Speaker 1: So you know who's in charge for the next four years.
So all these guys are accommodating that new reality. And
what that means for the social media platforms is that
they have to basically adopt something close to X's moderation policies,
which is to say, not a whole lot of moderation
at all. You know, they have to do that because
anything else opens them up to lawsuits that the courts
won't be on their side.
Speaker 2: You are listening to Carrie Let's's Financial Survival Network, where
you get valuable information you just can't find anywhere else
to thrive in today's trying times. You need the Financial
Survival Network now more than ever. Go to Financial Survivalnetwork
dot com and get your free newsletter and gift. Financial
Survival Network now more than ever.
Speaker 3: And welcome you are listening to and watching those Financial
Survival Network. I'm Carrie Levet. John Rabino is with us.
After a more than one month. I ate it and
I feel like John, we kind of like miss a month,
probably the most consequential month in so many different ways.
Then since we started talking back in twenty eleven, I
mean Trump is re elected. I knew that was going
to happen. But all the other things that are going on,
the stock market is still booming. Of lot of lots
of things going on here, John, welcome.
Speaker 1: Back, Hey carry good to be back. Yeah. We do
have a few things to talk about today, don't we.
But I gotta say, this is the first election I've
ever stressed over, because in the past it's always seemed like, yeah,
you know, you get a different flavor of basically the
same thing. The deep state is in charge regardless. This
time that was at stake. You know, if we went
four more years with the policies of the last four years,
we're over as a country. You know, the borders we're
going to stay open, and all the swing states because
of that, would would vote one way. We'd be a
one party state, and we'd have broad based censorship. We'd
probably blunder into World War three. You know, it was
it was a terrifying prospect, and I was hoping for
just you know, a squeaker for Trump and then civil
unrest for a couple of months. That seemed like the
best to hope for. But this, you know, a landslide basically,
you know, it settles the issue of who won, which
was a really big deal because we were, you know,
we were bordering on a civil war there where nobody
trusts elections in the US. Whoever loses assumes they've had
it stolen from them and is right there ready to
take to the streets. So we avoided all that, which
is just in its own right, is a huge thing,
no matter what else happens. But now we at least
have a chance of reversing some of the these policies,
and it's you know, it's a good start so far
without the transition having even happened. Yet there are policy
changes happening that that are pointing in the right direction.
You know, there's peace plans being floated in Ukraine and
negotiations overclosing the borders on both north and south right,
and yeah, that's a very big deal. So I'm I'm
short term optimistic about our political system. In other words,
we're going to survive intact. We'll still take some luck,
but we're heading in that direction, which is I got
to say, that's nice. It's been a while since since
there was any reason for optimism about the US system.
Speaker 3: Absolutely, I could agree with you more. And don't forget
those the Department of Government Efficiency. You know that I'm
that and the idea of like because nobody has talked
about this. Trump didn't talked about it his first term.
You know, no president since Reagan has talked about that.
The government talks too damn much. It's inefficient, it's the
just a corporate welfare. John, We're spending like half a
trillion to a trillion a year to get rid of
the corporate welfare. And then you know, rationalize these programs
because these programs all started. You know, we didn't have
much of a government until FDR. They weren't all these
the welfare state emerged, and then LBJ and then you know,
the rest of them. All of a sudden, we're talking
about turning back the hands on the clock, and it
seems like support for this is wide spread. Now we'll
see how long it left. Because one man's the wasted
government spending is another man's entitlement. But at least we're
having the conversation, and we're having the conversation about endless wars.
We're having the conversation about government overreach, about departments that
their only purpose is make your life miserable, like a
lot of free letter agencies, about closing the FBI headquarters,
all of these things. Now, you know they're going to
fight him. But way I look at it, John, look
at everything Trump had to do to get here. All right.
