Speaker 1: You see somethings going to happen.
Speaker 2: What what's gonna happen?
Speaker 3: What?
Speaker 2: Help? Welcome to the Occult Rejects Fridays. Unfortunately, my man
Speaker 2: JJ he won't be here. Uh so he's let me
Speaker 2: run the show, so it'll probably be a total disaster.
Speaker 2: But uh, I got with me tonight. I got with
Speaker 2: me tonight the Mad Scientist himself, the Occult reject Lisa, Lisa,
Speaker 2: thank you very much for joining us tonight. And I
Speaker 2: also got my boy you know who he is, the
Speaker 2: Headless Giant Headless? What is going on? Brother? How are you?
Speaker 1: I'm good man. I'm ready to talk about nutter butters
Speaker 1: and plane crash.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, yeah, this is There's so many things to
Speaker 2: talk about actually that we could talk about for sure. Headless.
Speaker 2: Wy don't you let everybody know what your deal is
Speaker 2: and where they can find your work? Please?
Speaker 1: You can find me on YouTube. I've been making a
Speaker 1: bunch of videos lately with people who have sent me
Speaker 1: emails about their occult topics. So I get a bunch
Speaker 1: of good stories in the emails, and now I got
Speaker 1: three lined up. So if you want to find out
Speaker 1: how you can get yours on the air, just email
Speaker 1: your story over to Headless Giant Podcast at gmail dot
Speaker 1: com and we will get that up and out there.
Speaker 2: Hell yeah, for real, especially my listeners have to drop
Speaker 2: this on an audio. I know I said this already,
Speaker 2: but definitely, if you got any stories, please hit him up.
Speaker 2: It should be pretty interesting. And yeah, his links I'm
Speaker 2: pretty sure in the bottom already. And yeah, one of
Speaker 2: the few things that we're going to talk about tonight,
Speaker 2: one of them is nutt of Butter. Believe it or not, Yes,
Speaker 2: the cookie nut of Butter. They got some really weird
Speaker 2: stuff going on out there, and this is actually a
Speaker 2: topic that was brought to my attention a bit ago. Actually,
Speaker 2: I'm actually, to be totally honest with you, I'm surprised
Speaker 2: nobody else has talked about this. It's so kind of old,
Speaker 2: you know, but yeah, it's kind of interesting, to be
Speaker 2: totally honest with you, we probably could have dug into
Speaker 2: it from a real occult aspect and probably found some stuff,
Speaker 2: but you know, we're just you know, throwing it out
Speaker 2: there and just showing some stuff. But this was brought
Speaker 2: to my attention from Lisa. So, Lisa, why don't you
Speaker 2: kind of let everybody know what the scoop is here
Speaker 2: with Nune.
Speaker 4: Of Butter, the truth is and we have like a
Speaker 4: ton of topics to cover, but we haven't covered them.
Speaker 4: And Nutter Butter is like, let's just.
Speaker 2: Throw it in.
Speaker 5: They're already yeah.
Speaker 4: So with nutder Butter, I can't remember what topic million
Speaker 4: topic we've been researching. We were researching a topic, and
Speaker 4: I decided to take to TikTok.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 4: I never I'm never on TikTok, so I've am very
Speaker 4: naive to how all this works. So I'm scrolling through
Speaker 4: TikTok and I see random account someone I don't follow
Speaker 4: that says, oh my god, have you all seen what's
Speaker 4: going on with nutter Butter. You know, nutter Butter has
Speaker 4: lost its mind. You need to go check it out.
Speaker 4: And I'm like, what is what are they talking about?
Speaker 4: And I was like whatever, Anyway, I keep scrolling and
Speaker 4: just scrolling, continuously scrolling, and then another account, not the
Speaker 4: same person says, nutter Butter's lost its mind. Please go
Speaker 4: see if nutter Butter's okay, And I was like, okay,
Speaker 4: I have to go check it out now, right, So
Speaker 4: I click on you know, the search thing and enter
Speaker 4: in the account thing and a video pops up and
Speaker 4: I watch the video and I'm like, what is this?
Speaker 4: Like it just made me feel weird inside, and so
Speaker 4: I send it. I send it to Nick and I
Speaker 4: was like, please tell me this is weird because it
Speaker 4: made me feel weird inside. And then he's like what
Speaker 4: is this? So then of course we start looking at
Speaker 4: the videos and it's just kind of disturbing a little bit.
Speaker 4: And then you go into the comments and you have actual,
Speaker 4: real verified accounts of other products like Oreo, chips Ahoy
Speaker 4: or whatever that are commenting and also making morbid commentary,
Speaker 4: and it's kind of like what And so they said
Speaker 4: that apparently like the Twitter account is worse, and I
Speaker 4: was like, hey, has anyone covered this? And he's like,
Speaker 4: I don't know. Let's start looking. So we check. We
Speaker 4: checked TikTok, we check well, I mean that's where I
Speaker 4: heard it from, but we check YouTube, We checked Twitter,
Speaker 4: and nobody had really covered it at all. And I
Speaker 4: was like, is it just me seeing this, because surely
Speaker 4: somebody else would have covered this. And so the Twitter,
Speaker 4: it's like, I think, like one word tweets, so they're
Speaker 4: also coded and weird, and they also have comments from
Speaker 4: verified accounts that are making comments as well. And then
Speaker 4: if you go on Reddit, apparently there's a whole storyline
Speaker 4: symbology to everything.
Speaker 5: And what have you.
Speaker 4: So that's kind of the backstory on that. But that
Speaker 4: was that was my introduction to the video of or
Speaker 4: the videos video.
Speaker 2: Yeah, definitely some weird ones out there, and there there
Speaker 2: is like some even theories too on Reddit and stuff
Speaker 2: that maybe we'll even get into that like later on. Yeah,
Speaker 2: I guess if if we want, I'll just kick it
Speaker 2: off for now. I'll play one of them for sure,
Speaker 2: you know, pull it up, the.
Speaker 6: Dreams for Real, the Dreams for Real and the Dreams
Speaker 6: for Real more time, the Dreams for Real and the
Speaker 6: Dreams for Real, The Dreams for Real and the Dreams
Speaker 6: for Real. M.
Speaker 1: I like how they throwing the cap cut logo. I'm
Speaker 1: pretty sure you can out.
Speaker 2: Oh you know what, you know what that might be from.
Speaker 2: It's probably from the way I ripped it off of TikTok.
Speaker 2: I'm thinking that might be the Yeah, at least that open.
Speaker 2: Here's another butter peanut butter standing cookie rental.
Speaker 5: Why has creamy peanut butter filling filling up its maids?
Speaker 1: And this peanuts Ydom cropsy.
Speaker 6: It's another Nutter butter peanut butter sandwich cookie. Oh here
Speaker 6: Nutter Butter man.
Speaker 4: Go there? Did you get one with a house and
Speaker 4: all that other stuff?
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's what this.
Speaker 1: Rost hair.
Speaker 2: When I saw that one, I actually went through a
Speaker 2: bunch of them, wondering if they were gonna, like name
Speaker 2: the other elements or something. I was wondering what was
Speaker 2: up at that?
Speaker 5: Yeah, hm hmm.
Speaker 2: It's fucking weird.
Speaker 3: Ship here comes Nadia.
Speaker 2: Isn't there something even with that character? Nadia isn't Wasn't
Speaker 2: there even a whole storyline behind that? Is some ship?
Speaker 2: You know? Hell is?
Speaker 1: You know what?
Speaker 2: I thought? It was interesting that you had said to
Speaker 2: me when I sent you some of this stuff you
Speaker 2: and I had thought of it myself very much, Tim
Speaker 2: and Eric, like I was, I found that interesting.
Speaker 1: Yeah, there's a I think there's a big cross over
Speaker 1: there between the same type of styles. So if you're
Speaker 1: if you're watching the different transitions and uh, how they
Speaker 1: time things out and how they slow words down, it
Speaker 1: kind of makes you feel uneasy. And so that that
Speaker 1: kind of disorientation causes people to watch it for longer
Speaker 1: because their their minds automatically are trying to figure out
Speaker 1: what they're missing, you know, like why is this bizarre?
Speaker 1: And that that feeling of confusion I think is really
Speaker 1: powerful when it comes to marketing, especially if you look
Speaker 1: at Tim and Eric. The guys who made Tim and Eric,
Speaker 1: they were into marketing before they made that show, and
Speaker 1: they realized if you if you make things weird and bizarre,
Speaker 1: you actually draw more eyes for longer because nobody knows
Speaker 1: what's coming next. It's just kind of bizarre. So I
Speaker 1: think that marketing strategy is being used by a bunch
Speaker 1: of different accounts online and they just keep one upping
Speaker 1: each other to try to make the viewer feel uneasy
Speaker 1: at what they're looking at.
Speaker 2: Do you think there's actually like it? Would? I mean,
Speaker 2: there might be a cult science behind that, but it
Speaker 2: doesn't necessarily mean there's a cultism or cultists behind it.
Speaker 2: But do you think sometimes they are like in marketing.
Speaker 1: Or it's called an Alison Wonderland technique. I'm pretty sure.
Speaker 1: So the Alice in Wonderland technique is to make people
Speaker 1: feel confused and then bring them back to reality with
Speaker 1: a with the anchor word, right, So nutter butters would
Speaker 1: be kind of the anchor point, you're like, you know
Speaker 1: this product, but then they've changed it so much that
Speaker 1: it creates a sense of confusion. So I think it's
Speaker 1: related to the fact that the mind likes to have
Speaker 1: problems that are easily figured out, or maybe a problem
Speaker 1: will get stuck in your head. It's it's the same
Speaker 1: thing with a song. If you're if you've got a
Speaker 1: song stuck in your head, usually it's because there's a
Speaker 1: part of the song that your memory can't recall, so
Speaker 1: it just plays it over and over again in your head,
Speaker 1: trying to remember that one part of it. The same
Speaker 1: thing works with unanswerable mystery. So they're giving you this
Speaker 1: this thing that you're trying to figure out. It gets
Speaker 1: stuck in your head and then you end up going
Speaker 1: to the store and trying to find the nutter butters.
Speaker 1: It's a It's a really effective marketing strategy if you
Speaker 1: think about it. So, Leasi, you went to the store
Speaker 1: and you're actually looking.
Speaker 4: At the right So you know, we were watching some
Speaker 4: of these videos and I think I think you even
Speaker 4: you had even told Teresa. I think Nick that you
Speaker 4: had like, hey, I sent it to Teresa, and we're
Speaker 4: all talking about it. I think kind of you know what,
Speaker 4: back and forth, and I think somebody said, oh, it's
Speaker 4: probably a marketing thing, right, And I was, okay, well,
Speaker 4: I'm gonna I'm gonna go check it out. So I
Speaker 4: went to a couple of grocery stores here and it
Speaker 4: was literally hard to find nut or butter, Like. I
Speaker 4: kept going up and down the aisle, like did they
Speaker 4: do away with it? Are they not selling it?
Speaker 1: Now?
Speaker 4: Like did my city ban it? Because all of a sudden,
Speaker 4: it's like weird. I mean, I don't know how like
Speaker 4: things are banned now? And then no, it wasn't. It
Speaker 4: was tucked in and there was like only two little
Speaker 4: tray boxes of it, And I was, Okay, if they're
Speaker 4: trying to up their marketing game, why isn't there more
Speaker 4: product on the shelf? Right? And I was like, oh,
Speaker 4: maybe this is just this one store. So I go
Speaker 4: to another store, same thing. So then I go out
Speaker 4: of town and I go to those stores, just you know,
Speaker 4: to see if it's also there, same thing. Like it's
Speaker 4: so it was hard to find. It was didn't have
Speaker 4: like a display or anything. It was like two or
Speaker 4: three little boxes kind of tucked into all the different
Speaker 4: you know, candy or a candywood like cookie sandwiches type deal.
Speaker 4: And so I told that to Endless earlier. When did
Speaker 4: you say, You're like, maybe they're like increasing what interest
Speaker 4: or demand?
Speaker 1: Right? You would have the problem of people looking for
Speaker 1: the nutter butters and they can't find it. So it
Speaker 1: affects that same part of the brain. It's like, well
Speaker 1: where are they? You know? I mean a lot of
Speaker 1: times in the stores, everything will be laid out by psychologists.
Speaker 1: So if you think about the most valuable shelf in
Speaker 1: the store, it's the one right at eye level with
Speaker 1: the kids. That's why they put all these sugary cereals.
Speaker 1: And each one of the characters on these sugary cereals
Speaker 1: looks directly at the children from the angle it's sitting
Speaker 1: on the shelf at. So they've got these things down
Speaker 1: to a marketing science and to influence that using a
Speaker 1: social media brand that wouldn't be too uncommon. I mean,
Speaker 1: what were you saying about freeedo La and how they
Speaker 1: were using their flavor enhancers.
Speaker 4: Yeah, and so there's a wall back. I was working
Speaker 4: as biologists and we were trying to get the tick
Speaker 4: population down in a certain area of Texas because they're
Speaker 4: become problematic to white tail deer and cattle. And so
Speaker 4: they had an idea that if they could put bait
Speaker 4: out for deer, the deer could intake some of it.
