WEBVTT

1
00:00:08.519 --> 00:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Good afternoon. You're listening to Gambling with an Edge.

2
00:00:12.359 --> 00:00:16.280
<v Speaker 2>Now Here are your hosts, Bob Dancer and Richard Munchkin.

3
00:00:17.000 --> 00:00:19.399
<v Speaker 3>Good afternoon, Welcome to Gambling with an Edge on Bob

4
00:00:19.480 --> 00:00:21.440
<v Speaker 3>Dancer and I'm Richard Munchkin.

5
00:00:22.039 --> 00:00:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Our guest today is poker player and sports better Dan Abrams,

6
00:00:25.800 --> 00:00:29.960
<v Speaker 2>who has written a new book entitled Sharp Money. Dan Abrams,

7
00:00:30.199 --> 00:00:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Gambling with an Edge.

8
00:00:32.880 --> 00:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, thanks for having me by training.

9
00:00:35.679 --> 00:00:38.840
<v Speaker 2>You're an engineer. How did you get started playing poker?

10
00:00:39.920 --> 00:00:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, like a lot of people in America, when the

11
00:00:44.280 --> 00:00:48.119
<v Speaker 1>World Series of Poker started being broadcast on ESPN in

12
00:00:48.119 --> 00:00:51.679
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and three. That was the year that Chris

13
00:00:51.719 --> 00:00:54.799
<v Speaker 1>Moneymaker won the main event, and it became a very

14
00:00:54.880 --> 00:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>very big deal because he won an online satellite to

15
00:00:59.560 --> 00:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>even get into the main event, and then he wound

16
00:01:02.960 --> 00:01:06.840
<v Speaker 1>up winning and it became really riveting television, and they

17
00:01:06.840 --> 00:01:10.120
<v Speaker 1>would put it on after you know, Sunday night baseball

18
00:01:10.239 --> 00:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>or whatever games they had going. So I really kind

19
00:01:14.560 --> 00:01:18.519
<v Speaker 1>of got interested that way. I had played poker just

20
00:01:18.640 --> 00:01:22.879
<v Speaker 1>for fun with my friends even as young as elementary school,

21
00:01:23.239 --> 00:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>but never really played it for money before. And then

22
00:01:26.159 --> 00:01:29.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, when when some guy wins two and a

23
00:01:29.439 --> 00:01:32.840
<v Speaker 1>half million dollars playing poker. It piques a lot of

24
00:01:32.840 --> 00:01:33.959
<v Speaker 1>people's interest.

25
00:01:34.519 --> 00:01:37.879
<v Speaker 3>So you're really known for RAZ, and you did a

26
00:01:37.920 --> 00:01:42.280
<v Speaker 3>lot of teaching of RAZ, and so can you explain

27
00:01:42.439 --> 00:01:44.879
<v Speaker 3>sort of how that evolution happened.

28
00:01:46.120 --> 00:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So the most popular game obviously was no Limit

29
00:01:50.560 --> 00:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Hold Them, but most of the online sites would spread

30
00:01:55.079 --> 00:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>other types of games, including seven Card Stud, which I

31
00:01:58.719 --> 00:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>was familiar with from playing as a kid and as

32
00:02:01.319 --> 00:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>a teenager. So I started playing that for a while

33
00:02:04.920 --> 00:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and I got pretty good at that, and I had

34
00:02:07.920 --> 00:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>seen RAS covered on TV and I understood a little

35
00:02:12.280 --> 00:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>bit about it, but I was primarily concentrating on STUD.

36
00:02:17.560 --> 00:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>And then I went through a period of several days

37
00:02:19.960 --> 00:02:22.520
<v Speaker 1>where I couldn't even get a decent starting hand, and

38
00:02:22.599 --> 00:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>if I did, you know, if I got something like

39
00:02:25.360 --> 00:02:29.080
<v Speaker 1>split jacks, somebody with a king would raise and then

40
00:02:29.120 --> 00:02:31.479
<v Speaker 1>an ace would re raise him and I'd have to fold.

41
00:02:32.159 --> 00:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>And I thought, well, let me give this RAZ game

42
00:02:34.439 --> 00:02:37.800
<v Speaker 1>a try, because the starting hands I tend to get

43
00:02:38.039 --> 00:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>seemed to be much better for RAS than they are

44
00:02:40.080 --> 00:02:43.719
<v Speaker 1>for STUD. And I just started at the lowest possible stakes,

45
00:02:43.800 --> 00:02:46.240
<v Speaker 1>really to get my feet wet, and I found out

46
00:02:46.240 --> 00:02:48.800
<v Speaker 1>that there weren't a whole lot of good players at

47
00:02:48.840 --> 00:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>those stakes on like No Limit Hold Them, where you

48
00:02:52.560 --> 00:02:56.159
<v Speaker 1>could multi table so easily, that the good players would

49
00:02:56.159 --> 00:02:57.919
<v Speaker 1>play at the low stakes, but they would play like

50
00:02:58.000 --> 00:03:00.800
<v Speaker 1>twelve or sixteen tables at a time, and that's how

51
00:03:00.800 --> 00:03:01.719
<v Speaker 1>they would win money.

52
00:03:02.639 --> 00:03:06.599
<v Speaker 3>And what was it about REZ that drew you to

53
00:03:06.639 --> 00:03:10.240
<v Speaker 3>it other than the fact that usually it's not where

54
00:03:10.280 --> 00:03:13.280
<v Speaker 3>all the sharpest people are when you know, kind of

55
00:03:13.319 --> 00:03:15.599
<v Speaker 3>go away from the mainstream.

56
00:03:16.560 --> 00:03:19.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. And what you could do on the online

57
00:03:19.800 --> 00:03:22.759
<v Speaker 1>sites is you could keep track of players that you

58
00:03:22.879 --> 00:03:26.240
<v Speaker 1>had played before. You could take notes on them or

59
00:03:26.319 --> 00:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>assign like a color code to them. And I found

60
00:03:29.400 --> 00:03:31.840
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of the players that I was going

61
00:03:31.960 --> 00:03:34.439
<v Speaker 1>up against in RAZ that were really bad at it,

62
00:03:34.879 --> 00:03:37.159
<v Speaker 1>I had notes on them as being very good No

63
00:03:37.240 --> 00:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Limit Hold Them players, And I began to realize that

64
00:03:41.000 --> 00:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>it's really very much the opposite of No Limit Hold

65
00:03:43.840 --> 00:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Them in so many ways that the people who were

66
00:03:47.120 --> 00:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>trying it and trying to play the same way they

67
00:03:50.319 --> 00:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>played in the Limit Hold Them were really really bad.

68
00:03:53.800 --> 00:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>So I really got interested that way and started to

69
00:03:57.080 --> 00:04:00.080
<v Speaker 1>do a little bit of studying of the game, and

70
00:04:00.120 --> 00:04:03.319
<v Speaker 1>there really wasn't much. There was not There was only

71
00:04:03.439 --> 00:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>really one book that had was completely about Raz and

72
00:04:07.680 --> 00:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>that was Sklansky on Poker by David Splansky. So I

73
00:04:12.439 --> 00:04:14.479
<v Speaker 1>got that and I read it and I was making

74
00:04:14.479 --> 00:04:17.399
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of notes, trying to study it like a textbook,

75
00:04:18.399 --> 00:04:21.199
<v Speaker 1>and he does like example hands at the end of

76
00:04:21.199 --> 00:04:25.279
<v Speaker 1>the book, and for one of them, he said, in

77
00:04:25.319 --> 00:04:29.079
<v Speaker 1>this situation, you should fold unless there's a lot of

78
00:04:29.079 --> 00:04:32.279
<v Speaker 1>money in the pot. And I thought, oh, geez, well,

79
00:04:32.279 --> 00:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how much a lot of money is

80
00:04:33.839 --> 00:04:38.879
<v Speaker 1>to him, right, So I tried to figure it out

81
00:04:38.879 --> 00:04:41.720
<v Speaker 1>on my own to see it kind of solve it backwards,

82
00:04:41.720 --> 00:04:43.959
<v Speaker 1>to see how much money there would need to be

83
00:04:44.120 --> 00:04:46.720
<v Speaker 1>in the pot to make it worth calling in that

84
00:04:46.800 --> 00:04:50.600
<v Speaker 1>situation rather than fold. And what I came up with

85
00:04:50.839 --> 00:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>was that it was really a very small amount of

86
00:04:53.040 --> 00:04:55.720
<v Speaker 1>money to be in the pot at that point in

87
00:04:55.759 --> 00:04:58.839
<v Speaker 1>the hand. And so I was like, huh, maybe there's

88
00:04:59.560 --> 00:05:04.720
<v Speaker 1>there's room to investigate Raz here that' Sklansky hadn't really covered.

89
00:05:05.279 --> 00:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>And that's what really got me rolling.

90
00:05:08.079 --> 00:05:14.079
<v Speaker 2>You said you switched games because you were card dead,

91
00:05:14.920 --> 00:05:20.279
<v Speaker 2>which is a type of betting a trend, reasoning that

92
00:05:20.360 --> 00:05:24.879
<v Speaker 2>you're now strongly opposed to as an investor. Now you're

93
00:05:25.000 --> 00:05:28.519
<v Speaker 2>very much an expert investor now, but when you but

94
00:05:28.720 --> 00:05:33.519
<v Speaker 2>using that reasoning for starting RAS seem like a very

95
00:05:33.519 --> 00:05:34.240
<v Speaker 2>ploppy move.

96
00:05:35.040 --> 00:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Is that fair? Oh yeah, it's very fair. I mean

97
00:05:39.279 --> 00:05:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I've made all sorts of mistakes in when I started investing,

98
00:05:43.079 --> 00:05:47.519
<v Speaker 1>when I started playing poker. You know, the same type

99
00:05:47.560 --> 00:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of thoughts that most people are thinking when they do that.

100
00:05:52.399 --> 00:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I just managed to analyze them a little bit and

101
00:05:55.439 --> 00:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>overcome those mistakes.

102
00:05:57.839 --> 00:06:03.399
<v Speaker 3>So how did the You obviously went from begin a

103
00:06:03.439 --> 00:06:06.959
<v Speaker 3>RES player to one of the top RES players out

104
00:06:06.959 --> 00:06:11.800
<v Speaker 3>there and became kind of a teacher at a site

105
00:06:12.480 --> 00:06:16.040
<v Speaker 3>that people tended to really flock to to learn more

106
00:06:16.040 --> 00:06:18.079
<v Speaker 3>about RES. How did that come about?

