Speaker 1: Of the deep dive on the war for our minds,
Speaker 1: the information war, and this is a deeper anybody goes
Speaker 1: this is just a surface. But in part two we
Speaker 1: got a little over an hour here. I want Jesse
Speaker 1: Well trying to lead us through this with our other
Speaker 1: guest here, mister Hayes, and miss result obviously on mister Jones,
Speaker 1: on different facets of this and what the endgame is
Speaker 1: and how they're incrementally changing our minds and now we
Speaker 1: think in ways to be aware of that and be
Speaker 1: conscious of that. And I would also ask, once somebody's
Speaker 1: kind of under these systems, is their way to get
Speaker 1: them out of it?
Speaker 2: Jesse Beltrimp Well, you know, in part one we talked
Speaker 2: about the Allison wonder Land programming, how confusion is basically
Speaker 2: elicited on purpose in order to reprogram behavioral and belief
Speaker 2: systems and your mind. We talked about predictive programming, which
Speaker 2: Joe Rogan was doing the interview on Chase and talked
Speaker 2: about how easily that's done, and then we talked about
Speaker 2: go into now what happens when your brain is rewired,
Speaker 2: and it's very easy to do. And the issue with
Speaker 2: this is what they disclose in the next video clip
Speaker 2: we're going to show is how easy it's done. Easily
Speaker 2: it's done, and then when it is done, you will
Speaker 2: not even be able to tell that the thoughts aren't
Speaker 2: your own. You're going to believe they are your own.
Speaker 3: And this is the aspect.
Speaker 2: When we talked about the technology in previous reports on
Speaker 2: how in the New World Vista's report, they disclosed why
Speaker 2: they were doing this RF technology, how the objective was
Speaker 2: to affect an adversary, either negatively or positively, and by love.
Speaker 4: This is in fiction.
Speaker 1: They just said, met of this is the congressional hearings
Speaker 1: of Youasho correct.
Speaker 2: And in that report on page eighty nine called Biological Systems,
Speaker 2: if you read through that New World Vistas that was
Speaker 2: released on November of nineteen ninety four, it says not
Speaker 2: only were they able to affect adversary and through our frequencies,
Speaker 2: they were also able to erase memory sets. You know,
Speaker 2: the rights of parents are being whittled away, the right
Speaker 2: to how you teach your child, like thirty.
Speaker 1: Something station pass laws were twelve and thirteen year olds.
Speaker 1: The parasitut acts or medical file.
Speaker 5: Well one hundred percent. It's really important how you raise
Speaker 5: your kids. You raise them up with the way they go.
Speaker 5: They're going to be you know, healthy, they're gonna be smart,
Speaker 5: They're gonna be good.
Speaker 4: And not evil.
Speaker 5: You know what Jesse's talking about. There's so many parallels
Speaker 5: to this. I think of Scripture and Book of Matthew
Speaker 5: about the eyes being the gateway to the soul.
Speaker 4: And this is the thing.
Speaker 5: That's why they target us with the propaganda and the television.
Speaker 5: They've tarkened us with a propaganda in person, because if
Speaker 5: they get it in your freaking brain. This you know,
Speaker 5: your eyes, it's hard wired to your brain. You can't
Speaker 5: unsee the things that you're exposed.
Speaker 3: To and you are facing with your children. Just think
Speaker 3: about that.
Speaker 2: If they're whittling the way the rights of your children,
Speaker 2: what happens when they come to a point in the
Speaker 2: future where they programmed your.
Speaker 3: Children to not who the hell you are?
Speaker 4: Okay, that they already got them more most people don't
Speaker 4: visit their parents.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I'm being extreme.
Speaker 4: Now, they were already here.
Speaker 1: They've already got it where they take your kid away
Speaker 1: and cut their dick off.
Speaker 3: That there's all kinds of issues going on there.
Speaker 5: There's been cult examples of this Soso prayers. About ten
Speaker 5: years ago, there were examples of people that came in
Speaker 5: and they would tell children, Hey, your parents abused you,
Speaker 5: your parents hurt you, and also the one hundred percent,
Speaker 5: and it's been used throughout history. This effectively disconnected those
Speaker 5: kids from their parents, gave them false memories, and they
Speaker 5: believed it. They had to go through counseling to unlearn
Speaker 5: the things they've been lied about.
Speaker 3: Yeah, false memories are a real thing.
Speaker 2: That's why in certain states, let's use hypnosis. If regressional
Speaker 2: therapies are Once you've hypnotized a person, they can no
Speaker 2: longer testify for themselves in a quarter law.
Speaker 1: In the state of California, obviously you can hypotize people
Speaker 1: get real suppressed memories.
Speaker 4: You can also create false ones on it correct.
Speaker 1: So you know, while the CIA had a lot of
Speaker 1: psychotics stuff worrying for them to do that.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Fortunately, in my state, the state of Nevada, regression therapy
Speaker 2: is admissible in a court of law.
Speaker 4: So how do you know the regressions real or false?
Speaker 3: There are some ways to test for that.
Speaker 2: And when I do regression therapy, I do not plant seeds.
Speaker 2: I do not I'm very careful you just get it
Speaker 2: wrong on the on the words that I use. All
Speaker 2: I do is get him into that state, regress him
Speaker 2: to that time point. Tell me what you see, Dan,
Speaker 2: what are you experiencing? You have to be very very
Speaker 2: careful on how you do that because if you say
Speaker 2: is it daytime or night time? That's an issue because
Speaker 2: you can create a false memory that it's daytime. All right,
Speaker 2: yeah you don't, you don't. I don't want to do that.
