Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome back to the Epstein chronicles.
So JP Morgan is seeking files from the Manhattan DA's
Office in its Jeffrey Epstein lawsuits, and I find that
laughable considering that the New York Prosecutor's Office let Jeffrey
Epstein off the hook every single step of the way.
Just go ask cy Vance about Jeffrey Epstein and ask
them why they argue that Jeffrey Epstein shouldn't be considered
the worst of the worst when it comes to sex offenders,
because that's the argument the New York Attorney's Office made
on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein. So other people might have forgotten,
I certainly haven't, and I know that those of you
out there that are following this case you haven't forgotten either.
And while I'm ranting real quick, I might as well
rant about all of the snake oil salesmen that pop
up on Twitter basically on a daily basis talking about Epstein.
These people don't know the first thing about the first thing,
yet they get up there and talk about how they're
going to expose the whole entire enterprise. Meanwhile, those saying
people talking about, oh, I'm going to expose this or
expose that couldn't expose themselves at a nudist festival. So
save the bullshit, all right, and stop trying to draw
traffic to your stupid Twitter site, your stupid Twitter handle
by posting bullshit about Jeffrey Epstein that's not even real.
And the crazy part about that is there's so much
salacious stuff that you could talk about that it's insane
that people make stuff up. For example, when's the last
time you heard a hard hitting piece about George Mitchell
and his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. And if you don't
know who George Mitchell is, let me give you a
little crash course real quick. George John Mitchell is an
American politician, diplomat, and lawyer. A leading member of the
Democratic Party, he served as a United States Senator from
Maine from nineteen eighty to nineteen ninety five and as
Senate Majority Leader from nineteen eighty nine to nineteen ninety five.
After retiring from the Senate, Mitchell played a leading role
in negotiations for peace in Northern Ireland and in the
Middle East. He was appointed United States Special Envoy for
Northern Ireland in nineteen ninety five to two thousand and
one by President Clinton, and as United States Special Envoy
for the Middle East Peace two thousand and nine through
twentyd and eleven by President Barack Obama. Mitchell was a
primary architect of the nineteen ninety six Mitchell Principles and
the nineteen ninety eight Good Friday Agreement in Northern Ireland,
and was the main investigator in two Mitchell Reports, one
into the Arab Israeli conflict and one on the use
of performance enhancing drugs in baseball. Mitchell served as the
chairman of the Walt Disney Company from March two thousand
and four until January two thousand and seven, and later
as chairman of the international law firm DLA Piper. He
was the chance of Queen's University in Belfast, Northern Ireland
from nineteen ninety nine to two thousand and nine. Mitchell
also served as a co chair of the Housing Commission
at the Bipartisan Policy Center. And then when you scroll
down a little bit further here on his Wikipedia page,
there's one little blurb about his Epstein relationship. You ready
for it. Virginia Roberts, a woman who has long claimed
that disgraced pedophile and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein forced
her to have sex with powerful men named Mitchell in
documents unsealed on August ninth, nineteen, a day before Epstein's death,
by a federal court in the Southern District of New York.
The papers included affid davids and depositions of key witnesses.
In a twenty fifteen lawsuit that Roberts filed against Epstein
and his associate, Glene Maxwell, Roberts accused the two individuals
of sex trafficking her the high profile individual Jewels, including Mitchell,
in the early two thousands while she was under age.
Mitchell denied ever having met or spoken with Roberts and
stated that he became aware of Epstein's criminal prosecution only
through the media. On November thirtieth, twenty twenty one, Epstein's
former pilot Larry Vasoski named Mitchell as one of the
people he recalled flying on one of Epstein's private planes,
but claimed to have never seen sexual activity nor indication
that such activity had taken place. Now, remember this whole
entire thing, as far as Epstein getting arrested the second
time around was initiated because the Miami Herald ran a
piece because alex Acosta got that job. Let's be very
honest about what happened. They were looking for dirt when
it came to Acosta, and they found it, and that
dirt was his connection to Jeffrey Epstein. And Acosta, as
I've said a million times, should have lost his job,
should have had all the ridicule that was thrown on
top of them. But why did it stop there? Why
did the legacy media stop at alex Acosta when we
have names like George Mitchell, who is and was way
more influential than alex Acosta could ever hope to be.
