Speaker 1: What's going on. Thank you so much for listening to
this podcast. It is heard live every day from noon
to three on WBT Radio in Charlotte.
Speaker 2: And if you want exclusive.
Speaker 1: Content like invitations to events, the weekly live stream, my
daily show prep with all the links, become a patron,
go to dpetecleanershow dot com. Make sure you hit the
subscribe button. Get every episode for free right to your
smartphone or tablet. And again, thank you so much for
your support. My apologies. Let me start my apologies going.
So I had the caller Jonathan. People have identified him
as a seminar caller. Rush Limboy used to talk about them, right,
the seminar callers, they're not actually calling to argue or
discuss things in good faith. But we then went to
break because I kept him on that entire third segment
of the last hour, and then he accused me of
not allowing anybody with a different opinion to talk, which
was kind of bizarre considering how long he was on
the air with me, but he so I let him
go and then we went to break. But then coming
out of the break, I forgot or during the break,
I forgot to check my emails and tweets and so
I'm gonna go over him now. So we're gonna these
are messages.
Speaker 2: So if you're listening on.
Speaker 1: The podcast, that these all these messages and tweets are
from topics in the in the last hour, so you
should probably go and just listen to that one first
if you're on If you're listening on the podcast, go
to episode two for Today Hour two. All right, so
first we talked about Letitia James, new York Attorney General.
She's being probed, but she's being probed for potentially federal
more crimes related to mortgage fraud. So a couple of
people commenting on that, Susan said, Pete, doesn't it sound
like Letitia James projected her guilt onto Trump as well
as being insanely jealous and hating him irrationally? Yeah, it does.
You know what, it reminds me of the prosecutor down
in Atlanta, Fanny Willis, Like the stuff that she was
doing in the midst of such a high profile case,
when you know people are going to be digging through
your you know, professional and personal life, like why would
you do this sort of stuff? And I think that
there is I think there is a psychological glitch going
on in some of these people. I think, when you,
you know, you rise through the ranks of you know,
political office and such, I think that well, I mean,
there are more sociopaths in the ranks of the elected
officials than I think really any other maybe lawyers and media.
So I think that's, you know, there's this feeling that like,
I'm never going to get caught. I'm too good, I'm
smarter than everybody else and all that. Greg says, Just
when I thought these clowns on the left couldn't get
any dumber, what more on would flamboyantly prosecute a US
president while doing the thing you're accusing the defendant of.
Is this real life, No, Greg, this is fantasy. We're
caught in a never mind. Bob says, oh, regarding Jonathan's
call that the volume and when he was talking about
that chart, the volume indicates trades, not direction. Each trade
equals a seller plus a buyer. Caller is a seminar buffoon.
Speaker 2: There you go.
Speaker 1: That's from Bob and angela subject line conspiracy. I love
it when you make them sweat and call them out.
He never had one thing he could say. He obviously
just called to create zero substance, keep digging. Love the
show Angela, Thank you Angela, I appreciate it. On the
Letitia James story, Gary says on Twitter, my assumption on
Letitia James is that she is deft troadding the bank.
Commercial real estate rates are based sorry, rates are different
based on thing On a second, commercial real estate rates
are different than residential. I think most commercial real estate
loans are five years that adjust probably at higher rates
than a residential fixed thirty. I have a commercial vehicle
for my business that is twenty five hundred. The auto
loan rate is over twice as much as what it
would be for a non commercial vehicle rate. I have
checked with credit unions and they wouldn't do a loan
on a commercial vehicle.
Speaker 2: That's interesting. And then.
Speaker 1: Old guy get off my lawn says. One to four
units is designated residential real estate and will have lower
interest rates. Above four units is designated commercial real estate
and would have higher interest rates. So that's the X
for why the place that she bought in Brooklyn years ago,
like in the I think in eighty three or something.
She bought this place years ago and kept saying it
was only four units but it apparently has five, and
that would that would be the material difference is that
if you're four units are fewer than you're in the
real you're in the residential side. Anything more than four
units now you're commercial and you get higher interest rates.
So that seems to be the explanation on that. Let
me see this is from russ. I'm sure Ag James
would not have done it intentionally, but under reporting the
number of units on her properties could be used to
hide income and inflate expenses per unit for tax purposes.
There's another potential explanation. Trent says that caller Jonathan was crazy.
Did he not listen when the tariffs went into effect
where you were not happy about Trump's plans. I think
you spent three full shows on the topic, pushing back
against him and some of your listeners. Yes, I did.
