Speaker 1: Three and fifty million Americans oil listeners. Damn, you got
Speaker 1: a long way to go. Yeah, but.
Speaker 2: The twelve that we have are of the lowest possible
Speaker 2: quality you could ever.
Speaker 3: Find, but extremely loyal, though extremely loyal, but extreme losers,
Speaker 3: absolute losers.
Speaker 2: And no matter how seriously we try to swat you away,
Speaker 2: you just keep coming on back.
Speaker 3: Or is it Stockholm syndrome?
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, that seems likely. Want to do is Stockholm syndrome?
Speaker 4: So let's let's just.
Speaker 2: Do you remember, for example, this this is about about
Speaker 2: about a year ago.
Speaker 5: But comparing that guy's mental state, I've said it for
Speaker 5: years now, he's cogent, But I undersold him when I
Speaker 5: said he was cogent. He's far beyond cogent. In fact,
Speaker 5: I think he's better than he's ever been intellectually, analytically,
Speaker 5: because he's been around for fifty years. And you know,
Speaker 5: I don't know if people know this or not. Biden
Speaker 5: used to be a hothead sometimes.
Speaker 2: Oh he's always been a hot head. He's still a
Speaker 2: hot head.
Speaker 3: During the election, he was trying to challenge Trump to
Speaker 3: a push up contest, and he would take him out
Speaker 3: back behind the barn and beat him.
Speaker 2: Remember that I've witnessed the hot headedness of Joe Biden.
Speaker 2: He and John McCain were two peas in the pond
Speaker 2: when it came to their temper and their abuse of
Speaker 2: their staff went now, not because their loyal immediate staff
Speaker 2: got treated like royalty, but if you were the second
Speaker 2: tier staff, you were treated like dirt.
Speaker 5: And intellectually analytically, because he's been around for fifty years,
Speaker 5: and you know, I don't know if people know this
Speaker 5: or not, Biden used to be a hothead sometimes that
Speaker 5: irishman would get in front of the reasoning. Sometimes you
Speaker 5: would say things he didn't want to say. This is
Speaker 5: and I don't really you know what they don't really
Speaker 5: start your tape right now, because I'm about to tell
Speaker 5: you the truth.
Speaker 2: Start the day and FU if.
Speaker 5: You can't handle the truth. This version of Biden, intellectually,
Speaker 5: analytically is the best Biden ever, not a close second.
Speaker 5: And I've known him for years. The presentskis have known
Speaker 5: him for fifty years. If it weren't the truth, I
Speaker 5: wouldn't say it.
Speaker 2: And if it weren't the truth, I wouldn't say it. Now.
Speaker 2: Many of you, the women and men of this jury,
Speaker 2: all twelve of you are thinking yourself, Okay, I've heard
Speaker 2: that a bazillion times, and uh, you know he was lying?
Speaker 2: Oh was he? Or does he actually believe it? Because
Speaker 2: I think both can be simultaneously true. I think he
Speaker 2: knows he's lying. At least he's exaggerating, he's pontificating, he's
Speaker 2: at least he's at least a little hyperbole here. But
Speaker 2: he is saying to his audience, you need to believe
Speaker 2: what I say.
Speaker 3: Wasn't that a Seinfeld thing? If it's not a lie,
Speaker 3: if you believe it, If you.
Speaker 2: Believe it, that's exactly right. So you need to stop
Speaker 2: internalizing that. Oh, Michael's just you know, digging in, digging in,
Speaker 2: digging in, digging in. No, I'm actually hoping that there
Speaker 2: will be a light bulb go off in your brains
Speaker 2: and at some point you'll say, holy crap. Every time
Speaker 2: Brown talks about the cabal, he talks about how he's
Speaker 2: gotten to the point where he's it's not I don't
Speaker 2: think it's cynicism. I think it's just reality that if
Speaker 2: if it's on the networks, for that matter, if it's
Speaker 2: on Fox News, I might be a little more inclined
Speaker 2: to get Fox News some leeway, but I've reached the
Speaker 2: point where I don't believe any of them. I'm gonna
Speaker 2: go confirm myself that is this really? What's what's the context?
