Speaker 1: You are listening to SCP night shift two files from
Speaker 1: the Foundation Archive tonight. File one A reptile in an
Speaker 1: acid vat that has survived every attempt to destroy it
Speaker 1: and learned to hate us for trying. File two, A
Speaker 1: videotape that should not exist. A president coming apart as
Speaker 1: he speaks, and the tape is never the same twice
Speaker 1: lights down, volume low, secure, contain protect File one SCP
Speaker 1: six eighty two, The hard to Destroy reptile. The subject
Speaker 1: spoke through a ruined throat, and then it moved against
Speaker 1: the personnel in the room with it. The attending researcher withdrew.
Speaker 1: The transcript ends there. What the entity said and what
Speaker 1: it appeared to do to the individual beside it are
Speaker 1: recorded plainly in the log that follows. A prior containment
Speaker 1: breach is documented later in this file. The subject appeared
Speaker 1: to assault the body of assigned personnel within the interview chamber,
Speaker 1: following moments in which staff had struggled to obtain audible
Speaker 1: speech from the entity. Prior to the incident, the attending
Speaker 1: researcher had instructed the assigned d class to advance the
Speaker 1: microphone closer to the subject's mouth. Its vocalizations having been
Speaker 1: rendered incomprehensible by apparent damage to the throat. The D
Speaker 1: class complied only reluctantly, remarking on the visible condition of
Speaker 1: the subject's throat and expressing the belief that further audio
Speaker 1: capture would be impossible. The objection was cut short. The
Speaker 1: recorded log notes the sudden gasping and screaming of the
Speaker 1: D class, followed by the subject producing an intelligible fragment
Speaker 1: in which it referred to unspecified parties as quote disgusting
Speaker 1: end quote. The attending researcher is noted in the log
Speaker 1: to have withdrawn from the room at this point, after
Speaker 1: which the log terminates. Appended to the interview record is
Speaker 1: a supplementary document cataloging containment breaches attributable to the subject.
Speaker 1: The first listed occurrence is recorded under a date that
Speaker 1: has been redacted in full. Personnel assigned to the response
Speaker 1: are identified only by redacted designations and are marked according
Speaker 1: to their status following the incident. Of those listed, one
Speaker 1: field agent is annotated as killed in action, alongside multiple
Speaker 1: D class personnel similarly annotated. The remaining responding agents are
Speaker 1: listed without further status notation. No account of the breach
Speaker 1: itself accompanies the entry, and the circumstances by which containment
Speaker 1: was re established are not addressed within the section presently
Speaker 1: under review. The second occurrence, its date obscured within the ledger,
Speaker 1: is recorded as having been handled by two field days agents,
Speaker 1: a doctor, and a small complement of Class D personnel.
Speaker 1: Of that complement, three are annotated as killed in action,
Speaker 1: while the remaining individual and the credentialed staff are listed
Speaker 1: without further comment. The record makes no attempt to describe
Speaker 1: the sequence of events, nor to account for the disparity
Speaker 1: in outcome between the assigned personnel. The third occurrence follows
Speaker 1: in the same abbreviated format. Two agents and a master
Speaker 1: sergeant are noted, alongside four additional persons, of whom three,
Speaker 1: including one agent and two Class D subjects, are annotated
Speaker 1: as killed in action. A single Class D designation appears
Speaker 1: at the close of the entry without such annotation. The
Speaker 1: fourth occurrence lists a larger and more varied assembly, drawing
Speaker 1: upon multiple ranks of enlisted personnel, a lieutenant, a colonel,
Speaker 1: and two agents. Five of these are annotated as killed
Speaker 1: in action, among them the colonel, two privates, a staff sergeant,
Speaker 1: and one of the agents. The remaining personnel a recorded
Speaker 1: without further status notation. The fifth occurrence returns to a
Speaker 1: narrower composition. A single Class D subject heads the entry,
Speaker 1: followed by three agents and four further Class D designations.
