Speaker 1: This is the Dana Show.
Speaker 2: My name is Craig Collins, filling in, thrilled to be
with you. A bunch of stuff out there to talk about.
Dana will be back tomorrow. We can thank the Heritage
Foundation for the new Biden tapes that are out there. Oh,
by the way, at d Lash Dana Lash Radio and
acts great way to stay connected to her and all
the awesome stuff that she and her fancy team of
people like producer Steven I put up on social media.
Must follow in the world of social media. All right,
Let's get to the Biden tapes. The Heritage Foundation sued
for these and then got an a legal fight, and
eventually they want and Biden back down, allowing.
Speaker 1: These tapes to see the light of day.
Speaker 2: I think there's something like one hundred hours, and a
lot of it is just an interview or excuse me,
a conversation he's having with his ghost writer who writes
a book for him. It goes back all the way
to twenty seventeen. And the craziest part about the Biden
tapes is he's already a broken brain man, Like you
can already hear it, and a lot of it from
what I'm here of people that listen to a bunch
more than I did is just like boring in a mess.
As far as a man who can't seem to remember
very basic stuff, it's terrifying in one sense, Like it's
not shocking. I should say that because a lot of
us thought this was who this person was, and we
thought this was who this president was the entire time
he was the auto pen in chief. But to hear
it as early as twenty seventeen, and then to know
how profound the lying and all the crap was from
the Democrats who pretended he was the fastest guy in
the room is insane. That's not the only thing valuable
in the tapes, of course, his brain being a complete
mushy mess. It's also that he's totally aware he has
classified documents. So we're going to play some of that
audio him saying that he found all the classified stuff
and then hey, this might be classified.
Speaker 1: I remember Trump had his home rated.
Speaker 2: Because of what they claimed were illegal possession of classified documents.
Biden allowed to keep and talk to a talk to
an author about all kinds of stuff. This is crazy
to hear as blatantly as it's being described. But again
by a man whose brain is mostly mush already, and
this is almost ten years ago that he's already not
really thinking the way that you should be thinking if
you want, at some point try to be the president
of the United States.
Speaker 3: So this was.
Speaker 4: I early on.
Speaker 5: In nine I just found all the classified stuff downstairs.
Speaker 1: Just found all that classified stuff downstairs. So great, here
we go.
Speaker 5: And then last thing you have here is this is excited.
Speaker 6: It's you jos to me.
Speaker 2: This is just classified, just holding some classified documents that
say that I shouldn't be in possession of these anymore.
In twenty seventeen, and I am and who cares not a.
Speaker 1: Big deal out admits that he didn't want to turn
any of this stuff into.
Speaker 5: I'm told by I guess you check with you in
order for me to get my get all those presidential
notes I had for lunch, the lunch and meetings.
Speaker 3: I have to go to.
Speaker 1: It's clipping out on purpose.
Speaker 2: By the way, I think there's stuff that they removed
intentionally from this audio.
Speaker 5: Okay, see if you can get the uh line while
I have you now, okay, and stay.
Speaker 2: By the way, we can all guess who he's talking about.
Thinking Barack could have been removed from some of this audio.
Speaker 7: That's probably something that goes to the presidential papers.
Speaker 5: I don't fix songs in betweet.
Speaker 8: If I didn't want to turn the.
Speaker 1: Man, that's the part the matters. He says, I did
not want to turn them in.
Speaker 5: I don't fix SOMs in betweet.
Speaker 9: I didn't want to turn the man.
Speaker 2: I don't want to give this stuff back that I
have right now. That's all classified documents. But there's a
bunch of just dropped audio where he goes, you talk
to that guy and he talked about that stuff.
Speaker 1: I mean, who do you think that was?
Speaker 2: I imagine it was Barack Obama, and that Obama was completely
aware of the ridiculous amount of classified documents that Joe
Biden had, because, as Trump said when his home was
being raided in Florida, all of the ex presidents have
a crap ton of classified documents on them because they
just take them and they were the president during that
time period of most of it. The saddest part about
this discussion is that if we were all being like
human and I think that's the thing that President Trump
somewhat expected at some point that the other people would
admit they were doing it too, or there might be
a reason for it to go away and not be
weaponized against him the way it was. But if we
were all human, most of what people keep is stuff
written to them, like a world leader writes a note
to them, and they want to keep that because as
I would think that's cool.
Speaker 1: See, you'd want to hang on to some of that stuff. Now, granted,
that's not all they keep.
Speaker 2: In the world of President Biden, I think he kept
all kinds of military information that he shouldn't have and
it would be dangerous if it fell into the wrong hand.
So like, I'm not necessarily excusing the behavior of doing
something illegal. I'm just articulating it the way that a
human being would when you realize how many things Trump
had that they said he shouldn't have had during his
time in office. But the rules disproportionately apply, you know that.
I know that it happens all the time. A one
side is allowed to do whatever they want.
Speaker 1: And actually, you know.
Speaker 2: What's crazy about this, When it was a really big
topic when they were talking a lot about Biden and
then Trump and classified documents and how something done could
be illegal, and then all the other crazy stuff with
Trump and how they wanted to throw them in jail
for like ridiculous, crazy versions of charges that made no sense.
One of the things I talked about a few years
ago when that was a big story was Bill Clinton
and how he was easily caught having done something incredibly illegal,
lying under oath, and at the end of all of it,
special investigators and everything, they essentially said, that's fine, it's
okay that he did that, he's not gonna do it again.
Speaker 1: Let's let him go.
Speaker 2: And that's insane to me that you can weaponize the
government sometimes and not all the time, and we see
it on display just constantly.
Speaker 1: But it's not shocking.
Speaker 2: I should say it's insane because it makes me angry,
but it's not something that I don't expect. At this point,
we've seen this movie far too many times. I want
to play some other audio. The doctor Anthony Fauci story
is picking up some amount of additional space, at least
in conservative media. President Trump said that had he known
all of this about Fauci, he would have fired him,
which I think would have been great at the time.
It probably would have caused a whole loss, less less
damage to our country, although who knows who would have
taken his spot, and how much of a crazy liar
they would have been.
Speaker 1: Fauci lied lied a lot. His diary shows.
Speaker 2: That he knew all kinds of stuff that he claimed
the exact opposite on, like the Wuhan lab for one,
A lot of the social distancing and mask wearing and
other stuff he didn't seem to actually think was going
to be effective or care all that much about. He
cared a lot more about himself and being treated like
a celebrity and a hero. So here's a little bit
of what Trump said about had he known this, he
would have been fired, you know, personally.
Speaker 10: As a person. But I didn't agree with what he
was saying, but what he was doing.
Speaker 11: And when Biden came in, he inherited him, and he
gave him a tremendously high position, and then he gave.
Speaker 10: Him a pardon.
Speaker 12: He did, he did, indeed, And you know, I think
we all thought there was a lot of science behind
what he was saying. And maybe not so much, but
mister President, if.
Speaker 2: You wouldn't I kind of love them, Maybe not so much,
because I'd go a little bit further than that doocy.
I would go deeper into the definitely not one.
Speaker 1: And what you know, now, would you have fired him?
Speaker 10: Well, I would have fired him.
Speaker 11: But again I didn't listen to him. So when he
was with Biden, he was like to God. When he
was with me, he wasn't even close.
Speaker 10: And I wasn't very I dealt with him very little.