I put aside all your preconditions, all your thoughts, negative
thoughts about him, whatever they might be. He's at law fair,
multiple lawsuits, criminal indictments, everything else, it attempted to attempted assassination,
FBI stings and covers, honey, pops. Well, he had everything
against him imaginable, every single force aligned. Now, whether you
want to believe in a higher power or God or whatever,
something spared him from when he was shot there in
Pennsylvania and here he is now he won. So I
feel like he's pretty much unstoppable at this point, both
by the Democrat and by the members of his own party,
who are worse than the opposing party. Here, John, Like,
there's nothing worse than like a you know, rooted thicken,
the knife in your rib between your ribs, or Mitch
McConnell saying Hi, I'm here from the US Senate and
I'm here to help, right like the Chamber of Commerce,
all of these forces the deep state aligned against you,
me and the rest of us. He's taken him on
and he prevailed. John, I don't I can't think of
any story like this in our lifetime.
Speaker 1: Yeah, this is the most dramatic couple of years of
our lifetimes for sure. A lot of stuff that was
really improbable actually ended up happening. So I think I
have four thoughts what you just said. So let's back
and remember him first. Trump's first term wasn't even a
real term because he didn't expect to get elected. He
thought he you know, he'd lose by a fair bit,
but he'd be much more famous. He'd go back to
TV and stuff like that and make even more money.
And that was his play back then. But then he
gets elected. He doesn't have any kind of a transition
team setup or anything, and so he ended up it
was like, WHOA, I'm president now, I guess I need
like a cabinet and stuff like that. So he went
to the swamp creatures and ask them who he should
name to all these different positions in his government. And
so he ended up with business as usual. He just
he got the people who he ran against and they
just stonewalled him. Plus the law, air and everything. So
nothing happened in his first four years which other things
being equal, is actually a pretty good outcome because if
the government does nothing, then it causes very little harm.
Right But still, we're seeing his actual first term unfold
right now. As you know, you look at the people
he's nominating. They are all bomb throwers from outside the mainstream,
and they have the deep state petrified right now. By
the way, Carrie, this is a little aside. I still
have my other thoughts on this, but you're I think
the only guy I know who knows both Trump and
RFK Junior. So it gives you a pretty interesting perspective
on some of what's happening right now. But okay, let's
see now, is it possible to cut back on government spending?
You know, he's he's got people in charge, not like
Elon Musk and the vic Ramaswami are phenomenally good at organizing,
and they're they're ideas of just closing down the Education Department,
moving big chunks of the law enforcement agencies to to
satellite offices in other states so they don't become, you know,
acclimated to Washington as their home base. And that's all
great and there there so there are things that can
be cut, but that doesn't save us no matter what
they do, it does not save us from the gigantic
financial crisis is coming because we already borrowed too much money.
You know, you can't fix debt at government debt at
one hundred and twenty percent of GDP and total debt
at three hundred and fifty percent of GDP unfixable. You know,
there's nothing you can do about that except have the
crisis that leads to the currency reset. So all of
that is still to happen, and that's how they handle
that inevitability is going to be what defines or one
of the things that defines Trump's four years here because
it will probably hit before he's out, and you know,
it's going to be a very big financial crisis. They're
going to have to deal with it. And it's not
clear that they are prepared for anything like that. They
don't talk about it or anything. But it's also possible
that they do the currency reset pretty well because they've
got gold bugs, you know, this Judy Shelton lady, and
they've got other people who might be open to the
idea of going back to a gold standard, so that
that is by far the least painful way to have
that currency reset, and it could be that Trump is
actually positioned to do that correctly. You know, that would
be that would be amazing if true, but or if
it happens that way. But you know, as far as
you know, like what RFK Junior is talking about doing
in healthcare phenomenally good because we have gotten nothing for
our wealth. We're in some ways the richest country in
the world, or at least we have been in the past,
but we're the least healthy, big rich country. We're the
least happy we have. You know, our average lifespan of
the US is much less than that of Italy. So
we've basically been captured by these big interests. You know,
Big food sells us poison which causes chronic illness, and
so we go to big pharm and they give us drugs,
incredibly expensive drugs to manage the symptoms of the poisoning
from big Food. And it just goes on like that
in a circle. And RFK Junior gets that, so he
could come in and just clean this stuff up. You know,
these conflicts of interest aren't even hidden or anything. They're
just right out there in the open. But it became
so normalized that they're like an aristocracy where yeah, yeah,
we have special rights. The laws don't apply to us.