Speaker 1: Every individual listed after the first is annotated as killed
Speaker 1: in action. The ledger offers no elaboration upon the conditions
Speaker 1: of the event, the manner of the losses, or the
Speaker 1: means by which the surviving subject was afterward returned to
Speaker 1: controlled custody. Attached to the incident's summaries is a further
Speaker 1: addendum designated for the cataloging of termination options considered attempted
Speaker 1: or actively pursued. The relevant entry within this addendum records
Speaker 1: a single trial conducted under observation by two general officers
Speaker 1: and one attending doctor, with a second doctor administering the procedure.
Speaker 1: The agent of the trial is another contained anomaly applied
Speaker 1: to the subject under controlled conditions. Exposure was initiated at
Speaker 1: the fourth hour. The subject reacted immediately, tearing at the
Speaker 1: point of contact and inflicting significant trauma upon the affected
Speaker 1: region of its own body. During this phase, the subject
Speaker 1: repeatedly requested to be informed of the nature of the
Speaker 1: substance to which it had been exposed. These requests were
Speaker 1: not per the log answered. By the eighth hour, crystallization
Speaker 1: of the exposed tissue was observed to have begun, though
Speaker 1: the process advanced considerably more slowly than the reference behavior
Speaker 1: recorded for the applied anomaly. Progress continued through the following
Speaker 1: hours under close observation. At the twelfth hour, the subject
Speaker 1: exhibited signs of extreme pain and entered a series of seizures.
Speaker 1: At the thirteenth hour, conversion halted at approximately sixty two
Speaker 1: percent of the exposed area. The crystallized region then failed, catastrophically,
Speaker 1: detonating outward and inflicting substantial physical trauma upon the subject.
Speaker 1: The entry concludes at that point. No statement is provided
Speaker 1: regarding the subject's condition following the detonation, the disposition of
Speaker 1: the observers, or whether the outcome was classified as partial success, failure,
Speaker 1: or something for which the standing terminology was found insufficient.
Speaker 1: By fourteen hundred hours, the subject was recorded as having
Speaker 1: recovered from the exposure sustained during the preceding event. This
Speaker 1: recovery occurred despite documented loss of limbs and internal organs structures,
Speaker 1: which the subject began to regenerate under observation. During this process,
Speaker 1: the subject issued a statement to the effect that it
Speaker 1: intended to locate, kill, and consume every staff member involved
Speaker 1: in the incident designated Event six' eight two e. Eighteen
Speaker 1: following this, recovery the subject is now a test as
Speaker 1: immune to the anomalous substance previously employed against. It as
Speaker 1: a direct, consequence protocol has been. Amended any future proposal
Speaker 1: to terminate the subject through the use of another contained
Speaker 1: anomaly must first be verified on tissue samples obtained from
Speaker 1: the subject before any full scale application is. Authorized acting
Speaker 1: on recommendations set out in an internal, document two members
Speaker 1: of the research, staff their names, redacted have submitted a
Speaker 1: formal request to attempt termination of the subject through the
Speaker 1: application of another contained, anomaly its designation likewise recorded only by.
Speaker 1: Number that request remains, pending awaiting approval from a supervisory
Speaker 1: body whose identifier has been withheld from this. FILE a
Speaker 1: separate suggestion has also been entered into the record proposing
Speaker 1: the use of another anomalous entity as a possible means
Speaker 1: of establishing communication with the. Subject the entity in question
Speaker 1: has expressed reluctance regarding this proposal and has indicated that
Speaker 1: it will refuse to enter the subject's containment area if
Speaker 1: such a course of action can in any way be.
