WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Special thanks to our next guest as we go from

2
00:00:02.520 --> 00:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>one goat to the next goat for being a little

3
00:00:05.320 --> 00:00:09.359
<v Speaker 1>bit adjustable today and versatile today. Tom Haberstrow for some

4
00:00:09.480 --> 00:00:11.759
<v Speaker 1>NBA basketball to Monday Tom, Happy Monday man.

5
00:00:11.759 --> 00:00:13.320
<v Speaker 2>How are we doing doing great?

6
00:00:13.320 --> 00:00:13.480
<v Speaker 3>Man?

7
00:00:13.519 --> 00:00:16.960
<v Speaker 2>How I'm good? I'm good. So we'll do a little

8
00:00:17.039 --> 00:00:17.480
<v Speaker 2>jazz here.

9
00:00:17.519 --> 00:00:19.199
<v Speaker 1>We're not gonna do We're not gonna do a ton

10
00:00:19.239 --> 00:00:20.839
<v Speaker 1>of jazz because I think we all kind of know

11
00:00:21.120 --> 00:00:22.839
<v Speaker 1>what time it is, we all kind of know what.

12
00:00:22.800 --> 00:00:23.320
<v Speaker 2>The deal is.

13
00:00:23.359 --> 00:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>But I'll say this, over the past seven or eight games,

14
00:00:26.679 --> 00:00:30.519
<v Speaker 1>at least offensively they don't guard anybody, they just don't.

15
00:00:30.960 --> 00:00:32.560
<v Speaker 2>But offensively they've been a lot better.

16
00:00:32.600 --> 00:00:34.560
<v Speaker 1>And I thought that went over the Knicks on Saturday

17
00:00:34.600 --> 00:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>here in Salt Lake was probably the best game I've

18
00:00:37.000 --> 00:00:39.520
<v Speaker 1>seen him play all year long. But what are your

19
00:00:39.520 --> 00:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on and if you have anything specific about the

20
00:00:42.039 --> 00:00:44.479
<v Speaker 1>past seven or eight games, why is the offense look

21
00:00:44.560 --> 00:00:45.159
<v Speaker 1>so much better?

22
00:00:45.159 --> 00:00:52.880
<v Speaker 3>To think, Well, first of all, marketing helps. Ye, that

23
00:00:52.960 --> 00:00:55.600
<v Speaker 3>guy is really good, and of course really good against

24
00:00:55.600 --> 00:00:58.039
<v Speaker 3>the Knicks too. But I think another thing that you

25
00:00:58.159 --> 00:01:00.960
<v Speaker 3>have to really pay attention to is the shot selection

26
00:01:01.880 --> 00:01:05.200
<v Speaker 3>is very modern. NBA We've got a head coach and

27
00:01:05.280 --> 00:01:09.239
<v Speaker 3>Will Hardy, who is as astute as it is when

28
00:01:09.319 --> 00:01:11.680
<v Speaker 3>it comes to what is the best way to win

29
00:01:11.920 --> 00:01:15.640
<v Speaker 3>in today's NBA. And what I mean by that is

30
00:01:16.040 --> 00:01:20.560
<v Speaker 3>the Utah Jazz are the leaders in one category offensively

31
00:01:21.760 --> 00:01:23.840
<v Speaker 3>that probably is a little under the radar, but I

32
00:01:23.879 --> 00:01:27.879
<v Speaker 3>just wrote about this at Yahoo Sports. There are these

33
00:01:27.879 --> 00:01:31.359
<v Speaker 3>things that I'll coin as shot desert games. These are

34
00:01:31.400 --> 00:01:35.920
<v Speaker 3>games in which teams do not make a single shot

35
00:01:36.000 --> 00:01:38.040
<v Speaker 3>in the mid range. They don't take a single shot,

36
00:01:38.400 --> 00:01:40.680
<v Speaker 3>make a single shot, they don't score in the mid range.

37
00:01:40.719 --> 00:01:44.519
<v Speaker 3>They just abandon it. And while it is for us

38
00:01:44.599 --> 00:01:47.719
<v Speaker 3>who grew up in the nineties, it is kind of

39
00:01:47.760 --> 00:01:49.840
<v Speaker 3>sad to see how the mid range game is dead,

40
00:01:50.239 --> 00:01:51.920
<v Speaker 3>but it is the smart way to play, just in

41
00:01:51.959 --> 00:01:54.480
<v Speaker 3>the same way that in baseball, the smart way to

42
00:01:54.519 --> 00:01:56.840
<v Speaker 3>play is to try to hit it over the fence

43
00:01:57.040 --> 00:01:59.920
<v Speaker 3>and get walks. And it might not be appealing for

44
00:02:00.120 --> 00:02:02.879
<v Speaker 3>a product standpoint, it is what the math tells us

45
00:02:02.879 --> 00:02:06.200
<v Speaker 3>to do, and what the math tells NBA teams to

46
00:02:06.200 --> 00:02:08.400
<v Speaker 3>do is what the Boston Celtics did last season is

47
00:02:08.639 --> 00:02:12.199
<v Speaker 3>bomb away from three and attack the rim and go

48
00:02:12.280 --> 00:02:17.360
<v Speaker 3>for rim attacks and the Jazz lead the league in

49
00:02:17.479 --> 00:02:20.319
<v Speaker 3>most games in which they don't score from the mid range.

50
00:02:20.319 --> 00:02:23.039
<v Speaker 3>You normally might say, hey, that's a bad thing. Well, no,

51
00:02:23.719 --> 00:02:26.240
<v Speaker 3>the mid range game is kind of a dead zone.