Speaker 2: You want to be very bland and open ended. Okay,
Speaker 2: that's how you get the truth. That's how you get
Speaker 2: a real experience, a memory that has actually happened.
Speaker 3: That's how you can tell.
Speaker 2: But not everyone's a capable hypnotist that's able to do this,
Speaker 2: and so this is this is another thing.
Speaker 3: It's the experience of the person who's regressing.
Speaker 1: Well, what makes somebody more successible versus Because I know
Speaker 1: it's a real science, but there's also fakes.
Speaker 4: There's people that aren't being hedized and they're.
Speaker 1: Playing long or doing something I mean, other people that
Speaker 1: don't know what they're doing or imagination.
Speaker 4: What are the gradients there?
Speaker 2: That's a tough question for me because I've never had
Speaker 2: an issue knowing when someone's in trance. Okay, you'll get
Speaker 2: pupil dilation, You'll get the skin colors will change, you'll.
Speaker 3: Get flushing, pupils get bigger, correct, you'll.
Speaker 2: Get ideomotor responses that you can't do consciously.
Speaker 3: These are all test and they don't know that.
Speaker 4: So that you know this stuff. Where's the example? People said,
Speaker 4: I said that Yea was on X. I said it
Speaker 4: was like he was on X. He shows up AX
Speaker 4: all weird the.
Speaker 1: Night before, shows up right when the show starts, and
Speaker 1: like two hours later he goes, I want to salad now,
Speaker 1: and he pulls the mask off and it was pure black.
Speaker 4: I said, like I said, I don't.
Speaker 1: He wasn't sweating, he didn't look like he wasn't Like
Speaker 1: doesn't Eve build on ecstasy and women and stuff at
Speaker 1: the base segirls like A and I go to you
Speaker 1: and Molly, oh yeah, you know, I'm a drug out.
Speaker 1: I can tell her what they're on. I've seen him.
Speaker 1: She was somebody's pother like, hey man, you know drunk,
Speaker 1: Hey are you drunk? You can tell what drugs are
Speaker 1: somebody like this.
Speaker 4: I was that coffee.
Speaker 1: But with him it was just I mean, you could
Speaker 1: barely see the outsides of his irises. It was maybe
Speaker 1: he was hypnotized for he out there.
Speaker 5: So it was it wasn't the net or the yahoo
Speaker 5: of the mask.
Speaker 4: No, I mean, it wasn't any mean to him.
Speaker 1: He took the mask off and was always just like
Speaker 1: what the hell I was like looking at it?
Speaker 4: It was like pure black eyes.
Speaker 6: Man.
Speaker 2: Well, there's a couple of things to come to mind,
Speaker 2: because also, you know, being a paramedic and having a
Speaker 2: strong medical background, was worthy. Pupils dilated because the mask
Speaker 2: was on, okay, and you'll you'll get a dilation because
Speaker 2: it's dark, so you would want.
Speaker 4: To pull them off for a common room of the
Speaker 4: life like this. Yeah, they're still like.
Speaker 2: Yeah now that they well, typically in a normal human,
Speaker 2: as soon as they're exposed to light, you'll get constriction
Speaker 2: of the pupil.
Speaker 3: Now, if they're they're in an altered state, they're going
Speaker 3: to stay that way.
Speaker 4: Well, it makes your pupils do that hypnotize.
Speaker 2: Drugs, hymnotism, or there's an optical issue with with the
Speaker 2: nerves and the eyes. I've seen that where one pupils dilated,
Speaker 2: one pupils constricted. Brain injury can do that. Strokes they're
Speaker 2: they're all kinds of sharp. Yeah, yeah, yeah, so yeah,
Speaker 2: it'd be interesting if they never constricted after taking that
Speaker 2: mask offs. You know, it's quite possible that there was
Speaker 2: an altered state that that's that's induced.
Speaker 1: But I was trying to put it now. I was
Speaker 1: just you know, yeah, who were like, did you ever
Speaker 1: take a mask off?
Speaker 4: Yeah?
Speaker 1: His eyes were like, so, so here's another above them,
Speaker 1: one like you barely see the irises. I was like, damn,
Speaker 1: so so it wasn't all of the lights now, I
Speaker 1: was like, black.
Speaker 4: Frigging leg Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah, So here's another characteristic. When you look at the
Speaker 2: suggestibility of people, people.
Speaker 3: That have smooth.
Speaker 2: Underbags under their eyes, they're more suggestible. He would be
Speaker 2: one you, I'm you're close to it, so you would
Speaker 2: be another one that would be easily put into. Yeah,
Speaker 2: the bags under your eyes, Yeah, if they're completely smooth,
Speaker 2: that is a characteristic of being someone who's highly suggestible
Speaker 2: and influenced.
Speaker 4: Do we know why?
Speaker 2: No, it's just an observation that they've took in the data.
Speaker 2: In fact, in the video clips that we showed him
Speaker 2: part one, he talks about that, Yeah.
Speaker 4: What does that have? No idea?
Speaker 2: What that means being such you're hypnotizable.
Speaker 4: No, no, I know that. Why would it be? I know
Speaker 4: you don't know.
Speaker 1: I'm saying this has just been registered in the research
Speaker 1: that they're correct.
Speaker 4: There's no idea why.
Speaker 3: They don't know why.
Speaker 2: All they know is that people with smooth under bags
Speaker 2: under their eyes are more suggestible.
Speaker 3: So I have bags under my eyes. Okay, he doesn't.
Speaker 2: That's that's a very typical description of someone with smooth
Speaker 2: underbags under their eyes. They are more suggestible, So, Matthew,
Speaker 2: I already know they could know. Yeah, no, yes, yeah,
Speaker 2: but you know so at this table I can kill.
Speaker 4: Yeah, serious, they get.
