Speaker 1: Using free speech to free minds. You are listening to
Speaker 1: The David Night Show.
Speaker 2: As the clock strikes thirteen, we gather for the David
Speaker 2: Knight Show. Welcome one and all to this program the
Speaker 2: first of September twenty twenty four September second, twenty twenty
Speaker 2: four year of our Lord. I'm Gardner Goldsmith, sitting in
Speaker 2: for David on this holiday, and I welcome you to
Speaker 2: it together Today until noontime Eastern time, we'll be looking
Speaker 2: at breaking stories, gathering some pertinent information to carry along
Speaker 2: with us after the fact, and we'll be joined by
Speaker 2: guests Donald Jeffries, historian, author, political commentator discussing his new book,
Speaker 2: and we'll look into freedom of speech with a man
Speaker 2: who knows very well what technology can do. Marty Gotdisfeld,
Speaker 2: will be joining us later in the program, as well
Speaker 2: as your opinions on the David Knight Show. Welcome to
Speaker 2: the David Knight Show. One in all. I'm Gardner Goldsmith,
Speaker 2: sitting in for David, who's getting a much deserved day
Speaker 2: off on this long weekend, and I hope you're enjoying
Speaker 2: it whatever time zone you might be calling home. Thanks
Speaker 2: for making this your home Monday through Friday, the David
Speaker 2: Knight Show nine am Eastern Time until noontime. You can
Speaker 2: join us inside the chats, and of course you can
Speaker 2: leave your comments after the fact. Please give the show
Speaker 2: the thumbs up and share it as much as you can,
Speaker 2: whether it be live or after the fact. If you're
Speaker 2: familiar with my work, it's probably because of my efforts
Speaker 2: with MRCTV. You might have also seen my program which
Speaker 2: is on six pm Monday through Friday on Rockfin and Rumble,
Speaker 2: and that is The Liberty Conspiracy. Because freedom is out
Speaker 2: of fashion nowadays. David Knight has great and I am
Speaker 2: so glad that you are here, whether you're watching on Rumble,
Speaker 2: on Rockfan, on David Knight's Twitter slash x feed which
Speaker 2: is at Liberty Terrian, if you're just catching it, please
Speaker 2: follow David, and of course on d Live d Live
Speaker 2: getting that audio out there already, I can see that
Speaker 2: people are inside the chats, and we've got a lot
Speaker 2: of really good folks who are populating there, including Mary
Speaker 2: Ellen Moore and fellow Liberty conspirator. I can't believe Jason
Speaker 2: Barker is also in the house. He's, of course the
Speaker 2: one of the two co founders of the Knights of
Speaker 2: the Storm and did a great show this weekend at
Speaker 2: ten am on Rumble. So check out Jason Barker as well,
Speaker 2: and you can follow him at real Jason Barker on X. Well,
Speaker 2: my friends, it has been some weekend. It's been an
Speaker 2: absolutely beautiful, beautiful start to the morning. I hope you're
Speaker 2: having a beautiful day wherever you are. I want to
Speaker 2: give you cheers, lots of wonderful, faithful hope, and I
Speaker 2: want to thank right off the bat before we go
Speaker 2: into any of the stories. Towards the end of the program,
Speaker 2: I found out that someone contributed as we closed off
Speaker 2: the month of August, someone contributed to the program to
Speaker 2: David Knight's show to the Family for the Love of
Speaker 2: the Road, and David actually text me about it. So
Speaker 2: if you are watching right now for the Love of
Speaker 2: the Road, thank you for what you did to close
Speaker 2: off the month the way you did, and thank you
Speaker 2: to everyone for being here to start off the new month.
Speaker 2: So let's do it in high fashion and great style.
Speaker 2: Let's offer our opportunities to discuss items with each other,
Speaker 2: and of course, if you would like to donate to
Speaker 2: help the David Knight Show. That is how they propel
Speaker 2: this program. So it's good to be here. I'm delighted
Speaker 2: that I get the opportunity to be here with you
Speaker 2: on this holiday. I hope you've had a fantastic holiday weekend.
Speaker 2: And in fact, before we do anything as far as
Speaker 2: the news is concerned, I want to show you a
Speaker 2: Bible quote that they came across today and I think
Speaker 2: it starts things off beautifully. This is from what David
Speaker 2: suggested to me to visit the Blue Letter Bible. It's
Speaker 2: a wonderful Blueletterbible dot Org, a wonderful site. Here is
Speaker 2: today's Bible quote. And wisdom and knowledge shall be the
Speaker 2: stability of thy times and strength of salvation. The fear
Speaker 2: of the Lord is his treasure. That's from Isaiah. That's
Speaker 2: great wisdom and knowledge. Well we get a lot of
Speaker 2: that from David Knight, that is for sure. So everyone,
Speaker 2: let's see what's on tap for the David Knight Show today.
Speaker 2: Mentioned we're gonna have some great guests today and we're
Speaker 2: gonna dig into a lot of very major issues today
Speaker 2: on the program this Labor Day beginning of September, and
Speaker 2: let's start it off with a bang. Everyone. The David
Speaker 2: Knight Show nine two twenty four. What's on tap today? Everyone? Wow?
Speaker 2: Look at that. Jeez, the whole team here put together
Speaker 2: a lot. You guys are working hard. You have to
Speaker 2: may be better food and drinks and pay I think
Speaker 2: let's see, we've got the news flash. It's our Silence
Speaker 2: of Dissent edition. Yes, of course that's going to roll
Speaker 2: into the first major story Brazil. Robert Reich and both
Speaker 2: of them, a lot of others going up against free
Speaker 2: speech X and Elon Musk. What are we to make
Speaker 2: of these developments as X has been banned in Brazil
Speaker 2: and VPNs have been banned in Brazil, but some politicians
Speaker 2: are openly defying the judicial order. We'll talk about that,
Speaker 2: give some of the details of how this has built
Speaker 2: up over the past few months out of Brazil, and
Speaker 2: what some people seem to be making of the reason
Speaker 2: why this is happening. Perhaps some political frustration on the
Speaker 2: part of many of the people in Brazil. Definitely, we'll
Speaker 2: look at Aurora, Colorados talk about political dissent, how they
Speaker 2: are worrying about migrant gangs taking over apartments. Saw some
Speaker 2: discussion about this, saw that it was disputed and then
Speaker 2: saw that it was confirmed. And then we'll take a
Speaker 2: look at California as Nancy Pelosi inkes Ronald Reagan to
Speaker 2: promote a California statute handing home loans to illegal aliens.
Speaker 2: We'll also discuss the Berkeley lawdean who has joined MSNBC
Speaker 2: to very flamboyantly and wonderfully, almost as if it was rehearsed,
Speaker 2: quite too rehearse. When you see the video, I think
Speaker 2: you'll know what I mean to call for the trashing
Speaker 2: of the already trash US Constitution, sorry to say. And
Speaker 2: we've got Don Jeffries as our guest on his new
Speaker 2: book American Memory Hall, and guest Marty Gottisfeld on online
Speaker 2: privacy and government corruption. So welcome to the program everyone.
Speaker 2: I hope you had a great weekend. I hope it's
Speaker 2: a great day. Hey, let me know on the five
Speaker 2: y five if the audio is coming through strong for you,
Speaker 2: put it in your comments. I see already we've got
Speaker 2: Martin thorn Is saying good morning Guard from the Shadow
Speaker 2: Band Mruskrat Lounge. Well, I'm sorry your shadow band, my friend.
Speaker 2: And yes, let's talk a little bit and get your
Speaker 2: personal opinions about free speech, especially on X. As you
Speaker 2: might have heard, Eric Peters joined us last week and
Speaker 2: on Friday, and it was quite interesting because Eric's been
Speaker 2: working on whether or not everybody is really enjoying the
Speaker 2: fruits of the free speech totem of X. We'll find out,
Speaker 2: and of course we're going to be welcoming more and
Speaker 2: more viewers as they pop in. So thank you everyone
Speaker 2: for recycling and giving it the thumbs up. I want
Speaker 2: to say hi to everybody inside Rumbleland. I see Lieutenant
Speaker 2: Oracle of Truth is there? I salute you. I see
Speaker 2: Princess Wrong Think. I love that. That is great, What
Speaker 2: a great title. Judy Wrinkles, where are you people coming from?
Speaker 2: This is great? And Gold's nugget as well as the
Speaker 2: real Jason Barker RUFUS sixty nine firefly is saying yo,
Speaker 2: I like it very good. Reminds me of like was
Speaker 2: Carmen Maraguso or something was one of that was like
Speaker 2: the boyfriend of one of the women on Laverne and Shirley.
Speaker 2: Was that his name Carmine the Big I don't know,
Speaker 2: but he always said yo. Anyway, thanks for being there.
Speaker 2: Steve Swan inside Rock then Lazy Toad thanks for being there,
Speaker 2: Lazy and Nancy as well. Eco Taxi. Good to have
Speaker 2: you there. And again big thanks for the love of
Speaker 2: the road for ending last month, and let's start off
Speaker 2: this month with a bang as well and send all
Speaker 2: of our affection and an energy over to you know who,
Speaker 2: David Knight and the family. Hey, by the way, everybody,
Speaker 2: if you want to follow me on X it's at
Speaker 2: Guard Goldsmith. That's at Guard Goldsmith, and I do want
Speaker 2: to give the thumbs up and thanks to the people
Speaker 2: at MRCTV. I just found out that there is a
Speaker 2: person who owns eleven small television stations out west and
Speaker 2: he's made a deal. It's just a you know, like
Speaker 2: a sharing deal to provide some of the material that
Speaker 2: we do on video for MRCTV onto his television stations,
Speaker 2: which is just great. It's just terrific. I'll find out
Speaker 2: more details and give it to you. But I spoke
Speaker 2: with Eric Shiner, the executive director of MRCTV, over the weekend,
Speaker 2: and that was wonderful to hear, and the man liked
Speaker 2: some of the videos that I was doing and so on,
Speaker 2: so thank you. I'll have to speak to him directly,
Speaker 2: and I thought that was really nice to see, very
Speaker 2: very good piece of information over the weekend, A nice
Speaker 2: addition to everything. Well, everyone, let's give a nice addition
Speaker 2: to the start of this program. I usually start Liberty
Speaker 2: Conspiracy on Monday through Friday at six pm over on
Speaker 2: Rumble and Rockman and my ex by going through a
Speaker 2: quick take on some of the things that have been
Speaker 2: happening in the news. And you know what, I thought
Speaker 2: of something special to put behind this. It's all about
Speaker 2: free speech. What's going on in Brazil and the wonderful
Speaker 2: Robert Reich as Rush Limbaugh used to humorously poke fun
Speaker 2: of him as he used to give his pieces on
Speaker 2: PBS and and then with Robert b Reich on the
Speaker 2: News Hour. Well, let's talk a little bit about free speech,
Speaker 2: shall we. It's time for a little derivation from the
Speaker 2: Liberty Conspiracy for the David Knight Show. It's time for
Speaker 2: a newsflash everyone.
Speaker 3: Brazilian government is freaking out.
Speaker 4: I wonder why.
Speaker 5: Oh yeah, yeah, that's probably why, as the Brazilian government
Speaker 5: just literally bound Twitter.
Speaker 6: Hello darkness, smile friend, I've come to talk with here again.
Speaker 3: The Brazilian government just banned X, which means that the
Speaker 3: handle for the US Embassy in Brazil at US andbr
Speaker 3: is now banned in Brazil. Brazilians can't even see the
Speaker 3: X account of the embassy, and the embassy has not
Speaker 3: issued a statement condemning what's happened.
Speaker 4: Has not threatened.
Speaker 3: Sanctions has not threatened. The retrenchment of US business interests
Speaker 3: has not threatened, getting rid of the two hundred million
Speaker 3: dollars in foreign government assistance to Brazil.
Speaker 4: Nothing.
Speaker 3: Just today, earlier, the US Embassy finally, finally, after I
Speaker 3: don't know, almost a year of total silence, on just
Speaker 3: hours before the Brazil banned it said finally made a
Speaker 3: public statement about everything that's happened and said we are
Speaker 3: monitoring the situation.
Speaker 7: Because a vision softly.
Speaker 4: I think we need to push back on this.
Speaker 8: There's no guarantee of free speech on miss information or or.
Speaker 9: Hate speech, and especially around our democracy.
Speaker 1: Left it seize while I was sleeping.
Speaker 10: Persecution, what they're doing to me, what they're doing to Sarah,
Speaker 10: what they're doing to Palestine action, it's entirely and utterly political,
Speaker 10: like kiss Starmer took over, uh, you know, and and
Speaker 10: suddenly this starts and I'm not seeing the Tories were
Speaker 10: any better, But we should remember Tony Blair is the
Speaker 10: one that you know brought this piece of legislation into
Speaker 10: effect and was buddy buddy with George Bush.
Speaker 2: We all remember.
Speaker 11: The end of vision that was planted.
Speaker 2: Stealing.
Speaker 8: Conservatives are tolerant. We're are you know, kind of get
Speaker 8: out of your business. You leave me alone, I'll leave
Speaker 8: you alone. Hit Iran, they have all fills out in
Speaker 8: the open. They have the Revolutionary Guard headquarters you can
Speaker 8: see from space, blought off the.
Speaker 4: Map, lacking line US.
Speaker 12: Two.
Speaker 8: Those I just got off the phone of israelis. Their
Speaker 8: goal is to destroy Hamas in the South.
Speaker 13: The Times this published an ExPASy headlined buying Quiet inside
Speaker 13: the Israeli plan that propped up Hamas. It's about Israel
Speaker 13: secretly sending billions of dollars to Hamas over roughly a decade.
Speaker 13: The piece begins quote just weeks before Hamas launched the
Speaker 13: deadly October seventh attacks on Israel, the head of Masad
Speaker 13: arrived in Doha Cutter for a meeting with Cuttery officials.
Speaker 13: For years, the Cuttery government had been sending millions of
Speaker 13: dollars a month into the Gaza Strip, money that helped
Speaker 13: prop up the Hamas government. There Prime Minister benjaminata Yaho
Speaker 13: of Israel not only tolerated those payments, he encouraged them.
Speaker 13: And when the cuttery officials asked David barneya the head
Speaker 13: of Masad, should we stop this, he said, no.
Speaker 12: Talking.
Speaker 4: Speaking people, hearing with the listener.
Speaker 11: Democrats have introduced legislation to crackdown on christ Gougey in.
Speaker 12: Suns and PSNB no disturb the sun.
Speaker 1: Look silent, fool said, are you.
Speaker 12: To silence like your cancer?
Speaker 11: To hear my word?
Speaker 4: A nager.
Speaker 12: Tell the outger in my world time silence drops to
Speaker 12: control in the world of cider, have a treble.
Speaker 11: Balance the two of them.
Speaker 12: God.
Speaker 6: For people that are using IVF, which is fertilization, we
Speaker 6: are going the government is going to pay for it.
Speaker 6: Where we're going to get or mandate your insurance company.
Speaker 12: In the sign last Hour f Canois as far in
Speaker 12: the sign saddle the world Romance, when the subway walls,
Speaker 12: in the tenements laws.
Speaker 5: I'm talking about democratic colleagues who we might be able
Speaker 5: to find common ground here.
Speaker 2: So a little mix of the original song, and of
Speaker 2: course disturbed with a version of that song that so
Speaker 2: many people commented, I was unaware of it. And it
Speaker 2: is quite powerful and mixed in with a lot of
Speaker 2: news cuts that themselves are quite disturbing. So thanks for
Speaker 2: viewing everyone, and please spread the word about the David
Speaker 2: Knight Show. Of course, David giving me the opportunity to
Speaker 2: fill in for him, I want to make sure I
Speaker 2: do a really good job presenting the news to you
Speaker 2: and getting feedback from you as we break apart these
Speaker 2: news stories of the and so the first story will
Speaker 2: be about the sounds of silence coming to us from
Speaker 2: Brazil and elsewhere, following up on the heels of what
Speaker 2: the French government has done with the CEO of Telegram,
Speaker 2: plus the Telegram employees fleeing their former place of employment
Speaker 2: in cutter No, United Arab Emirates. So let's look at
Speaker 2: my Sunday news assembly. You can see this every Sunday,
Speaker 2: and I put out instead of twenty stories yesterday, I
Speaker 2: decided I would split it into two Sunday news assemblies
Speaker 2: for the long weekend, so there'll be another section of
Speaker 2: it coming out today later on today. The first major story,
Speaker 2: of course, was the French attack on durov and the
Speaker 2: departure of Telegram employees from the UAE, mixed with what
Speaker 2: is going on in Brazil, and, as I wrote in
Speaker 2: line with the French attack on pav al Durov and
Speaker 2: the departure of telegram employees from the UAE over fears
Speaker 2: that they too would be arrested, the leadership in the
Speaker 2: Brazilian government is going full on attacking Elon Musk and X. Now,
Speaker 2: how do we adjudge Elon Musk's efforts at X his
Speaker 2: parentage coming from technocratic parents, how does one judge the
Speaker 2: immediate situation for him and his legal fight there? He's
Speaker 2: definitely spending a lot of money to try to remain operative,
Speaker 2: and he could be arrested if he goes down there. Well,
Speaker 2: a man named Judge Demorris, as I noted on Substack,
Speaker 2: appears to be both doing the bidding of President Lula
Speaker 2: and acting on his own rancorous behalf. Demores has banned X,
Speaker 2: and I wanted to offer a reminder to the fans
Speaker 2: of the United States government who you who seem to
Speaker 2: be very delighted with the fact that the US government
Speaker 2: is banning or forcing the sale of TikTok de Moores
Speaker 2: in Brazil is banning X because X has not complied
Speaker 2: with his censorship orders with specific posts that he wants
Speaker 2: users to be and specific users he wants banned, including
Speaker 2: members of the Brazilian Congress that he wants banned from X.
Speaker 2: And X has not served up a so called employee
Speaker 2: to participate with the government, in other words, to get
Speaker 2: arrested and probably stand trial for what. Nobody's really sure. Now.
Speaker 2: There is a very good piece on this that comes
Speaker 2: from Mario Nafaul and he says telegrams do buy office
Speaker 2: where pa val Durav moved the company in twenty seventeen.
Speaker 2: Oh sorry, I'm skipping over. I went to the wrong one.
Speaker 2: That's that's incorrect. Sorry about that. Here is the key paragraph. Yes,
Speaker 2: so this is what I want? Yes, all right, it
Speaker 2: says here. Mores order calls for the immediate, complete and
Speaker 2: comprehensive suspension of X in Brazil, directing the National Communications
Speaker 2: Agency to enforce the ban within twenty four hours. Judge
Speaker 2: Mores also threatened to find of eighty nine hundred dollars
Speaker 2: many people have been hearing that number over the weekend
Speaker 2: for anyone using tools like VPNs to circumvent this block. Additionally,
Speaker 2: the judge initially demanded that tech giants Google and Apple,
Speaker 2: along with Internet providers implement measures to prevent access to x,
Speaker 2: though he later softened that order. Now want to head
Speaker 2: over here to play you a little bit from Glenn
Speaker 2: Greenway and system update on Rumble, and there may be
Speaker 2: a commercial or may not. We'll see, Hey, football, there
Speaker 2: is a quick one. Glenn Greenwald was living in Brazil.
Speaker 2: He's not in Brazil anymore. In fact, I believe he's
Speaker 2: back in the United States, which is not going to
Speaker 2: be a friendly place for Glenn Greenwald either. I don't
Speaker 2: know whether he's going to be here permanently because of
Speaker 2: course he worked with Edward Snowden. Here's more from Glenn Greenwald,
Speaker 2: as I know.
Speaker 14: At the top of the show, we spent Monday and
Speaker 14: Wednesday dissecting wide developments in France, specifically the arrest of
Speaker 14: the Telegram founder and CEO of the Russian born Pavel
Speaker 14: drov is so unbelievably threatening to core online press freedoms
Speaker 14: and speech expression rights as well, because what France is
Speaker 14: essentially saying is that anybody who doesn't immediately cooperate with
Speaker 14: our censorship demands and provide US backdoor access to encrypted
Speaker 14: apps becomes a criminal subject to arrest. In France, and
Speaker 14: then presumably in all of Europe as well. And I
Speaker 14: can assure you that this has captured the attention of
Speaker 14: every single founder and CEO of big tech platforms who
Speaker 14: are all billionaires and travel the world freely and are
Speaker 14: very concerned now that their liberty can also be constrained,
Speaker 14: if not outright denied, by this precedent set.
Speaker 4: In France for obvious reasons.
Speaker 14: That's the point of that arrest is to create a
Speaker 14: climate of fear among the tech companies that you either
Speaker 14: comply with all of our orders and give us access
Speaker 14: to your user data, or you two might go to prison.
Speaker 4: No matter how rich or powerful you are.
Speaker 14: What is happening in Brazil, and this has long been true,
Speaker 14: is a step beyond And the reason, as I say,
Speaker 14: I always want to report on Brazil is not just
Speaker 14: because Brazil is a massive country with geostrategic importance, the
Speaker 14: second largest country in the Hemisphere, etc.
Speaker 4: It is a part of the democratic world.
Speaker 14: Brazil is still ostensibly a democracy in the same way
Speaker 14: that the US is at least, and I can assure
Speaker 14: you that all the censorship actions that have been undertaken
Speaker 14: in Brazil, which are a step or two ahead of
Speaker 14: even Western Europe are being closely watched in those European
Speaker 14: allies and in the United States to see how far
Speaker 14: those countries can go as well. Every time there's a
Speaker 14: disinformation conference or a hate speech conference or a combating
Speaker 14: online harm conference, they invite all these Brazilian judges and
Speaker 14: all of these Brazilian think tank experts and all these
Speaker 14: Brazilian prosecutors and experts, we're all cheerleaders of the censorship
Speaker 14: regime to come and talk to these fancy conferences in
Speaker 14: Berlin and Paris and Amsterdam and Rome and Spain and
Speaker 14: Portugal about exactly what it is that Brazil is doing
Speaker 14: because the EU wants to copy it.
Speaker 4: Now just a couple of today.
Speaker 14: Actually, rather what happened here is the context is, and
Speaker 14: we told you this before, is that last week the
Speaker 14: indescribably authoritarian judge on the brazil Supreme Court, Aleshondro de Maraisch,
Speaker 14: who essentially runs the country.
Speaker 4: It's really not an exaggeration to say that.
Speaker 14: He threatened Brazilian executives with X that they would be
Speaker 14: immediately arrested if X did not instantly comply with censorship
Speaker 14: orders that had been sent to them, including to censor
Speaker 14: elected members of the Senate and the Congress, and X
Speaker 14: is reluctant to censor this because obviously these are political,
Speaker 14: politically motivated censorship campaigns. There's no due process provided these
Speaker 14: people have not been convicted of any crimes. It's just
Speaker 14: this very politically motivated judge ordering these people banned from
Speaker 14: the Internet with no due process, and X doesn't want
Speaker 14: to cooperate with that. And so once this issue was
Speaker 14: this threat was issued, We're going to arrest executives with
Speaker 14: X inside Brazil unless you comply.
Speaker 4: Elon Musk said.
Speaker 14: We can't guarantee the safety of our executives in Brazil
Speaker 14: any longer, and so we're closing down all offices in Brazil.
Speaker 4: We will no longer have any.
Speaker 14: Executives who work in Brazil because it's not safe for
Speaker 14: them to work.
Speaker 4: There, and it absolutely is not.
Speaker 14: And as a result, X either separated with Brazilian executives
Speaker 14: or brought them outside of Brazil to work with X
Speaker 14: and other capacities.
Speaker 4: And now this judge in response.
