WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.200 --> 00:00:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, oh, I missed it. You know. It's one thing

2
00:00:03.080 --> 00:00:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I do keep up with closely, Charlie is your Twitter game,

3
00:00:05.480 --> 00:00:07.719
<v Speaker 1>which is one of the top five percent in the world.

4
00:00:07.879 --> 00:00:13.279
<v Speaker 1>But I think, ask not what your country can do

5
00:00:13.480 --> 00:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>for you, ask what you can do for your country.

6
00:00:17.679 --> 00:00:24.559
<v Speaker 1>Mister Garbachoff, Tear down this wall. It's the Ricochet Podcast

7
00:00:24.600 --> 00:00:28.359
<v Speaker 1>with Steve Hayward along with Charles C. W. Cook breaking

8
00:00:28.399 --> 00:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>it all down with our special guests Scott Jennings, author

9
00:00:31.879 --> 00:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>of a Revolution of common Sense, So Let's have ourselves

10
00:00:36.359 --> 00:00:40.240
<v Speaker 1>a podcast in which she's quoted as referring to you

11
00:00:40.280 --> 00:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>as excuse me and again not my words, sir, but

12
00:00:43.479 --> 00:00:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a conspiracy theorist of a decade.

13
00:00:46.039 --> 00:00:48.520
<v Speaker 2>As like I'll trust I'll trust what you said. I

14
00:00:48.520 --> 00:00:50.240
<v Speaker 2>haven't looked at the article. I of course have heard

15
00:00:50.240 --> 00:00:55.719
<v Speaker 2>about it, but conspiracy theorists sometimes I am a conspiracy theorist,

16
00:00:55.719 --> 00:00:58.159
<v Speaker 2>but I only believe in the conspiracy theories that are true.

17
00:00:58.679 --> 00:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Welcome everybody to the Ricochet Podcast, number seven hundred and

18
00:01:02.560 --> 00:01:06.120
<v Speaker 1>sixty nine. I'm Steve Hayward out in California along with

19
00:01:06.239 --> 00:01:10.879
<v Speaker 1>Charles C. W. Cook in Florida. James is indisposed overseas

20
00:01:11.159 --> 00:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot to get to this week as always, but Charles,

21
00:01:14.040 --> 00:01:17.120
<v Speaker 1>since I have the host parrogative this week, I've been

22
00:01:17.200 --> 00:01:19.959
<v Speaker 1>curious for a long time, and I'm sure some listeners

23
00:01:20.000 --> 00:01:24.359
<v Speaker 1>are too. What does c W stand for in the

24
00:01:24.400 --> 00:01:25.319
<v Speaker 1>middle of your name?

25
00:01:25.840 --> 00:01:29.959
<v Speaker 2>It's Christopher William Charles, not real concealed weapon.

26
00:01:30.879 --> 00:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I think that's what we're spreading around though. That's

27
00:01:33.680 --> 00:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a good one, right, right, I mean it's I think,

28
00:01:37.120 --> 00:01:39.719
<v Speaker 1>as you know, it's slightly unusual for Americans to have

29
00:01:39.760 --> 00:01:40.719
<v Speaker 1>two middle names.

30
00:01:40.719 --> 00:01:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Although my way i've been you know why I write

31
00:01:43.799 --> 00:01:46.799
<v Speaker 2>with it? Maybe I've told you because I had repeated yes,

32
00:01:46.840 --> 00:01:50.560
<v Speaker 2>because of Charlie Kirk the post. Yeah right, it's getting

33
00:01:50.560 --> 00:01:52.640
<v Speaker 2>my hate mouth, so I thought it was only fair

34
00:01:52.719 --> 00:01:55.120
<v Speaker 2>to distinguish myself from the right.

35
00:01:55.239 --> 00:01:59.319
<v Speaker 1>And Yeah, although the names are the same, you're pretty

36
00:01:59.319 --> 00:02:03.239
<v Speaker 1>different people, both in appearance bearing views what you write it.

37
00:02:03.680 --> 00:02:06.359
<v Speaker 1>But you know you can see how it happens. There

38
00:02:06.439 --> 00:02:10.960
<v Speaker 1>is actually a Canadian born novelist named Stephen Hayward, exact

39
00:02:11.039 --> 00:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>same spelling as mine. I don't think he's very political.

40
00:02:13.719 --> 00:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I haven't read any of his novels, but he happened

41
00:02:16.120 --> 00:02:18.599
<v Speaker 1>to be down at I think he's still teaching at

42
00:02:18.599 --> 00:02:22.919
<v Speaker 1>Colorado College in Colorado Springs, and he was there. It

43
00:02:23.000 --> 00:02:24.719
<v Speaker 1>was that year that I came to the University of

44
00:02:24.719 --> 00:02:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Colorado at Boulder, and we would get confused once in

45
00:02:27.080 --> 00:02:29.719
<v Speaker 1>a while, which I thought was the poor man, because

46
00:02:29.759 --> 00:02:38.879
<v Speaker 1>I was the controversial one and he's just teaching English literature. Yes,

47
00:02:39.240 --> 00:02:41.039
<v Speaker 1>when I used to write a lot of cover stories

48
00:02:41.080 --> 00:02:43.879
<v Speaker 1>for the Weekly Standard, I would get fan mail saying,

49
00:02:43.919 --> 00:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>what of a great article? And my wife loves you

50
00:02:46.719 --> 00:02:51.599
<v Speaker 1>because she says you're the cute one on Fox News.

51
00:02:52.000 --> 00:02:54.879
<v Speaker 1>And then we have gotten each other's email a couple

52
00:02:54.879 --> 00:02:57.520
<v Speaker 1>of times when people have both of them, and including

53
00:02:57.520 --> 00:03:00.719
<v Speaker 1>one day my wife missus twenty years ago when our

54
00:03:00.800 --> 00:03:03.719
<v Speaker 1>kids were small and we were both working in downtown Washington,

55
00:03:03.800 --> 00:03:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and my wife sends out an email saying, Hey, can

56
00:03:06.280 --> 00:03:08.759
<v Speaker 1>you pick up the kids from preschool? But she sent

57
00:03:08.759 --> 00:03:09.639
<v Speaker 1>it to Steve Hayes.

58
00:03:10.960 --> 00:03:11.560
<v Speaker 2>Did he do it?

59
00:03:12.039 --> 00:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>No? He wrote back and said, happy to, but you

60
00:03:14.000 --> 00:03:17.319
<v Speaker 1>want to check with your husband first. So we've had

61
00:03:17.360 --> 00:03:19.599
<v Speaker 1>fun with that over the years. Yeah, that does happen.

62
00:03:19.800 --> 00:03:26.080
<v Speaker 1>So all right, gosh, it's on that happy note, which

63
00:03:26.120 --> 00:03:29.439
<v Speaker 1>I wish we could continue. What a what a horrible week?

64
00:03:29.479 --> 00:03:34.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this shooting in Australia, this Brown University shooting

65
00:03:34.400 --> 00:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>which apparently involves also apparently it's now i think confirmed,

66
00:03:39.000 --> 00:03:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the same person shot the scientist at MIT, making this

67
00:03:43.080 --> 00:03:47.319
<v Speaker 1>quite different from your normal campus mass shooting event. So

68
00:03:47.520 --> 00:03:49.479
<v Speaker 1>it was still a lot to learn about that, and

69
00:03:49.520 --> 00:03:53.199
<v Speaker 1>then the terrible Rob Ryer story. But I think let's

70
00:03:53.479 --> 00:03:56.039
<v Speaker 1>maybe spend a minute or two on Australia. You know,

71
00:03:56.120 --> 00:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the Muslim angle, of course is well known and well

72
00:03:58.560 --> 00:04:02.759
<v Speaker 1>talked about. But Charlie, especially with you being the Second

73
00:04:02.800 --> 00:04:07.599
<v Speaker 1>Amendment advocate, liberals are being notably silent on the fact that,

74
00:04:07.759 --> 00:04:09.599
<v Speaker 1>as they've been telling us for twenty years, there are

75
00:04:09.599 --> 00:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>no guns in Australia. How could this possibly happen?

76
00:04:12.879 --> 00:04:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Take it away, Well, there are guns in Australia. There

77
00:04:17.160 --> 00:04:20.120
<v Speaker 2>are four million or so guns, and there are more

78
00:04:20.160 --> 00:04:23.759
<v Speaker 2>guns now than there were twenty five years ago when

79
00:04:24.639 --> 00:04:27.879
<v Speaker 2>the last vestiges of the reforms of nineteen ninety six

80
00:04:28.000 --> 00:04:34.079
<v Speaker 2>went into force. What Australia did in the nineteen nineties

81
00:04:34.079 --> 00:04:38.560
<v Speaker 2>after the Port Arthur massacre was past. All of the

82
00:04:38.600 --> 00:04:42.600
<v Speaker 2>gun control provisions that American gun controllers would like here,

83
00:04:43.480 --> 00:04:50.160
<v Speaker 2>including confiscation and the melting down of guns and bands

84
00:04:50.279 --> 00:04:57.120
<v Speaker 2>on most modern weapons, but there are still guns in Australia.

85
00:04:58.120 --> 00:04:58.399
<v Speaker 1>Now.

86
00:04:58.759 --> 00:05:01.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm of the view that thenineteen ninety six law didn't

87
00:05:01.680 --> 00:05:03.839
<v Speaker 2>do a great deal. I think it may have very

88
00:05:03.879 --> 00:05:10.000
<v Speaker 2>slightly reduced the suicide rate. Suicide rates are tricky and

89
00:05:10.680 --> 00:05:14.079
<v Speaker 2>nevertheless interesting, because you will find nations where there are

90
00:05:14.120 --> 00:05:16.959
<v Speaker 2>no guns really at all. South Korea and Japan have

91
00:05:17.079 --> 00:05:21.160
<v Speaker 2>much higher suicide rates than say the United States, because

92
00:05:21.199 --> 00:05:25.079
<v Speaker 2>we get substitution effects. But I think in Australia it

93
00:05:25.120 --> 00:05:27.040
<v Speaker 2>may be fair to say that their suicide rate was

94
00:05:27.079 --> 00:05:30.240
<v Speaker 2>slightly diminished out last thing on that I don't think,

95
00:05:30.480 --> 00:05:32.680
<v Speaker 2>and this is the American in me. I don't think

96
00:05:32.720 --> 00:05:35.800
<v Speaker 2>that you should pass gun control laws to protect people

97
00:05:35.800 --> 00:05:39.600
<v Speaker 2>from themselves. Maybe that makes me a libertarian, but I

98
00:05:39.639 --> 00:05:42.800
<v Speaker 2>think the case is much stronger, although I'm against it,

99
00:05:43.560 --> 00:05:48.000
<v Speaker 2>when you're arguing that you should protect people against others. Anyhow,

100
00:05:48.199 --> 00:05:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Australia did that in nineteen ninety six. I don't think

101
00:05:50.720 --> 00:05:53.839
<v Speaker 2>it did very much. What did did not do, clearly

102
00:05:54.120 --> 00:05:58.319
<v Speaker 2>was make it impossible to stage a massacre because you

103
00:05:58.360 --> 00:06:00.959
<v Speaker 2>can't stop this. You can't stop it with guns, in

104
00:06:00.959 --> 00:06:03.079
<v Speaker 2>my view, but really you can't stop it at all.

105
00:06:03.399 --> 00:06:07.079
<v Speaker 2>And if you look around the world, when people who

106
00:06:07.120 --> 00:06:11.680
<v Speaker 2>wish to harm large numbers of innocent people cannot get

107
00:06:11.720 --> 00:06:14.160
<v Speaker 2>hold of guns, which they usually can. There are mass

108
00:06:14.160 --> 00:06:17.680
<v Speaker 2>shootings in Sweden and Germany and France and the Netherlands

109
00:06:17.720 --> 00:06:21.319
<v Speaker 2>and so forth. But when they can't get hold of firearms,

110
00:06:22.319 --> 00:06:26.240
<v Speaker 2>they get hold of cars or trucks or knives or bombs.

111
00:06:26.879 --> 00:06:29.639
<v Speaker 2>And I'm something of a fatalist on this, and so

112
00:06:29.759 --> 00:06:32.199
<v Speaker 2>I don't turn this answer into a two hour disquisition.

113
00:06:32.839 --> 00:06:36.360
<v Speaker 2>Let me put it like this. My view, basically, Steve,

114
00:06:36.600 --> 00:06:39.600
<v Speaker 2>is that it is possible, with good policing and a

115
00:06:39.600 --> 00:06:42.519
<v Speaker 2>lot of thought and effort and sometimes money, to reduce

116
00:06:43.040 --> 00:06:46.560
<v Speaker 2>daily crime. I think we've learned this around the country

117
00:06:46.680 --> 00:06:49.839
<v Speaker 2>over the years. If you know where the crime is committed,

118
00:06:49.879 --> 00:06:52.959
<v Speaker 2>if you know who's committing it and why, then you

119
00:06:53.040 --> 00:06:57.319
<v Speaker 2>can reduce it. I don't think it is easy to

120
00:06:57.480 --> 00:07:02.160
<v Speaker 2>reduce mass killings mass shootings. Once the guns are in

121
00:07:02.199 --> 00:07:04.480
<v Speaker 2>a country, somebody who wants to do a lot of

122
00:07:04.480 --> 00:07:07.600
<v Speaker 2>harm at a random point that could never be predicted

123
00:07:08.639 --> 00:07:11.399
<v Speaker 2>is most likely going to be able to do it.

124
00:07:11.399 --> 00:07:14.800
<v Speaker 2>And as such, the fact that Australia has responded to

125
00:07:14.839 --> 00:07:18.680
<v Speaker 2>this by saying, well, now will gun control even harder

126
00:07:19.720 --> 00:07:23.600
<v Speaker 2>is to me ridiculous and an application of responsibility. And

127
00:07:23.639 --> 00:07:27.120
<v Speaker 2>if you look at the one big thing that they're

128
00:07:27.160 --> 00:07:29.959
<v Speaker 2>trying to do, which many gun controllers in America would

129
00:07:30.000 --> 00:07:32.000
<v Speaker 2>like to do as well, it's reduced the number of

130
00:07:32.040 --> 00:07:35.519
<v Speaker 2>guns each person or household is allowed to own. But

131
00:07:35.639 --> 00:07:39.360
<v Speaker 2>what's that going to do? I only have two hands, Yeah,

132
00:07:39.399 --> 00:07:42.519
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm not being facetious. If you are not

133
00:07:42.759 --> 00:07:45.439
<v Speaker 2>of my view, if you don't have the Second Amendment,

134
00:07:45.439 --> 00:07:48.560
<v Speaker 2>if you don't have an American conception of individual rights,

135
00:07:49.360 --> 00:07:53.360
<v Speaker 2>what's that supposed to do. These guys needed one gun each.

136
00:07:53.439 --> 00:07:55.439
<v Speaker 2>They did have more, but I think they had a couple.

137
00:07:55.959 --> 00:07:59.040
<v Speaker 2>They wouldn't have cared about that law, and they wanted

138
00:07:59.040 --> 00:08:02.399
<v Speaker 2>to kill Jewish people on Hanika. That the idea that

139
00:08:02.600 --> 00:08:05.959
<v Speaker 2>you're going to stop this by slightly tweaking and already

140
00:08:06.040 --> 00:08:09.680
<v Speaker 2>draconian set of laws is preposterous. So I think this

141
00:08:09.759 --> 00:08:12.160
<v Speaker 2>is a great example of the limitations of gun control

142
00:08:12.160 --> 00:08:16.439
<v Speaker 2>and the magical thinking that always goes into the claim

143
00:08:16.560 --> 00:08:18.720
<v Speaker 2>that if we just tweaked it a little bit more,

144
00:08:18.759 --> 00:08:20.800
<v Speaker 2>then we could stop this, or that you can't.

