Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of The
Diddy Diaries. In this episode, we're picking up where we
left off with Ashley Parum's amended complaint naming Ditty, drewski Odell, Beckham, Jaguar,
Wright and others. Second cause of action Violations of Racketeer
Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act RICO Conspiracy US Code eighteen,
nineteen sixty two d Plaintiffs against all defendants. Plaintiff incorporates
by reference and realleges, each of the preceding paragraphs and
all paragraphs below, as though fully set forth and brought
in this cause of action. Each defendant agreed to commit
the substantative racketeering offense through agreeing to participate in racketeering acts.
Each enterprise member agreed to commit the substantative racketeering offense
through agreeing to participate in racketeering acts. Each defendant knew
the general status of the conspiracy was to enable the
cover and cover up defend in Ditty's decades worth of
sexual abuse. Each enterprise member knew the general status of
the conspiracy was to enable and cover up the ditties
decades worth of sexual abuses. Each defendant member knew the
conspiracy extended beyond their individual role as set forth above.
Each defendant agreed and conspired to violate US Code Section
nineteen sixty two C, specifically in an effort to enable
further protect aid, secrete, and cover up each of Defendant
Ditty's sexual assaults, defending Ditty's pattern and practice of sexual assault, kidnapping,
an abuse, and defending Ditty's sexual battery against plaintiffs, Defendants
agreed to engage in each of the predicate offenses identified above.
Defendants knew their predicate acts were a part of a
pattern of racketeering activity and agreed to the commission of
those acts to further the schemes described above, constituting a
conspiracy to violate US Code eighteen, section nineteen sixty two C,
in violation of US Code eighteen, Section nineteen sixty two D.
Third Cause of Action Civil Code Section one seventy zero
eight dot five Sexual Battery Plaintiffs against Defendant Ditty, Shane, Odell, Drewski,
and Valdez. Plaintiff incorporates by reference and realleges, each of
the preceding paragraphs and all paragraphs below, as though fully
set forth and brought in this cause of action. Defendants
committed acts with the intent to cause a harmful or
offensive contact with an intimate part of plaintiff. The sexually
offensive and unwonted contact with plaintiff directly resulted from defendants
set acts. Defendant Ditty exploited his position of authority to intimidate, overwhelm,
and subdue plaintiffs with the assistance of defendants Shane kk
Odell Brandy, and Drewski. Objections to his conduct would have
been met with retaliation. Defendant Ditty abused his position of
power and authority over a plaintiff Parum, who was in
no position to reject his sexual assault due to word
being fit, physically outnumbered, unable to vacate the premises because
she was drugged and having her clothes, purse, cell phone,
and keys hidden from her. Defendant Didty abused his position
of power and authority over plaintiff John Doe, who was
in no position to reject his sexual assault due to
him being physically outnumbered, unable to vacate the premises because
he was drugged and kidnapped, and having his cell phone
and keys hidden from him. Defendant Valdez abused his position
of power and authority over plaintif Jane Doe, who was
in no position to reject his sexual assault due to
her being physically outnumbered, unable to vacate the premises because
she was drugged and kidnapped and having her cell phone
and keys hidden from her defendant Didty Shane Odell and
Drewski's battery on plaintiff caused physical injury, severe mental and
emotional distress, pain and suffering, mental anguish, and loss of
enjoyment of life. Defendants on lawful actions were intentional, done
with malice, and or showed a deliberate, wilful, wanton, and
reckless indifference to Plaintiff's rights. Plaintiff claims compensentory and punitive
damages herein. The amount of damages sought herein exceeds the
jurisdictional limits of all other courts which would otherwise have jurisdiction.
Fourth cause of action California Civil Code, Section three forty
dot sixteen, Sexual Assault Plaintiff parum against defendants Ditty, Shane
O'Dell and Drewski. Plaintiff incorporates by reference and realleges, each
of the preceding paragraphs and all paragraphs below as though
fully set forth and brought in this cause of action.
Defendant touched an intimate part of plaintiff against her will
for a sexual arousal, sexual gratification, or a sexual abuse.
Defendants committed an act of sexual penetration against Plaintiff's will
by means of force, drugging, violence, duress, menace, or fear
of immediate and unlawful bodily injury to a plaintiff. Defendant's
conduct places plaintiff in a reasonable apprehension of bodily harm.
Defendants act actions caused plaintiff to fear retaliation in the future,
and there was a reasonable possibility that defendants, specifically Defendant Ditty,
could execute on a threat of retaliation. Defendants assault on
plaintiff caused physical injury, severe mental and emotional distress, pain
and suffering, mental anguish, and loss of enjoyment of life.