But so what, it's always been that way. So you know,
he could clean that part of the system up, and
if he does, that would be amazing because you know,
we're poisoning our children. To put it bluntly, yeah.
Speaker 3: You know, like the whole thing of the unhealthiest country
in the world, the the bcity rate and all of
this is biohacking. It's primitive biohacking. It's just like you
hauled out some sugar when Johnny is two months old
or I like that, and you get a dopamine hit
and then you get hooked on this and all of
our food if you look at all the processed foods,
you know, we have more ways of the saying sugar
in the English language that we to go you know
what yourself, right, there are more ways that they sugar,
some like two hundred and forty ways that they show.
Speaker 1: And see, the amazing thing is that sugar isn't even
the worst process sweetener that is in our food. Fruit douse,
corn syrup is much worse. And you've got all these
other things with names like you said that we don't
even necessarily recognize as some kind of a fake sweetener
that causes obesity and causes autism. I'm guessing about the autism.
Something causes autism. We will find out what it is
if we actually test for it. And childhood, what's the
thing when your old allergies, you know, allergies used to
be very rare and now they're super common. And our
food plus all the industrial chemicals that are in other
products that we that we use and sleep with and
drive around, you know, all of that stuff is causing
these things. And we could go science based in our
you know, in the FDA and the NIH and and
actually find these things. And that's that might be the
part of this whole thing that I'm most well second
most excited about. Stopping these wars is the existential thing immediately,
you know, we've got to stop blundering into World War three,
and to the extent that we shut down the whole
thing in Ukraine and dial back the thing in the
Middle East, and and make some kind of an agreement
with China so we're not one mistake by a fighter
pilot in the South China Sea away from World War
three over there that gives us the breathing room in
which to fix these other things. So you know, here's
hoping it's it's finally possible to have some optimism about
some of this stuff, which is hugely refreshing after the
past four years.
Speaker 3: And I think that the polarization we've been encountered. Whoever
called that, you know, everybody's responsible because you don't listen,
you just speak. I think that polarization now we have
a shot at it anyway fading away. But going back
to the food applies, which to me is elemental of
But I heard Rfka Junior speaking and he was talking
about seed oil, like they invented vegetable oil and short
vegetable shortening. Originally it was invented from lubrication for machinery
before they had petroleumas lubricin, and somebody thought, hey, this
can it worked for the machines, that can really work
for our food. It wasn't any evil intent at the time.
It was ignorant. But seed oil I in satti omega sixes,
which are inflammatory by nature and causes all sorts of
bad things along with all the chemicals. Like Rfka Junior
is talking about fruit needs now, to me, breakfast cereals
are poison. You should never give your kids. You should
never eat one unless you're going to eat steel cut
both feelings. But the fruit loops of the United States
had eighteen ingredients, and the one in Canada had eighteen ingredients,
except that all of the flavorings and all of the
coloring in the Canadian cereal is natural, and all of
those the ingredients and the American fruit loops were chemicals.
Speaker 1: Carry it. Okay, right, let me interject, because the New
York Times fact checked Kennedy on this. You saw that, right,
And they came back and said, no, Kennedy's wrong. There's
the same number of ingredients in each of these cereals,
and the only difference is and then they listed the
industrial chemicals that in the US version and that was
their fact check that, oh yeah, it's the same serial
except for these three different patrick chemicals that caused twenty
five different diseases.
Speaker 3: Yeah, oh man, you can't make this ship up, John, No, No,
first on the show since I started. But you really
can't make it up. You know that there is no
deep state, right, John, there's no deep state. You just
imagine who killed the Kennedy, who killed Martin Luther King Junior.
Speaker 1: Hey, you we might be finding that out. Yeah, yeah, right,
I'd like to know.
Speaker 3: But even without knowing, you know that there's a deep
state of the lives and the well and oh, elections
never get stolen, john, Right, But nineteen sixty something happened
kind of funny there and the Dead came out in
record numbers in Chicago and elected Kennedy.
Speaker 1: Right, so great, read any biography of LBJ and and
you see what they used to do or what they
still do in different forms. But back then, he you know,
he basically ran Texas, so he would figure out how
many votes each precinct needed to manufacture for him, and
he would let them know, and that's how they won
their elections, you know. And it's the same thing now
except it's it's a little more sophisticated. But there probably
aren't the phone records. But yeah, you know there's still
theft going on out there.
