WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.040 --> 00:00:03.879
<v Speaker 1>All right, I decided to let about forty eight hours

2
00:00:03.879 --> 00:00:08.359
<v Speaker 1>go by before commenting on the whole Pete heg Seth,

3
00:00:08.640 --> 00:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Mike Waltz, Marco Ruby, all these top national security people

4
00:00:14.000 --> 00:00:20.039
<v Speaker 1>who accidentally put together a signal chat to discuss the

5
00:00:20.120 --> 00:00:28.039
<v Speaker 1>recent American strikes against the Huthis who are disrupting American

6
00:00:28.079 --> 00:00:33.320
<v Speaker 1>shipping in the Red Sea and in the Red Sea.

7
00:00:33.759 --> 00:00:40.039
<v Speaker 1>And because a couple of reasons, I had a liberal

8
00:00:40.039 --> 00:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>friend who was like, this is terrible. Don't you see

9
00:00:42.039 --> 00:00:45.399
<v Speaker 1>this just as bad as Hillary's emails? And everyone needs

10
00:00:45.399 --> 00:00:47.719
<v Speaker 1>to be fired. This is horrible, and it vioally it's

11
00:00:47.759 --> 00:00:49.960
<v Speaker 1>federal law this way, this way, this way, and oh

12
00:00:49.960 --> 00:00:55.799
<v Speaker 1>classified information people. And this is a thing I've learned

13
00:00:55.920 --> 00:01:01.280
<v Speaker 1>as a lawyer. You have to hear both sides of

14
00:01:01.320 --> 00:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the case. You have to hear both sides of the case.

15
00:01:06.879 --> 00:01:10.799
<v Speaker 1>And I very distinctly remember this during the Brett Kavanaugh

16
00:01:11.480 --> 00:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>confirmation hearings, where you know, some people like him, you know,

17
00:01:18.519 --> 00:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>but this was just an instance of how bad this

18
00:01:21.680 --> 00:01:26.760
<v Speaker 1>could be. You have the Brett Kavanaugh hearings and they

19
00:01:26.799 --> 00:01:30.159
<v Speaker 1>bring in Christine blasi Ford, the woman who accused Kavanaugh.

20
00:01:30.439 --> 00:01:33.079
<v Speaker 1>Maybe at some point I don't know when, but I

21
00:01:33.079 --> 00:01:34.879
<v Speaker 1>definitely know it was him. I don't know when, I

22
00:01:34.920 --> 00:01:36.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know where, I don't know how any witnesses. I

23
00:01:36.760 --> 00:01:42.159
<v Speaker 1>don't have any contemporaneous evidence whatsoever, barely my own recollection.

24
00:01:42.280 --> 00:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Somehow I know that Brett Kavanaugh actually assulted me, and

25
00:01:46.200 --> 00:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>then her lawyer after the fact said, well, she was

26
00:01:48.000 --> 00:01:51.079
<v Speaker 1>motivated because she didn't want him to overturn Robe Wade. Okay, great,

27
00:01:52.840 --> 00:02:00.200
<v Speaker 1>where Christine blasi Ford testified that Brett Kavanaugh actually assaulted her,

28
00:02:01.879 --> 00:02:07.359
<v Speaker 1>And it was the hearings in the Senate Judiciary Committee.

29
00:02:07.719 --> 00:02:10.360
<v Speaker 1>It was I remember the day. It was. She was

30
00:02:10.479 --> 00:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>testifying first, like she was testifying in the morning, and

31
00:02:13.680 --> 00:02:15.639
<v Speaker 1>then he was testifying in the afternoon or something, and

32
00:02:15.840 --> 00:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I remember it was like I remember like I was

33
00:02:18.439 --> 00:02:20.360
<v Speaker 1>like watching it in my office. It was like, you know,

34
00:02:20.400 --> 00:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>it was appointment viewing, and it was this in between

35
00:02:28.520 --> 00:02:33.599
<v Speaker 1>break between Christine blasi Ford and Brett Kavanaugh, and there

36
00:02:33.639 --> 00:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>were conservative commentators just rushing and by the way, one

37
00:02:38.960 --> 00:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>of them was Ben Shapiro. By the way, so leads

38
00:02:41.439 --> 00:02:43.439
<v Speaker 1>me to I have ever since I've taken Ben Shapiro

39
00:02:43.479 --> 00:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>with a grain of salt, rushing to say that the

40
00:02:46.719 --> 00:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Brett Kavanaugh nomination was finished, that it was done, Trump

41
00:02:52.319 --> 00:02:56.680
<v Speaker 1>was gonna have to withdraw a Brett Kavanaugh. What a disaster.

42
00:02:57.240 --> 00:03:03.599
<v Speaker 1>Christine blasi Ford was so convincing. Why because they only

43
00:03:03.599 --> 00:03:10.039
<v Speaker 1>heard one side of the case. Then within minutes, Brett

44
00:03:10.080 --> 00:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Kavanaugh came up in front of the Judiciary Committee, he testified,

45
00:03:17.199 --> 00:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and everyone was like, oh wow, because he's still he's

46
00:03:20.080 --> 00:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>totally denying this and he's actually pretty dang convincing. And

47
00:03:23.800 --> 00:03:28.719
<v Speaker 1>then everyone's minds on the right certainly changed and said, well, Okay, well,

48
00:03:28.719 --> 00:03:31.479
<v Speaker 1>maybe he shouldn't withdraw his nomination. Maybe Trump shouldn't withdraw

49
00:03:31.560 --> 00:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>his nomination, maybe Republicans shouldn't vote him down. And Brett

50
00:03:35.159 --> 00:03:38.439
<v Speaker 1>Kavanaugh gets nominated, gets confirmed as a Supreme Court justice.

51
00:03:40.639 --> 00:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>And I continue to this day to think that the

52
00:03:42.319 --> 00:03:45.719
<v Speaker 1>Christine Blasiford thing was ridiculous, Especially with more space and

53
00:03:45.759 --> 00:03:51.759
<v Speaker 1>time away from it, I realize, huh, Like, why were

54
00:03:51.759 --> 00:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>we convinced that this was like a huge like this

55
00:03:55.360 --> 00:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>was someone who made a bare accusation and had no

56
00:03:58.879 --> 00:04:03.919
<v Speaker 1>other evidence, no corroboration whatsoever of something that allegedly happened

57
00:04:03.960 --> 00:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>forty years ago, where she can remember absolutely no details

58
00:04:06.879 --> 00:04:09.599
<v Speaker 1>except conveniently for the detail that it was Breck Kavanaugh,

59
00:04:10.879 --> 00:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and we learned that she was politically motivated to do it.

60
00:04:16.079 --> 00:04:19.319
<v Speaker 1>That was sort of how I felt about this story

61
00:04:19.399 --> 00:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>about the hoofies, Like it was so bad, the first

62
00:04:23.720 --> 00:04:29.040
<v Speaker 1>telling of it, so bad, so terrible, that eh, I

63
00:04:29.120 --> 00:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>was like, Okay, hold on a second before I talk

64
00:04:31.839 --> 00:04:34.959
<v Speaker 1>about this. The legal analysis that was given along with

65
00:04:35.000 --> 00:04:38.399
<v Speaker 1>the Atlantic article I was also highly suspicious of. I'm like, okay,

66
00:04:38.959 --> 00:04:41.199
<v Speaker 1>the Atlantic is saying that all of these laws were broken.

67
00:04:41.240 --> 00:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's Usually the legal analysis for a story

68
00:04:44.720 --> 00:04:46.920
<v Speaker 1>like this, it takes like twenty four to forty eight

69
00:04:47.000 --> 00:04:49.879
<v Speaker 1>seventy two hours, maybe even a whole week before people

70
00:04:49.920 --> 00:04:52.759
<v Speaker 1>really get a solid sense of the legal issues at play.