Speaker 2: What's the kind You know, if you hear Tapper trying
Speaker 2: to rationalize why he said some of the things that
Speaker 2: he said, most of it's done in the context of
Speaker 2: what you need to in the context of that's kind
Speaker 2: of funny he does it, and well, you need to
Speaker 2: understand the context in which we were talking about these things,
Speaker 2: in which in which these things were occurring. Really, why
Speaker 2: why do we need any context? Why do we need
Speaker 2: context whatsoever? Now, if if you don't think that these
Speaker 2: people are pretty evil, let's walk through some of the
Speaker 2: interview that occurred today this morning with Jake Tapper as
Speaker 2: he's trying to sell the books on the same he's
Speaker 2: now appeared to give you context the guy that you
Speaker 2: just heard Joe Scarborough who said, this is the finest
Speaker 2: Biden I've ever known. And Synski's my my little trophy
Speaker 2: wife over here, Mika, her family has known the Bidens
Speaker 2: for fifty years and this is the best Biden ever.
Speaker 5: You're around a guy for hours and hours and hours.
Speaker 6: I guess the question is, what's the takeaway here?
Speaker 2: What did you learn? Because we wait, did you?
Speaker 7: Did you pick it up.
Speaker 5: In real time?
Speaker 8: So well, I just I saw what everybody else saw, right.
Speaker 2: Oh, so he saw what everybody else saw. You know,
Speaker 2: if I were Tapper, I would at that point said,
Speaker 2: well what about when you said he was the best
Speaker 2: Biden ever? Because everybody saw. You know, It's kind of
Speaker 2: funny because Tapper kind of turns to his right and
Speaker 2: gestures toward I guess the other people on the panel
Speaker 2: that are on Morning Joe, and I guess maybe to
Speaker 2: the cameraman and the producers and maybe just everybody out there.
Speaker 2: And you know that the eleven people that Scarborough has
Speaker 2: listened to him.
Speaker 8: I saw what everybody else saw, the stumbles in front
Speaker 8: of the camera and that. But I saw him in
Speaker 8: person in for the State of the Union lunch and
Speaker 8: that they do with anchors in early twenty twenty three,
Speaker 8: and that I didn't see him in person. Other than that,
Speaker 8: I will say two things. One of them is there
Speaker 8: were more moments of non functioning Biden behind the scenes
Speaker 8: that than we were privy to. That we saw than
Speaker 8: what we saw.
Speaker 2: And That's the rationale he Chase tried to use in
Speaker 2: every interview that I've heard. I've heard maybe three or
Speaker 2: four different interviews since I got the book yesterday, And
Speaker 2: that's the main rationale, is that, yeah, there were a
Speaker 2: lot of things that we saw that you know, were public,
Speaker 2: that everybody else.
Speaker 8: Saw, but stioning Biden behind the scenes, that than we
Speaker 8: were privy to.
Speaker 2: Oh so we weren't privy to it. Here's the question
Speaker 2: I would ask. You just said you saw everything else
Speaker 2: that we saw, and that led you to decide to
Speaker 2: write a book about how bad things were and who
Speaker 2: was really running the presidency? Why didn't you ask those
Speaker 2: questions when you weren't When you say you weren't privy,
Speaker 2: well maybe you weren't privy because you never asked the question.
Speaker 2: You never asked. Heykarine, Jean Pierre, may I have fifteen minutes,
Speaker 2: may thirty minutes of your time. I'd like to talk
Speaker 2: to you about the president's condition and go do a
Speaker 2: one on one in her office or wherever she wants
Speaker 2: to meet and have a discussion about what's really going on.
Speaker 2: You keep telling us no, even off the record, even
Speaker 2: if you just want to get some background. There's no
Speaker 2: indication anywhere that he ever attempted to just do nothing
Speaker 2: more than accept the denials from everybody that kept doing
Speaker 2: the public denials.