Speaker 1: Avoided the prohibition against verbal engagement remains in practice the
Speaker 1: most consistently observed protocol associated with this containment. Operation. Foundation
Speaker 1: personnel r without, exception forbidden from speaking to the, subject
Speaker 1: addressing it by any, designation or acknowledging any vocalization it
Speaker 1: may produce from within the acid. Pool this prohibition is
Speaker 1: grounded in observed correlations between verbal stimulus and the onset
Speaker 1: of what has been documented as a rage, state a
Speaker 1: condition during which the subject's activity, levels resistance to, submersion
Speaker 1: and attempts at breach have been noted to escalate. Significantly
Speaker 1: the precise threshold at which speech provokes this response has
Speaker 1: not been quantified within present, documentation and no assumption of
Speaker 1: safety is extended to any category of, voevocalization whether direct,
Speaker 1: address ambient conversation within audible, range or communication conducted through intermediary.
Speaker 1: Channels the prohibition is therefore absolute in its. Application enforcement
Speaker 1: of this directive is treated with the same operational seriousness
Speaker 1: as physical containment. Itself any, personnel regardless of clearance or,
Speaker 1: assignment who are observed attempting to communicate with the subject
Speaker 1: through any means, whatsoever will be restrained and removed from
Speaker 1: the containment area by. Force this applies equally to authorized
Speaker 1: staff acting outside sanctioned procedure and to unauthorized individuals who
Speaker 1: have gained access to the vicinity of the. Chamber removal
Speaker 1: is to be affected without delay and without regard for
Speaker 1: the wishes of the individual in. Question the rationale underlying
Speaker 1: this measure is not disciplinary in, nature but, preventative predicated
Speaker 1: on the understanding that a single instance of unsanctioned verbal
Speaker 1: contact may precipitate a containment failure of catastrophic. Proportions attention
Speaker 1: now turns to the matter of location and terrestrial. Buffer
Speaker 1: the subject is designated for containment at a site whose
Speaker 1: identifier has been withheld from this. Record surrounding this, facility
Speaker 1: The foundation exerts sustained effort to preserve a radius of
Speaker 1: fifty kilometers in which no human development is permitted to take. Root, roads,
Speaker 1: dwellings agricultural, installations and other markers of civilian occupation are
Speaker 1: to be, discouraged, redirected or otherwise excluded from this perimeter
Speaker 1: through the full application of available institutional. Resources the rationale
Speaker 1: for so, extensive according is implicit in the nature of
Speaker 1: the entity itself and requires no elaboration. Here the description
Speaker 1: of the subject may be summarized as. Follows it is
Speaker 1: a large creature of vaguely reptilian, appearance of origin unknown
Speaker 1: to The. Foundation at this. Time no prior taxonomic placement
Speaker 1: has been, identified and its provenance remains a matter of open.
Speaker 1: Inquiry the organism has been assessed as possessing intelligence of
Speaker 1: a notably high. Order during a period of limited mutual
Speaker 1: exposure with another contained anomaly of a computational, nature the
Speaker 1: subject was observed to engage in exchanges that investigators characterized
Speaker 1: as complex, communication the content of which lies beyond the
Speaker 1: scope of this. File beyond, intellect the subject presents a
Speaker 1: disposition of consistent and evident hostility toward all living. Things
Speaker 1: this orientation is not inferred solely from. Behavior it has
Speaker 1: been articulated by the subject directly across a number of
Speaker 1: recorded interviews conducted under containment. Conditions further material bearing upon
Speaker 1: these statements is retained in the associated addendum and is
Speaker 1: not reproduced within this. Section physical assessment of the subject
Speaker 1: presents further COMPLICATIONS scp six eighty two has consistently been
Speaker 1: observed to possess extremely high, strength, speed and, reflexes although
