Speaker 1: So there's some comparisons to make in the show today
Speaker 1: intent design versus outcome or are we really dealing with intent?
Speaker 1: There is a series of stories where we have, for instance, narrative,
Speaker 1: narrative turn on its heads, you know, the whole idea
Speaker 1: of people who are confused about their gender or defiant
Speaker 1: of it and they're wildly abused. Yeah, I've known for
Speaker 1: this for some time and maybe you have as well,
Speaker 1: but there's some new data that shows that's not the case.
Speaker 1: In fact, the opposite is true. And then remember that
Speaker 1: desire to protect women. There was an app called the
Speaker 1: t app. I was going to protect women, women can
Speaker 1: run background checks and men sort of crowdsourcing men, and
Speaker 1: something happened there intent design, who knows will try to
Speaker 1: peace through this? Then there's this idea, of course that
Speaker 1: women are the ones we can trust in society to
Speaker 1: keep us safe because they're very, very calm. And this
Speaker 1: is an example of a woman who works for a
Speaker 1: security company and she has some ideas on what she
Speaker 1: wants to start doing in white communities. So we'll talk
Speaker 1: about design, intent, comparisons, contrast, and compare across these many
Speaker 1: many factors. Let's see if we can find the through line.
Speaker 1: We'll talk about this with the help of Bulwark Capital
Speaker 1: Management at Know Your riskpodcast dot com and God Almighty.
Speaker 2: But Todd Herman show is one disapproved by big pharma
Speaker 2: technocrats in tyrans everywhere from the hind mountains of Free America.
Speaker 2: Here's the Emerald City exime Todd Herman.
Speaker 3: Today is the day the Lord has made in These
Speaker 3: are the times through which God has decided where shall live.
Speaker 3: The website says that there was a community of four million,
Speaker 3: six hundred and forty seven thousand other women dedicated to
Speaker 3: empowering each other to get access to a suite of
Speaker 3: dating safety tools made just for FBI gurlies. FBI gurlies,
Speaker 3: they're going to crowdsource their protection. What's more, the t
Speaker 3: app it's sisterhood Together. We're read defining modern dating.
Speaker 1: Plus we give back. Ten percent of profits are donated
Speaker 1: to the National Domestic Violence Hotline. I'm sure they all
Speaker 1: meant very very well. Background checks, catfish images, sex offender
Speaker 1: search phone number, look up criminal records, and then they
Speaker 1: can rate dates. So, Hey, I dated this guy. Here's
Speaker 1: what I found. He was a great guy, but he
Speaker 1: broke up with me. Or this is modern dating funny thing.
Speaker 1: This thing didn't just get hacked. Alex was telling me
Speaker 1: there was a core exploit. They got to the root
Speaker 1: of the servers and they stole apparently every piece of
Speaker 1: data and they used it to docs women and men.
Speaker 1: So it was designed to protect women for sure. And
Speaker 1: was it a great idea to begin with dating safety
Speaker 1: tools to protect women? Yeah? What was the old way?
Speaker 1: This happened in the olden days? Sometimes the best intentions,
Speaker 1: if we're gonna compare and contrast and look at intentions
Speaker 1: versus outcome, intent, design and outcome, sometimes the very best
Speaker 1: intentions skip past what worked before. When we had communities
Speaker 1: and people belonged to communities, say oh, I don't know
Speaker 1: a church community. It wasn't uncommon for adults to say
Speaker 1: to their kids or to one another, our son and
Speaker 1: daughters should meet, or for families to spend time together,
Speaker 1: and for people to get to know each other in
Speaker 1: those settings. I know some very very good marriages that
Speaker 1: started in those settings, and they're not all perfect because
Speaker 1: as we're human beings and were broken by sin. But
Speaker 1: in the olden days, the reviews came from adults who
Speaker 1: knew these young people coming up and therefore could talk
Speaker 1: about who they become. You could see their parents, so
Speaker 1: you could observe the marriages of their parents. Because kids,
Speaker 1: for good and for bad, take a lot of their
Speaker 1: modeling from their parents and to how they behave with
Speaker 1: the opposite sex. That's not always the case. There are
Speaker 1: some very good married people whose kids have gone way
Speaker 1: off the rails and understand that God himself is the
Speaker 1: perfect parent. And of course you know what happened to
Speaker 1: Adam and Eve. But an app the coldness, the mechanical
Speaker 1: nature of it is it's even a joy driver to date.
Speaker 1: And by the way, what is the purpose of dating?
Speaker 1: If you look at intent and design and outcome. The
Speaker 1: intent seems to be here to be able to date
Speaker 1: people whenever you want. And maybe, I mean, I don't
Speaker 1: need to say this to be rude, but kind of
Speaker 1: trade boyfriends. I dated them for a while, things were
Speaker 1: hot and then they kind of cooled, So I'm going
Speaker 1: to push them back in the pool. But he's a
Speaker 1: good guy. It's a good guy, pays for things, carrying
Speaker 1: good in bed. Is that really protecting women? I mean, yes,
Speaker 1: criminal background checks. I would advise people to do that.
Speaker 1: If you don't know a person. But is that really
Speaker 1: protecting women or is it convincing them that the only
Speaker 1: real intimacy you can have has to be computer driven.