Speaker 11: I didn't agree with many of the things he said. No,
he wanted to close up everything. Look at all the states.
Speaker 10: That remained open.
Speaker 11: Those states remained open. He wanted everything closed, and it
just turned out that closing wasn't so good. Because you know,
it's very interesting some of the states that fared the
worst in terms of the spread were actually closed.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they were.
Speaker 2: You know what's really interesting about this too. If you
recall these press conferences, President Trump didn't interrupt Fauci. He
let Fauci say whatever he wanted. But then Trump said
totally different stuff. And I enjoyed the hell out of it.
A bunch of people hated it, and a bunch of
people thought that Fauci was some white knight fighting for
them and you know, trying to defeat the evil, terrible
person that was President Trump. But if you listen to
his recollection of how that went it actually does seem
aligned with how Trump carried himself. Now, granted, I do
think a lot of people thought that President Trump allowed
him the space to say stuff that immediately contradicted himself.
That essentially Fauci was being given that opportunity and Trump
didn't stop it. But part of me continues to better understand,
at least I think I do who President Trump is
after all this time that he's been in office and
been in the public space as a politician or whatever
you want to call him, and I think he is
completely willing to let the audience, the people, the United
States of American citizens, like evaluate it for themselves. He
let Fauci say whatever Fauci said. He said whatever he wanted,
and he walked away from the press conference. He's like,
all right, we said different stuff. I don't think he
was unaware of what was going on and unaware of
how it was being shaped, and he didn't do the
thing that media would accuse him of doing, which was
silencing Fauci. Because if you also remember anytime Fauci wasn't
at the press conference during COVID, people went crazy on
social media on the left, thinking it was somehow silencing him.
Speaker 1: And then he was there the next day.
Speaker 2: But that's how little Trump seemed to actually care about
the positions and the differences they had on stuff.
Speaker 1: Now, Tom Elliot Agrabian, who.
Speaker 2: Tweeted about me the other day, I was very happy
about that he tweeted that I was covering for Dana
and talked about him. So we're doing it again. But
also because he put together something that's incredible. It is
a supercut of media just fawning over the liar that
is doctor Anthony Fauci and the crazy stuff that happened
during COVID and this. You know what's really interesting about
this when I hit play on this. Part of what's
driving this amount of praise for Fauci wasn't just that
they thought that he was the guy saying the thing
in the room that was true and Trump was saying
the thing that was false. It's when you hate someone
so much you prop up these other people around them
that you think are fighting your fight for you. You
think that they're trying to defeat the enemy that you
see day in and day out that haunts you in
your dreams. A bunch of these Trump derangement syndrome people,
I think are haunted by anything and everything that is
President Trump. And because of that, as much as how
much they might have liked Fauci, they praised the absolute,
ever loving crap out of him, and man, oh man,
did he love it, but also not deserve it because
he was lying every day to the American people.
Speaker 13: The single most respected voice on the pandemic.
Speaker 1: It's doctor Anthony Fauci.
Speaker 14: The man who's become known as America's docta, Pation's top
infectious disease expert. Anthony Fauci, you are.
Speaker 4: A saint too many as a superhero.
Speaker 5: Doctor Anthony Fauci, American hero and New York Yankee fan.
Speaker 15: You've done so.
Speaker 1: Much in this country in terms of this crisis.
Speaker 7: So I really appreciate your insight.
Speaker 5: Who better to give us answers that we can trust
than doctor Anthony Fauci.
Speaker 16: Perfect Christen to answer our questions today joining us now,
doctor Anthony Fauci.
Speaker 1: Doctor Anthony Fauci, appreciate your candor, Doctor Fauci, appreciate the candor.
Speaker 15: We appreciate your service to this country. We appreciate your service.
Thank you for your service, oh my service.
Speaker 5: Greatly appreciate your service to America.
Speaker 14: Thank you for your suchy seven years of service I
believe to seven presidents, and thank you for your welcome.
Speaker 2: I gotta stop it. We're forty seven seconds in. I
am going to play more of it. But what's crazy
listening to this and then knowing what's in the diaries
is how much Fauci loved this part, Like how many
interviews he did, how much he was agreeing to because
he absolutely wanted to be the person that they're describing
him as.
Speaker 1: He didn't live up to it.
Speaker 2: He absolutely failed behind the scenes to tell us the truth,
to do the things that they all seem to think
he was doing. But that's not as important as the
fact that this fed his massive ego and he was
talking all the time about prizes and awards and being.
Speaker 1: Called a hero.
Speaker 2: Like his diary is full of the stuff that maybe
a sixteen year old girl who dreams of one day
being an influencer would have full in her diary too.
It's a crazy amount of me, me, me, me, me, pasty.
The great news is you're sticking around in the Biden administration.
Speaker 1: We are so grateful to you, doctor Fauci for everything
you do.
Speaker 15: Thank you so much for everything you do.
Speaker 9: Thank you very much for everything that you do.
Speaker 10: Thanks so much for the work that you do.
Speaker 3: Thank you very much for the reassurance, and as always
for all of your public service.
Speaker 15: Thank you, doctor Fauci.
Speaker 12: Thank you for all your guidance this past year, and
it's greatly.
Speaker 2: Appreciated that this is a whole another minute. Check out
Tom Elliott's social media pages if you want to see
the entire supercut.
Speaker 1: It is just ridiculous.
Speaker 2: Thank you, doctor Anthony Fauci for lying to us constantly
for an amount of time that you were getting paid
attention to and absolutely obsessed with getting the spotlight as
much as you could. Thank you for that, sir, quick
break a lot more. Craig Collins filling in on the
Data Show.
Speaker 17: Have you ever noticed that most laundry detergents smells like
something you'd use to scrub a toilet? I mean, no, thanks,
nobody wants that. This is why I love and personally
use laundry sauce because it doesn't just get your clothes clean,
it makes them smell absolutely incredible four days, Like I'm
smelling myself right now.
Speaker 15: It's so good.
Speaker 17: I want the smell of summer. You want the smell
of summer. So you have to try their new limited
edition Brazilian vanilla to think of whipped vanilla and caramel
and coconut and just enough warm woods to make it
feel like summer in a bottle. So if you want
something a little richer, million sandalwood, it's warm and earthy
and it's just one of those sents that lasts. And
if you have sensitive skin, they have Himalayan cashmere. It's hypoallergenic,
it's soft, it's clean, it's seriously comforting. It's not just
about fragrance either. Laundry Sauce uses powerful bio enzymes to
go after stains from barbecues, mud, coffee, anything, all the
stuff that happens when you're living life. And they even
have scent boosters, fabric conditioner, dryer sheets, fabric freshener, everything
to take your laundry up a notch. So for a
limited time, you can get twenty percent off of your
entire order when you use promo Codana at laundrysauce dot com.
That's laundrysauce dot com promo Codana for twenty percent off.
Speaker 2: This is the Dana Show. My name is Craig Collins.
Filling in, thrilled to be with you. A bunch of
stuff out there to talk about. Vice President Jade Vance
spoke at Lindsey Graham's memorial service, pointing out that Brett
Kavanaugh probably wouldn't be a Supreme Court justice if not
for the way that Lindsey Graham handled the ridiculous things
that were happening during that hearing.
Speaker 1: But let's first play this. This is JD.
Speaker 2: Van saying that you know he misses Lindsey Graham, and
that he's known him for a very long or knew
him for a very long time.