Speaker 1: the exact levels of these attributes vary in accordance with
Speaker 1: its current, form no stable baseline has been, established as
Speaker 1: the subject appears to adjust its physical parameters in response
Speaker 1: to conditions that remain incompletely. Understood the body OF scp
Speaker 1: six's eighty two grows and changes with considerable. Rapidity it
Speaker 1: is capable of increasing or decreasing in overall size as
Speaker 1: it consumes or sheds, material and this process appears to
Speaker 1: be a continuous feature of its existence rather than a
Speaker 1: response to any single. Stimulus the subject derives energy from
Speaker 1: anything it, ingests without apparent regard for whether the ingested
Speaker 1: material is organic or. Inorganic in, nature digestion is understood
Speaker 1: to be assisted by a set of filtering gills situated
Speaker 1: within the interior OF scp six eighty two's. Nostrils these
Speaker 1: structures are capable of removing usable matter from any liquid
Speaker 1: solution to which the subject is. Exposed this mechanism is
Speaker 1: regarded as directly relevant to the containment, methodology as it
Speaker 1: enables the subject to draw sustenance from and thereby continuously
Speaker 1: regenerate within the acid in which it is. Contained the
Speaker 1: regenerative capabilities and general resilience OF scp six eighty two
Speaker 1: are described in the record as. Staggering the subject has
Speaker 1: been observed to remain capable of coordinated movement and of
Speaker 1: articulate speech while as much as eighty seven percent of
Speaker 1: its physical body has been either destroyed or rendered into
Speaker 1: a rotted. State no upper threshold for this tolerance has
Speaker 1: at present been reliably. Identified in the event of containment,
Speaker 1: breach standard protocol dictates that the subject be tracked and
Speaker 1: recaptured through the coordinated deployment of all available mobile task.
Speaker 1: Forces no team of fewer than seven members is cleared
Speaker 1: to engage the entity under any. Circumstances as of the
Speaker 1: most recent internal, audit the total number of attempted breaches
Speaker 1: has reached, seventeen of which six are classified as. Successful
Speaker 1: further operational data pertaining to these incidents is retained in
Speaker 1: a separate addendum and is not reproduced. HERE a supplementary
Speaker 1: document designated as an addendum to this file preserves a
Speaker 1: partial transcript of a recorded audio. Session the recording is
Speaker 1: retained Within foundation archives and is available to cleared personnel
Speaker 1: through internal. Channels the transcript resumes at a time. Stamp
Speaker 1: approximately twenty one minutes and fifty two seconds into the,
Speaker 1: log the attending, researcher whose name is, withheld poses a
Speaker 1: direct question to the subject regarding its earlier killing of
Speaker 1: an unspecified group of. Farmers the subject offers no verbal.
Speaker 1: Response the researcher issues a warning indicating that failure to
Speaker 1: respond will result in the subject's removal from the current
Speaker 1: attempt and its return to prior containment. Measures the subject
Speaker 1: then produces, vocalization though the recording renders it incomprehensible to review.
Speaker 1: Personnel the researcher requests clarification and is observed on the
Speaker 1: log motioning to move the microphone closer to the. SUBJECT
Speaker 1: a second vocalization, follows it too remains. Incomprehensible the transcript
Speaker 1: terminates at this. Point no further verbal exchange from this
Speaker 1: session has been cleared for inclusion within the primary containment.
Speaker 1: File file TWO scp nineteen eighty. One Ronald reagan cut
Speaker 1: up while. TALKING a former head of state addresses an
Speaker 1: unseen audience while fresh lacerations open across his face and
Speaker 1: his left. Arm parts cleanly at the. Elbow he continues
Speaker 1: speaking unaware or unwilling to acknowledge the. Damage he. Laughs
Speaker 1: the recording that captures this event was recovered under circumstances
Speaker 1: documented later in this. File he says there is no.