Speaker 14: To saying, either you comply with our censorship demands in
Speaker 14: twenty four hours, this is the order that he issued
Speaker 14: last night, in twenty four hours. You must number one,
Speaker 14: comply with all of our censorship orders and remove these
Speaker 14: members of Congress from the Internet instantly, without question. And
Speaker 14: number two, you must identify an ex representative in Brazil
Speaker 14: physically in Brazil.
Speaker 4: Because he wants to hold them hostage.
Speaker 14: He wants to order them arrested and then say they're
Speaker 14: not getting out unless X complies to.
Speaker 4: These censorship demands.
Speaker 14: What person in the right mind would agree to be
Speaker 14: the ex representative in Brazil given this judge, Unless he
Speaker 14: said AX complies with those two conditions, then he will
Speaker 14: block X as a platform in all of Brazil.
Speaker 2: And that has happened because of course Elon Musk was
Speaker 2: smart enough to know that the judge's claim that he
Speaker 2: wanted to negotiate with a member of the X team
Speaker 2: was completely fatuous, because you can negotiate from afar and
Speaker 2: not have to worry about being arrested. The judge wanted
Speaker 2: to put out an arrest order and hold someone hostage.
Speaker 2: That's exactly right. Glenn Greenwold nails it. And of course
Speaker 2: I've got to say Michael Schellenberger has been doing some
Speaker 2: great investigative reporting on this as well. You can find
Speaker 2: Schollenberger's Twitter coverage of this, the X coverage of this
Speaker 2: on Michael Schollenberger's feed, and I'll give you a quick
Speaker 2: taste of what we're talking about here. And he has
Speaker 2: a number of thumbnails. He has a long, long series
Speaker 2: of post about this if you want to get really
Speaker 2: deep into this, and we're going to get semi deep here,
Speaker 2: because things are moving very rapidly when it looks that
Speaker 2: when we look at the X information. In fact, things
Speaker 2: were changing even this morning, I was doing some updates
Speaker 2: to the plans for the program. So here it is.
Speaker 2: This is what Schellenberger says. Twitter files Brazil. Brazil is
Speaker 2: engaged in a sweeping crackdown on free speech led by
Speaker 2: a Supreme Court justice named Alexandre de Moores. Demores has
Speaker 2: thrown people in jail without trial for things they posted
Speaker 2: on social media. Sounds like England. He has demanded the
Speaker 2: removal of users from social media platforms, and he has
Speaker 2: required the censorship of specific posts without giving users any
Speaker 2: right of appeal or even the right to see the
Speaker 2: evidence presented against them. And as we heard Mike ben say,
Speaker 2: what has the US State Department said about this incredible
Speaker 2: attack on one of the bedrock principles of the United
Speaker 2: States system zero, except we're monitoring the situation and Mike
Speaker 2: Ben's has some thoughts on that. I'm going to show
Speaker 2: you in just a minute. And of course, so a
Speaker 2: lot of people are saying, where did Mike Ben's come from?
Speaker 2: What's this guy's background? Well, you know, I got to say,
Speaker 2: I saw him offer a presentation about a lot of
Speaker 2: the information on Ukraine and the CIA connections there with
Speaker 2: the Deep State and the Atlantic Council. He was right
Speaker 2: on the money. So taking each piece as it comes out,
Speaker 2: saying do I find this valuable and trustworthy? And this
Speaker 2: one I want to get your opinions on when we
Speaker 2: present the Mike Ben's information. But right now, Schellenberger's got
Speaker 2: this covered very well, he says. He says, He says,
Speaker 2: this judge has demanded the removal of users from social
Speaker 2: media platforms, and he has required the censorship of specific
Speaker 2: posts without giving users any right of appeal or even
Speaker 2: the right to see the evidence presented against them, now
Speaker 2: released here for the first time reveal that de Moores
Speaker 2: and the Superior Electoral Court that he controls engaged in
Speaker 2: a clear attempt to undermine democracy in Brazil. Now, of course,
Speaker 2: We have to be very careful of the term democracy,
Speaker 2: and we'll discuss that in further detail and a piece
Speaker 2: that I wrote for MRCTV if we can get the
Speaker 2: time time of it. But democracy is, of course two
Speaker 2: wolves and a sheep deciding what's going to be served
Speaker 2: up for lunch. There're supposed to be protections against the
Speaker 2: tyranny and the majority. So let's say hypothetically that this man,
Speaker 2: this judge, was a politician who had been elected by
Speaker 2: the majority. Would it be any better if that kind
Speaker 2: of a person cracked down on free speech? No, it wouldn't.
Speaker 2: Of course, of course it wouldn't be any better. He says.
Speaker 2: This is what the judge is attempting to do. He's
Speaker 2: illegally demanded that Twitter reveal personal details about Twitter users
Speaker 2: who used hashtags that he didn't like. Next, he has
Speaker 2: demanded access to Twitter's internal data, in violation of Twitter policy,
Speaker 2: much like what the French government wants Telegram to do.
Speaker 2: They want the back doors, they want access, as I mentioned,
Speaker 2: exactly like Joe Biden's early twenty twenty four executive order
Speaker 2: that demands that any company that is creating algorithms, any
Speaker 2: programs that could have an application for biological research or
Speaker 2: chemical research or communications. He says, they've got to turn
Speaker 2: over all of their programs and their back doors to him,
Speaker 2: which means anybody, anybody working on any program because it
Speaker 2: could potentially be used. A word document could potentially be
Speaker 2: used for a company, a digit, a zero or one
Speaker 2: in binary code could be used. Finally, Schellenberger says, the
Speaker 2: man has so to weaponize Twitter's content moderation policies against
Speaker 2: supporters of former president jar Balsarano Balsonaro, sorry Balsonaro, so
Speaker 2: Bolsonaro of course, pushed out by Lula and now they've
Speaker 2: got the backup on the judicial side. What a shocker,
Speaker 2: of course, painting all the political opposition. As you saw
Speaker 2: a little bit earlier with Luke at the beginning of
Speaker 2: the newsflash, there are a lot of people who are
Speaker 2: opposing Lula and favor some alternative, perhaps Balsonaro. Coming back.
Speaker 2: The files show the origins of the Brazilian judiciaries demand
Speaker 2: for sweeping censorship powers, the court's use of censorship for
Speaker 2: anti democratic election interference, and the birth of the censorship
Speaker 2: industrial complex in Brazil. Now, to let you know, I've
Speaker 2: reposted this one and you can follow all of this thread.
Speaker 2: There are many many pieces in this He's got a
Speaker 2: lot of information, He's got the documents, and it goes
Speaker 2: back to February of twenty twenty, as he mentions. On
Speaker 2: February fourteenth, twenty twenty, Happy Valentine's Day, Twitter's legal counsel
Speaker 2: in Brazil, ralphae Al Batista, emailed his colleagues to describe
Speaker 2: a hearing in Congress on disinformation and fake news. Batista
Speaker 2: revealed that members of the Brazilian Congress had asked what
Speaker 2: you got? It had asked uh where am I? Had
Speaker 2: asked Twitter for the content of messages exchanged by some
Speaker 2: users via dms, as well as login records, among other information.
Speaker 2: Batista said, quote, we are pushing back against the requests,
Speaker 2: which were illegal because they do not meet Brazilian Internet
Speaker 2: law Marco Seville legal requirements for disclosure of user's records.
Speaker 2: Batista noted that some conservative Twitter users had gone to
Speaker 2: the Supreme Court after they learned from the media that
Speaker 2: the Congress was trying to get their IPS and DM content.
Speaker 2: In light of this, the Supreme Court granted an injunction
Speaker 2: suspending the requirement given its failure to fulfill legal requirements.
Speaker 2: So you can see where this judge has completely flipped
Speaker 2: the switch on his own and people are saying it's
Speaker 2: the judge who should be arrested. That's Michael Schellenberger's coverage.
Speaker 2: And of course Michael Schellenberger did excellent work previously exposing
Speaker 2: a lot of the Twitter files. Now I want to
Speaker 2: give you something along the more speculative lines. Mike Benz,
Speaker 2: of course, sort of rose to fame rather rapidly as
Speaker 2: a whistleblower who had a lot of information about spying
Speaker 2: and censorship. Great conversation, hour long conversation recently with Tucker Carlson.
Speaker 2: A major portion of what Mike Ben's had to say
Speaker 2: about Ukraine, I know is one hundred percent verified because
Speaker 2: I had friends who were working in the Obama administration
Speaker 2: at the time who spoke to me. So and Mike
Speaker 2: Benz for what he's offering here, this one really starts
Speaker 2: to tie in the United States. So here, let me
Speaker 2: give you this and get your opinions on this.
Speaker 3: Hey, I'm just doing this video totally off the cuff.
Speaker 3: Have to say something. The Brazilian government just banned x,
Speaker 3: which means that the handle for the US Embassy in
Speaker 3: Brazil at US andbr is now banned in Brazil. Brazilians
Speaker 3: can't even see the x account of the embassy, and
Speaker 3: the embassy has not issued a statement condemning what's happened.
Speaker 3: Has not threatened, sanctions has not threatened, the retrenchment of
Speaker 3: US business interests has not threatened, getting rid of the
Speaker 3: two hundred million dollars in foreign government assistance to Brazil.
Speaker 4: Nothing.
Speaker 3: Just today, earlier, the US Embassy finally, finally.
Speaker 4: After I don't know, almost a year of.
Speaker 3: Total silence on just hours before the Brazil bannit said,
Speaker 3: finally made a public statement about everything that's happened and said,
Speaker 3: we are monitoring the situation.
Speaker 4: They are monitoring it. They've been monitoring it.
Speaker 3: They have been behind it, they have been funding it,
Speaker 3: they had been coordinating it. Earlier today I saw a
Speaker 3: picture of a Brazilian member of Congress in the United States.
Speaker 3: Say it as a censored man in Congress. But do
Speaker 3: you know that the US government actually funded the Brazilian NGOs,
Speaker 3: the Brazilian think tanks who are part of the legislative
Speaker 3: development of these censorship edicts, and who pressured Brazil's government
Speaker 3: not to create a carve out for congressional parliamentarians because
Speaker 3: it would give a free pass for Brazilian members of
Speaker 3: Congress to spread misinformation online. So the US government funded
Speaker 3: the pressure for the ability to arrest that politician.
Speaker 2: This is let's pause it right there. That's a very
Speaker 2: strong allegation, and it looks like he's got the documentation.
Speaker 2: We're talking organizations like USAID, Powell and others, Susan Powell
Speaker 2: and others who have been intimately involved in the overthrow
Speaker 2: of nation states. And of course we can't forget that
Speaker 2: the United States government has not lifted a finger about
Speaker 2: Ukraine banning journalists, arresting Gonzalalira, seeing him die in prison,
Speaker 2: likely killing him, eliminating the Russian Orthodox Church, and then
Speaker 2: last week eliminating the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, doing everything it
Speaker 2: can to silence people. And of course we can't forget
Speaker 2: that Rumble had to move out of Brazil recently, and
Speaker 2: yet the United States not only is not doing anything
Speaker 2: in Brazil, they're continuing to take your money out of
Speaker 2: your pockets to give it to the Ukrainian dictator, who
Speaker 2: of course has long since gone past his bogus election
Speaker 2: period and is still sitting in power, getting our cash
Speaker 2: and weapons. It's incredible to see the hypocrisy of these
Speaker 2: politicians as they go around and wave the floor on
Speaker 2: the fourth of July and talk about things like free speech,
Speaker 2: but want to do everything they can to silence speech,
Speaker 2: including the forced sale or closure of TikTok as they
Speaker 2: tell us that China, China is the repressive government. Oh okay, thanks,
Speaker 2: kettle meet pot.
Speaker 3: A case of Brazilian government gone rogue. The US government
Speaker 3: sponsored it through the State Department, through Usaid, through the
Speaker 3: National Dowman for Democracy in about one hundred different NGOs,
Speaker 3: university centers, legal scholars, and activists within Brazil starting in
Speaker 3: twenty eighteen, starting in about October twenty eighteen, And first
Speaker 3: they came for the social media companies, then they came
Speaker 3: for What's Happened Telegram, and now finally they're coming for x.
Speaker 3: Now they are between a rock and a hard place,
Speaker 3: which is why I believe the US Embassy finally issued
Speaker 3: this pittance of a public statement hours ago before the
Speaker 3: band that they're monitoring the situation. And this is because
Speaker 3: now there's a firelit under their ass And I'm sorry,
Speaker 3: but part that may have been because I generated over
Speaker 3: one hundred million impressions in the past forty eight hours
Speaker 3: specifically naming the US embassy, and I just went on
Speaker 3: Tucker Carlson specifically naming the US Embassy. Not to be clear,
Speaker 3: I'm not sure if it's the US Embassy or it's
Speaker 3: the Western Hemisphere. What I know is it's the State
Speaker 3: Department and State Department dollars, and I have a thousand
Speaker 3: of these people in Brazil with confessions that they were
Speaker 3: coordinating with the State Department while receiving State Department book money.
Speaker 2: To do it. Okay, okay, So that's a very big claim.
Speaker 2: But I think it ties in with a lot of
Speaker 2: the sentiment that many people feel about what the French
Speaker 2: government is doing to Telegram and paval Durov, and how
Speaker 2: many people think that this is on behalf of the
Speaker 2: national security establishment of the United States that wants the
Speaker 2: back doors to Telegram's cry cryptography. But whether they can
Speaker 2: get it, we will see, and whether they if they
Speaker 2: even get it, the folks at Telegrams say even they
Speaker 2: can't break their own to graphic codes. So I think
Speaker 2: that that is a big deal. But also there's something
Speaker 2: else here that I think is very key. This coming
Speaker 2: from Reuters. The Brazilian judge is also blocking Starlink accounts
Speaker 2: in the country because, of course he doesn't want X
Speaker 2: to make any money. Well, Starlink is very important for
Speaker 2: many of the people actually in that country to function.
Speaker 2: Brazilian Supreme Court Judge Alexander de Mores on Thursday ordered
Speaker 2: the blocking of the financial accounts of billionaire Elon Musk
Speaker 2: Starlink due to the lack of legal representatives in the
Speaker 2: country for social media platform X, of course, whom he
Speaker 2: would kidnap. A Supreme Court stars told Reuters Morris and
Speaker 2: Musk have been in a public feud for months and
Speaker 2: after X failed to comply with his legal orders to
Speaker 2: block certain accounts accused of spreading so called fake news.
Speaker 2: So what so what are they direct attacks on people? No,
Speaker 2: this is a pretty big deal. It's unbelievable, and the
Speaker 2: trajectory of it is going to increase as the members
Speaker 2: of the United States political elite are doing everything they
Speaker 2: can to try to silence us and get back doors
Speaker 2: into things. Want to remind people of some of the
Speaker 2: information that recently came out via MRCTV. Want to give
Speaker 2: you this one on let me see make sure I
Speaker 2: can find it here. Yeah. MRCTV via Newsmas they reported
Speaker 2: on this a number of months ago, so I thought
Speaker 2: that I would bring this back. Watchdog Google interfered in
Speaker 2: US elections forty one times. This is the Media Research
Speaker 2: Center that did this. They're the folks who contract with
Speaker 2: me for MRCTV works. The Media Research Center is the
Speaker 2: overall umbrella organization. Conservative Watchdog Media Research Center released a
Speaker 2: report Monday. This is back in March. This is Monday,
Speaker 2: March eighteenth, twenty twenty four. Conservative Watchdog Media Research Center
Speaker 2: released a report Monday that documented forty one times over
Speaker 2: the past sixteen years that Google has interfered with US elections.
Speaker 2: That's direct interference. Then we've got other things like Zach
Speaker 2: Vorhees and the Google blacklist. We've got Facebook removing eight
Speaker 2: hundred pages after proper not which was an absolute farce.
Speaker 2: It was a total beard for deep state connections to
Speaker 2: try to portray people like Ron Paul on his website
Speaker 2: as somehow potential terroristic Russian propaganda. Utterly absurd. I mean,
Speaker 2: it was just ridiculous. It's laughable. A ten year old
Speaker 2: child could look at that and say this is so stupid.
Speaker 2: Are you serious? I wouldn't even believe this in a cartoon.
Speaker 2: In a nineteen page report, MRC said that Google's impact
Speaker 2: quote has surged dramatically, making it ever more harmful to democracy.
Speaker 2: Now is MRC calling for the shutdown of Google. No,
Speaker 2: they're not. They're not asking a judge to shut down Google.
Speaker 2: They're trying to get the information out to people. They
Speaker 2: don't want to use the weapon of government censorship, which
Speaker 2: is already being used via Google and others, like the
Speaker 2: prior owners of Twitter when the FBI gave them three
Speaker 2: and a half million dollars. Like as we have seen
Speaker 2: the Supreme Court continuing to allow despite the fact that
Speaker 2: people like Jay Badikaria and other signers of the Great
Speaker 2: Barrington Declaration brought suit in the case that was retitled
Speaker 2: Merthy v. Missouri, and the majority of the Supreme Court
Speaker 2: a month and a half ago said, oh, I'm sorry.
Speaker 2: You know what, you just don't have any claim of harm,
Speaker 2: so you can't bring it to court. Seriously, honestly, what
Speaker 2: do they determine this harm? And that's up to the state. See,
Speaker 2: I'm a voluntarist, I'm an anarchist, right I believe there
Speaker 2: should be no human being who claims authority over you,
Speaker 2: you have to voluntarily offer your decisions, operate according to
Speaker 2: your free will as given to you by God. Nobody
Speaker 2: else can tell you that they control you. As I
Speaker 2: mentioned on Friday, Jefferson said it. No man is born
Speaker 2: with a saddle on his back, and no man is
Speaker 2: born with spurs to ride him. So I don't believe
Speaker 2: that any human being claiming over authority over you is legitimate.
Speaker 2: So when we see this idea that the United States
Speaker 2: government can work with these agencies to say, well, you know,
Speaker 2: that should be suppressed, and then someone's speech is removed,
Speaker 2: and then we see continued US agents in the Supreme
Speaker 2: Court then saying well, you know, I'll define for you
Speaker 2: what is harm, and that's not harm, even though even
Speaker 2: if you were to look at it professionally. One of
Speaker 2: the people who was in the suit did, and she
Speaker 2: could find direct linkage between her removal from social media
Speaker 2: platforms and her profession. Okay, even if that weren't the case,
Speaker 2: it's not up to the state to tell us whether
Speaker 2: or not we've been stinking harmed. How about that? Because
Speaker 2: if that's the case, they can say we're never harmed.
Speaker 2: It's for our own good, it's for the public good.
Speaker 2: We can be sacrificed, we can be silenced, even though
Speaker 2: what we're saying is actually the truth, and the stuff
Speaker 2: that they're spouting in the meetings with Donald Trump and
Speaker 2: Anthony Fauci and Deborah the scarf Burks are clearly lies.
Speaker 2: So one final thing on this point here, as this
Speaker 2: trajectory just goes skyrocketing with what's going on in Brazil,
Speaker 2: please remember the heroism of Zach Vorhees, who years ago
Speaker 2: exposed the Google blacklists. And please remember that Zach Vorhees
Speaker 2: was trotted out of his house in San Francisco and
Speaker 2: guns were pointed at him merely because he exposed the
Speaker 2: fact that Google had a list of websites, including MRCTV,
Speaker 2: that should be suppressed in their searches. Did the United
Speaker 2: States government do anything about that? Did they bring them
Speaker 2: up for antitrust violations the sort of thing that they're
Speaker 2: demanding of various groups and say we might bring anti
Speaker 2: trust against you, we might shut you down under Section
Speaker 2: two thirty of the of the nineteen ninety six Telecommunications
Speaker 2: That no, of course not. Because Google actually was started
Speaker 2: as a branch of the CIA. They got assistance from
Speaker 2: the CIA, and they've been doing the bidding of the
Speaker 2: people who want to expand collectivism. So when they downgrade
Speaker 2: people like, oh, I don't know, talk show host Glenn Beck,
Speaker 2: and some people have problems with Glenn or the Daily Callers.
Speaker 2: Some people have problems with them their pro Israeli positions, that,
Speaker 2: so on and so forth. But Ron Paul MRCTV, those things,
Speaker 2: what do they do. The United States government doesn't do anything.
Speaker 2: In fact, they like it. So thought that I would
Speaker 2: bring that up to you because I thought it was important,
Speaker 2: and also I think it might be wise to remember
Speaker 2: what the French you're doing with telegram and then talk
Speaker 2: about something else. Let's go domestic with a breaking story
Speaker 2: that has been coming around over the weekend and has
Speaker 2: a lot to do with the way that things are
Speaker 2: portrayed in the media. I want to talk to you
Speaker 2: a little bit about this story about Aurora, Colorado, because
Speaker 2: it mixes both the immigration issue and firearms of all things.
Speaker 2: So let's go with a little theme. Sometimes I do
Speaker 2: themes on my program, and this is my theme that
Speaker 2: I use for immigration. It's that great song which is
Speaker 2: I think kind of a fun tune and it doesn't
Speaker 2: necessarily mean that all the migrants are coming up from Mexico.
Speaker 2: And again I'm actually in favor of people recognizing that
Speaker 2: immigration is not a federal purview. Let's give you some
Speaker 2: information about what's going on in Colorado, and then what's
Speaker 2: going on with Nancy Pelosi in California as they're pushing
Speaker 2: for you got it, special home loans for migrants. We
Speaker 2: need a theme for this. Indeed, wala voodoo the world
Speaker 2: here on the road. Then the.
Speaker 12: Radio.
Speaker 2: Ah, yes, yes, yes, there's nothing like central command and
Speaker 2: control to get everybody arguing over how some sort of
Speaker 2: a system is going to be managed. And that's precisely
Speaker 2: what the United States States government did in eighteen seventy
Speaker 2: five when, despite the fact that the word immigration doesn't
Speaker 2: appear in the US Constitution, a Supreme Court ruled in
Speaker 2: the case of Chilong v. Freeman that, hey, immigration should
Speaker 2: be up to the Congress. Naturalization is a power left
Speaker 2: in the constan Institution to the Congress, but the immigration
Speaker 2: issue is supposed to be left up to the states.
Speaker 2: And so now you get absolute mismanagement because nobody can
Speaker 2: figure out what to do, and we get major problems
Speaker 2: in places like Colorado. Migrants central command and control incentives
Speaker 2: double talk. Who always gets to claim power over your
Speaker 2: property to build the walls or to allow migrants to
Speaker 2: work there. Whichever side you want to take, well, it's
Speaker 2: the government. So here is a little something of what's
Speaker 2: been going on in Colorado.
Speaker 3: As videos have been circulating on social media showing gang
Speaker 3: members taking over apartments, it's important.
Speaker 8: To know if the city nor the Aurora Police Department
Speaker 8: have confirmed any of those claims.
Speaker 15: Get in contact with the residents, reassuring them about the
Speaker 15: criminal activity that's happening here and how we're going to
Speaker 15: address it.
Speaker 11: We're out here.
Speaker 15: We want to reassure the people that live in this
Speaker 15: community that we are actively investigating criminal activity that's happening
Speaker 15: and listening to them. I'm not saying that there's not
Speaker 15: gang members that don't live in this community, but what
Speaker 15: we're learning out here is that gang members have not
Speaker 15: taken over this complex. We've really made an effort to
Speaker 15: the last few days to just really ask the specific
Speaker 15: questions of the direct questions in terms of.
Speaker 10: Can you confirm whether or not this gang has taken
Speaker 10: over these buildings there in Aura.
Speaker 16: So there are several buildings actually under the same ownership
Speaker 16: out of state ownership that have fallen to the Venezuelan gangs.