Speaker 8: So many of you argued with Lindsey, laughed with Lindsay,
relied on Lindsey. And I also, of course want to
give condolences to a group of people you sometimes don't hear,
as often mentioned in the same breath. But I know
who loved him, which is his staff. I know all
of you worked for him for a long time. Many
of you worked for him for longer than you know.
I've been in public service, certainly longer some of you
even then. I've been graduated from high school age any
of you. But what a testament to a man that
he has so much loyal and devoted staff.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that the staff really cared about him and liked him.
That there's no you know, rumor that he was a
jerk to people and they all hated him and he
yelled them all the time. What you hear from a
lot of people constantly hear is Vance talking about the
Brett Kavanaugh hearing and the confirmation of him as a
Supreme Court Jez and I probably will play the Lindsey
Graham audio that went very viral after his sudden passing,
because it was excellent.
Speaker 1: But here's what the Vice President said before I knew Lindsay.
Speaker 8: One of the most enduring parts of his legacy is,
I do believe that Justice Kavanaugh would not be on
the Supreme Court were it not for his fierce advocacy
during a critical moment. Remember that Senate confirmation hearing where
Lindsay and by the way, he got criticism from the
Republican side.
Speaker 1: Of the aisle for this.
Speaker 8: He would always vote for qualified Democrat judicial nominations. He
came to the judicial nomination process in a spirit of bipartisanship. Again,
he was criticized sometimes from our side of the aisle
for that, but what he saw happening to Kavanaugh was
not a policy disagreement. It was character assassination. And Lindsay
got as fiery and as passionate as I have ever
seen a human being get during a judicial confirmation, and
I believe that he saved the nomination.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I agree with you. I agree with you, mister
Vice President.
Speaker 2: So let's play a little bit of Lindsay Graham just
to remember him again as the Vice president does being
incredible at the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation.
Speaker 7: Here, if you wanted an FBI investigation, you could have
come to us. What you want to do is destroy
this guy's life. Hold this seat open, and hope you
went in twenty twenty. You've said that, not me. You've
got nothing to apologize for. When you see Soda Maron Kagan,
tell him that Lindsay said, Oh, because I voted for them,
I would never do to them what you've done to
this guy. This is the most unethical sham go Lindsey
since I've been in politics. And if you really wanted
to know the truth, you sure as hell wouldn't have
done what you've done to this guy.
Speaker 2: Absolutely, he went on for almost three more minutes, complaining
about and absolutely rightfully holding the left account for the
crazy way in which they were treating him, his high
school yearbook being brought out and somehow being used as
some sort of proof that Brett Kavanaugh was a terrible person.
Lindsey Graham even read from a myriad of different sources,
some of them very very high profile, saying how respected
of a person Brett Kavanaugh was, which I think was
important to that hearing. But the best part is right
there at the beginning, not only as he points out,
as Jade Vance said, he did that he voted for
people that maybe you and I might not have voted
for to be Supreme Court justices, but that if they
actually wanted to investigate the thing they were accusing Kavanov doing,
there was a much better way to do it than
to try to ask him questions at that moment in
that hearing. If they really thought that he was guilty
of any of these crimes, they go to the FBI,
or they go to certain committees and ask for investigations
that happened long before this moment. This was political theater,
and this was calling out political theater at its absolute best.
But the Vice President talking about Lindsay Graham today, many
many others talking about Lindsay Graham today. It's certainly important
moment to once again remember the life of someone who
served this country as long as he did. But they're
celebrating him a memorial in the Capitol Rotunda that I
think I'll probably play some of that audio again a
little later on in the show.
Speaker 1: All right, let's move on to this.
Speaker 2: Caitlyn Collins went on The Daily Show and talked about
the fact that she was made fun of at the
White House Correspondence dinner. My favorite part of the joke
that President Trump told her the myriad of jokes he told,
but the ones about Colin specifically, is when he compared
her to Dylan mulvaney. Because it put a lot of
Democrats in an awkward situation. They either have to say
that Dylan Mulvaney is not a beautiful woman because he's
a dude, or they have to say that it's somehow,
you know, kind to compare the two, that Caitlyn Collins
looks like a transgender female.
Speaker 1: It's either or you got to pick one of the roads.
Speaker 2: That because people were praising how attractive Dylan Mulvaney was
on the left, and then when Trump made the comparison
and called Caitlin a young and attractive woman.
Speaker 1: It became confusing for them, but the insults.
Speaker 2: That Caitlyn actually did call them apparently didn't impact her
the way that they were supposed to. I don't think
they were supposed to impact her at all. She's crying
a victim while pretending that she's above it, which is
odd because I think you either have to just be
above it or complain about it. You're choosing a little
bit of both roads here.
Speaker 4: You know, I've covered Trump for ten years, and so
I've listened to pretty much all of his speeches for
ten years with very little exception, and so I actually
think it's helpful for other people to able to listen
to them in their entirety, which people really don't that
much these days. In the room, I think I was
not surprised when he insulted me. That happens pretty regularly
inside the Oval office. This is just a bigger venue
where it was happening. What was most surprising to me
was the room was filled with a lot of his
his staffers, his cabinet, his allies, Republicans in Congress. It
was so quiet in the room during the President's.
Speaker 15: Remarks because of how much they respect.
Speaker 1: Him, whatever, whatever.
Speaker 2: Jon Stewart, I do think it's funny. I think some
people like when you hear a joke that's as aggressive
as some of those jokes are, you find it funny,
but you don't immediately burst out laughing. You're almost like, whoa,
he did that, And then you look over to Caitlin
to see what her face is doing, and then you
look back at President Trump. You're almost it's like when
you see a car crash. But version of it that
I think is quite different in the fact that you're
not really making noises, but you're captively paying attention.
Speaker 1: That doesn't mean that you hate the jokes.
Speaker 2: It just means that you're surprised they're happening, which at
this point I don't know that a lot of people
should be surprised. I was laughing when I heard it.
I actually thought it was funny, and had I been
in the room, I think I would have thought it
was pretty funny the entire time. But all right, let's
move on some other things out there that I saw.
This is interesting. The DSA is actually significantly more unpopular
than the Tea Party was in twenty ten, which is
and isn't important. It's important to us the side that
would love to see Democrats lose because I think that
the DSA is their ticket to failing at a whole
bunch of elections. So I'd rather see it continue to
be prominent up until the midterms. But I'm a little
bit afraid it's like playing with fire. I'm a little
bit afraid that if it actually took hold, then people
actually got in a position to power who believe the
insane things that the Democratic Socialists of America believe. That
it could do a lot of harm to our country.
So I definitely want them to lose, and I would
love to see again the Democratic Party taken over by
this level of insanity.
Speaker 1: But I just thought it was interesting.
Speaker 2: CNN points out how deeply disliked the DSA seems to
be by the everyday average American, which is exactly what
you should expect if someone is, you know, talking about
and highlighting and celebrating what is essentially communism.
Speaker 18: A new Tea Party. Net favorable opinion of the Tea
Party back in June of twenty ten versus the Democratic
Socialist of America the DSA. Right Now, remember the Tea
Party helped keep Democrats control of the United States Senate
back in twenty ten, because Republicans ran all these candidates
that were just seen out of the mainstream, right Christin
O'Donnell and Delaware, how about ken Buck and Colorado? How
about Sharon Angele who did the impossible Nevada and helped
get Harry Read another term in the United States Senate. Well,
their net favoral rating back in June of twenty ten
thirteen points underwork, not too hot to truent, not too
hot to Trump.