Speaker 1: Hope at timestamp eighteen minutes and two, seconds the subject
Speaker 1: addresses the unseen audience with a statement concerning a first
Speaker 1: rising and a subsequent. Consumption he describes the observation of
Speaker 1: circles that are not, circles and refers to billions of
Speaker 1: dead souls held within a form of. Containment he speaks
Speaker 1: of unravelers having eaten the moral fabric of a, country
Speaker 1: and of hearts having been rendered into. Filth he identifies
Speaker 1: himself as originating from a kingdom situated at a level
Speaker 1: above the human and questions what such an origin. Yields
Speaker 1: he answers his own inquiry with a reference to a
Speaker 1: smile that condemns an entire. Nation at eighteen minutes and
Speaker 1: forty three, seconds the subject states that there is no.
Speaker 1: Hope at eighteen minutes and fifty nine, seconds applause is
Speaker 1: audible from an unseen. Source at nineteen minutes and five fifteen,
Speaker 1: seconds the subject recoils in a manner consistent with the
Speaker 1: sudden onset of severe. Pain additional lacerations manifest across the
Speaker 1: exposed ocular, region and further punctures appear across the forehead
Speaker 1: and the. Temples the remaining portion of the left arm
Speaker 1: is observed to have been cleanly. Divided at nineteen minutes
Speaker 1: and fifty nine, seconds the subject resumes, speech indicating that
Speaker 1: further consensus has demonstrated that a majority of the national
Speaker 1: population continues to harbour. Hatred he then refers in sequence
Speaker 1: to being eaten whole by a, void and to the,
Speaker 1: emptiness the, sadness the, blackness and the. Darkness laughter follows
Speaker 1: at twenty minutes and thirty. Seconds the laughter persists until
Speaker 1: the signal degrades into. Static description. CONTINUED scp one, thousand
Speaker 1: nine hundred eighty one Present events as a home video
Speaker 1: recording of Former United States President Ronald reagan delivering what
Speaker 1: is known publicly as The Evil empire, speech addressed to
Speaker 1: The National association Of evangelicals at The Sheraton Twin Towers
Speaker 1: hotel In, Orlando, florida on the eighth Of march nineteen eighty.
Speaker 1: Three for the initial minute and ten, seconds of the,
Speaker 1: recording the address proceeds in a manner consistent with existing historical.
Speaker 1: Documentation following this, interval the content of the speech begins
Speaker 1: to deviate significantly from established. Records the deviation intensifies, progressively
Speaker 1: and by later portions of the, recording the address bears
Speaker 1: no discernible resemblance to any speech verifiably delivered by the
Speaker 1: subject during his. Lifetime at approximately the five minute, mark
Speaker 1: visible trauma begins to manifest upon the person of the.
Speaker 1: Speaker multiple, incisions, lacerations and penetration wounds are observd appearing
Speaker 1: slowly across the body of the. Subject throughout the remainder
Speaker 1: of the, Recording no corresponding, instrument, hand or source of
Speaker 1: injury is visible within the frame at any. Point despite
Speaker 1: sustaining bodily harm that, would under ordinary physiological conditions incapacitate
Speaker 1: a subject and prohibit further, vocalization the recorded figure continues
Speaker 1: to deliver the altered address without. Interruption this continuation persists
Speaker 1: until one of two terminal conditions is. Met either the
Speaker 1: vocal apparatus of the subject is compromised beyond the capacity for,
Speaker 1: speech or the recording itself degrades into visual and auditory
Speaker 1: static at the time stamp of twenty two minutes and
Speaker 1: thirty four. Seconds no recording extends beyond this. Point subsequent
Speaker 1: testing has established THAT scp nineteen eighty one does not.
Speaker 1: Repeat upon, reward finding the cassette and initiating playback a second,
Speaker 1: time the figure Of reagan will deliver an entirely new,
Speaker 1: address frequently diverging in radical fashion from any speech previously.
Speaker 1: Documented recorded subject matter has, included without, limitation the practice of,
Speaker 1: torture the molestation of, miners and forms of ritual. Sacrifice
Speaker 1: the nature and source of the address remains undetermined at this.