Speaker 16: Somebody put them there and somebody funded it, whether it's
Speaker 16: federal government or not. We're trying to find out who
Speaker 16: they in fact have kind of pushed out the property
Speaker 16: management through intimidation and then collected the rents.
Speaker 17: O good innovation and the challenge we have of us.
Speaker 2: Yes, let's we'll get to the Nancy Pelosi piece in
Speaker 2: just a second. Actually, let's actually I was going to
Speaker 2: play that in a minute, but let's go back to
Speaker 2: Nancy as Pelosi shows us years ago her position on immigration.
Speaker 17: Of immigration and the challenge we have of undocumented people
Speaker 17: in our country.
Speaker 15: We certainly don't want any more coming in.
Speaker 2: Okay, that was then, this is now.
Speaker 18: The California lawmakers just passed the law. It hasn't been
Speaker 18: signed by Governor Newsom, but giving government assistance to undocumented
Speaker 18: immigrants to buy houses. That's kind of a different place
Speaker 18: than the Democratic Party used to be on immigration, as
Speaker 18: it do like I say, that's what the country is
Speaker 18: going to do, but that's certainly where California is.
Speaker 15: Well, let me just say immigration had always been a
Speaker 15: bipartisan issue. I refer you to the.
Speaker 11: Not free houses.
Speaker 17: Well, it's not free housing, it's the American dream being
Speaker 17: available to more people.
Speaker 11: Colorado today, Did you see that.
Speaker 1: Venez will A gang members have taken over parts.
Speaker 11: Of the city.
Speaker 2: Okay, so there's a lot to that, and whether the
Speaker 2: gang members are posing as Amazon delivered people and that
Speaker 2: sort of thing. A lot of stories coming out of there,
Speaker 2: and some of them are very, very scary. A couple
Speaker 2: of the things that I'd like to bring up to people, however,
Speaker 2: is that Colorado specifically recently had a major gun crackdown.
Speaker 2: And of course this is Aurora, which is infamous for
Speaker 2: the theater attacks years ago. But here it is a
Speaker 2: lot of people aren't discussing this part. The eight gun
Speaker 2: bills passed by Colorado's legislature this year and signed into
Speaker 2: law by the governor. This just came out June twelfth,
Speaker 2: and it's from the Colorado Sun. Governor Jared Polis signed
Speaker 2: into law eight bills passed by the legislature this year
Speaker 2: that titan Colorado's gun statutes. Colorado Ceasefire, a nonprofit that
Speaker 2: calls for tougher gun regulations, says that is a legislative
Speaker 2: session record for the state. Well, clearly the people with
Speaker 2: criminal intent really care about that. Interesting that, especially in
Speaker 2: Aurora where everyone is so sensitive about guns. Of course,
Speaker 2: after a man went into a movie theater knowing that
Speaker 2: there wouldn't be people who were armed there, that people
Speaker 2: should come into Aurora and target it as they carry
Speaker 2: firearms and people are vulnerable without firearms. These laws impose
Speaker 2: new requirements on people obtaining concealed carry permits, the way
Speaker 2: firearms must be stored in vehicles, and how weapons and
Speaker 2: ammunition are sold. Yeah, and CENTIPIL three authorizes of the
Speaker 2: Colorado Bureau of Investigation to probe gun crimes, including illegal
Speaker 2: firearms purchases. It also sends one point five million dollars
Speaker 2: to the agency for that work, the Bureau of Investigation,
Speaker 2: and that will be spent hiring ten employees next fiscal year,
Speaker 2: which starts July first, And strangely enough, it's way past July,
Speaker 2: isn't it. Well, there's more guns are a banned schools,
Speaker 2: so kids will be highly vulnerable there. That's wonderful, isn't it. Then,
Speaker 2: of course they're banded voting sites and at the state capitol,
Speaker 2: except the course for the armed guards who are hired
Speaker 2: by the agents of the state. But if you want
Speaker 2: to be armed yourself walking around the Capitol, sorry, not
Speaker 2: any any luck there. They have to be surrendered by
Speaker 2: people's subject to a temporary domestic violence restraining order, despite
Speaker 2: the fact that no one has been actually tried or
Speaker 2: given due process. So that is a violation of the
Speaker 2: Fourth Amendment, of the Second Amendment, violation of the Third Amendment,
Speaker 2: violation of the fourth Amendment, because of course the agents
Speaker 2: of the state will be allowed into anybody's place to
Speaker 2: inspect it. That's essentially like quartering of troops. The fourth
Speaker 2: Amendment is you have to have a judge's warrant specific
Speaker 2: to an item, and the judge has to determine if
Speaker 2: there is a probable cause. Now, I don't like to
Speaker 2: leave it in the hands of the state to determine
Speaker 2: what is probable cause. The Fifth Amendment says that if
Speaker 2: you were going to be punished with something, you have
Speaker 2: to be accused of a crime and have a speedy trial.
Speaker 2: Of course, it leaves it up to the state to
Speaker 2: decide what is a speedy trial in front of your peers.
Speaker 2: With the sixth Amendment, the eighth Amendment prohibits cruel and
Speaker 2: unusual punishment. Well, how can you be punished if you've
Speaker 2: actually never been charged with a crime. Well, Colorado is
Speaker 2: throwing all that away. They don't care. They don't care.
Speaker 2: They want to disarm people at a time when they've
Speaker 2: got guys walking around with automatic rifles going into apartment complexes,
Speaker 2: and then everybody's debating as to whether or not it's
Speaker 2: fake news, and you can report on this. Well, regardless
Speaker 2: of all this, let's just get a quick lesson out
Speaker 2: of this, which which is one thing that is for sure,
Speaker 2: you will not find the word immigration in the US Constitution.
Speaker 2: This is supposed to be left up to the states.
Speaker 2: So if there's a problem in Texas, they're supposed to
Speaker 2: handle it in Texas, where in eighteen sixty nine when
Speaker 2: they passed their state constitution they actually have a Bureau
Speaker 2: of Immigration in it. It's supposed to be left up
Speaker 2: to Colorado. So they're not going to get my money
Speaker 2: for screwing up what's going on in Colorado. I don't
Speaker 2: have to pay for that. I don't have to pay
Speaker 2: for the federal government to go and then give my
Speaker 2: money to Alejandro Majorcas who doesn't do anything about what
Speaker 2: is evidently a problem on the Texas border. According to
Speaker 2: the people who live in Texas. I don't live in Texas.
Speaker 2: He doesn't seem to be doing anything about what's going
Speaker 2: on in Colorado. And let me tell you, if you
Speaker 2: know any local cops, they have major problems with the Feds.
Speaker 2: I spoke with local cops here in New Hampshire. They
Speaker 2: have major problems with the Feds because the Feds often
Speaker 2: prevent them from being able to add apprehend criminal wrongdoers
Speaker 2: whom they know are illegal immigrants. This is a big deal.
Speaker 2: And again, as a voluntarist, I want to mention that
Speaker 2: for me, it's extremely important to note first, on the
Speaker 2: constitutional level, your central command and control system isn't giving
Speaker 2: you what you want. And so if conservatives think they're
Speaker 2: going to get a better deal by putting Donald Trump
Speaker 2: in for a little while, well it will eventually revert
Speaker 2: back to where it was because you're systematically looking at
Speaker 2: it in the wrong way. The Constitution doesn't give the
Speaker 2: federal government the power to handle immigration only if states
Speaker 2: ask for the federal government to participate in assisting them
Speaker 2: and maintaining their constitutional form of government, and that is
Speaker 2: in the Constitution. Can the federal government ask the members
Speaker 2: of the militia to go in and help out. The
Speaker 2: legislator of a state. Legislature of a state can do that,
Speaker 2: or if the legislature is not in session according to
Speaker 2: the constitution, then the governor of the state can do it,
Speaker 2: which is exactly what Abbot did. And I'm not a
Speaker 2: big big fan of Abbot, okay, but this is exactly
Speaker 2: what he did. Now, as a voluntarist, I do want
Speaker 2: to bring up just like in economics, and I brought
Speaker 2: this up before in my show, just like in economics,
Speaker 2: no one can ever say that anything the government does,
Speaker 2: any political system does, has any value. Why because logically speaking,
Speaker 2: all politicians are not spending their own money on it,
Speaker 2: and the people who are paying for it are forced
Speaker 2: to pay for it, so it doesn't reveal their preferences,
Speaker 2: it doesn't allow them to show their voluntary interests. So
Speaker 2: the entire system negates free will, it negates the revelation
Speaker 2: of preferences. So technically, logically speaking, no one, no one
Speaker 2: can ever say that a political border that is put
Speaker 2: up by the government by taking people's property right, that
Speaker 2: that actually is the place where someone wants a border.
Speaker 2: The only place where you can tell someone wants a
Speaker 2: border is if it's on his own land and he's
Speaker 2: spending his own own money, not forcing somebody else, and
Speaker 2: saying it's my preference that you will put that border somewhere.
Speaker 2: And this is the thing that strikes me. And we'll
Speaker 2: get into the Nancy Pelosi story in a little while
Speaker 2: coming out of California and her utter hypocrisy. But the
Speaker 2: people who are upset about these Venezuelan gangs coming and
Speaker 2: taking property are also many of them in favor of
Speaker 2: the federal government coming and taking people's property to build walls.
Speaker 2: How does that comport? It doesn't, unless, of course, you
Speaker 2: come up with the idea of it's for the greater good,
Speaker 2: which is a pernicious and very poisonous philosophical consequentialist outcome
Speaker 2: that has nothing to do with individual morality or the
Speaker 2: recognition of the sanctity of the individual, which can be
Speaker 2: turned back on yourself. At least when the founders wrote
Speaker 2: it up, they allowed for differentiation. They allowed for the
Speaker 2: states to handle this themselves. As Thomas jeffers And said
Speaker 2: in the Kentucky Resolution of seventeen ninety eight, number four,
Speaker 2: he wrote, resolved that alien friends on the soil of
Speaker 2: any of the signatory states now existing are under their jurisdiction.
Speaker 2: I'm paraphrasing in the last part. James Madison said almost
Speaker 2: the exact same thing. And the Virginia Resolves in seventeen
Speaker 2: ninety eight. They wrote them simultaneously aware of what the
Speaker 2: other people were doing because of the Alien Act under
Speaker 2: John Adams, which was patently unconstitutional. Why people can recognize
Speaker 2: the unconstitutionality, the utter, the utter affront to the very
Speaker 2: concept of the Constitution, which itself was a usurpation of
Speaker 2: the Articles of Confederation. Why they can't recognize what's going
Speaker 2: on today as similar the concept that the federal government
Speaker 2: is going to come up with rules over who can
Speaker 2: be here on the soil of the states. That was utterly,
Speaker 2: utterly talk about alien alien two people of that time,
Speaker 2: except people like John Adams who wanted a centi things.
Speaker 2: So I wanted to make sure that I brought that up.
Speaker 2: And then we'll discuss that video clip of Bill Maher
Speaker 2: and Nancy Pelosi a little bit later in this hour,
Speaker 2: but right now going to take a break, and then
Speaker 2: when we come back, I want to talk to a
Speaker 2: man who has looked into a lot of American history,
Speaker 2: and he has found that Americans seem to be operating
Speaker 2: based on what he calls the American memory hole. A
Speaker 2: lot of things in US history have been forgotten. So
Speaker 2: while we take this opportunity, I want to thank again
Speaker 2: for the Love of the Road donation last Friday was
Speaker 2: great and reminded that remind you that if you want
Speaker 2: to maintain the David Night Show, feel free to donate.
Speaker 2: And we're gonna hear a little wonderful music that David
Speaker 2: composed for the program.
Speaker 4: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: Wonderful movie Shenandoah providing the visuals there, and I hope
Speaker 2: everybody will take the opportunity to watch. Jimmy Stewart in
Speaker 2: that film, as I mentioned, has a lot of pro
Speaker 2: liberty themes. It's about a farmer who is between the
Speaker 2: North and the South, wants nothing to do with either
Speaker 2: of them, and as you see in the video, circumstances
Speaker 2: end up roping in one of his sons and he
Speaker 2: has to go try to rescue his son because he's
Speaker 2: been mistaken as being one of the fighters in the
Speaker 2: Civil War. It's a wonderful movie. In fact, it has
Speaker 2: such strong pro liberty themes. And I know people have
Speaker 2: mixed feelings about ein Rand, but there's actually a train
Speaker 2: called the John Galt in the film. So check out
Speaker 2: Shenandoah and check out the work of this next man.
Speaker 2: I want to introduce this gentleman to the stage. If
Speaker 2: you follow him yet at Don Jeffries on X you
Speaker 2: will discover a very rich vein of thought and knowledge.
Speaker 2: And of course you'll discover that the author of the
Speaker 2: new book American Memory Hole has a lot to offer us,
Speaker 2: especially about censorship, about the United States handling of the border,
Speaker 2: and a lot more. Donald Jeffries is with us, Don,
Speaker 2: Good to have you here. How are you welcome to
Speaker 2: the David Knight Show. Great to see.
Speaker 11: You, hey, Guard, It's always great to stalk with you.
Speaker 2: Thanks for having me absolutely. How's it going outside of
Speaker 2: the swamp of Washington, d C.
Speaker 11: Well, it's all you know, we live. I live far
Speaker 11: enough away we're it don't smell. And you know, I'm
Speaker 11: I'm lucky. I'm in one of those dinosaur suburbs. You
Speaker 11: know that I'm playing, you know, And these are the
Speaker 11: kind of neighborhoods they want to eliminate. So I'm enjoying
Speaker 11: it while.
Speaker 2: I can, oh absolutely absolutely. You know, don Over on
Speaker 2: your x feed you posted something and I want to
Speaker 2: tie this in if we can, to just open up
Speaker 2: this topic and then we'll talk a little bit about
Speaker 2: your book and so on. But one of the things
Speaker 2: over on my schedule was I wanted to discuss this
Speaker 2: unbelievable move by Robert Reisch who's calling for Elon must
Speaker 2: to be arrested. I'm going to put this up on
Speaker 2: the screen. And you've got a little something from Kamala
Speaker 2: Harris that a lot of people seen in some video. Now,
Speaker 2: this is actually a reprint from Robert Reich's Guardian piece.
Speaker 2: So here it is Elon Musk is out of control,
Speaker 2: says this constant government parasite. Here is how to rein
Speaker 2: him in, and he goes through this is a very
Speaker 2: strange piece that actually reads from left to right. He
Speaker 2: goes through all these things and he says that he
Speaker 2: thinks that Musk either should be arrested or he should
Speaker 2: be gone after by the US government for anti trust
Speaker 2: and that the the the folks and the Securities and
Speaker 2: Exchange Commission should do something about him. On your X feed,
Speaker 2: you have the video of Kamala Harris, and you have
Speaker 2: imagined that letting people speak to potentially millions without any
Speaker 2: oversighter regulation. Yes, Kamala doesn't like that is almost like
Speaker 2: we have a First Amendment or something. Now, you come
Speaker 2: from more the left tradition. You've mentioned this before, and
Speaker 2: it is I come from the punk rock tradition where
Speaker 2: I started to see that the people who had been
Speaker 2: portrayed as or portrayed themselves as leftists shouldn't have been believed.
Speaker 2: You could start to see it as I was a teenager.
Speaker 2: What's your take on the X attack out of Brazil
Speaker 2: and the status of many of the big whigs shutting
Speaker 2: down TikTok on the Republican and Democrats side, Kamala Harris
Speaker 2: and her utter disdain for free speech, and Tim Waltz
Speaker 2: claiming that so called misinformation as he describes it, has
Speaker 2: no place in our discourse despite the First Amendment. It's
Speaker 2: just stunning.
Speaker 11: Well, you know, as you noted, I did come out
Speaker 11: of the left as a teenager, as a card carry
Speaker 11: member of the ACOU. Mark Lane was my hero. I
Speaker 11: became a civil libertarian because of him. When I was
Speaker 11: working on the JFK assassination with his group. And it's
Speaker 11: amazing to me how the lift is completely swung around
Speaker 11: on their entire and this is a perfect example of it.
Speaker 11: They are there used to be about trying to stand
Speaker 11: up for the little guy and get rights for people
Speaker 11: who didn't have them. Now they're trying to take rights
Speaker 11: away from people who kind of still have them. And
Speaker 11: that's all they're about. They're trying to suppress speech. I mean,
Speaker 11: I remember back in the day is all about free speech,
Speaker 11: and most of it back then was they were fighting
Speaker 11: in the Catholic Church and they wanted more nudity and
Speaker 11: sexual stuff. That was pretty much the fight back then.
Speaker 11: But now it's all about suppression and hate speeches or
Speaker 11: welly in term, and it's become accepted. I put out
Speaker 11: many times like what what does that even mean? Hates
Speaker 11: the human emotion? Who's it's in the eye, It's in
Speaker 11: the eye of the beholder. We all hate something that
Speaker 11: doesn't make any sense to say, Hey, so hate speech
Speaker 11: contradicts free speech? Misinformation and disinformation. You know, you have
Speaker 11: the right to be misinformed. I mean, ninety percent of
Speaker 11: the American people is misinformed about everything, you know, So yeah,
Speaker 11: so I mean that you have the right to be wrong,
Speaker 11: and uh we just Robert Rice exemplify as somebody that
Speaker 11: he said a few good things economically, but he was
Speaker 11: a member of the of the Clinton administration, and I
Speaker 11: know from my friends on the left were talking him
Speaker 11: up and said, you know, talked about my book Survival
Speaker 11: of the Riches, and he would never read my book.
Speaker 11: And these kinds of statements are the reason why at
Speaker 11: heart he's he's an authoritarian and somebody like Elon Musk,
Speaker 11: and you know how we all all about Elad Musk.
Speaker 11: I don't think he's the champion of free speech, but
Speaker 11: he's been put out there as that that's what his
Speaker 11: that's what his role is at this point is to
Speaker 11: try to defend free speech. And even his version of
Speaker 11: free speech is too much for these people, and the
Speaker 11: idea that they could arrest him, and again, these are
Speaker 11: it's like Trump getting arrested. You know, it used to
Speaker 11: be impossible to rest a billionaire for anything, and now
Speaker 11: you're going to arrest a billionaire for having I mean
Speaker 11: x X is the only platform I'm still shadowban there,
Speaker 11: but it's it's eased up a lot under Musk. But
Speaker 11: the idea that this is the only social media platform
Speaker 11: where at least the guy pays lip service to free
Speaker 11: speech and talks about it and seems like he's more willing.
Speaker 11: But that they don't. They hate that, they don't want anything.
Speaker 11: And I said all along guard that when when the
Speaker 11: Internet came into being, they got it out of the Pentagon.
Speaker 11: It really they were beside themselves because they want an
Speaker 11: FCC to regulate this thing, and and there's no see
Speaker 11: you now. They finally came upon the social media. And
Speaker 11: that's how that's how they've gotten a lot of us
Speaker 11: is because we're so dependent on the social media platform.
Speaker 11: So if we lose this one, if you lose X
Speaker 11: and of course you know, I'm the only place I'm
Speaker 11: not cheating to van is substack, and I live in
Speaker 11: fear that they're going to get there because that's that's
Speaker 11: the last free speech platform. That's where I make most
Speaker 11: of my money nowadays. I hope they don't go there.
Speaker 11: But these little incremental processes, and when you look in
Speaker 11: the heads of somebody like a Kamala Harrison, you know,
Speaker 11: she said, you can't what do you mean if you
Speaker 11: And this is this is the left's notion. This is
Speaker 11: what pousses for the left today. They used to be
Speaker 11: again civil libertarians, free speech purists. Now it's well, you
Speaker 11: can't say, I mean, we have to regulate, we have
Speaker 11: who has to regulate? How is that? How is that
Speaker 11: possibly in line with the First Amendment? But they don't
Speaker 11: believe in the First Amendment guard The recent poll said
Speaker 11: fifty three percent of Americans think the First Amendments come
Speaker 11: too far, and that's exactly what Tim Wall said. Millions
Speaker 11: of people support him. We're out numbered, my.
Speaker 2: Friend, absolutely absolutely. And John, it's interesting because I as
Speaker 2: a teenager, I used to look at the vaunted claims
Speaker 2: of the so called anti authoritarians who were the authorities
Speaker 2: in front of me in the school, these you know,
Speaker 2: aging hippies, and I looked at them very skeptically. And
Speaker 2: it's very difficult because I thought, this is a difficult
Speaker 2: thing to navigate here. And I'd love to get your
Speaker 2: thoughts on this, because back then I saw the shadow
Speaker 2: play that they were and I mentioned, you know, Plato's
Speaker 2: parable of the Cave. They were projecting the idea that
Speaker 2: they were free speech when they were really authoritarians. It
Speaker 2: was very easy to see. They would tell us look
Speaker 2: at this television show, look at this news, look at
Speaker 2: this newspaper, And I'm like, are you aware of Reason magazine?
Speaker 2: Are you aware of my dad's favorite human events? No,
Speaker 2: you don't want us to talk about those things. You
Speaker 2: already have your preferences. You already are acting as an authoritarian.
Speaker 2: And that was the problem that I found in college
Speaker 2: at Boston University. And now the question is whether there's
Speaker 2: some grander shadow play going on, as we say, see
Speaker 2: some of these blips pop up with Telegram, and it
Speaker 2: seems to be accelerating with Elon Musk and X and
Speaker 2: we saw what happened previously. I think people try to
Speaker 2: differentiate and say, is this all on the ground sort
Speaker 2: of stuff? Is this Google blacklist for real? Yeah? It's
Speaker 2: for real. I was on the Google blacklist, you know,
Speaker 2: MRCTV was on it. I get hit by NewsGuard. I
Speaker 2: have to write letters back to NewsGuard. That's the on
Speaker 2: the ground question I can answer that is, yes, they're
Speaker 2: trying to censor us. They don't like it, and they're
Speaker 2: trying to portray us as the dangerous ones. You know,
Speaker 2: a piece that I write about climate change, I've got
Speaker 2: the hyperlinks in there, and they don't click the hyperlinks.
Speaker 2: So last time I mentioned on my show, last time
Speaker 2: I had to write the back. I said, if you
Speaker 2: think it would be constructive, maybe we could just have
Speaker 2: a debate and you could bring your information, we could
Speaker 2: bring ours. We go up on the stage and do
Speaker 2: it for charity, and you could offer what you have
Speaker 2: to say and it might be constructive for people haven't
Speaker 2: heard anything back. In fact, they downgraded MRCTV before before
Speaker 2: they even got through our emails back to them. That's
Speaker 2: what NewsGuard is doing. So it's unbelievable to see what
Speaker 2: they're doing. And of course the way that you have
Speaker 2: been treated with your books, masking the truth, all those
Speaker 2: different things, whether it be on Amazon and so on,
Speaker 2: you yourself have been directly affected by this. And so I'm
Speaker 2: wondering if you look at something like X, some people
Speaker 2: might say this is a grand shadow play. I just
Speaker 2: don't know where to assess that. But on the ground,
Speaker 2: these immediate things, I'm taking them as what they are.
Speaker 2: I think there's a big battle in Brazil for political control.
Speaker 2: I think the United States was involved with getting the
Speaker 2: French to go after paval Durov. I know that they
Speaker 2: have gone after me, so these are direct things. I
Speaker 2: think this is you know, whether Elon Musk is playing
Speaker 2: some larger long term game, I don't know. But what's
Speaker 2: going on in Brazil, I don't think as part of
Speaker 2: some grand strategy that they're pulling off right now on
Speaker 2: some theater.
Speaker 11: Yeah.