Speaker 1: Okay, what not?
Speaker 18: Absolutely terrible compared to the DSA now twenty five points underwear,
twice as unpopular as the Tea Party was back in
June of twenty ten.
Speaker 2: Because the Tea Party was a little crazy and some
of the things they said, at least you could kind
of understand. The Democratic Socialists of America are absolutely insane.
They're insane in a way that everything they say you
look at it like really especially even my favorite part
from the audio, the one viral yesterday where one of
their co chairs is saying they want to upend the
Senate entirely because anybody in the Senate would probably not
like that. That they're fired and their jobs are over,
and the Senate just closes down completely. But that's because
it's a I think version of the patriarchy or somehow
tied to, you know, the United Kingdom and kings.
Speaker 1: I forget all the stuff she said.
Speaker 2: That was so crazy to listen to her here, But
it's definitely the kind of thing that you want it
to crash and burn. But you're a little afraid that
someone somewhere might actually benefit from the insanity and then
do more harm if they actually got into a position
like Mamdami to do things with said power. By the way,
the mayor in New York, the og in the world
of democratic socialist communist Mark was celebrating his grocery store
and how it's going to be thirty percent below retail prices,
the government owned store selling food as he starts to
try to take over different businesses and organizations and the
means of production, all of the things that make communism
what it is and all this stuff that's bad.
Speaker 1: He was bragging about it yesterday.
Speaker 14: Here's how it will work. Once a month, our five
city run grocery stores will set prices for this core
set of goods at thirty percent below typical retail prices,
no exceptions, no gimmicks. The savings will last for the
entire month. That means no weekly fluctuations nor sticker shock
at the checkout line.
Speaker 2: We're going to try to bagrup to all the grocery
stores is essentially what he's saying. We're going to use
government funds to do it, which is horrible. How to
think about how much damage that could do and how
control over your food the government in New York might
inevitably have. He also was asked about people who didn't
want a nine to eleven memorial, So s this was
kind of crazy.
Speaker 16: A number of people who are survivors of nine to
eleven are calling on you not to go to nine
to eleven memorial services. I wonder how you feel about
the fact that they're trying to keep you away.
Speaker 2: I think it makes sense, and I think you should
probably stay away.
Speaker 1: Sara, what are you going to say?
Speaker 9: I will proudly honor the families, the survivors, the first
responders forever impacted by that horrific terror attack by standing
alongside them at this year's nine to eleven commemoration, reaffirming
that we will never forget the solemn day, so they don't.
Speaker 2: Want you there, and your response is, I'm going to
be there anyway. That's how you respect them. You respect
people that think that you've spoken way too many times
in crazy, awful ways that stoke additional hate and all
kinds of things that we don't want to see in
our country or in the biggest city in the United States.
And your response to that is, I'm such an arrogant
piece of wealth, you know what, that I'm going to
stand there anyway. That's surreal to me to hear them
say that. In response to that question, people don't want
you there, what do you think you should do? And
his answer is, do whatever the heck I want. By
the way, have you seen this grocery store. All the
prices are way cheaper. Who knows if the goods, if
the food is any value, has any value, or it's
the cheapest possible stuff they can find. It's crazy to
watch literal communism slowly be taking over New York City.
I'm so so glad I don't live there, all right,
quick break a lot more Craig Collins filling in on
the data show.
Speaker 17: We got a lot more on the way as we
move our partners that bring you the program.
Speaker 15: It is the folks over at Webroot.
Speaker 17: Webroot wants to make sure that you're protected online, because
it doesn't matter if you're streaming, your gaming, your shop,
and you're reading whatever it is you're doing, you probably
don't have an antivirus program and an AI driven threat eras.
You really do need one of those, but the problem
is that most everybody hates them because most of them
are horrible. They're clunky, and it's like they haven't been
updated since the early oughts, which is a real thing.
Speaker 15: Webroot, though, is totally different.
Speaker 17: It's like somebody decided to apply modernization to anti viral
threat detection. Webroot is cloud based, so it's engineered to
stay out of your way. It takes up far less
space than bulky competitors, and it scans significantly faster, so
you get more powerful protection without the lag. And because
the intelligence lives in the cloud, it keeps your device
feeling light, fast, smooth while actively defending against malware, fishing, ransomware,
all other modern threats in real time. So whether you're working,
you're gaming, your browsing, streaming, whatever it is, it's running
quietly in the background, and it's security that works for you,
not against you. So your computer actually feels usable again,
and it's easy to get, it's easy to install, it
uses minimal resources. It's a set and forget type of protection.
So make the switch and modernize right. Feel the difference
of actual, fast, modern antivirus protection. And for a limited
time you can save a whole sixty percent through webroot
dot com slash data promo coddata. That's webroot dot com
slash data sixty person off using promo code Dana.
Speaker 2: This is the Dana Show. My name is Craig Collins,
filling in, thrilled to be with you. A bunch of
stuff out there to talk about. Natalie Winters has released
a bunch of information on social media at Natalie G.
Winters that you should read. She is a White House correspondent,
she's part of the Bandon War Room. She's a co
host on that. But this is really interesting. This is
looking into all the journalists who were flown out to
and might be on the payroll of the communist regime
in China, the communist government Jina that's thrown around all
kinds of cash, all kinds of money because they would
like to get favorable coverage here in the United States.
So the Chinese Communist Party flew out New York Times writers,
several of them, CNN writers, AP, Associated Press writers, a
Vox Media a miss. Now for whatever reason, they're still
calling it that NBC News MSNBC, NPR, Yahoo, Finance calumnists
for some reason, Chicago Tribune writer, which I thought was
interesting too, but a whole bunch of national correspondents for
a lot of the news organizations you already assumed we're
far left are hanging out with the Chinese Communist Party
getting free trips. And I'm not going to name the
individual people because I didn't do the research, but she did.
Speaker 1: You should look it up. You should find it on go.
Speaker 2: There and see these names and these individuals that are
totally fine taking money from China and thrilled to then
cover them, I guess favorably, which is insane to see happen.
In other news, I saw that the President said that
he is hopeful that there is a good chance now
for an Iran deal. He's warned that strikes could easily continue.
I know some of the news out there was that
we're depleting resources. We can rebuild any resources that we're depleting.
We can get that figured out and get that done.
I don't think that is realistically the hold up, long
term hold up for any sort of conflict with us
anywhere in the world. Remember that before, like early on
in this fight, talking about how we're losing a stockpile
of ammunitions over here over there, we're the United States.
I feel like that can't possibly be, Like, I don't
think we'd ever stand down because we don't have the
capability from a ammunition standpoint to do something. We might
stand down for a short amount of time, rebuild a stockpile,
and then go back after whoever we need to go after.
But we're not a third world country in the sense
that we're going to run out of something and are
incapable of putting it back where it was. That just
makes no sense to me as a conversation. Like I'll
say this for anyone that's surprised, I say it that way.
I'm not dismissing the reality that it can be temporarily true,
but for our country, it's not going to be true
long term, regardless of what we're doing. Also, this crazy
video a video put out by Iran showing the disturbing
assassination of President Trump, Baron Trump, and Malania Trump, all
of them potentially targets of Iran. Horrible stuff, even graphics
that say like where to kill Milania. This is what
they've resorted to the Iranian government because I think we
are easily winning this fight that they want to threaten
the president and his family, and I think nothing could
make it more likely that we returned to fighting them
than saying that the first lady is a target and
they want to killer.