52
00:02:26.240 --> 00:02:28.639
<v Speaker 3>It's you don't get fouled, it's a low percentage shot,

53
00:02:29.000 --> 00:02:31.639
<v Speaker 3>and there's only a few players that it makes sense

54
00:02:31.960 --> 00:02:33.840
<v Speaker 3>to be living in the mid range, whether it's Chris

55
00:02:33.840 --> 00:02:38.319
<v Speaker 3>Paul or jamar Derozen and the Utah Jazz continually do this,

56
00:02:38.439 --> 00:02:42.479
<v Speaker 3>and even you know, in Saturday's game against the Knicks,

57
00:02:42.639 --> 00:02:45.159
<v Speaker 3>they scored one hundred and twenty one points and only

58
00:02:45.199 --> 00:02:47.800
<v Speaker 3>one basket was in the mid range. And they have

59
00:02:48.039 --> 00:02:52.319
<v Speaker 3>more shot desert games than any other team. It's four

60
00:02:52.599 --> 00:02:54.719
<v Speaker 3>to this point in the season, and this number is

61
00:02:54.759 --> 00:02:57.360
<v Speaker 3>exploding league wide. You know, we didn't even have a

62
00:02:57.400 --> 00:03:00.840
<v Speaker 3>single team a decade ago with any of these games.

63
00:03:00.879 --> 00:03:03.080
<v Speaker 3>And now we're on pace for about one hundred and

64
00:03:03.080 --> 00:03:06.879
<v Speaker 3>fifty desert games where they don't score from the mid

65
00:03:06.960 --> 00:03:10.919
<v Speaker 3>range for the entire game. And so we're almost double

66
00:03:11.800 --> 00:03:13.719
<v Speaker 3>what we're you know, we're pacing at almost double the

67
00:03:13.800 --> 00:03:17.000
<v Speaker 3>rate at what we normally see over the last couple

68
00:03:17.000 --> 00:03:19.439
<v Speaker 3>of years, and there's a real inflection point. We're seeing

69
00:03:19.439 --> 00:03:22.719
<v Speaker 3>in the NBA where team smart offenses, even if they're

70
00:03:22.759 --> 00:03:25.439
<v Speaker 3>not being able to make all the shots from downtown.

71
00:03:25.479 --> 00:03:27.919
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's it's not every night that you see

72
00:03:27.960 --> 00:03:32.840
<v Speaker 3>the Jazz shoot. You know, what was it seventeen nineteen

73
00:03:32.879 --> 00:03:36.639
<v Speaker 3>to thirty four, fifty six percent from downtown. But this

74
00:03:36.680 --> 00:03:38.840
<v Speaker 3>is kind of by design, is that they have made

75
00:03:39.400 --> 00:03:44.560
<v Speaker 3>the team buy into this, you know, threes and rim shots,

76
00:03:45.840 --> 00:03:49.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, attacking the basket and not worrying so much

77
00:03:49.560 --> 00:03:51.719
<v Speaker 3>about the mid range, try to get to the free

78
00:03:51.719 --> 00:03:55.360
<v Speaker 3>throw line, try to take threes, and so far, I

79
00:03:55.400 --> 00:04:00.199
<v Speaker 3>think that shot profile is really helping them slim the

80
00:04:00.280 --> 00:04:03.319
<v Speaker 3>talent gap. And you saw it on Saturday night, just

81
00:04:03.479 --> 00:04:06.599
<v Speaker 3>how good they look when the three ball is falling.

82
00:04:06.840 --> 00:04:08.599
<v Speaker 3>But it's not a matter of being lucky. This is

83
00:04:08.639 --> 00:04:10.960
<v Speaker 3>a team that is designed that way and the offense

84
00:04:11.360 --> 00:04:13.719
<v Speaker 3>is designed that way, and I think it's really smart,

85
00:04:14.080 --> 00:04:16.600
<v Speaker 3>even if it's a little sad for us watching and

86
00:04:16.600 --> 00:04:19.120
<v Speaker 3>growing up watching Michael Jordan. This is the way to

87
00:04:19.160 --> 00:04:21.600
<v Speaker 3>win in today's NBA, and they're doing an excellent.

88
00:04:21.360 --> 00:04:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Job of it. So do you think the league will look?

89
00:04:24.519 --> 00:04:27.399
<v Speaker 1>Because I read your piece and that's kind of why

90
00:04:27.439 --> 00:04:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I asked you the question to lead you into that answer,

91
00:04:30.079 --> 00:04:31.879
<v Speaker 1>so you could explain it to our listeners because you

92
00:04:32.160 --> 00:04:34.600
<v Speaker 1>unpacked it better than I could. But the fact of

93
00:04:34.600 --> 00:04:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the matter is, you know, you and I will watch

94
00:04:37.040 --> 00:04:39.279
<v Speaker 1>NBA basketball, but a lot of people aren't.

95
00:04:39.959 --> 00:04:42.879
<v Speaker 2>The ratings are suffering. I don't know if it's the product.

96
00:04:42.959 --> 00:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I continue to believe until stars show up every single night,

97
00:04:46.360 --> 00:04:48.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, unless we got to say it, unless they're hurt,

98
00:04:49.160 --> 00:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I know, but you can't argue with the numbers. And yes,

99
00:04:53.199 --> 00:04:55.079
<v Speaker 1>they can throw their P and L statement at me

100
00:04:55.120 --> 00:04:56.199
<v Speaker 1>and say where's the problem?

101
00:04:56.240 --> 00:04:57.240
<v Speaker 2>I say, Okay, I get it.

102
00:04:57.639 --> 00:05:00.680
<v Speaker 1>But do you think the decline in NBA rings as

103
00:05:00.800 --> 00:05:03.600
<v Speaker 1>because nobody wants to just watch a team, you know,

104
00:05:03.759 --> 00:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>shoot sixty plus threes. Nobody wants to, you know, watch

105
00:05:06.560 --> 00:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>a three point shooting shooting contest unless it's during All

106
00:05:09.120 --> 00:05:11.959
<v Speaker 1>Star weekend, And as numbers tell us, people don't really

107
00:05:12.000 --> 00:05:13.879
<v Speaker 1>like to watch that either. Does the league have a

108
00:05:13.959 --> 00:05:17.079
<v Speaker 1>problem with this style of play that you outline in

109
00:05:17.319 --> 00:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>your piece? Do you think they look to do something

110
00:05:19.040 --> 00:05:19.439
<v Speaker 1>about it?

