Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the
Speaker 1: Epstein Chronicles. Now that the Department of Justice has declared
Speaker 1: that Jeffrey Epstein was just a sick guy with some
Speaker 1: very disturbing proclivities, and that he was a lone wolf,
Speaker 1: you have the legacy media showing up right on cue
Speaker 1: to back up what they're saying. And what's so funny
Speaker 1: about that is, every other time we hear about something
Speaker 1: going on as far as, you know, the Trump-led FBI
Speaker 1: or Trump-led DOJ, People like the author of the article
Speaker 1: we're about to read, well, they don't believe anything that's
Speaker 1: coming out of the DOJ. But all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: now they believe it? Now they believe the DOJ report
Speaker 1: on Jeffrey Epstein? Ask yourselves why. What's the motivation in
Speaker 1: believing what the DOJ has to say when it comes
Speaker 1: to Epstein, but when they're telling you about, say, criminal
Speaker 1: aliens who are dangerous, well, we can't believe them there.
Speaker 1: You see, either you believe the Department of Justice, or
Speaker 1: you don't. And I fall into the category of not,
Speaker 1: no matter who's in office. So you can't just pick
Speaker 1: and choose and arbitrarily say, oh yeah, well this story
Speaker 1: sounds like it's real and the Department of Justice would
Speaker 1: never run any cover here. Meanwhile, out of the other
Speaker 1: side of your mouth, saying something completely different. And the
Speaker 1: fact that the authors of this article from Rolling Stone
Speaker 1: think they're like spiking the ball on somebody is just gross.
Speaker 1: What these people do is run cover for the people
Speaker 1: who really ran Epstein. And right on cue, you have
Speaker 1: Rolling Stone showing up, calling anybody who's questioning what the
Speaker 1: DOJ had to say a conspiracy theorist. Well, as you
Speaker 1: can imagine, I have a few things to say to
Speaker 1: the authors of this article. Miles Klee and Asawin Subhasang.
Speaker 1: And just to be clear, I've never heard of either
Speaker 1: of these people, never saw them talk about Epstein one
Speaker 1: single time, but now all of a sudden they're the
Speaker 1: arbiters of truth? I truly have no idea how anyone
Speaker 1: can take the legacy media serious at this point. This
Speaker 1: article was published by Rolling Stone, and the headline, They're
Speaker 1: Gonna Be So Mad. Trump Admin Braces for MAGA Revolt
Speaker 1: Over the Epstein Memo. So according to Miles Klee and
Speaker 1: Asawan Subhasang, the only people that are upset about this
Speaker 1: memo are MAGA people and people on the right. Which
Speaker 1: comes as news to me, because everybody I know, no
Speaker 1: matter their political affiliation, who isn't terminally online anyway, is
Speaker 1: pissed off about this story. And anyone with a brain
Speaker 1: in their head understands that we're getting dog walked here.
Speaker 1: After a lengthy investigation into remaining questions about the late
Speaker 1: sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, The Justice Department and the FBI
Speaker 1: on Monday released a memo declaring that, contrary to various
Speaker 1: popular conspiracy theories, he was not murdered, but in fact
Speaker 1: killed himself. Investigators also concluded that he never had a
Speaker 1: client list used to blackmail celebrities and political elites. Do
Speaker 1: you understand what they're doing here? They're just trying to
Speaker 1: change things up by using word salad. I've told you
Speaker 1: for how long there was no list. You folks have
Speaker 1: to understand who we're dealing with here. We're dealing with
Speaker 1: people that control the narrative on the grand scale. And
Speaker 1: I don't mean just stories like this. I'm talking about
Speaker 1: in a geopolitical sense. So if you really think that
Speaker 1: these folks can't change the narrative, that they can't, you know,
Speaker 1: make things confusing for people, you're crazy. And that's what
Speaker 1: the list always was. And anybody who amplified that list,
Speaker 1: shame on you. That list never existed. I told you
Speaker 1: it didn't exist. And they were using it as a lever.
Speaker 1: So now they can come out and say, look, we look,
Speaker 1: there's no list here. So there was no blackmail. But
Speaker 1: what sort of compromise operation has a spreadsheet with all
Speaker 1: of the people that are involved? And furthermore, this wasn't
Speaker 1: your traditional trafficking operation. Girls weren't being served up for money.