We're talking about the most powerful man in the Senate
at one point, not only that, but a man who
is brokering these peace deals on a world stage. Then
you flip the script and you start looking at who
he was working for, and it all makes sense, right,
considering all of the ties Clinton has to Jeffrey Epstein,
it all makes sense. But the legacy media refuses to
dig deep here. They refuse to really go after the
people that they should be going after. And so do
all of these dumbass Twitter accounts as well. They're too
busy trying to move some kind of political message with
their nonsense. Oh, Tom Hanks is eating children and now
he's locked in a basement in Guantanamo. Meanwhile, the dude's
doing movies and all of that stuff is provably false.
So why even bother with it? Because the time spent
on all of that dumbass bullshit conspiracy theory nonsense is
time spent away from the real scoundrels like George Mitchell
and Bill Richardson. So for all the Epstein experts out
there all of a sudden on Twitter talking about how
they're gonna expose the whole entire enterprise, there's a name
to start with, and then let's see your work with
that name, and then maybe I'll give you another one.
I usually don't let that kind of shit bother me,
but lately there has been like this push of a
bunch of goofballs. And I'm talking about people with like
hundreds of thousands of followers making posts on Twitter that
are absolutely ridiculous, and it's taking people away from the
actualities that happened in this case. I don't know how
many times I have to say it. This is the
case where you don't need to make anything up This
is delicious enough with the people involved that you don't
need to bring in all sorts of other people where
you don't have the evidence to prove that they did
all the things that you're trying to say that they did. Meanwhile,
George mit has somebody who is pointing to him and
saying he raped me. He was part of Jeffrey Epstein's
criminal enterprise and he raped me and nobody did anything
about it. Nobody's doing anything about it. So until action
has been taken on the people that have already been named,
you can miss me with all of the bullshit to
try and drive traffic to your dumbass Twitter page. All right,
So now that my rant is out of the way,
we can dive into this article from NBC News and
see what author Chloe Atkins has for US headline. JP
Morgan seeks files from Manhattan DA in Jeffrey Epstein lawsuits.
JP Morgan Chase is seeking documents from Manhattan District Attorney
Alvin Bragg's office in lawsuits the bank faces over its
relationship with a late convicted sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein, a
former client. According to federal court records, attorneys for Bragg,
JP Morgan Chase, a former senior executive, Jess Day, and
the plaintiffs in the case, attended a telephone conference before
US District Judge Jed Raykoff on Tuesday. Raykoff instructed Bragg's
office to provide a so called privileged log relating to
documents sought by the Wall Street Giant by Friday. That's
a list of documents Bragg's office argues are privileged and
not subject to discovery. A spokesman for Bragg said a
protective order is in place, so we cannot comment on
the nature of the requested documents. They can never comment
what it has to do with Epstein. Hau Can you
guys comment on his death yet? Or do you need
some more time to figure out what happened? You bunch
of goofballs. JP Morgan Chase didn't immediately respond to a
request for comment. The bank faces to lawsuits filed last
year by the US Virgin Islands and a woman identified
as Jane Doe Number one, accusing it of having facilitated
Epstein's sex trafficking enterprise. JP Morgan knowingly, negligently and unlawfully
provided and pulled the levers through which recruiters and victims
were paid and was indispensable to the operation and concealment
of the Epstein trafficking enterprise. The US Virgin Islands alleged
in a complaint. The two suits seek monetary damages. JP Morgan.
Chase has denied liability. Deutsche Bank agreed Wednesday to pay
seventy five million dollars to Epstein victims to settle a
lawsuit claiming it enabled Epstein's conduct. And it's crazy that
these people can get off the hook once again. They're
basically aiding and abetting sex trafficking and nobody gets in trouble.
Oh yeah, we're gonna pay a fine. Oh it's the
biggest fine ever baid. Oh yeah, like it's gonna stop them.
Is it a deterrent until the next one? Right, Yeah,
it's the biggest fine until the next gumbag uses their
bank to molest a bunch of girls. Then we'll hear
about how big the fine is. Again, it's all just
a bunch of bullshit. I hope all of you see that.