Speaker 1: It can't be through community, it can't be churning to
Speaker 1: a group of friends to help guide that. That's one
Speaker 1: way to look at this. There's another way to look
Speaker 1: at intent, design and outcome, and this has to do
Speaker 1: with the notion that so called trans people are uniquely bullied.
Speaker 1: A massive study finds that so called trans identifying teens,
Speaker 1: especially those who identify as non binary, are more likely
Speaker 1: to bully others than be bullied. Intent design, and outcome.
Speaker 1: When you make people aware of the fact that they're
Speaker 1: the special people, advice yourself that they're probably going to
Speaker 1: act that way. They're probably going to act like the
Speaker 1: stars of the show in the new series has come
Speaker 1: out from Angel Studio, Real People, James and Philip Paul John.
Speaker 1: They're the stars of a show that is taking the
Speaker 1: Book of Acts and moving it into the modern era.
Speaker 1: It's called Testament, and Testament takes the Book of Acts
Speaker 1: that period of time when they were building christ Church
Speaker 1: and it moves them into an era of a surveillance state,
Speaker 1: a censorship state, and a time in which people hate truth.
Speaker 1: You can go see this and will arch it and
Speaker 1: stream it immediately at angel dot com slash todd. This
Speaker 1: is bold Christian filmmaking because it actually forces us to
Speaker 1: examine our own hearts, what we stand for Christ as
Speaker 1: the world stands against us. When you go stream this
Speaker 1: at angel dot com slash todd, you become a Premium
Speaker 1: Angel Studio Guild member. Stream it immediately, you get two
Speaker 1: free tickets to any of their theatrical releases from Angel Studios.
Speaker 1: You also get to vote on the stories that they
Speaker 1: career and that they produce and that they promote. They've
Speaker 1: changed culture with Sound of Freedom, they changed it again
Speaker 1: with King of Kings, destroying that ridiculous Snow White remake,
Speaker 1: and they're changing it again with Testaments. Be part of this.
Speaker 1: It's Angel dot com slash todd. There is a big
Speaker 1: study that's looked at kids who are supposedly gender non binary,
Speaker 1: in other words, gender rebellious. Doctor Colin Wright's and Evolutionary
Speaker 1: Biology PhD, Manhattan Institute fellow and co editor in chief
Speaker 1: of Reality's Last Stand. His runnings appeared in The Wall
Speaker 1: Street Journal, The Times, New York Post, Newsweek, City journal,
Speaker 1: Quillette's Queer Majority, and other major news outlets and peer
Speaker 1: review journals. He writes, in recent years, few topics have
Speaker 1: generated more political, cultural, and medical controversy is so called
Speaker 1: trensgender identities, especially as it relates to the growing popularity
Speaker 1: among young people. Much of this discussion is focused on
Speaker 1: how schools, healthcare providers, and families should respond when children
Speaker 1: come out and identify so called transgender. At the center
Speaker 1: of this conversations is the issue of bullying. The dominant narrative,
Speaker 1: repeated in the media, advocacy campaigns, and education policies, portrays
Speaker 1: so called transgender identifying youth as passive victims being ostracized, excluded,
Speaker 1: and harassed for being their authentic selves. This framing has
Speaker 1: driven majority policy changes, including rewriting school curricula around gender identity,
Speaker 1: reinforcing compelled speech regarding pronoun and expanding the use of
Speaker 1: so called gender affirming care such as puberty blocker as,
Speaker 1: cross sex hormones, and surgeries. This narrative is grounded in
Speaker 1: a psychological framework known as the minority stress model. According
Speaker 1: to this framework, the mental health struggles seen in so
Speaker 1: called trans identifying youth aren't due to underlying psychological issues,
Speaker 1: but are instead caused by social rejections, stigma, and lack
Speaker 1: of affirmation. This model has become widely accepted in academic
Speaker 1: and activist circles. It assumes that so called trans identifying
Speaker 1: youth are mentally healthy by default, and that any emotional
Speaker 1: distress stems from how society treats or judges them. But
Speaker 1: the model's unscientific, both because it's circular and false. Affiy
Speaker 1: bible and any signs of distress or taken as proof
Speaker 1: of victimization. On any suggestion that mental health problems or
Speaker 1: social difficulties might proceed a so called transgender identity is
Speaker 1: dismissed as transphobic. A study from Finland complicates this simple narrative,
Speaker 1: published in Frontiers and Psychology. That paper, titled so called
Speaker 1: transgender identity is associated with bullying involvement among Finnish adolescents,
Speaker 1: found that adolescents who identify as so called transgender, especially
Speaker 1: those who consider themselves quote non binary, were more likely
Speaker 1: than non transidentified peers not only to be bullied but
Speaker 1: also to bully others. In fact, the link between a
Speaker 1: so called transgender identity and perpetuating bulling was even stronger
Speaker 1: than the link to being bullied. Of course, this makes sense,
Speaker 1: and let's go back to the organizing principle of today's show.
Speaker 1: We're looking at intent, we're looking at design and outcome.
