Speaker 1: Five o five. It's about d r C be Coff
Speaker 1: station every Wednesday. It is a vacation. Well, isn't that
Speaker 1: the case? And as I mentioned previously, since I hear
Speaker 1: my tongue opening song every morning, I actually could use
Speaker 1: a vacation. I'll be taking one next week and I
Speaker 1: am looking forward to, uh the mental health week, which
Speaker 1: is the designated reason for taking the vacation. Excuse me,
Speaker 1: hold on, there's that cough button to thank god it exists.
Speaker 1: It's not another a syllable until Mike comes on. Although
Speaker 1: I did add a couple of words with Sean mc
Speaker 1: man this morning, Shawn Cover for the out Joe Strecker
Speaker 1: and I hope he's doing all right. I hope you're
Speaker 1: doing all right too this morning. Always enjoy hearing from you,
Speaker 1: so you can feel free to call. Perhaps you want
Speaker 1: to react to what one hundred and four percent tariffs
Speaker 1: on China which kicked in at midnight five three seven
Speaker 1: eight hundred eight two three talk with Pound five fifty
Speaker 1: on AT and T phone. I always remember, never forget
Speaker 1: if you have carecy dot com podcasts up talk with
Speaker 1: doctor Joseph Shaughnessy yesterday about head and neck cancer interesting
Speaker 1: that HPV. Yeah, that causes uh throat cancer and sadly,
Speaker 1: as doctor Shaughnessy pointed out, it's literally everywhere. So just
Speaker 1: things you need to look out for, signs, symptoms, lifestyle
Speaker 1: changes that you can engage in to prevent the head
Speaker 1: and neck cancer. Most notably don't smoke and apparently don't
Speaker 1: accessively drink, So go ahead and go down that road.
Speaker 1: Alternatively trying to duck, run and cover from HPV it
Speaker 1: can be a little difficult thing to do, given hell
Speaker 1: widely it spreads. It is out there in the world.
Speaker 1: Sorry to pass along the bad information, but that's what
Speaker 1: doctor Shaughnessy from OHC is there to do. And yes,
Speaker 1: I had my scan yesterday. I don't know what the
Speaker 1: results will be. The earliest I can get them back
Speaker 1: is today, but it'd be more likely tomorrow. So so
Speaker 1: many people have asked, and you know, I cannot thank
Speaker 1: you enough for the kind words of the prayers and
Speaker 1: the concern for my health. So I'll keep my fingers
Speaker 1: crossed at at least some positive results. But again I'm
Speaker 1: not real optimistic. But whatever the deal, the hand that
Speaker 1: life deals you and you go from there, take good
Speaker 1: care of your health and put your hands in put
Speaker 1: your health in the hands of some good doctors, which
Speaker 1: I feel like I have done with my friends at
Speaker 1: OHC Todd's Ledge and the VA. What a wonderful thing,
Speaker 1: and God bless him. I got a challenge coin from
Speaker 1: Todd is since ANIVA challenge coin add to my collection
Speaker 1: and challenge coins is. But I will certainly cherish that.
Speaker 1: Been working with Todd in the since ANIVA talking about
Speaker 1: all the things they're doing for our American veterans, and
Speaker 1: it's a relationship I have thoroughly enjoyed over the years,
Speaker 1: and it gives me great pleasure to keep my veteran
Speaker 1: a listening audience up to speed on what's going on
Speaker 1: over the VA, as well as with the various veteran
Speaker 1: services to join the program and other guests in veterans
Speaker 1: organizations like Patriots Landing. I mentioned that when I was
Speaker 1: talking to Todd the other day. So they're all out
Speaker 1: there and they're there to help your needs and service
Speaker 1: you because you well rose to the challenge and served
Speaker 1: our country. Monday, Monday, Brian James, that's up there, Christopher
Speaker 1: Smith and Smith Avan, It's all right there. Fifty five
Speaker 1: Krsey dot com and encouragement to get the iHeartMedia app
Speaker 1: wire there. It makes it so easy to listen. Hello
Speaker 1: to my wife, who is in Chicago for a conference
Speaker 1: this week. Yes, it's bachelor week for Brian Thomas. Honestly
Speaker 1: rather it not be. Yeah, I don't take my wife
Speaker 1: for granted ever, but it's those times when he's not
Speaker 1: around got started. I don't know that I could take
Speaker 1: care of myself. It wasn't for my wife. Yes, I
Speaker 1: I'll kick my coverage and I'm happy to admit that.
Speaker 1: Also there it is again looking forward to seven oh five.
Speaker 1: First guests in the morning, Anson Freerricks. He's a Cincinnati
Speaker 1: native and former president of Anheuser Busch. He was out
Speaker 1: and actually saw the woke reality coming before he got
Speaker 1: out in Anheuser Busch. But he wrote a book on
Speaker 1: and we're going to talk about it today at seven
Speaker 1: o five, last call for bud Light. Doesn't take too
Speaker 1: much to read into that one, does it, And so
Speaker 1: Ansoner joined the program to talk about his time at
Speaker 1: bud Light or with Budweiser. And you know what happened
Speaker 1: to bud with the woke ideology that took over? Where
Speaker 1: it came from? How it crept in. And how is
Speaker 1: it that a beer company and the most popular beer
Speaker 1: in America could possibly lose sight of its core audience
Speaker 1: so much that it fell off the map as a
Speaker 1: consequence of the Dylan Moulvaney controversy, among other things. Yeah,
Speaker 1: the old focus was on sports and partying and having
Speaker 1: fun and you know, enjoy yourself. An icy cold bud
Speaker 1: Light goes down easy, and that work for a number
Speaker 1: of years, a tried and true strategy. Only they have
Speaker 1: it blow up almost in a moment's time. And if
Speaker 1: you notice, as I'm thinking about that, and I suppose
Speaker 1: it was a conservative backlash, but considering it's an eighty
Speaker 1: twenty thing, this whole transgender women are, you know, men
Speaker 1: or women kind of thing, the Dylan Mulvaney's of the
Speaker 1: world is and talk about losing propositions, it is something
Speaker 1: that eighty percent of Americans reject. So it's difficult for
Speaker 1: me to call it a conservative revolt against bud Light
Speaker 1: the boycott, but let's just say for the sake of discussion,
Speaker 1: it is. And I'm sure a large majority of the
Speaker 1: people who went on a bud Light boycott, and by
Speaker 1: the fact they may have drank bud Light for years.
Speaker 1: Did they go around and torch bud Light displays its stores.
Speaker 1: Did they go out to bud Light distributors and spray
Speaker 1: paint them and protest in front of them. No, you
Speaker 1: just didn't put bud Light in your shopping cart when
Speaker 1: you're going out to the grocery store, your local convenience store.
Speaker 1: That was your response, and your reaction it's a legitimate one.
Speaker 1: You're entitled to buy or not buy whatever product you
Speaker 1: want in this world, in this country, and if you
Speaker 1: reject the ideology of a company, you reject maybe the
Speaker 1: product because it tastes like crap, you don't buy it. Obviously,
Speaker 1: the star contrast from people going around and burning up
Speaker 1: private property owned by other people, people who were not
Speaker 1: making a political statement when they bought a Tesla for example.
Speaker 1: I don't know. It is the star contrast between the
Speaker 1: anger and the violence that comes from the left compared
Speaker 1: to that of the conservatives. And you were probably remember
Speaker 1: during the Biden administration, it was who was the big
Speaker 1: problem in the country, who represented the biggest challenged national security,
Speaker 1: who represented the biggest terroristic threat was always you know,
Speaker 1: right wing conservatives or Nazis or racists or something like that.
Speaker 1: I can't really remember, and you can correct me if
Speaker 1: I'm wrong. If I've overlooked maybe one or two events
Speaker 1: that were racial, anti or racist based organized events protested
Speaker 1: involved violence related to conservative causes. If they were out there,
Speaker 1: they pretty flew. They pretty much flew underneath my radar
Speaker 1: compared to all the violence and disruption that we saw
Speaker 1: during let's say Anti File or what we're witnessing now
Speaker 1: with the completely unhinged left dealing with the Trump administration
Speaker 1: for whatever reason, and the Department of Government efficiency. Oh,
Speaker 1: let's burn a tesla. Okay, connect the dots on that
Speaker 1: one if you're able to, and nobody in the protests
Speaker 1: were really able to do that. Dono and a Neil
Speaker 1: America for Prosperity. He'll be out at seven thirty the
Speaker 1: return it out of it and you always enjoy hearing
Speaker 1: from him to probably have a call to action for us.
Speaker 1: We'll figure out what AFP's working on. Congressman Thomas Massey.
Speaker 1: My favorite hour of radio with Congressman Massey, followed by
Speaker 1: Judge Unit of Politano. No fan of Tariff's. Judge of Politano.
Speaker 1: He says they're actually unconstitutional. And there's he makes a
Speaker 1: good argument for it, so don't get mad at him.
Speaker 1: Up front. I'll explain it, he'll explain it. But Congressman
Speaker 1: Massey on the Dual Loyalty Disclosure Act, and another one
Speaker 1: that I love, the country of origin labeling, will we
Speaker 1: get the reinstatement of that? That was that multi country
Speaker 1: trade agreement, the Mexico Canada US Trade agreement, which removed
Speaker 1: our ability to know where our food came from. If
Speaker 1: you're at the store and you have a pile of
Speaker 1: meat in front of you, are you interested in all
Speaker 1: in knowing where the meat came from? I certainly am.
Speaker 1: I would like to see it. Have a nice proud
Speaker 1: you A grown, manufactured, made and processed in the United
Speaker 1: States of America. And if I had a stack of
Speaker 1: Mexican prepared food next to that one, and all things
Speaker 1: being equal to pound of ground beef, as a pound
Speaker 1: of ground beef, i'd i prefer the USA label. Would
Speaker 1: the price be different? I don't know. Pre terrified, I
Speaker 1: can't answer that question, But in terms of my preference,
Speaker 1: I'd like to support the American farm worker. I trust
Speaker 1: American manufactured products more. Yes, all these rules and regulations
Speaker 1: regarding cleanliness and USDA standards and all that do cost
Speaker 1: us more because of the regulatory burdens they place on
Speaker 1: American industry. But I'll be happy to enjoy them because
Speaker 1: I know if I pick a pound of American manufactured
Speaker 1: ground beef and it says it's manufactured in America, I
Speaker 1: view that as a good thing. It provides me with information,
Speaker 1: which you know me. I'm big on information. I can
Speaker 1: then make an informed decision. I always read the label
Speaker 1: before I buy shrimp. I want United States, either Golf
Speaker 1: of Mexico or Golf of America, depending upon which side
Speaker 1: of the ledger you stand on. It's a golf, it's
Speaker 1: where the shrimp are. And if American sailors are out there,
Speaker 1: fishermen are out there gathering up fresh golf shrimp, wild
Speaker 1: caught fresh golf shrimp. I want to know that because
Speaker 1: I don't want to buy farm raised shrimp from Vietnam
Speaker 1: or any other foreign country. I don't want farm raised shrimp.
Speaker 1: That's a label I enjoy reading. Why can't we have that?
Speaker 1: Congressomassi will address that and we I'm looking forward to
Speaker 1: that conversation. Also, there is some efforts to stop Donald
Speaker 1: Trump tariffs, which you know, segues quite nicely into Judge
Speaker 1: Ennitapolitana's conclusions about tariffs, and briefly, as he writes in
Speaker 1: his column, in nineteen seventy seven, Congress and acted the
Speaker 1: International Economic Emergency Powers Act. That's what Donald Trump asserted
Speaker 1: in slapping the twenty five percent tariffs on Canon Mexico, saying,
Speaker 1: the fentanyl crisis is an emergency and we need to
Speaker 1: do something about it. So we're slapping a terrify on
Speaker 1: you guys unless you help us stop the flow of
Speaker 1: fentanyl into our country. Well, that ended up being a
Speaker 1: little bit broader in terms of the impact on other
Speaker 1: countries and other goods outside Canada and Mexico. So then
Speaker 1: he asserted the fact that we have a trade imbalance,
Speaker 1: citing the emergency that was created by a massive trade imbalance,
Speaker 1: and we certainly have a massive trade imbalance. That's one
Speaker 1: of the reasons we're in his trade war with China.
Speaker 1: And whether or not the tariffs ultimately are determined by
Speaker 1: a court to be legal or not under the International
Speaker 1: Economic Emergency Powers Act, which Poltonus says in and of
Speaker 1: itself is a delegation of the spending powers of Congress
Speaker 1: to the President, which you can't delegate constitutionally enshrining powers
Speaker 1: to other agencies or other branches of government. But that's
Speaker 1: the extra layer that's in this discussion. But because we've
Speaker 1: had a trade imbalance going on since it's nineteen thirty four,
Speaker 1: he points out that by definition, it's neither sudden nor
Speaker 1: unexpected and therefore can't qualify as the emergency, which negates
Speaker 1: the basis for the tariffs that have been implemented so far.
Speaker 1: So probably ruffling a few feathers of my listening audience,
Speaker 1: although I know some people in my listening audience are
Speaker 1: big fans of tariffs anyway, And we are bracing ourselves
Speaker 1: again for the just implemented one hundred and four percent
Speaker 1: tariffs on China, which take took effect this morning at
Speaker 1: twelve oh one. So more on that and some victories
Speaker 1: for the Trump administration in the Supreme Court. We can
Speaker 1: talk about that, and we can talk to you, including
Speaker 1: you being Mississippi James, who's on the phone. We'll have
Speaker 1: to wait for a moment to get his call. It
Speaker 1: is already five eighteen. Hang on there for a moment.
Speaker 1: You guys can feel free to call in two, five, one, three, seven,
Speaker 1: four nine, fifty eight two three talk be right back
Speaker 1: after these brief words. Fifty five KRC got up in
Speaker 1: five twenty two of eighty five KRC Detox Station. Oh,
Speaker 1: real quick, because I do want to forget. I mentioned
Speaker 1: my wife's had a ton of the conference in Chicago.
Speaker 1: Do you know what, Sean, I'll pull the room. What
Speaker 1: do you think the valet parking rate is for the
Speaker 1: hotel she's staying with in at Michigan Avenue in Chicago.
Speaker 1: Twenty bucks? How about eighty per day? It is ridiculous,
Speaker 1: Thank you very much. And she also she ordered a
Speaker 1: Cobs salad and one glass of white wine room serves.
Speaker 1: It was I think she said, sixty dollars. Yeah, don't
Speaker 1: go to Chicago. I used to live there, man, eight years.
Speaker 1: In this one of the I say it out loud
Speaker 1: because one of the main reasons I'm so happy we
Speaker 1: chose to move back to Cincinnati. We both took a
Speaker 1: cut and salary in our cost of living, or rather
Speaker 1: our quality of living went through the roof. And there's
Speaker 1: a couple of illustrations exactly why why would you go
Speaker 1: to Chicago for your business conference? Anyway, Mississippi, James, thanks
Speaker 1: for bearing with me while I vented my spleen on that.
Speaker 1: Welcome back, my Friend's good to hear from you this morning.
Speaker 1: All right, good morning, doctor Brian.
Speaker 2: Now you just said an example about your wife in Chicago.
Speaker 2: I'll say that first, so I get to my point. Okay,
Speaker 2: about five years ago I went to New York. Now
Speaker 2: I use points to get the hotel off my credit cards,
Speaker 2: you know, accumulated points on there. But your park it
Speaker 2: was seventy.
Speaker 1: Five dollars a day. Yeah, about five years ago is
Speaker 1: New York?
Speaker 2: My goodness, you.
Speaker 1: Know what, Mississippi's I bet the cost of them over
Speaker 1: in our valet parking overnight New York is probably one
Speaker 1: hundred dollars. Now, you know, Chicago would still look like
Speaker 1: a like a like a deal compared to it. Ah,
Speaker 1: it's crazy. Yeah, she's getting re emerge, but her company's
Speaker 1: not doing serving itself by having every person that's at
Speaker 1: that conference charging that kind of money that's coming out
Speaker 1: of the business's bottom line. Why do not you use
Speaker 1: a different city? As she drove past Indianapolis on the
Speaker 1: way up there, they could have chosen I bet it's
Speaker 1: only like thirty forty bucks for valet parking in India
Speaker 1: every night. Anyway, go ahead and get to your point, James,
Speaker 1: right now. I'm gonna help you out a little bit. Now,
Speaker 1: first I must uh you still there be out of here.
Speaker 2: Okay, I couldn't hear anything. But I'm gonna help you
Speaker 2: out a little bit. But first I must make my disclaimer. Hey,
Speaker 2: I come in peace. I love everybody, and there's nothing
Speaker 2: you can do about it.
Speaker 1: You made me, Yeah, you've made that clear ever since
Speaker 1: you've been calling in. I've got no.
Speaker 2: Argument with that, right And if you know me, I
Speaker 2: do not condone any violence. I do not advocate for
Speaker 2: any destruction, burning, tearing or whatever. Agreed, but not an
Speaker 2: example you just made about bud Light with anhuser Bush,
Speaker 2: them leaving from their base that supported them. Yes, I
Speaker 2: see the same thing happening with Elon Musk, the people
Speaker 2: that loved him and adored him when he was doing
Speaker 2: this thing, then when he got into politics and pull
Speaker 2: a rug from und the people. They are reacting in
Speaker 2: a certain way. I know the intention was to find
Speaker 2: the fraud, the wayte the abuse and all of that, right,
Speaker 2: but it's a certain way you have to present it.
Speaker 2: Back to the peoples, you know, and it was so abruptly.
Speaker 2: Know what I'm saying is right, wrong and different. I'm
Speaker 2: just saying from my position, anytime you pull a rug
Speaker 2: from on the people's they're gonna react.
Speaker 1: And I do not negative weight and I don't disagree
Speaker 1: with that. So let's assume with the second discussion, they're
Speaker 1: all upset with what Elon Musk is doing, and therefore
Speaker 1: if they acted like the bud Like people, they just
Speaker 1: wouldn't buy Tesla stock. They wouldn't buy Tesla automobiles. If
Speaker 1: they own one, they might choose to sell it because
Speaker 1: they don't want to be seen driving around in one.
Speaker 1: That would be a perfectly acceptable response. But burning them
Speaker 1: and spray painting Tesla dealerships and being violent towards people,
Speaker 1: and you know, keying rid property and spray painting private property,
Speaker 1: that's a horse of a different color. That's criminal activity.
Speaker 1: And I don't respect remember anybody engaging in criminal activity
Speaker 1: against bud Light because they went down a different path.
Speaker 1: And if people were just calm and peaceful and just
Speaker 1: recognized out loud and tried to support a protest and
Speaker 1: a boycott against Tesla, that will be perfectly acceptable behavior.