111
00:05:20.519 --> 00:05:22.519
<v Speaker 3>I think they're always looking to do something about it.

112
00:05:22.639 --> 00:05:25.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this is a This is the same league

113
00:05:25.959 --> 00:05:29.839
<v Speaker 3>office that introduced the in season Tournament, the play in Tournament,

114
00:05:30.800 --> 00:05:33.160
<v Speaker 3>as well as the elam Ending and the All Star,

115
00:05:33.279 --> 00:05:36.839
<v Speaker 3>the NBA draft for the All Star. They're trying to

116
00:05:36.879 --> 00:05:42.319
<v Speaker 3>figure out ways to augment or gimmick or gamify the season.

117
00:05:42.959 --> 00:05:45.319
<v Speaker 3>And I don't think that they're you know, the shot

118
00:05:45.360 --> 00:05:47.959
<v Speaker 3>selection is off the table in terms of how do

119
00:05:48.040 --> 00:05:51.639
<v Speaker 3>we adjustice to make it more appealing for the audiences.

120
00:05:51.680 --> 00:05:54.439
<v Speaker 3>And I think, you know, Nick Wright, the kind of

121
00:05:54.480 --> 00:05:57.319
<v Speaker 3>the reason why I did that story was Nick Right

122
00:05:57.439 --> 00:06:00.959
<v Speaker 3>went on his podcast. You know, it wasn't on Fox

123
00:06:01.000 --> 00:06:02.680
<v Speaker 3>Sports one, but it was on his podcast that it

124
00:06:02.720 --> 00:06:04.720
<v Speaker 3>went viral where he was like, the India has as

125
00:06:04.759 --> 00:06:06.839
<v Speaker 3>a as an entertainment problem is that it's not as

126
00:06:06.959 --> 00:06:09.240
<v Speaker 3>entertaining as it used to be, and a lot of

127
00:06:09.240 --> 00:06:11.439
<v Speaker 3>that is because of all the threes. And he suggested

128
00:06:11.439 --> 00:06:13.680
<v Speaker 3>the idea of making dunks worth three points. That was

129
00:06:13.720 --> 00:06:17.480
<v Speaker 3>one of his proposals. And I think it gets at

130
00:06:17.519 --> 00:06:20.639
<v Speaker 3>something that I think we do need to consider is

131
00:06:21.800 --> 00:06:26.439
<v Speaker 3>should we make the mid range alive again and make

132
00:06:26.560 --> 00:06:29.600
<v Speaker 3>more shot diversity where it doesn't feel like it's just

133
00:06:29.680 --> 00:06:34.680
<v Speaker 3>threes and rim attacks every time down the floor. My

134
00:06:34.879 --> 00:06:40.360
<v Speaker 3>suggestion is this two three four system where you shortened

135
00:06:40.480 --> 00:06:44.240
<v Speaker 3>the three point line to about fifteen feet to bring

136
00:06:44.279 --> 00:06:48.240
<v Speaker 3>back the mid range, and then you extend the current

137
00:06:48.279 --> 00:06:51.319
<v Speaker 3>three point line to a four point line at about

138
00:06:51.360 --> 00:06:54.399
<v Speaker 3>thirty five or forty feet. You make it far enough

139
00:06:55.000 --> 00:06:58.279
<v Speaker 3>that it's a real challenge for NBA players to hit it.

140
00:06:58.720 --> 00:06:59.879
<v Speaker 3>So it's not just gonna be a bunch of do

141
00:07:00.000 --> 00:07:02.240
<v Speaker 3>who is pulling up from half court every time. But

142
00:07:02.360 --> 00:07:05.720
<v Speaker 3>you also want players to want to go to the rim,

143
00:07:06.000 --> 00:07:08.079
<v Speaker 3>to want to shoot from twenty feet, and want to

144
00:07:08.079 --> 00:07:10.399
<v Speaker 3>shoot from forty feet if it makes sense, And so

145
00:07:10.600 --> 00:07:14.079
<v Speaker 3>I think that proposal is one of my favorites that

146
00:07:14.120 --> 00:07:16.399
<v Speaker 3>I've heard. There's also, and I talk about this in

147
00:07:16.439 --> 00:07:20.519
<v Speaker 3>the piece, the idea of do we get rid of

148
00:07:20.600 --> 00:07:22.920
<v Speaker 3>the corner three so that you don't have two guys

149
00:07:22.920 --> 00:07:25.279
<v Speaker 3>standing in the corners and then getting a short, shorter

150
00:07:25.399 --> 00:07:29.120
<v Speaker 3>shot because the NBA dimensions make it such that the

151
00:07:29.199 --> 00:07:32.040
<v Speaker 3>corner three is about a foot shorter than a normal three,

152
00:07:32.480 --> 00:07:34.519
<v Speaker 3>and so there's an advantage there. Get rid of that

153
00:07:34.560 --> 00:07:36.959
<v Speaker 3>advantage and you won't see as many three pointers. There's

154
00:07:37.000 --> 00:07:39.800
<v Speaker 3>another idea that I've heard is capping the number of

155
00:07:39.800 --> 00:07:43.279
<v Speaker 3>three pointers that you make or take sorry to about

156
00:07:43.319 --> 00:07:47.279
<v Speaker 3>twenty per quarter, So basically you have like or sorry,

157
00:07:47.399 --> 00:07:49.959
<v Speaker 3>twenty per game, so you have basically twenty three pointers

158
00:07:50.399 --> 00:07:53.959
<v Speaker 3>to play around with, and then after that any three

159
00:07:54.000 --> 00:07:57.480
<v Speaker 3>pointer is worth two points. All those ideas are getting

160
00:07:57.480 --> 00:08:00.879
<v Speaker 3>to the same trying to solve this problem, which is

161
00:08:00.920 --> 00:08:04.639
<v Speaker 3>it feels like the NBA is all about threes and

162
00:08:04.720 --> 00:08:08.399
<v Speaker 3>all that rim attacks and some of the creativity and

163
00:08:08.600 --> 00:08:11.519
<v Speaker 3>ingenuity and spontaneity of the NBA that might have been

164
00:08:11.560 --> 00:08:14.120
<v Speaker 3>around in the eighties and nineties it might be overstated.