71
00:04:53.000 --> 00:04:56.040
<v Speaker 1>So I was like, all right, well, let's hold off here,

72
00:04:57.439 --> 00:05:02.800
<v Speaker 1>let's wait and see. And I'm glad I did because

73
00:05:02.920 --> 00:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a better a clearer legal picture here,

74
00:05:07.360 --> 00:05:11.279
<v Speaker 1>and a clearer picture sort of the of a bunch

75
00:05:11.319 --> 00:05:20.519
<v Speaker 1>of different issues involved. All right, so let me discuss

76
00:05:20.639 --> 00:05:23.399
<v Speaker 1>sort of what happened, because I've actually used this app,

77
00:05:23.519 --> 00:05:28.879
<v Speaker 1>this app called Signal. All right, all of these top

78
00:05:29.560 --> 00:05:34.040
<v Speaker 1>defense officials, along with Vice President Vance, they think one

79
00:05:34.040 --> 00:05:38.600
<v Speaker 1>of the participants was Steven Miller, who's one of the

80
00:05:38.600 --> 00:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>president's top advisors. We're all on this chat in this

81
00:05:43.319 --> 00:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>app called Signal, and Signal is basically a forum for

82
00:05:48.879 --> 00:05:56.560
<v Speaker 1>secure and encrypted a synchronous group discussions. Think of it

83
00:05:56.639 --> 00:06:00.319
<v Speaker 1>like your a text group that you have with multiple people,

84
00:06:03.040 --> 00:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>which for high level government officials who are trying to

85
00:06:05.800 --> 00:06:14.199
<v Speaker 1>discuss sensitive top difficult topics. Some kind of asynchronous platform

86
00:06:14.759 --> 00:06:17.839
<v Speaker 1>for talking with each other where you don't you don't

87
00:06:17.839 --> 00:06:21.600
<v Speaker 1>have to coordinate that everyone has to be online all

88
00:06:21.639 --> 00:06:24.439
<v Speaker 1>at the same time to all discuss it together. This

89
00:06:24.480 --> 00:06:26.959
<v Speaker 1>could be useful for a bunch of high ranking government

90
00:06:27.000 --> 00:06:30.600
<v Speaker 1>officials who all are busy and have busy lives and

91
00:06:30.720 --> 00:06:36.040
<v Speaker 1>busy schedules, where you can go in, send a message,

92
00:06:36.120 --> 00:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>review what other people have said, give your opinion, and

93
00:06:39.319 --> 00:06:45.160
<v Speaker 1>go about your day. Now, the problem is is that

94
00:06:45.680 --> 00:06:49.519
<v Speaker 1>actually safe? Well there, I guess there are two problems.

95
00:06:49.680 --> 00:06:54.360
<v Speaker 1>One is that safe? Two is that legal? So one

96
00:06:54.399 --> 00:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>is it legal if you're sharing highly sensitive intelligence material,

97
00:07:07.879 --> 00:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a question about whether it's legal to do so

98
00:07:11.519 --> 00:07:17.079
<v Speaker 1>over a forum like Signal. Signal is encrypted, it's more

99
00:07:17.120 --> 00:07:19.759
<v Speaker 1>secure than just texting your buddy from your smartphone, but

100
00:07:19.800 --> 00:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not perfect. Russians had hacked signals servers once before

101
00:07:26.040 --> 00:07:30.839
<v Speaker 1>in the past, so it's not a perfectly immune thing. Also,

102
00:07:31.199 --> 00:07:36.759
<v Speaker 1>signal officials can use signal from their phones. Now were

103
00:07:36.759 --> 00:07:41.399
<v Speaker 1>they using it from their phones? Unclear? You can also

104
00:07:41.480 --> 00:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>use it from a desktop or a laptop computer, which

105
00:07:44.000 --> 00:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>that's how I've used signal. Also, there are some issues

106
00:07:50.240 --> 00:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that some of the officials who are on the thread,

107
00:07:52.560 --> 00:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>or thought to be on the thread, were in foreign countries.

108
00:07:56.360 --> 00:07:59.639
<v Speaker 1>One of them was allegedly in Russia. One of them

109
00:07:59.720 --> 00:08:05.319
<v Speaker 1>was in South Korea. Being in Russia with your phone

110
00:08:05.519 --> 00:08:10.680
<v Speaker 1>doing messaging with your phone could leave your phone open

111
00:08:11.199 --> 00:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>to hacking from intelligence agencies. You know, if you're in Russia, Russia,

112
00:08:20.040 --> 00:08:23.079
<v Speaker 1>there are hostile actors and hostile intelligence agencies trying to

113
00:08:23.120 --> 00:08:27.160
<v Speaker 1>hack into your stuff. If you're in South Korea, there,

114
00:08:27.680 --> 00:08:31.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's far more Chinese influence in South Korea

115
00:08:32.039 --> 00:08:40.879
<v Speaker 1>as far as intelligence, official intelligence entities, blah blah blah. However,

116
00:08:40.960 --> 00:08:44.159
<v Speaker 1>there's also this that signal might be the best thing

117
00:08:44.200 --> 00:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>we've got. There's an interesting piece by an interesting piece

118
00:08:51.399 --> 00:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>by Michael Brendan Doherty from National Review who wrote that basically,

119
00:08:58.519 --> 00:09:03.639
<v Speaker 1>basically Americans have this idea that our intelligence services have better,

120
00:09:04.279 --> 00:09:07.200
<v Speaker 1>more secure They've watched too many James Bond movies and

121
00:09:07.279 --> 00:09:09.879
<v Speaker 1>think that we've got that. Here. They are using this

122
00:09:09.960 --> 00:09:14.559
<v Speaker 1>commercially available app on their phones for communications. How insecure

123
00:09:14.759 --> 00:09:17.399
<v Speaker 1>is that? And what Dherty is saying, well, first of all,

124
00:09:18.120 --> 00:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>there was a Biden era memos sent out through the

125
00:09:23.519 --> 00:09:26.919
<v Speaker 1>Department of Homeland Security actually recommending the use of signal

126
00:09:27.600 --> 00:09:35.639
<v Speaker 1>for high level discussions. And what Dherty is saying is, well, look,

127
00:09:36.559 --> 00:09:40.159
<v Speaker 1>let's not kid ourselves. The US government actually doesn't necessarily

128
00:09:40.240 --> 00:09:45.919
<v Speaker 1>have like more secret, more secure, like better channels for

129
00:09:46.000 --> 00:09:50.639
<v Speaker 1>asynchronous communication than this. Now, some people have pointed out,

130
00:09:50.639 --> 00:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to share classified intelligence, you need to

131
00:09:53.039 --> 00:09:58.679
<v Speaker 1>be in a skiff, a secure contained intelligence something. It's

132
00:09:58.720 --> 00:10:00.840
<v Speaker 1>an acronym, but it basically needs Hey, you need to

133
00:10:00.840 --> 00:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>be in this secured area. All of these officials probably

134
00:10:04.480 --> 00:10:06.759
<v Speaker 1>have a skiff in their homes. They can also set

135
00:10:06.840 --> 00:10:11.039
<v Speaker 1>up a sort of traveling temporary skiff for anyone who's

136
00:10:11.399 --> 00:10:17.279
<v Speaker 1>on the road. But as far as asynchronous communications go,

137
00:10:17.480 --> 00:10:21.600
<v Speaker 1>signals seems to be the best thing going. And again,

138
00:10:22.159 --> 00:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, which is the part

139
00:10:26.000 --> 00:10:29.279
<v Speaker 1>of the Department of Homeland Security recommended that high level