I hope you see what's going on here. When you
have enough money, you can buy your way out of anything,
even molesting little girls. JP Morgan Chase suits Staley in March,
claiming he should be held liable for damages in my
face from the lawsuits. It accuses Staley, who worked at
the bank for more than thirty years, of knowing about
Epstein's conduct and engaging in sexual activity with young women
procured by Epstein. Staley asked for the lawsuits to be
dismissed and said the bank is using him as a
public relation shield. However, he has expressed regret for his
relationship with Epstein. All this regret, I don't care about
your regret, Savior, sories, Savior, I should have done something
else's You all knew who he was, you knew what
he was up to, and you all chose to chill
with them. JP Morgan. Chase CEO Jamie Diamond is scheduled
to be deposed in the lawsuits this month. In a
Bloomberg television interview last week, he said he is so
sad that we had any relationship to that man whatsoever.
You know, we had top lawyers evaluating from the US
Securities and Exchange Commission, Enforcement, the Justice Department, you know,
and obviously had we known then what we know today,
we would have done things differently. Diamond said, but it's
very unfortunate, and I have deep respect for these women.
That doesn't mean that we're liable for the action of
an individual. He added, but I do have deep respect
for them. My heart goes out to them. No, you're
not responsible for his actions. You're responsible for enabling his
actions and facilitating them. You jackass. But JP Morgan's Chase
banking relationship was also known at the highest levels of
the bank. The US Virgin Island said in court documents
in August two thousand and eight, internal email says I
would count Epstein's assets as a probable outflow for two
thousand and eight one hundred and twenty million or so,
as I can imagine it will stay pending the Diamond
review and guess what it stayed. Additional internal emails and
memos filed as exhibits also revealed that bank executives had
been worried about the financial institution's relationship with Epstein dating
to two thousand and six. Financial records showed Epstein uses
his JP Morgan account to transfer around three million dollars
to women and girls from two thousand and three to
twenty and thirteen. According to records, the plaintiffs filed as exhibits.
The financial records do not disclose the names of those
who receive the transfers or their connections to Epstein. And
here's another breadcrumb for all of the super Epstein investigators
out there on Twitter and elsewhere. Follow the money, Okay,
pretty simple, right, Follow the money and you'll find everything
that you're looking for. And the reason that we didn't
see Rico here is because of all of these people
who are tied to Epstein financially. You really mean to
tell me Epstein wasn't out here engaging in money laundering
and tax evasion and all the rest of it. Pretty
Much every transaction the dude made would have been illegal
if he was hit under Rico predicates. And that's why
they didn't do it. They hit Keith Raynery with Rico Wright. Oh,
they hit r Kelly with Rico Wright. Oh why not
Glean Maxwell? Why not Jeffrey Epstein? Just ask yourselves that
during that time, Epstein withdrew a little over five million
in cash, typically in amounts of forty thousand dollars core
document show. Meanwhile, Senator Tina Smith, Democrat of Minnesota, a
member of the Banking Housing and Urban Affairs Committee asked
Diamond in a letter last week, why the bank ignored
obvious signs of Epstein's illegal activity and maintained a relationship
with Epstein. Well, Tina Smith, why did George Mitchell? Why
did Bill Richardson? Why did Bill Clinton? Go? Ask them
that you're a big senator, right, you're this big time senator.
You're a big shot. Go ask your buddies, Go ask
the people who used to call those very halls that
you work in on a daily basis in DC home
about Jeffrey Epstein and is illegal activity. And furthermore, Tina Smith,
since you injected yourself into the conversation, I'm calling on
you now to put together a whole ass committee that
digs deep into this and goes for RICO predicates, or
at the very least recommends rico predicates. Put your money
where your mouth is, Tina Smith. If true, JP Morgan's
decision to turn a blind eye to such egregious misconduct
raises serious questions about its role in facilitating Epstein's abuse
and its willingness or ability to root out and prevent
other less apparent instances of sex trafficking, she said, And remember,
as well that the Congress and the Senate, they have
their own slush fund of taxpayer dollars that they can
access to pay off their own sexual harassment lawsuits. So
these are the people we're relying on to go after
people like eapstein Hau and put new laws on the books.
Talk about inspiring confidence, all right, folks, that's gonna do
it for this one. All of the information that goes
with the episode can be found in the description box.