WEBVTT

1
00:00:03.120 --> 00:00:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Well life.

2
00:00:04.400 --> 00:00:06.639
<v Speaker 2>Okay, guys, got another debate for y'all today. We got

3
00:00:06.679 --> 00:00:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Brian Shapiro, Jay Dher both have been on the show.

4
00:00:09.119 --> 00:00:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for coming guys in person. Let's make this thing happen.

5
00:00:11.960 --> 00:00:13.560
<v Speaker 2>So we're going to talk about Trump today. I ran

6
00:00:13.640 --> 00:00:16.440
<v Speaker 2>and Alex Jones. I know Brian wanted to talk about

7
00:00:16.440 --> 00:00:18.719
<v Speaker 2>Alex Jones, but absolutely you want to lead this thing

8
00:00:18.760 --> 00:00:19.679
<v Speaker 2>off with Alex Brian.

9
00:00:19.800 --> 00:00:21.559
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, first of all, thanks for being here. Man,

10
00:00:21.640 --> 00:00:24.079
<v Speaker 1>nice to meet you. I've seen I've seen some of

11
00:00:24.079 --> 00:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>your stuff on social media. I'll be honest with you.

12
00:00:27.000 --> 00:00:29.399
<v Speaker 1>What we do is probably a little different. Right, as

13
00:00:29.440 --> 00:00:31.640
<v Speaker 1>we were talking off the air, you debate, you've been

14
00:00:31.640 --> 00:00:33.679
<v Speaker 1>doing this for like what twenty five years, right, long time.

15
00:00:34.159 --> 00:00:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I've been doing radio for almost that long. But my

16
00:00:36.280 --> 00:00:38.439
<v Speaker 1>show is more of like the last twenty four hours,

17
00:00:38.520 --> 00:00:40.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, talking about news of the day and that

18
00:00:40.759 --> 00:00:43.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of stuff. But all right, let's start. I wanted

19
00:00:43.280 --> 00:00:44.679
<v Speaker 1>to start off by asking you about something because I

20
00:00:44.719 --> 00:00:47.840
<v Speaker 1>know you're friends with Alex Jones, right, and I know

21
00:00:47.880 --> 00:00:49.359
<v Speaker 1>this is probably something more. We'll get into it a

22
00:00:49.399 --> 00:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit, but bull well, you know, I come from Connecticut.

23
00:00:53.920 --> 00:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I was raised in Connecticut, and obviously where the Sandy

24
00:00:55.960 --> 00:00:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Hook shooting was. And I say to myself, and I've listened,

25
00:00:59.719 --> 00:01:02.159
<v Speaker 1>I've reviewed his ex wife. That's kind of irrelevant to

26
00:01:02.159 --> 00:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>this conversation that I've had private conversations with her, But

27
00:01:05.400 --> 00:01:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I've also interviewed some of the parents who have lost

28
00:01:08.000 --> 00:01:10.719
<v Speaker 1>their children, eight and nine year olds that were decapitated,

29
00:01:11.959 --> 00:01:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and Alex Jones made their pain worse. And I thought

30
00:01:14.760 --> 00:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>what he did was reprehensible. And then he used the

31
00:01:17.879 --> 00:01:21.519
<v Speaker 1>excuse of psychosis, which I think is utter bullshit. He

32
00:01:21.599 --> 00:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>knew that that shooting happened. He's not a stupid guy,

33
00:01:24.480 --> 00:01:26.519
<v Speaker 1>and he only lied about it on the air with

34
00:01:26.560 --> 00:01:31.359
<v Speaker 1>his huge platform and said that they were actors, you

35
00:01:31.400 --> 00:01:33.799
<v Speaker 1>know what he said. And he only did that for

36
00:01:33.840 --> 00:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>clicks and money. And you're making the pain of parents,

37
00:01:38.120 --> 00:01:39.439
<v Speaker 1>like I said, some of them who I had to

38
00:01:39.480 --> 00:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>talk to an interview, and my heart goes out to them,

39
00:01:41.319 --> 00:01:43.879
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure yours does as well. And he called

40
00:01:43.920 --> 00:01:45.719
<v Speaker 1>them actors, and he made their pain worse. And I

41
00:01:45.760 --> 00:01:50.079
<v Speaker 1>find only a reprehensible, despicable human being would do what

42
00:01:50.120 --> 00:01:52.439
<v Speaker 1>Alex Jones does. Now, he is a conspiracy theorist, and

43
00:01:52.480 --> 00:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I understand he says a lot of batshit crazy stuff.

44
00:01:55.519 --> 00:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>But if you don't hurt somebody by doing that, then

45
00:01:58.120 --> 00:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a problem with it. You could think

46
00:02:00.040 --> 00:02:02.280
<v Speaker 1>nine eleven was an inside job and you can find

47
00:02:02.319 --> 00:02:05.359
<v Speaker 1>if you're not hurting anybody. But he hurt those people

48
00:02:05.359 --> 00:02:07.319
<v Speaker 1>who are already grieving the loss of their children. And

49
00:02:07.359 --> 00:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering how you could be friends with somebody who

50
00:02:11.879 --> 00:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>does that. I just I don't It's unbelievable to me

51
00:02:16.080 --> 00:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that he would even do something like that and then

52
00:02:18.599 --> 00:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>blame it on psychosis, Like, how could you square up

53
00:02:22.159 --> 00:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and be friends with somebody like that? Because I don't

54
00:02:24.319 --> 00:02:26.080
<v Speaker 1>know you. I don't know you, I've never hung out

55
00:02:26.120 --> 00:02:29.360
<v Speaker 1>with you. I'm just asking, like, how how can you

56
00:02:29.759 --> 00:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>be friends with somebody who did that? And are you

57
00:02:31.840 --> 00:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>willing to call that out?

58
00:02:33.280 --> 00:02:35.199
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think Alex himself has called that out. Alex

59
00:02:35.240 --> 00:02:37.360
<v Speaker 3>has admitted that he made a huge mistake. I remember

60
00:02:37.400 --> 00:02:40.560
<v Speaker 3>at the time when the trials were happening, one thing

61
00:02:40.599 --> 00:02:42.319
<v Speaker 3>that I noticed in a lot of the you know,

62
00:02:42.439 --> 00:02:47.000
<v Speaker 3>examinations and the prosecution questioning, was that there seemed to

63
00:02:47.039 --> 00:02:50.319
<v Speaker 3>be quite a bit of laxity when it came to

64
00:02:50.439 --> 00:02:52.879
<v Speaker 3>vetting the guests, and that was hammer Home with multiple

65
00:02:52.879 --> 00:02:55.919
<v Speaker 3>people that produced the show, and the way that I'm

66
00:02:55.960 --> 00:02:57.719
<v Speaker 3>sure you know, the way that media works, especially for

67
00:02:57.800 --> 00:02:59.520
<v Speaker 3>high profile people, is that a lot of that is

68
00:02:59.639 --> 00:03:02.319
<v Speaker 3>farmed out to people that work for you to vet

69
00:03:02.520 --> 00:03:04.560
<v Speaker 3>the guests and whatnot. So I think there was some

70
00:03:04.599 --> 00:03:09.080
<v Speaker 3>significant failures, mainly with vetting people like Wolfgang. How big

71
00:03:09.120 --> 00:03:11.240
<v Speaker 3>people that ended up being I think probably con men,

72
00:03:11.919 --> 00:03:13.960
<v Speaker 3>and Alex was lax in that. I think that was

73
00:03:14.000 --> 00:03:17.479
<v Speaker 3>a huge mistake. I think that there is precedent not

74
00:03:17.639 --> 00:03:20.439
<v Speaker 3>for what happened at Sandy Hook, but for the idea

75
00:03:20.560 --> 00:03:23.039
<v Speaker 3>of government being involved in types of things like that,

76
00:03:23.080 --> 00:03:26.879
<v Speaker 3>like the Operation Gladio for example. That's a publicly declassified

77
00:03:26.879 --> 00:03:27.319
<v Speaker 3>document to.

78
00:03:27.520 --> 00:03:30.479
<v Speaker 1>I get that, But the government, as you know, wasn't involved.

79
00:03:30.080 --> 00:03:32.199
<v Speaker 3>In I'm just saying, I said, there's precedent for the

80
00:03:32.240 --> 00:03:35.199
<v Speaker 3>understand which is why Alex would have had in his

81
00:03:35.319 --> 00:03:38.800
<v Speaker 3>mind legitimacy, legitimacy to question certain topics.

82
00:03:38.879 --> 00:03:41.080
<v Speaker 1>So why would you question that? Though? Why would you

83
00:03:41.159 --> 00:03:44.719
<v Speaker 1>question a school shooting hours after the children are killed?

84
00:03:44.759 --> 00:03:48.560
<v Speaker 3>Because if Operation Gladia includes public shootings at places, light

85
00:03:48.680 --> 00:03:51.439
<v Speaker 3>malls or perhaps even schools, there's no reason why you

86
00:03:51.439 --> 00:03:51.919
<v Speaker 3>couldn't quit.

87
00:03:51.960 --> 00:03:53.879
<v Speaker 1>But wouldn't you question it if there was some sort

88
00:03:53.879 --> 00:03:57.240
<v Speaker 1>of evidence to prove, like the twenty twenty election. I mean,

89
00:03:57.280 --> 00:03:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump still says I'm sure we can get into that.

90
00:03:59.280 --> 00:04:02.599
<v Speaker 1>But it's like when listen, if people have ideas or opinions,

91
00:04:02.639 --> 00:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>they're entitled to that. That's fine. But like I said,

92
00:04:05.000 --> 00:04:07.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm not someone who's trying to censor free speech. But

93
00:04:07.199 --> 00:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, when you say things that can

94
00:04:08.879 --> 00:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>hurt people, I know you're not a fan of Candace Owans.

95
00:04:11.400 --> 00:04:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Neither of mine. Okay, we both would agree on that.

96
00:04:13.960 --> 00:04:16.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm friends with Tim Poole. He said some things about

97
00:04:16.199 --> 00:04:18.480
<v Speaker 1>it that I actually agree with. But to me, Alex

98
00:04:18.600 --> 00:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Jones does what Candace Owens does, which is say things

99
00:04:21.959 --> 00:04:25.160
<v Speaker 1>that you know are not true. You know are not true.

100
00:04:25.240 --> 00:04:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Alex Jones knew that innocent children were murdered. He knew

101
00:04:29.839 --> 00:04:33.279
<v Speaker 1>that those weren't actors. They're dead, and yet he went

102
00:04:33.360 --> 00:04:37.759
<v Speaker 1>on the air and called them actors. Those family members,

103
00:04:37.800 --> 00:04:42.600
<v Speaker 1>as you know, were threatened, they had threats to their life.

104
00:04:42.680 --> 00:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>He knew that those children were dead, he knew that

105
00:04:45.360 --> 00:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>those families were grieving. I have an issue not necessarily

106
00:04:48.120 --> 00:04:51.879
<v Speaker 1>with conspiracy theorists, but conspiracy theorists like Candace Owns and

107
00:04:51.959 --> 00:04:55.279
<v Speaker 1>like Calex Jones that say things knowing they're not true

108
00:04:55.319 --> 00:04:59.319
<v Speaker 1>and knowing that they will hurt people. Alex Jones' comments

109
00:04:59.480 --> 00:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>at times, not just the Sandy Hook shooting, hurt people,

110
00:05:02.720 --> 00:05:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and I find that only a despicable human being would

111
00:05:06.120 --> 00:05:08.519
<v Speaker 1>profit off of something like that. I'm glad that he

112
00:05:08.560 --> 00:05:10.759
<v Speaker 1>has to pay out that money. Like I said, I've

113
00:05:10.800 --> 00:05:13.319
<v Speaker 1>had private conversations with his ex wife. I don't know

114
00:05:13.360 --> 00:05:15.759
<v Speaker 1>what's true. I don't know what's not true. That's why

115
00:05:15.839 --> 00:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to share the conversations I had with her.

116
00:05:18.879 --> 00:05:20.759
<v Speaker 1>But what I do know is I could never associate

117
00:05:20.800 --> 00:05:23.519
<v Speaker 1>myself with somebody like that. Who it's good to have

118
00:05:23.560 --> 00:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>difference as of opinions. We probably have a lot of

119
00:05:25.279 --> 00:05:27.040
<v Speaker 1>different opinions on a lot. I think that's great, that's

120
00:05:27.079 --> 00:05:30.079
<v Speaker 1>what makes America great. But I think Alex Jones is

121
00:05:30.120 --> 00:05:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a scumbag. And by the way I met Alex Jones,

122
00:05:33.360 --> 00:05:35.839
<v Speaker 1>he is a different person off the camera. He doesn't

123
00:05:35.839 --> 00:05:39.519
<v Speaker 1>have in my opinion, that persona or Hey, was that good?

124
00:05:39.720 --> 00:05:42.399
<v Speaker 1>Was this good? I mean, I don't know. I don't

125
00:05:42.399 --> 00:05:44.879
<v Speaker 1>think he's a good person. And I'm not saying guilty

126
00:05:44.879 --> 00:05:47.319
<v Speaker 1>by association. I'm not trying to make a bad argument,

127
00:05:47.680 --> 00:05:50.240
<v Speaker 1>but I just can't fathom or understand how anybody could

128
00:05:50.279 --> 00:05:53.519
<v Speaker 1>hang out with a guy like that who literally made well,

129
00:05:54.000 --> 00:05:56.519
<v Speaker 1>I'm just trying to understand how anybody, not just you,

130
00:05:56.600 --> 00:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>but anybody would would be okay associated and you host

131
00:05:59.720 --> 00:06:02.399
<v Speaker 1>on the on that network, Like, I just don't understand. Well.

132
00:06:02.439 --> 00:06:05.399
<v Speaker 3>Again, so that'd be like saying anybody involved in media,

133
00:06:05.399 --> 00:06:07.680
<v Speaker 3>who's involved with anybody that's made a mistake in media,

134
00:06:07.800 --> 00:06:08.199
<v Speaker 3>I don't.

135
00:06:08.079 --> 00:06:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Think that's a mistake. You know what I think a

136
00:06:09.959 --> 00:06:11.759
<v Speaker 1>mistake is. But how do you prove that it's not

137
00:06:11.879 --> 00:06:14.319
<v Speaker 1>a mistake? Is locking your keys in your car? You

138
00:06:14.360 --> 00:06:17.639
<v Speaker 1>mean to tell me that after this shooting happened where

139
00:06:17.839 --> 00:06:20.639
<v Speaker 1>body bags were taken out of that school, that Alex

140
00:06:20.720 --> 00:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Jones legitimately believed that those eight nine year olds were actors.

141
00:06:24.160 --> 00:06:25.639
<v Speaker 1>That's bullshit. I don't believe that.

142
00:06:25.879 --> 00:06:28.800
<v Speaker 3>I think that Alex legitimately believed that there was a

143
00:06:28.879 --> 00:06:31.480
<v Speaker 3>variety of options that you could have and.

144
00:06:31.560 --> 00:06:32.480
<v Speaker 1>He called them actors.

145
00:06:32.519 --> 00:06:36.000
<v Speaker 3>Jay understand that, but that's after having people on who

146
00:06:36.000 --> 00:06:37.240
<v Speaker 3>were not probably Vetter like Wolf.

147
00:06:37.879 --> 00:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>He has a lot of people on wars that have

148
00:06:40.160 --> 00:06:40.959
<v Speaker 1>zero credibility.

149
00:06:41.000 --> 00:06:43.279
<v Speaker 3>I actually agree that everybody who does media, for the

150
00:06:43.279 --> 00:06:49.399
<v Speaker 3>most part, I'm not talking about you. Everybody in media

151
00:06:49.439 --> 00:06:52.240
<v Speaker 3>has people on because it's media. Media is kind of

152
00:06:52.279 --> 00:06:54.279
<v Speaker 3>like you know, it's about.

153
00:06:54.079 --> 00:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>But it's our responsibility to push back at those people.

154
00:06:57.120 --> 00:06:59.720
<v Speaker 3>I agree that, and I think that my main criticism

155
00:06:59.720 --> 00:07:02.399
<v Speaker 3>about would have been and still has been, there should

156
00:07:02.399 --> 00:07:04.439
<v Speaker 3>have been a better vetting of the sources of these

157
00:07:04.480 --> 00:07:06.319
<v Speaker 3>so called events, because the main source at that time,

158
00:07:06.319 --> 00:07:08.639
<v Speaker 3>because I was listening through that whole period, was Wolf

159
00:07:08.720 --> 00:07:11.720
<v Speaker 3>kank Kalbek, who said, I've worked in government, I worked

160
00:07:11.720 --> 00:07:13.720
<v Speaker 3>in education, I was there. I know that this was

161
00:07:13.720 --> 00:07:15.959
<v Speaker 3>a fraud. I went investigated and all that was not true.

162
00:07:16.000 --> 00:07:17.720
<v Speaker 3>So he did not properly about this. He blamed it

163
00:07:17.759 --> 00:07:20.800
<v Speaker 3>on psychosis. There is no medical information to prove that.

164
00:07:20.839 --> 00:07:23.399
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that could be. I mean his yeah, that could

165
00:07:23.399 --> 00:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>have been, didn't provide any medical information that he had psychosis.

166
00:07:26.079 --> 00:07:29.759
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I don't know. I don't know Alex's legal teams.

167
00:07:29.920 --> 00:07:32.720
<v Speaker 3>You know well that they use psychosis.

168
00:07:32.800 --> 00:07:35.279
<v Speaker 1>You know that. Come on again, I don't know what

169
00:07:35.360 --> 00:07:38.439
<v Speaker 1>the legal team advice. They didn't show. Well, the legal

170
00:07:38.480 --> 00:07:40.879
<v Speaker 1>team if they're going to say he suffered from psychosis.

171
00:07:41.040 --> 00:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>There would have to be some evidence to prove that,

172
00:07:42.959 --> 00:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>which clearly they didn't show it wasn't psychosis. And I

173
00:07:45.560 --> 00:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>guess this is maybe where we disagree. People like Alex

174
00:07:49.120 --> 00:07:52.199
<v Speaker 1>Jones and Candae Owns and many others, Laura Lumer I

175
00:07:52.240 --> 00:07:54.879
<v Speaker 1>could name you a lot. They say things knowing that

176
00:07:54.920 --> 00:07:58.199
<v Speaker 1>it will hurt people, and they don't fucking care. They

177
00:07:58.240 --> 00:08:00.839
<v Speaker 1>say things knowing that it will hurt people, knowing that

178
00:08:00.879 --> 00:08:02.759
<v Speaker 1>it's probably not true. By the way, I don't buy

179
00:08:02.800 --> 00:08:05.319
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Alex didn't think it was a real shooting.

180
00:08:05.319 --> 00:08:07.079
<v Speaker 1>He knew it was. Like I said, Alex is not

181
00:08:07.120 --> 00:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>a stupid guy. He knew that there were innocent young

182
00:08:10.319 --> 00:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>children that died, and he called them actors now regardless

183
00:08:13.680 --> 00:08:15.680
<v Speaker 1>of what all their stuff might have been going on

184
00:08:15.720 --> 00:08:17.639
<v Speaker 1>in his mind. He made a lot of money off that.

185
00:08:17.680 --> 00:08:19.279
<v Speaker 1>Now in the end it's going to cost him money.

186
00:08:19.759 --> 00:08:21.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we should be allowed to say things

187
00:08:21.920 --> 00:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>like that with no justification, and it hurts people. Those

188
00:08:25.079 --> 00:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>families had death threats, They had death threats, Jay, and

189
00:08:28.800 --> 00:08:32.039
<v Speaker 1>they hadn't even buried their kids yet, eight nine year olds.

190
00:08:32.440 --> 00:08:35.159
<v Speaker 1>And as you can see, I get visibly angry talking

191
00:08:35.240 --> 00:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>about this guy because I think he's a horrible human being,

192
00:08:38.120 --> 00:08:40.519
<v Speaker 1>and I think his entire network is a fucking joke.

193
00:08:40.759 --> 00:08:44.559
<v Speaker 1>It's a bunch of tinfoil hat morons who spread conspiracy

194
00:08:44.600 --> 00:08:47.879
<v Speaker 1>theories about COVID, They spread conspiracy theories about the deep state,

195
00:08:48.039 --> 00:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>they spread conspiracy theories about the twenty twenty election, and

196
00:08:51.159 --> 00:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the guy who runs the whole thing spread conspiracy theories

197
00:08:53.840 --> 00:08:55.799
<v Speaker 1>about a shooting where a bunch of eight and nine

198
00:08:55.879 --> 00:08:58.840
<v Speaker 1>year old kids were murdered were kept in. I mean,

199
00:08:59.279 --> 00:09:00.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't even think the I should be allowed to

200
00:09:00.799 --> 00:09:02.519
<v Speaker 1>even have a show. That's my personal thing.

201
00:09:02.559 --> 00:09:06.840
<v Speaker 3>Could you name another crazy temple hat that the position

202
00:09:06.919 --> 00:09:09.600
<v Speaker 3>that you think me or Alex or anybody has positive.

203
00:09:09.840 --> 00:09:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I can't speak to you because I'll be honest with you,

204
00:09:12.000 --> 00:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and I don't mean this way like a whole network

205
00:09:14.159 --> 00:09:16.759
<v Speaker 1>is all crazy. Well, I mean the regulars. I would

206
00:09:16.759 --> 00:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>assume you're a guest on there a lot, and sometimes

207
00:09:19.080 --> 00:09:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about the regulars who do shows, you know,

208
00:09:20.879 --> 00:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>five days a week. They spread conspiracy theories about me.

209
00:09:25.000 --> 00:09:28.159
<v Speaker 1>Harrison talked about me. Didn't even and we talked about

210
00:09:28.159 --> 00:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>this off the air a couple of minutes ago. Didn't

211
00:09:30.399 --> 00:09:32.639
<v Speaker 1>even know my position on vaccines, and I don't want

212
00:09:32.639 --> 00:09:34.559
<v Speaker 1>to get too deep into the vaccine stuff because you know,

213
00:09:34.600 --> 00:09:37.240
<v Speaker 1>some platforms don't allow it. Didn't even know my position

214
00:09:37.240 --> 00:09:39.519
<v Speaker 1>on the vaccines, and just assume that I want everyone

215
00:09:39.600 --> 00:09:42.879
<v Speaker 1>to get ten boosters. They say things about people not

216
00:09:42.960 --> 00:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>doing their homework, not under even and by the way,

217
00:09:46.039 --> 00:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I said I would go on their show. I was

218
00:09:47.759 --> 00:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>talking to somebody from their network. I said, listen, I

219
00:09:49.879 --> 00:09:52.879
<v Speaker 1>will go on that show and I will defend my positions.

220
00:09:53.279 --> 00:09:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Harrison didn't want me on. I call that a coward.

221
00:09:56.200 --> 00:09:58.960
<v Speaker 1>If you're willing to talk shit about somebody, which is fine.

222
00:09:59.080 --> 00:10:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm a big boy. I can handle it, but then

223
00:10:01.000 --> 00:10:02.960
<v Speaker 1>you don't want that person to come on. I invite

224
00:10:03.000 --> 00:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>anybody on my show. Nick Fuentes can do my show

225
00:10:05.639 --> 00:10:07.559
<v Speaker 1>if he wants to. I think he's an awful human being.

226
00:10:07.879 --> 00:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>But I would have had oj Simpson do my show.

227
00:10:10.919 --> 00:10:14.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not the criticism. He's no longer with us unfortunatelyfortunately

228
00:10:14.480 --> 00:10:17.080
<v Speaker 1>whichever way you look at it. But I'm willing to

229
00:10:17.120 --> 00:10:18.919
<v Speaker 1>have anybody on my show that I disagree with, even

230
00:10:18.919 --> 00:10:21.559
<v Speaker 1>if they're despicable people. If Alex Jones wanted to do

231
00:10:21.639 --> 00:10:23.720
<v Speaker 1>my show, I would probably be a little bit more

232
00:10:23.720 --> 00:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>heated with him than am you, because I'm not blaming

233
00:10:25.759 --> 00:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you for the stuff that that Alex Jones said. Make it.

234
00:10:28.120 --> 00:10:31.840
<v Speaker 1>What's another topic that you think of COVID spread COVID?

235
00:10:32.399 --> 00:10:34.679
<v Speaker 1>I think he's spread lies about the vaccines. He sells

236
00:10:34.720 --> 00:10:37.799
<v Speaker 1>his stupid pills on his website to make money that

237
00:10:37.799 --> 00:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>there's no evidence that any of those pills actually help

238
00:10:40.399 --> 00:10:43.799
<v Speaker 1>you if you had COVID, I would talk about nine

239
00:10:43.799 --> 00:10:45.200
<v Speaker 1>to eleven a little bit more, because I know he's

240
00:10:45.200 --> 00:10:48.320
<v Speaker 1>talked about nine to eleven a lot. What about nine eleven, Well,

241
00:10:48.320 --> 00:10:50.919
<v Speaker 1>he thinks it was an inside john right right, Okay,

242
00:10:51.000 --> 00:10:53.159
<v Speaker 1>Well we can get into that. We can get into that.

243
00:10:53.279 --> 00:10:56.200
<v Speaker 1>So what's the crazy talks about the deep state all

244
00:10:56.200 --> 00:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the time with no evidence to back up his claims

245
00:10:58.399 --> 00:10:59.799
<v Speaker 1>about the deep state? What is the deep state?

246
00:10:59.840 --> 00:11:03.919
<v Speaker 3>Tell it's the breakaway national security apparatus in the background

247
00:11:03.960 --> 00:11:06.440
<v Speaker 3>that has a tremendous amount of influence installed at the

248
00:11:06.480 --> 00:11:06.919
<v Speaker 3>time of.

249
00:11:06.919 --> 00:11:10.480
<v Speaker 1>World War two, particularly from right now yah formulations. It's

250
00:11:10.480 --> 00:11:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the same structure. Okay, so right now who is running

251
00:11:13.039 --> 00:11:13.519
<v Speaker 1>the deep state?

252
00:11:13.759 --> 00:11:16.360
<v Speaker 3>CFR and Trilateral Commission of a huge amount of influence.

253
00:11:16.399 --> 00:11:21.799
<v Speaker 3>This is a CFR historian's own background accounts for in Hurst's.

254
00:11:21.799 --> 00:11:23.600
<v Speaker 1>But there's over election through on my channel right now.

255
00:11:23.679 --> 00:11:28.320
<v Speaker 3>So, yeah, I've heard Alex Corporation, Military Industrial Complex, that's.

256
00:11:28.159 --> 00:11:30.679
<v Speaker 1>What you say. So I've heard Alex say that Barack

257
00:11:30.720 --> 00:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Obama was really running the country when Joe Biden was president.

258
00:11:33.600 --> 00:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>There's no evidence to back that up. You meant to

259
00:11:35.519 --> 00:11:38.799
<v Speaker 1>stay behind situation that Obama had set up. And he

260
00:11:39.600 --> 00:11:42.840
<v Speaker 1>said the Obamas had gay relationships and that Barack Obama

261
00:11:42.879 --> 00:11:45.480
<v Speaker 1>was gay. This is not a serious talk radio. You

262
00:11:45.519 --> 00:11:47.600
<v Speaker 1>make jokes, you make you do sat there outsis satare

263
00:11:47.600 --> 00:11:49.639
<v Speaker 1>all the time. Okay, Well, when I hear Alex Jones

264
00:11:49.679 --> 00:11:51.639
<v Speaker 1>say that he believed, first of all, I don't think

265
00:11:51.679 --> 00:11:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that's funny. That's ten year old humor. I don't think

266
00:11:54.000 --> 00:11:56.480
<v Speaker 1>it's anything funny in saying a president is gay. I

267
00:11:56.519 --> 00:11:58.559
<v Speaker 1>don't think that. I mean, unless we're ten years old.

268
00:11:58.639 --> 00:12:03.039
<v Speaker 1>What about faking gay? You? I mean, okay, but you

269
00:12:03.080 --> 00:12:05.159
<v Speaker 1>get what I'm saying, right, Well, you just laugh, So

270
00:12:05.159 --> 00:12:07.679
<v Speaker 1>you do think it's first right, Well, here's the problem, right,

271
00:12:07.879 --> 00:12:11.559
<v Speaker 1>Alex Jones has a huge platform, and I think it's

272
00:12:11.639 --> 00:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>important for people to choose their words wisely and to

273
00:12:16.320 --> 00:12:20.679
<v Speaker 1>be responsible. We agree. I think that Alex Jones should

274
00:12:20.720 --> 00:12:22.200
<v Speaker 1>not have done what he did when it came to

275
00:12:22.200 --> 00:12:25.919
<v Speaker 1>the Sandy Hook shooting. It hurt people. Now, if you

276
00:12:25.919 --> 00:12:29.919
<v Speaker 1>make a joke that doesn't hurt somebody, Okay, fine, if

277
00:12:29.960 --> 00:12:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you have a conspiracy theory that doesn't necessarily hurt somebody,

278
00:12:34.679 --> 00:12:36.879
<v Speaker 1>then that's one thing, right. But when you have the

279
00:12:36.879 --> 00:12:39.799
<v Speaker 1>platform that Alex Jones has and you say things that

280
00:12:39.840 --> 00:12:43.639
<v Speaker 1>are unproven, stuff that is just blatantly ridiculous. They said

281
00:12:43.639 --> 00:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>things about me that aren't true. I have a problem

282
00:12:47.159 --> 00:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>with that, and I don't think that network is a

283
00:12:49.639 --> 00:12:52.519
<v Speaker 1>serious network. I don't think that is a serious news network.

284
00:12:52.639 --> 00:12:55.679
<v Speaker 1>Give It's one thing. If you give Kanye West a platform, heck,

285
00:12:55.720 --> 00:12:57.759
<v Speaker 1>I would interview Kanye West and ask him about his

286
00:12:57.799 --> 00:13:01.720
<v Speaker 1>anti Semitism. But Alex Jones, he was praising Adolf Hitler,

287
00:13:01.879 --> 00:13:03.879
<v Speaker 1>and Alex Jones is sitting there with his thumb up

288
00:13:03.919 --> 00:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>his ass. I watched that specifically disagree with him and

289
00:13:07.759 --> 00:13:10.039
<v Speaker 1>said that he didn't believe Hitler was a good guy.

290
00:13:10.120 --> 00:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>And but the very next day, Richard Grove and I

291
00:13:12.360 --> 00:13:14.559
<v Speaker 1>hosted that next day, yeah talked about that. We did

292
00:13:14.559 --> 00:13:17.320
<v Speaker 1>not agree with. Okay, It's one thing to say you

293
00:13:17.320 --> 00:13:18.919
<v Speaker 1>don't agree with it, and I'm glad you did that,

294
00:13:19.759 --> 00:13:22.759
<v Speaker 1>But if someone sitting next to me is praising Adolf Hitler,

295
00:13:22.840 --> 00:13:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I would call them for what they are. You are

296
00:13:25.000 --> 00:13:27.799
<v Speaker 1>an anti Semite, and you are a moron if you

297
00:13:28.000 --> 00:13:30.399
<v Speaker 1>if you, if you praise a man who's responsible for

298
00:13:30.480 --> 00:13:35.279
<v Speaker 1>murdering anybody, let alone millions of people, there's something wrong

299
00:13:35.360 --> 00:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>with you. And I would say that to Kanye. I

300
00:13:37.120 --> 00:13:39.799
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't sit here and say, well, you know, Kanye, I

301
00:13:39.840 --> 00:13:42.159
<v Speaker 1>really disagree with you on that. I saw that. I

302
00:13:42.159 --> 00:13:45.919
<v Speaker 1>don't respect people who praise evil, murderous dictators. That's what

303
00:13:45.960 --> 00:13:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Alex Jones did in that interview. Okay, he coddled Kanye. Well, well,

304
00:13:50.639 --> 00:13:53.799
<v Speaker 1>he praised He praised Kanye West in some ways, and

305
00:13:53.840 --> 00:13:56.879
<v Speaker 1>he was very sad. He coddled him, He coddled him.

306
00:13:56.960 --> 00:13:59.639
<v Speaker 1>It was a fluffer interview. And I think we also

307
00:13:59.679 --> 00:14:04.759
<v Speaker 1>have a responsibility to question people and to be tough

308
00:14:04.799 --> 00:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>on people that praise murderous dictators. Alex Jones did not

309
00:14:09.759 --> 00:14:13.159
<v Speaker 1>do that. So on one side of the coin, Kanye West

310
00:14:13.200 --> 00:14:15.360
<v Speaker 1>will sit there and praise Adolf Hitler and he'll say, well,

311
00:14:15.360 --> 00:14:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I disagree with that. But on the other side of

312
00:14:16.840 --> 00:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the coin, he'll just bash Democrats and left wingers and

313
00:14:19.919 --> 00:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>aoc an attacker for being a bartender. He's more tough

314
00:14:23.759 --> 00:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>on somebody like AOC than somebody like Kanye West, who

315
00:14:26.879 --> 00:14:29.519
<v Speaker 1>praises Adolf Hitler and is a Jew hater. Make no

316
00:14:29.559 --> 00:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>mistake about it, Kanye is a jew hater, anti Semitic,

317
00:14:33.279 --> 00:14:35.799
<v Speaker 1>piece of scum. I don't care whether he's mentally ill

318
00:14:35.879 --> 00:14:39.399
<v Speaker 1>or not. And these gripers that go around, I just

319
00:14:39.440 --> 00:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>think they're really bad people. Right.

320
00:14:41.240 --> 00:14:43.159
<v Speaker 3>But so a lot of this debate so far has

321
00:14:43.200 --> 00:14:45.639
<v Speaker 3>been about the character of people.

322
00:14:45.720 --> 00:14:47.679
<v Speaker 1>So and I'm not well believing that.

323
00:14:48.000 --> 00:14:49.600
<v Speaker 3>Okay, but I mean, you just said at the beginning

324
00:14:49.600 --> 00:14:51.679
<v Speaker 3>that you weren't interested in GOI by association, but.

325
00:14:52.960 --> 00:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to understand why you would be friends with

326
00:14:55.360 --> 00:14:56.919
<v Speaker 1>some of the guy who I think has no more.

327
00:14:57.480 --> 00:15:00.440
<v Speaker 3>But what I'm illustrating is that nobody consistently can apply

328
00:15:00.519 --> 00:15:02.679
<v Speaker 3>that in media, because I'm sure you have friends that

329
00:15:02.720 --> 00:15:04.840
<v Speaker 3>you disagree with that you might find reprehensible that you've

330
00:15:04.840 --> 00:15:06.679
<v Speaker 3>gone on shows that you don't I don't have you,

331
00:15:06.919 --> 00:15:09.240
<v Speaker 3>so you don't have any I don't have any friends.

332
00:15:09.639 --> 00:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Here's Morgan you go on Here's Morgan show. Yeah, I

333
00:15:12.960 --> 00:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>don't hang out with Pierce Morgan. He's not one of

334
00:15:14.600 --> 00:15:17.240
<v Speaker 1>my friends. I do his show. There's a difference. So

335
00:15:17.399 --> 00:15:19.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't have any So I don't have so it

336
00:15:19.720 --> 00:15:22.399
<v Speaker 1>is guilt. Well, you're friends with him, So about friends

337
00:15:22.399 --> 00:15:24.360
<v Speaker 1>with that is guilt by association with you said, you're

338
00:15:24.360 --> 00:15:26.679
<v Speaker 1>not trying to trying to understand why you would be,

339
00:15:26.759 --> 00:15:28.960
<v Speaker 1>so you are doing guilt by association. I'm asking you,

340
00:15:29.000 --> 00:15:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm asking a question, implying, implying that it's morally wrong.

341
00:15:33.759 --> 00:15:40.279
<v Speaker 1>I mind understand how morally you could associate yourself and

342
00:15:40.279 --> 00:15:42.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to understand that as a friend, not just

343
00:15:42.399 --> 00:15:43.039
<v Speaker 1>for doing a show.

344
00:15:43.080 --> 00:15:46.120
<v Speaker 3>The morals are, which are what like what's the beau?

345
00:15:46.279 --> 00:15:47.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it's consistently apply.

346
00:15:47.600 --> 00:15:50.279
<v Speaker 1>I think people that associate themselves with people like Alice

347
00:15:50.360 --> 00:15:53.279
<v Speaker 1>Jones are the same people that associate themselves with Donald Trump.

348
00:15:53.600 --> 00:15:57.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's I think it's the same. Well, the

349
00:15:57.440 --> 00:15:59.519
<v Speaker 1>whole chorus has been guilt by social what you said

350
00:15:59.519 --> 00:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of your not going to do well, What

351
00:16:01.360 --> 00:16:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I was hoping to do is try to get an

352
00:16:03.480 --> 00:16:06.879
<v Speaker 1>explanation from you on how you could be friends with

353
00:16:06.919 --> 00:16:09.519
<v Speaker 1>somebody like that. I find that in general, and I'm

354
00:16:09.519 --> 00:16:11.919
<v Speaker 1>going to make a general statement now, people that are

355
00:16:13.120 --> 00:16:16.159
<v Speaker 1>big fans of Alex Jones or friends of Alex Jones

356
00:16:16.200 --> 00:16:18.679
<v Speaker 1>tend to also be big fans of Donald Trump, and

357
00:16:18.720 --> 00:16:21.679
<v Speaker 1>they throw they're willing to push aside the Epstein stuff.

358
00:16:21.720 --> 00:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>They're willing to push aside his behaviors, the way he

359
00:16:24.279 --> 00:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>talks about women in gold Star families and POW's and

360
00:16:27.120 --> 00:16:28.879
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he's named thousands of times in the

361
00:16:28.919 --> 00:16:32.639
<v Speaker 1>Epstein Falls. I think the same kinds of people who

362
00:16:32.679 --> 00:16:36.440
<v Speaker 1>support Donald Trump are gravitated towards Alex Jones. And yes,

363
00:16:36.519 --> 00:16:38.679
<v Speaker 1>I'll say it again, I think Donald Trump and Alex

364
00:16:38.759 --> 00:16:41.279
<v Speaker 1>Jones are similar. I think they're both horrible human beings.

365
00:16:41.679 --> 00:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>They're horrible human beings who probably only care about themselves.

366
00:16:44.799 --> 00:16:47.480
<v Speaker 3>And you know, but again, I think this is what

367
00:16:47.720 --> 00:16:50.559
<v Speaker 3>usually ends up being something not worth debating. I'm not

368
00:16:50.600 --> 00:16:52.399
<v Speaker 3>saying you can't bring interview, debate whatever you want, but

369
00:16:52.559 --> 00:16:56.080
<v Speaker 3>the idea of only focusing on the morals or some

370
00:16:56.159 --> 00:16:59.279
<v Speaker 3>individual in media or in politics, to me just seems absurd.

371
00:16:59.480 --> 00:17:01.960
<v Speaker 3>That's why I'm always an issues guy, because I'm sure

372
00:17:02.000 --> 00:17:06.400
<v Speaker 3>that I'm sure that everybody has some moral flaw or

373
00:17:06.440 --> 00:17:09.240
<v Speaker 3>some problem in their their ethos.

374
00:17:09.319 --> 00:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I would never deny that. I would never deny what

375
00:17:11.240 --> 00:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>you're saying. So then so then it's not consistently applied.

376
00:17:13.759 --> 00:17:17.240
<v Speaker 1>So it would seem there are different levels of the levels.

377
00:17:17.440 --> 00:17:18.839
<v Speaker 1>It seems like you're doing the very thing that you're

378
00:17:18.839 --> 00:17:21.160
<v Speaker 1>saying shouldn't be done. No, so there are different levels

379
00:17:21.160 --> 00:17:23.279
<v Speaker 1>of mistakes that are made. Whether you cheat on your

380
00:17:23.359 --> 00:17:26.240
<v Speaker 1>wife for who determines that? Okay, well, I'm just giving

381
00:17:26.279 --> 00:17:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you my opinions. There's no book on determining. I'm just

382
00:17:29.200 --> 00:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>telling you, Uh, simply put, if you're a person who

383
00:17:33.359 --> 00:17:37.079
<v Speaker 1>intentionally lies about a school shooting when children are murdered

384
00:17:38.240 --> 00:17:41.279
<v Speaker 1>to make money and clicks, you're a fucking disgusting human being.

385
00:17:41.319 --> 00:17:43.279
<v Speaker 1>But how do you know a person's motives? Maybe you

386
00:17:43.480 --> 00:17:47.240
<v Speaker 1>because Alex Jones does it all the time. He says things,

387
00:17:47.240 --> 00:17:49.640
<v Speaker 1>he's over the top and he says things. How do

388
00:17:49.640 --> 00:17:52.519
<v Speaker 1>you know the motives? So you think Alex Jones didn't

389
00:17:52.559 --> 00:17:53.839
<v Speaker 1>have what do you think his motive saying?

390
00:17:54.519 --> 00:17:56.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm saying that when you debate and again, you can

391
00:17:56.960 --> 00:18:00.240
<v Speaker 3>obey whatever you want. But my critique of this type

392
00:18:00.240 --> 00:18:02.559
<v Speaker 3>of debate is that when you debate people's motives is

393
00:18:02.559 --> 00:18:04.519
<v Speaker 3>something that you can never really explicitly prove.

394
00:18:04.599 --> 00:18:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Why does that Why did you think Alex Jones? Give

395
00:18:06.400 --> 00:18:09.240
<v Speaker 1>me an educated guest, h Jay, if you can, why

396
00:18:09.240 --> 00:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>do you think Alex Jones said those things?

397
00:18:11.920 --> 00:18:14.640
<v Speaker 3>I believe that Alex has always, for the most part,

398
00:18:14.720 --> 00:18:17.240
<v Speaker 3>been sincere. That's why he has been willing to change

399
00:18:17.400 --> 00:18:19.079
<v Speaker 3>his mind at me he was wrong. For example, he

400
00:18:19.079 --> 00:18:22.119
<v Speaker 3>recently admitted he was wrong that he thought Trump might

401
00:18:22.200 --> 00:18:23.319
<v Speaker 3>reverse the course on a ramp.

402
00:18:23.480 --> 00:18:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about he admits that he was completely right.

403
00:18:25.759 --> 00:18:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I do want to talk to you about that. Agree

404
00:18:27.720 --> 00:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>on that.

405
00:18:27.799 --> 00:18:30.680
<v Speaker 3>That's a recent admission that Alex said I was wrong

406
00:18:30.720 --> 00:18:31.079
<v Speaker 3>about this.

407
00:18:31.440 --> 00:18:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay, good, So so let me ask you something about

408
00:18:33.759 --> 00:18:37.519
<v Speaker 1>that because I disagree with you, respectfully. If Alex Jones

409
00:18:37.559 --> 00:18:42.400
<v Speaker 1>wasn't sued, I think Alex Jones would have apologized. Well.