140
00:10:29.279 --> 00:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>government officials switch to signal last year. So there's a

141
00:10:35.519 --> 00:10:39.080
<v Speaker 1>couple of different things. Was the law violated. It seems

142
00:10:39.159 --> 00:10:44.480
<v Speaker 1>like maybe the law was violated. There is a dispute

143
00:10:44.559 --> 00:10:50.440
<v Speaker 1>right now. Jeffrey Goldberg, Now, why did this? All of

144
00:10:50.440 --> 00:10:52.480
<v Speaker 1>this become known? I should have led with this. This

145
00:10:52.559 --> 00:10:56.279
<v Speaker 1>all became known because Mike Waltz, the National Security Advisor,

146
00:10:56.840 --> 00:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>accidentally added Jeffrey Goldberg into this chat. Jeffrey Goldberg, who

147
00:11:04.399 --> 00:11:06.960
<v Speaker 1>is not a national security official. He's just a writer

148
00:11:07.120 --> 00:11:13.600
<v Speaker 1>for The Atlantic, a mainstream media journalist and a pretty

149
00:11:13.639 --> 00:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>liberal one at that. And Goldberg was added to this

150
00:11:18.080 --> 00:11:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and just was astonished as he was reading, like all

151
00:11:22.519 --> 00:11:25.480
<v Speaker 1>this stuff about attacks against the Hoho thies that turned

152
00:11:25.519 --> 00:11:31.679
<v Speaker 1>out to be true. Now, Goldberg characterized some of the

153
00:11:31.720 --> 00:11:38.440
<v Speaker 1>stuff that was shared as quote, war plans, and the

154
00:11:38.480 --> 00:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration is saying, well, no, there wasn't any classified

155
00:11:42.039 --> 00:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>info that was actually shared on that. Goldberg also said

156
00:11:46.559 --> 00:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>that something was shared that might have involved an active

157
00:11:51.320 --> 00:11:57.159
<v Speaker 1>CIA intelligence agent, and he so he didn't publish certain

158
00:11:57.200 --> 00:12:01.200
<v Speaker 1>of these things. Now more stuff has been published, I

159
00:12:01.240 --> 00:12:03.759
<v Speaker 1>think in response to the Trump administration saying none of

160
00:12:03.799 --> 00:12:09.240
<v Speaker 1>them are Trump administration officials who keep saying, no, none

161
00:12:09.240 --> 00:12:15.279
<v Speaker 1>of the stuff actually shared on that was classified. So

162
00:12:15.799 --> 00:12:17.679
<v Speaker 1>it's a bit of a screw I mean, it's a

163
00:12:17.720 --> 00:12:22.960
<v Speaker 1>screw up, certainly, and I continue to dislike this thing

164
00:12:23.120 --> 00:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>where now and by the way, it doesn't seem like

165
00:12:28.480 --> 00:12:32.519
<v Speaker 1>anyone's head is going to roll over this, even for

166
00:12:32.600 --> 00:12:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the obvious mistake of adding a journalist to a conversation

167
00:12:35.519 --> 00:12:38.919
<v Speaker 1>between the Secretary of State, the National Security Advisor, the

168
00:12:39.320 --> 00:12:41.919
<v Speaker 1>Vice President of the United States, blah blah blah blah

169
00:12:41.919 --> 00:12:45.519
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah. It doesn't seem like anyone's head is

170
00:12:45.559 --> 00:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>going to roll over this. And the National Security Advisor

171
00:12:49.679 --> 00:12:52.639
<v Speaker 1>has publicly been stating he's never met Jeffrey Goldberg, he

172
00:12:52.639 --> 00:12:54.519
<v Speaker 1>has no idea who he is. He doesn't know how

173
00:12:54.759 --> 00:12:58.159
<v Speaker 1>that would have gotten into his signal contacts. There's a

174
00:12:58.200 --> 00:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>thought that there's a different Trump mitration official whose initials

175
00:13:03.480 --> 00:13:08.559
<v Speaker 1>are JG, whom he was trying to add. I wish

176
00:13:08.559 --> 00:13:10.000
<v Speaker 1>he had added me. I mean that would have been

177
00:13:10.039 --> 00:13:14.039
<v Speaker 1>super cool. But you know, alas as also a JG.

178
00:13:18.320 --> 00:13:21.799
<v Speaker 1>But it sounds like nobody's heads are going to roll

179
00:13:21.840 --> 00:13:26.200
<v Speaker 1>over this. And there's a part of me that doesn't

180
00:13:26.279 --> 00:13:29.279
<v Speaker 1>like that. So again, though we were not one hundred

181
00:13:29.320 --> 00:13:32.200
<v Speaker 1>percent sure was all of this information classified. Was all

182
00:13:32.200 --> 00:13:36.879
<v Speaker 1>this information not classified? Unclear if classified information was being

183
00:13:36.919 --> 00:13:45.039
<v Speaker 1>shared over an unauthorized platform. Low level people who do that,

184
00:13:46.639 --> 00:13:48.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them tend to get prosecuted. If you're

185
00:13:48.879 --> 00:13:53.080
<v Speaker 1>like a low level government contractor a low level official

186
00:13:53.120 --> 00:13:55.600
<v Speaker 1>who works for the CIA, a low level member of

187
00:13:55.639 --> 00:13:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the United States military and you share classified information in

188
00:13:59.320 --> 00:14:01.720
<v Speaker 1>a way you're not post do you get prosecuted and

189
00:14:01.759 --> 00:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>you go to jail. If you're a high ranking government

190
00:14:06.240 --> 00:14:09.799
<v Speaker 1>official and you do it, if you're Donald Trump, if

191
00:14:09.799 --> 00:14:15.919
<v Speaker 1>you're Hillary Clinton, if you're Joe Biden, if you're you know,

192
00:14:16.519 --> 00:14:19.399
<v Speaker 1>Secretary of State or something, you don't get in trouble. Now.

193
00:14:19.480 --> 00:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Actually Trump almost got Trump was indicted for it. Actually

194
00:14:25.799 --> 00:14:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump faced more potential retribution over it than anyone has,

195
00:14:30.679 --> 00:14:35.039
<v Speaker 1>and even he it didn't go very far. Now that

196
00:14:35.039 --> 00:14:36.720
<v Speaker 1>he's been elected, I think that whole case is going

197
00:14:36.759 --> 00:14:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to now that he's president of the United States, I

198
00:14:38.480 --> 00:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>think that whole case is going to get dropped. And actually,

199
00:14:42.200 --> 00:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>out of all of the lawsuits filed against Trump, the

200
00:14:45.120 --> 00:14:48.480
<v Speaker 1>only one that I ever thought was like legitimate was

201
00:14:48.559 --> 00:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>his retention of documents in mar A Lago that I

202
00:14:53.120 --> 00:14:55.519
<v Speaker 1>think that was the one thing that he clearly actually

203
00:14:55.519 --> 00:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>did something wrong. And of course Joe Biden did the

204
00:14:58.159 --> 00:15:01.480
<v Speaker 1>exact same thing. So there's a part of me that

205
00:15:01.519 --> 00:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't like this culture of like we will literally send

206
00:15:08.279 --> 00:15:11.080
<v Speaker 1>low level people to jail for doing the same thing

207
00:15:11.120 --> 00:15:13.519
<v Speaker 1>that high level people do. But I also I don't

208
00:15:13.559 --> 00:15:18.519
<v Speaker 1>know if what level of objective seriousness this is getting

209
00:15:18.559 --> 00:15:21.639
<v Speaker 1>away from what the law requires. I don't know how

210
00:15:21.679 --> 00:15:25.639
<v Speaker 1>bad this is as far as now. Obviously adding a