Speaker 2: Yeah, but these are just tidbits of information that I
Speaker 2: always get.
Speaker 4: One of the other things.
Speaker 2: As far as physical signs, mostly it's it's it's whether
Speaker 2: or not.
Speaker 3: You are a physical or what we.
Speaker 2: Call a physical suggestible or an emotional suggestible. That's really
Speaker 2: the depiction, because we address it in part one that
Speaker 2: thirty percent of the population on our physical suggestibles. Okay,
Speaker 2: and those are the ones that are easily hypnotizable. Those
Speaker 2: are the ones that you'll see up on stage and
Speaker 2: affair hypnotists show, and when I talked about you know,
Speaker 2: they have everyone stand up and.
Speaker 3: They do suggestibility tests.
Speaker 2: So and this is what I want to do on
Speaker 2: our you know, we have a project that we're talking
Speaker 2: about maybe doing here. But you bring in people and
Speaker 2: you have them, you do you're running through some tests. Say,
Speaker 2: you know, when you put your fingers out, I want
Speaker 2: you to spread them apart. Imagine them being two strong magnets,
Speaker 2: and these magnets are becoming stronger and stronger, and they're pulling,
Speaker 2: pulling closer and closer and closer and closer. The people
Speaker 2: whose fingers go like this, those are the physical suggestibles
Speaker 2: that you want to bring up on stage. Those are
Speaker 2: the ones that I would choose almost immediately to hearing
Speaker 2: it again.
Speaker 5: Correct, correct, Well, have you looked at like world leaders
Speaker 5: like President Trump for example, is he highly suggestible?
Speaker 3: Does he have some of these?
Speaker 2: You know, I've never really thought about analyzing doing an
Speaker 2: analysis on that, but it'd be interesting to take a
Speaker 2: look at world leaders and just.
Speaker 3: Using the IBAG.
Speaker 2: Criteria and seeing who might be more influenced than others.
Speaker 2: But you know, this is something when you're using your
Speaker 2: verbal frequency our voices. Now, when you're using RF emissions,
Speaker 2: that's a completely different ballgame. Particularly when you have nanotech
Speaker 2: in you, the m RNA, that's the completely different ballgame
Speaker 2: because they've already done studies knowing what type of frequencies
Speaker 2: they need to send in order to put someone into
Speaker 2: an altered state and make it.
Speaker 1: The mos kings most of signal the cell phone. Everybody
Speaker 1: kills each other. Before I never came out. I was
Speaker 1: readly like Baltimore centarcles about CIA tested in the nineties
Speaker 1: how to send out waves to may people agitated or
Speaker 1: socially excited or angry or sleepy, and they like kind
Speaker 1: of tell you here and there, and then they admit
Speaker 1: that they patented all this. But then but then when
Speaker 1: you talk about it, oh, you're a cook. So so
Speaker 1: so let's get into how they're able to reprogram the brain.
Speaker 2: So basically what they're describing is they're they're talking about
Speaker 2: the frequency issues that we're dealing with. Now Habana syndrome.
Speaker 2: Let's call it for what it is, the HI phenomena.
Speaker 4: The big, the big mystery.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the big The sign up is is they want
Speaker 2: everyone to believe that there are these nefarious groups out
Speaker 2: there that are pointing directed energy weapons at you. Okay,
Speaker 2: does that happen? Yes, that happened down in Florida. That
Speaker 2: was that case where the law enforcement officer was hit
Speaker 2: with the directed energy device. They caught the individual he
Speaker 2: was a chef, ended up being former KGB and the
Speaker 2: went of.
Speaker 1: The Russian's famous in the sixties hit our embassy with
Speaker 1: radiation beams.
Speaker 4: Correct.
Speaker 2: So this stuff goes on correct, And that's essentially kind
Speaker 2: of what we're being.
Speaker 3: Dealing with now with the Savannah syndrome.
Speaker 2: The psyop though, is that we know from our data
Speaker 2: covering US civilians since twenty ten that it's BS because
Speaker 2: it is logistically improbable and financially unsound to be having
Speaker 2: all of these victims being chased around with someone pointing
Speaker 2: some weapon at.
Speaker 4: That our helicopter drone correct.
Speaker 1: Instead, was it through the TVs, the phones or it's
Speaker 1: already implanted in them?
Speaker 4: How's it being activated?
Speaker 3: So it's satellite based, that's where it's coming from.
Speaker 2: Even you know, doctor Cruise is correct, there's some type
Speaker 2: something coming from the skies.
Speaker 3: Okay, that's that's number one.
Speaker 2: That's why when I was taking individuals two miles down
Speaker 2: into granite taverns in Jackson, California and still detecting frequencies
Speaker 2: are like, how is this even possible. There's no cell
Speaker 2: phone towers out there, you can't get a radio, you
Speaker 2: can't get a radio signal out there.
Speaker 3: Nothing. The only way it can come is from satellite
Speaker 3: deep penetration.
Speaker 4: Yet, oh wow, that might be like a ground peder
Speaker 4: rain or one hundred percent. So they have ultimate low
Speaker 4: frequency correct.
Speaker 5: The same kind of technology we would use with submarines. Sure,
Speaker 5: exactly the same, the same kind of technology. One how
Speaker 5: submarines would communicate too, How we would be able to
Speaker 5: look into and try to gather in toldans on like
Speaker 5: a deep nuclear uh silo site? Like, I ran right,
Speaker 5: it's it's the same technology being I was.
Speaker 4: I was in Virginia, but West A few people on
Speaker 4: the next people don't know.