410
00:18:42.440 --> 00:18:45.960
<v Speaker 3>The Again, the lawsuit, as I said, highlighted the bad betting.

411
00:18:46.240 --> 00:18:48.680
<v Speaker 3>If you look, for example, at the prosecute where they

412
00:18:48.680 --> 00:18:51.240
<v Speaker 3>were ja I understand me question, let me finish anything.

413
00:18:51.559 --> 00:18:56.240
<v Speaker 3>The when they were interrogating Owen, Schweyer and Owen was

414
00:18:56.279 --> 00:19:00.920
<v Speaker 3>responsible for bringing on a couple people that not just Wolfgang,

415
00:19:01.000 --> 00:19:04.319
<v Speaker 3>but also the zero Hygi article that they highlighted.

416
00:19:03.920 --> 00:19:07.240
<v Speaker 1>It that was misinformation. So that was not properly about it.

417
00:19:07.400 --> 00:19:09.599
<v Speaker 3>And I'm saying that if you've got a network that

418
00:19:09.640 --> 00:19:14.720
<v Speaker 3>has multiple people doing multiple cogs of the operation, you can't.

419
00:19:15.079 --> 00:19:16.880
<v Speaker 3>I understand that the head of the operation is going

420
00:19:16.880 --> 00:19:20.519
<v Speaker 3>to receive the brunt of the criticism, but it's not

421
00:19:20.599 --> 00:19:24.839
<v Speaker 3>like Alex was just doing all of this without sincere investigation.

422
00:19:25.119 --> 00:19:28.119
<v Speaker 1>I believe he's sincere okay. So that's where we disagree.

423
00:19:28.119 --> 00:19:29.440
<v Speaker 1>And I would go as far as to say this,

424
00:19:29.720 --> 00:19:32.519
<v Speaker 1>I believe that if Alex Jones wasn't sued and he

425
00:19:32.559 --> 00:19:35.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't have to face consequences for his first things, he

426
00:19:35.200 --> 00:19:38.079
<v Speaker 1>would never have apologized or retracted anything, because he never

427
00:19:38.119 --> 00:19:40.440
<v Speaker 1>has in the past to my knowledge, for anything else.

428
00:19:40.599 --> 00:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>The reason why he apologized and says I shouldn't have

429
00:19:43.000 --> 00:19:44.799
<v Speaker 1>said that, which, by the way, he said in a courtroom,

430
00:19:44.880 --> 00:19:46.839
<v Speaker 1>and then he said it was a kangaroo court, and

431
00:19:46.880 --> 00:19:49.920
<v Speaker 1>he attacked the judge and he attacked the prosecutors instead

432
00:19:49.920 --> 00:19:51.240
<v Speaker 1>of just being a man and saying, you know what,

433
00:19:51.279 --> 00:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I really fucked up. I really shouldn't have said that stuff.

434
00:19:54.039 --> 00:19:56.960
<v Speaker 1>What happened to those families was awful. Instead, he does

435
00:19:56.960 --> 00:20:00.480
<v Speaker 1>what Donald Trump does. It's a kangaroo court. I didn't

436
00:20:00.480 --> 00:20:04.039
<v Speaker 1>do anything wrong, So no, I disagree with you, Jay.

437
00:20:04.400 --> 00:20:06.559
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Alex Jones would have ever retracted what

438
00:20:06.599 --> 00:20:08.400
<v Speaker 1>he said, and I don't think Alex Jones would have

439
00:20:08.400 --> 00:20:11.880
<v Speaker 1>ever apologized if, in fact, he was never facing a

440
00:20:11.960 --> 00:20:15.839
<v Speaker 1>civil lawsuit, which he lost. That's my personal opinions. We

441
00:20:15.839 --> 00:20:17.640
<v Speaker 1>can move on to a rock because it's way to

442
00:20:17.720 --> 00:20:19.440
<v Speaker 1>prove it. We can do that. Well, that's just my

443
00:20:19.519 --> 00:20:21.920
<v Speaker 1>personal opinion. Obviously, there's no way to one hundred percent

444
00:20:21.920 --> 00:20:23.519
<v Speaker 1>proven other than the fact that to my knowledge, I

445
00:20:23.559 --> 00:20:25.839
<v Speaker 1>don't think Alex has ever apologized for anything else on

446
00:20:25.880 --> 00:20:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the air in the past. The only thing I could

447
00:20:27.440 --> 00:20:31.599
<v Speaker 1>ever recall that he's ever apologized for or retracted was

448
00:20:32.200 --> 00:20:34.559
<v Speaker 1>the comments he made about the school shooting and those

449
00:20:34.599 --> 00:20:37.559
<v Speaker 1>kids being acted. And he recently retracted his position on Iran.

450
00:20:37.640 --> 00:20:39.720
<v Speaker 3>He thought Trump would have a better course and a

451
00:20:39.759 --> 00:20:41.880
<v Speaker 3>course correction, and he was wrong about that. He was

452
00:20:41.920 --> 00:20:45.319
<v Speaker 3>wrong about the thing that was going around where Pam

453
00:20:45.400 --> 00:20:48.559
<v Speaker 3>Bondy was saying that they were going to release the files.

454
00:20:48.640 --> 00:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>He thought that that was as he has been open

455
00:20:52.079 --> 00:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>about criticism for the Epstein files because he's been talking

456
00:20:55.039 --> 00:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>about the Epstein files for years, and I think Donald

457
00:20:56.960 --> 00:20:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Trump has made a lot of people like the Alex

458
00:20:59.000 --> 00:21:01.599
<v Speaker 1>Jones that look really add because Donald Trump has protected

459
00:21:01.599 --> 00:21:04.759
<v Speaker 1>pedophiles in my opinion, I know that. That's what I

460
00:21:04.839 --> 00:21:08.720
<v Speaker 1>just said. Yeah, I'm happy I agree with you on that.

461
00:21:08.759 --> 00:21:12.640
<v Speaker 1>He's angry. Well, he's he's upset at Donald Trump. It's

462
00:21:12.640 --> 00:21:14.799
<v Speaker 1>not really that he was wrong about something. He he

463
00:21:14.960 --> 00:21:18.119
<v Speaker 1>he's upset about what Pam Bondi said like two months ago. Well, yeah,

464
00:21:18.160 --> 00:21:22.279
<v Speaker 1>he's criticized at times the Trump administration. He gives the

465
00:21:22.319 --> 00:21:25.119
<v Speaker 1>apology that you want. Basically, it's not really the apology

466
00:21:25.160 --> 00:21:28.519
<v Speaker 1>that I want. It's it's basically it wasn't really an apology.

467
00:21:28.559 --> 00:21:30.480
<v Speaker 1>He just basically when it comes to the Epstein stuff,

468
00:21:30.680 --> 00:21:32.839
<v Speaker 1>he's talked about how disappointed he was. He was wrong

469
00:21:32.839 --> 00:21:35.160
<v Speaker 1>about Pam Bondi. He was wrong about Pam Bondy, and

470
00:21:35.160 --> 00:21:35.960
<v Speaker 1>he thought Pam Bondi no.

471
00:21:36.079 --> 00:21:38.400
<v Speaker 3>He said specifically that the claim that they were going

472
00:21:38.440 --> 00:21:41.039
<v Speaker 3>to release more of the files, that when Pam Bondi

473
00:21:41.400 --> 00:21:44.880
<v Speaker 3>claimed this, he shared that and then a bunch of

474
00:21:44.880 --> 00:21:46.079
<v Speaker 3>people on soldial media called him out.

475
00:21:46.119 --> 00:21:47.160
<v Speaker 1>He said, you know what, You're right, I was wrong,

476
00:21:47.400 --> 00:21:50.400
<v Speaker 1>so he will Admitkay, well, I'm glad he did that.

477
00:21:50.480 --> 00:21:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I was unaware of that, and I'm and I'm glad

478
00:21:52.200 --> 00:21:53.599
<v Speaker 1>he did that, and we could we can end the

479
00:21:53.640 --> 00:21:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Alex Jones conversation. But but in closing, I'll just say this,

480
00:21:57.000 --> 00:21:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and and you know, it's not nothing that I've I've

481
00:21:59.519 --> 00:22:05.279
<v Speaker 1>never said that's fair. Of course, I think Alex Jones

482
00:22:05.359 --> 00:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>is what's horrible with society. I think there are grifters,

483
00:22:08.960 --> 00:22:12.039
<v Speaker 1>the Candace Owens types. I put Alex Jones in that category.

484
00:22:12.480 --> 00:22:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I think he only says things as an act to

485
00:22:15.559 --> 00:22:21.599
<v Speaker 1>get clicks and to make money. What he did was disgusting.

486
00:22:21.599 --> 00:22:23.680
<v Speaker 1>And then the reason why this topic is so it

487
00:22:23.680 --> 00:22:26.039
<v Speaker 1>should be personal to anybody, but it's even more personally

488
00:22:26.079 --> 00:22:27.880
<v Speaker 1>because I grew up about twenty minutes away from Sandy

489
00:22:27.880 --> 00:22:29.759
<v Speaker 1>Hook number one, number two. I've interviewed some of those

490
00:22:29.759 --> 00:22:32.839
<v Speaker 1>families who have to wake up every day without seeing

491
00:22:32.880 --> 00:22:37.640
<v Speaker 1>their kids. It's reprehensible and the fact that somebody like

492
00:22:37.640 --> 00:22:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Alex Jones, and this is irrefutable, made their grief even worse.

493
00:22:42.599 --> 00:22:46.000
<v Speaker 1>With what Alex Jones put those families through is reprehensible,

494
00:22:47.079 --> 00:22:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think only a reprehensible and repugnant human being

495
00:22:50.519 --> 00:22:54.200
<v Speaker 1>would do what Alex Jones did. I have zero respect

496
00:22:54.200 --> 00:22:56.680
<v Speaker 1>for him. I don't care how many followers he has.

497
00:22:56.920 --> 00:22:58.519
<v Speaker 1>I have no more respect for him than I do

498
00:22:58.640 --> 00:23:00.599
<v Speaker 1>like a Candace Owens type, and I know we'll probably

499
00:23:00.640 --> 00:23:02.680
<v Speaker 1>agree on gandis owns. There is a way to have

500
00:23:02.759 --> 00:23:05.119
<v Speaker 1>differences of opinions, and there is a way to have

501
00:23:05.240 --> 00:23:09.279
<v Speaker 1>a conversation without hurting people. And there are too many people,

502
00:23:09.279 --> 00:23:12.720
<v Speaker 1>particularly in right wing media today, that do that. They

503
00:23:12.759 --> 00:23:17.440
<v Speaker 1>make claims that hurt people. They lie, They attack undocumented

504
00:23:17.440 --> 00:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>immigrants in brown people every single day, making it seem

505
00:23:20.279 --> 00:23:22.960
<v Speaker 1>like all these undocumented immigrants are going to rape your kids.

506
00:23:23.160 --> 00:23:25.880
<v Speaker 1>They're wrong. They lied about the terrorist attack in New Orleans.

507
00:23:25.920 --> 00:23:28.200
<v Speaker 1>They said it was undocumented immigrant. They said it was

508
00:23:28.200 --> 00:23:31.279
<v Speaker 1>because of Joe Biden's open border policies. They lie. They

509
00:23:31.319 --> 00:23:34.359
<v Speaker 1>lied in conspiracy theories about what happened to Paul Pelosi

510
00:23:34.440 --> 00:23:36.559
<v Speaker 1>when Paul Pelosi was attacked with a hammer, and Alex

511
00:23:36.640 --> 00:23:39.039
<v Speaker 1>Jones was one of those guys that spread the conspiracy

512
00:23:39.079 --> 00:23:42.119
<v Speaker 1>theory that Paul Pelosi had some sort of gay relationship

513
00:23:42.119 --> 00:23:44.759
<v Speaker 1>with the guy that almost killed him with a hammer.

514
00:23:44.880 --> 00:23:47.319
<v Speaker 1>Did Alex Jones ever apologize for that when the police

515
00:23:47.359 --> 00:23:49.640
<v Speaker 1>report came out? And Matt Gates when he was in

516
00:23:49.720 --> 00:23:53.000
<v Speaker 1>office another repugnant piece of garbage, and Ted Cruz spread

517
00:23:53.039 --> 00:23:57.160
<v Speaker 1>those conspiracy theories. These right wingers don't apologize. Usually. I'm

518
00:23:57.160 --> 00:23:59.359
<v Speaker 1>glad that Alex Jones has done that, but there's a

519
00:23:59.359 --> 00:24:01.519
<v Speaker 1>lot of people on the right that don't. They don't retract,

520
00:24:01.519 --> 00:24:03.839
<v Speaker 1>they don't apologize. When you get something wrong, why don't

521
00:24:03.880 --> 00:24:06.519
<v Speaker 1>you wait until the information comes out first before you

522
00:24:06.519 --> 00:24:08.359
<v Speaker 1>you spread conspiracy? There is I'm not talking about you,

523
00:24:08.440 --> 00:24:10.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying in general terms people on the right,

524
00:24:10.799 --> 00:24:13.119
<v Speaker 1>and that's my one of my biggest criticisms is with

525
00:24:13.160 --> 00:24:15.559
<v Speaker 1>the lower lumers of the world and so many others.

526
00:24:15.799 --> 00:24:18.559
<v Speaker 1>It's all about clicks, Jay, It's about money and clicks.

527
00:24:18.599 --> 00:24:20.200
<v Speaker 1>They don't care whether they get it right or not.

528
00:24:20.519 --> 00:24:22.640
<v Speaker 1>They I'm generalizing. There's a lot of people on the

529
00:24:22.720 --> 00:24:24.759
<v Speaker 1>right on X they want to be the first one

530
00:24:24.799 --> 00:24:26.559
<v Speaker 1>to say it was an undocumented immigrant, it was a

531
00:24:26.599 --> 00:24:28.880
<v Speaker 1>black person, it was this without knowing, and then when

532
00:24:28.920 --> 00:24:31.680
<v Speaker 1>they get it wrong, they don't retract and they don't apologize.

533
00:24:31.839 --> 00:24:33.319
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sorry if I'm going on a rant here,

534
00:24:33.359 --> 00:24:36.160
<v Speaker 1>but on X when you look at when they're fact checked,

535
00:24:36.160 --> 00:24:39.400
<v Speaker 1>what is that called on the bottom? Checking community notes? Yeah?

536
00:24:39.440 --> 00:24:41.359
<v Speaker 1>What is the point of a community note if somebody

537
00:24:41.440 --> 00:24:43.680
<v Speaker 1>is getting a community note like two hundred times. There

538
00:24:43.680 --> 00:24:46.400
<v Speaker 1>are right wingers out there that have been community noted

539
00:24:46.400 --> 00:24:49.640
<v Speaker 1>two hundred times. They're not suspended, their accounts don't get

540
00:24:49.680 --> 00:24:52.200
<v Speaker 1>taken down. Why are we community noting people when they

541
00:24:52.400 --> 00:24:55.519
<v Speaker 1>literally it happens to them every day. So anyway, I digress,

542
00:24:55.559 --> 00:24:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead.

543
00:24:56.759 --> 00:25:00.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah again, I think you know, so much of media

544
00:25:00.400 --> 00:25:02.039
<v Speaker 3>ends up being a lott of low tier slop and

545
00:25:02.079 --> 00:25:04.839
<v Speaker 3>debating about things that are not really that substantial, such

546
00:25:04.839 --> 00:25:07.960
<v Speaker 3>as people's motives or intentionality, which is unless you have

547
00:25:08.039 --> 00:25:10.559
<v Speaker 3>you know, somebody's actual DMS or something like that, it's

548
00:25:10.559 --> 00:25:13.960
<v Speaker 3>really difficult, I think, to know the motives, and so

549
00:25:14.079 --> 00:25:16.319
<v Speaker 3>in philosophy and debate we don't typically focus on that.

550
00:25:16.440 --> 00:25:19.119
<v Speaker 3>Understand that in media and in news it probably is

551
00:25:19.160 --> 00:25:22.640
<v Speaker 3>the best. But I would assume that maybe you engage

552
00:25:22.640 --> 00:25:25.319
<v Speaker 3>in debating about who's good and who's bad because that's

553
00:25:25.359 --> 00:25:27.599
<v Speaker 3>the easy, low tier route to go to get attention,

554
00:25:27.640 --> 00:25:28.279
<v Speaker 3>to get clicks.

555
00:25:28.279 --> 00:25:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, aren't.

556
00:25:28.720 --> 00:25:31.319
<v Speaker 3>You think it's low tier to today what it is

557
00:25:31.359 --> 00:25:33.240
<v Speaker 3>to debate people's motives because its call that homine.

558
00:25:34.079 --> 00:25:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's low tier to talk about our

559
00:25:35.960 --> 00:25:38.559
<v Speaker 1>president and his behavior about Alex.

560
00:25:38.519 --> 00:25:41.039
<v Speaker 3>Jones, right, you're saying as bad motives, and I'm saying

561
00:25:41.039 --> 00:25:44.279
<v Speaker 3>that that that works in low tier political debate. But

562
00:25:44.480 --> 00:25:46.640
<v Speaker 3>like if you get into a philosophical debate you debate

563
00:25:46.640 --> 00:25:49.519
<v Speaker 3>people's motives, that's called that hominism because unless you have

564
00:25:49.599 --> 00:25:51.839
<v Speaker 3>proof that there's some motives, you don't know people's motives

565
00:25:52.000 --> 00:25:52.799
<v Speaker 3>other than to say that.

566
00:25:52.759 --> 00:25:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Well he's a bad person. Okay, that's so he's a

567
00:25:55.200 --> 00:25:57.240
<v Speaker 1>bad person. What is that proof. I don't think it's

568
00:25:57.359 --> 00:26:01.079
<v Speaker 1>low tier to criticize al Jones for what he did.

569
00:26:01.359 --> 00:26:03.480
<v Speaker 1>But you said that you motives, and I'm just trying

570
00:26:03.480 --> 00:26:05.599
<v Speaker 1>to figure out how you know that. Well, first of all,

571
00:26:05.720 --> 00:26:07.799
<v Speaker 1>I think most people would say the reason why Alex

572
00:26:07.880 --> 00:26:11.319
<v Speaker 1>Jones says these things is because he wants to That

573
00:26:11.319 --> 00:26:13.599
<v Speaker 1>would be money and get more attention. The fact that

574
00:26:13.640 --> 00:26:16.000
<v Speaker 1>most people think that really has nothing to do, Okay, well,

575
00:26:16.200 --> 00:26:19.079
<v Speaker 1>that's I think I would like to think that a

576
00:26:19.160 --> 00:26:23.759
<v Speaker 1>logical opinion would be that the reason why fallacies. Okay, well,

577
00:26:23.839 --> 00:26:26.400
<v Speaker 1>if you think that Alex Jones does this stuff. I mean,

578
00:26:26.720 --> 00:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>do you think appeal to masses is a fallacy? No,

579
00:26:29.079 --> 00:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>but I would say I would say, you don't think

580
00:26:30.720 --> 00:26:33.440
<v Speaker 1>it's perhaps. But the point that I was trying to

581
00:26:33.440 --> 00:26:37.240
<v Speaker 1>get at is that just just Alex Jones says these things,

582
00:26:37.599 --> 00:26:39.559
<v Speaker 1>not because he needs to get this off his chest

583
00:26:39.640 --> 00:26:41.960
<v Speaker 1>or he wants to be an inn. So you're just

584
00:26:42.000 --> 00:26:44.039
<v Speaker 1>saying what his motives are. Okay, Well, well what do

585
00:26:44.079 --> 00:26:47.079
<v Speaker 1>you think his motives are? Help me understand Alex Jones.

586
00:26:47.160 --> 00:26:48.720
<v Speaker 1>You're friends with them. I've listened to Alex in two

587
00:26:48.720 --> 00:26:49.240
<v Speaker 1>thousand and three.

588
00:26:49.359 --> 00:26:53.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I've noticed him consistently over the years reference

589
00:26:53.400 --> 00:26:55.880
<v Speaker 3>many tax that we lecture through on my channel. So

590
00:26:55.920 --> 00:26:57.839
<v Speaker 3>it's become a mainstep what I do is to kind

591
00:26:57.839 --> 00:26:59.480
<v Speaker 3>of take all those books that he references over the

592
00:26:59.559 --> 00:27:01.680
<v Speaker 3>years to to see if he's legit and if you're

593
00:27:01.680 --> 00:27:03.240
<v Speaker 3>saying the right things. And most of what he says,

594
00:27:03.279 --> 00:27:05.799
<v Speaker 3>I would say ninety percent of what Alex has said

595
00:27:05.799 --> 00:27:07.400
<v Speaker 3>over the years has been accurate in terms of the

596
00:27:07.400 --> 00:27:10.440
<v Speaker 3>big geopolitical perspective. There are minutia areas where I would

597
00:27:10.440 --> 00:27:13.599
<v Speaker 3>disagree particularly with wh who he brought on during that

598
00:27:13.680 --> 00:27:15.920
<v Speaker 3>time period of Sandy Hook that was not properly vetted.

599
00:27:16.440 --> 00:27:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

600
00:27:16.720 --> 00:27:18.799
<v Speaker 3>But when it comes to the big geopolitical stuff, most

601
00:27:18.839 --> 00:27:20.720
<v Speaker 3>of the time I disagree. But there's been areas where

602
00:27:20.759 --> 00:27:23.079
<v Speaker 3>I disagree with Alex over Trump. So I don't have

603
00:27:23.079 --> 00:27:24.880
<v Speaker 3>a problem disagree with Alex. But I don't think that

604
00:27:24.920 --> 00:27:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Alex is ultimately overall about person. I've met him, known him,

605
00:27:28.079 --> 00:27:29.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, personally, for many years.

606
00:27:29.240 --> 00:27:31.319
<v Speaker 1>So okay, I mean I based that on some other

607
00:27:31.359 --> 00:27:33.359
<v Speaker 1>things that I'm not going to talk about here on

608
00:27:33.400 --> 00:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the show, but people that have known him very close,

609
00:27:35.759 --> 00:27:38.200
<v Speaker 1>closer than you even. But we can leave it at that.

610
00:27:38.680 --> 00:27:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I know this entire debate isn't isn't this movie, But

611
00:27:41.960 --> 00:27:43.359
<v Speaker 1>if you want to talk about Iron, I'm happy to

612
00:27:43.359 --> 00:27:45.400
<v Speaker 1>stave to Iran. Yeah, even though you both agree, maybe

613
00:27:45.400 --> 00:27:47.279
<v Speaker 1>there's some slight I won't be taking Alex Jones out

614
00:27:47.319 --> 00:27:49.000
<v Speaker 1>to dinner tonight. I guess I was trying to say,

615
00:27:49.079 --> 00:27:49.960
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, shan.

616
00:27:49.759 --> 00:27:51.240
<v Speaker 2>Jay, you want to start off with Iran and how

617
00:27:51.240 --> 00:27:53.039
<v Speaker 2>you feel about the US getting involved, how you feel

618
00:27:53.039 --> 00:27:54.799
<v Speaker 2>like Trump's done with that relationship.

619
00:27:55.079 --> 00:27:55.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

620
00:27:55.319 --> 00:27:57.519
<v Speaker 3>So this is an issue that I've dealt with for

621
00:27:57.599 --> 00:27:59.559
<v Speaker 3>many years. I've had a lot of debates publicly with

622
00:27:59.640 --> 00:28:01.799
<v Speaker 3>muslim for about eight years straight.

623
00:28:01.839 --> 00:28:03.599
<v Speaker 1>Some of them. We've debated most of the top Muslims.

624
00:28:03.640 --> 00:28:05.799
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe Junior the future of Muslim debate they're

625
00:28:05.839 --> 00:28:06.079
<v Speaker 1>going to do.

626
00:28:06.880 --> 00:28:09.160
<v Speaker 3>So I'm very familiar with like the background of you know,

627
00:28:09.200 --> 00:28:12.960
<v Speaker 3>Sunni versus Shia Islam. I'm decently educated on the history

628
00:28:12.960 --> 00:28:15.640
<v Speaker 3>of Iran, and I think the big issue with Iran

629
00:28:15.759 --> 00:28:17.400
<v Speaker 3>is that this is really just a repeat of nineteen

630
00:28:17.440 --> 00:28:19.920
<v Speaker 3>fifty three with the CIA Q where they took out

631
00:28:20.079 --> 00:28:22.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, Mozedic to put the SHAW in. Then you

632
00:28:22.519 --> 00:28:25.920
<v Speaker 3>had the SHAW failing, and you had Istola Kashani being

633
00:28:25.920 --> 00:28:29.880
<v Speaker 3>brought in with British intelligence and CIA assistance, all ultimately

634
00:28:29.920 --> 00:28:33.519
<v Speaker 3>for Anglo Iranian Oil Company which would become VP. So

635
00:28:33.599 --> 00:28:38.039
<v Speaker 3>I think that from the very beginning, this was a destabilization,

636
00:28:38.119 --> 00:28:40.160
<v Speaker 3>a regime change that was brought about for the purpose

637
00:28:40.240 --> 00:28:42.599
<v Speaker 3>of a big corporate interest in Iran. I think it's

638
00:28:42.640 --> 00:28:45.519
<v Speaker 3>really not that different today if we fast forward to

639
00:28:45.759 --> 00:28:47.759
<v Speaker 3>where we are now, it's a lot of repeat of

640
00:28:47.839 --> 00:28:51.000
<v Speaker 3>what we saw with Iraq, which was you know, false intel,

641
00:28:51.440 --> 00:28:54.920
<v Speaker 3>weapons of mass destruction, which is not true. Saddam was

642
00:28:54.960 --> 00:28:57.640
<v Speaker 3>brought into power by the CIA, trained by the stay

643
00:28:57.640 --> 00:29:00.759
<v Speaker 3>of that, he's given weapons of mass destruction, usually by

644
00:29:00.759 --> 00:29:03.240
<v Speaker 3>the CIA, to fight the Iran Iraq war. And then

645
00:29:03.240 --> 00:29:05.440
<v Speaker 3>when we decided that he had to spoiled like spoiled milk,

646
00:29:05.480 --> 00:29:08.240
<v Speaker 3>then we didn't need a Sodomini Moore. And I've never

647
00:29:08.319 --> 00:29:10.119
<v Speaker 3>been pro war all the way back to nine to eleven.

648
00:29:10.160 --> 00:29:12.799
<v Speaker 3>I've been anti war pretty much because I think most

649
00:29:12.799 --> 00:29:17.440
<v Speaker 3>of the wars are fought for interest, not in the

650
00:29:17.480 --> 00:29:20.200
<v Speaker 3>best preview of American people. Their fought for corporate and

651
00:29:20.240 --> 00:29:23.160
<v Speaker 3>banking interest. For the most part. I'm not a past fist.

652
00:29:23.160 --> 00:29:25.759
<v Speaker 3>I believe in self defense. But so the same situation

653
00:29:25.799 --> 00:29:28.680
<v Speaker 3>with Iran, I think that we've seen the administration all

654
00:29:28.680 --> 00:29:30.559
<v Speaker 3>the way back to Obama with the Green Revolution. They

655
00:29:30.599 --> 00:29:33.079
<v Speaker 3>were pushing for a kind of a more democratic any

656
00:29:33.119 --> 00:29:36.079
<v Speaker 3>D style Color revolution back in twenty nine, ten eleven.

657
00:29:36.400 --> 00:29:38.480
<v Speaker 3>But now what we have a situation where Trump has

658
00:29:38.519 --> 00:29:42.200
<v Speaker 3>just greenlit under I think probably influence from BB Yahoo

659
00:29:42.559 --> 00:29:46.599
<v Speaker 3>to go for a full on just you know, you know, taking.

660
00:29:46.440 --> 00:29:48.559
<v Speaker 1>Them out and go back thirty years.

661
00:29:48.599 --> 00:29:50.559
<v Speaker 3>They were playing the cliffs yesterday on Hodge Twins, where

662
00:29:50.599 --> 00:29:53.400
<v Speaker 3>BB is like saying a little two weeks away from

663
00:29:53.440 --> 00:29:56.799
<v Speaker 3>the nuclear Bob and then like every few years it's

664
00:29:56.839 --> 00:29:59.200
<v Speaker 3>the same two weeks and it's like, so it's like

665
00:29:59.240 --> 00:30:01.279
<v Speaker 3>two weeks to fly in the Iran was my joke

666
00:30:01.599 --> 00:30:04.160
<v Speaker 3>on Twitter, not making jokes about Yeah, but I mean

667
00:30:04.599 --> 00:30:06.680
<v Speaker 3>the same situation where oh it's two week flatten the

668
00:30:06.680 --> 00:30:08.480
<v Speaker 3>curb and then it's going to turn into protracted war.

669
00:30:08.559 --> 00:30:09.440
<v Speaker 1>This is different than Syria.

670
00:30:09.519 --> 00:30:11.599
<v Speaker 3>Syria, it took fifteen years to take down a SAWD

671
00:30:11.680 --> 00:30:16.160
<v Speaker 3>to install by CAA in Western support a very radical

672
00:30:16.440 --> 00:30:19.920
<v Speaker 3>Sunni regime under Joulawi. That's something that was mentioned in

673
00:30:19.960 --> 00:30:22.000
<v Speaker 3>the Clean Break memo. It's something that goes back to Ed,

674
00:30:22.000 --> 00:30:24.279
<v Speaker 3>you know, on strategy. So I think that all of

675
00:30:24.319 --> 00:30:26.880
<v Speaker 3>those are a disaster for the West and for America.

676
00:30:28.279 --> 00:30:30.839
<v Speaker 3>They basically only benefit the Greater Israel project. And I

677
00:30:30.880 --> 00:30:31.559
<v Speaker 3>disagree with all that.

678
00:30:32.319 --> 00:30:33.759
<v Speaker 1>It pays me to say I agree with a lot

679
00:30:33.759 --> 00:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>of what you just said. Not much of a debate there,

680
00:30:36.279 --> 00:30:38.920
<v Speaker 1>but I will say this. When Donald Trump was running

681
00:30:38.960 --> 00:30:40.640
<v Speaker 1>for office again, said he was going to be the

682
00:30:40.680 --> 00:30:42.119
<v Speaker 1>peace president, the peace candidate.

683
00:30:42.200 --> 00:30:45.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, exactly, You'll never have war again, nothing to worry about. Yeah,

684
00:30:45.319 --> 00:30:48.319
<v Speaker 4>probably the best that's true. He said that, and uh,

685
00:30:48.599 --> 00:30:50.000
<v Speaker 4>he said there were you know, he's going to be

686
00:30:50.039 --> 00:30:52.799
<v Speaker 4>a known regime, new regime president and all that. Tulsi

687
00:30:52.880 --> 00:30:55.319
<v Speaker 4>Gabbert testified ten months ago under Oh that there was

688
00:30:55.359 --> 00:30:57.559
<v Speaker 4>no reasonablieve, based on our own intelligence, that they were

689
00:30:58.000 --> 00:30:59.480
<v Speaker 4>furthering their nuclear capabilities.

690
00:30:59.519 --> 00:31:02.279
<v Speaker 1>We were told eight months ago obliviated, I believe is

691
00:31:02.319 --> 00:31:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the word obliterated. I'm sorry, obliterated. I always get that

692
00:31:04.960 --> 00:31:09.680
<v Speaker 1>mixed up. Obliterated their nuclear capabilities. Then we heard it

693
00:31:09.799 --> 00:31:11.799
<v Speaker 1>was regime change. And then when they figured it out, well, wait,

694
00:31:11.799 --> 00:31:13.279
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have to have boots on the ground if

695
00:31:13.319 --> 00:31:16.640
<v Speaker 1>there's regime change. Then they said, well, these civilians need

696
00:31:16.720 --> 00:31:20.640
<v Speaker 1>to rise up. The hell does that mean? Then Marco Rubio,

697
00:31:20.799 --> 00:31:23.920
<v Speaker 1>in some terminology, was blaming Israel. And I agree, by

698
00:31:23.960 --> 00:31:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the way, with a lot of the stuff you said

699
00:31:25.200 --> 00:31:27.359
<v Speaker 1>about Benjamin and I am listen, I'm a Jewish guy.

700
00:31:27.799 --> 00:31:32.279
<v Speaker 1>It's not anti Semitic to be critical of the Israeli government.

701
00:31:32.400 --> 00:31:35.839
<v Speaker 1>I've maintained that position. I am very anti Israeli government.

702
00:31:36.039 --> 00:31:38.359
<v Speaker 1>I am very pro Israeli people. I think they're great people,

703
00:31:38.400 --> 00:31:41.759
<v Speaker 1>but I'm anti Benjamin Uttaw who plays Donald Trump like

704
00:31:41.759 --> 00:31:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a fiddle. Then we were told by Marco Rubio that Israel,

705
00:31:45.240 --> 00:31:49.400
<v Speaker 1>you know forced our hand. Then we have this school

706
00:31:49.480 --> 00:31:53.960
<v Speaker 1>bombing and Donald Trump it was a tomahawk missile. Iran

707
00:31:53.960 --> 00:31:58.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have tomahawk missiles. Everybody knows that, and he blames Iran.

708
00:31:59.480 --> 00:32:02.079
<v Speaker 1>Does he even know that they don't have tomahawk missiles.

709
00:32:02.160 --> 00:32:04.400
<v Speaker 1>It's this guy is such a madman, and he's such

710
00:32:04.400 --> 00:32:08.319
<v Speaker 1>an imbecile and Pete hegsett this. They don't take responsibility.

711
00:32:08.799 --> 00:32:11.160
<v Speaker 1>We're told this is the party of protecting children, and

712
00:32:11.240 --> 00:32:13.000
<v Speaker 1>now we're told, well, this was about the Marines and

713
00:32:13.079 --> 00:32:16.319
<v Speaker 1>this was about attacking the ships. I agree with what

714
00:32:16.400 --> 00:32:20.240
<v Speaker 1>you said about Iraq. That was an ill advised war.

715
00:32:20.559 --> 00:32:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Thousands of American soldiers died, hundreds of thousands of innocent

716
00:32:23.480 --> 00:32:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Iraqis died, trillions of dollars that were still paying off.

717
00:32:27.119 --> 00:32:29.559
<v Speaker 1>How is this any different? Are you disappointed you voted

718
00:32:29.599 --> 00:32:31.920
<v Speaker 1>for Trump. I know you're not defending this war, which

719
00:32:31.920 --> 00:32:36.279
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate. Are you disappointed in your vote? Kamala Harris

720
00:32:36.319 --> 00:32:38.559
<v Speaker 1>would not have start You could have your criticisms of

721
00:32:38.599 --> 00:32:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Kamala and that's fine, and we can get into that.

722
00:32:41.119 --> 00:32:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying she was perfect. She would not have

723
00:32:43.240 --> 00:32:44.880
<v Speaker 1>started a war in iron I do not believe this

724
00:32:44.960 --> 00:32:45.680
<v Speaker 1>war would have happened.

725
00:32:46.640 --> 00:32:48.759
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, it's similar to you know, a lot

726
00:32:48.839 --> 00:32:52.799
<v Speaker 3>of what Obama campaigned upon. We saw Obama campaigning as

727
00:32:52.799 --> 00:32:54.640
<v Speaker 3>a peace candidate back in the day. We saw him

728
00:32:54.680 --> 00:32:57.039
<v Speaker 3>then reversing with the drone strikes that he was involved in.

729
00:32:57.200 --> 00:33:01.480
<v Speaker 3>So I didn't have high hopes for politics to be

730
00:33:01.680 --> 00:33:03.440
<v Speaker 3>anything other than what the one it usually is.

731
00:33:03.599 --> 00:33:06.119
<v Speaker 1>I was involved in promoting Ron Paul back in two

732
00:33:06.119 --> 00:33:06.720
<v Speaker 1>thousand and seven and.

733
00:33:06.759 --> 00:33:10.000
<v Speaker 3>Eight ran Paul campaign, and I saw back then the

734
00:33:10.079 --> 00:33:12.400
<v Speaker 3>way that Ron Paul was sort of sidelined and kind

735
00:33:12.440 --> 00:33:15.039
<v Speaker 3>of kept out of the political discourse. And so my

736
00:33:15.160 --> 00:33:17.279
<v Speaker 3>vote for Trump was mainly based on a lot of

737
00:33:17.319 --> 00:33:20.160
<v Speaker 3>the policies that he supported, which are kind of older

738
00:33:20.359 --> 00:33:22.759
<v Speaker 3>nineties centrist Democrat type of America.

739
00:33:22.839 --> 00:33:26.079
<v Speaker 1>First, sure, are you think as some of some of

740
00:33:26.119 --> 00:33:28.880
<v Speaker 1>these policies are America. I'm saying what he campaigned on, okay,

741
00:33:28.920 --> 00:33:30.559
<v Speaker 1>And I'm so many campaigns on a lot of things

742
00:33:30.599 --> 00:33:32.039
<v Speaker 1>that he lies about. We're going to build a wall

743
00:33:32.079 --> 00:33:33.200
<v Speaker 1>in Mexico's going to pay for it.

744
00:33:33.200 --> 00:33:36.759
<v Speaker 3>I'm saying that I disagree with the main areas that

745
00:33:37.000 --> 00:33:39.200
<v Speaker 3>my main issues are that I can think of with Trump.

746
00:33:39.480 --> 00:33:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I think worksheet was a huge failure. I think that

747
00:33:41.519 --> 00:33:42.119
<v Speaker 1>was a mistake.

748
00:33:42.960 --> 00:33:44.720
<v Speaker 3>I think he did that probably at the behest of

749
00:33:44.759 --> 00:33:47.440
<v Speaker 3>a lot of pharmaceutical and corporate interests. That's my opinion

750
00:33:47.519 --> 00:33:51.039
<v Speaker 3>on that. I think that it was a mistake to

751
00:33:53.000 --> 00:33:54.640
<v Speaker 3>talk a lot about the Federal Reserve, but not really

752
00:33:54.680 --> 00:33:56.200
<v Speaker 3>to go after the federal reserve. I think that's a

753
00:33:56.279 --> 00:33:59.559
<v Speaker 3>huge problem for the country, for the economics, and then

754
00:33:59.640 --> 00:34:03.880
<v Speaker 3>also to promote the war for Israel's benefit. Really, that's

755
00:34:04.240 --> 00:34:06.079
<v Speaker 3>I mean, those are the main things off the top

756
00:34:06.079 --> 00:34:06.759
<v Speaker 3>of my head that I can think of.

757
00:34:06.799 --> 00:34:08.719
<v Speaker 1>It. Those are big things. Well, I mean those are

758
00:34:08.760 --> 00:34:10.639
<v Speaker 1>my main those are my mains. It's pretty important things,

759
00:34:10.679 --> 00:34:11.679
<v Speaker 1>don't you. Again.

760
00:34:12.000 --> 00:34:15.039
<v Speaker 3>I'm not a Trump apologist, but I'm an issues person.

761
00:34:15.440 --> 00:34:17.320
<v Speaker 3>What I'm saying is that since two thousand and seven,

762
00:34:17.360 --> 00:34:20.519
<v Speaker 3>I was really disaffected with mainline party politics.

763
00:34:20.599 --> 00:34:22.679
<v Speaker 1>What about rolling out the red carpet for Vladimir Putin

764
00:34:22.760 --> 00:34:25.440
<v Speaker 1>in Alaska? What about no concessions? What about the fact

765
00:34:25.480 --> 00:34:28.280
<v Speaker 1>that Russia is giving intel to Iran right now? And

766
00:34:28.360 --> 00:34:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Trump they just don't seem to want to talk about that.

767
00:34:30.599 --> 00:34:33.360
<v Speaker 1>They've had pleasant conversations in the last week. Rolling out

768
00:34:33.360 --> 00:34:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the red carp He blamed Vladimir Zelenski called him a dictator,

769
00:34:37.199 --> 00:34:39.599
<v Speaker 1>and he blamed Ukraine for the war. Let me tell

770
00:34:39.599 --> 00:34:42.639
<v Speaker 1>you something, if Iran had invaded Israel, I might feel

771
00:34:42.639 --> 00:34:44.559
<v Speaker 1>a little differently about this war. Well, here's where we

772
00:34:44.639 --> 00:34:46.960
<v Speaker 1>disagree right now. I would be intol Ukraine for sure.

773
00:34:47.119 --> 00:34:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Who started the war in Ukraine? Uh, NATO, That's not true.

774
00:34:51.079 --> 00:34:55.280
<v Speaker 3>It is true Vladimir who invaded twelve NATO was provoking

775
00:34:55.440 --> 00:34:58.559
<v Speaker 3>Russia and they did not keep to the agreements during

776
00:34:58.599 --> 00:35:00.320
<v Speaker 3>the Cold War about not banding.

777
00:35:00.760 --> 00:35:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Who invaded Ukraine? Again? Who started violence vod Russia to invade? Okay,

778
00:35:06.920 --> 00:35:10.639
<v Speaker 1>I didn't ask you who provoked? Who invade? Who invaded Ukraine?

779
00:35:11.119 --> 00:35:16.599
<v Speaker 1>Russia devoked? Started the violence? Who put the the I

780
00:35:16.639 --> 00:35:20.639
<v Speaker 1>could provoke the biolabs. I could provoke somebody the biolabs.

781
00:35:21.280 --> 00:35:25.559
<v Speaker 1>I could provoke somebody politics. Okay, I can provoke somebody

782
00:35:25.639 --> 00:35:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to murder somebody. But I'm not asking you who provoked.

783
00:35:27.960 --> 00:35:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm asking you who committed put the bio labs all

784
00:35:31.039 --> 00:35:36.280
<v Speaker 1>around Russia as a offensive Probaly, nobody forced Vladimir Putin?

785
00:35:36.639 --> 00:35:39.159
<v Speaker 1>Who invade Ukraine? It is a forcing I disagree with you.

786
00:35:39.239 --> 00:35:43.280
<v Speaker 3>Well again that Ukraine is actually historically Russia anyway, and

787
00:35:43.760 --> 00:35:46.800
<v Speaker 3>it was only Ukraine after Lenin and after World War One.

788
00:35:46.840 --> 00:35:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so it's not even a real country. Ukraine didn't

789
00:35:49.559 --> 00:35:50.199
<v Speaker 1>start this war.

790
00:35:50.880 --> 00:35:53.599
<v Speaker 3>It's a country that was created by the West and

791
00:35:53.760 --> 00:35:57.000
<v Speaker 3>by Communists to sever that center of power.