145
00:08:21.560 --> 00:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And the fact that normally you would have expected

146
00:08:24.680 --> 00:08:26.759
<v Speaker 1>this kind of shooting to have been at a mosque

147
00:08:26.920 --> 00:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>or some Jewish community center or something. The fact that

148
00:08:30.279 --> 00:08:32.919
<v Speaker 1>it was done out of Bondi Beach, which I've visited

149
00:08:33.039 --> 00:08:36.679
<v Speaker 1>many decades ago, is I think, you know, unexpected, you're

150
00:08:36.679 --> 00:08:39.320
<v Speaker 1>not going to police everywhere. The other thing, just briefly

151
00:08:39.360 --> 00:08:42.279
<v Speaker 1>about suicide rates. That long story while I'll skip over it,

152
00:08:42.320 --> 00:08:45.799
<v Speaker 1>but maybe fifteen twenty years ago, I was trying to

153
00:08:45.799 --> 00:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>do a deep dive into American suicide rates by method

154
00:08:49.039 --> 00:08:51.679
<v Speaker 1>and so forth, and what I discovered was, are the

155
00:08:51.759 --> 00:08:54.519
<v Speaker 1>quality of our suicide statistics are very poor For a

156
00:08:54.600 --> 00:09:00.639
<v Speaker 1>simple reason. A lot of times suicide invalidates certain life

157
00:09:00.679 --> 00:09:03.919
<v Speaker 1>insurance contracts, so you want to not have that be

158
00:09:04.000 --> 00:09:06.039
<v Speaker 1>listed as the cause of death on a death certificate

159
00:09:06.120 --> 00:09:08.840
<v Speaker 1>or a corner's report. Other times there's families who want

160
00:09:08.919 --> 00:09:12.200
<v Speaker 1>to not have an acknowledge that somebody has overdosed deliberately.

161
00:09:13.240 --> 00:09:16.399
<v Speaker 1>And whereas a gun suicide that you can't I mean,

162
00:09:16.480 --> 00:09:18.919
<v Speaker 1>maybe you could call it accidental, but I think when

163
00:09:18.960 --> 00:09:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the police and corner investigate, they can't fudge that too far.

164
00:09:22.120 --> 00:09:26.879
<v Speaker 1>And so our statistics are skewed and incomplete. And but

165
00:09:27.080 --> 00:09:29.840
<v Speaker 1>in the case of where like Australia. Our gun suicides

166
00:09:29.840 --> 00:09:33.639
<v Speaker 1>are harder, going to be harder to disguise or classify

167
00:09:33.720 --> 00:09:38.159
<v Speaker 1>something else than maybe the statistical difference is significant and measurable.

168
00:09:38.200 --> 00:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the other. Uh. I don't want to

169
00:09:43.360 --> 00:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>make a shooting comparison. But Susie Wiles shot herself on

170
00:09:46.879 --> 00:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the foot this week, or so we're told with her

171
00:09:49.399 --> 00:09:53.159
<v Speaker 1>Vanity Fair interview where she made all these comments about

172
00:09:53.440 --> 00:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump has a alcoholic personality. Russ VOIGHTDT is a right

173
00:09:57.639 --> 00:10:04.720
<v Speaker 1>wing zealot Dvance believe in conspiracy theories and so forth,

174
00:10:04.799 --> 00:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and they're all saying it's taken out of context. I

175
00:10:08.159 --> 00:10:11.159
<v Speaker 1>have some theories about how this happened. Actually it's not

176
00:10:11.200 --> 00:10:15.279
<v Speaker 1>a theory. I'm surprised that someone as shrewd and effective

177
00:10:15.279 --> 00:10:17.960
<v Speaker 1>as Susie Wiles would have thought she would be treated

178
00:10:18.000 --> 00:10:21.679
<v Speaker 1>fairly by Vanity Fair. And I mean I've been around

179
00:10:21.759 --> 00:10:23.759
<v Speaker 1>long enough to know and to study this also that

180
00:10:24.240 --> 00:10:28.399
<v Speaker 1>what I call ventriloquist journalism runs rampant right and it's

181
00:10:28.440 --> 00:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the social skill. I mean, these elite media reporters Eric

182
00:10:32.399 --> 00:10:34.799
<v Speaker 1>Wemple in this case, But sixty minutes is the best

183
00:10:34.799 --> 00:10:37.039
<v Speaker 1>example I know. A couple of people have been on

184
00:10:37.320 --> 00:10:39.679
<v Speaker 1>sixty minutes, and Mike Wallace took him to the cleaners.

185
00:10:39.720 --> 00:10:41.559
<v Speaker 1>And they say, the way he does it is you

186
00:10:41.639 --> 00:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>get relaxed with him. He makes you think he's your

187
00:10:44.639 --> 00:10:47.720
<v Speaker 1>best buddy, and then you start saying things you shouldn't say.

188
00:10:48.240 --> 00:10:50.120
<v Speaker 1>And there have been so many examples us over the years,

189
00:10:50.159 --> 00:10:53.159
<v Speaker 1>going back to in my recollection David Stockman in nineteen

190
00:10:53.200 --> 00:10:55.639
<v Speaker 1>eighty one to The Atlantic, to a very left wing

191
00:10:55.720 --> 00:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>reporter named William Grider, who took things out of context,

192
00:11:01.200 --> 00:11:03.759
<v Speaker 1>got Stockman to drop his guard and say embarrassing things

193
00:11:03.799 --> 00:11:06.919
<v Speaker 1>about Reaganomics, and why else appears to have done the

194
00:11:06.960 --> 00:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>same thing. And I'm just astounded that an administration who,

195
00:11:11.320 --> 00:11:13.879
<v Speaker 1>more than any other is self conscious that the major

196
00:11:13.960 --> 00:11:16.679
<v Speaker 1>media is their enemy, would have fallen under this trap.

197
00:11:17.360 --> 00:11:20.519
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly my takeaway. I do think some of the

198
00:11:20.559 --> 00:11:25.279
<v Speaker 2>things she said are impossible to imagine in context being

199
00:11:25.320 --> 00:11:28.799
<v Speaker 2>any better than they were out of context. And for example,

200
00:11:28.919 --> 00:11:32.759
<v Speaker 2>saying that Elon Muskus a ketamine addict, unless she said

201
00:11:32.879 --> 00:11:34.840
<v Speaker 2>and that's a good thing at the end, then you

202
00:11:34.879 --> 00:11:38.159
<v Speaker 2>do wonder. But I can see some of it. What

203
00:11:38.360 --> 00:11:41.399
<v Speaker 2>shocks me, like you, is that she thought that the

204
00:11:41.840 --> 00:11:44.799
<v Speaker 2>inflammatory parts of what she was saying, We're not going

205
00:11:44.840 --> 00:11:47.519
<v Speaker 2>to be lifted out and either printed in isolation or

206
00:11:47.519 --> 00:11:51.679
<v Speaker 2>at least emblazoned on the front cover. And I say

207
00:11:51.720 --> 00:11:56.000
<v Speaker 2>that because Susie was is actually a fixture of where

208
00:11:56.000 --> 00:11:59.080
<v Speaker 2>I live, Jacksonville. She moved to Jacksonville in the eighties

209
00:11:59.440 --> 00:12:02.039
<v Speaker 2>and she's run a bunch of businesses here. Some of

210
00:12:02.080 --> 00:12:04.679
<v Speaker 2>them were PR firms. One of them she ran with

211
00:12:04.879 --> 00:12:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Tony Biselli, who was Jacksonville Jaguars Hall of Famer, played

212
00:12:10.120 --> 00:12:15.080
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL for eight or nine seasons. So I

213
00:12:15.120 --> 00:12:19.919
<v Speaker 2>am aware how solid her reputation is and how many

214
00:12:19.960 --> 00:12:22.799
<v Speaker 2>times she's been around the block. She's not twenty five.

215
00:12:23.799 --> 00:12:26.879
<v Speaker 2>So when I saw this and then the inevitable tweet

216
00:12:26.919 --> 00:12:29.720
<v Speaker 2>that said, well this is outrageous media bias and I

217
00:12:29.759 --> 00:12:32.039
<v Speaker 2>was taken out of context, I wanted the same, How

218
00:12:32.039 --> 00:12:34.720
<v Speaker 2>could this possibly have happened? I will say that I

219
00:12:34.720 --> 00:12:36.679
<v Speaker 2>think she might get away with it because I think

220
00:12:36.720 --> 00:12:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Trump will recognize the instinct. The only thing she said

221
00:12:41.080 --> 00:12:45.399
<v Speaker 2>about Trump was that he has the personality of an alcoholic,

222
00:12:45.720 --> 00:12:48.000
<v Speaker 2>which is something that Trump has set himself on stage

223
00:12:48.000 --> 00:12:49.440
<v Speaker 2>over and over again. And he has a very funny

224
00:12:49.519 --> 00:12:51.279
<v Speaker 2>line about this where he says, can you imagine what

225
00:12:51.320 --> 00:12:53.759
<v Speaker 2>I'd be like if I drank so because he didn't

226
00:12:53.799 --> 00:12:57.480
<v Speaker 2>go after him, sorry, because she didn't go after him,

227
00:12:57.879 --> 00:13:00.480
<v Speaker 2>and because she behaved in the way he does, which

228
00:13:00.519 --> 00:13:02.759
<v Speaker 2>is just to let it all out. I wonder if

229
00:13:02.759 --> 00:13:07.879
<v Speaker 2>he will actually recognize the mode and say, all right,

230
00:13:07.960 --> 00:13:08.679
<v Speaker 2>it's fine.

231
00:13:08.960 --> 00:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Well I think he did. I mean I caught secondhand

232
00:13:11.200 --> 00:13:13.639
<v Speaker 1>or a little clip of him saying, oh, yeah, that's

233
00:13:13.679 --> 00:13:16.279
<v Speaker 1>an accurate description. And then Jade Vance. I thought it

234
00:13:16.320 --> 00:13:18.759
<v Speaker 1>was also very clever he said, well, I believe conspiracy

235
00:13:18.759 --> 00:13:20.840
<v Speaker 1>theories that are true. That he rattled off three or

236
00:13:20.840 --> 00:13:25.840
<v Speaker 1>four and so sort of. And the calmness of the

237
00:13:25.840 --> 00:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>White House reaction I think is kind of curious. I'm

238
00:13:29.360 --> 00:13:31.480
<v Speaker 1>reluctant to go as far as the saying I wonder

239
00:13:31.799 --> 00:13:33.399
<v Speaker 1>not that this is on purpose, but they knew it

240
00:13:33.440 --> 00:13:36.960
<v Speaker 1>was coming. He decided reacting calmly was better than going

241
00:13:36.960 --> 00:13:39.639
<v Speaker 1>off with a tantrum. The other thing I wonder, though,

242
00:13:39.840 --> 00:13:42.440
<v Speaker 1>is I mean, I don't know how much intrigued there is.

243
00:13:43.159 --> 00:13:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Unlike Trump one, nobody has been dismissed yet or fired

244
00:13:47.200 --> 00:13:50.759
<v Speaker 1>or moved around. And I think Trump has screened more

245
00:13:50.799 --> 00:13:53.799
<v Speaker 1>carefully for loyalty that's a plus the minus, of course.

246
00:13:55.039 --> 00:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, I don't know if you caught this.

247
00:13:57.200 --> 00:14:00.639
<v Speaker 1>Maybe three weeks ago, there was a very our story

248
00:14:00.679 --> 00:14:04.600
<v Speaker 1>about Cash Patel in the New York Post by Carol Markowitz,

249
00:14:04.600 --> 00:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>who's otherwise a very pro Trump columnist and knowing nothing

250
00:14:10.519 --> 00:14:12.840
<v Speaker 1>and not having any inside information. I did wonder, I

251
00:14:12.919 --> 00:14:15.679
<v Speaker 1>wonder if that's a planted story. You know, you're hearing

252
00:14:15.720 --> 00:14:17.639
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stuff, a lot of criticism of Patel

253
00:14:17.720 --> 00:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>from other Republicans and people in Washington, and Dan Bongino

254
00:14:22.399 --> 00:14:24.919
<v Speaker 1>this week announced that he's leaving as the number two

255
00:14:24.919 --> 00:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>person at the FBI. I wonder if the Markowitz story

256
00:14:30.519 --> 00:14:36.120
<v Speaker 1>was planted, and whether some of what Susie Wilds was

257
00:14:36.120 --> 00:14:40.559
<v Speaker 1>saying to the reporter is also playing the Washington game

258
00:14:40.600 --> 00:14:43.519
<v Speaker 1>of getting some damaging stories circulating in the press to

259
00:14:43.600 --> 00:14:45.200
<v Speaker 1>ease some people out. I don't know if that's just

260
00:14:45.200 --> 00:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>pure speculation on my part, but that's interesting.

261
00:14:49.399 --> 00:14:54.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if one assumes that Trump is unhappy with

262
00:14:54.519 --> 00:14:59.559
<v Speaker 2>Pam Bondy, which probably should be, that was the yeah,

263
00:15:00.080 --> 00:15:03.080
<v Speaker 2>guess criticism that she could have leveled. She essentially said, look,

264
00:15:03.120 --> 00:15:07.639
<v Speaker 2>she blew this big task. There's no getting around that. Again,

265
00:15:07.679 --> 00:15:12.200
<v Speaker 2>that's not taking out of context. That's an attack. So

266
00:15:12.399 --> 00:15:17.279
<v Speaker 2>perhaps you're right either way. I think there was some

267
00:15:17.399 --> 00:15:19.240
<v Speaker 2>damage done there. I don't think the whole thing was

268
00:15:19.240 --> 00:15:21.000
<v Speaker 2>a setup. I don't think this is all seventy two

269
00:15:21.080 --> 00:15:24.200
<v Speaker 2>d chests. So I'm surprised that it happened.

270
00:15:24.840 --> 00:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, it seemed surprised me. That's right, because she seems,

271
00:15:28.840 --> 00:15:31.519
<v Speaker 1>for one thing, she doesn't do interviews, she doesn't go

272
00:15:31.559 --> 00:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>onto Sunday talk shows like most chiefs of staff do,

273
00:15:34.440 --> 00:15:37.919
<v Speaker 1>and seems to run a pretty tight ship there except

274
00:15:37.960 --> 00:15:41.039
<v Speaker 1>for here's an exit question. We'll get out quickly here.

275
00:15:41.080 --> 00:15:44.919
<v Speaker 1>But so you know, Trump had that really appalling tweet

276
00:15:44.960 --> 00:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>about Rob Reiner. One thing I've noticed about Trump's tweets. Oh,

277
00:15:49.000 --> 00:15:50.759
<v Speaker 1>by the way, you know, the deal has been as

278
00:15:50.799 --> 00:15:53.559
<v Speaker 1>we've heard, I'm happy with mean tweets if I get

279
00:15:53.600 --> 00:15:56.720
<v Speaker 1>three dollars gallon gasoline, okay, But this ABU is the privilege.

280
00:15:57.559 --> 00:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>But one thing about his tweets so far in Trump

281
00:16:00.039 --> 00:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>two is that there's still very much in character as

282
00:16:03.840 --> 00:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>we know in but they seem to be proof read.

283
00:16:07.759 --> 00:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll put it that way right now.

284
00:16:09.519 --> 00:16:13.600
<v Speaker 3>He dictates is that it okay seeing the video of him,

285
00:16:13.639 --> 00:16:16.039
<v Speaker 3>I think it was from election night where he sits

286
00:16:16.080 --> 00:16:18.960
<v Speaker 3>and there's a young lady in this video and he

287
00:16:19.039 --> 00:16:20.879
<v Speaker 3>dictates it and then he says, read it back to me,

288
00:16:20.919 --> 00:16:21.679
<v Speaker 3>and then he says.