Speaker 1: I remember when I was a little kid, my dad's
Speaker 1: end to all this, and we'd be driving from Austin
Speaker 1: visiting family back to Dallas and we sometimes go to
Speaker 1: Fort Work to see family.
Speaker 4: He'd point out later I looked at it was true.
Speaker 1: He goes, that's our deep earth communications with the with
Speaker 1: the submarines. And he would explain they would have like
Speaker 1: five two mile long cable. It would be an X
Speaker 1: and it sends a wave to the Earth. That's basically instantaneous,
Speaker 1: like just like through water are better than the satellite
Speaker 1: or whatever. And that's how the submarines will communicate with
Speaker 1: their own systems instead of sonars through rock and most
Speaker 1: of us liquid to the core.
Speaker 4: But now they'd be classified all that. It's funny you
Speaker 4: knew about that.
Speaker 1: But so you're saying they're using that same stuff through satellites,
Speaker 1: but I guess isn't remagnified by the ground penetrators, And
Speaker 1: that's that's the control.
Speaker 2: System, correct, And then you have the other aspects of it.
Speaker 2: It is a complete network. You know, My background is
Speaker 2: also in network technologies.
Speaker 1: Well, there's a whole spectrum of multiple frequency. What's the
Speaker 1: we know in particularly there's a bunch of U F.
Speaker 3: E l F ultra ultra low frequencies.
Speaker 2: Then you get into infrasound ultrasound those frequencies. I was
Speaker 2: in Virginia Beach recently and we happened to find a
Speaker 2: thumber signal right off the ocean and it it When
Speaker 2: we looked up who owned that frequency, it says most
Speaker 2: likely in a Russian submar.
Speaker 4: Well, a thumper.
Speaker 2: A thumper is what the technologies that these submarines use
Speaker 2: what you were just describing, So we call them thumpers.
Speaker 3: We call them thumpers.
Speaker 2: Okay, but what what was unusual about the frequencies that
Speaker 2: we were detecting is that normally in a waterfall, when
Speaker 2: we use a spectrum antalyzer, you'll have a waterfall, it's
Speaker 2: a blue screen or yellow or red depending on what
Speaker 2: color you pick, but you can see a data line
Speaker 2: on a frequency that's being detected. What we were seeing
Speaker 2: and they're vertical.
Speaker 4: What we were.
Speaker 2: Seeing is a horizontal signal never before found NonStop, very
Speaker 2: unique and it was very in sync, like every ten
Speaker 2: seconds we would see it. And I brought it to
Speaker 2: my mentor and he says, that's that's a new type
Speaker 2: of thumper. So and I said, wow, yeah, So this
Speaker 2: was covering vast spectrums in that ultra low frequency criteria
Speaker 2: that we would tip see. Well, it's very difficult to decrypt.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, that's what it means, and it's going to
Speaker 2: be and so remember my hole.
Speaker 1: Ohause, they're probably sitting out a bunch of garbage. That's
Speaker 1: how you there's a big means a code like there's
Speaker 1: a bunch of garbage with it.
Speaker 2: We don't know, because you would have to decrypt it
Speaker 2: to really isolate what's being transmitted.
Speaker 4: Maybe you said a bunch of trash with it and
Speaker 4: people don't know.
Speaker 3: What's Yeah, so it's it's completely encrypted.
Speaker 2: So in order to decrypt something like that, you would
Speaker 2: have to be able to capture all of that data
Speaker 2: across all of those frequency spectrums and somehow decrypted to
Speaker 2: get the protocol. And then once you get the protocol,
Speaker 2: then you can establish what's there.
Speaker 4: But any idea what it was communic gatting with no idea.
Speaker 2: All we know is it was an observation. Another observation
Speaker 2: was is all of the fish are dying on the beaches.
Speaker 1: I was about to raise when they do these sonar tests,
Speaker 1: it kills a bunch of whales.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Well, here's what's interesting.
Speaker 2: There are thousands of fish on the beaches that are
Speaker 2: in Virginia Beach and none of the birds are eating them.
Speaker 4: I saw that in the news.
Speaker 3: Okay, I witnessed it myself the first I was just
Speaker 3: there this year. Wow, this year, maybe four months ago.
Speaker 1: And and by the way, even tho there's a red tide,
Speaker 1: I've seen them. The birds, even though they get sick,
Speaker 1: they'll still eat rotten fish poison. They're not eating fish.
Speaker 1: That's unheard of.
Speaker 2: Yeah, they're not eating the fish, and or I'm going
Speaker 2: there should be birds everywhere. So I happened to speak
Speaker 2: to a military person who confided with us and said,
Speaker 2: we've known about this, and he goes, did you notice
Speaker 2: that the fish aren't being eaten? I said, yes, I did,
Speaker 2: and he goes, it's because they're being exposed to this
Speaker 2: frequency and the birds know not to eat them somehow
Speaker 2: the animals know and that's a GMO corn.
Speaker 5: Well maybe maybe it's because in this way it does
Speaker 5: change it from being even a fish anymore.
Speaker 4: But we talked to it was for about it.
Speaker 5: Does they seek to recreate, you know, mankind seek through
Speaker 5: create the species on this earth. In this way, maybe
Speaker 5: it changes these fish. They're a long a fish anymore.
Speaker 4: If the right noses like a dog too, they're like, whoa,
Speaker 4: what's that? You know?
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, I don't know.
Speaker 2: But the bottom line is that we're all being exposed
Speaker 2: to this RF technology. We know that there's a read
Speaker 2: write capability to the human minds, and there is going
Speaker 2: to come a time very shortly and I mean told
Speaker 2: when the implementation of six G. That's when the whole
Speaker 2: system gets turned on.