It went on for about a week. I did an
appearance on a radio program up in Raleigh in Greensboro
that got me accused of being part of the globalist cabal.
And I kept this secret hidden for so long. Who
knew it would be the tariff's position that would have
exposed me? But yeah, I said, I'm and what have
I said about the tariffs this entire time. I've repeated
several talking points, if you will, but they are simply
I could very well be wrong. I could be the
fish that doesn't know it's wet because I grew up
in this free trade water right where we wanted free trade.
And there is this other competing theory, the balanced trade
theory or model, that took off in the late nineties,
and I say took off among like zero point one
percent of economists. And so that's the fight that is
now occurring. I have always been for fair and free trade. Okay,
it's got to be fair, and if we're being blocked
access into their markets, then fair is we're blocking your
access into our markets, which is why we shouldn't be
dealing with.
Speaker 2: China like we do.
Speaker 1: Also, I don't like trading with you know, communists and enemies.
We shouldn't be doing that. But the theory at the
time was that if we helped China open up, they
will recognize the error of their ways too, like the
Soviets did. The problem there is that that's not why
the Soviet Union fell. They didn't fall because you know,
people were like, wow, look at this, I can get
cheap goods from America or something. Oh, I wanted that,
you know, Texas instrument calculators so bad. No, that wasn't it.
Speaker 2: It was well rock and roll music.
Speaker 1: That was probably part of it, youth rebellion, but it
was because the flaws in communism are self defeating. It
will destroy you from the inside. It eventually collapses, as
they always do. So we just had to wait them
out and keep them on lockdown. And that's what we
should have been doing with China instead of opening them
up and then hoping that they'll you know, come around
to see things the way we do. But instead we
just enriched them and funded their their revolution. Not a
good not a good idea anyway. So if oh, and
then this one was regarding the North Carolina, there are
two bills in the North Carolina legislature to prohibit the
sale of agricultural land around military bases to China basically
and Iran and Russia and so our ah pubs or
whatever says on Twitter. So if they're a friendly country
today but then become an adversary, is their land confiscated?
Speaker 2: Hmm? That's a good idea.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I feel like if we go to war with
a country, and that country owns land in our country,
then we would just seize that land that does. I
think that tracks. Here's a great idea. How about making
an escape to a really special and secluded getaway in
western North Carolina. Just a quick drive up the mountain
and Cabins of Asheville is your connection. Whether you're celebrating
an anniversary, a honeymoon, maybe you want to plan a
memorable proposal, or get family and friends together for a
big old reunion, Cabins of Asheville has the ideal spot
for you where you can reconnect with your loved ones
and the things that truly matter. Nestled within the breath
taking fourteen thousand acres of the Pisga National Forest, their
cabins offer a serene escape in the heart of the
Blue Ridge Mountains. Centrally located between Ashville and the entrance
of the Great Smoky Mountain National Park. It's the perfect
balance of seclusion and proximity to all the local attractions,
with hot tubs, fireplaces, air conditioning, smart TVs, Wi Fi, grills,
outdoor tables, and your own private covered porch. Choose from thirteen.
Speaker 3: Cabins, six cottages, two villas, and a great lodge with
eleven king sized bedrooms. Cabins of Ashville has the ideal
spot for you for any occasion, and they have pet
friendly accommodations. Call or text eight two eight three six
seven seventy sixty eight or check out all there is
to offer at cabins Offashville dot com and make memories
that'll last a lifetime.
Speaker 2: Carolina Journal.
Speaker 1: Reporting on a committee meeting that occurred yesterday, Yeah, yesterday,
April fifteenth. The committee was hearing the It was the
House Education Committee, and they were hashing out the details
of House Bill six thirty six. The name of that
bill is entitled Promoting Wholesome Content for Students. You can
obviously see why Democrats would be angry about this. They
vigorously objected to the measure that would ban sexually explicit
materials from public school libraries. They got very angry yesterday
during the committee meeting. The bill would direct local public
school units so districts basically to adopt policies for reviewing
library media to ensure that it is age appropriate, has
literary value, and complies with laws like the Children's Internet
Protection Act. Again, you can see why Democrats are so
mad about this bill, How dare you prevent me from
pushing pornography in front of your kid's face. I had
an idea actually when I was reading this story, and
I thought, you know what, maybe I'm wrong, Like it's
good to self examine. Think, Okay, well what is the
other side of this argument? And maybe they've got a
point here, and so maybe I'm wrong, and then let's
let's open that door. Right, Okay, So I'm wrong, and
this is actually this kind of material is age appropriate
for the kids in you know, second grade. They should
be reading comic books with you know, drawn pictures, graphic
depictions of various forms of intercourse. That like that's a
good thing, right to get kids familiar with this. Okay,
you know we're all gonna die too, you know that everybody,
No one gets out of this life alive. So maybe
we should, I don't know, maybe do some snuff films
for them too. Maybe could we do that, you know,
like actual videos of people getting killed or dying, Like
why not get them exposed to that, get them, you know,
made aware, so you know, there they won't be as
afraid of it and all. Like like I'm just trying
to I'm thinking through the principle the standard, which obviously
is nuts.
