Speaker 1: Perhaps we need some outside universal threat to make us
Speaker 1: recognize this common bound. I occasionally think how quickly our
Speaker 1: differences worldwide would vanish if we were facing an alien
Speaker 1: threat from outside this world.
Speaker 2: Welcome back to you, Raised by Giants. Another live episode discussion.
Speaker 2: Welcome everyone in the chat. I get to see you
Speaker 2: guys and any channel members and or moderators out there.
Speaker 2: Thanks for joining us here this morning for a special
Speaker 2: report with someone who knows a lot about these drones
Speaker 2: and may be able to shed some light on what
Speaker 2: they are and what may actually be going on. This
Speaker 2: will be my last show before Christmas. Merry Christmas everyone,
Speaker 2: Mary x miss Marry x Man. Christmas, however, or whatever
Speaker 2: it is that you celebrate. I hope that you're happy,
Speaker 2: healthy in your family, is safe, and everything goes super
Speaker 2: smooth this Christmas. And be sure to tell your friends
Speaker 2: and family about a Clockwork shining on Amazon Prime. It
Speaker 2: is a Christmas movie, you know, an unconventional Christmas movie,
Speaker 2: but it's still a Christmas movie. Follow the show on
Speaker 2: Spotify and Apple Podcasts. The show is also a podcast,
Speaker 2: and you can download the episode there and listen whenever
Speaker 2: you like. Also, if you're in the Christmas Spirit and
Speaker 2: we are a viewer supported show. If you'd like to
Speaker 2: help support the show, PayPal and buy me a coffee.
Speaker 2: Links are in the description. Also, you can send in
Speaker 2: super chats in superstickers if you would like a comment
Speaker 2: or a question highlighted during the show. Channel memberships are
Speaker 2: also available and are a fantastic way to help support
Speaker 2: the show, and you get bonus content for being a
Speaker 2: Channel member. But with all that down, here to discuss
Speaker 2: with us the strange stuff that's happening in New Jersey.
Speaker 2: He actually investigates areas of high strangeness and owns property
Speaker 2: overlooking the infamous Skinwalker Ranch. He hosts the popular podcast
Speaker 2: Here a Paranormal and has written about his experiences investigating
Speaker 2: the skin Walker Ryan Burns, Welcome back to the show,
Speaker 2: my friend.
Speaker 3: How's it going going great? Happy to be talking with you,
Speaker 3: and Merry Christmas to you if we don't talk before then,
Speaker 3: And I highly recommend people watch eight o'clock work Shining,
Speaker 3: It's definitely worth it. But yeah, let's get into this.
Speaker 2: Yeah, this seems like there's that this whole thing has
Speaker 2: been like evolving since its inception right in New Jersey.
Speaker 2: And thank you, Ryan I really appreciate that, and Merry
Speaker 2: Christmas to you as well. But it seems like it's
Speaker 2: been evolving its started out. I've talked about it a
Speaker 2: few times already with Trey Hudson and Ryan Gable before,
Speaker 2: but it seems like it's always it's been changing and
Speaker 2: evolving since this first started. Supposedly it's been happening since
Speaker 2: November of this year, Is that correct?
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's my understanding. And you know, while we're recognizing
Speaker 3: it right now, it's like a huge thing. Everybody's got
Speaker 3: their eyes to the skies in New Jersey. This is
Speaker 3: something that you know, there's credible implications and credible reports coming,
Speaker 3: like you said, since November.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it seems like that a Phoenix Lights type of
Speaker 2: situation that we kind of got going on that people
Speaker 2: don't really may not understand the implications of exactly what's
Speaker 2: going on right now because we're in the moment, you know,
Speaker 2: we're we're experiencing it right now, and I think that
Speaker 2: it's possible that later on, some other implications, some other event,
Speaker 2: just like I played the Ronald Reagan clip before we
Speaker 2: you know, started the show, some other event is sort
Speaker 2: of lined up in the future. And this is something
Speaker 2: to get people used to the idea of these crafts
Speaker 2: just kind of being in the sky, regardless if they're
Speaker 2: actual drones, regardless if they are you know, military craft,
Speaker 2: regardless of because some people are now saying that their
Speaker 2: plasma beings. Have you heard about this? People calling them
Speaker 2: plasma I mean, this is a video that was taken
Speaker 2: from ABC and this I don't know what this is.
Speaker 2: Do you have any idea what this is?
Speaker 3: Yeah, when you're in the when you're in the business
Speaker 3: of filming UFOs, this in my opinion, is nothing spectacular.
Speaker 3: And the only reason I say that is you can
Speaker 3: do this with any celestial body and a regular filming
Speaker 3: device like an iPhone or a Samsung Galaxy. You just
Speaker 3: have to make sure and focus into the right distance
Speaker 3: and you'll get this effect. Now without anything in the
Speaker 3: foreground or background showing movement, and without any video really
Speaker 3: showing what this thing is doing. It's kind of difficult,
Speaker 3: you know, to to really it could be authentic. But yeah,
Speaker 3: you or I could could make this. I could make
Speaker 3: this right now, like looking out my window, and.
Speaker 2: So it's like a reflection of light or like a
Speaker 2: lens flare.
Speaker 3: Yeah, So if you have. It could be anything. It
Speaker 3: could be it could be and given the time that
Speaker 3: it was done, it's it could even be the moon.
Speaker 3: You know, we have a full moon right now, so
Speaker 3: you could have it on like very low zoom. And again,
Speaker 3: I don't want to say that this is fake or anything,
Speaker 3: but I'm just saying that there's just not enough to
Speaker 3: go on with this footage. You could you could make
Speaker 3: this footage out, Like I said, I could make it
Speaker 3: out my window right now and it would look just
Speaker 3: like that. And that's not to say that everything everyone
Speaker 3: is seeing in New Jersey. There's definitely something going on,
Speaker 3: but we have seen a lot of footage exactly. Bradley
Speaker 3: just nailed it the out of focused light source because
Speaker 3: there's just there's just no detail there.
Speaker 2: You're telling me that ABC is putting out fake footage, Ryan,
Speaker 2: Oh my god, I cannot believe. But this is a
Speaker 2: big problem with a lot of these videos and everyone
Speaker 2: kind of jumping on this bandwagon because they're not only
Speaker 2: posting videos that may or may not be authentic videos,
Speaker 2: but they're also posting old videos, old or videos from
Speaker 2: who knows where that may or may not even be real.
Speaker 2: And it's kind of like just throwing all this stuff
Speaker 2: into the mix, and it's created a lot of confusion.
Speaker 2: Now there are other videos. This one here is actually
Speaker 2: really interesting that I found last night, which looks like
Speaker 2: a like a drone war is kind of going down,
Speaker 2: and there's things that are shooting out of this drone
Speaker 2: and which whenever it pans over, it is really reminiscent
Speaker 2: of the TR three B, this military craft that we
Speaker 2: know that the military has and has been developing for
Speaker 2: a long time. But this this one looks like it's
Speaker 2: just it's kind of disappearing and then like reappearing and
Speaker 2: then did you see a flash of light right there?