Speaker 1: And Trump even said a few months ago, oh, it
Speaker 1: goes deeper in the skin, which and all the patents
Speaker 1: five G and all that actually heats the skin.
Speaker 4: It's doing something different.
Speaker 2: There's a thermodynamic response to a matter of what type
Speaker 2: of ore frequency you are exposed.
Speaker 4: So almost shut up, do the deep dive. Everybody's mad
Speaker 4: at me to go into all this.
Speaker 1: And we'll come back again into it all okay, So
Speaker 1: let sharp find the clipshon a you're ready.
Speaker 2: Okay, so we'll play that clip on the Rewire in
Speaker 2: the brain.
Speaker 7: Isn't if you're being manipulated, that's already happening. The real
Speaker 7: question now is how many versions of the script have
Speaker 7: been tested just on you think about it. This isn't
Speaker 7: a feed, it's a behavioral lap and you're not the audience,
Speaker 7: you're the subject. The techniques Chase Hughes exposes aren't theory anymore.
Speaker 7: They're active systems shaping what you see, what you believe,
Speaker 7: and who you become. And once you've been rewired, the
Speaker 7: worst part is you won't even notice.
Speaker 2: Okay, that was a short thirty second clip, but your
Speaker 2: listeners you heard what he said, that you will be
Speaker 2: rewired and you won't be able to tell. Okay, that
Speaker 2: is a seriousness of this. That is why I say
Speaker 2: that the future of your children's cognitive liberty and freedoms
Speaker 2: are at stake.
Speaker 3: Okay, yours may even be.
Speaker 2: And you know if six G gets turned on tomorrow,
Speaker 2: you know that it could very well happen to you,
Speaker 2: to me, any of us. I am hopeful that I
Speaker 2: teach everyone. The number one defense about this is education.
Speaker 3: Being aware.
Speaker 2: So your awareness, knowing what your internal voice sounds like,
Speaker 2: knowing what your moral compass is, that is your foundation.
Speaker 3: And then I strongly believe that.
Speaker 2: If the subconscious can be programmed remotely like that, why
Speaker 2: can't the subconscious Because it doesn't make interpretations, It is
Speaker 2: not discriminate, it.
Speaker 3: Does not have prejudices.
Speaker 2: That's why whenever it takes in any type of command
Speaker 2: or language or whatever it hears or what it's being programmed,
Speaker 2: it just takes it literally. So I've done this a
Speaker 2: couple of times, including to myself, is that I believe
Speaker 2: that you can program your own firewall. And we're looking
Speaker 2: deeper and deeper into that, but ultimately, ideally, what we
Speaker 2: want to do is make sure that we protect our
Speaker 2: cognitive liberties. But there are many states now who are
Speaker 2: starting to create laws to protect your brain from this
Speaker 2: type of intrusive technology. And you know, I don't know
Speaker 2: how much teeth they're going to be able to have
Speaker 2: with them, because this is a invisible technology, so to speak.
Speaker 2: Although we're proving that it exists with our equipment, our
Speaker 2: Mi six whistleblower we're about to disclose to the world
Speaker 2: has figured out a way to identify the signature. Yeah,
Speaker 2: and you know, you brought up this point when we
Speaker 2: were in the UK. Lass is that election interference? Well,
Speaker 2: if you wanted the holy grail of being able to
Speaker 2: manipulate an election, this is it just program massive population
Speaker 2: sets out there and you're guaranteed to win an election. Okay,
Speaker 2: Is that freedom? Is that democracy? You know, I would
Speaker 2: think not, But I would think the majority of the
Speaker 2: world listening today would say that that's complete slavery. It's
Speaker 2: enslavement of your brain, it's enslavement of your thoughts, it's
Speaker 2: enslavement of your creativity.
Speaker 3: That's that's one aspect of it.
Speaker 2: Now, let's talk about people who are voted into leadership,
Speaker 2: who are currently into leadership who are maybe not exposed
Speaker 2: to this right now, but we'll be exposed to that
Speaker 2: into the near future. You'll be able to program those leaders.
Speaker 2: You know, I've kind of wondered, you know, President Trump
Speaker 2: has you know, came out one way and what we're
Speaker 2: seeing today is something completely different. You know, is he
Speaker 2: being exposed to this type of technology. We know it's
Speaker 2: being utilized now, We know there are members in Congress
Speaker 2: currently who are suffering from this. I was contacted by
Speaker 2: the head doc of a three letter agency and said,
Speaker 2: I was absolutely right that my clients and his three
Speaker 2: hundred and thirty eight Habana syndrome patients had the same symptoms.
Speaker 2: He said, the only difference was, and this was pre
Speaker 2: pandemic on the cases that he was referencing, is that
Speaker 2: we were pulling out biosensors surgically removing them, and he
Speaker 2: wanted to know more. It turns out that he also
Speaker 2: was the head doc or the mind control program for
Speaker 2: the CIA, and I found that out recently after digging
Speaker 2: a little bit deeper into who he was. But this
Speaker 2: is what the world is facing, particularly here in the
Speaker 2: United States. What our forefathers had pre planned, never ever
Speaker 2: fathom that technology would be able to be intrusive into
Speaker 2: the human mind, you know, And that's that's the criteria
Speaker 2: that we need to look at.
Speaker 6: When you say a firewall about protecting someone's mental program.
Speaker 6: So it reminds me of they've done thousands of studies
Speaker 6: that Bill Clinton admitted one time of mind control studies,
Speaker 6: and the way studies go, you learn something and you
Speaker 6: build upon it. You don't repeat the same study one
Speaker 6: hundred times.
Speaker 3: That's just not so.
Speaker 6: I'm thinking of a thousand built upon studies of what
Speaker 6: they know, and then to sit there and take Okay, now,
Speaker 6: there hasn't been any studies to see how to stop it, right.