Speaker 2: It is nuts.
Speaker 1: We make these determinations all the time for age appropriateness.
That's why we have ratings on movies. Democrats don't care
about that, right, Why don't democrats Why don't we see
democrats out there, you know, picketing with their signs at
movie theaters demanding that, you know, the rating system be
abolished because they need to have your kid dragged into
some rated X movie Or NC seventeen. Did they even
do those anymore? Maybe that was a big deal. The
NC seventeen wasn't that worse than are which I thought
was weird because ours for eighteen and older? Right, I
don't even remember. But we do this all the time.
We do it all the time. The labels are there,
right in order to tell parents, hey, this has explicit language. Hey,
this has references to smoking. By gosh, you see these
warnings all the time on every TV show. Now, why
it's so you can ban that show? No, it's not
a ban. No one is saying that the show must
be taken off the air, it must be banned. They're saying,
cure rate, cure rate. Make a decision whether you want
your kid to see this or not based on a
trigger warning, if you will, Right, lefties, you guys are
all about the trigger warnings for well, probably like three
years or so that kind of burned out. But the
you guys are all about these trigger warnings. That's what
the that's what the rating say, that's why they put
the stupid things. Oh my gosh, you better be careful
because this has, you know, mild violence or something on
this TV show. I was watching one and it said
something like, uh, suicide.
Speaker 2: Was one of the warnings.
Speaker 1: And it's like, well, that's a spoiler, Like why are
you telling me that?
Speaker 2: Why would you say that?
Speaker 3: Why would you put that warning on the show?
Speaker 1: It's the season finale. I think it was actually White Lotus.
It's the only one I watched. Christy watched the show.
I watched the I watched the last season finale because
I said, like, I see this stuff. This show is
being talked about all over the place, so like, I
just I got to watch one episode, so I have
a general understanding of the concept of what it is.
So I didn't I didn't know any of the stories
or anything. But when you put that warning on the
beginning of the show suicide, Like, Wow, okay, I think
someone's probably gonna, you know, commit suicide or something or
try so ah. I just I'm so fed up with this,
with the fake argument that they make about this particular book.
But on the other hand, it's very helpful for people
like me who are on the political right. That makes
it makes it easier to win people over to my
side because I feel like most parents understand the concept
of curating reading materials for their kid. It's why you
buy a book that's not too advanced for your child
at the early ages, because they don't understand what they're reading, right.
You don't give them some kind of heavy material dealing with,
you know, existential dilemmas. They're just they're they're too young,
their brains are not fully formed. You just need to
teach them how to spell cat at this point, right.
But yeah, Democrats very very mad about how spilled six
thirty six. They really would like your kid to see
the porn. I mean, I guess that might be a
winning political message. We'll find out, all right. So spring
is here a time of renewal and celebrations. You've got graduations, weddings, anniversaries,
and the special days for mom and dad. Your family's
making memories that are going to last a lifetime. But
let me ask you, are all of those treasured moments
from days gone by? Are they hidden away on old
VCR tapes, eight millimeter films, photos slides? Are they preserved?
Because over time, these precious memories can fade and deteriorate,
losing the magic of yesterday. At Creative Video, they help
you protect what matters most. Their expert team digitizes your
cherished family moments and transfers them onto a USB drive,
freezing them in time so they can be enjoyed for
generations to come. I urge you do not wait until
it's too late this spring, celebrate your past. Visit Creative
Video today and let them preserve your legacy with the
love and care that it deserves. Creative Video Preserving Family
Memories since nineteen ninety seven, located in mint Hill, just
off four eighty five, Orders are accepted to get all
the details that create a video dot com. As we
do on every third Wednesday of the month, we chat
with Stacy Matthews aka Sister Told You and she is
over at RedState dot com and you can read her
work there. RedState dot Com. Hey Stacy, how are you?
Oh my goodness, your phone connection is terrible? Are you
standing next to a microwave?