Speaker 1: Because me, as a.
Speaker 2: Husband, I would go right back to bombing them immediately,
and like I'd be accused of being a terrible leader
for doing that. Although remember when Joe Biden, when President
Biden was defending his son, everybody said he was a
great father, Like ah, this, he's just a great dad.
He's just an emotional person who thinks that Hunter's great
even though he's obviously terrible. So they praised him. They'd
attack Trump if he did this, but I'd do it.
You threaten my wife, please, This is ridiculous. It actually
reminds me of a story that people tell about President Trump,
some military people where he was negotiating. I think this
was in Afghanistan during the early stages of trying to
plan an exit that eventually Biden absolutely did horribly. But
during some of those negotiations, Trump would sit down with
people and they'd try to be tough, and he'd show
them a photo of their house and be like, just
so you know, we know where this is, and we
would blow it up if you keep being difficult with us.
He is a tough person in those rooms, to say
the very least, and usually people relent and back down.
It would be incredibly dumb for Ron to actually attempt
to take the life of his wife or say like,
it's incredible to even say it out loud. But that's
a real thing that's going on and out there. Also
a quick update and another thing in the news. Apparently
reports are coming in that say that President Trump was
not willing to meet with Benjamin Net Yahoo unless there
was some sort of accomplishment from a diplomatic standpoint, from
a humanitarian standpoint, some version of a win politically for
Net and Yahoo before President Trump or to sit down
with him. So this is a version of we support you,
where allies with you. We want to see something from
you in order to sit down and have a discussion,
and the Israeli government deployed the International Stabilization Force into
Gaza for humanitarian purposes. So there was a demonstration of
a diplomatic win that then allowed Benjamin Etyaho to make
the appointment to go ahead and have a meeting with
President Trump. I thought that was really really interesting, And
the reason I want to talk about it is because
of that narrative that people claim anybody, or specifically in
this case, Israel, has some sort of control over Trump,
the president, and the person that you've seen you in
that job and then not in that job for the
last twelve years or ten years at least, Like that
individual is not controlled by anybody, and it's crazy to
say that he is. And this story, which will be
ignored by a vast majority of media today, is an
absolute demonstration that he's not controlled by anybody.
Speaker 1: And he wanted to win. He wanted to win.
Speaker 2: That would actually make Democrats and a lot of the
crazy people out there, he'd placate them. They'd be happy
that he pushed for something and that it was Gaza
where net Yahu thought he could maybe do something to
have the type of move that the President expected. So
it's fascinating to again think about that that this happens
behind closed doors and behind the scenes. It gets reported
on by at least a couple places. I talk about
it here on this fancy national show filling in for
Dana Lash, and most media just pretends it doesn't happen,
so that a lot of dumb people out there can
continue to be brainwashed and think that Trump does whatever
he's told to do by Israel, because that's the narrative
that's out there, and it's obviously a narrative that touches
on a lot of other things. But it's just kind
of crazy to think about the way that people purposefully
ignore certain data, certain stories, certain information to keep the
people that are passionately on their side in the dark.
So you continue to be a useful idiot. All right,
let's play this. This is Sean Hannity. He was talking
to Rhino and Senate Majority Leader John Foon about the
filibuster about how they're not going to try to get
rid of it because they don't have the votes for it,
and Thune says, you know, President Trump would have to
talk to all the Republican senators who are against this.
It's convenient to say that and not actually show us
that it's true, like attempt to get rid of it
and then see who says no to it. That's a
very different version than I'm not even going to try,
because I promise we don't have the votes.
Speaker 1: I want to know, and Thune doesn't.
Speaker 2: Want this on the record for reasons that I think
you and I obviously can guess.
Speaker 13: Here we go get there, getting rid of the philibuster
non starter?
Speaker 10: You don't have the votes, Well, we don't.
Speaker 13: And I've actually told I've had this conversation with the
President many times, I think as you know. And I
actually suggested at one point that they his team come
up and sit down and visit with some of my colleagues.
So they came up, met with about twenty Republican senators
and fifteen or no on and getting rid of the filibuster.
The votes aren't there to do it. I know he
thinks he can persuade people, but there are a lot
of folks who are very This is a hard position
for a lot of Senate Republicans.
Speaker 2: All right, So here's the thing, And I'm going to
pretend that the entire story that Thune just told is
in fact true. So he's insinuating that President Trump is
deeply aware that there are Republican votes who would vote
no if they tried to remove the filibuster. If the
President is still calling for this to be attempted, if
he's still pushing Thun to try it, then he wants
the thing that I want.
Speaker 1: Then he wants the thing that I think a lot
of other people want. We want to know who's who.
Speaker 2: We want to know who says no, we want to
know why they say no, and we want that to
potentially impact anyone running for reelection in midterm elections are
in you know, elections in a couple of years. We
want people to be removed who aren't doing this for
the right reasons. Now, granted, there's I think a concern
that if you lost control of the entirety of the government,
if you lost the House, the Senate, and then you
lost the presidency to Democrats, that they're just going to
do it anyway, and we don't want to make it
easier for them. I'd say, to control something that we
should control first.
Speaker 1: But I do think it's true.
Speaker 2: I think it is going to happen, and so I
think the Republican should absolutely before it, and they don't
want to go on the record because they would become
pretty important people to a whole lot of Republican voters
and the President who would no longer be happy with them.
Speaker 1: And we can guess who some of these are.
Speaker 2: When you say fifteen to twenty, you definitely want even
more information there.
Speaker 1: So I've never liked the idea that you.
Speaker 2: Don't attempt something because you claim to me or to
anyone else that you don't have a support to do it.
Speaker 1: You should at least try so that we have it
on record.
Speaker 2: That's the part that always becomes to me more important.
I hate performative politics, I really do, and I hate
when both sides do this to the other side, to
show the American people that barely pay attention to these
kind of votes what people think. But I think from
a political strategy standpoint, so not necessarily for you and I,
because a lot of people probably won't pay attention, but
from a political strategy standpoint, you identify people better who
might be hiding in the wing somewhere, who might be
claiming that they're not people that are against this when
they truly are. I like that piece to be exposed
for whatever value.
Speaker 1: It winds up having. All Right, one last thing I
want to play.
Speaker 2: This is John Fetterman, Senator Fetterman talking about Democratic Socialists
and now it's saying they are. He's one of the
reasonable people in the room now and has been for
a little while. It is crazy to think the political
career of Fetterman, when he struggles with health issues, seems
like someone that probably shouldn't be in a political office
at all, that he wasn't going to be mentally or
physically capable of it.
Speaker 1: To who he is now.
Speaker 2: There's a lot of Republicans who would rather have a
Republican in this seat and not a Democrat, but are
pretty grateful that it's him and not someone crazier when
they hear them speak about a vast majority of these issues.
A case in point is his conversation about the Democratic
Socialists of America.
Speaker 3: Senator you need a Senate to have a Senate filibuster.
And there's some of the people and in the party
at this point, and especially on the DSA side of thing,
they want to eliminate the Senate. They want to eliminate
the Senate, they want to defund ice they want to
they want to close down prisons. When you see all
this happening, do you think that this is it here?
Speaker 10: It's a big tent.