Speaker 1: But that's not what's going on. It's widespread violence and
Speaker 1: destruction of property, which and even if you take out
Speaker 1: the Tesla automobile, you know, call it a widget. If
Speaker 1: it was widespread violence and destruction of widgets, it would
Speaker 1: still be criminal activity. That's the difference that I was
Speaker 1: trying to illustrate. So, yeah, you're right. You're entitled to
Speaker 1: make your own choices. You're entitled to choose, and you're
Speaker 1: entitled to decide that some person that you supported and
Speaker 1: thought was the greatest savior of the climate that ever existed,
Speaker 1: or the most brilliant man ever has now become some
Speaker 1: sort of rogue. You can change your opinion and change
Speaker 1: your mind and also chase your change your buying choices
Speaker 1: and sport that concept. But like you said, and I'm
Speaker 1: with you, I don't agree with the violence five twenty seven.
Speaker 1: It's the stark contrast what's going on five twenty seven
Speaker 1: fifty five Carrius of the talks station, Local stories or
Speaker 1: your phone calls. Either way you go, We'll be right
Speaker 1: back about thirty one. Happy Wednesday. Oh, I imagine talked
Speaker 1: about Aaron Anson Frerek's author of the book Last Call
Speaker 1: for bud Lie, former President Van huns A Bush seven
Speaker 1: oh five, Diamond and Neil at seven thirty, Congressman Thomas
Speaker 1: Massey eighth five Napolitano of course at a thirty. I
Speaker 1: forgot to mention doctor j Rissover, he's doing an empower
Speaker 1: you seminar and that will be tomorrow night getting at
Speaker 1: seven pm, making America healthy. He is really into the
Speaker 1: you know, make America healthy again kick that we all
Speaker 1: seem to be on, and I hope that gained some
Speaker 1: steam for all of our sake. Meanwhile, over the local stories,
Speaker 1: the University of Cincinnati's thank you to The Inquirer's Elizabeth
Speaker 1: Kim credit credit biological bathroom signs went viral on Reddit
Speaker 1: and apparently caused outrage among students. Back in February, they
Speaker 1: were removed, university confirming the science were taken down last month.
Speaker 1: Signs appeared after Ohio's bathroom bill, which required students in
Speaker 1: Ohio to use bathrooms and locker rooms matching their own
Speaker 1: sex assigned at birth, took effect. Back in February. The
Speaker 1: bill Foliday host of executive voters that Trump signed regarding
Speaker 1: transgender people, DEI and all those programs. When students protesting
Speaker 1: the UC's rollback of DEI during a Board of trustees meeting,
Speaker 1: asked whether using the word biological was legally necessary. University
Speaker 1: of President Nevil Pental called the signs an error. His words,
Speaker 1: there were one hundred and seventeen signs installed in four
Speaker 1: residential communities on the campus. Court of the University spokes
Speaker 1: first in speaking with the Enquirre mb Riley in response
Speaker 1: to an enquirre record request created using a three D
Speaker 1: printer installed by regular employees as part of their ongoing duties.
Speaker 1: Total cost of labor and materials sixteen thousand dollars High
Speaker 1: Representative Adam Bird, Representative Republican from New Richmond, co sponsor
Speaker 1: of the bathroom bill. Spic, speaking with the inquire back
Speaker 1: in February, said the biological language on the signs was
Speaker 1: not necessary to comply with the law. Email simp from
Speaker 1: Vice Provost Nicole Mayo and Vice President blue Zette Marshall
Speaker 1: to students back in February, quote, this was an error
Speaker 1: on our part, and we apologize for the harm it
Speaker 1: may have caused. Email did not clarify why or how
Speaker 1: the error was made well, and I suppose that is
Speaker 1: beauty in the ivy holder. I think the word error
Speaker 1: may be appropriate depending upon your subjective opinion or not.
Speaker 1: All ways of seventy one northbound near Myra Marker fifty
Speaker 1: four blocked over nine due to a semi truck crash,
Speaker 1: according to the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, different District six folks.
Speaker 1: The Galton County Sheriff's Office responded to a crash late
Speaker 1: last Tuesday evening about a half a mile south of
Speaker 1: the Eggs at fifty five to Viva fifty four northbound
Speaker 1: Ice seventy one truck off the right side of the road.
Speaker 1: They expected delays. According to local news KYTC six d
Speaker 1: C D six, there's not yet a timeline when the
Speaker 1: crash will be cleared. First responders were working to clear
Speaker 1: up the scene and as of this morning, I had
Speaker 1: no update. Actually the update that I got was four
Speaker 1: hours old, so it may very well have been cleaned up,
Speaker 1: but just the heads up for pudential delays.
Speaker 3: There.
Speaker 1: Boone County Sheriff's Office confirmed two people or die have
Speaker 1: died after a dump truck crashed into a restaurant. Truck
Speaker 1: hit another vehicle that went through the side of Boondocks
Speaker 1: Pub and grub at US forty two and Beaver Road.
Speaker 1: Happened at four point thirty yesterday. Car also involved flipped
Speaker 1: over and landed on its roof. One employee of Boondocks
Speaker 1: speaking with Fox nineteen cents inside the restaurant when the
Speaker 1: crash happened, along with other employees. Fortunately, no one inside
Speaker 1: was injured in the incident. People say three people were
Speaker 1: in the car and two died at the scene. Dump
Speaker 1: truck driver injured and taken to the hospital along with
Speaker 1: a passenger from the car. Leslie Lovelass, co owner of
Speaker 1: the restaurant, said it's not the first crash at this intersection.
Speaker 1: According to Lovelace, has been a problem for years and
Speaker 1: she's hope a hopes of changes made. We've been another tragedy. Boondocks,
Speaker 1: for this part, posted a statement on facebooks that were
Speaker 1: deeply saddened by the tragic accident that occurred and at
Speaker 1: the intersection of Highway forty two and Beaver Our hearts
Speaker 1: and prayers go after those affected and we extend our
Speaker 1: sinceres condolences to the families, loved ones and first responders involved.
Speaker 1: According to the restaurant said, we're aware of it that
Speaker 1: a clip from our security camera has been circulated on
Speaker 1: social media. This footage was not intended for public release
Speaker 1: and we are currently looking into how it was shared.
Speaker 1: Kindly asked that, out of respect for those impacted, the
Speaker 1: video not be shared. Further identity the two killed in
Speaker 1: the crash have not yet been released. Restaurant owners said
Speaker 1: they have a long clean up the head but are
Speaker 1: grateful for the help and support they've already received. Good
Speaker 1: luck to them. Five thirty six right now if five
Speaker 1: krsity talk station and plump type plumbing plumbing done right
Speaker 1: by forty two? If you if i've kersite talk station
Speaker 1: hover the stack of stupid wow tow truck driver out
Speaker 1: there attempting to repossess the couple's car. The driver of
Speaker 1: the car tried to stop him by running over his head.
Speaker 1: The guy repossessing the tow truck victim going by the
Speaker 1: name of Phil Pacman guy on social media, actually survived
Speaker 1: and oddly enough managed to capture the whole thing on
Speaker 1: video and of course shared it onto Facebook. Twenty seven
Speaker 1: year old Brandy Rebels and thirty four year old Nicholas
Speaker 1: Way now charged with aggravated assault. Ray accused of being
Speaker 1: the mail responsible for the Ford Fusion when the victim
Speaker 1: was run over while hooking up his truck to the
Speaker 1: Sea's vehicle. Happened Wednesday last court to the Memphis Police
Speaker 1: Department in a news release, revel allegedly tells Ray to
Speaker 1: hurry up footage showing the repilman underneath the car. Ray
Speaker 1: runs toward the vehicle, jumps into the driver's seat, and
Speaker 1: then allegedly drives over the victim's head video screen. According
Speaker 1: the video, which you can see, he screams repeatedly, writhing
Speaker 1: on the ground, you ran over my f warding head.
Speaker 1: You're going to f warding jail. Ray then spends nearly
Speaker 1: a minute trying to get out of the parking lot
Speaker 1: as Rebels helps guide him. Victim eventually stands up stumbles
Speaker 1: back to his truck to stop the recording. Taken to
Speaker 1: the hospital in non critical condition, believe it or not,
Speaker 1: suffered arm pain, sustained abrasions from his head from the ordeal,
Speaker 1: all while he had to be shook in order to
Speaker 1: keep him awake. His words. Man shared photos of his injuring,
Speaker 1: putting his neck brace while riding in an ambulance and
Speaker 1: later in the hospital where he showed off the bruising
Speaker 1: on both sides of his head, Rebels taking it a
Speaker 1: custody Thursday. Ray detained. On Friday, vehicle toe to the
Speaker 1: city lot. Rebels held on a fifteen thousand dollars bond.
Speaker 1: Ray on a sixty thousand dollars bond. According to the
Speaker 1: Memphis Police, Jeez, parents out there. You ever every kid
Speaker 1: say there's a monster underneath the bed. You say, no,
Speaker 1: there's no monster uneath the bed. You look underneath the bed, Well,
Speaker 1: guess what this is? From Kansas, babysitter looked under a
Speaker 1: bed to reassure a worried child that there was not
Speaker 1: a monster hiding there, coming face to face with a
Speaker 1: man who was not supposed to be in the room.
Speaker 1: According to the Sheriff's office in Kansas in a news release,
Speaker 1: twenty seven year old booked into jail after a struggle
Speaker 1: with the babysitter that knocked the child to the ground.
Speaker 1: The Barton County Sheriff's Office said deputies were called late
Speaker 1: Monday to the home near Great Bend. Suspect was gone
Speaker 1: when they arrived, with the babysitter told him the child
Speaker 1: had been completed a monster before she found the suspect
Speaker 1: the man actually once lived in the home, but there
Speaker 1: was a protection order from a protection from abuse order
Speaker 1: issued against him to keep him away from the property,
Speaker 1: Cording to the Sheriff's office, deputy searched but were unable
Speaker 1: to find the man until the next day, when he
Speaker 1: was captured after a foot chase. Record show the man
Speaker 1: had posted a bond about ten days earlier after being
Speaker 1: charged with criminal threat, domestic battery, and violating a protection
Speaker 1: from abuse order, allegations alleged to have occurred in January.
Speaker 1: February as following latest arrest, the judge ordered him jailed
Speaker 1: without bond Sheriff's Office at additional request. Charges include aggravated battery,
Speaker 1: aggravated battery and child in our, burglary, and aggravated battery
Speaker 1: and child endangerment. Sometimes the kids may be right back
Speaker 1: to the stack of stupid. This one stupid on multiple
Speaker 1: levels too. Mayor of one of North North Dakota's largest
Speaker 1: cities had to resign after an investigation to him mistakenly
Speaker 1: sharing what is described as a leude video sent to
Speaker 1: the city attorney but not Mayor Tom Ross resigned Tuesday,
Speaker 1: believe that'd be yesterday. The same day investigative report was
Speaker 1: made public that found Ross sent a video of himself
Speaker 1: well pleasuring himself to the city attorney, Stephanie Staalheim. It
Speaker 1: happened back in January. He sent the video minutes after
Speaker 1: the two had a telephone call discussing a police officer's suicide.
Speaker 1: Ross asked Staalheim to delete the video, not to watch it,
Speaker 1: and to keep the incident between them. According to the report,
Speaker 1: Ross told an interviewer that he recorded the video at
Speaker 1: home during a lunch break, meaning to send it to
Speaker 1: his romantic partner, not to the city attorney. He said
Speaker 1: it was a a quote, a sexy video for his
Speaker 1: girlfriend close quote, Once again entering into the realm of
Speaker 1: the subjective. Report says Stalheim struggled with whether to make
Speaker 1: a former report. Ross was her direct supervisor and Staalheim's
Speaker 1: annual review was pending at the time. Accord to the report,
Speaker 1: her complaint asked for an apology from Ross and that
Speaker 1: he considered resigning his mayor. Investigator found Ross's conduct quote
Speaker 1: directly caused Stalheim's inability to work in an environment free
Speaker 1: from unreasonable sexual harassment and created an offensive work environment.
Speaker 1: Close quote, Well, it's because you can't unsee something like that.
Speaker 1: You're fighting, Ross said Wednesday, takes full responsibility. Well, of course,
Speaker 1: and old Stalheim in the utmost regard and respect. He
Speaker 1: said he had not resigned earlier to respect the process.
Speaker 1: Now he plans on focusing on himself, healing and moving
Speaker 1: forward with his family. Well, I think the video reflected
Speaker 1: he was focusing on himself. Don't you think.
Speaker 4: The direction to who stormed Capitol Hill patriots?
Speaker 1: You're on fire today man telephone email message seeking comment.
Speaker 1: We're left with Stalham t day and apparently he did
Speaker 1: not reply. City Council voted to appoint a mayor from
Speaker 1: within the council after fifteen days, which is the time
Speaker 1: frame for citizens to petition for a special election, as
Speaker 1: opposed to the mispronounced word. And here's a bizarre one
Speaker 1: for you. An orthopedic surgeon in Australia hit with a
Speaker 1: hefty fine for taking a photo of a patience penis,
Speaker 1: which was tattooed with a swastika, and then sharing it
Speaker 1: with others. Doctor not identified snapped the picture while treating
Speaker 1: the man at a hospital in April of twenty nineteen.
Speaker 1: Patient required surgery after a homemade pipe bomb exploded in
Speaker 1: his hands. This according to reporting from the New Zealand Herald.
Speaker 1: After surgery, the patient was placed in intensive care where
Speaker 1: he was innovated in place in a coma for over
Speaker 1: a week. The surgeon somehow felt the need to take
Speaker 1: a photo at some point that week and shared it
Speaker 1: in a what App chat with other practitioners, despite it
Speaker 1: having no clinical or medical purpose. Office of Health and
Speaker 1: Almsbudsman tipped off about the photo in December of twenty nineteen,
Speaker 1: which prompted an investigation and refer to the Medical Tribunal.
Speaker 1: Tribunal member Peter Murphy described the surgeon's conduct as serious,
Speaker 1: noting that the patient was unconscious and particularly vulnerable, adding
Speaker 1: the trust reposed by the patient in his treating doctors
Speaker 1: can be seen to be particularly acute in those circumstances.
Speaker 1: Surgeon received a stern reprimand a fine of ten thousand dollars,
Speaker 1: despite their tribunal acknowledging that the surgeon immediately regretted taking
Speaker 1: and sharing the photo. I'm sorry you can't unring that
Speaker 1: bell man. I guess the patient wasn't interviewed what prompted
Speaker 1: him to have a swastika tattooed?
Speaker 5: There.
Speaker 1: It seems to me that that sounds quite painful in
Speaker 1: addition to being extraordinarily stupid and racist painful fivefty five
Speaker 1: and five Garcin talks eights ondes in stack is stupid?
Speaker 1: Aren't you glad you're not there? Got plenty to talk about?
Speaker 1: The six o'clock iur love to hear from me if
Speaker 1: you've got a thought or comment five one, three, seven,
Speaker 1: four nine fifty five hundred, eight hundred eight two to
Speaker 1: three talk pound five fifty on AT and T phones.
Speaker 1: I'll be right back after the news. That's six oh
Speaker 1: five fifty five AIRCD talk station and Brian Thomas wishing
Speaker 1: every one any very happy Wednesday, and about you to
Speaker 1: stick around all morning. As in Frearrek's the former president
Speaker 1: of Vanheuser Busch book, Last Call for bud Light should
Speaker 1: be an interesting conversation. He was out before they went
Speaker 1: fully woke, but he was there when they started going woke,
Speaker 1: and he can explain that to us, and he will
Speaker 1: coming up in an hour. Donovan and the Americans for
Speaker 1: Prosperity to talk about a big event coming up a Sunday.
Speaker 1: It's called Restore Liberty US Fiscal Sanity Rally taking place
Speaker 1: at the Double Tree in Blue ash We'll get the
Speaker 1: details from Donovan and what the purpose of that rally
Speaker 1: is if you can't figure it out by its name.
Speaker 1: That'll be at seven thirty. Fast forward a couple hours
Speaker 1: Congressman Thomas Massey, we'll be talking about the Dual Loyalty
Speaker 1: Disclosure Act, the country of origin labeling. Will that be
Speaker 1: reinstated since we don't know the country of origin from
Speaker 1: the food we eat and just don't ever have never
Speaker 1: understood that anyway. We might get his reaction on the tariffs.
Speaker 1: I'm quite sure where Congressman s he is on tariffs.
Speaker 1: Joe Jenna Politano not a fan because he said they're
Speaker 1: not constitutional based upon the setup and the arguments made
Speaker 1: in support of how they are being enacted. Should be
Speaker 1: a controversial for some of my listeners and not so
Speaker 1: much for others. Plus an empower use seminar, Doctor J
Speaker 1: Risso or doctor J. He's going to be making America Healthy.
Speaker 1: That one's taking place tom ight at ten. We'll get
Speaker 1: some of the details from doctor J at the end
Speaker 1: of the program. The meantime over to the phones five one, three, seven, nine,
Speaker 1: fifty five hundred, eight hundred and eighty two three talk.
Speaker 1: Got a few callers online. We'll take them in the
Speaker 1: order in which they received. To just bear with me,
Speaker 1: William and Steve when I take Bobby's call, because he
Speaker 1: was first. Bobby, welcome back to the program.
Speaker 6: Happy hump Day, my brother Faith, flagged family, and forty
Speaker 6: five seventies.
Speaker 1: There you are, or whatever firearm you choose, that's right.
Speaker 6: Uh, Congresso Massy when he comes on later on, I
Speaker 6: don't know if you'll have time to chime in with
Speaker 6: him about or or not. But one thing, it's not
Speaker 6: what people say and do, it's what they don't say
Speaker 6: and do. And since the president's been in office, we
Speaker 6: haven't heard anything about the sis and the government contractors
Speaker 6: that January the sixth Congressome Massy's got a stack of
Speaker 6: papers as tall as a file cabinet.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's worthy asking about it, because you're right, not
Speaker 1: a peep since the new administration's been in. So that's
Speaker 1: a worthy conversation if we have time. I just wrote
Speaker 1: J six question mark all my notes for Congressroman Assy.
Speaker 1: I'll see if I can't squeeze that in. Appreciate the
Speaker 1: heads out on Bobby and forty five seventy may not
Speaker 1: be the ideal firearm for a petite, young, a small
Speaker 1: framed individual. I just have to note that, William, thanks
Speaker 1: for calling this morning. Welcome to the Morning Show.
Speaker 7: Hey, thanks Brian for taking my call. And you know
Speaker 7: the stuff you're being a law you're and when is
Speaker 7: enough going to be enough? When they're going to quit?
Speaker 8: These judges?
Speaker 7: I mean, they don't have the power to get in
Speaker 7: the front of the president and what the people voted for, can.
Speaker 1: You well, you know, okay, therein lies the challenge because
Speaker 1: you know, from a lawyer's perspective, I have to respond
Speaker 1: to you by saying no. In some cases they do.