Speaker 2: Look like one of these things shot at one of
Speaker 2: them and then it pans over and then boom right here?
Speaker 2: Does that not look like a TR three B M
Speaker 2: right there?
Speaker 3: I mean, yeah, there's a number of triangular craft, TR
Speaker 3: three B being one of them, the Aurora. There's a
Speaker 3: number of them, and yeah, I mean they're all really
Speaker 3: easily described as having those those points of light you know,
Speaker 3: on their edges, for good reason. But yeah, that I mean,
Speaker 3: this this footage is like, in my opinion, far better
Speaker 3: than the one you had before. But and there's and
Speaker 3: there's more. As you've seen, it's just like a tapestry
Speaker 3: of all kinds of events.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so what do we think is actually happening with
Speaker 2: these drones? Is it? The last time I talked to you,
Speaker 2: you said that you were possibly actually going to New Jersey.
Speaker 2: Did you ever make it to New Jersey?
Speaker 3: Yeah? I have a contact out there and I was
Speaker 3: going to go out with him and he ended up
Speaker 3: having to cancel. Not to say that it still won't happen,
Speaker 3: but there is a lot a lot going on, and
Speaker 3: like I said, it is in my opinion, no one
Speaker 3: thing in particular that I know of. There are at
Speaker 3: least five components right now, and there could be more. So. Uh.
Speaker 3: The issue is that when you have a multi different
Speaker 3: players with an overall narrative, in other words, a multi
Speaker 3: pronged strategy. Ah, you you you can't say it's just
Speaker 3: this without taking into consideration some of the other players
Speaker 3: or characters or objects. And you know, the this this
Speaker 3: footage of like the triangular craft versus the orb versus
Speaker 3: the obvious drones, there's there's a number of potential players
Speaker 3: and so it's it's a puzzle.
Speaker 2: Yeah, these ones are really interesting because it doesn't seem
Speaker 2: to be like the light source doesn't seem to be
Speaker 2: like blinking other than those two drones that just were
Speaker 2: whatever they were went in between those. It doesn't seem
Speaker 2: like that they're you know, standard aircraft here, because normally
Speaker 2: a standard aircraft would be have blinking and rotating lights
Speaker 2: like green red, like a you know, a typical drone
Speaker 2: or a typical manned aircraft would have. Here, actually have
Speaker 2: a footage of one of these drones and what they
Speaker 2: actually look like and what they can look like, which
Speaker 2: is this right here. This is what a typical drone
Speaker 2: at night would be flashing, and that is what some
Speaker 2: of them look like.
Speaker 3: Yeah, the typical drone thing is something that we can't
Speaker 3: ignore because we're getting a lot of people in the
Speaker 3: conspiracy world that are posting these are not drones. And
Speaker 3: I understand that there's a percentage of these that may
Speaker 3: not be drones, for sure, my hat's in that ring. However,
Speaker 3: there is a percentage of these that are very much drones.
Speaker 3: Like you're saying, like, we know what we're looking at.
Speaker 3: You know, it's it's obvious, and there's a number of
Speaker 3: people that are basically fighting the drone you know, idea,
Speaker 3: but some of them are very obviously drones, and in
Speaker 3: some cases these drones are actually being decommissioned or taken
Speaker 3: out of the sky by things that appear to be
Speaker 3: more exotic in nature or possibly anomalous. So yeah, it's
Speaker 3: it's a heck of a deal. This, in my opinion,
Speaker 3: will go down in the books as sort of a
Speaker 3: War of the World's scenario later on, because it just continues,
Speaker 3: and a lot of folks are saying it's just distraction,
Speaker 3: you know, don't take it seriously, but there's very much
Speaker 3: a serious aspect to this.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I would have to agree in the way that
Speaker 2: it keeps, it keeps going on, and it keeps happening,
Speaker 2: and that's one of the strangest things that's going on,
Speaker 2: and nobody seems to know exactly what it is. I mean,
Speaker 2: the White House came out and commented on it and
Speaker 2: said that that they believe that it's manned aircraft. You know.
Speaker 2: Trump comes on and says, oh, well, this is the
Speaker 2: military knows what this is, and for some reason they're
Speaker 2: not telling the American public. Did you hear us comments
Speaker 2: on that?
Speaker 3: Yeah? Yeah, And I think he is not entirely incorrect.
Speaker 3: He's not wrong. There is Whenever this happens, you have
Speaker 3: to kind of approach it much like an intelligence squadron
Speaker 3: would or a group of intelligence efficients. And whenever you
Speaker 3: have so called aerial craft that are typically not seen
Speaker 3: and in some cases unidentified, you you have you have
Speaker 3: to investigate it. And the FBI has investigated it and
Speaker 3: other agencies, and in their reconnaissance they've found a lot
Speaker 3: of things, a lot of that stuff they can't report on,
Speaker 3: and they've had a lot of anomaloust things happen after
Speaker 3: some of the investigations. But the important thing to remember
Speaker 3: is if anybody just comes out and says it's this
Speaker 3: one hundred percent end of story, I would say, turn around,
Speaker 3: walk away, and you know, yeah, you can bookmark that.
Speaker 3: But there's more going on.
Speaker 2: Now. What do we think about this, this idea of
Speaker 2: you know, these drones scanning for something or these craft
Speaker 2: because like you said, I don't know if they are
Speaker 2: all drones. People saying their plasma, some saying that they're
Speaker 2: manned aircraft, some are a military drone, some are you know,
Speaker 2: R and D like people people's regular drones that they
Speaker 2: apparently buy from best Buy and fly up there. What
Speaker 2: do we think about the idea that they're looking for something,
Speaker 2: that they're scanning maybe the skies for something, or they're
Speaker 2: scanning the ground for something. It looks like you got
Speaker 2: a little orbit. Is a drone in your house right now?
Speaker 3: Ryan?
Speaker 2: What's going on up there?
Speaker 3: Wild times? I do have one just over my desk
Speaker 3: here and another two in the corner. So yeah, a
Speaker 3: lot of people, there's a lot of private citizens that
Speaker 3: have these. A lot of people have put out the
Speaker 3: allegation that hey, this is all Elon Musk's brother, you know,
Speaker 3: Kimball Musk, because he owns a company known as Nova
Speaker 3: Sky Stories with over nine thousand drones in his capacity.
Speaker 3: And you know, I love the conspiracy aspect of all this.
Speaker 3: It's a lot of fun. But getting back to what
Speaker 3: you said, I think there is a political element to this.
Speaker 3: We have conflicts in the world happening right now. Of course,
Speaker 3: the conflict in the Middle East. We have conflicts with Ukraine.