792
00:35:57.079 --> 00:36:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I understand. I understand your history. I understand. But Ukraine

793
00:36:01.400 --> 00:36:05.320
<v Speaker 1>did not start the war. They did not start to disagree. Okay, Well,

794
00:36:05.400 --> 00:36:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that NATO and the West provoked the war,

795
00:36:08.519 --> 00:36:10.440
<v Speaker 1>so that then they could You think Zelenski is a

796
00:36:10.480 --> 00:36:13.159
<v Speaker 1>dictator in many ways, he acts like a dictator with

797
00:36:13.239 --> 00:36:17.360
<v Speaker 1>per and shuts it down. So Zelensky started the war

798
00:36:17.440 --> 00:36:19.639
<v Speaker 1>and he's a dictator. You agree with Donald Trump start

799
00:36:19.719 --> 00:36:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the war? Well, Donald Trump said that was he lying?

800
00:36:23.079 --> 00:36:26.199
<v Speaker 3>Uh, he may be speaking about for for political reasons.

801
00:36:26.280 --> 00:36:27.719
<v Speaker 3>He didn't start the war. I think NATO started the

802
00:36:27.719 --> 00:36:28.599
<v Speaker 3>war again, don't you think.

803
00:36:28.480 --> 00:36:30.079
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of important if you're the president of the

804
00:36:30.159 --> 00:36:32.719
<v Speaker 1>United States, do not lie about problem criticizing Trump.

805
00:36:33.079 --> 00:36:35.079
<v Speaker 3>But I will defend the fact that I don't think

806
00:36:35.480 --> 00:36:37.679
<v Speaker 3>that Russia started the NATO provoked the war.

807
00:36:37.760 --> 00:36:40.599
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you this NATO expanded sense the Cold War. Well, no,

808
00:36:40.800 --> 00:36:43.039
<v Speaker 1>but I can tell you that, well, Hold on a second.

809
00:36:43.320 --> 00:36:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Let me just go back. They've been putting bases and

810
00:36:45.079 --> 00:36:47.679
<v Speaker 1>bio labs that that came out dependagon on medies. There's

811
00:36:47.679 --> 00:36:50.519
<v Speaker 1>biolabs in Ukraine, but that still doesn't defend It's not

812
00:36:50.599 --> 00:36:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a defense for Vladimir's Ukraine problem. Okay, So do you

813
00:36:55.039 --> 00:36:57.800
<v Speaker 1>think we let's say, people if they started coming into

814
00:36:57.840 --> 00:37:00.800
<v Speaker 1>your property and they were saying, oh, well, you don't

815
00:37:00.840 --> 00:37:03.239
<v Speaker 1>have a right to you know, react because you know

816
00:37:03.320 --> 00:37:06.280
<v Speaker 1>we're not actually causing you to react, We're just coming

817
00:37:06.320 --> 00:37:10.320
<v Speaker 1>on your property. So do you think it's appropriate for

818
00:37:10.440 --> 00:37:13.159
<v Speaker 1>an evil murderer's dictator, which is who Vladimir Putin is.

819
00:37:13.159 --> 00:37:14.559
<v Speaker 1>I would hope that we could at least, even though

820
00:37:14.599 --> 00:37:17.079
<v Speaker 1>we disagree on this, you would agree with me that

821
00:37:17.199 --> 00:37:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Vladimir Putin doesn't have a regard for human life. He

822
00:37:20.119 --> 00:37:22.559
<v Speaker 1>kills journalists in his own country that disagree with him.

823
00:37:22.800 --> 00:37:25.039
<v Speaker 1>If you talk about Vladimir Putin on the phone, there

824
00:37:25.119 --> 00:37:28.519
<v Speaker 1>have been instances where you're massacred, he kills. He's an

825
00:37:28.559 --> 00:37:31.079
<v Speaker 1>evil dictator. Can we at least agree on that? I mean,

826
00:37:31.159 --> 00:37:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't.

827
00:37:31.519 --> 00:37:34.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean all heads of state operate in a similar way.

828
00:37:34.559 --> 00:37:37.199
<v Speaker 3>The US assassinates people all the time. So can you

829
00:37:37.280 --> 00:37:38.840
<v Speaker 3>tell me where the US assassination?

830
00:37:40.079 --> 00:37:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all the time.

831
00:37:42.119 --> 00:37:44.679
<v Speaker 3>Is the famous I'm familiar, famous journalist who was assassinated

832
00:37:44.719 --> 00:37:48.239
<v Speaker 3>in Germany. We're talking about the CIA infiltrating and using

833
00:37:48.320 --> 00:37:52.320
<v Speaker 3>German media for Western purposes. So whether or not Putin

834
00:37:52.400 --> 00:37:54.559
<v Speaker 3>himself had the journalist assassinated, I don't know, but I

835
00:37:54.599 --> 00:37:55.920
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't be surprised because a lot.

836
00:37:55.800 --> 00:37:58.599
<v Speaker 1>Of journalists are actually also undercover as pies. If anybody

837
00:37:58.679 --> 00:38:01.280
<v Speaker 1>listened to my show for thirty if I was talking

838
00:38:01.280 --> 00:38:04.039
<v Speaker 1>about Vladimir Putin that way in Russia, I would be murdered.

839
00:38:04.320 --> 00:38:06.400
<v Speaker 1>In the United States of America, even though Donald Trump

840
00:38:06.519 --> 00:38:08.559
<v Speaker 1>is trying to take away our First Amendment rights to

841
00:38:08.639 --> 00:38:10.639
<v Speaker 1>criticize him, he does it all the time. He calls

842
00:38:10.679 --> 00:38:14.639
<v Speaker 1>people like me vermin and the enemy within. We still

843
00:38:14.719 --> 00:38:16.719
<v Speaker 1>have the right in this country to our First Amendment

844
00:38:16.840 --> 00:38:21.079
<v Speaker 1>to criticize politicians and the president. In Russia, you will

845
00:38:21.159 --> 00:38:23.719
<v Speaker 1>be murdered if you do that. That's what makes him

846
00:38:23.719 --> 00:38:25.559
<v Speaker 1>a dictator. That's part of what makes him a dictator.

847
00:38:25.679 --> 00:38:27.679
<v Speaker 1>And the point I was trying to make was was

848
00:38:27.760 --> 00:38:30.039
<v Speaker 1>that Donald Trump has right. And I'm not saying you're

849
00:38:30.039 --> 00:38:32.719
<v Speaker 1>a Trump apologist, but Donald Trump has rolled out the

850
00:38:32.800 --> 00:38:36.719
<v Speaker 1>red carpet for an evil dictator on American soil. To

851
00:38:36.840 --> 00:38:40.519
<v Speaker 1>this day, no Russian sanctions. In fact, they've blamed Ukraine.

852
00:38:40.639 --> 00:38:43.719
<v Speaker 1>Now I know, I guess we disagree on what's going

853
00:38:43.800 --> 00:38:47.519
<v Speaker 1>on in Ukraine. But Donald Trump's foreign policy is a joke.

854
00:38:47.679 --> 00:38:49.480
<v Speaker 1>The world is laughing at us right now when it

855
00:38:49.519 --> 00:38:52.079
<v Speaker 1>comes to tariffs, the one hundred and seventy five billion

856
00:38:52.159 --> 00:38:55.079
<v Speaker 1>dollars that he stole from the American people, and now

857
00:38:55.199 --> 00:38:56.840
<v Speaker 1>we were told we were going to get tariff checks

858
00:38:56.840 --> 00:38:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and now it's turned into well, you can sue us

859
00:38:58.800 --> 00:39:01.679
<v Speaker 1>if you'd like to. I can go policy by policy

860
00:39:01.760 --> 00:39:04.440
<v Speaker 1>with you. Ice. I agree that because I'm sure this

861
00:39:04.559 --> 00:39:06.039
<v Speaker 1>is a topic that you talk about a lot, which

862
00:39:06.039 --> 00:39:10.440
<v Speaker 1>is immigration. I am pro border security. I want people

863
00:39:10.519 --> 00:39:13.599
<v Speaker 1>to come to this country legally. However, I don't want

864
00:39:13.639 --> 00:39:15.599
<v Speaker 1>people that have been in this country for decades, that

865
00:39:15.679 --> 00:39:18.000
<v Speaker 1>pay taxes, that have families here sent to an L

866
00:39:18.079 --> 00:39:22.159
<v Speaker 1>Salvador prison. That's happened. Not everybody was nonviolent, but the

867
00:39:22.239 --> 00:39:24.639
<v Speaker 1>majority of those people, I think it was over sixty

868
00:39:24.679 --> 00:39:26.079
<v Speaker 1>percent of the people that they sent to an El

869
00:39:26.119 --> 00:39:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Salvador prison were non violent criminals. I don't want people

870
00:39:29.360 --> 00:39:32.199
<v Speaker 1>murdered in the streets. What happened in Minneapolis is a travesty.

871
00:39:32.440 --> 00:39:36.000
<v Speaker 1>What happened to Renee Good and Alex Pretty is repugnant.

872
00:39:36.079 --> 00:39:38.719
<v Speaker 1>It's terrible. And then you had christinoam who is no

873
00:39:38.800 --> 00:39:42.000
<v Speaker 1>longer there now, who called them domestic terrorists hours after

874
00:39:42.039 --> 00:39:45.800
<v Speaker 1>these shootings without a full investigation, and by the way,

875
00:39:46.039 --> 00:39:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the evidence proves it. That's why they took that Boveno

876
00:39:48.920 --> 00:39:51.920
<v Speaker 1>asshole out of Minneapolis, and they took out two or

877
00:39:51.960 --> 00:39:56.039
<v Speaker 1>three thousand troops. Listen, violent criminals ninety percent of the country.

878
00:39:56.079 --> 00:39:59.159
<v Speaker 1>Democrats and Republicans agree if you're a violent criminal and

879
00:39:59.199 --> 00:40:03.280
<v Speaker 1>you're undocumented, deported, absolutely, I'm on board with that. But

880
00:40:03.400 --> 00:40:05.599
<v Speaker 1>I have a serious problem with a party that says,

881
00:40:06.000 --> 00:40:08.039
<v Speaker 1>come on into our country, just do it the right way,

882
00:40:08.119 --> 00:40:09.719
<v Speaker 1>do it legally. We don't care what the color of

883
00:40:09.760 --> 00:40:11.880
<v Speaker 1>your skin is. Which is the party that has made

884
00:40:11.920 --> 00:40:14.440
<v Speaker 1>it more difficult for people to become legal citizens. In

885
00:40:14.559 --> 00:40:17.360
<v Speaker 1>some cases it takes ten or fifteen years for people

886
00:40:17.400 --> 00:40:20.119
<v Speaker 1>to be naturalized. The Democrat party has tried to come

887
00:40:20.199 --> 00:40:22.000
<v Speaker 1>up with a way to make it easier for people

888
00:40:22.039 --> 00:40:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to get a pathway to citizenship, and meanwhile, Republicans make

889
00:40:24.840 --> 00:40:27.559
<v Speaker 1>it more difficult. Let's make it easier for people. I

890
00:40:27.599 --> 00:40:29.480
<v Speaker 1>want them to be vetted, but let's make it a

891
00:40:29.519 --> 00:40:32.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit easier for people to become citizens, and let's

892
00:40:32.440 --> 00:40:34.440
<v Speaker 1>give them some more incentives. And if you happen to

893
00:40:34.519 --> 00:40:38.280
<v Speaker 1>be undocumented and your nonviolent criminal, which I think is important,

894
00:40:38.679 --> 00:40:40.360
<v Speaker 1>then you have to pay a penalty. But let's come

895
00:40:40.440 --> 00:40:42.480
<v Speaker 1>up with something that works for the American people. I

896
00:40:42.559 --> 00:40:45.239
<v Speaker 1>don't think separating families and murdering people on the streets

897
00:40:45.679 --> 00:40:48.039
<v Speaker 1>is good policy, and that's what the Trump administration has done.

898
00:40:49.159 --> 00:40:51.639
<v Speaker 1>I would actually just say we don't need immigration really

899
00:40:51.679 --> 00:40:51.960
<v Speaker 1>at all.

900
00:40:52.039 --> 00:40:55.360
<v Speaker 3>I think we have enough human resource and capital here

901
00:40:55.599 --> 00:40:58.440
<v Speaker 3>in the West in America that we don't actually need

902
00:40:59.400 --> 00:41:01.199
<v Speaker 3>the replace of the indigenous people.

903
00:41:01.280 --> 00:41:03.039
<v Speaker 1>And that's kind of a war crime in my view.

904
00:41:03.400 --> 00:41:05.079
<v Speaker 1>This is a known strategy.

905
00:41:05.480 --> 00:41:08.599
<v Speaker 3>You can read Kelly Greenhill's book, She's Like, she writes

906
00:41:08.639 --> 00:41:11.719
<v Speaker 3>for Cornell University. I think weapons of mass migration. So

907
00:41:11.800 --> 00:41:17.039
<v Speaker 3>this is a known geopolitical strategy technique to change the

908
00:41:17.119 --> 00:41:20.320
<v Speaker 3>people groups. Specifically with Europe, you have the Colergy plan.

909
00:41:20.440 --> 00:41:24.159
<v Speaker 3>I've read Kudnov Clergy It's real. His book Practical Idealism

910
00:41:24.239 --> 00:41:27.599
<v Speaker 3>discusses this explicitly that plan was adopted by the Royal

911
00:41:27.679 --> 00:41:30.920
<v Speaker 3>Society to change the demographics of the European Union, and

912
00:41:30.960 --> 00:41:32.599
<v Speaker 3>then we have the same situation I think in America

913
00:41:32.719 --> 00:41:36.440
<v Speaker 3>where you have the flooding of the country with all

914
00:41:36.599 --> 00:41:40.639
<v Speaker 3>kinds of third world people, to change the demographics, not

915
00:41:40.840 --> 00:41:43.119
<v Speaker 3>just for political reasons, but I think ultimately for long

916
00:41:43.199 --> 00:41:45.639
<v Speaker 3>term socialist international reasons.

917
00:41:46.519 --> 00:41:48.880
<v Speaker 1>So we can give a history lesson on immigration, and

918
00:41:49.199 --> 00:41:52.239
<v Speaker 1>we can talk about the past, but what I'm talking

919
00:41:52.280 --> 00:41:54.679
<v Speaker 1>about right now is the future and where this country

920
00:41:54.760 --> 00:41:57.719
<v Speaker 1>is at right now. Will you agree with me that

921
00:41:57.840 --> 00:42:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the shootings of Rene Good and Alex Pretty were horrible.

922
00:42:02.760 --> 00:42:05.159
<v Speaker 1>They weren't handled properly, and we had a woman in

923
00:42:05.239 --> 00:42:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Chicago who was shot five times, almost died, and everybody

924
00:42:10.679 --> 00:42:13.760
<v Speaker 1>in Ice, including Donald Trump, Christy Noams, Stephen Miller, everybody,

925
00:42:13.800 --> 00:42:16.000
<v Speaker 1>based on text messages, were praising this guy for shooting

926
00:42:16.039 --> 00:42:19.000
<v Speaker 1>this woman five times. They claimed that Ms. Martinez was

927
00:42:19.079 --> 00:42:21.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to impeding an investigation, and then all of a sudden,

928
00:42:21.480 --> 00:42:23.519
<v Speaker 1>when the body camera footage came out, it said the

929
00:42:23.639 --> 00:42:27.480
<v Speaker 1>total opposite and they were tracted the charges. Did anybody apologize?

930
00:42:27.800 --> 00:42:27.840
<v Speaker 4>No?

931
00:42:28.480 --> 00:42:32.639
<v Speaker 1>Are those officers still out there? Yes, that's wrong. Can

932
00:42:32.719 --> 00:42:33.559
<v Speaker 1>we agree that that's wrong?

933
00:42:33.559 --> 00:42:35.079
<v Speaker 3>I mean, and I don't doubt that in some of

934
00:42:35.119 --> 00:42:38.199
<v Speaker 3>these situations, you have absolutely horrible mistakes like that. I

935
00:42:38.239 --> 00:42:39.960
<v Speaker 3>would probably agree with that, But and I don't know

936
00:42:40.000 --> 00:42:42.199
<v Speaker 3>the specific of those cases because I'm more focused on

937
00:42:42.239 --> 00:42:43.400
<v Speaker 3>the bigger you'll pay you watch.

938
00:42:44.559 --> 00:42:46.639
<v Speaker 1>You're saying, oh, we don't need a history lesson.

939
00:42:46.639 --> 00:42:48.199
<v Speaker 3>I actually do need a history lesson because if what

940
00:42:48.199 --> 00:42:50.599
<v Speaker 3>I'm talking about is true, then there's a longer, broader strategy.

941
00:42:50.639 --> 00:42:52.199
<v Speaker 1>You don't want immigrants in here at all, there's a

942
00:42:52.280 --> 00:42:54.719
<v Speaker 1>long we don't need any more. No, so you want

943
00:42:54.760 --> 00:42:57.800
<v Speaker 1>to just close the borders for everybody? Yeah, sure, okay,

944
00:42:57.840 --> 00:42:59.119
<v Speaker 1>Well obviously I disagree with you one.

945
00:42:59.239 --> 00:43:02.679
<v Speaker 3>Okay, but that's fine. But Uh, the the reason that

946
00:43:03.119 --> 00:43:05.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm saying that is because there is a real long

947
00:43:05.400 --> 00:43:08.280
<v Speaker 3>term socialist strategy to change the demographics of the entire West,

948
00:43:08.679 --> 00:43:10.119
<v Speaker 3>and these documents point to that.

949
00:43:10.400 --> 00:43:12.079
<v Speaker 1>It cell goes oct what does it matter to you

950
00:43:12.199 --> 00:43:13.480
<v Speaker 1>where where someone comes from?

951
00:43:13.920 --> 00:43:14.039
<v Speaker 2>Uh?

952
00:43:14.280 --> 00:43:15.000
<v Speaker 1>What does it matter?

953
00:43:15.519 --> 00:43:17.719
<v Speaker 3>You know, the people's heritage and tradition makes sense. All

954
00:43:17.719 --> 00:43:20.119
<v Speaker 3>the people who come here, all the people that come

955
00:43:20.159 --> 00:43:22.480
<v Speaker 3>here certainly believe that what is it? What does it

956
00:43:22.719 --> 00:43:27.599
<v Speaker 3>matter where somebody was from. So long as the example,

957
00:43:27.639 --> 00:43:29.920
<v Speaker 3>as long as if they have Sunni ISLAMI believes it

958
00:43:29.960 --> 00:43:30.679
<v Speaker 3>matters quite a bit.

959
00:43:31.159 --> 00:43:33.639
<v Speaker 1>Okay, But if they're not breaking the law and they're

960
00:43:33.760 --> 00:43:37.079
<v Speaker 1>decent people and their family people, why is it.

961
00:43:37.519 --> 00:43:40.159
<v Speaker 3>It's way more complex than that, because, for example, in Islam,

962
00:43:40.400 --> 00:43:43.239
<v Speaker 3>they have the idea and belief that you pretend to

963
00:43:43.400 --> 00:43:47.000
<v Speaker 3>be a minimal and affable to the society that you're

964
00:43:47.039 --> 00:43:49.119
<v Speaker 3>going into, and then over time, when you gain power,

965
00:43:49.599 --> 00:43:50.679
<v Speaker 3>then you overthrow them.

966
00:43:50.719 --> 00:43:53.320
<v Speaker 1>That's in the Quran. Okay, Well, so that's one example.

967
00:43:53.360 --> 00:44:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you have any friends, to have any friends? No,

968
00:44:01.480 --> 00:44:05.119
<v Speaker 1>that's not what I know you. I didn't mean interact,

969
00:44:06.679 --> 00:44:08.679
<v Speaker 1>But do you do you? Interaction is one thing, but like,

970
00:44:08.760 --> 00:44:12.519
<v Speaker 1>do you do you spend time with people of Muslim? Okay,

971
00:44:12.800 --> 00:44:14.960
<v Speaker 1>so I have and I didn't. I didn't say you

972
00:44:15.000 --> 00:44:21.039
<v Speaker 1>didn't have friends. That I misspoke. That's fine. But I

973
00:44:21.119 --> 00:44:23.119
<v Speaker 1>can tell you that I know a lot of people

974
00:44:23.199 --> 00:44:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that are Muslim that live in this country, maybe a

975
00:44:25.519 --> 00:44:29.920
<v Speaker 1>couple dozen, and they're good people. They're nice people, they're

976
00:44:29.960 --> 00:44:34.280
<v Speaker 1>family people. Not every Muslim wants harm on America. Not

977
00:44:34.480 --> 00:44:37.199
<v Speaker 1>every Muslim it is a terrorist. But there are people

978
00:44:37.280 --> 00:44:39.880
<v Speaker 1>on the right that do. Laura Lumer thinks that all

979
00:44:40.000 --> 00:44:44.239
<v Speaker 1>Muslims should be deported. She is despicable. She is a racist. Now,

980
00:44:44.320 --> 00:44:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I disagree with you on the fact that you don't

981
00:44:46.400 --> 00:44:48.880
<v Speaker 1>want any immigrants in this country at all. But I

982
00:44:48.960 --> 00:44:51.760
<v Speaker 1>will say this, every single time Donald Trump says make

983
00:44:51.800 --> 00:44:55.320
<v Speaker 1>America great again, it always meant to me, make America

984
00:44:55.360 --> 00:44:58.239
<v Speaker 1>white again. That's what I believe many in his base

985
00:44:58.320 --> 00:45:02.400
<v Speaker 1>beliefs would racist. Yes, yes, but you're saying race isn't wrong.

986
00:45:02.920 --> 00:45:06.079
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely it's wrong. And I'm saying his slogan, and a

987
00:45:06.119 --> 00:45:08.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of people that abide by his slogan want America

988
00:45:09.039 --> 00:45:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to be white. And and I and I I don't

989
00:45:11.920 --> 00:45:13.960
<v Speaker 1>know about you just said, what's wrong with the people

990
00:45:14.079 --> 00:45:16.599
<v Speaker 1>coming here? I don't see anything wrong with people from

991
00:45:17.199 --> 00:45:19.280
<v Speaker 1>what's wrong with them having their heritage and their tradition.

992
00:45:19.880 --> 00:45:22.039
<v Speaker 1>It depends specifically what you're talking about. But if they're

993
00:45:22.079 --> 00:45:24.079
<v Speaker 1>not breaking the law, then let them believe in what they're.

994
00:45:23.960 --> 00:45:26.239
<v Speaker 3>What's wrong with people who are white having their heritage

995
00:45:26.239 --> 00:45:27.599
<v Speaker 3>in their tradition, if they're not breaking the law.

996
00:45:27.679 --> 00:45:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I don't have a problem with that either. But

997
00:45:30.119 --> 00:45:32.480
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying to me is you don't want any

998
00:45:32.599 --> 00:45:36.920
<v Speaker 1>immigrants country. Okay, but I think that's wrong. Does Japan

999
00:45:37.079 --> 00:45:40.480
<v Speaker 1>have to take in third world people? First of all?

1000
00:45:40.800 --> 00:45:43.159
<v Speaker 1>That makes do they have to That's that's a different country.

1001
00:45:43.159 --> 00:45:45.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about the United States. What makes is this

1002
00:45:45.159 --> 00:45:48.639
<v Speaker 1>a universal principle? No? I believe the United States, the

1003
00:45:48.760 --> 00:45:51.400
<v Speaker 1>United States of America was particular just to America. We

1004
00:45:51.800 --> 00:45:53.519
<v Speaker 1>live in the United States. So I'm going to speak

1005
00:45:53.559 --> 00:45:55.519
<v Speaker 1>on what I want here in the country applies to

1006
00:45:55.639 --> 00:45:58.320
<v Speaker 1>people in America, doesn't apply to our country. In a

1007
00:45:58.360 --> 00:46:01.719
<v Speaker 1>perse relative in a perfect world, it's arbitrary. In a

1008
00:46:01.800 --> 00:46:04.599
<v Speaker 1>perfect arbitrary, I'm answering you. In a perfect world, I

1009
00:46:04.639 --> 00:46:07.800
<v Speaker 1>would love the entire world to operate in a state

1010
00:46:07.880 --> 00:46:10.800
<v Speaker 1>of live where you want to live, have the religion

1011
00:46:10.880 --> 00:46:12.599
<v Speaker 1>that you want. And I don't want people to be

1012
00:46:12.679 --> 00:46:16.679
<v Speaker 1>judged based on religion ors sing j in a perfect world?

1013
00:46:16.800 --> 00:46:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Should they in a perfect world? I want want every

1014
00:46:19.320 --> 00:46:21.519
<v Speaker 1>You talk about this world, so should they in this world? Yeah?

1015
00:46:21.639 --> 00:46:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I think everybody of every country should take in immigrants.

1016
00:46:24.599 --> 00:46:31.079
<v Speaker 1>I think untold infinity as long as you're vetted properly. Well,

1017
00:46:31.159 --> 00:46:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean, listen, I come from a different cloth,

1018
00:46:34.400 --> 00:46:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess and in my personal opinion, I don't care

1019
00:46:37.960 --> 00:46:39.960
<v Speaker 1>what you look like. I don't care what the color

1020
00:46:39.960 --> 00:46:43.079
<v Speaker 1>of your skin is unless I don't care. No, you're

1021
00:46:43.079 --> 00:46:44.400
<v Speaker 1>not letting me finished. No, it has something to do

1022
00:46:44.440 --> 00:46:46.119
<v Speaker 1>with that I want. It's a double center. No, it's

1023
00:46:46.159 --> 00:46:48.039
<v Speaker 1>not a double standard. You're not hearing me out. I

1024
00:46:48.119 --> 00:46:50.519
<v Speaker 1>don't care where you're from. You could be white, you

1025
00:46:50.599 --> 00:46:52.280
<v Speaker 1>could be black. I don't care. You could be as

1026
00:46:52.320 --> 00:46:55.119
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent white like me. I want everyone to

1027
00:46:55.199 --> 00:46:58.840
<v Speaker 1>have the same opportunities as long as you're vetted properly. Yes,

1028
00:46:58.880 --> 00:47:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I do want border secure. I want people to be vetted.

1029
00:47:02.400 --> 00:47:04.239
<v Speaker 1>But the difference, to the fundamental difference here is I

1030
00:47:04.280 --> 00:47:06.239
<v Speaker 1>don't care where you're from as long as you don't

1031
00:47:06.280 --> 00:47:08.599
<v Speaker 1>have bad intention. It's crazy you don't care about that.

1032
00:47:08.800 --> 00:47:09.719
<v Speaker 1>But that wasn't the question.

1033
00:47:09.800 --> 00:47:12.159
<v Speaker 3>The questions about the ethics of an entire country taking

1034
00:47:12.239 --> 00:47:15.440
<v Speaker 3>in massive amounts of other third world migrants, that was

1035
00:47:15.519 --> 00:47:15.880
<v Speaker 3>the question.

1036
00:47:16.079 --> 00:47:18.800
<v Speaker 1>First of all, it's dependent upon are they coming in

1037
00:47:18.880 --> 00:47:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the right way. It's dependent upon are they properly vetted.

1038
00:47:22.320 --> 00:47:24.719
<v Speaker 1>It's dependent upon where are they going to go? Are

1039
00:47:24.800 --> 00:47:26.440
<v Speaker 1>they going to be able to provide something to the

1040
00:47:26.559 --> 00:47:29.679
<v Speaker 1>United States? Tools and skills that they have. That's part

1041
00:47:29.719 --> 00:47:31.960
<v Speaker 1>of the vetting process. So as long as you're doing

1042
00:47:32.039 --> 00:47:34.440
<v Speaker 1>that properly, and we don't have bad people, which I

1043
00:47:34.559 --> 00:47:37.159
<v Speaker 1>don't want. I don't want bad people coming here. I

1044
00:47:37.199 --> 00:47:39.119
<v Speaker 1>don't want people that want to do harm to America.

1045
00:47:39.360 --> 00:47:42.039
<v Speaker 1>I don't want rapists or child molesters, or quite frankly,

1046
00:47:42.079 --> 00:47:44.320
<v Speaker 1>people that you support like Donald Trump. I don't want

1047
00:47:44.360 --> 00:47:47.280
<v Speaker 1>people like that in this country. And if they're properly,

1048
00:47:47.360 --> 00:47:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm being serious that. I know it's funny, but I'm

1049
00:47:49.000 --> 00:47:51.079
<v Speaker 1>being serious. I don't want people like Donald Trump, your

1050
00:47:51.119 --> 00:47:53.440
<v Speaker 1>orange people like Donald Trump, who are thirty four count

1051
00:47:53.480 --> 00:47:56.760
<v Speaker 1>fellow liable sexual abusers, people that you support like Donald Trump,

1052
00:47:56.840 --> 00:48:00.320
<v Speaker 1>who's named thousands of times in the Epstein files. I mean,

1053
00:48:00.320 --> 00:48:02.039
<v Speaker 1>I don't want people like that in this country. I

1054
00:48:02.079 --> 00:48:03.719
<v Speaker 1>don't care what the color of their skin is, like you,

1055
00:48:03.960 --> 00:48:06.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't care where what country they're from. I don't

1056
00:48:06.199 --> 00:48:08.920
<v Speaker 1>want people in this country like Donald Trump. And I

1057
00:48:08.960 --> 00:48:12.159
<v Speaker 1>can give you multiple reasons why you voted for a

1058
00:48:12.239 --> 00:48:15.480
<v Speaker 1>thirty four count villain. You voted for a liable sexual abuser.

1059
00:48:15.920 --> 00:48:18.079
<v Speaker 1>Why are you so worried about people from other countries

1060
00:48:18.119 --> 00:48:20.159
<v Speaker 1>coming here? When the guy who you support the president

1061
00:48:20.199 --> 00:48:22.320
<v Speaker 1>of the United States is like a fallacy machine. No,

1062
00:48:22.440 --> 00:48:24.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not a fallacy machine, it's logic.

1063
00:48:24.079 --> 00:48:25.880
<v Speaker 3>Don't Well, you don't actually know what fallacies are because

1064
00:48:25.880 --> 00:48:27.880
<v Speaker 3>you demonstrated that earlier. You don't know what appealed to

1065
00:48:27.960 --> 00:48:29.159
<v Speaker 3>masses was I know.

1066
00:48:29.400 --> 00:48:31.119
<v Speaker 1>I know what someone who is a threat to this

1067
00:48:31.199 --> 00:48:33.360
<v Speaker 1>country looks like, and I know what's someone who is

1068
00:48:33.440 --> 00:48:34.360
<v Speaker 1>not an immigrant.

1069
00:48:34.639 --> 00:48:36.719
<v Speaker 3>You think that massive amounts of people should be able

1070
00:48:36.719 --> 00:48:37.880
<v Speaker 3>to come into the country. So I don't think you

1071
00:48:37.920 --> 00:48:39.719
<v Speaker 3>actually have a good assessment of what threats are. I

1072
00:48:39.719 --> 00:48:41.760
<v Speaker 3>don't think you have a good assure your situation would

1073
00:48:41.760 --> 00:48:43.199
<v Speaker 3>allow for the complete disintegration.

1074
00:48:43.400 --> 00:48:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you have a good assessment of what's

1075
00:48:44.920 --> 00:48:46.639
<v Speaker 1>good for this country and what's not. You want you

1076
00:48:46.760 --> 00:48:48.519
<v Speaker 1>you want our border. Your assessment was based on he

1077
00:48:48.599 --> 00:48:51.159
<v Speaker 1>was purely subjective. What you want. You want our borders

1078
00:48:51.199 --> 00:48:55.000
<v Speaker 1>to be closed. You don't want any good for the country. Okay,

1079
00:48:55.239 --> 00:48:57.639
<v Speaker 1>so countries that have voting for Donald Trump, but voting

1080
00:48:57.719 --> 00:48:59.639
<v Speaker 1>tru is good for the country. That's good for the country.

1081
00:48:59.719 --> 00:49:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Give it what he can starting. Yeah, so yeah, but

1082
00:49:03.920 --> 00:49:06.760
<v Speaker 1>he's not doing that. He's who cares what this guy? Actually?

1083
00:49:06.800 --> 00:49:09.559
<v Speaker 1>Were you calling me out for voting for what he campaign.

1084
00:49:09.639 --> 00:49:11.679
<v Speaker 1>You want good people? Trying to associate me with a

1085
00:49:11.760 --> 00:49:14.119
<v Speaker 1>bad guy again, which, well, yeah, because you support him

1086
00:49:14.119 --> 00:49:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and you voted for him, you have no problem supporting

1087
00:49:16.039 --> 00:49:19.760
<v Speaker 1>up going with his policies already. What about his behavior?

1088
00:49:19.880 --> 00:49:21.880
<v Speaker 1>You want good people in this country, You don't want migrants.

1089
00:49:22.079 --> 00:49:26.519
<v Speaker 1>Politicians have crazy behavior. Right, gave me another politician that's

1090
00:49:26.559 --> 00:49:28.639
<v Speaker 1>ever been the president that's a thirty four count felon,

1091
00:49:28.800 --> 00:49:31.159
<v Speaker 1>that's a liable sexual abuser. Please give me one example.

1092
00:49:31.280 --> 00:49:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Jay Uh, Well, I don't know the number of because

1093
00:49:34.960 --> 00:49:36.599
<v Speaker 1>because you couldn't find that. Because you couldn't find that,

1094
00:49:38.239 --> 00:49:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't defend Bill Clinton. You can try the what about?

1095
00:49:41.000 --> 00:49:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean what about? You asked me how would that be?

1096
00:49:43.480 --> 00:49:45.760
<v Speaker 1>What about? To answer your question, it was Bill Clinton

1097
00:49:45.800 --> 00:49:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a thirty four count film. I didn't say he was.

1098
00:49:47.440 --> 00:49:49.679
<v Speaker 1>I said there is probably nobody with thirty four counts

1099
00:49:49.719 --> 00:49:51.719
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. Yeah, you voted for that guy. Well, you

1100
00:49:51.800 --> 00:49:52.239
<v Speaker 1>asked him that.

1101
00:49:52.199 --> 00:49:55.440
<v Speaker 3>Absurd question to give a specific person who has thirty

1102
00:49:55.480 --> 00:49:57.280
<v Speaker 3>four felons, which obviously there's not a person.

1103
00:49:57.360 --> 00:50:00.519
<v Speaker 1>Well admit that with respect. I think it's a absurd

1104
00:50:01.400 --> 00:50:03.559
<v Speaker 1>when you say you want our borders closed and you

1105
00:50:03.639 --> 00:50:08.199
<v Speaker 1>don't want but it's coming here. Why because the other

1106
00:50:08.280 --> 00:50:12.519
<v Speaker 1>countries we founded, I'm telling you we were founded by immigrants.

1107
00:50:13.199 --> 00:50:19.039
<v Speaker 1>But about this found I'm giving you my full explanation.

1108
00:50:19.559 --> 00:50:23.559
<v Speaker 1>We were My my personal opinion is that I want

1109
00:50:24.440 --> 00:50:27.559
<v Speaker 1>it's the land of opportunity, and I believe that if

1110
00:50:27.599 --> 00:50:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you're vetted and you're you know, you're not a criminal,

1111
00:50:30.639 --> 00:50:34.039
<v Speaker 1>we should give everybody the opportunities to succeed in this country.

1112
00:50:34.079 --> 00:50:36.880
<v Speaker 1>You go through the process of becoming a legal citizen.

1113
00:50:37.159 --> 00:50:39.199
<v Speaker 1>There are a ton of immigrants that have come to

1114
00:50:39.280 --> 00:50:41.239
<v Speaker 1>this country that have done so many great things for

1115
00:50:41.320 --> 00:50:43.960
<v Speaker 1>this What I was arguing, well, I mean, you just

1116
00:50:44.000 --> 00:50:46.079
<v Speaker 1>want the borders to be completely closed, which I think

1117
00:50:46.159 --> 00:50:48.840
<v Speaker 1>is absurd. Okay, I'm sorry. I just for the countries

1118
00:50:48.880 --> 00:50:50.519
<v Speaker 1>that do that seem to do I just disagree with you.

1119
00:50:50.800 --> 00:50:53.639
<v Speaker 1>I just I just think that And again, you might

1120
00:50:53.719 --> 00:50:55.559
<v Speaker 1>not like the comparison I'm making here, but I think

1121
00:50:55.599 --> 00:50:58.280
<v Speaker 1>it's important. You seem to have a concern and you

1122
00:50:58.360 --> 00:51:01.880
<v Speaker 1>think it's bad for the country to have immigrants coming

1123
00:51:01.960 --> 00:51:06.840
<v Speaker 1>here no infinity immigrant. Yeah, Well again, you know, I

1124
00:51:06.960 --> 00:51:09.280
<v Speaker 1>think maybe there needs to be something put in place.

1125
00:51:09.360 --> 00:51:11.320
<v Speaker 1>But you've made the case that you don't want immigrants

1126
00:51:11.320 --> 00:51:13.880
<v Speaker 1>here at all. You want to close the borders completely, right,

1127
00:51:14.000 --> 00:51:16.119
<v Speaker 1>it's not needed? Yeah, well, I mean there's a lot

1128
00:51:16.159 --> 00:51:17.719
<v Speaker 1>of things that you might think is not needed. But

1129
00:51:17.800 --> 00:51:20.800
<v Speaker 1>how does that affect you negatively if immigrants are coming up.

1130
00:51:20.800 --> 00:51:22.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm not arguing for what effects mean personally. I'm just

1131
00:51:23.679 --> 00:51:24.800
<v Speaker 1>for America country in general.

1132
00:51:25.199 --> 00:51:29.199
<v Speaker 3>Countries that have homogeneous populations that keep to their traditions

1133
00:51:29.239 --> 00:51:31.480
<v Speaker 3>and their heritage seem to flourish and function better than

1134
00:51:31.480 --> 00:51:34.039
<v Speaker 3>those that are demographically changed. Hence why I was referring

1135
00:51:34.079 --> 00:51:36.559
<v Speaker 3>back to the older strategies of the War College and

1136
00:51:36.599 --> 00:51:39.679
<v Speaker 3>others that are written about how to do demographic replacement,

1137
00:51:40.280 --> 00:51:41.159
<v Speaker 3>which is a form of warfare.

1138
00:51:41.199 --> 00:51:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you think immigrants, all undocumented immigrants that are in

1139
00:51:44.519 --> 00:51:47.719
<v Speaker 1>this country now should all be deported? Yes? So people

1140
00:51:47.760 --> 00:51:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that have lived in this country for decades that have

1141
00:51:49.679 --> 00:51:51.760
<v Speaker 1>children here. How about anchor babies? Do you think they

1142
00:51:51.800 --> 00:51:54.360
<v Speaker 1>should be deported as well? I would want the law

1143
00:51:54.400 --> 00:51:56.199
<v Speaker 1>to be changed on that. Yes, So you think that

1144
00:51:56.280 --> 00:51:58.119
<v Speaker 1>if you're a three or a four year old child

1145
00:51:58.159 --> 00:51:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that was born in this country, they should be deported?

1146
00:52:00.559 --> 00:52:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately you do? Okay, Well, I think that's extremely harsh,

1147
00:52:03.280 --> 00:52:04.519
<v Speaker 1>and I disagree with you. By the way, if you're

1148
00:52:04.519 --> 00:52:07.840
<v Speaker 1>seeking asylum from a country, you know, from Mexico for example,

1149
00:52:08.000 --> 00:52:09.239
<v Speaker 1>and you're going about it the right way and you

1150
00:52:09.320 --> 00:52:11.119
<v Speaker 1>filled out the right paperwork, it is illegal for the

1151
00:52:11.159 --> 00:52:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration to deport you. Do you understand that they're

1152
00:52:13.360 --> 00:52:15.280
<v Speaker 1>doing that right now? It is against the law. And

1153
00:52:15.280 --> 00:52:17.800
<v Speaker 1>there they are going against what our constitution says. It's

1154
00:52:17.880 --> 00:52:20.119
<v Speaker 1>happening right now as we speak. You have ICE agents

1155
00:52:20.159 --> 00:52:22.840
<v Speaker 1>outside of courtrooms when they have filled out the proper paperwork.

1156
00:52:22.920 --> 00:52:23.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1157
00:52:23.280 --> 00:52:24.639
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean, I think these are your focusing on

1158
00:52:24.760 --> 00:52:28.239
<v Speaker 3>minutia of bad situations that happened the individuals in masses

1159
00:52:28.320 --> 00:52:31.880
<v Speaker 3>of tens of millions of people, when the overall net

1160
00:52:32.000 --> 00:52:34.880
<v Speaker 3>negative for the country is more important than the minutia.

1161
00:52:35.000 --> 00:52:37.760
<v Speaker 3>And you know, one person is a you know, a

1162
00:52:37.840 --> 00:52:40.440
<v Speaker 3>news story, but the statistics of millions of people get forgotten.

1163
00:52:40.559 --> 00:52:43.000
<v Speaker 3>So it's more important for the long term benefit of

1164
00:52:43.039 --> 00:52:45.159
<v Speaker 3>the country in general than to highlight as the left

1165
00:52:45.199 --> 00:52:46.719
<v Speaker 3>off and does I'm not saying you're a leftist, but

1166
00:52:46.800 --> 00:52:50.480
<v Speaker 3>they highlight specific cases to do emotional peals and so

1167
00:52:50.639 --> 00:52:52.679
<v Speaker 3>like you've done in this debates, a lot of emotional PILs,

1168
00:52:52.679 --> 00:52:53.400
<v Speaker 3>which also fallacy.

1169
00:52:53.599 --> 00:52:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's emotional to say that the president

1170
00:52:56.039 --> 00:52:58.719
<v Speaker 1>is ripping up parts of the constitution and breaking the law.

1171
00:52:58.880 --> 00:53:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Those are breaking the laws emotions, Those are emotional appeals.

1172
00:53:01.719 --> 00:53:03.719
<v Speaker 1>Does it say that we all have What does it

1173
00:53:03.800 --> 00:53:05.760
<v Speaker 1>say in our constitutions say every citizen has the right

1174
00:53:05.800 --> 00:53:08.039
<v Speaker 1>to do process? Or or any every person? What does

1175
00:53:08.079 --> 00:53:09.440
<v Speaker 1>it say? Uh?

1176
00:53:09.960 --> 00:53:11.039
<v Speaker 3>Off the top of my head, I don't recall, but

1177
00:53:11.079 --> 00:53:13.280
<v Speaker 3>I kind of important. I would assume its citizens.

1178
00:53:13.559 --> 00:53:17.599
<v Speaker 1>No, you're wrong. In our constitution it says any person

1179
00:53:18.119 --> 00:53:21.960
<v Speaker 1>has the right to do process. This is really fundamentally important. Okay,

1180
00:53:22.119 --> 00:53:24.519
<v Speaker 1>but they also didn't have the idea of infinity open borders.