Speaker 1: The currency here was information. These girls would get set
Speaker 1: up with these scumbag pieces of shit who could never
Speaker 1: get laid when they were younger. And then they'd be
Speaker 1: filmed while they were doing it. And then that's the
Speaker 1: blackmail material. Not some fucking list with their name on it.
Speaker 1: I mean, come on, use your head. Oh yeah, let
Speaker 1: me have a list here with all the people that
Speaker 1: are involved in my compromise operation. Does that sound plausible?
Speaker 1: And furthermore, if you want a list... Look at the
Speaker 1: black book. Take a look at the notepads that were
Speaker 1: left by, you know, Sarah Kellen Vickers, that were left
Speaker 1: by Leslie Groff, talking about this girl's coming over or
Speaker 1: that girl's coming over. And then I also saw people
Speaker 1: talking about, oh, well, the numbers don't add up. How
Speaker 1: could have Jeffrey Epstein abused so many girls? Well, considering
Speaker 1: there were points in time where he had three girls
Speaker 1: a day coming over from local high schools, I'd say
Speaker 1: that it's right in the realm of possibility. And that's
Speaker 1: what really bothers me. There's a lot of people that
Speaker 1: have zero idea what they're talking about when it comes
Speaker 1: to this story. But anytime some news breaks, all of
Speaker 1: a sudden they're all fucking experts, right? Now, fortunately for them,
Speaker 1: I've been relatively busy for the last few months. Covering
Speaker 1: the Diddy Trial. Well now, not as busy anymore. So
Speaker 1: you dumb fucks with your stupid ass, dumb ass Jeffrey
Speaker 1: Epstein theories, I have some bad news for you. Daddy's home.
Speaker 1: And this is where your stupid nonsense comes to die. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: Trump's inner circle, knowing full well that some of the
Speaker 1: president's loudest supporters refuse to accept either claim, brace for impact.
Speaker 1: As part of our commitment to transparency, the Department of
Speaker 1: Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation have conducted an
Speaker 1: exhaustive review of investigative holdings relating to Jeffrey Epstein, the
Speaker 1: joint FBI and DOJ memo states. This systematic review revealed
Speaker 1: no incriminating client list. There was also no credible evidence
Speaker 1: found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions.
Speaker 1: We did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation
Speaker 1: against uncharged third parties. And here's the rub. The FBI
Speaker 1: wasn't in charge of the compromise. The FBI was the
Speaker 1: group that flipped Jeffrey Epstein initially, and we have the
Speaker 1: paperwork to prove it. And then from there, he was
Speaker 1: farmed out to the CIA and the intelligence apparatus. You know,
Speaker 1: people don't even talk about the fact that Jeffrey Epstein
Speaker 1: was very close to a bunch of people that were
Speaker 1: involved in Iran-Contra or that Jeffrey Epstein had deep ties
Speaker 1: to Saudi Arabia and the Khashoggi's. This is stuff people
Speaker 1: don't talk about because it's much more fun to talk about, oh,
Speaker 1: I don't know, the Mossad, right? Or talk about whatever
Speaker 1: other nonsense you want to bring up. But the fact
Speaker 1: is Jeffrey Epstein was being run as an asset and
Speaker 1: all the people that are clouding the conversation talking about
Speaker 1: how he's a foreign agent That's more misdirection. That's more disinformation.
Speaker 1: That's to throw you off the scent. Just like the
Speaker 1: stupid ass list. And I've been warning about this too.
Speaker 1: Now look, I'm not saying he has no ties to
Speaker 1: the Mossad. He most certainly does. But if anybody's out
Speaker 1: here telling you that it was the Mossad who created
Speaker 1: Epstein and who was managing Epstein and running him as
Speaker 1: an asset, they're lying. Sure, they had a seat at
Speaker 1: the table, but they didn't make the meal. And I'm
Speaker 1: not going to let our own intelligence services off the
Speaker 1: hook by trying to pitch the blame somewhere else. This
Speaker 1: is an American problem, and it needs to be dealt
Speaker 1: with by American authorities. But unfortunately, that's never going to happen.