Speaker 1: Time the injuries sustained by the figure Of reagan during
Speaker 1: the course of these recordings likewise vary between. Viewings documented
Speaker 1: instances of trauma include, impalement genital, mutilation and further, injuries
Speaker 1: the specifics of which have been redacted from this file
Speaker 1: at the discretion of The containment. Committee in no observed
Speaker 1: instance does the pattern of injury correspond to any preceding,
Speaker 1: recording nor does the delivery of the address appear to
Speaker 1: be interrupted by the trauma. Inflicted in approximate one in
Speaker 1: every seven viewings OF scp nineteen eighty. One an additional
Speaker 1: anomaly has been. Noted on these, occasions a single member
Speaker 1: of the assembled press detail present within the recorded footage
Speaker 1: will have been replaced by a figure clothed in black
Speaker 1: robes and wearing a conical, hood obscuring the features. Entirely
Speaker 1: this entity has been DESIGNATED scp nineteen eighty one one
Speaker 1: for the purposes of ongoing. Documentation the position occupied BY
Speaker 1: scp nineteen eighty one one within the press detail appears
Speaker 1: to be selected at random and does not correspond to
Speaker 1: any identifiable individual removed from the original. Footage the significance
Speaker 1: of the appearance OF scp nineteen eighty one one and
Speaker 1: its relationship to the broader, phenomenon is at present. Unknown
Speaker 1: the content of the addresses delivered by the subject during
Speaker 1: each playback, is in the majority of instances. Incoherent the
Speaker 1: speeches lack any discernible thematic structure and are largely composed
Speaker 1: of nonsensical anecdotes and rambling, parables delivered in a cadence
Speaker 1: consistent with the original speaker's public. Manner despite this general
Speaker 1: absence of, coherence isolated passages have been observed in which
Speaker 1: specific reference is made to events which the original speaker
Speaker 1: could not reasonably have known of or predicted at the
Speaker 1: time the source footage was. Produced documented examples include allusions
Speaker 1: to the terrorist attacks Of september the, eleventh the outcome
Speaker 1: of the two thousand and Eight russian, elections and one further,
Speaker 1: event the details of which have been redacted from this.
Speaker 1: File in consideration of this predictive, quality considerable time and
Speaker 1: personnel resources have been allocated to the verbatim transcription of
Speaker 1: the speech delivered during every recorded. Playback attempts to duplicate
Speaker 1: the anomaly through the transfer of its contents onto a
Speaker 1: Comparable betamax tape have consistently failed to produce further anomalous. Behavior,
Speaker 1: however camera's position to record the television screen upon which
Speaker 1: the object is broadcast have proven capable of capturing individual
Speaker 1: playbacks in a stable and reviewable. Form, accordingly all observations
Speaker 1: conducted upon the object are required to be recorded using
Speaker 1: the camcorder provided within the containment, chamber and the resulting
Speaker 1: footage submitted for subsequent review to the project's, supervisor whose
Speaker 1: identity remains redacted within general. Documentation it should be noted
Speaker 1: that years of accumulated exposure to ambient magnetic interference have
Speaker 1: contributed to a marked degradation of the signal quality inherent
Speaker 1: to the. Object this deterioration compounds an already considerable difficulty
Speaker 1: faced by review, personnel as the extraction of coherent or
Speaker 1: meaningful information from any given playback session has grown and
Speaker 1: progressively less reliable over. Time auditory and visual artifacts frequently
Speaker 1: obscure portions of the recorded, material and the fidelity of
Speaker 1: the transmission cannot be expected to improve through any conservation
Speaker 1: measure currently available to the containment. TEAM a further, consideration
Speaker 1: bearing upon the review process concerns the nature of the imagery.
Speaker 1: Itself the mutilations sustained by the depicted subject during the
Speaker 1: course of each recorded event have been characterized by qualified
Speaker 1: reviewing personnel as extremely disturbing in both their manner and their.