1181
00:53:24.519 --> 00:53:27.079
<v Speaker 1>Okay at the time, again you use the term infinity,

1182
00:53:27.159 --> 00:53:29.239
<v Speaker 1>but you said you don't want any immigrants coming into

1183
00:53:29.280 --> 00:53:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the country, So that's different than infinity. My solution to

1184
00:53:32.159 --> 00:53:34.719
<v Speaker 1>infinity is the closing of the borders, Right, you want

1185
00:53:34.760 --> 00:53:37.119
<v Speaker 1>the borders closed and you don't want any immigrants coming in.

1186
00:53:37.159 --> 00:53:38.400
<v Speaker 1>And the point that I was trying to make is

1187
00:53:38.440 --> 00:53:40.559
<v Speaker 1>if you care about our constitution, which I hope you do.

1188
00:53:40.760 --> 00:53:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I do as well, it says in our Constitution our forefathers,

1189
00:53:44.039 --> 00:53:47.800
<v Speaker 1>it says not any citizen has the right to do process.

1190
00:53:47.960 --> 00:53:50.480
<v Speaker 1>It says any person and as much as your person

1191
00:53:50.519 --> 00:53:52.519
<v Speaker 1>also can be a lawbreaker and people that are here

1192
00:53:52.760 --> 00:53:55.239
<v Speaker 1>absolutely absolutely, but that doesn't mean they don't have the

1193
00:53:55.320 --> 00:53:56.079
<v Speaker 1>right to do process.

1194
00:53:56.159 --> 00:53:57.880
<v Speaker 3>That's what it says in our constitution. Well, yeah, I

1195
00:53:57.920 --> 00:54:00.239
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't have a problem trying to that and do uh

1196
00:54:00.559 --> 00:54:01.159
<v Speaker 3>do process.

1197
00:54:01.239 --> 00:54:03.679
<v Speaker 1>But they're not doing that. Jay, Well, that's I'm sorry.

1198
00:54:03.800 --> 00:54:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I didn't. I didn't. I didn't defend that specifically,

1199
00:54:08.159 --> 00:54:10.000
<v Speaker 1>but just now asked me about that. Okay, but you're

1200
00:54:10.079 --> 00:54:12.320
<v Speaker 1>saying that any child that is.

1201
00:54:12.360 --> 00:54:17.159
<v Speaker 3>Born, I said specifically, highlighting certain emotionally charged cases is

1202
00:54:17.320 --> 00:54:19.960
<v Speaker 3>neglecting the bigger problem. And that's what the left tends

1203
00:54:20.000 --> 00:54:22.960
<v Speaker 3>to do in this topic is highlight the emotional appeal

1204
00:54:23.039 --> 00:54:25.559
<v Speaker 3>topics about this child or that child, which is unfortunate,

1205
00:54:26.079 --> 00:54:26.559
<v Speaker 3>but it's.

1206
00:54:26.480 --> 00:54:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Not the big issue.

1207
00:54:27.519 --> 00:54:30.400
<v Speaker 3>The big issue is I'm sorry going Well, I'm saying

1208
00:54:30.440 --> 00:54:32.639
<v Speaker 3>in philosophy and emotional appeal is where you cite a

1209
00:54:32.679 --> 00:54:35.559
<v Speaker 3>specific example and then you expand that to the to

1210
00:54:35.679 --> 00:54:38.719
<v Speaker 3>the totality and say that on the basis of how

1211
00:54:38.760 --> 00:54:41.599
<v Speaker 3>you feel about this specific example, you should sway your opinion.

1212
00:54:41.960 --> 00:54:43.960
<v Speaker 3>So the reason it's the fallacies that's not actually based

1213
00:54:44.000 --> 00:54:46.119
<v Speaker 3>on the logic of the situation. It's based on what

1214
00:54:46.360 --> 00:54:48.000
<v Speaker 3>what you feel the war propaganda does.

1215
00:54:48.039 --> 00:54:49.320
<v Speaker 1>That's where they say, look at this child, he was

1216
00:54:49.400 --> 00:54:51.440
<v Speaker 1>killed in the war, therefore be against the war. Well,

1217
00:54:51.480 --> 00:54:53.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm just talking about our constitution in the lawn. No,

1218
00:54:53.519 --> 00:54:56.719
<v Speaker 1>you weren't. You were talking about I wasecific emotionally charge case. Now,

1219
00:54:56.760 --> 00:54:59.159
<v Speaker 1>I was specifically talking about what it says in the constitution.

1220
00:54:59.519 --> 00:55:01.239
<v Speaker 1>You talked about mostly charge cases. Then you ask me

1221
00:55:01.239 --> 00:55:03.960
<v Speaker 1>about that I'm asking you about and I was responding

1222
00:55:04.000 --> 00:55:06.719
<v Speaker 1>to the law which states if you are from certain

1223
00:55:06.760 --> 00:55:09.719
<v Speaker 1>countries like Mexico and you're seeking asylum, and you come

1224
00:55:09.760 --> 00:55:12.199
<v Speaker 1>to this country and you fill out the proper paperwork,

1225
00:55:12.239 --> 00:55:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and you're in the middle of that process, and you

1226
00:55:14.599 --> 00:55:17.079
<v Speaker 1>show up in front of a judge, it is illegal

1227
00:55:17.639 --> 00:55:20.159
<v Speaker 1>for the Trump administration to deport you. And the point

1228
00:55:20.199 --> 00:55:21.480
<v Speaker 1>that I was trying to make is this isn't a

1229
00:55:21.519 --> 00:55:24.239
<v Speaker 1>one off for a couple of cases. Thousands of people

1230
00:55:24.320 --> 00:55:27.800
<v Speaker 1>have been deported in the middle of the paperwork process,

1231
00:55:27.880 --> 00:55:31.239
<v Speaker 1>where in our own constitution it says they cannot deport

1232
00:55:31.320 --> 00:55:34.679
<v Speaker 1>you if you're seeking asylum from certain countries. It's against

1233
00:55:34.719 --> 00:55:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the law. That's not an emotional argument, but it's a

1234
00:55:37.079 --> 00:55:37.719
<v Speaker 1>law that's being.

1235
00:55:37.639 --> 00:55:41.039
<v Speaker 3>Broke thousands of cases versus ten twenty thirty million people

1236
00:55:41.079 --> 00:55:43.719
<v Speaker 3>that are here illegally in the last few decades. Again,

1237
00:55:43.800 --> 00:55:46.719
<v Speaker 3>it's that's highlighting something that's not the main issue. So

1238
00:55:46.840 --> 00:55:50.079
<v Speaker 3>it's more important to save the country than to be

1239
00:55:50.239 --> 00:55:52.199
<v Speaker 3>an overly concerned I don't think these people.

1240
00:55:52.039 --> 00:55:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Are ruining the country and our country needs to be saved.

1241
00:55:54.800 --> 00:55:57.079
<v Speaker 1>In fact, per case, I disagree. Okay, well, do you

1242
00:55:57.159 --> 00:55:58.400
<v Speaker 1>have a better chance of being the victim of a

1243
00:55:58.480 --> 00:56:02.760
<v Speaker 1>crime from an undocumented immigrant or American citizen depends on

1244
00:56:02.800 --> 00:56:04.800
<v Speaker 1>where you are. Okay, now, you know to certain places

1245
00:56:04.840 --> 00:56:06.559
<v Speaker 1>where there are no there's going to be more crime

1246
00:56:06.599 --> 00:56:08.519
<v Speaker 1>in certain cities. But as a whole, and you could

1247
00:56:08.519 --> 00:56:10.800
<v Speaker 1>look this up FBI statistics, you have a better chance

1248
00:56:10.840 --> 00:56:12.480
<v Speaker 1>of being the victim of a crime from an American

1249
00:56:12.559 --> 00:56:15.000
<v Speaker 1>citizen than you do an undocumented immigrant. I think that's

1250
00:56:15.079 --> 00:56:16.639
<v Speaker 1>very important to note because a lot of people think

1251
00:56:16.639 --> 00:56:19.199
<v Speaker 1>that brown people and undocumented emigrant's coming into this country

1252
00:56:19.280 --> 00:56:20.679
<v Speaker 1>are going to rape your kids and they're going to

1253
00:56:20.760 --> 00:56:22.800
<v Speaker 1>kidnap your wife. It's just not the case. There are

1254
00:56:22.840 --> 00:56:26.159
<v Speaker 1>examples there are examples of undocumented immigrants that do horrible things.

1255
00:56:26.199 --> 00:56:28.199
<v Speaker 1>I want those people to ported. I don't want them here.

1256
00:56:28.480 --> 00:56:30.960
<v Speaker 1>But the overwhelming majority of these people that are coming

1257
00:56:31.039 --> 00:56:33.920
<v Speaker 1>into this country, that are here already, many of them

1258
00:56:34.079 --> 00:56:37.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, that are undocumented, are not bad people with

1259
00:56:37.440 --> 00:56:40.960
<v Speaker 1>bad intentions. I want bad people, uh thrown out of

1260
00:56:41.000 --> 00:56:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the true But it's still illegal. Yeah, okay, okay, so

1261
00:56:44.480 --> 00:56:47.239
<v Speaker 1>it's against the law. Yeah so you think so. Your

1262
00:56:47.519 --> 00:56:49.440
<v Speaker 1>your opinion is if you break the law, there should

1263
00:56:49.440 --> 00:56:51.960
<v Speaker 1>be consequences. Is that a fair assessment? Sure? What are

1264
00:56:52.000 --> 00:56:54.159
<v Speaker 1>the consequences for Donald Trump, the man who you support.

1265
00:56:55.519 --> 00:56:57.039
<v Speaker 1>You're laughing, but it's I mean.

1266
00:56:57.119 --> 00:56:58.760
<v Speaker 3>Because you're trying to pay me as if I'm some

1267
00:56:58.960 --> 00:57:01.239
<v Speaker 3>sort of like, well, no, every single policy.

1268
00:57:01.559 --> 00:57:04.400
<v Speaker 1>This isn't about policy. This is about concept. Now you're

1269
00:57:04.480 --> 00:57:06.480
<v Speaker 1>changing between when I told you I was an issues person.

1270
00:57:06.599 --> 00:57:09.159
<v Speaker 1>You say I'm a Trump apologist. I did not say

1271
00:57:09.159 --> 00:57:11.000
<v Speaker 1>you're a trumpopolicy said the man that you support, And

1272
00:57:11.039 --> 00:57:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, yeah, no on specific issues issue person. Okay,

1273
00:57:14.440 --> 00:57:16.280
<v Speaker 1>so let's talk about this. And I already agreed that

1274
00:57:17.079 --> 00:57:20.639
<v Speaker 1>let's forget about the fact that you've because it's hypocrisy.

1275
00:57:21.000 --> 00:57:23.599
<v Speaker 1>You want people held to the highest hold on I'll

1276
00:57:23.599 --> 00:57:25.079
<v Speaker 1>explain to you what I mean, and I'm not. I

1277
00:57:25.119 --> 00:57:27.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think you're a Trump apologist. I don't think you are.

1278
00:57:27.239 --> 00:57:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Based on the twenty minutes i've known you, I don't

1279
00:57:29.320 --> 00:57:32.519
<v Speaker 1>think you are. But you want people to be held

1280
00:57:32.519 --> 00:57:35.199
<v Speaker 1>to account. If it's somebody, by the way, it's a misdemeanor.

1281
00:57:35.239 --> 00:57:36.840
<v Speaker 1>If you come into this country legally, it's not even

1282
00:57:36.840 --> 00:57:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a felony. But but you want people to held to

1283
00:57:39.480 --> 00:57:42.519
<v Speaker 1>the highest extent of the law in this case of misdemeanor. Okay, fine.

1284
00:57:42.599 --> 00:57:45.280
<v Speaker 3>I believe for the for the maintenance and safety and

1285
00:57:45.360 --> 00:57:47.480
<v Speaker 3>health of the country, because I think the country will collapse.

1286
00:57:47.519 --> 00:57:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Do you do you agree with me? I disagree with that,

1287
00:57:50.000 --> 00:57:52.880
<v Speaker 1>But do you agree with me that we should have

1288
00:57:53.000 --> 00:57:55.400
<v Speaker 1>that same standard held to the highest people in power,

1289
00:57:55.480 --> 00:57:57.960
<v Speaker 1>including Donald Trump? Yeah? I think everybody, nobody should be

1290
00:57:58.000 --> 00:58:01.639
<v Speaker 1>immune to to or above the wall. Sure do you

1291
00:58:01.679 --> 00:58:03.760
<v Speaker 1>think that standard has held up when it comes to

1292
00:58:03.840 --> 00:58:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump in the thirty four count felony felonies that

1293
00:58:06.360 --> 00:58:08.440
<v Speaker 1>he was found guilty of or the Jack Smith case?

1294
00:58:08.840 --> 00:58:11.119
<v Speaker 1>Uh January sixth, Let me ask you another question. Since

1295
00:58:11.159 --> 00:58:13.840
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about the law, do you do you think

1296
00:58:13.880 --> 00:58:16.360
<v Speaker 1>January sixth happens. If Donald Trump doesn't lie about the

1297
00:58:16.400 --> 00:58:22.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty election, would January six have happened? Yeah? If

1298
00:58:22.519 --> 00:58:24.519
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump didn't lie, which clearly it was a lie,

1299
00:58:24.519 --> 00:58:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't care what Alex Jones says. If Donald Trump

1300
00:58:27.320 --> 00:58:30.079
<v Speaker 1>didn't lie about the twenty twenty election because he didn't win,

1301
00:58:30.599 --> 00:58:33.960
<v Speaker 1>does January sixth happen? I have no idea. You have

1302
00:58:34.039 --> 00:58:36.679
<v Speaker 1>no idea, all right, Hypothetically speaking to you, asked me

1303
00:58:36.719 --> 00:58:38.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of questions I want to ask. Can I

1304
00:58:38.880 --> 00:58:40.559
<v Speaker 1>just touch on this? But I want to use some

1305
00:58:40.599 --> 00:58:43.840
<v Speaker 1>interrogation as well. Fair enough you can, as you can

1306
00:58:43.840 --> 00:58:46.719
<v Speaker 1>ask me anything you like. Last question, well, to this issue.

1307
00:58:47.320 --> 00:58:50.440
<v Speaker 1>You're telling me that if Donald Trump did what every

1308
00:58:50.480 --> 00:58:53.519
<v Speaker 1>other president did in American history, which was concede, which

1309
00:58:53.559 --> 00:58:57.400
<v Speaker 1>he didn't do, you think January sixth still happens and

1310
00:58:57.440 --> 00:58:59.400
<v Speaker 1>people are trying to overthrow a free and fair election.

1311
00:58:59.480 --> 00:59:01.559
<v Speaker 1>You can't add answer that question. You don't know.

1312
00:59:01.760 --> 00:59:03.559
<v Speaker 3>It's just an argument from silence. I don't know what

1313
00:59:03.639 --> 00:59:06.320
<v Speaker 3>would have happened had this major event not occurred.

1314
00:59:06.519 --> 00:59:09.599
<v Speaker 1>So if he conceded and did what every other president did,

1315
00:59:09.639 --> 00:59:11.960
<v Speaker 1>you still think January sixth happens, and they stormed the

1316
00:59:12.000 --> 00:59:14.400
<v Speaker 1>capin on their saying, I don't know what would have happened. Okay,

1317
00:59:14.559 --> 00:59:16.679
<v Speaker 1>maybe it does, it happen, Maybe it's less likely. Who

1318
00:59:16.760 --> 00:59:19.599
<v Speaker 1>won the twenty twenty election free and fair? I believe

1319
00:59:19.639 --> 00:59:22.440
<v Speaker 1>there's manipulation. I think most elections are manipulation. Okay, who

1320
00:59:22.480 --> 00:59:24.239
<v Speaker 1>won the election? Free and fair? Did Joe Biden win

1321
00:59:24.239 --> 00:59:26.559
<v Speaker 1>a free and fair election? No? Is there any evidence

1322
00:59:26.599 --> 00:59:28.599
<v Speaker 1>of widespread voter front that you can share with us today?

1323
00:59:29.719 --> 00:59:31.559
<v Speaker 1>This is my opinion. I don't spend a whole lot

1324
00:59:31.599 --> 00:59:34.519
<v Speaker 1>of time focusing on voter fraud or voter election issues

1325
00:59:34.559 --> 00:59:36.920
<v Speaker 1>because I'm not really into day to day politics, but

1326
00:59:37.800 --> 00:59:39.719
<v Speaker 1>studying the history of the CIA the way it works,

1327
00:59:39.760 --> 00:59:43.039
<v Speaker 1>I think that they can easily tap into their techniques

1328
00:59:43.119 --> 00:59:46.199
<v Speaker 1>for regime change and throwing elections. Donald Trump win the

1329
00:59:47.480 --> 00:59:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump win the twenty twenty four election free and fair? Then?

1330
00:59:49.920 --> 00:59:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Or would you hold that same standard and maybekommonalt No.

1331
00:59:53.039 --> 00:59:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that Trump had overwhelming popular so so it's

1332
00:59:56.400 --> 00:59:58.239
<v Speaker 1>only free and fair if Donald Trump wins. But I

1333
00:59:58.360 --> 01:00:00.960
<v Speaker 1>just gave you my opinion based on what though there's

1334
01:00:01.000 --> 01:00:03.519
<v Speaker 1>no evidence of widespread voter for he had chances my

1335
01:00:03.719 --> 01:00:09.480
<v Speaker 1>opinion on how the CIA riggs elections. But go ahead,

1336
01:00:11.599 --> 01:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of what you've argued, you keep saying

1337
01:00:13.280 --> 01:00:15.519
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, my opinion, my opinion. I'm just curious, like

1338
01:00:16.000 --> 01:00:18.960
<v Speaker 1>where on what basis ought we go with your opinion

1339
01:00:19.079 --> 01:00:21.760
<v Speaker 1>on what which opinion? Every topic tonight has come back

1340
01:00:21.800 --> 01:00:25.800
<v Speaker 1>to your specific specific on what what what topics in general?

1341
01:00:26.000 --> 01:00:29.559
<v Speaker 1>On the on what basis ought we to choose your opinions? Well,

1342
01:00:29.639 --> 01:00:32.159
<v Speaker 1>first of all, it's not an opinion, but you said

1343
01:00:32.159 --> 01:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>that the Trump administration is breaking the law.

1344
01:00:34.280 --> 01:00:37.000
<v Speaker 3>I've already clearly why we know, why ought we do

1345
01:00:37.159 --> 01:00:39.039
<v Speaker 3>this or that for the country. For example, you said

1346
01:00:39.039 --> 01:00:43.199
<v Speaker 3>that we ought to have certain types of immigration that's legal,

1347
01:00:43.800 --> 01:00:45.400
<v Speaker 3>and this and that, And I'm saying you said this

1348
01:00:45.519 --> 01:00:47.440
<v Speaker 3>was my opinion, my opinion, my opinion, And I'm saying,

1349
01:00:47.719 --> 01:00:50.239
<v Speaker 3>why ought we do that? Because you didn't apply those

1350
01:00:50.239 --> 01:00:52.400
<v Speaker 3>things to other places like Japan? So why ought we

1351
01:00:52.519 --> 01:00:55.039
<v Speaker 3>only go with your assessments?

1352
01:00:55.199 --> 01:00:58.679
<v Speaker 1>America is not Japan? Number two? So why ought we

1353
01:00:58.960 --> 01:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>care about here? Well, because I care about the country

1354
01:01:01.360 --> 01:01:04.559
<v Speaker 1>that I live. I'm more concerned about the country that

1355
01:01:04.719 --> 01:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>are the ethics relative or are the universal? It's a question.

1356
01:01:08.320 --> 01:01:12.960
<v Speaker 1>As I've said, I wish that every government across the

1357
01:01:13.079 --> 01:01:16.639
<v Speaker 1>world shared the belief of we are going to vet

1358
01:01:16.719 --> 01:01:20.159
<v Speaker 1>you properly ought to because you wish it was the case. No,

1359
01:01:20.360 --> 01:01:22.039
<v Speaker 1>I just don't care what the color of your skin

1360
01:01:22.119 --> 01:01:23.719
<v Speaker 1>is or where you're from. If you're a decent person,

1361
01:01:23.760 --> 01:01:25.679
<v Speaker 1>I welcome you in my country. So what's a pretty

1362
01:01:25.719 --> 01:01:30.000
<v Speaker 1>fair logical We follow your position? Because it's logical? Why

1363
01:01:30.199 --> 01:01:32.440
<v Speaker 1>ought we follow not being a racist? Because that's kind

1364
01:01:32.440 --> 01:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>of when I'm I think if you don't want anybody

1365
01:01:37.559 --> 01:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>from any other country, which is what you have said,

1366
01:01:40.159 --> 01:01:42.519
<v Speaker 1>you want our borders completely shut down. I believe that

1367
01:01:42.599 --> 01:01:46.719
<v Speaker 1>is Unamerican. Okay. The beauty of this country is that

1368
01:01:47.119 --> 01:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>we have the freedom and others have the freedom to

1369
01:01:50.800 --> 01:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>make something of themselves so wherever they come from. And

1370
01:01:53.480 --> 01:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a beautiful thing about the United So

1371
01:01:55.760 --> 01:01:58.119
<v Speaker 1>I can't speak for Japan. Why ought we follow that though?

1372
01:01:58.159 --> 01:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Because you because you like it, you think it's beautiful.

1373
01:02:00.280 --> 01:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Why this country was founded on that our freedom? Many

1374
01:02:04.000 --> 01:02:06.199
<v Speaker 1>countries have founded on all kinds of things that are stupid.

1375
01:02:06.280 --> 01:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>So your reasoning is the country is going to go

1376
01:02:09.000 --> 01:02:13.559
<v Speaker 1>down the crapper if we that's that's your reasoning behind it,

1377
01:02:13.559 --> 01:02:15.559
<v Speaker 1>and I okay, so fine, my reasoning is dumb, but

1378
01:02:15.599 --> 01:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to know why we have to follows dumb.

1379
01:02:17.559 --> 01:02:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying, why are we follow yours? Because we

1380
01:02:21.480 --> 01:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>have been following it for decades and I think we're

1381
01:02:23.360 --> 01:02:25.119
<v Speaker 1>the best country in the world for for a very

1382
01:02:25.239 --> 01:02:30.199
<v Speaker 1>very long time. Circular argument following, because I do believe

1383
01:02:30.280 --> 01:02:33.519
<v Speaker 1>the immigrants have a lot of benefits to the United

1384
01:02:33.559 --> 01:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>States of America. You're not telling me why we ought

1385
01:02:35.519 --> 01:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to follow that. Well, produce jobs that immigrants take, that

1386
01:02:39.480 --> 01:02:42.679
<v Speaker 1>most Americans are not willing to take, working for wages

1387
01:02:42.719 --> 01:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that and Americans they help the economy. There's no question

1388
01:02:45.519 --> 01:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that it helps the Why are those things? So? In

1389
01:02:48.000 --> 01:02:50.119
<v Speaker 1>other words, you're assuming that there's this good that you

1390
01:02:50.239 --> 01:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>have access to the different cultures I think is good.

1391
01:02:53.440 --> 01:02:56.159
<v Speaker 1>I think I think learning different cultures and uh, I

1392
01:02:56.199 --> 01:02:59.039
<v Speaker 1>think what's made America great is being uh for, for

1393
01:02:59.199 --> 01:03:01.920
<v Speaker 1>lack of a better term, I'm a mixt of different

1394
01:03:02.199 --> 01:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>colors in the crayon box and being diverse. I think

1395
01:03:04.360 --> 01:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>diversity is a good thing, and I don't.

1396
01:03:07.039 --> 01:03:08.840
<v Speaker 3>I said, so there's a standard of the good, which

1397
01:03:08.880 --> 01:03:11.559
<v Speaker 3>originally was what you said was your opinion and you

1398
01:03:11.639 --> 01:03:13.920
<v Speaker 3>think that it works, and this and that's the standard.

1399
01:03:14.159 --> 01:03:17.199
<v Speaker 1>Brown people scary. So now you're asking questions when I well, yeah,

1400
01:03:17.239 --> 01:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>because I don't understand your logic to this. You said

1401
01:03:19.400 --> 01:03:21.599
<v Speaker 1>America is going to go down. You're deflecting away from

1402
01:03:21.599 --> 01:03:24.239
<v Speaker 1>the fact that your position objective. I'm not deflecting. Are

1403
01:03:24.280 --> 01:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>they relative? Are they subjective opinions not based on on

1404
01:03:29.639 --> 01:03:32.800
<v Speaker 1>crime and statistics and and the benefits that the economy

1405
01:03:32.920 --> 01:03:35.920
<v Speaker 1>UH has toward ethics? Are they subjective? Yah? But I

1406
01:03:36.079 --> 01:03:39.440
<v Speaker 1>was talking about the economy of numbers ethics. What about

1407
01:03:39.440 --> 01:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the ethics? Is your ethics subjective and relative or is

1408
01:03:42.360 --> 01:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>it objective? Yeah? I think there are people out there

1409
01:03:44.400 --> 01:03:46.599
<v Speaker 1>that could disagree with me that are maybe don't like

1410
01:03:46.679 --> 01:03:48.079
<v Speaker 1>brown people. I think there are people out there that

1411
01:03:48.159 --> 01:03:53.199
<v Speaker 1>have different opinions that think that brown people are I

1412
01:03:53.239 --> 01:03:55.639
<v Speaker 1>guess I guess you could make the case. I guess

1413
01:03:55.639 --> 01:03:57.639
<v Speaker 1>you could make the case it's subjective. I guess you

1414
01:03:57.719 --> 01:04:00.159
<v Speaker 1>can make that case. I mean, some people could say

1415
01:04:00.159 --> 01:04:02.719
<v Speaker 1>the Klan isn't racist. I guess that's subjective to you

1416
01:04:02.800 --> 01:04:05.079
<v Speaker 1>could make the case. You could make the case. I

1417
01:04:05.199 --> 01:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>know what's subjective means? What does it mean, I know

1418
01:04:06.840 --> 01:04:08.719
<v Speaker 1>what it means. I understand what it means. And this

1419
01:04:08.840 --> 01:04:10.239
<v Speaker 1>is see, this is sean. I'm not sure that they

1420
01:04:10.239 --> 01:04:13.679
<v Speaker 1>do so in terms of relativism and what is that?

1421
01:04:13.800 --> 01:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>What do you think that this is? Okay, I'll answer

1422
01:04:15.360 --> 01:04:18.559
<v Speaker 1>your question, but this is this is the Andrew Wilson approach. Well,

1423
01:04:18.559 --> 01:04:20.239
<v Speaker 1>I've been doing this debate for twenty five years, I know,

1424
01:04:20.320 --> 01:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and you can be doing it for one hundred years.

1425
01:04:21.920 --> 01:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't mean anything to me, means dick. Okay, so

1426
01:04:24.000 --> 01:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>let's continue the conversation. I don't have to have as

1427
01:04:26.639 --> 01:04:28.840
<v Speaker 1>no no, no, no no. This is a word game

1428
01:04:28.880 --> 01:04:30.559
<v Speaker 1>that you're trying to play with me. So I do

1429
01:04:31.199 --> 01:04:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and ethics games. You can say all racism is word games.

1430
01:04:35.880 --> 01:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>To the point that I'm trying to say for the

1431
01:04:37.360 --> 01:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>good and you're saying it's a word game. So your

1432
01:04:38.920 --> 01:04:41.559
<v Speaker 1>position is based on I've told you you're not listening.

1433
01:04:42.199 --> 01:04:45.119
<v Speaker 1>First of all, it's a benefit to the economy. Why

1434
01:04:45.199 --> 01:04:47.199
<v Speaker 1>is that a show you in the question what's the good?

1435
01:04:48.400 --> 01:04:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Why is it a benefit that it people help our economy?

1436
01:04:51.960 --> 01:04:53.719
<v Speaker 3>You have a reference to the good in all of

1437
01:04:53.800 --> 01:04:55.920
<v Speaker 3>these assertions, and I'm asking you what is this good?

1438
01:04:56.239 --> 01:04:58.280
<v Speaker 3>Because you just keep saying. Then you said admitted that

1439
01:04:58.400 --> 01:05:00.639
<v Speaker 3>it's objective and it's relative. Well, and that case, then

1440
01:05:01.639 --> 01:05:04.559
<v Speaker 3>there's no reason to prefer to offer that on anyone else.

1441
01:05:05.119 --> 01:05:06.639
<v Speaker 1>Well, I would ask you the same question, why is

1442
01:05:06.639 --> 01:05:09.159
<v Speaker 1>it bad? I don't believe in subjective ethics? Okay, Well,

1443
01:05:09.519 --> 01:05:11.440
<v Speaker 1>why is it bad for the country? Why are immigrants

1444
01:05:11.440 --> 01:05:12.599
<v Speaker 1>bad for the United States of America?

1445
01:05:12.599 --> 01:05:14.039
<v Speaker 3>Why do you want to close I already argued that

1446
01:05:14.199 --> 01:05:18.159
<v Speaker 3>because a massive influx of other people that are not

1447
01:05:18.280 --> 01:05:21.119
<v Speaker 3>indigenous to this population replaces the it's demographic.

1448
01:05:21.239 --> 01:05:23.079
<v Speaker 1>Don't we have a First Amendment right to believe? We

1449
01:05:23.159 --> 01:05:24.920
<v Speaker 1>believe that. So you want to take the first Amendment?

1450
01:05:25.119 --> 01:05:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to say that your ethics comes from the Constitution.

1451
01:05:27.519 --> 01:05:29.239
<v Speaker 1>That's fine, you want to take. I'm asking you, though,

1452
01:05:29.480 --> 01:05:32.280
<v Speaker 1>people that are in this country that are not from America,

1453
01:05:32.960 --> 01:05:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't believe they should have a First Amendment right

1454
01:05:34.840 --> 01:05:36.559
<v Speaker 1>to believe something differently than you when it comes to

1455
01:05:36.639 --> 01:05:40.159
<v Speaker 1>religion or beliefs. Certainly you misunderstood the question. So the

1456
01:05:40.280 --> 01:05:43.039
<v Speaker 1>question wasn't are there people who have different positions or

1457
01:05:43.079 --> 01:05:45.400
<v Speaker 1>do they have a right to different position? The question was,

1458
01:05:45.519 --> 01:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>what's the epstemic basis you have for your ethics, which

1459
01:05:48.119 --> 01:05:50.599
<v Speaker 1>was purely subjective. Yeah, do you know? Well then I mean,

1460
01:05:50.679 --> 01:05:54.079
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean, if it's purely subjective, then in debate,

1461
01:05:54.159 --> 01:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>then you But no, I've not conceded anything. What I'm

1462
01:05:57.039 --> 01:05:58.639
<v Speaker 1>trying to tell you is that when it comes to

1463
01:05:58.880 --> 01:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>immigrants that are in this country relative I'm talking about

1464
01:06:02.519 --> 01:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>legal immigrants. I can give you statistics that show you

1465
01:06:05.920 --> 01:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>that it benefit follow your position. I'm telling you because

1466
01:06:10.039 --> 01:06:11.639
<v Speaker 1>you don't want our economy to be boosted.

1467
01:06:11.679 --> 01:06:13.639
<v Speaker 3>You know you don't understand that question is about why

1468
01:06:13.719 --> 01:06:16.000
<v Speaker 3>ought we follow it? Not just to restate what the

1469
01:06:16.039 --> 01:06:16.519
<v Speaker 3>position is.

1470
01:06:16.599 --> 01:06:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Why ought we follow it? Because it's why should we

1471
01:06:19.559 --> 01:06:22.119
<v Speaker 1>because you've already said it's relative and subjectives? Why should

1472
01:06:22.159 --> 01:06:24.840
<v Speaker 1>we not close our borders? And why does Brian believe

1473
01:06:24.880 --> 01:06:27.159
<v Speaker 1>that we should allow people from other countries in? As

1474
01:06:27.199 --> 01:06:29.079
<v Speaker 1>I've told you before and I'll tell you again.

1475
01:06:28.960 --> 01:06:32.719
<v Speaker 3>So again, it's a higher level order of questioning. That's

1476
01:06:32.760 --> 01:06:35.280
<v Speaker 3>about the basis for the ethics, not to restate your

1477
01:06:35.320 --> 01:06:37.800
<v Speaker 3>position again, but why ought we follow your position? When

1478
01:06:37.840 --> 01:06:40.000
<v Speaker 3>you then admitted that your position is relative and suspective.

1479
01:06:40.400 --> 01:06:42.639
<v Speaker 1>I've told you that I don't think immigrants coming into

1480
01:06:42.679 --> 01:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>this country as a whole are bad for the United

1481
01:06:44.880 --> 01:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>States of America. I've stated my position there, which is

1482
01:06:47.440 --> 01:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>based on the good, but you don't know what the

1483
01:06:49.000 --> 01:06:51.599
<v Speaker 1>good is. Well, I've told you already, which is benefit

1484
01:06:51.719 --> 01:06:56.599
<v Speaker 1>to our economy. I believe diversity position. So you're saying,

1485
01:06:56.639 --> 01:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>what is the case, this is the case, this is

1486
01:06:58.840 --> 01:06:59.199
<v Speaker 1>the case.

1487
01:06:59.280 --> 01:07:03.039
<v Speaker 3>But why ought we follow your subjective, relativistic argument, Because

1488
01:07:03.039 --> 01:07:05.320
<v Speaker 3>when you come to debate and you admit that it's relative, ye,

1489
01:07:05.480 --> 01:07:07.639
<v Speaker 3>then well then there's no reason to follow it.

1490
01:07:08.079 --> 01:07:10.599
<v Speaker 1>Well, listen, you come from the cloth of you want

1491
01:07:10.639 --> 01:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>our borders to be completely closed and we can play

1492
01:07:12.920 --> 01:07:16.679
<v Speaker 1>word games. You are, and the reason why is the

1493
01:07:16.760 --> 01:07:18.639
<v Speaker 1>reason why I disagree with you. Instead of getting into

1494
01:07:18.679 --> 01:07:22.159
<v Speaker 1>a philosophical debate, which I'm not here to do, I'm

1495
01:07:22.199 --> 01:07:26.639
<v Speaker 1>telling you that in my personal opinion, it's my opinion.

1496
01:07:27.840 --> 01:07:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a problem with anybody from other parts

1497
01:07:30.920 --> 01:07:34.559
<v Speaker 1>of the world, from different cultures and different backgrounds and

1498
01:07:34.599 --> 01:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>different religions coming into this country, so long as they're

1499
01:07:37.440 --> 01:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>properly vetted and we know they're not criminals and they

1500
01:07:39.519 --> 01:07:42.119
<v Speaker 1>have good intentions. I don't think that's a threat to

1501
01:07:42.159 --> 01:07:44.519
<v Speaker 1>the United States of America. Now you do you think

1502
01:07:44.559 --> 01:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>it's bad for America. You think it's a threat to America.

1503
01:07:47.840 --> 01:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I disagree with you. I've given you multiple reasons why.

1504
01:07:50.079 --> 01:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>First of all, a lot of these people are good

1505
01:07:52.079 --> 01:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>for our economy. They're hard workers, they want a better

1506
01:07:55.079 --> 01:07:58.639
<v Speaker 1>life for it themselves. I think diversity is a good thing.

1507
01:07:58.800 --> 01:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't want everybody to look like you and me.

1508
01:08:01.159 --> 01:08:03.559
<v Speaker 1>I think diversity is good for the country. Now you

1509
01:08:03.639 --> 01:08:05.519
<v Speaker 1>can say, well, you know that's just your opinion and

1510
01:08:05.599 --> 01:08:07.719
<v Speaker 1>you're you're not basing it on anything. Well, you can

1511
01:08:07.760 --> 01:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>base it on the crime rates. You could base it

1512
01:08:09.679 --> 01:08:12.800
<v Speaker 1>on how it benefits our economy, the financial numbers. There

1513
01:08:12.840 --> 01:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of different ways. You know, why should

1514
01:08:15.440 --> 01:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>we follow All those things are assertions about what are

1515
01:08:17.800 --> 01:08:19.439
<v Speaker 1>the cases? Well, tell me why should we follow you?

1516
01:08:19.680 --> 01:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Why should we follow you? I've answered your question. You

1517
01:08:22.039 --> 01:08:24.359
<v Speaker 1>might not like my answer. Why should we follow you?

1518
01:08:24.439 --> 01:08:27.199
<v Speaker 1>And why should we close the orders completely? If the

1519
01:08:27.319 --> 01:08:31.560
<v Speaker 1>ethics that you prefer are relative and subjective, then in

1520
01:08:31.680 --> 01:08:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a debate, that means that anyone can just state the

1521
01:08:34.640 --> 01:08:37.680
<v Speaker 1>exact opposite and it's just as legitimate as your position.

1522
01:08:37.880 --> 01:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>To me, this isn't about winning a debate. This isn't

1523
01:08:39.920 --> 01:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>about to me when I come to a conversation. It's

1524
01:08:45.800 --> 01:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>not about playing word games. It's not about talking about philosophy.

1525
01:08:48.520 --> 01:08:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Would you think it's because that's what we're doing now.

1526
01:08:53.279 --> 01:08:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I want you to explain to me why it's so bad,

1527
01:08:57.359 --> 01:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>so you just don't want to get drilled into your

1528
01:08:58.960 --> 01:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>position to give the basis. It's not about me being

1529
01:09:01.560 --> 01:09:04.159
<v Speaker 1>afraid of anything. I want to know. I want to

1530
01:09:04.239 --> 01:09:09.439
<v Speaker 1>know why position based on good I gave you. I

1531
01:09:09.560 --> 01:09:13.199
<v Speaker 1>gave you my ma I gave you, I gave you

1532
01:09:13.279 --> 01:09:16.840
<v Speaker 1>my reasons. Why I think immigrants coming into this country

1533
01:09:16.960 --> 01:09:20.479
<v Speaker 1>as a whole. That's just like I'm telling you, well, yeah,

1534
01:09:20.520 --> 01:09:22.359
<v Speaker 1>that's what this entire thing is about. It's about opinion.

1535
01:09:23.119 --> 01:09:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay, Well, you can have a different way of

1536
01:09:25.680 --> 01:09:27.319
<v Speaker 1>talking to people, and you have that right to do that,

1537
01:09:27.399 --> 01:09:29.279
<v Speaker 1>but I don't play that game. So I'm asking you

1538
01:09:29.920 --> 01:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>why why do you want the borders closed? And why

1539
01:09:33.039 --> 01:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>do you think immigrants all over the world are so

1540
01:09:35.039 --> 01:09:36.479
<v Speaker 1>bad for America? Tell me why.

1541
01:09:36.680 --> 01:09:40.640
<v Speaker 3>I argue and explained that earlier that the demographic replacement

1542
01:09:40.680 --> 01:09:43.239
<v Speaker 3>of a people group is a form of genocide and warfare.

1543
01:09:43.600 --> 01:09:47.079
<v Speaker 1>So just igrants, I would just know, I said, mass

1544
01:09:47.199 --> 01:09:51.399
<v Speaker 1>amounts of infinity immorants, not legalized immigrants, and not reasonable

1545
01:09:51.520 --> 01:09:54.199
<v Speaker 1>sensible numbers of people. Sure that makes sense, that's not

1546
01:09:54.279 --> 01:09:56.039
<v Speaker 1>what you said earlier. You want the borders closed, you

1547
01:09:56.079 --> 01:10:00.399
<v Speaker 1>don't want any immigrants. That's the case right now, decision.

1548
01:10:00.920 --> 01:10:02.840
<v Speaker 1>So right now, you think would be a wise decision

1549
01:10:02.960 --> 01:10:06.039
<v Speaker 1>to not allow anybody from other countries I come into

1550
01:10:06.079 --> 01:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>this country legally because you think there would be genocide.

1551
01:10:10.079 --> 01:10:12.880
<v Speaker 3>No, I said that bringing in infinity amounts of people

1552
01:10:13.079 --> 01:10:15.760
<v Speaker 3>is a form of genocide, is demographic replacement, and that's

1553
01:10:15.800 --> 01:10:18.119
<v Speaker 3>what I disagree with. So that's why I would say

1554
01:10:18.199 --> 01:10:21.880
<v Speaker 3>that the present policy would be wise to completely in

1555
01:10:21.960 --> 01:10:23.039
<v Speaker 3>immigration at this stage.

1556
01:10:23.159 --> 01:10:25.239
<v Speaker 1>So people that are on student pieces or you would

1557
01:10:25.279 --> 01:10:27.399
<v Speaker 1>you be against that as well. People, it's I'm talking

1558
01:10:27.439 --> 01:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>about the masses of people, and so yes, all of it.

1559
01:10:31.199 --> 01:10:34.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean a lot of the for example, Chinese foreign

1560
01:10:34.079 --> 01:10:35.840
<v Speaker 3>change students, A lot of those people are spies anyway,

1561
01:10:36.000 --> 01:10:36.600
<v Speaker 3>So yeah.

1562
01:10:36.520 --> 01:10:37.199
<v Speaker 2>So of it.

1563
01:10:37.319 --> 01:10:39.119
<v Speaker 1>Didn't Trump say he wanted to bring in six hundred

1564
01:10:39.119 --> 01:10:41.399
<v Speaker 1>thousand Chinese because that was a mistake because in his

1565
01:10:41.479 --> 01:10:43.800
<v Speaker 1>first administration he said I want to cut off.

1566
01:10:43.760 --> 01:10:48.119
<v Speaker 4>These Chinese students. A lot of these people are Chinese spies,

1567
01:10:48.239 --> 01:10:50.079
<v Speaker 4>probably not wise to do so.

1568
01:10:50.880 --> 01:10:53.279
<v Speaker 3>Again, I disagree with Trump rehearsing on that. That's by

1569
01:10:53.279 --> 01:10:57.520
<v Speaker 3>the way. That's another one I disagree with. Okay, up, immigration, Okay, yeah,

1570
01:10:57.600 --> 01:10:59.079
<v Speaker 3>I really don't know what else to say. Obviously, I

1571
01:10:59.159 --> 01:11:03.439
<v Speaker 3>disagree with him, Obviously. I want people to be vetted properly.

1572
01:11:03.520 --> 01:11:04.960
<v Speaker 3>I think there's a lot of good people all over

1573
01:11:05.000 --> 01:11:07.239
<v Speaker 3>the world that make America great. I have a lot

1574
01:11:07.319 --> 01:11:10.640
<v Speaker 3>of friends that come from other countries, wonderful people. I

1575
01:11:10.720 --> 01:11:14.159
<v Speaker 3>have friends that are from the faith of Islam. I

1576
01:11:14.239 --> 01:11:17.000
<v Speaker 3>don't come from the cloth of judging somebody by where

1577
01:11:17.000 --> 01:11:19.319
<v Speaker 3>they're from. I judge them on their character. I think

1578
01:11:19.399 --> 01:11:21.640
<v Speaker 3>Alex Jones is just as much of a threat to

1579
01:11:21.640 --> 01:11:23.880
<v Speaker 3>the United States of America. I think Donald Trump is

1580
01:11:24.000 --> 01:11:25.359
<v Speaker 3>just as much of a threat to the United States

1581
01:11:25.399 --> 01:11:28.279
<v Speaker 3>of America than the overwhelming majority of immigrants that come

1582
01:11:28.319 --> 01:11:28.800
<v Speaker 3>to this country.