211
00:15:25.720 --> 00:15:30.519
<v Speaker 1>journalist accidentally is bad, but using signal itself as a

212
00:15:30.559 --> 00:15:32.639
<v Speaker 1>means of communicating this stuff, I don't know how bad

213
00:15:32.639 --> 00:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>it is. It seems like it's not sort of what

214
00:15:37.159 --> 00:15:41.399
<v Speaker 1>is authorized legally, but at the same time it's more

215
00:15:41.480 --> 00:15:44.360
<v Speaker 1>secure than what is authorized, or as secure as what

216
00:15:44.480 --> 00:15:47.679
<v Speaker 1>is authorized, and actually far more useful. If that's the case,

217
00:15:47.720 --> 00:15:50.279
<v Speaker 1>then probably the law needs to change to reflect that,

218
00:15:50.480 --> 00:15:55.639
<v Speaker 1>and or we need to be less severe in punishing

219
00:15:55.679 --> 00:16:03.919
<v Speaker 1>low level people who violate the law. So I guess

220
00:16:03.919 --> 00:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I obviously adding a journalist to a text thread like

221
00:16:07.879 --> 00:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>this is bad. I think we need to wait and

222
00:16:10.159 --> 00:16:17.559
<v Speaker 1>see about how classified was all this stuff actually and

223
00:16:17.720 --> 00:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>when we return, I want to talk about people's selective

224
00:16:21.799 --> 00:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>outrage at selective select members of this group chat and

225
00:16:29.679 --> 00:16:32.519
<v Speaker 1>how it all just seems to line up with people's

226
00:16:32.879 --> 00:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>ideological priors. That's next on the John Girardi Show. It's

227
00:16:38.240 --> 00:16:43.559
<v Speaker 1>very funny to read who people think, whom people think

228
00:16:43.600 --> 00:16:47.879
<v Speaker 1>should be fired, who people think should be fired. I'm

229
00:16:48.919 --> 00:16:50.480
<v Speaker 1>get a little confused by who and whom they're I

230
00:16:50.480 --> 00:16:52.879
<v Speaker 1>think it should be whom whom people think should be

231
00:16:52.919 --> 00:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>fired for the accidental adding of Jeff Goldberg, a columnist

232
00:16:59.000 --> 00:17:05.279
<v Speaker 1>for The Atlantic, into a signal chat group discussing the

233
00:17:05.359 --> 00:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>imminent American strikes against the Houthis that happened earlier this month.

234
00:17:10.960 --> 00:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Who should be fired over it? Whose heads should roll?

235
00:17:15.119 --> 00:17:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Democrats say everyone should be fired. The same Democrats who

236
00:17:19.480 --> 00:17:22.799
<v Speaker 1>didn't think a single person should be fired for the

237
00:17:22.839 --> 00:17:26.599
<v Speaker 1>Afghanistan debacle where people actually died, think all these people

238
00:17:26.680 --> 00:17:31.720
<v Speaker 1>should be fired over this. And both sides accused the

239
00:17:31.720 --> 00:17:33.799
<v Speaker 1>other side of hypocrisy. And it's sort of like, well,

240
00:17:34.000 --> 00:17:37.319
<v Speaker 1>if both sides are accusing the other of hypocrisy, are

241
00:17:37.400 --> 00:17:45.680
<v Speaker 1>both sides hypocritical? Here? You then have the selective people

242
00:17:46.160 --> 00:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>who selectively we want to fire there are certain kind

243
00:17:51.000 --> 00:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>of more neo con leaning outlets, including I like National

244
00:17:55.720 --> 00:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Review a lot. I write a lot for National Review,

245
00:17:57.519 --> 00:17:59.680
<v Speaker 1>but they're definitely Their foreign policy tends to lean a

246
00:17:59.720 --> 00:18:03.640
<v Speaker 1>certain direction that I don't one hundred percent agree with

247
00:18:03.640 --> 00:18:06.519
<v Speaker 1>all the time. I probably align most with their writer,

248
00:18:06.599 --> 00:18:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Michael Brendan Dherty. They've got two columns out, one saying

249
00:18:10.759 --> 00:18:15.640
<v Speaker 1>that Now, again, these are not editorials by the newspaper,

250
00:18:15.640 --> 00:18:18.759
<v Speaker 1>by the paper, it's just, you know, individual pieces by

251
00:18:18.839 --> 00:18:22.200
<v Speaker 1>individual people. One that Trump should fire Pete hagg Seth

252
00:18:22.240 --> 00:18:24.799
<v Speaker 1>and the other that Trump shouldn't fire Mike Waltz. Mike

253
00:18:24.799 --> 00:18:27.559
<v Speaker 1>Waltz is a good guy, Mike Waltz the National Security Advisor,

254
00:18:27.839 --> 00:18:31.559
<v Speaker 1>So we should fire Pete hegg Seth, the Defense Secretary,

255
00:18:31.559 --> 00:18:34.319
<v Speaker 1>but we shouldn't fire the National Security Advisor, even though

256
00:18:34.480 --> 00:18:37.200
<v Speaker 1>it was the National Security Advisor himself who started the

257
00:18:37.200 --> 00:18:42.240
<v Speaker 1>whole group chat, added Jeff Goldberg to it, the guy

258
00:18:42.279 --> 00:18:44.599
<v Speaker 1>who wasn't supposed to be on it. It's the whole

259
00:18:44.640 --> 00:18:48.559
<v Speaker 1>reason this debacle started in the first place. Now, why

260
00:18:48.599 --> 00:18:51.480
<v Speaker 1>are people wanting to fire Pete hagg Seth and not

261
00:18:51.519 --> 00:18:56.200
<v Speaker 1>wanting to fire Mike Waltz. Well, Waltz as the National

262
00:18:56.200 --> 00:19:01.039
<v Speaker 1>Security Advisor, was not thought to be a particularly maga

263
00:19:01.079 --> 00:19:06.359
<v Speaker 1>pick by Trump, and Waltz seems to be more favored

264
00:19:07.279 --> 00:19:12.119
<v Speaker 1>by some of the more neo con leaning people. He

265
00:19:12.160 --> 00:19:15.400
<v Speaker 1>has more friends in sort of what used to be

266
00:19:15.480 --> 00:19:19.559
<v Speaker 1>the quote establishment, right, so everyone it seems like there's

267
00:19:19.559 --> 00:19:21.440
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of people like rushing to say no, no, no, no,

268
00:19:21.440 --> 00:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>no no.

269
00:19:22.039 --> 00:19:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Mike Waltz is a good guy. You know, this one

270
00:19:25.039 --> 00:19:26.240
<v Speaker 2>screw up, you should get fired.

271
00:19:26.519 --> 00:19:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Meanwhile, none of that crowd likes Pete Hegseth one bit.

272
00:19:32.559 --> 00:19:36.119
<v Speaker 1>Heg Seth is very much a maga pick and a

273
00:19:36.160 --> 00:19:39.279
<v Speaker 1>maga darling. So no, no, no, we got to get

274
00:19:39.359 --> 00:19:44.920
<v Speaker 1>rid of Pete Hegseth. And it's also one of the

275
00:19:44.920 --> 00:19:48.319
<v Speaker 1>things I've been laughing at is sort of the outrage

276
00:19:48.319 --> 00:19:53.559
<v Speaker 1>over the content of what was shared in the text

277
00:19:53.559 --> 00:20:01.039
<v Speaker 1>group that that makes neo conservative commentators so angry. I mean, basically,

278
00:20:01.079 --> 00:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>there's what I've seen in the conservative commentariat is sort

279
00:20:07.039 --> 00:20:11.680
<v Speaker 1>of at this higher level of like neo conservative commentators

280
00:20:11.759 --> 00:20:16.000
<v Speaker 1>hate JD. Vans. They just despise him. They hate everything

281
00:20:16.039 --> 00:20:20.200
<v Speaker 1>about him that. They hate his foreign policy, they hate

282
00:20:20.200 --> 00:20:23.640
<v Speaker 1>his views of foreign relations and the foreign policy stuff.