Speaker 12: No.
Speaker 11: And I think you wrote it when you said about
Speaker 11: the hippies. I mean, we saw that the hippies were
Speaker 11: the counterculture back then, and as I wrote my book
Speaker 11: in history, it was largely controlled. You had people like
Speaker 11: Timothy Leary and Gloria Steinon that were working for the CIA.
Speaker 11: We now know that, so a lot of their leaders
Speaker 11: were being put out there and again his controlled opposition.
Speaker 11: But once they came into power, I mean Jerry Rubin
Speaker 11: ended up his days as a yuppie on Wall Street. Uh,
Speaker 11: they quickly changed. I mean Abby Hoffman stayed good. And
Speaker 11: I have the respect for Abbie Hoffin and anybody that
Speaker 11: writes writes a book called steal this book, and he
Speaker 11: wanted people to steal it. So I mean he he,
Speaker 11: I mean, he was at least being true to his credo.
Speaker 11: But most of them were were not, you know, the
Speaker 11: real deal. And as you knowed, they they were very controlling,
Speaker 11: even if he watched the arguments between Meathead Carl Ryder,
Speaker 11: who in real life, you know, exemplifies what those guys became.
Speaker 11: He is in real life, that's what he is. And
Speaker 11: the control freaks, and what really really repelled them were
Speaker 11: the Archie Bunkers of the world, the old guard, their
Speaker 11: antiquated beliefs and because they were constantly lecturing them.
Speaker 2: All the time, Yeah, yep. And Archie Bunker was always
Speaker 2: the straw man, you know, he was the straw man
Speaker 2: right wing that the classic cliche caricature, and back then,
Speaker 2: that's one of the things that that show specifically, was
Speaker 2: one of the things that got me very sensitized to
Speaker 2: the way that they would portray. They would put out
Speaker 2: a projection of what the enemy was in their eyes,
Speaker 2: which wasn't realistic. And it's the same thing as you
Speaker 2: investigated with people like Senator McCarthy. So let's talk about
Speaker 2: American Memory Hole, your new book, how people can get it,
Speaker 2: and of course hopefully it won't be Memory Hold. I
Speaker 2: really want to suggest people find the book and it's
Speaker 2: literally just out on its a real public run just
Speaker 2: over the past few days. People could order it a
Speaker 2: little bit beforehand, tell us about American memory hole and
Speaker 2: maybe mention how this sort of fits the theme for
Speaker 2: what we're seeing with silencing of information.
Speaker 11: Yeah, well we do. And that's why I, you know,
Speaker 11: I urge people because most Americans are historically illiterate, and
Speaker 11: it's not their fault because they don't they get this
Speaker 11: Mick history stuff, and you know, they get the courtus.
Speaker 11: I call them the court historians. And the reason I
Speaker 11: use that term all the time the subtitles, how the
Speaker 11: court historians promote this information. I use that term over
Speaker 11: and over again. It comes from Professor Harry al M. Barnes,
Speaker 11: who was a typical leftist of the day back in
Speaker 11: the twenties. And most of these people, ad my hl
Speaker 11: Make and these are classical leftists who would be considered
Speaker 11: white supremacists and they'd want to put in prison today
Speaker 11: just because, but they were the liberals of their day.
Speaker 11: Harry L. L. Barnes, you know, he they established returned
Speaker 11: on him when he realized, well, you know, all these
Speaker 11: millions of people died World War One. I can't figure
Speaker 11: out why. You know, he said, there's absolutely no reason
Speaker 11: for this to have happened. It was a blood lending
Speaker 11: beyond belief, and once he started to go against the narrative,
Speaker 11: there he was drummed out applied society and he ended
Speaker 11: up his life, you know, speaking at revisionous historical conferences
Speaker 11: because nobody else would have him. He was also an
Speaker 11: early victim of what I have in the book. We
Speaker 11: talked about how FDR you know, was inventing cancel culture
Speaker 11: back then, and Barnes was a typical victim of that,
Speaker 11: where FDR and the administration would go after their critics
Speaker 11: and just like you would see today, and they would
Speaker 11: instead of getting a drum doff social media or maybe
Speaker 11: talking to the big publishing houses, they would talk to
Speaker 11: the newspapers and the radio stations and the magazine boy
Speaker 11: John T. Flynn, who was ahead of the American chapter
Speaker 11: of the America First Committee in New York, who was
Speaker 11: again a liberal and good standing road for the nation
Speaker 11: and all these periodicals. FDR called him up and said, hey, look,
Speaker 11: get rid of this guy. Don't hire him. Yep, he
Speaker 11: doesn't want us to get in World War two. And
Speaker 11: so that's where you can so these things when you
Speaker 11: look at what's happening today, these things are connected. I
Speaker 11: mean they come up to the point where you can
Speaker 11: have a Robert Wright or Tim Walls or Kamala Harris
Speaker 11: running for president where they can openly come out and
Speaker 11: speak against you know, and talk against free speech, and
Speaker 11: it's not controversial. In fact, it's popular to millions of people.
Speaker 11: And it just I mean, that should ruin what Wall
Speaker 11: said and what Harris said regards to anything else. Uh,
Speaker 11: that should have ruined their chances right then in an
Speaker 11: honest electorate. But it won't because at the end they're
Speaker 11: running against Trump and you know, anything at the Trumpetstein Project,
Speaker 11: So people are going to vote for them no matter what.
Speaker 11: And I've I've talked about it with enough good some
Speaker 11: formally good I thought, good people in the jfk assassination
Speaker 11: research community who have lost their minds oyah, And I said,
Speaker 11: you know, you're you understand what Kamala Harrison's district attorney
Speaker 11: of San Francisco. I wrote an article in American Free
Speaker 11: Press years ago that was had such an impact. Paul Schrad,
Speaker 11: who was a victim who was shot in the Ambassador Hotel,
Speaker 11: just died a few years ago and the idea. He
Speaker 11: contacted me and said how much he loved the article
Speaker 11: Kamala Harrison at that time said I don't care if
Speaker 11: there was a second shooter, it doesn't matter.
Speaker 2: Oh it's stunning, it's stunning. And you know, don it's
Speaker 2: interesting the work I do with MRCTV. You know, you've
Speaker 2: got these these people who take a quote from Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: It's a flip comment about how he might say something like,
Speaker 2: you know, the media, it's the enemy and the American people, right,
Speaker 2: then they amplify that to say, you know, he is
Speaker 2: he's going to arrest journalists, he is going to shut
Speaker 2: down free speech, He's going to do all these different
Speaker 2: things which he has not done, right, And they don't
Speaker 2: even mention that Obama and Biden as president and vice
Speaker 2: president tried to use the Espionage Act against more whistleblowers
Speaker 2: and journalists than all the other presidents prior to them
Speaker 2: combined up to when it was passed during World War One.
Speaker 2: They've got the uh, they've got the gall to bring
Speaker 2: this sort of stuff up while they have surrogates like
Speaker 2: NewsGuard being fed with federal money to shut down people. Well,
Speaker 2: they've got the FBI going into going into Twitter and
Speaker 2: paying them three and a half million dollars to thank
Speaker 2: them for their efforts to silence people, and it has
Speaker 2: a direct effect on people's lives. Because we were talking
Speaker 2: about don't take the jabs, watch out for the masks.
Speaker 2: They don't do anything. This stuff from Fauci is bogus.
Speaker 2: Here's the story about how they can't actually say how
Speaker 2: many people died from this virus because they're subsidizing the
Speaker 2: hospitals to claim that they've got the virus. The PCR
Speaker 2: tests are bogus. All these things that are verifiably true,
Speaker 2: and even if they weren't correct, as John Stuart Mill said,
Speaker 2: and on liberty, openness to opinions and in information allows
Speaker 2: people to exercise and argue and debate. And to me,
Speaker 2: one of the big things that comes out of this,
Speaker 2: and I'd love to tie it into American memory, Hold,
Speaker 2: Don Jeffries, is this There seems to be this this
Speaker 2: constant push for them to try to portray anybody who
Speaker 2: is speaking and they don't like as the big guy
Speaker 2: in a sort of cultural Marxist way. So Robert Reich
Speaker 2: is portraying Elon Musk as the big guy who runs
Speaker 2: X and so therefore the great paladin of the people.
Speaker 2: The Securities in Exchange Commission which shakes down people all
Speaker 2: the time. It gets our tax money, whether we like
Speaker 2: it or not, has nothing to do with the Constitution.
Speaker 2: He wants them to go after Musk, he wants Musk arrested.
Speaker 2: He's calling for a guy who just wants to open
Speaker 2: up speech to be arrested, and he thinks that he's
Speaker 2: standing for the little guy. It's just stunning. It's so
Speaker 2: completely inverted from anything that has anything to do with
Speaker 2: individual morality. And yet they're the ones who try to
Speaker 2: claim that they stand for the little guy. Which gets
Speaker 2: right to some of your information on things like McCarthy
Speaker 2: and you know, revelations about Abraham Lincoln and others that
Speaker 2: you have come out with in American Memory Hall, I'd
Speaker 2: love to put this on the screen. Don So tell
Speaker 2: us some of the things that surprise you, for example
Speaker 2: about Senator McCarry.
Speaker 11: Well mcarthy and I got one. I thank Chris Grays
Speaker 11: and Peter Seekatch that did some incredible work and research.
Speaker 11: I couldn't do it with that. Then they really helped
Speaker 11: a lot. Uh McCarthy. I alluded to it in Crimes
Speaker 11: and cover Ups earlier, but but he really comes off
Speaker 11: more and more as a hero and he's been he's
Speaker 11: been so misrepresented. Again just to give you an idea
Speaker 11: of how historically a literate Americans are. If you look
Speaker 11: at his name has been added to the dictionary, McCarthy
Speaker 11: isn't to represent an air I supposedly, And you know,
Speaker 11: they add there's probably one percent of Americans that even
Speaker 11: though that's Joe McCarthy. They they you get asked them
Speaker 11: and say, well, there was somebody named McCarthy, and they
Speaker 11: must figure somebody was named McCarthy. They don't know who
Speaker 11: or anything. And I'm sure they get him mixed up,
Speaker 11: maybe with Eugene McCarthy later that ran, you know, against Johnson,
Speaker 11: but uh and anywhere. This guy was a genuine and
Speaker 11: again you know I feel about war, but he was
Speaker 11: a war hero. His name was tail gunner Joe. He
Speaker 11: wasn't a chicken hawk. And that's how he's elected to Congress.
Speaker 11: Like a lot of these guys JFK and all of
Speaker 11: them war. But he he has been unfairly represented. He's
Speaker 11: tied in with the Hollywood ten, the blacklisting and Hollywood
Speaker 11: and all this stuff when he had nothing.
Speaker 2: Been the House on American Committee and he was in
Speaker 2: the Senate.
Speaker 11: He was in the Senate, right, so he all that
Speaker 11: came out. They won't to blame anybody blamed j part
Speaker 11: Old Thomas. Nobody knows who that was. He was the
Speaker 11: chairman of Hughack, which was I mean, you're talking about
Speaker 11: un American committee, a committee called the House an American
Speaker 11: Activities ridiculous. But McCarthy had nothing to do with that.
Speaker 11: He was in the Senate and he was investigating subterfuge
Speaker 11: in the United States. Company was concentrating on the army.
Speaker 11: And that's when you know he all the list of
Speaker 11: how many people his list, by the way, it was
Speaker 11: very similar to a list that came out of the
Speaker 11: FCR administration earlier. But you know he once he did,
Speaker 11: he got to kind of press. That's although it wasn't
Speaker 11: bad because you said, more of a conservative press then,
Speaker 11: but the liberal press that drew Pearson's of the day,
Speaker 11: young Jack Anderson people like that. They went after him
Speaker 11: with the viciousist that you're used to seeing and with
Speaker 11: Donald Trump and the guys. As we show in the book,
Speaker 11: he was probably the first conspiracy theorist openly in public
Speaker 11: to talk about FDR. Knowing about Pearl Harbor advanced and
Speaker 11: he was. You know, he was a friend of the
Speaker 11: kendidate's friend of James Forrestall, who was pushed out of
Speaker 11: the window at Does Naval Hospital. And you know, I
Speaker 11: used Forrestall's quote to McCarthy all the time when he
Speaker 11: told me, you know, McCarthy is this wasn't a giant conspiracy.
Speaker 11: Once in a while they'd make a mistake in our favor,
Speaker 11: and I use that all the time. They never do.
Speaker 11: It's there's no randomness at all involved at all. That's
Speaker 11: why you know this is organized otherwise randomly, Once in
Speaker 11: a while something different would happened, something good. But McCarthy,
Speaker 11: like Forrestall, died Test Naval Hospital. He went he went
Speaker 11: in there at age forty eight with a knee issue.
Speaker 11: Two days later he's dead, no autopsy done. Jack Anderson
Speaker 11: instantly attacks him and claims he was an alcoholic and
Speaker 11: he drank himself to death. And that's that's the story.
Speaker 11: You know, later, you know, you roll back decades later
Speaker 11: in The Idiot, George Clooney makes a movie, you know,
Speaker 11: exemplifying L. G. Morrow, who was you know, a typical
Speaker 11: journalist of the day, was you know, completely biased and
Speaker 11: and smearing McCarthy so that's the way he's gone down
Speaker 11: in history. And again I think it's terribly unfair. He
Speaker 11: was also good friends with old Joe Kennedy, and as
Speaker 11: you know, I think I'm the only person you know
Speaker 11: that's trying to restore Joe Kennedy's reputation. And he wasn't
Speaker 11: a bootlegger. All that stuff is nonsense. It all comes
Speaker 11: from CIA and mafia sources. Joe Kennedy was really good
Speaker 11: friends with Forrest so and McCarthy was a godfather to
Speaker 11: Robert F. Kennedy's oldest child, Kathleen, although they try to
Speaker 11: deny it now, that's how close he was to the family.
Speaker 2: And you know, don that information about Joe Kennedy that
Speaker 2: coming from the New England area, I had no idea
Speaker 2: about that. You know, the story about him being a
Speaker 2: rum runner, and you know how that was how he
Speaker 2: made his fortune. That is like established lord. The same
Speaker 2: thing with McCarthy. You know all those things. And I'll
Speaker 2: give me an example of how the law of Edward R. Murrell,
Speaker 2: perfect example, you know, incredibly biased. Walter Cronkite, incredibly biased.
Speaker 2: And this is one of the things. When I was
Speaker 2: eleven years old, I was arguing with my teachers about this.
Speaker 2: It's like, how can you say that those people are
Speaker 2: on bias. They're human beings. We all have biases, Like,
Speaker 2: how can you be so stupid? I couldn't understand it.
Speaker 2: It's like, just look for alternatives. The most you can
Speaker 2: ask is for a journalist to be at least fair
Speaker 2: and open. That's all you can ask, you know. So
Speaker 2: I'll give you an example. I was at Boston University
Speaker 2: where they heralded Murrow, they loved Murrow, and they had
Speaker 2: a panel on objectivity in the media. Every person that
Speaker 2: they brought in was from the Boston Phoenix, the Boston Globe,
Speaker 2: or some left wing radio station like public radio or whatever.
Speaker 2: Every person on the panel and they almost all repeated
Speaker 2: the same mantra. I got into journalism to fight the
Speaker 2: big wig in the three I mean it was almost
Speaker 2: word for word. It was uncanny, the big wig in
Speaker 2: the big glass office in his three PCE suit. So
Speaker 2: then we went and got together and the teachers like kumbaya.
Speaker 2: Everybody turned their chairs to a circle, like you're ten
Speaker 2: years old, right, And it's like, so, what did you think,
Speaker 2: wasn't it? What'd you think of the And I raised
Speaker 2: my hand. I was like, did anybody else here notice
Speaker 2: that this panel on objectivity in the media was completely
Speaker 2: substantially biased? And she's like what I was like, I
Speaker 2: went through every person. I was like, this person's from
Speaker 2: the globe, this persons from the Phoenix, Like who are
Speaker 2: you kidding? Like why do you serve up this nonsense? Hey,
Speaker 2: ed Don, if I can, can I read a little
Speaker 2: bit of this excellent forward and people can find this
Speaker 2: at Amazon. American Memory Hole is the new book from
Speaker 2: Don Jeffers. Everybody and you're probably familiar with hidden history
Speaker 2: and asking the truth, just great, great stuff. Here's the
Speaker 2: part of the introduction from Sam Tripoli. I'm so glad
Speaker 2: that Sam wrote this. I'm gonna read it without putting
Speaker 2: it on the screen, Don, and I hope you don't mind,
Speaker 2: because it obviously is. It has a lot of great
Speaker 2: things to say about you, but in particular about the work.
Speaker 2: It's great, he says Sam Tripley. And the forward says,
Speaker 2: it is with great enthusiasm and admiration that I introduce
Speaker 2: you to John Jeffrey's latest literary endeavor, American Memory Hole.
Speaker 2: I've had the privilege of knowing Don through his insightful
Speaker 2: contributions to journalism afield, where his commitment to truth telling
Speaker 2: stands as a beacon in an often murky landscape. Wonderfully stated,
Speaker 2: that's great. That is great, Don, and it's so true
Speaker 2: in the realm of investigative journalism. Don Jeffries is a
Speaker 2: name that resonates with authenticity and courage. His career spans decades,
Speaker 2: marked by an unwavering dedication to uncovering the hidden truths
Speaker 2: that shape our world. From clandestine operations to gover ups,
Speaker 2: Don fearlessly navigates through the labyrinth of misinformation to expose
Speaker 2: the realities obscured from public view. One of the things that,
Speaker 2: of course Sam Tripley, host of Tinfoil Hat, brings to mind, Don,
Speaker 2: and I wanted to bring it up to you from
Speaker 2: American Memory Hole, which is just out everybody American memory Holes.
Speaker 2: Show it on the screen again, is there's a weird
Speaker 2: psychology that I noticed, especially in high school, which was
Speaker 2: a form of defensiveness that becomes its own doctrine. They
Speaker 2: become doctrinaire and accept things without question as a form
Speaker 2: of almost a protective layer against criticism. So the McCarthy stuff,
Speaker 2: it's an easy go to. Nobody questions it. You've got
Speaker 2: different things like Edward armurraw, Oh, he's unquestionable, what a
Speaker 2: wonderful journalist he is, Walter Cronkite, the fact that he
Speaker 2: was a hardcore socialist. Nobody wants to bother talking about that.
Speaker 2: That he might have been biased, Nobody wants to talk
Speaker 2: about that. And now we get to this idea of
Speaker 2: people like Robert Reich saying, well, of course, for the
Speaker 2: protection of our democracy, or Tim Wallas of our democracy.
Speaker 2: They always use that term democracy as if it would
Speaker 2: be okay if the majority wanted to take away your
Speaker 2: life or take away your freedoms for our democracy. Somehow,
Speaker 2: the highly much more democratic idea of open voices has
Speaker 2: to be stopped. It's recurse of and insane. But they
Speaker 2: pushed this stuff. And I wonder as you saw the
Speaker 2: left become increasingly more authoritarian and totalitarian, did you have
Speaker 2: any friends who commented to you. I know that a
Speaker 2: lot of them went by the wayside that sort of
Speaker 2: felt the same way from your generation.
Speaker 11: Well, there's like my friend Cindy Sheehan and I have
Speaker 11: become really good friends and the left. I mean, she
Speaker 11: was and she probably is a socialist that we differ
Speaker 11: from that. But she's she's honest. She's been a great
Speaker 11: supporter of mine. She wrote a blurb for this like
Speaker 11: she has pretty much any time I've asked her. But she,
Speaker 11: you know, lost her child in the Gulf War. And
Speaker 11: as long when Bush was in the office, the left
Speaker 11: loved her. We were talking about Jackson Brown. I happened
Speaker 11: to mention that much I love Jackson Brown. She was
Speaker 11: friends with Jackson Brown. Jackson Brown asked her to present
Speaker 11: an award to it. He admired her that much. But
Speaker 11: what happened was once Obama came into office and she
Speaker 11: kept she saw, hey, he's doing the same thing he says,
Speaker 11: bombing even more kind. The left left her and so
Speaker 11: she suddenly it didn't matter anymore, and that she exemplifies
Speaker 11: what's roth love is. Cynthia McKinney is another one who
Speaker 11: I admire very much, who was who will refuse to
Speaker 11: take the And she claimed there was an actual oath
Speaker 11: she had to take in Congress to Israel she wouldn't take.
Speaker 11: And I think they looked at her as just another
Speaker 11: member of the Black Caucus and then eventually said, well,
Speaker 11: you got to get rid of her, and there are
Speaker 11: people like that. I think Dennis Kucinich is still pretty good,
Speaker 11: and I think that Jimmy Dore I like very much,
Speaker 11: you know. But so there's a left out there that
Speaker 11: that still stands up for some of these classical liberal ideals.
Speaker 11: But there aren't many of them, and there's very few.
Speaker 11: I've said I'm the last civil libertarian America, I think,
Speaker 11: but I feel that way sometimes. But you know, that's
Speaker 11: the that's the essence, is the essence of because the
Speaker 11: essence of free speech is what is what Patrick Henry said.
Speaker 11: He was quoting Voltaire and he said, and it got
Speaker 11: me excited as a little kid, you know, learning is
Speaker 11: I love the Revolutionary Aaron I used to just gravitate
Speaker 11: towards that it read books on as a little kid.
Speaker 11: And I realized even then, God, there's not many movies
Speaker 11: about that. And I've written about that before. Hollywood avoids
Speaker 11: the subject. And when Meel Gibson made The Patriot and
Speaker 11: around two thousand or nineties whatever it was, it was
Speaker 11: very controversial. I mean, they went nuts over it and
Speaker 11: it was nothing. He just told the story. Yeah, they
Speaker 11: didn't want anybody knowing. They didn't want anybody remembering that, Hey,
Speaker 11: this was that the United States decided to break away,
Speaker 11: to secede, if you will. And there's a reason why
Speaker 11: they called it the Articles of Confederation, and then later
Speaker 11: they became the Confederate States. They chose that name with
Speaker 11: the reason because they recognized they were doing the same thing.
Speaker 11: And that's why it gets to when you roll up.
Speaker 11: While I write so much about Lincoln, because he's the
Speaker 11: secular saint of our civilization, that says a lot about
Speaker 11: your civilization when you have the greatest despot we've ever had.
Speaker 11: And so I'm trying to show the truth about him,
Speaker 11: but people need to realize that are whatever the founders
Speaker 11: were fighting for. They're under line principle was the consent
Speaker 11: of the government. And in eighteen sixty those states no
Speaker 11: longer consented, and Abraham Lincoln said, no, you have to
Speaker 11: consent and crush them, and almost a million people died.
Speaker 11: The United States became singular insteadled plural, and that's that's
Speaker 11: the end. That was the end of the Founding Fathership.
Speaker 11: Most people don't realize that.
Speaker 2: You had a great conversation about a month and a
Speaker 2: half ago with of course author and now head of
Speaker 2: the Mesas Institute Tom de Lorenzo and his book's just fantastic,
Speaker 2: The Real Lincoln, Lincoln Unmasked. Also, Jeffrey Rogers Hummel has
Speaker 2: an excellent book called Emancipating Slaves and Slaving free Men,
Speaker 2: And of course De Lorenzo's book called How Capitalism Saved
Speaker 2: America is just phenomenal, just remarkable. And you know, as
Speaker 2: a guy who was the tall kid in fourth grade,
Speaker 2: I had to memorize and recite the Gettysburg address, have
Speaker 2: the stove pipe, pat have a fake beard that looped
Speaker 2: around my ears, and give, you know, give the four score.