Defendants on lawful actions were intentional, done with malice, and
are with a deliberate, wilful, wanton, and reckless indifference to
Plaintiff's rights. Defendant conspired to and did engage in a
cover up or attempted cover up of previous instances of
allegations of sexual assault by defendant Ditty. Newly enacted CCP
three forty dot sixteen, effect of January first, twenty twenty three,
is a governing California state statute extending the Statute of
Limitations in granting revival of a plaintiff claim seeking to
recover damages suffered as a result of a sexual assault
that occurred on plaintiff. The amount of damages sought herein
seedes the jurisdictional limits of all other courts which would
otherwise have jurisdiction. Fifth cause of action California's Civil Code,
Section fifty one dot nine Sexual Harassment Plaintiff parum against
defendants Ditty, Shane Odell, and Drewski. Plaintiff incorporate by reference
and re allege each of the preceding paragraphs and all
paragraphs below as though fully set forth and brought in
this cause of action. Defendants made sexual advances, solicitations, sexual requests,
demands for sexual compliance by plaintiff, as well as engaged
in other verbal, visual, or a physical conduct of sexual
nature or of a hostile nature based on Plaintiff's gender,
all of which were unwelcome and pervasive or severe. Defendants intentionally,
recklessly and wantonly acts resulted in harmful and offensive contact
with the intimate parts of Plaintiff's persons. Defendant Ditty specifically
used his authority to coerce and to exploit Defendant Shane
into a learning plaintiff to his home so that Defendant
Ditty could physically, psychologically, and or emotionally through force, manipulation,
emotional abuse, intimidation, and retaliation abuse Plaintiff. These acts were
done for defending Ditty's sexual gratification. Plaintiffs suffered economic loss
or disadvantage and or personal injury, including but not limited
to emotional distress, as a result of defendant's conduct. As
a result of defendants on lawful conduct, Plaintiff is entitled
to actual damages and exemplary damages pursuant to California Code
Section fifty two, Subdivision B, in an amount to be
awarded at trial. Six. Cause of action Battery Plaintiff against
all defendants. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference and re allege each
of the preceding paragraphs and all paragraphs below, as though
fully set forth and brought in this cause of action.
Defendants intended to commit and committed acts of unwanted contact
with plaintiffs. Defendant Ditty Shane O'Dell and Drewski committed unwanted
contact with Plaintiff Parum in a harmful and offensive manner,
including but not limited to, by inflicting sexual abuse against plaintiff,
among other batteries. Defending KK and Brandy abuse Plaintiff Parum
without her consent and without equality. Defendant Peltae, Gonzales, Valdez,
Helena and Jaguarre committed unwanted contact with Plaintiff's Doe in
a harmful and offensive manner, including but not limited to,
by inflicting severe physical abuse against plaintiffs. Defendant Ditty committed
unwanted contact with Plaintiff John Doe in a harmful and
offensive manner, including but not limited to, by inflicting sexual
abuse against plaintiff. Defendant Ditty exploited his position and status
to intimidate, overwhelm, and subdued plaintiffs. Any objections to his
conduct would be met with retaliation not only by plaintiffs,
but by other defendants involved. Defendant Didty abused his position
of power and influence over Plaintiff Parum and John Doe,
who were in no position to reject his sexual if
Defendants batteries on plaintiff cause physical injury, severe mental and
emotional distress, pain and suffering, mental anguish, and loss of
enjoyment of life. Defendants on lawful actions were intentional, done
with malice, and or showed a deliberate, wilful, wanton, and
reckless indifference to plaintiff's rights. Plaintiffs claim compensentory and punitive
damages herein. The amount of damages sought herein exceeds the
jurisdictional limits of all other courts which would otherwise have jurisdiction.
Seventh cause of action Assault Plaintiffs against all defendants. Plaintiffs
incorporate by reference and re allege each of the preceding
paragraphs and all paragraphs below as though fully set. Fourth,
and broaden this cause of action. Defendants intentionally attempted, threatened,
and committed harmful and offensive contacts against plaintiffs, including but
not limited to, inflicting sexual abuse and physical abuse against plaintiffs.
Defendant's conduct placed plaintiffs, and reasonable apprehension of bodily harm.