Speaker 1: Persistence this characterization is not offered, lightly and it has
Speaker 1: been formally incorporated into standing containment documentation as a matter
Speaker 1: of operational welfare rather than descriptive. Interest, accordingly it is
Speaker 1: recommended that any personnel, who following a playback, session reports
Speaker 1: symptoms of, squeamishness, nausea acute, unease or comparable somatic and
Speaker 1: psychological distress promptly present themselves at the on site psychiatry.
Speaker 1: Facility there they are to undergo A level three evaluation
Speaker 1: conducted by qualified. Staff compliance with this recommendation is regarded
Speaker 1: as a standard component of responsible engagement with the, object
Speaker 1: and personnel are reminded that such evaluations carry no adverse
Speaker 1: implication regarding their continued suitability for assignment within the. Project
Speaker 1: during the initial containment, period the individual who serves as
Speaker 1: the recurring subject OF scp nineteen eighty one's recorded footage remained.
Speaker 1: Living in light of this, circumstance a surveillance net was
Speaker 1: deployed with the objective of establishing any, relation causal or
Speaker 1: associative between the subject and the anomalous. Object despite sustained
Speaker 1: monitoring across an extended, interval no known connection was. Developed
Speaker 1: it is, noted, however that the subject was reported to
Speaker 1: have frequently complained of nightmares during the years preceding the
Speaker 1: deterioration of his mental, state which was subsequently attributed to
Speaker 1: progressive neurological. Illness The foundation makes no formal claim regarding
Speaker 1: the significance of this, correlation and records it here strictly
Speaker 1: for the completeness of the, FILE a representative segment of recorded,
Speaker 1: content time stamped at approximately seventeen minutes and twenty four
Speaker 1: seconds into a given instance of, playback is reproduced in
Speaker 1: summary as. Follows the subject appears to be delivering a
Speaker 1: formal address invoking a renewal of traditional values described as
Speaker 1: the tendons of the nation's. Strength he then references a
Speaker 1: survey purportedly concluding that the surrounding population had grown markedly
Speaker 1: more willing to participate in cannibalism than in the preceding.
Speaker 1: Century he continues by declaring that the nation in question
Speaker 1: will not suffer abominations. Lightly the address is interrupted by
Speaker 1: the isolated utterance of a, numeral followed by further statements
Speaker 1: concerning an awakening at the core of national, identity two additional,
Speaker 1: numerals an assertion regarding the cessation of a named hostile,
Speaker 1: organization and a concluding remark of a colloquial. Character at
Speaker 1: approximately seventeen minutes and fifty three, seconds applause is. Recorded
Speaker 1: the transcript resumes with a further monologue attributed to the,
Speaker 1: subject in which travel across an ostensible national geography is.
Speaker 1: Described references are made to industrial, sites agricultural expanses and
Speaker 1: the abandoned premises of a commercial, entity the latter noted
Speaker 1: as being occupied by unauthorized. Persons additional imagery invokes structures
Speaker 1: associated with harm to, infants decays matter framed as a moral,
Speaker 1: condition and an elevate advantage from which the subject claims
Speaker 1: to have observed a landscape of collective. Distress the rhetorical
Speaker 1: question posed by the subject is answered after an interval
Speaker 1: with a single word denoting a place of. Damnation the
Speaker 1: audience is recorded responding with. LAUGHTER a muffled voice is
Speaker 1: registered from beyond the field of the, camera after which
Speaker 1: the subject issues a familiar colloquial rejoinder and the laughter.
Speaker 1: Subsides the subject continues with a series of statements pertaining
Speaker 1: to temporality and, truth incorporating, malformed idiomatic constructions and a
Speaker 1: taxonomy of knowledge that trails into an indecipherable. Term the
Speaker 1: subject then remarks that certain of these unknowns are present
Speaker 1: within the assembled. Audience at approximately sixteen minutes and two,
Speaker 1: seconds injuries previously sustained by the subject are documented is
Speaker 1: having progressed to a degree incompatible with structural support of the.