Speaker 3: Yeah yeah, so that's a you know, we don't want
to get kicked off here and refer to a to
be labeled as the election deniers that our digital overlords
would like to put But with musk in there X
formerly known as Twitter, it really made such a huge difference.
And the study now is it's evenly divided ideologically between
left and right, virtually identical numbers before that, the left
out number before he took it over, the left out
number the right sixty one to like thirty nine or
sixty eight to thirty two, something like that. Now it's
it reflects the country as a whole. And look at
all these people who believe in freedom and Trump the
fascist were coming out saying that the social you know,
social media platforms, especially Twitter, needs to be regulated.
Speaker 1: Right well, and a lot of them are a lot
of those people who used to be on Twitter are
going to I think it's Blue Sky. I think that's
the name of the Twitter competitor that is censored. You know,
that's that's moderated to the point where mainstream people are comfortable.
And there was just a story about that that platform
came out lately that said they are swamped with censorship
requests from their users. So those people show up and
they immediately start demanding that anybody who disagrees with them
be shut down immediately.
Speaker 3: So hopefully, uh, the big ones, Google and Facebook now
Mark Zuckerberg uh to a trip down to Mari Lago
to the huddle with Trump. What do you think that
was about.
Speaker 1: Well, you know that that is one of the benefits
of having a landslide victory because there's no ambiguity now,
so you know who's in charge for the next four years.
So all these guys are accommodating that new reality. And
what that means for the social media platforms is that
they they have to basically adopt something close to X's
moderation policies, which is to say, not a whole lot
of moderation at all. You know, they're there. They have
to do that because anything else opens them up to
lawsuits that the courts won't be on their side, and
you know, so they know they have to accommodate. And
then the same thing with the leaders of the countries
on our border. Trump hasn't has a conversation with the
president of Mexico, and she seems to agree to close
down the border on her side, you know, and just
stop the the millions of people from coming over. And
then Trudeau from Canada comes down tomorrow a Lago and
talks to Trump and then and agrees to kind of
the same thing. He's going to tighten his border policies.
So that's the kind of thing a landslide victory gets
you because you're you're not a fluke anymore. You are
the new reality. And that's that's what Trump's dealing with.
He must be loving it because you know, as a
deal maker, he probably doesn't find it that easy to
make deals all the time because you know, deals are
with somebody who has bargaining power, and in this case,
he has all the bargaining power, you know, so he
just gets to dictate terms in a lot of cases.
So he must be loving this. I hope it doesn't
make him lazy, though, because he's going to have some
hard negotiation to do out there around the world, and
you know it's gonna be much hard, harder than it
is with Mexico and Canada for sure.
Speaker 3: Well, you know, like I say, he seems to be
at this very point unstoppable, and I think we'll get
the people in the cabinet he wants. And one thing
going back, I will give you the perspective of a
recovering attorney who studied the Impoundment Power Act where Congress
I think it was right around mixed in seventy one.
He had prior to that. But if President didn't like
the allocation of what Congress did to a program, he
could just choose not suspend it. That was called impoundment,
and Congress passed the Impoundment Authority Act, which said that
he has to impound it, and then both houses of
Congress have to agree, which of course they never will
because they spent the money in the first place. This
case went to the Supreme Court during Watergate of the
congress ion. But my sources tell me, and I was
talking to somebody handling some of the transition for Trump
is they're going to resurrect the impoundment power and they're
going to take it to the Supreme Court. So if
he doesn't like what they spend money on, like building
the new mansions for Boeing the executive management, he's just
going to choose not to spend the money and then
say to Congress, Well stopped me. And I don't think
of the lead wore a constitutional crisis. But I'm telling
you this is in the game plan. He wanted to
do it last time, but he didn't have an Attorney
general who wasn't trying to sticken a ship between his bridge,
so he couldn't do it, it's going to be.