Speaker 8: That we saw then what we saw. If there are
Speaker 8: two Joe Biden, says, the one that you saw that
Speaker 8: you just described, and then there's the one who's non functioning,
Speaker 8: like what we saw at the debate night, can't follow
Speaker 8: his train of thought, can't come up with names, can't
Speaker 8: remember dates what you listened to in the her report,
Speaker 8: or he's like unsure of when his son deployed, unsure
Speaker 8: when his son died. Tragic stuff, But he really honestly
Speaker 8: doesn't know those dates. That non functioning Biden reared his
Speaker 8: head more and more and more. Now, one thing in
Speaker 8: your specific case, Joe, our reporting indicates that Joe Biden,
Speaker 8: who as you know, is a frequent viewer of the show,
Speaker 8: saw when David Ignatius wrote that column and I think
Speaker 8: August twenty twenty three saying that Joe I should not
Speaker 8: run for reelection because of what he had been hearing, right,
Speaker 8: and he came on this show and you guys had
Speaker 8: a robust conversation about this. You largely agreed that you
Speaker 8: had been hearing things about this, but that there was
Speaker 8: really no alternative, that Kamala Harris was not up to
Speaker 8: the job. That's what democrats were telling you behind the scenes.
Speaker 2: You get what I mean this. If you want any
Speaker 2: concrete evidence of the intertwined relationship between what MSNBC does
Speaker 2: on a daily basis to their audience, it is you
Speaker 2: know the old you remember Limball used to joke about
Speaker 2: how the what do he called them? The seminar listeners.
Speaker 2: I think the seminar listeners that would call in and
Speaker 2: they would have Democrat talking points trying to attack him,
Speaker 2: and Limball would laugh them off and talk about, how,
Speaker 2: you know, I don't get my talking points from the
Speaker 2: RNC or anybody else. You know, what you get is
Speaker 2: me blah blah blah blah. Well, those seminar callers that
Speaker 2: would call into Limbaugh are the people that listen to
Speaker 2: Scarborough and his ilk, Will Flitzer and you know Caitlyn Collins,
Speaker 2: Jake Tapper, anybody the networks, all the anchors of the Networks,
Speaker 2: nor O'donald, all of them. They would just take, okay, well,
Speaker 2: if this is our mission to cover this up, then
Speaker 2: we will be complicit in doing that it's pretty much
Speaker 2: what Tapper's admitting right here.
Speaker 8: Joe Biden saw that. Joe Biden said to staffers that
Speaker 8: he wanted to convince you that you were wrong. And
Speaker 8: he focused on you like you were a constituency, like
Speaker 8: you were farmers in Iowa, like you were the Kawanas
Speaker 8: Club in New Hampshire, and he made sure that you thought.
Speaker 8: He made sure that you thought differently. I think he
Speaker 8: did this with a couple people. I think he did
Speaker 8: it with me Chum. He might have done it with
Speaker 8: Evan Osnos. He knew that there were people that had
Speaker 8: to be convinced that he was fine, and he tried
Speaker 8: to prove that.
Speaker 2: To you, and he must have. He must have succeeded because.
Speaker 5: But comparing that guy's mental state, I've said it for
Speaker 5: years now, he's cogent. But I undersold him when I
Speaker 5: said he was cogent. He's far beyond cogent. In fact,
Speaker 5: I think he's better than he's ever been intellectually, analytically,
Speaker 5: because he's been around for fifty years. And you know,
Speaker 5: I don't know if people know this or not. Bid
Speaker 5: used to be a hothead sometimes that irishman would get
Speaker 5: in front of the reasoning.
Speaker 2: Sometimes, Oh so let's rationalize, you know, because he's I
Speaker 2: thought he was Dominican, I thought he was Hispanic, I
Speaker 2: thought he was black, I thought he was Indian. I
Speaker 2: thought he was anything but Irish. But I guess sometimes
Speaker 2: he was Irish. So here's Scarborough trying to throw in.
Speaker 2: You know, you know, he sometimes would say things that
Speaker 2: he shouldn't say, because well, he was just mad. So
Speaker 2: he became a little irrational. He got hot headed, and
Speaker 2: so you might say things that were, you know, probably
Speaker 2: impertinent to say.