1583
01:11:28.840 --> 01:11:30.520
<v Speaker 1>You ask me, I think we should deport Alex Jones.

1584
01:11:30.560 --> 01:11:32.239
<v Speaker 1>I think we should support your buddy to Gaza. I

1585
01:11:32.279 --> 01:11:34.079
<v Speaker 1>think Alex Jones is a piece of shit. I think

1586
01:11:34.079 --> 01:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>we should deport Donald Trump to Gaza. I think he's

1587
01:11:36.000 --> 01:11:37.600
<v Speaker 1>a piece of shit. These are people that you surround

1588
01:11:37.640 --> 01:11:39.399
<v Speaker 1>yourself with. This is people that you vote for. I

1589
01:11:39.439 --> 01:11:42.159
<v Speaker 1>think those people are far more dangerous to the United

1590
01:11:42.199 --> 01:11:44.079
<v Speaker 1>States of America than a lot of the people that

1591
01:11:44.119 --> 01:11:46.399
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about that you don't want here. That's my

1592
01:11:46.520 --> 01:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>personal opinion. I think there are bigger threats in the

1593
01:11:48.840 --> 01:11:51.279
<v Speaker 1>United States of America people that look like you than

1594
01:11:51.319 --> 01:11:54.479
<v Speaker 1>anybody that looks brown that comes into this country. You know,

1595
01:11:54.600 --> 01:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>hopefully what's up. Racism is wrong? Right? Yeah, how am

1596
01:11:58.920 --> 01:12:02.399
<v Speaker 1>I being racist? Well you just divided up your assessments

1597
01:12:02.439 --> 01:12:04.359
<v Speaker 1>on the basis of yeah, because you are very concerned

1598
01:12:04.399 --> 01:12:07.199
<v Speaker 1>with people is wrong. Yeah, absolutely, racism is wrong. I

1599
01:12:07.279 --> 01:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>have no problem with white people racism right now. No,

1600
01:12:09.920 --> 01:12:12.039
<v Speaker 1>I'm not. I'm doing orange people. I don't care what

1601
01:12:12.159 --> 01:12:15.399
<v Speaker 1>the color of skin Donald Trump is. Yeah, because you

1602
01:12:15.960 --> 01:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>seem to be having a problem with people that come

1603
01:12:18.960 --> 01:12:22.560
<v Speaker 1>from other backgrounds differently than you. I think that there

1604
01:12:22.600 --> 01:12:25.640
<v Speaker 1>are people all sorts of people, different colors. But racism

1605
01:12:25.720 --> 01:12:30.760
<v Speaker 1>is also subjective or is it morally wrong? In general?

1606
01:12:31.079 --> 01:12:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Racism is terrible, it's wrong. It's horrible. Everybody anybody who's

1607
01:12:35.720 --> 01:12:38.840
<v Speaker 1>a racist. So now you're not a relativists subjectivist. When

1608
01:12:38.920 --> 01:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>did I ever say that it's okay to be racist?

1609
01:12:41.279 --> 01:12:45.479
<v Speaker 1>It's another word game. No, you either, so either something

1610
01:12:45.640 --> 01:12:49.439
<v Speaker 1>is relative or it's objective. And now racism is objectively

1611
01:12:49.520 --> 01:12:53.199
<v Speaker 1>morally wrong everywhere. But your ethics was relativists and subjectivists.

1612
01:12:53.239 --> 01:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>So you just I've been very very clear, and I'll

1613
01:12:54.880 --> 01:12:58.960
<v Speaker 1>make it very very simple for you. Racism is wrong

1614
01:12:59.399 --> 01:13:02.479
<v Speaker 1>on what base? This and that was subjective on any basis? No,

1615
01:13:02.840 --> 01:13:06.079
<v Speaker 1>what is your base? When you judge people based on

1616
01:13:06.239 --> 01:13:09.039
<v Speaker 1>your skin color? When you judge people and treat them,

1617
01:13:09.159 --> 01:13:12.720
<v Speaker 1>is that universally morally wrong? I believe so yet Okay,

1618
01:13:12.760 --> 01:13:15.199
<v Speaker 1>but now you're not a relativist or subjectivist.

1619
01:13:15.279 --> 01:13:17.960
<v Speaker 3>Now you're believing in moral universal claims, which you said

1620
01:13:18.640 --> 01:13:19.359
<v Speaker 3>isn't really possible.

1621
01:13:19.359 --> 01:13:21.079
<v Speaker 1>Point that I was trying to make, Jay, So it's

1622
01:13:21.079 --> 01:13:23.279
<v Speaker 1>a contradiction. No, it's not a contradiction the point that

1623
01:13:23.319 --> 01:13:25.399
<v Speaker 1>I was, is it subjective or is it objective? I'm

1624
01:13:25.399 --> 01:13:28.239
<v Speaker 1>going to give you the easy background. Is it subjective?

1625
01:13:28.640 --> 01:13:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to answer you, but I'm going to give

1626
01:13:29.960 --> 01:13:31.680
<v Speaker 1>it to you. You're going to get around the question

1627
01:13:31.840 --> 01:13:36.359
<v Speaker 1>because because earlier your ethics were subjective and now they're universal,

1628
01:13:36.760 --> 01:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>so it can't have both. My opinion that when you

1629
01:13:39.800 --> 01:13:42.039
<v Speaker 1>so it's not universal. So it's not universal. So you

1630
01:13:42.119 --> 01:13:45.119
<v Speaker 1>just contradicted So it's not a contradiction what I'm about

1631
01:13:45.159 --> 01:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to say it's universal. It's not universal. That's a contradiction.

1632
01:13:48.399 --> 01:13:50.640
<v Speaker 1>What's your definition of what racism is? What about do

1633
01:13:50.680 --> 01:13:53.520
<v Speaker 1>you think it's universal? Is it universal? Right? I don't.

1634
01:13:53.560 --> 01:13:56.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know even what racism is technically,

1635
01:13:56.560 --> 01:13:59.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know what racism is. Is that a serious statements

1636
01:13:59.600 --> 01:14:03.000
<v Speaker 1>you expect because when people define it, it gets defined

1637
01:14:03.039 --> 01:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>in a million different ways. And your situation, you just

1638
01:14:06.920 --> 01:14:09.840
<v Speaker 1>did a racist on to me. I'm a bipop person.

1639
01:14:10.479 --> 01:14:13.399
<v Speaker 1>I see that black indigenous personal. I'm sure you are,

1640
01:14:14.000 --> 01:14:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and how there you? So you should be so you

1641
01:14:15.920 --> 01:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>would want you to be deported them? So let me

1642
01:14:18.800 --> 01:14:21.039
<v Speaker 1>be clear on this, Okay, The reason why I said

1643
01:14:21.079 --> 01:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>people who look like you is not an attack on

1644
01:14:23.880 --> 01:14:27.119
<v Speaker 1>all white people. The reason why I said that is

1645
01:14:27.239 --> 01:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>because the reason why I said that, which I think

1646
01:14:31.760 --> 01:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you're struggling to understand respect. I don't. I mean, I

1647
01:14:36.039 --> 01:14:38.319
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's anything funny when it comes to racism.

1648
01:14:38.920 --> 01:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>But racism is subjective. But also can call you word

1649
01:14:43.960 --> 01:14:46.000
<v Speaker 1>games are So if I say A and non a,

1650
01:14:46.199 --> 01:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>is that a word game or is that a contradiction.

1651
01:14:48.039 --> 01:14:50.039
<v Speaker 1>So here's the point that a contradiction, not a second.

1652
01:14:50.199 --> 01:14:53.479
<v Speaker 1>Calm down for a second, don't so logic is relaxed.

1653
01:14:53.600 --> 01:14:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Second is logical. Point that I was trying to make

1654
01:14:56.439 --> 01:15:00.239
<v Speaker 1>was that you seem to think that if we'll allow

1655
01:15:00.279 --> 01:15:04.199
<v Speaker 1>a lot of immigrants coming into this country, yes, it's

1656
01:15:04.359 --> 01:15:08.039
<v Speaker 1>bad for America. The right that I was traveling. The

1657
01:15:08.119 --> 01:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>point that I was trying to make is people like

1658
01:15:09.920 --> 01:15:13.159
<v Speaker 1>your good friend Alex Jones and people who you voted for,

1659
01:15:13.720 --> 01:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>like Donald Trump, to me, are probably more of a

1660
01:15:16.720 --> 01:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>danger to this country than most immigrants that are coming

1661
01:15:20.720 --> 01:15:23.039
<v Speaker 1>into this country. But yet you want to be concerned

1662
01:15:23.039 --> 01:15:25.119
<v Speaker 1>about all these people over the world that you claim

1663
01:15:25.159 --> 01:15:26.560
<v Speaker 1>are got to cause a genocide.

1664
01:15:27.520 --> 01:15:30.560
<v Speaker 3>You assumed that I had no other I mean, I mean,

1665
01:15:30.720 --> 01:15:32.800
<v Speaker 3>but why is Donald Trump or Alex Jones more of

1666
01:15:32.800 --> 01:15:35.319
<v Speaker 3>a threat to the country than millions of.

1667
01:15:35.720 --> 01:15:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, first of all, first Amendment, first amendment, free speech.

1668
01:15:38.760 --> 01:15:41.800
<v Speaker 1>He attacks people like me on a daily basis with lawsuits,

1669
01:15:42.000 --> 01:15:46.359
<v Speaker 1>civil suits. Yeah, towards people in the media in general,

1670
01:15:46.640 --> 01:15:50.199
<v Speaker 1>media members in general. When you look at the Pentagon

1671
01:15:50.279 --> 01:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>press briefings, I can give you an example there. I

1672
01:15:52.720 --> 01:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>know people that are way on the right. Uh, they

1673
01:15:54.760 --> 01:15:57.439
<v Speaker 1>don't allow people like me at these press briefings, and

1674
01:15:57.520 --> 01:16:00.279
<v Speaker 1>they don't allow people in Pentagon press briefings unless right

1675
01:16:00.319 --> 01:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>wing idiots. And if someone gets in there that is

1676
01:16:02.960 --> 01:16:05.600
<v Speaker 1>on the left or in the middle, Pete Hexth does

1677
01:16:05.680 --> 01:16:07.479
<v Speaker 1>not call on them, that is against our democracy to

1678
01:16:07.560 --> 01:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>begin with. Anyway, I think that's a joke when you

1679
01:16:10.000 --> 01:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>look at the White House press briefings and we're just

1680
01:16:11.680 --> 01:16:13.319
<v Speaker 1>talking about the media right now. You ask me about

1681
01:16:13.319 --> 01:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the media when you have idiots like Jack pisobic and listen,

1682
01:16:18.199 --> 01:16:20.479
<v Speaker 1>I think Tim Poole, I don't think Timpole's an idiot,

1683
01:16:20.880 --> 01:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>but I think Tim Poole would agree. He's not a journalist.

1684
01:16:22.960 --> 01:16:25.279
<v Speaker 1>He's a talk show host, just like me. Talk show

1685
01:16:25.319 --> 01:16:27.600
<v Speaker 1>hosts and opinionated people should not be in that room.

1686
01:16:27.880 --> 01:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>That's not about opinionated people. That should be about strictly

1687
01:16:31.359 --> 01:16:35.479
<v Speaker 1>journalists doing their job. And I find that an attack

1688
01:16:35.520 --> 01:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>on democracy as well. I think that is a threat

1689
01:16:38.560 --> 01:16:40.520
<v Speaker 1>to democracy. It's a threat to this country. It's a

1690
01:16:40.600 --> 01:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>threat what happened on January sixth. It's a threat that

1691
01:16:42.960 --> 01:16:45.720
<v Speaker 1>he still has yet to concede an election that was

1692
01:16:45.800 --> 01:16:48.000
<v Speaker 1>not stolen, by the way, there's no evidence of widespread

1693
01:16:48.079 --> 01:16:51.119
<v Speaker 1>voter fraud. You cannot you couldn't articulate that whatever you

1694
01:16:51.199 --> 01:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>said about the CIA or the FBI or whatever you said. Okay,

1695
01:16:54.960 --> 01:16:57.279
<v Speaker 1>well act so all of a sudden. Now it's okay

1696
01:16:57.319 --> 01:16:58.520
<v Speaker 1>for you to have an opinion, But if I have

1697
01:16:58.560 --> 01:17:01.159
<v Speaker 1>an opinion on that, you're playing word as the justification

1698
01:17:01.319 --> 01:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>for your what's your justice? I asked for the justicers

1699
01:17:03.960 --> 01:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>for your morals, which you're not to our opinion. Okay,

1700
01:17:07.039 --> 01:17:10.079
<v Speaker 1>it's fair enough. What's your justification that the twenty twenty

1701
01:17:10.119 --> 01:17:13.319
<v Speaker 1>election was stolen? Let's use your same have a hard

1702
01:17:13.479 --> 01:17:15.279
<v Speaker 1>position on that? Because I said, now you don't have

1703
01:17:15.359 --> 01:17:17.840
<v Speaker 1>a hard position. It's my opinion based on the my

1704
01:17:18.239 --> 01:17:20.119
<v Speaker 1>what's your justification? Why do you keep interrupted me when

1705
01:17:20.159 --> 01:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you asked me? But because I don't need a justification

1706
01:17:22.760 --> 01:17:25.079
<v Speaker 1>for my assessment. That's an opinion I don't need. It's

1707
01:17:25.079 --> 01:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a different type of question than what's the grounding for

1708
01:17:27.680 --> 01:17:29.960
<v Speaker 1>your ethics? I don't need my justification for an opinion.

1709
01:17:29.960 --> 01:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess, I guess I could use the same logic

1710
01:17:31.560 --> 01:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that you just know for ethics. Okay, not your opinion again,

1711
01:17:34.600 --> 01:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>what about our justic case where ethics can't be a

1712
01:17:37.079 --> 01:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>mere opinion.

1713
01:17:38.000 --> 01:17:40.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that was the argument. Now you're conflating two different

1714
01:17:40.840 --> 01:17:43.119
<v Speaker 3>two different questions. By the way, not to believe in

1715
01:17:43.119 --> 01:17:44.439
<v Speaker 3>democracy much is retarded.

1716
01:17:44.560 --> 01:17:46.359
<v Speaker 1>So you don't think we should have elections.

1717
01:17:47.640 --> 01:17:49.640
<v Speaker 3>I think that elections have been kind of a joke

1718
01:17:49.640 --> 01:17:51.560
<v Speaker 3>for a long time, so I just don't really care

1719
01:17:51.600 --> 01:17:54.239
<v Speaker 3>about them. So it doesn't matter to me whether there's a.

1720
01:17:54.319 --> 01:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we should have elections in this country.

1721
01:17:57.399 --> 01:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm more I'm more of a monarchist to believe in monarchy. Okay, wow,

1722
01:18:01.199 --> 01:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't expect that you don't care about democracy. I

1723
01:18:04.640 --> 01:18:09.119
<v Speaker 1>think democracy, like Plato SAIDs retorted, So democracies, what do

1724
01:18:09.159 --> 01:18:12.640
<v Speaker 1>you mean it's gay baking gay? Can you help me

1725
01:18:12.720 --> 01:18:15.359
<v Speaker 1>understand something I guess we could have. I feel like

1726
01:18:15.439 --> 01:18:19.199
<v Speaker 1>words of Magas supporters, they use homophobic slurs. I'm not

1727
01:18:19.199 --> 01:18:22.439
<v Speaker 1>saying you did that on X to attack people. I

1728
01:18:22.479 --> 01:18:24.199
<v Speaker 1>don't understand that. It's like the way an eight year

1729
01:18:24.239 --> 01:18:28.159
<v Speaker 1>old but Brian democracy ethic, it's just a jug. If

1730
01:18:28.199 --> 01:18:30.880
<v Speaker 1>ethics are relative, I don't understand then I just have

1731
01:18:31.000 --> 01:18:35.079
<v Speaker 1>a different ethic. But okay, so democracy is gang can

1732
01:18:35.520 --> 01:18:43.159
<v Speaker 1>that should be the title. So people on social media,

1733
01:18:43.239 --> 01:18:45.399
<v Speaker 1>some are saying you're a fascist. I didn't say that,

1734
01:18:45.479 --> 01:18:47.119
<v Speaker 1>but some people on social media are saying that, what

1735
01:18:47.159 --> 01:18:48.960
<v Speaker 1>would you What would be your response to that.

1736
01:18:49.399 --> 01:18:51.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I've done a lot of critiques of fascism on

1737
01:18:51.359 --> 01:18:55.000
<v Speaker 3>my channel. Again, christian or the ox Christianity is not fascist.

1738
01:18:55.039 --> 01:18:56.920
<v Speaker 3>It's out a history of being monarchists. So if you

1739
01:18:56.960 --> 01:18:59.039
<v Speaker 3>think that fascism is monarchy, that would be a big

1740
01:18:59.159 --> 01:19:02.760
<v Speaker 3>historical mistake. Fascism is the joining of the corporate interests

1741
01:19:02.800 --> 01:19:04.880
<v Speaker 3>together with the state interests.

1742
01:19:05.039 --> 01:19:06.359
<v Speaker 1>That was Mussolini's definition.

1743
01:19:06.680 --> 01:19:10.680
<v Speaker 3>Mussolini was originally a socialist leftist who became a fascist,

1744
01:19:10.760 --> 01:19:13.439
<v Speaker 3>and so I do think that the history of fascism is.

1745
01:19:13.479 --> 01:19:14.119
<v Speaker 1>Bound up with.

1746
01:19:15.680 --> 01:19:18.720
<v Speaker 3>Corporatism, and I'm opposed to corporatism. So I would actually

1747
01:19:18.800 --> 01:19:22.720
<v Speaker 3>favor a minimalist government that is a form of hierarchy.

1748
01:19:23.439 --> 01:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I haven't said this, but there are people that have

1749
01:19:25.640 --> 01:19:28.159
<v Speaker 1>accused you of being anti Semitic. I have not heard

1750
01:19:28.199 --> 01:19:30.399
<v Speaker 1>anything that you've said in this conversation that would lead

1751
01:19:30.439 --> 01:19:33.119
<v Speaker 1>me to believe that. Why do you think people say

1752
01:19:33.159 --> 01:19:34.640
<v Speaker 1>that about you? And what are your thoughts on Jewish

1753
01:19:34.680 --> 01:19:35.279
<v Speaker 1>people in general?

1754
01:19:35.359 --> 01:19:37.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, again, I think guilt by association if you go

1755
01:19:38.000 --> 01:19:40.439
<v Speaker 3>on a podcast of somebody who's critical of Israel, you'll

1756
01:19:40.439 --> 01:19:41.359
<v Speaker 3>get immediately be called it.

1757
01:19:41.479 --> 01:19:43.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't think that's anti Semitis.

1758
01:19:43.239 --> 01:19:45.199
<v Speaker 3>I'm just saying that you're I'm answering the question as

1759
01:19:45.199 --> 01:19:48.159
<v Speaker 3>to why might somebody say that. I do believe that

1760
01:19:48.720 --> 01:19:51.520
<v Speaker 3>the Talmud is not good. I don't think it teaches

1761
01:19:51.560 --> 01:19:51.960
<v Speaker 3>good things.

1762
01:19:52.560 --> 01:19:54.920
<v Speaker 1>You're a religious person, Okay, So.

1763
01:19:55.159 --> 01:19:59.439
<v Speaker 3>I'm giving the answers about I think that Zionism was

1764
01:19:59.520 --> 01:20:04.720
<v Speaker 3>originally a socialist quasi religious movement from Heimweitzmann, Theodore Herzel,

1765
01:20:05.319 --> 01:20:07.760
<v Speaker 3>Moses has Uh, and I disagree with Zionism, but I

1766
01:20:07.840 --> 01:20:10.239
<v Speaker 3>think that as an Orthodox Christian, we have a duty

1767
01:20:10.279 --> 01:20:12.880
<v Speaker 3>to love all people, and so we can't hate anybody

1768
01:20:13.079 --> 01:20:15.359
<v Speaker 3>or specifically pick out certain people. But I do think

1769
01:20:15.479 --> 01:20:20.319
<v Speaker 3>organized crime syndicates like BB or Jeffrey Epstein should be opposed.

1770
01:20:20.359 --> 01:20:23.840
<v Speaker 1>But I don't make sin Jeffyin's religion, though I don't

1771
01:20:23.880 --> 01:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>make sin genetic. Was what I was about to say. Okay,

1772
01:20:26.640 --> 01:20:28.359
<v Speaker 1>what are your thoughts on Jewish people in general?

1773
01:20:28.560 --> 01:20:30.159
<v Speaker 3>I think that again, we have a duty, as Paul

1774
01:20:30.199 --> 01:20:32.399
<v Speaker 3>says in Romans eleven, to love and to pray for

1775
01:20:32.439 --> 01:20:33.479
<v Speaker 3>the conversion of Jewish people.

1776
01:20:34.520 --> 01:20:36.199
<v Speaker 1>I think religion is bad for people, by the way

1777
01:20:37.039 --> 01:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I think. I think in general terms, billions and billions

1778
01:20:39.560 --> 01:20:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of people have died because of their religion, because of

1779
01:20:41.720 --> 01:20:45.319
<v Speaker 1>their religious beliefs. What's wrong? I have a song with that.

1780
01:20:45.399 --> 01:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>What's wrong with death? Murdering people's kind of if morals

1781
01:20:48.600 --> 01:20:51.319
<v Speaker 1>are subjective, is nothing actually wrong? I think murdering people

1782
01:20:51.680 --> 01:20:56.159
<v Speaker 1>and killing it's not. Actually it's not a universal moral wrong.

1783
01:20:56.319 --> 01:20:58.359
<v Speaker 1>It's just a personal subjective Yeah, well, I think most

1784
01:20:58.359 --> 01:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>people would agree. Do you think it Okay? Probably killing,

1785
01:21:01.880 --> 01:21:04.399
<v Speaker 1>that's a fallacy because appeal to masses. Well, I'm not

1786
01:21:04.399 --> 01:21:07.039
<v Speaker 1>going to debate that, because you know you want to

1787
01:21:07.079 --> 01:21:10.640
<v Speaker 1>give using fallacy that's going to listen appeal if you

1788
01:21:10.760 --> 01:21:12.640
<v Speaker 1>try to call it what you want. All I'm saying

1789
01:21:12.720 --> 01:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of people have died innocent people and

1790
01:21:15.039 --> 01:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>their faith and religion. So that's all I'm saying. You're

1791
01:21:18.000 --> 01:21:20.359
<v Speaker 1>saying what is First of all, it's a genetic fallacy,

1792
01:21:20.479 --> 01:21:24.520
<v Speaker 1>So because people have died because of their fallacy, Yes,

1793
01:21:24.560 --> 01:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I do, But answer my question. Answer my question. I

1794
01:21:26.600 --> 01:21:32.279
<v Speaker 1>asked you first. You keep you keep asking to try

1795
01:21:32.359 --> 01:21:34.279
<v Speaker 1>to making bad arguments.

1796
01:21:34.319 --> 01:21:36.520
<v Speaker 3>I have a duty if we're playing chess, and you

1797
01:21:36.640 --> 01:21:38.800
<v Speaker 3>kept violating the rules like I would have to say,

1798
01:21:38.920 --> 01:21:39.960
<v Speaker 3>you can't move the pawn.

1799
01:21:40.119 --> 01:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Like, no, you're right, listen, Jay, You're right. Calling democracy

1800
01:21:42.880 --> 01:21:45.680
<v Speaker 1>gay is a great argument. You're very okay, Well, it

1801
01:21:45.760 --> 01:21:50.119
<v Speaker 1>wasn't very funny, you have I'm serious, though, Do you

1802
01:21:50.239 --> 01:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>care about our democracy? Do you care? Again?

1803
01:21:52.800 --> 01:21:56.600
<v Speaker 3>I I would like to see American flourish and do well.

1804
01:21:56.640 --> 01:21:59.199
<v Speaker 3>I don't have any hopes for democracy. I think democracy

1805
01:21:59.319 --> 01:22:02.600
<v Speaker 3>is a term that so weaponized and used. The CIA

1806
01:22:02.760 --> 01:22:04.760
<v Speaker 3>kind of used this in the Cold War. I don't

1807
01:22:04.840 --> 01:22:08.439
<v Speaker 3>care what about history. I'm asking you about your opinions.

1808
01:22:08.520 --> 01:22:10.239
<v Speaker 3>I do care about history, but I'm asking about your

1809
01:22:10.279 --> 01:22:11.000
<v Speaker 3>opinions right now.

1810
01:22:11.119 --> 01:22:13.439
<v Speaker 1>My opinions come from history and the books that I read.

1811
01:22:13.479 --> 01:22:15.880
<v Speaker 1>So we shouldn't have elections? What book? What book did

1812
01:22:15.960 --> 01:22:17.960
<v Speaker 1>you read that should I just said that I don't

1813
01:22:17.960 --> 01:22:19.359
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of faith in elections. I didn't say

1814
01:22:19.359 --> 01:22:22.399
<v Speaker 1>we should have. And where's your evidence that our elections

1815
01:22:22.439 --> 01:22:25.039
<v Speaker 1>are being rigged or stolen? I said that the CIA

1816
01:22:25.079 --> 01:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>has a long history of rigging elections of foreign countries.

1817
01:22:27.560 --> 01:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>It's a very general state.

1818
01:22:29.239 --> 01:22:31.159
<v Speaker 3>So that's why I don't have a lot of faith

1819
01:22:31.199 --> 01:22:33.279
<v Speaker 3>in elections. In general, I think that at the local level,

1820
01:22:33.319 --> 01:22:35.359
<v Speaker 3>people can do a lot more effect. They can be

1821
01:22:35.399 --> 01:22:38.960
<v Speaker 3>a lot more effective in terms of politics than national elections.

1822
01:22:39.000 --> 01:22:40.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, unless you're a lobbyist, unless you're part of

1823
01:22:41.000 --> 01:22:41.640
<v Speaker 3>a pack, unless you.

1824
01:22:41.640 --> 01:22:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Have billions of dollars. Really, I don't see that's that's

1825
01:22:44.920 --> 01:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>national polity. I understand what you're saying. I would have

1826
01:22:46.720 --> 01:22:48.239
<v Speaker 1>a problem with that. I understand what you're saying, Jay,

1827
01:22:48.279 --> 01:22:50.399
<v Speaker 1>But I'm an evidence. I'd like to think of myself

1828
01:22:50.439 --> 01:22:53.199
<v Speaker 1>as an all I said. But everything I said is

1829
01:22:53.239 --> 01:22:56.039
<v Speaker 1>not even controversial. Okay, But but Jay, you are not

1830
01:22:56.199 --> 01:22:58.880
<v Speaker 1>willing to say that Joe Biden won a free and

1831
01:22:58.960 --> 01:23:02.239
<v Speaker 1>fair election, and my question an opinion on it? Right?

1832
01:23:02.319 --> 01:23:04.039
<v Speaker 1>You said you have an opinion, and most people that

1833
01:23:04.159 --> 01:23:07.840
<v Speaker 1>have an opinion based that on actual and I gave you.

1834
01:23:08.800 --> 01:23:09.920
<v Speaker 1>You didn't give me any species.

1835
01:23:09.920 --> 01:23:11.720
<v Speaker 3>I think you'd understand the difference between when people have

1836
01:23:11.760 --> 01:23:13.720
<v Speaker 3>an opinion that they have as a theory or an

1837
01:23:13.720 --> 01:23:16.119
<v Speaker 3>assessment that they don't have a hard heart position on,

1838
01:23:16.399 --> 01:23:18.000
<v Speaker 3>versus when they have a heart position.

1839
01:23:18.119 --> 01:23:20.159
<v Speaker 1>So I have some things that I have heard positions. Okay,

1840
01:23:20.239 --> 01:23:22.239
<v Speaker 1>but when somebody tells me that they believe that the

1841
01:23:22.319 --> 01:23:24.720
<v Speaker 1>election might happen. I said, it's an opinion based on

1842
01:23:24.840 --> 01:23:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the way that I know about how the CIA works.

1843
01:23:26.680 --> 01:23:29.319
<v Speaker 1>That's my opinion. So your opinion is the election might

1844
01:23:29.399 --> 01:23:31.399
<v Speaker 1>have been stolen because you're based on the way the

1845
01:23:31.520 --> 01:23:34.880
<v Speaker 1>CIA works. If you presented in dozens of other countries

1846
01:23:36.479 --> 01:23:39.439
<v Speaker 1>the elections in Iran, thinking about other countries, that's different. Well,

1847
01:23:39.479 --> 01:23:41.439
<v Speaker 1>that's the precedence for why it would happen here. We're

1848
01:23:41.439 --> 01:23:46.399
<v Speaker 1>not Iran, Okay, we actually because the way the deep

1849
01:23:46.439 --> 01:23:47.880
<v Speaker 1>state that you asked them about the beginning, the way

1850
01:23:47.880 --> 01:23:49.880
<v Speaker 1>they operate in other countries, is the same way that

1851
01:23:49.920 --> 01:23:51.640
<v Speaker 1>they object. Let's try that one. Let me try this

1852
01:23:51.680 --> 01:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>different way. If I'm a judge right now, and your

1853
01:23:54.840 --> 01:23:58.640
<v Speaker 1>case that you're making that you believe opinion that Joe

1854
01:23:58.680 --> 01:24:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Biden didn't win a free and fair, aaloh election, what

1855
01:24:00.880 --> 01:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>evidence would you be able to present to me other

1856
01:24:03.039 --> 01:24:06.079
<v Speaker 1>than I know how the CIA works, which is not evidence,

1857
01:24:06.119 --> 01:24:08.079
<v Speaker 1>by the way, well it is of it. Okay, Then

1858
01:24:08.199 --> 01:24:11.319
<v Speaker 1>where is your You have to have something called residence. Okay,

1859
01:24:11.439 --> 01:24:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you have to have something presented to a judge called widespread.

1860
01:24:13.840 --> 01:24:16.039
<v Speaker 1>But I didn't come here with a hard opinion. Again,

1861
01:24:16.199 --> 01:24:18.640
<v Speaker 1>on the twenty twenty election, So you can have an

1862
01:24:18.680 --> 01:24:20.840
<v Speaker 1>opinion based on no fact at all. I didn't say.

1863
01:24:21.000 --> 01:24:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Note again, you're lying about whether I had so tell me.

1864
01:24:24.039 --> 01:24:26.159
<v Speaker 1>Give me something that makes you believe that Joe Biden

1865
01:24:26.239 --> 01:24:29.880
<v Speaker 1>because I believe that there's a breakaway security establishment that

1866
01:24:30.119 --> 01:24:32.439
<v Speaker 1>is the quote deep state, and the same way that

1867
01:24:32.520 --> 01:24:35.560
<v Speaker 1>they re elections. And I don't care what it sounds like.

1868
01:24:35.600 --> 01:24:37.479
<v Speaker 1>That's again a fallacy of association, which you said you're

1869
01:24:37.520 --> 01:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>not going to do what Well, you sound like you're

1870
01:24:40.000 --> 01:24:43.039
<v Speaker 1>saying that I'm sorry that you can't do the nuance,

1871
01:24:43.119 --> 01:24:46.119
<v Speaker 1>But that's a fallacy. You're making a claim that the

1872
01:24:46.199 --> 01:24:50.199
<v Speaker 1>election opinion, okay, an opinion. Are there things that you

1873
01:24:50.279 --> 01:24:53.479
<v Speaker 1>have opinions on that you're not hard set on based

1874
01:24:53.520 --> 01:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>on some cherry or gut? Sure, So if I told

1875
01:24:56.079 --> 01:24:57.720
<v Speaker 1>you that, why are you trying to grill me on

1876
01:24:57.800 --> 01:25:00.439
<v Speaker 1>something that If I told you that I have an

1877
01:25:00.479 --> 01:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>opinion that Donald Trump is a criminal, I would give

1878
01:25:03.760 --> 01:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you actual cases and evidence to prove that he is

1879
01:25:07.039 --> 01:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a criminal. My argument was actual cases of dozens of

1880
01:25:10.640 --> 01:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>countries where the CIA rigs elections. But other countries are

1881
01:25:15.199 --> 01:25:17.399
<v Speaker 1>the United States. Yeah, I know, but I'm saying that

1882
01:25:17.560 --> 01:25:20.520
<v Speaker 1>that's how it was here. Okay, So you not get that,

1883
01:25:20.720 --> 01:25:24.560
<v Speaker 1>So you believe the way the CIA has allegedly rigged

1884
01:25:24.600 --> 01:25:29.239
<v Speaker 1>other elections they do this. You don't know that you believe,

1885
01:25:30.479 --> 01:25:32.640
<v Speaker 1>you believe it probably was. How did they do that here?

1886
01:25:32.800 --> 01:25:35.359
<v Speaker 1>How did they rig it again the same way that

1887
01:25:35.399 --> 01:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>they do it in other countries. There's a lot of

1888
01:25:38.800 --> 01:25:40.720
<v Speaker 1>different techniques. How did they rig it here? Help me

1889
01:25:40.800 --> 01:25:43.239
<v Speaker 1>understand again? It's my opinion that they rigged it probably

1890
01:25:43.319 --> 01:25:47.279
<v Speaker 1>with Holli stuffing. They can bring the evidence of boutant stuffing, though,

1891
01:25:47.279 --> 01:25:50.319
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't you have cameras. I don't have a hard opinion

1892
01:25:50.359 --> 01:25:51.920
<v Speaker 1>on this, so I don't know why you're trying to

1893
01:25:51.960 --> 01:25:53.680
<v Speaker 1>debate me on Like if I had a hard opinion,

1894
01:25:53.720 --> 01:25:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I would say, I'll be honest with you. I'll tell

1895
01:25:55.800 --> 01:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>you why. It's a theory. I'll tell you why. The

1896
01:25:58.880 --> 01:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>reason why I'm grilling you on this, for lack of

1897
01:26:00.800 --> 01:26:04.319
<v Speaker 1>a better term, is because there is zero, let me

1898
01:26:04.399 --> 01:26:09.199
<v Speaker 1>repeat zero evidence of widespread voter fraud. Does this idea

1899
01:26:09.239 --> 01:26:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that in that do they any hold on? Let me

1900
01:26:11.640 --> 01:26:13.880
<v Speaker 1>just produce thought and then you have the floor. Do

1901
01:26:14.000 --> 01:26:17.880
<v Speaker 1>they there is zero evidence of widespread arter the same

1902
01:26:17.920 --> 01:26:21.239
<v Speaker 1>a position. It's not a position, it's a fact. But

1903
01:26:21.399 --> 01:26:24.039
<v Speaker 1>birth is not that and Donald Trump did not win

1904
01:26:24.119 --> 01:26:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the associated Well, no, I'm just showing how ridiculous you're

1905
01:26:27.640 --> 01:26:31.840
<v Speaker 1>argument ridiculous. No, it's not because I'm saying because you

1906
01:26:31.960 --> 01:26:36.399
<v Speaker 1>know how they do they do in other countries. I'm

1907
01:26:36.439 --> 01:26:38.359
<v Speaker 1>sure it's happened in the past, but that has nothing

1908
01:26:38.399 --> 01:26:40.880
<v Speaker 1>to do that is. That's the precedent for why I

1909
01:26:41.039 --> 01:26:43.439
<v Speaker 1>have the suspicion of twenty twenty So you know so

1910
01:26:43.520 --> 01:26:46.640
<v Speaker 1>by your standard, you don't believe any elections. Do you

1911
01:26:46.720 --> 01:26:50.119
<v Speaker 1>think any election is election? We're giving a a straw man.

1912
01:26:50.199 --> 01:26:53.039
<v Speaker 1>I didn't say every election is, but twenty twenty four wasn't.

1913
01:26:53.199 --> 01:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>That's a strong man? Okay, yes, I do twenty twenty

1914
01:26:56.920 --> 01:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I argue that all elections are. Do you know what

1915
01:26:58.880 --> 01:27:01.239
<v Speaker 1>evidence is? I can your Yeah, do you know what

1916
01:27:01.319 --> 01:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>evidence is?

1917
01:27:01.880 --> 01:27:01.920
<v Speaker 2>No?

1918
01:27:02.039 --> 01:27:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you okay?

1919
01:27:02.920 --> 01:27:02.960
<v Speaker 4>No?

1920
01:27:03.079 --> 01:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't okay. I can play your stupid word games too,

1921
01:27:06.159 --> 01:27:09.319
<v Speaker 1>the two thousand game, the twenty twenty four, the twenty

1922
01:27:09.479 --> 01:27:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and twenty four elections. You want to you keep saying game.

1923
01:27:12.479 --> 01:27:13.920
<v Speaker 1>So I want to know if the law of non

1924
01:27:13.960 --> 01:27:16.520
<v Speaker 1>contradiction is the word game. I'm asking you a question. Okay,

1925
01:27:16.600 --> 01:27:19.319
<v Speaker 1>I've answered all your questions. Is the law the world

1926
01:27:19.680 --> 01:27:21.680
<v Speaker 1>hold on you just say everything's a word game. The

1927
01:27:21.760 --> 01:27:26.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four election was not I have a suspicion, okay,

1928
01:27:26.479 --> 01:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>but the two thousand suspicion. So the twenty and sixteen

1929
01:27:30.640 --> 01:27:33.279
<v Speaker 1>election where Donald Trump won, I admitted the he does

1930
01:27:33.319 --> 01:27:36.039
<v Speaker 1>this the country. So why are you growing I don't

1931
01:27:36.079 --> 01:27:38.279
<v Speaker 1>have the knowledge of that. So in two you said

1932
01:27:38.319 --> 01:27:40.239
<v Speaker 1>it probably did. Maybe I don't know. So that's why

1933
01:27:40.359 --> 01:27:43.640
<v Speaker 1>that's my question. I'm not making that claim. All I'm

1934
01:27:43.680 --> 01:27:47.199
<v Speaker 1>simply saying is in twenty and sixteen, you believe Trump won.

1935
01:27:47.640 --> 01:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>In twenty and twenty four, you believe Trump one. But

1936
01:27:50.880 --> 01:27:53.880
<v Speaker 1>it's very interesting that you retort back to the CIA

1937
01:27:54.119 --> 01:27:56.840
<v Speaker 1>as the reason why you think Joe Biden's suspicion right,

1938
01:27:57.119 --> 01:28:01.279
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden didn't win because you have a suspicion. Mhm, Okay,

1939
01:28:01.279 --> 01:28:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll let the less on something that you said is possible.

1940
01:28:03.640 --> 01:28:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll let the list. I want to ask, so if

1941
01:28:08.359 --> 01:28:11.199
<v Speaker 1>if I say A is the same thing as not a,

1942
01:28:11.560 --> 01:28:13.159
<v Speaker 1>do you think that's a word game or is that

1943
01:28:13.319 --> 01:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the law of non contradiction? No, I think you're a hypocrite.

1944
01:28:16.079 --> 01:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>I think when you use these words and you have

1945
01:28:17.880 --> 01:28:20.399
<v Speaker 1>these opinions, No, I think you're a hypocrite. That's an

1946
01:28:20.399 --> 01:28:24.399
<v Speaker 1>out homonym. Okay, No, I wouldn't. I'm not name calling you.

1947
01:28:24.520 --> 01:28:27.119
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't say that. But I think, okay, well, because

1948
01:28:27.159 --> 01:28:30.720
<v Speaker 1>you say certain things like, for example, okay, fine, you think,

1949
01:28:31.119 --> 01:28:35.399
<v Speaker 1>let's say, for the sake of argument, standard in every election,

1950
01:28:35.720 --> 01:28:39.760
<v Speaker 1>is a the same thing as non a? Is that

1951
01:28:39.880 --> 01:28:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a word game? Is the law? It depends? What we're

1952
01:28:43.760 --> 01:28:46.600
<v Speaker 1>talking is the law? I'm asking you about the law

1953
01:28:46.600 --> 01:28:48.680
<v Speaker 1>of non contradiction. That's what we're talking about, is that

1954
01:28:49.359 --> 01:28:51.199
<v Speaker 1>it depends on the topic that we are referring. Is

1955
01:28:51.279 --> 01:28:54.279
<v Speaker 1>the law itself a word game? Like I said, I'll

1956
01:28:54.279 --> 01:28:57.359
<v Speaker 1>answer the law. Do you know that there in logic?

1957
01:28:57.439 --> 01:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>You study laws? Right? What do you think those law

1958
01:29:00.399 --> 01:29:04.520
<v Speaker 1>word games? Do? I think laws are the laws of logic?

1959
01:29:05.560 --> 01:29:08.359
<v Speaker 1>Depends specifically what you are refering to. One called the

1960
01:29:08.439 --> 01:29:10.600
<v Speaker 1>law of non contradiction? Is that a word? What about it? No?

1961
01:29:10.680 --> 01:29:13.039
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't say that. Okay, thank you, not necessarily so,

1962
01:29:13.159 --> 01:29:15.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm not playing word games. But you are a hypocrite.

1963
01:29:15.680 --> 01:29:19.720
<v Speaker 1>You use a different standard for that. You do actually

1964
01:29:19.760 --> 01:29:22.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't argue that Donald Trump was had a different center.

1965
01:29:22.600 --> 01:29:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I actually specifically said that he should be held to

1966
01:29:24.600 --> 01:29:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the same standard. I don't think that she hasn't. Well,

1967
01:29:26.840 --> 01:29:28.720
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean that that's again, had nothing to do

1968
01:29:28.800 --> 01:29:30.359
<v Speaker 1>with it what I argued, No, I think I think

1969
01:29:30.399 --> 01:29:31.199
<v Speaker 1>it is a little bit to do it. But I

1970
01:29:31.239 --> 01:29:35.439
<v Speaker 1>do find it interesting. When Trump wins, everything must have

1971
01:29:35.520 --> 01:29:37.600
<v Speaker 1>gone fine in the election. But if Trump loses, the

1972
01:29:37.680 --> 01:29:41.239
<v Speaker 1>CIA must have been involved. That's an Alex Jones conspiracy theory.

1973
01:29:41.319 --> 01:29:43.520
<v Speaker 1>That's not what I argue. That is a conspiracy theory.

1974
01:29:43.640 --> 01:29:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I know what's going on in the CIA, and I

1975
01:29:46.039 --> 01:29:48.479
<v Speaker 1>don't think Joe Biden. I know I had a suspicion.