289
00:16:21.480 --> 00:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Send, I didn't know that. Actually, Well that explains a lot,

290
00:16:25.440 --> 00:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>but they seem a little different than Trump one, where

291
00:16:28.879 --> 00:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, we haven't had kofifi yet, which my favorite. Right, Okay,

292
00:16:35.360 --> 00:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>well we'll leave that for now, and let's take a

293
00:16:38.039 --> 00:16:40.799
<v Speaker 1>quick break for some sponsor messages, and then we will

294
00:16:40.799 --> 00:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>come back with our special guests. And now we welcome

295
00:16:45.639 --> 00:16:49.879
<v Speaker 1>to the podcast. Scott Jennings the senior political correspondent for CNN,

296
00:16:50.480 --> 00:16:53.320
<v Speaker 1>America's favorite pundit, as a lot of people say of him.

297
00:16:53.840 --> 00:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>He's been a long time political consultant, a lecture at

298
00:16:56.480 --> 00:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, and just announced the week

299
00:17:00.559 --> 00:17:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the replacement on Salem Radio on weekdays for Charlie Kirk's

300
00:17:04.440 --> 00:17:07.559
<v Speaker 1>old radio spot. He's also the author and the book

301
00:17:07.599 --> 00:17:11.079
<v Speaker 1>We Want to Talk About Today, A Revolution of Common Sense,

302
00:17:11.279 --> 00:17:15.519
<v Speaker 1>How Donald Trump stormed Washington and fought for Western civilization.

303
00:17:15.759 --> 00:17:18.119
<v Speaker 4>Scott, welcome. It's a real pleasure to have you join us.

304
00:17:18.759 --> 00:17:20.680
<v Speaker 4>Thank you, and good to be with you all. Honored

305
00:17:20.680 --> 00:17:24.200
<v Speaker 4>by the invitation. I'm a regular listener, longtime listener, first

306
00:17:24.240 --> 00:17:24.759
<v Speaker 4>time caller.

307
00:17:24.839 --> 00:17:30.480
<v Speaker 1>As they so, revolution of common sense, and you know,

308
00:17:30.519 --> 00:17:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I've read enough to know and listened to you enough

309
00:17:32.160 --> 00:17:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to know that you point out that Trump differs from

310
00:17:34.680 --> 00:17:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the usual even conservative politician in Washington. He doesn't use

311
00:17:39.240 --> 00:17:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the normal Beltway vocabulary. He's the major figure at The

312
00:17:44.920 --> 00:17:47.319
<v Speaker 1>other person who's like this to some extent was Ronald Reagan,

313
00:17:47.319 --> 00:17:50.400
<v Speaker 1>but Trump even more so. So you know, he won't

314
00:17:50.400 --> 00:17:55.240
<v Speaker 1>call them undocumented immigrants or undocumented aliens, right, which is

315
00:17:55.279 --> 00:17:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the politically correct term. They've been forced down on float

316
00:17:57.480 --> 00:18:00.279
<v Speaker 1>for thirty years, and it's not accurate, right. You know,

317
00:18:00.559 --> 00:18:05.559
<v Speaker 1>he ridicules paper straws, you know, a man in women's bathrooms,

318
00:18:05.680 --> 00:18:09.640
<v Speaker 1>a so forth and so. Anyway, So when did you

319
00:18:09.640 --> 00:18:11.559
<v Speaker 1>first pick up on that? I know that you've confessed

320
00:18:11.599 --> 00:18:13.759
<v Speaker 1>to being sort of a late convert to Trump, or

321
00:18:14.000 --> 00:18:16.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe medium convert to Trump, But when did you first

322
00:18:16.640 --> 00:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>pick up on the fact that that common sense turned

323
00:18:19.039 --> 00:18:21.039
<v Speaker 1>out to be Trump's superpower?

324
00:18:21.799 --> 00:18:24.920
<v Speaker 4>Well, I was thinking about writing a book after the election.

325
00:18:25.000 --> 00:18:26.160
<v Speaker 5>I'd never written one before.

326
00:18:26.240 --> 00:18:28.359
<v Speaker 4>But I was sitting on the set at CNN on

327
00:18:28.480 --> 00:18:32.359
<v Speaker 4>inauguration day and Trump uses this phrase a revolution of

328
00:18:32.400 --> 00:18:34.799
<v Speaker 4>common sense and his inaugural address, and I turned to

329
00:18:35.079 --> 00:18:37.839
<v Speaker 4>Van Jones and I said, that'll make a great book title.

330
00:18:38.559 --> 00:18:41.759
<v Speaker 4>And a couple of weeks went by and I thought about,

331
00:18:42.000 --> 00:18:44.000
<v Speaker 4>how would I do this, and I went to pitch

332
00:18:44.039 --> 00:18:46.119
<v Speaker 4>him on it in the Oval office in early February.

333
00:18:46.960 --> 00:18:50.160
<v Speaker 4>But it really all started with hearing him phrase his

334
00:18:50.200 --> 00:18:54.079
<v Speaker 4>own political branding that way. Later in the book, I

335
00:18:54.119 --> 00:18:55.920
<v Speaker 4>go to Michigan with him on his one hundredth day

336
00:18:55.960 --> 00:18:58.759
<v Speaker 4>in office, and he says to the crowd in Warren, Michigan,

337
00:18:59.160 --> 00:19:01.160
<v Speaker 4>whether you're right or your left, or whatever the hell

338
00:19:01.200 --> 00:19:01.720
<v Speaker 4>you are.

339
00:19:01.640 --> 00:19:02.920
<v Speaker 5>It's just common sense.

340
00:19:03.119 --> 00:19:06.480
<v Speaker 4>And so my interactions with him, my observations with him,

341
00:19:07.119 --> 00:19:09.880
<v Speaker 4>is that that's how he thinks of himself. I asked

342
00:19:09.960 --> 00:19:12.400
<v Speaker 4>him once, actually, do you consider yourself more of a

343
00:19:12.440 --> 00:19:16.079
<v Speaker 4>conservative or more of a common sense person? And he said, well,

344
00:19:16.119 --> 00:19:18.680
<v Speaker 4>most of the time conservative is common sense. But he

345
00:19:18.759 --> 00:19:22.480
<v Speaker 4>left himself a little wiggle room, you know, But that's

346
00:19:22.519 --> 00:19:24.720
<v Speaker 4>how he portrays it. I told him, I thought one

347
00:19:24.759 --> 00:19:27.000
<v Speaker 4>hundred of the usual suspects would come along and write

348
00:19:27.039 --> 00:19:29.799
<v Speaker 4>books crapping on him for the first one hundred days.

349
00:19:29.880 --> 00:19:32.000
<v Speaker 4>What he intended to do, and then somebody who has

350
00:19:32.079 --> 00:19:34.119
<v Speaker 4>voted for you three times, likes you and wants you

351
00:19:34.240 --> 00:19:36.279
<v Speaker 4>to succeed, ought to get a crack at it, and

352
00:19:36.319 --> 00:19:37.200
<v Speaker 4>he eventually agreed.

353
00:19:37.240 --> 00:19:41.160
<v Speaker 1>And here's the book. Yeah, so you're from western Kentucky.

354
00:19:41.839 --> 00:19:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that's interesting because while all the political commentators

355
00:19:45.440 --> 00:19:49.200
<v Speaker 1>have tended to look at how Trump broke the blue

356
00:19:49.240 --> 00:19:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Wall states in twenty sixteen and again in twenty twenty four,

357
00:19:52.240 --> 00:19:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and so forth, but a

358
00:19:57.440 --> 00:20:00.240
<v Speaker 1>few astute people I know said, you know, the really

359
00:20:00.319 --> 00:20:03.680
<v Speaker 1>interesting state to look at for Trump is Kentucky. Not

360
00:20:03.720 --> 00:20:06.599
<v Speaker 1>because it was a state that flipped, but maybe you

361
00:20:06.640 --> 00:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>know Elliott County, which I think is out in eastern Kentucky.

362
00:20:10.160 --> 00:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>It is so Elliott County is a sign a political scientist,

363
00:20:13.279 --> 00:20:15.559
<v Speaker 1>so I know these weird things. Elliott County has been

364
00:20:15.799 --> 00:20:19.519
<v Speaker 1>deep Democrat forever. It did not even vote for Ronald

365
00:20:19.519 --> 00:20:22.519
<v Speaker 1>Reagan in the nineteen eighty four landslide election. Year it

366
00:20:22.599 --> 00:20:25.759
<v Speaker 1>went heavily for Barack Obama twice, and then in twenty

367
00:20:25.799 --> 00:20:29.759
<v Speaker 1>sixteen it went heavily for Donald Trump. That tells you

368
00:20:29.839 --> 00:20:33.400
<v Speaker 1>something about Trump Democrats. We used to talk about Reagan Democrats,

369
00:20:33.440 --> 00:20:36.960
<v Speaker 1>but the Trump Democrats story in places like Elliott County, Kentucky,

370
00:20:37.000 --> 00:20:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think elsewhere you mentioned your own father is

371
00:20:39.519 --> 00:20:44.079
<v Speaker 1>an old Clinton loving Democrat who came around to Trump.

372
00:20:44.559 --> 00:20:47.440
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, isn't your state your home state, in

373
00:20:47.480 --> 00:20:50.440
<v Speaker 1>some ways the most emblematic state for what Trump did.

374
00:20:51.359 --> 00:20:53.799
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I mean we had been trending somewhat read since

375
00:20:53.839 --> 00:20:57.799
<v Speaker 4>the Obama years, but Trump put it on blast. In fact,

376
00:20:57.880 --> 00:21:00.160
<v Speaker 4>Kentucky was the last state that had a Democrat at

377
00:21:00.279 --> 00:21:04.079
<v Speaker 4>state legislature in the South until twenty sixteen, the night

378
00:21:04.079 --> 00:21:07.319
<v Speaker 4>Trump was elected, we finally flipped the state House in Kentucky.

379
00:21:07.400 --> 00:21:09.039
<v Speaker 4>We'd had the Senate for a number of years, and

380
00:21:09.119 --> 00:21:12.319
<v Speaker 4>so it had been somewhat resistant to the movement towards

381
00:21:12.319 --> 00:21:14.240
<v Speaker 4>the Republican Party in the way that the rest of

382
00:21:14.279 --> 00:21:17.039
<v Speaker 4>the South had moved, particularly at the local level. And

383
00:21:17.079 --> 00:21:19.799
<v Speaker 4>we still have a Democratic governor today, although I think

384
00:21:19.839 --> 00:21:23.279
<v Speaker 4>that's going to change in twenty twenty seven. But yes,

385
00:21:23.440 --> 00:21:25.440
<v Speaker 4>there are a lot of people in Kentucky, in east

386
00:21:25.480 --> 00:21:30.000
<v Speaker 4>and West who had been a career and lifelong Democrats.

387
00:21:30.039 --> 00:21:32.799
<v Speaker 4>Their parents and grandparents were Democrats who referenced my father,

388
00:21:33.480 --> 00:21:35.960
<v Speaker 4>Jeff Jennings from Dawson Springs, Kentucky.

389
00:21:35.559 --> 00:21:36.319
<v Speaker 5>Where I grew up.

390
00:21:36.839 --> 00:21:38.720
<v Speaker 4>I mean, these are the biggest Clinton people I knew

391
00:21:38.920 --> 00:21:40.599
<v Speaker 4>when I was growing up. They were in unions, they

392
00:21:40.599 --> 00:21:43.160
<v Speaker 4>loved Bill Clinton. They were Democrats. My grandfather was a

393
00:21:43.160 --> 00:21:46.759
<v Speaker 4>New Deal Democrat. I was a recial Republican from the

394
00:21:46.799 --> 00:21:48.960
<v Speaker 4>time I was eighteen. I came of age during the

395
00:21:49.039 --> 00:21:52.519
<v Speaker 4>gingrich Republican Revolution of the nineties, and so I felt

396
00:21:52.599 --> 00:21:55.319
<v Speaker 4>kindly towards that and it always appealed to me. But

397
00:21:55.559 --> 00:21:57.400
<v Speaker 4>you know, I grew up around all these Democrats. But

398
00:21:57.480 --> 00:22:00.559
<v Speaker 4>my dad was the first guy to tell me Donald

399
00:22:00.599 --> 00:22:02.400
<v Speaker 4>Trump was going to be the next president. And I,

400
00:22:02.440 --> 00:22:04.480
<v Speaker 4>of course, as a trained political operative, told him he

401
00:22:04.519 --> 00:22:06.920
<v Speaker 4>was full of crap. But it was not the first

402
00:22:06.960 --> 00:22:09.160
<v Speaker 4>time in my life that my father was right and

403
00:22:09.160 --> 00:22:10.799
<v Speaker 4>I was wrong. It sure it won't be the last,

404
00:22:10.839 --> 00:22:14.200
<v Speaker 4>but you know, eventually, throughout the course of writing the book,

405
00:22:14.680 --> 00:22:17.920
<v Speaker 4>the President gave me his hat and signed it for

406
00:22:18.000 --> 00:22:21.039
<v Speaker 4>my dad, acknowledging that he, in fact, was the first

407
00:22:21.079 --> 00:22:23.880
<v Speaker 4>Trump supporter in western Kentucky.

408
00:22:24.880 --> 00:22:26.599
<v Speaker 1>So I want to ask you one more question before

409
00:22:26.599 --> 00:22:30.319
<v Speaker 1>I turned you over to Charlie Cook, and it's how

410
00:22:30.400 --> 00:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>you do your show prep for CNN. And but the

411
00:22:32.759 --> 00:22:36.519
<v Speaker 1>reason I ask it that way is every time I

412
00:22:36.559 --> 00:22:39.799
<v Speaker 1>see you or see the clips that get circulated on

413
00:22:39.839 --> 00:22:42.920
<v Speaker 1>social media, you're landing a knockout blow. I mean, if

414
00:22:42.920 --> 00:22:45.359
<v Speaker 1>this surprise fight, you be landing a knockout blow in

415
00:22:45.400 --> 00:22:48.960
<v Speaker 1>every single round. And so I'm wondering, first two part question,

416
00:22:49.119 --> 00:22:51.200
<v Speaker 1>what show prep do you do to be so good

417
00:22:51.240 --> 00:22:53.839
<v Speaker 1>at it? Maybe you're just a natural like Rocky Balboa.

418
00:22:54.799 --> 00:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>But also at the same time, how do you keep

419
00:22:57.000 --> 00:23:01.200
<v Speaker 1>your equanimity? You're bearing, you never lose your temper, you

420
00:23:01.279 --> 00:23:03.400
<v Speaker 1>never lose your cool. You're always calm, and I think

421
00:23:03.400 --> 00:23:05.720
<v Speaker 1>that adds forced to when you lay a knockout blow

422
00:23:05.720 --> 00:23:08.519
<v Speaker 1>on somebody. I mean, do you do breathing exercises? Are

423
00:23:08.559 --> 00:23:11.920
<v Speaker 1>you taking some kind of experimental zen drugs? Tell me

424
00:23:11.960 --> 00:23:14.519
<v Speaker 1>how you go about your role on CNN? Sure?

425
00:23:14.599 --> 00:23:15.119
<v Speaker 5>Well thanks.

426
00:23:15.400 --> 00:23:17.079
<v Speaker 4>First of all, I think the debating show has been

427
00:23:17.119 --> 00:23:19.599
<v Speaker 4>a great thing for CNN. They used to have debates

428
00:23:19.599 --> 00:23:21.400
<v Speaker 4>and then they went away from it, and now it's

429
00:23:21.440 --> 00:23:23.119
<v Speaker 4>like the only show like it on TV. I think

430
00:23:23.119 --> 00:23:25.400
<v Speaker 4>the country is hungry for debates. I think they want debates.