165
00:08:14.160 --> 00:08:16.560
<v Speaker 3>How you know, the x's and o's were amazing, and

166
00:08:16.560 --> 00:08:18.920
<v Speaker 3>the game was amazing because of this, A lot of

167
00:08:18.920 --> 00:08:21.920
<v Speaker 3>those games were just they were It was wrestling. It

168
00:08:21.920 --> 00:08:24.120
<v Speaker 3>was a different sport. It was not the same thing

169
00:08:24.120 --> 00:08:26.000
<v Speaker 3>as what we're seeing today, and in a bad way.

170
00:08:26.319 --> 00:08:29.480
<v Speaker 3>So I'm not saying that everything was perfect in nineteen

171
00:08:29.560 --> 00:08:32.320
<v Speaker 3>ninety five. It wasn't. But the idea of there's too

172
00:08:32.360 --> 00:08:34.600
<v Speaker 3>many threes and it might be repelling some people from

173
00:08:34.639 --> 00:08:38.279
<v Speaker 3>watching the sport, I understand that viewpoint, but I don't

174
00:08:38.279 --> 00:08:40.960
<v Speaker 3>think that making dunks worth three points is the answer.

175
00:08:40.960 --> 00:08:43.320
<v Speaker 3>I think it'll make more injuries because of you know,

176
00:08:43.360 --> 00:08:46.919
<v Speaker 3>it's a violent sport already, but making it a dunk

177
00:08:46.960 --> 00:08:49.559
<v Speaker 3>worth three points would only increase the mid air collisions

178
00:08:49.559 --> 00:08:53.200
<v Speaker 3>and you'll see Chet Holmgrens of the world land horribly

179
00:08:53.360 --> 00:08:55.720
<v Speaker 3>and be out because of a broken hip. I think

180
00:08:55.799 --> 00:08:58.320
<v Speaker 3>that would be more commonplace in a league with a

181
00:08:58.360 --> 00:09:01.120
<v Speaker 3>three point dunk. But I do think I think bringing

182
00:09:01.159 --> 00:09:04.440
<v Speaker 3>back some shot diversity and bringing back the mid range

183
00:09:04.480 --> 00:09:06.720
<v Speaker 3>in a way that makes sense, I think could go

184
00:09:06.799 --> 00:09:09.240
<v Speaker 3>a long way to bringing back some viewers who feel

185
00:09:09.279 --> 00:09:12.159
<v Speaker 3>like this game is just make or miss from downtown

186
00:09:12.440 --> 00:09:15.080
<v Speaker 3>and that's going to dictate everything is whether my team

187
00:09:15.120 --> 00:09:17.679
<v Speaker 3>made threes, and certainly the Utah Jazz on Saturday night

188
00:09:17.679 --> 00:09:19.480
<v Speaker 3>we're evidence of that is how good they look when

189
00:09:19.480 --> 00:09:22.759
<v Speaker 3>those threes are dropping. But some other nights it's pretty

190
00:09:22.759 --> 00:09:23.279
<v Speaker 3>hard to watch.

191
00:09:23.879 --> 00:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>What do you most attribute the lack of solid ratings to, Tom,

192
00:09:28.200 --> 00:09:30.519
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's just this, Maybe it's just this, And look,

193
00:09:30.639 --> 00:09:34.279
<v Speaker 1>historically speaking, it's been a number of years since pro

194
00:09:34.440 --> 00:09:38.080
<v Speaker 1>basketball was even within a earshot of Pro football, and

195
00:09:38.159 --> 00:09:40.639
<v Speaker 1>this time of year, most everybody that are sports fans

196
00:09:40.679 --> 00:09:43.840
<v Speaker 1>are you know, they're watching football, college and pro. Sunday

197
00:09:43.879 --> 00:09:47.799
<v Speaker 1>Night football is the highest rated television show in our

198
00:09:47.879 --> 00:09:50.240
<v Speaker 1>country not sporting a d television show.

199
00:09:50.759 --> 00:09:53.679
<v Speaker 2>So we will see the numbers improve come, you.

200
00:09:53.639 --> 00:09:57.039
<v Speaker 1>Know, February January, February when bowl seasons behind us, the

201
00:09:57.080 --> 00:10:01.279
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowls behind us. But it's undy liviable that these

202
00:10:01.399 --> 00:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>NBA ratings like the first couple of weeks like whatever.

203
00:10:03.759 --> 00:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>But now we've got to sample size. We're approaching Thanksgiving

204
00:10:06.879 --> 00:10:09.200
<v Speaker 1>where some of the time slots are down as much

205
00:10:09.200 --> 00:10:11.320
<v Speaker 1>as like thirty forty percent. This is not five or

206
00:10:11.360 --> 00:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>six percent. Why do you think people are watching pro

207
00:10:13.559 --> 00:10:14.480
<v Speaker 1>basketball right now?