Speaker 1: The judicial branches there to interpret the sort of constitutionality
Speaker 1: of laws that have and put in place the constitutionality
Speaker 1: of actions. The executive branch does have its limitation much
Speaker 1: in the same way Congress has its limitations and if
Speaker 1: someone oversteps their boundaries, And in fact, Judge Jennita Pultown
Speaker 1: is going to talk about this today in connection with
Speaker 1: with tariffs. Power of the purse lies in Congress. How
Speaker 1: is it that Donald Trump can just go ahead and
Speaker 1: impose what amount to the power of the purse implication
Speaker 1: tariffs on other countries without approval of Congress. Well, there
Speaker 1: is an act that was passed back in the seventies
Speaker 1: which does provide a vehicle for that. Now, whether or
Speaker 1: not that Act is in and of itself constitutional, because
Speaker 1: it represents a delegation of congressional authority to the executive branch,
Speaker 1: that alone may be unconstitutional. So courts do play a
Speaker 1: profound role in this, and just don't don't look at it.
Speaker 1: I mean in presence of whose ox is being gored,
Speaker 1: because there have been liberal administrations and Democrat presidents who've
Speaker 1: tried the same type of things, only to have court
Speaker 1: step in and stop them from doing it. So I
Speaker 1: appreciate where you're coming from. It's not that I'm not
Speaker 1: sympathetic to it. It is frustrating, but these things have
Speaker 1: a way of working themselves through the process. And you know,
Speaker 1: Trump just got three in a row at the Supreme Court.
Speaker 1: Maybe not as broad a victory as Donald Trump and
Speaker 1: the administration might have wanted, but you know, Supreme Court
Speaker 1: ruled on the tens of thousands of fired probationary employees
Speaker 1: and they came out on Trump's favor. On that they
Speaker 1: came out in Trump's favor on. I said, you know,
Speaker 1: doge's access to some of these agencies that were refusing
Speaker 1: to give them access to the information, So you can
Speaker 1: score some wins. And that's why you want conservative jurists,
Speaker 1: not judicial activists. The activist component of the ones that
Speaker 1: are willing to overlook constitutional limitations, overlook the separation of
Speaker 1: powers and the realities that they present, and go ahead
Speaker 1: and just do whatever the hell they want and essentially
Speaker 1: legislate from the bench. What is legislating from the bench?
Speaker 5: Roe v.
Speaker 1: Wadees a great illustration of it that was a whole
Speaker 1: cloth creation of what amounted to a piece of legislation.
Speaker 1: Legislation is the exclusive power of the legislative branch of government,
Speaker 1: and people were making that argument for years and years.
Speaker 1: They overstep their boundaries, and quite often judges do that.
Speaker 1: So again I'm not unsympathetic to what you're saying, but
Speaker 1: they do play a principal role and keeping the power
Speaker 1: in check and keeping people in their wheelhouse as opposed
Speaker 1: to letting them run amok. So, you know, and it's
Speaker 1: got to go back to Barack Obama started this with
Speaker 1: his phone and his pen and a lot of things
Speaker 1: he did. You know, probably deeming unconstitutional and beyond the
Speaker 1: executive power reach. So let's see what Steve's got. Steve,
Speaker 1: thanks for calling this morning. Welcome to the Morning Show.
Speaker 9: Yes, sir, in honor of you, getting ready to go
Speaker 9: on vacation and in fact Friday, I'm going to India.
Speaker 2: So I'm.
Speaker 9: We've been to about twenty five different countries and this one,
Speaker 9: I think is going to be one of the most unique.
Speaker 9: Is going to call you from India and I was like,
Speaker 9: what's the time difference? And it actually covers two time zones,
Speaker 9: but they wanted the country in to have the same
Speaker 9: time everywhere, so like the East would be ten o'clock
Speaker 9: in the west would be nine. Instead of them picking
Speaker 9: ten or nine, they picked nine thirty. So it's really
Speaker 9: and I'm thinking that's going to be a perfect way
Speaker 9: of portraying how strange this vacation is going to be,
Speaker 9: because we've never seen that anywhere else we've gone. They
Speaker 9: always thinking, you know, they might not follows daylight saving
Speaker 9: time or anything. Sometimes you know, there are things like that,
Speaker 9: but I've never seen where it's like on the half
Speaker 9: like a half hour, it's a nine and a half
Speaker 9: hour difference, which I thought was, I'm like, this is
Speaker 9: I've never seen this never ever.
Speaker 1: I did not know that there was such a thing
Speaker 1: as a nine and a half or a half hour
Speaker 1: increment there in that time.
Speaker 10: I did not either.
Speaker 9: But I'm thinking that's just that's just getting me ready
Speaker 9: for how strange this is going to be. I think
Speaker 9: it's going to be. And I know danesh used, I
Speaker 9: haven't heard him in a while, but I think it's
Speaker 9: going to be the most beautiful and I'm not trying
Speaker 9: to offend anybody. I think it's going to be the
Speaker 9: most beautiful and the most horrific thing I see simultaneously,
Speaker 9: with the poverty, the conditions, the animals everywhere. I mean,
Speaker 9: I'm an animal lover like you are.
Speaker 1: Oh, it's going to be a culture shock, without question.
Speaker 1: But isn't that why you travel globally?
Speaker 9: Abs Absolutely, And I mean we've we've been everywhere, so
Speaker 9: I mean you and yeah, I mean so yeah, So
Speaker 9: that's exciting.
Speaker 1: I gotta salute your Huevos for doing something like that.
Speaker 1: No international traveler am I, and you know I am.
Speaker 1: I get just sort of anxiety thinking about being in
Speaker 1: a country where I don't speak the language. I am
Speaker 1: a sort of roaming the wilderness, and you know, a
Speaker 1: fish out of water. And I don't know that I
Speaker 1: could ever become comfortable traveling. And it's like going to China.
Speaker 1: I'm sure there's some amazing things to see in and
Speaker 1: it wouldn't shock me at all. It'd be a beautiful
Speaker 1: thing to see. But they don't speak broad English and
Speaker 1: all the signs are in Chinese. I say, I wanted
Speaker 1: to go get a beer or something. How in the
Speaker 1: hell would I know where the beer's being sold because
Speaker 1: I don't speak the language and I can't read this signage.
Speaker 1: So is this a guided tour? You got somebody helping
Speaker 1: you along the way. Are you just going out on
Speaker 1: your own?
Speaker 9: I am going by myself, but I'm hooking up with
Speaker 9: a tour after I get there. So, I because it
Speaker 9: looks like a very intimidating country. I mean, we've done
Speaker 9: everything on our own. We were in Egypt, we were
Speaker 9: in Jerusalem. We've done all this stuff on our own.
Speaker 9: We were in Rio Dejian Eio, and it's easy to do.
Speaker 9: You do a little planning. But India looks more intimidating
Speaker 9: than any place I've been.
Speaker 1: I say, so I want it. I want to save travels.
Speaker 9: Man'd a little bit. But here's why I called. And
Speaker 9: you ever do something, and it's like, don't ever do
Speaker 9: that again. A couple of days ago, I'm drawing, and
Speaker 9: I love animals.
Speaker 10: Like you do.
Speaker 9: I'm going to India. Yeah, but I'm driving home and
Speaker 9: there's a couple of cars stopped and this is on
Speaker 9: Turkey Foot in Independence or Langer, And okay, why are
Speaker 9: they stopped. Well, there's the biggest snapping turtle you've ever seen.
Speaker 9: That's like halfway out in the road. Now, I've seen
Speaker 9: them before driving by and I and if nobody was stopped,
Speaker 9: I would have gone around it. It's easy not to hit.
Speaker 9: I mean, it's easy to see. But I figured I
Speaker 9: better let me stop because all these other people are stopped.
Speaker 9: And I went up to it, and I've never seen
Speaker 9: one up close, and I thought, well, now I've got
Speaker 9: people watching me. So I'm you know, here I am.
Speaker 9: I'm walking right up here to do something.
Speaker 1: A viral YouTube video to get I'm.
Speaker 9: Almost missing a finger is what I'm doing. So I figured,
Speaker 9: let me pick it up. Well, it's heavy. Well I'm
Speaker 9: trying to put it not on the road. It's the heavy.
Speaker 9: It's really heavy. And I did not know this. I
Speaker 9: in my mind a turtle moved slow and maybe it walked,
Speaker 9: maybe a walk slow, and its head and neck came
Speaker 9: so far out of that shell and it was like
Speaker 9: on a spring and it popped back on the back
Speaker 9: of the shell to me and I just had it
Speaker 9: a few inches off the off the road and I
Speaker 9: dropped it. I was so scared.
Speaker 1: Don't go the snapping turtle. Their heads and necks are
Speaker 1: really really long.
Speaker 6: I didn't know that.
Speaker 9: Well well, so I did pick it up and I
Speaker 9: like trying to grab it near the back of the shell.
Speaker 9: And the toenails on this thing are monstrous.
Speaker 1: It's a prehistoric creature.
Speaker 9: Man, it's and it's nasty. It's and I'll tell you
Speaker 9: what was worse. It had mud underneath it and it
Speaker 9: was the stinkiest stuff. And I had this all over
Speaker 9: my hands and it's like I went home and washed
Speaker 9: my hands and everything and you can't get It's like
Speaker 9: a musky, nasty smell. And I was just thinking if
Speaker 9: this thing nip me and I and I broke the skin.
Speaker 9: In fact, there's got to be so much bacteria in
Speaker 9: this thing.
Speaker 1: I don't think you'd be going to again, and you
Speaker 1: wouldn't have been going to India. Probably you'd be missing
Speaker 1: a limb or an arm, a hand, a finger at least. Yeah.
Speaker 1: I mean I I've been swimming in ponds before, and
Speaker 1: that's the one thing that freaks me out because quite
Speaker 1: often those things living ponds, and if your toes dangle
Speaker 1: down in front of one, you might lose a toe. Yeah,
Speaker 1: read up on them. Those creatures are nasty. Man, you're
Speaker 1: you know, cautionary tail today. Don't do what Steve did. Steve,
Speaker 1: I'm glad you're okay man six seventeenth. If I've care
Speaker 1: see the talk station. Okay, So Cory if instant message
Speaker 1: me if you will. If you want to move a snapper,
Speaker 1: grab them by the tail. They can't reach their tails.
Speaker 1: How about I wouldn't want to move a snapper. Not
Speaker 1: a chance. Well pass on that anyway. Back to the
Speaker 1: judicial realities, the editory board of this journal did a
Speaker 1: nice jap summing up the several cases that there have
Speaker 1: been victories for the Trump administration recently. And I've mentioned
Speaker 1: a few among the radio, but a trio of recent
Speaker 1: orders they sent the lower court judges an important reminder
Speaker 1: that they must still respect judicial rules and procedures. A
Speaker 1: five four majority described as a partial victory this past Monday,
Speaker 1: allowing the Trump administration to continue deporting Venezuelan's believed to
Speaker 1: be members of the Trading the Iragua gang under the
Speaker 1: Alien Enemies Act. It doesn't rule in the legal merits,
Speaker 1: but holds that plaintiffs must challenge their deportations in the
Speaker 1: district courts in which they are detained under habeas corpus,
Speaker 1: rather than seek like class action relief under the Administrative
Speaker 1: Procedures Act. The order also requires the administration to provide
Speaker 1: the deportees with notice and an opportunity to contest deportation.
Speaker 1: This was napolitanus point that people got pissed off of
Speaker 1: out a week or two ago. It's due process. Okay,
Speaker 1: you're going to deport me and send me off to
Speaker 1: El Salvador, you at least have to allow me an
Speaker 1: opportunity to go to court and argue that I am
Speaker 1: not subject to the deportation. That means the administration will
Speaker 1: no longer be able to summarily deport Venezuela, as the
Speaker 1: El Salvador deportees will also still be allowed to challenge
Speaker 1: the president's use of the Alien Enemies Act in federal courts,
Speaker 1: which seems to defeat the president's purpose in using the law,
Speaker 1: which was to end run due process and expedite deportations.
Speaker 1: End running due process constitutional right, you have due process rights.
Speaker 1: Three liberal justices obviously wanted to leave in place the
Speaker 1: lower court blocking the deportation. They point out, as kavanab
Speaker 1: just as Cavanaugh noted in an occurrence, the use of
Speaker 1: habeas for transfer claims is not novel in the extradition context,
Speaker 1: and with respect to transfers of Guantanam and other wartime detainees,
Speaker 1: Hebeus Corpus proceedings have long been the appropriate vehicle. So
Speaker 1: you just sue in the court that's nearest to where
Speaker 1: you're being held. You can make your legal arguments. You
Speaker 1: just can't have those plainists and all those alleged gang
Speaker 1: members pile up in Washington, d C. Represented by the
Speaker 1: ACLU and some liberal leaning court basically Forum Shopping said
Speaker 1: the High Court may eventually take up a case regarding
Speaker 1: the use of the Alien Enemies Act, but the order
Speaker 1: on Monday prevents a single district court from summarily blocking
Speaker 1: the deportation. So there's your there's some relief to that
Speaker 1: district court acting beyond its authority. They point out, the
Speaker 1: court issued another order, another brush back to errant judges
Speaker 1: yesterday when they lifted an order requiring the Trumpet administration
Speaker 1: to reinstate sixteen thousand fired employees. They didn't rule on
Speaker 1: the merits. The Justice is held that the environmental groups
Speaker 1: and union challenges dismissed dismissals they lacked legal stand to sue.
Speaker 1: They weren't facing a unique issue that they themselves were
Speaker 1: going to be uniquely harmed. And that's where standing fundamentally
Speaker 1: boils down to, and it's been the biggest roadblock to
Speaker 1: getting something in front of judges. You're like, how come
Speaker 1: someone can't sue? Well, if you're not uniquely harmed by
Speaker 1: an action, then you can't run into court and challenge it.
Speaker 1: It's just it's a frustrating concept in the law, but
Speaker 1: it's there, and it's been there from well the beginning
Speaker 1: of our country. Bedrock Article three principle planeiffs must demonstrate
Speaker 1: they are likely to suffer concrete harm as a result
Speaker 1: of a defendant's actions in order to bring a case
Speaker 1: to federal court. Now, the plaineiffs claim they've been harmed
Speaker 1: by reduction in public services caused by the layoffs, but
Speaker 1: that's speculative at best, according to the court's ruling. So
Speaker 1: sorry sucks to be you. You don't have standing. We're
Speaker 1: throwing the case out. Court stressed that again in a
Speaker 1: Friday miss passed in a five to four unsigned order
Speaker 1: that let the Education Department withhold sixty five million dollars
Speaker 1: in grants for teacher training. Lower court had ordered those
Speaker 1: funds to be reinstated, but, as the court pointed out,
Speaker 1: the limited waiver of sovereign immunity doesn't extend to orders
Speaker 1: to enforce a contractual obligation to pay money. In other words,
Speaker 1: the plains who want the Feds to release frozen funds
Speaker 1: must seek relief in Federal Claims Court. There is a
Speaker 1: process that's already set up for that. That's essentially what
Speaker 1: justice is. Alito, Gorsage, Thomas, and Kavanaugh said in the
Speaker 1: earliest earlier decision in a case involving US AID grants.
Speaker 1: There is a process that they have to go through.
Speaker 1: They didn't. They weren't in court at the appropriate time,
Speaker 1: so the cases got chucked. So there you can get
Speaker 1: your judiciary reach, or you can you can get judicial relief.
Speaker 1: Sometimes the wheels adjust to spend slowly, sometimes very slowly.
Speaker 1: This time they were treated on an expedita basis, So
Speaker 1: you got an answer to the question a lot earlier
Speaker 1: than I think someone like me would have guessed. What happen?
Speaker 1: Six six thirty three fifty five KRC the talk station Wednesday,
Speaker 1: Drake to the phones. I do local stories, but Gary
Speaker 1: from New Hampshire's on New Hampshire. Gary, welcome back to
Speaker 1: the program, and a happy Wednesday to you, sir.
Speaker 5: Happy Wednesday to you. First, I'm going to give Steve
Speaker 5: a little advice I used to give my troops when
Speaker 5: I was in don't play with the indigenous creatures. They're
Speaker 5: not playing with you.
Speaker 1: True.
Speaker 4: Absolutely, I've almost been eaten by a hyena, I came
Speaker 4: face to face with a cobra, and I almost got
Speaker 4: stomped on a twelve foot python.
Speaker 5: In my career, those are my closest encounters. But I
Speaker 5: just I just stayed away from you know, smart advice,
Speaker 5: smart advice, The next thing, the next thing I want
Speaker 5: to do. I just wanted to offer you prayers for
Speaker 5: your cat scan if they're all praying for you, but
Speaker 5: think you're in your thought.
Speaker 1: I appreciate that, Gary. Hopefully i'll know by tomorrow. And
Speaker 1: again I'm not expecting anything overwhelming. I just you know,
Speaker 1: like I said, I was using an excuse because I
Speaker 1: changed my diet and anticipation of that, and diet change
Speaker 1: can be great for you. You'll feel better. Just get
Speaker 1: the sugar out of your diet as a start, and
Speaker 1: I'm telling you you'll have a lot more energy and
Speaker 1: feel better about yourself. And if you're interested in losing weight,
Speaker 1: it'll just kind of fall off on its own. You know,
Speaker 1: you don't really have to change too much. God bless you, sir,
Speaker 1: to appreciate that. Anyway, I guess matter, I better get
Speaker 1: back on the clock. Get the hairy eyeball from Sean McMahon.
Speaker 1: It doesn't really seem to give give me too much
Speaker 1: of a hard time for not staying on the clock. Strecker, however,
Speaker 1: looking forward to having Joe back. But I enjoy when
Speaker 1: Sean covers for him so and it means six thirty
Speaker 1: nine on a Wednesday, and a happy one to you.
Speaker 1: And Eric thinks Chuck hates the West Side because he
Speaker 1: doesn't really do any reporting on the flooding over on
Speaker 1: the west side, which I presume still struggling with flooding.
Speaker 1: Obviously New Richmond is certainly dealing with it. But you know,
Speaker 1: to my friends on the west side, I have no idea.
Speaker 1: I don't think he bears any animosity toward the west
Speaker 1: side of the city of Cincinnati. He's only got like
Speaker 1: thirty seconds to get a weather reported. So anyhow, I
Speaker 1: hope things settled down soon for everyone. It's been pretty bad,
Speaker 1: interesting teas and this teas Trump brought it up. It
Speaker 1: was earlier this week or over the weekend, not really material,
Speaker 1: but White House Press Secretary Carolyn Lovett brought it up.
Speaker 1: I guess again yesterday, and it's got me intrigued, and
Speaker 1: it's got a lot of people intrigued. There's a big
Speaker 1: buzz going around on the internet about this cryptic statement
Speaker 1: hinting at what she and Trump described as a horrible
Speaker 1: discovery made by the Department of Governmental Efficiency. So she's
Speaker 1: doing this US conference yesterday and she said, I can
Speaker 1: confirm that's something troubling has come to light. So we're
Speaker 1: all sit on the edge of the seat. You know,
Speaker 1: I got my popcorn out waiting for the details on that.
Speaker 1: We don't know what it is. She confirmed that the
Speaker 1: Department of Governmental Efficiency has made a quote massive discovery
Speaker 1: close quote, but saying that we would know very soon.