Speaker 4: No?
Speaker 2: No, that's better. That's a little bit better.
Speaker 1: Okay, okay, So is society so crazy now that Piers
Morgan makes sense? Is that what happened, like the entire
Western civilization went so nuts that now Piers Morgan seems
sort of sane.
Speaker 4: It's not just Piers Morgan's people like Bill Maher, who
probably five or six years ago you and I were
laughing at on a daily basis. These people are slowly
being red. Feel it's a good thing, but it's just
it's just a sign of the time, you know, with
Howe the lift is gone, that even some of their
most stalwart defenders are abandoning ships.
Speaker 1: Well, and it's over issues. I saw where was this
RNC research the Twitter account? So the Republican Party pushing out,
you know, various narratives and such. But they I think
they're correct in this. They said, here's what Democrats are
prioritizing this week. Deported illegal alien gang members, elite IVY
League universities with massive endowments, and men playing women's sports
like that's those are the hills they're choosing to fight on.
It's bizarre. And even with the dirty books in the
libraries issue, like, it's all still this sort of same
thing where they've found the least popular positions to take
and they just take them and run with it. And
this case of what Mahmud Khalil out of Columbia University
is another one of these cases, and you wrote about
it right.
Speaker 4: Yeah. Paris Morgan was on the Bill Maher program a
few days ago, Pee and he made sense on this issue,
and he kind of turned the left arguments around on
them on the My Mood Colt case. You know, they're
trying to make it sound like his First Amendment rights
are being violated and that sort of thing. But he's
you know, he's on he's here on the green card.
And like Marco Rubio said, if if on his application
you know, to come to America, he had put anything
on there about you know, supporting a mosque and wanting
a worldwide into Fada and all that, his application would
have been rejected. So it's kind of like, you know,
I mean, that just boils it right down to what
the issue is about. And what Piers Morgan said was
if this guy, It's like if Piers Morgan, for example,
had come to America, you know, on a green card
and whatnot, and then he proceeded to go to Columbia
University and whip up white supremacist mobs against black students
and have them terrorized. The left words had no issues
with with having them deported immediately, you know, virtuy signaling
about it. But because it's a person who clearly hates Jews,
they're treating him to him in his case differently, and
it kind of makes you want.
Speaker 1: Right, well, somebody comes into your your house and says
I want to destroy your house, and you you are
under no obligation to allow them to stay in your house.
Like it's a It's a pretty basic concept, that's It's
just it. It's another example of how the left picks
their poster kids for various issues. And I don't understand
why they pick the ones they pick when there are better,
uh poster kids out there for them to choose.
Speaker 2: And this is just another one of them, this.
Speaker 1: Khalil guy from Columbia University who literally said uh. And
the quote here is I support Hamas, I support Global Intofauta,
I support the destruction of Western civilization, Like, but no,
you don't get to stay, you don't get to come
here and overthrow our country.
Speaker 2: I think it's right.
Speaker 4: Nobody should have any any sympathy for this first night.
I know that you've seen a lot of reports, and
this is the real interesting thing is the media is
still doing their thing. You know, you have Democrats doing
their thing. I'm still repeating the same mistakes they made
ahead of the twenty twenty four elections with the positions
that they take Pete. But the media is doing the
same thing in every media report, nearly every media report
you see about this guy, he is a lawful citizen.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's like the Maryland Dad.
Speaker 4: Story, right, every media it's like they want people to know, Okay,
the Trump administration is trying to deport a legally an
American citizen who is here legally. It's just, oh, it's
just maddening the way they play these word games.
Speaker 1: Let's talk about Barrett Evans and also the fact that
Ford Motor Company apparently has a chief learning officer.
Speaker 4: Yeah, and I'm still trying to figure out what that means.
There were a lot of things said on Twitter about
what a chief learning officer was that aren't repeatable the radio?
Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm the CLO at Ford, Like, oh a CLO.
What's that chief law enforcement officer or something? No, no, no,
it's a chief Learning officer who apparently is.
Speaker 4: Learning officer that has a lot of learning to do.
His name is Barrett Evans and he I haven't heard
any update as to whether ford Is responded to this,
but at the time I wrote my piece at RedState
dot com, Barrett Evans was a Chief Learning Officer or
the chief Learning officer at Ford, and he went on
the Threads social media app to talk about how he
was triggered by a man who was on a flight
with him, an elderly man who he says, watched Fox
News the entire flight and once they departed the plane
and were headed to their next destination. This chief learning
officer for Ford, he said he saw the elderly man
his wife get in a wheelchair to be pushed to
wherever it was they were going, and he promptly, promptly
confronted them and told them that because they were using
wheelchairs they supported dee. I I mean, last I checked
the d and d I does not stand for disabled.