Speaker 2: And it just sounds such, you know, such flowery language.
Speaker 2: But yeah, you know, when you find out about Lincoln,
Speaker 2: when you find out why they called him leap in Lincoln,
Speaker 2: when you find out how corrupt he was, how he
Speaker 2: you know, he was in Congress, and the unconstitutional Transcontinental Railroad,
Speaker 2: which was not supposed to have been any sort of
Speaker 2: government project, but the scions of Alexander Hamilton and Henry
Speaker 2: Clay that wanted the special favors done for their friends,
Speaker 2: and the politicians who knew they could latch onto it.
Speaker 2: Lincoln was one of them, bought a bunch of land
Speaker 2: just outside of Springfield and made sure that that rail
Speaker 2: line was steered that way, and then sold all that
Speaker 2: land back to the Fedes for more money than he
Speaker 2: made even as a lawyer during his whole career as
Speaker 2: a lawyer. That ought to tell people a little something,
Speaker 2: even before he becomes president. And then the entire idea
Speaker 2: of the Emancipation Proclamation being this wonderful thing that somehow
Speaker 2: it freedes the slave It was a tactical move to
Speaker 2: try to generate rebellion on the slave plantations in a
Speaker 2: place where he didn't have jurisdiction anymore. And Northerners rioted,
Speaker 2: They had protest marches over the fact that he wasn't
Speaker 2: freeing the slaves in the north right.
Speaker 11: And all you need to know about him is that,
Speaker 11: and we talked about it in this book, is that
Speaker 11: during his career he was a corporate lawyer. You know,
Speaker 11: my hero is Huey Long. And Huey Long used to
Speaker 11: like to say he never took a case against a
Speaker 11: poor man. I don't. I don't think Abraham Lincoln ever
Speaker 11: took a case for poor man. He was exact opposite
Speaker 11: of Huey Long, and he was a railroad corporate lawyer,
Speaker 11: and he was in their hip pocket. And all you
Speaker 11: need to know is that there we talked about. There
Speaker 11: was at least one example of when he there was
Speaker 11: a runaway slave, and Lincoln didn't represent the runaway slave.
Speaker 11: He represented the master. This is a great emancipator and
Speaker 11: what is the great amanster. But see you try to
Speaker 11: bring that up, and they don't let you bring it
Speaker 11: up because obviously it ruins the image. You know, you're
Speaker 11: you're going to quit, so you're representing the master and
Speaker 11: you're and you're saying and all you need in Lincoln's first,
Speaker 11: in all your address, he's he he laid it out.
Speaker 11: He said, if I could free the if I could
Speaker 11: save the Union, but without freeing a slave, I'd do it.
Speaker 11: And people, you're exactly right. He did it for public
Speaker 11: relations purposes. And then Lincoln, there's all the evidence of
Speaker 11: the world as Lincoln was an atheist. And then in
Speaker 11: fact he wrote a rebuttal to the New Testament when
Speaker 11: he was young, and that his friends said we got
Speaker 11: to get rid of this, and they burned it. And
Speaker 11: when he entered politics, and but still this this flaming atheist.
Speaker 11: He decided to a few years into the war, he
Speaker 11: started blaming God and invoking the Almighty, who he didn't
Speaker 11: believe in. So all those great speeches and he wasn't
Speaker 11: He was a good writer and he could turn a phrase.
Speaker 2: And uh, well, the slippery tongue devils, you know. Yeah,
Speaker 2: and in fact you you remind me I'm showing on
Speaker 2: the screen Don. Don Jeffers is our guest and the
Speaker 2: David Knight Show, folks, And I just want to mention
Speaker 2: Martin thorn Over on X says Don. I know, by
Speaker 2: comparison is a small player, but Andrew Torbas stands against censorship,
Speaker 2: he sure does, and works are a very small team there,
Speaker 2: and I'm on GAB too, and against foreign governments telling
Speaker 2: him what to do. So yeah, and I know David
Speaker 2: Knight is over there, and you know, maybe more people
Speaker 2: will populate that and feel free to comment on that
Speaker 2: and bring in other comments. But I want to show
Speaker 2: the screen again because this slippery tongue devil of Abraham Lincoln, right,
Speaker 2: Don makes me think of Bill Clinton. And you've got
Speaker 2: something in here, the quote it isn't easy being a
Speaker 2: historian when most of America isn't interested in the past,
Speaker 2: and is woefully uninformed or misinformed about even the most
Speaker 2: important events and personalities. In this book, we'll examine in
Speaker 2: greater detail the events of nine to eleven, the Oklahoma
Speaker 2: City bombing, and the depth of JFK. Junior. We'll also
Speaker 2: look back at the founding of the Republic, James K. Polk,
Speaker 2: Woodrow Wilson, Fdr. Joel McCarthy, and several other misrepresented historical
Speaker 2: events and personalities. I often bring up things like Shay's
Speaker 2: Rebellion and how that was used toe to leverage people
Speaker 2: so that a lot of those very wealthy friends of
Speaker 2: Alexander Hamilton would buy those pennies on the dollar bonds
Speaker 2: from the US from the War for Independence, and then
Speaker 2: they were able to of course get them paid for
Speaker 2: by the central government, and the Whiskey Rebellion rebellion was
Speaker 2: put down in order to make sure they could facilitate
Speaker 2: the excise tax to pay for those bonds. I mean
Speaker 2: it was incredibly corrupt. But let's talk about Oklahoma City,
Speaker 2: because when you look at Abraham Lincoln and the way
Speaker 2: that he was able to set up the firing the
Speaker 2: shot at Fort Sumter, I mean utterly, utterly corrupt, unbelievably corrupt,
Speaker 2: sending fake messages so that the South would think one thing,
Speaker 2: and then of course getting the South to be very
Speaker 2: fearful and getting them to fire the first shot. Must
Speaker 2: much like the way FDR communicate with Winston Churchill to
Speaker 2: say I'll do anything I can to get the US
Speaker 2: involved in this, and then already breaking the Purple Code
Speaker 2: of the Japanese, moving all the valuable ships away from
Speaker 2: the cone where the Japanese would be traveling, then blaming
Speaker 2: the people who were there who didn't get the information
Speaker 2: from the people in DC. I mean, this is real,
Speaker 2: real dark character action. But we'll go to Oklahoma City
Speaker 2: real quick, because I'll never forget. And I actually got
Speaker 2: it because I was going to write a book on
Speaker 2: the history of talk radio. When Clinton said we hear
Speaker 2: so many angri voices out there, you know, of violent voices,
Speaker 2: he was blaming Oklahoma City essentially on rush Limbaugh. Yeah,
Speaker 2: it was unbelievable. And you've got a lot of this information.
Speaker 2: Pick any of those, don and let's let's extend our
Speaker 2: conversation as long as you can be here, because I'd
Speaker 2: love to continue this conversation and take questions from the
Speaker 2: audience and the David Knight Show.
Speaker 11: Sure, well, you know, Clinton was i you know much
Speaker 11: as I think Reagan transformed the right into this. And
Speaker 11: basically he let the new cons take over and instead
Speaker 11: of worrying about reggae, did and cut a single sub
Speaker 11: agency and government his entire eight years in office. And
Speaker 11: he raised taxes on the majority of people, especially he
Speaker 11: double tax Social Security, which is already taxed. And somehow
Speaker 11: the right was okay with that. The right was transformed
Speaker 11: under Reagan into this kind of greed is good, kind
Speaker 11: of worship of the marketplace. And Clinton in the nineties
Speaker 11: transformed the left. He was the first one to feel
Speaker 11: your pain, and you know, identity politics he was all about,
Speaker 11: and that's exactly what so he would naturally look who
Speaker 11: can blame and that's and that was that was when
Speaker 11: the left started doing that. And and you see that
Speaker 11: that's right out of their playbooks. Something happens, let's blame
Speaker 11: the white supremacist, let's blame you know. And instead of
Speaker 11: course they they never it's a conspiracy theory to even
Speaker 11: look into it. You have General Ben Parton. It was
Speaker 11: a nation's topic in general. You know, it must been
Speaker 11: something he was a general uh, the nation's top expert
Speaker 11: on explosives. He was trying to get on a t
Speaker 11: He couldn't get on a single TV show. I think
Speaker 11: Gallax Jones had him on to talk about it. They
Speaker 11: had to be bombs in the buildings. And they know
Speaker 11: that they had the original coverage of Oklahoma City that
Speaker 11: day where they used to be. I don't know if
Speaker 11: it's out there on the line out, but it was
Speaker 11: for a long time where the original coverage where the
Speaker 11: story took hold. They have over and over again reporters,
Speaker 11: reporters and witnesses talking about explosions, finding bombs. They even
Speaker 11: talked about bringing bombs out. So yeah, And in this
Speaker 11: book I had the story of Corey Loudenslager or Mike
Speaker 11: Loudenslager I think his name was. And despite that name,
Speaker 11: I can't find any of his family to talk to.
Speaker 11: But he was he was seen by many people. He
Speaker 11: was a hero rescuing people, and he was also seen
Speaker 11: arguing with government agents heatedly h their Their official explanation
Speaker 11: is that he died during the blast, and his death
Speaker 11: that all those people that saw I'm arguing and helping
Speaker 11: people nothing. And of course you can't find his family
Speaker 11: to talk about. I had representative State Representative Charles Key
Speaker 11: on the that I've had him on my show a
Speaker 11: couple of times, and he couldn't locate a lot of
Speaker 11: these people. You know, the daycare center owner who disappeared,
Speaker 11: Chris Gray's worked a lot on that, and we can't
Speaker 11: find her. She's alive, she's gone into hiding. And that's
Speaker 11: you know. I actually talked to Timothy mcvey's father, very briefly.
Speaker 11: It was one of the few actually answered the phone.
Speaker 11: I'm shocked, you know, but I have maybe thirty seconds
Speaker 11: of a conversation. He didn't want to talk. I said, well,
Speaker 11: I think someone was a patsy, and I tried, but
Speaker 11: he didn't care. No, I can't. He didn't want to
Speaker 11: hear anything about it. And that's that's where we are.
Speaker 11: The people that are associated with these things don't want
Speaker 11: to talk, you know, all down to seth Rich's family
Speaker 11: or anybody like that.
Speaker 2: That's amazing. I mean, the seth Rich thing is such
Speaker 2: a classic example of what actually really had to have happened,
Speaker 2: which was the data had to have been downloaded inside
Speaker 2: the building and seth Rich literally getting killed before he's
Speaker 2: going to meet with the FBI, and you know they
Speaker 2: call her a box robbery. And you know with the
Speaker 2: Oklahoma City thing, you bring it to mind because Mary
Speaker 2: Ellen Moore, Chris Emory, their company has done Yeoman's work,
Speaker 2: Doctor Henry film on Oklahoma City, absolutely excellent work. And
Speaker 2: I want to if I can, I'd like to show
Speaker 2: some of these great quotes here don on the book,
Speaker 2: these blurbs John Barbera of course from NBC television and producer,
Speaker 2: and he has take a dive down the memory hole
Speaker 2: with Donald and you will have the most brilliant memories
Speaker 2: of how our media and government underinformed and misinformed us.
Speaker 2: And want to go back to John in just a moment.
Speaker 2: Then you've got a quote from G. Edward Griffin, author
Speaker 2: of course Creature from Jekyll Island, a very good on nutrition.
Speaker 2: He has this is not a giant tribe against America.
Speaker 2: It is a wake up call to recognize that the
Speaker 2: bigger a government becomes, the greater attraction it is to
Speaker 2: those seeking to use that government to attain personal power
Speaker 2: and wealth. Knowledge of this truth is the first step
Speaker 2: to realistic reform. And then you also have this from
Speaker 2: Daniel Estelen, who is a great writer, have numerous of
Speaker 2: his book Memory many of his books. Yes, Jeffries rightfully
Speaker 2: teaches us that we must question what we are told.
Speaker 2: And this is why American memory Hole plays such an
Speaker 2: important role in helping us understand who is doing what
Speaker 2: to whom and how it is being done on a
Speaker 2: global scale. So if I can, if I can entice
Speaker 2: and gender even two or three people in the audience
Speaker 2: to pick up this book and get some of your
Speaker 2: other books as well, Hidden history, crimes and cover ups.
Speaker 2: These books are remarkable. And then of course to follow
Speaker 2: you don it's at Don Jeffries at Don Jeffries on
Speaker 2: X right don yes, yes.
Speaker 11: And you can do it. They're letting me grow very
Speaker 11: slowly there. They still you know, they for a long
Speaker 11: time they've unfollowed people, people who told me and all that.
Speaker 11: So they definitely in the old days tried to stop that.
Speaker 11: But it is what it is. But substack is the
Speaker 11: best place. Dout on Jeffries at substack dot com because
Speaker 11: it's called I protests like my podcast, because that's the
Speaker 11: only place they are allowing me to grow.
Speaker 2: And substats good stuff I don't.
Speaker 11: And I don't. Yeah, and that's that's a free speech platform.
Speaker 11: Let's hope it stays that way. You get big names
Speaker 11: like Len red Wall, Glenn Greenwall, my friend Naomi Wolf,
Speaker 11: people like that are writing there and and doing well.
Speaker 11: Let's hope it because these are we need something like
Speaker 11: that to counteract what's happening on Facebook and Instagram and
Speaker 11: and that TikTok. If they close that down, you know,
Speaker 11: it's just it's it's ironic, is it, because TikTok. So
Speaker 11: many people on the right were uppolled at the you know,
Speaker 11: the yeah, purple haired tattooed teachers, and I was too,
Speaker 11: you know, with the lgbt he flags. But you don't
Speaker 11: shut the entire platform. And that's the essence of being
Speaker 11: a civil liberitarian. I mean, much as you know, I
Speaker 11: kind of blanted saying that they have rights too, I don't.
Speaker 11: I'm not going to sit down their free speech. I mean,
Speaker 11: they have a right to fly that flag and say
Speaker 11: whatever nonsense they're saying. I mean, and that's you know,
Speaker 11: if you're if you're true to free speech, then you
Speaker 11: support their right as well.
Speaker 2: Absolutely done. Don Jeffers is our guests on the David
Speaker 2: Knight Show. Don gonna check out some of the comments.
Speaker 2: See if if people have put comments in and I've
Speaker 2: missed them, just you know, copy paste, regenerate, anything like that.
Speaker 2: We've got. William A. Martell says Lincoln was a student
Speaker 2: of Shakespeare. Well, if you want some curious information about Shakespeare,
Speaker 2: get Sam Blumenfeld's book on the Marlowe Shakespeare connection, because
Speaker 2: he reveals that Christopher Marlowe was never killed. He was
Speaker 2: actually a spy for Queen Elizabeth. And the idea that
Speaker 2: Marlowe was killed outside a pub in a fight was
Speaker 2: a trumped up thing. They had to move him out
Speaker 2: because of political pressures, and he lived the rest of
Speaker 2: his life in Corsica. And through analysis, it's very interesting
Speaker 2: and Sam Blumenfeld this was just one of his side interests.
Speaker 2: He was one of these guys with you know, Charlotte
Speaker 2: izzerbeit very influential on John Taylor Gotto. And so I'm
Speaker 2: really good friends with my father, And when my dad
Speaker 2: was working with Charlotte in the Reagan administration trying to
Speaker 2: eliminate the education department, that's how he became friends with Sam.
Speaker 2: And Sam just became interested in Shakespeare. Very interesting stuff
Speaker 2: and perhaps perhaps Lincoln could have been a character from
Speaker 2: a Shakespeare tragedy.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 11: Yeah, Joe Sobern wrote a great book about that too,
Speaker 11: about the country.
Speaker 2: Yes, that's right, Joe Sober. Yeah. And was it he was?
Speaker 2: He wasn't looking at Marlow as people.
Speaker 11: I think he was looking at Bacon. I think it
Speaker 11: was Francis Bacon.
Speaker 2: I believe Bacon. That's what it was. Yeah, yeah, it's
Speaker 2: and it you know who can answer it. But one
Speaker 2: thing we do know is that Shakespeare, as as Sam
Speaker 2: brought up Shakespeare, supposedly this man of letters had a
Speaker 2: daughter who was illiterate. He never taught her how to read,
Speaker 2: and he didn't have a library. So where was he
Speaker 2: getting all this knowledge?
Speaker 11: Yeah?
Speaker 2: Meanwhile, a guy like Marlow was basically a scion of
Speaker 2: the or at least a special especially favorite person of
Speaker 2: the Queen and the royalty, had access to all this
Speaker 2: information and was well educated in those areas. So very curious.
Speaker 2: Inside Rock then I want to thank uh, let's see
Speaker 2: inside Rock. Then we've got Eco Taxi, who has contributed
Speaker 2: to the program. Thank you, Thank you, Eco Taxi, And
Speaker 2: he says hi again. Liberty guard Goldsmith of real Christian libertarianism.
Speaker 2: Remember how almost lifelong figurative and literal nWo Nancy Patricia
Speaker 2: Dellassandro Pelosi's Nasty he abbreviates it. Political career evidently began
Speaker 2: as JFK's Oh is there a story that she was
Speaker 2: mixed up with JFK?
Speaker 11: Yeah, that was a picture taken. Ever, she was miss
Speaker 11: lou Boyle of nineteen fifty nine and something, So I
Speaker 11: don't know who knows, maybe JFT And her father was
Speaker 11: a monster in Baltimore, and I have actually an American
Speaker 11: memory how we're talking about that her brother, her brother
Speaker 11: was involved in a gang rape of a twelve year
Speaker 11: old or thirteen year old or something, and like ten
Speaker 11: guys and he was the only one that wasn't prosecuted.
Speaker 11: That show whoa his father had him?
Speaker 2: Yeah, man, And and it isn't newsome her nephew by marriage.
Speaker 2: Is that what it is?
Speaker 11: Yes, yes, yeh, yep. They're on these people.
Speaker 2: It's just they're incredible. Also inside rock. Then let's see
Speaker 2: we've got uh oh oh, very I I appreciate this,
Speaker 2: Sam uh the don This is a bit of a
Speaker 2: side side mark, but I know you're probably familiar with
Speaker 2: Sam Bloomfeld's work. Brian de McCartney says, this we taught
Speaker 2: our youngest to read with alpha phonics by Bloomenfeld. Well done.
Speaker 2: Sam Blumenfeld was one of the people who spoke up
Speaker 2: against the public school hegemony and try to tell people
Speaker 2: that most of the kids who are diagnosed as dyslexic,
Speaker 2: they're just not taught phonetic reading left to right the
Speaker 2: way the Phoenicians developed the alphabet. And I I you know,
Speaker 2: I I have. Sam gave me a bunch of his
Speaker 2: stuff before he passed away. He lived about an hour
Speaker 2: away outside of Boston, don and we we would have
Speaker 2: dinner together and stuff like that after my dad passed away.
Speaker 2: So Sam was a good friend and he was a
Speaker 2: great guy. And it is interesting because he would take
Speaker 2: parents in and they would bring their kids in and
Speaker 2: he would teach the kids phonics, and by the end
Speaker 2: of the afternoon they'd be reading the street signs going
Speaker 2: home and they had been diagnosed as learning disabled and
Speaker 2: all these things, and then they would have been drugged.
Speaker 2: Pharmaceutical complex would have gotten hold of them. It's amazing
Speaker 2: to see how and done from your perspective. One of
Speaker 2: the things that I found, just to sort of bring
Speaker 2: this around, I found that some of my left wing
Speaker 2: British friends in punk rock were right on the money
Speaker 2: regarding corporatism. And there's this fine line between recognizing the
Speaker 2: dangers of the corporate government fascist feedback loop and blaming
Speaker 2: business and endeavors and private property. And to me, the
Speaker 2: source of the problem is the corrupt power of the
Speaker 2: state of the government. So the more that the government
Speaker 2: does and the larger the area of control, the more
Speaker 2: people it's going to hurt, and the more likely they're
Speaker 2: going to try to gain the system to get advantages.
Speaker 2: So that's one of the reasons I liked the centralation
Speaker 2: because there's an easier escape.
Speaker 11: Yeah, but that's why I'm a populist, and you know
Speaker 11: populist And again my hero is Huey Long. Huey Long.
Speaker 11: You know, people think of him as a communist or
Speaker 11: socialist and you read what I rode about and Survival
Speaker 11: of Rich it's really the obituaries they get ready, I mean,
Speaker 11: they hated this guy even in death. Uh the communist
Speaker 11: didn't like in the socialists like because he actually accomplished
Speaker 11: something and he did it. He provided great services to
Speaker 11: the people Louisiana. He did it with the third lowest
Speaker 11: operating expenses of any state. He also his share of
Speaker 11: the wealth plan was going to exempt the first million
Speaker 11: dollars of income from any taxation. That would be twelve
Speaker 11: million dollars today, So you know who he was going after.
Speaker 11: He already knew about the foundations. He was already talking
Speaker 11: about them. Now, imagine what you say about the gate Side.
Speaker 11: There's we don't even know how much wealth is tied
Speaker 11: up in those foundations. And so he knew where the
Speaker 11: money was. That's why they hated him. That's why Roosevelt,
Speaker 11: that's why they had him assassinated. But that's it. But
Speaker 11: populism looks at a bigness, too much concentrated power anywhere.
Speaker 11: So they don't like big government or big business. They
Speaker 11: don't know or you know, a big person. They don't
Speaker 11: want they want things, They want things spread up because
Speaker 11: they know power corrupts. The great populist Lord Acton, who
Speaker 11: is a good friend of Robert E. Lee, not not
Speaker 11: Abraham Linken. His credo, of course power corrupts, and absolute
Speaker 11: power corrupts. Absolutely is remembered by other people. And that's
Speaker 11: what it is. So we have to it doesn't matter
Speaker 11: that you and me or anybody who thinks a great guy.
Speaker 11: Power is intoxicating, and that's why you have to what
Speaker 11: is it, Jefferson said, you know, hold him down by
Speaker 11: the change of the constitution. We have to start. Too
Speaker 11: much power, and that's what differentiates a liberal and a conservative.
Speaker 11: You know that the conservatives defend big business. Liberals defend
Speaker 11: big government. Now, too much concentrated power anywhere is not good.
Speaker 11: And you see the results in the way the.
Speaker 2: Country is so true, you know, you bring up there's
Speaker 2: so many, so many rich veins to tap here don
Speaker 2: American Memory Hole is the book everyone. And before I
Speaker 2: bring up my point, I want to bring up some
Speaker 2: points inside rumble. It's the fruit striped gum colors of rumble.
Speaker 2: I love it. Michelle Obama and is there? Thank you
Speaker 2: for being there. How nine thousand Watson is there? How
Speaker 2: nine thousand Wantson says? And Newsom's ex is Trump Junior's wife.
Speaker 11: Good point, that's right, yes, yeah, yeah, yeah, And that interesting?
Speaker 11: I mean, how would she that shows you know that
Speaker 11: these people are strange bedfellows. I don't know. I don't,
Speaker 11: I can't. I couldn't be married to somebody who was
Speaker 11: my political opposite, I know.
Speaker 2: And at the same time, I don't want to be
Speaker 2: you know, I don't want to criticize because you just
Speaker 2: don't know what the circumstances were on people meeting. I
Speaker 2: don't know how how much of it is artificial. I
Speaker 2: don't know, right, but a couple of the things I
Speaker 2: do want to bring up is and there's so much
Speaker 2: in your writing. Let's talk about Robert E. Lee and
Speaker 2: the way that Lincoln is portrayed as the saint. Well,
Speaker 2: Robert E. Lee is portrayed as the bad guy, and
Speaker 2: yet it was Robert Lee who actually cared about slaves,
Speaker 2: cared about human beings, and actually believed in natural rights.