Speaker 1: We the American public can know very soon there has
Speaker 1: been a discovery. Speaking of reporters, she said, I hate
Speaker 1: to leave you hanging on a clip, but I don't
Speaker 1: want to get ahead of the president on that. But
Speaker 1: I can confirm there has been discovery. It's just not
Speaker 1: to get ahead of the president on that. But I
Speaker 1: can confirm there has been discovery. It's not just quite
Speaker 1: ready for release. So it does echo what Donald Trump said.
Speaker 1: It was last week that they had the DOGE group
Speaker 1: had made a horrible and his word, incredible discovery. They
Speaker 1: found something today that's horrible. It's horrible. You'll find out
Speaker 1: very soon. And of course, how bad can it be.
Speaker 1: We just learned recently the DOGE that uncovered like millions
Speaker 1: of illegal immigrants that were granted a SOCIS security number
Speaker 1: over the past four years, I mean almost through an
Speaker 1: automatic process. That was really frightening. When you read the
Speaker 1: details of how this happened, it's just like, welcome to
Speaker 1: the country, here's your hearing day and here's a form.
Speaker 1: Fill it out in that form ultimately led you getting
Speaker 1: a socials Security number is basically automatically created and given
Speaker 1: to you. One point three million illegal immigrants received Medicaid.
Speaker 1: For those leftists out there screaming how the Trump administration
Speaker 1: is the one that wants to kill medicaid, you know,
Speaker 1: the way you kill medicaid, you put a bunch of
Speaker 1: people on Medicaid who aren't eligible for it and who
Speaker 1: will be consuming the benefits that you otherwise might be
Speaker 1: might be eligible for, and registered to vote. And it
Speaker 1: was determined by Doge and the folks that are looking
Speaker 1: into that many of them have voted. That's illegal. Do
Speaker 1: you want to uphold the integrity the American elections or
Speaker 1: do you want to undermine the integrity of the American elections?
Speaker 1: And everybody's screening about Donald Trump saying the election was stolen, like, oh,
Speaker 1: he's got no evidence of that, He's got no evidence
Speaker 1: of that. Well, they have found that a whole heap
Speaker 1: loot of illegal immigrants have voted. Illegal immigrants who are
Speaker 1: not eligible to vote. So you know, I don't know
Speaker 1: which way they voted. I suppose it's conceivable that they
Speaker 1: voted for a Republican, it's possible. I think most people presume,
Speaker 1: since the Democrats are the one that facilitated the entry
Speaker 1: into the country and ignored the immigration laws and allowed
Speaker 1: them just come on in. Oh, by the way, here's
Speaker 1: your social Security number, that they would if they did
Speaker 1: vote vote Democrat. In twenty twenty one, two hundred and
Speaker 1: seventy four and twenty five illegal immigrants were issued social
Speaker 1: Security numbers. In twenty two, five hundred and ninety thousand
Speaker 1: plus issued US as security numbers. In twenty twenty three,
Speaker 1: nine and sixty four thousand were and in county year
Speaker 1: twenty twenty four, notably, the last year of the Biden administration,
Speaker 1: two million, ninety five thousand, two hundred and forty seven
Speaker 1: illegal immigrants issued US to Security cards. Representative Tim Burchet
Speaker 1: he's a Republican at Tennessee. He said that the paper
Speaker 1: trail revealed by the Department of Governmental Efficiency goes back
Speaker 1: to d C. He said, somebody better be let out
Speaker 1: of a building in handcuffs. I don't know if we've
Speaker 1: got the guts to do it well. I'd like to
Speaker 1: think someone will. Does this is this right? Does this
Speaker 1: rise to the level of criminal behavior. Is this an
Speaker 1: organized attempt to interfere with the American election process? Lots
Speaker 1: of questions swirling around in doge is responsible for revealing
Speaker 1: it to you Themmerican people, And yet outrage is being
Speaker 1: expressed by so many members on the left. Maybe the
Speaker 1: jig is up. Maybe this is something that they supported
Speaker 1: and and and encourage, and of course the non government
Speaker 1: organizations and the George Soros types of the world. Certainly
Speaker 1: this sounds like something that they would be full on
Speaker 1: in favor of. Talked about the other day with with
Speaker 1: Oliver Oliver Lane, the London News correspondent. I don't know
Speaker 1: who was able to go to that meeting last night,
Speaker 1: the presentation he did on populism growing in Europe, and
Speaker 1: but we did talk about illegal immigration and some of
Speaker 1: the you know, the theories and motives behind it, basically eliminating,
Speaker 1: eroding and eradicating the cultures that are within any individual country,
Speaker 1: sort of homogenizing in a new group of people that
Speaker 1: really don't give a wit about say French's history, the
Speaker 1: history of France and their culture ideas entity, wanting to
Speaker 1: eradicate that so there is no cultural identity. It's really
Speaker 1: scary stuff. Mike, I see you are on the phone
Speaker 1: with the content or the comment about tariffs. Can't wait
Speaker 1: to talk to you, but I do it for break.
Speaker 1: It's six forty five right now, six fifty one. If
Speaker 1: you have KRCD talk station, if you're having a wonderful Wednesday,
Speaker 1: We're talking to Anson Frereks. He is the former president
Speaker 1: Anheuser Bush the name of his book. And you can
Speaker 1: figure out what this is all about. Last call for
Speaker 1: bud Light Donald Nee Americans for Prospered about event that's
Speaker 1: going on this weekend. And over to the phone's five one, three, seven, four,
Speaker 1: nine fifty eight hundred and eight two to three talk
Speaker 1: pun five fifty on AT and T phone. The one
Speaker 1: hundred and four percent tariffs on China kick in today.
Speaker 1: Mike's on the phone, have a comment about tariffs. Mikes,
Speaker 1: thanks for calling and holding over the break. Good to
Speaker 1: hear from you, Hi.
Speaker 11: Brian once you're a good thing about Tariff's the company
Speaker 11: I work for, I work for a local pharmaceutical company
Speaker 11: and uh, we lost some business on one of our well,
Speaker 11: we just got a big order because the company that
Speaker 11: they put a big order and because they're buying from India.
Speaker 6: While the tariffs are.
Speaker 10: Pushing them back to that.
Speaker 6: So we got a huge order well bank for what
Speaker 6: we lost.
Speaker 1: So there are some bright spots out there in tariff land.
Speaker 1: You know, I hope more and more stories like you're poor,
Speaker 1: yours poor in Mike, because uh, you know, I and
Speaker 1: everybody who knows who's listening to me over the years knows,
Speaker 1: I'm I'm a pretty good fan of the Wall Street Journal. Man.
Speaker 1: They hate these tariffs. You can't find a positive word
Speaker 1: of the Wall Street Journal about these tariffs as far
Speaker 1: as and white as you might want to search for it.
Speaker 1: But I guess there can be some some bright spots
Speaker 1: in there, and there are some countries stepping up to
Speaker 1: the plate. According to the US Treasury Secretary of about
Speaker 1: seventy countries have already reached out to start negotiating with
Speaker 1: the bidamin or with Oh god, I'm sorry about that
Speaker 1: Freudian slip, but the Trump administration and trying to negotiate
Speaker 1: some better situation with the tariffs. I know the Democrats
Speaker 1: are trying to advance a bill to block Trump from
Speaker 1: doing these tariffs, and that's going to be the subject
Speaker 1: matter of our conversation with Judge and Politana at a
Speaker 1: thirty He is going to make a very good legal
Speaker 1: argument that this is beyond the power of the president
Speaker 1: to impose the tariffs, considering the power of the purse
Speaker 1: lies with Congress, and in his perception, we aren't really
Speaker 1: in an emergency situation. If you recall the fentanyl crisis
Speaker 1: with Canada Mexico led to the twenty five percent tariffs,
Speaker 1: and well, you may be able to call that an emergency.
Speaker 1: We've had trade imbalances since nineteen thirty five, I guess
Speaker 1: with most of these countries, so that it's difficult to
Speaker 1: call that emergency since it's not recent. It has been
Speaker 1: going on for a very long time. We've just been
Speaker 1: sort of playing along with it over the time. So
Speaker 1: whether he can use this late nineteen seventies Act to
Speaker 1: justify it emergency emergency Act, well, we're made to be
Speaker 1: seen in. There is something else that'll probably be resolved
Speaker 1: in the courts. But one hundred and four percent on
Speaker 1: Chinese goods, I can't imagine that not having a profound
Speaker 1: ripple effect. But one thing's for sure. I guess the
Speaker 1: European Union loves Kentucky Bourbon. Now they're moving forward plans
Speaker 1: to slap tariffs on a whole bunch of American products.
Speaker 1: But the other day they removed Kentucky bourbon and California
Speaker 1: wine from the list, saying that they will not respond
Speaker 1: to President Trump dollar for dollar. So sadly for the
Speaker 1: folks at Harley Davidson, that's on the list, boats, beef, soybean,
Speaker 1: chewing gum, peanut butter. That's according to documents that have
Speaker 1: been reviewed. Whiskey is on an initial list that the
Speaker 1: U published in March, but was removed after consultations with
Speaker 1: members state countries. What your kids tax? We went our
Speaker 1: Kentucky bourbon, damnit and our California wine. So it's funny
Speaker 1: what matters, isn't it? Addinghow six fifty five afty five
Speaker 1: k City Talks stays. Let's find out what happened to
Speaker 1: Bud Budweiser and i Anson Freerik's former president of Anheuser
Speaker 1: Busch with his new book, Last Call for Bud Light.
Speaker 1: That'll be after the top of the our News. And
Speaker 1: then Donovan and Neil about the weekend event at seven
Speaker 1: thirty for Americans for Prosperity. I sure hope you can
Speaker 1: stick around. I so Cincinnati native Anson Freericks. He has
Speaker 1: a wild background. He's the founder of Athletic Capital and
Speaker 1: co founder of Strive asset Management, but prior to founding Strive,
Speaker 1: he led finance sales and underscore the word marketing operations
Speaker 1: as president of Anheuser Busch Sales and distribution company, and
Speaker 1: he's written a book about it. Last Call for Bud Light,
Speaker 1: The Fall and Future of America's Favorite Anson. It's great
Speaker 1: having you on the show. Thanks having this morning, Brian. Well,
Speaker 1: what a dream job running a brewery and one of
Speaker 1: the biggest in the world. That had to have been
Speaker 1: a good time up until what happened. And how come
Speaker 1: you're not there anymore? Anson?
Speaker 10: Yeah, So, Brian, just be clear.
Speaker 3: I left about a year before annazer Bush's partnership with
Speaker 3: Bill mulvaney, so I wasn't there when the partnership happened,
Speaker 3: but I left in part because I saw a lot
Speaker 3: of these problems coming down the pipeline where the company
Speaker 3: really stopped focusing on its customer, knew who its customer was.
Speaker 10: I mean, when I was at Dane has A Bush,
Speaker 10: we tried.
Speaker 3: To win the Super Bowl ad Meter Award every single year,
Speaker 3: and that was really sort of the gold standard if
Speaker 3: you got if you won this Super Bowl ad Meter award,
Speaker 3: that's when.
Speaker 10: You knew you were hitting the core customer.
Speaker 3: But over time, once the company was bought by kind
Speaker 3: of European and Belgian company called InBev, and you had
Speaker 3: a lot of sort of foreign folks from Europe and
Speaker 3: Belgium and in Brazil come to the US and they
Speaker 3: really changed the marketing. They changed the marketing to fit
Speaker 3: more of this diversity equity inclusion standards they're trying to
Speaker 3: win awards over in Europe. That was forcing bud Light
Speaker 3: to not do what bud Light was. So I saw
Speaker 3: the company changing a little bit left. About a year
Speaker 3: before me and I actually founded a company with vid
Speaker 3: A Ramaswami from Cincinnati as well called Drive to ask
Speaker 3: companies not.
Speaker 10: Get involved in political issues. So it was really a
Speaker 10: collision of two worlds.
Speaker 3: When my old company, Anne hester Bush did the partnership
Speaker 3: with Dylan Malvaaney about two years ago actually this week,
Speaker 3: and then the company we'd started with Strive, who was
Speaker 3: telling companies.
Speaker 10: Not to get involved in these things it was bad
Speaker 10: for business.
Speaker 3: I became sort of the person that was most knowledge
Speaker 3: about the topic and kind of what went wrong?
Speaker 1: Were you perhaps an impetus behind the vext book Woke Incorporated?
Speaker 3: You know this was uh, this was this was before
Speaker 3: Vivid wrote the book, right when we were kind of
Speaker 3: starting strives. I think he was the one who wrote
Speaker 3: Wolkes Incorporated. And you know, I wrote this book Last
Speaker 3: Call for bud Life, and hopefully it's sort of the
Speaker 3: last time that companies need to get involved in political
Speaker 3: and social issues and reminds people that, man, the most
Speaker 3: sustainable thing a business can do is folks on its customers,
Speaker 3: give them great products and services, stay out of all
Speaker 3: the issues that companies have gotten involved in over the
Speaker 3: last couple of years. Whether it's been the transgendered issues,
Speaker 3: whether it's been Roby weight issues, whether it's been voting
Speaker 3: rights issues.
Speaker 10: I mean, you name it.
Speaker 3: You've had so many companies get involved in things that
Speaker 3: really aren't in their mission or their their their core
Speaker 3: kind of customer promise. And that's what's led to a
Speaker 3: lot of the issues.
Speaker 10: Whether it's been at Disney, or it's been at Nike,
Speaker 10: or it's been at.
Speaker 3: Starbucks, Ben and Jerry, you name it, there's been so
Speaker 3: many companies that unfortunately have lost millions of customers, you know,
Speaker 3: billions of dollars of value and have had to fire
Speaker 3: a lot of employees or have had their suppliers shut
Speaker 3: down solely because they fragmented their customer base by getting
Speaker 3: involved in issues they.
Speaker 10: Shouldn't be well.
Speaker 1: It defies logic and reason that a major corporation like
Speaker 1: Anheuser Busch would engage in actual advocacy along any of
Speaker 1: these lines, because, of course, the world is filled with
Speaker 1: a diverse group of people and that already holds that
Speaker 1: particular ideology that they would be alienating a sizable chunk,
Speaker 1: particularly a beer company, a sizeable chunk of their base.
Speaker 1: It just seems so obvious. How is it that any
Speaker 1: advertising department could just fail to recognize such a simplistic, logical,
Speaker 1: and reasonable concept as that and go the opposite direction.
Speaker 10: I mean, you're right, Brian.
Speaker 3: I mean, you know, most beer drinkers, they just want
Speaker 3: their beer cold and they want it fresh. That's essentially
Speaker 3: the value proposition, even for a brand like butt Light.
Speaker 3: But Light was the biggest beer brand in the US
Speaker 3: because it had this idea that it wanted to be
Speaker 3: easy to drink, easy to enjoy. It was like an
Speaker 3: easy drinking, simple logger, and it was always a humorous, funny,
Speaker 3: kind of kind of beer brand, and really I think
Speaker 3: a lot of the DNA of the company. It changed
Speaker 3: really in the two thousand and eight two thousand and
Speaker 3: nine time period when annezer Busch, which was this historic
Speaker 3: US American owned brand and beer company, was bought by InBev,
Speaker 3: which is a game, this European and Belgian company. And
Speaker 3: then also when the company, the Europeans and kind of
Speaker 3: Belgians who bought it, they moved the headquarters of Anezer
Speaker 3: Bush from Saint Louis, Missouri, to New York City. And
Speaker 3: this happened in sort of like the twenty sixteen twenty
Speaker 3: seventeen time period. And at that time, all of a sudden,
Speaker 3: you're hiring people that just grew up in New York City,
Speaker 3: that only attended New York City schools. They had only
Speaker 3: seen the US through the lens of you know, kind
Speaker 3: of Fifth Avenue, and that's not really who the core
Speaker 3: beer drinker was. And even the lady that was running
Speaker 3: bud Light when named Alyssa Heinerschnein, who was doing the
Speaker 3: part who did the partnership with Dylan Malvany. I know
Speaker 3: Alyssa and you know, nice, nice girl. But they grew
Speaker 3: up in New York, went to boarding schools, went to
Speaker 3: Harvard for undergrad went to Wharton and UPenn for bus
Speaker 3: in the school. You know, I don't know if you
Speaker 3: never drank a butt light in her life or knew
Speaker 3: who somebody who was. And so that's where the company
Speaker 3: really started going wrong. And then on top of that,
Speaker 3: there was a real sort of push over the last
Speaker 3: five years by this I called this coalition of of
Speaker 3: sort of a DEI and ESG enablers. That was, you
Speaker 3: had large asset managers like black Rock, State Street, Vanguard,
Speaker 3: the Control twenty trillion dollars a capital, largest investors in
Speaker 3: company like Anhezard Bush. They were pushing this esgdi agenda.
Speaker 3: You had large consulting companies like McKenzie and Baine. They
Speaker 3: were kind of selling DEI consulting services on how companies
Speaker 3: needed to become more diverse, more equitable, more inclusive. And
Speaker 3: then you had a lot of really activist organizations, especially
Speaker 3: under sort of like the Biden administration, that were going
Speaker 3: to companies, things like the Human Rights Campaign, things like
Speaker 3: other organizations that really pushed sort of aggressive ideologies on
Speaker 3: companies and shame them if they didn't if they didn't abide.
Speaker 3: And so therefore you had this sort of you know,
Speaker 3: coalition of actors that were putting a lot of pressure
Speaker 3: on companies and if you have sort of the wrong
Speaker 3: people at the companies that were running brands, Unfortunately they
Speaker 3: were successful and sell for you know, this progressive agenda
Speaker 3: that just didn't sit with most most Americans.
Speaker 1: Well, so you have basically this echo chamber of liberal
Speaker 1: voices talking to each other and only listening to each other,
Speaker 1: but failing to appreciate that the underlying motive and reason
Speaker 1: that the business is in business is to generate profit
Speaker 1: and revenue. I mean, they seem to have lost track
Speaker 1: and the focus of what was important is that's serving
Speaker 1: the shareholder's best interest. That's a fiduciary obligation of board
Speaker 1: of directors owns. And again, you got to step outside
Speaker 1: of yourself and think even these left wing nutcases that
Speaker 1: haven't heard anything but their own voices have to understand
Speaker 1: that they don't hold the only viewpoint and they might
Speaker 1: want to do a little bit of polling and research
Speaker 1: ahead of time to find out if this is the
Speaker 1: right road to go down, because it may be bad
Speaker 1: for the bottom line.
Speaker 10: Brian, You're you're exactly.
Speaker 3: Right, and that's didn't Unfortunately a lot of these folks
Speaker 3: they didn't do the thinking and they thought, and frankly.
Speaker 10: They got away with it for a number of years
Speaker 10: and there was this.
Speaker 3: More philosophical battle that's been going on for really ten years.
Speaker 3: But what's the purpose of the corporation? You talked about
Speaker 3: Historically businesses that they were in the business to give
Speaker 3: returns to shareholders. That was kind of a Milton Friedman
Speaker 3: view of the world that's been happening since.