Speaker 1: There've always been people who been gender rebellious or gender
Speaker 1: confused that existed for as long as sin has existed,
Speaker 1: and only in recent years have they been shown to
Speaker 1: be the special people. What they've been shown is you
Speaker 1: have magic powers. You speak the made up, ridiculous word
Speaker 1: trans and suddenly you have a magic power. If you're
Speaker 1: a boy and you haven't been able to do anything
Speaker 1: of any note in sports in your life, suddenly you
Speaker 1: have superpowers. Suddenly you can go win medals and scholarships,
Speaker 1: you can be the best in your league. You can
Speaker 1: break state records, you can break national records, you can
Speaker 1: break jaws of your opponents. If you're in combat sports,
Speaker 1: magic powers. If your boy and you like to look
Speaker 1: at girls in the shower against their will, you have
Speaker 1: that magic power. You're allowed to walk into a shower
Speaker 1: in many of the separate countries and olga women and
Speaker 1: girls that you're to your heart's content because you had
Speaker 1: a magic power bestowed upon you, because you've uttered the
Speaker 1: magic word trans. When you utter that word, any question
Speaker 1: of how you see reality must be dismissed. If you
Speaker 1: see reality as you are a woman, and so called
Speaker 1: trans women are women. Everybody has to agree when you
Speaker 1: place a pronoun in yourself like they people have to
Speaker 1: pretend you're two people, or three or four or five
Speaker 1: magic powers. If anyone questions this, you get to watch
Speaker 1: as they're the ones taken out in the hallway. You
Speaker 1: get to watch as in school districts in Virginia has happened.
Speaker 1: You had girls complaining about a creepy boy who from
Speaker 1: time to time decided he was non binary, decided to
Speaker 1: go into girls bathrooms, and he got away with raping
Speaker 1: girls twice. Finally finally faced some charges, but not before
Speaker 1: a father of one of the girls was thrown to
Speaker 1: the flown to the ground by cops at a school
Speaker 1: board hearing because he wasn't in favor of the school
Speaker 1: board trying to cover this up by sending this kid
Speaker 1: to another school. That kid got to watch, he got
Speaker 1: to know, Yeah, you know what, I raped that girl
Speaker 1: and her dad's the one who's taking the punishment. All
Speaker 1: I did was I got sent to another school. I
Speaker 1: got to go do it again. He was shown the model.
Speaker 1: Let's go back intent, design and outcome. The intent on transgenderism,
Speaker 1: the lie thereof is many and various. There is a
Speaker 1: motive for profit, there's a motive for control. There's a
Speaker 1: motive to change humanity. That's the end game of transhumanism.
Speaker 1: There's a model to change humanity and to change our
Speaker 1: social structure that overlies all of this, to tear apart
Speaker 1: America as part of the color revolution. Intent, design, and outcome.
Speaker 1: The intent was to protect women with that app. The
Speaker 1: design was to tell women that protecting yourself means physically,
Speaker 1: not necessarily emotionally, not by building around you a community
Speaker 1: of helpers, not by building around you a Christian village
Speaker 1: that can help you identify FI in yourself, the holes
Speaker 1: and the holes of your sin problem in yourself. But no,
Speaker 1: just a cold app. The intent and design an outcome
Speaker 1: was this thing got hacked and now everybody's data is out.
Speaker 1: The intent, as I have said, with this called lies
Speaker 1: of transgenders, are various in many and the design we
Speaker 1: can see we're now we're looking at the outcome. A
Speaker 1: tribe of people who believe because they've been shown by society.
Speaker 1: They get to boll the others they're doing it shouldn't
Speaker 1: surprise us. This is pretty huge because there is a
Speaker 1: pushback and praise God, we're seeing this. Do you remember
Speaker 1: when a fencer at Wagner College would not participate in
Speaker 1: going against a man competing against the man. She simply
Speaker 1: took a knee and refused to participate, and the judge
Speaker 1: came out and she pointed out that as a man,
Speaker 1: I am not going to compete against a man. And
Speaker 1: the man stood there somewhat awkwardly with his sword pointed out,
Speaker 1: looking to be the goof that he is not able
Speaker 1: to compete with other men. And of course she was punished.
Speaker 1: They were going to try to end her fencing career.
Speaker 1: Wagner College has agreed to issue apologies to all its
Speaker 1: female athletes who had to compete against a male named
Speaker 1: Redmond Sullivan. And this came after a quote pressure from
Speaker 1: the Trump administration. Okay, how did it begin? How did
Speaker 1: boys end up getting to steal the trophies and scholarships
Speaker 1: and placements and accomplishments of women and girls. They did
Speaker 1: it because of pressure from Barack Hussein Obama and the
Speaker 1: people who ran his administration. They got to do it
Speaker 1: because of that. So the bullying goes both ways. I'm
Speaker 1: sure there are people who are non bininary and they've
Speaker 1: been made fun of, and I was made fun of
Speaker 1: and you were made fun of. But in terms of
Speaker 1: creating a tribe of people who get to bully, that's
Speaker 1: been the intent. It's been the design, and it's clearly
Speaker 1: the outcome. This has happened in other areas as well.
Speaker 1: It's happened racially, and sometimes racial lines can cross gender lines.
Speaker 1: There's a woman who is a page or at least
Speaker 1: was to help protect people in schools, in the military,
Speaker 1: and around Amazon facilities, et cetera. And she has some
Speaker 1: interesting views on what she'd like to do to white communities.