208
00:10:16.679 --> 00:10:19.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think large majority of that slide is due

209
00:10:19.440 --> 00:10:22.759
<v Speaker 3>to the absence of Stars, And you hit on it

210
00:10:22.879 --> 00:10:25.840
<v Speaker 3>in the beginning, and I'll just give you this that

211
00:10:27.919 --> 00:10:33.080
<v Speaker 3>games missed by Stars is up fifty two percent compared

212
00:10:33.120 --> 00:10:38.159
<v Speaker 3>to last year, fifty two percent increase. Through fifteen games

213
00:10:38.200 --> 00:10:41.320
<v Speaker 3>of the season, we've had one hundred and fifty two injuries,

214
00:10:41.559 --> 00:10:44.039
<v Speaker 3>and last year at this point there was one hundred

215
00:10:44.559 --> 00:10:47.279
<v Speaker 3>games lost due to injury. So last year we had

216
00:10:47.320 --> 00:10:50.320
<v Speaker 3>one hundred games lost due to injury for Stars, and

217
00:10:50.720 --> 00:10:53.120
<v Speaker 3>now we're looking at one hundred and fifty two over

218
00:10:53.159 --> 00:10:56.919
<v Speaker 3>that same time period. So what we're seeing is, you know,

219
00:10:57.320 --> 00:11:03.639
<v Speaker 3>a nice return of stars, say Murray, Kevin Durant, Bradley Beale, chrisafsperzingis.

220
00:11:04.120 --> 00:11:07.440
<v Speaker 3>These guys are coming back, but a lot of players

221
00:11:07.519 --> 00:11:09.840
<v Speaker 3>are not that. Luca Dncrich is out for a week.

222
00:11:10.240 --> 00:11:14.120
<v Speaker 3>You have Joel Embiid, who knows what's happening with that guy.

223
00:11:14.200 --> 00:11:18.000
<v Speaker 3>Kawhi Leonard is still out for the season. Chris Middleton,

224
00:11:18.080 --> 00:11:21.879
<v Speaker 3>we have no real, real timetable for his return. And

225
00:11:22.440 --> 00:11:27.559
<v Speaker 3>we're seeing star players miss at extreme rates compared to

226
00:11:27.559 --> 00:11:32.759
<v Speaker 3>the recent history. And I think there's this there's this

227
00:11:32.840 --> 00:11:40.360
<v Speaker 3>happy medium between being smart and being good business smart, right,

228
00:11:40.519 --> 00:11:42.759
<v Speaker 3>Like there's smart in the medical sense of like, hey,

229
00:11:43.000 --> 00:11:46.000
<v Speaker 3>we're holding out these players because we don't want to

230
00:11:46.159 --> 00:11:49.799
<v Speaker 3>hurt them for the long run, or we're having preventative

231
00:11:50.240 --> 00:11:53.600
<v Speaker 3>treatments so that you know, this knee brain doesn't turn

232
00:11:53.639 --> 00:11:56.960
<v Speaker 3>into a torny acl I get that, but also there

233
00:11:57.000 --> 00:12:00.200
<v Speaker 3>has to be a happy meeting between that. And we're

234
00:12:00.240 --> 00:12:03.000
<v Speaker 3>seeing now where injuries or games lost due to injury

235
00:12:03.039 --> 00:12:06.480
<v Speaker 3>or absences are up fifty two percent, and so you know,

236
00:12:06.559 --> 00:12:09.320
<v Speaker 3>it's not good for business to have a Thursday night

237
00:12:09.360 --> 00:12:12.320
<v Speaker 3>game without any stars. Or have you know the Clippers

238
00:12:12.360 --> 00:12:15.200
<v Speaker 3>playing the Sixers in the opening week of the season

239
00:12:15.840 --> 00:12:19.519
<v Speaker 3>and only Paul George is playing. You got no Joelle Embiid,

240
00:12:19.559 --> 00:12:24.320
<v Speaker 3>no Tyrese Maxey, no Paul George, no Kawhi Leonard. And

241
00:12:24.559 --> 00:12:26.759
<v Speaker 3>that's not good for the sport, not just for that night,

242
00:12:26.840 --> 00:12:30.600
<v Speaker 3>but also the message it sends to potential viewers is, oh,

243
00:12:30.600 --> 00:12:34.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to watch this Sixers Clippers game. Wait a minute,

244
00:12:34.360 --> 00:12:36.919
<v Speaker 3>those guys aren't playing, ah man, Like this is just

245
00:12:37.080 --> 00:12:40.360
<v Speaker 3>another game where the NBA stars aren't playing. That can

246
00:12:40.480 --> 00:12:43.840
<v Speaker 3>kind of really poison the well. And I'm hoping that

247
00:12:43.919 --> 00:12:47.519
<v Speaker 3>this avalanche of injuries is really coming to an end

248
00:12:47.559 --> 00:12:50.919
<v Speaker 3>here because we are seeing some players come back this week,

249
00:12:51.120 --> 00:12:53.679
<v Speaker 3>which is really good for the NBA Cup. The NBA

250
00:12:53.720 --> 00:12:55.960
<v Speaker 3>Cup is coming up, and I really hope that we

251
00:12:56.080 --> 00:12:59.360
<v Speaker 3>have a full, you know, roster of star players because

252
00:12:59.360 --> 00:13:02.279
<v Speaker 3>this is a star league and when you know injuries

253
00:13:02.360 --> 00:13:04.279
<v Speaker 3>or games lost, Dude, injury to star players is up

254
00:13:04.320 --> 00:13:07.960
<v Speaker 3>fifty two. That's about as much of an explainer as.

255
00:13:07.919 --> 00:13:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Anything well said. Good stuff.

256
00:13:10.279 --> 00:13:12.159
<v Speaker 1>Let me go back to the Jazz for a moment

257
00:13:12.440 --> 00:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and uh just kind of kick the tires with you

258
00:13:14.600 --> 00:13:18.799
<v Speaker 1>on some potential storylines and topics you know, this year,

259
00:13:19.320 --> 00:13:21.679
<v Speaker 1>and they took a big step back with their developmental

260
00:13:21.720 --> 00:13:24.440
<v Speaker 1>program after Taylor broke his leg. Poor kid, because he

261
00:13:24.480 --> 00:13:26.519
<v Speaker 1>came back in great shape and he's looking pretty good.