Speaker 10: The nineteen seventies.
Speaker 3: Were Milton Friedman, famous economists here in the US wrote
Speaker 3: this article about the social purpose of a business is
Speaker 3: to return money to shareholders.
Speaker 10: How did they do that?
Speaker 3: Create great products and services folks in your customer that
Speaker 3: allows you to get to do more innovation, hire more people,
Speaker 3: you know, be involved in your community.
Speaker 10: And there's been this push towards this more this.
Speaker 3: European stakeholder capitalism model, which is that's the Cloud Schwab
Speaker 3: World Economic Forum, this globalist kind of view that says no, no, no,
Speaker 3: businesses need to work with governments and other stakeholders.
Speaker 10: The kind of social engineer policy.
Speaker 3: I reject that view because then you end up with
Speaker 3: what we did over the last couple of years, where
Speaker 3: you had businesses getting involved in all these social and
Speaker 3: political issues that alienated their customer base. That led to
Speaker 3: millions of customers leaving these businesses, thousands of people getting fired,
Speaker 3: and then massive loss is in share market value for companies,
Speaker 3: and that's not sustainable, No, it's not.
Speaker 1: And the demand for beer I don't think went away.
Speaker 1: What this did to bud Light, the most popular beer
Speaker 1: in America at one point, is people said, I'm not
Speaker 1: going to buy that because of this woke crap and
Speaker 1: this you know, this Dylan mulvaney person. I'm going to
Speaker 1: go over and I'm going to sample maybe one of
Speaker 1: the other thousands of beers that exists. And they found
Speaker 1: there were other beers that were maybe even tasted better
Speaker 1: that they chose over bud Light. They were longtime bud
Speaker 1: dry Light drinkers, weren't inclined to try something else, so
Speaker 1: this forced them to try another product, and they found out,
Speaker 1: in the world of competition, if you make a better product,
Speaker 1: people will buy it.
Speaker 10: Yeah.
Speaker 3: No, that's exactly it. And I think one of the
Speaker 3: other things that this showed as well. This is one
Speaker 3: of the very first times that there was actually like
Speaker 3: a real consumer boycott of a brand. You know, there's
Speaker 3: been a lot of people that were upset over the
Speaker 3: last five years, maybe the NFL when you had a
Speaker 3: lot of players kneeling, or the NFL was was going down,
Speaker 3: you know, the whole Black Lives Matter movement, which became
Speaker 3: very controversial. But the thing is like if you or
Speaker 3: or you know, when I watch football on Sundays, there's
Speaker 3: no real alternatives in the NFL R. One of the
Speaker 3: reasons is bud light boycott was so successful. There was
Speaker 3: really two reasons.
Speaker 10: One, there's a lot of alternatives to bud Light.
Speaker 3: I mean, everywhere you have bud Light, you have cores Light,
Speaker 3: you have Miller Lite, and they're all in the same
Speaker 3: six packs, are on draft and the same price points.
Speaker 10: It's really easy to pick those up.
Speaker 3: And then secondarily, people were seeing the impact that they
Speaker 3: had because every single week, sales of bud Light are
Speaker 3: reported at retailers like Walmart and Kroger in seven to eleven,
Speaker 3: so every week you were seeing that sales were down
Speaker 3: ten percent, twenty percent, thirty percent. And then you were
Speaker 3: seeing all these pictures on social media nobody being in
Speaker 3: the bud Light line.
Speaker 10: And you know.
Speaker 3: Cincinnati reds Gate or a Bengals games, they're off the cores.
Speaker 1: Lightlines for It's start. Now you're at the point where.
Speaker 10: Bud Light sales, I mean they've been down.
Speaker 3: They're down fifty percent from where they were two years ago,
Speaker 3: which is absolutely crazy to think about.
Speaker 10: You see a brand implode like that.
Speaker 1: Last call for bud Light to fall and future of
Speaker 1: America's favorite beer. Speaking of the last component of the subtitle,
Speaker 1: is there a way for them to rehabilitate? Can bud
Speaker 1: Light ever capture that top spot?
Speaker 3: You know, I don't think into the current leadership that
Speaker 3: they can. They had multiple chances to go to their
Speaker 3: loyal consumer base say hey, we screwed up. We never
Speaker 3: said but like get involved in these like in these
Speaker 3: political and social issues. And so I think the current
Speaker 3: the current group which is again is a Belgian owned company,
Speaker 3: and they have US leadership that hasn't been able to apologize.
Speaker 3: I think what they actually do is they actually need
Speaker 3: to sell the US business. I think they need to
Speaker 3: sell that US business back to a group like I
Speaker 3: don't call it Warren Buffett or Berkshire Hathaway or who knows,
Speaker 3: maybe the Bush family, And I think you need to
Speaker 3: have real leadership come back in for the for you know,
Speaker 3: the American population, they're actually pretty forgiving, and I think
Speaker 3: if you just went to them and said, you know,
Speaker 3: I always say that the path that forgiveness goes to redemption.
Speaker 3: You're never going to be redeem unless you admit there
Speaker 3: was an air. And nobody has admitted there's an air.
Speaker 3: So you have to have a strong leadership team come
Speaker 3: back in say hey, we screwed up. There's a new
Speaker 3: ownership in place for American owned once again. We're going
Speaker 3: to earn your trusts back by being just this funny, humorous,
Speaker 3: great tasting logger that you can enjoy at barbecues and
Speaker 3: sports and music festivals.
Speaker 10: And that's what we want to do it.
Speaker 3: I think the actually can get back to that, but
Speaker 3: it's not going to be into the cournembership group.
Speaker 1: It's been fabulous talking with you, Anson Ferreks. He is
Speaker 1: again since a resident author of the book we're talking
Speaker 1: about today, Last Call for bud Light, The Fall and
Speaker 1: Future of America's Beer, A favorite beer answering your books
Speaker 1: on my blog page fifty five carsite dot com with
Speaker 1: the link where people can easily get a copy of it,
Speaker 1: and I'm sure they will fascinating conversation and interesting analysis
Speaker 1: of really bad decisions in the wrong direction. You have
Speaker 1: a wonderful day. So it's been a real pleasure having
Speaker 1: you on the program. So sixteen here fifty five car
Speaker 1: Seed Talk Station. Got a few minutes to talk if
Speaker 1: you want to give me a quali five one, three, seven, seven,
Speaker 1: twenty one On a Wednesday, Americans for Prosperity Donovan and
Speaker 1: Neil Bottom of the Arrow got a text day event
Speaker 1: coming up in the weekend. He's going to tell us
Speaker 1: all about that in the absence of phone calls news
Speaker 1: that's overshadowed by the tariff news and all the wailing
Speaker 1: and gnashing and teeth over that. I guess today's today,
Speaker 1: when the China levies take effect pretty substantial, they are
Speaker 1: sit back. I can wait to see how that gets
Speaker 1: well reckoned with. But over so, I got a lot
Speaker 1: of Second Amendment friends out of the audience. Undoing a
Speaker 1: major avenue of Biden administration's aggression against gun dealers, the
Speaker 1: Department of Justice and Alcohol to back on firearms. Yesterday
Speaker 1: announced they terminated the Federal Firearms Administrative Action Policy aka
Speaker 1: the Zero Tolerance Policy. Gun Owners of America reporting on
Speaker 1: this first introduced under the Biden administration, the policy aggressively
Speaker 1: targeted gun dealers for minor paperwork errors, which of course
Speaker 1: created fear and uncertainty across the firearms community. Set Up
Speaker 1: by the Biden administration, the zero Tolerance policy one of
Speaker 1: a Yank firearm dealer's license if they were found to
Speaker 1: have made any number of infractions, including minor ones, of course,
Speaker 1: setting them up for litigation and extreme costs. Critics said,
Speaker 1: of course it was a pretext for reducing the number
Speaker 1: of firearms dealers. National Shooting Sports Foundation praising this eradication,
Speaker 1: this wreck cliss policy throttled small businesses and drove minute
Speaker 1: to shut down by threatening crippling administrative costs to fight
Speaker 1: against penalties for minor errors and infractions that were previously
Speaker 1: reconciled in good faith between the ATF officials and law
Speaker 1: abiding firearms retailers. Of course, you get condemnation from the
Speaker 1: gun control advocates, which you might expect. Gunners of America
Speaker 1: also announced that two other deregulatory moves are coming soon.
Speaker 1: The first would kill the Biden era ban on pistol braces.
Speaker 1: Now that's been held unconstitutional or illegal by the Eighth
Speaker 1: Circuit Court of Appeals. So if you have a pistol
Speaker 1: with a brace on it, you should be okay right now.
Speaker 1: But they're supposed to well get rid of the regulation
Speaker 1: that was randomly and arbitrarily put in place. Biden famously
Speaker 1: and ignorantly famous for saying putting a pistol on a
Speaker 1: brace turns it in into a gun. Contemplate that for
Speaker 1: a minute. He also claimed it allowed it to shoot
Speaker 1: a higher caliber bullet. So, in Biden's mind, such as
Speaker 1: it was, and as we've learned, in a rapidly declining state,
Speaker 1: felt that by placing a pistol brace on a previously
Speaker 1: existing caliber firearm would allow it to shoot a higher
Speaker 1: caliber bullet. Okay, a Circuit Court of Appeals previously ruled
Speaker 1: the pistol brace will allow the ATF to arrive at
Speaker 1: whatever conclusion it wishes about the ad about adequately explaining
Speaker 1: the standard on which a decision was based. They had
Speaker 1: for years said pistol braces were not a problem. They
Speaker 1: said they were fine, and there was nothing wrong with them,
Speaker 1: only to magically change their mind in a moment's time
Speaker 1: and then turn everybody that owned one basically into a felon.
Speaker 1: Another rule that they may repeal, the one requiring a
Speaker 1: background check on private gun sales. So if you wanted
Speaker 1: to sell your firearm to your next door neighbor, that would,
Speaker 1: under the Biden administration proposal required an FFL background check.
Speaker 1: So that rule looks like it's on its last legs
Speaker 1: as well. So some positive progress as we have a
Speaker 1: new administration with new attitudes towards the Second Amendment. Pete,
Speaker 1: welcome to the Morning Show and a very happy Wednesday
Speaker 1: to you. Thanks for calling.
Speaker 12: Thanks Brian. It seems like the whole world is against
Speaker 12: Trump's pariffs, and yet they don't seem to be against
Speaker 12: all the tariffs that have been levied on us. They
Speaker 12: keep referring to as Trump's starting a trade war.
Speaker 5: Well, we've been the victim of.
Speaker 12: A trade war for decades, and that trade war we
Speaker 12: have almost a trillion dollar trade deficit now. And how
Speaker 12: long do they think that they can keep draining a
Speaker 12: trillion dollars worth of wealth from our country year after
Speaker 12: year on top of a thirty six trillion dollar dead
Speaker 12: that we're having to pay interest on and let that
Speaker 12: keep going.
Speaker 1: Well as long as they as long as they they starting.
Speaker 12: A war, he's just fighting back for a war that's
Speaker 12: been levied against us.
Speaker 1: Well, Trump is willing to suffer the slings and arrows
Speaker 1: that he's going to suffer for a while until this
Speaker 1: gets resolved and we're going to all have the reality
Speaker 1: of probably increased prices. But so far, seventy countries have
Speaker 1: now stepped up to the playble table and expressed interest
Speaker 1: in resolving this amicably, and it may very well be
Speaker 1: resolved amicably among them me the most of them. China,
Speaker 1: however's gone the other direction, which is why we now
Speaker 1: have this massive and four percent tarify on Chinese goods.
Speaker 1: How that's going to sit with the American people remains
Speaker 1: to be seen. We've gotten very use to buying very
Speaker 1: inexpensive Chinese made products and China has been the obvious
Speaker 1: beneficiary of that. That again, China doesn't have wrecked radical
Speaker 1: crazy EPA rules regulations, ocean regulations, pollution regulations, which allows
Speaker 1: manufacturing to be set up a lot cheaper there and
Speaker 1: allows profits to go through the roof. That's why Wall
Speaker 1: Street doesn't like because they're big companies, built factories there
Speaker 1: and have been benefiting from cheap labor and low regulatory
Speaker 1: standards for years and years, allowing them to sell their
Speaker 1: products here in America for less than had they manufactured
Speaker 1: them here. Fewer people probably would have bought American made
Speaker 1: products if they had to be made at American level
Speaker 1: financial obligations, you know, in other words, we've got to
Speaker 1: We've not. We've got all these rules, regulations and burdens
Speaker 1: placed on it, and then you throw climate change on
Speaker 1: top of us, which causes the increase in electricity prices.
Speaker 1: It's going to be a lot more expensive. So we
Speaker 1: haven't been manufacturing electronics in this country since hell the
Speaker 1: eighties when Japan took over and then it all moved
Speaker 1: to China. So yeah, it's going to take a while
Speaker 1: to work out. There is going to be some pain.
Speaker 1: But you know what, Donald Trump's essentially a lame duck president.
Speaker 1: He ain't gonna be around anymore after this term. I
Speaker 1: know some people think he's eligible for a third term.
Speaker 1: I don't fall into that category. But he's willing to
Speaker 1: do it, and he campaigned on this. He told everybody
Speaker 1: in the world million times in the campaign trail. This
Speaker 1: is exactly what he was going to do, so it
Speaker 1: shouldn't come as a shock to anybody. You voted for
Speaker 1: him for a strong border, Yeah, you voted for him
Speaker 1: for it, filling the blank reasons. Yeah, But he also,
Speaker 1: whether you liked it or not, voted for him because
Speaker 1: he was promising to impose tariffs on other countries. That
Speaker 1: came along with a full package. So we'll ride it out.
Speaker 1: I think we'll come out the other side, okay. And
Speaker 1: if not, I suppose he can just pull the plug
Speaker 1: on the tariffs anytime he wants, or it'll be resolved
Speaker 1: in the courts. And there's already legislation to prevent Trump
Speaker 1: from engaging in this, whether or not Congress passes something
Speaker 1: like that, which would still be subject to write a
Speaker 1: Trump veto. So even if they passed legislation trying to
Speaker 1: stop him, I think the courts ultimately will make the
Speaker 1: final determination of whether this is lawful. Under the currently
Speaker 1: existing authorization, he has to engage in tariffs under emergency circumstances.
Speaker 1: Seven two Happy Wednesday to you, Judge Eden of Balaton.
Speaker 1: One hour on tariffs and the legality of tariffs, at
Speaker 1: least the way Donald Trump's doing it should be rather interesting.
Speaker 1: Prior to that, it's the best one two punch in
Speaker 1: radio with Congressman Thomas Messey joining us to talk about
Speaker 1: the Dual Loyalty Disclosure Act as well as the country
Speaker 1: of origin labeling. Can we get that back and maybe
Speaker 1: we'll get a comment or two on tariffs from him
Speaker 1: in the meantime. Welcome back to the fifty five Kssey
Speaker 1: Morning Show from Americans for Prosperity, Donovan and Neil. Great
Speaker 1: to have you on, Brian, always good to be with you.
Speaker 1: So we got a big event coming up on Palm Sunday.
Speaker 13: That's right, we sure do. It's a fiscal sanity rally,
Speaker 13: something I think.
Speaker 1: Our country is in dire need of, you know, Just
Speaker 1: let me get your reaction real quick before we talk
Speaker 1: about the details on that. He saw all the insanity
Speaker 1: going on over the weekend. Did you watch any of
Speaker 1: the videos of the people at these crazy rallies being
Speaker 1: interviewed and asked exactly what their problem was with Elon
Speaker 1: munt Us, the work that Doge is doing, or Donald
Speaker 1: Trump generally. I mean, did you come across with any
Speaker 1: clear idea of what the hell they're talking about or
Speaker 1: protesting about Donovan.
Speaker 8: Well, you know, one one no, And I think this is.
Speaker 13: I'm trying to wind up for something.
Speaker 3: There.
Speaker 10: No, there's not It's not really clear.
Speaker 13: And you know, here's something I think is important to
Speaker 13: keep in mind, right, especially as you look at different
Speaker 13: election results that just came in. There definitely is a
Speaker 13: number of folks out there who are who are frustrated,
Speaker 13: who are upset or angry. But I think here's what's
Speaker 13: key is they don't know why they are. They're just
Speaker 13: being told from progressive organizations that they should be upset
Speaker 13: with what's going on. I think what we've got to
Speaker 13: make sure we're doing, Brian Ryan, and you're a great
Speaker 13: megaphone for this in Southwest Ohio, is connects folks to
Speaker 13: the importance of what doge, what the president, what the
Speaker 13: new Republican majority in Washington are getting done right. They're
Speaker 13: reigning and the spending, they're working to create policies they
Speaker 13: are going to promote money in people's pockets and unleash
Speaker 13: opportunity here in the United States.
Speaker 10: And so I think that the best way to combat
Speaker 10: that that nonsensical.
Speaker 13: Frustration that some folks seem to be having out there
Speaker 13: is connected to what these positive impacts are, because I
Speaker 13: can tell you sure, it's like they don't have a
Speaker 13: clear vision for the future of this country. And that's
Speaker 13: that's key as well. But I let're make sure we're
Speaker 13: staying out there and staying on message, because they got
Speaker 13: a lot of visibility over the weekend, but when you
Speaker 13: scratch beneath the surface, it really ain't that great.
Speaker 1: Well, And I think the visibility didn't do a much
Speaker 1: given much credibility because you know, I heard over and
Speaker 1: over again one of the main criticisms on their pre
Speaker 1: printed list of talking points, which didn't provide any really
Speaker 1: fundamental explanation for why they were screaming about medicaid. For example,
Speaker 1: you know you're going to take medicaid away from me.
Speaker 1: They're taking Medicaid away. I mean, my retort has been
Speaker 1: over and over. No, look at what dog is uncovered.
Speaker 1: One point three million illegal immigrants got put in the
Speaker 1: Medicaid rolls, and there's countless bill millions of dollars in
Speaker 1: fraud in the Medicaid system, which DOGE is revealed. To
Speaker 1: the extent you get rid of that illegal activity and
Speaker 1: those fraudulent or erroneous payments. You are going a long
Speaker 1: way to saving the program. I mean, doge in the
Speaker 1: administration is doing the exact opposite of what they're accusing
Speaker 1: them of, which frustrates the living hell out of me
Speaker 1: that they're so clueless that they don't realize that we
Speaker 1: all pay taxes, right.
Speaker 13: We all should expect that the tax dollars that go
Speaker 13: to Washington DC are hard earned. Money that goes to
Speaker 13: Washington DC is going to be spent well and spent efficiently.
Speaker 13: Right nobody's talking about ending these programs. Nobody's talking about
Speaker 13: cutting these programs. We're talking about making these programs run
Speaker 13: more efficiently so that the population that depends on them,
Speaker 13: our neighbors and friends who depend on these programs, have
Speaker 13: the ability.
Speaker 1: To access to them.
Speaker 13: We can talk about whether these programs should exist in
Speaker 13: the first place in the time. Right now, we're just
Speaker 13: talking about making sure these programs are run efficiently. And
Speaker 13: I think that's something every tax paying American citizen should applaud.