Speaker 5: Sometimes you would say things he didn't want to say.
Speaker 5: This is and I don't really you know what, I
Speaker 5: don't really care to start your tape right now because
Speaker 5: I'm about to tell you the truth and few if
Speaker 5: you can't handle the truth, This version of Biden, intellectually,
Speaker 5: analytically is the best Biden ever, not a close second.
Speaker 5: And I've known him for years, the presents have known
Speaker 5: him for fifty years. If it weren't the truth, I
Speaker 5: wouldn't say it.
Speaker 7: Hmm.
Speaker 2: If it weren't the truth, I wouldn't say it. There
Speaker 2: you have it. That's exactly what's going on here. Is Biden,
Speaker 2: and not just Biden, but that pollit bureau that I
Speaker 2: referred to earlier, that close group that really controlled everything
Speaker 2: that Biden did. Yes, that came directly at Joe Scarborough.
Speaker 2: They were they were determined, determined that they could, and
Speaker 2: they succeeded in convincing a constituent of one because that
Speaker 2: constituent of one reaches their preferred audience, who already suffers
Speaker 2: from Trump derangement syndrome. And now they've been given an
Speaker 2: injection of you know, whatever you might want to call it,
Speaker 2: to boost that, not to eliminate, but to boost that
Speaker 2: Trump and derangement syndrome. Not an antibody, but an actual
Speaker 2: medication to uh make that Trump derangement syndrome curse through
Speaker 2: their veins even more worse.
Speaker 9: All right.
Speaker 10: Joining US sale anchor and chief Washington correspondent for CNN
Speaker 10: Jake Tapper and national political correspondent for Axius Alex Thompson,
Speaker 10: they are co authors of the new book entitled Original Sin,
Speaker 10: President Phiden's Decline, It's cover Up, and his disastrous choice
Speaker 10: to run again. Interesting timing for the book, given everything.
Speaker 10: Good to have you both on. I guess at first
Speaker 10: I'll start with kind of an obvious question, but Jake,
Speaker 10: is it fair to say that Joe Biden had a
Speaker 10: successful presidency, remarkable presidency, possibly even a historic presidency in
Speaker 10: his time in office.
Speaker 8: Well, he certainly feels that way, and we don't really render.
Speaker 10: It when you look at the legislation that he passed
Speaker 10: and his accomplishments and how it ranks against other presidents.
Speaker 8: I'm not here to render a verdict and how successful
Speaker 8: a president he was, Certainly he feels that way. You
Speaker 8: can point to any number of accomplishments he has he
Speaker 8: had having to do with NATO or the Infrastructure Bill,
Speaker 8: or the Chips Act, and on and on, and that
Speaker 8: will be for history to decide. Obviously, the American people
Speaker 8: thought that the country was on the wrong track and
Speaker 8: took issue with the border and inflation and his age
Speaker 8: and acuity. But this book is more focused on what happened.
Speaker 8: You know, we all saw the debate June twenty seventh,
Speaker 8: and we were all shocked. We all stunned at his
Speaker 8: inability to communicate his thoughts and the record that you
Speaker 8: speak of to the American people. And Alex and I
Speaker 8: set out to figure out what happened.
Speaker 2: Right so so so, Mika starts out the entire interview
Speaker 2: with don't you have to admit that he had a
Speaker 2: historic presidency? And Tapper, of course, you know, he thinks yes,
Speaker 2: but he can't say that. He has to deflect it.
Speaker 2: That's not what we're here for. That's for history to judge.
Speaker 2: Look at the inflation. And then he goes to list
Speaker 2: all the things that in their minds, in the cabal's
Speaker 2: mind are winners, are all great accomplishments. Now, to give
Speaker 2: Tappara a many little bit of credit, he does point
Speaker 2: out that the majority of Americans thought the country was
Speaker 2: on the wrong track because of those things, and so
Speaker 2: they chose to go a different direction. But this is
Speaker 2: the Cabal, and this is Jake Tapper trying to tap
Speaker 2: around his membership. In fact, he's probably one of the
Speaker 2: top ten members of the Cabal, and yet try to
Speaker 2: sell a book about the frailties and the cover up
Speaker 2: of which, in my opinion, he unequivocally was a part of. Hey,
Speaker 2: let's go to Gary over at the retirement Planning Center
Speaker 2: of the Rockies. Gary, how you doing today?
