Speaker 1: This is Dan Caplis and welcome to today's online podcast
Speaker 1: edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to
Speaker 1: give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
Speaker 1: and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
Speaker 1: single day on your favorite podcast platform. Did God save
Speaker 1: President Trump? Again? As you know, I believe that God
Speaker 1: did save President Trump in that first assassination attempt in Pennsylvania.
Speaker 1: You look at the whole way that came down, and
Speaker 1: then Sunday, thank God, thank God, that this second assassin
Speaker 1: did not succeed. Can you imagine the consequences for this nation,
Speaker 1: obviously the President's family and beyond, so that this nation
Speaker 1: should we should all be on our niece today, very
Speaker 1: very thankful eight five five for zero five eight two
Speaker 1: five five the number text d A N five seven
Speaker 1: seven three nine. Obviously, so much to talk about. I
Speaker 1: won't even try to rein it in, so you just
Speaker 1: you know, call when you want to call about whatever
Speaker 1: you want to talk about. Obviously, much of the conversation
Speaker 1: is going to center around this second assassination attempt and
Speaker 1: all the issues flowing out of that. Now, one thing
Speaker 1: we have got to talk about under that umbrella is
Speaker 1: What do you think the political consequence is going to be,
Speaker 1: because you know, we look at what are we now
Speaker 1: fifty days away from the election. I'll do the math,
Speaker 1: but we are so close to election day, mel ballots
Speaker 1: coming out in many different places soon. What do you
Speaker 1: think the political impact of this will be? Whether you
Speaker 1: think it'll be for Trump against Trump? Absolutely neutral, would
Speaker 1: love your take on that. Eight five five four zero
Speaker 1: five eight two five five, the number text, dam five seven,
Speaker 1: seven thirty nine, and then so much more to cover
Speaker 1: we had promoted for today, and I think it's still relevant.
Speaker 1: I would say even more relevant, you know, the the
Speaker 1: issue of the Taylor Swift endorsement, what outcome on the campaign,
Speaker 1: and as you may know by now yesterday morning, obviously
Speaker 1: before this assassination attempt, President Trump had posted on true
Speaker 1: Social and then went up via ex I hate Taylor Swift.
Speaker 1: So we'll talk about that as well, because you can
Speaker 1: be sure the left is going to be doing everything
Speaker 1: they possibly can with that. But is that going to
Speaker 1: actually backfire on them? But again, we'll center most, if
Speaker 1: not all, of the conversation today on issues rolling out
Speaker 1: of the second assassination attempt. Heiers speaker Mike Johnson on
Speaker 1: that night. I would really like your take on it.
Speaker 1: I think that thoughtful people across the political spectrum have
Speaker 1: this issue on their mind.
Speaker 2: It's a remarkable thing. And Kelly and I spoke with
Speaker 2: him at great length about that, because it is something
Speaker 2: that no one can deny. God has spared his life
Speaker 2: twice now, and I told him that it reminded me
Speaker 2: of the bulletproof George Washington, our first president, who evaded
Speaker 2: being shot when he was an army colonel. The famous
Speaker 2: incident of the French and America in any war where
Speaker 2: they all took shots at and bullet holes went through.
Speaker 3: His jacket and it didn't take him down.
Speaker 2: That event took place, ironically, less than fifty miles from
Speaker 2: where President Trump was shot on the stage at Butler, Pennsylvania.
Speaker 1: So your thoughts on that. I can't wait to see
Speaker 1: what Texters have to say today. Obviously, it's unprecedented, right
Speaker 1: so when we ask questions like, holy cow, what's the
Speaker 1: political impact going to be? We've never had anything remotely
Speaker 1: like this in American political history, these two assassination attempts
Speaker 1: in a very short period of time. You know, how
Speaker 1: do when the only voters who matter here, right are
Speaker 1: the base voters the both party depends on parties dependent,
Speaker 1: but also obviously the six key swing states and within
Speaker 1: those swing states the undecided. So I just want to
Speaker 1: get your take on that. I want to get you
Speaker 1: some more sound of the day. So many issues rolling
Speaker 1: out of both of these pressers and credit to authorities,
Speaker 1: even though, like me, you're probably frustrated there isn't more
Speaker 1: information out of these pressers at least the right. Remember
Speaker 1: after Trump being shot in Pennsylvania, you know, authorities just
Speaker 1: for the most part, you know, just went cold and
Speaker 1: went silent, which obviously fueled the suspicions arising out of
Speaker 1: that President Trump. I'm looking at a CNN headline right now.