1976
01:29:48.560 --> 01:29:51.600
<v Speaker 1>You have a suspicion past evidence and examples that you admitted.

1977
01:29:51.600 --> 01:29:54.239
<v Speaker 1>So if I said I have a suspicion possible if

1978
01:29:54.279 --> 01:29:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I said no, if I said that, you said the CIA,

1979
01:29:56.920 --> 01:29:59.279
<v Speaker 1>you said the CIA could elections and others. I don't know.

1980
01:29:59.479 --> 01:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't have and he knows possible. What I do

1981
01:30:02.000 --> 01:30:03.760
<v Speaker 1>know is that said earlier as possible. What I do.

1982
01:30:03.920 --> 01:30:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Just because I say something is possible that I didn't

1983
01:30:07.880 --> 01:30:11.119
<v Speaker 1>say that you did, that's my suspicion. So you just

1984
01:30:11.239 --> 01:30:14.720
<v Speaker 1>have a suspicion with no evidence. You in a position.

1985
01:30:16.000 --> 01:30:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's it's it's okay. There's nothing wrong

1986
01:30:18.760 --> 01:30:21.520
<v Speaker 1>with being a hypocrite, because ethics a relative anyway. Yeah,

1987
01:30:22.800 --> 01:30:24.239
<v Speaker 1>you got to fend off with the files and the

1988
01:30:24.239 --> 01:30:28.880
<v Speaker 1>deep state or sure we could talk about that. Sure, absolutely, absolutely,

1989
01:30:29.159 --> 01:30:30.600
<v Speaker 1>you want to go first this time? Go ahead, I'll

1990
01:30:30.600 --> 01:30:33.319
<v Speaker 1>be a gentleman. You let him go, I'll let him

1991
01:30:33.359 --> 01:30:39.399
<v Speaker 1>go first. What's the prompt? Are they are they real?

1992
01:30:39.479 --> 01:30:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Are they good? Or they like? Yeah? Well, would you

1993
01:30:41.840 --> 01:30:42.079
<v Speaker 1>want to?

1994
01:30:42.560 --> 01:30:44.399
<v Speaker 2>I guess you mentioned Trump's in there a lot, But

1995
01:30:44.680 --> 01:30:46.399
<v Speaker 2>do you have a heart take on that, Brian? I've

1996
01:30:46.439 --> 01:30:47.319
<v Speaker 2>seen files with Trump.

1997
01:30:47.479 --> 01:30:51.359
<v Speaker 1>Sure, I have some very strong opinions on it. First

1998
01:30:51.359 --> 01:30:54.239
<v Speaker 1>of all, a lot of maga Republicans and even members

1999
01:30:54.279 --> 01:30:57.000
<v Speaker 1>of Trump Trump's well, not before his administration. A lot

2000
01:30:57.000 --> 01:30:59.479
<v Speaker 1>of people that were around Trump campaigned on this, the

2001
01:30:59.520 --> 01:31:03.239
<v Speaker 1>deep state in Hollywood, pedophiles, and then they had those binders.

2002
01:31:03.279 --> 01:31:05.720
<v Speaker 1>As you know, Jay Jack Bisobek was one of them.

2003
01:31:05.840 --> 01:31:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I called him out for this and Pam BONDI made

2004
01:31:07.600 --> 01:31:10.520
<v Speaker 1>them all look like clowns. I agree. As you know,

2005
01:31:10.600 --> 01:31:12.399
<v Speaker 1>there's still see we might agree on this one. There's

2006
01:31:12.399 --> 01:31:14.640
<v Speaker 1>still three million well, let me just start with this foundation.

2007
01:31:14.720 --> 01:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>You agree with me that what happened to these kids

2008
01:31:16.880 --> 01:31:19.039
<v Speaker 1>is horrible, sure, and people should be held to account. Right,

2009
01:31:19.079 --> 01:31:21.079
<v Speaker 1>but to this day the only two people, I think

2010
01:31:21.319 --> 01:31:24.800
<v Speaker 1>there were a few more arrests right overseas, but Gislaine

2011
01:31:24.840 --> 01:31:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein are really the only two people

2012
01:31:28.880 --> 01:31:30.520
<v Speaker 1>in this country that have been held to account. Correct.

2013
01:31:30.520 --> 01:31:32.800
<v Speaker 1>What does Donald Trump do well? The first thing he

2014
01:31:32.880 --> 01:31:36.119
<v Speaker 1>does is, says his former personal attorney Todd Blanche to

2015
01:31:36.279 --> 01:31:38.520
<v Speaker 1>interview Maxwell. A couple of days later, she sent to

2016
01:31:38.560 --> 01:31:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a club med facility. Jeez, I wonder why she's still there,

2017
01:31:41.720 --> 01:31:43.880
<v Speaker 1>by the way. And when she was asked, as you know,

2018
01:31:45.319 --> 01:31:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it was like a month or two ago,

2019
01:31:46.560 --> 01:31:48.439
<v Speaker 1>she pled the fifth and she said she only answered

2020
01:31:48.439 --> 01:31:51.159
<v Speaker 1>the questions if Trump basically gives her a pardon. Trump

2021
01:31:51.239 --> 01:31:52.840
<v Speaker 1>had nothing to say about that, and he hasn't ruled

2022
01:31:52.880 --> 01:31:55.039
<v Speaker 1>out a pardon for her. Donald Trump is mentioned in

2023
01:31:55.079 --> 01:31:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the files that we've already seen partially thousands of times.

2024
01:31:58.960 --> 01:32:00.880
<v Speaker 1>In fact, Donald Trump is mentioned more in the Epstein

2025
01:32:00.920 --> 01:32:04.399
<v Speaker 1>falls than Jesus Christ is mentioned in the Bible. He

2026
01:32:04.479 --> 01:32:06.279
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want us talking about it. Jay. He calls people

2027
01:32:06.319 --> 01:32:08.079
<v Speaker 1>like you and me stupid for even talking about the

2028
01:32:08.119 --> 01:32:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Epstein fau even talking about it. I've been very consistent,

2029
01:32:11.560 --> 01:32:13.000
<v Speaker 1>whether you're a left or a righty, whether you're a

2030
01:32:13.039 --> 01:32:15.199
<v Speaker 1>Democrat or a Republican, I want everyone held to account.

2031
01:32:15.239 --> 01:32:17.800
<v Speaker 1>If you're in those files, release everything, redact the names

2032
01:32:17.840 --> 01:32:20.960
<v Speaker 1>of the victims. If Bill Clinton did some horrible things, fine,

2033
01:32:21.279 --> 01:32:26.239
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton testified, Bill Clinton testified. Why isn't Howard Lutnick testified.

2034
01:32:26.319 --> 01:32:28.560
<v Speaker 1>This is a guy. This is a guy, as you

2035
01:32:28.720 --> 01:32:30.720
<v Speaker 1>know a month ago, who said he was never on

2036
01:32:30.800 --> 01:32:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the Epstein island and then right of course, and then

2037
01:32:33.760 --> 01:32:35.800
<v Speaker 1>he led about it. Trump doesn't want him to testify.

2038
01:32:36.039 --> 01:32:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Why isn't Donald Trump testifying? If Hillary Clinton? You know

2039
01:32:38.760 --> 01:32:41.720
<v Speaker 1>what the Republicans did, They set a precedent. Now Milania

2040
01:32:41.760 --> 01:32:44.760
<v Speaker 1>should have to testify. She was closer to JESSELEYN. Maxwell

2041
01:32:44.880 --> 01:32:49.319
<v Speaker 1>and Jeffrey Epstein than Hillary ever was. So do I

2042
01:32:49.479 --> 01:32:52.439
<v Speaker 1>know for sure, one hundred percent if Donald Trump committed

2043
01:32:52.479 --> 01:32:54.560
<v Speaker 1>any crimes in there, No, I don't. I know there

2044
01:32:54.560 --> 01:32:56.840
<v Speaker 1>are accusations. But what I do know is that this

2045
01:32:56.960 --> 01:33:01.079
<v Speaker 1>is a huge cover up, huge cover up. I want

2046
01:33:01.159 --> 01:33:04.920
<v Speaker 1>people held to account. This is a huge cover up.

2047
01:33:05.039 --> 01:33:06.920
<v Speaker 1>And then I do believe a portion of the war

2048
01:33:07.000 --> 01:33:09.439
<v Speaker 1>and Iran a portion of it is a distraction.

2049
01:33:09.600 --> 01:33:12.399
<v Speaker 3>I agree, So that's kind of like my Yeah, I

2050
01:33:13.720 --> 01:33:16.039
<v Speaker 3>covered this pretty extensively on my channel. We live streamed,

2051
01:33:16.079 --> 01:33:18.680
<v Speaker 3>I think every day as these were beginning to sort

2052
01:33:18.720 --> 01:33:21.520
<v Speaker 3>of drip out. We did about thirty hours of live stream.

2053
01:33:21.560 --> 01:33:23.279
<v Speaker 3>People can go check all that out where we sort

2054
01:33:23.319 --> 01:33:26.960
<v Speaker 3>of archived everything. I thought that was pretty substantial that

2055
01:33:27.079 --> 01:33:30.239
<v Speaker 3>came out. I do think absolutely that the rest of

2056
01:33:30.319 --> 01:33:32.520
<v Speaker 3>the of the file should be released. There should be

2057
01:33:32.640 --> 01:33:36.800
<v Speaker 3>total you know, they should redact everybody but victims absolutely

2058
01:33:36.840 --> 01:33:39.279
<v Speaker 3>agree with all that. I do think it was a huge,

2059
01:33:39.439 --> 01:33:42.600
<v Speaker 3>huge mistake to cover this up and to not allow

2060
01:33:43.319 --> 01:33:45.520
<v Speaker 3>not to push for this to be released when this

2061
01:33:45.760 --> 01:33:49.479
<v Speaker 3>was a campaign promise. So I'm having a hard time

2062
01:33:49.520 --> 01:33:51.720
<v Speaker 3>to figuring it out where we could disagree on this one.

2063
01:33:52.039 --> 01:33:54.600
<v Speaker 3>Totally agree, huge bleunder, as big as any of the

2064
01:33:54.680 --> 01:33:55.720
<v Speaker 3>other Trump blunders.

2065
01:33:57.039 --> 01:33:59.079
<v Speaker 1>What would it take for you to regret your vote

2066
01:33:59.600 --> 01:34:01.520
<v Speaker 1>if something came out in the episte? To be honest

2067
01:34:01.520 --> 01:34:05.479
<v Speaker 1>with my vote was just kind of anti Yeah, you

2068
01:34:05.560 --> 01:34:07.239
<v Speaker 1>could say that, what was it about Kamala? I know

2069
01:34:07.319 --> 01:34:09.800
<v Speaker 1>we're kind of because we're gonnae on the Epstein stuff.

2070
01:34:09.800 --> 01:34:11.920
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to argue about that only because only

2071
01:34:11.960 --> 01:34:15.960
<v Speaker 1>because I only because I agreed with what were the

2072
01:34:16.039 --> 01:34:19.079
<v Speaker 1>majority of Trump's campaign promises. Okay, I get that part.

2073
01:34:19.439 --> 01:34:21.399
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about Coamala from moment. I don't really is

2074
01:34:21.439 --> 01:34:22.960
<v Speaker 1>there anything about her like you just said, I just

2075
01:34:23.000 --> 01:34:26.199
<v Speaker 1>can't vote for the because of what do you in

2076
01:34:26.319 --> 01:34:29.359
<v Speaker 1>what sense? Like what do you mean she's a goober?

2077
01:34:30.279 --> 01:34:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Just in that sense? I just I mean, I don't

2078
01:34:32.880 --> 01:34:37.359
<v Speaker 1>take political seriously anyway, So, but there's there something about

2079
01:34:37.359 --> 01:34:38.720
<v Speaker 1>her that said I can't, I can't vote for her,

2080
01:34:38.840 --> 01:34:41.960
<v Speaker 1>like what you wanted me to say, that she's a

2081
01:34:42.039 --> 01:34:47.079
<v Speaker 1>brown person. Jay, That's not why I That's not why

2082
01:34:47.079 --> 01:34:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I messing. I'm asking the question policies you didn't like

2083
01:34:50.159 --> 01:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>obviously again the positions as I said that Trump campaigned upon, uh,

2084
01:34:54.760 --> 01:34:58.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, no new wars reigning in Uh. It was

2085
01:34:58.319 --> 01:35:01.560
<v Speaker 1>more about his promises more than a I'm always an

2086
01:35:01.640 --> 01:35:05.319
<v Speaker 1>issue person, but I definitely think that even if Donald

2087
01:35:05.319 --> 01:35:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Trump went full Neocon, which I always had the suspicion

2088
01:35:08.000 --> 01:35:10.840
<v Speaker 1>that he could turn neok on, I felt like that

2089
01:35:11.159 --> 01:35:13.960
<v Speaker 1>it would still be a better bet than Kamala. But

2090
01:35:13.960 --> 01:35:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't even think that that. What I'm getting from

2091
01:35:16.600 --> 01:35:18.720
<v Speaker 1>you is it was more of Trump's promises that you

2092
01:35:18.880 --> 01:35:20.479
<v Speaker 1>thought he would keep, which I don't.

2093
01:35:20.279 --> 01:35:20.880
<v Speaker 4>Know what it was.

2094
01:35:21.359 --> 01:35:21.399
<v Speaker 1>Like.

2095
01:35:21.479 --> 01:35:23.159
<v Speaker 3>If I'm going to have to choose between these two,

2096
01:35:23.399 --> 01:35:26.920
<v Speaker 3>then I'm gonna at least agree with these campaign promises.

2097
01:35:26.960 --> 01:35:30.680
<v Speaker 3>But I also don't believe politicians actually ever, even if

2098
01:35:30.680 --> 01:35:32.039
<v Speaker 3>they keep half of their promises.

2099
01:35:32.079 --> 01:35:34.680
<v Speaker 1>That would be Jay Jay. He ran them basically on

2100
01:35:34.840 --> 01:35:37.800
<v Speaker 1>two things. In twenty sixteen, he ran and We're going

2101
01:35:37.840 --> 01:35:39.560
<v Speaker 1>to build a wall in Mexico's going to pay for it.

2102
01:35:39.840 --> 01:35:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Obviously that didn't happen. And every campaign stop he talked

2103
01:35:43.800 --> 01:35:45.560
<v Speaker 1>about locking up Hillary Clinton and he was going to

2104
01:35:45.680 --> 01:35:48.119
<v Speaker 1>hire a special prosecutor. So what would make you think

2105
01:35:48.159 --> 01:35:50.239
<v Speaker 1>that he was going to keep his promises this time around?

2106
01:35:51.560 --> 01:35:55.319
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps the potentiality that he had a lot of.

2107
01:35:58.039 --> 01:36:02.039
<v Speaker 3>Ignorance and naivety about who he's staffed as his as

2108
01:36:02.159 --> 01:36:04.319
<v Speaker 3>his as his people. So there was a lot of

2109
01:36:04.399 --> 01:36:06.199
<v Speaker 3>neo cons a lot of people that betrayed him. And

2110
01:36:06.239 --> 01:36:09.279
<v Speaker 3>so my hope was that if he saw that Bolton

2111
01:36:09.319 --> 01:36:12.399
<v Speaker 3>and these kinds of characters were sort of duplicitous, that

2112
01:36:12.560 --> 01:36:16.239
<v Speaker 3>he might actually take actions. To quote durin the swamp

2113
01:36:16.279 --> 01:36:18.920
<v Speaker 3>and actually not have a bunch of lobbyists and you know,

2114
01:36:19.239 --> 01:36:20.079
<v Speaker 3>pack type people.

2115
01:36:20.239 --> 01:36:21.920
<v Speaker 1>If they can remind it, let me finish it.

2116
01:36:22.079 --> 01:36:23.319
<v Speaker 3>The last thing I would say is that also I

2117
01:36:23.399 --> 01:36:26.119
<v Speaker 3>think it had to do with he campaigned originally on

2118
01:36:26.239 --> 01:36:28.960
<v Speaker 3>not taking GOP money, and then I suspect that there

2119
01:36:29.159 --> 01:36:31.199
<v Speaker 3>was that he did take GOP money in twenty sixteen,

2120
01:36:31.239 --> 01:36:33.840
<v Speaker 3>and that's why you had so many neo con appointments

2121
01:36:34.359 --> 01:36:39.079
<v Speaker 3>to his staff. And then I had hoped that in

2122
01:36:39.159 --> 01:36:42.600
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty that he would learn from the first mistakes

2123
01:36:42.840 --> 01:36:44.840
<v Speaker 3>and perhaps at least attempt to not.

2124
01:36:46.239 --> 01:36:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Based on his age and where he's from, he hasn't

2125
01:36:48.079 --> 01:36:49.680
<v Speaker 1>learned from any of his mistakes. I would also say,

2126
01:36:49.800 --> 01:36:50.800
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately it seems that way.

2127
01:36:50.840 --> 01:36:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Know.

2128
01:36:51.039 --> 01:36:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Jared Kushner when he took two point one billion

2129
01:36:53.600 --> 01:36:56.399
<v Speaker 1>dollars from the Saudis, Donald Trump with his crypto scheme scandal,

2130
01:36:56.720 --> 01:36:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I disagree with all those Yeah, eight times more wealth

2131
01:36:59.880 --> 01:37:01.640
<v Speaker 1>now than he had when he first got into office.

2132
01:37:01.720 --> 01:37:04.079
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know, man, my whole take on

2133
01:37:04.159 --> 01:37:06.800
<v Speaker 1>this whole thing. And like I said, we're not going

2134
01:37:06.880 --> 01:37:09.039
<v Speaker 1>to disagree on the Epstein stuff. I'm glad we that's

2135
01:37:09.039 --> 01:37:10.720
<v Speaker 1>a really important thing. I'm glad we agree on that

2136
01:37:12.119 --> 01:37:14.720
<v Speaker 1>is that I went to Trump rallies and I was

2137
01:37:14.760 --> 01:37:18.640
<v Speaker 1>criticized nationally for saying it felt like a clan rally. Now,

2138
01:37:18.680 --> 01:37:20.760
<v Speaker 1>that might be extreme language. I don't believe everybody that

2139
01:37:20.840 --> 01:37:22.840
<v Speaker 1>goes to a Trump rallies racist. I don't believe everybody

2140
01:37:22.880 --> 01:37:25.159
<v Speaker 1>that goes to a Trump rally as a clansman. But

2141
01:37:25.920 --> 01:37:28.039
<v Speaker 1>in a way, the way you talk sometimes in a

2142
01:37:28.119 --> 01:37:32.279
<v Speaker 1>joking fashion, right, ninety nine percent of the people were white.

2143
01:37:32.880 --> 01:37:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I went to a Kamala rally and it felt like America.

2144
01:37:36.039 --> 01:37:39.600
<v Speaker 1>It was very diverse. I saw Confederate flags at Trump rallies.

2145
01:37:40.319 --> 01:37:44.359
<v Speaker 1>I saw a lot of hatred. Fuck Joe and the

2146
01:37:44.399 --> 01:37:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Hoe shirts.

2147
01:37:47.119 --> 01:37:47.720
<v Speaker 2>It was just like.

2148
01:37:49.359 --> 01:37:52.079
<v Speaker 1>Just a lot of hatred. Man. And I've never said,

2149
01:37:52.199 --> 01:37:54.359
<v Speaker 1>and I've never grouped all Trump supporters as one. I

2150
01:37:54.359 --> 01:37:56.239
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't put you in one. I wouldn't. I've never done

2151
01:37:56.279 --> 01:37:58.319
<v Speaker 1>that ever, and I never will. But I will say this,

2152
01:37:59.039 --> 01:38:03.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't think, uh, everybody who voted for Donald Trump

2153
01:38:03.319 --> 01:38:05.079
<v Speaker 1>is a racist. But I do believe everybody who is

2154
01:38:05.119 --> 01:38:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a racist voted for Donald Trump. I strongly believe that.

2155
01:38:11.520 --> 01:38:16.720
<v Speaker 1>And I could go with policy. Listen, you haven't done

2156
01:38:16.760 --> 01:38:18.319
<v Speaker 1>this but a lot of people in the right call Kamala.

2157
01:38:18.439 --> 01:38:20.640
<v Speaker 1>They've called her a whore, she slept her way to

2158
01:38:20.720 --> 01:38:22.479
<v Speaker 1>the top. I haven't heard you say that. I'm not

2159
01:38:22.560 --> 01:38:25.319
<v Speaker 1>accusing you. I didn't even remember that. I remember people saying, yeah, yeah,

2160
01:38:25.319 --> 01:38:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not accusing you of that. I want to be clear.

2161
01:38:27.079 --> 01:38:29.159
<v Speaker 1>But well, I'm trying to sleep my way at the top,

2162
01:38:29.159 --> 01:38:31.039
<v Speaker 1>so I could be hire for me to call out.

2163
01:38:31.199 --> 01:38:33.600
<v Speaker 1>That's funny. Actually, see you made me laugh. You're funny.

2164
01:38:34.279 --> 01:38:35.960
<v Speaker 1>But you know I hated that rhetoric. You know what

2165
01:38:36.000 --> 01:38:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean. Here's a woman who she became the attorney

2166
01:38:39.000 --> 01:38:41.319
<v Speaker 1>general duly elected twice. Even if you disagree with their politics,

2167
01:38:41.359 --> 01:38:44.840
<v Speaker 1>that's fine. Yeah, this is a woman who became a

2168
01:38:44.920 --> 01:38:48.399
<v Speaker 1>senator and then a vice president. Uh wasn't wasn't my first,

2169
01:38:48.439 --> 01:38:50.359
<v Speaker 1>second or third? Let me be very clear, how about this?

2170
01:38:50.720 --> 01:38:52.640
<v Speaker 1>She's a woman? That's that would be an area where

2171
01:38:52.640 --> 01:38:55.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't want her in politics? Why tell me why? Seriously,

2172
01:38:56.439 --> 01:38:58.319
<v Speaker 1>you don't want women? Why tell me why? Oh, less

2173
01:38:58.359 --> 01:39:01.279
<v Speaker 1>women in politics, just like I would want less immigration. Well,

2174
01:39:01.359 --> 01:39:03.640
<v Speaker 1>let's go. I don't think women are fitted for that.

2175
01:39:03.720 --> 01:39:05.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they're made for that. Why tell me

2176
01:39:05.399 --> 01:39:07.319
<v Speaker 1>what's why would you say women A woman can't be

2177
01:39:07.359 --> 01:39:09.560
<v Speaker 1>a politician. I don't think they're made for that. What

2178
01:39:09.760 --> 01:39:11.640
<v Speaker 1>they can do? What are their characteristics that would lead

2179
01:39:11.640 --> 01:39:12.359
<v Speaker 1>you to believe.

2180
01:39:12.159 --> 01:39:15.319
<v Speaker 3>That women tend to be more emotional, They tend to

2181
01:39:15.880 --> 01:39:18.800
<v Speaker 3>not make their decisions based on facts, reasoning, and logic.

2182
01:39:18.840 --> 01:39:20.000
<v Speaker 3>Typically doesn't mean that all.

2183
01:39:20.079 --> 01:39:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. That's funny married, because if you have

2184
01:39:23.600 --> 01:39:26.159
<v Speaker 1>a wife, I'm laughing. Because the guy who you voted

2185
01:39:26.159 --> 01:39:28.800
<v Speaker 1>for has nicknames for people he disagrees with. You couldn't

2186
01:39:28.800 --> 01:39:31.079
<v Speaker 1>find a more insecure emotional guys that have to do

2187
01:39:31.199 --> 01:39:34.119
<v Speaker 1>with the question of whether you don't I'll tell you what,

2188
01:39:34.319 --> 01:39:36.560
<v Speaker 1>because you're making the case, which I disagree with, that

2189
01:39:36.720 --> 01:39:40.039
<v Speaker 1>women are more emotional. Uh, when the man who is

2190
01:39:40.039 --> 01:39:42.960
<v Speaker 1>probably more emotional ten times more emotional, I would imagine

2191
01:39:43.000 --> 01:39:45.000
<v Speaker 1>than most women that are in office right now, who

2192
01:39:45.039 --> 01:39:47.159
<v Speaker 1>has nicknames for people he disagrees with, he puts on

2193
01:39:47.279 --> 01:39:48.920
<v Speaker 1>eight layers of orange makeup. When you have a.

2194
01:39:49.399 --> 01:39:51.680
<v Speaker 3>Comedy, I mean it comes to Trump's a comedian. So

2195
01:39:51.800 --> 01:39:53.359
<v Speaker 3>the stuff you're talking about there, you.

2196
01:39:53.359 --> 01:39:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Want a comedian to be president, A serious person who

2197
01:39:56.000 --> 01:39:58.520
<v Speaker 1>happens to be serious person. So you don't think you

2198
01:39:58.560 --> 01:40:05.680
<v Speaker 1>don't think Kama is a s Why do you say that? Again,

2199
01:40:05.720 --> 01:40:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think most politicians are serious people politicians in general.

2200
01:40:10.000 --> 01:40:11.840
<v Speaker 1>He's got a law degree, she's a good mother. She's

2201
01:40:11.840 --> 01:40:14.319
<v Speaker 1>got to see politicians as like, well, what's the old

2202
01:40:15.800 --> 01:40:15.920
<v Speaker 1>is that?

2203
01:40:16.520 --> 01:40:16.680
<v Speaker 4>You know?

2204
01:40:16.760 --> 01:40:19.119
<v Speaker 1>Politics is Hollywood for ugly? Okay, So you don't think

2205
01:40:19.199 --> 01:40:21.760
<v Speaker 1>you don't think women should be an elected office? What

2206
01:40:21.840 --> 01:40:23.640
<v Speaker 1>other jobs do you What other jobs do you do

2207
01:40:23.720 --> 01:40:27.199
<v Speaker 1>you think are not front lines? What if they pass

2208
01:40:27.239 --> 01:40:29.359
<v Speaker 1>a physical the same physical that a man passes, well,

2209
01:40:29.399 --> 01:40:31.640
<v Speaker 1>none of them have passed the Navy Seal physical. I'm

2210
01:40:31.640 --> 01:40:34.079
<v Speaker 1>not talking about Navy seals, just in general serving. You

2211
01:40:34.079 --> 01:40:36.039
<v Speaker 1>don't have to be just a pass. It would then

2212
01:40:36.079 --> 01:40:38.680
<v Speaker 1>suggest that they're physically different. I believe that if a

2213
01:40:38.760 --> 01:40:40.800
<v Speaker 1>woman is able to and by the way, there are

2214
01:40:40.840 --> 01:40:43.720
<v Speaker 1>some women that are that are able to pass the

2215
01:40:43.800 --> 01:40:46.640
<v Speaker 1>same physical standards that a man. Okay, so why would

2216
01:40:46.640 --> 01:40:49.760
<v Speaker 1>you have a problem with them because the exceptions don't

2217
01:40:49.880 --> 01:40:50.520
<v Speaker 1>make the norm?

2218
01:40:50.600 --> 01:40:52.359
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think that's kind of common sense that

2219
01:40:52.560 --> 01:40:54.520
<v Speaker 3>just because of our exceptions, we wouldn't want that to

2220
01:40:54.600 --> 01:40:55.079
<v Speaker 3>be the norm.

2221
01:40:55.319 --> 01:40:58.079
<v Speaker 1>Why not the norm be just passed this one generic

2222
01:40:58.359 --> 01:41:02.279
<v Speaker 1>uh test that all genders have to pass. Why wouldn't

2223
01:41:02.279 --> 01:41:03.800
<v Speaker 1>that be Why wouldn't that be a good norm?

2224
01:41:03.880 --> 01:41:06.399
<v Speaker 3>But the test and most women not passing that test

2225
01:41:06.439 --> 01:41:08.560
<v Speaker 3>would make my point that men and women are fitted

2226
01:41:08.600 --> 01:41:11.359
<v Speaker 3>and made different, they have different.

2227
01:41:11.119 --> 01:41:13.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a case by case basis as far as physical ability.

2228
01:41:13.800 --> 01:41:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I think you would again, I agree that you know

2229
01:41:15.960 --> 01:41:19.359
<v Speaker 1>there have been for example, frontline soldiers typically have not

2230
01:41:19.479 --> 01:41:21.479
<v Speaker 1>been women, and there's a reason for that. So you

2231
01:41:21.479 --> 01:41:24.319
<v Speaker 1>don't think women should be elected officials because they're quote

2232
01:41:24.399 --> 01:41:27.600
<v Speaker 1>unquote emotional, They're too emotional not be the norm. You

2233
01:41:27.680 --> 01:41:30.199
<v Speaker 1>don't that women even if they pass the basic physical

2234
01:41:30.279 --> 01:41:32.000
<v Speaker 1>that a man has to pass, they shouldn't be able

2235
01:41:32.000 --> 01:41:34.199
<v Speaker 1>to risk their license or the norm. I said, I

2236
01:41:34.319 --> 01:41:37.319
<v Speaker 1>know that you're not listening unless they the norm, But

2237
01:41:37.439 --> 01:41:41.600
<v Speaker 1>why can't the Norman will be one basic standard physical

2238
01:41:41.720 --> 01:41:43.000
<v Speaker 1>because that's not all that it is.

2239
01:41:43.119 --> 01:41:46.279
<v Speaker 3>There's also a push, there's a social engineering push to

2240
01:41:46.840 --> 01:41:50.000
<v Speaker 3>get for example, all women in America to go to

2241
01:41:50.079 --> 01:41:51.600
<v Speaker 3>college to become career women.

2242
01:41:51.840 --> 01:41:53.439
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a bad idea. I think women are

2243
01:41:53.520 --> 01:41:55.800
<v Speaker 1>made to be at home, So women are made to

2244
01:41:55.880 --> 01:41:57.319
<v Speaker 1>be at home. A lot of people would call that

2245
01:41:57.359 --> 01:42:00.359
<v Speaker 1>a massogynist statement. Women are made to be at home?

2246
01:42:00.439 --> 01:42:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Should women be allowed to vote? Again? I don't think voting.

2247
01:42:03.560 --> 01:42:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I think voting is dumb, so okay, but but what

2248
01:42:06.960 --> 01:42:08.359
<v Speaker 1>ought to be I didn't ask you what your opinion

2249
01:42:08.399 --> 01:42:10.000
<v Speaker 1>on voting was. I'm just saying right now we're we

2250
01:42:10.079 --> 01:42:12.520
<v Speaker 1>out of the do you think women should be allowed

2251
01:42:12.560 --> 01:42:17.319
<v Speaker 1>to vote? I don't think voting makes sense in general.

2252
01:42:17.560 --> 01:42:20.760
<v Speaker 1>So you don't like you don't like voting? I don't

2253
01:42:20.800 --> 01:42:21.119
<v Speaker 1>think women?

2254
01:42:22.600 --> 01:42:25.800
<v Speaker 3>Answer, Women shouldn't be involved in politics or geopolitics or

2255
01:42:25.840 --> 01:42:26.159
<v Speaker 3>any of that.

2256
01:42:26.680 --> 01:42:28.680
<v Speaker 1>What, they shouldn't be allowed to vote. So they're made

2257
01:42:28.720 --> 01:42:30.800
<v Speaker 1>for being at home. They're just made for being at home.

2258
01:42:31.319 --> 01:42:33.159
<v Speaker 1>So women shouldn't be out there in society in the

2259
01:42:33.239 --> 01:42:35.319
<v Speaker 1>office place. They shouldn't be able to have their own careers.

2260
01:42:35.520 --> 01:42:37.359
<v Speaker 1>They shouldn't be allowed to be teachers and dies. When

2261
01:42:37.640 --> 01:42:40.439
<v Speaker 1>when you make that attempt to make that a norm

2262
01:42:40.520 --> 01:42:46.159
<v Speaker 1>for society, it undoes society. So without getting personal here,

2263
01:42:46.319 --> 01:42:48.479
<v Speaker 1>and I don't mean to be personal, you're married. Well,

2264
01:42:48.640 --> 01:42:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trying to go there with you. That's why

2265
01:42:50.000 --> 01:42:53.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm asking you. First. You're a married man, right, so

2266
01:42:53.319 --> 01:42:56.000
<v Speaker 1>you tell your wife. If your wife wants to have

2267
01:42:56.119 --> 01:42:59.000
<v Speaker 1>a career, she wants a job. Maybe she wants to

2268
01:42:59.039 --> 01:43:00.560
<v Speaker 1>do what you do. She wants to be a podcast

2269
01:43:00.640 --> 01:43:02.039
<v Speaker 1>or you would tell her, no, your your job is

2270
01:43:02.079 --> 01:43:04.119
<v Speaker 1>to be We do that together, so we have a dynamic.

2271
01:43:04.239 --> 01:43:06.000
<v Speaker 1>If she said, that's great, I'm happy to hear that.

2272
01:43:06.079 --> 01:43:10.279
<v Speaker 1>But if your wife said to you, for example, you know, Jay,

2273
01:43:10.319 --> 01:43:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I've been thinking I really want to be a teacher

2274
01:43:12.079 --> 01:43:15.439
<v Speaker 1>or a doctor, you would tell her no, typically careerism, no,

2275
01:43:15.600 --> 01:43:17.279
<v Speaker 1>it is not good for one. So women shouldn't have

2276
01:43:17.319 --> 01:43:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the choice to.

2277
01:43:19.239 --> 01:43:21.520
<v Speaker 3>I also recognize that we live in a world that's

2278
01:43:21.600 --> 01:43:25.319
<v Speaker 3>not that's not that way, So people are forced into situation.

2279
01:43:25.439 --> 01:43:28.119
<v Speaker 3>So I don't blame them for what they were taught,

2280
01:43:28.199 --> 01:43:30.079
<v Speaker 3>what they were indoctrinate with growing up. But I don't

2281
01:43:30.119 --> 01:43:32.239
<v Speaker 3>think that that's the best way for women to live.

2282
01:43:32.359 --> 01:43:35.359
<v Speaker 1>No, but that's your opinion. Why not let that is

2283
01:43:35.439 --> 01:43:37.399
<v Speaker 1>not my opinion. Why shouldn't a woman be able to

2284
01:43:37.479 --> 01:43:39.920
<v Speaker 1>decide for herself what's good for you? Why should do

2285
01:43:40.399 --> 01:43:40.720
<v Speaker 1>for them?

2286
01:43:40.800 --> 01:43:43.439
<v Speaker 3>They can do that in this society, and I think,

2287
01:43:43.640 --> 01:43:46.159
<v Speaker 3>but if you observe the negative effects of doing that.

2288
01:43:46.560 --> 01:43:50.439
<v Speaker 3>My view is based on traditional Christian morals, so that's

2289
01:43:50.520 --> 01:43:51.439
<v Speaker 3>why that's the aught.

2290
01:43:51.760 --> 01:43:55.439
<v Speaker 1>So Christian morals say that women shouldn't be allowed to

2291
01:43:55.520 --> 01:43:58.600
<v Speaker 1>have careers. Generally, Jesus Christ would have said that women

2292
01:43:58.680 --> 01:44:01.640
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be allowed to have careers, right proverb thirty one? Okay,

2293
01:44:01.720 --> 01:44:05.840
<v Speaker 1>well again, I'm unaware of Jesus's teachings of saying that

2294
01:44:05.920 --> 01:44:08.159
<v Speaker 1>women shouldn't be allowed to live their life. Jesus what

2295
01:44:08.239 --> 01:44:09.560
<v Speaker 1>men tell? Did? St? Paul?

2296
01:44:09.600 --> 01:44:12.319
<v Speaker 3>And Paul says that women are made to be a

2297
01:44:12.560 --> 01:44:15.399
<v Speaker 3>subject to the husband and to have children and to

2298
01:44:15.520 --> 01:44:15.920
<v Speaker 3>be at home.

2299
01:44:15.960 --> 01:44:18.039
<v Speaker 1>So Jesus appointed politican, what if a woman doesn't want

2300
01:44:18.039 --> 01:44:20.760
<v Speaker 1>to have a child, they don't want to have a child. Yeah,

2301
01:44:20.760 --> 01:44:22.079
<v Speaker 1>if they don't want to be a mother and they

2302
01:44:22.119 --> 01:44:23.680
<v Speaker 1>just want to they want to be a career person.

2303
01:44:23.800 --> 01:44:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Is that wrong? I mean, again, you have the ability

2304
01:44:26.000 --> 01:44:28.680
<v Speaker 1>to do that. But again I'm saying that I don't

2305
01:44:28.720 --> 01:44:30.279
<v Speaker 1>think that. But in your world you don't think they

2306
01:44:30.319 --> 01:44:31.199
<v Speaker 1>should have that ability.

2307
01:44:32.359 --> 01:44:33.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, I don't have the I don't think that we

2308
01:44:33.640 --> 01:44:37.279
<v Speaker 3>have the ability to enforce some sort of like handmaiden's

2309
01:44:37.279 --> 01:44:38.319
<v Speaker 3>tales that you don't.

2310
01:44:38.359 --> 01:44:41.800
<v Speaker 1>But in your world you would want women. But I

2311
01:44:41.880 --> 01:44:44.399
<v Speaker 1>also believe not have careers. I believe in a degree

2312
01:44:44.399 --> 01:44:46.159
<v Speaker 1>of freedom in society. What about all the women that

2313
01:44:46.239 --> 01:44:51.680
<v Speaker 1>are teachers, professors, very successful doctors, surgeons, brain surgeons. What

2314
01:44:51.760 --> 01:44:53.600
<v Speaker 1>about all the women in this country? That is to

2315
01:44:53.640 --> 01:44:55.520
<v Speaker 1>do with what that's like saying that because people do

2316
01:44:55.680 --> 01:44:58.520
<v Speaker 1>things in the case that these women are not qualified

2317
01:44:58.520 --> 01:45:01.439
<v Speaker 1>because they're too emotional. I said that it shouldn't be

2318
01:45:01.439 --> 01:45:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the norm. It shouldn't be the norm. Right, So, for example, I.

2319
01:45:04.760 --> 01:45:09.600
<v Speaker 3>Know one woman who is extremely uh proficient in history,

2320
01:45:10.239 --> 01:45:13.319
<v Speaker 3>she knows geopolitics very well. She's an outlier. So it's

2321
01:45:13.359 --> 01:45:16.560
<v Speaker 3>not the norm for that domain for women to be

2322
01:45:16.680 --> 01:45:19.479
<v Speaker 3>in that. The fact that we have that in modernity

2323
01:45:19.800 --> 01:45:22.520
<v Speaker 3>and that it's common doesn't mean that it ought to

2324
01:45:22.600 --> 01:45:23.119
<v Speaker 3>be the case.

2325
01:45:25.199 --> 01:45:28.239
<v Speaker 1>This is why I don't live my life based on religion.

2326
01:45:28.560 --> 01:45:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't live but you live it based on subjective

2327
01:45:31.760 --> 01:45:34.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't live my life based on what something is

2328
01:45:34.319 --> 01:45:36.960
<v Speaker 1>said in a book. I'm not a Bible thumper, but

2329
01:45:37.039 --> 01:45:39.880
<v Speaker 1>it's just based on what Brian says. No, it's you're

2330
01:45:40.000 --> 01:45:42.399
<v Speaker 1>just based on what Jesus Christ says. Well, that's a

2331
01:45:42.439 --> 01:45:44.960
<v Speaker 1>better basis than just what Brian says. I would I would,

2332
01:45:45.000 --> 01:45:46.800
<v Speaker 1>first of all, I would respectfully disagree with you with

2333
01:45:47.079 --> 01:45:50.199
<v Speaker 1>Jesus that Jesus Christ doesn't wouldn't want any woman to

2334
01:45:50.279 --> 01:45:52.079
<v Speaker 1>have a career and be forced to stay home. I

2335
01:45:52.119 --> 01:45:54.000
<v Speaker 1>think that's a misogynistic opinion in my.

2336
01:45:54.279 --> 01:45:55.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean, and you've given it a place in

2337
01:45:55.880 --> 01:45:58.560
<v Speaker 3>the Bible. Jesus implies that that's I don't live my life.

2338
01:45:58.600 --> 01:46:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't live my life. But you said she wouldn't

2339
01:46:00.560 --> 01:46:03.039
<v Speaker 1>say that. I'd like to think Jesus say that. So,

2340
01:46:03.439 --> 01:46:07.960
<v Speaker 1>so you're telling me in the Bible, Jesus, so women

2341
01:46:08.000 --> 01:46:09.680
<v Speaker 1>should stay at home and they shouldn't. You made the.

2342
01:46:09.720 --> 01:46:12.479
<v Speaker 3>Argument that Jesus wouldn't say that. So I'm asking you where. Well,

2343
01:46:12.479 --> 01:46:14.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm asking you where does it asking me when you

2344
01:46:14.640 --> 01:46:18.600
<v Speaker 3>made the assertion, Well, tell me what's where? Where does

2345
01:46:18.640 --> 01:46:21.159
<v Speaker 3>it say in Jesus he says to Timothy that women

2346
01:46:21.239 --> 01:46:23.960
<v Speaker 3>should not be teachers and that they should not be

2347
01:46:24.479 --> 01:46:25.159
<v Speaker 3>outside of the home.

2348
01:46:25.199 --> 01:46:27.319
<v Speaker 1>They should be at home. Okay, So and if you

2349
01:46:27.359 --> 01:46:29.920
<v Speaker 1>would have to take a look at that. But you

2350
01:46:30.039 --> 01:46:32.359
<v Speaker 1>said Jesus wouldn't say that, And I'm saying, but he

2351
01:46:32.479 --> 01:46:35.680
<v Speaker 1>does say that. Well, I'll tell you what I think

2352
01:46:35.680 --> 01:46:37.720
<v Speaker 1>about the Bible, and I'll tell you what I think

2353
01:46:37.720 --> 01:46:42.079
<v Speaker 1>about religion in general. You can believe in the tooth fairy.

2354
01:46:42.680 --> 01:46:44.279
<v Speaker 1>You don't know if there's heaven and hell. You have

2355
01:46:44.359 --> 01:46:46.840
<v Speaker 1>no idea. If there's a god, you can believe it.

2356
01:46:47.039 --> 01:46:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's anything wrong with you believing it.

2357
01:46:48.840 --> 01:46:51.119
<v Speaker 1>I actually am not an atheist. I'd like to believe

2358
01:46:51.279 --> 01:46:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that there's something out there, a higher power, but we

2359
01:46:53.760 --> 01:46:55.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know. You know, you don't know if there's hell

2360
01:46:55.720 --> 01:46:58.039
<v Speaker 1>or life after death. You don't know any more than

2361
01:46:58.079 --> 01:46:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I know. And guess what, we won't know until we're dead.