431
00:23:25.440 --> 00:23:27.799
<v Speaker 4>Everywhere I go, I hear two things. I love you

432
00:23:27.839 --> 00:23:29.920
<v Speaker 4>and I love the debates. I don't care for you,

433
00:23:29.960 --> 00:23:32.319
<v Speaker 4>but I love the debates. The commonality is the debate,

434
00:23:32.400 --> 00:23:35.200
<v Speaker 4>so it's a good thing. I ingest a huge amount

435
00:23:35.240 --> 00:23:38.039
<v Speaker 4>of information all day every day. I'm reading virtually every

436
00:23:38.160 --> 00:23:41.319
<v Speaker 4>mainstream source. I'm reading a lot of conservative sources. I'm

437
00:23:41.319 --> 00:23:44.279
<v Speaker 4>reading a lot of independent sources. I'm watching things happening

438
00:23:44.279 --> 00:23:46.680
<v Speaker 4>in real time. I spend a huge amount of time

439
00:23:46.680 --> 00:23:49.519
<v Speaker 4>on the phone with policymakers. If I don't understand something,

440
00:23:49.559 --> 00:23:51.559
<v Speaker 4>I'll pick up the phone and call the people involved

441
00:23:51.599 --> 00:23:54.279
<v Speaker 4>and have them walk me through it. I'm also ingesting

442
00:23:54.319 --> 00:23:56.000
<v Speaker 4>a lot of things on the left to try to

443
00:23:56.160 --> 00:23:58.839
<v Speaker 4>predict what vectors they're going to take in the evening.

444
00:23:59.359 --> 00:24:01.480
<v Speaker 4>Thing I've learned about the left is that they're very

445
00:24:01.799 --> 00:24:06.200
<v Speaker 4>authoritarian in their communications. Once the argument vectors go out,

446
00:24:06.279 --> 00:24:08.960
<v Speaker 4>once the debating points go out, they all tend to

447
00:24:09.000 --> 00:24:10.960
<v Speaker 4>adhere to it. So if I can learn what that

448
00:24:11.119 --> 00:24:13.359
<v Speaker 4>is during the day, I'm pretty sure I'm going to

449
00:24:13.400 --> 00:24:16.559
<v Speaker 4>hear it at night. And what you see out there

450
00:24:16.799 --> 00:24:19.039
<v Speaker 4>is really authentic. I don't have a script. There's nothing

451
00:24:19.039 --> 00:24:21.039
<v Speaker 4>on the teleprompter for me. I don't know what Abby

452
00:24:21.160 --> 00:24:22.559
<v Speaker 4>is going to say. I don't know what clips she's

453
00:24:22.599 --> 00:24:26.759
<v Speaker 4>going to play. So what you're getting is my ingesting

454
00:24:26.920 --> 00:24:30.319
<v Speaker 4>and analyzing the news all day and an authentic reaction

455
00:24:30.960 --> 00:24:34.319
<v Speaker 4>to what I'm hearing. You know, sometimes I hear crazy things.

456
00:24:34.359 --> 00:24:36.599
<v Speaker 4>A lot of nights I hear crazy things. But what

457
00:24:36.599 --> 00:24:39.920
<v Speaker 4>you're getting my authentic reaction and I and just to

458
00:24:40.000 --> 00:24:43.000
<v Speaker 4>address the issue of how do you stay calm, Preparation

459
00:24:43.119 --> 00:24:47.559
<v Speaker 4>breeds confidence, And if I've learned anything from Ronald Reagan,

460
00:24:47.640 --> 00:24:50.240
<v Speaker 4>it is that we will win more arguments by being

461
00:24:50.279 --> 00:24:53.440
<v Speaker 4>happy warriors than by being angry. And virtually everyone I'm

462
00:24:53.440 --> 00:24:56.720
<v Speaker 4>debating against is in a constant state of being in rage,

463
00:24:57.240 --> 00:24:59.720
<v Speaker 4>which I still don't understand why they're so enraged about

464
00:24:59.720 --> 00:25:01.480
<v Speaker 4>being America, but they are and I'm not, and I'm

465
00:25:01.480 --> 00:25:02.200
<v Speaker 4>happy to be here.

466
00:25:03.319 --> 00:25:08.119
<v Speaker 2>Hi, Scott Charles Cook care. So the book is about

467
00:25:08.640 --> 00:25:12.599
<v Speaker 2>Trump fighting for Western civilization as much as common sense.

468
00:25:12.960 --> 00:25:16.319
<v Speaker 2>What does that mean? And why did it take him?

469
00:25:16.480 --> 00:25:17.559
<v Speaker 2>What was happening before?

470
00:25:18.200 --> 00:25:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Well?

471
00:25:18.559 --> 00:25:21.480
<v Speaker 4>I put that in the title because over the course

472
00:25:21.519 --> 00:25:24.160
<v Speaker 4>of the election and over the course of writing the book,

473
00:25:24.720 --> 00:25:28.119
<v Speaker 4>it sort of really hit home for me that we're

474
00:25:28.119 --> 00:25:30.559
<v Speaker 4>not fighting about day to day politics anymore. We're not

475
00:25:30.759 --> 00:25:34.440
<v Speaker 4>arguing about you know, marginal tax rates and this and that,

476
00:25:34.799 --> 00:25:37.319
<v Speaker 4>and we are, but there's something bigger going on, the

477
00:25:37.799 --> 00:25:41.720
<v Speaker 4>cultural attacks on our Judeo Christian heritage, the mass migration

478
00:25:41.880 --> 00:25:44.759
<v Speaker 4>crisis that's going on that has overrun Europe and threatens

479
00:25:44.799 --> 00:25:46.079
<v Speaker 4>to overrun the United States.

480
00:25:46.880 --> 00:25:49.400
<v Speaker 5>And so I just I started to see.

481
00:25:49.160 --> 00:25:52.759
<v Speaker 4>Politics through a much larger lens than just Okay, we'll

482
00:25:52.759 --> 00:25:54.160
<v Speaker 4>be in and then they'll be in, and we'll be

483
00:25:54.200 --> 00:25:54.880
<v Speaker 4>in and they'll be in.

484
00:25:54.920 --> 00:25:56.759
<v Speaker 5>There's something bigger going on in the world.

485
00:25:56.880 --> 00:25:59.680
<v Speaker 4>And when I interviewed Elon Musk about this for the book,

486
00:25:59.680 --> 00:26:01.839
<v Speaker 4>he he laid out his views. That's why he got

487
00:26:01.880 --> 00:26:05.119
<v Speaker 4>involved in politics. For Trump, he thought something larger was

488
00:26:05.160 --> 00:26:09.440
<v Speaker 4>at play. He thinks our fiscal situation, the devaluation of

489
00:26:09.480 --> 00:26:13.319
<v Speaker 4>our currency, the mass migration crisis, the low birth rate crisis,

490
00:26:13.359 --> 00:26:16.160
<v Speaker 4>and he thinks all of this is conspiring to threaten

491
00:26:16.240 --> 00:26:19.119
<v Speaker 4>America but threaten the future of the West. And so

492
00:26:19.359 --> 00:26:21.559
<v Speaker 4>for Trump, I don't know whether he knew he was

493
00:26:21.559 --> 00:26:24.079
<v Speaker 4>signing up for it or not, but whether he likes

494
00:26:24.079 --> 00:26:27.640
<v Speaker 4>it or not, he is on the wall of defending

495
00:26:27.680 --> 00:26:31.160
<v Speaker 4>the West against a lot of crazy things, and whether

496
00:26:31.200 --> 00:26:36.400
<v Speaker 4>it's very real things like October the seventh, which I

497
00:26:36.480 --> 00:26:39.160
<v Speaker 4>think has been the Central front, military front and the

498
00:26:39.200 --> 00:26:41.240
<v Speaker 4>fight for the West over the last couple of years,

499
00:26:41.359 --> 00:26:45.079
<v Speaker 4>or cultural things like the transgender ideology or the climate

500
00:26:45.160 --> 00:26:48.200
<v Speaker 4>people or whatever. There's a lot of things out there

501
00:26:48.640 --> 00:26:52.880
<v Speaker 4>converging in a very aggressive way, and he is kind

502
00:26:52.880 --> 00:26:54.880
<v Speaker 4>of standing up to all of them at the same time.

503
00:26:55.359 --> 00:26:57.319
<v Speaker 4>And it's sort of the person who's willing to say

504
00:26:57.839 --> 00:26:59.519
<v Speaker 4>what we're all thinking. But a lot of people have

505
00:26:59.519 --> 00:27:02.440
<v Speaker 4>been afraid say when Democrats are in power, because they'll

506
00:27:02.480 --> 00:27:02.960
<v Speaker 4>come after you.

507
00:27:03.039 --> 00:27:05.720
<v Speaker 5>And so for a lot of reasons, we had to

508
00:27:05.720 --> 00:27:06.319
<v Speaker 5>have him back.

509
00:27:06.799 --> 00:27:09.519
<v Speaker 4>If Kamala Harrison won the election, all of these fights

510
00:27:09.519 --> 00:27:11.440
<v Speaker 4>would be lost, all of the wrong.

511
00:27:11.200 --> 00:27:12.359
<v Speaker 5>People would be encouraged.

512
00:27:12.440 --> 00:27:14.160
<v Speaker 4>We wouldn't be able to tell the difference between right

513
00:27:14.160 --> 00:27:17.599
<v Speaker 4>and wrong, and civilization and barbarism. And I think Trump

514
00:27:18.359 --> 00:27:21.160
<v Speaker 4>for right now is our best bet in the fight

515
00:27:21.200 --> 00:27:22.960
<v Speaker 4>for the West. We'll have another election in twenty eight

516
00:27:23.000 --> 00:27:25.240
<v Speaker 4>and hopefully the next people that come along and see

517
00:27:25.240 --> 00:27:25.880
<v Speaker 4>it the way he does.

518
00:27:26.039 --> 00:27:27.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I want to ask you about that. I

519
00:27:27.960 --> 00:27:31.240
<v Speaker 2>want to ask you what you think happens next. Obviously,

520
00:27:31.440 --> 00:27:34.279
<v Speaker 2>there's been a great deal of debate on the right

521
00:27:34.440 --> 00:27:37.960
<v Speaker 2>in conservatism, in the Republican Party about Trump. I am

522
00:27:38.160 --> 00:27:40.319
<v Speaker 2>critical of him in many ways. There's a lot of

523
00:27:40.400 --> 00:27:43.240
<v Speaker 2>things he does and thinks that I don't like, although

524
00:27:43.799 --> 00:27:45.599
<v Speaker 2>he also does a lot of things that I do like,

525
00:27:46.079 --> 00:27:50.440
<v Speaker 2>and I think much of his legacy will be positive.

526
00:27:51.279 --> 00:27:53.440
<v Speaker 2>When we talk about this at National Reviewer on the

527
00:27:53.519 --> 00:27:59.839
<v Speaker 2>Ricochet podcast, we often bring it into broader ideological fights

528
00:28:00.119 --> 00:28:04.000
<v Speaker 2>have obtained for years. But Trump also is Suey Gennaris.

529
00:28:04.039 --> 00:28:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Trump is a rock star. He has been for years.

530
00:28:07.640 --> 00:28:09.519
<v Speaker 2>It's one of the reasons he won the nomination. He's

531
00:28:09.559 --> 00:28:12.240
<v Speaker 2>extremely charismatic, he's quite funny. He's larger than life. Even

532
00:28:12.279 --> 00:28:15.839
<v Speaker 2>when he's being awful. He's interesting. I wonder how much

533
00:28:15.960 --> 00:28:19.480
<v Speaker 2>of the Trump phenomenon do you think is Trump and

534
00:28:19.559 --> 00:28:22.440
<v Speaker 2>how much is it a reflection of real changes in

535
00:28:22.480 --> 00:28:25.799
<v Speaker 2>the way that Republican voters and Americans generally started to

536
00:28:25.839 --> 00:28:26.960
<v Speaker 2>think ten years ago.

537
00:28:27.640 --> 00:28:30.119
<v Speaker 4>Great question, and I should have said in my answer

538
00:28:30.200 --> 00:28:33.799
<v Speaker 4>about Shoprev. One of the first things I do every

539
00:28:33.880 --> 00:28:36.960
<v Speaker 4>day is see what Charles is saying about any particular issue,

540
00:28:37.039 --> 00:28:41.039
<v Speaker 4>because you and I don't always track, but like ninety

541
00:28:41.079 --> 00:28:44.240
<v Speaker 4>eight percent of the time I'm tracking, and so your

542
00:28:44.799 --> 00:28:48.400
<v Speaker 4>your takes and your insights on things are actually quite invaluable.

543
00:28:48.400 --> 00:28:50.559
<v Speaker 4>Thank you, although we've never met in person, and I

544
00:28:50.599 --> 00:28:52.799
<v Speaker 4>was wanted to do this because you're You're my hero,

545
00:28:53.400 --> 00:28:58.480
<v Speaker 4>I am, so I asked him about this once. I

546
00:28:58.519 --> 00:29:02.079
<v Speaker 4>asked Trump, who who is best prepared to carry on

547
00:29:02.160 --> 00:29:06.160
<v Speaker 4>your political coalition or your political movement? And he answered

548
00:29:06.160 --> 00:29:08.039
<v Speaker 4>me for about five minutes and didn't name a single

549
00:29:08.119 --> 00:29:11.880
<v Speaker 4>name because I think he knows that he's singular and

550
00:29:12.400 --> 00:29:16.559
<v Speaker 4>his personality, his charisma, the way he does it, his humor,

551
00:29:16.640 --> 00:29:18.359
<v Speaker 4>he's singular. Now, this is true of a lot of

552
00:29:18.400 --> 00:29:22.480
<v Speaker 4>two term presidents, and who replaced Obama? Nobody really who

553
00:29:22.519 --> 00:29:26.640
<v Speaker 4>replaced Bill Clinton? Nobody who replaced Reagan Bush wins the election,

554
00:29:26.720 --> 00:29:29.359
<v Speaker 4>but then as a one term president. So you know,

555
00:29:29.480 --> 00:29:33.200
<v Speaker 4>I don't think anybody can replace him in the way

556
00:29:33.240 --> 00:29:37.079
<v Speaker 4>he does it. So replicating it is impossible. But can

557
00:29:37.119 --> 00:29:40.319
<v Speaker 4>someone hold it together, add to it, build their own coalition,

558
00:29:40.880 --> 00:29:44.119
<v Speaker 4>bring new people in. Absolutely the biggest challenge for that

559
00:29:44.160 --> 00:29:46.440
<v Speaker 4>person is going to be how do you get people

560
00:29:46.480 --> 00:29:49.839
<v Speaker 4>who have only ever voted for Trump to vote for you?

561
00:29:50.440 --> 00:29:52.599
<v Speaker 4>When we haven't really fixed this in the Republican Party.

562
00:29:52.839 --> 00:29:54.960
<v Speaker 4>There's a lot of people who leave the ballot blank.

563
00:29:55.079 --> 00:29:57.119
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we left like four Senate races on the

564
00:29:57.119 --> 00:29:59.079
<v Speaker 4>table last year because they vote Trump and then they

565
00:29:59.160 --> 00:30:01.920
<v Speaker 4>leave the rest of it. That'll be true for any

566
00:30:01.960 --> 00:30:05.160
<v Speaker 4>other Republican that comes next, who I suspect will be jd.

567
00:30:05.279 --> 00:30:05.559
<v Speaker 1>Vance.

568
00:30:05.640 --> 00:30:07.160
<v Speaker 4>I don't have any reason to believe he won't be

569
00:30:07.200 --> 00:30:10.640
<v Speaker 4>the nominee, and he has pretty good ratings right now,

570
00:30:10.640 --> 00:30:11.839
<v Speaker 4>and if he and Marco.

571
00:30:11.640 --> 00:30:14.319
<v Speaker 5>Rubio team up, that would be quite a formidable thing.

572
00:30:14.839 --> 00:30:16.559
<v Speaker 5>But it still doesn't quite.