262
00:13:27.159 --> 00:13:28.559
<v Speaker 2>Marketing cannot be traded.

263
00:13:29.639 --> 00:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe all I need to say to real NBA fans

264
00:13:32.480 --> 00:13:34.799
<v Speaker 1>about who the jazz are is John Collins might have been.

265
00:13:34.799 --> 00:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>They might be their best players so far. Maybe maybe

266
00:13:37.080 --> 00:13:39.799
<v Speaker 1>that's all you need to know. But you know, certainly

267
00:13:39.919 --> 00:13:43.279
<v Speaker 1>Danny Aing's Justin Zannik open for business at all times.

268
00:13:43.879 --> 00:13:45.919
<v Speaker 1>Do you think any of these vets are going to

269
00:13:45.960 --> 00:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>be on the move, because there is part when I like,

270
00:13:48.120 --> 00:13:51.840
<v Speaker 1>when watching the Nick game, I'm thinking, all right, Marketing's back,

271
00:13:51.919 --> 00:13:52.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, here we go again.

272
00:13:53.039 --> 00:13:54.279
<v Speaker 2>Are they going to start winning a little?

273
00:13:54.279 --> 00:13:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Because Lowry's that good and when they're hitting shots like

274
00:13:57.159 --> 00:13:59.639
<v Speaker 1>they were, they have the ability to win some games,

275
00:13:59.639 --> 00:14:01.440
<v Speaker 1>which I they very much do not want them to do.

276
00:14:01.600 --> 00:14:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I've been on that page for two years, as you know, Tom,

277
00:14:04.120 --> 00:14:06.559
<v Speaker 1>So I'm bring on the losing, Like when they started

278
00:14:06.600 --> 00:14:10.279
<v Speaker 1>losing big, you know, like where it seemed to be

279
00:14:10.279 --> 00:14:12.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty obvious that they were leaning into this development. They

280
00:14:12.879 --> 00:14:15.360
<v Speaker 1>started losing, and I felt better about their direction that

281
00:14:15.440 --> 00:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I have in two years. But you think we're gonna

282
00:14:18.720 --> 00:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>see Danny and Justin maybe break this down to like

283
00:14:21.279 --> 00:14:24.039
<v Speaker 1>if they start winning tom if they go on some run,

284
00:14:24.080 --> 00:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>whether they win like twelve of fourteen, which I do

285
00:14:26.639 --> 00:14:28.559
<v Speaker 1>not believe that they will do. But if they do that,

286
00:14:29.639 --> 00:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>will they start breaking this down prior to the February

287
00:14:32.639 --> 00:14:33.600
<v Speaker 1>deadline this time?

288
00:14:35.919 --> 00:14:39.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's just the perverse incentive structure of the NBA, right,

289
00:14:39.600 --> 00:14:44.279
<v Speaker 3>is that we're rooting. If you're a Jazz fan, you're conflicted.

290
00:14:44.360 --> 00:14:46.759
<v Speaker 3>You're rooting for them to lose because they might give

291
00:14:46.799 --> 00:14:49.080
<v Speaker 3>them the best chance at a star in that market.

292
00:14:49.159 --> 00:14:52.360
<v Speaker 3>It might be the best route, the best path to

293
00:14:52.480 --> 00:14:56.639
<v Speaker 3>getting a foundational star. But it's also you look at

294
00:14:56.639 --> 00:14:59.080
<v Speaker 3>the Detroit Pistons. You look at for so long, the

295
00:14:59.120 --> 00:15:02.960
<v Speaker 3>Sacramento King the Minnesota Timberwolves when they got Andrew Wiggins,

296
00:15:03.279 --> 00:15:05.879
<v Speaker 3>and then only saw, you know, all of that mediocrity

297
00:15:05.879 --> 00:15:08.919
<v Speaker 3>to continue under Andrew Wiggins and Karl Anthony Towns, and

298
00:15:08.960 --> 00:15:11.399
<v Speaker 3>it's like, we got two number one overall picks and

299
00:15:11.440 --> 00:15:15.159
<v Speaker 3>we're still not anywhere until they moved Andrew Wiggins and

300
00:15:15.200 --> 00:15:17.879
<v Speaker 3>then they got Rudy Gobert and of course Anthony Edwards

301
00:15:18.120 --> 00:15:21.919
<v Speaker 3>another number one overall pick. It's not it's more art

302
00:15:22.000 --> 00:15:26.240
<v Speaker 3>than science how to build a championship team. But the

303
00:15:26.279 --> 00:15:29.519
<v Speaker 3>problem is that the incentives are right there is you

304
00:15:29.639 --> 00:15:31.879
<v Speaker 3>have more ping pong balls if you are not good,

305
00:15:32.399 --> 00:15:34.879
<v Speaker 3>and so I think that will be the you know,

306
00:15:34.960 --> 00:15:38.440
<v Speaker 3>telling factor is how much they got to be in

307
00:15:38.480 --> 00:15:40.600
<v Speaker 3>the bottom five. But it doesn't have to be necessarily

308
00:15:41.159 --> 00:15:43.840
<v Speaker 3>the worst team. But I think if they're going to

309
00:15:43.879 --> 00:15:47.240
<v Speaker 3>be record wise, you know, on that five to six,

310
00:15:48.080 --> 00:15:51.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, bottom of five six teams, I think that'll

311
00:15:51.120 --> 00:15:54.159
<v Speaker 3>be enough to you know, give them a solid shot

312
00:15:54.200 --> 00:15:57.360
<v Speaker 3>at a star in the draft. But you know, the

313
00:15:57.440 --> 00:16:01.080
<v Speaker 3>question is you look at a team like the Houston Rockets,

314
00:16:01.679 --> 00:16:06.799
<v Speaker 3>where there now as have won as many teams. And

315
00:16:06.799 --> 00:16:09.519
<v Speaker 3>I wrote about this for a Tomdefiner dot com I substack.