283
00:20:23.720 --> 00:20:28.119
<v Speaker 1>Really drives these people. Their knives are sharpened. They hate

284
00:20:28.119 --> 00:20:30.359
<v Speaker 1>his views on Ukraine, they hate his views on America's

285
00:20:30.400 --> 00:20:33.039
<v Speaker 1>role in the world. That they are just desperate for

286
00:20:33.160 --> 00:20:35.519
<v Speaker 1>any chance to knife him, any chance they get. And

287
00:20:35.559 --> 00:20:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I think they're trying to think, Okay, whom can we

288
00:20:38.559 --> 00:20:41.920
<v Speaker 1>groom to replace JD. Vans in twenty twenty eight. They

289
00:20:42.200 --> 00:20:45.960
<v Speaker 1>just despise him, and they've really been playing up certain

290
00:20:46.039 --> 00:20:48.160
<v Speaker 1>aspects of what was shared in this signal group that

291
00:20:48.160 --> 00:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I actually thought was fascinating. When we return, I'm going

292
00:20:50.039 --> 00:20:53.119
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the actual content of what was shared

293
00:20:53.640 --> 00:20:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and why it left me actually somewhat impressed. That's next

294
00:20:56.920 --> 00:21:02.519
<v Speaker 1>on the John Girardi Show. Less discussed, although definitely noted,

295
00:21:02.640 --> 00:21:06.440
<v Speaker 1>definitely noted in the commentariat, especially among neoconservative commentators who

296
00:21:06.480 --> 00:21:10.119
<v Speaker 1>despise Jade Vance and all his works and all his

297
00:21:10.240 --> 00:21:14.880
<v Speaker 1>pomps and just hate everything about him. Is the actual

298
00:21:15.039 --> 00:21:19.599
<v Speaker 1>content of the discussions that took place in this leaked

299
00:21:19.880 --> 00:21:25.240
<v Speaker 1>signal chat room between Mike Waltz, the National Security Advisor,

300
00:21:25.480 --> 00:21:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Marco Rubio, JD. Vance, Pete Hegseth, et cetera, et cetera,

301
00:21:29.160 --> 00:21:33.400
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, Stephen Miller. It's thought one of the President's

302
00:21:33.440 --> 00:21:42.079
<v Speaker 1>close advisors. In this discussion about the houthis and it reflects,

303
00:21:42.119 --> 00:21:44.839
<v Speaker 1>I think, a very different kind of approach to American

304
00:21:44.880 --> 00:21:47.480
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy. All right, so, what's the problem. You have

305
00:21:47.559 --> 00:21:52.759
<v Speaker 1>these houthies who are harassing shipping in the Red Sea

306
00:21:53.480 --> 00:21:59.319
<v Speaker 1>international shipping. Now, some American shipping goes through the Red Sea,

307
00:21:59.400 --> 00:22:05.240
<v Speaker 1>but it is more so a benefit to Europe. A

308
00:22:05.279 --> 00:22:07.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of European shipping goes through the Red Sea. And

309
00:22:07.240 --> 00:22:12.519
<v Speaker 1>these hoothy rebel pirates basically are huge disruptors to international

310
00:22:12.559 --> 00:22:17.319
<v Speaker 1>trade and have made things more expensive, made things more difficult.

311
00:22:17.400 --> 00:22:25.519
<v Speaker 1>It's bad, okay, And so the discussion comes, well, should

312
00:22:25.559 --> 00:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>we more aggressively strike Vance in this discussion, I thought,

313
00:22:32.720 --> 00:22:34.880
<v Speaker 1>by the way, that the level of the discussion was

314
00:22:34.920 --> 00:22:37.880
<v Speaker 1>actually like the kind of thing you would expect and

315
00:22:37.960 --> 00:22:41.279
<v Speaker 1>want to see from top administration officials. The problem is

316
00:22:41.400 --> 00:22:45.079
<v Speaker 1>us seeing it no in the pages of the Atlantic

317
00:22:45.160 --> 00:22:51.799
<v Speaker 1>rather than you know, them just keeping it confidential. Vance

318
00:22:53.240 --> 00:22:57.039
<v Speaker 1>discussed at length a couple of points that I thought

319
00:22:58.160 --> 00:23:02.119
<v Speaker 1>were noteworthy, that this would be another instance of the

320
00:23:02.200 --> 00:23:09.119
<v Speaker 1>United States bailing out Europe. That you know, again, this

321
00:23:09.160 --> 00:23:13.440
<v Speaker 1>is Europe freeloading on the United States. As military build up,

322
00:23:14.039 --> 00:23:20.079
<v Speaker 1>that the Europeans have been able as NATO members to

323
00:23:21.200 --> 00:23:26.160
<v Speaker 1>reduce their level of military spending in their countries as

324
00:23:26.160 --> 00:23:28.960
<v Speaker 1>a percentage of GDP lower and lower and lower and

325
00:23:29.000 --> 00:23:31.880
<v Speaker 1>lower and lower, including lower than sort of the required

326
00:23:32.279 --> 00:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>levels for NATO membership. Why Well, because they know that

327
00:23:36.039 --> 00:23:41.559
<v Speaker 1>the United States has got it, and we kept building up, up, up, up,

328
00:23:41.599 --> 00:23:43.920
<v Speaker 1>up up up our military, especially for our misadventures in

329
00:23:43.960 --> 00:23:48.279
<v Speaker 1>a rock in Afghanistan. So are another bad consequence of

330
00:23:48.279 --> 00:23:50.839
<v Speaker 1>a rock in Afghanistan? I think is we built up

331
00:23:50.880 --> 00:23:59.880
<v Speaker 1>our military and they built down theirs. So Dvance starts asking,

332
00:24:00.039 --> 00:24:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, why are we doing this? This is properly

333
00:24:04.920 --> 00:24:07.200
<v Speaker 1>something that europe should do. Yes, it does involve some

334
00:24:07.279 --> 00:24:09.680
<v Speaker 1>American shipping, but it's far more a benefit to Europe

335
00:24:09.720 --> 00:24:12.480
<v Speaker 1>than it is to us. What are we going to

336
00:24:12.519 --> 00:24:15.240
<v Speaker 1>get out of this? We should get something out of it.

337
00:24:15.559 --> 00:24:20.279
<v Speaker 1>Are there concessions that we can get from the Europeans

338
00:24:21.759 --> 00:24:28.119
<v Speaker 1>for this? And that was a big part of the discussion.

339
00:24:29.480 --> 00:24:34.599
<v Speaker 1>Now after the fact, and by the way, let me

340
00:24:34.640 --> 00:24:41.960
<v Speaker 1>just say this, I think most Republican voters hearing that

341
00:24:42.200 --> 00:24:47.960
<v Speaker 1>would say hell yeah, hell yeah, jd Vance. They are

342
00:24:48.079 --> 00:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>free loaders like That's been the funniest thing thing to

343
00:24:51.519 --> 00:24:55.559
<v Speaker 1>me in the Ukraine discussions, where you know, President Trump's

344
00:24:55.559 --> 00:24:59.279
<v Speaker 1>trying to do some kind of negotiated ceasefire whatever between

345
00:24:59.319 --> 00:25:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Russian and Ukraine.

346
00:25:00.079 --> 00:25:00.160
<v Speaker 2>And.