Speaker 2: No, nor does the E or the I.
Speaker 1: Yeah right, yeah, it's uh, they're they're needing assistance in
a wheelchair and so therefore that's a d E I
and he and he goes up.
Speaker 2: And now I guess the question is did this actually
even happen? We don't even know.
Speaker 4: That was my question too, because you know, the last
uh the Purtue signal was on with love to embellish,
you know, their their cred. So this this may or
may not have happened. But what made this all kind
of crystal clear as to what this guy was all
about was when you saw a picture that was posted
as him on social media. People that did their digging
and whatnot and found a picture of him was someone
who was presumably his partner standing in front of a
rainbow flag. So we know that this person probably wouldn't
have his job at Ford if it wasn't for DEI.
Speaker 1: I'm going to go out on a limon say that
the Chief Learning Officer has something to do with DEI
stuff at.
Speaker 4: Ford, right, exactly like it. Like other people said, he
wouldn't probably would not be working it for unless it
was for the I. Yeah, so of course he's going
to be a proponent of it. But but imagine the
kind of person you have to be. And again we're
just assuming for purposes of discussion that this story that
he told was true. Imagine thinking that going online and
bragging about harassing, aggressively harassing an elderly couple getting in wheelchairs.
Imagine thinking that makes you look good. Think about the
depravity of the mind here for somebody to think that
that actually would make them look good. Yeah, it is
like one hundred thousand likes on threads.
Speaker 1: Well, and seriously, Threads is the Facebook version of Twitter,
which I'm surprised that's actually still around.
Speaker 3: You mean old.
Speaker 4: Twitter where the lunatics around.
Speaker 1: The astylum, right exactly, But now I think they got
cannibalized by Blue Sky as well. So there are all
these lots of places for the left to run to
to avoid any kind of pushback on their narratives. You
have one other thing that I wanted to ask you about,
because I wasn't aware of this until today. You do
a caregivers diary on RedState dot com as well, and
I read this one that you're the most recent one
you had about the bird feeders. My wife kids me
because I have I like looking at birds. I mean,
I haven't we haven't done the bird feeder route yet.
I have owned bird feeders in my time, but like
this was this was a nice story, I thought, and
that after your your dad passed away, you're now taking
care of your mom and somebody you're at your sister
gave you a bird feeder.
Speaker 4: Yes, yes, and I appreciate you reading that and bringing
up a VIP program at Red State. Yeah. Back in
twenty twenty two and in the summertime, and I'll try
to make this quick. We lost my dad after a
long battle with kidney disease, and four months later we
learned that my mom had calling cancer. And in the
middle of that, my sisters were trying to do things
to cheer us up and to take our minds off
of our thoughts about my dad. And they bought my
mom a bird feeder because my mom really likes spurs
and she likes watching the bird feeders. And I grumbled
about it at first because I knew I was going
to have to maintain it. And at the time, the
squirrels were getting to the bird feeder and it drove
me crazy because I knew I was going to have
to spend a lot of money to keep refilling the feeder.
So but as time went on, I began to really
enjoy the feeders, and I actually ended up getting new feeders,
new shepherd's hooks, setting things up to where you know,
both Mom and I could get visuals on the birds,
and it just it just reminded me, well, you know,
once I kind of came to the conclusion that hey,
I'm into the bird feeder thing, it just it was
just another reminder to me that we really need to
pause enjoy the simple things in life. You know, we
don't do that enough. You know, for me, my mind
is a little overly analytical. I was a little bit
scoogy about the bird feeders first, but it really is
a reminder to slow down and to and to just
enjoy the simple things, because that's really what life's all about.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's a It was a It was a nice piece.
I enjoyed it thoroughly, as I do our conversation. So
we'll talk again in about thirty days, if that's all
right with you, Stacy.
Speaker 4: I would love it. Pete, thank you all.
Speaker 2: Yes, ma'am, you too. That's Stacy Matthews.
Speaker 1: You can read her work at RedState dot com and
that the caregiver's diary that she writes is part of
their VIP program RedState dot com. All right, if you're
listening to this show, you know I try to keep
up with all sorts of current events, and I know
you do too, And you've probably heard me say get
your news from multiple sources. Why well, because it's how
you detect media bias, which is why I've been so
impressed with ground News. It's an app, and it's a website,
and it combines news from around the world in one
place so you can compare coverage and verify information. You
can check it out at check dot ground, dot news
slash pete. I put the link in the podcast description too.