316
00:16:09.919 --> 00:16:12.080
<v Speaker 3>They're twelve and six right now, and they've built through

317
00:16:12.080 --> 00:16:15.120
<v Speaker 3>the draft. You look at Alphera and Shane gun Jalen Green,

318
00:16:16.440 --> 00:16:19.600
<v Speaker 3>Amen Thompson Reed, Shepherd's glued to the bench because there's

319
00:16:19.639 --> 00:16:22.879
<v Speaker 3>just so many good young players on that Teamtari Easton's

320
00:16:22.879 --> 00:16:26.639
<v Speaker 3>been fantastic for them. They made one signing right there

321
00:16:26.679 --> 00:16:30.200
<v Speaker 3>with Fred van Vliet, and he's kind of set the

322
00:16:30.200 --> 00:16:33.039
<v Speaker 3>tone for the locker room and that is a model

323
00:16:33.080 --> 00:16:35.559
<v Speaker 3>for the Utah Jazz. Is like building, it's going to

324
00:16:35.639 --> 00:16:38.399
<v Speaker 3>take a few years, but building through the draft and

325
00:16:38.480 --> 00:16:40.320
<v Speaker 3>seeing where it gets them, but you have to hit.

326
00:16:41.159 --> 00:16:44.320
<v Speaker 3>And the Houston Rockets, the Oklahoma City Thunder, they've built

327
00:16:44.320 --> 00:16:46.679
<v Speaker 3>through the draft in a way that is a nice

328
00:16:46.720 --> 00:16:48.639
<v Speaker 3>model for Houston, but you have to make sure you

329
00:16:48.720 --> 00:16:51.440
<v Speaker 3>nail those picks. And so for the Jazz it's like, yeah,

330
00:16:51.480 --> 00:16:53.639
<v Speaker 3>we can build through the draft, but if we don't

331
00:16:53.679 --> 00:16:57.559
<v Speaker 3>get Cooper Flag in the draft, will this be all

332
00:16:57.639 --> 00:17:00.000
<v Speaker 3>for not? And unfortunately the NBA, for a small mart

333
00:17:00.120 --> 00:17:04.880
<v Speaker 3>the team, the odds are not great to begin with,

334
00:17:05.039 --> 00:17:07.119
<v Speaker 3>and the odds that might be best if you build

335
00:17:07.119 --> 00:17:10.519
<v Speaker 3>through the draft like OKAC and Houston has and hope

336
00:17:10.519 --> 00:17:13.119
<v Speaker 3>you can nail those picks and you can get an

337
00:17:13.160 --> 00:17:15.960
<v Speaker 3>Alpera and Shane Gun. You can get a check Holme

338
00:17:16.000 --> 00:17:18.960
<v Speaker 3>Grin or a Jalen Williams. But the history of the

339
00:17:19.039 --> 00:17:22.440
<v Speaker 3>NBA shows you know you need a superstar and probably

340
00:17:22.480 --> 00:17:24.480
<v Speaker 3>two or three of them in order to win a championship.

341
00:17:24.519 --> 00:17:27.079
<v Speaker 3>And for Utah, it's just gonna be really hard to

342
00:17:27.279 --> 00:17:30.240
<v Speaker 3>bring one in without having enough bites at the apple

343
00:17:30.279 --> 00:17:30.599
<v Speaker 3>at the.

344
00:17:30.519 --> 00:17:32.759
<v Speaker 1>Top before I set you loose, because I know you

345
00:17:32.759 --> 00:17:34.319
<v Speaker 1>got to go, and if you need to go quick,

346
00:17:34.400 --> 00:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Just be quick, quick with the answer.

347
00:17:35.720 --> 00:17:36.359
<v Speaker 2>But here's the thing.

348
00:17:36.440 --> 00:17:40.799
<v Speaker 1>I've never considered anybody to be able to win a

349
00:17:40.920 --> 00:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>quote triple crown in pro basketball because I simply thought

350
00:17:44.000 --> 00:17:47.680
<v Speaker 1>it was entirely impossible. And Nikola Jokich is second in

351
00:17:47.799 --> 00:17:50.119
<v Speaker 1>rebounding right now, he's second in assists.

352
00:17:50.759 --> 00:17:51.599
<v Speaker 2>Uh no't excuse me.

353
00:17:51.599 --> 00:17:54.240
<v Speaker 1>He leads the league in rebounding, he's second in scoring,

354
00:17:54.640 --> 00:17:57.279
<v Speaker 1>and he's second in assists, and he's shooting like forty

355
00:17:57.279 --> 00:18:00.200
<v Speaker 1>three percent from three. Maybe we're numb to it, but

356
00:18:00.279 --> 00:18:02.880
<v Speaker 1>he strikes me as like this virtue. Also, who's mastered

357
00:18:02.880 --> 00:18:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the cello and wants to retire and go do something else.

358
00:18:05.680 --> 00:18:07.920
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of what we could potentially see

359
00:18:07.920 --> 00:18:08.880
<v Speaker 1>with the Jokics this year?

360
00:18:11.000 --> 00:18:13.599
<v Speaker 3>I hate to correct you, but I'm only doing it

361
00:18:13.599 --> 00:18:15.720
<v Speaker 3>because I love you, and because it's even funnier. The

362
00:18:15.839 --> 00:18:19.440
<v Speaker 3>stat is, Yoki isn't shooting forty three percent from downtown.

363
00:18:19.640 --> 00:18:21.480
<v Speaker 3>He's shooting fifty six.

364
00:18:22.200 --> 00:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh my gosh, I must have had the wrong stat

365
00:18:25.079 --> 00:18:27.200
<v Speaker 1>that's insane.