Speaker 2: This is fascinating. Any comments you have on that and
Speaker 2: any of the other items that we might want to
Speaker 2: bring up before eleven o'clock, well we'll have Marty gotdisfeld
Speaker 2: is going to be here about free speech as well,
Speaker 2: because Marty's going to be talking to us about that
Speaker 2: as well. Done.
Speaker 11: Well well, Robertie Lee. I think it represents class where
Speaker 11: he was a statesman and he comes off much better.
Speaker 11: Em and Jefferson Davis both come off way better than
Speaker 11: anybody in the North and I In American Memory, holl
Speaker 11: I published a directive from I think it was from
Speaker 11: Jefferson Davis had been I think it was from Davis,
Speaker 11: but to his troops and his generals about how they
Speaker 11: were because they already knew all the stories about what
Speaker 11: the Union was doing targeting civilians, raping them and stealing.
Speaker 11: I mean they talk about stealing theft on anti magical
Speaker 11: scale atrocity's burning crops, you know, destroying homes, the stuff
Speaker 11: that they did. And he was appalled by it. But
Speaker 11: he's he told them you are not to target civilians,
Speaker 11: no matter what the enemy's doing. You don't do that.
Speaker 11: And that's why you can't find these tales of atrocity,
Speaker 11: you know, otherwise they'd be trumpeted to disguise if you could.
Speaker 11: Lee was a and again Lee was his You your
Speaker 11: friends speak well if the Lord Acton was maybe the
Speaker 11: greatest populace of the nineteenth century out of England, and
Speaker 11: he's just a great man, and he was he was good.
Speaker 11: He was rooting for the conveneracy and he at the
Speaker 11: end he said he weeped for what happened there, you know,
Speaker 11: because he weeped for the the surrender in appimatics and
Speaker 11: later Lee Lee once the hards of reconstruction came Lee
Speaker 11: came up with that great quote. If I had known
Speaker 11: what was going to happen afterwards, I would have never
Speaker 11: surrendered my sword. And so you know, yeah, I think
Speaker 11: these these guys, and that's why when I look, I
Speaker 11: don't know that how many of you know heroes or
Speaker 11: what a hero is even, But for the most part,
Speaker 11: when you look at somebody like Robberty or Joe McCarthy,
Speaker 11: Joe Kennedy, people like that that are demonized in a life,
Speaker 11: and then you look at FDR and what the rules
Speaker 11: in Abraham Lincoln, people like that Hamilton. Certainly, these people
Speaker 11: seem way more like villains when you just scratch the surface.
Speaker 11: So I don't know, you know what that means other
Speaker 11: than maybe they're just trying to mess with people's minds.
Speaker 11: But if you worship, if you worship people, if you
Speaker 11: if you believe that people ain't Lincoln who set all
Speaker 11: these precedents. So look at today, if for instance, you
Speaker 11: had civil Libertarians in the ACAA, he was doing its
Speaker 11: job today and they were actually protesting the fact that
Speaker 11: the January sixth people have been held not all due
Speaker 11: process for over three years now. They were doing their
Speaker 11: job if somehow they got the government to respond to that,
Speaker 11: what would the government do. They would set Lincoln, they
Speaker 11: would cite Lincoln as a president. Well, you know, it's
Speaker 11: an insurrection. Look what Lincoln did during what Well Lincoln
Speaker 11: did it. Okay, it must be fine.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the man who the man who attempted to suspend
Speaker 2: habeas corpus himself. And then when a judge said us
Speaker 2: members of courts said no, only Congress can do that,
Speaker 2: then he sent magistrates to arrest the Supreme Court justice.
Speaker 11: Yes he did, canad So this is so when you
Speaker 11: when you worship a guy like that into a lesser exent,
Speaker 11: somebody like Fdr Wodrow Wilson. Uh. And you can see
Speaker 11: because the court historians, they will you know, they probably
Speaker 11: give Joe Biden a good presidential ranking. I don't know,
Speaker 11: but they'll certainly give Obama a much better ranking than
Speaker 11: he deserves and Trump will be at the bottom. It's typical.
Speaker 11: And uh, this is this is dishonest and it's not
Speaker 11: based it's based on it. Again, to go back to
Speaker 11: Bill Clinton, when he rewrote the left, the left he
Speaker 11: lost all its freezing back then, you know, just before
Speaker 11: Trump and they started going to emotion. How does it
Speaker 11: make me feel? And that's what identity politics all about.
Speaker 11: And that's thanks to Bill Clinton. And you had the
Speaker 11: ultimate and Barack Obama with the left again, all these
Speaker 11: crazy especially white women, went nuts because, oh, to kill
Speaker 11: a mocking bird. All this is the this is the
Speaker 11: culmination of all our dreams. We finally have a half
Speaker 11: black president and that was it. They wouldn't have cared
Speaker 11: what he did at all. They felt so so excited
Speaker 11: that that this was you know, this is their dream.
Speaker 11: It made them feel good. That's identity politics.
Speaker 2: Oh, it's amazing. And I think don it's almost as if,
Speaker 2: you know, again we talk about defensive postures. Eventually they
Speaker 2: have to there's so much retrenchment that they eventually have
Speaker 2: to get to the point of, well, don't talk to
Speaker 2: me about facts. You're hurting me with your words, because
Speaker 2: this is my this is my truth. And it's just amazing.
Speaker 2: And it's cultural max cultural Marxism to the max, where
Speaker 2: you can't even discuss actual two plus two ekals four
Speaker 2: because they they feel that it's five. So in a
Speaker 2: way you get to the same destination as or well
Speaker 2: and room one o one. You know, it's just it's
Speaker 2: the Emotional Room one oh one, and I'll give you
Speaker 2: an example of the stunning hypocrisy. This is a piece
Speaker 2: that will will be published tomorrow at MRCTV don and
Speaker 2: you might have already heard about this as we close
Speaker 2: the off, I just want to give this one to
Speaker 2: you to show the absolute self delusion and confusion of
Speaker 2: these people. The dean of the Berkeley Law School has
Speaker 2: a new book and you might have seen this where
Speaker 2: he is calling for the trashing of the Constitution because,
Speaker 2: as he says, it hobbles American democracy. So we talked
Speaker 2: about how the Founders try to explain democracy, as Benjamin
Speaker 2: Franklins said, you know, to Wolfson the Sheep. James Bouvart's
Speaker 2: done great work about that, and so he's on MSNBC
Speaker 2: and I mentioned this as we open up the show,
Speaker 2: and we'll talk about it more on Liberty Conspiracy tonight
Speaker 2: at six o'clock. Everybody's so stream it. But the guy's
Speaker 2: name is Irwin Chemerinsky, and he's the dean of the school,
Speaker 2: the tax supported subsidized California school. And he actually says,
Speaker 2: get this, that there's not enough democracy around. So is
Speaker 2: what do they have to do? They have to. Of course,
Speaker 2: the constitution at self doesn't allow for enough democracy. It's
Speaker 2: putting so called democracy at risk. Well, the constitution was
Speaker 2: put in in order to stop the tyranny of the
Speaker 2: majority over people. That was the point if you're going
Speaker 2: to establish the founder's thought democracy was very dangerous. But
Speaker 2: then the guy says, you know what, we ought to
Speaker 2: do something like have a constitutional convention and if that
Speaker 2: doesn't work, we ought to, oh split off and have
Speaker 2: the West become what's called pacifica, they should secede. So
Speaker 2: here you've got a left wing guy who hates the
Speaker 2: concept of southern secession. Yeah, doesn't like the constitutional confederate
Speaker 2: system that's made up. And he eventually gets to the
Speaker 2: point where he argues for confederation and splitting off.
Speaker 11: He doesn't even get it.
Speaker 2: You just sit there, you like, oh, my goodness, did.
Speaker 11: I more equal than others? Yeah? I mean and that
Speaker 11: guy again, he there are people that are if you
Speaker 11: wonder why again the country is turning? Why fifty three
Speaker 11: percent of the Americans? And I believe that's true, maybe higher.
Speaker 11: Uh you think the first a medical store because they're
Speaker 11: being instructed by people like this, and you see the matrosities,
Speaker 11: the purple haired, tattooed people that are completely nuts, that
Speaker 11: are teaching our children. And so they're obviously going to
Speaker 11: come out of that, they're going to be indoctrinated. And
Speaker 11: there's and so you see in the especially the antipa
Speaker 11: type margins, you see they're they're screeching like banshees. They
Speaker 11: can't even this is what it creates, and it's it's
Speaker 11: really a shame. But I this thing about threatening democracy,
Speaker 11: and again, what what I would if I'm up there
Speaker 11: and allowed to have a platform and say, well, first
Speaker 11: of all, like to find the anti semitism, to find
Speaker 11: white supremacy, to find democracy, which what what do you
Speaker 11: mean by democracy? Because how how does free speech threaten democracy?
Speaker 2: And this is the thing, you know the Austrian economists, Uh,
Speaker 2: that's one of the reasons why I'm a volunt terrists
Speaker 2: anarchist is you know, subjective valuation and things like that.
Speaker 2: If you take the term democracy and strip it of
Speaker 2: its political polis derivation, what they should be in favor
Speaker 2: is getting rid of government controls over everybody. If they
Speaker 2: want real democratization, they want more free speech, they want
Speaker 2: everything open. And yet they use this bizarre beard where
Speaker 2: they claim, like Liz Warren does, oh, we're working for
Speaker 2: the little guy and creating the Corporate Financial Protection Bureau, right,
Speaker 2: And they create this thing and she gens it so
Speaker 2: that she, as an attorney before she becomes a senator,
Speaker 2: will be hired by these giant corporations. It's not going
Speaker 2: to put them at risk, and she'll make money off
Speaker 2: the corporations helping them navigate the legislation. She wrote. It's
Speaker 2: just it's mind bogged way.
Speaker 11: And you get an idea of what they mean by
Speaker 11: democracy when you look at they they're fighting for their
Speaker 11: supporting democracy in the Ukraine. They think this guy's Lenski
Speaker 11: who shut down all his political opponents, shut down all
Speaker 11: the newspapers like Lincoln did. Lincoln shutdown our Patunita newspapers.
Speaker 11: So maybe that is democracy. I don't know you so
Speaker 11: in which case you said, but whatever we have in
Speaker 11: the United States States certainly not a constitutor of republic.
Speaker 11: But I don't think it's It's not what I don't
Speaker 11: think of as democracy. Democracy supposed to be the majority rules,
Speaker 11: I mean, but maybe that's true now because you know,
Speaker 11: if the majority of people are against the first Amendment.
Speaker 11: I think they probably are now maybe they finally reached,
Speaker 11: you know, the point where they.
Speaker 2: Want you remind me, you remind me, don of the
Speaker 2: lesson that James Madison seemed to learn. Remember when Madison
Speaker 2: during the Constitutional Convention period, Madison was much more on
Speaker 2: the Hamiltonian side, you know, with the you know you
Speaker 2: got you got, yeah, exactly, federalists and things like that,
Speaker 2: who of course born the name federalism. They were really
Speaker 2: the centralists. But he worried that the states, if left
Speaker 2: without some stronger central government, the states would crush individual rights.
Speaker 2: So he wanted a stronger central government. And then over
Speaker 2: the years he seem to learn like, oh, yeah, I
Speaker 2: see the problem, just like Thomas Hobbs. You know, Thomas
Speaker 2: Hobbs in writing Leviathan said well, you know, you've got
Speaker 2: to have some central authority because everybody's going to be
Speaker 2: arguing against each other and worrying about each other. And
Speaker 2: so then I go to the students, I was like
Speaker 2: I would draw a little circles. I was like, these
Speaker 2: are the individuals, you got to have the Leviathan around them.
Speaker 2: Now let's go back a little further and have this monarch.
Speaker 2: Now we've got another monarch over here. They're both human
Speaker 2: beings too, So how does Hobbes answer that? No, you're
Speaker 2: just making it worse. You're centralizing the problem. You're removing
Speaker 2: more and more individual choice and decisions and valuation over things.
Speaker 2: And what I think is kind of an interesting thing
Speaker 2: is as you look at these people who talk about
Speaker 2: democracy and all these different types of things, they constantly
Speaker 2: turn to the central government as the answer to protect
Speaker 2: the democracy. And Madison learns that is not the way
Speaker 2: to do it. At least the found had decentralization and
Speaker 2: a confederated system, and people look at that now, they've
Speaker 2: they depict that since the sixties as somehow commenting on
Speaker 2: state rights is a cipher to racism. You know, they do.
Speaker 2: They it's a lingua non lingua. You can't even use
Speaker 2: the language anymore.
Speaker 11: No, you're right, And that's what happens when they associated,
Speaker 11: you know, with state's rights. And again it goes back
Speaker 11: to the States Rights Party with strong thermin and everything
Speaker 11: that ran back. So those are the Dixiecrats and then
Speaker 11: the people that were against segregation. But I mean, I
Speaker 11: I don't to me, the left kind of it seems
Speaker 11: like their pro segregation at this point. To me, they don't.
Speaker 11: They don't seem like they' for integration. And I've got
Speaker 11: it many times. The Civil rights movement was based on not,
Speaker 11: you know, everybody having the right to eat in restaurants.
Speaker 11: And then you've had, you had. You know, Sarah Huckabee
Speaker 11: Sanders drummed out of a restaurant by the owner because
Speaker 11: she worked for Trump, and nobody saw the irony. I mean, okay,
Speaker 11: you can if you want to make that argument, then
Speaker 11: some other owner can make the argument. I don't want
Speaker 11: these people in here. I don't want somebody Trump'd be consistent.
Speaker 2: I give you an example. I watched video last week.
Speaker 2: I played it on Liberty Conspiracy of a bath pub
Speaker 2: owner back in twenty twenty one telling Keir Starmer out
Speaker 2: of my pub. Out of my pub, and the yeah, yeah,
Speaker 2: the owner. Yeah, the owner was struggling against one of
Speaker 2: the bodyguards of Starmer who was pushing him around in
Speaker 2: the foyer of his own pub. I ain't back. And
Speaker 2: I remember I knew immediately when I saw the video.
Speaker 2: I was like, I know that place. That's the first
Speaker 2: place where I ate. That pub in bat is the
Speaker 2: first place I ate fish and chips with the mash piece.
Speaker 2: It was fantastic, It was so good. But I was
Speaker 2: so glad I gave the guy my money because he
Speaker 2: wanted Starmer out because Starmer was in favor of the lockdowns.
Speaker 2: And so here you have, you know, such a good
Speaker 2: recognition of private property rights. And in the United States,
Speaker 2: it's such a mixed bag.
Speaker 9: You know.
Speaker 2: Yes, Donald Trump was the one who initiated the unconstitutional
Speaker 2: executive order for the emergency for the medical emergency in
Speaker 2: March of twenty twenty, he wasn't the one who directly
Speaker 2: ordered the JAB mandates that that was mostly the governors,
Speaker 2: the job and the Biden administration. And you know, it
Speaker 2: was a real mixed bag when it came to Trump
Speaker 2: with the jabs and the rollout of those things. That
Speaker 2: obviously was a big mistake. And so now you know,
Speaker 2: I don't vote, I don't vote for anybody to fill
Speaker 2: a political office. But people are looking at these these
Speaker 2: choices and they're saying, well, you got you got a
Speaker 2: guy who was very against the jobs going in with
Speaker 2: Donald Trump. Now that's RFK Junior, his vice presidential candidate,
Speaker 2: said we were going to resist because Trump didn't apologize,
Speaker 2: and I would love to see Donald Trump at least
Speaker 2: and again, I don't know whether to trust him on anything.
Speaker 2: You know, he unconstitutionally occupied, continue to occupy Syria, the
Speaker 2: JAB stuff, the Operation Wharf Speed's ridiculous. But I would
Speaker 2: love to see at least some honest conversation between a
Speaker 2: guy like RFK Junior that he brings in to say,
Speaker 2: you know, could you at least speak to these errors,
Speaker 2: at least speak to the Constitution. But they're not talking
Speaker 2: on the Constitution that I see. The founders wrote.
Speaker 11: No and and it's RFK J And I feel about
Speaker 11: the Kennedys and I he he he says so many
Speaker 11: great things. Of course, he's got Rabbi Schmooley, which is
Speaker 11: a huge but but they all have their Rabbi Schmooley's.
Speaker 11: I mean they're yeah, you know, there's no there's not
Speaker 11: there's no dissidence there allowed unless you're Thomas Massey and
Speaker 11: then your wife Saidley dies a week later. You know why.
Speaker 11: But uh, but you know, RFK Jr. I think is
Speaker 11: having a good impact on Trump. I don't know to
Speaker 11: you know, I think Trump's an actor, but you know what,
Speaker 11: I think that I think these things are decided in advance.
Speaker 11: I don't know what they're planning to do at this point,
Speaker 11: I think, but I think the only reason they would
Speaker 11: let Trump back in office is if they want the
Speaker 11: country to completely collapse, because that will happen because the
Speaker 11: left is completely insane and all they need to do
Speaker 11: is have a few of their leaders lead them out
Speaker 11: into the streets and they will go nuts. They'll burn
Speaker 11: and loot on an unprecedented scale. Trump will do the
Speaker 11: same thing he did before. He won't send out the
Speaker 11: National Guard. He'll talk and tweet and all that stuff
Speaker 11: that he does. That's what he does, and that will
Speaker 11: be you know, I think very sad. But on the
Speaker 11: other hand, what's you know, if you put Harrison them
Speaker 11: in there, then you're just going to have, especially if
Speaker 11: you're a white person, the great replacement's going to continue
Speaker 11: on abate And then don't I don't want my kids
Speaker 11: and I have grandkids one day, I don't want them
Speaker 11: to be second class citizens. It's like Martin, you.
Speaker 2: Know, but don you're clearly racist. Is those people in
Speaker 2: England who recognize that the government's taking their money to
Speaker 2: house people in hotels outside out of Ethrow, or the
Speaker 2: people in Massachusetts, like Howie Carr, who's saying, Hey, you know,
Speaker 2: I wanted to go to that football game, but the
Speaker 2: hotels are filled with people that you're subsidizing their moves. Like,
Speaker 2: maybe that's not racist. Maybe there's a major systemic problem
Speaker 2: here that they're not discussed exactly. But I do want
Speaker 2: to mention a couple of things. First, I want to
Speaker 2: mention that Steve Swan, who's I believe up in Maine,
Speaker 2: is over on X right now, and he comments, he said,
Speaker 2: I knew Sam Blumenfeld from libertarian conventions where I promoted
Speaker 2: Erwin Schiff Rest in Peace, Irwin Schiff as well, yep,
Speaker 2: and his anti income tax info. Erwin was a great guy.
Speaker 2: Sam was a great guy as well. And let's see,
Speaker 2: we've got William A. Martel on X says, I thought
Speaker 2: the claim has been made that RFK wouldn't allow visitors
Speaker 2: into his home unless you had the JAB. I think
Speaker 2: his wife had a party, and uh, and he went
Speaker 2: with yeah, I think, and I think he said I
Speaker 2: kind of had to go.
Speaker 11: Any anything reported about the Kennedy's, I'm dubio. They don't.
Speaker 11: They never tell the truth about.
Speaker 2: I know, but yeah, but I have heard that as well.
Speaker 2: I have heard that as well. Yeah, and also inside
Speaker 2: X I mean inside inside Rockvin, we have Auntie Opel.
Speaker 2: What a great name, Auntie ople number of people have
Speaker 2: contributed to the show, so I want to thank Risha
Speaker 2: m as always awesome information. Thanks Don for coming on,
Speaker 2: and anti Opele David offered a contribution as well. Thank
Speaker 2: you all. This is great.
Speaker 11: Don.
Speaker 2: Once more, again your substack's the best place and it
Speaker 2: is I protest. Look up Don Jefferies and let's talk
Speaker 2: one more time about the book. Here's one last quote
Speaker 2: from Cindy Sheen, and boy has she gone through a lot.
Speaker 2: Another entry in the Jeffries canon of setting the historical
Speaker 2: record straight. We all owe a debt of gratitude to
Speaker 2: Donald for his very well researched body of work that
Speaker 2: helps us understand the true origins of what has grown
Speaker 2: to be an evil empire. I hope those that should
Speaker 2: read this book do. Cindy Sheen, activist and author of
Speaker 2: Peace Mom that all about the book American Memory Hole. Don,
Speaker 2: Thanks thanks so much. I hope I can again inspire
Speaker 2: a number of people to go out and get the book.
Speaker 11: Appreciate it. I appreciate it. Guard.
Speaker 2: Thanks for having me on h Don, you were great.
Speaker 2: Thank you and I will contact you via text afterwards.
Speaker 2: I love you man, You're great.
Speaker 11: Okay, thank you. I love you too.
Speaker 2: Thank you, Thank yous, take care, Thanks Don good Man,
Speaker 2: Don Jeffries good Man. I hope it didn't keep them
Speaker 2: too long. I really am just glad that he's stuck
Speaker 2: stuck around. It just flew by. There's so much to
Speaker 2: discuss in his books. They're so great. I remember the
Speaker 2: first time I picked up Hidden History, I thought, wow,
Speaker 2: this is great. It was similar to the first time
Speaker 2: I picked up Del Lorenzo's The Real Lincoln. You're just
Speaker 2: flipping the pages, I'm underlining all sorts of stuff, like
Speaker 2: every page is under like I gotta remember this going
Speaker 2: up to people like did you hear this? I got
Speaker 2: to check this out. So great stuff, Don, Jefferies, and William.
Speaker 2: Thank you. Thank you, William. I appreciate that. I appreciate
Speaker 2: that very much. Inside X and I see Jason Barrett.
Speaker 2: We only up in the coming ambush by invalidating Kamala
Speaker 2: out of office asap as ineligible. Yeah, I've heard people
Speaker 2: talking about that, and I don't think it's going to happen.
Speaker 2: Obviously I don't know enough to be able to comment
Speaker 2: on it, but I think that it's not going to
Speaker 2: be happening. But thank you all and thank you for
Speaker 2: the contributions. It looks like I'm just waiting to see
Speaker 2: whether our guest, Marty Gottisfeld will be able to join us,
Speaker 2: so I'll be looking for that very very soon. But
Speaker 2: while we have the opportunity, I want to maybe offer
Speaker 2: you a little something else from David Knight. Another nice
Speaker 2: one from David that of course is musical talent and
Speaker 2: the video talents. They come together beautifully on the David
Speaker 2: Night Show.
Speaker 4: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: And I see also on X Jackson says, thanks Gardner
Speaker 2: and Jackson, thank you, what a great day, what a
Speaker 2: wonderful way to start the month. And thanks to David
Speaker 2: and everybody in the family. God bless everyone who's here.
Speaker 2: It's wonderful, very contented, feeling to be on the show,
Speaker 2: very hopeful, and I just sent cheers to everyone. Thank
Speaker 2: you for having the faith in David and the team,
Speaker 2: and of course thanks to MRCTV for letting me do
Speaker 2: the pieces for them. I'm not on staff of MRCTV.
Speaker 2: I'm on contract with them RCTV, and I want to
Speaker 2: give you this preview of what will be coming tomorrow
Speaker 2: on the program on MRCTV. I'll be shooting a video
Speaker 2: about this as well. This is that story about the
Speaker 2: Berkeley WAW dean. This man who was on MSNBC. His
Speaker 2: name is Erwin Chemerinsky, and as I noted, it's really flabbergasting.
