up and never again rebuttal, I

782
00:41:33.599 --> 00:41:34.920
<v Speaker 2>just want to I want to hear.

783
00:41:35.239 --> 00:41:38.079
<v Speaker 3>I want to just hear Hadley tell some good ethnic

784
00:41:38.119 --> 00:41:42.599
<v Speaker 3>jokes to close out the friendly podcast.

785
00:41:43.039 --> 00:41:45.119
<v Speaker 4>And he's got all kinds. He's the funniest damn ones

786
00:41:45.159 --> 00:41:46.039
<v Speaker 4>I ever heard of my life.

787
00:41:46.079 --> 00:41:47.519
<v Speaker 1>So can I impose a question to you.

788
00:41:48.280 --> 00:41:49.880
<v Speaker 4>Don't go away.

789
00:41:50.239 --> 00:41:53.960
<v Speaker 1>So in Somerset's case, and which was cited by numerous

790
00:41:54.000 --> 00:41:56.079
<v Speaker 1>others in the founding and is understood to be correct,

791
00:41:56.079 --> 00:41:59.760
<v Speaker 1>they said, slavery is so odious a contrary to the

792
00:41:59.760 --> 00:42:03.159
<v Speaker 1>next law, that it could only be supported by unmistakable

793
00:42:03.239 --> 00:42:08.159
<v Speaker 1>positive law. We have unmistakable positive law in various states

794
00:42:08.239 --> 00:42:13.239
<v Speaker 1>permitting the genetic mutilation of children, which is absolutely insane,

795
00:42:13.320 --> 00:42:15.639
<v Speaker 1>contrary to the natural law. And I have all sorts

796
00:42:15.639 --> 00:42:19.760
<v Speaker 1>of things I can say about for that, forbidding, for permitting,

797
00:42:20.039 --> 00:42:24.840
<v Speaker 1>for admitting. Yeah, And the question tomorrow is whether there's

798
00:42:24.840 --> 00:42:30.440
<v Speaker 1>a constitutional right to be for parents notwithstanding such laws

799
00:42:31.119 --> 00:42:33.840
<v Speaker 1>that So it's actually two things. Have you presume that

800
00:42:33.880 --> 00:42:35.639
<v Speaker 1>you have the laws that allow this, and then that

801
00:42:35.679 --> 00:42:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the parents don't get told, both of which seem to

802
00:42:39.000 --> 00:42:41.039
<v Speaker 1>be quite contrary to the natural law, because of course

803
00:42:41.039 --> 00:42:43.239
<v Speaker 1>parents have a right to know everything about their children,

804
00:42:43.519 --> 00:42:46.480
<v Speaker 1>if you, I think, just think about it, right, resort

805
00:42:46.519 --> 00:42:49.039
<v Speaker 1>to natural reason, natural law, or what have you. But

806
00:42:49.239 --> 00:42:52.880
<v Speaker 1>just as slavery could be supported by unmistakable positive law,

807
00:42:53.000 --> 00:42:55.360
<v Speaker 1>because it was, there was no clause prohibiting it until

808
00:42:55.360 --> 00:42:57.599
<v Speaker 1>the thirteenth Amendment. Where's the clause that prohibits this. You

809
00:42:57.719 --> 00:43:01.039
<v Speaker 1>must rely on notions of substantive process things that are

810
00:43:01.239 --> 00:43:04.440
<v Speaker 1>deeply rooted in our history and tradition, and maybe parental

811
00:43:04.480 --> 00:43:07.760
<v Speaker 1>knowledge of these sorts of things is deeply rooted. I

812
00:43:07.800 --> 00:43:10.719
<v Speaker 1>don't know. But also there's a whole originalist strain that

813
00:43:10.840 --> 00:43:13.440
<v Speaker 1>argues there is no substantive due process at all in

814
00:43:13.440 --> 00:43:16.519
<v Speaker 1>the Constitution, that it's an oxymoron, that's a misconstruction, and

815
00:43:16.559 --> 00:43:18.320
<v Speaker 1>so it is. All I want to say is it's

816
00:43:18.320 --> 00:43:21.079
<v Speaker 1>going to be a much more interesting debate tomorrow on

817
00:43:21.199 --> 00:43:26.119
<v Speaker 1>the constitutional question. As Scalia used to say, stupid but constitutional.

818
00:43:26.480 --> 00:43:28.599
<v Speaker 1>This might be one of those examples. Right, if you

819
00:43:28.719 --> 00:43:32.000
<v Speaker 1>just resort to the natural reasoning I think Hadley, then

820
00:43:32.039 --> 00:43:33.760
<v Speaker 1>you think Scaley was wrong about that, which I think

821
00:43:33.760 --> 00:43:35.320
<v Speaker 1>you do think Skeey was wrong about that.

822
00:43:35.800 --> 00:43:36.920
<v Speaker 4>Look, there was a letter.

823
00:43:38.360 --> 00:43:40.079
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I'm not taking out a position. I'm

824
00:43:40.079 --> 00:43:41.039
<v Speaker 1>playing devil's advocate.

825
00:43:41.119 --> 00:43:41.159
<v Speaker 10>You.

826
00:43:41.199 --> 00:43:42.239
<v Speaker 4>No, of course that's what we want.

827
00:43:43.039 --> 00:43:45.199
<v Speaker 1>I might be I might think these things too, but

828
00:43:45.320 --> 00:43:46.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'll keep that ambiguous.

829
00:43:46.559 --> 00:43:48.800
<v Speaker 2>But I could be wrong, as Dennis Miller used to say,

830
00:43:48.840 --> 00:43:50.800
<v Speaker 2>that great jurist anyway.