Speaker 1: Trump lashes out at Harris over assassination attempts. So we'll
Speaker 1: follow up with that on you and then their next
Speaker 1: headline Fans doubles down on false pet eating claims at
Speaker 1: the latest CNN headline. There, but who do you blame?
Speaker 1: Who do you blame for this? Right? Because we got
Speaker 1: to start with this completely unacceptable, completely unacceptable should be
Speaker 1: anywhere on the planet, but in the United States of
Speaker 1: America to be able to have, you know, assassins in
Speaker 1: position in position to assassinate the president and the first
Speaker 1: one out. How can anybody doubt that that was gone
Speaker 1: directly saving Trump? And I don't doubt that happened here either,
Speaker 1: And you know, happy to debate that if you don't
Speaker 1: agree with me. But but we know this nation cannot
Speaker 1: allow this to happen, so it cannot be the new normal.
Speaker 1: So who do you blame and how do you stop it?
Speaker 1: Do you blame the rhetoric of the Democrats. Do you
Speaker 1: blame the Biden administration for not giving Trump better protection?
Speaker 1: Do you blame all of the above, do you add
Speaker 1: to that mix? And above all, because we're not just
Speaker 1: about cursing the darkness, we want to light the candle.
Speaker 1: How do you fix this? Eight five five four zero
Speaker 1: five eight two five five the number text d A
Speaker 1: N five seven seven three nine. Let's start in Lakewood,
Speaker 1: Colorado with Mike. You're on the Dan Kaplis Show.
Speaker 4: Welcome, Hidian, thanks for taking my call. I would like
Speaker 4: to draw an analogy to nine to eleven. First plane
Speaker 4: hits the tower. Oh, what a tragic accident. Second plane
Speaker 4: hits the second tower. Now we have a conspiracy. Same
Speaker 4: thing I think is going on here.
Speaker 1: Do you think that two are related.
Speaker 4: Oh, absolutely, I listened. Well, let me explain. I listened
Speaker 4: to an episode of.
Speaker 5: The Seawan Ryan podcast with the former head of the
Speaker 5: Blackwater organization. He said he has contacts in the federal
Speaker 5: government and the first shooter from Pennsylvania the beds with
Speaker 5: the phone and found out that he was in contact
Speaker 5: with somebody in Washington, DC.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and Mike, you know, the challenge, as you know,
Speaker 1: is that anybody can say anything they want on the
Speaker 1: internet or on a podcast, but is there the evidence
Speaker 1: out there to back it up?
Speaker 5: Well, I you know, I would assume so, given that
Speaker 5: he was pretty clear about his statements on that podcast
Speaker 5: and listening to Ryan earlier, this event was not on
Speaker 5: President Trump's schedule, so apparently hardly anybody knew about it
Speaker 5: and that this shoe was mining in ambush since two
Speaker 5: o'clock in the morning, twelve hours until the Secret Service
Speaker 5: came across that Rifel Beryl sticking to the path.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Very very fair question there, Mike, And we're gonna
Speaker 1: have to this break, but thank you for kicking it off,
Speaker 1: my friend. Very very fair question, right, And credit to
Speaker 1: authorities for not trying to bury it. And they brought
Speaker 1: it up in the second presser today as well. In fact,
Speaker 1: they emphasized it that that wait a second, this golf
Speaker 1: was was kind of a late addition to the schedule,
Speaker 1: and and you know, so they weren't trying to throw
Speaker 1: cold water on this very good question of how would
Speaker 1: this killer have no right? How would this killer have known? Now,
Speaker 1: of course, there's the theory that, hey, you can be
Speaker 1: monitoring mar Lago and once the motorcade goes on the move,
Speaker 1: you can follow the motorcade and get positioned. But then
Speaker 1: the information we get today that you've got cell phone
Speaker 1: data in that hour twelve in that area, twelve hours
Speaker 1: in advance. Now, of course, what you and I can't
Speaker 1: know just sitting here today is all right, so you've
Speaker 1: got his cell phone, there was he there with it?
Speaker 1: Or was the cell phone just positioned along with the
Speaker 1: GoPro already up along the fence. We can't know the
Speaker 1: answer to that, but I think it's fair right now
Speaker 1: to look at an analysis that would include him being
Speaker 1: in that immediate area for twelve hours before. And so
Speaker 1: that is a screaming question, right if golf was a
Speaker 1: late addition, how would he know twelve hours before Yeah,
Speaker 1: and then here's a question for you. What kind of
Speaker 1: process would you trust to get to the bottom of
Speaker 1: all this? And listen, does my gut tell me right
Speaker 1: now that these two assassination attempts are directly linked? No,
Speaker 1: but that doesn't mean they aren't. So what we know
Speaker 1: is we need true, complete, trustworthy investigations into both of these,
Speaker 1: including that the potential of any possible linkage. So who
Speaker 1: would you trust to do that? What would that process
Speaker 1: have to look like to satisfy you? And this is
Speaker 1: a very very serious question because America needs to know
Speaker 1: and America needs to have confidence that it knows the
Speaker 1: full truth here. You know, for lots of different reasons,
Speaker 1: including protecting the president of the future. I think he's
Speaker 1: going to win this election. He's going to be president.