Defendant's assaults on plaintiffs cause physical injury, severe mental and
emotional distress, pain and suffering, mental anguish, and loss of
enjoyment of life. Defendants on lawful actions were intentional, done
with malice and or show to deliberate, wilful, wanton, and
reckless indifference to Plaintiffs' rights. Plaintiff claims compensentory and punitive
damages here in. The amount of damages sought herein exceeds
the jurisdictional limits of all other courts which would otherwise
have jurisdiction. All right, we're going to wrap up right here,
and in the next episode we're going to pick up
with the eighth cause of action. If you'd like to
contact me, you can do that at Bobby Kopucci at
protonmeil dot com. That's bo b b Y c ap
u Cci at ProtonMail dot com, or if you prefer,
you can find me on x at Bobby Underscore cap
use Cci. All of the links that we discussed can
be found in the description box. What's up, everyone, and
welcome to another episode of the Diaries. In this episode,
we're again right back too that Ashley Parum amended complaint
against Ditty, Drew, Ski, Odell, Beckham, Jaguar, Wright and others.
Eighth cause of action Negligence Plaintiff Parum against defendant Shine
Plaintiff incorporates by reference and realleges, each of the preceding
and all paragraphs below is though fully set forth and
brought in this cause of action. Defending Shane invited plaintiff
to his home as a guest. Defending Shain owed plaintiff
a right to expect protection from the other defendants, specifically
defendant Ditty while a guest at his home. As a
direct and proximate result of the foregoing negligence, Plaintiff was
sexually harassed, assaulted, and abused by defendants Ditty Shane in
those one and two, causing plaintiff bodily injuries, pain and suffering,
mental anguish, and loss of capacity for the enjoyment of life.
The losses are either permanent or continuing, and plaintiff will
suffer losses in the future. Ninth cause of action negligent
failure to warn plaintiff against defendant Shain, KK Pelatier, Gonzales, Valdez, Odell, Drewski, Jaguar, Helena,
Brandy En Dooz. Plaintiff incorporates by reference and realleges, each
of the preceding and all paragraphs below as though fully
set forth and brought in a cause of action defendant's
conduct created a risk of physical or emotional harm to plaintiffs.
Defendants knew and had reason to know that Plaintiff Parum
and John Doe were at risk of sexual assault and
abuse by defendant Ditty. Despite the knowledge of the danger
in the participation in the Ditty sexual abuse and cover
up enterprise, defendants did not alert plaintiff to the risk
of sexual assault, harassment, kidnapping, physical assault, rape, and or
other attacks by defendant Ditty. In fact, defendants facilitated and
assisted defendant Ditty in his illegal, devian activities and despicable behavior.
Defendant Pelletier represented he was lawfully transporting plaintiff Dose for
the purpose of outstanding warrants. Defendant Chains specifically represented to
plaintiff that she would be safe while guest in his
home and would be free of risk of attack. Defendants
had reason to know that plaintiffs would be unaware of
the risk of sexual assault, harassment, kidnapping, physical abuse, and
cover up enterprise. A warning to plaintiffs by any defendant
that they were at risk of sexual assault, harassment, kidnapping,
physical assault, rape, and or other attacks by defendant Ditty
or any other defendant would have reduced the risk of
harm to plaintiffs. As a legal and direct result of
the aforementioned conduct and omission of defendants, Plaintiffs were sexually assaulted, harassed, kidnapped,
physically assaulted, raped, and or otherwise attacked and robbed of
their dignity and personal safety. The depraved attacks on plaintiff
caused plaintiff to suffer serious psychological and physical harm from
which she may never fully recover. As a direct and
legal result, a defendant's failure to warn, plaintiff suffered damages,
both economic and general non economic damages. According to proof
tenth cause of Action Negligent supervision and Retention Plaintiffs against
Defendant Ditty, Plaintiff incorporates by reference and realleges, each of
the preceding paragraphs and all paragraphs below, as though fully
set forth and brought in this cause of action. At
all times material defendants were employed by Defendant Ditty under
the control and authority of Defendant Ditty. Defendants were unfit
or incompetent and posed a particular risk of sexually harassing, assaulting,
and or mentally abusing plaintiff. Defendant Ditty new or should
have known, not only that defendants were unfit or incompetent
and posed a particular risk of sexually harassing, assaulting, physically,
and or mentally abusing plaintiffs, but also that this unfitness
created a particular risk to plaintiffs. Defendants on fitness and
particular risk to plaintiffs harmed plaintiffs. Defendant Ditty new or
should have known that defendants Odell and Drewski had previously
engaged and was continuing to engage an unlawful sexual conduct
for his own personal sexual gratification. Defendant Ditty knew or
should have known that it was foreseeable that defendants Odell
and Drewski was engaging or would engage in illicit sexual
activities with plaintiff under the cloak of the authority, confidence,
and trust bestowed upon him through Defendant Ditty. At no
time during the alleged period did Defendant Didty have in
place a reasonable system or a procedure to investigate, supervise,
and monitor defendants Odell Andrewski to prevent sexual and verbal
abuse sexual assault, nor did he implement a system or
a procedure to oversee a monitor conduct towards individuals that
they encountered. Defendant Ditty conspired to and did breach his
duties of care ode to plaintiff, including by turning a
blind eye and encouraging known abuses by defendants Odell Andrewski
and the known dangerous conditions of the Ditty sexual enterprise,
and by continuing to expose individuals like Plaintiff Parum and
John Doe to these dangers for decades. Even though defendant
Ditty knew or should have known of the sexual illicit
activities by himself and defendants Odell and Drewski, he failed
to use reasonable care in supervising defendants Odell Andrewski and
did nothing to reasonably investigate supervisor monitor defendants Odell and
Drewski to ensure the safety of individuals they encountered. Defending
Ditty's negligence in supervising and or attaining defendants Odel and
Drewski was a substantial factor in causing harm to plaintiff.