107
00:06:19.600 --> 00:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's kind of a roundabout story, which I tell

108
00:06:23.040 --> 00:06:26.079
<v Speaker 1>in the book, is that I was looking to do

109
00:06:26.639 --> 00:06:32.079
<v Speaker 1>some one on one poker coaching for RAZ, specifically because

110
00:06:32.079 --> 00:06:37.279
<v Speaker 1>I noticed that at stakes above the level that I

111
00:06:37.399 --> 00:06:40.160
<v Speaker 1>was bankrolled to play, there would be a lot of

112
00:06:40.199 --> 00:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>players who really didn't know what they were doing at

113
00:06:44.800 --> 00:06:48.680
<v Speaker 1>RAZ at all. They were just hunting away money. And

114
00:06:48.720 --> 00:06:50.439
<v Speaker 1>I thought, well, if I can get a few of

115
00:06:50.480 --> 00:06:53.399
<v Speaker 1>these guys to be interested in one on one coaching

116
00:06:53.879 --> 00:06:56.399
<v Speaker 1>to make a little money on the side doing that,

117
00:06:57.279 --> 00:06:59.959
<v Speaker 1>So I was looking for perspective students, and I had

118
00:07:00.040 --> 00:07:04.199
<v Speaker 1>had the occasion to be looking at the forums on

119
00:07:04.319 --> 00:07:07.199
<v Speaker 1>two plus two if you If you recall, two plus

120
00:07:07.199 --> 00:07:11.800
<v Speaker 1>two Publishing has a huge set of forums that were

121
00:07:11.879 --> 00:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>very very popular back in the day, and they had

122
00:07:15.560 --> 00:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a couple of hands that were played by one of

123
00:07:18.240 --> 00:07:22.639
<v Speaker 1>the top no limit hold'em tournament players and they they

124
00:07:22.680 --> 00:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>had they could show the hand history, and they were

125
00:07:25.480 --> 00:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>they were really played badly. So I looked up the

126
00:07:28.720 --> 00:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>guy's profile and he had his email address in the profile.

127
00:07:31.759 --> 00:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>So I sent him an email and I said, hey, look,

128
00:07:34.279 --> 00:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm a RAZ specialist. I play the game almost exclusively.

129
00:07:38.399 --> 00:07:43.079
<v Speaker 1>I've done all this research and if you would be interested,

130
00:07:43.399 --> 00:07:46.399
<v Speaker 1>I would like to coach you. And I basically gave him,

131
00:07:46.439 --> 00:07:49.439
<v Speaker 1>like some some free example hands to take a look

132
00:07:49.480 --> 00:07:52.759
<v Speaker 1>at to see what he thought. It ended up he

133
00:07:52.800 --> 00:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't and he didn't wind up taking me on as

134
00:07:55.399 --> 00:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>a coach, But later on he apparently talked to some

135
00:07:59.040 --> 00:08:01.439
<v Speaker 1>of his friends about it, and they were starting up

136
00:08:01.600 --> 00:08:04.839
<v Speaker 1>a poker training site, so they reached out to me

137
00:08:04.879 --> 00:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and said, would you be interested in making videos on RAZ?

138
00:08:08.800 --> 00:08:10.759
<v Speaker 1>And so that's how I got that gig.

139
00:08:11.560 --> 00:08:13.279
<v Speaker 3>Are those videos still out there?

140
00:08:14.680 --> 00:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>No, actually they're not. They had a that site ended

141
00:08:21.120 --> 00:08:23.600
<v Speaker 1>up being bought by card Runners, which was a much

142
00:08:23.639 --> 00:08:28.000
<v Speaker 1>bigger site, and I eventually made some videos for card Runners.

143
00:08:28.040 --> 00:08:30.199
<v Speaker 1>So actually, if you look on YouTube, you can see

144
00:08:30.199 --> 00:08:34.039
<v Speaker 1>some of the snippets that card Runners would put out

145
00:08:34.399 --> 00:08:37.320
<v Speaker 1>as like, you know, five minute trailer of my videos.

146
00:08:37.600 --> 00:08:39.399
<v Speaker 1>There's still a few of those on YouTube if you

147
00:08:39.440 --> 00:08:39.960
<v Speaker 1>look them up.

148
00:08:40.559 --> 00:08:43.879
<v Speaker 3>Can can you still find RAS games? Are there? I

149
00:08:43.919 --> 00:08:46.720
<v Speaker 3>assume there's a RAS tournament in the World Series.

150
00:08:47.639 --> 00:08:51.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. The World Series now has two RAZ tournaments every year,

151
00:08:52.080 --> 00:08:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and of course they have mixed game tournaments. It's probably

152
00:08:54.960 --> 00:08:58.279
<v Speaker 1>about seven or eight of them each year that include RAZ.

153
00:08:58.639 --> 00:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>It's part of like a horse game or an eight

154
00:09:01.159 --> 00:09:04.279
<v Speaker 1>game mix and that sort of thing. And they have

155
00:09:05.320 --> 00:09:10.600
<v Speaker 1>there's some sites online sites that will feature RAZ still,

156
00:09:11.919 --> 00:09:15.200
<v Speaker 1>but mostly in the US. You can only play in

157
00:09:15.279 --> 00:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>certain states unless you use crypto sites. So the crypto

158
00:09:20.039 --> 00:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>site called Fena that still has RAS and they get

159
00:09:23.200 --> 00:09:24.679
<v Speaker 1>RAZ games going occasionally.

160
00:09:25.720 --> 00:09:27.720
<v Speaker 3>Are you still actively playing or no?

161
00:09:28.799 --> 00:09:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? At this point, you know, just every once in

162
00:09:31.960 --> 00:09:34.120
<v Speaker 1>a while. I think the games are so sporadic but

163
00:09:34.960 --> 00:09:36.399
<v Speaker 1>I will play when they're available.

164
00:09:38.200 --> 00:09:41.360
<v Speaker 2>Now it's it's well known that a number of very

165
00:09:41.360 --> 00:09:46.320
<v Speaker 2>successful poker players have lost a ton of money betting sports. Yeah,

166
00:09:46.360 --> 00:09:49.200
<v Speaker 2>didn't that give you pause before you went that route?

167
00:09:49.200 --> 00:09:51.720
<v Speaker 2>And how did you assume your journey would be different

168
00:09:51.759 --> 00:09:52.240
<v Speaker 2>than theirs?

169
00:09:53.279 --> 00:09:55.320
<v Speaker 1>It gave me a lot of pause, you know. I

170
00:09:55.360 --> 00:09:59.279
<v Speaker 1>started playing poker probably the end of two thousand and three,

171
00:09:59.759 --> 00:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and and I didn't start betting sports until twenty twenty.

172
00:10:03.759 --> 00:10:05.960
<v Speaker 1>And I really never intended to bet sports at all,

173
00:10:06.039 --> 00:10:10.440
<v Speaker 1>because I'd heard from several people that that's the best

174
00:10:10.440 --> 00:10:13.159
<v Speaker 1>way for a poker player, a good poker player to

175
00:10:13.200 --> 00:10:16.360
<v Speaker 1>lose money, to start betting sports. But they had a

176
00:10:17.159 --> 00:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>site in Pennsylvania where I lived at the time, which

177
00:10:21.240 --> 00:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>was Poker Stars for Poker, But then they also had

178
00:10:24.360 --> 00:10:29.200
<v Speaker 1>a section for sports betting through Fox Bet, and so

179
00:10:29.240 --> 00:10:32.159
<v Speaker 1>they would send promotions to me all the time, saying,

180
00:10:32.240 --> 00:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, here's an odds boost or a free bet

181
00:10:35.480 --> 00:10:38.159
<v Speaker 1>or whatever to try to get me interested in sports betting.

182
00:10:38.759 --> 00:10:40.759
<v Speaker 1>So I reached out to my friend Eric, who I

183
00:10:40.759 --> 00:10:43.399
<v Speaker 1>had played poker with for years, and he had started

184
00:10:43.399 --> 00:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>sports betting, and I sought out his advice and started playing.

185
00:10:48.039 --> 00:10:51.120
<v Speaker 3>Through that, and are you still doing that?

186
00:10:52.000 --> 00:10:55.399
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I mean Fox bet is no more they shut down,

187
00:10:55.919 --> 00:10:59.759
<v Speaker 1>but I'm still actively sports betting and you still doing

188
00:10:59.799 --> 00:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>well with that.

189
00:11:01.399 --> 00:11:05.039
<v Speaker 3>So one of the things that really caught my eye

190
00:11:05.320 --> 00:11:10.360
<v Speaker 3>in the book was your discussion about why it may

191
00:11:10.399 --> 00:11:13.240
<v Speaker 3>be a good thing to over bet your bankroll when

192
00:11:13.240 --> 00:11:16.399
<v Speaker 3>you're starting out and have a small bankroll. So you

193
00:11:16.559 --> 00:11:17.639
<v Speaker 3>can we talk about that.

194
00:11:18.840 --> 00:11:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, sure, that's the sort of thing that is actually

195
00:11:23.399 --> 00:11:27.039
<v Speaker 1>being talked about in financial circles by a lot of

196
00:11:27.080 --> 00:11:32.320
<v Speaker 1>academics because, you know, they want to guide people in

197
00:11:32.399 --> 00:11:37.279
<v Speaker 1>how to construct the portfolio, and you know, you want

198
00:11:37.320 --> 00:11:40.559
<v Speaker 1>to have a certain amount of risk associated with your portfolio,

199
00:11:41.559 --> 00:11:44.919
<v Speaker 1>but not too much risk because you know you want

200
00:11:44.919 --> 00:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to protect it. Same thing with your bankroll. But they

201
00:11:48.080 --> 00:11:50.960
<v Speaker 1>realize that the amount of money you have in your

202
00:11:50.960 --> 00:11:55.480
<v Speaker 1>portfolio now doesn't represent the whole story. You have to

203
00:11:55.519 --> 00:11:58.679
<v Speaker 1>take into account how much future earnings you're going to have.