573
00:30:16.359 --> 00:30:19.599
<v Speaker 4>Solve the issue of these people who love Trump, who

574
00:30:19.640 --> 00:30:22.440
<v Speaker 4>only participate in politics for Trump. You know where do

575
00:30:22.519 --> 00:30:24.079
<v Speaker 4>they go? Do they come back at all? I mean,

576
00:30:24.119 --> 00:30:26.559
<v Speaker 4>let's be honest. They vote for Trump because they view

577
00:30:26.640 --> 00:30:29.519
<v Speaker 4>him as not a politician. He's an outsider, and they

578
00:30:29.599 --> 00:30:33.039
<v Speaker 4>elected him to smash political institutions and to smash the

579
00:30:33.039 --> 00:30:36.079
<v Speaker 4>politicians that they hate, to smash the media that they hate.

580
00:30:36.559 --> 00:30:38.279
<v Speaker 4>In order to keep them in. You would have to

581
00:30:38.319 --> 00:30:40.960
<v Speaker 4>portray that same kind of attitude. I don't know if

582
00:30:40.960 --> 00:30:43.000
<v Speaker 4>anybody else can do it. Because of the time that

583
00:30:43.039 --> 00:30:46.480
<v Speaker 4>Trump came along, he came along against the Clintons. I mean,

584
00:30:47.000 --> 00:30:49.160
<v Speaker 4>it may be too unique to ever expect anybody to

585
00:30:49.200 --> 00:30:49.640
<v Speaker 4>do it again.

586
00:30:50.240 --> 00:30:52.079
<v Speaker 1>Can I put in here, Charlie with a sequel to

587
00:30:52.119 --> 00:30:55.680
<v Speaker 1>your last question, and it's I mean, that's always the

588
00:30:55.680 --> 00:30:58.559
<v Speaker 1>succession question is always crucial. You mentioned, you know, I'm

589
00:30:58.599 --> 00:31:00.599
<v Speaker 1>a student Reagan and you know up with him, and

590
00:31:02.119 --> 00:31:06.039
<v Speaker 1>never mind how Bush squandered Reagan's legacy. But one of

591
00:31:06.079 --> 00:31:09.119
<v Speaker 1>the marks of a transformative president is not so much

592
00:31:09.119 --> 00:31:11.000
<v Speaker 1>what they do to their own party and whether they

593
00:31:11.039 --> 00:31:15.000
<v Speaker 1>have a succession, but how they transform the other party.

594
00:31:15.160 --> 00:31:17.759
<v Speaker 1>So even Democrats and took them having to get beaten

595
00:31:17.839 --> 00:31:21.039
<v Speaker 1>by landslides three times to return to the middle. And

596
00:31:21.839 --> 00:31:23.559
<v Speaker 1>you may be familiar with this. There's a whole school

597
00:31:23.640 --> 00:31:26.839
<v Speaker 1>thought among progressives that Bill Clinton sold out to Reaganism.

598
00:31:27.440 --> 00:31:29.519
<v Speaker 1>And there's a certain way in which is that is true.

599
00:31:30.039 --> 00:31:32.359
<v Speaker 1>And so as you're watching Democrats right now, you can

600
00:31:32.440 --> 00:31:35.680
<v Speaker 1>see some smartmans like ruy to Cher who've had on

601
00:31:35.680 --> 00:31:38.599
<v Speaker 1>this podcast and others saying, boy, Democrats got to dump

602
00:31:38.599 --> 00:31:41.880
<v Speaker 1>all this identitarianism stuff. They need to embrace the abundance

603
00:31:41.920 --> 00:31:44.519
<v Speaker 1>agenda and be pro growth like John F. Kennedy. In

604
00:31:44.559 --> 00:31:46.720
<v Speaker 1>other words, Democrats have to get rid of a lot

605
00:31:46.720 --> 00:31:49.440
<v Speaker 1>of what cost him the election. Are you seeing any

606
00:31:49.599 --> 00:31:54.599
<v Speaker 1>signs of that? Instead? It's Trump arrangement syndrome all the

607
00:31:54.599 --> 00:31:58.079
<v Speaker 1>way down. With maybe the possible exception of your home

608
00:31:58.119 --> 00:32:00.599
<v Speaker 1>state's governor. So two part question, tell us if you

609
00:32:00.640 --> 00:32:03.480
<v Speaker 1>want about Kentucky's governor, if you think he is a

610
00:32:03.599 --> 00:32:06.759
<v Speaker 1>plausible threat to a Trump succession. And then more broadly,

611
00:32:07.039 --> 00:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>do you see any signs or what should we watch

612
00:32:09.240 --> 00:32:11.279
<v Speaker 1>for to see how Trump was going to transform the

613
00:32:11.400 --> 00:32:12.519
<v Speaker 1>other party?

614
00:32:13.119 --> 00:32:16.480
<v Speaker 4>The shifting coalitions of the two parties under Trump is fascinating.

615
00:32:16.519 --> 00:32:19.119
<v Speaker 4>I mean, all the Clinton Democrats from the nineties are

616
00:32:19.119 --> 00:32:21.640
<v Speaker 4>now Republicans. I mean, like my dad, I mean, and

617
00:32:21.880 --> 00:32:24.480
<v Speaker 4>we've adopted some of the economic theories is I know,

618
00:32:24.559 --> 00:32:26.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, And so they've come into the Republican party,

619
00:32:27.000 --> 00:32:31.079
<v Speaker 4>these working class democrats who liked protectionism, who thought the

620
00:32:31.119 --> 00:32:34.160
<v Speaker 4>state should be doing more. So they come in for

621
00:32:34.359 --> 00:32:37.119
<v Speaker 4>economic reasons and for cultural reason. They're not into the

622
00:32:37.119 --> 00:32:40.680
<v Speaker 4>transgender stuff. You know, they're not into DEI. And so

623
00:32:40.880 --> 00:32:46.559
<v Speaker 4>they just totally rejected the modern cultural and economic liberalism

624
00:32:47.079 --> 00:32:47.960
<v Speaker 4>and the attitude of.

625
00:32:48.319 --> 00:32:50.519
<v Speaker 5>Liberals today because it's not what they grew up with.

626
00:32:50.599 --> 00:32:51.240
<v Speaker 5>I don't like it.

627
00:32:51.319 --> 00:32:53.880
<v Speaker 4>And Trump was able to appeal to them and absorb

628
00:32:54.000 --> 00:32:55.319
<v Speaker 4>some of what they wanted to do.

629
00:32:55.920 --> 00:32:57.799
<v Speaker 5>Will they ever go back? I don't know.

630
00:32:57.839 --> 00:33:00.279
<v Speaker 4>I don't think they will, because my view is, answer

631
00:33:00.319 --> 00:33:03.440
<v Speaker 4>your question, the Democrats haven't learned anything. I mean, I

632
00:33:03.440 --> 00:33:07.279
<v Speaker 4>think they're doubling down on the lurch to the left,

633
00:33:07.480 --> 00:33:11.039
<v Speaker 4>particularly culturally. That cost them all these people in the

634
00:33:11.079 --> 00:33:13.319
<v Speaker 4>first place. And look where the energy is. Look who

635
00:33:13.359 --> 00:33:16.680
<v Speaker 4>they nominated for this house race in Tennessee the other day.

636
00:33:16.960 --> 00:33:20.119
<v Speaker 4>They found the craziest person they could find videos of

637
00:33:20.160 --> 00:33:22.599
<v Speaker 4>her on the internet, like running into the Texas Tennessee

638
00:33:22.599 --> 00:33:26.480
<v Speaker 4>Governor's office, screaming, being dragged out. This sort of performance,

639
00:33:26.759 --> 00:33:30.359
<v Speaker 4>radical liberalism, that's what they want. They had a guy

640
00:33:30.400 --> 00:33:32.279
<v Speaker 4>in Texas lined up to run for the Senate. Now

641
00:33:32.359 --> 00:33:34.680
<v Speaker 4>Jasmine Crockett's going to run him. I bet she wins.

642
00:33:35.279 --> 00:33:36.839
<v Speaker 4>They have Mondani in New York.

643
00:33:37.200 --> 00:33:38.000
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it's.

644
00:33:37.839 --> 00:33:41.440
<v Speaker 4>Pretty apparent that the energy in their party is with

645
00:33:41.599 --> 00:33:45.400
<v Speaker 4>the radicals, with the liberals, with the anti America crowd,

646
00:33:45.440 --> 00:33:48.759
<v Speaker 4>with the people who don't believe in Western civilization, frankly,

647
00:33:48.880 --> 00:33:49.240
<v Speaker 4>and that's.

648
00:33:49.160 --> 00:33:50.519
<v Speaker 5>Who they're going to continue to nominate.

649
00:33:50.559 --> 00:33:54.200
<v Speaker 4>It. Maybe what saves the Republicans in the midterms is

650
00:33:54.440 --> 00:33:58.440
<v Speaker 4>Democrats just can't bring themselves to nominate regular, normal, everyday

651
00:33:58.480 --> 00:34:02.000
<v Speaker 4>people like where they're headed. To answer your question about

652
00:34:02.000 --> 00:34:04.319
<v Speaker 4>Andy Basher. I've known him since I was sixteen, were

653
00:34:04.359 --> 00:34:07.400
<v Speaker 4>the exact same age, and I think.

654
00:34:07.240 --> 00:34:09.159
<v Speaker 5>He's quite liberal.

655
00:34:09.199 --> 00:34:11.480
<v Speaker 4>He's more liberal, certainly than he has led on to

656
00:34:11.559 --> 00:34:14.280
<v Speaker 4>the people of Kentucky. He has saved from his own

657
00:34:14.599 --> 00:34:17.920
<v Speaker 4>liberalism by the Republican legislature there. We have super majorities

658
00:34:17.920 --> 00:34:20.840
<v Speaker 4>in both chambers. They don't permit him to do anything crazy.

659
00:34:21.360 --> 00:34:23.639
<v Speaker 4>But deep down he's quite liberal. Does he have the

660
00:34:23.679 --> 00:34:25.079
<v Speaker 4>performative piece of it down?

661
00:34:25.760 --> 00:34:25.960
<v Speaker 1>No?

662
00:34:26.280 --> 00:34:28.719
<v Speaker 4>And I think that's where he probably will fall short

663
00:34:29.239 --> 00:34:31.800
<v Speaker 4>in this Democratic primary. If the party wants you to

664
00:34:31.840 --> 00:34:36.599
<v Speaker 4>be more performance based, more radically performative, Basher will have

665
00:34:36.599 --> 00:34:37.719
<v Speaker 4>a hard time replicating them.

666
00:34:38.440 --> 00:34:43.199
<v Speaker 2>So if you advising the Democrats, who would you tell

667
00:34:43.320 --> 00:34:46.480
<v Speaker 2>them to pick and what two things would you tell

668
00:34:46.519 --> 00:34:48.840
<v Speaker 2>them to cut out to have a shot?

669
00:34:50.000 --> 00:34:54.440
<v Speaker 4>Well, their most popular governor is probably Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania.

670
00:34:54.800 --> 00:34:56.840
<v Speaker 4>I mean, that's what the polling currently says, and he

671
00:34:56.920 --> 00:34:59.960
<v Speaker 4>tends to attract some moderate and even Republican support in Pennsylvan,

672
00:35:00.679 --> 00:35:03.159
<v Speaker 4>a state you have to win with a population that

673
00:35:03.199 --> 00:35:05.639
<v Speaker 4>if you can win over people there, you can see

674
00:35:05.639 --> 00:35:07.719
<v Speaker 4>the appeal of it in other swing states. He'll have

675
00:35:07.840 --> 00:35:10.960
<v Speaker 4>quite a problem because He's Jewish, and the Democratic Party

676
00:35:10.960 --> 00:35:14.039
<v Speaker 4>has decided that they hate Israel, and by and large

677
00:35:14.079 --> 00:35:16.840
<v Speaker 4>they're skeptical of the Jewish population in the United States.

678
00:35:16.920 --> 00:35:19.159
<v Speaker 4>So he's going to have a hard time. But somebody

679
00:35:19.280 --> 00:35:21.280
<v Speaker 4>like that is probably.

680
00:35:20.800 --> 00:35:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Their best bet.

681
00:35:21.480 --> 00:35:23.239
<v Speaker 4>The other way to go is do what the Republicans

682
00:35:23.239 --> 00:35:26.119
<v Speaker 4>did and just go totally to the outside. I mean,

683
00:35:26.159 --> 00:35:29.000
<v Speaker 4>after the twenty twelve election, which I worked in, the

684
00:35:29.039 --> 00:35:32.719
<v Speaker 4>party was so depressed and demoralized. It decided that there

685
00:35:32.760 --> 00:35:35.519
<v Speaker 4>isn't a single electric Republican in the country that we trust.

686
00:35:36.000 --> 00:35:37.760
<v Speaker 4>We're going to go find somebody else. And that would

687
00:35:37.800 --> 00:35:39.360
<v Speaker 4>be the other way for the Democrats to do. It

688
00:35:39.400 --> 00:35:43.840
<v Speaker 4>find a charismatic outsider who's a little bit ideologically flexible

689
00:35:44.719 --> 00:35:47.840
<v Speaker 4>and gives them that gives them the flexibility to keep.

690
00:35:47.639 --> 00:35:49.079
<v Speaker 5>Some things throw things out.

691
00:35:49.440 --> 00:35:51.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm not a politician, you know, I don't have to

692
00:35:51.440 --> 00:35:56.400
<v Speaker 4>adhere to these ideological guardrails. That might be the other

693
00:35:56.440 --> 00:35:58.199
<v Speaker 4>way to go. And they have plenty of celebrities to

694
00:35:58.280 --> 00:35:59.840
<v Speaker 4>choose from. If any of them are willing to get

695
00:35:59.840 --> 00:36:01.920
<v Speaker 4>in to it. I suspect they might have some room

696
00:36:01.960 --> 00:36:03.760
<v Speaker 4>to run in their primary. What would I get rid

697
00:36:03.840 --> 00:36:06.280
<v Speaker 4>of I would immediately get rid of the wrong side

698
00:36:06.280 --> 00:36:09.719
<v Speaker 4>of all these eighty twenty issues. Jettison the transgender stuff,

699
00:36:10.000 --> 00:36:15.039
<v Speaker 4>jettison the DEI stuff, jettison the condescending attitude towards men.

700
00:36:15.400 --> 00:36:17.719
<v Speaker 4>In the Quinnipiac poll this week, they have a fifteen

701
00:36:17.760 --> 00:36:23.000
<v Speaker 4>percent approval rating among men, fifteen They are down to friends, family,

702
00:36:24.079 --> 00:36:28.800
<v Speaker 4>health insurance executives, illegal aliens, and maybe some transgenders. And

703
00:36:28.840 --> 00:36:32.119
<v Speaker 4>that's what they're down to right now, eighteen percent overall,

704
00:36:32.199 --> 00:36:35.280
<v Speaker 4>fifteen percent among men. You can't win that way, and

705
00:36:35.280 --> 00:36:37.639
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't advise them to keep going down this path.

706
00:36:37.679 --> 00:36:39.880
<v Speaker 5>I mean, that's what they're doing now. But it's a

707
00:36:39.920 --> 00:36:40.880
<v Speaker 5>terrible dead end.

708
00:36:41.559 --> 00:36:43.920
<v Speaker 2>And what about on the right, not who would we choose?

709
00:36:43.920 --> 00:36:48.639
<v Speaker 2>We've covered that, but do Republicans or does Trump himself

710
00:36:48.760 --> 00:36:53.280
<v Speaker 2>do things that you think should be walked back or

711
00:36:53.320 --> 00:36:56.440
<v Speaker 2>cut out completely lest it damage him ahead of the

712
00:36:56.440 --> 00:36:59.159
<v Speaker 2>midterms and the party in twenty twenty eight.