Speaker 4: It was ibermectin, but they could intake ibermectin or whatever,
Speaker 4: and it would help reduce the population of tics because
Speaker 4: ticks at the time will even still carry diseases and
Speaker 4: then it causes the animals to become sick and what
Speaker 4: have you. So but they couldn't get deer to come
Speaker 4: to the bait stations, right because it's not corn or
Speaker 4: it's not whatever. And they wanted to kind of control
Speaker 4: the dosing or whatever, and so they said, well, we
Speaker 4: can just call Freedo Lay or you know, the company
Speaker 4: of Freedo Lay or something. And I was like, freedom
Speaker 4: Lay why And they were like, well, because they have
Speaker 4: this whole thing with like smells and tastes that actually
Speaker 4: are addictive. And I was like what and they're like yeah, yeah,
Speaker 4: you know, they pour it into Freedo lay or potato
Speaker 4: chips or whatever, and not only do you finish the
Speaker 4: whole bag, but it'll have you like it's psychotropics. It'll
Speaker 4: have you craving more product such as you know, free
Speaker 4: dos or potato chips or whatever, not only that day,
Speaker 4: but the next day and the day after, and then
Speaker 4: it'll change your gut bacteria to where the gut bacteria
Speaker 4: also craves it and will indicate to the brain. Hey,
Speaker 4: I want you know free Doo's Again. We didn't end
Speaker 4: up using it, but I was like, that actually exists.
Speaker 4: I mean I knew it existed, but I didn't know
Speaker 4: it existed like that, Like it was actually a tub
Speaker 4: of stuff that you could, I don't know, do a
Speaker 4: por on or something.
Speaker 1: Think about how much they hated MSG back in the
Speaker 1: nineteen seventies, yep, right, everybody started listing whether they had
Speaker 1: MSG or not because there was the possibility that it
Speaker 1: was an excito toxin. Well, that sounds like an excito
Speaker 1: toxin to me. And nobody's talking about it because nobody
Speaker 1: knows it's in their Freedo lays or whatever.
Speaker 4: I mean, that's uh, well, I think all at all
Speaker 4: of the from what I understood, all of the sorry
Speaker 4: fast food. I was like, that's those that industry called
Speaker 4: all of the fast food. That's pretty much the name
Speaker 4: of the game with them. In that they have the
Speaker 4: these psychotropics or these addictive chemicals in their food stuff
Speaker 4: along with everything else, right, but for people to come
Speaker 4: back for more, I mean they work. They're the ultimate
Speaker 4: drug dealer. They work on the comeback. So I think
Speaker 4: they get you know, all these people hooked on I
Speaker 4: mean think about it. Say you have McDonald's today, all
Speaker 4: of a sudden, a couple days later, you're like, I
Speaker 4: want McDonald's again. Why you just had it? Like you
Speaker 4: know what I mean, Like I don't I don't know. Like,
Speaker 4: if your mom makes spaghetti, you're like, alreny hat spaghettana,
Speaker 4: want spaghetti this week? Why would you crave McDonald's later
Speaker 4: on in the week.
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 1: It's just me think about the standard American diet for kids,
Speaker 1: That's what it is. They get you hooked on it
Speaker 1: early on, and then you're always crazy for the rest
Speaker 1: of your life.
Speaker 4: I think Nick and I had this conversation one time,
Speaker 4: and it was like, you know, when you were a kid,
Speaker 4: you saw a kid bring in McDonald they were the
Speaker 4: cool kid, you know what I mean, And everybody's like,
Speaker 4: can I have a fry? Can I have a fry?
Speaker 5: You know?
Speaker 4: And so it was also socially addictive as well. You
Speaker 4: wanted to be the cool kid at the cafeteria table
Speaker 4: that had the happy meal.
Speaker 1: So especially our generation, I mean that was always sort
Speaker 1: of like the thing is that was that was the
Speaker 1: flex on all the other kids.
Speaker 2: But you know what.
Speaker 1: I mean, there's a lot of intrinsic value to how
Speaker 1: you associate these things throughout the rest of your life.
Speaker 1: So you get that initial cake when you're a kid,
Speaker 1: you know you want to go back to it, at
Speaker 1: least on some level. You've got those positive memory associations.
Speaker 4: Mm hmm for sure for sure. Yeah.
Speaker 5: The Twitter.
Speaker 4: Sorry not to interrupt your headless, but yeah, that Twitter
Speaker 4: account is weird, very coded. Some of it's like one word,
Speaker 4: one word tweets, and then some of the like they
Speaker 4: think like they they tweet help several times or something.
Speaker 2: Here.
Speaker 4: It's odd, very odd. The other thing is that there's
Speaker 4: a video if you go, we're not going to pre
Speaker 4: send all this traffic over it to another buttery on TikTok.
Speaker 2: That uh.
Speaker 4: I think it's a pinned video and it's like a
Speaker 4: house and it looks like there's been a murder scene. Okay,
Speaker 4: I think I put it in the chat.
Speaker 2: Have a bunch of stuff.
Speaker 4: Okay, I'm sorry.
Speaker 2: No, it's okay, yeah.
Speaker 4: But okay. So some of the Reddit posts is like,
Speaker 4: I think the backstory is that the main character's name
Speaker 4: is Aiden, and I think he lost his son or
Speaker 4: his son died. Yes, this is not a butter like
Speaker 4: these videos. And he has a wife whose name is Nadia,
Speaker 4: and Nadia is the anagram for Aiden. So it's like,
Speaker 4: are they one and the same? Are they the same person?
Speaker 4: But they're married? At mean, what's going on? They had
Speaker 4: a kid?
Speaker 1: That's bizarre.
Speaker 2: Here's their Twitter account real quick, got I know? Huh?
Speaker 1: Well, the story was that like the official canon or
Speaker 1: is that like a fan site.
Speaker 4: It's on Reddit, that's where I got it from it
Speaker 4: so I don't know if it's official, but.
Speaker 1: I wouldn't be surprised it was.
Speaker 4: It was plausible for me. I was like, oh I didn't,
Speaker 4: I didn't. That didn't even dawn on me.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the Twitter, I didn't notice. Even on some of them,
Speaker 2: they get do like extra spacing and stuff too. I know,
Speaker 2: double space y space ou and it says here sudden
Speaker 2: follow I It's I am, but I space M equals
Speaker 2: space sentient some for me, don't unless this time year,
Speaker 2: what if I'm here very weird mm hmm.
Speaker 1: And then I know that's a powerful form of mind
Speaker 1: control what they're trying to do there, because they're making
Speaker 1: these associations that are pretty strong, and it, you know,
Speaker 1: draws you in, like you're like you're talking about so, yeah,
Speaker 1: got us talking about But I mean if it draws
Speaker 1: you in, how come no one else was talking about it?
Speaker 4: Well, why was it up to us? Like why hasn't
Speaker 4: I don't know, I'm just saying, like, why hasn't like
Speaker 4: a bigger you know, like the mainstream you.
Speaker 1: Know, somebody else, Because that's the big thing with secret
Speaker 1: societies and stuff is that when they do send messages,
Speaker 1: it's it's to do it publicly enough to where anybody
Speaker 1: who's looking can see, like all the thirty three stuff,
Speaker 1: you know, mm hmmm.
Speaker 2: It might be almost very damn brownish almost in a sense.
Speaker 2: I do believe that shit does go on. I think
Speaker 2: that's like what Cicada three three oh one was probably
Speaker 2: even about.
Speaker 1: What's that called? I was trying to think of that
Speaker 1: that word earlier. It's not a live action role play,
Speaker 1: it's something else. Arg I think it's called an ARG.
Speaker 1: I forgot what it stands for. But basically you got
Speaker 1: games like Pokemon Go, which is an ARG. And then
Speaker 1: you've got that other right, you know that app that
Speaker 1: would give you coordinates random Attica.
Speaker 2: You guys show, Yeah, yeah you too.
Speaker 1: That grew out of that whole Cicada thing. They just
Speaker 1: figured out how they could apply that to locations and
Speaker 1: they harvested a ton of location data from all those
Speaker 1: kids that were playing Poskemon Go. That was massive data
Speaker 1: collection operations.
Speaker 4: I have to agree with Teresa. I don't even know
Speaker 4: how that got approved. Like I think somebody hacked the
Speaker 4: account and was like, we're going to run with this
Speaker 4: since nobody's really paying attention to us.
Speaker 1: I don't know, man, about GPS data is very highly valuable,
Speaker 1: you know, and all of it was recorded the whole
Speaker 1: The whole point of the game was to get people
Speaker 1: to map things for them, so, I mean everything else
Speaker 1: they put on top of it, that was just it
Speaker 1: always seemed kind of clunky to me. Have you ever
Speaker 1: played it?
Speaker 4: No, but I've heard that a lot of like sensors
Speaker 4: are now based on some of that data that was collected.
Speaker 1: Well, it's not an option that you could switch over
Speaker 1: to the camera and then the little Pokemon figure would
Speaker 1: be dancing in front of whatever you were looking at.
Speaker 1: So they're just collecting that camera data. You know, you've
Speaker 1: got the entire map of your neighborhood and anywhere you're going.
Speaker 1: If they're interested in a site, all they have to
Speaker 1: do is put a gym out there and then they
Speaker 1: get all the data they need to. So if you're
Speaker 1: surveilling somebody, you want the kids to have their cameras open, right.
Speaker 4: Yeah, that's true.
Speaker 2: Yes, yes, here we go. I'm gonna play this one
Speaker 2: and then the weird one. Well, I mean they're all weird.
Speaker 2: I shall play one more time, just for the cats.
Speaker 2: Oh god, here's hiss his this is actually did you
Speaker 2: want to say something, Lisa?
Speaker 3: Yeah, I don't see.
Speaker 5: I don't know.
Speaker 4: For me, it doesn't make me run out there and
Speaker 4: go and get nutter butter, especially the one with the
Speaker 4: house thing. It was so gross. I was like, I mean, okay,
Speaker 4: so I went and bought one right eventually.
Speaker 5: Because I would like I got I got him.
Speaker 4: He was like, well, I found it, so maybe now
Speaker 4: I guess I'll.
Speaker 2: Buy it and worked on me. Here's funny, and I
Speaker 2: bought some of the day. I thought we were doing
Speaker 2: it the first time.
Speaker 4: Yeah, we were going to do a whole show about it.
Speaker 5: Right, we're gonna go.
Speaker 2: Here's another one. This is This is like kind of
Speaker 2: the creepy one that you know, they're not creepy already.
Speaker 1: Yeah, the craft vibes on that is pretty palpable.
Speaker 5: Yeah, thank you.
Speaker 4: Yeah, it's supposed to be It's supposed to be blood
Speaker 4: according to the redded thing, right. Of course that's sound official,
Speaker 4: but that's what it's supposed to represent. I don't know.
Speaker 4: And that was yes, yes, Aiden. And then the wife's
Speaker 4: name is not Yeah, which is is an anagram of Aiden.
Speaker 2: Aiden Maloney, associated social media manager on the nuda Butter account.
Speaker 4: What Teresa, you need to hop on?
Speaker 1: Clott Dickens.
Speaker 2: All right, yeah, anybody else got any information? This is
Speaker 2: gen Z brain rot it is.
Speaker 1: It's got that gen Z brain rot field to it.
Speaker 2: You know, let me play this one.
Speaker 1: So recently we've been made aware of the another but
Speaker 1: social media accounts that we just wanted to take the
Speaker 1: time to apologize that everyone who's had to see it.
Speaker 2: This is.
Speaker 1: Wow, that is nerve wracking.
Speaker 2: And then this is this weird one that I took.
Speaker 2: I took snapshots of this one, so you do see
Speaker 2: it does change. It's interesting. Yeah, it's fucking weird.
Speaker 1: I gotta agree. Yeah, it's got different themes going on there.
Speaker 1: If you're going to break that down metaphysically, mm.
Speaker 4: Hmm mm hmmm, it's to me, it's just creepy.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I'll pull this one up and then I get
Speaker 2: them done with them. Of recently we've been.
Speaker 5: Yeah you so, m we should find not you now where.
Speaker 1: This out buried under somebody's basement.
Speaker 4: No kidding, buried under all that paint. Peanut butter want cookie.
Speaker 2: Wax snack.
Speaker 4: I'm gonna say, is that if all of y'all go
Speaker 4: out and buy some nut butter tag us, you know
Speaker 4: because you heard it here first.
Speaker 2: Jeez, and same thing.
Speaker 4: Mm hmm.
Speaker 2: That's interesting. All right, So we got we got that
Speaker 2: over with. Uh, what did you want to talk? Did
Speaker 2: you want to talk about the executive? What is all
Speaker 2: the planes?
Speaker 6: Head?
Speaker 2: List which ones you want to talk?
Speaker 1: I want to go to the planes.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, it's some weird ship, right, So.
Speaker 1: To list them out what I have so far would
Speaker 1: be the crash in d C where you had a
Speaker 1: Blackhawk helicopter crash into a passenger plane and took out
Speaker 1: an entire uh. I think it was a figure skating team,
Speaker 1: which prompted the return of Who's the Lady that got
Speaker 1: hit on the knee? Nancy Carrigan. Just a few days ago,
Speaker 1: there were like three million hits on a new video
Speaker 1: by the one who hit her, Tanya Harding. Mhm. It's
Speaker 1: strange how these these themes just sort of getting mashed together.