Speaker 3: When we have mainstream of Democrats all they don't really
say that, they don't reject a lot of these things.
They just kind of say, oh, you know, the d
s A will be the DSA. We don't, you know,
it's a big ten.
Speaker 1: We like a lot of ideas.
Speaker 3: They don't reject some of the most insane ideas. And
I'm sure that that's what you're you're getting at here.
Speaker 15: It's insanity.
Speaker 6: I agree, that's my point. It's like I said that
on my own socials, I'm like, this is not a
big ten kind of like, well, you know, like you
know what I mean, Abolish prisons, abolish the border, abolish
the presidency, abolish the Pentagon. I mean, these are crazy people,
and now they are electing people across our country, you know, Colorado,
even in my own state, definitely in New York City
right now, and some of those people like Mondani are
doing dangerous thing. Could you imagine if I just announced
that that, you know, I'm going to arrest so so
and so in Pennsylvania or you're not welcome here in
my state.
Speaker 1: It's crazy talking about Benjamin Yiahuo too.
Speaker 2: They're insane people and they want power to do insane
things with it, and so that's the rub of this
whole thing. You want to see them succeed in convincing
Democrats to put them into positions to run for, you know,
any sort of political job, but you want to see
them fail to win those jobs, because if these people
get into a position of actual power, horrible things seem
like they're in all of our futures, very very horrible things.
A communist, you know, Marxist things. I quick break a
lot more. Creig Collins filling in on the Dana Show.
Speaker 17: Super Beats. They have a new watermelon flavor. You guys
are familiar with. The chews right the heart choose blah
blah blah, science and all this other stuff. I don't
care about that. It doesn't taste horrible. It's not a
giant horse pill to choose, is all it takes. This
is something I can take, actually super easily, because I
just the giant horse pills of all of these other
things that promised to do with super Beats does way better,
just doesn't cut it. And now guys, they have a
watermelon flavor, and if I don't get a box of them,
I'm going to riot. So the watermelon flavor, everything that
they do, you know, they don't use artificial sugar, They
don't use any of this artificial anything. This literally was
developed out of ut University of Texas Health Science Center, right,
and it was about studies on blood flow and nitric oxide.
And this is why Superbats is America's number one bet
bran for ten straight years. It was created to solve
an issue and look at the benefits that are being
raped by so many people. Healthy blood flow supports everything
from heart health, healthy blood pressure, circulation, daily energy to
choose is all. It takes, clinically studied ingredients that are
shown to deliver nearly two times more effective blood pressure
support than diet and exercise alone. And limited edition watermelon flavor.
So y'all better get it because when it's gone, it's gone.
Visit Human. It's h U M A N N I
just you know, we can't say human, but it's human
dot com slash Dana, you get your free thirty day supply.
Speaker 15: Get it before they sell out, because.
Speaker 17: The watermelon will not last long, and I don't know
how if I can beg them to make them come
out with them again.
Speaker 15: Human dot Com slash Dana.
Speaker 1: This is the Dana Show.
Speaker 2: My name is Craig Collins, filling in, thrilled to be
with you. A bunch of stuff out there to cover
Lindsey Graham. His memorial is happening in the Capitol Rotunda
building today in the Capital Rotunda, I think is the
way you're actually supposed to say that the vice president
the president. Many people are eulogizing the late senator. President
Trump just a short bit ago said that nothing of
consequence happened without Lindsay.
Speaker 19: For more than thirty years, Nothing of consequence happened in
his capital, without Lindsay Graham knowing about it. Nothing of
significance happened anywhere in the world without Lindsay Graham having
a view on it. And no bill became law in
the most exceptional republican human history without Lindsay Graham having
a say in it. He was a man who gave
America the full measure of his good and mighty heart
until that heart itself just gave out. But even though
Lindsay's life was cut short, well, he was still so
full of vim and vigor. There can be no doubt
that he lived absolutely to the fullest. He died doing
the work he was born to do. He was truly
a great politician serving the country. He loved to serve
so deeply. He went out of the peak of his
career and the top of his game as a legend
that everyone of us, many of us here today blessed
to know him, and a friend that none of us
will ever forget. There was truly nobody like Lindsey Graham.
Speaker 2: That is the President talking about the late senator, also
the Vice President saying that what he was most moved
by was how much Lindsay's staff that all worked with
him for a long time.
Speaker 1: Some had worked with him since before.
Speaker 10: JD.
Speaker 2: Vance had graduated high school. They'd been with him so long.
But how much is staff all really liked and missed him?
Speaker 8: So many of you argued with Lindsay, laughed with Lindsay,
relied on Lindsey. And I also, of course want to
give condolences to a group of people you sometimes don't
hear as often mentioned in the same breath. But I
know who loved him, which is his staff. I know
all of you worked for him for a long time.
Many of you worked for him for longer than you know.
I've been in public so certainly longer. Some of you
even then I've been graduated from high school. I mean
agenty of you. But a lot of testament to a
man that he has so much loyal and devoted staff.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that is true, by the way, especially in the
world of politics, when you see so many people talking
about all the horrible things that happened behind closed doors,
people having like phones and stuff thrown at them, like
there's so many versions of this person treats their staff
like crap. Us to saying this about Lindsay is valuable.
There was a moment where the President of the United
States made a joke about how in his script it
said everyone liked Lindsay Graham, and he stops himself and says, well,
that's not totally true. There were people that didn't like him,
but that's not really the focus of today. I thought
that was a sort of interesting I'm not actually going
to play it, but an interesting human moment because it
leads me to something else.
Speaker 1: And I've said this before and I'll say it again.
Speaker 2: When an individual passes away part of what I no
longer want to do is argue the political disagreements with
a person who can no longer argue back. It doesn't
mean I suddenly agree with everything that they said that
I disagreed with when they were alive. It just means
it's no longer a fair fight. It's no longer something
where they get to react to the things that I'm saying.
So part of me well thinking it's valuable to talk
about the human aspect of someone being lost and the
value that they added to people's lives that knew them,
like all the things that make any sort of moment
like this important to be discussed. Part of me also
thinks that we should, if we don't mean it, shy
away from those moments of I agreed with him all
the time, everything he said. There's no need to celebrate
the passing of people, and it's horrible how many of
us seem to be doing that now in the world
of social media, like cheering for our political disagreements to
result in someone being either killed or die. It's just
disgusting to see that level of humanity stripped away from people,
at least online. I don't know, maybe hopefully there's a
version of a real life person that you'd talk to
that wouldn't say the same version of a thing that
you here said. But in these moments, what's really important,
I think is just is just remembering that we're all human,
we all won't be here forever, and you know, that's
one thing that does in fact unite us. And I
think that's all you have to do. And then you
move on and talk about whatever is in the news
with people who are alive and here to defend themselves.
You don't attack the people who can no longer, you know,
defend themselves essentially, at least in the day to day discussion.
Of course, we can retroactively look at the historical significance
of the bad decisions that people make who are long
since passed away. I'm not trying to pretend that we
can't talk about any of that stuff. I just think
that in the immediate aftermath of someone passing, it's just
not beneficial to do it. Moving on, another thing that
I saw out there that I thought was really interesting.
Abby Phillips seemed to be desperate it to shut down
an argument that happened on her TV show when some
people were saying out loud that the Fauci diaries looked bad,
that you know, the Democratic Socialist of America semen sane.