347
00:25:02.720 --> 00:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, they had the stupid meeting at the White

348
00:25:05.000 --> 00:25:08.960
<v Speaker 1>House where Zelensky sort of blew up the meeting with

349
00:25:09.640 --> 00:25:11.799
<v Speaker 1>in front of the cameras with with Trump and Vance

350
00:25:12.440 --> 00:25:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and all these europe A couple of these European nations

351
00:25:16.440 --> 00:25:20.119
<v Speaker 1>responded by saying, well, then we should The.

352
00:25:20.160 --> 00:25:22.559
<v Speaker 2>United States is not going to the United States is

353
00:25:22.599 --> 00:25:25.920
<v Speaker 2>abandoning us. Therefore we should build up our militaries, have

354
00:25:26.000 --> 00:25:29.839
<v Speaker 2>our own deturn. Now, first of all, that that's tough talk,

355
00:25:29.920 --> 00:25:31.960
<v Speaker 2>but that's going to be very difficult for them to do.

356
00:25:32.000 --> 00:25:34.920
<v Speaker 2>They they've you know, defunded their military so much over

357
00:25:34.920 --> 00:25:37.599
<v Speaker 2>the last twenty years. There's such a gap that even

358
00:25:37.640 --> 00:25:41.319
<v Speaker 2>if they, you know, massively increased their defense spending that

359
00:25:41.319 --> 00:25:45.000
<v Speaker 2>they're as I've heard Michael Brendan Doherty described this in

360
00:25:45.079 --> 00:25:48.839
<v Speaker 2>National Review, even if they massively increase their defense spending

361
00:25:48.880 --> 00:25:52.559
<v Speaker 2>over the next ten years, there they'll barely be in

362
00:25:52.599 --> 00:25:57.720
<v Speaker 2>the child's passenger seat of NATO as far as a

363
00:25:57.720 --> 00:26:04.200
<v Speaker 2>big boy contributor. But the idea that these Europeans think, ooh,

364
00:26:04.240 --> 00:26:06.119
<v Speaker 2>we'll stick it to Donald Trump by building up our

365
00:26:06.119 --> 00:26:08.640
<v Speaker 2>own military and taking care of these, you know, helping

366
00:26:08.680 --> 00:26:12.359
<v Speaker 2>out our Ukraine itself. Do you really think Donald Trump

367
00:26:12.440 --> 00:26:16.079
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't love that. That's exactly what Trump's been saying. He's

368
00:26:16.240 --> 00:26:18.519
<v Speaker 2>desperate for you guys to build up your own military

369
00:26:18.559 --> 00:26:20.440
<v Speaker 2>and take care of your own stinking affairs rather than

370
00:26:20.519 --> 00:26:21.279
<v Speaker 2>us being called in.

371
00:26:25.480 --> 00:26:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, the Europeans might actually build up their own

372
00:26:27.680 --> 00:26:30.440
<v Speaker 1>militaries and handle their own freaking problems for once. Yes,

373
00:26:30.680 --> 00:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Trump wants that. That's not like, this is not some

374
00:26:33.440 --> 00:26:36.400
<v Speaker 1>oh dear, oh dear me, what a threat. No, that's

375
00:26:36.440 --> 00:26:38.640
<v Speaker 1>precis you know what else are you gonna do? Make

376
00:26:38.680 --> 00:26:40.440
<v Speaker 1>me a steak dinner and get me a nice bottle

377
00:26:40.440 --> 00:26:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of white like, uh, that's what I want. However, there

378
00:26:48.000 --> 00:26:50.559
<v Speaker 1>are a bunch of these sort of neocon writers now

379
00:26:50.799 --> 00:26:53.640
<v Speaker 1>who are writing these things about how terrible jd Vance

380
00:26:53.720 --> 00:26:59.079
<v Speaker 1>is for acting transactional with American shipping. I'm shipping free

381
00:26:59.119 --> 00:27:02.440
<v Speaker 1>shipping lanes or good for everyone, and it's an important role.

382
00:27:02.720 --> 00:27:05.920
<v Speaker 1>How can a marine not be aware that the United

383
00:27:05.960 --> 00:27:08.680
<v Speaker 1>States military has been involved in anti piracy efforts since

384
00:27:08.720 --> 00:27:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the very founding of the Marines, from the wholes of

385
00:27:10.759 --> 00:27:14.519
<v Speaker 1>Montezuma to the shores of Tripoli, which is when the

386
00:27:14.559 --> 00:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Marine Corps first began its action against pirates under Thomas Jefferson.

387
00:27:23.160 --> 00:27:28.640
<v Speaker 1>And it's all this like preachy stuff, But this is

388
00:27:28.720 --> 00:27:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the mandate that won the election, is the Vance view.

389
00:27:34.759 --> 00:27:48.440
<v Speaker 1>We're tired of foreign policy stuff that isn't clearly benefiting us. Okay,

390
00:27:48.480 --> 00:27:52.000
<v Speaker 1>it's bad that Russia is invading Ukraine. It's very bad.

391
00:27:52.200 --> 00:27:55.519
<v Speaker 1>We don't like it. Putin's a bad guy. The Ukrainians

392
00:27:56.000 --> 00:27:59.240
<v Speaker 1>totally understand that they want all the money in the world,

393
00:27:59.279 --> 00:28:03.359
<v Speaker 1>all the weapons of everything possible to fight them off.

394
00:28:03.519 --> 00:28:10.119
<v Speaker 1>That God bless them, but it's all on our dollar.

395
00:28:10.440 --> 00:28:13.240
<v Speaker 1>It needs to be clear that there's some benefit we

396
00:28:13.319 --> 00:28:19.240
<v Speaker 1>get out of this, because guess what, guys, whoever controls

397
00:28:19.319 --> 00:28:25.359
<v Speaker 1>the Donbas, the territory in the southeast Ukraine that's near

398
00:28:25.359 --> 00:28:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the Black Sea, whoever controls the Donbas doesn't change a

399
00:28:29.480 --> 00:28:34.680
<v Speaker 1>flipping thing for you and me. It just doesn't change

400
00:28:34.759 --> 00:28:40.359
<v Speaker 1>much about American life. So if we're gonna get involved

401
00:28:41.000 --> 00:28:42.839
<v Speaker 1>or give them money or something, there's got to be

402
00:28:42.880 --> 00:28:48.240
<v Speaker 1>some kind of clear benefit to US, because that's Russia's

403
00:28:48.319 --> 00:28:51.240
<v Speaker 1>encroachment in Ukraine, I agree is threatening. It ain't threatening

404
00:28:51.240 --> 00:28:54.519
<v Speaker 1>to me, it's threatening to people who live in Poland.

405
00:28:56.680 --> 00:28:59.039
<v Speaker 1>It's threatening to people who live in Latvia and Estonia.

406
00:28:59.640 --> 00:29:03.960
<v Speaker 1>So maybe if there was like a union of European

407
00:29:04.680 --> 00:29:10.680
<v Speaker 1>countries who could all coordinate their funding and their militaries

408
00:29:11.279 --> 00:29:13.799
<v Speaker 1>to provide their own deterrent against If only there was

409
00:29:13.839 --> 00:29:18.039
<v Speaker 1>like a Union of Europe, like a like a Union

410
00:29:18.240 --> 00:29:23.160
<v Speaker 1>of Europe that had a bigger population than the United

411
00:29:23.160 --> 00:29:28.799
<v Speaker 1>States does and a GDP. No, maybe not more than

412
00:29:28.799 --> 00:29:31.599
<v Speaker 1>the United States, but maybe comparable, and that could pool

413
00:29:31.640 --> 00:29:37.119
<v Speaker 1>its resources. But no, the European Union hasn't done that.