Speaker 1: But somehow all of these names from the past just
Speaker 1: pop up at the same time as this crash. It's
Speaker 1: just kind of bizarre. Well, that's that's the first one.
Speaker 1: And then within like twelve hours there was a crash
Speaker 1: in Alaska with a F thirty five that seemed to
Speaker 1: stall out mid air and then just crash. So that's two.
Speaker 1: And now we've got another crash in Philadelphia, and this
Speaker 1: one looks really suspicious, like it started flaming out in
Speaker 1: mid air. So I'm wondering if this isn't part of
Speaker 1: a bigger pattern, and if it is, could it be
Speaker 1: related to the next crisis in the Trump administration.
Speaker 2: Yeah, one thing I do want to mention, because somebody
Speaker 2: already brought up in the chat. I did find interesting
Speaker 2: that plan was supposed to was heading from runway thirty three, right,
Speaker 2: that's fucking weird.
Speaker 1: That was a prominent thing.
Speaker 2: And so.
Speaker 1: What are we supposed to think of this stuff? I
Speaker 1: think it might be a kind of a new computer
Speaker 1: virus program, because I mean, what better way to get
Speaker 1: us involved in multiple front war than a computer virus
Speaker 1: that's taken out our jets. And that would go along
Speaker 1: with a lot of the stuff that comes out of
Speaker 1: the wef they were talking about, like a Internet shutdown
Speaker 1: order or something. And so that was part of the
Speaker 1: whole great reset plan. And if you think about it,
Speaker 1: what better way to kick that off than with a
Speaker 1: mysterious computer virus that's knocking planes out of the sky.
Speaker 4: Yeah, would very very odd. Hacking is most of the
Speaker 4: Is it true that I know for airlines most of
Speaker 4: it is controlled? Right?
Speaker 5: There?
Speaker 4: Is?
Speaker 6: You know?
Speaker 4: Computer controlled? Are black Hawks now computer controlled as well?
Speaker 4: Or are they still manned?
Speaker 2: Luckie Martin makes them that you can radio control them
Speaker 2: up to three hundred miles?
Speaker 5: Way was that one.
Speaker 2: On YouTube? Will even show you Lucky Martin has one
Speaker 2: three hundred miles? Yeah, that that sho if you people
Speaker 2: go and look at the video. That thing looks like
Speaker 2: it went right to it.
Speaker 1: Think about the Tesla bombing. What if they say that
Speaker 1: that was a hack too?
Speaker 4: Mm hmm.
Speaker 1: You know that might be a different angle that they're
Speaker 1: playing on. This whole thing is like, what what if
Speaker 1: all these remotely controlled things can be hacked?
Speaker 2: Maybe reasons for pre crime? Right since uh, you know
Speaker 2: what's his face teals very into that and he's basically
Speaker 2: running Trump and everybody around them, And Trump said he
Speaker 2: was gonna use pre crime for to help with gun
Speaker 2: control instead of taking them away.
Speaker 4: And I'm just asking the manufacturer the ultimate one that
Speaker 4: makes black hawks? Is it's similar to because Boeing was
Speaker 4: the is still the primary manufacture of UH commercial airlines?
Speaker 5: Correct, I believe?
Speaker 4: So who makes black Hawk?
Speaker 1: Is what?
Speaker 4: My where I'm going with this is like, is one,
Speaker 4: you know, taking out the competition? You know, are they
Speaker 4: creating some sort of cornering the market effect by all
Speaker 4: these planes flying I mean falling out of the air,
Speaker 4: getting hit whatever, whatever, or are they taking out the competition?
Speaker 4: Is someone taking out the competition? That's that would be
Speaker 4: my first guess. The other one is you know, the
Speaker 4: push for AI because you're worried that man is to
Speaker 4: incapell or two imperfect reason for AI. No, I'm not
Speaker 4: poor AI.
Speaker 2: I'm saying.
Speaker 5: Mm hmmm hm.
Speaker 4: But that would be that would definitely be like a
Speaker 4: a case, you know what I mean, that they could
Speaker 4: really push.
Speaker 1: I'm on the Lockheed Martin Blackhawks site here, and it says,
Speaker 1: fully integrated with the aircraft's digital flight controls, the weapon
Speaker 1: systems calculate the range and complex ballistics required for pilot
Speaker 1: gunners to hit targets with high accuracy reliability from standoff
Speaker 1: distances during day and night operations. That sounds like AI controlled,
Speaker 1: you know, like partially integrated with the human component. But
Speaker 1: you got a lot of that stuff going on right
Speaker 1: now with targeting systems, and why not flight controls as well.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's what they're talking about, digital flight controls
Speaker 1: right market.
Speaker 4: Mark Nick and I were talking about that, you know,
Speaker 4: whenever you first mentioned it or we first were talking
Speaker 4: about it, I was like, I'm calling it assassination for sure.
Speaker 4: I mean because you look at I don't know, I
Speaker 4: just you know, armchair one Monday night quarterbacking over here
Speaker 4: that if you look at the flight path that is
Speaker 4: on Twitter, right you know, you assume that that's correct.
Speaker 4: It looks like there's enough time to debate away. But
Speaker 4: it also looks like one turns into the other. And
Speaker 4: it also looks like the correct me if I'm wrong.
Speaker 4: The helicopter hit it perpendicular, like it wasn't even just
Speaker 4: a you know, some people are you know, maybe it
Speaker 4: would right right if it's not.
Speaker 5: I'm on the same right.
Speaker 2: To man, it looked like it was just like like
Speaker 2: if anything, like not for nothing the way it looked,
Speaker 2: you know how some people are already trying to pull
Speaker 2: it off. The the pilot was a transgender person, right,
Speaker 2: I was like, if anything, I could see it being
Speaker 2: suicide and done on purpose. And everybody's mind sucking it now.
Speaker 1: But that was a big story that lady came out
Speaker 1: and said that she wasn't the pilot, That lady's guy
Speaker 1: thing mm hmmm. Story. Yeah, I mean that's a pretty
Speaker 1: big fake story if you think about it. There's a
Speaker 1: lot of moving parts in that one. And so they
Speaker 1: got that one through and then the person showed up
Speaker 1: and there that whole group of conservatives were like DEI
Speaker 1: higher or whatever, right, And so you've got right, You've
Speaker 1: got these two different angles sort of converging right here.
Speaker 1: So there, I think there is a significance to what's
Speaker 1: going on. You know, I can't really put my finger.
Speaker 2: On it, though, Yeah, I forgot. I actually channel awesome.
Speaker 4: I was going to say that I saw a clip
Speaker 4: of the Donald talking about how he had written an
Speaker 4: executive order to have the hires of Traffic Control or
Speaker 4: FAA or whatever to be of the highest standards. I'm like,
Speaker 4: aren't they already like I thought they were, I mean,
Speaker 4: and okay, and then he I think he went on
Speaker 4: to say something like that, I guess in the previous
Speaker 4: administration they had opened it up to not discriminate against
Speaker 4: mental health. And I was like, did they though, like
Speaker 4: I'm just asking, I wasn't there, Like I'm just asking.
Speaker 1: All I know is that the Biden administration screwed up
Speaker 1: the skies worse than anybody I've ever seen. I mean,
Speaker 1: think about it. Since COVID has flying gotten to any easier,
Speaker 1: has anything gone back to normal when it comes to fly,
Speaker 1: that whole situation is totally fucked. So why wouldn't the
Speaker 1: FAA be fucked too?
Speaker 4: That's true, But this is again, I mean, this is
Speaker 4: really going to hit a dent to flying.
Speaker 1: To think, yeah, big time. But I mean at this point,
Speaker 1: I think there's a much bigger decline going on in
Speaker 1: this country than what anybody's talking about. And I think
Speaker 1: a lot of this stuff has to do with that
Speaker 1: because a lot of people, a lot of competent people
Speaker 1: were taken out by COVID. Yes, and what are you
Speaker 1: left with? You know, who are these people? And they're
Speaker 1: always hiring and firing anyway, So what's the training program? Like,
Speaker 1: you know, the entire bureaucracy is falling apart because there's
Speaker 1: a competency crisis. None of these people are any good
Speaker 1: at anything.
Speaker 4: Didn't you hear that they had like some sort of
Speaker 4: issued statement that the problem with what was happening with
Speaker 4: the black Hawk being in the airspace or the same
Speaker 4: airspace was a continuity of government training situation.
Speaker 1: It was one of the first stories that broke, right, Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: they said that the doomsday plan was in the air,
Speaker 1: and it didn't make a lot of sense. But I
Speaker 1: don't know if it was in the air or not. Again,
Speaker 1: these whole lot of nothing, right, These are stories that
Speaker 1: just dropped and then you know, went away with no
Speaker 1: other explanation. I think we're going to see a lot
Speaker 1: more of that. It could be that Alice in wonderlanding technique,
Speaker 1: you know, where you create confusing situations, your brain gets
Speaker 1: conflicting stories, and then all of a sudden, whatever comes
Speaker 1: last is the thing that people go with because you know,
Speaker 1: there's just too much out there. It's also called flooding
Speaker 1: the zone, which I think takes us a little bit
Speaker 1: into that Donald Trump situation, because Donald Trump's entire strategy
Speaker 1: as he started this race or as he started his
Speaker 1: presidency is to flood the zone with as many things
Speaker 1: as possible so that the media can't latch onto any
Speaker 1: one thing and create an outrage culture of it. So
Speaker 1: these executive orders are a really good example of that.
Speaker 1: He signed so many of them in the first day
Speaker 1: that none of these liberals nowhere to start each each
Speaker 1: and every one of these things they want to use
Speaker 1: lawfair against. They've got the lawyers on staff, they're ready
Speaker 1: to they're ready to go, but you got to have
Speaker 1: some sort of public outrage. And if they can't control
Speaker 1: their own media, there's no public outrage. So he's keeping
Speaker 1: up a pretty intense pace as far as like criticizable
Speaker 1: things going on Is.
Speaker 4: It true that they brought out a desk and a
Speaker 4: chair to his inauguration and he signed everything there.
Speaker 1: It looked like, wwe, He's out there right on the
Speaker 1: podium signing these things and holding them up.
Speaker 2: Ridiculous, right, I mean, I know it was, you know,
Speaker 2: and even when I was watching it was that's kind
Speaker 2: of funny, and like, if you're a Trump fan that ship,
Speaker 2: you definitely ate that up. But it really is. It's
Speaker 2: all it's a stalking pony show.
Speaker 4: The amount of theatrics that's going on, it's it's a
Speaker 4: little much.
Speaker 1: That's why you eat it. That's exactly why he's because
Speaker 1: he wants to get as much negative press as possible
Speaker 1: in very very diffuse areas so that nothing sticks. This
Speaker 1: was a Steve Bannon strategy. Is he wanted to flood
Speaker 1: the zone with as much bad stuff as possible, just
Speaker 1: on the surface level, just to make the guys freak
Speaker 1: out feel uncomfortable, right, which everything he's doing is to
Speaker 1: make them very nervous.
Speaker 4: And he's definitely he knows his audience. He's definitely catering
Speaker 4: to his audience. He is definitely crowd pleasing his audience.
Speaker 5: But then.
Speaker 4: This is still a show. I mean, I mean, it
Speaker 4: always has been. I'm not I'm sorry, I'm not saying
Speaker 4: it's not. I'm not surprised, but it's just show in
Speaker 4: your face that it's a show.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but it's a different technique. I mean, anything to
Speaker 1: sort of displace the thing that we've got going on
Speaker 1: right now. I mean, at this point, the things that
Speaker 1: he's done to please the audience have really pleased the audience.
Speaker 1: They have they have well, so I'm not saying everything
Speaker 1: he's doing is good, obviously not. You got this whole
Speaker 1: what's this called the Stargate operations stargate where he's paying
Speaker 1: out like hundreds of billions of dollars for AI VOX,
Speaker 1: your AI you know VS. We can't even say anymore.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, yeah. What do you call about the cross?
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, yeah, the injectible crucifix.
Speaker 2: Crucifix and it fits.
Speaker 1: It's a religion, man, you heard the recent interviews with Okay,
Speaker 1: so they're trying to confirm RFK in the Senate right now,
Speaker 1: and each and every one of these sold out senators
Speaker 1: is coming at him about the injectable crucifix, like Senator
Speaker 1: Elizabeth Warren, she gets out there on the floor, and
Speaker 1: she is like grandstanding that if he gets into this position,
Speaker 1: he's going to start suing big Pharma. And won't somebody
Speaker 1: think about big Pharma. We have to consider that these
Speaker 1: injectible crucifixes are getting into each and every child all
Speaker 1: the time with no delay or else. You know, they're
Speaker 1: going to die, you know, obviously it's that serious. And
Speaker 1: so she's saying that if he sues them within the
Speaker 1: next eight years that he would be liable for that.
Speaker 1: She wanted to have him make a commitment to that,
Speaker 1: don't sue the manufacturers of these injectable crucifixes for at
Speaker 1: least eight years, because they know how bad it's going
Speaker 1: to be once the lawsuits start flooding into them. Without
Speaker 1: the nineteen eighty six law that made it illegal to sue,
Speaker 1: you know, injectible crucifix manufacturer, they've been avoiding all lawsuits
Speaker 1: and there have been a ton of laws.