Speaker 1: But now that all of this is a closed investigation,
Speaker 1: we shouldn't have any problem getting freedom of information requests
Speaker 1: served up, right? I can't tell you how many times
Speaker 1: I've been told no because it's an open investigation. That
Speaker 1: shouldn't be the case anymore. And with that in mind,
Speaker 1: you better believe I'm going to be firing off some
Speaker 1: freedom of information requests to get some information I've been
Speaker 1: trying to get for years. And how much do you
Speaker 1: want to bet that I still don't get that information?
Speaker 1: It'll be a different roadblock, a new one. Oh, we
Speaker 1: don't have that. That was destroyed. We lost that in
Speaker 1: a fire. The dog ate that. Joe Biden took that
Speaker 1: with him to the beach and a seagull ate it.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's how ridiculous these cover stories are. So
Speaker 1: would you be shocked? I wouldn't be. The memo further
Speaker 1: notes after a thorough investigation, FBI investigators concluded that Jeffrey
Speaker 1: Epstein committed suicide in his cell at the Metropolitan Correctional
Speaker 1: Center in New York City on August 10, 2019, adding
Speaker 1: that this is consistent with previous findings, including from an
Speaker 1: autopsy performed at the time, yeah? What did Michael Bodden
Speaker 1: say about the autopsy? He was there. He witnessed it.
Speaker 1: He didn't agree. So we're just going to defer and
Speaker 1: believe what Mrs. Hawk had to say? Okay, I guess,
Speaker 1: if that's what you want to do. The Justice Department
Speaker 1: also shared more than 10 hours of CCTV video from
Speaker 1: the facility where Epstein had been held. It shows him
Speaker 1: being escorted by correctional officers across a common area to
Speaker 1: his cell, which is off camera, on the evening of
Speaker 1: August 9th. From this footage, it appears nobody else entered
Speaker 1: his cell afterwards. Well, now it's coming out that it
Speaker 1: looks like that video has been altered. But again, here's
Speaker 1: more misdirection. Nobody ever talks about the first alleged attempt.
Speaker 1: The first alleged attempt of suicide by Jeffrey Epstein was
Speaker 1: done while he was in a cell with a dude
Speaker 1: named Nicholas Tartaglione, a man who was facing four murder
Speaker 1: charges at the time. Now, can anyone explain why that
Speaker 1: man would be in a cell with Jeffrey Epstein? No,
Speaker 1: you can't explain that because there's no logical explanation. So
Speaker 1: he's in the cell with Epstein. And Epstein says that
Speaker 1: he got beat up by Nicholas Tartaglione. That's what he
Speaker 1: tells his lawyer. And his lawyer has come out and
Speaker 1: said that several times. Supposedly, they tell the MCC and MCC.
Speaker 1: does an investigation and they clear Nicholas Tartaglione in like
Speaker 1: a day. And what do they have to go on? Well,
Speaker 1: Nicholas Tartaglione's word. And based on the word of a
Speaker 1: man who has now been convicted of four homicides, they
Speaker 1: decided to just close the book and not investigate any further. Now,
Speaker 1: according to Tartaglione, He says that he tried to help
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein when Jeffrey Epstein tried to commit suicide. I
Speaker 1: do not buy that for one single second. And I've
Speaker 1: said from the very beginning that I believe that Nicholas
Speaker 1: Tartaglione was put into that jail cell to send Jeffrey
Speaker 1: Epstein a message. And that message was either you do
Speaker 1: it or we do. So sure, Epstein might have killed himself.
Speaker 1: But do you really think he did it of his
Speaker 1: own volition? Do you really think he just woke up
Speaker 1: one day and was like, you know what? That's it.
Speaker 1: I'm going to kill myself. especially considering that the Department
Speaker 1: of Justice just came out and told us that they
Speaker 1: don't have any evidence against him. So why would he
Speaker 1: kill himself? You see, folks, the story just doesn't make sense.
Speaker 1: To people who really understand what's going on, they know
Speaker 1: that none of this makes sense, and they know that
Speaker 1: the BS that's being pitched to us is not true.
Speaker 1: As the Trump administration prepared to release the two-page memo,
Speaker 1: officials were acutely aware of the furor it would ignite
Speaker 1: in the fiercely conspiracist MAGA base. I mean, come on.