Speaker 7: Hey, good morning, Michael. I'm doing well. How about you?
Speaker 2: I'm doing good. So I've got the question in front
Speaker 2: of me but it says, let me just read it away.
Speaker 2: I'd like to read it. When is it the right
Speaker 2: time for me to seek professional help? Because I need
Speaker 2: professional help just in general.
Speaker 7: Well, some of that help I can't provide, Okay.
Speaker 2: All right. I just wanted to see what the limitations
Speaker 2: of the retirement planning so the Rockies were, So now
Speaker 2: I get it. So I can't come to you for
Speaker 2: that kind of help. So the question is when is
Speaker 2: it the right time to seek professional help from the
Speaker 2: retirement planning of the Rockies? And what is your retirement timeline?
Speaker 4: Well, let me share with you though a lot of
Speaker 4: people think they just wait till the last minute and
Speaker 4: do their retirement planning when they're ready to retire. And
Speaker 4: that's a.
Speaker 7: Real a scary proposition. Let me use an analogy.
Speaker 2: Of a mountain.
Speaker 4: So we work our whole lives and we climb this mountain,
Speaker 4: and we call the mountain the mountain of accumulation. In
Speaker 4: other words, we're trying to gather and save as much
Speaker 4: money as we absolutely cancel that we can have this
Speaker 4: ultimate retirement amount on the day we're ready to retire.
Speaker 4: Interestingly enough, because we get up this mountain and we
Speaker 4: near retirement, we enter what we call the retirement hazard zone.
Speaker 4: This is a period Michael, of probably ten twelve years
Speaker 4: before retirement where people typically begin to size back the
Speaker 4: risk and nature of the investments because they would rather
Speaker 4: have maybe a little less gain than a potential for
Speaker 4: a strong downturn when they meet this retirement date, they're
Speaker 4: trying to accomplish, and so that's when we begin to
Speaker 4: strategize and put things in place, because the rules.
Speaker 7: Of accumulation that get you and I up this.
Speaker 4: Mountain are wonderful, but you know what, they don't work
Speaker 4: to get us off the mountain. A good friend of
Speaker 4: mine once told me, he said, and by the way,
Speaker 4: this is the guy who climbed down there with the
Speaker 4: first American without the.
Speaker 2: Use of oxygen.
Speaker 7: His name is Larry Nilson. He lives in Olympia, Washington.
Speaker 4: Larry said, interestingly enough, most people when they climb mountains,
Speaker 4: seventy five percent die coming down, not going up. And
Speaker 4: I find that interesting, and that really applies as well
Speaker 4: to retirement planning, because if you don't have good rules
Speaker 4: of distribution in place, believe me, the rules that you
Speaker 4: used to get up the mountain will not work as
Speaker 4: well to get you down. So we understand as retirement
Speaker 4: income certified professionals, we understand how to get people off
Speaker 4: the mountain.
Speaker 7: And of course we tell people all the time listen,
Speaker 7: our goal is very simple. We want you to sleep
Speaker 7: well at night.
Speaker 4: We want you to do that knowing that you've got
Speaker 4: a good comprehensive plan in place, that we're in your corner,
Speaker 4: and that you don't have to sit in fear for
Speaker 4: the things they had because we're going to implement long
Speaker 4: time proven strategies that will help and bless do that.
Speaker 4: So that's how we work with the retirement timeline. And
Speaker 4: believe me, the longer we can let this scene build
Speaker 4: and grow, the better it is. And so we try
Speaker 4: to get people started if we can ten to twelve
Speaker 4: years before it's time to retire, to build this comprehensive plan.