Speaker 13: Finally happening for the first time in ages in Washington DC.
Speaker 1: Yeah, approaching government the way private businesses would approach it.
Speaker 1: We've got too many of these departments we've got too
Speaker 1: much middle management. It's costing the shareholders a lot of money.
Speaker 1: We can run a more efficient operation, provide the same,
Speaker 1: if not better goods and services with less, and let's
Speaker 1: allocate the money to better products and goods and services.
Speaker 1: That is how a successful business runs. And of course
Speaker 1: we all know that is not how government runs. And
Speaker 1: this administration, at least for the seeming the first time
Speaker 1: in my lifetime, is revealing that and doing something about it.
Speaker 1: I know you've got the big event coming up on
Speaker 1: Sunday you want to talk about that. We'll bring Donovan
Speaker 1: and Neil for Americans for Prosperity back working with Restoring
Speaker 1: Liberty dot Us. I'll be right back after a big
Speaker 1: positive positive thumb Zone seven fifty five KARSD Talk station
Speaker 1: if you're having a half e Wednesday, Thomas Massey after
Speaker 1: the top of the our news, Judge and Paultano at
Speaker 1: eight thirty and then doctor j Rissover, my good friends
Speaker 1: doing making America Healthy again. Power you seminar tonight and
Speaker 1: you can join it. I'm sorry, tomorrow night you can
Speaker 1: join in the fund with that. We'll learn about that
Speaker 1: coming up. In the meantime. Donovan and Neil for Americans
Speaker 1: for Prosperity teaming up at Restore Liberty dot Us. The
Speaker 1: rally that we're having this Sunday. Where is it when
Speaker 1: of the door opens and what are we going to
Speaker 1: be talking about? Who are we going to be hearing from?
Speaker 1: Donovan and Neil Dan.
Speaker 13: Well, we're partnering with the great folks that were Store
Speaker 13: Liberty and George I've been on the show talking about
Speaker 13: and I know you know George, Well, they got a
Speaker 13: one heck of an operation there with Restore Liberty.
Speaker 1: These folks are.
Speaker 13: Getting together working hard to ensure conservative liberty oriented principles
Speaker 13: are happening in southwest Side. So we're partner with them,
Speaker 13: partners empower you and Americans for Prosperity to offer a
Speaker 13: fiscal sanity rally and the lead up to that day
Speaker 13: that every bureaucrat marks on the calendar and counts down
Speaker 13: for Tax Day April fifteenth. But we're going to get
Speaker 13: together April thirteenth there at the Double Tree in Blue
Speaker 13: AshEL on Kemper Road. Double Tree in Blue Ashland, East
Speaker 13: Temper Road, doors open up four point thirty. We're gonna
Speaker 13: have a dinner buffet. Program will begin at six o'clock
Speaker 13: and we'll get together again talking about fiscal sanity, recognizing
Speaker 13: that we're at a critical inflection point with this country,
Speaker 13: whether it's you're looking at our national debt, you're looking
Speaker 13: at the waste and abuse in our in our federal government,
Speaker 13: even on the state local level, making sure we're remaining
Speaker 13: fiscally sane at those.
Speaker 1: Levels as well.
Speaker 10: We're gonna be talking about it all.
Speaker 13: It's gonna be a great opportunity to get plugged into
Speaker 13: what's going on, identify some action.
Speaker 10: Items that you can as a you know, as a participant.
Speaker 13: Take part in to make sure that from our state.
Speaker 1: Local, federal government levels, we're driving.
Speaker 13: Fiscal sanity up and down the ladder.
Speaker 10: Because this is.
Speaker 13: About the future of our our country. It's about the
Speaker 13: future of our our for our children, and that's what
Speaker 13: we're gonna be talking about this Sunday. There's a double
Speaker 13: Tree on East Kemper Road, doors open at four thirty.
Speaker 1: Well, you know, I'm looking at the notes from Restored
Speaker 1: Liberty dot us and in explaining what's going on, you
Speaker 1: left out a critical word when you referring to dinner buffet.
Speaker 1: It says complementary dinner buffet you want to get people
Speaker 1: in the doors man.
Speaker 10: You can.
Speaker 1: It's free food and all this wonderful discussion about fiscal responsibility.
Speaker 1: So I'm just trying to increase and reveal who can
Speaker 1: make it. And I'll be honest with you. George Brunneman
Speaker 1: from Restore Liberty dot Us did invite me and we're
Speaker 1: having a Palm Sunday meal at my mom's that was
Speaker 1: already on the calendar and family comes first, So sadly
Speaker 1: I will not be able to make it, but I
Speaker 1: know it's going to be an extraordinary event. Any special
Speaker 1: speaker is going to be there, beyond maybe you and
Speaker 1: George and others.
Speaker 13: Well, they're putting together a number of locals. I don't
Speaker 13: think they fully released the list yet, at least they
Speaker 13: haven't given it to me yet, but I would say register,
Speaker 13: you'll get updates.
Speaker 10: We're expecting a.
Speaker 13: Packed house, a good crowd, a great program, and if
Speaker 13: you care about fiscal sanity, if you want to get
Speaker 13: in the fight and help push back against some of
Speaker 13: the craziness that you saw over the weekend around the country,
Speaker 13: this is the.
Speaker 1: Place to be.
Speaker 13: We're going to be We're gonna be talking fiscal sanity,
Speaker 13: we're gonna be talking making the Trump tax cuts permanent,
Speaker 13: and this is the kind of stuff we need to
Speaker 13: be doing, follow through on from the votes we cast
Speaker 13: last November.
Speaker 1: Well, and of course that's going to require engagement from
Speaker 1: my listeners and getting in touch with their elected officials.
Speaker 1: Any reaction on what's going on in d C with
Speaker 1: the you know, the whole process with the reconciliation and
Speaker 1: the Senate came out with a proposal and the Republicans
Speaker 1: are now struggling with that and maybe some holdouts. Do
Speaker 1: you do you have any insight or thoughts about that
Speaker 1: process that's going on right now, Donovan, Well, so.
Speaker 13: We've always known it was going to be a tenuous situation,
Speaker 13: right when you bring Congress is famous for one thing,
Speaker 13: failing to follow through on what it says it's going
Speaker 13: to do, right, and so we knew there's going to
Speaker 13: be a tenuous situation here. Well, I think you know
Speaker 13: the House is done, it's vote. Senate, it's done, it's vote.
Speaker 13: It's a long winding road to work through this convoluted
Speaker 13: reconciliation process Congress, and BASSI can give you we'll definitely
Speaker 13: be able to give you a better insight than I
Speaker 13: can there. But I think we key is everything's moving
Speaker 13: along as needed. With a number of our staff at
Speaker 13: an annual retreat and some of our federal government affairs fos.
Speaker 13: For folks who lobby on the Hill, what they've been
Speaker 13: saying is this is actually moving along a bit faster
Speaker 13: than folks were expecting. And so I think that's a
Speaker 13: good sign. The grassroots pressure is key here right continuing
Speaker 13: to send the message to Washington, to your elected officials,
Speaker 13: this is what we sent you there to do, to
Speaker 13: unleash energy abundance, to secure and front our border, and
Speaker 13: most importantly, unleash prosperity by making permanent the Trump tax cuts,
Speaker 13: the one big beautiful bill of Senate got done, you know,
Speaker 13: started to have a vote procedural vote.
Speaker 1: On over the weekend. Move that ball down the line.
Speaker 13: Gets that much closer to President Trump's desk. And ultimately
Speaker 13: what's important is relief, much needed relief for Americans who
Speaker 13: have experienced four years of Bidenomics and are ready for
Speaker 13: that to end.
Speaker 1: Well, and I'll tell you what one thing that you
Speaker 1: hit on energy policy. If we could get some sanity
Speaker 1: and not only restore liberty, but restore sanity, to our
Speaker 1: energy policy. I know Trump's embraced this all the above approach,
Speaker 1: even talking about bringing back coal, But abundant and inexpensive
Speaker 1: energy is really what drives growth in the economy. You know,
Speaker 1: if it doesn't cost as much to run a factory,
Speaker 1: it doesn't cost as much to you know, heat and
Speaker 1: air conditioning your house. That frees up money which otherwise
Speaker 1: can go to the economic engine of this country. And
Speaker 1: we have stood in the way of energy policy for
Speaker 1: so long under this climate change crap. And my favorite
Speaker 1: favorite point on that is just standing in the way
Speaker 1: of pursuing modular nuclear technology, which is you know, it's efficient,
Speaker 1: it's small footprint, it generates just infinite amounts of energy.
Speaker 1: And there's so many of these environmental alarmists standing the
Speaker 1: way of nuclear keeps screaming about three mile Island in
Speaker 1: Cherniobil as if the technology is the same as it
Speaker 1: was in the nineteen seventies. No it's not. I mean,
Speaker 1: we've got the answer to their concerns about carbon dioxide
Speaker 1: aka tree food, and it exists now and we could
Speaker 1: have it but for all of these people standing in
Speaker 1: the way with their regulations, rules and screaming about it
Speaker 1: and I don't know what they're screaming about in terms
Speaker 1: of that it's the answer to our problems.
Speaker 13: Well, yeah, who was against cheap abundant energy, right, and
Speaker 13: I think that modular nuclear is the right thing. You know,
Speaker 13: in Columbus, they're working on energy legislation. Here in Ohio,
Speaker 13: we're going to have once this.
Speaker 1: Legislation gets to the governor's desk.
Speaker 13: The goal here is to get site approved within forty
Speaker 13: five days. So if you've got an energy generation site
Speaker 13: you want to build in the state of Ohio, the
Speaker 13: state of Ohio on its end of the approval process,
Speaker 13: we'll get that done in forty five days. The bet
Speaker 13: there is to put more pressure on the federal government.
Speaker 13: And we've got a lot of allies at that level now, right,
Speaker 13: But yeah, put that pressure on the federal government to
Speaker 13: get these products, to fix the EPA, to fix its
Speaker 13: federal permitting processes so we can get energy generated, bring
Speaker 13: down that cost for Americans. And that's a big key
Speaker 13: part of manufacturing too, right, right, how to have abundant
Speaker 13: affordable energy to make manufacturing makes sense into the United
Speaker 13: States again, and so across the board, consumers to manufacturers
Speaker 13: to business, it all matters. Energy is at the.
Speaker 1: Heart of it all. It certainly is. And I had
Speaker 1: a conversation on the Morning show the other day with
Speaker 1: vivig Ramaswami, and I mean, he is on board with
Speaker 1: everything you've been talking about this morning, so he sounds
Speaker 1: like the right man for the job. He's all in
Speaker 1: favor of lowering taxes, in fact, hopefully getting rid of
Speaker 1: income taxes in the state of Ohio to level the
Speaker 1: playing field with those other states are the biggest draws
Speaker 1: for business and industry, the ones that don't have any
Speaker 1: income tax.
Speaker 10: It warms my heart.
Speaker 13: Brand here folks, this early in the process talking about
Speaker 13: the future Ohio in such a way right where we're
Speaker 13: going to yes, well that the conversation isn't about how
Speaker 13: much we're going to grow government the state of Ohio.
Speaker 13: The conversation looking at twenty twenty six is about what
Speaker 13: are we going to cut, what are we going to change,
Speaker 13: what are we going to do to transform Ohio to
Speaker 13: be the economic engine not just the Midwest, but of
Speaker 13: the country and most importantly moved from middle in the
Speaker 13: Midwest to number one in the nation. These big bold
Speaker 13: ideas that folks are talking about, I think and we
Speaker 13: like it at AFP. We like the fact that folks
Speaker 13: are talking about elimiting the income text because that's what
Speaker 13: we think is going to take to really put Ohio
Speaker 13: on the map and make folks look here.
Speaker 1: To site their projects. Yes, indeed so Double Tree, Blue
Speaker 1: Ash sixty three hundred East Kemper Road. Doors open at
Speaker 1: four pm. Rally begins at five. Complementary dinner. That's this Sunday,
Speaker 1: April thirteenth, aka Palm Sunday Information to Restore Liberty dot us.
Speaker 1: And as we always end, if folks want to get engaged,
Speaker 1: get involved and stay in touch with AFP, which website
Speaker 1: you want to turn them to? Donovan?
Speaker 13: Well, yeah, go to go to protect prosperity dot com.
Speaker 13: Protect prosperity dot com. That's the key for all the
Speaker 13: stuff we're working on on that national level, like we
Speaker 13: were talking.
Speaker 1: About today, Protect prosperity dot com. Until we talk again, donald'neil,
Speaker 1: have a wonderful event on Sunday. I'll look forward to
Speaker 1: our next conversation and keep up the great work with AFP.
Speaker 1: Really appreciate it. Thanks, Brian, Take care of my brother
Speaker 1: seven forty nine fifty five KCD talk if I have
Speaker 1: kersee the talk station just got a I guess the
Speaker 1: new campaign and for Corey Bowman westside Jim Keefer's sentence,
Speaker 1: so I asked him how that event went last night,
Speaker 1: said Gray say really worked the crowd, common sense, got
Speaker 1: some laughter, went Overwhell and he said hyde Park after
Speaker 1: high Park after first was cold, but he spoke one
Speaker 1: half came up to him and thanked him for running.
Speaker 1: We've been kind of speculating on the possibility that my
Speaker 1: friends in Hyde Park, sometimes often leaning very blue, might
Speaker 1: cot into a Corey Bowman mayor because he's not going
Speaker 1: to shove zoning regulations down your throat. He's not a
Speaker 1: fan of connected communities because it deprives local communities of
Speaker 1: their options as their residents see fit in terms of development.
Speaker 1: So and I embrace his philosophy along those lines. A
Speaker 1: little more free market, you know, a little mess dictatorial,
Speaker 1: a little less you know, like Agenda twenty one and
Speaker 1: planning type stuff. So anyway, keep my fingers crossed for
Speaker 1: Cordy's success and looking forward to having on the program
Speaker 1: my favorite one two punch on the fifty five Carsey
Speaker 1: Morning Show, Congressman Thomas Massey followed by Judge Editor Politano,
Speaker 1: and then we get an extra special add on doctor
Speaker 1: j Rissover making America healthy. He's all about that. He's
Speaker 1: doing an empower youth seminar tomorrow evening. We'll get some
Speaker 1: details on that at eight forty five. I hope he
Speaker 1: can stick around. We'll be right back covering Trump's first
Speaker 1: one hundred days.
Speaker 8: Every day America's Deadline is over.
Speaker 1: Fifty five KRC being talk station. This report days sponsored
Speaker 1: the shiveto five and fifty five kr CV Talk Station.
Speaker 1: A very happy Wednesday, extra special Wednesday, And of course
Speaker 1: I always call my favorite hour radio here on the
Speaker 1: fifty five Garsey Morning Show when we get to here
Speaker 1: from Congressman Massy, followed by Judge Editor Politana, who may
Speaker 1: be very well be listening. Welcome back, Congressman Massy. Always
Speaker 1: a distinct pleasure to have you on my program. Great
Speaker 1: to be on your show again, Brian, don't know where
Speaker 1: to start. I want to start with Terris, but I
Speaker 1: know we got other things to talk about, So let's
Speaker 1: start with and you can explain to my listeners the
Speaker 1: Dual Loyalty Disclosure Act, which I know was on your
Speaker 1: short list today.
Speaker 13: Sure, so this is a bill I introduced just last week,
Speaker 13: and it says that when you file to run for
Speaker 13: a federal office, if you are a citizen of another
Speaker 13: country as well as the United States, that you have
Speaker 13: to disclose that. And the concern here is that we
Speaker 13: may have members of Congress who are citizens of other
Speaker 13: countries and therefore have loyalty to other countries. When you
Speaker 13: are sworn into office, you take an oath to the
Speaker 13: US Constitution. We want to know who else you're obligated to.
Speaker 13: And people say, is this ever happened? How do you
Speaker 13: know there are members of Congress with dual loyalty. Well,
Speaker 13: it's hard to know. That's why we have the bill.
Speaker 13: But sometimes when they run for president, we find out
Speaker 13: or they find out that they do have citizenship in
Speaker 13: another country. The two conservative examples I can give you
Speaker 13: was that I think it was Michelle Bachman had a
Speaker 13: citizenship in Switzerland and Ted Cruz had citizenship in Canada,
Speaker 13: and they both renounced their citizenship, which I think is
Speaker 13: what you should do. And by the way, my personal
Speaker 13: preference is that you only have citizenship in the United States.
Speaker 13: But I thought it would be easier to get a
Speaker 13: bill passed that requires you to close it and then
Speaker 13: the voters can decide whether you should be a dual
Speaker 13: citizen serving in Congress.
Speaker 1: Well, I think that makes perfect sense. I one of
Speaker 1: my dear friends from you know, high school age married
Speaker 1: a French girl, and he's been living in France now
Speaker 1: for the past thirty at least thirty, maybe forty years,
Speaker 1: and I know he considers himself more French than a
Speaker 1: US citizen. He's critical of US government, its policies, and
Speaker 1: some even some of the freedoms we enjoy. So I
Speaker 1: know where his loyalties lie. So it stands to reason
Speaker 1: that that could because certainly something like that could happen.
Speaker 1: So the big question is who would be against this
Speaker 1: common sense proposal?
Speaker 14: Congressman Massy nobody should be against it, I don't know yet,
Speaker 14: although I've only got I think four co sponsors for it,
Speaker 14: Clay Higgins, Marjorie Taylor Green, and one of the I
Speaker 14: think Andy Biggs, and somebody else joined here recently.
Speaker 13: So if you're listening to this show and I'm not
Speaker 13: your congressman, please call their office and ask them to
Speaker 13: co sponsor this bill.
Speaker 1: All right, I guess is it in committee right now?
Speaker 1: I know these things have to come out of committee
Speaker 1: in order to be advanced to the floor, and of
Speaker 1: course it needs to be put up for vote on
Speaker 1: the floor. So where are we in process?
Speaker 13: So this it's you know, I introduced it so recently
Speaker 13: that I'm not sure that it's if it's been referred
Speaker 13: to a committee yet. And sometimes they're referred to more
Speaker 13: than one committee, but this is such a short bill,
Speaker 13: I think it would just go to one committee, and
Speaker 13: it would be the committee that oversees election law. And
Speaker 13: I'm not sure which one that is. It's not one
Speaker 13: that I serve on because the way I structured this
Speaker 13: bill is it requires an FEC disclosure, just like when
Speaker 13: you file to run for office, you have to disclose
Speaker 13: your financial you have to give financial statements. So it's
Speaker 13: just one more thing that you have to disclose when
Speaker 13: you run for office.
Speaker 1: Okay, fair enough. Pivoting over to something that it really
Speaker 1: really gets under my skin, the idea that I can't
Speaker 1: find out and can't see you from labeling where it
Speaker 1: is that my food has been manufactured country of origin labeling.
Speaker 1: We used to have that at some point, didn't we,
Speaker 1: And somewhere along the lines that got eradicated.