204
00:11:59.279 --> 00:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>So somebody close to retirement should be a lot more

205
00:12:02.279 --> 00:12:09.080
<v Speaker 1>conservative with their bankroll or their portfolio then somebody in

206
00:12:09.120 --> 00:12:12.080
<v Speaker 1>their twenties or thirties should be. And they actually did

207
00:12:12.120 --> 00:12:15.759
<v Speaker 1>a lot of very complicated academic research to prove this

208
00:12:15.919 --> 00:12:19.399
<v Speaker 1>point and so I said, well, the same thing can

209
00:12:19.480 --> 00:12:23.320
<v Speaker 1>apply equally well to sports betting. I mean, when you

210
00:12:23.600 --> 00:12:26.879
<v Speaker 1>have when you're at a professional level and you have

211
00:12:26.919 --> 00:12:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a bankroll, say in the millions, are close to it,

212
00:12:30.279 --> 00:12:33.559
<v Speaker 1>that's very hard to replace. But if you're doing it

213
00:12:33.679 --> 00:12:37.039
<v Speaker 1>on the side where you're earning an income from a

214
00:12:37.159 --> 00:12:40.879
<v Speaker 1>job and you're using a certain amount set size as

215
00:12:40.919 --> 00:12:43.919
<v Speaker 1>your bankroll, if you have to, if you go bust

216
00:12:44.000 --> 00:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>on that bankroll and you have to replenish it, and

217
00:12:46.159 --> 00:12:48.240
<v Speaker 1>say you take three or four months to replenish it,

218
00:12:48.879 --> 00:12:52.279
<v Speaker 1>that's not a disaster. You take a break, but you're

219
00:12:52.279 --> 00:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>not out of the game. And the whole idea of

220
00:12:55.039 --> 00:12:58.559
<v Speaker 1>protecting your bank roll is if you lose your whole bankroll,

221
00:12:58.600 --> 00:13:02.039
<v Speaker 1>you're out of the game. You can't bet anymore, and

222
00:13:02.120 --> 00:13:05.639
<v Speaker 1>you can't take advantage of your edge anymore at that point.

223
00:13:06.279 --> 00:13:09.759
<v Speaker 1>So it's really and it was the sort of thing

224
00:13:09.960 --> 00:13:12.799
<v Speaker 1>in poker that was very, very common and probably still

225
00:13:12.919 --> 00:13:16.399
<v Speaker 1>is for the younger players where they would take shots

226
00:13:16.519 --> 00:13:19.720
<v Speaker 1>at higher levels and I did as well, you know

227
00:13:19.759 --> 00:13:22.519
<v Speaker 1>when I was starting out. You know, they'll they'll take

228
00:13:22.600 --> 00:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>set aside, maybe twenty percent of their bank roll and say, okay,

229
00:13:25.320 --> 00:13:27.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go up a couple of levels and

230
00:13:27.799 --> 00:13:31.039
<v Speaker 1>see if I can beat them. And if they can,

231
00:13:31.159 --> 00:13:33.879
<v Speaker 1>they stay at those levels and can earn a lot

232
00:13:33.919 --> 00:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>more per hour. They don't, you know, they lose twenty

233
00:13:37.480 --> 00:13:40.080
<v Speaker 1>percent of their bank roll. They step back down and

234
00:13:40.080 --> 00:13:42.200
<v Speaker 1>they start grinding it back up, but they're at the

235
00:13:42.279 --> 00:13:43.399
<v Speaker 1>regular stakes.

236
00:13:44.120 --> 00:13:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

237
00:13:44.399 --> 00:13:48.519
<v Speaker 3>I remember when I was starting out, I knew one

238
00:13:48.559 --> 00:13:52.120
<v Speaker 3>blackjack player in particular who had a ten thousand dollars

239
00:13:52.159 --> 00:13:55.480
<v Speaker 3>bank roll and he was out betting two hands of

240
00:13:55.559 --> 00:14:00.399
<v Speaker 3>five hundred and I thought he was absolutely insane. But

241
00:14:00.960 --> 00:14:04.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, he happened to run well, and he ran

242
00:14:04.200 --> 00:14:08.559
<v Speaker 3>it up to one hundred K. And and I don't know,

243
00:14:08.639 --> 00:14:10.559
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he didn't have a job at the time.

244
00:14:10.919 --> 00:14:13.240
<v Speaker 3>You know, that was what he was planning to do.

245
00:14:13.320 --> 00:14:17.559
<v Speaker 3>But you know, I guess in retrospect, well, yeah, if

246
00:14:17.559 --> 00:14:20.399
<v Speaker 3>he lost it, well he could go back and get

247
00:14:20.440 --> 00:14:23.720
<v Speaker 3>a job and build up a bankroll and start over.

248
00:14:23.919 --> 00:14:26.879
<v Speaker 3>But it was certainly more risk than I was willing

249
00:14:26.919 --> 00:14:27.320
<v Speaker 3>to take.

250
00:14:28.600 --> 00:14:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I when I talked a similar point in my

251
00:14:31.600 --> 00:14:34.960
<v Speaker 2>video poker classes, I would make the point that when

252
00:14:35.000 --> 00:14:38.720
<v Speaker 2>you're twenty five and you'd go broke, it's not a

253
00:14:38.759 --> 00:14:41.679
<v Speaker 2>good thing. But when you're seventy and go broke as

254
00:14:41.720 --> 00:14:46.039
<v Speaker 2>a disaster, And so when you're starting out you have

255
00:14:46.240 --> 00:14:50.200
<v Speaker 2>so many more options of ways to get the money back,

256
00:14:50.879 --> 00:14:55.120
<v Speaker 2>and when you're seventy, your best money making options are over.

257
00:14:55.919 --> 00:14:59.279
<v Speaker 2>So I did it in terms of age rather than wealth,

258
00:14:59.360 --> 00:15:01.080
<v Speaker 2>But it's a simil principle, I think.

259
00:15:01.720 --> 00:15:06.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think also about when you're twenty five, or

260
00:15:06.279 --> 00:15:11.759
<v Speaker 3>when I was twenty five, my lifestyle was pretty spartan.

261
00:15:11.879 --> 00:15:14.799
<v Speaker 3>I would never stay in a motel better than Motel

262
00:15:14.960 --> 00:15:19.039
<v Speaker 3>six or whatever was the cheapest possible thing I could find.

263
00:15:19.639 --> 00:15:21.200
<v Speaker 2>But you know, you reach.

264
00:15:21.039 --> 00:15:23.600
<v Speaker 3>A certain point in your life where I'm not going

265
00:15:23.679 --> 00:15:26.519
<v Speaker 3>to stay in Motel six anymore, you know what I mean,

266
00:15:26.679 --> 00:15:30.080
<v Speaker 3>Like you're used to more comforts as you get older

267
00:15:30.080 --> 00:15:33.960
<v Speaker 3>and your bankroll grows, and so yeah, I totally agree

268
00:15:34.000 --> 00:15:37.039
<v Speaker 3>with you that there's a big difference going growth later.

269
00:15:38.000 --> 00:15:41.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Absolutely. And you know when I was in my twenties,

270
00:15:41.639 --> 00:15:43.639
<v Speaker 1>I stayed at Motel five and a half. I mean

271
00:15:43.679 --> 00:15:47.399
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't emplord Motel six. So I know where you're

272
00:15:47.399 --> 00:15:47.919
<v Speaker 1>coming from.

273
00:15:48.600 --> 00:15:52.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Now, when you were in sports betting, you developed

274
00:15:52.759 --> 00:16:01.360
<v Speaker 2>a theory of increasing expected growth as a better theory

275
00:16:01.440 --> 00:16:06.200
<v Speaker 2>then increasing expected value. So how did that work in

276
00:16:06.279 --> 00:16:11.919
<v Speaker 2>sports and does that go well with investing in other things?

277
00:16:12.600 --> 00:16:17.879
<v Speaker 1>Well, in sports, really, you know your end goal is

278
00:16:17.960 --> 00:16:23.159
<v Speaker 1>to increase the size of your bank roll, and the

279
00:16:23.240 --> 00:16:27.799
<v Speaker 1>first step to doing that is finding positive expected value

280
00:16:27.879 --> 00:16:31.279
<v Speaker 1>opportunities that are going to lead to winning more in

281
00:16:31.279 --> 00:16:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the long term than you lose. But that the expected

282
00:16:36.519 --> 00:16:40.480
<v Speaker 1>value of a bet or a play doesn't take into

283
00:16:40.519 --> 00:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>account the level of risk you have to endure. That's

284
00:16:44.279 --> 00:16:46.919
<v Speaker 1>why there is such a thing as the Kelly criterion.

285
00:16:47.120 --> 00:16:51.399
<v Speaker 1>Cally criterion says, Okay, if you have positive expected value,

286
00:16:51.559 --> 00:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>here's the optimal amount to stake on that bet, maybe

287
00:16:56.399 --> 00:16:59.759
<v Speaker 1>one percent, three percent, five percent of your bank roll.

288
00:17:00.360 --> 00:17:02.879
<v Speaker 1>But why is there an optimal amount? Why isn't ten

289
00:17:02.919 --> 00:17:04.960
<v Speaker 1>percent of your bankroll better? A twenty percent of your

290
00:17:04.960 --> 00:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>bankroll better? Well, in terms of expected value, the most

291
00:17:09.039 --> 00:17:12.680
<v Speaker 1>expected value you're going to get in terms of absolute

292
00:17:12.759 --> 00:17:15.559
<v Speaker 1>dollars is if you find a big edge, you put

293
00:17:15.559 --> 00:17:17.400
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent of your bank roll on it, and

294
00:17:17.440 --> 00:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that's the most expected value you can get. And obviously

295
00:17:21.039 --> 00:17:24.160
<v Speaker 1>it only takes or one or two times or one

296
00:17:24.200 --> 00:17:27.440
<v Speaker 1>time losing with one hundred percent of your bankroll on

297
00:17:27.480 --> 00:17:30.640
<v Speaker 1>a play that you go bust and then you can't

298
00:17:30.680 --> 00:17:35.200
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of any more plus EV opportunities. So the

299
00:17:35.839 --> 00:17:39.319
<v Speaker 1>idea that you want to increase your expected bank roll

300
00:17:40.279 --> 00:17:43.640
<v Speaker 1>actually takes into account the amount of risk that you're

301
00:17:43.680 --> 00:17:50.799
<v Speaker 1>taking and balances it with the positive ev that you

302
00:17:50.880 --> 00:17:54.519
<v Speaker 1>can get based on your edge. The same I didn't

303
00:17:54.559 --> 00:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>know it at the time when I first started looking

304
00:17:57.240 --> 00:18:00.960
<v Speaker 1>into it, but the same principle exists in investing. It

305
00:18:01.160 --> 00:18:04.839
<v Speaker 1>just goes by a different name called risk adjusted returns.