Speaker 1: So this is just about MAGA? Anybody who's concerned about
Speaker 1: this is MAGA? That's so weird to say. And why
Speaker 1: are you trying to frame the conversation as a left
Speaker 1: and right thing? Are you trying to say that people
Speaker 1: on the left don't care about Jeffrey Epstein or what
Speaker 1: he was up to? I don't believe that. I don't
Speaker 1: believe that at all. They're going to be so mad
Speaker 1: at us, one Trump administration official tells Rolling Stone of
Speaker 1: the memo on the FBI and Justice Department conclusions. This
Speaker 1: insider was of course referring to the legion of prominent
Speaker 1: figures who have eagerly awaited Epstein bombshells since Trump returned
Speaker 1: to office, only to learn again and again that no
Speaker 1: new information is forthcoming. Yeah, because the CIA doesn't rat
Speaker 1: on itself, you dumb fucks. Stop being obtuse. Stop acting
Speaker 1: like this doesn't exist, and stop acting like people in
Speaker 1: positions of power... haven't been muting the message from day one.
Speaker 1: This person, as well as two other Trump officials, described
Speaker 1: an administration that has spent an inordinate amount of time
Speaker 1: trying and failing to appease conspiracy theorists long obsessed with
Speaker 1: unfounded claims that Epstein was murdered to protect some of
Speaker 1: Trump's enemies, including high-profile Democrats and liberal Hollywood stars. These
Speaker 1: ideas abound MAGA World despite Trump's own well-documented connections to Epstein. Look,
Speaker 1: they were all connected to Epstein. The sooner you dumb
Speaker 1: fucks realize that and understand that this wasn't about one
Speaker 1: party or the other, the better off people are going
Speaker 1: to be. Like I've been telling you that both parties
Speaker 1: are responsible here. We've been through how many presidencies? How
Speaker 1: many different parties? And nobody did shit? And now there's
Speaker 1: no doubt. You had a bunch of people out here
Speaker 1: talking about how this is going to be the most
Speaker 1: transparent administration ever. Yeah, well, I guess not. And I
Speaker 1: was never buying the bullshit. I said from the very beginning, A,
Speaker 1: no list exists, and B, you're never going to see
Speaker 1: the files. And while I usually enjoy being right, I
Speaker 1: don't like being right about this. I wish we were
Speaker 1: getting transparency. I wish we were getting everything released. And
Speaker 1: if they want to do full transparency, that's what they'll do.
Speaker 1: Obviously not videos where kids are being abused, but every
Speaker 1: last document, completely unredacted. But you know, and I know,
Speaker 1: that that is never going to occur. After months of
Speaker 1: pushing federal law enforcement to produce some sort of acceptable
Speaker 1: sop for the MAGA Epstein conspiracists, Trump administration officials are
Speaker 1: now hoping to manage the intro party disappointment. Now, mind you,
Speaker 1: this report also said that Jeffrey Epstein abused over a
Speaker 1: thousand girls. Not one mention of that shit here in
Speaker 1: this article from this dude, right? Because it's never been
Speaker 1: about the survivors for the legacy media. It's about trying
Speaker 1: to score points. And whenever they think that the story
Speaker 1: is going against them and it's going to out one
Speaker 1: of their faves, they just shut up about it. And furthermore,
Speaker 1: while we're talking about people who are involved with Jeffrey
Speaker 1: fucking Epstein, how come nobody's talking about the fact that
Speaker 1: Stacey Plaskett is being sued by Jeffrey Epstein survivors right
Speaker 1: now as we speak? You would think that somebody who
Speaker 1: is a sitting representative, quote-unquote congresswoman, who is being sued
Speaker 1: by Jeffrey Epstein survivors would get some print, but I
Speaker 1: guess Rolling Stone doesn't have the time for that. Instead,
Speaker 1: they want to call you a conspiracy theorist and call
Speaker 1: you a piece of shit. They think you're stupid. They
Speaker 1: truly believe you're dumb. But the truth is, most of
Speaker 1: these people that are talking about Epstein, most of these
Speaker 1: people that are writing articles about Epstein, they have no
Speaker 1: idea what they're talking about. And these two knuckleheads writing
Speaker 1: this article... for sure, have zero idea what they're talking about.
Speaker 1: Asked if these attempts to tamp down the backlash has worked,
Speaker 1: this Trump administration official simply says no. Indeed, some far-right
Speaker 1: personalities were so incensed that they decided the memo had
Speaker 1: to be fake, pointing out the lack of a date
Speaker 1: or signature. It is, however, posted on the Justice Department website,
Speaker 1: which somewhat undercuts that argument. Somewhat undercuts it? It's not fake.