Speaker 3: And you know, it's been my understanding and a lot
Speaker 3: of other folks have keyed into this that there is
Speaker 3: a very real aspect. In other words, at least nine
Speaker 3: nations but most likely more that are not happy with us,
Speaker 3: and we do have enemies. Believe it or not, we
Speaker 3: have enemies. And if it was not for this conflict
Speaker 3: in Ukraine the way it was explained to me, RFK
Speaker 3: has done a good job of explaining this online and
Speaker 3: Mitch McConnell has actually kind of tipped his hat and
Speaker 3: let the cat out of the bag. But basically, if
Speaker 3: it was not for the common inflict in Ukraine, I've
Speaker 3: been told that our country would be completely bankrupt right now,
Speaker 3: we would be in an extreme recession and everybody would
Speaker 3: be starting to go hungry, if not starving already. And
Speaker 3: the conflict in Ukraine has basically filled our coffers, or
Speaker 3: filled the pockets of the Big five, which is Northrop, Grumming, Boeing, Raytheon,
Speaker 3: Lockheed Martin, General, Dynamics, and those are owned in majority
Speaker 3: by Black Rock, State Street and Vanguard. So not to
Speaker 3: get too convoluted, but these guys have made a ton
Speaker 3: of money. Not only a ton of money, they've gotten
Speaker 3: rid of all their old surplus and they've kept us
Speaker 3: from going bankrupt allegedly, which is a great thing if
Speaker 3: you live here, not a good thing if you live
Speaker 3: in Ukraine. So there is you know, the very real
Speaker 3: aspect that there are winners and losers in these conflicts.
Speaker 3: And not only we have the Big Five and Black
Speaker 3: Rock and State Street and Vanguard and all of these
Speaker 3: other multinational corporations, many of which are agricultural and have
Speaker 3: their eyes on the prize, which is the agricultural land
Speaker 3: in Ukraine, which is kind of the bread basket of Europe,
Speaker 3: really really rich soil. The DuPonts have purchased land there,
Speaker 3: the company formerly known as Monsanto and other multinationals because
Speaker 3: Ukraine can never fully repay us for what we've done.
Speaker 3: You know, you can't. It's it's kind of unfair. But anyway,
Speaker 3: the bottom line is we are winning not only agricultural
Speaker 3: lands in the form of those purchases, we're winning getting
Speaker 3: rid of our old surplus. And what Mitch McConnell said,
Speaker 3: which really tipped you know a lot of people off,
Speaker 3: is he was asked, you know, why do we continue
Speaker 3: giving these billions and billions of dollars to Ukraine And
Speaker 3: he explained, we're not. We're getting this money back with interest.
Speaker 3: And everybody realized at that point, like, well, we may
Speaker 3: have some kind of a grift here, right, like a
Speaker 3: money laundering scheme, and that is one reason that you know,
Speaker 3: our economy is doing pretty good. This Christmas is looking
Speaker 3: pretty pretty amazing. But at the same time, we have
Speaker 3: to be aware that there could be the potential for
Speaker 3: an attack. And as you asked, if we have these
Speaker 3: highly exotic technologies capable of detection in other words, detection
Speaker 3: units that are highly specialized assets designed for reconnaissance and
Speaker 3: threat identification, that's accurate. I think I think these leaks
Speaker 3: are accurate.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Unfortunately, war equals money for the military industrial complex
Speaker 2: and the banks, of course, and I personally believe that
Speaker 2: the reason that we give so much foreign aid is
Speaker 2: because it's like hush money, right, We're like, here, take
Speaker 2: all this money, take all of our money for whatever
Speaker 2: you need to use it for. And then when it's
Speaker 2: time to it's not even so much like pay us back.
Speaker 2: It's like it's like a favor, right for for something
Speaker 2: that's going to happen in the future that we're going
Speaker 2: to need your support. You remember whenever I gave you
Speaker 2: all you remember when I gave you five billion dollars
Speaker 2: about five or six years ago for to support your
Speaker 2: country and you know, support this war against Russia. Well,
Speaker 2: now it's your turn. It's your turn to return the favor, right,
Speaker 2: And that's kind of you can see that on like
Speaker 2: a small scale with people. You know, they they do
Speaker 2: things for each other and they expect something in return,
Speaker 2: and maybe not something. It's kind of like an IOU
Speaker 2: that is what I look at it. And essentially we've
Speaker 2: just been paying off all these countries for a really
Speaker 2: long time and then you know, either backstabbing them or
Speaker 2: you know, making them do something that they necessarily don't
Speaker 2: want to do. And I think countries are going to
Speaker 2: start to if they haven't already, they're going to start
Speaker 2: seeing through that really quickly.
Speaker 3: Yeah, as you know, there is a really good book
Speaker 3: out there called Confessions of an Economic hit Man that
Speaker 3: detail what you're talking about really well. Where these associates
Speaker 3: and assistance to the central banks with connections in you know,
Speaker 3: all kinds of engineering, municipal work, you name it, whatever
Speaker 3: the case might be. They roll into countries and they say,
Speaker 3: and these are countries that don't have conflicts, they they
Speaker 3: can go in and rape them. And so it just
Speaker 3: imagine a country that has any kind of a perceived conflict,
Speaker 3: which in many cases are conflicts that for lack of
Speaker 3: a better word, are put into motion in a problem reaction,
Speaker 3: solution dynamic, and then the coast is clear because it's
Speaker 3: it's it's just easy pickens. It's like taking candy from
Speaker 3: a baby. And you know, we do have we do
Speaker 3: have enemies right now. The bricks Nations are something that
Speaker 3: have kind of branched off and at least at least
Speaker 3: inso much as public opinion have a different plan. Now
Speaker 3: that's not to say and I'm one who believes that
Speaker 3: Russia has also made a lot of money. Their economy
Speaker 3: is doing really well. Russia and the United States have
Speaker 3: done really well with this conflict. It's always the little
Speaker 3: guy that doesn't do so hot. But I think what
Speaker 3: you said is accurate. Man, I think what you said
Speaker 3: is accurate.
Speaker 2: So what's the possibility and what's the chance that some
Speaker 2: of the stuff that's happening in New Jersey currently right
Speaker 2: now are our foreign that foreign as in another country's technology,
Speaker 2: Because again, that was one of the first things that
Speaker 2: Republican senator says that you know, this was Iran, That
Speaker 2: Iranian mothership was parked off of the East coast and
Speaker 2: that was sending in all these drones but then Trump
Speaker 2: says that he doesn't believe that it's a foreign threat,
Speaker 2: because if it was a foreign threat, as in another
Speaker 2: country's technology, then we would shoot it down. We would
Speaker 2: just shoot it right out of the sky. And that
Speaker 2: kind of makes sense. But then also when you take
Speaker 2: into consideration the Chinese spy balloon that was floating around
Speaker 2: the United States for weeks on end last year around
Speaker 2: this time last year, that we didn't shoot that down
Speaker 2: for a while. We waited until it was over the
Speaker 2: ocean to you know, shoot it down. And apparently we
Speaker 2: knew that that was the Chinese. So if we knew
Speaker 2: that it was the Chinese and it was a freaking
Speaker 2: spy ballo, why didn't we shoot it down immediately? So
Speaker 2: I don't know if that comment actually holds any water.