Speaker 1: These assassination attempts are not going to stop. And then
Speaker 1: that's one reason I am a little bit concerned about
Speaker 1: the political consequence. I mean, I can definitely see a
Speaker 1: rally around the flag, rally around this courageous former president phenomena.
Speaker 1: I hope that's what occurs, and people say, no way,
Speaker 1: we're going to let these killers and assassins and haters
Speaker 1: win and we're electing this guy, and obviously that's what
Speaker 1: I hope happens, and I think that's the more likely phenomena.
Speaker 1: On the other hand, we haven't seen this before. We
Speaker 1: don't can't cite a president. Are we going to have
Speaker 1: people say, well, you know, they're going to be trying
Speaker 1: to kill him every single day of his four years
Speaker 1: in office? And I don't know if I want that.
Speaker 1: I hope to god we don't get that kind of
Speaker 1: weak need surrender to the killer attitude out there among voters.
Speaker 1: But again, we haven't seen this thing before. Which way
Speaker 1: do you think that's going to cut? We'll come back
Speaker 1: to that and much more. You're on the Dan Capla Show.
Speaker 6: And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 7: Just unquestionable at this point that that man cannot see
Speaker 7: public office again. He is not only unfit, he is
Speaker 7: destructive to our democracy and he.
Speaker 3: Has to be He has to be eliminated.
Speaker 1: And he doesn't think that green Light's an attack on Trump.
Speaker 1: He has to be eliminated. Really, President Trump coming out
Speaker 1: today and telling Fox News Digital that the suspect quote
Speaker 1: believe the rhetoric of Biden and Harris, and he acted
Speaker 1: on it their rhetoric is causing me to be shot.
Speaker 1: At what I am the one is who is going
Speaker 1: to save the country, and they are the ones that
Speaker 1: are destroying the country, both from the inside and out.
Speaker 1: Eight five five or zero five A two five five
Speaker 1: the number? Do you agree with the President on that? Obviously,
Speaker 1: right now none of us can know conclusively, but I
Speaker 1: think any reasonable person could could infer from the evidence
Speaker 1: available that the President's exactly right on that eight five
Speaker 1: five for zero five A two five five the number?
Speaker 1: Now does that mean, and I'll go to our jam lines,
Speaker 1: does that mean that Biden and Harris have been trying
Speaker 1: to get Trump killed by saying that he is a
Speaker 1: threat to democracy by all of these other things that
Speaker 1: they say about him regard And I am not saying
Speaker 1: that there's an that's their intent to get him killed.
Speaker 1: That is not my point. But I think a reasonable
Speaker 1: person looking at what we know now could infer that
Speaker 1: that A it would be foreseeable to them when they
Speaker 1: say these kinds of things about him, that it might
Speaker 1: cause somebody to try to kill him, and b is
Speaker 1: there an actual in fact cause a link here? Too
Speaker 1: early to tell, We just need much more information, But
Speaker 1: I think any reasonable person, any honest person, would have
Speaker 1: to see that as an active possibility that has to
Speaker 1: be investigated. Here, let's go to the phone lines and
Speaker 1: start with Jack and Adams County. You're on the Dan
Speaker 1: Kaplis Show.
Speaker 8: Welcome, Hi Dan, how are you doing?
Speaker 1: Upset? How about you?
Speaker 8: Yeah, it's really scary. I'm going to give you some
Speaker 8: information that just dropped last hour on Real America's Voice
Speaker 8: and on X The.
Speaker 4: Name I'll give you is and so Ryan.
Speaker 8: Can check this up real fast. Eric Prince, former high
Speaker 8: level security with Blackrock. He's just released information that both
Speaker 8: shooters appeared in Blackrock television commercials. He said, statistically impossible.
Speaker 9: I don't know what that means.
Speaker 8: I'm just throwing that out there. And if you go
Speaker 8: to Eric Prince you can see the broadcast he did
Speaker 8: on Real America's Voice with a Natalie Winner. Yeah, so
Speaker 8: if that's true, I don't know.
Speaker 1: I appreciate the call on that, and I've seen I've
Speaker 1: seen those reports, whether they're true or not. I've seen
Speaker 1: multiple reports to that effect. Yeah, so we'll follow up
Speaker 1: on that.