Speaker 1: This is real. I know it sounds like it's fake.
Speaker 1: I know it should be fake, but it's real. And
Speaker 1: we've been dealing with this ever since the beginning of
Speaker 1: this case. Let's not forget the Vanity Fair article. Let's
Speaker 1: not forget ABC killing the Virginia Roberts interview with Amy Robach.
Speaker 1: I mean, it goes on and on and on. And
Speaker 1: it's still continuing to this day. Elon Musk, the billionaire
Speaker 1: Trump megadonor who has since turned on the president over
Speaker 1: his massive spending bill and pledged to form a new
Speaker 1: political party, was among those to make a stink. Having
Speaker 1: previously accused Trump of suppressing the so-called Epstein files because
Speaker 1: he has named them, and posts that he later deleted,
Speaker 1: the world's richest man on Monday shared memes on X,
Speaker 1: his social media platform, mocking the administration for not producing
Speaker 1: a client list. One image he posted was an official
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein pedophile arrest counter displaying zeros. He also shared
Speaker 1: a post from Republican Texas State Delegate Sarah Fields who wrote,
Speaker 1: If the entire government is protecting pedophiles, it has officially
Speaker 1: become the government against the people. And look, not for nothing,
Speaker 1: but Elon Musk should just shut up. Bro was at
Speaker 1: the billionaire dinner with Jeffrey Epstein in 2011 after Epstein
Speaker 1: was already convicted. And what did he do? Oh, that's right,
Speaker 1: you broke bread with him. You sat there, talked, hung out. Imagine?
Speaker 1: Imagine being in a room with somebody like Jeffrey Epstein
Speaker 1: and not smacking the dog shit out of them? I
Speaker 1: gotta tell you, I'm taking whatever penalty is coming my way.
Speaker 1: I'm at a dinner like that with somebody like Epstein
Speaker 1: and I have Elon Musk money. I hate to say it, homie,
Speaker 1: but you're getting folded. You're going to see your dentist
Speaker 1: with every one of your teeth in a pouch. And
Speaker 1: whatever the penalty is, it'll be worth it. I'd be
Speaker 1: like Bobby Axelrod in the show Billions. After he punches
Speaker 1: that dude in the face, walks away, turns around, looks
Speaker 1: at him and goes, worth it. 100% worth it. Whatever
Speaker 1: the penalty would be. And now you got Elon Musk
Speaker 1: out here talking all kinds of nonsense when he has
Speaker 1: his own ties to Jeffrey Epstein and Glenn Maxwell. Does
Speaker 1: he think that we forgot? We most certainly haven't, Mr. Transhumanism.
Speaker 1: And by the way, saying that nobody was arrested due
Speaker 1: to Jeffrey Epstein and the enterprise he was running is
Speaker 1: just not true. Jeffrey Epstein was arrested, Glenn Maxwell was arrested,
Speaker 1: and so was Jean-Luc Brunel. But go ahead, Mr. Richest
Speaker 1: Man in the World, continue to talk a bunch of bullshit. Meanwhile, U.S.
Speaker 1: Attorney General Pam Bondi's promises of major revelations in the
Speaker 1: Epstein case had already fizzled back in February. Despite appearing
Speaker 1: on Fox News to hype up the release details on
Speaker 1: Epstein's associates, she only managed to provide binders of already
Speaker 1: public information to a handful of right-wing influencers. To spread
Speaker 1: the blame for the inevitable disappointment of what she had
Speaker 1: sold to the MAGA faithful as the Epstein Files Phase 1,
Speaker 1: Bondi simultaneously issued a letter to FBI Director Kash Patel
Speaker 1: claiming that the Bureau had withheld evidence she had requested.
Speaker 1: No phase two documents have been released. Well, the FBI
Speaker 1: doesn't have the documents. That's true too. But that's only
Speaker 1: part of the truth. And that's because these documents, the
Speaker 1: case files, all of the information is in the possession
Speaker 1: of people who are above the FBI. People that don't
Speaker 1: really need any kind of okay from anybody else to operate.