713
00:37:00.119 --> 00:37:07.159
<v Speaker 4>Well, his communications attitude sometimes interrupts better stories that he'd

714
00:37:07.239 --> 00:37:10.719
<v Speaker 4>rather be telling. I mean, the Reiner comment this week

715
00:37:10.800 --> 00:37:12.320
<v Speaker 4>is a case in point. I don't think he should

716
00:37:12.360 --> 00:37:15.039
<v Speaker 4>have done that, and it took focus off of other

717
00:37:15.079 --> 00:37:17.440
<v Speaker 4>things he wanted to be talking about. For twenty four hours.

718
00:37:17.440 --> 00:37:19.280
<v Speaker 4>This happens over time. You're never going to get him

719
00:37:19.280 --> 00:37:23.000
<v Speaker 4>to stop. And that's who he is. And you know, look,

720
00:37:23.039 --> 00:37:25.079
<v Speaker 4>I voted for him three times. I've learned to accept

721
00:37:25.079 --> 00:37:26.599
<v Speaker 4>it for what it is and for who he is,

722
00:37:26.679 --> 00:37:30.400
<v Speaker 4>and it's part of his ethos. It's unnecessary I think

723
00:37:30.440 --> 00:37:34.840
<v Speaker 4>for winning in the future. From a policy perspective, the

724
00:37:34.920 --> 00:37:37.920
<v Speaker 4>next person, if it's Jade Vance, is going to have

725
00:37:38.000 --> 00:37:40.800
<v Speaker 4>to He'll be in an interesting position because he'll be

726
00:37:40.840 --> 00:37:43.159
<v Speaker 4>defending the Trump legacy and.

727
00:37:43.159 --> 00:37:45.960
<v Speaker 5>All the good and whatever the voters think is good

728
00:37:46.039 --> 00:37:47.320
<v Speaker 5>or whatever they think is bad.

729
00:37:47.719 --> 00:37:50.559
<v Speaker 4>But he'll also be trying to portray his own platform,

730
00:37:50.559 --> 00:37:52.639
<v Speaker 4>which I actually think is somewhat different than Trump. I

731
00:37:52.679 --> 00:37:55.199
<v Speaker 4>think he's got different views on foreign policy. I think

732
00:37:55.199 --> 00:37:58.480
<v Speaker 4>he's got different views in some ways on economics. And

733
00:37:59.440 --> 00:38:02.880
<v Speaker 4>so while defending one legacy and promoting your own agenda,

734
00:38:02.960 --> 00:38:07.960
<v Speaker 4>it's a tricky thing. But you know, my general view

735
00:38:08.039 --> 00:38:12.280
<v Speaker 4>is is that the next person should not try to

736
00:38:12.320 --> 00:38:18.079
<v Speaker 4>replicate Trump's attitude that sometimes interrupts, you know, what he

737
00:38:18.159 --> 00:38:21.880
<v Speaker 4>wants to be the message of the day. You shouldn't

738
00:38:21.880 --> 00:38:23.440
<v Speaker 4>think that you have to do that because it won't

739
00:38:23.480 --> 00:38:25.880
<v Speaker 4>be authentic to you and no one will think that

740
00:38:25.920 --> 00:38:26.360
<v Speaker 4>it is.

741
00:38:26.960 --> 00:38:28.400
<v Speaker 5>And it'll get you off track.

742
00:38:28.480 --> 00:38:30.360
<v Speaker 4>And so I think it's fine to let Trump do

743
00:38:30.400 --> 00:38:32.559
<v Speaker 4>it because that's who Trump is. But to try to

744
00:38:32.599 --> 00:38:35.199
<v Speaker 4>replicate that, or to think that you have to replicate.

745
00:38:34.800 --> 00:38:36.159
<v Speaker 1>That in the future, would be a mistake.

746
00:38:37.920 --> 00:38:38.280
<v Speaker 2>Steve.

747
00:38:39.239 --> 00:38:42.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So I'm gonna go back to the question that

748
00:38:42.840 --> 00:38:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Charles asked you about, and it's in your title. One

749
00:38:45.760 --> 00:38:48.039
<v Speaker 1>of the things I find so unique about your book

750
00:38:48.239 --> 00:38:50.000
<v Speaker 1>is in contrast to all the other books, let me

751
00:38:50.079 --> 00:38:51.880
<v Speaker 1>put it that way. There's so many books out there,

752
00:38:51.920 --> 00:38:53.679
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them very good about how Trump has

753
00:38:53.719 --> 00:38:58.320
<v Speaker 1>captured the populace turn recognizing things that many Republicans didn't

754
00:38:58.360 --> 00:39:01.480
<v Speaker 1>recognize going on in the country, and lots of good

755
00:39:01.559 --> 00:39:04.559
<v Speaker 1>date about that and all the rest. But you've connected

756
00:39:04.559 --> 00:39:07.239
<v Speaker 1>it to common sense. But then the other side of

757
00:39:07.280 --> 00:39:10.079
<v Speaker 1>it is, I'm really glad you connected the question of

758
00:39:10.119 --> 00:39:13.239
<v Speaker 1>the survival of Western civilization. And here's the part I

759
00:39:13.280 --> 00:39:16.199
<v Speaker 1>still have a hard time trying to understand or convey

760
00:39:16.199 --> 00:39:19.159
<v Speaker 1>to people. I think you're absolutely right about that. I

761
00:39:19.199 --> 00:39:22.000
<v Speaker 1>think he is the champion of Western civilization, and the

762
00:39:22.000 --> 00:39:25.920
<v Speaker 1>fact that he's so popular overseas with other populist parties

763
00:39:25.960 --> 00:39:29.280
<v Speaker 1>other people in Europe. I was in Dublin, Ireland last

764
00:39:29.360 --> 00:39:32.400
<v Speaker 1>June when there was a massive protests from the populace

765
00:39:32.440 --> 00:39:37.920
<v Speaker 1>there against what's the Irish government governing miserably, especially on

766
00:39:37.920 --> 00:39:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the immigration question. And I took lots of pictures of

767
00:39:41.480 --> 00:39:46.159
<v Speaker 1>all people carrying God blessed Donald Trump signs in Dublin, Ireland, right,

768
00:39:46.199 --> 00:39:48.679
<v Speaker 1>And we know that in the continent too. But here's

769
00:39:48.719 --> 00:39:50.280
<v Speaker 1>what sort of odd is when I think of the

770
00:39:50.639 --> 00:39:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and maybe it's because I have a PhD. And that's

771
00:39:52.480 --> 00:39:55.559
<v Speaker 1>my handicap, but I think of the champions of Western

772
00:39:55.599 --> 00:39:58.079
<v Speaker 1>civilization that we love in the modern era. And of course,

773
00:39:58.119 --> 00:40:01.360
<v Speaker 1>you know Churchill comes to mind, Ronald Reagan and John F. Kennedy,

774
00:40:01.760 --> 00:40:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Pat moynihan, for example, and you know they all spoke

775
00:40:04.960 --> 00:40:10.480
<v Speaker 1>in their elegant, highly grounded rhetoric with you know, classical

776
00:40:10.519 --> 00:40:13.639
<v Speaker 1>references and all the rest. And Trump is not like

777
00:40:13.719 --> 00:40:17.360
<v Speaker 1>that rhetorically at all, except once in a while. I know,

778
00:40:17.400 --> 00:40:19.559
<v Speaker 1>as speechwriters are very good either friends of mine, some

779
00:40:19.599 --> 00:40:21.559
<v Speaker 1>of them, and they write very good speeches. And he'll

780
00:40:21.599 --> 00:40:25.360
<v Speaker 1>sometimes will strike those notes in the text. Great, that's wonderful,

781
00:40:25.400 --> 00:40:29.960
<v Speaker 1>but it's not his natural not his natural rhetorical style,

782
00:40:30.079 --> 00:40:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and yet there he is and is that instinct. I

783
00:40:34.880 --> 00:40:36.519
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you talked to him about that in

784
00:40:36.559 --> 00:40:39.840
<v Speaker 1>more detail than just the headline in your book. That's

785
00:40:39.840 --> 00:40:41.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of a rambling question. But this, to me is

786
00:40:41.880 --> 00:40:43.679
<v Speaker 1>the most interesting aspect of Trump.

787
00:40:44.679 --> 00:40:46.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I don't think he thinks of it the way

788
00:40:46.400 --> 00:40:48.400
<v Speaker 4>that I do, or maybe the way that you all do,

789
00:40:49.400 --> 00:40:50.480
<v Speaker 4>because he's very.

790
00:40:50.320 --> 00:40:50.840
<v Speaker 1>In the moment.

791
00:40:50.920 --> 00:40:51.920
<v Speaker 5>He's a counterpuncher.

792
00:40:51.960 --> 00:40:53.039
<v Speaker 1>He's dealing with as.

793
00:40:52.960 --> 00:40:54.360
<v Speaker 5>They him in the moment.

794
00:40:54.440 --> 00:40:57.400
<v Speaker 4>I tend to think of this over time, and if

795
00:40:57.400 --> 00:41:00.199
<v Speaker 4>we make mistakes today, over time, what will those mistakes

796
00:41:00.760 --> 00:41:03.360
<v Speaker 4>due to us? But I tend to find that when

797
00:41:03.360 --> 00:41:05.519
<v Speaker 4>it comes to these issues, he almost always makes the

798
00:41:05.599 --> 00:41:09.159
<v Speaker 4>right decision. Even though he has people in his coalition

799
00:41:09.480 --> 00:41:12.199
<v Speaker 4>or that claim to be in his coalition that have

800
00:41:12.280 --> 00:41:15.239
<v Speaker 4>constantly tried to ascribe positions to him that he does

801
00:41:15.280 --> 00:41:17.679
<v Speaker 4>not have but they want him to have, he tends

802
00:41:17.719 --> 00:41:20.840
<v Speaker 4>to shake it off and resist it, particularly on foreign affairs.

803
00:41:20.880 --> 00:41:22.960
<v Speaker 4>I mean, there's all sorts of isolationists out there that

804
00:41:23.000 --> 00:41:25.639
<v Speaker 4>have forever wanted him to be one of them.

805
00:41:25.960 --> 00:41:26.360
<v Speaker 5>He's not.

806
00:41:26.760 --> 00:41:29.960
<v Speaker 4>He's always supported American engagement when it was smart. He's

807
00:41:29.960 --> 00:41:33.360
<v Speaker 4>not an adventurist, but he has not shied away from

808
00:41:33.360 --> 00:41:36.519
<v Speaker 4>an American engagement. And look what's happened. You know, we

809
00:41:36.599 --> 00:41:41.039
<v Speaker 4>took out Solomoni in Iran in his first term. We

810
00:41:41.440 --> 00:41:44.280
<v Speaker 4>fired cruise missiles into Syria. We got the living hostages

811
00:41:44.280 --> 00:41:47.079
<v Speaker 4>home from Gaza. He has solved some of these conflicts

812
00:41:47.079 --> 00:41:51.159
<v Speaker 4>around the world. We've got the Venezuela surrounded by the

813
00:41:51.280 --> 00:41:56.280
<v Speaker 4>US Navy. I mean, he's obviously for American engagement, even

814
00:41:56.280 --> 00:41:58.000
<v Speaker 4>though a lot of people have been hanging on him

815
00:41:58.039 --> 00:42:00.760
<v Speaker 4>to change his views on that or or to fall

816
00:42:00.760 --> 00:42:04.079
<v Speaker 4>in line with their views. I think those things are

817
00:42:04.159 --> 00:42:07.480
<v Speaker 4>ultimately good for protection of the West. It's certainly good

818
00:42:07.480 --> 00:42:09.920
<v Speaker 4>for the protection of the Western hemisphere. But you know,

819
00:42:10.360 --> 00:42:15.320
<v Speaker 4>an engaged America, a strong American president has most of

820
00:42:15.360 --> 00:42:17.480
<v Speaker 4>the time been pretty good for the world. And I

821
00:42:17.480 --> 00:42:20.119
<v Speaker 4>think Trump has shown us that. I do think next

822
00:42:20.119 --> 00:42:22.639
<v Speaker 4>time round there's going to be another attempt by the

823
00:42:22.679 --> 00:42:26.960
<v Speaker 4>isolationists who believe that American engagement in the world is

824
00:42:27.039 --> 00:42:30.760
<v Speaker 4>bad or somehow bad for us as Americans. I think

825
00:42:30.760 --> 00:42:32.480
<v Speaker 4>they're going to push to make that a central part

826
00:42:32.519 --> 00:42:34.360
<v Speaker 4>of the Republican platform, and I think we ought to

827
00:42:34.360 --> 00:42:36.559
<v Speaker 4>reject that. I think we ought to follow Donald Trump's lead.

828
00:42:37.559 --> 00:42:40.079
<v Speaker 4>You don't have to rhetorically be into this all the time,

829
00:42:40.400 --> 00:42:42.039
<v Speaker 4>but as a matter of action, if you make the

830
00:42:42.119 --> 00:42:45.519
<v Speaker 4>right decision about smart American engagement, you can make a

831
00:42:45.599 --> 00:42:48.199
<v Speaker 4>very positive difference. I mean, I think a big debate

832
00:42:48.280 --> 00:42:50.800
<v Speaker 4>in twenty eight is what is the Trump legacy on

833
00:42:50.880 --> 00:42:51.679
<v Speaker 4>foreign affairs.

834
00:42:52.599 --> 00:42:53.960
<v Speaker 5>It's going to look pretty darn good.

835
00:42:54.159 --> 00:42:56.199
<v Speaker 4>And I don't really want to have a campaign in

836
00:42:56.239 --> 00:42:58.760
<v Speaker 4>twenty eight where people where both parties are arguing that

837
00:42:59.360 --> 00:43:02.079
<v Speaker 4>somehow Trump way of doing it over two terms was incorrect.

838
00:43:02.079 --> 00:43:05.239
<v Speaker 4>I think it's far superior to what the famously indecisive

839
00:43:05.280 --> 00:43:08.119
<v Speaker 4>and wee Joe Biden was doing, far superior to what

840
00:43:08.159 --> 00:43:10.199
<v Speaker 4>Obama did, And I'd rather do it the Trump way

841
00:43:10.239 --> 00:43:12.719
<v Speaker 4>than the way that they did it. I just I

842
00:43:12.719 --> 00:43:16.440
<v Speaker 4>don't want to see this lurch to the isolationist take

843
00:43:16.440 --> 00:43:17.920
<v Speaker 4>hold of the republic platform.

844
00:43:18.519 --> 00:43:21.360
<v Speaker 1>So I have one last question for you before we

845
00:43:21.480 --> 00:43:24.480
<v Speaker 1>let you begin your show prep for today. It's a

846
00:43:24.519 --> 00:43:27.320
<v Speaker 1>bit of a delicate one and it concerns your friend

847
00:43:27.400 --> 00:43:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and I think at one time former employer Mitch McConnell

848
00:43:30.760 --> 00:43:33.960
<v Speaker 1>from your home state. And first of all, I am

849
00:43:34.000 --> 00:43:36.199
<v Speaker 1>not one of the naysayers of Mitch McConnell. I think

850
00:43:36.199 --> 00:43:39.000
<v Speaker 1>he's been the greatest Senate majority leader since Lyndon Johnson

851
00:43:39.039 --> 00:43:41.360
<v Speaker 1>in the fifties. So I don't talk smack about him

852
00:43:41.360 --> 00:43:43.480
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of people do. That said, I don't

853
00:43:43.519 --> 00:43:46.079
<v Speaker 1>think it's a secret that he hasn't been on the

854
00:43:46.119 --> 00:43:49.639
<v Speaker 1>best of terms or had the best regard for Trump.