Speaker 2: I said in the opening, it might be difficult, difficult
Speaker 2: to decide which is more offensive. The fact that a
Speaker 2: law school dean subsidized in the state of California can
Speaker 2: be either so toweringly ignorant or so dismissive of natural
Speaker 2: rights that he can spout this drivel, the fact that
Speaker 2: the dean's salary is tax subsidized, the fact that he
Speaker 2: can get a publishing contract to spread his curdled cream collectivism,
Speaker 2: or that he can get such a receptive audience on
Speaker 2: the obnoxious MSNBC. So I'd like to juxtapose that with
Speaker 2: the man we just heard on the program, and saw
Speaker 2: on the program and listening on d Live just an audio,
Speaker 2: but saw Donald Jeffries Yeoman's work with great researchers, Peter Scosh,
Speaker 2: Chris graves helping him out. They are down down in
Speaker 2: the trenches. It's DIY punk rock. They're not getting promoted
Speaker 2: by MSNBC. He's getting shadow band. His book is being slammed.
Speaker 2: His last one, Masking the Truth, got slammed by Amazon,
Speaker 2: not in reviews, but the tech was going after him.
Speaker 2: So strangely, Erwin Chermaninski Chermerinsky, who is of course on
Speaker 2: the payroll of the tax subsidized Berkeley Law School, is
Speaker 2: getting a very easy ride from MSNBC. I So, whichever
Speaker 2: facet of this truly ugly political shadow play one studies,
Speaker 2: it contributes to one's understanding that many so called legal
Speaker 2: theorists and politically motivated media members, as well as many
Speaker 2: of their politically powerful friends, love to promote both the
Speaker 2: canard that the US government operates as a or our
Speaker 2: democracy folding you into it. It's all the collective. We
Speaker 2: the most dangerous pronoun in the language. And they promote
Speaker 2: the idea that the Constitution is a clunky anachronism that
Speaker 2: puts said democracy at risk. So on the one hand,
Speaker 2: they're talking about the US system as a democracy, and
Speaker 2: then they claim that the Constitution, which is supposed to
Speaker 2: protect against democracy of course, puts their vaunted democracy at risk.
Speaker 2: So clearly they don't like the Constitution. So the latest
Speaker 2: time profile deceiver in this regard is Erwin Schirmerinsky, who
Speaker 2: is the author of the scintillating new book No Democracy
Speaker 2: Lasts Forever. Oh yes, indeed, let me show you that
Speaker 2: on Amazon. It's looking really good. It's got the thread
Speaker 2: with the star and all that. It's like, oh, it's unraveling.
Speaker 2: Oh lamentations. Oh okay, fine, well we'll continue, I said,
Speaker 2: So of course one can see his democracy canard in
Speaker 2: bold text. The subtitle is how the Constitution threatens the
Speaker 2: United States. Seriously, that's the subtitle, and I wrote for
Speaker 2: Emercy TV. I don't know if this is going to
Speaker 2: be edited out or not, but anyway we'll find out tomorrow,
Speaker 2: allowing us to wonder how the so called rule book
Speaker 2: that creates the federal offices and applies the limits to
Speaker 2: them also can be the thing that threatens itself. Again,
Speaker 2: the politicians don't swear an oath to the United States
Speaker 2: of America as much as John McCain said that that
Speaker 2: was the case when he ran for president. When I
Speaker 2: ran for president, I swear a note to the United
Speaker 2: States of America and protecting America. No, don no, John,
Speaker 2: you didn't you swear a note to protect and defend
Speaker 2: the US Constitution, which evidently is why you went and
Speaker 2: hung out with Nazis like ol A Tiani Bach and
Speaker 2: the Slovada Party in Ukraine when you were preparing the
Speaker 2: overthrow of Ukraine. Yeah, I love it. I love Lindsey Graham.
Speaker 2: He's so pro Israel. In the meantime, if you criticize
Speaker 2: Israeli government policies, the policies of a state apparatus, you
Speaker 2: somehow are anti Semitic, as they're crushing the Semitic peoples
Speaker 2: in Palestine and now the West Bank, those occupied territories.
Speaker 2: And yet Lindsey Graham is on camera shaking hands with
Speaker 2: a neo Nazi in Ukraine seriously, and so is Joe
Speaker 2: Bideny's oh man Ah. I guess maybe he couldn't quite
Speaker 2: feel the handshake because his hand was so slicked up
Speaker 2: with oil from Barisma. I don't know, maybe I'm wrong.
Speaker 2: I could be off off base on that one, but anyway,
Speaker 2: we'll continue, I said, regardless of her. Perhaps because of
Speaker 2: these logical, historical and philosophical problems, MSNBC August thirtieth made
Speaker 2: sure to offer the Berkeley Waw Dean pl dee's the
Speaker 2: dean plenty of time to look the fool on morning Joe.
Speaker 2: So for NewsGuard, Hey, NewsGuard, here's a hyperlink. Let me
Speaker 2: show you. Ah, look there he is. Check this out, everybody.
Speaker 2: This is unbelievable. They'll probably be an ad. So we'll
Speaker 2: take the ad off. I'll put my wonderful visage on
Speaker 2: the screen as MSNBC makes some money. Oh man, they
Speaker 2: want to trash the constitution, so we better make sure
Speaker 2: that we take care of this. It's very important to
Speaker 2: let them have their say, all right. So MSNBC, Oh yeah,
Speaker 2: tied to Microsoft. Of course they're wonderful. All right, here
Speaker 2: we go.
Speaker 19: It's a beautiful shot the sun coming up over the
Speaker 19: Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco at six thirty nine
Speaker 19: in the morning, nine thirty nine here on the East Coast,
Speaker 19: as we fast approach one of the most consequential elections
Speaker 19: in American history. The political divide is wide, with both
Speaker 19: sides of the aisle believing a win for their opponent
Speaker 19: could doom the country. But the dean of Berkeley Law
Speaker 19: School argues it's not just politics, but America's founding document,
Speaker 19: the Constitution, that needs a bit of an overhaul. Joining
Speaker 19: us now is Dean Irwin Chemerinsky. His new book is
Speaker 19: titled No Democracy, Last Forever. How the Constitution threatens the
Speaker 19: United States.
Speaker 2: Dean, So, let me just get this straight. And I
Speaker 2: asked this of Bill Bradley when he was running for president.
Speaker 2: I said, Senator Bradley, since since many businesses states, I said,
Speaker 2: I said, many politicians claim the Constitution is what they
Speaker 2: call a living document, and they don't mean the amendment process.
Speaker 2: Since there is an amendment process in there, and yet
Speaker 2: we seem to be at the whim of judicial and
Speaker 2: legislative interpretations that have nothing to do with the Constitution.
Speaker 2: Why should we bother having a written constitution with an
Speaker 2: amendment process at all? He sort of blinked at Bradley.
Speaker 2: He started blinked, like you get a bad pass when
Speaker 2: he was playing in the NBA, Like, well, that came
Speaker 2: at me out of nowhere. What was that? And he said, well,
Speaker 2: he took him a second. He said, I consider myself
Speaker 2: to be more a child of the Declaration of Independence.
Speaker 2: I believe in life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Speaker 2: And literally he said this, and I believe that here
Speaker 2: in America the government is here to give us these things.
Speaker 2: I'm like, boy, dude, First of all, you're not addressing
Speaker 2: my question. Second of all, you just flipped the concept
Speaker 2: of natural rights as expressed by Jefferson completely upside down.
Speaker 2: The government is here to give us these things. Oh man,
Speaker 2: they're just insufferable. But here's the rest from MSNBC, not
Speaker 2: all of it, but you'll enjoy this, and then we'll
Speaker 2: go a little bit and round this off with that
Speaker 2: MRCTV piece as a preview.
Speaker 19: TM Erinski, thanks for being with us this morning. So
Speaker 19: how in your view does the constitution that this country
Speaker 19: was built on and has been for nearly two hundred
Speaker 19: and fifty years is a threat actually to the country.
Speaker 7: Choices that were made in adopting the constitution to come
Speaker 7: to haunt us. The electoral college increasingly is choosing the
Speaker 7: president who lost the popular vote two senators per stay
Speaker 7: is undermining democracy. In the last session of Congress, there
Speaker 7: were fifty Democratic senators and fifty Republican senators, where the
Speaker 7: fifty Democratic senators represented forty two million people.
Speaker 2: It's not rehearsed in any way, he's not nervous. Okay,
Speaker 2: so let me just go now to the piece at MRCTV,
Speaker 2: I said, I hope this doesn't sound too harsh, I said.
Speaker 2: Chermerinsky wasted no time to spout idiotic bladder, releasing what
Speaker 2: appeared to be a rehearsed litany of complaints about the
Speaker 2: Constitution and how it seems to stand in the way
Speaker 2: of what he wants, more gang rule over innocent people
Speaker 2: and their own individual rights to property, their freedom of
Speaker 2: con tract, the right to self defense, and write a
Speaker 2: free speech. First up, the Berkeley Law Dean revealed his
Speaker 2: disdain for the fact that the Electoral College in twenty
Speaker 2: twenty chose for president someone who did not win the
Speaker 2: so called popular vote. To even trust that, of course not,
Speaker 2: which makes one wonder if this law Dean has read
Speaker 2: anything by the founders, and if he knows that they
Speaker 2: were well aware that the electoral College was supposed to
Speaker 2: act as a check on large population states lording it
Speaker 2: over small population states. Of course, the idea of state
Speaker 2: differentiation and the concept that there might be vestigial state
Speaker 2: semi autonomy, well, those are verboten, and mister Chermaninski's lexicon,
Speaker 2: it's us hedgemon. For him, it's DC created uniformity and
Speaker 2: that includes your individuality. Yeah, it's the tyranny of the majority,
Speaker 2: all for his tootemic religion of democracy, democracy, democracy. He
Speaker 2: and other collectivists claim to be fighting for individual choice.
Speaker 2: It's their pretense, their fakery, that their tyrannical so called
Speaker 2: democracy means you get to control your life. Actually, the
Speaker 2: way to lead to greater self control is to allow
Speaker 2: for freedom, decentralization, and autonomy, not democratic pretenses that actually
Speaker 2: allow for gangsterism across an entire continent. If you want
Speaker 2: true individual autonomy, which you're claiming is included in your democracy.
Speaker 2: If you really want to democratize things, get the government
Speaker 2: out of restricting their lives, taking their stuff, telling them
Speaker 2: what their choices can be. Oh, it's kind of crazy,
Speaker 2: isn't it? More individual choice, less government. I know, it's
Speaker 2: kind of weird. Not imposing your will on others through
Speaker 2: the means of the state. And then he added two
Speaker 2: centers per state is undermining democracy, so I said, since
Speaker 2: the founders wanted the Senate to be composed of people
Speaker 2: who were chosen by the state legislatures, to represent state interest,
Speaker 2: again trying to balance population heavy states that might have
Speaker 2: more sway in Congress. And since many Americans view the
Speaker 2: nineteen thirteen Seventeenth Amendment as a massive cut against that principle,
Speaker 2: this law dean might want to return to the books
Speaker 2: rather than writing books. Chermerinsky also decries the fact that,
Speaker 2: as he says, in the last session of Congress, there
Speaker 2: were fifty Democrat senators and fifty Republican senators. But the
Speaker 2: fifty Democrat senators represented forty two million people. So I wrote,
Speaker 2: so what again? Not only was the Senate designed to
Speaker 2: be the legislative body, or state legislatures sent so called
Speaker 2: representatives for their state governments, The very idea of so
Speaker 2: called representation in any political system is philosophically and logically impossible.
Speaker 2: All forms of statism, be they democracy, monarchies, or constitutional republics,
Speaker 2: are imposed on people. By definition, they are involuntary. If
Speaker 2: they were voluntary associations of people, again, by definition, they
Speaker 2: would be socially personally achieved organizations, and no one would
Speaker 2: be forced to be involved or to pay otherwise, I said. Likewise,
Speaker 2: so called representation in any political system is mathematically temporarily
Speaker 2: and ethically impossible. There would never be enough so called
Speaker 2: representatives in a political body to represent all the people
Speaker 2: under the rule of that government. Every time some idea
Speaker 2: is debated. Elected politicians don't approach each person they so
Speaker 2: called represent to get their opinion on every new bill
Speaker 2: after they get elected. Political decisions affect multitudes who aren't
Speaker 2: even born. And if people believe in allowing their neighbors
Speaker 2: to truly represent their own interests, they can't ethically impose
Speaker 2: a government on them and then claim that those people
Speaker 2: are somehow represented. I mean, the whole thing. It's so ridiculous.
Speaker 2: You know, I'm an anarchist libertarian, I'm a voluntarist, I'm
Speaker 2: an anarchist Christian anarchist. So it's just, it's just it's
Speaker 2: really really ridiculous. So the one thing I want to
Speaker 2: add to this, though, is MSNBC is not just promoting
Speaker 2: this guy's book. The New York Times is promoting this
Speaker 2: guy's book. So down the way in this piece, I wrote,
Speaker 2: MSNBC is not alone and promoting this guy. On August thirty, firth,
Speaker 2: at first, The New York Times published a long, vacuous
Speaker 2: screed by Jenniferal. I don't even know how to pronounce this.
Speaker 2: I know that must have sounded terrible. S z a
Speaker 2: l Ai Zally Zally, I guess pushing Chermerinsky's book. I
Speaker 2: know my tongue has been doing a lot of dancing
Speaker 2: with these names, ranging from her complaint that Donald Trump
Speaker 2: didn't win the popular vote yet appointed three Supreme Court justices,
Speaker 2: justices who helped overturn their gilded Roe v. Wade decision
Speaker 2: in twenty twenty two and return the question of abortion
Speaker 2: statutes to where they belong in the States, to her
Speaker 2: discussion of Chermerinsky's posit that if the Constitution isn't amended
Speaker 2: to allow for more gang rule over individual rights, the
Speaker 2: West Coast States should secede to become pacifica. Slally also
Speaker 2: misses the point about freedom versus democracy. Here's the last
Speaker 2: bit I said. In fact, by arguing that West Coast
Speaker 2: states might secede to get away from the federal government,
Speaker 2: both she and Chermerinsky both tacitly admit to the benefits
Speaker 2: of decentralization over ruled by the mob. Oh Man, and
Speaker 2: then I do mention at the end. I don't know
Speaker 2: whether they'll cut this out or not, but I mentioned
Speaker 2: Lysander Spooner. If anybody wants to read a great essay
Speaker 2: of how the Constitution doesn't have any an authority over you. You
Speaker 2: never complied to it, you never were there, you didn't
Speaker 2: sign it. You can't sign it for somebody else. Your
Speaker 2: grandparents can't sign a contract for you. Read Lessiander Spooner's
Speaker 2: great essay, No Treason the Constitution of No Authority was
Speaker 2: published in eighteen seventy. He came from air Massachusetts, just
Speaker 2: over the border, and he was a remarkable guy. He's
Speaker 2: the guy who started up an alternative to the US
Speaker 2: Postal Service that yes, they eventually shut down because it
Speaker 2: was cheaper and more efficient and people were turning to
Speaker 2: it rather than the US Postal Service. Now, there is
Speaker 2: another bit that I want to get to for you.
Speaker 2: First of all, I do want to mention just briefly,
Speaker 2: you were probably aware that inside the newsflash that I played,
Speaker 2: we showed Donald Trump talking about how he wants to
Speaker 2: force insurance companies to pay for in virtual fertilization. I
Speaker 2: also did a piece about how Tim Waltz claimed are
Speaker 2: insinuated that he and his wife had two children through IVF,
Speaker 2: and in that piece, for MRCTV I noted that IVF
Speaker 2: is sort of a cipher to for those people who
Speaker 2: are involved with the pro abortion movement, because it creates embryos,
Speaker 2: living human beings who will never have a chance to
Speaker 2: live beyond that point. They're frozen, and then they pull
Speaker 2: them out, they try to implant them to see if
Speaker 2: the woman will take them and become pregnant. So this
Speaker 2: has massive ethical problems. So the least we could do
Speaker 2: is ask Donald Trump not to force my neighbor to
Speaker 2: pay for it. Well, you might have seen that Lindsey
Speaker 2: Graham is in the news because Lindsey Graham has been
Speaker 2: said that he won't back Trump's IVF idea. I saw
Speaker 2: that reported in one area, But in fact he's actually
Speaker 2: saying that something could be done, they could work something out.
Speaker 2: I've got a little video of that. Let me see
Speaker 2: if I can show that. I don't know if I've
Speaker 2: got that prepped up. Okay. And we also have his
Speaker 2: claims about Iran which are just stunning, and Hamas and
Speaker 2: you know we got to stop Hamas. Oh you mean
Speaker 2: Hamas that was of course being funded by the West
Speaker 2: and Nettan Yahoo. But here is Lindsey Graham the USA
Speaker 2: Today claims that he doesn't back Donald Trump's IVF proposal,
Speaker 2: but says Congress could find common ground. And that was
Speaker 2: the last piece that you saw in the video where
Speaker 2: he says we could probably work something out as that
Speaker 2: Sounds of Silence song finished off. That was one of
Speaker 2: the clips that I played at the beginning of the
Speaker 2: show today. And here's a little bit in text form
Speaker 2: from USA Today. Lindsay Graham, Center of South Carolina Republican
Speaker 2: said he could see a bipartisan way forward to help
Speaker 2: American families afford in vitual fertilization. One of the things
Speaker 2: that he mentioned on television was a tax credit, but
Speaker 2: that's often a cipher to subsidy, like, for example, the
Speaker 2: earned income tax credit. That's actually a subsidy. It's not
Speaker 2: a tax credit at all. Right, And then the left says, oh,
Speaker 2: we gave the middle class a tax cut. No, actually,
Speaker 2: you put the US government further in debt and shuffled
Speaker 2: off money from some people who are earners to those
Speaker 2: people because you for were scheduled their Medicare payments and
Speaker 2: you're still promising the Medicare payments when they get older.
Speaker 2: So it's a subsidy. Well, Graham appeared on ABC's This
Speaker 2: Week on Sunday, where he said he would support a
Speaker 2: means tested tax credit for IVF users. So means tested,
Speaker 2: so you see what that's already an indication that it's
Speaker 2: probably going to lead towards some sort of subsidy because
Speaker 2: means tests, of course, is progressivism Marxism built into who
Speaker 2: actually gets to write it off their taxes, and then
Speaker 2: they expand it to the point where even if you
Speaker 2: aren't paying taxes, you can claim it and then you'll
Speaker 2: get money back. You haven't even given it up. You'll
Speaker 2: get money from somebody else. Now, interestingly enough, other people
Speaker 2: in the Republican Party are supportive of Donald Trump's idea.
Speaker 2: He says that Trump is he's not in favor of
Speaker 2: mandating insurance companies. Graham says he's not in favor of
Speaker 2: mandating insurance companies fully cover IVF, saying that there's no
Speaker 2: end to that. Okay, So he doesn't like the idea
Speaker 2: that US insurance companies should be mandated to cover IVF,
Speaker 2: but he does like the idea that you should be
Speaker 2: forced to pay for weapons to be sent to Ukraine
Speaker 2: and for weapons to be sent to Israel. Okay, see
Speaker 2: if you can figure that out. Graham, who voted against
Speaker 2: a recent bill that would have protected access to IVF,
Speaker 2: added that he saw Trump's statements about IVF as a
Speaker 2: signal of support because, quote, we've been accused, the party
Speaker 2: has of being against birth control. We're not. We're being
Speaker 2: accused of being against IVF treatments. We're not. Again, here's
Speaker 2: when Tom Cotton of Arkansas, also on Meet the Press,
Speaker 2: said that GEOP law makers support access to IBS services
Speaker 2: for American families. Well, again, it's not a federal issue.
Speaker 2: It's a state issue. So federal GEOP law makers should
Speaker 2: be saying, you know what, we have no say on this.
Speaker 2: It's a state issue. Now. Technically speaking, again, if people
Speaker 2: are familiar with the Fourteenth Amendment, the fourteenth Amendment stipulates
Speaker 2: that states that have punishments and prohibitions, that have statues
Speaker 2: that protect people against aggression by other people have to
Speaker 2: apply those protect people equally. It's the equal protection clause. So,
Speaker 2: as former Senator Bob Smith noted that, technically speaking, would
Speaker 2: create a nationwide abortion ban if people actually wanted to
Speaker 2: address that. Every state has statutes that protect human beings
Speaker 2: against encroachments. On their lives by other human beings, then
Speaker 2: you have to decide is the fetus at conception a
Speaker 2: human being? It is human, distinct DNA from the parents,
Speaker 2: and it is being. It's not anything else. It's growing. Otherwise,
Speaker 2: what are you trying to stop? So it doesn't matter morally,
Speaker 2: although morally that is the key. Logically, you can appeal
Speaker 2: to these people and say, just logically, do you want
Speaker 2: to be consistent or not? If you support the state
Speaker 2: and you say that there should be statutes that punish
Speaker 2: people for taking the lives of other human beings, are
Speaker 2: you going to be consistent or are you going to
Speaker 2: call for the abolition of the state apparatus? The way
Speaker 2: I do, I believe that the state is illegitimate. Philosophically,
Speaker 2: I can't force my neighbor to pay for the policing
Speaker 2: of anything, whether it be policing of a Borde Order,
Speaker 2: policing of what I think is the correct amount for
Speaker 2: police to protect people, or to protect a school, or
Speaker 2: for the school itself, or for mail carrying or anything.
Speaker 2: And again it comes down to whether or not even
Speaker 2: if I think something is a bad action to take
Speaker 2: against someone, I can't engage in the bad action of
Speaker 2: making my neighbor pay to stop, to create a police
Speaker 2: force that supposedly will stop that. I don't have that right.
Speaker 2: It doesn't arise out of my recognition of trouble for
Speaker 2: another guy, or even for myself. And I certainly don't
Speaker 2: have the right to be parasitic off somebody else for
Speaker 2: my own protection. So the predicate for the state supposedly
Speaker 2: is that the state is there to protect you. And
Speaker 2: as I mentioned, even Thomas Jefferson in the Constitution off
Speaker 2: he offers what John Locke did in a sort of
Speaker 2: mistaken way. Jefferson uses the passive voice in the Declaration
Speaker 2: of Independence. I mentioned to David and that I might
Speaker 2: bring this up. He doesn't use the active voice, which
Speaker 2: is it's a form of magic. In a way. He says,
Speaker 2: governments are instituted among men, well by whom some people.
Speaker 2: It's not governments arise. And he says, because he says
Speaker 2: men are born, men are endowed by their creator with
Speaker 2: certain inalienable rights, life, liberty, in the pursuit of happiness,
Speaker 2: governments are instituted among men. No, The point is that
Speaker 2: men claim that people have a right to be left alone,
Speaker 2: and then they undercut that by saying, in order to
Speaker 2: protect your right to be left alone, we're going to
Speaker 2: create an agency that won't leave you alone, and it'll
Speaker 2: be run by other people. That's all it is. That's
Speaker 2: what the government is, that's what the state is. And
Speaker 2: then they come up with all these various arguments to
Speaker 2: protect different kinds of people because they say, well, that
Speaker 2: group is, they're taking advantage. So we got to do this,
Speaker 2: and it builds and builds and builds. So let's go
Speaker 2: over to the Nancy Pelosi story and show you some
Speaker 2: of this Nancy Pelosi story out of California. There are
Speaker 2: a number of stories out of California that I'll give you. First,
Speaker 2: let's offer this one out of California. California passes a
Speaker 2: statute prohibiting localities from requesting voter ID. This from SCNR
Speaker 2: August twenty ninth, Hannah Claire Brimolo wrote, voter ID laws
Speaker 2: only subvert voter turnout, said State Senator Dave Minn Okay,
Speaker 2: what kind of turnout do you want? Authentic turnout or not?