As a result of the above described conduct, Plaintiff has
expended significant costs on therapy and suffered damages, including deprivation
of income and benefits, loss of employment opportunities, severe physical
and emotional distress, pain and suffering, mental anguish, humiliation, loss
of enjoyment of life and damage to a reputation and career.
Plaintiff's componenty I Punitive damages herein and the amount of
damages sought herein exceeds the jurisdiction limits of all other
courts which would otherwise have jurisdiction Eleven. Cause of action
Intentional infliction of emotional distress. Plaintiff incorporates by reference and
re alleges each of the preceding paragraphs and all paragraphs
below as though fully set forth and brought in this
cause of action. Defendants conspired to and did engage in
conduct that was extreme and outrageous and intentionally caused severe
emotional distress to plaintiffs. Defendant's conduct exceeded all possible bounds
of decency. Defendants acted with the intent and knowledge that
plaintiffs suffered emotional distress due to their inexcusable and outrageous conduct.
Defendants conduct caused plaintiffs to suffer physical injury, severe mental
and emotional distress, pain and suffering mental anguish, and loss
of enjoyment of life. Defendants on lawful actions, were intentional,
done with malice, and or showed a deliberate, willful, wanton
and reckless indifference to Plaintiff's rights. Plaintiffs' claim competentory and
punitive damages herein the amount of damages sought herein exceeds
the jurisdictional limits of all other courts which would otherwise
have jurisdiction. Twelfth cause of action negligent infliction of emotional distress.
Plaintiff incorporates by reference and realleges, each of the preceding
paragraphs and all paragraphs below, as though fully set forth
and brought in this cause of action. Defendants were negligent
by both conspiring to and each breaching the duty of
care that they owed to plaintiffs to keep her safe,
and by breaching their duty to properly supervise and control
defendants within the ditty sexual abuse and cover up enterprise.
Plaintiffs suffered physical injuries, severe mental and emotional distress, pain
and suffering, mental anguish, and loss of enjoyment of life.
Defendants negligence were a substantial factor in causing plaintiffs to
suffer physical injuries, severe mental and emotional distress, pain and suffering,
mental anguish, and the loss of enjoyment of life. Thirteenth
cause of action on justin Richmond, plaintiff against defendant Shane KK,
Pelotae Valdez, Brandy, Drewski, Helena, Odell, big homy c C. Jaguarre,
and Doze. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference and re allege each
of the preceding paragraphs and law paragraphs below as though
fully set forth and brought in this cause of action.
Defendan Shane receives significant revenue, specifically a new car, for
his betrayal and his involvement in Plaintiff's assault, battery, rape,
false imprisonment, and his role in the Ditty Sexual abuse
and cover up enterprise. Defendants Pelote, Valdez, KK, Brandy, Helena, Jaguar,
and Doze receive revenue in the form of cash payments
for their involvement in plaintiff dose assault, battery, false imprisonment,
and his role in the Ditty Sexual abuse and cover
up enterprise. Other defendants named herein receive significant revenue for
their involvement in Plaintiff's assault and their roles in the
and the Ditty sexual abuse and cover up enterprise. Defendants
appreciate and have knowledge of such benefits and retain them
to this day under principles of equity and good conscience,
Defendants should not be permitted to retain the profit they
received and retained the plaintiff's expense while refusing to provide
compensation for the injuries suffered by plaintiffs as a result
of their own awful conduct, including their failure to guard against,
educate as to, or otherwise failure to prevent such injuries
inflicted on plaintiffs. Under principles of equity and good conscience,
defendants should not be permitted to retain the profit they
received and retained at plaintiff's expense while refusing to provide
compensation for the injuries suffered by plaintiffs as a result
of their own awful conduct as members of the Ditty
sexual Abuse and cover up Enterprise. Plaintiffs seek restitution and
or disgorgement of all money's defendants have unjustly received and
retained as a result of their own awful conduct and
participation in the Ditties, Sexual Abuse and cover up Enterprise.