855
00:43:49.760 --> 00:43:52.440
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know if you can. Maybe it's personal,

856
00:43:52.440 --> 00:43:56.199
<v Speaker 1>and I don't want to have you trying disclose confidences,

857
00:43:56.239 --> 00:43:58.800
<v Speaker 1>but I wonder if you might say something about that,

858
00:43:58.880 --> 00:44:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and whether partly it's it's an institutional thing, I mean,

859
00:44:02.159 --> 00:44:05.280
<v Speaker 1>among other of McConnell's virtues as a respector of the

860
00:44:05.320 --> 00:44:08.440
<v Speaker 1>separation of powers and the prerogatives of the Senate, which Trump,

861
00:44:09.440 --> 00:44:12.639
<v Speaker 1>so to say, is not always so a cognizant of right.

862
00:44:12.719 --> 00:44:15.079
<v Speaker 1>So I don't say a little bit about that obviously

863
00:44:15.199 --> 00:44:16.320
<v Speaker 1>difficult relationship.

864
00:44:17.199 --> 00:44:21.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they're not golfing buddies, that's right, and that's and look,

865
00:44:21.119 --> 00:44:22.960
<v Speaker 4>by the way, that's fine. I don't need all my

866
00:44:23.000 --> 00:44:26.280
<v Speaker 4>Republicans and all my Conservatives to be hanging out every weekend.

867
00:44:26.320 --> 00:44:27.800
<v Speaker 4>What I need them to do is to do things

868
00:44:27.880 --> 00:44:30.800
<v Speaker 4>that we want them to do, like cut my taxes,

869
00:44:30.920 --> 00:44:33.599
<v Speaker 4>which they did, and then they made that permanent. I

870
00:44:34.039 --> 00:44:37.159
<v Speaker 4>need them to make the Supreme Court conservative, which.

871
00:44:36.960 --> 00:44:37.719
<v Speaker 5>They did together.

872
00:44:37.760 --> 00:44:39.559
<v Speaker 4>I mean, these two guys, whether they like it or not,

873
00:44:39.599 --> 00:44:41.880
<v Speaker 4>are going to be linked in history by saving the

874
00:44:41.920 --> 00:44:45.760
<v Speaker 4>Supreme Court from the liberals and changing it for a generation.

875
00:44:46.079 --> 00:44:49.679
<v Speaker 4>That's a great thing. They've worked together on other issues.

876
00:44:49.719 --> 00:44:52.119
<v Speaker 4>Sometimes they're at odds with each other. I suspect McConnell

877
00:44:52.159 --> 00:44:53.960
<v Speaker 4>doesn't agree with Trump, for instance.

878
00:44:53.639 --> 00:44:54.760
<v Speaker 1>About the filibuster.

879
00:44:55.000 --> 00:44:57.639
<v Speaker 4>In fact, I know he doesn't. But on the big

880
00:44:57.639 --> 00:45:01.119
<v Speaker 4>ticket issues of our day, let our taxes go down?

881
00:45:01.719 --> 00:45:05.079
<v Speaker 4>Did we appoint conservatives to the judiciary? Did we save

882
00:45:05.119 --> 00:45:09.360
<v Speaker 4>the Supreme Court? Absolutely? And so I got Look, I've

883
00:45:09.400 --> 00:45:11.320
<v Speaker 4>happily voted for both of them every.

884
00:45:11.119 --> 00:45:13.760
<v Speaker 5>Time they've been on the ballot in my adult life, and.

885
00:45:14.159 --> 00:45:17.840
<v Speaker 4>So have hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of other Kentuckians.

886
00:45:17.840 --> 00:45:21.199
<v Speaker 4>And so you know, I don't need them to be

887
00:45:21.199 --> 00:45:23.119
<v Speaker 4>best friends. They're never going to be best friends.

888
00:45:23.159 --> 00:45:25.639
<v Speaker 5>And that's okay if you look at Kentucky as a whole.

889
00:45:25.639 --> 00:45:28.679
<v Speaker 4>Interestingly, a lot of people thought McConnell in the second

890
00:45:28.800 --> 00:45:30.880
<v Speaker 4>term was going to be a thorn and Trump's side.

891
00:45:30.920 --> 00:45:32.960
<v Speaker 4>That has not turned out to be the case at all.

892
00:45:33.000 --> 00:45:37.000
<v Speaker 4>It's been Paul and Massy. Yeah, I've been more vexing

893
00:45:37.079 --> 00:45:40.880
<v Speaker 4>to Trump than Mitch McConnell. So I think history will

894
00:45:40.880 --> 00:45:45.280
<v Speaker 4>probably remember a little bit about their personal differences, somewhat

895
00:45:45.440 --> 00:45:48.400
<v Speaker 4>stemming from January the sixth, But it's at a macro

896
00:45:48.519 --> 00:45:51.320
<v Speaker 4>level going to remember these two guys cut taxes and

897
00:45:51.320 --> 00:45:53.400
<v Speaker 4>save the Supreme Court, and that's a record that any

898
00:45:53.440 --> 00:45:54.800
<v Speaker 4>conservative ought to be proud of.

899
00:45:55.400 --> 00:45:57.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to let your hero Charlie Cook have the

900
00:45:57.239 --> 00:45:58.960
<v Speaker 1>last question comment for you.

901
00:45:59.000 --> 00:46:00.440
<v Speaker 2>So I have a final question, and I don't know

902
00:46:00.440 --> 00:46:03.159
<v Speaker 2>if you can answer. But you said that people come

903
00:46:03.239 --> 00:46:05.000
<v Speaker 2>up to you and they say that they love the debate.

904
00:46:05.320 --> 00:46:07.239
<v Speaker 2>And then you said you think you're on the only

905
00:46:07.280 --> 00:46:10.519
<v Speaker 2>show where that debate happens. And I think that's probably true.

906
00:46:10.559 --> 00:46:12.639
<v Speaker 2>I would know there's only one of you. They don't

907
00:46:12.679 --> 00:46:14.559
<v Speaker 2>have three or four of you on You're always up

908
00:46:14.559 --> 00:46:18.639
<v Speaker 2>against eight people. But I wonder why you think it

909
00:46:18.840 --> 00:46:23.559
<v Speaker 2>is that we have fewer shows then the public would

910
00:46:23.599 --> 00:46:26.039
<v Speaker 2>obviously want, because I hear this too. I get told this,

911
00:46:26.280 --> 00:46:30.119
<v Speaker 2>whether it's podcasts that I'm on or my own show.

912
00:46:30.199 --> 00:46:32.159
<v Speaker 2>People love the debates. They love it when you have

913
00:46:32.239 --> 00:46:34.320
<v Speaker 2>someone on and you're not rude to each other, but

914
00:46:34.400 --> 00:46:37.320
<v Speaker 2>you argue about politics, and yet it seems to happen

915
00:46:37.400 --> 00:46:38.679
<v Speaker 2>less and less. Why do you think that.

916
00:46:38.840 --> 00:46:42.360
<v Speaker 4>Is because I think during the Trump years it became

917
00:46:42.440 --> 00:46:46.880
<v Speaker 4>unfashionable in mainstream media to platform any voice from the right,

918
00:46:46.960 --> 00:46:50.159
<v Speaker 4>anybody who was a Republican, anybody who voted for Trump.

919
00:46:50.199 --> 00:46:51.559
<v Speaker 4>So I've been with seeing n for eight and a

920
00:46:51.599 --> 00:46:53.719
<v Speaker 4>half years and no one's ever censored me or told

921
00:46:53.760 --> 00:46:54.480
<v Speaker 4>me what to say.

922
00:46:55.360 --> 00:46:57.400
<v Speaker 5>But look, in mainstream media as a.

923
00:46:57.360 --> 00:47:00.239
<v Speaker 4>Whole, it just there was a lot of pressure to

924
00:47:00.360 --> 00:47:04.679
<v Speaker 4>not allow equal footing to the Trump side of the

925
00:47:04.719 --> 00:47:06.880
<v Speaker 4>argument or the Republican side of the argument, which is

926
00:47:06.920 --> 00:47:09.519
<v Speaker 4>a shame because they deserve it. Half the country believes

927
00:47:09.519 --> 00:47:11.559
<v Speaker 4>in Donald Trump and voted for Donald Trump. It's been

928
00:47:11.559 --> 00:47:14.880
<v Speaker 4>true for three straight elections, and so I think it

929
00:47:14.920 --> 00:47:16.800
<v Speaker 4>was a mistake that they made. But I just you know,

930
00:47:16.960 --> 00:47:18.559
<v Speaker 4>one of the number one comments I hear on my

931
00:47:18.599 --> 00:47:22.159
<v Speaker 4>own social media, why does CNN allows Scott Jittings to

932
00:47:22.199 --> 00:47:29.119
<v Speaker 4>talk so illiberalism that has taken hold in quarters of

933
00:47:29.119 --> 00:47:31.760
<v Speaker 4>American politics. I mean, I think it had an impact

934
00:47:31.800 --> 00:47:34.480
<v Speaker 4>on the thinking of people who run our media. I

935
00:47:34.480 --> 00:47:37.480
<v Speaker 4>think CNN was genius in bringing it back. Our CEO

936
00:47:37.599 --> 00:47:41.440
<v Speaker 4>is Mark Thompson, British guy, American citizen like you, but

937
00:47:41.800 --> 00:47:45.119
<v Speaker 4>random BC Rand the New York Times. He believes in debates,

938
00:47:45.360 --> 00:47:48.559
<v Speaker 4>and I'm kind of shocked more people haven't followed his

939
00:47:48.639 --> 00:47:52.519
<v Speaker 4>lead because I think the content is desired, and I

940
00:47:52.559 --> 00:47:54.760
<v Speaker 4>think it's good for half the country to be able

941
00:47:54.800 --> 00:47:56.320
<v Speaker 4>to turn on the TV and say, oh, there's somebody

942
00:47:56.360 --> 00:48:00.199
<v Speaker 4>for me to watch two. But the the debating content,

943
00:48:00.800 --> 00:48:03.800
<v Speaker 4>the way people are consuming it in these little segments online,

944
00:48:04.239 --> 00:48:06.639
<v Speaker 4>I think it's good for our politics, and I wish

945
00:48:06.679 --> 00:48:08.840
<v Speaker 4>more people would produce it. I suspect in the future

946
00:48:09.119 --> 00:48:10.280
<v Speaker 4>you're going to see more of it, even.

947
00:48:10.199 --> 00:48:12.039
<v Speaker 5>If folks are slow to do it.

948
00:48:12.519 --> 00:48:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Scott, congratulations on a revolution of common sense, and we

949
00:48:16.840 --> 00:48:18.760
<v Speaker 1>are all thrilled that we'll be able to take you in.

950
00:48:18.760 --> 00:48:20.679
<v Speaker 1>More of you on the radio starting the new year,

951
00:48:20.800 --> 00:48:23.079
<v Speaker 1>and so best of luck to you, Mery Christmas in

952
00:48:23.079 --> 00:48:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a happy new Year.

953
00:48:24.360 --> 00:48:25.360
<v Speaker 5>Thank you, Steve Charles.

954
00:48:25.400 --> 00:48:28.559
<v Speaker 4>Good to meet you finally, and I'll keep listening to

955
00:48:28.719 --> 00:48:30.559
<v Speaker 4>really appreciate the time today guys, Thank you all.

956
00:48:33.559 --> 00:48:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Well. Charlie. I think the other story of the week

957
00:48:36.480 --> 00:48:41.159
<v Speaker 1>that really grabbed me as an old Cold War baby

958
00:48:41.199 --> 00:48:44.920
<v Speaker 1>boomer was the passing of Norman pot Horns, who I

959
00:48:45.000 --> 00:48:48.119
<v Speaker 1>never knew him. I only met him once in person,

960
00:48:48.559 --> 00:48:50.519
<v Speaker 1>you know. I started reading him and commentary in the

961
00:48:50.559 --> 00:48:53.280
<v Speaker 1>late seventies when I was in college. I mean, there's

962
00:48:53.280 --> 00:48:55.559
<v Speaker 1>been lots of encomiums to him the last few days.

963
00:48:55.880 --> 00:48:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I do think there are some essays of his from

964
00:48:58.000 --> 00:49:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the eighties in particular, maybe he was at his peak

965
00:49:00.880 --> 00:49:03.400
<v Speaker 1>of influence that has stood a test of time. I

966
00:49:03.400 --> 00:49:05.199
<v Speaker 1>could talk about those a little bit. Maybe I will

967
00:49:05.199 --> 00:49:06.719
<v Speaker 1>in a moment, But I don't know if you had

968
00:49:06.719 --> 00:49:09.639
<v Speaker 1>a chance to medium or if the sort of commentary

969
00:49:09.760 --> 00:49:12.519
<v Speaker 1>National Review alliance is still as robust as it was

970
00:49:12.559 --> 00:49:14.920
<v Speaker 1>back in the days when Buckley and pot Hearts were

971
00:49:14.960 --> 00:49:18.519
<v Speaker 1>in the chair. But shares your thoughts.

972
00:49:18.360 --> 00:49:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, I never met him. I never met William I. F.

973
00:49:20.760 --> 00:49:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Barkley Junior either, so I didn't meet either side of

974
00:49:23.519 --> 00:49:27.199
<v Speaker 2>the braid. I think was how John Petoritz, his son,

975
00:49:27.280 --> 00:49:31.960
<v Speaker 2>described it in the most recent National Review, the seventeenth

976
00:49:31.960 --> 00:49:40.119
<v Speaker 2>anniversary edition. Here's what I find most compelling about Norman Petorrets.

977
00:49:41.679 --> 00:49:44.880
<v Speaker 2>I was on a podcast earlier this week and we

978
00:49:44.880 --> 00:49:50.199
<v Speaker 2>were talking about Trump's takeover of the party, which I

979
00:49:50.199 --> 00:49:54.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm not thrilled about, as you know, and the failures

980
00:49:54.960 --> 00:49:57.960
<v Speaker 2>of the establishment, which I think are real. And one

981
00:49:58.000 --> 00:50:03.800
<v Speaker 2>of the things that I noted was that we had

982
00:50:03.880 --> 00:50:09.119
<v Speaker 2>a movement reached a point at which a lot of

983
00:50:09.159 --> 00:50:14.559
<v Speaker 2>our leading lights, be they writers or activists or thinkers

984
00:50:14.639 --> 00:50:22.800
<v Speaker 2>or politicians, were just saying words by wrote without much

985
00:50:22.840 --> 00:50:28.320
<v Speaker 2>thought behind them, and that was a problem. We've been

986
00:50:28.400 --> 00:50:30.719
<v Speaker 2>very successful. Reagan had come in, he'd won a lot

987
00:50:30.760 --> 00:50:32.239
<v Speaker 2>of the arguments with the help of a lot of

988
00:50:32.280 --> 00:50:35.400
<v Speaker 2>other people. And then in the nineteen nineties, although Bill

989
00:50:35.440 --> 00:50:38.119
<v Speaker 2>Clinton won twice, the center of gravity was to the right,

990
00:50:38.480 --> 00:50:44.280
<v Speaker 2>and we atrophied, and you met people who would just

991
00:50:44.320 --> 00:50:46.800
<v Speaker 2>stand up and they would say, we must do this,

992
00:50:46.840 --> 00:50:48.280
<v Speaker 2>we mist do that, we miss stand for this, we

993
00:50:48.320 --> 00:50:49.960
<v Speaker 2>miss stand for that. But when you asked them as

994
00:50:49.960 --> 00:50:51.719
<v Speaker 2>a follow up question, they had absolutely no idea what

995
00:50:51.800 --> 00:50:54.920
<v Speaker 2>they were talking about. And what's so interesting and impressive

996
00:50:54.960 --> 00:50:59.679
<v Speaker 2>about Norman Praetoris, in part because he shifted in his politics,

997
00:50:59.679 --> 00:51:02.119
<v Speaker 2>he was bonded to two things and then he created

998
00:51:02.199 --> 00:51:07.800
<v Speaker 2>this new philosophy, was that he always knew exactly what

999
00:51:07.880 --> 00:51:10.719
<v Speaker 2>he thought and why he never wrote a single sentence

1000
00:51:11.119 --> 00:51:14.559
<v Speaker 2>in this entire life that was just going through the motions.