Speaker 13: Well, listen, your phone has the country of origin label.
Speaker 13: Your car on the sticker, has country of origin label,
Speaker 13: your shoes, your suit, your socks. You can know which country,
Speaker 13: your tools, which country those things came from. Except now
Speaker 13: with beef and pork. Since twenty fifteen, when Congress removed
Speaker 13: the requirement to label the country of origin on beef
Speaker 13: and pork, you can't necessarily know.
Speaker 1: And what's more is a lot of times this.
Speaker 13: Stuff will be stamped USDA US Department of Agriculture, and
Speaker 13: people read that label and they think, oh, this has
Speaker 13: made the USA. No, that could be from any country
Speaker 13: in the world. So I think we made a mistake
Speaker 13: in twenty fifteen when we removed country of origin labeling
Speaker 13: for beef and pork. I fought it tooth and nail.
Speaker 13: I lost the argument because they came to US and said, oh,
Speaker 13: the World Trade Organization has ruled against you in a
Speaker 13: suit from Canada and Mexico. Well, this suit was really,
Speaker 13: I believe, brought by the meat packers who want to
Speaker 13: be able to sell you meat from anywhere in the
Speaker 13: world and put that USDA label on it make you
Speaker 13: think it came from the United States. And in any case,
Speaker 13: the world Trade Organization, in my opinion, does not have
Speaker 13: authority over Congress.
Speaker 10: I can't find them in the constitution right, any kind.
Speaker 13: Of superior court. In fact, even the Supreme Court is
Speaker 13: a co equal branch with the legislative branch according to
Speaker 13: our constitution. So I don't believe we have to follow
Speaker 13: World Trade Organization. But here's what the World Trade Organization
Speaker 13: said in twenty fifteen. They said that Canada and Mexico
Speaker 13: can impose retaliatory tariffs on your farmers if you keep
Speaker 13: requiring country of origin labeling. So that was enough to
Speaker 13: scare enough of my colleagues into removing country of origin labor. Here.
Speaker 13: The thought just occurred to me, though, when Trump put
Speaker 13: these tariffs on, and now we got all these other
Speaker 13: countries and they're going to reciprocate with tariffs. Okay, if
Speaker 13: we're in a full blown trade war or trade dispute,
Speaker 13: go ahead and put the labels back on. I mean,
Speaker 13: this is art of the deal. Let's get back the
Speaker 13: territory we lost and label our dagone food about where
Speaker 13: it came from. Well, one more, go ahead, one more thing.
Speaker 13: While I'm on this topic. The US Olympic Association even
Speaker 13: advised Olympic athletes to be careful about eating meat in
Speaker 13: China and in Mexico, because even though they do ban
Speaker 13: the use of anabolic steroids in their animals, they're still
Speaker 13: using them. There's no enforcement, and so you could eat
Speaker 13: that meat and fail a drug task at the arampage.
Speaker 1: Oh my god. Well, and you just illustrate a great point.
Speaker 1: First off, I wasn't aware of the reality of what
Speaker 1: you just told me. So now I am a more
Speaker 1: informed consumer. And I was just making the point earlier
Speaker 1: when I saw the topics of conversation, most notably on
Speaker 1: this one. If I'm standing at the supermarket and I've
Speaker 1: got a pile of ground beef in front of me,
Speaker 1: and it's labeled, you know, manufactured, raised, you know, all
Speaker 1: United States processed, and I got another pile of meat
Speaker 1: that doesn't have anything related to that, then I'm left
Speaker 1: to guess, I wonder where that came from. Do they
Speaker 1: have the same safety standards as we do. It's the
Speaker 1: same level of you know, oversight in those countries, and
Speaker 1: that allows me to make an informed decision. Plus, perhaps
Speaker 1: I would just like to support the American farmer and
Speaker 1: buy United States grown and processed beef.
Speaker 13: That's Here's what's more that that mystery pile of beef,
Speaker 13: it's probably it's certainly going.
Speaker 10: To say us d A on it.
Speaker 13: So the average consumer is going to think that the
Speaker 13: mystery pile, the mystery meat is from the USA, but
Speaker 13: the USDA label does not imply that.
Speaker 10: And the other thing is it may.
Speaker 13: Say product of the USA just because they.
Speaker 1: Grounded up in the United States, process processed in the
Speaker 1: United States does not mean that that meat was grown here, correct.
Speaker 13: So, uh, this is something There are some various bills
Speaker 13: on this in the Senate. In the House, I'm looking
Speaker 13: at drafting my own bill to reinstitute country of origin labeling.
Speaker 13: And you know, the libertarian argument here is buyer beware
Speaker 13: and if you know, if the consumers want to buy
Speaker 13: the mystery meat, let them buy them exactly. But but
Speaker 13: I'm a constitutionalist here, and we have the authority Congress
Speaker 13: does to regulate trade when it comes across the border.
Speaker 13: And I think you know, even the Founders endowed Congress
Speaker 13: with the ability to set standards for weights and measures.
Speaker 13: That's in Article one, section eight, the Directive toward Congress.
Speaker 13: You know, so that a pound weighs a pound, whether
Speaker 13: you're buying it in Kentucky or Ohio. So this falls
Speaker 13: under both of those categories, the ability for Congress to
Speaker 13: set standards and.
Speaker 10: Also the ability to.
Speaker 13: Regulate commerce with other countries. And it's really no extra
Speaker 13: imposition to put that on the label.
Speaker 1: There are some who would.
Speaker 13: Say it is, but the consumers have the right to know.
Speaker 1: We do. And there's something I always looking out for,
Speaker 1: and I've noticed that quite often you will see, at
Speaker 1: least in so far as seafood is concerned, you'll see
Speaker 1: country of origin on seafood. Like I do not want
Speaker 1: to buy farm raised shrimp from Vietnam or China or
Speaker 1: Malaysia or wherever the hell it comes from. I want
Speaker 1: Gulf of Fill in the Black Mexico, United States wild
Speaker 1: caught shrimp, and you can find it.
Speaker 13: You want to know why. That is why, because the
Speaker 13: seafood lobby is not as powerful as the meat processing lobby,
Speaker 13: and so you still have to label the country of
Speaker 13: origin on seafood for poultry, and there's not a whole
Speaker 13: lot of post processing on seafood, so you know you
Speaker 13: can generally eat it as eat it or sell it
Speaker 13: as it came out of the ocean. A lot of times.
Speaker 13: And so you don't have that same oligarchy that controls
Speaker 13: the seafood industry that you do in the beef and
Speaker 13: pork industry.
Speaker 10: Oh that is, you still have to label it.
Speaker 1: So if they had more money and could pay off
Speaker 1: lobbyists and congress people elected officials, then I wouldn't be
Speaker 1: able to know where my shrimp came from. That's really
Speaker 1: what this comes down to. That is what it down to, Brother,
Speaker 1: always telling it like it is. Congress of Massy, let's pause.
Speaker 1: We'll bring you back because I do want to talk
Speaker 1: a little bit about tariffs and a couple other topics,
Speaker 1: and I know you're usually fair game for pretty much anything.
Speaker 1: To take nineteen if fifty about kercit talks Nation Bron
Speaker 1: Thomas with Congressman Thomas mass Always a wonderful thing to
Speaker 1: having Congress Massy on the program. Always even made better
Speaker 1: because Judge of Politana follows, and we'll be talking with
Speaker 1: Judge of Palatano on tariffs. And he points out in
Speaker 1: his column that these tariffs were implemented or asserted by
Speaker 1: Donald Trump pursued to the International Economic Emergency Powers Act
Speaker 1: of nineteen seventy seven, which permits the president to impose
Speaker 1: tariffs on goods coming from outside the US in the
Speaker 1: case of economic emergency, and he initially cited the fentanyl
Speaker 1: crisis with regard to the twenty five percent tariffs on
Speaker 1: Canada and Mexico, and I think we can easily agree
Speaker 1: that fentyl is a bit of a crisis. But moving over,
Speaker 1: apparently that had broader implications than originally intended. And so
Speaker 1: he cited this economic imbalance, this trade deficit we have
Speaker 1: with so many countries, as the predicate the emergency to
Speaker 1: trigger them, but we apparently have been experiencing a trade
Speaker 1: imbalanced since nineteen thirty one, which according to the judge anyway,
Speaker 1: and I suppose people are free to have their own
Speaker 1: conclusions on it. This isn't a sudden or unexpected event. Ergo,
Speaker 1: it's not an emergency. And I know some of the
Speaker 1: Democrats are trying to advance legislation to block the tariffs,
Speaker 1: nullifying the emergency authority. Trump sided to enact of tariffs
Speaker 1: by Representatives Meeks and Larson and Neil, all Democrats. Where
Speaker 1: is Congressman Massey on this?
Speaker 13: This is great and by the way, everything you said
Speaker 13: is correct. So the President declared a national emergency in
Speaker 13: order to invokee these tariffs. Now, under the National Emergencies Act,
Speaker 13: there's an expedited way to bring a vote to the
Speaker 13: floor to countermand the president's declaration of an emergency. If
Speaker 13: Congress says, no, you know what, this is not an emergency, we're.
Speaker 10: Going to have a vote on it.
Speaker 13: And the way you do it doesn't even require the
Speaker 13: Speaker of the House's permission.
Speaker 10: And so what the Democrats are trying to do.
Speaker 13: Now here's where the nefariot stuff happens. Because I was
Speaker 13: in the center of the sausage factory last Congress. I
Speaker 13: served on the Rules Committee where they I think they're
Speaker 13: skirting the wall. The law says, if the President declares
Speaker 13: the national emergency, then anybody in Congress can bring a
Speaker 13: bill to the floor undoing the national emergency without the
Speaker 13: Speaker's permission. But what they do is in the Rules
Speaker 13: Committee they insert a little bit of text in one
Speaker 13: of these big resolutions that says, oh, by the way,
Speaker 13: that National Emergency Act thing that this congressman is trying
Speaker 13: to bring to the floor, it's not his resolution isn't
Speaker 13: in the right order, And so we're going to turn
Speaker 13: it off using this procedural sleight of hand. And then
Speaker 13: my colleagues, they vote for this rule, let's say, the
Speaker 13: rule that brings the big beautiful bill to the floor. Well,
Speaker 13: inside of that, they've got this provision to turn off
Speaker 13: the National Emergencies Act privileges for whoever's trying to bring
Speaker 13: the bill to the floor. So they can stop the
Speaker 13: bill from coming to the floor, even though the law
Speaker 13: says the bill needs to come to the floor. They
Speaker 13: can use a rule, this procedural resolution in Congress to stop.
Speaker 1: A vote on that bill.
Speaker 13: They have done this once already, and I was the
Speaker 13: only Republican to vote against that procedural resolution. I may
Speaker 13: have been one of ten who actually knew it was.
Speaker 13: Inside of that procedural resolution they were turning off privileges
Speaker 13: under the National Emergencies Act. So they've already once stopped
Speaker 13: a vote on the emergency that enables the tariffs. They've
Speaker 13: already once stopped it, and that was about three weeks ago,
Speaker 13: and I think they'll do the same thing again. They
Speaker 13: use the Rules Committee to do this. Last Congress, I
Speaker 13: served on the Rules Committee, and before I got on
Speaker 13: the Rules Committee, I said, if you pull this crap
Speaker 13: on anything, whether it's War Powers Act, they do it
Speaker 13: on Warpowers Act too, or anything. I will blow the
Speaker 13: whistle and I will vote no.
Speaker 10: In the Rules Committee.
Speaker 13: And so they never did it. They didn't pull these
Speaker 13: tricks for the two.
Speaker 1: Years I was on the Rules Committee.
Speaker 10: But they're back to their old ways.
Speaker 1: So I guess where do you see this going? I mean,
Speaker 1: regardless of what, whether you're in favor of the East tariffs,
Speaker 1: do you think they're going to go good or do
Speaker 1: economic damage? Will they get away with it?
Speaker 13: In this case, they're going to get away with it.
Speaker 13: And what's more, there will be no vote at least
Speaker 13: in the Senate. They voted on this because they don't have.
Speaker 10: A rules committee in the Senate.
Speaker 13: They actually followed the National Emergencies Act law in the Senate.
Speaker 13: In the House, they're going to get away with turning
Speaker 13: it off and not even having a vote because Republicans
Speaker 13: reflexibly vote for these procedural resolutions and we're in the majority,
Speaker 13: and I may be the only one that votes against
Speaker 13: it unless.
Speaker 10: I can wake up some of my colleagues.
Speaker 13: And by the way, my vote doesn't indicate whether I'm
Speaker 13: for or against the tariffs. When my vote says bring
Speaker 13: it to the floor as the wall requires, and let's
Speaker 13: vote on it. And so now I can give you
Speaker 13: my view on tariffs. For the first one hundred and
Speaker 13: fifty years of this country, we were the whole country
Speaker 13: was funded with tariffs because we didn't have an income tax.
Speaker 13: And if you wanted to replace the income tax, like
Speaker 13: get rid of it and replace it with tariffs, I'm
Speaker 13: all in. Like, I would rather have a sales tax
Speaker 13: on stuff coming from China or Canada to fund this
Speaker 13: government than to have a tax on everybody's labor in
Speaker 13: this country. But that's not the proposal.
Speaker 10: No, it's not the president.
Speaker 13: He's adding a tariff in addition to the income tax.
Speaker 13: And what's more is it's not a broad based tariff.
Speaker 1: This is this is my other pet peeve.
Speaker 13: When you go in and you say, oh, we need
Speaker 13: to tear if the steel industry, or we need to
Speaker 13: tear if I don't know the clothing industry or.
Speaker 1: The widget industry. Yeah, yeah.
Speaker 13: The problem is the government doesn't know which widgets you
Speaker 13: should be buying more of or less of, or what
Speaker 13: the price of those widgets should be. But when they
Speaker 13: go in individually and assigned tariffs on different widgets. Then
Speaker 13: they're playing, you know, like they're better than the free market.
Speaker 13: It doesn't work that way. And that's and here's what's more.
Speaker 13: It creates an industry of lobbyists. We just got done
Speaker 13: talking about the meat packing industry lobbyists. It creates an
Speaker 13: industry of lobbyists who come to Congress and ask for
Speaker 13: exemptions for their particular industry or their particular company.
Speaker 1: Going back to the seafood industry not having as much
Speaker 1: money as the beef and pork industry.
Speaker 13: Yeah, so this is and I and so then it
Speaker 13: starts wasting our time in Congress because there's another group
Speaker 13: of lobbyists who evolved that come and try to get
Speaker 13: these exemptions from these teriffs for their industry.
Speaker 10: And they'll be also over at the.
Speaker 13: White House lobbying the President. Hey, don't tear iff our thing.
Speaker 13: Our widget is does you know, needs to get into
Speaker 13: the country without a tariff on it. So we'll see
Speaker 13: how this all settles out. I honestly think you know,
Speaker 13: some people are saying that the stock market getting fidgety
Speaker 13: right now, in the bond market and all that that's
Speaker 13: due to the terraffs. I think it's due to the
Speaker 13: fact that the uncertainty of the teriffs that the president
Speaker 13: can wake up on one side of the bed and
Speaker 13: say we need to tariff this this morning, and then
Speaker 13: tomorrow you can wake up on the other side of
Speaker 13: the bed and say we need to tear if that today.
Speaker 13: If there was certainty behind it, I think they wouldn't
Speaker 13: have to price the uncertainty in the market.
Speaker 1: But we saw that the other day. There was this
Speaker 1: rumor going around that he was going to withdraw these
Speaker 1: tariffs that he had said he was going to impose,
Speaker 1: and the market went back up. And then he said no, no,
Speaker 1: where did that rumor come from, and the market went
Speaker 1: back down again. So there is a huge amount of
Speaker 1: uncertainty built into all this, and obviously uncertainty creates fidgety
Speaker 1: markets and a concerned populace. Congress from Thomas Massey, your
Speaker 1: honor Judge Naponto is listen, listening right now. He send
Speaker 1: it awave out to you and I'll go ahead this
Speaker 1: real quick.
Speaker 13: ARCA one, section eight says Congress should be doing this,
Speaker 13: not the president, and that would give you more certainty.
Speaker 1: Well, I guess in closing the International Economic Emergency powers Act,
Speaker 1: much like the Wars Power Act. I guess a lot
Speaker 1: of people can make an argument that that's not constitutional
Speaker 1: because we do have the provision for a declaration of
Speaker 1: war and the Congress does have the power of the purse.
Speaker 1: Right correct, there you are.
Speaker 13: Whether it's constitutional or not, it is the law, and
Speaker 13: the Rules Committee is circumventing the law by saying these
Speaker 13: are not the droids you're looking for, saying this is
Speaker 13: not a war Powers resolution, or this is not an
Speaker 13: emergency National Emergency Act resolution, and so we're going to
Speaker 13: turn it off and it's not coming to the floor.
Speaker 13: I think that's skirting the law.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I really do. Well could end up in the courts.
Speaker 1: I don't know, but you know what. I love you,
Speaker 1: Congressome Massy for explaining this to us and revealing the
Speaker 1: sausage making process and the shenanigans that go on each
Speaker 1: and every day in Congress. God bless you, sir. I
Speaker 1: appreciate your willingness to come on the program and speak
Speaker 1: truth to powers I always say. And waiting in the wings.
Speaker 1: I know you're a fan. Judge Nita Polaitano, Congressom Massy,
Speaker 1: best of health, my friend. We'll talk real soon.
Speaker 13: All right, we love you and the judge as well,
Speaker 13: so we'll talk to you soon.
Speaker 1: A twenty nine Here, fifty five cars of detoxation. Judge
Speaker 1: of Polton as up next, fifty five KRC the Talks
Speaker 1: Station ay thirty four or fifty five car seed Talks
Speaker 1: Station had a very happy Wednesday too, and the heels
Speaker 1: of Congressman Thomas Massy fingers crossed. We get our technical
Speaker 1: details work out. Joe Strecker is out, Seawn's filling in.
Speaker 1: Do we have audio because I can see the judge?
Speaker 1: Can I hear the judge? Welcome back, Judge Annapolitano.
Speaker 15: All right, good morning, Brian, can you hear me?
Speaker 1: Thank God? Let me pause and say a prayer to
Speaker 1: the dear Lord that it is working. Good morning, your honor.
Speaker 1: It's always great having you on sweat and bullets there
Speaker 1: for a little while, Your honor.
Speaker 15: Well, I'm glad that it's working.
Speaker 16: I'm afraid to hang up my phone because I don't
Speaker 16: know if we're talking through the link or through the phone.
Speaker 1: Well, let's keep your phone on because the content of
Speaker 1: your column, I think is extremely important and I really
Speaker 1: suspected you would go down this road, and I just
Speaker 1: had a conversation with Congressman Massey about it. This whole
Speaker 1: concept of the International Economic Emergency Powers Act of nineteen
Speaker 1: seventy seven is what allegedly gives Donald Trump the authority
Speaker 1: to impose these tarots.
Speaker 15: Well, the statute is the basis for the effort authority.