Speaker 2: Even if we did believe that these were foreign drones
Speaker 2: or foreign craft or whatever there's based off of the past,
Speaker 2: that doesn't mean that we would immediately shoot them down.
Speaker 3: Yeah, there he I think the guy went out the congressman,
Speaker 3: I'm sorry, the senator, I believe it was. I think
Speaker 3: he went out on a limb a little too far.
Speaker 3: And you know, he's not wrong in that, and neither
Speaker 3: was Trump, But I think you brought up something really
Speaker 3: big when you said, you know, these foreign threats, and
Speaker 3: we'll get to that. But I think that, yeah, there is.
Speaker 3: There has been initial, in accurate leaks of a covert
Speaker 3: segment of the US intelligence that has flagged credible indications
Speaker 3: of an impending large scale attack. And this is not
Speaker 3: what everybody thinks it might be, but it could be
Speaker 3: what people are brainstorming about. In other words, it's a
Speaker 3: threat that could be at least, as it was described
Speaker 3: to me, dynamic, highly fluid, and elusive. And the way
Speaker 3: it was described to me is it would be like
Speaker 3: hunting a mouse in a pitch black football stadium. So
Speaker 3: you can imagine how hard that would be and why
Speaker 3: you would need something like drones or something with the
Speaker 3: technology to cover and do reconnaissance in an area, scan
Speaker 3: a vicinity, and you know, these operations would be to
Speaker 3: sniff is what they call it, even though it's not
Speaker 3: exactly sniffing, but basically it would be something to avoid
Speaker 3: widespread panic, find any potential threats. And we've noticed that
Speaker 3: these drones are being seen in other states as well.
Speaker 3: In fact, just day before yesterday, Las Vegas News outlet
Speaker 3: came out openly saying that they will be flying aircraft
Speaker 3: over the Las Vegas Strip to sniff, scan and look
Speaker 3: for any potential radiation threats. So the reality is everybody
Speaker 3: knows that there is, for lack of a better word,
Speaker 3: the potential for a nuclear threat, suitcase, nuke, dirty bomb,
Speaker 3: whatever you want to call it, maybe even something bile
Speaker 3: or chemical. And it doesn't help that the gentleman in
Speaker 3: charge of Russia's nuclear, chemical and biological warfare was just assassinated.
Speaker 3: He was just blown up coming out of a building
Speaker 3: with his assistant, and you know, the news reported it,
Speaker 3: but people really haven't commented on it. This is a
Speaker 3: huge deal. This is like that would be like if
Speaker 3: a country did that here, that would be for sure
Speaker 3: an act of terrorism. You know, took out one of
Speaker 3: our top generals and the top guy when it came
Speaker 3: to nuclear strategy. So yeah, there's there's definitely blood in
Speaker 3: the water.
Speaker 2: I think where they mess up is that they say
Speaker 2: that they don't know what they are right, because then
Speaker 2: that leads to so much speculation and hyperbole and conjecture.
Speaker 2: All that they really got to say is if they
Speaker 2: actually have the situation under control, and it is our craft,
Speaker 2: or if it's mixed with some other maybe foreign craft,
Speaker 2: or mixed with some you know, civilian drones. All they
Speaker 2: got to say is that it's a military exercise. That's it.
Speaker 2: That's all they gotta do, Just like they do with
Speaker 2: every other event that happens, there always seems to be
Speaker 2: some sort of military exercise going on during the time
Speaker 2: of that event. I mean, you got nine to eleven,
Speaker 2: you got the Boston marathon bombing, the most recent shooting,
Speaker 2: there was a freaking a testing that was going on
Speaker 2: to try and prevent that exact same thing. It's so crazy.
Speaker 2: So really, all they got to do is be like, oh,
Speaker 2: don't worry, guys, this is just the military exercise, and
Speaker 2: then people would just be like, Okay, well it's just military,
Speaker 2: that's it, and then that would solve all the concerns,
Speaker 2: regardless of actually what it might be. Might be something
Speaker 2: completely different, we don't really know, but they could just
Speaker 2: tell the public to calm everybody down to keep this
Speaker 2: from becoming something that it's not. By just saying this
Speaker 2: is a military exercise. You would solve it all by
Speaker 2: doing that. And there is some proof that this may
Speaker 2: actually be a military exercise. I mean the United States,
Speaker 2: the UK and Australia. You know, they're testing AI powered
Speaker 2: drone swarms and you know, in military exercises where they're
Speaker 2: just like for you know, to simulate battlefield scenarios. And
Speaker 2: they've been doing this since August of this year. It's
Speaker 2: called Project Convergence. So and also China has drones that
Speaker 2: are almost doing that exact same thing. You know, they're
Speaker 2: throwing out aerial cluster drones to simulate swarm attacks. You know,
Speaker 2: So all they got to do is say, hey, this
Speaker 2: is just the military exercise and then I'll calm everybody down.
Speaker 2: But they don't. And I'm so it's so strange that
Speaker 2: they don't say that, like because it could just completely
Speaker 2: you know, take away anybody's fears. But so the only
Speaker 2: reason that I would think that they would want to
Speaker 2: do that is because they want the speculation, They want
Speaker 2: the theories. They want people you know going online and
Speaker 2: talking about it and nobody knowing exactly what's going on,
Speaker 2: because they could literally solve it. And I think that
Speaker 2: that might be what you know, Trump is really saying
Speaker 2: when he says that they know what they are and
Speaker 2: they're not telling anybody. And for some reason they're not
Speaker 2: telling anyone, So that would make the most sense in
Speaker 2: my eyes. Just come out and say it's a military
Speaker 2: training exercise and it's done and it's over. But the
Speaker 2: only reason that they wouldn't do that is if they're
Speaker 2: trying to build those theories and build that speculation, and
Speaker 2: build that, you know, the theorizing of what these are to,
Speaker 2: you know, give people a sense, get people used to
Speaker 2: just seeing things in the sky for an event that
Speaker 2: may or may not happen five to ten years in
Speaker 2: the future.
Speaker 3: I think a lot of valid points, with lots of
Speaker 3: valid points. It's in my opinion, as you said, this
Speaker 3: is something that if it continues, I believe we will
Speaker 3: or it's very likely that we will see military engagement
Speaker 3: in the realm of exercises deployed, or they will admit
Speaker 3: that these are taking place. At the moment, they may
Speaker 3: just be protecting some of the independent contractors, allegedly reliable robotics.
Speaker 3: There's a there's a list a mile long of these contractors.
Speaker 3: But the reality is, of course, the drones. As you've mentioned,
Speaker 3: the reality is that you know, when whenever these things surface,
Speaker 3: when whenever there's reports of anomalous craft. I believe that
Speaker 3: the government, the United States government has deliberately remained silent
Speaker 3: to avoid any any widespread panic, first of all, but
Speaker 3: more importantly, it's it's something that they tolerate these wild claims,
Speaker 3: you know, these alien invasion claims. In fact, that the
Speaker 3: alien invasion narrative is great because it is something that
Speaker 3: distracts from what's actually taking place, and it's far less
Speaker 3: is stabilizing to the majority of the population then the reality.