Speaker 4: I can't see them anymore right now, But I mean,
Speaker 4: you're right, Elizabeth Warren. I was like, man, the end
Speaker 4: of the month's coming. She must that check, and she
Speaker 4: worked for it, and she she she performed very well.
Speaker 4: She should be getting a really nice check. Today's as
Speaker 4: a matter of facts.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it was eight hundred and forty five thousand dollars
Speaker 1: she had gotten from Big Pharma. They've already tracked it out.
Speaker 1: They could see how much these people are getting paid
Speaker 1: off by them, and all of the questions that they
Speaker 1: read are written down by these lobbyists and handed to them. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean, I want people to realize that for a second,
Speaker 1: this is not the words of Elizabeth Warren that was
Speaker 1: written out a piece of paper and handed to her
Speaker 1: to say. That's how archaic this system is. If you
Speaker 1: think about it as I.
Speaker 4: Don't know, if you're old enough, it's the same. I
Speaker 4: don't know if you're old enough. But I remember when
Speaker 4: liberals were hippies and we're against big pharma, hugely, hugely
Speaker 4: against big pharma, if anything. I remember going to some
Speaker 4: of these first and you had tables in tents by democrats,
Speaker 4: by liberals talking about the atrocities of Monsanto, of big Pharma,
Speaker 4: of you know, cornering the market of food, cornering the
Speaker 4: market of vaccine. Sorry, and so uh, Chris fix and
Speaker 4: it's a complete Yeah, I mean I remember that, and
Speaker 4: I don't understand when I do understand, but how it
Speaker 4: flipped and they were the first ones in line, hook
Speaker 4: line and sinker. But then you look at the Conservatives.
Speaker 4: I will admit I hold on to a majority of
Speaker 4: conservative values. I want very limited government. I've always been
Speaker 4: that way. But the reason I say that is because
Speaker 4: now you're seeing how they want to absorb Greenland, Canada
Speaker 4: and Mexico. Wouldn't that mean more government? I thought, as
Speaker 4: a conservative you would have a ch I've seen less government.
Speaker 1: None of this stuff means anything, No, it doesn't.
Speaker 4: You're right, But what I guess what I'm talking about
Speaker 4: is how the ideologies of what people adhered to as
Speaker 4: their political base, as their football team for politics has
Speaker 4: completely flipped again.
Speaker 2: This is like we're back in such wartimes on both sides.
Speaker 4: When the South was a Democrat and they were you know,
Speaker 4: on plantations and stuff, and then it flipped. So are
Speaker 4: we seeing this now? Are we seeing a paradigm shift? Now?
Speaker 1: We definitely are. If you think about the Mahja movement,
Speaker 1: you're talking about a big portion of the liberal base
Speaker 1: flipping over to Donald Trump. I mean, this is why
Speaker 1: that victory was so decisive. You know, a lot of
Speaker 1: those people still existed a lot of those people see
Speaker 1: how insane the entire covid era was, and they were
Speaker 1: desperate to get rid of that same type of covid
Speaker 1: era democratic politics. I mean, these were the smart liberals
Speaker 1: that made the shift. So what we're seeing now is,
Speaker 1: you know, kind of a clash of worlds. So, you know,
Speaker 1: obviously nobody's happy with the Greenland whatever situation, but they're
Speaker 1: so focused on actually making it happen. For this Maha
Speaker 1: movement getting a RFK in there, You're seeing people with
Speaker 1: billions of dollars come out there and say, if you
Speaker 1: stand in the way as a Republican. These are lifelong
Speaker 1: Democrats shaking their fingers at lifelong Republicans, right, They say,
Speaker 1: as a Republican, if you get in the way of RFK,
Speaker 1: I will primary you with my millions of dollars. And
Speaker 1: the Sergei Brin's ex wife just did that the other day.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's that's kind of an earth shaking event.
Speaker 1: It's like, we're not we're not playing games with you,
Speaker 1: Big Tech. We're not playing games with you. You know,
Speaker 1: all the rest of these people that they came from,
Speaker 1: they want to get rid of the health restrictions that
Speaker 1: have been placed on us. By you know, all the
Speaker 1: shit that we're talking about in the grocery stores. I mean,
Speaker 1: all that stuff is fucking poison. We can get rid
Speaker 1: of it tomorrow and nobody would know the difference, but
Speaker 1: it's hurting us really badly.
Speaker 4: One hundred percent. And the thing is that I don't
Speaker 4: like how of course they do it every time that
Speaker 4: they sell this huge bill of goods, right and you
Speaker 4: are feeling inspired because you're so tired of the way
Speaker 4: things are going, and you know it's all bullshit, And
Speaker 4: the thing is that it's sold to you and people
Speaker 4: are hook line and sinker, and it's like, why are
Speaker 4: people so sick, you know, and why the need for
Speaker 4: big pharma? If you had just cleaned up the water
Speaker 4: and cleaned up the food, how much would we really
Speaker 4: need big pharma?
Speaker 5: We wouldn't a second though.
Speaker 1: You got to look at this historically too, because the
Speaker 1: smart liberals have been the ones pushing the green agendas.
Speaker 1: You know, the smart liberals are the ones that you know,
Speaker 1: actually put all this stuff in place that we see
Speaker 1: in society right now. So as those smart liberals have switched,
Speaker 1: they seem to be a little bit more effective politically.
Speaker 1: You're you might be able to get something out of
Speaker 1: this administration because these people are thinking about how these
Speaker 1: systems can change and the least possible impact to the
Speaker 1: existing status quo. You know, that's that's basically what you
Speaker 1: have to do, is you have to sort of sidle
Speaker 1: up to these government programs and then relabel everything. You know.
Speaker 1: That's that's kind of what these people are really good at.
Speaker 1: So we might see a massive push when it comes
Speaker 1: to a pr battle existing around people like RFK, and
Speaker 1: to see that kind of investment, would you know, that
Speaker 1: would be a really positive sign for the future, at
Speaker 1: least in my path.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean, I'm all for attempting. I'm all for
Speaker 4: attempting to make it better. It's not you're not going
Speaker 4: to change it overnight, and and you know, little decisions
Speaker 4: towards something better I'm all for. But at the same time,
Speaker 4: don't I mean, you're telling people like, oh, well, we
Speaker 4: just need to do this or we just need to
Speaker 4: do that. No, you don't. You I mean not to
Speaker 4: get on like obviously Mexico has its own issues or whatever,
Speaker 4: but the recent ban of Maze GMOs into Mexico, it's
Speaker 4: a complete ban. They don't want the usgmos. They're looking
Speaker 4: how and just a little backstory, because I've looked into
Speaker 4: this is the maze, the heirloom or the ancient maze
Speaker 4: that was domesticated by the Aztecs and michig Cup people
Speaker 4: or whatever. The maze itself is extremely high in protein
Speaker 4: and very low in carbohydrates, right, and they lived off
Speaker 4: of that obviously, right, you know, back back then, and
Speaker 4: what's happening. You have different species of maze and they
Speaker 4: do different things, whether for whatever you want it for.
Speaker 4: But the the thing about it is that because the
Speaker 4: GMO genetics, it actually outcompetes the genetics of the ancient maze.
Speaker 4: And so that's why they've said stop, don't because you're
Speaker 4: now endangering the genetics of ancient maize or heirloom mate. Rather,
Speaker 4: but because my trains passing away.
Speaker 1: And their lawsuit happy. You know, all these GMO companies
Speaker 1: come down there and they try to take everything over
Speaker 1: with lawsuits. You know, that's not something Mexico wants. That's
Speaker 1: that's law fair coming from the United States to try
Speaker 1: and you know, get land across the border. I wouldn't
Speaker 1: be surprised if China tries to try something like that. Too.
Speaker 1: I mean, we're the ones who export a lot of
Speaker 1: food to China. But at the same time, you know,
Speaker 1: they're trying to make moves on the agricultural level as well,
Speaker 1: So who knows, we might be a net importer from
Speaker 1: Chinese food pretty soon, which would be disgusting. I mean,
Speaker 1: could you imagine. But you know, I mean any sort
Speaker 1: of collapse in the agricultural market, that's that's not gonna
Speaker 1: be good. And you see all these massive, uh you know,
Speaker 1: factories burning for the past what six years, that's not good.
Speaker 1: I mean meat processing plants all the rest of these
Speaker 1: places supposedly catch fire. How do you catch fire to
Speaker 1: meat processing plant? That doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 4: There's a lot of meat marking meat packing plants in
Speaker 4: the US that are Chinese owned. I don't know how
Speaker 4: many of those caught fire, but I do know I
Speaker 4: don't understand how other countries can own something like that.
Speaker 5: Oh sorry, wait.
Speaker 1: Until you find out about the toll roads. The toll
Speaker 1: roads around Washington, DC are all owned by an Australian company,
Speaker 1: so they just take the profits and ship it to Australia.
Speaker 1: Why what the fuck is the point of that? Don't
Speaker 1: you want a domestic company that can actually repair and
Speaker 1: rebuild the site around it. Now they just offshore that shit.
Speaker 1: It's like, is this the level of theft that we're
Speaker 1: willing to put up with? Nobody has a problem with it. Yeah,
Speaker 1: but I mean hopefully, I mean, these are the directions
Speaker 1: that I think Donald Trump might be going in. You know,
Speaker 1: all this other fluff and all this other circumstance and
Speaker 1: all that shit. Maybe he's just doing that to get
Speaker 1: attention away from what his real policies are. And you know,
Speaker 1: actually getting rid of these companies that are just buying
Speaker 1: up and stealing from us might be one of those policies. Hopefully.
Speaker 1: Fuck man, we got a lot of them. There's a
Speaker 1: lot of predatory Chinese businesses that are coming in and
Speaker 1: destroying the land. But you know it's not just them,
Speaker 1: We've got other allies that come in and do the
Speaker 1: same thing. I remember a couple weeks back a friend
Speaker 1: of mine who was going Christmas shopping at the mall
Speaker 1: and she brings back a bag full of you know, cosmetics,
Speaker 1: and I'm like, oh, you saw the Israelis. Because all
Speaker 1: of those kiosks that have that stuff are owned by Israelis,
Speaker 1: and the Israeli students that come here on a visa,
Speaker 1: which means that they're spies. And what's interesting about this
Speaker 1: mall is that it's got a VA hospital attached to it.
Speaker 1: And you know, Israel has always been the number one
Speaker 1: spy of the United States. So why not have a
Speaker 1: kiosk in the mall at the place where you're skimming
Speaker 1: all the data off of their servers, you know, because
Speaker 1: you got veterans that come through there, and they've got
Speaker 1: a lot of valuable documents.
Speaker 4: When I was going to say about so many things
Speaker 4: I wanted to say with the Mexico thing, I wanted
Speaker 4: to insert this a couple of tidbits. Is you're talking
Speaker 4: about foreign companies, and I left off on the whole.
Speaker 4: You know, Chinese owned meat packing plants, and it depends,
Speaker 4: you know, whether it's chicken or poultry, beef, pork, whatever.
Speaker 4: One of the things that I've heard again I heard
Speaker 4: I won there. I don't know that a lot of
Speaker 4: the factories are now Chinese owned in Mexico and they've
Speaker 4: moved in to these areas. Another thing that I've heard
Speaker 4: is that majority of the resorts in Mexico are Chinese owned.
Speaker 4: As a matter of fact, I know a couple of
Speaker 4: friends of mine that are Mexican and they said they
Speaker 4: were going back because that the pay was great at
Speaker 4: some of these resorts and that there's no crime because
Speaker 4: they don't allow crime to happen around some of these resorts.
Speaker 4: And I'm thinking, Wow, you have that much pool with
Speaker 4: the cartel to like not you know whatever.
Speaker 2: Real quick, I just want to say in Mexico and
Speaker 2: dr both times, well, I've been to Mexico only once,
Speaker 2: but the one time I went there and one of
Speaker 2: the two or three times I went to Or they
Speaker 2: actually had people that they paid to stand out there
Speaker 2: with guns around the fucking resort. I was like, Yo,
Speaker 2: this motherfuckers out there with AK forty seven's. Like if
Speaker 2: you want to go walk around at night, like you know,
Speaker 2: I went to go smoke a joint. So I walked
Speaker 2: around the place like twelve o'clock at night. If you
Speaker 2: start like veering off the path and start getting close
Speaker 2: to it, like you know what, you'll see dudes out
Speaker 2: there with guns. I was like, holy shit, they're really
Speaker 2: out there, like I you know, I had to go
Speaker 2: see for myself. Yeah, yeah, that's the I had to
Speaker 2: press the button like Headless says.
Speaker 4: Speaking speaking of hired guns. Another segue, still talking about
Speaker 4: the market, that I had heard that avocados from Mexico
Speaker 4: we got into some war with China, economic war in
Speaker 4: that they were outbit They wanted full rights to purchase
Speaker 4: avocados from Mexico and they didn't want them to sell
Speaker 4: them to any other country. But China, and I think
Speaker 4: you predominate the market in terms of the demand for avocados.