Speaker 1: I'll share that with you in a second. Then it
Speaker 1: goes right back to intent, design and outcome. Intent, design
Speaker 1: and outcome. I'm sure that your tax attorney or your
Speaker 1: accountant intended to give you as much corporate shield as
Speaker 1: they could when they set up your business, or maybe
Speaker 1: you did it at Legal Zoom, or there's Zen Business,
Speaker 1: which is actually a good service. I use Zen Business,
Speaker 1: and they would go set up an LC or corporation
Speaker 1: for you. But every time. I've seen people going in
Speaker 1: and dig into their paperwork. If they're smaller, medium sized
Speaker 1: business owners. There's been a few times that they come
Speaker 1: back and said, yeah, I actually have corporate credits, but
Speaker 1: let me just present this to you. Unless you've remade
Speaker 1: yourself and your corporation. When you filled out the paperwork
Speaker 1: to start your corporation, did it exist?
Speaker 2: No?
Speaker 1: So what address did you use? Yours? What Social Security
Speaker 1: number did you use because you probably didn't have an
Speaker 1: EI N yet yours? What's still on your foundational documents
Speaker 1: at your bank. I'm going to bet it's your personal credit.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna bet so if you go look at this,
Speaker 1: I don't care. I've seen people with tax accounts and
Speaker 1: attorneys to set it up and ended up the same position.
Speaker 1: They thought they had a corporate shield. They thought their
Speaker 1: corporation meant that only their corporation could get sued, that
Speaker 1: people couldn't go after their personal assets, the home or
Speaker 1: the retirement accounts, kids, college saving funds. And they've come
Speaker 1: back and said, oh wait, wow, oh hold on, wait,
Speaker 1: my corporation is me. Here's an easy way for you
Speaker 1: to find out and to have a free, no obligation
Speaker 1: consultation with visible. Their website is gobisible dot com. That's
Speaker 1: g O and then with a Z gobisible dot com,
Speaker 1: go bisible dot com. When you go there, they will
Speaker 1: find out if you have actual corporate credit. If so, congratulations,
Speaker 1: and they can introduce you to a lending database and
Speaker 1: an investment database of people who invest in companies like yours.
Speaker 1: If you do not have corporate credit, they can fix
Speaker 1: that for you in seven easy steps. And then there's
Speaker 1: that firewall. It's go bisible dot com. Go take them
Speaker 1: up on their free no consultation obligation today it's go
Speaker 1: bisible with a Z, go bisible dot com. This is
Speaker 1: a woman on libs of TikTok got this who gets
Speaker 1: paid for protecting schools and military facilities, et cetera. And
Speaker 1: she decided to go make a video and I'll share
Speaker 1: it with you now, and we'll go back to intent,
Speaker 1: design and outcome.
Speaker 4: And my question for y'all is, why are we blowing
Speaker 4: how they used to blow up our communities? Why an't
Speaker 4: we flooded how they used to flood our community?
Speaker 5: Huh?
Speaker 4: Why ain't we out here making their life harder just
Speaker 4: like they try not be out here making our lives harder,
Speaker 4: and I don't want to hear none of that. Oh
Speaker 4: were not built like that. We just don't have it
Speaker 4: in our hearts that they don't care about us, and
Speaker 4: they never cared about us.
Speaker 1: Intent, design, and outcome. The intent in racial pandering is,
Speaker 1: of course, to get votes, and with votes power and
Speaker 1: with power money. The intent is also in the hands
Speaker 1: of a culture revolutionary, the same thing as the lies
Speaker 1: of transgenderism. It is to divide. It is to teach
Speaker 1: younger women like this that all white America hates her
Speaker 1: and that only violence is going to solve this intent
Speaker 1: and design. The design has been to tell Black people
Speaker 1: over these past many sixty seventy eighty million eon of one
Speaker 1: hundred years that they are uniquely oppressed in the United States
Speaker 1: of America, which is not true statistically speaking. Historically speaking,
Speaker 1: we were the second of the major countries to outlaws slavery.
Speaker 1: We've paid an enormous cost for this. Yes, it took
Speaker 1: too long for black people to get to vote. Yes,
Speaker 1: there's been real things such as redlining. Redlighting happened in
Speaker 1: Los Angeles, had happened in Seattle. There were, in fact
Speaker 1: places in Los Angeles where you could get hassled by
Speaker 1: a cop for walking while black. That happened, then it
Speaker 1: doesn't happen much anymore, and where it does, it gets
Speaker 1: found out. There are also neighborhoods and communities where you
Speaker 1: don't have any business there's a white guy. I know
Speaker 1: because I was pulled over in one. I got pulled
Speaker 1: over by a black cop who had a white partner.
Speaker 1: And the black cop came up and when he pulled
Speaker 1: me over, I said, my ask when I'm being pulled over?
Speaker 1: He said, yeah, you were speeding a little bit. But
Speaker 1: I'm also just wondering what a white guy's doing this neighborhood.
Speaker 1: Fair question. From his perspective, I guess was it up
Speaker 1: there to exploit people? So the intent and the design
Speaker 1: and the outcome, the outcome is clear in the mind
Speaker 1: of this young woman that she gets to go make
Speaker 1: threats against white communities because of course, white communities uniquely
Speaker 1: hate her. It's interesting seeing that she was, though employed
Speaker 1: to protect businesses that had white people in it. It's
Speaker 1: also interesting that she felt empowered to make that video
Speaker 1: at work. Does she work for an all black security
Speaker 1: form is Allied Universal and all black firm? If so,
Speaker 1: then they're breaking federal law, and they themselves are indicating
Speaker 1: that they're racist. When we look at this and we
Speaker 1: look at the intent and the outcome and design, it
Speaker 1: crosses racial boundaries. It also gets into purely cultural boundaries
Speaker 1: such as Hulk Hogan. Now, Hulk was a cultural icon.