2362
01:47:00.359 --> 01:47:02.279
<v Speaker 1>But what I don't like about religion is people that

2363
01:47:02.359 --> 01:47:04.600
<v Speaker 1>push their beliefs on other people. And I believe that's

2364
01:47:04.640 --> 01:47:06.960
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing. But you push your beliefs right now. No,

2365
01:47:07.319 --> 01:47:08.920
<v Speaker 1>I want women to do whatever the hell they want

2366
01:47:08.920 --> 01:47:11.399
<v Speaker 1>to do, but you're pushing that belief. Give me an example.

2367
01:47:11.479 --> 01:47:15.359
<v Speaker 1>Are you give me an example of me pushing a

2368
01:47:15.520 --> 01:47:18.239
<v Speaker 1>belief and forcing other people or treating it.

2369
01:47:20.159 --> 01:47:21.800
<v Speaker 3>It does not equate the forcing people to do it

2370
01:47:21.840 --> 01:47:23.520
<v Speaker 3>because you've been arguing your positions the whole time.

2371
01:47:23.560 --> 01:47:25.880
<v Speaker 1>My whole position is I want people to live their

2372
01:47:26.000 --> 01:47:27.720
<v Speaker 1>lives and I want people to do what they want.

2373
01:47:27.760 --> 01:47:30.039
<v Speaker 1>A position that you're pushing on people. I want people

2374
01:47:30.119 --> 01:47:32.359
<v Speaker 1>to have the freedoms to have a career regardless of

2375
01:47:32.399 --> 01:47:34.600
<v Speaker 1>what's between their legs. But I don't give a fuck

2376
01:47:34.640 --> 01:47:37.920
<v Speaker 1>what's in the Bible. But you say, oh, I have

2377
01:47:38.000 --> 01:47:39.880
<v Speaker 1>all these Muslim friends. They don't believe that. I'm going

2378
01:47:39.920 --> 01:47:41.880
<v Speaker 1>to ask Sean a question. Okay, so you're not going

2379
01:47:41.920 --> 01:47:43.640
<v Speaker 1>to answer this? No, no, no, this is important. This

2380
01:47:43.760 --> 01:47:46.119
<v Speaker 1>is important, Sean. I hate to bring you into this.

2381
01:47:47.279 --> 01:47:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Is it ridiculous for somebody to think? Do you disagree

2382
01:47:50.800 --> 01:47:54.039
<v Speaker 1>that what a man says that a woman should have

2383
01:47:54.159 --> 01:47:57.920
<v Speaker 1>replaced not having a career but should be at home?

2384
01:47:58.720 --> 01:48:02.239
<v Speaker 1>Is that a misogynistic you? Am I wrong? And I

2385
01:48:02.279 --> 01:48:03.880
<v Speaker 1>want to know what is I trust him. He is

2386
01:48:03.920 --> 01:48:06.119
<v Speaker 1>referencing a Bible verse, so I think he's approaching it

2387
01:48:06.199 --> 01:48:09.000
<v Speaker 1>from that point. But would you say that's massogynists? And

2388
01:48:09.039 --> 01:48:11.159
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people say that ethics are relative, So

2389
01:48:11.439 --> 01:48:14.359
<v Speaker 1>another wrong with racism, more misogyny. You're telling an entire

2390
01:48:14.520 --> 01:48:17.880
<v Speaker 1>group of people what to do, what you think they

2391
01:48:17.880 --> 01:48:19.680
<v Speaker 1>should do, like you've done this whole debate where you

2392
01:48:19.720 --> 01:48:22.000
<v Speaker 1>said that every white man in America must accept your

2393
01:48:22.079 --> 01:48:23.840
<v Speaker 1>form of liberals. I never said that, and I'm not

2394
01:48:23.880 --> 01:48:25.159
<v Speaker 1>a liberal and I never said that. When did I

2395
01:48:25.199 --> 01:48:28.520
<v Speaker 1>say you're a liberal you're a classical I'm a classical liberal. Okay,

2396
01:48:28.600 --> 01:48:31.159
<v Speaker 1>let's go with that. Uh. And we had this conversation before,

2397
01:48:31.399 --> 01:48:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and this is what happens when we have these conversations.

2398
01:48:33.760 --> 01:48:35.880
<v Speaker 3>But you've been arguing that the people in America should

2399
01:48:35.880 --> 01:48:37.800
<v Speaker 3>accept your positions, So you're doing the same thing.

2400
01:48:37.840 --> 01:48:40.920
<v Speaker 1>You're I'm not asking you to accept any of my positions.

2401
01:48:41.000 --> 01:48:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm just disagreeing. Debates are about trying to convince people

2402
01:48:45.600 --> 01:48:49.560
<v Speaker 1>in your position. Teople, I know that I will never

2403
01:48:49.720 --> 01:48:52.479
<v Speaker 1>convince somebody like you about anything. You are stuck in

2404
01:48:52.560 --> 01:48:54.680
<v Speaker 1>your views and your christianda, oh, fine, I'm bad, But

2405
01:48:54.920 --> 01:48:58.319
<v Speaker 1>what about I didn't say you were bad. I'm just

2406
01:48:58.359 --> 01:49:02.239
<v Speaker 1>saying whatever. Let me be very clear, when I wake

2407
01:49:02.319 --> 01:49:03.800
<v Speaker 1>up in the morning and I do my radio show,

2408
01:49:04.039 --> 01:49:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm never trying to convince anybody. What you're going to

2409
01:49:06.640 --> 01:49:09.680
<v Speaker 1>get is my beliefs and my opinions. I don't show

2410
01:49:09.760 --> 01:49:11.640
<v Speaker 1>up somewhere and say, boy, you know, I saw that

2411
01:49:11.800 --> 01:49:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Jay Dier guy, and he thinks all women should be

2412
01:49:13.800 --> 01:49:15.600
<v Speaker 1>in the kitchen. So I'm going to show up to

2413
01:49:15.680 --> 01:49:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that debate and I'm going to try to convince him

2414
01:49:17.600 --> 01:49:21.159
<v Speaker 1>that women should have their own careers. The audience. Okay,

2415
01:49:21.359 --> 01:49:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm never I'm never going to convince you because this

2416
01:49:24.920 --> 01:49:27.800
<v Speaker 1>is the way you believe the audience. Okay, well listen,

2417
01:49:28.239 --> 01:49:31.319
<v Speaker 1>anybody who's watching this, chances are if they're a fan

2418
01:49:31.399 --> 01:49:33.479
<v Speaker 1>of yours, they're going to agree with you. If they're

2419
01:49:33.479 --> 01:49:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a fan of mine, they're going to agree with me.

2420
01:49:35.239 --> 01:49:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not obsessed with audience. I'm not obsessed with changing

2421
01:49:38.000 --> 01:49:40.560
<v Speaker 1>people's minds because in most cases, I think a lot

2422
01:49:40.640 --> 01:49:43.079
<v Speaker 1>of people that are on the right, that are Trump supporters,

2423
01:49:43.159 --> 01:49:46.720
<v Speaker 1>it is impossible to convince them virtually about anything. Occasionally

2424
01:49:46.760 --> 01:49:48.159
<v Speaker 1>I get a caller who calls in and says, you

2425
01:49:48.199 --> 01:49:50.720
<v Speaker 1>know what, Brian, I made a mistake. I regret voting

2426
01:49:50.720 --> 01:49:53.279
<v Speaker 1>for Trump. It could be the Iran War, the Epstein falls, whatever.

2427
01:49:53.399 --> 01:49:56.119
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not trying jay to convince anybody. That's why

2428
01:49:56.199 --> 01:49:59.560
<v Speaker 1>we are fundamentally different. Well, on debate, I am trying

2429
01:49:59.560 --> 01:50:01.880
<v Speaker 1>to do that, well, debate to convince people. Okay, well

2430
01:50:01.880 --> 01:50:05.960
<v Speaker 1>you haven't done that. Okay, Well again, when you make

2431
01:50:06.000 --> 01:50:09.199
<v Speaker 1>a statement that you believe all women, in your opinion,

2432
01:50:09.680 --> 01:50:12.960
<v Speaker 1>should be in the kitchen, most people would them Okay,

2433
01:50:13.119 --> 01:50:15.920
<v Speaker 1>most people would define that as extremely misogynistic. And let

2434
01:50:16.000 --> 01:50:18.560
<v Speaker 1>me tell you something. I don't have a problem either,

2435
01:50:18.600 --> 01:50:21.439
<v Speaker 1>do I. But I can tell you that if a

2436
01:50:21.520 --> 01:50:25.880
<v Speaker 1>woman is capable and she's smart, then I have no

2437
01:50:25.960 --> 01:50:27.880
<v Speaker 1>problem with her being a politician. I think there are

2438
01:50:27.880 --> 01:50:29.920
<v Speaker 1>people in DC that are women that are very good

2439
01:50:29.960 --> 01:50:32.079
<v Speaker 1>at what they do. I have no problem with them.

2440
01:50:32.159 --> 01:50:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people like you didn't vote

2441
01:50:33.840 --> 01:50:36.479
<v Speaker 1>for Kamala because they're women, and I think that's wrong,

2442
01:50:36.640 --> 01:50:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's wrong, and I think it should

2443
01:50:38.640 --> 01:50:41.920
<v Speaker 1>be about your intelligence and your merit and what you've

2444
01:50:41.920 --> 01:50:44.560
<v Speaker 1>done in your life. And Hillary Clinton, listen, I didn't

2445
01:50:44.560 --> 01:50:46.800
<v Speaker 1>even vote for Hillary Clinton in twenty sixteen, but I'll

2446
01:50:46.800 --> 01:50:49.079
<v Speaker 1>be the first one to admit she was overqualified for

2447
01:50:49.159 --> 01:50:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the position based on what she's done in her life.

2448
01:50:51.920 --> 01:50:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump is a fucking reality TV show host. You

2449
01:50:54.880 --> 01:50:57.520
<v Speaker 1>voted for a reality TV show host guy with no

2450
01:50:58.520 --> 01:51:00.720
<v Speaker 1>experience on campaign policy. He was given a half a

2451
01:51:01.079 --> 01:51:03.840
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar company from his dad when he was like

2452
01:51:03.880 --> 01:51:06.039
<v Speaker 1>a teenager. This is a guy that was a TV

2453
01:51:06.199 --> 01:51:08.159
<v Speaker 1>reality star. So if you want to talk about people

2454
01:51:08.199 --> 01:51:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that are not qualified, I would say maybe we shouldn't

2455
01:51:10.000 --> 01:51:12.439
<v Speaker 1>put reality TV stars as the leader of the free

2456
01:51:12.479 --> 01:51:14.720
<v Speaker 1>world more than what's between their legs. Which it sounds

2457
01:51:14.760 --> 01:51:16.880
<v Speaker 1>like you're a little bit obsessed with I'm sorry it

2458
01:51:16.960 --> 01:51:18.600
<v Speaker 1>does sound that way. You would never vote for a woman,

2459
01:51:18.680 --> 01:51:21.039
<v Speaker 1>It's clear, right, you would never vote for a woman ever,

2460
01:51:21.319 --> 01:51:24.520
<v Speaker 1>right ever, because they're a woman. Mean, there could be

2461
01:51:24.600 --> 01:51:28.439
<v Speaker 1>some insinuating circumstances where there's a you know, lesser of

2462
01:51:28.479 --> 01:51:32.840
<v Speaker 1>two evils, okay, good, Like for example, if there was

2463
01:51:32.880 --> 01:51:35.319
<v Speaker 1>a woman running in a local election that I thought

2464
01:51:35.359 --> 01:51:39.159
<v Speaker 1>in my vote would have some effect on so you

2465
01:51:39.199 --> 01:51:40.399
<v Speaker 1>would be okay with the woman being.

2466
01:51:40.880 --> 01:51:43.079
<v Speaker 3>Brian, I said the whole time the norm, and you

2467
01:51:43.119 --> 01:51:45.840
<v Speaker 3>wanted to make it like expansive universal claims.

2468
01:51:45.880 --> 01:51:47.439
<v Speaker 1>It was just what well you made the case and

2469
01:51:47.520 --> 01:51:50.199
<v Speaker 1>we could rewind the tape that women are not shouldn't

2470
01:51:50.239 --> 01:51:54.199
<v Speaker 1>be programmed, women shouldn't be politicians. That's a generalization, but.

2471
01:51:54.239 --> 01:51:58.119
<v Speaker 3>A generalization can include exceptions, which I said, for example,

2472
01:51:58.199 --> 01:52:00.520
<v Speaker 3>because they're emotional. For example, the case of as a

2473
01:52:00.560 --> 01:52:05.039
<v Speaker 3>friend of mine, she's a PhD in history, feopolitics translates

2474
01:52:05.640 --> 01:52:08.840
<v Speaker 3>foreign languages. I mean, she's an outlier in terms of

2475
01:52:08.880 --> 01:52:12.039
<v Speaker 3>a domain that's typically male dominated. I think there's a

2476
01:52:12.119 --> 01:52:15.079
<v Speaker 3>reason why STEM courses and things like that are dominated

2477
01:52:15.119 --> 01:52:18.199
<v Speaker 3>by men. Geo politics because that's the domain that men

2478
01:52:18.239 --> 01:52:21.800
<v Speaker 3>are better fitted for. I think, in general, every human

2479
01:52:21.880 --> 01:52:25.800
<v Speaker 3>being is different. Some are more emotional than others. In general,

2480
01:52:26.119 --> 01:52:28.720
<v Speaker 3>doesn't matter what's between your legs and my opinion. Some

2481
01:52:28.880 --> 01:52:31.199
<v Speaker 3>people are smarter than others, Some people are more capable

2482
01:52:31.199 --> 01:52:33.239
<v Speaker 3>of some people are stronger than There's plenty of women

2483
01:52:33.279 --> 01:52:34.840
<v Speaker 3>that would kick my ass. And I said that to

2484
01:52:34.920 --> 01:52:38.560
<v Speaker 3>Myron Gaines, who was assas. Those are all exceptions, bro Okay,

2485
01:52:38.640 --> 01:52:40.720
<v Speaker 3>but you're making a generalization. You don't be any women

2486
01:52:40.760 --> 01:52:43.359
<v Speaker 3>should be politicians, but you're trying to make it they

2487
01:52:43.359 --> 01:52:45.000
<v Speaker 3>should be in the kitchen on the exceptions, and I'm

2488
01:52:45.000 --> 01:52:47.239
<v Speaker 3>doing the opposite. Okay, but they're Every single human being

2489
01:52:47.319 --> 01:52:49.359
<v Speaker 3>is different, and I don't speak for women, but some

2490
01:52:49.479 --> 01:52:52.399
<v Speaker 3>women choose They're still generalizations. But some women don't want

2491
01:52:52.439 --> 01:52:54.680
<v Speaker 3>to have kids, some women don't want to be moms.

2492
01:52:54.840 --> 01:52:56.079
<v Speaker 3>Some women put their career.

2493
01:52:56.239 --> 01:52:58.760
<v Speaker 1>None of those were relevant to what you asked me

2494
01:52:59.039 --> 01:53:03.359
<v Speaker 1>was the best fit generally speaking. I mean, listen, going

2495
01:53:03.439 --> 01:53:07.520
<v Speaker 1>back to my original statements earlier, I don't like government

2496
01:53:07.600 --> 01:53:11.399
<v Speaker 1>involvement in our lives. I don't. That's my biggest criticisms

2497
01:53:11.439 --> 01:53:14.199
<v Speaker 1>of religion is that too many people tell other people,

2498
01:53:14.359 --> 01:53:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm right and you're wrong. No, my religion is right

2499
01:53:17.079 --> 01:53:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and your religion is wrong. But don't you think in

2500
01:53:19.039 --> 01:53:22.159
<v Speaker 1>this debate you think you're right when it comes to

2501
01:53:22.239 --> 01:53:25.560
<v Speaker 1>what religion? I think anybody positions. Okay, well, well let's

2502
01:53:25.560 --> 01:53:27.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about religion. I'm just saying, like, you don't believe

2503
01:53:27.840 --> 01:53:29.760
<v Speaker 1>that about yourself. What do you mean?

2504
01:53:30.640 --> 01:53:32.840
<v Speaker 3>Don't you believe that all your positions are correct? You're

2505
01:53:32.840 --> 01:53:35.319
<v Speaker 3>doing the very thing that when it comes to I believe.

2506
01:53:35.399 --> 01:53:37.399
<v Speaker 3>Let me hear this way. I believe everybody is religious,

2507
01:53:37.479 --> 01:53:40.079
<v Speaker 3>even you. You have a religious commitment to your positions.

2508
01:53:40.119 --> 01:53:41.800
<v Speaker 3>You just don't believe that it's a god. You're basically

2509
01:53:41.920 --> 01:53:43.399
<v Speaker 3>just your own god. And you're saying that all my

2510
01:53:43.479 --> 01:53:45.640
<v Speaker 3>positions are what I say, and that's my opinion, and.

2511
01:53:45.680 --> 01:53:48.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm not forcing it down your throat. I'm not making law.

2512
01:53:48.319 --> 01:53:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I'm not trying to convince you. I'm telling

2513
01:53:51.680 --> 01:53:55.079
<v Speaker 1>you my opinions of how I feel. You're telling you're

2514
01:53:55.119 --> 01:53:57.239
<v Speaker 1>telling half the I'm not trying to convince anybody. You're

2515
01:53:57.279 --> 01:53:59.800
<v Speaker 1>telling No, I'm not so when you're coming to it,

2516
01:53:59.840 --> 01:54:01.640
<v Speaker 1>that you're coming to a debate and not to debate,

2517
01:54:01.760 --> 01:54:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay, I'm coming to a debate or discussion to

2518
01:54:04.760 --> 01:54:07.720
<v Speaker 1>tell you how I feel about different topics or just

2519
01:54:07.920 --> 01:54:09.640
<v Speaker 1>how do you feel about It's a very feminine. Okay,

2520
01:54:09.720 --> 01:54:11.960
<v Speaker 1>well that's fine, you can call me. I guess I

2521
01:54:12.000 --> 01:54:14.359
<v Speaker 1>guess Jay thinks I'm in the kitchen. Then I guess

2522
01:54:14.399 --> 01:54:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not Jay. I got bad news for I'm not

2523
01:54:15.720 --> 01:54:18.479
<v Speaker 1>cooking you dinner tonight. But you're not gonna make a

2524
01:54:18.520 --> 01:54:23.199
<v Speaker 1>sund Everybody. Everybody is different, every human being is different,

2525
01:54:23.239 --> 01:54:27.439
<v Speaker 1>everybody has different skills. Because you're making a generalization about

2526
01:54:27.479 --> 01:54:29.279
<v Speaker 1>women how they should all be in the kitchen, and

2527
01:54:29.319 --> 01:54:33.159
<v Speaker 1>I find that to be extremely misogynistic. Generalizations are not

2528
01:54:33.439 --> 01:54:35.760
<v Speaker 1>again on your wrong, it's on your basis women in

2529
01:54:35.800 --> 01:54:38.079
<v Speaker 1>your life, and I'm just making if you tell them

2530
01:54:38.199 --> 01:54:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you you all belong in the kitchen. What

2531
01:54:40.000 --> 01:54:42.680
<v Speaker 1>would they say to you if you said that? How

2532
01:54:42.800 --> 01:54:47.000
<v Speaker 1>is that relevant too? Because because I'm curious, this is

2533
01:54:47.000 --> 01:54:49.079
<v Speaker 1>an emotional appeal again, Okay, but but I want to

2534
01:54:49.159 --> 01:54:52.880
<v Speaker 1>know the people in your life, your mom or sister, whoever,

2535
01:54:53.279 --> 01:54:56.039
<v Speaker 1>when you say, hey, you guys shouldn't be mom. My

2536
01:54:56.119 --> 01:54:58.840
<v Speaker 1>mom was an outlier. Actually she was a very qualified

2537
01:54:59.279 --> 01:55:02.760
<v Speaker 1>editor assigned journals. I think that's great. I think that's great.

2538
01:55:02.960 --> 01:55:05.279
<v Speaker 1>So why can't other people like your mom? Well, I'm

2539
01:55:05.279 --> 01:55:08.760
<v Speaker 1>sure in this society they can, but that doesn't mean

2540
01:55:08.880 --> 01:55:11.479
<v Speaker 1>that it's the best for society. So the question was

2541
01:55:11.520 --> 01:55:14.520
<v Speaker 1>what's the best for society, not can they actually physically

2542
01:55:14.600 --> 01:55:16.479
<v Speaker 1>do it? So that's two different You think it's best

2543
01:55:16.520 --> 01:55:19.039
<v Speaker 1>for society to get all the brain surgeons and the

2544
01:55:19.159 --> 01:55:21.840
<v Speaker 1>teachers and the politicians and every woman, say oh, I

2545
01:55:21.920 --> 01:55:23.000
<v Speaker 1>said generalizations.

2546
01:55:23.119 --> 01:55:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Typically, it's not the best for society for women to

2547
01:55:25.720 --> 01:55:29.239
<v Speaker 3>have what are classically male oriented positions and jobs.

2548
01:55:29.239 --> 01:55:31.199
<v Speaker 1>Wouldn't that be a case by case basis based on

2549
01:55:31.279 --> 01:55:36.159
<v Speaker 1>the person. No, if you're asking me about what's generally

2550
01:55:36.239 --> 01:55:39.800
<v Speaker 1>better for society, what about the individual? Does that matter too?

2551
01:55:40.119 --> 01:55:42.319
<v Speaker 1>What's best for the individual? Well?

2552
01:55:42.359 --> 01:55:44.640
<v Speaker 3>I have a Christian ethic and belief so I think

2553
01:55:44.720 --> 01:55:46.520
<v Speaker 3>that that's the best for society and for individuals.

2554
01:55:46.520 --> 01:55:48.359
<v Speaker 1>So I would assume you think that gay people are

2555
01:55:48.399 --> 01:55:52.359
<v Speaker 1>all sinners, you're against gay marriage because of your religion.

2556
01:55:52.439 --> 01:55:55.079
<v Speaker 1>I believe that those are actions, not a state of

2557
01:55:55.159 --> 01:55:57.359
<v Speaker 1>being or an identity. So you think everybody chooses to

2558
01:55:57.439 --> 01:56:01.239
<v Speaker 1>be gay? You think Richard Simmons was born because I

2559
01:56:01.239 --> 01:56:04.479
<v Speaker 1>think that's ridiculous. Are you saying he was gay? So

2560
01:56:04.920 --> 01:56:07.279
<v Speaker 1>there are many people when they're four or five, when

2561
01:56:07.319 --> 01:56:10.119
<v Speaker 1>they're four or five years I actually had a conversation.

2562
01:56:10.840 --> 01:56:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I actually had a conversation with George Santos about this

2563
01:56:13.039 --> 01:56:15.039
<v Speaker 1>the other day. We're actually friends, believe it or not,

2564
01:56:15.600 --> 01:56:17.079
<v Speaker 1>and George told me he knew he was gay and

2565
01:56:17.159 --> 01:56:19.720
<v Speaker 1>he was like four or five years old, and it's

2566
01:56:19.760 --> 01:56:21.520
<v Speaker 1>not a choice. And I think a lot of people

2567
01:56:21.560 --> 01:56:24.159
<v Speaker 1>who are because I talk to these people and they

2568
01:56:24.239 --> 01:56:27.560
<v Speaker 1>tell me, and they're honestly, that's still that's not how

2569
01:56:27.640 --> 01:56:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you would know that. So Richard Simmons was born straight.

2570
01:56:30.279 --> 01:56:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying that, I'm saying that what you answered

2571
01:56:33.800 --> 01:56:36.640
<v Speaker 1>with would not prove the way that you know. Do

2572
01:56:36.760 --> 01:56:37.960
<v Speaker 1>you think being gay is a choice?

2573
01:56:38.960 --> 01:56:43.520
<v Speaker 3>Yes, there can be a society apigenetics, So you think sometimes,

2574
01:56:43.560 --> 01:56:45.680
<v Speaker 3>let me finish, there can be an epigenetic or a

2575
01:56:45.760 --> 01:56:49.640
<v Speaker 3>societal factors that can influence people's proclivity. Sure, but I

2576
01:56:49.720 --> 01:56:52.399
<v Speaker 3>think there's still a degree of human volition, and so

2577
01:56:52.479 --> 01:56:54.159
<v Speaker 3>let's go with that logic for a second. You think

2578
01:56:54.359 --> 01:56:57.199
<v Speaker 3>men in society who are once straight wake up one

2579
01:56:57.279 --> 01:56:58.960
<v Speaker 3>day and say, hey, I think I like penis now

2580
01:56:59.520 --> 01:57:00.560
<v Speaker 3>that's the way you think it works.

2581
01:57:00.600 --> 01:57:02.479
<v Speaker 1>You think it's a choice like that. That's probably, in

2582
01:57:02.560 --> 01:57:06.840
<v Speaker 1>most cases a continual progression of moving in a certain direction.

2583
01:57:06.920 --> 01:57:11.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it happens overnight. Again, I'm gonna strong men. Well,

2584
01:57:11.840 --> 01:57:14.520
<v Speaker 1>here's another one for you. I believe that sometimes in

2585
01:57:14.680 --> 01:57:18.119
<v Speaker 1>society people hide behind their religion to hide their bigotry.

2586
01:57:18.479 --> 01:57:21.279
<v Speaker 1>And when people judge somebody based on sexuality or in

2587
01:57:21.319 --> 01:57:23.720
<v Speaker 1>this case, what's between their legs, I believe it's a

2588
01:57:23.840 --> 01:57:25.640
<v Speaker 1>form of bigotry. And you say, well, this is what

2589
01:57:25.760 --> 01:57:27.960
<v Speaker 1>my religion tells me. No, No, this is who you are.

2590
01:57:28.239 --> 01:57:30.760
<v Speaker 1>You decide to think that way. You decide to think

2591
01:57:30.800 --> 01:57:33.239
<v Speaker 1>that if somebody is different than you, I assume you're straight.

2592
01:57:33.479 --> 01:57:35.680
<v Speaker 1>If somebody is different, If somebody is different.

2593
01:57:36.199 --> 01:57:39.479
<v Speaker 3>People don't What do you mean? I mean if I

2594
01:57:39.640 --> 01:57:42.600
<v Speaker 3>just told you they're agnostic. Couldn't everything be conditioned? Then

2595
01:57:42.760 --> 01:57:45.239
<v Speaker 3>there are people who are good conditioned to believe? There

2596
01:57:45.279 --> 01:57:47.239
<v Speaker 3>are people who are Could I be conditioned to my religion?

2597
01:57:47.840 --> 01:57:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Could you be? I don't. I don't know. I have

2598
01:57:50.079 --> 01:57:51.880
<v Speaker 1>no idea. So why would I be held guilty or

2599
01:57:51.920 --> 01:57:56.399
<v Speaker 1>accountable on your Because when I talk to people about holmosexuality,

2600
01:57:56.439 --> 01:57:58.239
<v Speaker 1>you don't even understand the argument I make. And if

2601
01:57:58.239 --> 01:58:01.640
<v Speaker 1>it's people, and if my religion is genetic, then why

2602
01:58:01.640 --> 01:58:03.720
<v Speaker 1>am I guilty and gays aren't? And you think religion

2603
01:58:03.800 --> 01:58:07.039
<v Speaker 1>is genetic, I'm saying, if that's the case in your view,

2604
01:58:07.399 --> 01:58:10.840
<v Speaker 1>religion is genetic, religion is not understand that word I do.

2605
01:58:11.199 --> 01:58:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Religion is a choice. Why can't I be conditioned to

2606
01:58:13.800 --> 01:58:16.920
<v Speaker 1>my religion? Because sexuality is different than religion? You see

2607
01:58:16.960 --> 01:58:19.199
<v Speaker 1>for example, why can't I be conditioned? You're an atheist, right,

2608
01:58:20.000 --> 01:58:22.319
<v Speaker 1>You're an agnostic? Right? I believe that there's a higher poety. Okay,

2609
01:58:22.600 --> 01:58:24.119
<v Speaker 1>but it goes back to what I said.

2610
01:58:24.680 --> 01:58:27.479
<v Speaker 3>But if I'm raised in religion from my earliest days,

2611
01:58:27.600 --> 01:58:30.439
<v Speaker 3>being taught about same, baptized as an infant, let's sam,

2612
01:58:30.520 --> 01:58:33.960
<v Speaker 3>brought up in Sunday school from the age four, whatever,

2613
01:58:34.399 --> 01:58:36.479
<v Speaker 3>why would I not be conditioned in the same way.

2614
01:58:37.439 --> 01:58:39.920
<v Speaker 1>First of all, I believe that's wrong my worldview on that.

2615
01:58:40.439 --> 01:58:43.680
<v Speaker 1>That's not the question. Here's why. Here's why, because I

2616
01:58:43.720 --> 01:58:46.399
<v Speaker 1>think most people who are gay would tell you. And

2617
01:58:46.520 --> 01:58:48.239
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I am a straight man. I don't

2618
01:58:48.239 --> 01:58:50.640
<v Speaker 1>speak for gay people, but I think most people would

2619
01:58:50.640 --> 01:58:53.800
<v Speaker 1>tell you. It's a little bit different the fact. Hold on,

2620
01:58:53.960 --> 01:58:57.119
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit different to switch a religion or say,

2621
01:58:57.159 --> 01:59:00.359
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I know people in my life one

2622
01:59:00.399 --> 01:59:03.079
<v Speaker 1>woman who is a pastor, she's now an OnlyFans model.

2623
01:59:03.239 --> 01:59:05.319
<v Speaker 1>She's a great person. Of this is answering all question.

2624
01:59:05.479 --> 01:59:08.479
<v Speaker 1>She made a choice to get out of that lifestyle

2625
01:59:08.479 --> 01:59:11.279
<v Speaker 1>and that religion and go live her life. Okay, most

2626
01:59:11.319 --> 01:59:13.880
<v Speaker 1>people who are gay would tell you it's not just

2627
01:59:13.960 --> 01:59:17.199
<v Speaker 1>a snap of the finger. If you're born I believe

2628
01:59:17.359 --> 01:59:21.279
<v Speaker 1>gay and you want to turn straight. So those choices

2629
01:59:21.680 --> 01:59:25.079
<v Speaker 1>are conditioned and they're not actual free will choices. Do

2630
01:59:25.159 --> 01:59:27.560
<v Speaker 1>You're not believe in biology? You're not even letting me

2631
01:59:27.560 --> 01:59:29.880
<v Speaker 1>finish it, because this is a killer for your argument

2632
01:59:30.159 --> 01:59:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and I never even noticed, as it's literally in this debate.

2633
01:59:32.840 --> 01:59:35.520
<v Speaker 1>So you can be conditioned to believe or to have

2634
01:59:35.680 --> 01:59:38.399
<v Speaker 1>those proclivities. But even though I go through the exact

2635
01:59:38.399 --> 01:59:41.680
<v Speaker 1>same situation, I'm guilty for the choice that I made

2636
01:59:41.720 --> 01:59:44.279
<v Speaker 1>for the religion, which is identical to the conditioning according

2637
01:59:44.319 --> 01:59:47.680
<v Speaker 1>to you, No, well, I why is one of them

2638
01:59:47.720 --> 01:59:49.000
<v Speaker 1>free will and the other one on I'm going to

2639
01:59:49.039 --> 01:59:51.439
<v Speaker 1>be very clear again, here's where I think you're guilty of.

2640
01:59:51.680 --> 01:59:55.720
<v Speaker 1>And this goes for any religion in anybody. When you judge,

2641
01:59:55.920 --> 01:59:59.239
<v Speaker 1>somebody's wrong with judgment. I think it's wrong to judge. Well,

2642
01:59:59.279 --> 02:00:01.880
<v Speaker 1>that's great, but you're are relevant. Okay, So when you

2643
02:00:02.079 --> 02:00:05.399
<v Speaker 1>judge an entire group of people because they are different

2644
02:00:05.439 --> 02:00:07.359
<v Speaker 1>than you because of what the way they look or

2645
02:00:07.399 --> 02:00:11.279
<v Speaker 1>their sexuality, that is what bigotry is. What's wrong with

2646
02:00:11.359 --> 02:00:13.279
<v Speaker 1>being a biggot? Oh, I think that makes you an

2647
02:00:13.279 --> 02:00:15.199
<v Speaker 1>asshole if you're thinking, well, but I mean, those are

2648
02:00:15.279 --> 02:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>just your own prosper Well, you're right, biggots are great people. Argument.

2649
02:00:19.159 --> 02:00:22.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying, No, you're right, biggots are wonderful people.

2650
02:00:22.600 --> 02:00:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I shouldn't judge. Biggest why philosophy is good because if

2651
02:00:26.000 --> 02:00:28.960
<v Speaker 1>you learn philosophy, this is why religion is bad. Because

2652
02:00:29.000 --> 02:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>he's trying to defend religion. Never made a religious argument.

2653
02:00:31.560 --> 02:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>All I said was that when you judge, why is

2654
02:00:33.680 --> 02:00:36.079
<v Speaker 1>it so hard for you admit my judgments are my

2655
02:00:36.199 --> 02:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>conditioning that I'm not morally accountable on your world view?

2656
02:00:38.800 --> 02:00:41.439
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't the Bible say not to judge if but if

2657
02:00:41.479 --> 02:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>your worldview is correct? Does the Bible say your world

2658
02:00:44.000 --> 02:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>view is correct? My choices are my conditioning, so I'm

2659
02:00:47.000 --> 02:00:49.479
<v Speaker 1>not liable or accountable. Does the Bible say not to judge?

2660
02:00:50.279 --> 02:00:52.359
<v Speaker 1>It says judge with righteous judge Yeah exactly, So you

2661
02:00:52.399 --> 02:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>think this is righteous taking all groups of people because

2662
02:00:54.960 --> 02:00:59.279
<v Speaker 1>I have a consistent basis to judge actions, not the people.

2663
02:00:59.520 --> 02:01:02.359
<v Speaker 1>I believe you. I believe God can judge people. I

2664
02:01:02.439 --> 02:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know what God, whatever, God, you would How would

2665
02:01:05.600 --> 02:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you know? Then? How would you know he judges people? Okay,

2666
02:01:08.000 --> 02:01:10.680
<v Speaker 1>well it's a saying okay, but I will tell you

2667
02:01:11.199 --> 02:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know if God exists. I don't know,

2668
02:01:12.960 --> 02:01:15.079
<v Speaker 1>and you need to judges to you? How do you

2669
02:01:15.159 --> 02:01:17.479
<v Speaker 1>know this audio? I made a statement, as you would say,

2670
02:01:17.600 --> 02:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>a joke. How do you know that nobody knows that

2671
02:01:19.840 --> 02:01:21.279
<v Speaker 1>God exists? How do you know that we don't know

2672
02:01:21.359 --> 02:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>for sure? Nobody knows? Now it's a universal claim. How

2673
02:01:23.880 --> 02:01:25.399
<v Speaker 1>do you know that no one knows? Who's your evidence

2674
02:01:25.439 --> 02:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>that God exists? How do you know that No, I

2675
02:01:26.760 --> 02:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't make a universal claim? You did. How do you

2676
02:01:28.880 --> 02:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>know that no one knows? There is no direct evidence

2677
02:01:30.720 --> 02:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>that there is a God. But how do you know

2678
02:01:32.039 --> 02:01:33.760
<v Speaker 1>that no one? No one's presented it. So do you

2679
02:01:33.800 --> 02:01:35.880
<v Speaker 1>know what a universal claim is? Yes, nobody's presented it.

2680
02:01:36.000 --> 02:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>What's a universal claim? Universal claim is what I just said,

2681
02:01:38.680 --> 02:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>which is what nobody has direct evidence that God is?

2682
02:01:41.520 --> 02:01:44.720
<v Speaker 3>And what about all states, all people at all times

2683
02:01:44.960 --> 02:01:47.920
<v Speaker 3>a universal claim? Sure, do you have access to universal

2684
02:01:47.960 --> 02:01:48.680
<v Speaker 3>states of affairs?

2685
02:01:48.760 --> 02:01:51.159
<v Speaker 1>If you disagree with me, then tell me your evidence.

2686
02:01:51.239 --> 02:01:54.199
<v Speaker 1>Do not have access to university affairs? Give me your

2687
02:01:54.239 --> 02:01:55.279
<v Speaker 1>evidence that God exists?

2688
02:01:55.319 --> 02:01:55.479
<v Speaker 2>Do you?

2689
02:01:56.000 --> 02:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>You could make me so philosophical question or word games?

2690
02:02:00.600 --> 02:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Even though you admitted that the non contradictions God exists,

2691
02:02:03.279 --> 02:02:05.399
<v Speaker 1>your Christianity has got God exists? Right of course, where's

2692
02:02:05.399 --> 02:02:08.159
<v Speaker 1>your evidence that the transit argument? Oh? I see, okay,

2693
02:02:08.279 --> 02:02:12.439
<v Speaker 1>so so that's direct evidence. Uh yeah, it's a logical argument.

2694
02:02:12.680 --> 02:02:15.039
<v Speaker 1>And hell and heaven exists, right, yes, yeah, where's your

2695
02:02:15.079 --> 02:02:17.640
<v Speaker 1>evidence of that? Because it's part of the worldview? Got you?

2696
02:02:17.800 --> 02:02:20.359
<v Speaker 1>So your worldview? You know for sure? And if I

2697
02:02:20.439 --> 02:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>have the high okay, you can have the highest degree,

2698
02:02:23.920 --> 02:02:26.960
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't make it true. But we don't know if

2699
02:02:27.000 --> 02:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>heaven or Hell exists. But you don't know. But you

2700
02:02:30.039 --> 02:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>for you to make that you I think is insane.

2701
02:02:31.920 --> 02:02:35.960
<v Speaker 1>But you made the claim that you have universal knowledge

2702
02:02:36.039 --> 02:02:38.079
<v Speaker 1>that no one knows that and you can't know that

2703
02:02:38.279 --> 02:02:40.520
<v Speaker 1>either on your own position so you're going out on

2704
02:02:40.600 --> 02:02:42.199
<v Speaker 1>the bounds of what you can e do on your world.

2705
02:02:42.319 --> 02:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>There is no more evidence that God exists. Keep saying that,

2706
02:02:46.319 --> 02:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>but sorry, you don't have the evidence. No, but I

2707
02:02:49.079 --> 02:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't make the claim that no one knows you did

2708
02:02:51.159 --> 02:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>your entirely religion. Did you say no one knows your

2709
02:02:54.880 --> 02:02:56.960
<v Speaker 1>entire life is based in region? I think it's a

2710
02:02:57.000 --> 02:02:59.439
<v Speaker 1>fairy tale. Correctly, that's great, but you haven't given an

2711
02:02:59.520 --> 02:03:01.960
<v Speaker 1>argument for they have actually the fairy chill that you

2712
02:03:02.000 --> 02:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>believe in, like free will I have? Actually you have?

2713
02:03:04.239 --> 02:03:08.079
<v Speaker 1>How do you have the freedom to believe in what

2714
02:03:08.239 --> 02:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you want to believe in. I'm not denying, but if

2715
02:03:10.640 --> 02:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I go with Sam Harris or Daniel Dinnitt, maybe I'm

2716
02:03:12.920 --> 02:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>just conditioned to think I have free will and all

2717
02:03:14.600 --> 02:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>choices are determinists. Again, you have how do you know

2718
02:03:17.680 --> 02:03:19.920
<v Speaker 1>that free will exists? Okay, what do you mean you have?

2719
02:03:20.079 --> 02:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>How do you know that exists? Right? Because you believe

2720
02:03:22.039 --> 02:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>it metaphysical things that you can't justify you want me

2721
02:03:24.840 --> 02:03:27.439
<v Speaker 1>to justify. Listen, there's a there's the problem with saying

2722
02:03:27.520 --> 02:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to a theist that you have to justify it. You

2723
02:03:30.079 --> 02:03:34.159
<v Speaker 1>believe in logic, universals, things that you can't justify, like

2724
02:03:34.279 --> 02:03:36.399
<v Speaker 1>free will. So, Jay, so you don't you're not going

2725
02:03:36.439 --> 02:03:38.199
<v Speaker 1>to answer that. I'm going to answer, do you believe

2726
02:03:38.199 --> 02:03:39.479
<v Speaker 1>in free will? I'm going to answer it the way

2727
02:03:39.520 --> 02:03:43.399
<v Speaker 1>I want to Okay, Okay, you have the freedom well

2728
02:03:43.479 --> 02:03:47.439
<v Speaker 1>in your estimation, in anybody's that's it works. Okay, Well,

2729
02:03:47.439 --> 02:03:49.359
<v Speaker 1>if you want to use fallacies, you can understand. I

2730
02:03:49.479 --> 02:03:51.439
<v Speaker 1>understand how a debate. A debate works, j Just because

2731
02:03:51.479 --> 02:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you've been doing it for twenty five years doesn't mean

2732
02:03:53.039 --> 02:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>you have to be condescened. What's free will? I understand

2733
02:03:55.000 --> 02:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>that there's a lot of people on the left that

2734
02:03:56.640 --> 02:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>are very nice to you when you debate them, and

2735
02:03:58.840 --> 02:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>you're very condescending. That doesn't work with me, So you

2736
02:04:00.880 --> 02:04:03.159
<v Speaker 1>don't have to do that. I've been very respectful to

2737
02:04:03.199 --> 02:04:06.279
<v Speaker 1>you considering the circumstance. I'm just all and I'm asking

2738
02:04:06.319 --> 02:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>you to let me answer in the way I want

2739
02:04:07.960 --> 02:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>to answer it respectfully. You have the free will, I'll

2740
02:04:13.079 --> 02:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>use your terminology to believe in what you want to

2741
02:04:15.800 --> 02:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>believe in. You have the free will to believe in

2742
02:04:19.600 --> 02:04:24.479
<v Speaker 1>your God, your religion. I usually don't get along very

2743
02:04:24.560 --> 02:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>well with extremely religious people. I have almost nothing in

2744
02:04:28.680 --> 02:04:30.399
<v Speaker 1>common with some of these people. I think it's a

2745
02:04:30.479 --> 02:04:35.039
<v Speaker 1>mental illness. That's my opinion. Now, if you form and

2746
02:04:35.159 --> 02:04:37.600
<v Speaker 1>live your life based on your religion, you have the

2747
02:04:37.800 --> 02:04:42.039
<v Speaker 1>right to do that. But nobody knows if there's heaven

2748
02:04:42.159 --> 02:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>or hell. You don't know that. You don't know. You're

2749
02:04:45.600 --> 02:04:47.359
<v Speaker 1>making the case that there's a heaven or hell. I'm

2750
02:04:47.399 --> 02:04:49.960
<v Speaker 1>not making that case. What I'm saying, Jesus there might

2751
02:04:50.039 --> 02:04:54.399
<v Speaker 1>be Jay, I'm saying that there might be heaven or hell.