Speaker 6: They're more concerned with getting their in goal and it's
Speaker 6: just like with putting this internal biosystem in there. Of course,
Speaker 6: they got thousands of compartmentalized studies and art research and
Speaker 6: development they've done, but they didn't put anything into how
Speaker 6: to stop it per se. But you're saying that you're
Speaker 6: working on a way that people exercises possibly that people
Speaker 6: could do at home to actually be able to protect
Speaker 6: their mental cognity, their their their mentalness.
Speaker 3: Self hypnosis is not new.
Speaker 2: It's been around for for a long time and if
Speaker 2: you can learn to self program yourself to the subconscious
Speaker 2: to not be suggestible, to not be influenced too, to
Speaker 2: not take outside information in that way that's not allowed
Speaker 2: by you per se given permission by you to not
Speaker 2: listen to it, to to basically program your subconscious to say,
Speaker 2: I will not intake this data and I will refuse
Speaker 2: this data. That is type of a mental firewall that
Speaker 2: can be created, and I've seen it done with some
Speaker 2: pretty good success. So that's that's one aspect of this.
Speaker 2: And ultimately, you know, obviously we would want to stop
Speaker 2: this RF infiltration that's being imposed upon us, protecting the metadata,
Speaker 2: as we talked about in series one, having laws that
Speaker 2: our metadata is our intellectual property because what is being
Speaker 2: done with that data?
Speaker 3: Who's profiting off of it?
Speaker 2: Okay, your intellectual property is being stolen and someone else
Speaker 2: is making billions and trillions of dollars based off of
Speaker 2: your intellectual property. Let's call it for what it is,
Speaker 2: your own thoughts. Okay, your ideas, you know, trade secrets,
Speaker 2: all that's going to be out the window, and anything
Speaker 2: that you create is now going to be the property
Speaker 2: of someone else.
Speaker 3: Okay.
Speaker 2: This AI god system that elon must talks about. So
Speaker 2: that's that's what I'm referencing.
Speaker 5: Well, and so what are some things obviously, other than
Speaker 5: being discernedful of this, that you can do to build
Speaker 5: up a firewall.
Speaker 2: Exactly when I said, basically being able to.
Speaker 3: Get into a.
Speaker 2: Hypnotic state where you program your subconscious, your own subconscious
Speaker 2: to not allow these other influences to affect you. Now
Speaker 2: you would come up. You would actually have to be
Speaker 2: very strategic about how you do this because you want
Speaker 2: to be careful how the language is said to yourself.
Speaker 2: Because remember, the subconscious does not discern.
Speaker 3: Or make judgment.
Speaker 2: It just takes in that information and it acts on it, okay.
Speaker 3: Where the conscious mind.
Speaker 2: Is that filter where it says okay, based on everything
Speaker 2: that I've learned from childhood to now, I can say
Speaker 2: whether I believe that or not believe that, whether it's
Speaker 2: true or not true. The subconscious does not have that ability.
Speaker 2: And that's why this technology is dangerous. And they know this.
Speaker 4: This is.
Speaker 2: What they disclosed. That's what Alice in Wonderland was all about.
Speaker 2: That technique is because they knew that they could illicit confusion.
Speaker 2: And I called message units, so I can overstimulate you
Speaker 2: and confuse you and then put in a directive into
Speaker 2: your subconscious and your subconscious is going to take.
Speaker 3: It no matter what. That makes perfect sense. Yeah, so
Speaker 3: that's the whole idea.
Speaker 4: Are there things that make it less effective?
Speaker 6: I don't.
Speaker 4: We talked to Raefe.
Speaker 5: He said that he was a vice like not eat salad,
Speaker 5: like you know, stay off a certain died because we
Speaker 5: won't be able to intrude on your brain any further.
Speaker 2: You know, I don't know about the dietary stuff. That's
Speaker 2: not my expertise.
Speaker 3: I know.
Speaker 2: You know, Rafe did touch on they were told to
Speaker 2: take silicates during that exposure in twenty sixteen. If you
Speaker 2: remember the interview, and he was wondering why he didn't
Speaker 2: know why he didn't get it until.
Speaker 3: We talked about the zeolide z.
Speaker 2: When we talked about the zeolided z, then Rafe goes, oh,
Speaker 2: that's why we were being.
Speaker 3: Told to take the silicates.
Speaker 2: Because that's another you're asking, well, how do we defend ourself?
Speaker 2: That's another way if you can program your subconscious to
Speaker 2: create your own firewall, start doing the healthy things like
Speaker 2: taking the zli z, exercising.
Speaker 3: We know that sweat gets this stuff. Out of us.
Speaker 4: Well, that's right.
Speaker 1: For anything in the universe, God's got a counter to it.
Speaker 1: You guys should briefly tell the story of how you met.
Speaker 6: I was doing a study in the United Kingdom where
Speaker 6: David Ike actually had allowed his production team to freely
Speaker 6: and they ended up completing a documentary testing bluetooth signal
Speaker 6: emissions from the human body.
Speaker 4: And when we're looking at a computer.
Speaker 6: A phone, a phone can do bluetooth signals, a phone
Speaker 6: can do one hundred other things, but when you're looking
Speaker 6: at it as a computer, you wouldn't really measure it
Speaker 6: with a bluetooth signal m and in this case, masterpieces
Speaker 6: effectiveness at reducing no signals. Jesse got a hold of me.
Speaker 6: He was very direct and blunt, and he said, that's
Speaker 6: not enough. What you're doing is not gonna is not
Speaker 6: some type of answer that you want to broadcast as
Speaker 6: some type of solution and so forth. And I said, well,
Speaker 6: we've done graphing, oxide testing in different things like that.