Speaker 1: This Supreme Court has at least three people who would
go along with that in a heartbeat, you know they
I mean they overturned roversus ways. I don't think impoundment
is going to be a high hurdle for them. So yeah,
that that could absolutely happen. And then what the president
has is the equivalent of a line item veto, where
he can go through the budget bills line by line
and decide whether he wants to spend that money or not.
That's a revolution. Although Garry, we got to remember that
seventy five percent of federal spending is I don't want
to say untouchable, but very hard to touch because the
military budget is hard to cut. No, and then social
Security and Medicare are baby boomer priorities. You know, our
generation is just not is not going to take you know,
a thirty percent cut in our Social Security checks or
anything like that. So the efficiency thing has to happen
in how these these programs are administered, not how much
they send us, you know, how much they pay us.
And that really limits how much the a government with
a line item veto can actually cut out his ending.
But there will be a lot you know, even even
with Social Security being untouchable, a lot of stuff can
be cut out of the budget and it'll be hilarious
to watch it, because you know, this this screaming when
when the ng O is out there, like all these
non governmental organizations that get federal subsidies end up being
cut off, like national public, public radio or and what's
the TV version of that? I forget, But anyhow, those
things are going to be defunded in a heartbeat, I
would think, you know, and the the gnashing of teeth
and the tears will be hilarious to watch.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, there's still plenty of ways. Even though I
can't really cut Social Security per se. Uh, social Security
is way more than it started out with the stability
survivors and all that, and it'll have to be reformed.
But for Medicare, if people just stop eating this garbage
in eight whole food, healthy food, eighty percent of that
Medicare bill would disappear because all of your age related
older you know, diseases, type two diabetes, heart disease, all
of it is, the eighty percent of it anyway, is
directly caused by what you eat, by the employ food supply.
Speaker 1: So that that's how you run a national healthcare system,
because there's no way to run it in today's world
without going bankrupt. And that's not just the US, it's
every country out there is going bankrupt because of national healthcare.
But if you run it with the main priority being
creating the most healthy population imaginable, then yeah, then it's
then it's way cheaper.
Speaker 3: And exercise. So the four pillars of good health, not
that we're a health wellness show here, but number one diet,
So you're eating cold food, and you're eating things that
are not injurious to your health, like sugar and high
proced crotose corn syrup and eighty five other forms of
sugar and preservative and chemicals. And then exercise right, something
that most people don't do anymore. And then you have
sleep and stress management. So those are the four pillars
of good health. And exercise, stress management time to go together.
And it's really a simple matter. I don't know how
long I'm going to live, but I feel like right now,
at this particular moment, I'm probably in better health than
eighty percent for the people of my advanced age. We're
pretty close to the age year. And that doesn't mean
I'm not going to drop dead tomorrow, but it increases
improves my chances of surviving. And so if we had
a national campaign. Just remember John, when you and I
grew up, more than half the people smoked cigarettes, right
and now less than I think it's around ten percent.
Thirteen was the last but that number keeps going down
less than ten percent. That wasn't from laws. Yeah, pactes
were increased on nicotine product. It was education drilling into
your head that smoking is houzard is for your health.
Smoking will coox Hans right, perfect example. Food education. Nutrition
education can yield the same kind of results, only faster
because we're smarter now, we have more access to the
good information and the ability to get fill throughout the band.
Speaker 1: And so, yeah, it is totally possible to go from
being the sickest country in the world to one of
the healthiest with just a few tweaks. Like you said,
it doesn't it doesn't have to be this incredibly complicated
thing with huge amounts of science jargon. You know, you
get rid of the fifty worst food out it is,
and then you insist that health insurance focus on prevention,
and you know, because how many times have you been
to the doctor where they said, you know, we're going
to test your microbiome to see if it's optimal. Never
nobody's ever mentioned that to me either, you know, and
they say, well, your your blood pressure is this, we
can give you these statin drugs for you know, your cholesterol,
will give you these other drugs for it. That's modern
medicine right now, and it's you know, it's basically a
business scam run by public health. And well, you know,
you change that and you change everything, you know.
Speaker 3: So true. Uh, you know the old joke Take two
and call me in the morning. That's what our medical
system has become. A tilth pushers and big pharma who
pays for all these guys get educated to get their yeah, right,
and then you know, now we of this healthcare crisis.