Speaker 1: He became that through the power of the WWE and
Speaker 1: entertainment like that and male kind of pseudo sports porn,
Speaker 1: and Hulk later in life gave himself to the Lord Jesus.
Speaker 1: You know this, and praise God. He was baptized. He
Speaker 1: spoke openly about Jesus Christ, and praise God for that.
Speaker 1: There was a school board meeting and in that meeting
Speaker 1: there was a gentleman who decided to talk about the
Speaker 1: fact that some of the school board members had celebrated
Speaker 1: the death of Hul Cogan. It happened at a Lucia
Speaker 1: school board meeting, and there was a school board member.
Speaker 1: Her name was chair. She was the school board chair.
Speaker 1: Her name was Sarah Rockwell. And it surprised you to
Speaker 1: know that she had a halo, a rainbow halo around
Speaker 1: her face. Surprise you to know that she cheered the
Speaker 1: death of Hulk Cogan. But not just the death of
Speaker 1: Hulk Hogan. Sarah Rockwall, Oh did Hulk die? I didn't
Speaker 1: even know good one less Maga in the world, Sarah
Speaker 1: Rockwall replied, Sarah Walkle, Yes, I shouldn't kind of laugh
Speaker 1: because death isn't funny. But ever since it was a
Speaker 1: tiny girl, that man would creep me out and scare me.
Speaker 1: He worked with McMahon's to Union Bust professional wrestling. He's
Speaker 1: never been a good guy. I feel absolutely nothing about
Speaker 1: his death. Yeah, he used to creep me out too
Speaker 1: as a child. Cherry was a pleasant enough, was pleasant
Speaker 1: enough when I worked in the nineties, but he wasn't
Speaker 1: a great human. His racist rant was a final straw.
Speaker 1: I feel for his loved one, so at least we've
Speaker 1: got that. Sarah Rockwell, the chair of a school board,
Speaker 1: said one less Maga because she knows all people who
Speaker 1: want to bake America great again through the policies at
Speaker 1: President Trump. Because all of us are racists, all of
Speaker 1: us are homophobic. So this dad decided to make his
Speaker 1: own statement about this.
Speaker 6: You do not know what we want, Rockwell. You cheered
Speaker 6: for the deaf death of MAGA. You don't have to
Speaker 6: be a member of MAGA. I'm not a member of MAGA.
Speaker 6: I have loved ones and friends that are these.
Speaker 1: Don't interrupt him, Yeah.
Speaker 6: Don't, and you cheered for that. You didn't apologize. That's
Speaker 6: such backstep. And you're a PhD. Aren't you a highly
Speaker 6: educated woman that knows the exact meaning behind her words?
Speaker 6: Aren't you? You know what you said and you should
Speaker 6: step down. You're discussing bile human being.
Speaker 2: Sarah.
Speaker 6: I'm gonna ask you to be removed from the auditorium.
Speaker 4: This is the public space.
Speaker 1: Okay, excuse me, sir soult to the deputy.
Speaker 4: Our attorney asked us not to remove him.
Speaker 1: That he does not have to be removed. So the truce.
Speaker 1: I love the behind the scenes and truths like no,
Speaker 1: don't do this, don't And they're trying to backpell it,
Speaker 1: but not too late. He's removed in the crowd. See
Speaker 1: the intent and design and the outcome is so very
Speaker 1: very clear. Was it Jesus' intent to divide? I mean
Speaker 1: he said I have not come to unite, but to divide.
Speaker 1: Is it his intent or is it his presence that divides?
Speaker 1: You know, the American flag in certain settings can divide.
Speaker 1: There are hoa's where you're not allowed to have the
Speaker 1: American flag. There are places in America. There's cities in
Speaker 1: America where if you wear a proud patriotic American shirt,
Speaker 1: you're gonna get steered at, you might get spat at,
Speaker 1: you have things said to you. Just the flag divides.
Speaker 1: It's a cloth. When Jesus Christ said I have come
Speaker 1: not to unite, but to divide, he said that he
Speaker 1: would sit brother against brother, mother against son. I'm paraphrasing,
Speaker 1: but why Because Jesus is the way, the truth and
Speaker 1: the life, and no one comes to the Father but
Speaker 1: throw him, and truth is divisive. He doesn't want to divide,
Speaker 1: but he knows why he's come. He knows that there
Speaker 1: are people who are going to choose to follow their
Speaker 1: fleshly desires up to and including lust and anger and
Speaker 1: the results of anger and rage. He knows that. So
Speaker 1: if you follow this to the conclusion, then of the
Speaker 1: other spiritual entity, the one who's lost, who stands in defeat,
Speaker 1: and that Satan, he divides because it's his only tool.
Speaker 1: His only hope is to distract, divide and distort. That's
Speaker 1: his only possible hope. So when we watch this and
Speaker 1: we see racial outcomes like this, we should not be surprised.