Speaker 6: And I said, can you just look at the information
Speaker 6: and he was willing to look at it, and they
Speaker 6: were in double blinded format, so they're scientific fact and
Speaker 6: I had I said, my study coordinator is available if
Speaker 6: you'd like to talk with her about the way we've
Speaker 6: done these tests and so forth. And so I was
Speaker 6: transparent obviously, and a little bit later he said, hey,
Speaker 6: why don't you send me some.
Speaker 4: Of that stuff and we'll take a peek.
Speaker 6: And he didn't get back to me for about a month,
Speaker 6: and then he did and he said, hey, people are
Speaker 6: saying it's working, and and for him he was working too.
Speaker 6: I think I remember something like he was getting spots
Speaker 6: in his eyes, different things that was happening, and they
Speaker 6: had gone away, and then I think he stopped taking
Speaker 6: it and they came back.
Speaker 4: Then he started taking it again, it went away and
Speaker 4: so forth.
Speaker 1: And now since then you've done official studies, Well, yeah,
Speaker 1: scanning people and then doing the test.
Speaker 4: Yes, yeah, absolutely, we've done it before.
Speaker 1: We had show OLBI rolled me like a year ago.
Speaker 1: But we should we should scan everybody.
Speaker 3: Again, Okay, that's the problem.
Speaker 6: Absolutely, So we just but we agreed that doing a
Speaker 6: study where we were going to see if these silicon
Speaker 6: based electronic circuitry harmonic strength could actually be reduced. And
Speaker 6: you know, we just ended up, through trying to find
Speaker 6: truth and trying to help people, our missions collided and
Speaker 6: that's really what happened.
Speaker 1: Explain the devices you use, you've also got at university's
Speaker 1: and the others in Europe. Explain, explain what's happening here.
Speaker 1: Were same decades ago, we weren't even picking this up.
Speaker 4: Now it's almost everybody correct. Yeah, So so how are
Speaker 4: they getting us to the air.
Speaker 2: Well through our I six whistleblower, who you know, is
Speaker 2: a chemist out of Oxford. He had said that this
Speaker 2: is in our entire ecosystem. So you know, when you
Speaker 2: say air, you know, let's just say everything air, water.
Speaker 2: He says, it's in our grasses and our trees. He says,
Speaker 2: if you test any of these organs, they call it microplastic. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 2: it's in everything, is.
Speaker 3: What he said.
Speaker 8: My name is Raph Hasselon, a British citizen offter graduating
Speaker 8: from Oxford University with a degree in chemistry. I went
Speaker 8: abroad for about twelve to thirteen years. A decade of
Speaker 8: that time was spent in the Middle East, East Africa,
Speaker 8: and to an extent Asia. During that time I worked
Speaker 8: for a number of organizations, ranging from the US Department
Speaker 8: of State as a contractor, and in twenty and fifteen
Speaker 8: or thereabouts at the end of twenty fifteen beginning of
Speaker 8: twenty sixteen, I was coerced into becoming an intelligence asset
Speaker 8: here in the United Kingdom. The work in inverted commas
Speaker 8: that I've been doing involved a lot of technology that
Speaker 8: became known as related to Havana syndrome. It took me
Speaker 8: years to recover, but I was fortunate enough to do so,
Speaker 8: and unfortunate that I didn't die. I had an enormous
Speaker 8: range of health problems after this, and including stage three
Speaker 8: bowel cancer, so I had to have half my bowel removed.
Speaker 8: I went through chemotherapy. I lost hair, I had huge
Speaker 8: skin problems. At the end of twenty eighteen, I could
Speaker 8: barely see.
Speaker 2: When you said you started to lose your eye, sight,
Speaker 2: your hear and so for yeah, that was prior to
Speaker 2: the chemotherapy.
Speaker 8: Yes, that is it was definitely prior to the chemotherapy.
Speaker 8: So it did something physiologically, for example in that instance,
Speaker 8: to my eyes. But also I have had dreadful hearing
Speaker 8: problems ever since. And I, as I say, I lost
Speaker 8: hair my head, which has grown back. I lost hair
Speaker 8: in patches all over my body. I lost extreme amounts
Speaker 8: of weight, I became anemic and then that was when
Speaker 8: I learned that I had yeah, bowel, bowel cancer. And
Speaker 8: the conclusion that I've come to is that it is
Speaker 8: a singular system for surveillance based probably based on microwave
Speaker 8: phase interferometry. That is an incredibly powerful, non line of
Speaker 8: sight surveillance system. However, it can be repurposed to manipulate
Speaker 8: the electric field around a person. I think it is
Speaker 8: completely fair to describe this technology as a means of
Speaker 8: synthetic telepathy.
Speaker 3: Are you able to describe how this system is installed?
Speaker 8: Well, I think in my case I was a previous
Speaker 8: generation of technology. So in my case it is a
Speaker 8: dental implant of which I can provide you the notes.
Speaker 8: There are several flavors of this technology. It is not
Speaker 8: just for surveillance, which you can mess around if someone
Speaker 8: should you want to, but there are fairly brutal directed
Speaker 8: energy weapons systems that are designed to incapacitate. There's absolutely
Speaker 8: no motive, for example, to survey you or understand what
Speaker 8: you're thinking. It is literally there to turn you into
Speaker 8: a vegetable. And that is what I understand is the
Speaker 8: really devastating. I mean, it can be fatal as well. Technology.
Speaker 4: Have you heard that have you seen that technology be used.