1001
00:51:14.840 --> 00:51:19.400
<v Speaker 2>He didn't inherit any of his views, and so he

1002
00:51:19.519 --> 00:51:25.480
<v Speaker 2>was formidable because he could present them from first principles,

1003
00:51:25.599 --> 00:51:27.840
<v Speaker 2>from the ground up. You could ask him not just

1004
00:51:27.880 --> 00:51:30.199
<v Speaker 2>a follow up question, but eighty follow up questions, and

1005
00:51:30.199 --> 00:51:31.519
<v Speaker 2>he would say, oh, well, of course this is what

1006
00:51:32.199 --> 00:51:35.840
<v Speaker 2>And that is a remarkable thing to offer the world.

1007
00:51:36.760 --> 00:51:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Is a philosophy for which you are not solely but

1008
00:51:41.639 --> 00:51:45.639
<v Speaker 2>maybe primarily responsible, that you thought through and that you

1009
00:51:46.960 --> 00:51:53.440
<v Speaker 2>arrived at through experience and interrogation. And I cannot think

1010
00:51:53.639 --> 00:51:57.360
<v Speaker 2>of a better legacy to have than that.

1011
00:51:58.039 --> 00:52:01.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I dust at all have his memoir from

1012
00:52:01.159 --> 00:52:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the late seventies called Breaking Ranks, which detailed his movement

1013
00:52:05.320 --> 00:52:08.239
<v Speaker 1>from the left to the right, which took place mostly

1014
00:52:08.280 --> 00:52:10.599
<v Speaker 1>in the sixties. Certainly it was complete by the time

1015
00:52:10.599 --> 00:52:13.599
<v Speaker 1>a Governor arrived in nineteen seventy two. One of the

1016
00:52:13.679 --> 00:52:15.880
<v Speaker 1>parts of it that fascinated me was how in the

1017
00:52:15.920 --> 00:52:19.320
<v Speaker 1>early sixties, when the student New Left first started forming,

1018
00:52:20.000 --> 00:52:21.719
<v Speaker 1>and he was intrigued by them for a little bit.

1019
00:52:21.760 --> 00:52:26.880
<v Speaker 1>He almost printed an excerpt from the port Heuron statement

1020
00:52:26.920 --> 00:52:29.000
<v Speaker 1>from nineteen sixty two the Tom Hayden Roade, but then

1021
00:52:29.039 --> 00:52:32.000
<v Speaker 1>had second thoughts when he realized, I'm not sure this

1022
00:52:32.079 --> 00:52:35.039
<v Speaker 1>is altogether there. And by the end of the sixties

1023
00:52:35.280 --> 00:52:37.559
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that disgusted him was all the

1024
00:52:37.760 --> 00:52:41.599
<v Speaker 1>prominent liberals he knew friends of his who had completely

1025
00:52:41.679 --> 00:52:46.639
<v Speaker 1>capitulated to the new Left, even though pod Hartz said,

1026
00:52:46.800 --> 00:52:51.599
<v Speaker 1>they all knew that these were ruinous, reckless, ideologically unsound

1027
00:52:51.639 --> 00:52:54.840
<v Speaker 1>people doing great damage to the Democratic Party and the country.

1028
00:52:55.480 --> 00:52:57.920
<v Speaker 1>And now you fast forward to, you know, the era

1029
00:52:58.039 --> 00:53:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of wokeery from say, you know, the election of Obama

1030
00:53:00.920 --> 00:53:04.639
<v Speaker 1>until really the tide hasn't turned until this last election.

1031
00:53:04.760 --> 00:53:07.079
<v Speaker 1>I think that maybe a couple other things you can

1032
00:53:07.119 --> 00:53:10.519
<v Speaker 1>point out, but and so you see again, one of

1033
00:53:10.519 --> 00:53:13.519
<v Speaker 1>things that happens during the you know, the runaway wokery

1034
00:53:13.559 --> 00:53:17.239
<v Speaker 1>in the last decade, was so many people, even some conservatives,

1035
00:53:17.280 --> 00:53:21.679
<v Speaker 1>who but especially people the establishing in universities and corporations,

1036
00:53:21.719 --> 00:53:24.559
<v Speaker 1>who utterly surrendered all the cliches of the left about

1037
00:53:24.559 --> 00:53:29.239
<v Speaker 1>diversity and so forth. You think also of it was

1038
00:53:29.280 --> 00:53:34.239
<v Speaker 1>the late seventies, at the most inopportune time, pot Hartch

1039
00:53:34.239 --> 00:53:37.639
<v Speaker 1>wrote the book called Why We Were in Vietnam, And

1040
00:53:37.679 --> 00:53:40.679
<v Speaker 1>there's almost no defenders left in Vietnam except of course.

1041
00:53:40.679 --> 00:53:43.320
<v Speaker 1>The other one who was was Ronald Reagan, who caught

1042
00:53:43.440 --> 00:53:45.480
<v Speaker 1>hell for saying in nineteen eighty that it was a

1043
00:53:45.519 --> 00:53:46.280
<v Speaker 1>noble cause.

1044
00:53:46.639 --> 00:53:49.719
<v Speaker 2>Even though Jimmy stewartt I think was the right, yes,

1045
00:53:50.599 --> 00:53:51.760
<v Speaker 2>defender of Vietnam.

1046
00:53:51.960 --> 00:53:55.760
<v Speaker 1>There you go, and you know, okay, we'll go back

1047
00:53:55.760 --> 00:53:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and revisited that now. But he had the courage to say,

1048
00:53:57.800 --> 00:54:01.239
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, let's stop all this Vietnam demonization, which

1049
00:54:01.280 --> 00:54:03.400
<v Speaker 1>was the theme of every Hollywood movie in those days,

1050
00:54:03.480 --> 00:54:06.960
<v Speaker 1>right the demonology school, Every book was about, you know,

1051
00:54:07.079 --> 00:54:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Vietnam demonology is I used to put it. There are

1052
00:54:10.800 --> 00:54:13.480
<v Speaker 1>two essays in particular from the mid eighties that I

1053
00:54:13.519 --> 00:54:17.320
<v Speaker 1>think stand the test of time. Now they may both

1054
00:54:17.360 --> 00:54:19.360
<v Speaker 1>sound well. The second one will sound right. The first

1055
00:54:19.400 --> 00:54:24.599
<v Speaker 1>one was one called the Why the God That Failed Failed?

1056
00:54:24.840 --> 00:54:27.800
<v Speaker 1>And this is a little obscure. It's about the once

1057
00:54:27.840 --> 00:54:31.159
<v Speaker 1>famous book from nineteen forty nine called The God That Failed.

1058
00:54:31.199 --> 00:54:34.159
<v Speaker 1>It was six prominent communists and why they broke with communism.

1059
00:54:34.559 --> 00:54:38.159
<v Speaker 1>Arthur Kester was the most famous, but the novelist Ignausio Salone,

1060
00:54:38.239 --> 00:54:42.599
<v Speaker 1>Andre gud and France Richard Wright in America big figures

1061
00:54:42.639 --> 00:54:46.119
<v Speaker 1>then less so now, But what part Haras caught was

1062
00:54:46.519 --> 00:54:49.840
<v Speaker 1>they all said there against the Soviet Union and Marxist communism,

1063
00:54:50.239 --> 00:54:52.320
<v Speaker 1>but they all remained kind of on the left and

1064
00:54:52.400 --> 00:54:55.519
<v Speaker 1>pro socialists, so they really didn't break with what was

1065
00:54:55.679 --> 00:54:59.039
<v Speaker 1>wrong with that sort of spectrum of philosophy. And I

1066
00:54:59.079 --> 00:55:01.400
<v Speaker 1>think that's still true today for people on the left

1067
00:55:01.400 --> 00:55:04.719
<v Speaker 1>are so called progressives, even the ones who say they're

1068
00:55:04.719 --> 00:55:08.280
<v Speaker 1>against wokery and so forth. The second essay, also the

1069
00:55:08.400 --> 00:55:12.400
<v Speaker 1>mid eighties, was if or well, we're alive today? And

1070
00:55:12.440 --> 00:55:15.400
<v Speaker 1>again this will seem like old news for a lot

1071
00:55:15.400 --> 00:55:18.960
<v Speaker 1>of listeners perhaps, but I remember vividly in nineteen eighty four,

1072
00:55:19.679 --> 00:55:22.159
<v Speaker 1>when you know, the year that the book talked about

1073
00:55:22.239 --> 00:55:24.559
<v Speaker 1>arrived and you had all kinds of people on the left,

1074
00:55:24.599 --> 00:55:28.480
<v Speaker 1>like Walter Cronkite distorting the book, saying it's really about

1075
00:55:28.559 --> 00:55:33.239
<v Speaker 1>us and the capitalist West too, And but Harts was saying, no,

1076
00:55:33.280 --> 00:55:35.159
<v Speaker 1>if or we're alive, I know where he'd land to be,

1077
00:55:35.239 --> 00:55:37.800
<v Speaker 1>right next door to me. He put it more elegantly

1078
00:55:37.880 --> 00:55:39.719
<v Speaker 1>than that. Well, lo and behold. I don't know if

1079
00:55:39.719 --> 00:55:43.360
<v Speaker 1>you've heard about this, Charlie, but there's this movie about

1080
00:55:43.360 --> 00:55:46.280
<v Speaker 1>an animated versus an animal house coming out, and all

1081
00:55:46.280 --> 00:55:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the early indications from animal Farm. Sorry, yeah, absolutely. All

1082
00:55:54.000 --> 00:55:57.199
<v Speaker 1>the early indications are they have turned story inside out

1083
00:55:57.239 --> 00:55:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to be a grotesque perversion. And so

1084
00:56:00.159 --> 00:56:01.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, we need to channel the spirit of Norman

1085
00:56:02.000 --> 00:56:05.360
<v Speaker 1>pot hearts about or Well his application for today in

1086
00:56:05.440 --> 00:56:06.800
<v Speaker 1>this and so many other areas.

1087
00:56:06.960 --> 00:56:09.599
<v Speaker 2>So that is a hobby horse of mine, Steeve. I've

1088
00:56:09.599 --> 00:56:14.039
<v Speaker 2>written about it over and over. George Orwell was a socialist.

1089
00:56:14.159 --> 00:56:16.679
<v Speaker 2>He was not a conservative. He was a socialist. He

1090
00:56:16.760 --> 00:56:18.519
<v Speaker 2>believed in democratic socialism.

1091
00:56:18.599 --> 00:56:19.039
<v Speaker 1>I do not.

1092
00:56:20.000 --> 00:56:24.920
<v Speaker 2>But he was horrified by communism. And this is the

1093
00:56:25.000 --> 00:56:28.599
<v Speaker 2>key point. Not only was he horrified by communism, he

1094
00:56:28.760 --> 00:56:35.480
<v Speaker 2>was deeply worried that even democratic socialism might lead inexorably to totalitarianism.

1095
00:56:35.679 --> 00:56:40.320
<v Speaker 2>That book is not about capitalism. It's about that. It

1096
00:56:40.440 --> 00:56:44.119
<v Speaker 2>is insane to me that they're doing this, and it's

1097
00:56:44.159 --> 00:56:46.800
<v Speaker 2>insane that so many people believe it. So this is

1098
00:56:46.800 --> 00:56:48.679
<v Speaker 2>obviously me going on a long time. I didn't know

1099
00:56:49.079 --> 00:56:52.159
<v Speaker 2>that it happened in nineteen eighty four, hadn't been born yet.

1100
00:56:52.400 --> 00:56:55.920
<v Speaker 2>I did know in twenty twelve, when Barack Obama was

1101
00:56:56.000 --> 00:56:59.760
<v Speaker 2>running against Mitt Romney, that people started saying, oh, this

1102
00:56:59.840 --> 00:57:02.440
<v Speaker 2>is exactly the message of Animal Farm, which is when

1103
00:57:02.440 --> 00:57:05.719
<v Speaker 2>I started writing about it, Mitt Romney apparently, is this

1104
00:57:05.920 --> 00:57:08.440
<v Speaker 2>the topic of Animal Farm? No, he's not.

1105
00:57:09.519 --> 00:57:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Unbelievable.

1106
00:57:10.599 --> 00:57:13.960
<v Speaker 2>And in fact, you know that book was not published

1107
00:57:14.079 --> 00:57:17.800
<v Speaker 2>originally for a couple of years because we were allies

1108
00:57:17.840 --> 00:57:20.840
<v Speaker 2>with the Soviets in World War Two and no one

1109
00:57:20.920 --> 00:57:24.320
<v Speaker 2>wanted to publish a book that was such an obvious

1110
00:57:24.320 --> 00:57:26.719
<v Speaker 2>and transparent attack on the Soviet Union.

1111
00:57:27.239 --> 00:57:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a little quick footnote for you, and I can

1112
00:57:29.519 --> 00:57:31.000
<v Speaker 1>make a copy and sent it to you if you like.

1113
00:57:31.079 --> 00:57:33.760
<v Speaker 1>But I came across a review of nineteen eighty four

1114
00:57:34.599 --> 00:57:36.679
<v Speaker 1>by C. S. Lewis, of all not of all people.

1115
00:57:36.719 --> 00:57:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can see why he'd be interested in it,

1116
00:57:38.480 --> 00:57:41.079
<v Speaker 1>And what he really said was, I think Animal Farm

1117
00:57:41.159 --> 00:57:44.000
<v Speaker 1>is a much better book than nineteen eighty four, and

1118
00:57:44.119 --> 00:57:46.719
<v Speaker 1>his argument is coaching. But I got to thinking, I

1119
00:57:46.760 --> 00:57:49.599
<v Speaker 1>think Lewis thinks that because Lewis wrote so many books

1120
00:57:49.599 --> 00:57:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that had talking animals. Right, I liked I think you

1121
00:57:54.599 --> 00:57:57.280
<v Speaker 1>liked the vibe of it. Yeah. But anyway, it was

1122
00:57:57.280 --> 00:58:01.639
<v Speaker 1>an odd little discovery. But we have come to the

1123
00:58:01.760 --> 00:58:04.559
<v Speaker 1>end of our hour for this week. This podcast brought

1124
00:58:04.559 --> 00:58:08.519
<v Speaker 1>to you, as always by Ricochet dot Com. Please support

1125
00:58:08.519 --> 00:58:11.400
<v Speaker 1>this show by becoming a member. We'll see you, all

1126
00:58:11.400 --> 00:58:14.039
<v Speaker 1>of you in the comments and until next week. We

1127
00:58:14.119 --> 00:58:16.000
<v Speaker 1>may be off next week for Christmas. I'm not sure,

1128
00:58:16.039 --> 00:58:19.239
<v Speaker 1>but oh I will say this, it is scheduled. I

1129
00:58:19.239 --> 00:58:20.840
<v Speaker 1>think it will happen. I am going to do a

1130
00:58:20.880 --> 00:58:25.119
<v Speaker 1>special episode of Me in Conversation with Rob Long. Who

1131
00:58:25.159 --> 00:58:28.360
<v Speaker 1>better to talk about the Christmas season than Ricochet's own seminary,

1132
00:58:28.400 --> 00:58:31.360
<v Speaker 1>and so look forward to that sometime in the next

1133
00:58:31.400 --> 00:58:33.719
<v Speaker 1>ten days or so. So with that, go to see

1134
00:58:33.760 --> 00:58:36.559
<v Speaker 1>you Charles, We miss you, James, see everybody in the

1135
00:58:36.559 --> 00:58:38.920
<v Speaker 1>comments at Ricochet four point d.

1136
00:58:40.239 --> 00:58:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Whatever it is perfect