Speaker 16: What Congressman Massey and Senator Paul have been complaining bitterly
Speaker 16: about is that we shouldn't be running the government under
Speaker 16: emergency authority when there's no emergency. The statute itself defines
Speaker 16: an emergency as a sudden and unexpected event that adversely
Speaker 16: affects national security or economic prosperity. The stated purpose for
Speaker 16: the emergency. I won't go through the history with all
Speaker 16: the fentanyl nonsense, but the stated purpose for the emergency
Speaker 16: is the imbalance of trade.
Speaker 10: Brian.
Speaker 15: We've had an imbalance of trade since nineteen thirty.
Speaker 16: Four, so by definition, it's not a sudden and unexpected event.
Speaker 16: So there's no basis for the emergency. Therefore, there's no
Speaker 16: basis and no authority for him to impose the tariffs.
Speaker 16: The tariff is a sales tax.
Speaker 15: You want to have a sales tax, Congress has to
Speaker 15: impose it. Congressman Massey and Senator Paul are one hundred
Speaker 15: percent correct.
Speaker 1: One.
Speaker 16: The Democrats are on their side because they hate Trump
Speaker 16: and a half dozen Republicans and that's it.
Speaker 15: Everybody else has colt and afraid of Trump.
Speaker 1: Well, you know this reminds me, I mean dead on
Speaker 1: what we used to argue about when I was practicing
Speaker 1: litigation for pollution liability. The coverage came about for pollution
Speaker 1: liability for sudden and unexpected releases of toxins, and during
Speaker 1: the circle of litigation, all these companies went back to
Speaker 1: their insurance policies for pollution that they had been releasing
Speaker 1: into the world for literally decades, claiming it was sudden
Speaker 1: and unexpected, and that became the key to the litigation.
Speaker 1: Some judges said, no, for things that have been going
Speaker 1: on for years and years and years, you can't define
Speaker 1: that as sudden and unexpected. It has to happen in
Speaker 1: a sudden and unexpected way. So I understand the point here.
Speaker 16: So there is a challenge made by a small stationary
Speaker 16: company which imports its paper from China in federal court
Speaker 16: in Florida. Will a federal judge have the clarity of
Speaker 16: vision and professional courage to enjoin the tariffs. Who knows
Speaker 16: Supreme Court is letting Donald Trump get away with all
Speaker 16: kinds of things on the emergency docket. The decision to
Speaker 16: enjoy Judge Boseburg the other day was no decision. There
Speaker 16: was no opinion. You don't know what they're thinking was
Speaker 16: it was an opinion. It was a ruling by five
Speaker 16: of them, no opinion. Because they did it in the
Speaker 16: emergency connection, will they do the same thing. It's very
Speaker 16: very dangerous for jurisprudence in this country for the highest
Speaker 16: court in the land just to come down with a
Speaker 16: ruling without giving.
Speaker 15: A basis for it.
Speaker 16: I suspect the same thing will happen here. However, this
Speaker 16: is causing real and serious damage, a six.
Speaker 15: Trillion dollar capital loss. Thus, farm or only into this
Speaker 15: thing by a week. And the Chinese or the.
Speaker 16: Sales tax on goods from China is now one hundred
Speaker 16: and four percent.
Speaker 15: That doesn't kick in until today. So will Joe six pack?
Speaker 16: And is Maga Cap going to Walmart to buy a
Speaker 16: toaster and expecting to spend thirty dollars buy it for
Speaker 16: sixty dollars or will he go without a toaster or
Speaker 16: will he search in vain for an American toaster or
Speaker 16: will Joe six pack in his MAGA cap going to
Speaker 16: a Ford dealership in Cincinnati, how will we react with
Speaker 16: sticker shock when the dealer says, we have to add
Speaker 16: another three thousand dollars because that's what Ford had to
Speaker 16: pay in sales tax on the parts that were made
Speaker 16: that were put into your car. Because a lot of
Speaker 16: the car the parts come from Mexico, Canada and South Korea.
Speaker 15: This will be the same Joe six pack that you're
Speaker 15: Donald Trump to victory.
Speaker 1: Well, and I guess I have to ask because you
Speaker 1: and I have talked about this in the context of
Speaker 1: the War Powers Act. The International Economic Emergency Powers Act
Speaker 1: is a delegation of the power of the purse from
Speaker 1: Congress to the executive branch, granted pursuing to certain limitations
Speaker 1: like this sudden, unexpected emergency event. But is that in
Speaker 1: and of itself, as nineteen seventy seven Act constitutional in
Speaker 1: your mind?
Speaker 16: In my mind, it is not constitutional because it is
Speaker 16: delegating away a core function of the Congress, which is
Speaker 16: to raise taxes.
Speaker 15: I mean, this is so core to the Congress that
Speaker 15: the Constitution.
Speaker 16: Actually says taxes must emanate in the House of representatives.
Speaker 16: It is as clear as can be that this power
Speaker 16: resides solely with Congress, and Congress can't give away a
Speaker 16: core power. Could the president allow the Supreme Court to
Speaker 16: run the military. Of course, not, even if he wanted to,
Speaker 16: even if the Court accepted that power.
Speaker 15: It's the same thing.
Speaker 16: The president can't impose taxes, even if Congress wants them to.
Speaker 15: Where does that bring us to taxation without representation?
Speaker 16: That's where it brings us. We didn't elect a president
Speaker 16: to raise taxes. We elect that a Congress to address
Speaker 16: the tax rates.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and I hear what you're saying, and of course
Speaker 1: you know my listeners like, yeah, but it's so unfair,
Speaker 1: and it's been so unfair, and we have these unfair
Speaker 1: advantage because all these other countries can manufacture these goods
Speaker 1: at a fraction of what it cost to manufacture in America.
Speaker 1: That's why the toaster is only thirty five bucks when
Speaker 1: it comes to China, because they have no pollution rules,
Speaker 1: they have no ocean rules, they have no rules period,
Speaker 1: so they can churn it out on slave labor. We've
Speaker 1: got all these other things we've got to comply with,
Speaker 1: so we can't even make a toaster that Joe sixpack
Speaker 1: can afford. And I understand that frustration. And we learned
Speaker 1: a lot of lessons, hard lessons from COVID that we
Speaker 1: just don't manufacture some critically important goods here in the
Speaker 1: United States, most notably in a time of war when
Speaker 1: we couldn't get pharmaceuticals for our own men and women
Speaker 1: in uniform. But that doesn't change the Constitution. And there's
Speaker 1: that pesky Constitution, and you're in my clinging to it.
Speaker 1: That tends to stand it a way, especially in the
Speaker 1: face of a divided do nothing Congress.
Speaker 15: It is an intentional impediment to tyranny.
Speaker 16: And just as Scalia argued he didn't always carry the
Speaker 16: day or it often was in a descent, that these
Speaker 16: core functions cannot be delegated away because that leads to tyranny,
Speaker 16: It leads to an imbalance of power, It leads to
Speaker 16: too much power in the.
Speaker 15: Hands of one branch of government.
Speaker 16: The Congress today, in twenty twenty five, is frustrated over
Speaker 16: what its predecessor in nineteen seventy seven did. Senator Paul
Speaker 16: got a majority of senators to vote to nullify the
Speaker 16: declaration of an emergency on the theory that we just
Speaker 16: articulated he would need sixty seven in order to over
Speaker 16: right of presidential veto. The House leadership is totally wedded
Speaker 16: to the president. Even though a majority of members of
Speaker 16: the House, that's the Democrats plus the Freedom Caucus are
Speaker 16: against this. They won't even let this come to the
Speaker 16: floor for a vote for fear it will embarrass them.
Speaker 16: They couldn't care less about the Constitution. They couldn't care
Speaker 16: less about Joe sixpack. They only care about their relationship
Speaker 16: to the man.
Speaker 15: In the Oval office.
Speaker 1: Well, if you had to leave read Tea Leaves on this,
Speaker 1: this sounds like it is right for a judicial review
Speaker 1: ultimately end up in the lap of the Supreme Court.
Speaker 1: Do you see that happening? Do you see this getting
Speaker 1: resolved by way of resolving the issue, maybe the core
Speaker 1: issue of whether this nineteen seventy seven Act is even
Speaker 1: in and of itself constitutional, or are we just going
Speaker 1: to go along with steps quote.
Speaker 16: I would hope that the judiciary would have the courage
Speaker 16: to do the right thing, or even the wrong thing.
Speaker 16: I just hope that they would rule it would be
Speaker 16: reprehensible if the Supreme Court dates the nineteen seventy seven act, Well,
Speaker 16: then you might end up with judges running the military,
Speaker 16: because then you can just exchange assignments as if you
Speaker 16: were in grade school. I don't want to do this
Speaker 16: book report.
Speaker 15: You take mine and I'll take yours.
Speaker 16: You can't do that with the constitution that destroys human liberty,
Speaker 16: that turns the president into a tyrant.
Speaker 10: Did you hear.
Speaker 16: What he said on Air Force one the other day
Speaker 16: and when Carolyn Levitt repeated, we're thinking of finding ways
Speaker 16: to deport Americans? Good God, where are we going?
Speaker 15: Well, Congress sits on its button, does nothing.
Speaker 1: Yes, that results in an imperial presidency. You and I
Speaker 1: have reset conclusions many times over the many years that
Speaker 1: you and I have been talking. Well, at least the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court recognize that the people that are trying to
Speaker 1: kick out of the country are entitled to a habeus
Speaker 1: corpus hearing and a due process hearing.
Speaker 16: Before you know that that was a very sort of
Speaker 16: sneaky thing that the Court did. They made it look
Speaker 16: like they were giving Trump what he wanted by getting
Speaker 16: this case away from his beast in the night, Judge Boseburg,
Speaker 16: but requiring a hearing for everybody they want to deport
Speaker 16: they have three hundred and fifty thousand veneze whales they.
Speaker 15: Want to deport. Now they have to hold a hearing
Speaker 15: on each one in Britain's evidence.
Speaker 9: On each one.
Speaker 1: Hey, but that's exactly the argument you made last week.
Speaker 1: That's what the Constitution requires, so right, and it requires no.
Speaker 16: Less than due process whenever it wants to take anybody's liberty,
Speaker 16: no matter who you are, what they claim you've done.
Speaker 16: In the meantime, an innocent man sits in a hell
Speaker 16: hole in Al Salvador, and the president and his people
Speaker 16: couldn't care less.
Speaker 1: Well, a lot of people my listening audience couldn't care
Speaker 1: less about the concept of due process in this particular context.
Speaker 1: So I've been defending.
Speaker 16: Way the government comes after them, then they will appreciate process,
Speaker 16: and then they will appreciate an independent of issuary.
Speaker 1: And that's why I've been defending you on that point
Speaker 1: for the last week. Judge Editor Politano, judging freedom. Who
Speaker 1: are you talking to today, your honor?
Speaker 16: I have a Pepe Escobar from Thailand. He just returned
Speaker 16: from a week in Yemen. Phil Giraldi and Max Bloomenthal
Speaker 16: exciting days here, no question about it.
Speaker 15: I shouldn't get angry because this is all good for
Speaker 15: our business.
Speaker 6: Yes it is.
Speaker 1: I've got my popcorn now waiting for all this to
Speaker 1: get resolved. And there's no end of content that you
Speaker 1: and I can talk about each and every week. God
Speaker 1: bless you for coming on the program. I appreciate what
Speaker 1: you do. You're honor. I'll look forward to next week.
Speaker 15: Thank you for defending me. Brian, all the best.
Speaker 1: Take care. As long as you're defending the constitution, I'll
Speaker 1: defend you. It's eight forty six here fifty five care
Speaker 1: see the talks station, don't go away. Doctor j Rissover
Speaker 1: about health. He's going to be doing an a power
Speaker 1: you seven or tomorrow night to getting at seven. We'll
Speaker 1: get the details on that from doctor j. Coming up next,
Speaker 1: I KRC get ready for tapik a TV about Karr
Speaker 1: City Talk Tation. Welcome back to Think about Kersey Morning Show.
Speaker 1: A good friend of mine and a man who knows
Speaker 1: everything there is no about health. Doctor j Risover practice
Speaker 1: internal medicine for thirty six years and he also taught
Speaker 1: a local hospital system. Regret postgraduate medicine. There's a thing
Speaker 1: or two about taking good care of yourself and since
Speaker 1: we're all in Maha mode. Welcome Doctor J. Rissover. You're
Speaker 1: doing an empower You seminar tomorrow evening. It begins at
Speaker 1: seven with Senator George Lang talking about getting rid of
Speaker 1: Ohio's income tax. But you're going to be talking about health.
Speaker 1: What's the subject matter here and specifically doctor J.
Speaker 8: Thank you for the great introduction, Brian. Happy to be
Speaker 8: here and thanks for letting me follow two of the
Speaker 8: big heavy hitters on your show. Oh much love being
Speaker 8: in the spot. I'm so Dan Reganald asked me what
Speaker 8: I'd be interested in talking about Maha and I said, well,
Speaker 8: you know, I'd love to research that. It seems to
Speaker 8: be all in the news. That was some months ago,
Speaker 8: So I was spend in the last couple of months
Speaker 8: doing a lot of internet searches about MAHA. And I
Speaker 8: think I've got a really good little lecture here. I
Speaker 8: go through the history of RFK Junior, because really he
Speaker 8: embodies Mahai. It's his program, though he didn't come up
Speaker 8: with the term until after he decided to endorse President Trump.
Speaker 8: But he's an interesting guy. And I don't even talk
Speaker 8: about the worm, which apparently is I thought it was
Speaker 8: irrelevant but he was such a storied democrat. You know,
Speaker 8: he came from a Kennedy family. His father was RFK Junior,
Speaker 8: who I'm sorry, yeah, RFK Junior, who sadly was assassinated.
Speaker 8: His uncle was the president in JFK. He got assassinated.
Speaker 8: He is such a sad childhood. He had a lot
Speaker 8: of drugs and problems, even though he was in the
Speaker 8: Kennedy family, so he managed to skirt all those. But
Speaker 8: he had a heck of a childhood. And then eventually
Speaker 8: he became an adult. He became a person who could
Speaker 8: control himself, and he ended up in environmentalism and was
Speaker 8: a huge on an environmentalism. He took him on Fanta
Speaker 8: the court and won millions of dollars. He fixed rivers
Speaker 8: in Ohio, not Ohio, New York, like the Hudson River,
Speaker 8: and it wasn't And he was never controversial ever.
Speaker 10: You know.
Speaker 8: He published books. He wrote eleven books, including a couple
Speaker 8: of children's books and books about the water keepers and
Speaker 8: about pollution in New York. And then in two thousand
Speaker 8: and five he strayed to the verbotan topic of health
Speaker 8: and specifically vaccines and autism, and he stumbled upon a
Speaker 8: thing that's called the Simpson Wood Meeting. In two thousand
Speaker 8: and five, he published it in Salon and also in
Speaker 8: Rolling Stone. It was called Deadly Immunity. And suddenly overnight
Speaker 8: he becomes controversial, and they've written books about RFK Junior too,
Speaker 8: de bunk him. They've written articles. If you do a
Speaker 8: research like I did on the Internet, there are far
Speaker 8: more controversial takes on him then there are support. So
Speaker 8: if anyone who's going to Google search, you know exactly
Speaker 8: what I'm talking about.
Speaker 1: Well, if you're a storied guy with a popular name
Speaker 1: and a good reputation, you take on the pharmaceutical industry,
Speaker 1: you're gonna get a lot of crap there in your way,
Speaker 1: doctor j.
Speaker 8: He sure did, And so I don't spend really a
Speaker 8: lot of time presenting what he said and then showing
Speaker 8: the controversies about it. So I want to acknowledge to
Speaker 8: everyone he has been criticized for a lot of the
Speaker 8: stuff he says. But I put up just a couple
Speaker 8: of graphs to support what he said, for example, from
Speaker 8: the children's but yours is a shocking one.
Speaker 1: Real quickly here, because we're short on telling real quickly.
Speaker 8: Well, then let me not go through statistics. People, I
Speaker 8: don't bore you with graphs. We put a few of
Speaker 8: them up. Mostly it's a fascinating story about him, and
Speaker 8: of course we end with what actually Maha is and
Speaker 8: I have a little teaser at the end too for
Speaker 8: everyone who listens. I did this research totally different from
Speaker 8: anything I've ever done in my life. This is the
Speaker 8: first time I've ever done this. I'm leaving what it
Speaker 8: is that you all can guess on your own. I'm
Speaker 8: not going to say if you're right or not, but
Speaker 8: till the end I'm going to kind of reveal it.
Speaker 8: And it's just another fascinating thing I found out in
Speaker 8: researching this topic. But come, I have some good pictures,
Speaker 8: I have some good jokes, as I always do. You
Speaker 8: can't just be boring in a lecture. You I enjoy
Speaker 8: and thank you and learn a little bit about Mahan.
Speaker 10: RFK Junior.
Speaker 8: If you want, I can give you one statistic or
Speaker 8: something real quick, perfect time. Okay, So, if you look
Speaker 8: at major drug and vaccine recalls, the COVID vaccine has
Speaker 8: head According to this study, thirty five thousand deaths reported
Speaker 8: to the Very's database, which the USA keeps for all
Speaker 8: vaccine reported adverse effects. Now these haven't been researched. They're
Speaker 8: just reported. Thirty five thousand deaths of the covid vaccine
Speaker 8: since it's been done. When they took viox off the market,
Speaker 8: only six thousand deaths were reported and they removed it
Speaker 8: from the market. Bextra they had one six hundred deaths.
Speaker 8: They removed it from the market. They call had seven
Speaker 8: hundred deaths. They removed it from the market. There's ten
Speaker 8: other drugs and vaccines have been removed. They had far
Speaker 8: less deaths reported.
Speaker 1: That's the teaser you needing, Doctor Jay, you should have
Speaker 1: led with that one that gets people's interests perked up.
Speaker 1: So you will talk COVID vaccines, the dangers and the
Speaker 1: comparative treatment of various drugs versus COVID nineteen. That's tomorrow night,
Speaker 1: beginning at seventeen, beginning at seven with Senator George Lang
Speaker 1: followed by doctor j Rissover for a full hour. Empower
Speaker 1: You America dot or log in. You can either show
Speaker 1: up at the Empower Youth Studio at Great Oaks, drive
Speaker 1: at the Empower Youth Studio at Scarlett Oaks, or from
Speaker 1: the comfort of your own home. Either way you slice it.
Speaker 1: Just make sure you register ahead. Doctor j have a
Speaker 1: great event tomorrow night. I know a lot of people
Speaker 1: will be tuning in. I'll see you real soon, my friend. Folks,
Speaker 1: great day. Get a copy of Last Call for budl
Speaker 1: Like by Anson, Fredericks Donald and Neo Americans for Prosperity
Speaker 1: about the tax event. On Sunday, Congressman Thomas Passey and
Speaker 1: Judge entered Apoloiton. If you carosy dot com, have a
Speaker 1: great day. Glenn Beck's up next.