I started using ground News a few months ago and
more recently chose to work with them as an affiliate
because it lets me see clearly how stories get covered
and by whom. The blind spot feature shows you which
stories get ignored by the left and the right. See
for yourself check dot ground, dot news slash pete. Subscribe
through that link and you'll get fifteen percent off any subscription.
I use the Vantage plan to get unlimited access to
every feature your subscription. Then not only helps my podcast,
but it also supports ground news as they make the
media landscape more transparent. I'd be surprised if he's still here,
but Dave has been hanging on for a while, so
let's see if he's still there.
Speaker 5: Hello, Dave, Absolutely, wow, because I I need to get
this off my ears.
Speaker 2: Uh oh okay.
Speaker 5: As conservatives, we want smaller government. We are waiting on
the government to take these books out of schools. We
need to teach our kids at the home level to
stay away from this garbage.
Speaker 2: Yeah. That doesn't always work though, of.
Speaker 5: Course it doesn't. But we teach our kids not to
put their hands on the hot stoves.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that didn't work for me either, I still touched it. Well,
it's just like you can only do so much though, right,
And it's one thing. I mean, that's like saying, you know,
you know, you teach your kids don't smoke cigarettes, But
then if they went to school and the school is
selling packs of cigarettes, you know, in the in the cafeteria,
that makes it harder for the kid to not cave
into the peer pressure.
Speaker 5: That makes perfect clent.
Speaker 2: Yeah, but I know.
Speaker 1: I understand, like, and I'm not discounting. Yeah, it starts
in the home. You are absolutely correct, It starts in
the home. And I just think that by that you
that the schools by doing what they're doing currently, they
are working at odds with parents who are trying to
do just that.
Speaker 2: Does that make sense?
Speaker 5: Absolutely? Yeah, all right, I love what you do. I
love what you do.
Speaker 2: Thanks, Dave, I appreciate it.
Speaker 4: Man.
Speaker 2: Yep, yep, all right, take care. Thanks for hanging on.
By the way, along these lines.
Speaker 1: Breaking news out of the UK, you may want to
sit down for this. In a unanimous decision of the
UK Supreme Court, they have ruled that the terms woman
and sex refer to a woman and sex. This is
a big day. The word woman means a biological woman.
Who knew, I mean, besides, like you know, ninety nine
percent of the planet, but.
Speaker 2: Who knew that?
Speaker 1: Who knew UK would do that. There's the thing that
they have over there called the Equality Act of twenty
twenty ten, and there are words in the law that
refer to the words of women and sex that are
in the law, and the leftists have been trying to
redefine these terms. Well, it just says woman. So and
that's why there's been this push You know, trans women
are women, Like, there's a reason why they do that, right.
The ideology corrupts the language in order to control the debate.
So when you corrupt the language by saying this thing
is this other thing, and then people don't want to
offend you, they're being nice, or they feel, you know,
intellectually inferior, or they just go along, get along whatever. Well,
that expert knows what they're talking about, so I guess
that's true. And then it's like, okay, well then there
are all women. Everybody's a woman.
Speaker 2: That's great.
Speaker 1: Now all of these laws that are just about women,
now they apply to trands also, like, oh, so they've
rewritten the law without having to actually rewrite the law.
And what the UK Supreme Court said today was that
in this law from twenty ten, it was written the
word women and sex were referring to biological women and
biological sex. I didn't think that our you know, society
had gotten to the point where we needed to say
such obvious things.
Speaker 2: But here we are. Here we are.
Speaker 1: This is the same thing that the left did in
America when they and they still are attempting to rewrite
what Title nine to make gender and sex mean either
the same thing or not the same thing, depending on
which argument advances their ideology. Same playbook. Right, sex is
not gender, unless, of course it's title nine, in which
case then that's what it totally means. It's the same thing,
So you can't discriminate against, you know, boys wanting to
play in girls' sports. And that's the side, by the way,
that the left is taking, that's the side that democrats
are taking. Not a good position, not a good argument
to make, but we'll see how it plays out.
Speaker 3: All right, that'll do it for this episode.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much for listening. I could not do
the show without your support and the support of the
businesses that advertise on the podcast, so if you'd like,
please support them too and tell them you heard it here.
You can also become a patron at my Patreon page
or go to dpecleanershow dot com. Again, thank you so
much for listening, and don't break anything while I'm gone.