Speaker 4: And the kicker was that the amount of avocados produced
Speaker 4: by Mexico they cannot keep up with the demand for
Speaker 4: avocados from the US in that it is more profitable
Speaker 4: to sell avocados than marijuana or cocaine. In that cartels
Speaker 4: were trying to take over family orchards to take the
Speaker 4: avocado orchards because they were making that much money. So
Speaker 4: the families hired people with aks to basically help them
Speaker 4: defend against incoming cartel seizures or whatever of areas. But
Speaker 4: China was trying to corner or buy the market of
Speaker 4: avocados as well in Mexico. So I think, I mean,
Speaker 4: I think if we're seeing them kind of slowly take
Speaker 4: over some of the main food sources or food products
Speaker 4: that US highly imports, which I think is somewhat concerning.
Speaker 2: I actually found out to be pretty well.
Speaker 1: There's a ton of rebellions that happened back in Obama's
Speaker 1: years where you would have local communities rising up against
Speaker 1: the cartels that were coming in and trying to do
Speaker 1: stuff like logging. So the cartels will take over a
Speaker 1: town because they are a logging town. And then at
Speaker 1: this one, I believe it was Mutuacon, I'm not sure,
Speaker 1: but there was an uprising of a town where they
Speaker 1: wouldn't allow anybody from the cartel or the government in
Speaker 1: because they had to take over the It was the
Speaker 1: police gun safe basically, and so they raided the police
Speaker 1: gun safe, and that all of the citizens armed themselves
Speaker 1: and guarded the roads just like you were talking about,
Speaker 1: and they wouldn't let anybody from the government in and
Speaker 1: they wouldn't let anybody from the cartel in because they
Speaker 1: just took over their local police department. They got rid
Speaker 1: of their mayor. That was the first thing they did,
Speaker 1: is they ran him off, and then basically they just
Speaker 1: raided the police station. And now they've been independent from
Speaker 1: the rest of Mexico for the last like what fifteen years.
Speaker 4: That's very interesting. I have to look into that. I
Speaker 4: did not know that. I'd not heard that before. I'm
Speaker 4: all for improving situations however it needs to happen, but
Speaker 4: to improve it not Yeah, they.
Speaker 1: Actually had a really interesting political system as well, so
Speaker 1: they don't necessarily have a centralized government. Basically, people are
Speaker 1: voluntold to be a part of the government for a
Speaker 1: while and then they rotate out. So everybody's sort of
Speaker 1: on a rotation to be part of the government system,
Speaker 1: and then the next person comes in after your term's over.
Speaker 4: Interesting. I have to look into that anyway. About execus
Speaker 4: of orders, I'm sorry I deviated off of them topically.
Speaker 1: Well, I've got a list. First one he did was
Speaker 1: ending the weaponization of the federal government, and that's where
Speaker 1: he's saying, you can't use the federal government as a
Speaker 1: tool for political policies. That's definitely a reference to how
Speaker 1: they treated the Hunter Biden story, you know, because that
Speaker 1: was definitely put out there. And the very first thing
Speaker 1: he did was he revoked all of the security clearance
Speaker 1: status for the fifty one former CIA officials who signed that.
Speaker 1: He just said right off the bat, you're never going
Speaker 1: to work as an intelligence official. Again, he had the
Speaker 1: authority to do it. I think that's a really positive step.
Speaker 1: I don't know about you guys, but that's like, that's huge.
Speaker 1: That's their you know, path back into the government after
Speaker 1: Trump's gone. You know.
Speaker 4: So what I had I had read again, I don't
Speaker 4: know how true it is because I read it. What
Speaker 4: I had heard was that a majority of people that
Speaker 4: had worked for the government having that level of clearance.
Speaker 4: You really don't ever not have that level of clearance.
Speaker 4: And these people were leaving for jobs in the private sector, right,
Speaker 4: the private sector, but not just private sector, like I'm
Speaker 4: going to go sell real estate, private sector meaning like
Speaker 4: they were working for lockeed or Northrop Grumman or something
Speaker 4: like that. Do you know, to go make more money.
Speaker 4: Nothing wrong with that, But as as somebody that worked
Speaker 4: in the federal government, not mean but them in that
Speaker 4: and you have that level of clearance and then you're
Speaker 4: going to go work for Northrope, that's a little bit
Speaker 4: of a conflict of interest because they have private contracts.
Speaker 4: But if they have private contracts, maybe that's why you're
Speaker 4: kind of still affiliated.
Speaker 1: They don't go to work anywhere other than Washington, d C.
Speaker 1: Because as soon as they leave, they get hired by
Speaker 1: Northrop and then they stay there as a lobbyist. So
Speaker 1: they're just going right back to the same government people
Speaker 1: and selling the same contracts. And it's it's highly corrupt.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is why we're from right now.
Speaker 4: Yeah, and I agree with terminating that. No qualms for
Speaker 4: me on that. However, when when Trump took office in
Speaker 4: twenty sixteen, he had a certain person by his side
Speaker 4: that never left his side, and he is the person
Speaker 4: that won all of the private contracts during his administration
Speaker 4: and then shortly after and continues to enjoy the fruits
Speaker 4: of continued I guess renewal of government contracts, and he
Speaker 4: is now one of the fastest growing companies to have
Speaker 4: I guess intelligence, private security, intelligence and surveillance, intelligence and
Speaker 4: true and pre crime and intelligence in how people vote,
Speaker 4: how people.
Speaker 2: Politically that helped what distribute the crucifix. Also that company.
Speaker 4: Also basically help utilize, facilitate, and fully fund the distribution
Speaker 4: of the Crucifix and then as well as collect all
Speaker 4: kinds of demographic and epidemiological data on what was happening
Speaker 4: in twenty twenty and then turns around is saying, I'm
Speaker 4: also invested in psilocybin. I'm also invested in helping women
Speaker 4: conceive naturally or not conceive naturally. I'm also part of
Speaker 4: growing tissue to supply a growing meat industry, but not
Speaker 4: from meat but lab grown. He's cornered the entire market.
Speaker 4: And so when you say, Okay, I'm not going to
Speaker 4: give these people access to security clearance, I'm all for it.
Speaker 4: But was it contrived because a person sitting next to
Speaker 4: him was the one that won it all of the
Speaker 4: contracts as well as maintain control of the market as well.
Speaker 4: So that's where I raise an eyebrow.
Speaker 2: To all that. Well, if they keep we have to
Speaker 2: keep tabs on that, because that's you'll see it happen.
Speaker 1: It could be interesting, completely agree, And if you look
Speaker 1: at a lot of the Trump backers, it's it's really
Speaker 1: hard not to be nervous about them too. I mean, uh,
Speaker 1: the biggest one I think is Miriam Adelson and Miriam
Speaker 1: Aidelson is getting the guarantees from Trump to do to
Speaker 1: give anything Israel once to Israel and to you know,
Speaker 1: set up basically an environment for them to kick off
Speaker 1: World War three. You know, I mean, I don't think
Speaker 1: this h ceasefire is going to last. I think it's
Speaker 1: going to immediately go away after Trump has had his
Speaker 1: you know, one hundred days. And the way that it's
Speaker 1: set up the ceasefire is it's sixteen days for the
Speaker 1: first part and then another sixteen days for the second part.
Speaker 1: But Israel got a a clause in there that says
Speaker 1: that they can revoke all ceasefires at that sixteen daymark.
Speaker 1: So we haven't hit that yet, but that that could
Speaker 1: be when things really kick off, and then you know,
Speaker 1: Trump steps in and does does a bunch of craft
Speaker 1: for Israel.
Speaker 4: You know, what I don't understand is how like the
Speaker 4: conservatives were talking about, well, if we leave Democrats in
Speaker 4: office or in the oval, you know, it's going to
Speaker 4: be continuous Monday money sending over to that section of
Speaker 4: the world. However, again, the same person that was sitting
Speaker 4: next to Trump the whole entire twenty sixteen and continuing
Speaker 4: on is is deeply invested monetarily in and so.
Speaker 2: That's right, it's going to be way. Yeah. He's some
Speaker 2: work for them over there too, that's right.
Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah. And if anything, he has a software pre
Speaker 4: crime software that was first developed in Israel with Israel scientists,
Speaker 4: And I say that, I don't say that like as
Speaker 4: you know, that it's their fault or anything like that.
Speaker 4: That's That's not what I'm saying. What I'm saying is
Speaker 4: that the ties are there in that when the Conservatives
Speaker 4: reusing that as a ploy to kind of argue against
Speaker 4: it's not a valid argument because that person developed software
Speaker 4: that is now being implemented here in the US in
Speaker 4: certain cities as a trial for it, and the actual
Speaker 4: technicians are from there. So it's just odd. It's very
Speaker 4: very odd to see that.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, that brings up the whole issue of
Speaker 1: AI again, you know. I mean, I think the fact
Speaker 1: that Larry Ellison is now a seems to be integral
Speaker 1: part of the Trump administration. He's the founder of the
Speaker 1: Oracle Corporation. Oracle was created by the CIA to have
Speaker 1: databases for James Jesus Engleton's memory because his mind was
Speaker 1: starting to go at that time, and he knew the
Speaker 1: ins and outs of every part of the CIA. So
Speaker 1: they formed the Oracle Corporation to start experimenting with different
Speaker 1: types of you know, spreadsheet software and shit like that.
Speaker 1: So Oracle became a distributor to other businesses that had
Speaker 1: the same thing to basically start connecting all of this stuff.
Speaker 1: And now he's back in the Trump administration trying to
Speaker 1: be part of this AI initiative. So whatever is coming out,
Speaker 1: I think that's where it's going to be. And you know,
Speaker 1: that could be the big rollout to try and combat whatever,
Speaker 1: you know, plane crash, computer virus thing you could talk about.
Speaker 1: I mean, they might have the solution already planned out.
Speaker 4: It's funny you mentioned Larry Ellison, like ranting Nick who
Speaker 4: was like, let's go live, Let's go live. That We
Speaker 4: covered Larry Ellison and Oracle in our s FK series
Speaker 4: and the reason for it is because Oracle has a
Speaker 4: huge headquarters and home in Austin. And yes, you're right.
Speaker 4: CIA was was kind of operating as a venture capitalist
Speaker 4: through co Intel pro right in q tel, sorry in
Speaker 4: q tel, and their first project was called Operation Oracle,
Speaker 4: and they hired Larry Ellison, and I believe he was
Speaker 4: working for a company out of Colorado that now fully
Speaker 4: I guess is involved with Lockeed, Northrop, Grumm and all
Speaker 4: those people. But he worked with the CIA in certain
Speaker 4: in certain projects such as those So when he started
Speaker 4: his company. He named it Oracle after that project that
Speaker 4: he was involved with while he was working for the CIA.
Speaker 4: And so now, like you said, exactly, Oracle is a
Speaker 4: software mining company to where it mines all of people's data. Sorry,
Speaker 4: apparently I have ambulances back here. They're coming for me.
Speaker 4: They're hearing me talking. And so they mine all this
Speaker 4: data and they know like taking track locations, they were
Speaker 4: tracking likes, they were tracking how much people were spending
Speaker 4: time in certain websites and what have you. And they've
Speaker 4: been sued several times by people that they were collecting
Speaker 4: their data and following them, like legitly following them. And
Speaker 4: so when we brought them up with SFK, it's interesting
Speaker 4: because their headquarters overlooks a section of Ladyburg Lake and
Speaker 4: it is a section of lady Brook Lake where they
Speaker 4: have found several bodies floating, and so it's almost like,
Speaker 4: how much more do you need of like, like, I
Speaker 4: don't know, it just seemed a little odd.
Speaker 1: Larry Ellison too.
Speaker 4: Well, and let me let me insert this one. Right
Speaker 4: before they found Riley Strain in Tennessee, Larry Ellison had
Speaker 4: announced in Austin around the same time period, either it
Speaker 4: was a week before or after that they were moving
Speaker 4: their headquarters to Tennessee. I'll just leave it like that.
Speaker 1: Well, his I guess it was his stepsister or sister
Speaker 1: claimed that he sexually abused her for like twenty years.
Speaker 1: He denies it, but I mean, come on, the guy's
Speaker 1: are weirdo. He said some really out there transhumanist stuff,
Speaker 1: talking about people being replaced by AI and all the
Speaker 1: rest of this stuff. He's he's definitely on that spectrum
Speaker 1: of like anti human tech bro that you know, he
Speaker 1: built an entire Japanese village in his backyard and it
Speaker 1: cost him like one hundred million dollars. The guy's just
Speaker 1: a weirdo, I'm telling you. And he's eighty years old
Speaker 1: and he looks like he's sixty. I guarantee that that
Speaker 1: guy's got a blood boy.
Speaker 4: Oh you know what I think he does? Hold on,
Speaker 4: let me look, I know, I know one of them
Speaker 4: in big tech has had something like that.
Speaker 1: I don't think he's open about it. That could be it,
Speaker 1: you know, I mean, what's what's outside their reach?
Speaker 4: Well, and it's just interesting because all of those people
Speaker 4: had moved into the area around the same time in
Speaker 4: twenty thirteen, and I mean they may not have declared
Speaker 4: that their headquarters was there, but they were already there.