Speaker 1: Cranium vocalization ceases to be. Intelligible the body is recorded
Speaker 1: as remaining animate for a further, interval during which gestural
Speaker 1: activity continues and the spinal column is observed to separate
Speaker 1: from the neck cavity before collapse is. Noted the recording
Speaker 1: degrades into static at twenty two minutes and thirty four.
Speaker 1: Seconds documentation returns to matters of, designation classification and containment.
Speaker 1: Protocol the item under discussion is cataloged Within foundation records
Speaker 1: AS scp hyphen one nine eight. One its assigned object
Speaker 1: class is, safe reflecting the assessment that the anomaly remains
Speaker 1: stable and predictable under the conditions currently imposed upon. It
Speaker 1: special containment procedures are as. Follows the object is to
Speaker 1: be house within a secure video storage unit located in
Speaker 1: the media archive of the assigned, site the designation of
Speaker 1: which has been redacted in standard. Documentation when the item
Speaker 1: is not actively in, use it is to remain undisturbed
Speaker 1: within this storage unit during authorized. Viewings the object is
Speaker 1: not to be removed from its protective casing beyond what
Speaker 1: is strictly necessary for. Playback personnel are further instructed that
Speaker 1: the item must not be exposed to any strong magnetic.
Speaker 1: Sources in order to preserve the integrity of the recorded
Speaker 1: medium and to prevent inadvertent alteration of its. CONTENTS A
Speaker 1: betamax home video, system together with an analog television compatible
Speaker 1: with that, format has been provided within Observation theater zero
Speaker 1: two at the assigned. Site this equipment is designated for
Speaker 1: the sole purpose of reviewing the anomaly under controlled. Conditions
Speaker 1: additional video equipment has likewise been installed within the theatre
Speaker 1: in order to record each viewing in, full generating secondary
Speaker 1: documentation for subsequent analysis and comparison across. Sessions all personnel
Speaker 1: are reminded that access to the object and its associated
Speaker 1: equipment remains restricted to authorized research staff in accordance with
Speaker 1: Standard Media archive. Protocol description of the object itself is.
Speaker 1: BRIEF scp nineteen eighty one is a Standard betamax. Tape
Speaker 1: on its adhesive, label the Phrase Ronald reagan cut up
Speaker 1: while talking has been written by hand in felt tip.
Speaker 1: Pen the misspelling of the former president's name is preserved
Speaker 1: from the original inscription and has been noted in all official.
Speaker 1: Documentation laboratory analysis has confirmed that the tape is composed
Speaker 1: of ordinary, material consistent in every measurable respect with commercial
Speaker 1: home video media of its. Period serial numbers recovered from
Speaker 1: the cassette housing correspond with home cassette tapes produced In
Speaker 1: september of nineteen. Eighty the recovery circumstances OF scp nineteen
Speaker 1: eighty one are as. Follows the object was initially encountered
Speaker 1: by a filing clerk employed at The Ronald Reagan Presidential
Speaker 1: library in nineteen ninety. One upon viewing the contents of the,
Speaker 1: tape the clerk alerted local, police expressing the intent to
Speaker 1: locate the tape's creator in order to press obscenity. CHARGES
Speaker 1: a low level police investigation was subsequently. Conducted at this,
Speaker 1: stage The foundation was alerted to the matter and moved
Speaker 1: to SECURE scp nineteen eighty. One CLASS A amnestics were
Speaker 1: administered to relevant parties before further notification could take, place
Speaker 1: including notification of an individual whose identity has been redacted
Speaker 1: from the present. File follow up investigation of The Presidential
Speaker 1: library's records was carried out By foundation. Personnel this examination
Speaker 1: failed to yield any leads regarding the origin OF scp
Speaker 1: nineteen eighty, one its method of deposit within the, archive
Speaker 1: or the identity of the individual responsible for its inscription and,
Speaker 1: labeling