It is a crisis, and nobody has addressed it as
a crisis.
Speaker 1: That's the key, right, Yeah, Well it's not a crisis
if you're making billions of dollars from it. It's it's
a finely tuned market, you know. And that's how that's
how big pharma and big food view the current health system.
They think it's working great, and so you know, you need,
you need a bomb thrower to go into the system
and just blow it up, And there's an outside chance
that that happens in the next couple of years. And
that's that's almost too good to be true. You know
that I'd totally given up on the idea that the
country was ever going to be a healthy country. You know,
you know certain people who are in good shape and everything,
and you know what you should do for yourself, but
can't tell anybody else that stuff. So you know, don't
don't eat process carbohydrates. You know, if you say that
to ninety percent of Americans, they just look at you
you blankly, because first of all, they don't know what
the term is, you know, carbohydrates and process And second
of all, that's eighty percent of their diets. So you know,
if you take away their mountain dew and their their
cookies and stuff like that, they wouldn't have any idea
how to function in the world. So yeah, having that
come from on high, you know, have that be government policy,
and then all of a sudden people start paying attention
to it, so.
Speaker 3: A lot of your health issues can be addressed by
fast like I started doing two and three day fab
trying to do one every month, but sometimes it's a
little harder than others. And you know, blood sugar get down,
everything gets better. Use weight and apopagy. That's where your
body starts digesting all the unhealthy proteins sells that have accumulated,
aging to all these things. Anti dementia, that's another thing.
Dimension now is often referred to John as type diabetes,
all right, which means that blood sugar that the brain deteriorate,
and the nerve celt die. So all these things. Well,
we could go on and on about this, but it's
just give me your left one line summary of what
this election meant.
Speaker 1: Oh well, it meant a lot of entertainment for libertarians
in the next few years, because this is going to
be hilarious to watch. I mean it's already hilarious, but
it's it's going to get even funnier when they instead
of just talking about stuff, they actually start doing stuff.
And I can't wait for the the video of people
walking out of the FBI headquarters carrying a box with
their all the stuff they had in their offices and oh,
I'm going to Montana now. You know, it's just it's
going to be too good to be true. And you know,
our FK Junior is claiming that he's going to fire
the top four hundred scientists at the FDA if that happens. Again,
let's let's see the guys carrying their effects out in
a box, you know, to go get a real job
in the world where they actually have to produce something
of value. So it's going to be fun. At the
same time, there's going to be at least two assassinations
in the next couple of years, and that's unavoidable just
because the deep state won't go without a fight. So
they're going to fight back with serious weaponry, legal and kinetic,
you know. And so it's not going to be all
fun and games. It's going to be terrifying at different times.
And that's the nature of a revolution, so so be it.
I think the guys who are making it happen understand that,
and they know what they're getting into and.
Speaker 3: Think they voluntarily entered into it. So free will. I
love the taste of liberal peers in the morning.
Speaker 1: Kerry. One other, well, there's a bunch more to say
about the election, But one other thing that is a
result of that is the bricks movement. Yeah, and Trump
is saying, yeah, you know, if you try to start
a new currency, we'll slap you with one hundred percent tariff.
And I'm not sure that that's the right way to
approach it, because if you if you try to force
people to use your currency, it's not going to make
them want to use it even less. You know, it
seems like if Trump came out and said, well, look,
we've weaponized the dollar, I'm very sorry about that. It
was a huge mistake. From now on, the dollar is
going to be a neutral reserve asset. We will not
kick people out of the Swiss system anymore. We will
not levy sanctions on people. That's not the role of
the manager of the world's reserve currency. I think that
would short circuit the bricks movement. But saying you have
to use our currency or we will attack you, I
don't think that's a good policy. So we'll see. But
it seems like a mistake.
Speaker 3: Let's look at what it because he threatened the Mexico
and Canada of twenty five percent to get them feel
the borders, and they're already doing it, or they will
do it imminently. Let's just say that what he really
wants to do what are his goaled make the dollar
in the United States fundamentally sound, right, bring back sound money.