Speaker 1: Is it the devil at play with this woman? I
Speaker 1: don't know. Blaming everything on the devil then just removes
Speaker 1: responsibility from people for their own actions. But I know
Speaker 1: the devil loves this stuff, ensuring the death of one
Speaker 1: human being. Okay, so you hated Hulk Hogan. Love thy neighbor,
Speaker 1: love thy enemy, so he just couldn't get around to
Speaker 1: loving him, So extend the hatred to all of mega intent, design,
Speaker 1: and outcome. For eight years or more, many Americans have
Speaker 1: been taught that any association with President Trump at all
Speaker 1: means you are a racist and a homophobe. It means
Speaker 1: you hate Hispanic people, because the only reason you'd ever
Speaker 1: want border enforcement is because you hate Hispanic people. Intent, design, outcome.
Speaker 1: You have school board shares who have nothing to offer
Speaker 1: as a school board share other than rhetoric like this, Intent, design,
Speaker 1: and outcome. What is the intent of lowering the bar
Speaker 1: for what it takes to be a so called public servant?
Speaker 1: What has been the design of this to take people
Speaker 1: and put them in school board offices who aren't there
Speaker 1: to make sure schools run smoothly. They're not there to
Speaker 1: make sure grades are higher that teachers are held to account.
Speaker 1: They're not there to make sure that students are safe.
Speaker 1: They're there for rank divisive politics, intent, design and outcome.
Speaker 1: This is the outcome of the design that began with
Speaker 1: the intent to divide and the intent to destroy school,
Speaker 1: and destroying school is one of the ways that they
Speaker 1: intend to destroy society. It's a key step in that
Speaker 1: we've been responsible around the world for destroying some societies.
Speaker 1: And let's not kid ourselves. Before we go to war.
Speaker 1: We often go prep an environment mentally, and when we
Speaker 1: prep that environment, we are looking for people who will
Speaker 1: be our allies to help us in battle, and it
Speaker 1: paves the way for our troops oftentimes to go fight
Speaker 1: very righteous wars. The war in Afghanistan was righteous. We
Speaker 1: went after the people who knocked down the towers. That
Speaker 1: was a righteous war. Our troops went into Iraq being
Speaker 1: told that they had weapons of mass destruction ready to
Speaker 1: aim at America. Our troops fought righteously. They fought a
Speaker 1: righteous war because they were lied to, apparently about what
Speaker 1: the cause of this was. But they went and fought righteously.
Speaker 1: And my friend Tim Krukshank was one of those guys.
Speaker 1: He was a Medica attached to the Seal Team in
Speaker 1: Seal Teams in three deployments. While he was fighting in Iraq,
Speaker 1: he thought about what to do afterwards. He's a physician's
Speaker 1: assistant by training. That's what he'd done in the world,
Speaker 1: But his love was starting the coffee company, bone Frog Coffee,
Speaker 1: And this is a bag of Extortion seventeen. Now this
Speaker 1: off if you've never read about it. It's a very,
Speaker 1: very suspicious op. It led to the biggest loss of
Speaker 1: life in the history of special forces communities, and there's
Speaker 1: great reason to read about it. Tim's limited as to
Speaker 1: what he can say because he's still got agreements with
Speaker 1: the Department of Defense, But as you can see in
Speaker 1: the bag, he wants to honor his brothers and the
Speaker 1: one military dog that lost his life in there as well.
Speaker 1: It's a medium roast that tastes a little bit chocolately,
Speaker 1: a hint of chocolate. Both my wife and I picked
Speaker 1: up on this. You can buy this as your first
Speaker 1: experience with bone Frog and honor the Extortion seventeen team.
Speaker 1: Go to Bonefrogcoffee dot com slash todd use promo code
Speaker 1: todict checkout. You'll save ten percent on that first purchase.
Speaker 1: If you've already purchased the coffee and you fall in
Speaker 1: love with it, subscribe. Never miss out on coffee, always
Speaker 1: have it available and help tim give money to the
Speaker 1: families of fallen Navy Seals. It's Bonefrogcoffee dot com slash
Speaker 1: chod use promo code tott at checkout to save fifteen
Speaker 1: percent on subscription coffee, and remember ten percent of proceeds
Speaker 1: always go to the Navy Seal Foundation or foundations like
Speaker 1: that to help the families of fallen Navy Seals. Intent,
Speaker 1: design and outcome. If you look at school and how
Speaker 1: it's changed, let's think about intent. There was a time
Speaker 1: when the intent behind school, in many cases was to
Speaker 1: teach kids how to think, how to form an opinion,
Speaker 1: how to then defend that opinion rhetorically, how to use
Speaker 1: math and logic to inform an opinion rather than just
Speaker 1: emotion and feel. When that happened, when school was operating
Speaker 1: that way, we had some great thinkers. There was a turn.
Speaker 1: There came a moment where we decided to make schools
Speaker 1: about building workers. The intent changed. What do we want?
Speaker 1: We want kids who can work on assembly lines as adults.
Speaker 1: We want worker bees. So the intent changed. I remember
Speaker 1: when our schoolroom, our school became an open concept classroom,
Speaker 1: so we would go into the more. We'd have one class,
Speaker 1: it was homeroom. We checked in basically talk for half
Speaker 1: an hour. Then we would go and be dismissed. And
Speaker 1: we would stay in that room for most of the day.
Speaker 1: And it would go like this. The first hour, we
Speaker 1: would walk over to a common area. We would get
Speaker 1: some mimeographed copies, what we called dittos. We would sit
Speaker 1: down and we would write on the dittos, answering questions
Speaker 1: math or science or what have you. When you completed
Speaker 1: those and you were quote done with your work, you
Speaker 1: put them in a folder. You went back and put
Speaker 1: them in a file folder, and you could do whatever
Speaker 1: you wanted. So people like me looked at this for
Speaker 1: the scam and swindle.