306
00:18:05.359 --> 00:18:09.000
<v Speaker 1>So you can expect to get a certain return from

307
00:18:09.559 --> 00:18:12.799
<v Speaker 1>like a mutual fund, a stock mutual fund, and say

308
00:18:12.839 --> 00:18:16.319
<v Speaker 1>it's ten percent a year is your expected return. If

309
00:18:16.319 --> 00:18:21.160
<v Speaker 1>that's coming from a stock mutual fund that it mostly has,

310
00:18:21.319 --> 00:18:24.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, very large cap stocks and it doesn't move

311
00:18:24.319 --> 00:18:27.799
<v Speaker 1>around very much from year to year, that may be

312
00:18:27.839 --> 00:18:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a very good investment to put a lot of money in.

313
00:18:30.240 --> 00:18:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Whereas another fund that also has ten percent expected returns

314
00:18:35.000 --> 00:18:39.240
<v Speaker 1>per year but uses you know, micro like penny stocks

315
00:18:39.240 --> 00:18:42.839
<v Speaker 1>that have huge volatility from year to year, that may

316
00:18:42.880 --> 00:18:44.960
<v Speaker 1>not be a very good investment because you're not getting

317
00:18:45.000 --> 00:18:48.359
<v Speaker 1>any more return for the risks that you have to bear.

318
00:18:48.759 --> 00:18:51.359
<v Speaker 1>And it's really when you do the math. The math

319
00:18:51.599 --> 00:18:54.160
<v Speaker 1>is identical in both situations.

320
00:18:55.079 --> 00:18:58.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that. You know, the thing that people

321
00:18:58.680 --> 00:19:04.480
<v Speaker 3>miss about Bett and Kelly is the variance part of

322
00:19:04.519 --> 00:19:08.119
<v Speaker 3>the equation. Right, there's a big difference between if you're

323
00:19:08.160 --> 00:19:13.000
<v Speaker 3>playing blackjack with a one percent edge, but your variance

324
00:19:13.079 --> 00:19:16.119
<v Speaker 3>is only one point one. That's a big difference than

325
00:19:16.200 --> 00:19:19.160
<v Speaker 3>having a one percent edge on a slot machine, where

326
00:19:19.200 --> 00:19:23.440
<v Speaker 3>your variance might be you know, two hundred or something.

327
00:19:24.759 --> 00:19:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh absolutely, yes, that's really the key point is that

328
00:19:30.720 --> 00:19:35.440
<v Speaker 1>you have to account for both, and the variance is

329
00:19:35.519 --> 00:19:39.960
<v Speaker 1>going to hurt just about everybody. It's going there's gonna

330
00:19:39.960 --> 00:19:43.039
<v Speaker 1>be one person that's really lucky. You know, you find

331
00:19:43.039 --> 00:19:46.079
<v Speaker 1>one hundred people playing the slot machines, and one of

332
00:19:46.119 --> 00:19:49.200
<v Speaker 1>them is going to be really lucky and take home

333
00:19:49.480 --> 00:19:54.119
<v Speaker 1>a huge payday. The other ninety nine are not, And

334
00:19:54.240 --> 00:19:57.440
<v Speaker 1>so if you're not the luckiest of the bunch, the

335
00:19:57.559 --> 00:19:59.599
<v Speaker 1>variance is going to hurt you a lot more than

336
00:19:59.599 --> 00:20:00.759
<v Speaker 1>it helps.

337
00:20:01.359 --> 00:20:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, one thing about Kelly and sports betting is if

338
00:20:07.240 --> 00:20:12.160
<v Speaker 2>you can if you're if your formula says you should bet,

339
00:20:13.440 --> 00:20:18.480
<v Speaker 2>however many dollars, you often can't get that many dollars down.

340
00:20:19.039 --> 00:20:25.160
<v Speaker 2>You might be limited by by either the book's that big,

341
00:20:25.319 --> 00:20:28.519
<v Speaker 2>or they can limit you personally to you can bet

342
00:20:28.519 --> 00:20:32.119
<v Speaker 2>any amount you want up to ninety nine cents.

343
00:20:32.720 --> 00:20:35.960
<v Speaker 3>Does that get I remember when Elihu was on the

344
00:20:36.000 --> 00:20:39.400
<v Speaker 3>show and he said, at some point, Kelly just doesn't

345
00:20:39.440 --> 00:20:42.720
<v Speaker 3>matter anymore because, basically because of the limits, once your

346
00:20:42.759 --> 00:20:46.079
<v Speaker 3>bank roll is big enough, you you could never bet

347
00:20:46.240 --> 00:20:50.000
<v Speaker 3>as much as you wanted because the sports books just

348
00:20:50.039 --> 00:20:50.720
<v Speaker 3>won't take it.

349
00:20:52.079 --> 00:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that's that's very true. And you know that most

350
00:20:56.960 --> 00:21:00.160
<v Speaker 1>of the recreational sports books do a pretty good job

351
00:21:00.279 --> 00:21:03.799
<v Speaker 1>of figuring out who's sharp and who's not and limiting

352
00:21:03.839 --> 00:21:09.359
<v Speaker 1>them specifically, like Bob was talking about. But even beyond that,

353
00:21:09.440 --> 00:21:12.160
<v Speaker 1>you know that they have limits that everybody has to

354
00:21:12.200 --> 00:21:15.640
<v Speaker 1>adhere to. They're just not willing to take whatever you

355
00:21:15.680 --> 00:21:20.160
<v Speaker 1>want to plunk down. So that is a big factor.

356
00:21:20.200 --> 00:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>And when you get to the point where you have

357
00:21:22.279 --> 00:21:26.400
<v Speaker 1>a very large bank roll, then Kelly doesn't really come

358
00:21:26.440 --> 00:21:29.279
<v Speaker 1>into play because you're just not able to get down

359
00:21:29.319 --> 00:21:32.759
<v Speaker 1>as much as you want. But it's very interesting when

360
00:21:32.799 --> 00:21:37.319
<v Speaker 1>I've watched or listened to a lot of professional sports

361
00:21:37.319 --> 00:21:40.680
<v Speaker 1>betters talk about how they got their start and what

362
00:21:40.759 --> 00:21:43.359
<v Speaker 1>they do now. A lot of them get their start

363
00:21:43.480 --> 00:21:48.559
<v Speaker 1>by doing arbitrage betting or middling where you'll bet on

364
00:21:49.720 --> 00:21:52.880
<v Speaker 1>both sides of the game at different spreads, and if

365
00:21:52.880 --> 00:21:57.039
<v Speaker 1>the spread, if the game difference falls just right, you

366
00:21:57.119 --> 00:21:59.799
<v Speaker 1>win both bets. But most of the time you win one,

367
00:21:59.839 --> 00:22:03.599
<v Speaker 1>you lose one. That's how they got their start, and

368
00:22:03.640 --> 00:22:07.359
<v Speaker 1>those are much lower risk type of plays than just

369
00:22:07.440 --> 00:22:11.640
<v Speaker 1>betting on positive ev bets. And they built up their

370
00:22:11.640 --> 00:22:13.839
<v Speaker 1>bank rolls that way, and then when their bank rolls

371
00:22:13.920 --> 00:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>got to be so big that they couldn't get down

372
00:22:17.039 --> 00:22:20.000
<v Speaker 1>as much as they wanted to anymore, the light bulb

373
00:22:20.079 --> 00:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>went off and they said, Hey, why am I arbitrage

374
00:22:22.279 --> 00:22:25.519
<v Speaker 1>betting when I've got value on one side and I'm

375
00:22:25.880 --> 00:22:27.799
<v Speaker 1>losing value on the other side. Why don't I just

376
00:22:27.839 --> 00:22:30.799
<v Speaker 1>bet the side that only has value. Well, that's exactly

377
00:22:30.839 --> 00:22:33.319
<v Speaker 1>the point in time when you should make that switch,

378
00:22:33.759 --> 00:22:35.640
<v Speaker 1>when you can't get that as much as you want

379
00:22:35.680 --> 00:22:38.119
<v Speaker 1>to anymore, So you just bet the value side. You

380
00:22:38.160 --> 00:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>don't have to worry about Kelly criterion because you're never

381
00:22:40.759 --> 00:22:41.799
<v Speaker 1>going to get that much down.

382
00:22:42.720 --> 00:22:44.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

383
00:22:44.279 --> 00:22:47.680
<v Speaker 2>So arbing is a form of hedging your bets. Are

384
00:22:47.720 --> 00:22:51.759
<v Speaker 2>there in the financial markets or is it right to

385
00:22:51.880 --> 00:22:52.480
<v Speaker 2>headge your bets?

386
00:22:52.559 --> 00:22:56.559
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it certainly is, But it's a lot harder to do.

387
00:22:57.160 --> 00:22:59.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, back in like the sixties and the seventies,

388
00:23:00.079 --> 00:23:03.720
<v Speaker 1>and people like Ed Thorpe were starting with hedge funds.

389
00:23:04.519 --> 00:23:09.640
<v Speaker 1>That's what they did is they would find mispriced options

390
00:23:10.519 --> 00:23:14.119
<v Speaker 1>and they would load up on them, and then to

391
00:23:14.160 --> 00:23:17.799
<v Speaker 1>reduce their risk, they would either buy or short sell

392
00:23:17.880 --> 00:23:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the underlying stock, figuring that that was a pretty efficient market.

393
00:23:22.279 --> 00:23:25.279
<v Speaker 1>They might lose a tiny little bit of value on

394
00:23:25.440 --> 00:23:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the stock side, but they would make a ton of

395
00:23:27.960 --> 00:23:30.839
<v Speaker 1>value on the option side, and the risk would even out.

396
00:23:32.079 --> 00:23:36.119
<v Speaker 1>And that was very successful for a while until in

397
00:23:36.160 --> 00:23:39.839
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen seventies the Black Shoals formula got published and

398
00:23:39.880 --> 00:23:42.799
<v Speaker 1>then everybody could figure out how to value options correctly,

399
00:23:42.839 --> 00:23:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and that became much harder to do. So it's actually

400
00:23:45.960 --> 00:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot easier to do a true arbitrage in sports

401
00:23:51.000 --> 00:23:56.079
<v Speaker 1>betting than it is in investing, because in investing, you know,

402
00:23:56.119 --> 00:23:58.400
<v Speaker 1>when you go to buy a particular stock, there's only

403
00:23:58.440 --> 00:24:01.160
<v Speaker 1>one place to buy it, right it's either listed on

404
00:24:01.200 --> 00:24:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the New York socc Exchange or on the Nasdaq. And

405
00:24:07.000 --> 00:24:10.079
<v Speaker 1>in sports betting there's so many different books to choose from,

406
00:24:10.559 --> 00:24:13.680
<v Speaker 1>so you can can often find odds of one book

407
00:24:13.720 --> 00:24:16.519
<v Speaker 1>that are really good on team A. Another book, they're

408
00:24:16.519 --> 00:24:18.680
<v Speaker 1>really good on team B, and then you can form

409
00:24:18.720 --> 00:24:19.839
<v Speaker 1>an arbitrage that way.