Speaker 1: Do you really think that this was a CIA operation
Speaker 1: that was done out in the open? This was a
Speaker 1: black op, folks. That's what compromise operations are. You're never
Speaker 1: supposed to know about it. Meanwhile, people are like, how
Speaker 1: was it funded? Where'd they get the money? Do you
Speaker 1: realize that like $ 3 trillion has gone missing from the
Speaker 1: so-called military budget? Where did all that money go? You
Speaker 1: don't think some of that money found its way towards
Speaker 1: some of these black projects we're working on? Please don't
Speaker 1: be naive. The latest memo from the FBI and DOJ
Speaker 1: escalated the criticism of Bondi that erupted over that fiasco.
Speaker 1: Trump's sycophant and conspiracist, Laura Loomer, repeatedly called for her
Speaker 1: resignation on Monday. Hopefully someone at the White House press
Speaker 1: briefing today asked if President Trump plans on firing Pam Bondi.
Speaker 1: She wrote, in an ex-post, using her regular dismissive nickname
Speaker 1: for the AG, she calls her Blondie. If she doesn't
Speaker 1: get fired, over this Epstein memo, people are going to
Speaker 1: be so blackpilled. Jack Pasabayak, whatever the fuck his name is,
Speaker 1: one of the influencers to receive the dud phase one
Speaker 1: documents wrote, when will Pam Bondi be filing to unseal
Speaker 1: the Epstein files from the criminal case? We were promised everything. Bro,
Speaker 1: shut your mouth. You're part of the problem. Out there
Speaker 1: with your dumbass little white binder like the dork you are.
Speaker 1: Don't know the first fucking thing about Jeffrey Epstein. Don't
Speaker 1: know nothing about the case. Out here acting like a fool.
Speaker 1: You wanted to have anybody there at the White House?
Speaker 1: You should have brought the survivors, who were the ones
Speaker 1: who blew the doors, off this motherfucker. But instead you
Speaker 1: have a bunch of lame-ass influencers that don't even know
Speaker 1: what they're talking about. These are the people that are
Speaker 1: out there fighting the culture war. Well good, stick to that.
Speaker 1: Let the adults handle the adult stuff, please. Right-wing podcaster
Speaker 1: Tim Pool, meanwhile, accused Bondi of keeping the tens of
Speaker 1: thousands of child porn videos for herself. The Justice Department
Speaker 1: and FBI memo states that investigators reviewed a large volume
Speaker 1: of images of Epstein, images and videos of victims who
Speaker 1: are either minors or appear to be minors, and over 10,000
Speaker 1: downloaded videos and images of illegal child sex abuse material
Speaker 1: and other pornography. The document clarifies that no videos of
Speaker 1: abuse of minors will be released by the government, while
Speaker 1: much of the rest of the content is under court
Speaker 1: seal only to protect victims and did not expose any
Speaker 1: additional third parties to allegations of illegal wrongdoing. Well, that's it, folks.
Speaker 1: Pack it up. The party's over. The government has told
Speaker 1: you that there's nothing to see here. And remember, after that,
Speaker 1: to go get your booster shot. White House Press Secretary
Speaker 1: Carolyn Leavitt was pressed on Bondi's previous claims to have
Speaker 1: an Epstein client list on her desk by Fox News'
Speaker 1: Peter Doocy on Monday. She was saying the entirety of
Speaker 1: all the paperwork, all the paper, in relation to Jeffrey
Speaker 1: Epstein's crimes, Leavitt countered. That's what the Attorney General was
Speaker 1: referring to, and I'll let her speak for that. Oh, please,
Speaker 1: stop with the cover-up. The whole entire thing is just
Speaker 1: gross on its face. In May, conspiracy theorists had to
Speaker 1: account for why FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino, who was
Speaker 1: a podcaster, had heavily implied that Epstein was murdered as
Speaker 1: part of the massive cover-up, was now insisting that he
Speaker 1: died by suicide. There's no evidence in the case file
Speaker 1: indicating otherwise, he posted on X that month. Patel, too,
Speaker 1: a known QAnon promoter, had once claimed that it would
Speaker 1: be easy for the FBI to let us know who
Speaker 1: the pedophiles are. But since taking over the bureau... has
Speaker 1: not released any list of Epstein's clients or associates. This
Speaker 1: is beyond the FBI, folks. Beyond the DOJ. The same
Speaker 1: people who sold crack in America? Yeah, that's the same
Speaker 1: people doing this. The same people involved in Iran-Contra? You're
Speaker 1: looking at them. The same people that were involved in
Speaker 1: killing Gary Webb? That's right. Anyone who thinks that the
Speaker 1: FBI has the power to tell the CIA or the
Speaker 1: intelligence apparatus what to do, you are not paying attention.