Speaker 4: They were definitely already there, if anything, signing contracts to
Speaker 4: buy property to build their stuff on.
Speaker 1: So I think, I mean, Oracle could might as well
Speaker 1: just label itself US Corporation Oracle or something, you know.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's it's pretty obvious they're tightly controlled by
Speaker 1: the US government, but basically every US firm is nowadays,
Speaker 1: anything that's a major international brand is so tied in
Speaker 1: with the government they're almost undistinguishable.
Speaker 5: For instance, I think.
Speaker 4: That's exactly what Oracle was weren't trying to do. They
Speaker 4: wanted to be the data storage for everything, and that
Speaker 4: they were trying to basically, you know how we talked
Speaker 4: about in the back I don't know a few episodes
Speaker 4: way back that no longer is oil the currency, it's data.
Speaker 4: Data is the current currency in which we all operate on.
Speaker 4: And if you can create a software that you know
Speaker 4: has everything in reach or you can basically just tap
Speaker 4: in because it's minded all for you, you're good. And
Speaker 4: I think this is where pallunteer comes into play, because
Speaker 4: I think there were several times that people had said,
Speaker 4: So we have all this data, we don't know what
Speaker 4: to do with it. We can't make sense of it.
Speaker 4: It's just all these numbers and there's nothing there for
Speaker 4: us to basically make the connections and the correlations or whatever. Well,
Speaker 4: that was a job. And I can't remember which part
Speaker 4: of software that was affiliated with that venture capitalist specifically
Speaker 4: like a name off the top of my head, but
Speaker 4: it basically would go into the data and make the associations.
Speaker 4: And so finally, not only do you have this you know,
Speaker 4: buffet of data, you now have you know, something that
Speaker 4: can go in and start, you know, picking out all
Speaker 4: of the connections for you. I mean I think they
Speaker 4: were working in tandem. I mean I would think that
Speaker 4: it would be something that would easily be, you know,
Speaker 4: something to where they go into business together.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean Palleteeria's Peter Theel and Peter Thield now
Speaker 1: owns a vice president, so I mean, what better way.
Speaker 4: Well, but make no mistake, all of those people have
Speaker 4: been on his pay roll. All of those people are
Speaker 4: bought and paid by that guy. All of them were
Speaker 4: never Trumpers. People with that A.
Speaker 2: Lot of the people in the Senate that are all
Speaker 2: in Magna that you'd even be surprised he has bought Yeah, and.
Speaker 4: I mean I mean, I know, yes, no mistake about
Speaker 4: that he has. I don't I believe that he made
Speaker 4: contact with Vance during his law degree and then basically
Speaker 4: carried him on or helped him out, or helped him
Speaker 4: make connections or what have you. But all the other
Speaker 4: ones are all as well affiliated with some sort of
Speaker 4: venture capitalist of some sort. If you look into their finances,
Speaker 4: they are invested in some sort of venture capitalist that
Speaker 4: is tied in to you know.
Speaker 1: Here's a possibility. I mean, I don't know how accurate
Speaker 1: it is, but what if they just got so bad
Speaker 1: that these people decided that they were going to shift sides.
Speaker 1: Because before this, they were all working for the Democrats.
Speaker 1: They were all doing the stuff for the Democratic Party,
Speaker 1: and then that shift happened, and that was you know,
Speaker 1: that was kind of earth shattering because a lot of
Speaker 1: these people jumped ship and went over to the Republican
Speaker 1: They've been flirting for it for some time, but once
Speaker 1: Elied made that shift, all the rest of these big
Speaker 1: guys sort of followed. But they were doing the same
Speaker 1: kind of shit beforehand for the other side.
Speaker 4: So I don't know, absolutely, absolutely, that is exactly what happened.
Speaker 4: It's not if it is exactly what happened. And the
Speaker 4: main guys went into the confessional called the Joe Rogan
Speaker 4: Experience and confess their sins. And now they are, you know,
Speaker 4: pardon and forgiven by all of America, and they're okay,
Speaker 4: forget what they did in twenty twenty, forget all of
Speaker 4: the bad stuff that we knew that they had. We
Speaker 4: were present. It's not like our parents told us about
Speaker 4: it and we weren't born yet. We were present, We
Speaker 4: saw it happen. And yet they walked into the Joe
Speaker 4: Rogan Experience. We have now forgiven them and we have
Speaker 4: allowed them back to be normal in society. And no
Speaker 4: one is like, no one cares. It's fine because you
Speaker 4: know why, all of a sudden they're going to vote Republican.
Speaker 4: And yes, they did convert. They did convert. Of course
Speaker 4: they did because it's financially in their best interest.
Speaker 3: Fiscally.
Speaker 4: Those people are conservatives. Fiscally, they have always operated in
Speaker 4: a conservative manner. This is why they are as wealthy
Speaker 4: as they are. It's just, I mean, I think that's
Speaker 4: there's no bones about that, right.
Speaker 1: You know, the last person to hop on that trade
Speaker 1: or a founder of Facebook. You got his big trade
Speaker 1: information into the libertarian bro and now he's got the
Speaker 1: different haircut and he's doing I mean, it's just a
Speaker 1: total PR stunt. But I think it's kind of funny.
Speaker 1: It's like these people were really scared for their lives
Speaker 1: in some way. I mean, come on, look at the
Speaker 1: the shit that Facebook did in twenty twenty, Like that
Speaker 1: was horrific. Everybody has to admit that what they were
Speaker 1: doing in twenty twenty was just you know, direct marketing
Speaker 1: campaigns for the Democrats.
Speaker 4: Oh absolutely absolutely.
Speaker 2: One thing I did want to mention real quick that
Speaker 2: I found interesting. I mean it could literally have been
Speaker 2: coincidence or just you know, perfect timing. But you know
Speaker 2: when Elon and Trump were like they're at some sports
Speaker 2: game something and somebody took like a picture and went viral.
Speaker 2: I think Elon even posted it of like someone took
Speaker 2: a picture of like of the screen that's out for
Speaker 2: the crowd to look at, and it showed Elon and
Speaker 2: Trump like you know, in their box or in their
Speaker 2: area and advertisement on the side was Palatiner. I'm like
Speaker 2: that get any fucking better right now?
Speaker 1: Right?
Speaker 2: Like, what the fuck? I think if people want to
Speaker 2: go and check that out, you'd see Palenteers right there.
Speaker 1: Why why the hell is Palatier sponsoring.
Speaker 2: Right well?
Speaker 4: Why are we allowing for all of our technology to
Speaker 4: be under the umbrella of just so few people. I
Speaker 4: thought we were a country that was against monopolies. I
Speaker 4: thought we were a country that was against.
Speaker 1: Nobody knows about this stuff.
Speaker 6: Like you and I.
Speaker 1: We probably listened to a lot of the same things
Speaker 1: that give us, you know, clues as to what to
Speaker 1: look up and the rest of the stuff. Like in
Speaker 1: the nineteen forties, you've got the Macy conferences. All of
Speaker 1: this stuff is really tightly controlled around Princeton University and
Speaker 1: a lot of these elites came straight through there. I
Speaker 1: believe that, you know, Princeton still has a think you
Speaker 1: tell offices at the facility. I mean, these people have
Speaker 1: been involved with the shaping of big tech from day one.
Speaker 1: It doesn't look pretty, but you know, none other operations
Speaker 1: really do.
Speaker 4: No, No, it doesn't.
Speaker 5: It's it.
Speaker 4: It's concerning for sure. And when you look at you know,
Speaker 4: another one was Bill Gates. When you look at how
Speaker 4: much he pulled most of his stocks out and bought
Speaker 4: John Deere.
Speaker 5: What is that about?
Speaker 4: I mean, why why do you buy John Deere? And
Speaker 4: then now you hear how a majority of farmers who
Speaker 4: buy a John Deere, which I didn't know about this.
Speaker 4: John Deere's like, you know, three hundred thousand I think
Speaker 4: for a combine and if you wanted to repair it,
Speaker 4: you cannot repair it. You have to call a technician
Speaker 4: if you even touch it or change anything. You have
Speaker 4: avoided the warranty, and in fact you don't own it
Speaker 4: because everything on John Deere is patented. So you're basically
Speaker 4: paying three hundred dollars to lease an actual combine.
Speaker 1: And so the rollers that they have for the highways,
Speaker 1: same situation, those come from a different country. They have
Speaker 1: the special kind of key lock what do you call them?
Speaker 1: Sockets that you have to get from the manufacturer that
Speaker 1: they don't give out to make repairs on this thing. Basically,
Speaker 1: a lot of this specialty heavy equipment they try to
Speaker 1: keep mechanics out of for the vast majority of the
Speaker 1: time because they want to make all their money and
Speaker 1: parts and all the rest of this stuff. John Deere's
Speaker 1: so different, well worse. Probably they're the ones who set
Speaker 1: the tread to be out.
Speaker 4: Of the reason for bringing up John Deere is that
Speaker 4: the software that allows them to repair John Dear and
Speaker 4: they are pretty much impotent without their software. It seems
Speaker 4: a little bit coincidental that the software gets implemented somewhere
Speaker 4: around the time that Bill Gates bought it. That's where
Speaker 4: I'm going with that, in that not only are you
Speaker 4: polluting our food and our water, you now have also
Speaker 4: put your fingers into this as well.
Speaker 1: Right, do you know about the McDonald's ice cream maker debacle?
Speaker 1: The reason why every time you go to the drive
Speaker 1: through at McDonald's and you're trying to get an ice
Speaker 1: cream cone, their ice cream machine is down.
Speaker 4: Oh that's right.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's actually part of a much bigger conspiracy because
Speaker 1: McDonald's Corporation gave exclusive monopoly for repairs on the ice
Speaker 1: cream maker to a company that was never suited to
Speaker 1: make those kind of repairs. They're just collecting a paycheck,
Speaker 1: so you hardly ever get a repair guy out there,
Speaker 1: because you know, anything they make is going to be
Speaker 1: like hundreds of thousands of dollars from each one of
Speaker 1: these affiliates. So this one guy decided he was going
Speaker 1: to make software that could do a better diagnosis and
Speaker 1: actually fix the problem with these ice cream makers. Decided
Speaker 1: to make open source software and throw it out there
Speaker 1: to people so that they could figure this out and
Speaker 1: fix it themselves because this was highly encoded repair material
Speaker 1: just crazy, like they would go to the levels to
Speaker 1: make this stuff that inaccessible. And so, you know, they
Speaker 1: started distributing this stuff to McDonald's chains, and those bastards
Speaker 1: at the repair company decide that they're going to start
Speaker 1: suing these chains out of business for making repairs on
Speaker 1: the ice cream maker themselves because they couldn't make any
Speaker 1: money off of the thing. It was broken all the time.
Speaker 1: So there's still legal battles going on and they're still
Speaker 1: in discovery about how much you know, corruption went on
Speaker 1: between McDonald's and this repair company. And apparently that's not uncommon.
Speaker 1: You've got stories like this happening all over the corporate sphere.
Speaker 1: You know, it's it's absolutely insane.
Speaker 4: Well, going back to the whole, you know, executive orders,
Speaker 4: Conservative is sitting in the oval limited government. You know,
Speaker 4: we go into this whole like big tech. Big tech
Speaker 4: is responsible for being the sole perpetrator of people no
Speaker 4: longer being able to repair their own stuff the.
Speaker 1: Writer of Nerds God, because yeah, yeah, I mean it's
Speaker 1: it's a good thing. There is a different corporation when
Speaker 1: it comes to most cell phones, but at the same
Speaker 1: time is just fucking ridiculous. Oh yeah, they're almost like
Speaker 1: Disney and their re litigiousness. You know, they go after
Speaker 1: people because they have rounded corners on the cell phone.
Speaker 1: That's totally retarded, you know, and people still fall for
Speaker 1: this stuff.
Speaker 4: Okay, next executive order. I'm sorry, don't gonna be talking
Speaker 4: about stuff because that will just keep going.
Speaker 2: Oh, this is great, find another good one. And then
Speaker 2: if you have to skim through a couple.
Speaker 4: Damn McDonald's. They had great price back in the day.
Speaker 1: I'm just going to say that.
Speaker 4: And then they changed the oil and all went the crap.
Speaker 2: Can change this ship? That was. That was a drastic notice.
Speaker 2: I remember as a kid, Yeah, I remember that.
Speaker 1: So next one initial recessions of harmful executive orders and actions.
Speaker 1: He took back all the stuff that Joe Biden did
Speaker 1: in terms of the COVID nineteen vaccine, you know he yeah,
Speaker 1: So all the stuff that Joe Biden put in place
Speaker 1: that required you to take it he got rid of,
Speaker 1: which is fucking good. I think restoring the freedom of
Speaker 1: speech and ending federal censorship, Twitter files, all the rest
Speaker 1: of that stuff. America First Policy directive to the Secretary
Speaker 1: of State outlines a policy focused on prioritizing American interests
Speaker 1: in foreign affairs. Who knows what's actually in that one,
Speaker 1: ending rate radical wasteful government DEI programs, and preferencing that one.
Speaker 1: The ripples are still being felt on that because it's
Speaker 1: every corporation in America has THEI hires that are specifically
Speaker 1: for hiring and firing policies.