410
00:24:20.880 --> 00:24:24.559
<v Speaker 3>So the one thing that seemed to be not talked

411
00:24:24.599 --> 00:24:30.240
<v Speaker 3>about much was the whole tax implications of you know,

412
00:24:30.279 --> 00:24:35.519
<v Speaker 3>when you talked about rebalancing your portfolio, Well, there's a

413
00:24:35.680 --> 00:24:41.400
<v Speaker 3>huge cost if you're in a regular brokerage account. There's

414
00:24:41.440 --> 00:24:45.880
<v Speaker 3>a huge cost to rebalancing if you have a gain

415
00:24:45.960 --> 00:24:49.680
<v Speaker 3>on something that you now want to take your position

416
00:24:49.839 --> 00:24:51.880
<v Speaker 3>down to a lower amount.

417
00:24:52.960 --> 00:24:56.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you're absolutely right, And you know, I'm not a

418
00:24:56.240 --> 00:24:59.759
<v Speaker 1>tax professional, so I steered clear of trying to give

419
00:24:59.759 --> 00:25:03.480
<v Speaker 1>any sort of tax advice in the book. But you're

420
00:25:03.519 --> 00:25:07.519
<v Speaker 1>absolutely right, and that type of technique is going to

421
00:25:07.599 --> 00:25:10.440
<v Speaker 1>work much better in a tax advantage account like an

422
00:25:10.440 --> 00:25:13.680
<v Speaker 1>IRA or a four oh one K, as long as

423
00:25:13.680 --> 00:25:16.839
<v Speaker 1>you don't have any you know, high transaction costs in those.

424
00:25:17.920 --> 00:25:20.519
<v Speaker 1>And it's the kind of thing that could also work

425
00:25:20.559 --> 00:25:26.799
<v Speaker 1>in an ETF. They're they're already loads of ETFs that

426
00:25:27.079 --> 00:25:31.599
<v Speaker 1>are set up to do you know, two times leverage

427
00:25:31.680 --> 00:25:34.680
<v Speaker 1>or three times leverage of some sort of index like

428
00:25:34.759 --> 00:25:37.599
<v Speaker 1>the either the Nasdaq or the S and P five hundred,

429
00:25:38.279 --> 00:25:42.240
<v Speaker 1>or even of individual stocks and they're trading every single

430
00:25:42.359 --> 00:25:46.400
<v Speaker 1>day in order to reset that leverage because you know,

431
00:25:46.480 --> 00:25:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the as the stock or the or the index goes

432
00:25:49.720 --> 00:25:52.680
<v Speaker 1>up and down, the amount that they need to hold

433
00:25:53.079 --> 00:25:56.440
<v Speaker 1>of the underlying stocks versus the swaps that they use

434
00:25:56.559 --> 00:25:59.440
<v Speaker 1>to get the leverage changes every day, so they have

435
00:25:59.519 --> 00:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to reapback balance every day. Now, they're not turning over

436
00:26:02.039 --> 00:26:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the whole portfolio, they're only trading a little bit, but

437
00:26:05.440 --> 00:26:08.720
<v Speaker 1>they're doing it every day. And the type of rebalancing

438
00:26:08.759 --> 00:26:11.039
<v Speaker 1>that I was modeling is the same sort of thing

439
00:26:11.079 --> 00:26:14.839
<v Speaker 1>where you're not turning over the entire portfolio. We're trading

440
00:26:14.839 --> 00:26:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit every day to essentially adjust the leverage

441
00:26:18.920 --> 00:26:22.839
<v Speaker 1>that you have based on the market conditions.

442
00:26:23.400 --> 00:26:26.079
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I was faced with this situation a couple of

443
00:26:26.119 --> 00:26:29.839
<v Speaker 3>months ago where I had, you know, a bunch of

444
00:26:29.880 --> 00:26:35.559
<v Speaker 3>silver which had exploded, and because some of it was

445
00:26:35.720 --> 00:26:41.960
<v Speaker 3>in a broker not a taxible brokerage account, you know, I,

446
00:26:42.039 --> 00:26:44.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, I wanted to rebalance, but I was not

447
00:26:44.880 --> 00:26:47.720
<v Speaker 3>willing to pay the capital gains tax to do it.

448
00:26:48.000 --> 00:26:52.960
<v Speaker 3>And you know, I knew that I could buy puts,

449
00:26:53.240 --> 00:26:56.519
<v Speaker 3>which is basically an option that is like a beat

450
00:26:56.599 --> 00:27:00.039
<v Speaker 3>that silver will go down, but if I do that

451
00:27:00.319 --> 00:27:02.279
<v Speaker 3>and I'm correct, well then I have to pay the

452
00:27:02.319 --> 00:27:05.599
<v Speaker 3>tax on the put, which is now a short term

453
00:27:05.640 --> 00:27:10.160
<v Speaker 3>capital gain, which is even worse. Right, So yeah, it's

454
00:27:10.400 --> 00:27:15.559
<v Speaker 3>it's it's very difficult to do those things in taxable accounts,

455
00:27:15.920 --> 00:27:18.799
<v Speaker 3>which so basically, you know, I followed ed Thorpe and

456
00:27:18.880 --> 00:27:22.559
<v Speaker 3>Wren Buffett's advice to you know, just buy the index

457
00:27:22.640 --> 00:27:23.759
<v Speaker 3>and let it sit there.

458
00:27:25.480 --> 00:27:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean for taxable accounts, you absolutely have to

459
00:27:29.920 --> 00:27:34.799
<v Speaker 1>take that into account. And and and when you're doing

460
00:27:34.799 --> 00:27:38.680
<v Speaker 1>it yourself like that, passive investing has a lot of advantages.

461
00:27:39.680 --> 00:27:44.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, in your earlier writings on sports betting, you used

462
00:27:44.799 --> 00:27:47.319
<v Speaker 2>a route unit staking system.

463
00:27:48.240 --> 00:27:49.680
<v Speaker 1>So what is that?

464
00:27:49.839 --> 00:27:54.240
<v Speaker 2>And does that have an analog in the investing in

465
00:27:54.279 --> 00:27:55.599
<v Speaker 2>other things world?

466
00:27:57.720 --> 00:28:01.359
<v Speaker 1>So that's a staking system where you decide how much

467
00:28:01.400 --> 00:28:07.640
<v Speaker 1>you're going to bet based on the difference in odds

468
00:28:07.680 --> 00:28:13.200
<v Speaker 1>from basically an even money bet, and so you take

469
00:28:13.359 --> 00:28:17.319
<v Speaker 1>the square root of that difference and you divide your

470
00:28:17.319 --> 00:28:20.240
<v Speaker 1>bet by that amount. In other words, if you're if

471
00:28:20.279 --> 00:28:24.640
<v Speaker 1>you're normally betting, say one hundred dollars at even money,

472
00:28:25.519 --> 00:28:29.039
<v Speaker 1>and then you find a bet at plus four hundred,

473
00:28:29.079 --> 00:28:32.799
<v Speaker 1>so it's four to one odds, you would divide your

474
00:28:32.839 --> 00:28:36.039
<v Speaker 1>bet size by the square root of four, which is two,

475
00:28:36.240 --> 00:28:39.680
<v Speaker 1>so you would bet fifty dollars on that. Conversely, if

476
00:28:39.720 --> 00:28:42.519
<v Speaker 1>you're going to bet at something at minus four hundred,

477
00:28:43.319 --> 00:28:47.839
<v Speaker 1>you would divide by the square root of one quarter,

478
00:28:48.200 --> 00:28:52.039
<v Speaker 1>so dividing by a half, multiplying by two, you would

479
00:28:52.079 --> 00:28:57.440
<v Speaker 1>bet two hundred dollars. And essentially the way it works

480
00:28:57.559 --> 00:29:00.839
<v Speaker 1>is that if you're in a type of market where

481
00:29:00.599 --> 00:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>you have a pretty good idea of what your edge

482
00:29:03.839 --> 00:29:07.519
<v Speaker 1>is at even money bets, but you're not sure how

483
00:29:07.640 --> 00:29:12.119
<v Speaker 1>much the edge will change for bets at different odds,

484
00:29:12.440 --> 00:29:16.799
<v Speaker 1>if you follow this system, you're essentially mimicking what the

485
00:29:16.880 --> 00:29:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Kelly criteria would tell you to bet based on those odds,

486
00:29:20.799 --> 00:29:24.240
<v Speaker 1>because normally you'll find a bigger edge at the plus

487
00:29:24.279 --> 00:29:27.880
<v Speaker 1>money odds and a smaller edge for the minus money odds.

488
00:29:28.880 --> 00:29:32.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, a mistake that I a lot of gamblers make,

489
00:29:33.160 --> 00:29:37.839
<v Speaker 3>or people who are even our professional gamblers, is they

490
00:29:37.880 --> 00:29:42.359
<v Speaker 3>do not want to lay a big price. They you know,

491
00:29:42.480 --> 00:29:46.839
<v Speaker 3>they really hate the idea of, you know, laying eight

492
00:29:46.880 --> 00:29:51.720
<v Speaker 3>to one on something because if I lose, I lose eight,

493
00:29:51.880 --> 00:29:54.160
<v Speaker 3>but if I win, I only win one. But what

494
00:29:54.200 --> 00:29:57.480
<v Speaker 3>they're forgetting is you're supposed to win seven out of

495
00:29:57.480 --> 00:30:01.799
<v Speaker 3>eight times when you do that, So yes, you are

496
00:30:02.279 --> 00:30:06.000
<v Speaker 3>losing the eight when you lose, but seven or eight

497
00:30:06.039 --> 00:30:10.720
<v Speaker 3>times you're winning one. So yeah, it's just interesting that

498
00:30:11.200 --> 00:30:15.839
<v Speaker 3>even people who are professionals who should understand these things,

499
00:30:15.920 --> 00:30:19.000
<v Speaker 3>it's hard to not let your emotions take over with

500
00:30:19.119 --> 00:30:20.240
<v Speaker 3>those decisions.