414
00:29:37.400 --> 00:29:39.519
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't think there's any reason the European

415
00:29:39.599 --> 00:29:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Union couldn't be a stronger military power. But guess what.

416
00:29:43.920 --> 00:29:48.359
<v Speaker 1>European Union is full of countries that have a welfare state.

417
00:29:49.000 --> 00:29:52.079
<v Speaker 1>They're paying off everybody's pensions, and they don't have the

418
00:29:52.119 --> 00:29:56.440
<v Speaker 1>money right now, or they don't think they have the money,

419
00:29:56.519 --> 00:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>or they just have not prioritized defense spending, and so

420
00:30:00.920 --> 00:30:03.599
<v Speaker 1>as a result, they're like two decades behind where they

421
00:30:03.599 --> 00:30:05.559
<v Speaker 1>ought to be. If they actually want to provide a

422
00:30:05.559 --> 00:30:11.359
<v Speaker 1>de turrn to Russia. So at any rate, do I

423
00:30:11.400 --> 00:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>think anyone should be fired over you know, this signal group?

424
00:30:18.240 --> 00:30:22.599
<v Speaker 1>I mean, probably somebody should, right, I mean, I don't know,

425
00:30:23.200 --> 00:30:25.039
<v Speaker 1>And it's all I mean, none of these people are

426
00:30:25.079 --> 00:30:30.119
<v Speaker 1>going to hit the breadline. Are any of these people indispensable?

427
00:30:30.839 --> 00:30:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I mean, it seems like signal has

428
00:30:34.440 --> 00:30:37.200
<v Speaker 1>become kind of a best practices thing. I'm not sure

429
00:30:37.200 --> 00:30:39.480
<v Speaker 1>that I'm actually upset about people using signal for these

430
00:30:39.559 --> 00:30:44.000
<v Speaker 1>kinds of communications. The more I'm reading about it, the

431
00:30:44.000 --> 00:30:46.039
<v Speaker 1>more I'm sort of thinking, well, I don't know that

432
00:30:46.119 --> 00:30:50.079
<v Speaker 1>this is actually less secure than an actually you know,

433
00:30:50.160 --> 00:30:55.799
<v Speaker 1>government approved secure communications channel. And there's also I think

434
00:30:55.839 --> 00:30:58.880
<v Speaker 1>this open question of was what you know, the Trump

435
00:30:58.920 --> 00:31:02.160
<v Speaker 1>administration is claimed maybe this is a cya. I don't know.

436
00:31:03.000 --> 00:31:05.400
<v Speaker 1>They could be full of it, but the Trump Administration's

437
00:31:05.400 --> 00:31:09.160
<v Speaker 1>claiming it wasn't anything classified disgust I don't know. It

438
00:31:09.319 --> 00:31:11.640
<v Speaker 1>seems a little difficult for me to believe the timing

439
00:31:11.839 --> 00:31:17.359
<v Speaker 1>of a missile strike, you know, the when and where

440
00:31:17.400 --> 00:31:19.799
<v Speaker 1>it's going to happen, A missile strike that hasn't happened yet.

441
00:31:20.319 --> 00:31:23.480
<v Speaker 1>It seems like that would be seems like that would

442
00:31:23.480 --> 00:31:27.319
<v Speaker 1>be secured but they're saying not. I mean, there's a

443
00:31:27.319 --> 00:31:30.279
<v Speaker 1>pretty bold claim to make publicly when you know that

444
00:31:30.599 --> 00:31:34.319
<v Speaker 1>it's in the possession of a hostile journalist who can

445
00:31:34.400 --> 00:31:38.680
<v Speaker 1>share it with the Intelligence Committee anytime he wants. So

446
00:31:39.920 --> 00:31:42.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I think it depends a little bit

447
00:31:42.839 --> 00:31:47.559
<v Speaker 1>on whether the stuff was actually classified, how sensitive it was.

448
00:31:48.759 --> 00:31:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't necessarily have I don't necessarily have

449
00:31:55.680 --> 00:31:57.559
<v Speaker 1>a dog in the fight. I don't actually know that

450
00:31:57.680 --> 00:32:00.319
<v Speaker 1>much about Mike Waltz. There again, there's this person exception

451
00:32:00.480 --> 00:32:05.240
<v Speaker 1>of him as a bit more establishment GOP foreign policy friendly,

452
00:32:05.319 --> 00:32:09.720
<v Speaker 1>less MAGA, so there's some knives out for him. There's

453
00:32:09.759 --> 00:32:12.000
<v Speaker 1>some people vigorously trying to defend him, but trying to

454
00:32:12.000 --> 00:32:17.920
<v Speaker 1>fire Pete hegg Seth, which I think is silly. Waltz, clearly, though,

455
00:32:18.079 --> 00:32:20.759
<v Speaker 1>was the person who added Jeffrey Goldberg to the group,

456
00:32:20.960 --> 00:32:24.640
<v Speaker 1>to this chat group, and he's trying to I don't

457
00:32:24.680 --> 00:32:27.799
<v Speaker 1>know how that could have happened, but you know he

458
00:32:27.880 --> 00:32:33.359
<v Speaker 1>did it. So I don't know. If I guess if

459
00:32:33.359 --> 00:32:36.279
<v Speaker 1>anyone should be fired, it's him. I'm loath to believe

460
00:32:36.319 --> 00:32:40.519
<v Speaker 1>that signal was an inappropriate venue. I find it difficult

461
00:32:40.559 --> 00:32:42.519
<v Speaker 1>to believe I should say that signal was an inappropriate

462
00:32:42.599 --> 00:32:47.039
<v Speaker 1>venue for sharing this communication only because of how many

463
00:32:47.519 --> 00:32:51.519
<v Speaker 1>top officials were on it. Marc Rubio, Pete hegg Seth

464
00:32:51.720 --> 00:32:54.759
<v Speaker 1>JD vans this person that including people with with with

465
00:32:54.920 --> 00:32:58.359
<v Speaker 1>lots of experience with intelligence and intelligence sharing and secure

466
00:32:58.759 --> 00:33:02.079
<v Speaker 1>intelligent sharing, that that none of them would have thought, Hey,

467
00:33:02.160 --> 00:33:04.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe this isn't the best venue for sharing this stuff.

468
00:33:06.000 --> 00:33:08.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it makes me think that this is sort

469
00:33:08.839 --> 00:33:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of the standard that is used for sharing this kind

470
00:33:11.960 --> 00:33:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. So should anyone get fired? I don't know.

471
00:33:16.519 --> 00:33:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I think if anyone should, I guess it's Mike Waltz,

472
00:33:18.960 --> 00:33:21.000
<v Speaker 1>because he was the one who added some random journalists

473
00:33:21.000 --> 00:33:27.960
<v Speaker 1>to this, which all seems a little suspicious to me.

474
00:33:28.480 --> 00:33:32.200
<v Speaker 1>By the way, a very prominent journalist from the Atlantic

475
00:33:32.279 --> 00:33:36.599
<v Speaker 1>is the one who got added. I have no proof,

476
00:33:36.799 --> 00:33:43.960
<v Speaker 1>but of all the jgs that Mike Waltz knew, he

477
00:33:44.039 --> 00:33:46.160
<v Speaker 1>picks the one JG who happens to write from a

478
00:33:46.279 --> 00:33:51.119
<v Speaker 1>major mainstream media outlet. Seems a little suspicious. And I

479
00:33:51.160 --> 00:33:53.079
<v Speaker 1>wonder if there were going to learn anything more about that.