Speaker 2: Are they supposed to be gone by now too? Actually
Speaker 2: if since that's.
Speaker 1: In the federal government but not in all the corporations
Speaker 1: around America, it's all the same program. That's true, unleashing
Speaker 1: Alaska's extraordinary resources potential. So he's opening that up, holding
Speaker 1: former government officials accountable for election interference and improper disclosure
Speaker 1: of sensitive government information. That's what he took their took
Speaker 1: their you know, licenses away, a leashing American energy withdrawing
Speaker 1: the United States from the World Health Organization. See that
Speaker 1: one doesn't make any difference because he signed up for
Speaker 1: Gavy Alliance. As soon as he gets out of the
Speaker 1: World Health he goes over to Gavy.
Speaker 4: It's like, come on, just the same thing.
Speaker 1: It is. Literally, Bill Gates is like the number one
Speaker 1: funder of the World Health Organization and he controls it.
Speaker 1: So you either get Bill Gates or Bill Gates. That's
Speaker 1: a hell of a racket.
Speaker 4: If you ask me, let me just repackage it, right,
Speaker 4: I mean barely. I mean if you're looking. If you're looking,
Speaker 4: you'll see it. But if you're not, you won't notice it.
Speaker 1: Right, Well, nobody's looking, I guess declaring a national energy
Speaker 1: emergency everybody needs the drill. Uh designating cartels and other
Speaker 1: organization is foreign terrorists organization that specially designed global terrorists.
Speaker 1: Oh good, now we're gonna get special forces going into Mexico.
Speaker 1: That's that's a great idea.
Speaker 4: That energy one worked so well the last five times
Speaker 4: they did it.
Speaker 2: That energy go ahead, A no, that energy one in
Speaker 2: this one. Like I remember when I hearing those myself,
Speaker 2: I was like, I'm just wondering, like what it is
Speaker 2: entailed in that, Like what's tailed energy emergency? Like what
Speaker 2: does that allow them to start doing that?
Speaker 1: You remember what he said he wants to rename it
Speaker 1: the Gulf of America.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think he's done that already, did he.
Speaker 1: There's a lot of oil and gas in that Gulf
Speaker 1: of America. You got to get a lot of resources
Speaker 1: out of there. I mean, that's a great excuse to
Speaker 1: get into it. If you think about it. There's so
Speaker 1: much left untapped in the Gulf of Mexico that if
Speaker 1: he if he decides to focus on that, that's a
Speaker 1: lot oily gas. It's establishing and implementing the President's Department
Speaker 1: of Government Efficiency, the Doge Act.
Speaker 4: Oh come on, I mean he didn't like elon implementing
Speaker 4: the Doge coin. And then now you have the Doge
Speaker 4: creative those people over there on that sign.
Speaker 1: Protecting the American People against invasion. This order aims to
Speaker 1: protect the United States from foreign invasions, protecting the meaning
Speaker 1: and value of American citizenship. These are all just fluff
Speaker 1: in order to seek protect uphold the value of Americans.
Speaker 1: That doesn't mean anything. I mean, what do they actually
Speaker 1: teach you at an American citizenship classes That there's no history,
Speaker 1: there's no pride, there's nothing putting America first in international
Speaker 1: environmental agreements. I think that's the withdrawal from the Paris
Speaker 1: accord Okay application of Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled
Speaker 1: Applications Act to TikTok. This order applies to protecting Americans
Speaker 1: from Foreign adversary controlled applications of TikTok. Again, there's a
Speaker 1: big fucking deal to do with TikTok. I'm not sure
Speaker 1: exactly what the entire fuss is about. I mean, really,
Speaker 1: you have to have control of the narrative that much
Speaker 1: that you would take over TikTok. Anyways, Restoring accountability to
Speaker 1: policy influencing positions within the United States Workforce. This order
Speaker 1: aims to restore accountability and policy influencing positions within the
Speaker 1: federal workforce. So I think that has to do with
Speaker 1: the revolving door, maybe hopefully curifying the military's role in
Speaker 1: protecting the territorial integrity of the United States. Put them
Speaker 1: on the border, I guess.
Speaker 5: Back it up.
Speaker 4: We're gonna have boots on the ground inside the perimeter
Speaker 4: of the United States. I thought that that was not allowed.
Speaker 1: Well, it's the National Guard. They could be called up. Well,
Speaker 1: all he really has to do is say he's he's
Speaker 1: activating the US military, and then all the governors on
Speaker 1: the border activate their national guard which is not really
Speaker 1: the federal troops. But you know, I mean, I think
Speaker 1: that's what he's gonna do. That's what worked before. I
Speaker 1: think they had some sort of you know, injunction that
Speaker 1: allowed some of these governors to put out some federal guardsmen.
Speaker 1: It's not much, but I mean to show a force
Speaker 1: is enough to keep a lot of people out.
Speaker 2: Well, I'm just wondering with some of these things, it
Speaker 2: is it giving the you know, the armed forces a
Speaker 2: little bit more power? Right, don't wonder if he's going
Speaker 2: in that direction with some of these things.
Speaker 1: It doesn't really specify. But if I was going to
Speaker 1: guess that's that's the direction.
Speaker 2: I guess he's just going to go into what we're
Speaker 2: going to take the first hundred miles now, yes.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well that's already in place.
Speaker 4: That has a change, it's already in place. Yes, that's
Speaker 4: already in place. One thing I will say about this
Speaker 4: is that I never made sense to me why we
Speaker 4: always kept Mexico's at their world country. Why didn't we
Speaker 4: bring her up and make her over and like made
Speaker 4: her part of the family in that if you were
Speaker 4: to create a Mexico that looks like the US surely
Speaker 4: you would have a buffer because it used to be.
Speaker 4: And maybe say, whoever in the chat wants to correct
Speaker 4: me if I'm wrong. I live close to the border.
Speaker 4: It is not a whole lot of Mexicans that come
Speaker 4: into the US.
Speaker 1: It used to be.
Speaker 4: It's not anymore. As a matter of fact, whenever there
Speaker 4: are deportations, a lot of them are Mexican. You have
Speaker 4: more Central and South American that come in and stay
Speaker 4: more so than Mexicans. And so again, correct me if
Speaker 4: I'm wrong. But so if you were to somehow go
Speaker 4: mano amano with Mexico and be like, can y'all stop
Speaker 4: them at your and will help you? What's wrong with that?
Speaker 4: If anything, you're creating some sort of a buffer.
Speaker 1: All of these cartels, all of these cartels are laundering.
Speaker 4: One hundred percent.
Speaker 5: I agree with you.
Speaker 4: There. The word, the word on the streets, The word
Speaker 4: on the streets is that you do not cross the
Speaker 4: border unless the cartel has said so, because you have
Speaker 4: to pay a toll to the cartel. So if no
Speaker 4: one can cross a border without the cartel's knowledge, then
Speaker 4: apparently it is a controlled system, right, right, somebody's controlling it, right,
Speaker 4: So there is.
Speaker 1: A territorial dispute between the CIA and now US military.
Speaker 1: Maybe maybe this is the self licking ice ice cream
Speaker 1: coming we need you get a nice war on the
Speaker 1: southern border.
Speaker 4: The amount of natural resources andunerals that exists in just
Speaker 4: Texas would be enough for the country to want to
Speaker 4: take seizure of land by eminent domain, for other private
Speaker 4: corporations to come in and buy that property and mine
Speaker 4: it all.
Speaker 1: Right, true, Well, who knows. I mean, a hyper privatized
Speaker 1: society would be pretty pretty scary right about now, because
Speaker 1: we're in foreclosure, you know, I mean, how much debt
Speaker 1: can we handle?
Speaker 4: That's true, that's true, But anyway, sorry you mean.
Speaker 1: To no, it's it's absolutely true. I mean I've had
Speaker 1: a sinking suspicion ever since Ali North and the idea
Speaker 1: of the blue list Red list. You know, what was
Speaker 1: that operation or something nice and eighty for Rex REX
Speaker 1: eighty four?
Speaker 2: Oh yes, yeah, it's an asteroid, wasn't it.
Speaker 1: Well, No, that was about a readiness exercise that said,
Speaker 1: if there's a civil war down in South America and
Speaker 1: we get a massive influx of migrants, then that'll give
Speaker 1: us an incentive to go to martial law within the
Speaker 1: United States to get rid of the migrants. Well, it's
Speaker 1: not working necessarily in the same order, but why not
Speaker 1: have Trump declared some sort of soft martial law or
Speaker 1: hard martial law across the entire United States using this
Speaker 1: REX eighty four program that was set up by Biden
Speaker 1: pretty much. I mean, he let everybody in. He set
Speaker 1: that whole thing up.
Speaker 4: Yeah, no, it's true. Yeah, it's I think I think
Speaker 4: there are too many correlations with the previous It seems
Speaker 4: like there's repeats from twenty sixteen. To me, there's there's
Speaker 4: a lot of repeats, and it makes me vigilant or
Speaker 4: want to be vigilant because of the it feels like
Speaker 4: it's repeating, right a. Not fear poort or anything like that,
Speaker 4: but it just you start to get a sense of like,
Speaker 4: oh man, are we really going to ride this ride again?
Speaker 1: So yeah, well, you know, it reminds me of the
Speaker 1: Clinton administration in the nineties as they were sparring against
Speaker 1: the I guess you would call them the right wing
Speaker 1: militias back then. You know, I didn't find out that
Speaker 1: that was happening. I didn't put the pieces together until
Speaker 1: much later. But you know, you had the World Trades
Speaker 1: that are bombing. In ninety three, you had Oklahoma, you.
Speaker 7: Had say Oklahoma too, right, you had u Ridge and
Speaker 7: Ruby Ridge was supposedly the impetus for why they had Oklahoma,
Speaker 7: and then after that it was the Waco thing.
Speaker 1: But all of these things sort of centered around that
Speaker 1: same group that was called pat con Patriot conspiracy, and
Speaker 1: Patriot Conspiracy was a program within the FBI and CIA
Speaker 1: to set these people up, like Eloheim City was actually
Speaker 1: run by the FBI, that was supposedly this right wing
Speaker 1: training base. And so we see the ascendancy of the
Speaker 1: right wing today and there has to be some sort
Speaker 1: of countermeasures that they're going to use on it, because
Speaker 1: they can't really have one side or the other ever
Speaker 1: achieve anything important. And you do see a lot of
Speaker 1: Trump pushback, So I don't know, maybe there might be
Speaker 1: a war on the right coming, because why not. He's
Speaker 1: making a lot of executive orders. If you criticize Israel,
Speaker 1: then they're going to start pulling your green card. That
Speaker 1: was one of the executive orders.
Speaker 4: That's right, Yes, yes, yes, yes. One of the things
Speaker 4: I will sidestep a little bit. One of the things
Speaker 4: that I really drew me at the very beginning of
Speaker 4: the whole conspiracy community a long time ago was that
Speaker 4: they took such a meticulous critical eye to both sides
Speaker 4: of the political parties, and they didn't pick sides, you know,
Speaker 4: I mean, they they highlighted what was good, but they
Speaker 4: also talked about what was bad. And I do like
Speaker 4: this what we're doing right now, because I think both
Speaker 4: you know, are both sides should always be under the
Speaker 4: critical eye and they should always be hands to the
Speaker 4: fire all the time.
Speaker 1: Well, I'm just think I think there's too much to lose,
Speaker 1: you know what I mean, Like because if America goes down,
Speaker 1: Oracle goes down, all of the contractors go down. And
Speaker 1: I mean, we're facing down the death of the dollar
Speaker 1: right now. If if the dollar dies, all of these corporations,
Speaker 1: all of these American corporations go with it. So I
Speaker 1: could see why they would get serious about switching sides.
Speaker 1: Will at the same time, you know they're not to
Speaker 1: be trusted. But if China and Russia get together, that's
Speaker 1: it for the US dollar. There's no more hedgemony. All
Speaker 1: these corporations have to pay back this massive debt. It
Speaker 1: would be the it would be the worst financial collapse
Speaker 1: ever and we're on the precipice of that with all
Speaker 1: this you know, conflict going on in the world. So
Speaker 1: there could be a genuine shift over to Donald Trump
Speaker 1: because they don't want to see everything they work for
Speaker 1: their entire lives just evaporate, you know.
Speaker 4: I'd like, rightfully, so that is the most common sense
Speaker 4: thing to do if you are looking at it from
Speaker 4: a financial economic perspective. Absolutely, I don't fault them. I mean,
Speaker 4: I'm not like saying that, you know whatever, But that's
Speaker 4: why they did it. That's it's not because they care.
Speaker 4: It's not because they have benevolent hard and they're you know,
Speaker 4: bleeding hard people, you know, for the benefit of Maybe
Speaker 4: they are, I don't know, I'm not there, but but
Speaker 4: at the end of the day, I think they're always
Speaker 4: going to make the decision that is most economically but
Speaker 4: beneficial for themselves.
Speaker 1: Absolutely, I think I think that's sweet.
Speaker 4: I mean, that's.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: Both could be true at the same time, and I
Speaker 1: think that could be the shifting of lines is you know,
Speaker 1: you've got these unethical people willing to make that shift.