Speaker 2: But the same so so someone that's just as I
Speaker 2: often say, if you're just starting out and you're thinking
Speaker 2: your first job, that's a great time to sit down
Speaker 2: with you guys too. But if you fa But if
Speaker 2: you fail to do that and you're you know at
Speaker 2: that point where you really are, you know, even coming
Speaker 2: down the mountain, you can still call you guys, and
Speaker 2: you can still at least look at their situation and
Speaker 2: determine whether or not you could still help them.
Speaker 4: Absolutely, we'll help anybody because I've seen very few people
Speaker 4: that have ever come into our office that we can't
Speaker 4: offer some things that are going to benefit them financially
Speaker 4: and especially with their peace.
Speaker 2: Of mind and help them sleep at night. So if
Speaker 2: you if you, if you want to sleep at night,
Speaker 2: then you need to pick up the phone. Please call
Speaker 2: these guys, because trust me, they're going to treat you
Speaker 2: fairly and honestly. So call the Retirement Planning some of
Speaker 2: the rockies today. If even if you've put it off,
Speaker 2: there's that's that's not a problem. Call them anyway and
Speaker 2: you tell them Michael Brown sent you nine seven zero
Speaker 2: six six three thirty two eleven. They'll treat you right.
Speaker 2: Nine seven zero six six three thirty two eleven. Or
Speaker 2: go check out their website. Go check it out right
Speaker 2: now rpcenter dot com. Let me just wrap up on
Speaker 2: the whole Biden thing, because the science is pretty clear,
Speaker 2: as we've discussed earlier. In fact, here here's doctor Ezekiel,
Speaker 2: the oncologist Ram Emmanuel's brother, father of Obamacare, on with morning.
Speaker 4: Joe, Oh, more than several years.
Speaker 7: You don't get it.
Speaker 6: I just want to stop you. So your this is
Speaker 6: this is not speculation. If you have prostate cancer that
Speaker 6: has spread to the bone, then he's most certainly you
Speaker 6: were saying, had it when he was president of the
Speaker 6: United States.
Speaker 8: Oh yeah, Oh, he did not develop it in the
Speaker 8: last two hundred days.
Speaker 2: He had it while he was president.
Speaker 7: He probably had.
Speaker 2: It at the start of his presidency in twenty twenty one. Yes,
Speaker 2: that I don't think. Don't is any question about that.
Speaker 2: So doctor Kevin O'Connor, who's the White House physician for
Speaker 2: a Biden, repeatedly assured us that he was in good
Speaker 2: health in twenty one, twenty three, and even twenty four.
Speaker 2: The annual physicals were portrayed as routine, not alarming. They
Speaker 2: were clean. You know, girl, Dad asked, you know, maybe
Speaker 2: the COVID treatments where really he was really you know,
Speaker 2: he was suffering about you know, the cancer was really
Speaker 2: causing problems. Others of you noted on the text line
Speaker 2: the bruises on the hands. You know, you're getting chemo sometimes,
Speaker 2: you know, that's the vein that they might use. They
Speaker 2: put a port there on the back of your hand
Speaker 2: and you end up with bruises. So if the PSA
Speaker 2: scores were normal, where are those records? Where are they?
Speaker 2: If they were abnormal, why were we told otherwise? Either
Speaker 2: the doctors committed medical malpractice or they were engaging in
Speaker 2: political productionism. Either answer indicts the integrity of the presidency.
Speaker 2: And that's the point that I'm trying to get at.
Speaker 2: The timeline matters. Biden the NASA's re election bid in
Speaker 2: April twenty three. By every medical probability, he was already
Speaker 2: living with prostate cancer then, and he didn't tell anybody
Speaker 2: about it unless you want unless, of course, you want
Speaker 2: to count this little thing.
Speaker 9: And because it was a four lane highway that was accessible,
Speaker 9: my mother drove us and rather than us to be
Speaker 9: able to walk and guess what, the first frost, you
Speaker 9: know what was happening, Get had to put on the
Speaker 9: windshield wipers to get literally the oil slick off the window.
Speaker 9: That's why I have so damn any other people I
Speaker 9: grew up have cancer, and why camp for the longest time?