There were several moments where Abby Phillip is like, stop
stop talking. We got to move on from this topic
because I don't like the people are learning this that
are watching CNN for news, which terrifies me that anybody
does that and not for entertainment, which is really all
CNN is.
Speaker 20: I think we need to have transparency around what's going on.
I think one situation that frankly where we saw the
government was certainly off the skating didn't have any transparency
was Anthony Fauci, who were getting.
Speaker 1: That's actually that's actually something.
Speaker 21: We're sitting here talking about Americans who were killed in
theater as a result of a war. We are not
going to pivot to Anthony Fauci's.
Speaker 1: Yeah, But also, Abby, you never talked about it.
Speaker 2: The thing is, we're not going to pivot right now
or later when we ask everybody what your favorite ice
cream is, We're definitely not going to pivot to doctor
Fauci at that point because.
Speaker 1: We can't talk about it.
Speaker 2: There are some that are at least admitting that the
diaries themselves look bad. Fauci's obsession with his own fame,
his joy that he was getting out of the way
he was being treated, and the stuff he was lying about,
specifically the lab leak theory, and how quickly he knew
that that was absolutely how COVID happened, and that the
wet markets only enhanced the spread of it and not
actually created it, and how much he denied it because
it looked bad. Because we were funding the research into
the Wuhan coronavirus lab. Even John Stewart eventually came to
understand this much better than Fauci wanted us to understand it.
There were there's so many moments of failure and other importantly,
you know, devastating things that Fauci was seemingly influential in
deciding to do for the United States during the years
of COVID, so much so that I loved what President
Trump said when asked about it. Would you have fired
him if all this had come out sooner and wasn't
being hidden from you?
Speaker 1: And the answer is hell, yeah, I.
Speaker 10: Would have, you know, personally as a person.
Speaker 11: But I didn't agree with what he was saying, but
what he was doing and when Biden came in, he
inherited him, and he gave him a tremendously high position,
and then he gave him a pardon.
Speaker 12: He did, indeed, and you know, I think we all
thought there was a lot of science behind what he
was saying, and maybe not so much.
Speaker 1: But mister President, we didn't all know then what you
know now.
Speaker 11: Would you have.
Speaker 10: Fired him, well, I would have fired him.
Speaker 11: But again I didn't listen to him. So when he
was with Biden, he was like to God. When he
was with me, he wasn't even close.
Speaker 10: And I wasn't very close to him. I dealt with
him very little.
Speaker 11: I didn't agree with many of the things he said. No,
he wanted to close up everything. Look at all the states.
Speaker 10: That remained open.
Speaker 11: Those states remained open.
Speaker 10: He wanted everything closed.
Speaker 11: And it just turned out that closing wasn't so good
because you know, it's very interesting some of the states
that fared the worst in terms of the spread were
actually closed.
Speaker 2: Okay, yeah, we can explain it. It was a terrible decision,
by and large, awful, horrible decisions were constantly being made
by that administration for all kinds of terrible, awful reasons.
A lot of doctor Anthony Fauci I think will be
in the news over the next few days. If you're
listening to the right news. If there's a lot of
news like Abby Phillip that is actively suppressing and ignoring this,
then the thing that you should learn is you're not
listening to the right news because the diaries are incredibly damaging,
all right. Caitlyn Collins responded to a joke told at
her expense by the President at the White House Correspondence Dinner,
an event that we held even after someone tried to
kill Trump and anybody in the room a short time
time ago, the first attempt at the White House Correspondence Center.
So this is to be celebrated in and of itself
as the United States being the United States and refusing
to be intimidated by people who want to do bad
things in our country. And during it, Trump said a
lot of very nice things about the press, even though
he definitely doesn't agree with them or the way that
they treat him.
Speaker 1: But he did say some nice things to them.
Speaker 2: He then made fun of Caitlyn Collins for not smiling,
even though he called her an attractive woman, I think
young woman, and then he compared her to Dylan mulvaney,
which to me was the funniest part of the whole thing,
because it's such a genius trap. If you remember Dylan mulvaney,
the transgender woman who's a dude, who had a bud
like campaign of some kind. When he was doing that,
everybody on the left was saying how beautiful the guy was,
and it was a little confusing to a lot of people,
being like, really, and so now they're kind of trapped.
They can't admit that Dylan mulvaney doesn't look as good
as they claimed Dylan Mulvaney looked a little while ago.
Because it offended Caitlyn Collins, that's not okay, but it
is hilarious.
Speaker 1: Here we go.
Speaker 4: You know, I've covered Trump for ten years, and so
I've listened to pretty much all of his speeches for
ten years with very little exception, and so I actually
think it's helpful for other people to be able to
listen to them in their entirety, which people really don't
that much these days. In the room, I think I
was not surprised when he insulted me. That happens pretty
regularly inside the Oval office. This is just a bigger
venue where it was happening. What was most surprising to
me was the room was filled with a lot of
his staffers, his cabinet, his allies, Republicans in Congress. It
was so quiet in the room during the president.
Speaker 2: So a couple things in response to this. The first one,
and I've said it before, I'll say it again. Sometimes
when you hear a joke that you think is really good,
but also very much on the line of what and
not even that, you think it's inappropriate. Just like, man,
I wouldn't make that joke, I don't have the courage
to make it. A lot of people don't burst into laughter.
A lot of people do more of like the shocked
reaction and then laugh internally more so than externally. So
part of me thinks that potentially some people who were
entertained by the comments that Trump was making in the
room weren't laughing every single second of it because they
were bold jokes.
Speaker 1: To be made.
Speaker 2: The second thing, though, is I bet you a lot
of the staff already read this speech, because this part
of the speech he was reading, and so I bet
you a bunch of people had seen it, knew it
was coming, and had laughed about it already and we're
just waiting to see how Caitlin Collins would react when
the shot is fired. So I bet you a lot
of people had seen the show before. Essentially is the
way to see it in the world of comedy, and
you don't usually laugh hard the fifth or sixth time
you hear a joke compared to potentially the first time.
Speaker 1: But it's in either or to me.
Speaker 2: There might have been people entertained who didn't, you know,
burst into loud laughter, and there might have been people
who knew this was coming. One final thing before we
take a break that I think is interesting. CNN gave
some pulling data as far as how unfavorable the DSA
is the Democratic Socialists of America, and they even compared
it to the Tea Party back in twenty ten, and
now the Tea Party was more liked by people.
Speaker 1: In general than the DSA is.
Speaker 2: Now this seems to be political suicide, allowing these types
of thoughts, get rid of borders, get rid of jails,
get rid of the Senate, these types of thoughts to
be at the forefront of your political party, but they're
quickly becoming the norm, and a lot of democratic races,
and a lot of prominent Democrats are also saying they
don't want to kick anybody out of a room, even
though they demand all the time that conservatives do exactly that,
that the most radical crazy of us on our side
should not even be allowed to be on a podcast
interview of some kind. But them, they're allowing them to
win political races. Potentially, here we go.
Speaker 18: A new Tea Party net favorable opinion of the Tea
Party back in June of twenty ten versus the Democratic
Socialist of America the DSA. Right Now, remember the Tea
Party helped keep Democrats in control of the United States
Senate back in twenty ten, because Republicans ran all these
candidates that were just seen out of the mainstream, right,
Christin O'Donnell and Delaware, how about ken Buck and Colorado?