And the only way to do that is to get
those people the bricks to make a treaty with them,
because the bricks on their own are going to break
up because you have India, China, and Russia, and they
have divergent interests, especially China, so that brick thing is
not going to work anyway. But the dollar will get replaced.
But if you can get them to say, all right,
will we will agree to a treaty not to weaponize
the dollar ever again, we will cut down the deficit
to no more than like five percent of GDP. Right,
and you undertake a whole bunch of things, because treaty
are the law of the land. They're up there with statues. Right.
So he does a treaty with these countries and then
shove it down to Congress and through and then Congress
has sports become spending because there's a treaty that they
have to.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 3: They tried to do this with the International Small Arms
Treaty by banning small arms. The US never signed on
to it, and it seems to have never gone into effect.
It's exactly the same thing. I think got to look
at it strategically that Trump doesn't just do something. He's
got a goal in mind when he did it, and
probably the goal is to not weaponize the dollar again
and to normalize Russia again, to bring them back into
the fold, because that will be part of the deal
that happens when assuming he can settle the Ukraine War,
all of the sanctions against Russia, a pledge to never
and an international treaty never the weaponize it's a currency again,
that I think is the end goal.
Speaker 1: Well yeah, okay, but that's what I'm saying, is that
he could go straight there without picking this particular fight,
because by you know, threatening these tariffs, he's just doing
what the government of the US has been doing for
the last several decades that led to the creation of
the bricks. So yeah, if he just did all this
stuff you just said, that would be a better way
of going about it. Just say just saying, look, we're
going to be neutral again. You know, the dollar is
something you can all hold as a reserve asset and
we won't cheat and we won't abuse you. So I
don't think he has to go through the whole you know, start,
you know, making a threat to begin with, and then
negotiating back backwards from That's That's all I'm saying, is
that that'll be counterproductive.
Speaker 3: Yeah's just both can bring the sensors Smith to an end.
Even Martin Armstrong is at his conference. He was optimistic,
but he thinks in twenty six, twenty eight, it's going
to be major problems in the world. He doesn't know
what whether it's a dollar or you know, he doesn't
know what the cause is. He can only he can
only say with the system is telling him. And by
the way, John, I'm almost done with my book with
Martin Armstrong. It's entitled The the World according to Martin Armstrong,
My decade long Conversation with the Master forecast going through
every single interview I ever did with Martin, summarizing them
and basically getting a forward from Martin on the book.
And it'll be available, hopefully in the next couple of weeks.
Speaker 1: Garry, I can't wait to see that. Let me have
a copy when it's available, and I'll post an excerpt
on substack. Yeah, excellent.
Speaker 3: Yeah, you'll be able to get it in Obviously, I'm
not going in an audio book could abtain from audio,
but you'll be able to get it for the kindle
and the paperback and hopefully wherever fine books used to
be sold, including out and Barren the Noble.
Speaker 1: All right, good, Well, you know Martin Armstrong is one
of those unique guys who's been outrageous and right for
a really long time. You know, you were talking about
how he back when the dow was at ten thousand,
he was. He was talking about a quadrupling and quintupling
from there. And you know, back in those days, I
was looking for stuff to short. So we know who
is a better forecaster out of the two of us?
Speaker 3: Yeah, amazing. And you know I went through a list
of the predictions. Crash of eighty seven he predicted to
this day, the crash of the Ruble in the nineteen
ninety eight, of the crash of the Pound. So many
of these events, the guy has been spot off. So
I don't know how he does it, whether he's using
astrology or he says Socrates his computer system. However he's
doing it, he's got an enviable record that f you
out there for match, So hey, make sure you go
over to John substach Orbino dot substack dot com and
LinkedIn in the show notes. For this interview, we'll just
have to go over to Financial Survival Network dot com.
We'll see the show notes, and while you're there, sign
up for your newsletter. We are up to sixty thousand
subscribers now, John, and we're shooting for one hundred hopefully
by mid twenty twenty five.
Speaker 1: All right, well, great talking to you, Carrie. Let's do
it again soon.
Speaker 2: Thanks for listening to Carrie Lets's Financial Survival Network. Your
solution to today's trying times. For the latest, go to
Financial Survivalnetwork dot com. Financial Survival Network
Speaker 1: Now more than ever,