Speaker 1: But there's no reason not to consider that in everything
Speaker 1: that they do, you know, because that's who they are.
Speaker 1: At the same time, that could mean more efficiency because
Speaker 1: if you get in their way, what do they do?
Speaker 2: You know?
Speaker 1: Yeah, Like, there was a recent whistleblower against Sam Altman.
Speaker 1: I don't know if you were paying attention to that story,
Speaker 1: but the whistleblower he got his brains blown out in
Speaker 1: his apartment and his mom, you know, was calling the
Speaker 1: police over and over again to get them to do
Speaker 1: an automousy to actually check in on him, and they
Speaker 1: lied to her several times. I don't know if you
Speaker 1: guys watched the interviews the kid.
Speaker 4: The kid was out of California, right if right? Yeah,
Speaker 4: I remember that.
Speaker 5: I remember that that.
Speaker 2: That's true. That was sad.
Speaker 4: And the mom is still asking for to reopen the investigation.
Speaker 4: She does not believe.
Speaker 5: She just calls, oh, I have to check that out.
Speaker 1: But there's there's a lot of attention being paid to
Speaker 1: it right now. I mean, she's been on a bunch
Speaker 1: of big shows right now, and a lot of people
Speaker 1: are putting pressure on the San Francisco government to actually
Speaker 1: do their job. Smart liberals do get activated by that shit,
Speaker 1: you know. I mean, we might find out that Sam
Speaker 1: Altman is behind no. Sam Altman is the one that
Speaker 1: had that problem with his sister. I got him confused
Speaker 1: with Larry Allison. Oh yeah, assume me whatever, Sorry Larry,
Speaker 1: But yeah, so Sam Altman is the one that supposedly
Speaker 1: abused his sister for twenty years, so you know, he
Speaker 1: denies it, and I guess there was a huge payout.
Speaker 1: But at the same time, Sam Altman and open AI
Speaker 1: are muscling into the Trump administration. Who knows what being
Speaker 1: you know traded back behind the scenes there too. All
Speaker 1: of these tech pros are terrible.
Speaker 4: Isn't Vance's wife. She was the official litigator for Alphabet,
Speaker 4: which is Google. Alphabet was getting sued. I can't remember.
Speaker 4: I had it in my note somewhere. Alphabet was getting
Speaker 4: super something and she was their official litigator and won
Speaker 4: the case for them. So she again cross pollination here.
Speaker 1: Right, Larry Ellison sued Google. They were having a problem
Speaker 1: with Google using their interface, and so that was actually
Speaker 1: a big story in the early two thousands. So there's
Speaker 1: a lot of animosity I think bubbling to the surface.
Speaker 1: That's what I like to see though, you know, take
Speaker 1: these people who hate each other and smash them in
Speaker 1: the same room, see.
Speaker 4: What they come up with, or make them eat with
Speaker 4: the common folk, right, you know, I agree.
Speaker 1: There's lots of lots of good and bad that can
Speaker 1: come out of this. But all I know is we
Speaker 1: got to stop these planes from from the sky. What
Speaker 1: is oh, yeah, right crash while we've been talking, I
Speaker 1: feel like there should be.
Speaker 2: It's a wee kind of Bernie shit with the planes
Speaker 2: falling on trains next right, Well, I.
Speaker 4: Can help to think that it's a distraction. I'm sorry.
Speaker 4: I know everybody always says that, and it's so cliche
Speaker 4: to say it. I understand that, but dang, I mean,
Speaker 4: weren't we saying it's pretty quiet out there, and now
Speaker 4: all of a sudden it's like, yeah, things are falling
Speaker 4: out of the sky, chicken little.
Speaker 2: And like somehow aren't they playing in Trump for this
Speaker 2: already too?
Speaker 1: Yes, of course, But does anybody actually I mean, there's
Speaker 1: never been a collapse like the Democratic Party under Kamala Harris.
Speaker 1: I don't think we've fully realized that yet. I mean,
Speaker 1: everything they're doing is amateurish. Nobody buys a fucking word
Speaker 1: they're say. You know, nobody takes them serious anymore. I
Speaker 1: think that's really important to point out they've lost so
Speaker 1: much power.
Speaker 2: They have to find the script writer.
Speaker 4: Right, hire the one from a Nutter butter.
Speaker 2: I have better shot with that.
Speaker 4: See how I circle that back, Jim Pisaki.
Speaker 1: She's never gonna work again us to watch. Have you
Speaker 1: been paying attention to the sale of MSNBC, because that's
Speaker 1: actually going forward? Yeah, I'm not sure. Probably another big
Speaker 1: media conglomerate, you know, that's how they sort of work.
Speaker 1: And what the hell is an MSNBC anyway? How is
Speaker 1: that relevant to today's sorry? Right?
Speaker 4: It's that the team of the of the big media
Speaker 4: propaganda guy. It's literally the b team.
Speaker 1: It got started based off of the idea that you
Speaker 1: had this msn network, which was Microsoft obviously, and so
Speaker 1: MSNBC was supposed to be this extension of the Microsoft
Speaker 1: network website. And when that didn't work out, they just
Speaker 1: turned into the most ultraliberal news network that you could
Speaker 1: possibly imagine? How did that?
Speaker 4: Another one?
Speaker 6: Right?
Speaker 1: Basically owned by Bill Gates? And that's all they were
Speaker 1: doing is just pumping out this weird mix of like
Speaker 1: Marxism and and you know, I guess it's like racial supremacy.
Speaker 1: There's there's some sort of racial supremacy in there. Like,
Speaker 1: what the hell was that identitarian movement anyway. I mean
Speaker 1: you see it kind of fading out, but like it
Speaker 1: was very strong in a lot of people.
Speaker 4: Maybe the big farmer needed another place to launder their money.
Speaker 1: See clearly, I mean all of those commercials that say,
Speaker 1: you know, brought to you by Pfizer and all the
Speaker 1: rest that that hasn't stopped, you know.
Speaker 4: And it's not going to it's not going to, right, No,
Speaker 4: they own, don't they own the companies? Is that you know,
Speaker 4: at least they're the middle person.
Speaker 1: A lot of them. I mean, that's the whole point
Speaker 1: of putting your advertisements out there. You basically own the
Speaker 1: company at that point, because all you have to do
Speaker 1: is say go left, and they're there, the sole advertisers.
Speaker 4: So I'm old enough to remember that SNL had a
Speaker 4: skit when the first pharmaceutical commercials started coming out and
Speaker 4: listing all of the side effects. And SNL had a
Speaker 4: skit where they were saying, your eye falls off or
Speaker 4: your hand falls off or whatever whatever, and it was
Speaker 4: like super funny. And and then now you hear the
Speaker 4: freaking symptoms and nobody about tonight, right or not? The
Speaker 4: symptoms of side effects?
Speaker 5: Sorry, sure I.
Speaker 1: Still hear them. I don't know what's wrong with other people,
Speaker 1: Like your very first risk is always death and it's
Speaker 1: always a psychoactive substance. You know, take this brain trainer
Speaker 1: so that you can have less fat. It's like, no,
Speaker 1: what what are these? What are these injections? Do you
Speaker 1: know anything about the biochemistry of the injections that's supposed
Speaker 1: to make you skinny? What are those called?
Speaker 4: Yeah, Sadly, no, I don't know the chemistry. I know
Speaker 4: that they are for diabetics. Initially they were marketed for diabetics,
Speaker 4: and I believe it helps with the glucagan glue good
Speaker 4: gin and gly kitchen and glucose pathway. So it's manipulative
Speaker 4: in that regard. That's all I know about it.
Speaker 1: Sadly, You've got the angle that you know, having these
Speaker 1: injections every couple of what hours or something that can't
Speaker 1: be good for you and that's good for you, right,
Speaker 1: It's just the whole idea of it. It's like you're
Speaker 1: gonna get super super thin, super quick, so you're gonna
Speaker 1: have a bunch of skin everywhere, and you know that's
Speaker 1: not gonna be good. As soon as you get off
Speaker 1: the ozempic. Guess what comes back immediately all the way,
Speaker 1: so you got to stay at it for the rest
Speaker 1: of your life. And I remember during the Biden administration
Speaker 1: they were they had a council that was looking at
Speaker 1: making ozepic for kids and just only market to get
Speaker 1: to overweight kids.
Speaker 5: That are you know that's horrible.
Speaker 1: Yeah, now they got to stay on ozembic for the
Speaker 1: rest of their lives if they want to stay skinny.
Speaker 1: That's the perfect scam. But you know, again, hopefully people
Speaker 1: like RFK can do something about that, because I know
Speaker 1: we spoke out about how horrific this ozembic council was.
Speaker 5: Yeah, no, it is.
Speaker 4: I mean, I don't just let the kids go play
Speaker 4: outside instead of an attend Nintendo And maybe they'll take
Speaker 4: less out of post tissue into their adult life and
Speaker 4: be just.
Speaker 1: Well, the less injectable crucifixes and artificial food they get,
Speaker 1: I think they'll be better off when it comes to
Speaker 1: the weight department. Yeah, you know how the body deals
Speaker 1: with toxins that are putting into it and it cases
Speaker 1: them in fat.
Speaker 4: Yes, why this is why when you were trying to
Speaker 4: lose weight like effectively you know, diet and exercise standard
Speaker 4: type you know tried and proven or what tried and
Speaker 4: troupe and proven, and you can't lose the last ten
Speaker 4: or whatever. A lot of some of these what's it
Speaker 4: called whatever, they're called bloggers or whatever, talk about, you know,
Speaker 4: all these ways of flushing your body. Yes, because the
Speaker 4: way that your body, so your body has been designed
Speaker 4: or has evolved, that it is going to encounter toxins
Speaker 4: in its life, and so it needs a way to
Speaker 4: store it and not cause harm to the rest of
Speaker 4: the body. And the way that it quarantines it off
Speaker 4: or corners it off from your body is to put
Speaker 4: it in store it in fat, because most toxins are
Speaker 4: fat soluble, and so that it'd be easily and readily
Speaker 4: absorbed and stored in fat. But in order to get
Speaker 4: rid of it, you have to digest that fat and
Speaker 4: then it releases it into the gut and then you
Speaker 4: you know, excrete it out. But the only way that
Speaker 4: it does that is through I believe there's certain foods
Speaker 4: that colates it whatever, but through lots of water, and
Speaker 4: the body has to feel safe to do that. It's
Speaker 4: not going to place you in harm. Your body actually
Speaker 4: cares about you. It's probably the only you know entity
Speaker 4: that does genuinely care about your life and so yes,
Speaker 4: you are one hundred percent correct. In order to lose
Speaker 4: those last ten to fifteen pounds, you have to make
Speaker 4: this negotiation with your body. You're like, okay, I'm gonna
Speaker 4: fle I'm gonna help you flush this. But you know, uh,
Speaker 4: it's gonna be okay. That's just me giving out a voice.
Speaker 4: But and you have to enter into these cycles of detox,
Speaker 4: which includes a lot of water, intake a lot of
Speaker 4: like certain foods to help buying too some of these toxins,
Speaker 4: and then that you could safely excrete them out because
Speaker 4: the last thing it wants is to expose you or
Speaker 4: put it into the streaming then cause you harm.
Speaker 1: Right, and all these drugs are gonna do is gonna
Speaker 1: put it back into the bloodstream and cause you harm.
Speaker 1: I mean that's sick, but yeah it is. That's kind
Speaker 1: of where we're at. I mean, what a full circle, right,
Speaker 1: Nutter butter necessary.
Speaker 2: I'm gonna go eat some butters. I think we'll wrap
Speaker 2: it up here too. Yeah. Yeah, thank you, thank you
Speaker 2: all very much for coming on. I had a really
Speaker 2: good ton tonight. Yeah that was fun than yeah yeah
Speaker 2: yeah yeah, uh yeah, Headless, let everybody know where they
Speaker 2: can find you at again, Please, sir.
Speaker 1: Check out my YouTube channel, Headless Giant. I've got a
Speaker 1: couple on there that are gonna be uh coming out
Speaker 1: soon about the emails people send me, so I'm gonna
Speaker 1: plug it again. Go to a Headless Giant podcast at
Speaker 1: gmail dot com and send me your esoteric, magical paranormal
Speaker 1: stories and I'll read them out on the air.
Speaker 2: Did you mention dreams too or no, no dreams dreams too.
Speaker 2: Let me if they're bugged out for sure? Yes, uh yeah,
Speaker 2: thank you very much again Headless. You know, it's always
Speaker 2: great having you on. Lisa, thank you very much for
Speaker 2: jumping on always always appreciate it. And you know, another
Speaker 2: butter topic, Thank you very much for bringing that on.
Speaker 2: That was fun. Yeah, it's some weird shit with that stuff.
Speaker 2: So yeah, go check out another butter. It doesn't mean
Speaker 2: you have to go buy it though. All right, they
Speaker 2: already got they already got me, so you know, don't
Speaker 2: let it happen to you. Thank you everybody in the chat.
Speaker 2: That's what's up. There's a lot of people in there,
Speaker 2: and uh yeah again, I think we'll have JJ back.
Speaker 2: I think next week. Uh so yeah, this is another
Speaker 2: Fridays and I guess until the next one. Everybody be
Speaker 2: well later