480
00:33:53.119 --> 00:33:55.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, when we returned getting away from all this

481
00:33:55.279 --> 00:34:00.000
<v Speaker 1>national security stuff, the really important stuff, baby names Republican

482
00:34:00.640 --> 00:34:04.000
<v Speaker 1>stop giving your babies terrible names. Next on the John

483
00:34:04.039 --> 00:34:07.799
<v Speaker 1>Girardi Show. All right, to close it out, Let's close

484
00:34:07.799 --> 00:34:11.840
<v Speaker 1>it out on something light baby names. There is this

485
00:34:11.960 --> 00:34:17.840
<v Speaker 1>website called name Berry, which tracks names parents give their

486
00:34:18.039 --> 00:34:21.920
<v Speaker 1>newborn babies throughout the United States. And someone did a

487
00:34:21.920 --> 00:34:26.920
<v Speaker 1>tweet where he did an analysis of names that are

488
00:34:27.079 --> 00:34:30.679
<v Speaker 1>most prominent in Blue states versus most prominent in Red

489
00:34:30.719 --> 00:34:32.920
<v Speaker 1>states and did it by boys and girls. So you

490
00:34:32.960 --> 00:34:38.280
<v Speaker 1>take a name, and eighty percent of this name happens

491
00:34:38.320 --> 00:34:42.239
<v Speaker 1>in Blue states. Okay. That's so eighty percent of kids

492
00:34:42.239 --> 00:34:44.639
<v Speaker 1>with this name are born in a Blue state. Okay.

493
00:34:44.679 --> 00:34:46.440
<v Speaker 1>So it's a little bit of an analysis of like

494
00:34:46.719 --> 00:34:50.760
<v Speaker 1>how liberals are naming their babies versus conservatives. Now, when

495
00:34:50.760 --> 00:34:55.119
<v Speaker 1>you look at the most Blue state prominent names, a

496
00:34:55.199 --> 00:35:07.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of them are Jewish or Muslim. Okay, So Yusuf, Ali, Ibrahim, Okay,

497
00:35:07.239 --> 00:35:13.320
<v Speaker 1>those are all Muslim boy names, Mohammed. Okay. The most

498
00:35:13.480 --> 00:35:16.719
<v Speaker 1>Blue State prevalent name is Mosha, which is a Jewish name,

499
00:35:17.119 --> 00:35:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's probably mostly like very orthodox Jewish

500
00:35:20.400 --> 00:35:22.519
<v Speaker 1>people naming their kids Mosha. So ninety seven percent of

501
00:35:22.559 --> 00:35:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Mosha's are in Blue states. Okay, that makes sense. They're

502
00:35:25.320 --> 00:35:30.000
<v Speaker 1>probably all in New York Santino. Eighty two percent of

503
00:35:30.000 --> 00:35:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Santinos are in Blue states, So that's probably like, if

504
00:35:31.920 --> 00:35:35.199
<v Speaker 1>you're really hardcore Italian and you live in New York

505
00:35:35.400 --> 00:35:38.679
<v Speaker 1>or you know, Rhode Island or something like that, you're

506
00:35:38.760 --> 00:35:41.320
<v Speaker 1>naming your kids Santino. Okay, then you go to the

507
00:35:41.320 --> 00:35:45.280
<v Speaker 1>girl names, and the girl names are a bit more Yeah, Fiona,

508
00:35:46.639 --> 00:35:49.880
<v Speaker 1>are these all people who watch Shrek when they were

509
00:35:49.960 --> 00:35:55.920
<v Speaker 1>kids now having babies? Leanna Mira Mariam I think is

510
00:35:55.920 --> 00:36:02.719
<v Speaker 1>a Muslim name. Kira Miriam, I think that's a Jewish name.

511
00:36:03.079 --> 00:36:10.840
<v Speaker 1>More so, uh Nina, Aiesha, Paige Kayla. Now you read

512
00:36:10.880 --> 00:36:13.599
<v Speaker 1>Staters listening to this, you were conservatives listening to this,

513
00:36:14.760 --> 00:36:18.559
<v Speaker 1>I would caution you about making fun of these names, because,

514
00:36:18.679 --> 00:36:22.280
<v Speaker 1>let me just tell you the boy names. Sorry, the

515
00:36:22.320 --> 00:36:27.079
<v Speaker 1>Red state prevalent names are a train wreck. Let's get

516
00:36:27.119 --> 00:36:32.400
<v Speaker 1>into it. Okay. The most Red state prevalent name with

517
00:36:32.719 --> 00:36:35.119
<v Speaker 1>seventy two percent of these kids live in Red States,

518
00:36:35.880 --> 00:36:38.519
<v Speaker 1>and then the alternates, seventy two percent of kids with

519
00:36:38.559 --> 00:36:41.159
<v Speaker 1>this name live in Red states. Cohen with a K.

520
00:36:42.639 --> 00:36:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Red Staters, why are you naming your non Jewish child Cohen?

521
00:36:50.000 --> 00:36:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Cohen is a Jewish surname. It's an incredibly Jewish surname.

522
00:36:56.000 --> 00:36:59.000
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I read a thing somewhere saying that people

523
00:36:59.079 --> 00:37:04.199
<v Speaker 1>named Cohen were thought to be descended from like the

524
00:37:04.320 --> 00:37:09.280
<v Speaker 1>priestly line of Jewish people, like the descendants of Aaron

525
00:37:09.360 --> 00:37:11.960
<v Speaker 1>who served as the priests in the Old Testament Covenant.

526
00:37:12.159 --> 00:37:17.719
<v Speaker 1>That's what Cohen signifies. Red State women, Why are you

527
00:37:17.880 --> 00:37:22.480
<v Speaker 1>naming your highly not Jewish child Cohen? Because Cohen with

528
00:37:22.519 --> 00:37:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a C is also on the Red State prevalent name

529
00:37:25.960 --> 00:37:30.199
<v Speaker 1>sixty sixty one percent of Cohen's with a SEA live

530
00:37:30.239 --> 00:37:32.039
<v Speaker 1>in Red State. Seventy two percent of Cohen's with a

531
00:37:32.119 --> 00:37:33.880
<v Speaker 1>K live in Red State. By the way, Cohen with

532
00:37:33.920 --> 00:37:35.440
<v Speaker 1>a K, I don't think it's even like the most

533
00:37:35.599 --> 00:37:40.800
<v Speaker 1>common way that Cohen is spelled, like as a laughs name,

534
00:37:41.440 --> 00:37:45.760
<v Speaker 1>So like you're you're both intentionally misspelling it and not

535
00:37:45.800 --> 00:37:48.559
<v Speaker 1>making any sense. Here are the other boy name Red

536
00:37:48.599 --> 00:37:55.199
<v Speaker 1>State boy names, Baylor, Stetson, Kisen, Trip Sutton, Cohen, Gunner, Baker.

537
00:37:55.239 --> 00:37:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Are you just trying to get all the names of

538
00:37:56.880 --> 00:38:01.360
<v Speaker 1>all the characters from Yellowstone? And then the girl names

539
00:38:01.400 --> 00:38:04.880
<v Speaker 1>are a total train wreck? Hattie Oaklynn with a y

540
00:38:05.039 --> 00:38:07.159
<v Speaker 1>n n oak Lee with an E I G H.

541
00:38:07.239 --> 00:38:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Grace Lynn with a Y N N Renley. I don't

542
00:38:10.000 --> 00:38:12.360
<v Speaker 1>even know what that means. Blake Lee, that's the last

543
00:38:12.440 --> 00:38:15.400
<v Speaker 1>name Collins, that's a last name, Oaklee with two e's,

544
00:38:15.519 --> 00:38:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Are you kidding me? Sailor with an A Y L

545
00:38:18.360 --> 00:38:22.559
<v Speaker 1>O R Oakley. Do you like the sunglasses? That'll do it?

546
00:38:22.599 --> 00:38:24.440
<v Speaker 1>John Girardi show, see you next time on Power Talk