Alleged you're in fourteenth cause of action aiding and abetting
plaintiff against all defendants. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference and re
allege each of the preceding paragraphs and all paragraphs below
as though fully set forth and brought in this cause
of action. Defendants knew that an assault and battery sexual
assault was being committed and was going to be committed
against plaintiffs because of defendants involvement in the Ditty sexual
abuse and cover up enterprise, Defendants provided drugs to be
used to take advantage of plaintiffs without the knowledge or
consent of plaintiffs. Defendants new plaintiffs have been and would
be assaulted because of their involvement in the Ditty sexual
abuse and cover up enterprise. Defendant's conduct was a substantial
factor in causing harm to plaintiffs. Through aforementioned x, Defendants
caused plaintiffs an imminent apprehension of harmful or offensive contact
with an intimate part of Plaintiff's body and sexually offensive
contact with plaintiff resulted. As a result of defendant's conduct,
Plaintiff has suffered economic injury. Plaintiff's general, special, and consequential
damages are in the amount to be proven at trial,
but in no event is less than the minimum jurisdictional
amount of this Court. As a result of defendants above
describe conduct, plaintiffs have suffered and continues to suffer great
emotional distress and was prevented and will continue to be
prevented from performing daily activities and obtaining the full enjoyment
of life. As described in this complaint, the defendant's conduct
was done with oppression, fraud, and or malice, warranting significant damages,
including punitive damages. Here plaintiffs were sexually assaulted by defendant Ditty, Shane, Odell, Drewski,
Valdez Endo at defendant Chaine's residence. Plaintiff was legally on
the premises as a guest and an invitee of defendant Shaine.
Defended Shanine, through renting the premises, had dominion and control
over the premises where a plaintiff was harmed. Defendant Didty
had dominion and control over the actions of defending Shane, Odell, Drewski,
and Dough and failed to step in and stop them
from sexually assaulting plaintiff parum As owner of the property,
Defending Shane had a duty to protect plaintiff from the
harm she suffered at the hands of defendants Didty, Odell, Drewski,
and Dough and breached his duty when he failed to
stop them from sexually assaulting plaintiff. Parum. In furtherance of
this breach, Defending Shane encouraged defendant Ditty, Odell, Drewski, and
dough to continue their assault on plaintiff. Plaintiffs suffered immensely
because of Defending Shane's intentional breach of his duty. Tour
and Plaintiff Doughs were battered, sexually assaulted, and assaulted by
defendants Didty, Pelletae, Gonzales, and Valdez at Defending Chaine's residence.
Plaintiffs were legally on the premises as they were kidnapped
and forcefully brought there. Defending Shane, through renting the premises,
had dominion and control over the premises where plaintiffs were harmed.
Defendant Didty had dominion and control over of defendant Shane, Odell, Drewski, Pelotier, Gonzales,
and Valdez, and Doe failed to step in and stop
them from assaulting and battering plaintiffs. As the owner of
the property, Defending Shane had a duty to protect plaintiffs
from the harm they suffered at the hands of defendant Ditty, Pelletier, Gonzales,
and Valdez, and breach this duty when he failed to
stop them from battering and assaulting plaintiff does. In furtherance
of this breach, Defending Shine encouraged defendants to continue their
assault on plaintiffs. Plaintiffs have suffered immensely because of Defending
Shane's intentional breach of his duty to them. As a
result of this breach of duty, plaintiffs have suffered and
continue to suffer harm, including severe emotional distress, anxiety, and
other consequential damages, for which they are entitled to an
award of monetary damages and other relief. Defendant's conduct described
above was wilful, wanton, and malicious At all relevant times.
Defendants acted with conscious disregard for plaintiff's rights and feelings,
acted with the knowledge of, or with reckless disregard for
the fact that their conduct was certain to cause injury
to plaintiffs and intended to cause fear, physical injury, and
or pain and suffering to plaintiffs. By virtue of the foregoing,
plaintiffs are entitled to recover punitive damages. All right, We're
going to wrap up right here, and in the next
episode we're gonna pick up with the fifteenth cause of action.
If you'd like to contact me, you can do that
at Bobby Kopuchi at ProtonMail dot com. That's bo b
b Y c ap u Cci at protonmeil dot com,
or if you prefer, you can find me on x
at bo b b y underscore cap use Cci. All
of the links that we discussed can be found in
the description box.