How about Sharon Angele who did the impossible Nevada and
helped get Harry Read another term in the United States Senate. Well,
they're net favorable rating back in June of twenty ten
thirteen points underwar. Not too hot to trun, not too
hot to trump, you bet, but not absolutely terrible compared
to the DSA. Now twenty five points underwar twice as
unpopular as the Tea Party was back in June of
twenty ten.
Speaker 2: So the lesson here is the Tea Party sabotage the
Republican Party and their ability to say, create a red
wave and win some elections. It might happen again. The
Democratic Socialists of America may push their party to a
horrible place where they lose races that they expected to win.
Speaker 1: And I am cheering for that.
Speaker 2: However, I will say that it feels like you're playing
with five because part of me is afraid some of
these politicians might win on a grander scale, and that
would be horrible for our country because they disagree with
the most essential values and most important beliefs of what
makes this country great. Quick break a lot more. Greig
Allin's filling in on the data show.
Speaker 15: As we move our partners that will bring you the program.
It's the folks over at ghost Sped.
Speaker 17: If you have not switched your mattress and gotten a ghostbed,
you're sleeping a basically on a pile of hobo trash.
Speaker 15: I don't know what else to tell you.
Speaker 17: You know what's worse than summer heat trying to sleep
on a mattress that's just hot. It feels like you're
in a frying pan and it's just cooking you. That's
just horrible and miserable. And all of these mattress companies
they have cooling tech that are built into mattresses, but
it's an expensive upgrade that you have to pay extra for,
and it's usually a special order. That's not how ghost
sped operates. In fact, hot sleepers are some of their
happiest customers. That tech is incorporated into every single mattress.
It's not an expensive upgrade that you have to pay
extra for or order separately. You're going to notice the
difference right away, not just with the quality of material
and construction. Less tension, better temperature, no more waking up source.
So if you're tossing and turning, waking up stiff, or
sleeping hot, that's your mattress and you need to switch
to a ghost bed today because it helps with those
exact issues. You get one hundred and one nights to
try it at home, and if you don't feel the difference,
you can send it back risk free. There's still time
to take advantage of their fourth of July sale two.
All of you can get an extra ten percent off
using code Dana. Shop at ghostbed dot com slash Dana
and use code Dana for ten percent off.
Speaker 6: And now all of the news you would probably miss.
Speaker 1: It's time for Dana's Quick five. That's right, It's time
for Quick five on the Dana Show.
Speaker 2: A d Lash Dana Lash Radio and X a great
way to stay connected to her and all the fancy
stuff that she and her awesome team like producer Steven do,
and the world of social media, including sorting through.
Speaker 1: One hundreds and hundreds of.
Speaker 2: Things to get you the best possible stuff every single
day on all the fancy social media places.
Speaker 1: Let's do a couple of these. First. I love this story.
It is hilarious to me.
Speaker 2: A Netflix executive got fired for admitting something during a
trust exercise. Never trust the company you work for, baby.
This guy, who was a pretty high ranking executive and
had worked on fancy movies like Pirates of the Caribbean
and the Harry Potter franchise, admitted in some sort of
trust thing that.
Speaker 1: He had taken ketemine.
Speaker 2: He said he was medically told to do it by
a doctor. The company didn't love that that he was
admitting to ketamine use so inevitably it led to his firing.
The guy says, would all of us know that any
sort of moment where the business that you work for
tells you to just tell the many secrets you have,
it's always a trap. It's never ever a good thing
for you or anyone else. So don't do it, would
be my advice. Maybe also, don't take ketamine. I don't know,
although if a doctor told you to do.
Speaker 1: It, how is it wrong?
Speaker 2: Another thing out there, there was a story about how
you if you eat four hours or more before bed,
it actually might stave off to men't you? Eating closer
and closer to bed might be a bad decision, not
just for your waistline, but apparently for your brain.
Speaker 1: Stories like this make me feel horrible.
Speaker 2: And then I do nothing about them. I'm like, man,
I break this rule constantly. Oh well, I guess I'll
do it again later today because I have some leftover
pizza in the fridge that i'd very much like to eat,
and it's getting closer to bedtime and I don't care.
But anyway, for anyone out there who's trying to protect
themselves from any sort of negative health things, Yet another
study telling a lot of us. We're doing things wrong
that we can choose to care about or not so much. Also,
this story probably terrible confirming how little people use spoken
language in today's society compared to the past. Communication spoken
word communication has been driven down by technology.
Speaker 1: We speak far fewer words as of.
Speaker 2: Twenty nineteen, not even twenty twenty six, as we did
in two thousand and five. So many people not rehearsing
what it is to move the mouth and say the
stuff out loud, and that's probably not good for a
whole lot of us.
Speaker 1: I love a bunch of the end.
Speaker 2: Results of these studies where they just basically say the
part out loud that all of us can understand as
we're reading through it, Like bad things happening here. Choose
your own adventure if you decide to keep doing that
or do something else. Just call a person occasionally, don't
always text everyone, Get on the phone with somebody every
so often. Then, finally, Johnny Depp is making a comeback.
He will be in a new movie. I think he's
playing Ebenezer Scrooge in a Christmas Carol. A lot of
people seem very excited to see Johnny Depp portraying a
character in a movie in a theater. Cancel culture didn't
get him, mostly because Amber heard seemed insane in a
courtroom when dealing with everything that was that lawsuit and
all those accusations.
Speaker 1: So darn it, the truth might be able to set
you free.
Speaker 2: Appears to be the case here, and honestly, from the
little I've seen that, Johnny Depp looks like a perfect
person to play the role, the crazy version of the
role that he'll play. Quick break a lot more, less
time to do it. Creig Collins filling in on the
Dana Show.
Speaker 1: This is the Dana Show. My name is Craig Collins,
filling in. Thrilled to be with you.
Speaker 2: Dana is back tomorrow with a lot of cool things
planned to be talked about tomorrow, I'm sure on the show.
So one more day of me at d Lash, Dana
Lash Radio and X great way to stay connected to
her and all the cool stuff that she's up to
at radio.
Speaker 1: Craig, Z, if for.
Speaker 2: Some reason you want to make me look more legitimate
in this industry, I believe is the way I've been
joking about it. I don't do a lot on social media,
don't have much of a following there would.
Speaker 1: Like it to be more, all right.
Speaker 2: A California man was stranded at sea for more than
a month. He miraculously survived and was recently found kind
of off the coast of Hawaii.
Speaker 1: The story is crazy.
Speaker 2: The guy was eventually out of water during his month
long just being a drift at sea when his motor
ran out of gas. He was surviving by putting seawater
into bags and then licking the condent station off the
bags that obviously didn't have salt in it, so that
was fairly smart.
Speaker 1: He mostly ate oatmeal that he had with him for
as long.
Speaker 2: As he could until I think he that and then
he was eating squid and stuff that popped up on
his boat. He made PVC pipes into kayak paddles to
paddle his way into an area where people would inevitably
find him. Just an incredible story of a human being
that was destined or determined to survive no matter what.
And then finally, one other funny story. In Texas, people
are calling in this time of year to the police
worried that dogs are stuck in drains because they think
they hear dogs barking. It's not dogs it's frogs and
they're mating. It just sounds like dogs. So everything's fine.
No need to go in and help anybody doing what
they're doing in there.
Speaker 1: That's it.
Speaker 2: Talk to you next time. Craig Collin's filling in on
The Dana Show.