Speaker 2: So, and that's why I and so many other people
Speaker 2: have cancer. Now, at that time, he was already exhibiting
Speaker 2: signs of cognitive decline, the halting speech, the metal fog,
Speaker 2: the inexplicable lapses, and those were all dismissed because we
Speaker 2: were all a bunch of right wingers. We were smearing him.
Speaker 2: Whose ages? Remember the oh I forgot? Remember cheap fakes?
Speaker 2: All those videos they called cheap fakes. But his medical condition,
Speaker 2: his physical and neurological condition, was not a secret to
Speaker 2: those that were closest to him. Frank Biden, the President's brother,
Speaker 2: all been admitted that when he told the press that
Speaker 2: stepping away from politics would allow the family to cherish
Speaker 2: quote whatever time he had left a slip. Yeah, but
Speaker 2: slips probably tell you the truth more than a press
Speaker 2: release ever will. So why did he run? He surely
Speaker 2: knew he was unlikely to finish the second term. His
Speaker 2: staff is doctors. The party handlers knew it, And that's
Speaker 2: already outlined in at least the first part of the
Speaker 2: book that I've gotten through. But the answer lies not
Speaker 2: in Biden's ego. It lies in the Democrat Party's arithmetic.
Speaker 2: Because Kamala Harris, the veat selected by Obama because of
Speaker 2: our demographic symbolism, she was a non starter with the voters.
Speaker 2: Her approval ratings always hovered near historic loths. Her debate
Speaker 2: performances were riddled also with incoherence. Her tenure was marked
Speaker 2: by gaffs, invisible border trips that derisive length laughter we
Speaker 2: got sick of. Simply put, they knew she could not win,
Speaker 2: and yet Joe Biden could. At least in theory they
Speaker 2: thought so. Biden's candidacy was the Democrats trojan horse. Run
Speaker 2: him long enough to cross the electoral finish, then announces
Speaker 2: health crisis, and then allow Harris to assume the presidency,
Speaker 2: not by ballot but by attrition. Let her succeed to
Speaker 2: the presidency. That would be sold to the public as
Speaker 2: the dignified, the elder statesman sacrificing power because of his illness,
Speaker 2: passing the torch to the first female, first black president
Speaker 2: who just happens to be standing over there in the wings.
Speaker 2: Never mind that the people rejected her over and over
Speaker 2: and over, never mind that she was never vetted through
Speaker 2: any sort of general election. That's a plausible theory, but
Speaker 2: consider the consequence. Biden insists on running despite the obvious limitations,
Speaker 2: and then the inner circle, the polit bureaus they call
Speaker 2: it in the book, protects his appearances, restricts the press access,
Speaker 2: deflects any inquiry into his cognitive state, and then the
Speaker 2: autopin scandally erupts executive voters, military authorizations, even pardons Biden's
Speaker 2: hand no, probably by the auto pin. Congressional investigators uncovered
Speaker 2: have uncovered that the staffers were deploying the autopen for
Speaker 2: nearly all of the official signatures, the president barely president,
Speaker 2: mostly absent. So then who was governing? It was that
Speaker 2: Polop bureau, It was the immediate staff in the Polop Bureau,
Speaker 2: But it was really Ron Klain who would really worked
Speaker 2: for Barack Obama. It was Barack Obama. It was Joe Biden,
Speaker 2: who is who's portrayed, at least in the very first
Speaker 2: part of the book as particularly her chief of staff,
Speaker 2: as being a a absolute force. The first Lady's chief
Speaker 2: of staff was the driving force in the White House.
Speaker 2: And of course you got Nancy Pelosi. So you have
Speaker 2: this unelected consortium shielding this faulting president, keeping Kamala Harris
Speaker 2: out of sight, out of mind, out of power until
Speaker 2: the narrative could be arranged, changed and put in place.
Speaker 2: Its manipulation. And as I've said before, if that's true.