2752
02:04:54.920 --> 02:04:57.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. That's no no, no. You said no

2753
02:04:57.399 --> 02:05:00.319
<v Speaker 1>one knows. Those are tis. I don't know. That's the

2754
02:05:00.359 --> 02:05:02.319
<v Speaker 1>way I answer. You said, no one knows, and now

2755
02:05:02.359 --> 02:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you're saying I don't know. Those are two different Nobody knows,

2756
02:05:05.439 --> 02:05:10.279
<v Speaker 1>nobody knows. There might be heaven in Hell?

2757
02:05:11.279 --> 02:05:11.439
<v Speaker 4>Is it?

2758
02:05:11.760 --> 02:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't neither know. You is it I

2759
02:05:13.920 --> 02:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know? Or nobody knows. Nobody knows. Nobody can provide

2760
02:05:17.560 --> 02:05:20.119
<v Speaker 1>me direct evidence that heaven or hell exists. Nobody can.

2761
02:05:20.199 --> 02:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>In philosophy, those are two different claims. So which one

2762
02:05:22.640 --> 02:05:26.079
<v Speaker 1>is it? Nobody on the planet that's a human being,

2763
02:05:26.479 --> 02:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>how do you know that? Nobody? Nobody's presented direct evidence.

2764
02:05:29.920 --> 02:05:31.199
<v Speaker 1>That's what that doesn't. That does.

2765
02:05:31.359 --> 02:05:33.000
<v Speaker 3>That's not a proof that no one knows. That just

2766
02:05:33.039 --> 02:05:36.239
<v Speaker 3>means that in your limited experience empirically, you've never verified that.

2767
02:05:36.520 --> 02:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>So you don't actually know. No one if you know

2768
02:05:38.800 --> 02:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>for sure that, So you're assertain things that you don't know.

2769
02:05:41.079 --> 02:05:44.279
<v Speaker 1>Somebody would have to present clear and present evidence. But

2770
02:05:44.399 --> 02:05:46.399
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they have exists. But the fact that

2771
02:05:46.520 --> 02:05:48.600
<v Speaker 1>they haven't done it yet doesn't mean that you know

2772
02:05:48.880 --> 02:05:51.319
<v Speaker 1>that no one knows. Then nobody has provided evidence, which

2773
02:05:51.399 --> 02:05:54.279
<v Speaker 1>means nobody. So your argument is a bad argument because

2774
02:05:54.279 --> 02:05:58.199
<v Speaker 1>you can't help me, help me understand them. You believe

2775
02:05:58.239 --> 02:06:01.079
<v Speaker 1>that heaven and Hell exists. When you provide me I'm

2776
02:06:01.119 --> 02:06:03.720
<v Speaker 1>waiting for you to give a good argumenty. I just didn't,

2777
02:06:03.760 --> 02:06:06.319
<v Speaker 1>So I'm asking for right now, Jay, prove me wrong

2778
02:06:06.399 --> 02:06:08.880
<v Speaker 1>right now. You're a Christian. You believe that heaven and

2779
02:06:08.920 --> 02:06:12.319
<v Speaker 1>Hell exists. Give me direct evidence right now in your

2780
02:06:12.439 --> 02:06:14.479
<v Speaker 1>belief that heaven and Hell exists.

2781
02:06:14.520 --> 02:06:17.920
<v Speaker 3>Please, the argument is the impossibility of the contrary. Your

2782
02:06:18.000 --> 02:06:21.119
<v Speaker 3>worldview doesn't make sense of knowledge. That question wasn't about worldviewing.

2783
02:06:21.479 --> 02:06:24.000
<v Speaker 3>Hold on, Jay, the argument is a world of the argument.

2784
02:06:24.479 --> 02:06:28.079
<v Speaker 3>My question was argument is a world argument. My question

2785
02:06:28.279 --> 02:06:30.399
<v Speaker 3>wasn't about world views. I'll ask it again.

2786
02:06:30.560 --> 02:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>My argument is a worldview argument. So when you ask

2787
02:06:33.960 --> 02:06:37.720
<v Speaker 1>me the questions from religion based on religion, so based

2788
02:06:37.760 --> 02:06:41.319
<v Speaker 1>on your worldview, is that logic is based on religion. Okay,

2789
02:06:41.439 --> 02:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>so give me that logic. What is your evidence that

2790
02:06:43.720 --> 02:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>would lead you to believe from your world is a

2791
02:06:46.079 --> 02:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>logical argument called the transcendental argument. That is the argument. Okay,

2792
02:06:49.760 --> 02:06:51.840
<v Speaker 1>it's just a belief. I believe in the t's a

2793
02:06:51.920 --> 02:06:55.079
<v Speaker 1>logical My worldview tells me the tooth very exists, But

2794
02:06:55.159 --> 02:06:57.319
<v Speaker 1>you don't have a basis word my religion tell my

2795
02:06:57.439 --> 02:07:00.680
<v Speaker 1>religion tells my religion tells me that when I lose

2796
02:07:00.720 --> 02:07:03.239
<v Speaker 1>a tooth, I'm going to get a hundred. If you

2797
02:07:03.319 --> 02:07:05.119
<v Speaker 1>if you took a philosophy class, you would learn that

2798
02:07:05.279 --> 02:07:07.720
<v Speaker 1>free will is a metaphysical position that a lot of

2799
02:07:07.760 --> 02:07:10.359
<v Speaker 1>philosophers an atheists. I'm not saying an atheists, but people

2800
02:07:10.520 --> 02:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>like Daniel Dinnet or Sam Harris, they don't believe in

2801
02:07:13.760 --> 02:07:16.319
<v Speaker 1>free will. So I'm just trying to say that you're

2802
02:07:16.359 --> 02:07:19.319
<v Speaker 1>asserting things like free will that you don't have a

2803
02:07:19.359 --> 02:07:22.119
<v Speaker 1>basis for us. So hold on, be thirty seconds here.

2804
02:07:22.840 --> 02:07:25.399
<v Speaker 1>You are making the case, in your opinion, based on

2805
02:07:25.439 --> 02:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>your lie, I did not opinion hold on worldview that

2806
02:07:28.800 --> 02:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>heaven and Hell exists. My opinion is I don't know.

2807
02:07:32.520 --> 02:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>But that's not what you said. Ok You said no

2808
02:07:35.119 --> 02:07:37.279
<v Speaker 1>one knows, which is not an opinion that's a universal No,

2809
02:07:37.439 --> 02:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I knows for sure whether that's a universal client. Okay,

2810
02:07:39.640 --> 02:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>So tell me where you're getting this from your worldview.

2811
02:07:42.960 --> 02:07:45.119
<v Speaker 1>Give me some evidence that heaven and Hell exists. The

2812
02:07:45.319 --> 02:07:50.159
<v Speaker 1>evidence is the logical argument called the transcendental argument, which

2813
02:07:50.439 --> 02:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>there's not all. So evidence is not just like a

2814
02:07:53.760 --> 02:07:57.199
<v Speaker 1>physical object. There are logical arguments that are non physical

2815
02:07:57.279 --> 02:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>but are also evidences. That's what you're missing in what

2816
02:07:59.560 --> 02:08:03.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm arguing. So uh again again, I go back to

2817
02:08:03.520 --> 02:08:05.279
<v Speaker 1>what I said earlier. And this is my issue with

2818
02:08:05.359 --> 02:08:10.239
<v Speaker 1>religion in general. Every religion. You're a religious person, you're religious.

2819
02:08:10.439 --> 02:08:12.119
<v Speaker 1>I never said I was a religious person. No, you're

2820
02:08:12.359 --> 02:08:15.279
<v Speaker 1>rapidly religious about things like free will. What you have

2821
02:08:15.359 --> 02:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>no basis for. I'm not a religious person and I

2822
02:08:18.039 --> 02:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>don't believe in the tooth fairy, and I live my

2823
02:08:19.760 --> 02:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>life based on a religion. Free will is like free

2824
02:08:22.880 --> 02:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>will is this is the same thing as the tooth theory,

2825
02:08:24.920 --> 02:08:27.399
<v Speaker 1>the to and the free will are the same. I

2826
02:08:27.520 --> 02:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>live my life based on the way I was raised,

2827
02:08:30.039 --> 02:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the way my parents raised me, but none of that,

2828
02:08:32.000 --> 02:08:35.840
<v Speaker 1>And I don't religion. I don't hide. I don't hide

2829
02:08:35.880 --> 02:08:38.319
<v Speaker 1>behind a religion attacking all gay people, which I believe

2830
02:08:38.319 --> 02:08:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that are attacking. Yeah, you're right, it's emotional, just judging

2831
02:08:41.720 --> 02:08:43.319
<v Speaker 1>entire groups of people, which it says don't to do

2832
02:08:43.399 --> 02:08:47.560
<v Speaker 1>in the Bible. You're judging all women are more emotional,

2833
02:08:48.079 --> 02:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>or gay people are sinners. No, these are judgments on

2834
02:08:51.359 --> 02:08:53.680
<v Speaker 1>large groups of people. Your argument right now is an

2835
02:08:53.680 --> 02:09:00.279
<v Speaker 1>emotional appeal, not the statements you are making judgments. Don't

2836
02:09:00.359 --> 02:09:02.279
<v Speaker 1>like it. No, I just think you hide behind your

2837
02:09:02.319 --> 02:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>religion to defend your biginning. It's not I think. I

2838
02:09:07.800 --> 02:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>think people like fact that you think that I'm doing

2839
02:09:09.960 --> 02:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>something for bad motives. Yes, I do motive argument which

2840
02:09:13.640 --> 02:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>is not relevant to why when you judge an entire

2841
02:09:16.119 --> 02:09:19.560
<v Speaker 1>group of people, it's called bigotry and you don't like

2842
02:09:19.840 --> 02:09:22.239
<v Speaker 1>so what in your view? There you go in? Your

2843
02:09:22.319 --> 02:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>words are all subjective. If it's in your view, it's

2844
02:09:25.680 --> 02:09:27.560
<v Speaker 1>subject in your view. It's okay to be a bigot

2845
02:09:28.039 --> 02:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>in your view, it's okay to judge inconsistent in my view. No,

2846
02:09:31.079 --> 02:09:34.159
<v Speaker 1>you're right, you're you're consistently a bigot. That's what you are.

2847
02:09:34.399 --> 02:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Inconsistent in my view. For the used word games, your

2848
02:09:37.680 --> 02:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>position is inconsistent because you have very consistent You're very consistent.

2849
02:09:42.359 --> 02:09:46.079
<v Speaker 1>I'll explain once again, No, I'm I'm extremely consistent. I

2850
02:09:46.199 --> 02:09:50.359
<v Speaker 1>don't judge people based on sexual orientation. I don't hold on.

2851
02:09:50.600 --> 02:09:53.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't judge people based on color of skin, sexual orientation,

2852
02:09:53.640 --> 02:09:56.239
<v Speaker 1>or gender. I would never tell somebody that doesn't logic.

2853
02:09:56.720 --> 02:09:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I would never tell somebody that doesn't look like me

2854
02:09:59.279 --> 02:10:02.159
<v Speaker 1>that you belong in the kitchen. It's a big for

2855
02:10:02.319 --> 02:10:05.680
<v Speaker 1>your position is what's inconsistent, Not the having a moral

2856
02:10:05.760 --> 02:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>compass and caring about all people. Yeah, not telling other

2857
02:10:09.800 --> 02:10:13.000
<v Speaker 1>people what to do with their lives. Because you're a bigot.

2858
02:10:13.119 --> 02:10:17.119
<v Speaker 1>You tell other people, You make assumptions about people because

2859
02:10:17.119 --> 02:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>they're not like you and they don't look like I

2860
02:10:18.760 --> 02:10:21.439
<v Speaker 1>know that you don't like. I understand that it's not

2861
02:10:21.600 --> 02:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>probably most people don't. Most don't like. It's a fallacy.

2862
02:10:27.079 --> 02:10:29.680
<v Speaker 1>All women belong in the kitchen, All gay people are sinners,

2863
02:10:29.720 --> 02:10:32.000
<v Speaker 1>they're all bad. Because it's my world view, I hide

2864
02:10:32.039 --> 02:10:34.359
<v Speaker 1>behind my Christianity. I know that heaven and Hell are

2865
02:10:36.479 --> 02:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I've given a very simple basis you judged on. I

2866
02:10:40.560 --> 02:10:42.439
<v Speaker 1>don't care whether you think it's full. You're judging me.

2867
02:10:42.720 --> 02:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>You you're judging. You're judging me right now. I'm judging

2868
02:10:45.800 --> 02:10:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you right now. You have the right thing you judge,

2869
02:10:49.319 --> 02:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>you think you judge. That is wrong to be when

2870
02:10:51.560 --> 02:10:54.479
<v Speaker 1>you judge a group of people based on their sex

2871
02:10:54.760 --> 02:10:58.359
<v Speaker 1>orient No, I don't, because not all Christians think like you. Okay,

2872
02:10:58.399 --> 02:11:00.439
<v Speaker 1>but what's wrong with being a biggot and judge people

2873
02:11:00.479 --> 02:11:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to be a bigot when you don't have a basis

2874
02:11:01.960 --> 02:11:05.159
<v Speaker 1>for your understand that therapy, You don't have a basis ethic.

2875
02:11:05.279 --> 02:11:08.840
<v Speaker 1>It's subjective. That's the kills There is no kill shot here.

2876
02:11:08.880 --> 02:11:12.079
<v Speaker 1>That's your ethics is admittedly subjective and relativists, and then

2877
02:11:12.119 --> 02:11:14.880
<v Speaker 1>you make it universal. That's a contradiction. You are just

2878
02:11:15.039 --> 02:11:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you did. You said, no one knows I'm painting all

2879
02:11:17.640 --> 02:11:20.039
<v Speaker 1>Christians as this. I never said that. There are plenty

2880
02:11:20.039 --> 02:11:23.319
<v Speaker 1>of that universally wrong to be racist and a bigot? Yeah,

2881
02:11:23.399 --> 02:11:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I think so. Yeah, but your ethics is subjective and relative.

2882
02:11:27.800 --> 02:11:30.119
<v Speaker 1>That's a contradiction. I don't think it's subjective at all.

2883
02:11:30.399 --> 02:11:32.560
<v Speaker 1>You already argue for the first hour its subjective. I

2884
02:11:32.640 --> 02:11:34.880
<v Speaker 1>think I think it comes you argued that, well, you'll

2885
02:11:34.920 --> 02:11:37.279
<v Speaker 1>disagree with this, but I think it comes down yourself.

2886
02:11:37.359 --> 02:11:40.039
<v Speaker 1>I think no one, not you said you're making yourself.

2887
02:11:40.159 --> 02:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I think you did. You not say your ethics was

2888
02:11:42.880 --> 02:11:46.239
<v Speaker 1>in this, in this, in this, in this conversation, multiple times,

2889
02:11:46.840 --> 02:11:49.359
<v Speaker 1>your ethics is not everybody thinks murder is bad, not

2890
02:11:49.520 --> 02:11:53.720
<v Speaker 1>everybody thinks rape is bad. That's subjective to okay, thank you.

2891
02:11:53.880 --> 02:11:56.119
<v Speaker 1>So it's objective. So if somebody says that it's not

2892
02:11:56.319 --> 02:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>universally if you said that it's not universally wrong to

2893
02:11:58.840 --> 02:12:01.359
<v Speaker 1>be racist, big If you said to me, no, there

2894
02:12:01.399 --> 02:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>are people out there that think racism is okay, I

2895
02:12:03.560 --> 02:12:06.560
<v Speaker 1>don't deny that. Okay, but universal doesn't mean are there

2896
02:12:06.600 --> 02:12:10.359
<v Speaker 1>people who do otherwise? I said, this is I means stupid.

2897
02:12:10.439 --> 02:12:13.079
<v Speaker 1>This is how stupid this argument is. If I said

2898
02:12:13.119 --> 02:12:15.319
<v Speaker 1>to you right now now, I think it's stupid. If

2899
02:12:15.359 --> 02:12:17.439
<v Speaker 1>I said to you right we don't, I think it's

2900
02:12:17.479 --> 02:12:20.239
<v Speaker 1>very stupid. If I said to you that racism have

2901
02:12:20.640 --> 02:12:23.039
<v Speaker 1>a basis. If I said to you that rape rape

2902
02:12:23.159 --> 02:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>is bad, you have a basis. For why it's bad.

2903
02:12:25.960 --> 02:12:27.720
<v Speaker 1>You don't. I don't have a basis to why, big,

2904
02:12:28.279 --> 02:12:31.199
<v Speaker 1>consistent basis. No, have you seen slavery? You know what

2905
02:12:31.279 --> 02:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>that was? That bad? When people judged others based on

2906
02:12:33.640 --> 02:12:35.600
<v Speaker 1>their skin color and owned humans. It's not relevant to

2907
02:12:35.800 --> 02:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the ethics of well. First of all, I'm just giving

2908
02:12:38.960 --> 02:12:41.760
<v Speaker 1>you a general term. You just saying things are bad

2909
02:12:42.239 --> 02:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>because these things happened, and that doesn't get you to

2910
02:12:44.960 --> 02:12:47.439
<v Speaker 1>an ought. That's why philosophy matters. You need a better

2911
02:12:47.680 --> 02:12:50.279
<v Speaker 1>argument or a basis for why something. So, you need

2912
02:12:50.319 --> 02:12:53.399
<v Speaker 1>a better argument. But yet you're the guy who says

2913
02:12:54.159 --> 02:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump won the twenty twenty election. You need a better argument.

2914
02:12:57.920 --> 02:13:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Jay says, but yet all would be in the kitchen suspicion.

2915
02:13:03.159 --> 02:13:05.600
<v Speaker 1>For me, it's just a suspicion. I just have a suspicion.

2916
02:13:05.720 --> 02:13:07.199
<v Speaker 1>If you want to argue that your ethics is based

2917
02:13:07.239 --> 02:13:10.960
<v Speaker 1>on suspicions, I'll use your stupid I'll use your stupid

2918
02:13:11.000 --> 02:13:12.680
<v Speaker 1>defense and arguments, and I'll turn it right back on you.

2919
02:13:12.760 --> 02:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>But I don't have to have the same justification for

2920
02:13:14.680 --> 02:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>every position you're justifying. The religion you're justifying. All women

2921
02:13:19.000 --> 02:13:22.479
<v Speaker 1>is a philosophy domain. Politics is something I don't really care. Again,

2922
02:13:22.880 --> 02:13:26.720
<v Speaker 1>you're taking entire groups of people and all women and this, well, yeah,

2923
02:13:26.720 --> 02:13:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it makes you there's nothing universe. I think

2924
02:13:28.800 --> 02:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>it's very wrong. That's great that you think that very

2925
02:13:31.239 --> 02:13:33.760
<v Speaker 1>universally wrong. And also, by the way, I'm just conditioned

2926
02:13:33.800 --> 02:13:36.119
<v Speaker 1>by determinism to believe it. So what's wrong with that?

2927
02:13:37.039 --> 02:13:39.399
<v Speaker 1>I think you hide behind your religion to hide you.

2928
02:13:40.000 --> 02:13:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually giving you atheist lines of argumentation, though you're

2929
02:13:42.840 --> 02:13:47.079
<v Speaker 1>not an a saying that all women belong in the kitchen.

2930
02:13:47.520 --> 02:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about determinism and the idea that there's free will.

2931
02:13:53.159 --> 02:13:56.119
<v Speaker 1>You believe in a metaphysical fiction that you can't justify

2932
02:13:56.319 --> 02:13:59.159
<v Speaker 1>if your agnostic world is true, called free will? So

2933
02:13:59.680 --> 02:14:03.079
<v Speaker 1>other and using your word games, would you agree that Danield,

2934
02:14:03.079 --> 02:14:05.119
<v Speaker 1>Denna and Sam Harris believe that there's no free will?

2935
02:14:05.960 --> 02:14:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I haven't talked to them, but they do believe. I

2936
02:14:07.640 --> 02:14:10.239
<v Speaker 1>don't know that. I haven't talked to them. Many philologists,

2937
02:14:10.359 --> 02:14:12.239
<v Speaker 1>many philosophers, do not believe in free will. They think

2938
02:14:12.239 --> 02:14:15.199
<v Speaker 1>it's a metaphysical fiction. Fine, So it's like the too

2939
02:14:15.279 --> 02:14:18.479
<v Speaker 1>many bigots don't think that when in the kitchen to theory.

2940
02:14:18.600 --> 02:14:20.479
<v Speaker 1>So I want to know why should I believe in

2941
02:14:20.680 --> 02:14:22.760
<v Speaker 1>free will but not God? In your view? You can

2942
02:14:22.840 --> 02:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>believe whatever you want in your view. In my view,

2943
02:14:25.920 --> 02:14:28.319
<v Speaker 1>when you judge an entire I've said this like ten times.

2944
02:14:28.319 --> 02:14:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I was that an answer to the question I just asked.

2945
02:14:29.920 --> 02:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>You're not even listening to the question. I'm listening to you,

2946
02:14:32.199 --> 02:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and I'm amazed free will is equated to the tooth

2947
02:14:34.800 --> 02:14:37.239
<v Speaker 1>theory and most modern philosophy. Then I want to know

2948
02:14:37.359 --> 02:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>why is it free will any different than believing in God?

2949
02:14:39.560 --> 02:14:41.479
<v Speaker 1>It's a metaphysical claim. You can I'm not. I'm not

2950
02:14:41.560 --> 02:14:43.640
<v Speaker 1>making that argument. You can believe what you want to believe.

2951
02:14:43.680 --> 02:14:46.119
<v Speaker 1>You argue that free will makes me liable to belie

2952
02:14:46.279 --> 02:14:49.279
<v Speaker 1>and choosing religion versus gaze and not have a choice. Jay,

2953
02:14:49.359 --> 02:14:52.399
<v Speaker 1>you made the argue. Here's my argument. You're not your religion.

2954
02:14:52.800 --> 02:14:56.399
<v Speaker 1>Your argument as I am when you take your religion

2955
02:14:56.680 --> 02:15:01.039
<v Speaker 1>and you treat people differently in you're not listening to me.

2956
02:15:01.600 --> 02:15:03.479
<v Speaker 1>Why do you believe we can keep talking about free will?

2957
02:15:03.479 --> 02:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>You could listen to my questions for my religious dame. Jay,

2958
02:15:08.000 --> 02:15:11.119
<v Speaker 1>just let me get this out. When you when you

2959
02:15:11.359 --> 02:15:16.079
<v Speaker 1>use your religion and treat people in a negative fashion

2960
02:15:16.239 --> 02:15:19.439
<v Speaker 1>because of it, Okay, it's bad for society. Now, in

2961
02:15:19.520 --> 02:15:22.319
<v Speaker 1>this debate, you've talked about what you think is bad

2962
02:15:22.439 --> 02:15:26.680
<v Speaker 1>for society. Believe in two three things. I was making

2963
02:15:26.760 --> 02:15:29.079
<v Speaker 1>a joke about that. Now ridiculous are saying that it's

2964
02:15:29.880 --> 02:15:34.319
<v Speaker 1>Totti monster. I don't understand what you're saying, Jay, But

2965
02:15:34.439 --> 02:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>in my society that I would, Jay, you can believe

2966
02:15:37.640 --> 02:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want. Know why should I believe in your

2967
02:15:39.760 --> 02:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>worldview and free will? I think if you're a decent

2968
02:15:41.800 --> 02:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>human being, you probably should treat people with respect and dignity,

2969
02:15:44.680 --> 02:15:47.399
<v Speaker 1>regardless of whether there's whether the ocation for free will. Okay,

2970
02:15:47.439 --> 02:15:50.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm just telling you right now, I want, I want. Well,

2971
02:15:50.279 --> 02:15:53.079
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to give you my justice. Okay, but that's fine,

2972
02:15:53.159 --> 02:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>that's not going to give you subjective in your opinion,

2973
02:15:56.840 --> 02:15:58.279
<v Speaker 1>it's not a good argument. But a lot I think

2974
02:15:58.479 --> 02:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>in logic, if you make a subjective argument, it's not

2975
02:16:00.560 --> 02:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a good argument. In your opinion, it's not a good art. Okay, okay,

2976
02:16:03.359 --> 02:16:06.520
<v Speaker 1>But in your opinion that everything's opinion? Excuse me? Is

2977
02:16:06.560 --> 02:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>it your opinion that everything is an opinion? I don't

2978
02:16:08.960 --> 02:16:11.079
<v Speaker 1>think everything is opinion. There's fact and there's fiction that

2979
02:16:11.159 --> 02:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>goes along with it. Like Trump didn't win the twenty

2980
02:16:13.119 --> 02:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty election. That's a fact. That's not an opinion, Jay,

2981
02:16:16.000 --> 02:16:18.319
<v Speaker 1>that's a fact. Trump did not win in twenty twenty.

2982
02:16:18.359 --> 02:16:19.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think you're the one who can't spell the

2983
02:16:19.640 --> 02:16:22.039
<v Speaker 1>word fact. With that being said, when you take an

2984
02:16:22.199 --> 02:16:24.039
<v Speaker 1>entire yeah, yeah, I know you're shaking your head. It

2985
02:16:25.199 --> 02:16:27.119
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. No, it actually makes a lot of sense.

2986
02:16:27.359 --> 02:16:29.920
<v Speaker 1>The Earth is not flat, Jay, And Donald Trump did

2987
02:16:29.960 --> 02:16:32.479
<v Speaker 1>not win the two thousand No, you were. You were

2988
02:16:32.600 --> 02:16:34.639
<v Speaker 1>arguing that Trump Trump, but you think Trump won the

2989
02:16:34.680 --> 02:16:36.559
<v Speaker 1>two thousand election. So if you're going to talk to

2990
02:16:36.600 --> 02:16:41.959
<v Speaker 1>me about fact and total whatsoever, it's actually completely wrong.

2991
02:16:41.959 --> 02:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I never argued anything about the physics of the Earth.

2992
02:16:44.360 --> 02:16:46.719
<v Speaker 1>I asked you about free will, and you've had no answer. Yeah.

2993
02:16:46.760 --> 02:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>That is again you're you're missing the entire you believe

2994
02:16:49.239 --> 02:16:51.079
<v Speaker 1>in fairy tale things. I'm just trying to figure out

2995
02:16:51.159 --> 02:16:54.479
<v Speaker 1>why I believe. Why what do I believe that's very

2996
02:16:54.520 --> 02:16:56.879
<v Speaker 1>free will? Tell me what you think free will is, Jay, I.

2997
02:16:56.920 --> 02:16:59.000
<v Speaker 3>Believe that we're made in God's image and we have

2998
02:16:59.079 --> 02:17:02.040
<v Speaker 3>the ability to choose to is freely morally good or

2999
02:17:02.159 --> 02:17:04.479
<v Speaker 3>evil or this thing or that thing.

3000
02:17:04.520 --> 02:17:06.319
<v Speaker 1>That's what free will is. Now I'm just trying to

3001
02:17:06.319 --> 02:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>figure out if you don't believe in fairy tale things

3002
02:17:08.719 --> 02:17:11.559
<v Speaker 1>like God, why is free will any different than a

3003
02:17:11.639 --> 02:17:14.159
<v Speaker 1>thing like God. I never said I don't believe in God.

3004
02:17:14.319 --> 02:17:16.280
<v Speaker 1>What I said was but you said, I don't know

3005
02:17:16.280 --> 02:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>if there is I don't know what it is. I

3006
02:17:17.760 --> 02:17:19.719
<v Speaker 1>don't know whether there's a God. But you said my

3007
02:17:19.879 --> 02:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>belief is what you said. What I never said, that

3008
02:17:24.319 --> 02:17:26.520
<v Speaker 1>there's no God, But then you said my position was

3009
02:17:26.559 --> 02:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>fairy tale. Well, what I'm saying is when you make

3010
02:17:30.000 --> 02:17:34.079
<v Speaker 1>cases and you talk about homosuality and you know, listen

3011
02:17:34.159 --> 02:17:36.280
<v Speaker 1>to me, when those are mutually exclusive claims, when you

3012
02:17:36.399 --> 02:17:41.559
<v Speaker 1>make generalizations about people were digated positions, Well, I think

3013
02:17:41.559 --> 02:17:43.040
<v Speaker 1>there's something wrong with Well that's great, but you haven't

3014
02:17:43.040 --> 02:17:46.120
<v Speaker 1>given a moral basis for White's University. Wrong. Are we

3015
02:17:46.239 --> 02:17:48.639
<v Speaker 1>not all created as equals? Or is that not? No,

3016
02:17:49.040 --> 02:17:51.120
<v Speaker 1>we're not all created. I mean, am I equal to

3017
02:17:51.239 --> 02:17:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Kobe Bryant when it comes to physical ability? That that's

3018
02:17:53.959 --> 02:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>athletic ability. That would have to do with creation of

3019
02:17:56.680 --> 02:17:58.559
<v Speaker 1>my reld view. So okay, Well, I thought we were

3020
02:17:58.559 --> 02:18:02.319
<v Speaker 1>all created as equals, but maybe law but not in

3021
02:18:02.399 --> 02:18:09.719
<v Speaker 1>physical cysical abilities. Again, going back to what we said earlier.

3022
02:18:10.600 --> 02:18:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's wrap this up somewhere going to the final points.

3023
02:18:12.440 --> 02:18:17.079
<v Speaker 1>Final points matter. It's just it's just going on. We

3024
02:18:17.840 --> 02:18:19.639
<v Speaker 1>are going. We are going a little bit in sort of.

3025
02:18:20.040 --> 02:18:24.559
<v Speaker 1>I would agree with closing off. Sure, I'm glad we

3026
02:18:24.680 --> 02:18:29.479
<v Speaker 1>agree on the Epstein funnels. I think that's extremely important. Obviously,

3027
02:18:29.520 --> 02:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I would never vote for the orange turret. I disagree

3028
02:18:31.799 --> 02:18:34.959
<v Speaker 1>with you on you haven't give me really any reasons

3029
02:18:35.000 --> 02:18:37.959
<v Speaker 1>why other than you thought Donald Trump what he did,

3030
02:18:38.079 --> 02:18:39.799
<v Speaker 1>what he what he said he was going to do here, here,

3031
02:18:39.840 --> 02:18:41.719
<v Speaker 1>and here, and obviously he didn't do a lot of

3032
02:18:41.760 --> 02:18:44.639
<v Speaker 1>those things, which clearly are frustrated on. You didn't really

3033
02:18:44.680 --> 02:18:46.920
<v Speaker 1>give me many reasons other than Kamala Harris as a woman,

3034
02:18:46.959 --> 02:18:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and clearly you don't want to vote for general Yeah,

3035
02:18:50.120 --> 02:18:52.079
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, you know, you didn't really give

3036
02:18:52.079 --> 02:18:55.479
<v Speaker 1>me any reasons for that. The reason why I'm not

3037
02:18:55.559 --> 02:18:59.520
<v Speaker 1>an extremely religious person is because of this conversation today.

3038
02:19:01.239 --> 02:19:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I believe, especially in Christianity, people make judgments on other

3039
02:19:06.799 --> 02:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>people based on their religion because people don't look like them,

3040
02:19:12.239 --> 02:19:15.200
<v Speaker 1>or they don't have the sexuality that they have, or

3041
02:19:15.559 --> 02:19:17.559
<v Speaker 1>they're a woman. I also don't like the fact that

3042
02:19:17.639 --> 02:19:19.959
<v Speaker 1>women and men are separated in synagogue. I don't like

3043
02:19:20.040 --> 02:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that either. I don't like it in any religion. That's

3044
02:19:23.040 --> 02:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>why I'm not an extremely religious person. It comes down

3045
02:19:25.840 --> 02:19:28.479
<v Speaker 1>to me wanting to just treat people the same and

3046
02:19:28.559 --> 02:19:31.200
<v Speaker 1>with respect, regardless of what religion they are. I don't

3047
02:19:31.280 --> 02:19:34.239
<v Speaker 1>like to judge people, even if you're wearing a maga hat. Okay,

3048
02:19:34.520 --> 02:19:36.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to immediately assume that you're a racist

3049
02:19:37.120 --> 02:19:41.879
<v Speaker 1>or atrocious human being. And I think it's important in society.

3050
02:19:41.920 --> 02:19:45.159
<v Speaker 1>If you want to talk about society falling, I'm less

3051
02:19:45.200 --> 02:19:48.239
<v Speaker 1>concerned about immigrants in this country documented and not more

3052
02:19:48.360 --> 02:19:52.799
<v Speaker 1>concerned about people that judge other people, or people that

3053
02:19:52.879 --> 02:19:54.920
<v Speaker 1>are so upset. And I would assume you were one

3054
02:19:54.959 --> 02:19:56.840
<v Speaker 1>of them that was so upset at what Don Lemon

3055
02:19:56.879 --> 02:19:59.719
<v Speaker 1>did going into that church and disrupting a church service. Well.

3056
02:20:00.319 --> 02:20:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't condone people protesting on private property. I think

3057
02:20:03.879 --> 02:20:06.639
<v Speaker 1>that's wrong, it's against the law. But I find ice

3058
02:20:06.719 --> 02:20:10.040
<v Speaker 1>agents murdering people in the streets a little bit more upsetting.

3059
02:20:10.559 --> 02:20:13.440
<v Speaker 1>We need to have the separation between church and state,

3060
02:20:13.520 --> 02:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>which clearly we don't have in Washington, DC right now.

3061
02:20:16.280 --> 02:20:18.239
<v Speaker 1>And I think the people that want the ten commandments

3062
02:20:18.280 --> 02:20:20.239
<v Speaker 1>in classrooms are people that don't abide by the ten

3063
02:20:20.280 --> 02:20:26.079
<v Speaker 1>commandments themselves. They break those commandments themselves, Hence the word hypocrite.

3064
02:20:26.440 --> 02:20:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I did not come here to change your mind or

3065
02:20:28.799 --> 02:20:31.079
<v Speaker 1>try to convince you on anything. I understand that's your

3066
02:20:31.120 --> 02:20:34.399
<v Speaker 1>objective when you go to debates. I came here to

3067
02:20:34.840 --> 02:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>give you my opinions, my views on a number of

3068
02:20:37.879 --> 02:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>different issues. Some we agree on, obviously a lot we

3069
02:20:41.159 --> 02:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>disagree on. I think we've stopped listening to other people.

3070
02:20:47.639 --> 02:20:49.879
<v Speaker 1>This is why I do enjoy doing these kinds of things.

3071
02:20:50.920 --> 02:20:53.159
<v Speaker 1>But I think as a whole, we stop listening to

3072
02:20:53.200 --> 02:20:55.079
<v Speaker 1>other people. People that look differently than you and me,

3073
02:20:55.200 --> 02:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>people that have different pathways in life, people that have

3074
02:20:59.159 --> 02:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>been brought up differently in different cultures, different backgrounds. I'd

3075
02:21:02.559 --> 02:21:04.120
<v Speaker 1>like to think, as a whole, most human beings are

3076
02:21:04.159 --> 02:21:06.079
<v Speaker 1>good people. And then when we have issues and bad

3077
02:21:06.159 --> 02:21:08.159
<v Speaker 1>things that happen like nine to eleven and other issues,

3078
02:21:09.000 --> 02:21:12.239
<v Speaker 1>that the country comes together, even if it's only a week.

3079
02:21:14.680 --> 02:21:17.959
<v Speaker 1>But this is what I do, and this is what

3080
02:21:18.319 --> 02:21:21.719
<v Speaker 1>I preach, and I'm not trying to change people's opinions.

3081
02:21:22.280 --> 02:21:24.799
<v Speaker 1>People can have their own opinions and judgments about this debate.

3082
02:21:25.520 --> 02:21:27.360
<v Speaker 1>If you're a fan of Jay Dyer, they're going to

3083
02:21:27.399 --> 02:21:29.120
<v Speaker 1>agree with you. If they're a fan of my show,

3084
02:21:29.120 --> 02:21:30.959
<v Speaker 1>they're going to That's what. I don't really care about

3085
02:21:31.000 --> 02:21:36.239
<v Speaker 1>that stuff. Other people do. It's just not me. I'm glad,

3086
02:21:36.319 --> 02:21:39.680
<v Speaker 1>like I said in closing Land my Plan, Sorry, I'm

3087
02:21:39.680 --> 02:21:41.440
<v Speaker 1>glad we agree on the Epstein files. I'm glad we

3088
02:21:41.520 --> 02:21:44.680
<v Speaker 1>agree on some of the Trump stuff. That's refreshing. Obviously

3089
02:21:44.760 --> 02:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>we disagree a little bit on religion. But here's the difference. Like,

3090
02:21:46.840 --> 02:21:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I would never tell you what to do. I would

3091
02:21:48.719 --> 02:21:50.719
<v Speaker 1>never tell you what to believe. I would never tell

3092
02:21:50.760 --> 02:21:53.399
<v Speaker 1>you that you can't think of something, even though I

3093
02:21:53.479 --> 02:21:55.319
<v Speaker 1>might hate the way you think, even though I might

3094
02:21:55.440 --> 02:21:57.479
<v Speaker 1>hate your opinions on certain things. I would never say, Jay,

3095
02:21:57.719 --> 02:21:59.639
<v Speaker 1>you are not allowed to think like that, even though

3096
02:21:59.680 --> 02:22:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I hate the fact that you think women should be

3097
02:22:01.200 --> 02:22:03.040
<v Speaker 1>in the kitchen. I would say, you know what, we

3098
02:22:03.159 --> 02:22:05.239
<v Speaker 1>have something called freedom of speech in this country. And

3099
02:22:05.319 --> 02:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>if women you're you're clearly a married man, Clearly it's

3100
02:22:07.840 --> 02:22:09.879
<v Speaker 1>working out well for you. I would assume, which which

3101
02:22:09.959 --> 02:22:12.399
<v Speaker 1>is great. But you know, I would never tell you

3102
02:22:12.559 --> 02:22:15.079
<v Speaker 1>that you can't think that way. I think that's fundamentally

3103
02:22:15.200 --> 02:22:20.479
<v Speaker 1>very important. So anyway, thanks Jay for doing this discussion.

3104
02:22:20.680 --> 02:22:22.319
<v Speaker 1>There wasn't too torturous for you, and I don't think

3105
02:22:22.360 --> 02:22:24.719
<v Speaker 1>you're a bad guy. It was a civil, lively discussion.

3106
02:22:24.959 --> 02:22:27.319
<v Speaker 1>I enjoyed it. Go ahead, shut up.

3107
02:22:27.360 --> 02:22:29.399
<v Speaker 3>I would just say, yeah, I appreciate Brian coming. It

3108
02:22:29.520 --> 02:22:32.399
<v Speaker 3>was a great discussion. Thank you Sean for this opportunity.

3109
02:22:32.440 --> 02:22:35.319
<v Speaker 1>It was good. Yeah, I feel like, uh, you know,

3110
02:22:35.559 --> 02:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>there was common ground with the Epstein stuff, with uh,

3111
02:22:37.840 --> 02:22:40.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, criticisms of Trump's turn worn Iran. All that

3112
02:22:41.120 --> 02:22:44.399
<v Speaker 1>was was good. I would just you know, again, stress

3113
02:22:44.479 --> 02:22:47.440
<v Speaker 1>that when it comes to debate, My take on debate

3114
02:22:47.600 --> 02:22:49.959
<v Speaker 1>is that it's more like a chess game, not in

3115
02:22:50.040 --> 02:22:52.079
<v Speaker 1>the sense of it being frivolous or a game, but

3116
02:22:52.440 --> 02:22:54.959
<v Speaker 1>that it has rules and it has boundaries.

3117
02:22:54.479 --> 02:22:57.840
<v Speaker 3>And it has limitations that define it being chess and

3118
02:22:57.959 --> 02:23:00.440
<v Speaker 3>not checkers or some other games. So when we come

3119
02:23:00.479 --> 02:23:02.600
<v Speaker 3>to debate, we have to be able to abide by

3120
02:23:02.680 --> 02:23:04.639
<v Speaker 3>the rules, and those are the laws of logic, which

3121
02:23:04.639 --> 02:23:07.520
<v Speaker 3>are essentially the laws of critical thinking. The laws of

3122
02:23:07.600 --> 02:23:10.360
<v Speaker 3>logic dictate debate, because that's how we know when somebody's

3123
02:23:10.399 --> 02:23:12.760
<v Speaker 3>not playing chess anymore and they're doing something else, so

3124
02:23:13.000 --> 02:23:14.440
<v Speaker 3>we have to play by the rules. I think that

3125
02:23:14.559 --> 02:23:16.319
<v Speaker 3>Brian didn't play with the rules for the most of

3126
02:23:16.360 --> 02:23:18.799
<v Speaker 3>the debate when it came to the issues of justifying

3127
02:23:18.840 --> 02:23:21.399
<v Speaker 3>the morals, or when it came to the issues of say,

3128
02:23:21.760 --> 02:23:24.799
<v Speaker 3>free will being a metaphysical claim, which again to me

3129
02:23:25.000 --> 02:23:27.600
<v Speaker 3>is no different than the type of claim that God's

3130
02:23:27.639 --> 02:23:30.600
<v Speaker 3>existence is. So that's when it gets into the domain

3131
02:23:30.600 --> 02:23:34.040
<v Speaker 3>of philosophy. So again, I'm not used to political debates.

3132
02:23:34.120 --> 02:23:37.879
<v Speaker 3>This is probably, I think, my first political politics debate.

3133
02:23:38.000 --> 02:23:40.440
<v Speaker 3>So I'm again glad for Brian Viers always, I think.

3134
02:23:40.479 --> 02:23:42.000
<v Speaker 3>So I can't think of another one. I've done a

3135
02:23:42.040 --> 02:23:43.319
<v Speaker 3>lot of you know, he's.

3136
02:23:43.280 --> 02:23:45.319
<v Speaker 1>A lot of we've done Islam, atheism, but I don't

3137
02:23:45.319 --> 02:23:47.920
<v Speaker 1>think I've debated politics until now. But could you do

3138
02:23:48.040 --> 02:23:52.680
<v Speaker 1>me a favor, Alex I said, Hello, okay, anyway, Jay

3139
02:23:52.760 --> 02:23:53.000
<v Speaker 1>diy Er.

3140
02:23:53.000 --> 02:23:54.399
<v Speaker 3>You can find me on YouTube, you can find me

3141
02:23:54.520 --> 02:23:57.000
<v Speaker 3>on Twitter, Instagram, all those check them.

3142
02:23:56.959 --> 02:23:58.879
<v Speaker 1>Out, guys, we'll link everything below. Comment below who you

3143
02:23:58.920 --> 02:24:04.040
<v Speaker 1>want to see next, y'all? Next time? Good job? How

3144
02:24:04.079 --> 02:24:05.719
<v Speaker 1>long was that? Two hours? Two hours and a half.

3145
02:24:06.239 --> 02:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>That was my longest debate