Speaker 2: It was.
Speaker 1: There was no teaching. The teachers weren't even speaking. So
Speaker 1: I would just scribble on these forms and put them
Speaker 1: in and go sit down and listen to music because
Speaker 1: we got headphones like that. My friend Eric and I
Speaker 1: god rest Eric. We once listened to Let's Go by
Speaker 1: the Cars forty nine times in a row. Song was new.
Speaker 1: We'd never heard anything like it, and we listened to
Speaker 1: it and grove done at forty nine times in a
Speaker 1: row in a cubby sitting on beanbag chairs. That was
Speaker 1: my schooling. What were they designing? Office workers? You get
Speaker 1: a memo, you answer questions, you fill it out, you
Speaker 1: put it back in the file. Occasionally there was a
Speaker 1: class and teachers would get to teach. We had a
Speaker 1: science teacher there who I think actually really liked to teach,
Speaker 1: and he would often lecture and it was a relief.
Speaker 1: I didn't care for his style, but at least he
Speaker 1: was speaking to us. What is school now? Intent design
Speaker 1: an outcome? What is school now? School now is manufacturing
Speaker 1: more people like this young woman who work for Allied Universal.
Speaker 1: It's manufacturing more people like this school board member whose
Speaker 1: job as a school board member is to wish for
Speaker 1: the death of people who voted for President Trump. The
Speaker 1: design is to create a whole bunch of people who
Speaker 1: are confused or gender defiant, and in doing that, it
Speaker 1: is to make them the special people who go out
Speaker 1: and bold the others in services dividing society. The design
Speaker 1: came from intent and were watching the outcomes, and people
Speaker 1: are beginning to catch on to what school has become.
Speaker 7: School was one of the greatest scams ever created. It
Speaker 7: teaches you how to memorize, not how to think. It
Speaker 7: teaches you how to follow instructions, not how to lead,
Speaker 7: how to fit in not stand out. And it was
Speaker 7: designed to mass produce followers, not thinkers. And twenty twenty
Speaker 7: was a wake up call. People obeyed without question because
Speaker 7: they were trained to and the system worked exactly as
Speaker 7: it was intended to. You weren't taught to question, you
Speaker 7: were taught to comply. Education is powerful, but schooling that's
Speaker 7: something else.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 7: One frees your mind, the other one cages it. Stay
Speaker 7: in a box, do what you're told, don't question authority,
Speaker 7: that's the real curriculum. But thinking for yourself, that's the
Speaker 7: most dangerous thing that you can do in a system
Speaker 7: that runs on your silence. And I don't live in
Speaker 7: a box, and I'm teaching my children not to either,
Speaker 7: because thinking for yourself is one of the most deliberating
Speaker 7: things that you can do in a world that wants
Speaker 7: you compliant independent.
Speaker 1: My wife and I I've talked from time to time
Speaker 1: about those terrible what if questions. What if we'd followed
Speaker 1: kind of our hearts and sent our family, moved our
Speaker 1: family away from the separate country of Seattle and moved
Speaker 1: over and had our girl in a trivium school, the
Speaker 1: old fashioned Latin style learning. What if we just unschooled her,
Speaker 1: What if we just joined a Christian community and allowed
Speaker 1: her to have a free range upbringing. We're learning came
Speaker 1: through interactions with adults and kids and church. And you
Speaker 1: learn to write because you learn to copy your Bible
Speaker 1: and your Bible versus. And you learn logic because you're
Speaker 1: around logical people who teach you how to form opinions
Speaker 1: and arguments. And you gain math skills because you work
Speaker 1: in a kitchen and you have to figure out how
Speaker 1: fractions work if you want the cake to churn out
Speaker 1: the right way. You learn the mapping skills because hey,
Speaker 1: if you want to get back from the campground, you
Speaker 1: got to be able to map it. We've often pondered
Speaker 1: that the intent to design and the outcome in schools
Speaker 1: is seen in the intent, design and outcome of where
Speaker 1: these people have landed their jobs. What are they doing
Speaker 1: in these jobs? Do you remember when there was a
Speaker 1: marketing genius at bud Light who said, Hey, let's have
Speaker 1: a man imitate a woman in a clownish sense. And
Speaker 1: this will put bud on the map because bud Light
Speaker 1: needs to be refreshed. The brand's grown old and stale.
Speaker 1: This will bring people into the modern era. What do
Speaker 1: you think was the intent, design and outcome of the
Speaker 1: school that women went through? Who ran that campaign? And
Speaker 1: then there was entents run out of that advertising agency? Intent,
Speaker 1: design and outcome? What was the intent behind PBS? I
Speaker 1: mean public broadcasting? Probably there was good decent intent. Let's
Speaker 1: make sure that everybody can have access to learning. School
Speaker 1: or TV is a way to do that. But what
Speaker 1: has been the intent, design and outcome since then? We
Speaker 1: can observe this. I think it's pretty easy to observe.
Speaker 1: I'll show you this in a second. There's something i
Speaker 1: want you to know, and it's not a thing that
Speaker 1: I I'm relish doing. It's a thing that I've decided
Speaker 1: to do. And I've not asked any permission about this.