Speaker 2: That scheme represents the most dangerous political cover up in
Speaker 2: modern history. And here's why. It ellipses Watergate. Not a legality,
Speaker 2: it ellipses Watergate. In the consequence, the democratic process was
Speaker 2: circumvented through medical falsehoods. The twenty fifth Amendment was treated, oh,
Speaker 2: that's just maybe an option for we ever have to
Speaker 2: the public trust was weaponized. A terminally ill man was
Speaker 2: hoisted as a figurehead so that an unelected, unelectable vice
Speaker 2: president could inherit the oval office and the presidency by fiot.
Speaker 2: And then they had to do the next thing, which
Speaker 2: is why I think many of you are pissed off
Speaker 2: at me. I'm spending so much time on it. But
Speaker 2: wait till you understand what the cabal did.
Speaker 11: Hey, Mike, I know you're hell bent on not giving
Speaker 11: these jokers any money for this book, but look at
Speaker 11: it this way. Even if you don't return it and
Speaker 11: you read it and tell us all about it, none
Speaker 11: of us are.
Speaker 2: Going to have to buy it.
Speaker 1: Have a good day.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And actually I've had a couple of people suggest
Speaker 2: that I donate it to a library. Somebody had texted
Speaker 2: yesterday and said, I think in Westminster or some place
Speaker 2: there were one hundred and seventeen some reservations for five
Speaker 2: or six seven books that they were going to have
Speaker 2: and stocked. So yeah, maybe I'll just give it to
Speaker 2: a library or something. So this is manipulation. And I
Speaker 2: say the eclipses Watergate in the consequences because they completely
Speaker 2: circumvented the Democrat process and the twenty fifth Amendment was
Speaker 2: treated as optional. And why is that important? Because the
Speaker 2: same cabal also shrieked for four years about the twenty
Speaker 2: fifth Amendment under Donald Trump, and they now whisper all
Speaker 2: these excuses about privacy. And you know, we we should
Speaker 2: have just left We should have just left Biden alone.
Speaker 2: The same commentators, the same members of the cabal that
Speaker 2: demanded full disclosure of Trump's tax returns and in some
Speaker 2: cases actually stole the tax returns. Now, turn oh so
Speaker 2: philosophical about Biden's gurological charts. It's not merely hypocrisy. It
Speaker 2: is and this is the problem in this country. It
Speaker 2: is systemic rot. I don't know, I let me get
Speaker 2: caveat this. Trump's doing everything he can to get the
Speaker 2: Trump country back on track. But what you and I
Speaker 2: have to recognize is that while he politically may get
Speaker 2: us back on track in terms of public policy. There
Speaker 2: is a serious rot in this country, and I don't
Speaker 2: know that that You know, that rot can be like
Speaker 2: prostate cancer, it can metastasize. If you don't believe me
Speaker 2: that rod exists. Quit thinking about the federal government, Quit
Speaker 2: thinking about this case. Think about the dumb assy that
Speaker 2: goes on in the state of Colorado, that goes on
Speaker 2: in California, Illinois, New York. Think about what they're trying
Speaker 2: to do to Texas, that rock continues, that cancer of
Speaker 2: progressivism and Marxism is really here. And the media is
Speaker 2: absolutely complicit as a part of the cabal in trying
Speaker 2: to convince all the useful they that live amongst us that, oh,
Speaker 2: Orange Man is still bad. You know, he's doing nothing
Speaker 2: but trying to kick, you know, pour people off Medicaid.
Speaker 2: He's trying to you know, just to port people without
Speaker 2: you know, and and complete violation of their civil rights.
Speaker 2: He's you know, bastardizing the Constitution. He's doing everything wrong.
Speaker 2: And only Joe Biden could have saved us from all
Speaker 2: of this. But it's sad because cancer came about. Wait,
Speaker 2: stop forget them for a moment. Think about all of
Speaker 2: these states. You know, I really have come to the
Speaker 2: conclusion that California is worse than Colorado. Is really worse
Speaker 2: than California because we're still on the trajectory of more
Speaker 2: and more Marxism. California is at least recognizing that, holy crap,
Speaker 2: this ain't working. We haven't reached that point yet. So yeah,
Speaker 2: this is a lot worse than Watergate.