Speaker 3: So yeah, man, they're they're they're gonna keep quiet until
Speaker 3: they can't. And when they no longer can keep quiet,
Speaker 3: then I believe we will see, and probably in the
Speaker 3: near future, some military engagement exercise scenario.
Speaker 2: I mean, I think we already have. I mean this, uh,
Speaker 2: this seems like a military craft. What this is right here,
Speaker 2: and you know, there's there's schematics, there's you know, details
Speaker 2: about you know what this this kind of craft is,
Speaker 2: and online that you can just type in just you know,
Speaker 2: type into Google TR three B and here here's one
Speaker 2: of them right here, which is a schematic of what
Speaker 2: the TR three B looks like. And it seems that
Speaker 2: they're already they're already doing that, that they're already in
Speaker 2: the sky. Then it's like, oh, well, are these craft
Speaker 2: manned craft or are they one d percent autonomous drones?
Speaker 2: Are they hooked up with some kind of AI system,
Speaker 2: because that's what a lot of people have talked about with,
Speaker 2: you know, these drones when people or craft or whatever
Speaker 2: they are, whenever something gets close to them, they completely
Speaker 2: shut down. And that would be you know, reminiscent of
Speaker 2: some sort of AI technology that they would you know,
Speaker 2: go dark whenever something is approaching them. All the lights
Speaker 2: would go off so that they can get away. But
Speaker 2: then that brings up you know, are they you know,
Speaker 2: surveilling for something like why would you have all these
Speaker 2: drones clustered in the sky just because there's some videos
Speaker 2: Ryan that I've seen where it looks like there's hundreds
Speaker 2: of them. Now again, I don't know if all these
Speaker 2: videos are one real or if they're fake or they're
Speaker 2: older videos, but it seems like there's a lot of
Speaker 2: them in the sky. So what would be the purpose
Speaker 2: of doing that. I mean, would you be scanning for
Speaker 2: something in the sky, would you be scanning for something
Speaker 2: in the ground, or is this just some kind of
Speaker 2: exercise Because it kind of seems counterintuitive to have so
Speaker 2: many of them out there at the exact same time,
Speaker 2: unless this is, you know, a testing like I was
Speaker 2: talking about, or a military exercise. What do you think
Speaker 2: about that?
Speaker 3: Yeah, I think I think you nailed it. It's multi pronged.
Speaker 3: You can kill it. At this point, I think we're
Speaker 3: killing two or three birds with one stone. You know,
Speaker 3: we have we want to test things. The US Navy
Speaker 3: has been allegedly tested growing what is known as plasma
Speaker 3: technology bases. These are, you know, in different forms mid
Speaker 3: air decoys. They have all kinds of different capabilities, but
Speaker 3: they are very much plasma craft. And we have at
Speaker 3: the same time we have Christmas in New Year's coming up.
Speaker 3: I told you that at least in Las Vegas, they're
Speaker 3: they're acknowledging the fact that there will be aircraft checking
Speaker 3: for radiation signatures along the strip. And of course we
Speaker 3: have just over the river from New Jersey, we have
Speaker 3: New York and Manhattan Times Square, which is a big
Speaker 3: deal on New Year's. These are great places that if
Speaker 3: you were a terrorist and you had the technology to
Speaker 3: cause a bunch of havoc, this is a place that
Speaker 3: you would probably pinpoint. And then I think there's also
Speaker 3: so an interest in this technology that goes way deeper
Speaker 3: than many people believe that. As you said, this technology
Speaker 3: may be utilized in future capacities. And I've been told
Speaker 3: that allegedly there are NEST units, which is known as
Speaker 3: this is an this is an agency that a lot
Speaker 3: of conspiracy theorists allege is kind of the new MiB
Speaker 3: you know, craft recovery Teams, et cetera. Uh, and they
Speaker 3: come out of the Energy Department. It's a NEST stands
Speaker 3: for a new nuclear emergency support team which comes from
Speaker 3: a variety of different agencies all grouped together. And that's
Speaker 3: the best way to function, you know, allegedly is if
Speaker 3: you have an advanced working group that is gathering its
Speaker 3: top minds from different agencies. All of those specific agencies
Speaker 3: can claim they don't know what's going on because they don't,
Speaker 3: but their top minds are involved together in a secretive
Speaker 3: team that is on site. And if the nuclear emergency
Speaker 3: support teams are in the vicinity, I think a very
Speaker 3: good reason would be what we've seen, Like you pointed
Speaker 3: out the TR three B and some of the schematics
Speaker 3: there the allegations that these may be nuclear powered. Well,
Speaker 3: if one of these things comes down, it could turn
Speaker 3: into a problem. I've been told they're super insulated, they're
Speaker 3: very safe. Yet you could always have, you know, a mishap,
Speaker 3: a hairline crack. It's like driving a tesla. You know,
Speaker 3: things can happen even though you're riding on a huge
Speaker 3: lithium I own battery that's safe. Ninety nine point nine
Speaker 3: percent of the time, we see that things can happen.
Speaker 3: So if if this is the case, it would make
Speaker 3: sense why there have been so many public in effect
Speaker 3: notices sent out to law enforcement, to fire departments on
Speaker 3: the East Coast that if they see one of these
Speaker 3: things go down, to not approach it, to basically keep
Speaker 3: the public away from it, and to call in the
Speaker 3: big guns. And so yeah, I think that we have,
Speaker 3: in conclusion, a whole bunch of things taking place. And
Speaker 3: that's not to take away from the anomalous aspect, because
Speaker 3: some of the one FBI profiler in particular that I
Speaker 3: spoke with mentioned that some of the FBI agents that
Speaker 3: were investigating the quote unquote drones and I know people
Speaker 3: go crazy, don't call them drones, but one person he
Speaker 3: said that some of these agents would go home afterwards,
Speaker 3: and that some of the more anomaloust craft would actually
Speaker 3: hover over their residences. So there's either super exotic tracking
Speaker 3: technology or something more anomalous also involved. And a lot
Speaker 3: of the ufologists would call this a number of things,
Speaker 3: including the watchers or you know, it's similar to the
Speaker 3: hitchhike effect or the hitch hiker effect that you run
Speaker 3: into in the u Win a basin of Utah. Like
Speaker 3: in and around Space Wolf research, we'll have people visit,
Speaker 3: they'll see something strange or encounter something that is anomalous,
Speaker 3: and then they'll go home, in some cases thousands of
Speaker 3: miles away and have some of that high strangeness follow
Speaker 3: them home. So I don't want to discount the possibility
Speaker 3: of something non human involved, but it may just be
Speaker 3: along the lines of anomalous or you know, just general
Speaker 3: high strangeness.