366
00:18:27.240 --> 00:18:33.720
<v Speaker 3>Say fifty six percent spence from downtown and it's you know,

367
00:18:34.279 --> 00:18:35.799
<v Speaker 3>do you have to qualify it? I'm not so sure

368
00:18:35.799 --> 00:18:39.079
<v Speaker 3>he qualifies right now. Just because of the games played

369
00:18:39.480 --> 00:18:43.039
<v Speaker 3>from the three point standpoint, but fifty six percent from

370
00:18:43.079 --> 00:18:46.880
<v Speaker 3>downtown first and rebounding not quite like you said, not

371
00:18:46.960 --> 00:18:49.400
<v Speaker 3>quite assists and points right now, but he's right in

372
00:18:49.440 --> 00:18:52.960
<v Speaker 3>the mix of it. I never thought i'd see anything

373
00:18:53.000 --> 00:18:55.319
<v Speaker 3>like that, But then again, I thought i'd never see

374
00:18:55.440 --> 00:18:57.680
<v Speaker 3>Lebron James score forty thousand points, and I thought i'd

375
00:18:57.720 --> 00:19:00.519
<v Speaker 3>never see someone break off for Robertson's triple double record,

376
00:19:00.960 --> 00:19:04.319
<v Speaker 3>and then basically Russell Bosper did it three times. So

377
00:19:05.160 --> 00:19:07.640
<v Speaker 3>I can't put it past Jokich. He's a virtuo. So

378
00:19:07.880 --> 00:19:11.400
<v Speaker 3>he is the best player in the NBA, and I

379
00:19:11.400 --> 00:19:12.920
<v Speaker 3>don't think it's particularly.

380
00:19:12.720 --> 00:19:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Close this season.

381
00:19:15.119 --> 00:19:17.759
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if you'll have the volume or he'll

382
00:19:17.799 --> 00:19:22.759
<v Speaker 3>continue to shoot that well from downtown, but it's all

383
00:19:22.799 --> 00:19:25.240
<v Speaker 3>things are possible with that guy. He is a savant.

384
00:19:25.400 --> 00:19:29.559
<v Speaker 3>He is the chosen one in terms of like basketball skill,

385
00:19:30.839 --> 00:19:34.680
<v Speaker 3>and he's got incredible hands. He's second in the NBA

386
00:19:34.759 --> 00:19:38.400
<v Speaker 3>in deflections. We're not even talking about those steals and

387
00:19:38.440 --> 00:19:41.680
<v Speaker 3>block numbers for Jokic, but he's second in the NBA

388
00:19:41.799 --> 00:19:45.000
<v Speaker 3>in deflections per game, behind Dyson Daniels. Which no one

389
00:19:45.039 --> 00:19:49.279
<v Speaker 3>realizes is that he's just got these ridiculous myths that

390
00:19:49.400 --> 00:19:52.119
<v Speaker 3>not just has the touch but also just the hand

391
00:19:52.160 --> 00:19:56.599
<v Speaker 3>eye coordinations ridiculous. And so Jokich is incredible. He's my pick,

392
00:19:56.680 --> 00:19:59.440
<v Speaker 3>easy pick for MVP at this point. And it's certainly

393
00:19:59.480 --> 00:20:03.640
<v Speaker 3>within the realm possibility that he could have that triple

394
00:20:03.680 --> 00:20:06.680
<v Speaker 3>crown so to speak, and points, rebounds and assists. But

395
00:20:06.759 --> 00:20:09.079
<v Speaker 3>also that three point percentage is in sane fifty six

396
00:20:09.119 --> 00:20:10.200
<v Speaker 3>percent unbelievable.

397
00:20:10.279 --> 00:20:12.559
<v Speaker 2>Heading back to the motherland Tommy tomorrow.

398
00:20:12.680 --> 00:20:16.279
<v Speaker 1>So I'll pay my respects to the great I'm sure

399
00:20:16.359 --> 00:20:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Tom Haberstrow statue that's outside of Staples High School at

400
00:20:19.400 --> 00:20:19.799
<v Speaker 1>some point.

401
00:20:19.920 --> 00:20:22.200
<v Speaker 2>So have a great thanksgiving, my friend, Thank you for

402
00:20:22.240 --> 00:20:23.960
<v Speaker 2>the time. Okay, you too.

403
00:20:24.000 --> 00:20:26.200
<v Speaker 3>And I'll just say this. Charlotte, where I live, they

404
00:20:26.279 --> 00:20:28.359
<v Speaker 3>just announced Dave Matthews band is going to headline a

405
00:20:28.400 --> 00:20:30.559
<v Speaker 3>festival here. So I'm already trying to get in line

406
00:20:30.559 --> 00:20:31.119
<v Speaker 3>for tickets.

407
00:20:31.319 --> 00:20:32.960
<v Speaker 2>Stop it, I'm gonna I'm gonna fly out. We'll go

408
00:20:33.000 --> 00:20:36.119
<v Speaker 2>to a Dave show together. Let's do it, dude, come

409
00:20:36.119 --> 00:20:36.599
<v Speaker 2>me in there.

410
00:20:36.599 --> 00:20:38.920
<v Speaker 1>It is Tom Haberstrow, the Great Tom Haberstrow, one of

411
00:20:38.960 --> 00:20:41.759
<v Speaker 1>my favorite NBA guests. All of his work he's very busy.

412
00:20:42.160 --> 00:20:44.279
<v Speaker 1>He's about to go record a podcast. He does like

413
00:20:44.319 --> 00:20:47.519
<v Speaker 1>five a week. Tom Thefiner dot com is a substack.

414
00:20:47.599 --> 00:20:49.640
<v Speaker 1>He writes a column for Yahoos Sports, and he's on

415
00:20:49.680 --> 00:20:52.359
<v Speaker 1>the Blazers broadcast team. My man has like seven jobs

416
00:20:52.720 --> 00:20:54.519
<v Speaker 1>at Tom haberstrow is where you find him