501
00:30:21.119 --> 00:30:24.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it really is, because you know, our intuition gets

502
00:30:24.400 --> 00:30:30.079
<v Speaker 1>built up from other experiences, and then it just feels wrong.

503
00:30:30.559 --> 00:30:33.640
<v Speaker 1>It feels wrong to risk that much money, even though,

504
00:30:33.680 --> 00:30:35.359
<v Speaker 1>like you said, you're going to win seven out of

505
00:30:35.359 --> 00:30:38.839
<v Speaker 1>eight times. So occasionally you will lose and it will

506
00:30:38.880 --> 00:30:42.359
<v Speaker 1>really hurt, but you know you're going to rebound because

507
00:30:42.400 --> 00:30:44.319
<v Speaker 1>you know you keep doing it. You win seven out

508
00:30:44.319 --> 00:30:46.799
<v Speaker 1>of eight times, and when you look at it from

509
00:30:46.799 --> 00:30:53.759
<v Speaker 1>the lens of expected growth or risk adjusted returns, because

510
00:30:53.880 --> 00:30:57.799
<v Speaker 1>those kind of vets have much lower risk, right, you're

511
00:30:57.799 --> 00:31:00.480
<v Speaker 1>only going to lose one out of eight times. If

512
00:31:00.519 --> 00:31:04.240
<v Speaker 1>you can get the same edge that you could add

513
00:31:04.559 --> 00:31:07.440
<v Speaker 1>for an even money bet, those kind of minus eight

514
00:31:07.519 --> 00:31:10.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred bets are way more valuable. You will build your

515
00:31:10.720 --> 00:31:15.279
<v Speaker 1>bank roll much quicker with those kind of bets, and

516
00:31:15.480 --> 00:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>because of that, you usually don't see that big of

517
00:31:17.920 --> 00:31:20.240
<v Speaker 1>an edge when it's at minus eight hundred. As a

518
00:31:20.240 --> 00:31:22.119
<v Speaker 1>matter of fact, that you know, there's a certain limit

519
00:31:22.759 --> 00:31:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to how big the edge could possibly be, right, because

520
00:31:25.440 --> 00:31:27.599
<v Speaker 1>you could only you can only win one hundred percent

521
00:31:27.640 --> 00:31:30.079
<v Speaker 1>of the time. You can't win more than more than that.

522
00:31:31.039 --> 00:31:34.640
<v Speaker 1>But I actually did an article for Pinnacle a couple

523
00:31:34.720 --> 00:31:37.680
<v Speaker 1>of months ago talking about that exact subject, where there

524
00:31:37.759 --> 00:31:42.920
<v Speaker 1>was a betting service basically that kind of broke down

525
00:31:43.680 --> 00:31:48.119
<v Speaker 1>the profit that they made on their sharp bets by

526
00:31:48.519 --> 00:31:51.279
<v Speaker 1>what the odds were. They put them in certain groups,

527
00:31:51.759 --> 00:31:54.319
<v Speaker 1>and they found that the vast majority of their profits

528
00:31:54.920 --> 00:31:58.359
<v Speaker 1>came from betting these short odds bets, you know, like

529
00:31:58.400 --> 00:32:02.279
<v Speaker 1>the equivalent of minus four hundreds five hundred type of odds,

530
00:32:02.319 --> 00:32:05.319
<v Speaker 1>because they were able to find decent edges there and

531
00:32:05.359 --> 00:32:07.839
<v Speaker 1>the risk was so low that you know, when you

532
00:32:07.960 --> 00:32:10.599
<v Speaker 1>state them properly, you can make much more profit.

533
00:32:11.759 --> 00:32:14.359
<v Speaker 3>Right. And the reason that the edge is there is

534
00:32:14.400 --> 00:32:17.119
<v Speaker 3>because the public all wants to take the other side

535
00:32:17.119 --> 00:32:19.000
<v Speaker 3>of that. They want to bet a little and win

536
00:32:19.079 --> 00:32:24.720
<v Speaker 3>a lot, and it forces the price in that direction

537
00:32:24.960 --> 00:32:27.519
<v Speaker 3>for the person taking the other side.

538
00:32:28.200 --> 00:32:32.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely, I mean the book makers, you know, people

539
00:32:32.160 --> 00:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>think that a bookmaker wants to make the same amount

540
00:32:35.440 --> 00:32:40.079
<v Speaker 1>of profit whether the favorite wins or the or the

541
00:32:40.119 --> 00:32:43.200
<v Speaker 1>long shot the underdog wins. But that's not really true

542
00:32:43.400 --> 00:32:47.519
<v Speaker 1>because they take a lot more liability on those long shots.

543
00:32:47.559 --> 00:32:50.839
<v Speaker 1>When the long shots come in, you know, they're putting

544
00:32:50.839 --> 00:32:52.799
<v Speaker 1>out an awful lot of cash because a lot of

545
00:32:52.799 --> 00:32:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the public is on them rather than the favorite.

546
00:32:57.319 --> 00:32:59.359
<v Speaker 2>So if the Raiders win the Super Bowl next year,

547
00:32:59.400 --> 00:33:00.920
<v Speaker 2>the books are really going to take a bath.

548
00:33:02.480 --> 00:33:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, because I'm sure and now the books are

549
00:33:07.039 --> 00:33:09.119
<v Speaker 1>they're not quite as dumb as they look, you know,

550
00:33:09.160 --> 00:33:10.759
<v Speaker 1>the even the soft.

551
00:33:10.799 --> 00:33:12.759
<v Speaker 3>It depends on which one you're talking about.

552
00:33:15.480 --> 00:33:19.240
<v Speaker 1>But they they build in what people call the favorite

553
00:33:19.240 --> 00:33:22.240
<v Speaker 1>long shot bias, so that if if the Raiders have

554
00:33:22.559 --> 00:33:25.559
<v Speaker 1>like azer point one percent chance of winning the Super

555
00:33:25.559 --> 00:33:29.519
<v Speaker 1>Bowl next year, then you know, the fair odds would

556
00:33:29.559 --> 00:33:32.039
<v Speaker 1>be a thousand to one, right, But they're only going

557
00:33:32.079 --> 00:33:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to pay you like two hundred to one if the

558
00:33:34.279 --> 00:33:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Raiders win, because they they they want to protect themselves

559
00:33:38.519 --> 00:33:42.400
<v Speaker 1>from those you know, big outlays, and that gets baked

560
00:33:42.440 --> 00:33:46.559
<v Speaker 1>into these these lines in a very consistent way. And

561
00:33:46.640 --> 00:33:50.839
<v Speaker 1>people have been noticing this phenomenon for decades and they

562
00:33:50.880 --> 00:33:53.440
<v Speaker 1>call it the favorite long shot bias. And one of

563
00:33:53.480 --> 00:33:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the things that I looked at in my first book,

564
00:33:56.799 --> 00:34:00.200
<v Speaker 1>which is but how Much did You Lose, is the

565
00:34:00.240 --> 00:34:02.720
<v Speaker 1>fact that when you look at it in terms of

566
00:34:02.799 --> 00:34:06.839
<v Speaker 1>expected value, it does look like a bias those bookman

567
00:34:06.839 --> 00:34:09.679
<v Speaker 1>because they're asking for a lot more expected value from

568
00:34:09.719 --> 00:34:12.639
<v Speaker 1>the better for these long shots than they are from

569
00:34:12.639 --> 00:34:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the favorites. But if you look at it in terms

570
00:34:15.039 --> 00:34:18.639
<v Speaker 1>of expected growth from the bookmaker's point of view, and

571
00:34:18.679 --> 00:34:22.360
<v Speaker 1>you adjust for the risk that they're taking, it actually

572
00:34:22.400 --> 00:34:25.679
<v Speaker 1>works out to be exactly the same for favorites and

573
00:34:25.800 --> 00:34:29.079
<v Speaker 1>long shots, no matter how long the long shot is.

574
00:34:29.480 --> 00:34:33.280
<v Speaker 1>So they're getting the same type of expected growth from

575
00:34:33.280 --> 00:34:35.880
<v Speaker 1>a plus four hundred long shot and a plus one

576
00:34:35.920 --> 00:34:38.800
<v Speaker 1>thousand long shot and a plus five thousand long shot

577
00:34:38.960 --> 00:34:44.159
<v Speaker 1>because they keep shortening the pay the shortening the offered

578
00:34:44.199 --> 00:34:48.000
<v Speaker 1>odds compared to what the true odds should be to

579
00:34:48.159 --> 00:34:53.039
<v Speaker 1>keep that expected growth constant. And same thing with the favorites.

580
00:34:53.320 --> 00:34:57.000
<v Speaker 1>They give you a smaller edge for a minus one

581
00:34:57.079 --> 00:35:00.320
<v Speaker 1>thousand than they would for a minus two hundred, but

582
00:35:00.360 --> 00:35:04.119
<v Speaker 1>the expected growth from their perspective winds up being the same.

583
00:35:05.400 --> 00:35:10.519
<v Speaker 2>Now you've mentioned a few times that the big key

584
00:35:10.760 --> 00:35:14.159
<v Speaker 2>in making your bets or investments is making sure you're

585
00:35:14.159 --> 00:35:19.079
<v Speaker 2>the favorite, making sure you have the advantage. So the

586
00:35:19.199 --> 00:35:22.920
<v Speaker 2>question becomes, how do you know if you have the

587
00:35:23.000 --> 00:35:23.920
<v Speaker 2>advantage or not?