Speaker 2: Do we have any confirmed reports of any of these
Speaker 2: drones or craft actually being shot down because there's been
Speaker 2: a lot of or falling from the sky or crashing,
Speaker 2: because there's been a lot of people talk about that
Speaker 2: some of them have fell out of the sky. But
Speaker 2: the videos are really suspicious, you know, they look like
Speaker 2: we don't really know if they're real and they kind
Speaker 2: of look like actual planes that may have crashed, because
Speaker 2: I think that there was a plane crash that happened
Speaker 2: not too long ago on like a highway, and that
Speaker 2: might be being passed off as being a drone. From
Speaker 2: your understanding, Ryan, dude, are there any confirmed reports of
Speaker 2: any of these craft that are over New Jersey falling
Speaker 2: to the ground or being shot down?
Speaker 3: You know, I have seen some pretty legitimate reports that
Speaker 3: this has taken place, and people have reported that animals
Speaker 3: are acting very strange when these things are in the sky,
Speaker 3: some of them, and even though many of them appear
Speaker 3: to almost be along the lines of orbs or ball lightning,
Speaker 3: some kind of electrical plasma, the fact that animals and
Speaker 3: people are both kind of feeling, you know, the hairs
Speaker 3: on their necks go up. Again. I don't want to
Speaker 3: detract from the anomalous aspect, but I think that there
Speaker 3: are very much physical drones that have been taken out
Speaker 3: of the sky. Yes, and I think I think there's
Speaker 3: proof of that. I've seen law enforcement officials who have
Speaker 3: talked about that, and this is sort of one of
Speaker 3: the reasons I think that these notices are going out
Speaker 3: from higher levels of government asking, you know, firemen, law
Speaker 3: enforcement officials that if they see something come down out
Speaker 3: of the sky to not interact with it. There could
Speaker 3: be a variety of reasons.
Speaker 2: Do we think that some of these are because that's
Speaker 2: been a contention and in a question too is like
Speaker 2: well if these are just drones, are these are just
Speaker 2: military drones? And how do they hover for so long?
Speaker 2: How are they you know, staying in the same space
Speaker 2: for such long periods of time. I mean people have
Speaker 2: reported that they're over, like you mentioned, over their house
Speaker 2: for like five six hours out of time, just like
Speaker 2: hovering there. And then some people say, well, you know,
Speaker 2: we don't have that kind of technology because we couldn't actually,
Speaker 2: because there's also reports of them coming in and out
Speaker 2: of the water, like the UAP congressional hearing talked about
Speaker 2: just a couple of weeks ago. The entire congressional hearing
Speaker 2: was basically about you know, these USOS and they were like, well,
Speaker 2: we don't have the technology to be able to I mean,
Speaker 2: they do definitely have the technology for trans medium craft.
Speaker 2: They do have drones that are launched from submarines. The
Speaker 2: real thing, they launched them from submarines and they come
Speaker 2: up out of the water. Then they go to their destination.
Speaker 2: But some people have been in contention about if it
Speaker 2: is our technology and is being launched from a submarine
Speaker 2: and then it's going up into the sky and then
Speaker 2: it's going to New Jersey and then it's hovering for
Speaker 2: five to six hours, would it have enough you know,
Speaker 2: power source to get back to the submarine or to
Speaker 2: you know, get away. And I'm not one, I really
Speaker 2: don't know. I don't know how because it's reported that
Speaker 2: the t R three B is you know, based on
Speaker 2: what did this say, nuclear power or I don't know,
Speaker 2: if it was nuclear powers, Yeah, nuclear power, top secret craft,
Speaker 2: nuclear power flying triangle, the TR THREEV so and then
Speaker 2: that would also be the reason why some of these
Speaker 2: you know, agencies have been called in the to because
Speaker 2: if one of these nuclear power craft go down, then
Speaker 2: you know, that would then be a hazard to the public.
Speaker 2: Would that not be correct in that statement?
Speaker 3: It could be, it could be. And while you know,
Speaker 3: nuclear powered exotic propulsion is extremely efficient and i've heard
Speaker 3: very very safe, you know, these alleged exotic propulsion systems,
Speaker 3: there are characteristics that can still affect you know, close
Speaker 3: proximity with humans, We're just not meant to be in
Speaker 3: close proximity of this stuff in a normal way. So yeah,
Speaker 3: I think that I've heard the most exotic lithium ion
Speaker 3: drone technology I've come across has a eighteen hour capability.
Speaker 3: But like you said, some of these are being reported
Speaker 3: hovering for six hours in one particular spot, and then
Speaker 3: you know they're coming from far away, they're taking off
Speaker 3: going far away. We don't know, we don't know how
Speaker 3: long they've been in the air. And this wouldn't be
Speaker 3: any type of issue whatsoever if you have this alleged
Speaker 3: nuclear propulsion system on board, which is basically you know,
Speaker 3: I don't want to oversimplify it, but Bob Lazar was
Speaker 3: talking about this in the eighties, and you know, you
Speaker 3: basically just have a little onboard reactor. It's not that
Speaker 3: it is that high tech, but it's not that high tech,
Speaker 3: just just you know. So, and as you mentioned and
Speaker 3: previously talked about, the US Navy is the one that's
Speaker 3: doing a lot of the alleged plasma technology, both anti
Speaker 3: aircraft and shooting it out of the ocean. So so
Speaker 3: there is that aspect, and I mean, we've been doing
Speaker 3: that that I know of since nineteen sixty so and
Speaker 3: and that stuff you can find in declassified documents. So
Speaker 3: I mean, all all of these things hold some water.
Speaker 3: And I would say that there's a variety of reasons
Speaker 3: why you wouldn't want to approach something that comes down
Speaker 3: out of the sky. It could be it could be
Speaker 3: your basic tactical drone with with you know, a nuke
Speaker 3: on it. It could be you know, just duct taped
Speaker 3: to it or whatever. And then it could also be
Speaker 3: something a lot more exotic in nature that they don't
Speaker 3: want us seeing. I mean, there's a reason why some
Speaker 3: of these things, and you know, to this may be
Speaker 3: why some of the fact that there could be exercises
Speaker 3: has not been admitted to yet is because we do
Speaker 3: have technologies that we very much don't want the average
Speaker 3: citizen to see. With good reason. I mean, these technologies are,
Speaker 3: you know, protecting us and you know, the last thing
Speaker 3: you want. It's like going back to the medieval period
Speaker 3: and you're the only guy with a catapult. The last
Speaker 3: thing you want is for your neighbor to figure out
Speaker 3: that you have a catapult and like reverse engineer his
Speaker 3: own catapult. So, not to oversimplify, but yeah, we've seen
Speaker 3: a lot of cases of where technologies are actually detonated
Speaker 3: rather than even moving them. In some of these quick
Speaker 3: reaction scenarios where the public has seen something go down,
Speaker 3: they rather lose that particular unit and just destroy it,
Speaker 3: like the case of the helicopter allegedly that went and
Speaker 3: got Osama bin laden that had these felt tip blades
Speaker 3: among other exotic systems on board. They just blew it
Speaker 3: up because you know, it's possible that a goat herder
Speaker 3: there may have you seen something, so you know it's
Speaker 3: you never know, you know, is it likely that these
Speaker 3: individuals could reverse engineer these technologies? No, it's not likely,
Speaker 3: But the is a protocol and you don't want everybody
Speaker 3: and their dogs sniffing around.