Speaker 2: And again, the idea of voting to have a system
Speaker 2: that will then control other people's lives. That's part of
Speaker 2: the reason the founders tried to say that the state
Speaker 2: can only do certain things. At least they tried to
Speaker 2: pare it down to person on person conflicts. That was
Speaker 2: supposedly what it was about. It in a amendment to
Speaker 2: Senate Bill eleven seventy four in California. Now the governor
Speaker 2: has not signed this yet, but if he signs SB
Speaker 2: eleven seventy four, it would override a Huntington Beach ordnance
Speaker 2: requiring voter ID starting in twenty twenty six. The state's
Speaker 2: Attorney General, Bob Banta, and Secretary of State Shirley and
Speaker 2: Weber have already sued Huntington Beach over the ordnance. Just amazing.
Speaker 2: They don't want voter ID, Well, why I wonder why not?
Speaker 2: Maybe maybe it's because they want certain people to be
Speaker 2: able to vote. Maybe that's it. Let's talk about Nancy Pelosi,
Speaker 2: all right, And I've got a story that I wrote
Speaker 2: for MRCTV that will be out tomorrow, I think. And
Speaker 2: it's about Nancy Pelosi and that position that she had
Speaker 2: about making sure that Californians get one hundred and fifty
Speaker 2: thousand dollars in home loan subsidies. Okay, well, this is
Speaker 2: the story and it should be out tomorrow years old
Speaker 2: fully grown normalcy bias is a tricky animal, and former
Speaker 2: House speaker Nancy Pelosi's latest smorgasbord of socialist sober quays
Speaker 2: in favor of California housing loans for undocumented migrants is
Speaker 2: a perfect example. So get this. Appearing Friday with Bill
Speaker 2: Maher on his HBO program Real Time, Pelosis succeeded in
Speaker 2: not only avoiding the touchy matter of her role in
Speaker 2: perpetuating the centrally controlled and utterly messed up federal so
Speaker 2: called immigration system. She perpetuated the corrosive idea that government
Speaker 2: has an ethical role in providing home loans to people. Well,
Speaker 2: even as she invoked you got it, Ronald Reagan and
Speaker 2: fatuously to fatuously add what she seemed to think was
Speaker 2: a patina of patriotism and Americana to the fantastic feast.
Speaker 2: So she not only was saying that home loans should
Speaker 2: be provided by the government, but she invoked Ronald Reagan.
Speaker 2: Let's go to the video. Let's go to the newsreel footage,
Speaker 2: and here it is. This is provided actually by Disclosed
Speaker 2: TV on X and we showed a clip of this earlier.
Speaker 2: Here's a little bit more.
Speaker 20: The California lawmakers just passed the law. It hasn't been
Speaker 20: signed by Governor Newsom, but giving government assistance to undocumented
Speaker 20: immigrants to buy houses. That's kind of a different place
Speaker 20: than the Democratic Party used to be on immigration. As
Speaker 20: a don like I say, that's what the country is
Speaker 20: going to do. That's certainly where California is.
Speaker 17: Well, let me just say immigration had always been a
Speaker 17: bypart of an issue I refer you to.
Speaker 11: They're not free houses.
Speaker 17: Well, it's not free housing. It's the American dream being
Speaker 17: available to more people. But understand this about immigration. The
Speaker 17: best speech on immigration was by President Ronald Reagan. This
Speaker 17: is the last speech I will make as President of
Speaker 17: the United States. I want to communicate a message to
Speaker 17: the country I love. And he talked about the statue
Speaker 17: of liberty and the beacon of hope it is to
Speaker 17: the world, and what America was pre eminent in the
Speaker 17: world because our door was always open, and we will
Speaker 17: cease to be preeminent when we shut the door. Now
Speaker 17: that's I don't do justice to the great communicator.
Speaker 4: Google it.
Speaker 17: It's a fabulous speech. And George Herbert walker Bush continued
Speaker 17: in that respect for the diversity of America and the rest.
Speaker 17: California is always in the lead. Maybe others will follow
Speaker 17: that lead, but that's up to those states are blessed
Speaker 17: here with beautiful diversity.
Speaker 11: Vote for this law.
Speaker 20: Excuse me, so you'd vote for this law?
Speaker 17: Well, I don't. I'm not familiar with exactly what it is.
Speaker 17: But making the American dream of home ownership available to
Speaker 17: all people is something we have to do for people.
Speaker 4: For you, now, this is undocumented. This is for the undocumented.
Speaker 17: Well what I would like to do is move them
Speaker 17: to document it.
Speaker 2: So there you go. Okay, So she finally gets to
Speaker 2: that after hemming and hang and going back and forth.
Speaker 2: And you know, I have many disagreements with Bill Maher
Speaker 2: and stuff, and every once while on he comes out
Speaker 2: with something. You're like, oh, that was a good point.
Speaker 2: You know, you made a good point, and you think,
Speaker 2: all maybe's coming around to this side or this way
Speaker 2: or whatever. But so I happen to note this because
Speaker 2: there are a number of salient points here that I
Speaker 2: think I'd like to bring up, and a lot of
Speaker 2: other people probably noticed too, So hopefully I said. Appearing
Speaker 2: Friday with Bill Maher and his HBO program in real time,
Speaker 2: Pelosi succeeded, and so on and so forth. She gave
Speaker 2: this Patina, patriotism and Americana to the fantastic feast. Ma
Speaker 2: appeared to want a serious discussion about the new legislation,
Speaker 2: California's AB eighteen forty, which the State Assembly passed wednesday.
Speaker 2: It's a statute that, as the Daily Caller noted August eighteenth,
Speaker 2: will quote amend the California Dream for All Shared Appreciation
Speaker 2: Loan program. Okay, that's the California Dream for All Shared
Speaker 2: Appreciation Loan program. It would amend it, and it would,
Speaker 2: it would. It's an initiative launched last year that provides
Speaker 2: first time home buyers with a loan of up to
Speaker 2: twenty percent, according to the Daily Caller, and it would
Speaker 2: allow illegal migrants living in California to be able to
Speaker 2: apply for a piece of that, so they would get
Speaker 2: twenty percent of a loan that would be twenty percent
Speaker 2: of the house's purchase price for down payment or closing.
Speaker 2: The day. Billy Caller also noted in that piece that
Speaker 2: now that the Cares Act, federal handouts to states have
Speaker 2: dried up, California is sixty billion dollars in the red. Okay,
Speaker 2: so they're offering this loan subsidy and they're sixty billion
Speaker 2: in the red, I said, but that isn't stopping the
Speaker 2: panderers like Governor Gavin Newsom from not only promoting the
Speaker 2: idea that it's perfectly fine to have taxpayer subsidized loans
Speaker 2: for first time home buyers, it's also not stopping Pelosi
Speaker 2: from widening that insane normalcy bias to imply that it's
Speaker 2: only fair to expand the toxic state tax funded loan
Speaker 2: idiocy to migrants who have moved here, contrary to her
Speaker 2: central government's immigration statutes. Mar introduced the topic to her
Speaker 2: by correctly stating, the California lawmakers just passed a law.
Speaker 2: It hasn't been signed by Governor Newsom, but giving Democrat,
Speaker 2: it gives Democrat, it gives government a siy distance to
Speaker 2: undocumented immigrants to buy houses. That's kind of a different
Speaker 2: place than the Democrat Party used to be on immigration.
Speaker 2: And we showed the clip of Pelosi from years ago,
Speaker 2: and she had the exact opposite sort of position. Pelosi, says,
Speaker 2: I said, like a Palomino of platitudes. She bursts from
Speaker 2: the corral with, well, let me just say immigration has
Speaker 2: always been a bipartisan issue, and that wasn't the point.
Speaker 2: Mark kept focused on the matter at hand, he says,
Speaker 2: but not free housing. And then she says, well, it's
Speaker 2: not free housing, Pelosi claimed, And then she avoided the
Speaker 2: reality of what it is, which is tax supported loans
Speaker 2: that will artificially pump home building and direct resources where
Speaker 2: unmanipulated market participants normally would not have put the resources,
Speaker 2: which we'll see recipient's default. And as we have witnessed
Speaker 2: in the nineteen nineties and with the two thousand and
Speaker 2: eight twenty twelve so called Great Resis Session, which technically
Speaker 2: was an economic depression, could see numerous banks count the
Speaker 2: loans as assets, see the mortgages become unpaid and toxic,
Speaker 2: and sea wider systemic problems throughout the state economy. Yeah,
Speaker 2: she avoided all that. It's not about tax subsidized unnaturally
Speaker 2: pumped up housing demand from undocumented migrants. Instead, Nancy spoke
Speaker 2: about dreams, dreams. She says, it's it's she seemed to
Speaker 2: fish for something, the American dream being available to more people.
Speaker 2: And so I wrote, did you know that, as with
Speaker 2: most normalcy biased reinforcers, she kind of skips essentral parts
Speaker 2: of the American dream, those aspects being self reliance, self
Speaker 2: achieving work, merit, investment, and not being a parasite regardless
Speaker 2: of whether one is a migrant or one is born here,
Speaker 2: and made things even more offensive, trying, yes, to add
Speaker 2: a shine of Americana to her pablem by mixing Ronald
Speaker 2: Reagan into the dream world. As she said, but understand
Speaker 2: this about my immigration. You heard what she had to
Speaker 2: say about the great communicator. She pretended to respect him
Speaker 2: by calling him the great communicator. So I have a
Speaker 2: hyperlink to the actual speech. If you want to hear
Speaker 2: Reagan's speech, there's a video of it there.
Speaker 12: As he goes lead, there's musicalable events of September eleventh
Speaker 12: and continue.
Speaker 2: Yes, this is an ad obviously, so we're going to
Speaker 2: dump that ad. So this is Reagan when he was speaking,
Speaker 2: and you know, it's about being open to migrants, that
Speaker 2: sort of thing.
Speaker 9: Last speech that I will give as president, I think
Speaker 9: it's fitting to leave one final thought, an observation about
Speaker 9: a country which I love. It was stated best in
Speaker 9: a letter I received not long ago. A man wrote
Speaker 9: me and said, you can go to live in France,
Speaker 9: but you cannot become a Frenchmen. You can go to
Speaker 9: live in Germany or Turkey or Japan, but you cannot
Speaker 9: become a German, a Turk or Japanese. But anyone from
Speaker 9: any corner of of the earth can come to live
Speaker 9: in America and become an American. Yes, the Torch of
Speaker 9: Lady Liberty symbolizes our freedom and represents our heritage, the
Speaker 9: compact with our parents, our grandparents, and our ancestors. It
Speaker 9: is that lady who gives us our great and special
Speaker 9: place in the world. For it's the great life force
Speaker 9: of each generation of new Americans that guarantees that America's
Speaker 9: triumph shall continue unsurpassed into the next century and beyond.
Speaker 2: Okay, So I'm going to pause it there because just
Speaker 2: even in that imagery, there's a lot of propaganda. When
Speaker 2: you see Ellis Island, when you see the Statue of Liberty,
Speaker 2: you know near Ellis Island. Ellis Island exists because of
Speaker 2: the unconstitutional federal usurpation over the power of immigration, which
Speaker 2: is supposed to be reserved to the States. It was
Speaker 2: the eighteen seventy five chy Long decision. So let's continue
Speaker 2: here because I've got some more to offer to you.
Speaker 2: So she says, now, I don't do justice to the
Speaker 2: great communicator. Google it. It's a fabulous speech. So we
Speaker 2: go through some more. She talks about how George W.
Speaker 2: Bush push for this, and I said, mister Maher appeared
Speaker 2: to be very aware of Pelosi's grand, eloquent attempt to
Speaker 2: deflect from the actual points, so he offered one final
Speaker 2: attempt to get a real answer from her, So you'd
Speaker 2: vote for this law? And Pelosi appeared, I wrote, flustered,
Speaker 2: and of course deflected, again invoking her position as a
Speaker 2: federal politician in order to avoid answering about the ethics
Speaker 2: of the California statute, then claiming that the state was
Speaker 2: trying to help people achieve the wondrous American dream. Making
Speaker 2: the American dream of home ownership available to all people
Speaker 2: is something we have to do for people who are
Speaker 2: here now. As I mentioned, that's the same sort of
Speaker 2: problem that George W. Bush pushed. After Bill Clinton pushed
Speaker 2: for banks to have to give loans to people who
Speaker 2: shouldn't have gotten loans because they didn't have the income
Speaker 2: for it. George W. Bush claimed that he wanted America
Speaker 2: to become the home ownership society, and we saw what
Speaker 2: happened in two thousand and eight after they pumped up
Speaker 2: the home buying market and everything collapsed. Yeah, there's a
Speaker 2: lot to be said about not trying to promote any
Speaker 2: area of the economy through artificial means. Nancy Pelosi doesn't
Speaker 2: seem to get it, and of course she wants to
Speaker 2: pander to people that she evidently thinks will vote for Democrats.
Speaker 2: And yes, even at Huntington Beach, they're trying to make
Speaker 2: sure that only citizens vote, and even in California news
Speaker 2: and doesn't want that. So we have this, I said.
Speaker 2: She also implied that those people are undocumented migrants and
Speaker 2: the Feds have come up with a way to fast
Speaker 2: track citizenship for them. So this is our opportunity to
Speaker 2: get some important points into memory to avoid normalcy bias.
Speaker 2: I said. First, just because California or any other political
Speaker 2: gang hands out tax backed home loans does not mean
Speaker 2: that such a baseline action is proper on a moral
Speaker 2: or economic level. I have no more right to make
Speaker 2: my neighbor pay to back another person's home loan than
Speaker 2: I do to force my neighbor to pay for anything.
Speaker 2: Taxation is theft period, and as noted above, when the
Speaker 2: government engages in such activity, it warps the market, seeing monetary, human, temporal,
Speaker 2: and other resources pushed into those new homes when the
Speaker 2: homes normally would not have been built and the resources
Speaker 2: would have gone elsewhere based on honest market decisions made
Speaker 2: by what should be free people. And finally, Pelosi's attempt
Speaker 2: to claim that migrants should be on the same socialist
Speaker 2: get a government subsidized home loan footing as legal residents
Speaker 2: mixes into it the idea that she wants the FEDS
Speaker 2: to create a way to grant more migrant its legal
Speaker 2: status and not be deported. This brings us to the
Speaker 2: final and very important level of normalcy bias, about which
Speaker 2: I have written numerous times for MRCTV and by the way,
Speaker 2: Yes NewsGuard, here's some hyperlinks for you. It is the
Speaker 2: fact that immigration is not a federal issue. The word
Speaker 2: doesn't even appear in the US Constitution. Thomas Jefferson and
Speaker 2: James Madison both noted in seventeen ninety eight that it
Speaker 2: was a state purview. There's Jefferson's Kentucky Resolution number four,
Speaker 2: resolved that alien friends are under the jurisdiction and protection
Speaker 2: of the laws of the state, wherein they are that
Speaker 2: no power over them has been delegated to the United States,
Speaker 2: nor prohibited to the individual States, distinct from their power
Speaker 2: over citizens, and it being true as a general principle,
Speaker 2: and one of the amendments to the Constitution, having also
Speaker 2: declared that the powers not delegated to the United States
Speaker 2: by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States,
Speaker 2: are reserved in the States respectively, or to the people.
Speaker 2: The Act of the Congress of the United States, passed
Speaker 2: on the day of July seventeen ninety eight, entitled an
Speaker 2: Act Concerning Aliens, which assumes powers over alien friends not
Speaker 2: delegated by the Constitution, is not law, but is altogether
Speaker 2: void and of no force. Of course, I don't see
Speaker 2: what the day was stipulated there. Then we have Madison
Speaker 2: who said the same thing in his Virginia Resolutions. There
Speaker 2: you go, Virginia Resolutions twenty one December seventeen ninety eight.
Speaker 2: He goes into it as well, and there's a lot more.
Speaker 2: I said. They pointed it out. Texas had a Bureau
Speaker 2: of Immigration in its state constitution. Here is the image
Speaker 2: of the Constitution Article eleven of the Texas Constitution, Immigration
Speaker 2: Section one. There shall be a bureau known as the
Speaker 2: Bureau of Immigration, which shall have supervision and control of
Speaker 2: all matters connected with immigration. The idea that the federal
Speaker 2: government should have anything, anything at all to do with
Speaker 2: immigration is ahistorical and anti anti constitutional. And it came
Speaker 2: about in eighteen seventy five, as I mentioned in my
Speaker 2: article with the Chai Long v. Freeman decision, that was
Speaker 2: about a California statute that blocked migrants from coming into
Speaker 2: California because of course local workers didn't want the low
Speaker 2: price competition. They fatuously claimed that it was to stop
Speaker 2: possibly disease carrying women from coming over from China and
Speaker 2: becoming prostitutes, but they also were stopping men from coming
Speaker 2: into work in the gold mines and on the railroads.
Speaker 2: And so it went to the Supreme Court in eighteen
Speaker 2: seventy five, and that's where the Supreme Court just made
Speaker 2: it up. They made it up, and ever since then,
Speaker 2: Ellis Island, all that lovely black and white footage of
Speaker 2: all those people coming in enter here, all that stuff,
Speaker 2: it's utterly preposterous. It has nothing, zero, zero, zero to
Speaker 2: do with their claims of being constitutionalists. And this is
Speaker 2: a message for conservatives. Please look, if you call yourself
Speaker 2: a constitutionalist, I'm an anarchist. But I'm familiar enough with
Speaker 2: this that I'm conversing on it, and I hope that
Speaker 2: people will just at least honestly know what was happening. Then,
Speaker 2: even if they can't agree to say I don't want
Speaker 2: the federal government involved, it's not constitutional. It doesn't decentralize things.
Speaker 2: If they do think that there's something that has to
Speaker 2: be done, at least they'll know that they're operating in
Speaker 2: a manner contrary to their principles according to the Constitution.
Speaker 2: At least they'll know they're taking attack that isn't legitimate.
Speaker 2: At least they'll be honest with themselves. Even if they
Speaker 2: hold the double standards, they could admit it. I've had,
Speaker 2: as I mentioned, I've had debates with Pat Buchanan, Tom
Speaker 2: tan Credo, JD. Hayworth. They all agree, they say, you
Speaker 2: know what, you make your arguments right, you have a
Speaker 2: sound argument guard and they're good guys, you know, they're great,
Speaker 2: great guys. But then they go back to exactly where
Speaker 2: they were. Now the federal's government's going to do something
Speaker 2: about this, then they claim that there's an invasion. So
Speaker 2: the final point on this, if there is an invasion,
Speaker 2: if the federal authorities want to claim that there's an invasion,
Speaker 2: an invasion by whom by what, well, it could be
Speaker 2: one of two things, by agents of an invading state,
Speaker 2: and in that case you address it by addressing the
Speaker 2: invading state with a declaration of war capital w it's
Speaker 2: state on state. If they're non members of the state's
Speaker 2: military and they're not wearing the uniform of the state.
Speaker 2: The only way to address it on a federal issue
Speaker 2: a federal level, if you're going to try to do
Speaker 2: it that way and inspire it from the federal government
Speaker 2: first is to claim that they are coming in and
Speaker 2: you will not declare war, but you will issue letters
Speaker 2: of mark and reprisal against them. They haven't done that.
Speaker 2: They won't do that. That allows the president to hire
Speaker 2: mercenaries and to go after these wrongdoers. Okay, they won't
Speaker 2: do that. There is the final part, which, as I
Speaker 2: mentioned earlier, Ray Abbott brought up from Texas. States can
Speaker 2: request the militia from the federal government to come in
Speaker 2: to protect their constitutional form of government from invasion. Or
Speaker 2: insurrection or violence. This is why Trump couldn't go into Minnesota,
Speaker 2: because he wasn't asked to go into Minnesota. This is
Speaker 2: where I should have brought this up with Don. This
Speaker 2: is where no president can just waltz into a state
Speaker 2: with federal troops. They've got to be asked to come
Speaker 2: in by the legislature or by the governor if the
Speaker 2: legislature's not in session. Those are their rules. I didn't
Speaker 2: sign up for them. I'm just asking them to be
Speaker 2: honest to at least just give me a breather, right
Speaker 2: and let me say, Okay, at least, if you're claiming
Speaker 2: control over me, you're going by the rules of the
Speaker 2: claims control over me at least. I don't know how.
Speaker 2: I mean, that's kind of weird, but there you go.
Speaker 2: So listen. I got a message from Marty Goddessfelt and
Speaker 2: he apologized that he couldn't be with us. I'll try
Speaker 2: to see if Marty can join us on Liberty Conspiracy
Speaker 2: sometime this week. That would be great. And yeah, so
Speaker 2: we'll try to talk to him. I'm really looking forward
Speaker 2: to talking to him. And I want to thank Don
Speaker 2: Jeffries again. The book looks phenomenal. I have to get
Speaker 2: a copy. I'll probably buy a couple copies and give
Speaker 2: one away on Liberty Conspiracy. I did that with his
Speaker 2: book Masking the Truth. And I want to thank everybody
Speaker 2: for being there. American Memory Hole is the name of
Speaker 2: the book. Thank you so much everyone for being part
Speaker 2: of the David Knight Show today. It has been phenomenal.
Speaker 2: And I think we had one more contribution over at Rockfinn.
Speaker 2: This from Eco Taxi again, he says, dynamic Christian Libertarian
Speaker 2: duo Garden don my belief that nasty nasty Oh yeah,
Speaker 2: oh so okay, yeah, I saw that. Okay, so we're
Speaker 2: all set on that one. And and Rumbol I want
Speaker 2: to thank you everyone for being there as well. In
Speaker 2: the Fruit Stripe Gun thank you very much, Texas Coast South,
Speaker 2: he says, guard kicking you know what very well, Thanks buddy,
Speaker 2: appreciate it. And again check out Davidnightshow dot Com, Davidnight
Speaker 2: dot Gold of course, connecting to Wisewolf Gold and Silver Exchange,
Speaker 2: Tony Ardiburn, what a great guy. Rockfinn, Rumble d Live
Speaker 2: David's ex at Liberty Tarrian and David everyone, thank you
Speaker 2: for bringing me the cheer and the contentment and the
Speaker 2: faith and the hope and however things go. Everybody, you're
Speaker 2: part of a great team. So thank you for being
Speaker 2: part of the David Knight Show audience. Thank you to
Speaker 2: everyone who's been here. I'll leave you with a little
Speaker 2: something from David's program, The common Man, and also big
Speaker 2: compliments to the whole family, the Night family. They're awesome.
Speaker 2: I'll talk to you soon. Talk to you tonight six o'clock.
Speaker 2: Do tune in. Gives me a great opportunity to mention liberty, conspiracy,
Speaker 2: rumble Rockfinn and my ex is at guard Goldsmith and
Speaker 2: of course my substack that's the Gardner Goldsmith substack. Be
Speaker 2: seeing you everyone, Take care, God bless thank.
Speaker 21: You the common Man. They created common Core and dumbed
Speaker 21: down our children. They created common past track and control
Speaker 21: us their Commons project to make sure the commoners own
Speaker 21: nothing and the communist future. They see the common man
Speaker 21: as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each of us has worth
Speaker 21: and dignity created in the image of God. That is
Speaker 21: what we have in common. That is what they want
Speaker 21: to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
Speaker 21: They desire to know everything about us. While they hide
Speaker 21: everything from us. It's time to turn that around and
Speaker 21: expose what they want to hide. Please share the information
Speaker 21: and links you'll find at the Davidknightshow dot com. Thank
Speaker 21: you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you can't
Speaker 21: support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. The
Speaker 21: Davidnightshow dot com