831
00:43:50.559 --> 00:43:51.840
<v Speaker 4>No, there was last word.

832
00:43:53.159 --> 00:44:03.639
<v Speaker 12>Goodbye to the Queen. No there was a letter to

833
00:44:03.639 --> 00:44:06.360
<v Speaker 12>the Wall Street Journal wi Back for a father saying

834
00:44:07.199 --> 00:44:09.920
<v Speaker 12>that he's been threatened with withdrawal of custody because he's

835
00:44:09.920 --> 00:44:13.880
<v Speaker 12>seeking console for child in California, seeking couse for childs

836
00:44:13.880 --> 00:44:18.280
<v Speaker 12>on the going this confusion about sexuality and gender. I

837
00:44:18.320 --> 00:44:21.639
<v Speaker 12>never thought. I never thought I'd be living in a

838
00:44:21.719 --> 00:44:25.199
<v Speaker 12>regime which was now. People say, are are they not

839
00:44:25.239 --> 00:44:25.920
<v Speaker 12>those rights?

840
00:44:25.960 --> 00:44:26.159
<v Speaker 4>Oh?

841
00:44:26.440 --> 00:44:29.039
<v Speaker 12>Schoolly would say, oh, those are substance of due process.

842
00:44:29.199 --> 00:44:32.039
<v Speaker 12>We simply brought them in in the nineteen twenties, right,

843
00:44:32.480 --> 00:44:37.079
<v Speaker 12>and those there's something deficient about those rights now. Thomas Cooley,

844
00:44:37.119 --> 00:44:40.280
<v Speaker 12>the great Commas Cooley was the due process clause is

845
00:44:40.840 --> 00:44:46.679
<v Speaker 12>that is that device which the judges can bring in

846
00:44:46.719 --> 00:44:49.880
<v Speaker 12>those part times of natural law that we never thought

847
00:44:50.000 --> 00:44:51.840
<v Speaker 12>we'd have to special who never thought we'd have to

848
00:44:51.840 --> 00:44:54.760
<v Speaker 12>specify the right of parents to.

849
00:44:54.880 --> 00:44:57.159
<v Speaker 4>Be informed about what is done.

850
00:44:57.480 --> 00:45:00.719
<v Speaker 12>But at the same time found this also inder stood

851
00:45:00.800 --> 00:45:04.320
<v Speaker 12>for every liberty, there's a form of license, the fact

852
00:45:04.360 --> 00:45:07.320
<v Speaker 12>that parents may have liberty to do things with their children.

853
00:45:07.400 --> 00:45:10.119
<v Speaker 12>Not think they would have a right to do anything

854
00:45:10.159 --> 00:45:10.960
<v Speaker 12>with their children.

855
00:45:11.199 --> 00:45:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll just end by saying, if we're crazy enough to

856
00:45:13.920 --> 00:45:17.719
<v Speaker 1>have laws that allow this, then the judges can't save us.

857
00:45:17.840 --> 00:45:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Aren't we too far in that respect? We need another

858
00:45:21.000 --> 00:45:22.280
<v Speaker 1>whiskey for this conversation.

859
00:45:22.360 --> 00:45:26.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so you know, but this is like having Lucretia here.

860
00:45:26.639 --> 00:45:29.440
<v Speaker 2>We've gone really long, and so John, will you.

861
00:45:29.760 --> 00:45:30.760
<v Speaker 4>Wrap us up with the usual?

862
00:45:31.159 --> 00:45:36.840
<v Speaker 3>Great great that Elon and Hadley wrap this up? And Lucretia,

863
00:45:36.960 --> 00:45:40.159
<v Speaker 3>where are you? Are you out there polishing your guns

864
00:45:40.199 --> 00:45:43.199
<v Speaker 3>alone in the dark and the basement and looking at

865
00:45:43.239 --> 00:45:48.159
<v Speaker 3>pictures of the bushes and the Romsfelds, Reagans and Chenese.

866
00:45:48.280 --> 00:45:50.119
<v Speaker 4>Anyway, we miss you and.

867
00:45:51.519 --> 00:45:55.079
<v Speaker 3>This out always drink your whiskey, meat, buy more books.

868
00:45:55.119 --> 00:45:57.440
<v Speaker 3>And Steve, what bizarre AI think do you have for

869
00:45:57.480 --> 00:45:57.920
<v Speaker 3>us today?

870
00:45:57.920 --> 00:45:59.960
<v Speaker 4>I got nothing for that? But who needs it? You're

871
00:46:00.159 --> 00:46:01.920
<v Speaker 4>the chaos of the federal society?

872
00:46:02.039 --> 00:46:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Anyone needs? Oh?

873
00:46:03.000 --> 00:46:03.599
<v Speaker 4>Are you right?

874
00:46:04.079 --> 00:46:11.039
<v Speaker 3>Is a chaos of curs, a break in rocks and

875
00:46:11.159 --> 00:46:14.000
<v Speaker 3>the Madson about.

876
00:46:13.599 --> 00:46:18.920
<v Speaker 2>The lone lo On about the line of the love.

877
00:46:24.960 --> 00:46:32.599
<v Speaker 6>I needed money because in loan about the line loves about.

878
00:46:32.239 --> 00:46:34.800
<v Speaker 1>The line loves.

879
00:46:40.280 --> 00:46:44.280
<v Speaker 2>I love loving, I guess.

880
00:46:44.119 --> 00:46:47.719
<v Speaker 4>My Ricochet

881
00:46:49.440 --> 00:46:50.400
<v Speaker 8>Join the conversation.