588
00:35:26.000 --> 00:35:30.360
<v Speaker 1>That is a great question and sports betting, the best

589
00:35:30.400 --> 00:35:33.199
<v Speaker 1>way to know whether you have the advantage is if

590
00:35:33.239 --> 00:35:37.840
<v Speaker 1>you have closing line value, which means that when the

591
00:35:38.000 --> 00:35:41.679
<v Speaker 1>bet change, when the odds on that bet right before

592
00:35:41.719 --> 00:35:45.679
<v Speaker 1>the game starts are shorter than the odds that you

593
00:35:45.800 --> 00:35:50.559
<v Speaker 1>betted at, and they're shorter by enough to overcome the big,

594
00:35:51.440 --> 00:35:57.480
<v Speaker 1>then you can tell that, assuming that that closing line

595
00:35:57.800 --> 00:36:01.960
<v Speaker 1>is accurate, that you've got the edge. Now the question

596
00:36:02.079 --> 00:36:05.960
<v Speaker 1>is is the closing line accurate? Well, for highly liquid

597
00:36:06.000 --> 00:36:10.880
<v Speaker 1>markets that get bet back and forth many, many times,

598
00:36:11.559 --> 00:36:15.440
<v Speaker 1>there's tons of evidence to show that those closing lines

599
00:36:15.559 --> 00:36:20.159
<v Speaker 1>on average are accurate because people model it and say, okay,

600
00:36:20.199 --> 00:36:22.559
<v Speaker 1>what if I were to bet at the closing line

601
00:36:22.800 --> 00:36:25.519
<v Speaker 1>without any margin, you know, take out the big, but

602
00:36:25.599 --> 00:36:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I bet at that closing line, and I bet ten

603
00:36:27.920 --> 00:36:32.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand times, I should expect to make exactly zero profit

604
00:36:32.280 --> 00:36:36.599
<v Speaker 1>if those odds are accurate, and they run these models

605
00:36:36.599 --> 00:36:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and analyzes and they come out making basically zero dollars.

606
00:36:40.400 --> 00:36:45.599
<v Speaker 1>So in sports betting. That's a really really good indicator

607
00:36:46.199 --> 00:36:49.039
<v Speaker 1>in investing, Like in the stock market, there is no

608
00:36:49.159 --> 00:36:52.920
<v Speaker 1>indicator like that. If people could could find that kind

609
00:36:52.960 --> 00:36:56.400
<v Speaker 1>of indicator for a stock market or other type of

610
00:36:56.440 --> 00:36:59.360
<v Speaker 1>financial investing, that would be huge.

611
00:36:59.480 --> 00:37:02.519
<v Speaker 3>Well, there is an indicator, right, I mean, over one

612
00:37:02.599 --> 00:37:07.440
<v Speaker 3>hundred plus years, the stock market games. Right. The only

613
00:37:07.559 --> 00:37:11.880
<v Speaker 3>question is if you're going to try to get on

614
00:37:12.039 --> 00:37:15.320
<v Speaker 3>and off the bus that's going up the hill, and

615
00:37:15.719 --> 00:37:17.880
<v Speaker 3>if you could do better than if you just stayed

616
00:37:17.960 --> 00:37:21.480
<v Speaker 3>on the bus to start with and get to the

617
00:37:21.480 --> 00:37:24.360
<v Speaker 3>top of the hill, right, I mean, so you have

618
00:37:24.440 --> 00:37:27.559
<v Speaker 3>an edge. The question is could you have a bigger

619
00:37:27.679 --> 00:37:36.679
<v Speaker 3>edge by somehow making specific picks or timing or things

620
00:37:36.760 --> 00:37:37.159
<v Speaker 3>like that.

621
00:37:38.079 --> 00:37:42.159
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that's the key is that over the past hundred years,

622
00:37:42.840 --> 00:37:45.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, the market has gone up. There's no reason

623
00:37:45.559 --> 00:37:47.719
<v Speaker 1>to believe that over the next hundred years it won't.

624
00:37:47.840 --> 00:37:50.639
<v Speaker 1>But that's that means if you own the whole market,

625
00:37:51.320 --> 00:37:54.519
<v Speaker 1>spread out amongst thousands and thousands of stocks, like a

626
00:37:54.599 --> 00:37:57.679
<v Speaker 1>lot of these index passive index funds will do for you,

627
00:37:58.440 --> 00:38:00.880
<v Speaker 1>then you have an edge. But some people aren't satisfied

628
00:38:00.920 --> 00:38:03.840
<v Speaker 1>with that. They want a bigger edge, and they spend

629
00:38:03.840 --> 00:38:06.119
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time trying to figure out which stocks

630
00:38:06.159 --> 00:38:07.679
<v Speaker 1>are going to go up and which stocks are going

631
00:38:07.719 --> 00:38:12.239
<v Speaker 1>to go down. And maybe they're right, maybe they're wrong,

632
00:38:12.480 --> 00:38:16.800
<v Speaker 1>but the academic research all says that the majority of

633
00:38:16.840 --> 00:38:21.280
<v Speaker 1>them are wrong more than they're right, and the ones

634
00:38:21.599 --> 00:38:26.039
<v Speaker 1>that are right more than they're wrong change every year, right, Like,

635
00:38:26.119 --> 00:38:28.639
<v Speaker 1>maybe your picks will work this year, and Bob's picks

636
00:38:28.639 --> 00:38:30.480
<v Speaker 1>will work next year, and my picks will work the

637
00:38:30.559 --> 00:38:34.880
<v Speaker 1>year after that, but by then your picks have now

638
00:38:34.920 --> 00:38:38.800
<v Speaker 1>gone bad when my picks are going good. So and

639
00:38:38.880 --> 00:38:42.599
<v Speaker 1>you had fees on top of that for investment managers

640
00:38:42.599 --> 00:38:48.039
<v Speaker 1>who are trying these techniques, and there's really ends up

641
00:38:48.039 --> 00:38:51.639
<v Speaker 1>being no more edge. The edge, whatever little edge there

642
00:38:51.760 --> 00:38:54.239
<v Speaker 1>is gets eaten up by the fees for the managers

643
00:38:54.639 --> 00:38:58.039
<v Speaker 1>and does not usually make it down to the actual investors.

644
00:38:59.159 --> 00:39:01.559
<v Speaker 1>So that's what I mean. There's no indicator for the

645
00:39:01.599 --> 00:39:04.320
<v Speaker 1>whole market. Yeah, there's an indicator if you want to

646
00:39:04.320 --> 00:39:07.800
<v Speaker 1>pick like Microsoft and say, oh, you know, I'm confident

647
00:39:07.840 --> 00:39:11.480
<v Speaker 1>that Microsoft is undervalued and I'm going to buy them,

648
00:39:12.079 --> 00:39:15.239
<v Speaker 1>and in ten years, you know, I'll make ten percent

649
00:39:15.280 --> 00:39:18.079
<v Speaker 1>a year. Well maybe you will, maybe you won't, but

650
00:39:18.199 --> 00:39:21.400
<v Speaker 1>ten years isn't even close to long enough to figure

651
00:39:21.400 --> 00:39:23.639
<v Speaker 1>out whether you really did have an edge when you

652
00:39:23.679 --> 00:39:27.599
<v Speaker 1>bought it, because there's so much noise in the price

653
00:39:27.639 --> 00:39:32.880
<v Speaker 1>of these stocks over time that you know. It's like

654
00:39:33.079 --> 00:39:35.880
<v Speaker 1>it's like making, you know, twenty bets at the blackjack

655
00:39:35.960 --> 00:39:38.239
<v Speaker 1>table and saying, oh, well, I'm up one hundred dollars,

656
00:39:38.239 --> 00:39:42.079
<v Speaker 1>I must have an edge. Right, That's not how it works.

657
00:39:42.280 --> 00:39:44.360
<v Speaker 2>I want to go back to when we were talking

658
00:39:44.400 --> 00:39:49.320
<v Speaker 2>about beating the closing line value. It sounded to me,

659
00:39:49.440 --> 00:39:51.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm not a sports better, but it sounded to me

660
00:39:52.159 --> 00:39:56.639
<v Speaker 2>like when the line closes, you're going to know whether

661
00:39:56.719 --> 00:40:00.800
<v Speaker 2>or not you had this edge. But assuming you make

662
00:40:00.840 --> 00:40:05.039
<v Speaker 2>your line, you make your bets before the line closes,

663
00:40:05.840 --> 00:40:07.800
<v Speaker 2>then you're not going to know if you have the

664
00:40:07.840 --> 00:40:14.039
<v Speaker 2>advantage or not until sometime later. So if you don't

665
00:40:14.079 --> 00:40:18.119
<v Speaker 2>know if you have the advantage or not until sometime later,

666
00:40:18.280 --> 00:40:22.719
<v Speaker 2>it seems difficult to figure out whether you should bet

667
00:40:22.800 --> 00:40:25.079
<v Speaker 2>or not or how much because you don't know what

668
00:40:25.119 --> 00:40:25.599
<v Speaker 2>you're edged.

669
00:40:26.760 --> 00:40:30.639
<v Speaker 1>Yep, you're absolutely right. It is difficult to figure that out.

670
00:40:31.199 --> 00:40:37.320
<v Speaker 1>There's basically two techniques that get used commonly to figure

671
00:40:37.400 --> 00:40:40.480
<v Speaker 1>that out, or at least approximated as best you can.

672
00:40:41.360 --> 00:40:46.599
<v Speaker 1>One is called bottom up technique, where basically you handicap

673
00:40:46.679 --> 00:40:50.159
<v Speaker 1>the game. You take into account all the factors that

674
00:40:50.239 --> 00:40:53.679
<v Speaker 1>you think are going to affect the correct odds or

675
00:40:53.719 --> 00:40:58.079
<v Speaker 1>the correct spread, and if the odds or the spread

676
00:40:58.159 --> 00:41:01.800
<v Speaker 1>that the sportsbooks are offering is is better than what

677
00:41:02.320 --> 00:41:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you predict, you make the bet. Now, you don't know

678
00:41:06.320 --> 00:41:09.800
<v Speaker 1>if that stingle bet is going to have an edge

679
00:41:11.039 --> 00:41:12.920
<v Speaker 1>when you make it, Like you said, you don't know

680
00:41:13.199 --> 00:41:16.559
<v Speaker 1>until the line closes. But if you keep track of

681
00:41:16.599 --> 00:41:20.440
<v Speaker 1>them and over the course of six months, you know

682
00:41:20.559 --> 00:41:23.119
<v Speaker 1>you get closing line value on eighty to eighty five

683
00:41:23.159 --> 00:41:27.000
<v Speaker 1>percent of your bets, then probably what you're doing is

684
00:41:27.039 --> 00:41:29.960
<v Speaker 1>working and you can kind of gauge how big that

685
00:41:30.119 --> 00:41:35.039
<v Speaker 1>edge is based on that track record. The other way

686
00:41:35.039 --> 00:41:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to do it is called top down betting, where you

687
00:41:39.199 --> 00:41:42.840
<v Speaker 1>basically look at the market as a whole and you

688
00:41:43.039 --> 00:41:48.159
<v Speaker 1>monitor what kind of odds are being offered, and particularly

689
00:41:48.199 --> 00:41:51.039
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to the sharp sports books and when they

690
00:41:51.239 --> 00:41:55.320
<v Speaker 1>change their line and there's a reasonable limit that they're

691
00:41:55.360 --> 00:42:00.119
<v Speaker 1>offering at the time, that basically indicates that somebody sharp

692
00:42:00.159 --> 00:42:04.039
<v Speaker 1>has bet on that site they moved the line in

693
00:42:04.280 --> 00:42:08.119
<v Speaker 1>response to that, and so like if they were offering

694
00:42:08.239 --> 00:42:12.760
<v Speaker 1>plus one fifty on a baseball money line, and they

695
00:42:12.800 --> 00:42:15.880
<v Speaker 1>moved down the plus one twenty, and you look around

696
00:42:15.880 --> 00:42:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and some of the other sportsbooks still have plus one fifty.