Speaker 2: Then why would you put lights on it? Ryan? Why
Speaker 2: do you want blinking freaking lights on it if you
Speaker 2: don't want people to see it. If you're not trying
Speaker 2: to make a statement, and it's not a military exercise
Speaker 2: and you don't want people to see it, why are
Speaker 2: you strutting it out in front of everyone in the sky.
Speaker 2: That sounds counterintuitive, counterproductive, and I find it pretty odd Ryan,
Speaker 2: that you don't want your neighbor to have a catapult.
Speaker 2: Would we not all be safer if everyone had a
Speaker 2: catapult in their home.
Speaker 3: I would love one. I think, you know, if we
Speaker 3: see these Okay, so from the outside perspective, if we
Speaker 3: have that many craft in the sky and some of
Speaker 3: them are ours, there there is something built into some
Speaker 3: of the more exotic systems that is AI based, and
Speaker 3: it's known as situational awareness, where these things can, for
Speaker 3: all intents and purposes, almost act as if they're alive.
Speaker 3: And as you said, if something approaches them, they can
Speaker 3: turn off these lights so that they can't be seen.
Speaker 3: But if we have that many drones in the sky,
Speaker 3: there is the very real fear that we'll have planes
Speaker 3: running into them or crashing like the one you talked about,
Speaker 3: unless they have these marker lights on them. So I
Speaker 3: think we're this is you know, this is definitely somebody
Speaker 3: is juggling a lot of things right now. I'm glad
Speaker 3: it's not me, because it's definitely hit the fan. The
Speaker 3: public is noticed. People have been staying up at night,
Speaker 3: even though it's cold, filming what they can and I
Speaker 3: think that if this continues, we will see something along
Speaker 3: the lines of a military exercise command, you know, at
Speaker 3: least at least statement come out to the public.
Speaker 2: Lynn Earthlyne says people are reporting about getting sick or
Speaker 2: ill after watching them. Do you know anything about this?
Speaker 2: I haven't heard anything. Have you heard? Ryan knows a
Speaker 2: lot about getting second ill after seeing something really strange.
Speaker 2: He had an experience with a cattle mutilation that, God,
Speaker 2: I'm pretty sick. Have you heard any reports of this?
Speaker 3: Lynn has a very good question, and again getting back
Speaker 3: to why these these blanket statements going out to law
Speaker 3: enforcement and fire departments keep people away. Don't approach these things.
Speaker 3: There's something that back in the day people used to
Speaker 3: call UFO disease. But what has been found out due
Speaker 3: to a bunch of files that have leaked off the
Speaker 3: desk of CIA doctor Kate Green, is that there is
Speaker 3: something that they are now terming. It's the same thing,
Speaker 3: but they're now terming it interference syndrome, and what it
Speaker 3: is is very similar to havana syndrome. You know that nauseousness,
Speaker 3: you end up with problems with your head, neurological disorders
Speaker 3: like you were discussing, and basically nerve endings, et cetera.
Speaker 3: What they're finding is with hundreds of patients, not all
Speaker 3: of which are government employees. But if you look up
Speaker 3: interference syndrome, it takes a while to get to the goods.
Speaker 3: And the goods are that top scientists, rocket scientists, propulsion experts, etc.
Speaker 3: That are in close proximity to what are being termed
Speaker 3: exotic propulsion systems end up with the same thing interference
Speaker 3: syndrome as people who are in areas of high strangeness
Speaker 3: like space wolf research, people that are close to abduction events. Again,
Speaker 3: this is when you look at the brain scan. Their
Speaker 3: brains are literally like Swiss cheese with portions that have
Speaker 3: been killed for lack of a better word, or are
Speaker 3: dead matter where it gets really interesting with interference syndrome
Speaker 3: as many of these professionals, specifically the rocket scientists, the
Speaker 3: propulsion experts, et cetera, are able to kind of download
Speaker 3: information quicker. They come up with more ideas. In some
Speaker 3: cases their IQs go up, but as soon as they're
Speaker 3: no longer in those positions, oftentimes they'll retire, for example,
Speaker 3: and they will spiral very quickly. Their minds will spiral
Speaker 3: very quickly to you know, being near useless. And so
Speaker 3: this is an actual official study. Gary Nolan has been
Speaker 3: involved with this as well, an actual official study that
Speaker 3: the government has had to do to get NCD ten
Speaker 3: codes for the insurance companies for all the families that
Speaker 3: have come forward and said, hey, dad was working on
Speaker 3: some top secret craft or some exotic propulsion, or maybe
Speaker 3: he was just stationed at a place of high strangeness
Speaker 3: and now he's completely, you know, physically not well, and
Speaker 3: we need to know how to get our insurance check
Speaker 3: because up until that point they just say, hey, sounds
Speaker 3: like bad luck, but it's not. There's something to it.
Speaker 3: So that's a great question, Lynn.
Speaker 2: That seems to be the report from going way back
Speaker 2: into World War Two with the Bell technology as well,
Speaker 2: and the Bell giving off the bunch of radiation and
Speaker 2: just making people sick that is anywhere near it or
Speaker 2: around it. But that makes you question, well, if this
Speaker 2: is these kind of after making people that ill and
Speaker 2: that sick and causing neurological disorders, and how is anybody
Speaker 2: inside of the craft. They can't be anybody inside of
Speaker 2: the craft. They have to be drones, right. You can't
Speaker 2: put a human being inside of something that is putting
Speaker 2: off that much radiation or whatever it is that's causing
Speaker 2: this illness.
Speaker 3: That's above my pay grade.
Speaker 2: I don't know, unless they have like some kind of
Speaker 2: invisible force field within the craft, but I don't know.
Speaker 2: I don't know. But that reminds me of this incident
Speaker 2: and George Knapp's knew Netflix documentary that came out before
Speaker 2: the UFO congressional hearing. I don't know if you watch
Speaker 2: that or not, but he I can't remember exactly where
Speaker 2: he went. It might have been in the Congo, were
Speaker 2: somewhere far overseas, but there were these reports where there's
Speaker 2: like a couple of cars pulled over and they saw
Speaker 2: this craft in the sky. Then the craft came out
Speaker 2: and like shot laser beams at them. Are you familiar
Speaker 2: with that story?
Speaker 3: Yeah?
Speaker 2: And one of the hit a lady in the chest.
Speaker 2: She supposedly still has a scar from a laser beam.