Speaker 1: Some top Trump appointees are rather sensitive to suggestions made
Speaker 1: by the president's faithful that this administration, in failing to
Speaker 1: validate their conspiracy theories, is now affected by the same
Speaker 1: so-called deep state that Republicans have spent years whining about.
Speaker 1: Two of the Trump officials say that Bongino is especially
Speaker 1: touchy about this. Loomer on Monday shared a post from
Speaker 1: Bongino from April 2024 implying that Bill Clinton was an
Speaker 1: Epstein client. It's amazing how much things have changed, she wrote.
Speaker 1: He knows deep down the DOJ is lying. Look, and
Speaker 1: while we're at it, stop using the word client. You
Speaker 1: motherfuckers are out here acting like Jeffrey Epstein was Heidi Fleiss.
Speaker 1: That was not what was going on. Stop trying to
Speaker 1: muddy the waters and cloud shit up. And furthermore, you
Speaker 1: want to talk about Bill Clinton? Let's talk about some facts.
Speaker 1: Let's talk about the fact that Bill Clinton was receiving
Speaker 1: a massage from a traffic girl in an airport and
Speaker 1: we got a picture to prove it. Let's talk about
Speaker 1: the fact that Jeffrey Epstein visited the White House while
Speaker 1: Clinton was president at least 17 times and brought girls
Speaker 1: with him. Let's talk about the fact that Bill Clinton
Speaker 1: and Hillary Clinton went to Jeffrey Epstein for seed money
Speaker 1: for the Clinton Global Initiative. Oh, well, where are you
Speaker 1: getting that information? From Bill Clinton's own lawyer, but like
Speaker 1: the ShamWow guy. Wait, there's more. How about the trips
Speaker 1: down to Zorro Ranch that they lied about? We gonna
Speaker 1: talk about that? Or how about the fact that Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton got Ghislaine Maxwell's nephew a job at the State Department?
Speaker 1: Any conversation there? What they do is they try to
Speaker 1: curate the story by omitting things. And that shit's just
Speaker 1: not gonna fly here. And anybody who thinks that Bill
Speaker 1: Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein weren't super tight, well, you're lying
Speaker 1: to yourself. They were. In fact, Jeffrey Epstein said they
Speaker 1: were as close as brothers. In reality, while there's still
Speaker 1: much we don't know about the Epstein case, there has
Speaker 1: never been any reference in court documents or from witnesses
Speaker 1: attesting to the existence of the fabled client list at
Speaker 1: the heart of the conspiracy theories, once peddled by Bongino
Speaker 1: and Patel, which have come back to haunt them, Bondi,
Speaker 1: and other high-ranking Trump appointees. But the conspiracists said can
Speaker 1: enjoy a silver lining here because they will never get
Speaker 1: the answers they're after. They're free to keep making things up.
Speaker 1: This dude just got done saying in reality, while there
Speaker 1: is much we still don't know about the case, and
Speaker 1: then goes on to call people conspiracy theorists. How do
Speaker 1: you know what's a conspiracy and what's not if you
Speaker 1: don't know about the case, dum-dum? And this is the
Speaker 1: biggest problem. There are so many people out there that
Speaker 1: see what's going on with Epstein, and then they're afflicted
Speaker 1: with Dunning-Kruger, thinking they know everything about the case. Buddy,
Speaker 1: you are so far behind, you have no idea. Let
Speaker 1: me give you a little tip, okay? Start with the
Speaker 1: court documents. Why don't you dive in to Virginia Roberts'
Speaker 1: deposition against Ghislaine Maxwell. Start there. And then, after you
Speaker 1: do your homework, get back to me. I'll have another
Speaker 1: assignment for you. And then maybe, just maybe, you'll have
Speaker 1: a bit of a clue of what the fuck you're
Speaker 1: talking about. All of the information that goes with this
Speaker 1: episode can be found in the description box.