697
00:42:19.159 --> 00:42:21.840
<v Speaker 1>That's a pretty good indication that the plus one fifty

698
00:42:21.920 --> 00:42:24.920
<v Speaker 1>is a good value bet and you should go bet

699
00:42:24.920 --> 00:42:29.840
<v Speaker 1>it there. And typically you got to do it quickly

700
00:42:30.039 --> 00:42:33.039
<v Speaker 1>because it's not going to last. They're going to start

701
00:42:33.039 --> 00:42:35.239
<v Speaker 1>taking bets at plus one fifty and then they're going

702
00:42:35.280 --> 00:42:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to move their line. So it's always a race when

703
00:42:38.320 --> 00:42:40.599
<v Speaker 1>you're doing top down betting, but it is a very

704
00:42:40.639 --> 00:42:41.719
<v Speaker 1>effective way to do it.

705
00:42:42.440 --> 00:42:46.079
<v Speaker 3>But it's also a way to get your accounts limited severely,

706
00:42:46.400 --> 00:42:51.559
<v Speaker 3>very quickly, because they know that that's what you're doing.

707
00:42:51.800 --> 00:42:55.039
<v Speaker 3>The other problem, though, with the bottom up is you

708
00:42:55.079 --> 00:42:58.760
<v Speaker 3>know you could build a model and be making good

709
00:42:58.800 --> 00:43:03.480
<v Speaker 3>bets and do well this season, and next season your

710
00:43:03.599 --> 00:43:06.480
<v Speaker 3>edge may not may be gone and you don't know

711
00:43:06.559 --> 00:43:10.679
<v Speaker 3>it because things have changed, and you know, you can

712
00:43:10.760 --> 00:43:15.000
<v Speaker 3>end up losing a bunch of money while you're realizing that, oh,

713
00:43:15.239 --> 00:43:17.599
<v Speaker 3>looks like my edge is gone.

714
00:43:17.960 --> 00:43:21.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a big risk, and a lot of these

715
00:43:21.440 --> 00:43:26.079
<v Speaker 1>kind of handicappers or modelers experienced that, and you know,

716
00:43:26.119 --> 00:43:28.679
<v Speaker 1>if you can trust the closing line. It's going to

717
00:43:28.760 --> 00:43:32.559
<v Speaker 1>be a help. But even still, your your edge can

718
00:43:32.599 --> 00:43:35.440
<v Speaker 1>disappear and you don't know it, and that's a that's

719
00:43:35.480 --> 00:43:36.199
<v Speaker 1>a big problem.

720
00:43:37.239 --> 00:43:41.920
<v Speaker 3>Anyway, Thanks Dan, this has been great enjoyed talking about it.

721
00:43:41.960 --> 00:43:44.920
<v Speaker 3>I hope you do well with the book. I have

722
00:43:45.039 --> 00:43:49.760
<v Speaker 3>one question before before we go. Favorite restaurant in Las

723
00:43:49.840 --> 00:43:51.519
<v Speaker 3>Vegas that's not in a casino.

724
00:43:53.960 --> 00:43:57.239
<v Speaker 1>Gosh, I should have prepared for this. It's been to

725
00:43:57.320 --> 00:44:02.079
<v Speaker 1>warn you. You should have. Yeah. God, it's been a

726
00:44:02.079 --> 00:44:04.440
<v Speaker 1>long time since I've been in Las Vegas, but there

727
00:44:04.559 --> 00:44:08.079
<v Speaker 1>was a rom and place that I went to with

728
00:44:08.119 --> 00:44:09.880
<v Speaker 1>a friend of mine the last time I was there,

729
00:44:10.679 --> 00:44:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know. I'll have to get back to

730
00:44:12.800 --> 00:44:13.880
<v Speaker 1>you on the name.

731
00:44:14.760 --> 00:44:17.559
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so you're not coming out for the World Series

732
00:44:17.559 --> 00:44:17.960
<v Speaker 3>this year?

733
00:44:18.679 --> 00:44:24.159
<v Speaker 1>No, No, it's it's it's too much of a hurdle

734
00:44:24.199 --> 00:44:30.039
<v Speaker 1>to play those events, even the smaller events. They're like

735
00:44:30.039 --> 00:44:33.239
<v Speaker 1>a three day event, and so if you're going to

736
00:44:33.320 --> 00:44:35.559
<v Speaker 1>make any money at it, you've got to be prepared

737
00:44:35.599 --> 00:44:38.199
<v Speaker 1>to play, you know, twelve hours a day for three

738
00:44:38.280 --> 00:44:41.159
<v Speaker 1>days straight. Those days are behind me.

739
00:44:42.199 --> 00:44:45.519
<v Speaker 2>And my last question before we go is who is

740
00:44:45.559 --> 00:44:47.599
<v Speaker 2>the intended audience for your book.

741
00:44:48.800 --> 00:44:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, the first book was really meant for sharp sports

742
00:44:52.360 --> 00:44:55.800
<v Speaker 1>betters specifically, or people trying to become sharp sports betters,

743
00:44:56.440 --> 00:44:59.079
<v Speaker 1>to give them kind of guidance as to what was

744
00:44:59.199 --> 00:45:04.920
<v Speaker 1>important and how to accelerate their bankroll growth. The new book,

745
00:45:04.960 --> 00:45:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Sharp Money, is really for anybody interested in investing, and

746
00:45:10.840 --> 00:45:14.119
<v Speaker 1>you know their statistic to say, at least, you know,

747
00:45:14.199 --> 00:45:18.760
<v Speaker 1>sixty percent of Americans have some sort of retirement account

748
00:45:19.559 --> 00:45:22.199
<v Speaker 1>which is going to be invested in something. So you've

749
00:45:22.199 --> 00:45:23.760
<v Speaker 1>got to figure out what are you going to invest

750
00:45:23.840 --> 00:45:27.760
<v Speaker 1>it in and how are you going to evaluate whether

751
00:45:27.760 --> 00:45:30.719
<v Speaker 1>that's a good investment. And you know, part of the

752
00:45:30.719 --> 00:45:34.719
<v Speaker 1>book is about how to kind of rebalance your portfolio

753
00:45:34.480 --> 00:45:38.119
<v Speaker 1>to optimize it. But a lot of the subjects in

754
00:45:38.159 --> 00:45:42.760
<v Speaker 1>there talk about things like the correlation between different assets

755
00:45:43.320 --> 00:45:46.119
<v Speaker 1>and get it make sure, making sure that you get

756
00:45:46.360 --> 00:45:48.760
<v Speaker 1>enough return for the risks that you have to bear,

757
00:45:49.320 --> 00:45:52.079
<v Speaker 1>and being able to evaluate that stuff. So people don't

758
00:45:52.159 --> 00:45:56.079
<v Speaker 1>just you know, look at the you know, a spreadsheet

759
00:45:56.280 --> 00:46:00.320
<v Speaker 1>of what the expected what the trailing returns are different

760
00:46:00.320 --> 00:46:03.480
<v Speaker 1>investments and say, okay, well this one had did fifteen

761
00:46:03.519 --> 00:46:06.079
<v Speaker 1>percent last year and this one did eight percent last year,

762
00:46:06.079 --> 00:46:07.440
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going to put all my money in the

763
00:46:07.440 --> 00:46:09.880
<v Speaker 1>fifteen percent one, because that's got to be the best one,

764
00:46:10.679 --> 00:46:15.039
<v Speaker 1>you know. Spoiler alert, that's not necessarily the best one.

765
00:46:15.480 --> 00:46:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you plan a third book? I'm all in it over.

766
00:46:18.639 --> 00:46:21.599
<v Speaker 1>We'll see, we'll see how how I recovered from this one.

767
00:46:22.639 --> 00:46:25.079
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's good. As long as you can there sell

768
00:46:25.119 --> 00:46:27.599
<v Speaker 2>it to sixty percent of the population, that's that's done.

769
00:46:27.599 --> 00:46:28.079
<v Speaker 2>Pretty good.

770
00:46:28.599 --> 00:46:34.480
<v Speaker 1>There you go, Yes, son, audience is a much bigger.

771
00:46:36.039 --> 00:46:41.599
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for coming. We appreciate your time. Oh wait, sorry,

772
00:46:41.679 --> 00:46:42.559
<v Speaker 2>there's one last thing.

773
00:46:43.599 --> 00:46:44.480
<v Speaker 1>You scared me.

774
00:46:44.679 --> 00:46:49.480
<v Speaker 2>When I first got your your book, I got a

775
00:46:49.519 --> 00:46:55.760
<v Speaker 2>review copy and it said, if you share this review

776
00:46:55.840 --> 00:46:59.639
<v Speaker 2>copy with anybody, you're never going to hit another royal

777
00:46:59.719 --> 00:47:04.840
<v Speaker 2>flush in your life. Now, I'm a video poker player,

778
00:47:04.880 --> 00:47:07.719
<v Speaker 2>and that was that really would hurt me to the

779
00:47:07.719 --> 00:47:10.480
<v Speaker 2>core to have no more royal flushes. So that scared me,

780
00:47:10.519 --> 00:47:12.840
<v Speaker 2>honest on your thing. So I just want to know

781
00:47:12.920 --> 00:47:14.679
<v Speaker 2>that you're scared at least one person.

782
00:47:14.400 --> 00:47:17.800
<v Speaker 1>With that line. That was special for you.

783
00:47:17.679 --> 00:47:20.280
<v Speaker 2>Bob Ah very good.

784
00:47:20.320 --> 00:47:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I do feel special.

785
00:47:21.559 --> 00:47:25.159
<v Speaker 2>So thank you for being here. Thank you Richard. Go

786
00:47:25.199 --> 00:47:28.199
<v Speaker 2>out and hit lots of royal flushes everybody. Good day.

787
00:47:30.840 --> 00:47:35.719
<v Speaker 1>Free audio post production Biophonic dot com