Speaker 3: Yep. No, this is something that very much to the
Speaker 3: UFO skeptics, and many have alleged that this may have
Speaker 3: been you know, military testing back then. You know, there's
Speaker 3: no reason why that couldn't fall under the umbrella, you know,
Speaker 3: go somewhere else far away, test out what we got
Speaker 3: and see how it works. But there's always the possibility
Speaker 3: that this may be of a very anomalous or in
Speaker 3: other words, non human intelligence involved. Like you said, if
Speaker 3: it's not, if it's not a human pilot in there,
Speaker 3: and if we can't seem to figure this out, and I,
Speaker 3: you know, I don't want to go too far down
Speaker 3: the woo woo rabbit trail rabbit hole here, but there
Speaker 3: there there have been a lot of individuals who have
Speaker 3: alleged that there are what they call biologics. They won't
Speaker 3: call them biological, but they will call them biologics, which
Speaker 3: means that they are seemingly alive. They are apparently alive,
Speaker 3: they're logically in a capacity acting as a pilot, but
Speaker 3: they may not be entirely like us. And it opens
Speaker 3: a huge Pandora's box.
Speaker 2: Well, that doesn't even really make any sense either, because
Speaker 2: that doesn't mean that when you say by alog, I'm
Speaker 2: assuming you're getting that from Dave Grush with the UFO
Speaker 2: congressional hearing last year, But what is he actually referring to.
Speaker 2: Because there's some people that believe that the craft themselves
Speaker 2: are alive, and that's what Kenneth Arnold believed that one
Speaker 2: of the first people to see something supposedly anomalous back
Speaker 2: in nineteen forty seven. He later changed his ideas and
Speaker 2: his thoughts surrounding what the craft are, and he thought
Speaker 2: that it was like a living being, something that can
Speaker 2: morph and change due to the perception of the viewer,
Speaker 2: sort of like the you know, the Carl Jung the
Speaker 2: Youngian hypothesis that it's our perception, and that makes a
Speaker 2: lot of sense when you consider the way that the
Speaker 2: phenomenon has changed over the years, you know, and how
Speaker 2: it was apparently in the beginning some sort of salcer,
Speaker 2: though kennetharnald Or said that it was sorcer and shape.
Speaker 2: He said that it flew like a saucer, but that
Speaker 2: didn't stop people from still claiming that they saw saucer
Speaker 2: like craft. And then then it turned into, you know,
Speaker 2: the something completely different, and now it's drones, and like
Speaker 2: now it's plasma entity and beings. You know, it's just
Speaker 2: so strange. But Ryan, we actually have another thing that
Speaker 2: we got to be worried about. Other than these drones
Speaker 2: in New Jersey and some sort of drone invasion or
Speaker 2: an alien invasion, we also have to worry about a
Speaker 2: freaking asteroid. Bro dailymail dot Com Huge Christmas tree Christmas Eve, sorry,
Speaker 2: asteroid the size of a ten story building will skim
Speaker 2: past Earth and forty three miles per hour on December
Speaker 2: twenty fourth, NASA warns this Christmas Eve, children around the
Speaker 2: road may be hoping to catch a glimpse of Santa's
Speaker 2: sleigh flying through the skies, but NASA has worn the
Speaker 2: jolly old Saint Nick won't be the only thing whizzing
Speaker 2: over our heads. On December twenty fourth, a massive Christmas
Speaker 2: Eve asteroid the size of a ten story building will
Speaker 2: skim pass Earth at fourteen thousand, seven hundred and forty
Speaker 2: three miles per hour. Bro, you know about this asteroid?
Speaker 3: Dude, they're always trying to take Santa's fire. I think
Speaker 3: they're trying to deflect. No, there is, Yeah, you know
Speaker 3: a lot of these things happen, and it's always extremely dynamic,
Speaker 3: and it's horrifying and everybody's put on high alert. But
Speaker 3: you know, at the end of the day, it really
Speaker 3: does just look like Santa's sleigh going by.
Speaker 2: No, Bro, this is an ash. We gotta be concerned
Speaker 2: about the asteroid now, Dude. Always it's always an asteroid
Speaker 2: every year, dude, some kind of asteroids, some kind of
Speaker 2: what was it last year? It was a different kind
Speaker 2: of it was a comet.
Speaker 3: That some huge, huge one. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it was a comment last year that was coming
Speaker 2: close to Earth. I forget what it was called, but
Speaker 2: a big time news reporter from ABC was calling it
Speaker 2: a mothership. I distinctly remember this happening last year.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it fits so well with like the pre predictive
Speaker 3: programming of all the you know, like movies like don't
Speaker 3: look up where it's like, yeah, eventually, we're just we're
Speaker 3: just gonna get blown to smithering, So ignore it. I
Speaker 3: don't know there there's there seems to be a lot
Speaker 3: of stuff flying around, that's for sure.
Speaker 2: No, Bro, we need to be worried about this asteroid?
Speaker 2: Do we need to be worried about UFO drones, trans
Speaker 2: medium craft, alien species, bumb nukes and freaking asteroids?
Speaker 3: Bro?
Speaker 2: All of it?
Speaker 3: Yeah?
Speaker 2: Well, Ryan, thanks so much for coming on, brother. I
Speaker 2: really appreciate you. Can you let people know where they
Speaker 2: can find you?
Speaker 3: Absolutely, you can find the podcast. It's a smaller podcast.
Speaker 3: It's at hero Paranormal dot com, hero Paranormal on YouTube, Spotify, Rumble,
Speaker 3: anywhere you hear them.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Baby. Links to Ryan's website is in the description
Speaker 2: of this video. And thank you guys so much everyone
Speaker 2: in the chat for being here. Really appreciate you guys,
Speaker 2: and Merry Christmas and happy Holidays. Hope you guys enjoy
Speaker 2: your time and hope everything is great with your family.
Speaker 2: And be warn watch out for these UFOs, watch out
Speaker 2: for these orbs, watch out for these plasma craft, watch
Speaker 2: out for asteroids, watch out for suitcase nukes. It's all
Speaker 2: gonna come after us. They're here to get us. So
Speaker 2: beware of this Christmas and definitely beware of this asteroid.
Speaker 2: And get out your binoculars and your your military grade
Speaker 2: night vision goggles. Maybe you'll see a UFO, maybe you'll
Speaker 2: see an asteroid. Maybe you'll see Santa Sleigh. Who knows,
Speaker 2: bro But thank you guys so much for being here.
Speaker 2: Please be sure to hit the thumbs up button to
Speaker 2: help the channel on the algorithm, share subscribe, hit the
Speaker 2: bell icon as well for notifications, and also be sure
Speaker 2: to check out my documentary A Clockwork Shining on Amazon
Speaker 2: Prime and Apple TV Plus for the holidays. If you're
Speaker 2: you know December isn't hidden like October and you want
Speaker 2: to get your spooky season on watch a documentary on
Speaker 2: Amazon Prime and Apple TV. Plus all right, guys, we'll
Speaker 2: see you guys next time. Bye bye,