Speaker 1: For years. We've had a partnership with Alan Soaps. We
Speaker 1: just got our new shipment. John sent us six bars
Speaker 1: of soap and Ian's Blend. Ian's Blends liquid soap. The
Speaker 1: soap speaks for itself, and I'm going to ask you
Speaker 1: to do something. And I am going to ask you
Speaker 1: to do this as a good person who wants to
Speaker 1: help another. But I want to put a limit on this. Okay,
Speaker 1: John who runs Allan's for his dad. He started Alan
Speaker 1: Soap so his son would have a place to work
Speaker 1: because they'd tried to get him to abort Alan. He
Speaker 1: and his wife John said absolutely not. This is our son,
Speaker 1: and yes, Alan has challenges in life. He is effectively nonverbal.
Speaker 1: He's fourteen. He's been to his first school dance, got
Speaker 1: to go, got asked, loved it, dressed up, look sharp,
Speaker 1: look awesome, all looked awesome in a suit. And he's
Speaker 1: got these structural health challenges. Let's put him through about
Speaker 1: what eighteen surgeries and he's fourteen years old. His brother
Speaker 1: Ian is also impacted by autism. He gets to work
Speaker 1: there as well. The rest of the world had said, hey,
Speaker 1: just store these kids in box. Amy got autism late
Speaker 1: in life, late onset autism, very very, very frustrating for
Speaker 1: her and her family, and she's thriving at Alan. So
Speaker 1: here's what I'm asking you to do. I want you
Speaker 1: to try the soap. If you haven't yet, make this
Speaker 1: the day that you do. It, commit to go to
Speaker 1: alansaps dot com slash todd, and all I ask is
Speaker 1: by the sample pack. You're curious about the fragrances by
Speaker 1: the sample pack unless there's just some fragrances that communicate
Speaker 1: to you, resonate with you. If you love the soap,
Speaker 1: continue with subscription. And here's why. A. It's better soap,
Speaker 1: all natural made in America by a family, three generations
Speaker 1: of soap and king expertise. B. If you love the
Speaker 1: soap and you subscribe, if John is in fact taken
Speaker 1: to the Lord because he has been told he's got
Speaker 1: end stage cancer, he can rest assured that the soap
Speaker 1: company has the very best possibility of surviving and thriving.
Speaker 1: So yes, I'm asking you to do this out of
Speaker 1: your heart, but only if you love the soap. It's
Speaker 1: alansoaps dot com slash todd. If the soap does not
Speaker 1: appeal to you, no one wants you to continue to
Speaker 1: buy it. It is no out of charity, it is
Speaker 1: a business. Alan solps dot com slash taught. So Democrats
Speaker 1: are very very upset about PBS being shut down, and
Speaker 1: you can find lots of statements.
Speaker 5: About this acha like if you haven't realized by now
Speaker 5: we are so deeply already in a fascist state because
Speaker 5: it doesn't just happen over night. It doesn't happen like
Speaker 5: how you read in What Is It in nineteen eighty four.
Speaker 5: It's not an Inorwellian type of manner that it happens.
Speaker 6: Currently.
Speaker 5: We just found out that PBS is basically going to
Speaker 5: be shutting down. No not basically, they are going to
Speaker 5: be shutting down now. So PBS kids everything that we
Speaker 5: grew up on, all of the non stimulating, calming things
Speaker 5: that actually teach kids about other people with different abilities
Speaker 5: and disabilities and different types of ways that people think
Speaker 5: and look and talk. To teach those things to children
Speaker 5: at such a young age and for free, is extremely valuable.
Speaker 1: And it's not taught elsewhere. There's no other place to
Speaker 1: get it. There's not YouTube and a gajillion other places.
Speaker 1: There's not life, there's not community, and it's free. No
Speaker 1: one ever paid a dime, No one was ever forced
Speaker 1: to pay for shows which they disagreed, say, teaching messages
Speaker 1: that were intended to teach kids that parents are stupid
Speaker 1: and behind the times, designed to take certain identities, say
Speaker 1: the Live transgenderism and make them better than others, say,
Speaker 1: the fact that we are a binary species in terms
Speaker 1: of sex and gender, and then the outcomes. Kids who
Speaker 1: grew up on PBS became more and more racist, more
Speaker 1: and more, they hated America one and more. They identified
Speaker 1: a so called transgender Intent design and outcome. If that
Speaker 1: woman would like her kids to be exposed to programs
Speaker 1: like PBS, there's still the archives, there's still countless shows
Speaker 1: that go that far and more, or just like she
Speaker 1: just did there, she could create some videos herself. I
Speaker 1: picked that video up because it got thousands and thousands
Speaker 1: and thousands and thousands of views and likes. Intent, design,
Speaker 1: and outcome. God did not intend for us to live
Speaker 1: in a world broken by sin. We chose it. Our
Speaker 1: intent was to go be like God. The design was
Speaker 1: to go eat the fruit. The outcome, that's exactly what
Speaker 1: God told us, would be death. But through Christ we
Speaker 1: have redemption and he opposite it. It's a free gift.
Speaker 1: Simply accept Him as your Lord and savior. I agree
Speaker 1: to be changed by him. This is the Todd Hermershew.
Speaker 1: Please go be well, be strong, be kind, Please make
Speaker 1: every effort to walk in the light of Christ and
Speaker 1: celebrate from me as later I get to go home
Speaker 1: and see my beloved wife