Speaker 8: Oh yes, it has been used against me. And in fact,
Speaker 8: on October beginning of October in twenty sixteen, I had
Speaker 8: what I then came to understand was a common attack vector,
Speaker 8: which is that I was at the sink. And I
Speaker 8: think that's been the case of a number of people
Speaker 8: who have reported I was washing my hands, so clearly
Speaker 8: there is conductive effect metal sink and so on. And
Speaker 8: then suddenly I just heard the crackle of electricity around
Speaker 8: the back of my head, presumably something like the Fray effect.
Speaker 8: Maybe I don't know, but it was incredibly powerful and
Speaker 8: it knocked me to the floor. I couldn't breathe. I
Speaker 8: managed to make it to a different level of the
Speaker 8: house and I waited for it to pass. And that
Speaker 8: was my introduction, let me say, to the alternative version,
Speaker 8: and that was not by my own government. All of
Speaker 8: these technologies have the ability to be reconstructed or reconfigured
Speaker 8: for other purposes, and so in my view, absolutely, and
Speaker 8: I think that if certainly everything in the microwave and
Speaker 8: millimeter wave bands, I mean, it's quite common knowledge. L
Speaker 8: rad's you know, these we see these systems in the street.
Speaker 8: You know, is it such a great leap of you know,
Speaker 8: an assumption, a great assumption to say that, you know,
Speaker 8: we could repurpose towers that already broadcast in similar frequencies
Speaker 8: to do similar things to the effects we see elsewhere.
Speaker 8: I don't think so. And certainly, you know, with satellite
Speaker 8: systems and bringing five five G in the case of
Speaker 8: for example, SpaceX that's beaming down to your to your
Speaker 8: mobile handset, there is no denying that you have space
Speaker 8: to individual person communications signal, signaling, signaling. It was also
Speaker 8: made clear to me that there are non toxic substances
Speaker 8: that can be ingested that increase your ability to act
Speaker 8: as yeah, an electrode. Essentially it improves the quality factor
Speaker 8: of transmission or whatever it may be. Those materials have
Speaker 8: been known about for some time, and so it doesn't
Speaker 8: strike me as strange. I think, what what's new is
Speaker 8: not the ability to turn someone into a better human antenor,
Speaker 8: but the ability to do other things. So, for example,
Speaker 8: in the past, where you may ingest a substance that
Speaker 8: improves the quality of your bioelectromagnetic field, but that's it,
Speaker 8: and yes, okay, you can scan that for electronic signatures,
Speaker 8: be it brain waves, be it your heart rates, be
Speaker 8: it anything that you could potentially think. I think of
Speaker 8: as a human producing in the course of its natural
Speaker 8: life processes. That requires a lot of work. But what
Speaker 8: can you do to that person that's more limited when
Speaker 8: it's limited to the radio frequencies the types of effects
Speaker 8: that you might be able to like project to that person. However,
Speaker 8: with the nanotechnology being as it is, and I'm not
Speaker 8: familiar with it, this isn't I'll be clear that this
Speaker 8: isn't part of my experience. This is something that's come
Speaker 8: on later. I understand that the technology for using nanomateials
Speaker 8: is such that with certain frequency changes you can get
Speaker 8: nanostructures and particles to do activities. I warm someone up
Speaker 8: who has hypothermia, that's a real thing. To release chemicals,
Speaker 8: or to release drugs, that's another peer reviewed let me say,
Speaker 8: a known facet of nanotechnology within the human biome. So
Speaker 8: I think it opens up a new door of possibilities
Speaker 8: for this equipment. It's the next level, next generation of technology.
Speaker 2: But to get to how I met me at when
Speaker 2: they did that bluetooth study, I just said, hey, yeah,
Speaker 2: you might want to reconsider your conclusion that the zeolite
Speaker 2: is what caused those MAC addresses that you were detecting
Speaker 2: to this peer? Okay, because I know from my work
Speaker 2: that they can remotely turn it on and off. Okay,
Speaker 2: so if it stops transmitting, then you can theoretically not
Speaker 2: get a MAC address. And I said, and he goes, well,
Speaker 2: what do you suggest? And I said, well, you're going
Speaker 2: to need a nonlinear junction test because that will check
Speaker 2: for semiconductive.
Speaker 3: Areas well.
Speaker 4: It's a nonlinear junction test.
Speaker 2: So nonlinear junction is this device here? It was It
Speaker 2: was developed by an aeronautics engineer and as crazy as
Speaker 2: this sounds, this was designed to test for rust on airplanes, okay,
Speaker 2: because you.
Speaker 5: Can't see the rust sometimes it's inside the structure.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 2: And so what this does It sends out a harmonic
Speaker 2: to to test.
Speaker 3: To see if there's any oxidation.
Speaker 2: A couple harmonics that's you'll you'll get a third harmonic
Speaker 2: if there's octagens like radars are. It sends out a
Speaker 2: frequency eu it bounces back or.
Speaker 3: It bounce it bounces back.
Speaker 2: So what they discovered though, is not only did it
Speaker 2: find rust, but it could find electronic components which it
Speaker 2: had silicon okay, And silicon is in every electronic component
Speaker 2: out there, doesn't matter what it is. They need silicon
Speaker 2: in order for a semiconductor to be stable, otherwise they
Speaker 2: would just fall apart. And so what what they discovered though,
Speaker 2: is even if the electronic component was on or off,
Speaker 2: it would find it.
Speaker 3: Okay. So this is why I said him, Yeah, I
Speaker 3: said to him.
Speaker 4: I mean selicons transceav well you know it.
Speaker 2: So what the So this will send out three harmonics.
Speaker 2: The first harmonic it sends out, it'll detect whether there's
Speaker 2: silicon based conductivity okay, and that reflection will come back
Speaker 2: and it'll tell me that percentage