Speaker 10: I haven't seen Ryan Ralph the most recent would be
Speaker 10: shooter and involved with black Rock. Specifically, but like you said,
Speaker 10: the reporting could have come down the last hour. You
Speaker 10: did see though, Dan Thomas Crooks, the original shooter who
Speaker 10: killed Corey comparator who wounded Donald Trump. He was featured
Speaker 10: in a black Rock add that they pulled off of
Speaker 10: their site.
Speaker 1: That's a fact. And this gets back to the question
Speaker 1: of what kind of investigation here would you trust, who
Speaker 1: would it have to be done by, what would it
Speaker 1: have to look like mechanically? Here's President Trump at that
Speaker 1: to September tenth quote debate. This is the one that weaponized,
Speaker 1: not me. She weaponized.
Speaker 11: I probably took a bullet to the head because.
Speaker 1: Of the things that they say about me.
Speaker 11: They talk about democracy.
Speaker 1: I'm a threat to democracy.
Speaker 11: They're the threat to democracy. Was it take Russia Russia
Speaker 11: Russia investigation that went nowhere?
Speaker 1: Yeah? I thought that was one of his best points
Speaker 1: in the debate, has proven by the fact that one
Speaker 1: of the three debaters against him then interrupted him as
Speaker 1: he was making it. Let's go to our vediable talk
Speaker 1: to Brian. You're on the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 12: Welcome, hey, Dan.
Speaker 13: At some point, guys, we gotta start putting the you know,
Speaker 13: the pieces of the puzzle together. Come on to assassination
Speaker 13: attempts and guess who's investigating it. Oh, the same people
Speaker 13: that tried to take him out, Christopher Ray and Garland.
Speaker 1: Now these are what's your proof that they tried to
Speaker 1: take him out? You mean tried to take them out
Speaker 1: physically or tried to take him out legally.
Speaker 4: Dan, there's got to be a mole in the situation.
Speaker 12: Nobody knows where to go.
Speaker 4: Oh okay. First they leave a building wide open, okay,
Speaker 4: and we all just try to make excuses.
Speaker 12: Well, maybe they were just you know, they have the
Speaker 12: security of a third grader.
Speaker 4: I don't know.
Speaker 12: And now all of a sudden, oh man.
Speaker 4: There's just the bushes right there. He's laying in waite.
Speaker 12: How did he know about that? These people are so
Speaker 12: corrupt and these are the same people rip mind you. Okay,
Speaker 12: remember Epstein, guys, Okay, remember Epstein. Oh man, he just
Speaker 12: committed suicide.
Speaker 4: Guys.
Speaker 12: But you know what, we haven't found any of those
Speaker 12: people that molested those children. Now imagine that these are
Speaker 12: the same people that are in charge of the investigation.
Speaker 12: And we're all just gonna stick our head in the
Speaker 12: sand like we're stupid, and.
Speaker 4: We're gonna overanalyze everything.
Speaker 12: No, it couldn't be them.
Speaker 4: It's got to be a lone wolf. Guys start putting
Speaker 4: it together. And this ain't the last attempt.
Speaker 12: Trust me. There's too much money on the light.
Speaker 4: Just like with Puddity when he was gonna break up
Speaker 4: the CIA and stuff and he ended up dead. There
Speaker 4: is too much money. They're like a mafia and that's
Speaker 4: what their money. They're coming after you.
Speaker 1: Brian, appreciate the call. I want to try to get
Speaker 1: everybody in Listen. I think there needs to be a
Speaker 1: full nine to eleven commission type investigation into this. I
Speaker 1: don't think it should be left to any individual agency.
Speaker 1: I think individual agencies can be involved and do their
Speaker 1: normal job, but I think we need a full nine
Speaker 1: to eleven type commission because one thing I agree with
Speaker 1: Brian on is we have not seen the last of this, right.
Speaker 1: I mean, listen, wait a second. I talked about this
Speaker 1: on er. It seems like years ago Ryan Iran put
Speaker 1: out a video showing them killing Trump at his golf course. Now,
Speaker 1: I'm not saying there's an Iranian connection to what happened yesterday,
Speaker 1: but it needs to be investigated. The Biden administration knew
Speaker 1: before the Pennsylvania assassin that Iran was trying to assassinate Trump,
Speaker 1: but Iran put out a video showing them killing him
Speaker 1: at his golf course. So why didn't Trump get the
Speaker 1: same level of protection at that golf course yesterday that
Speaker 1: a sitting president would have had. Dan and Centennial Welcome
Speaker 1: to the show.
Speaker 14: Hey, Dan, thanks for having me on.
Speaker 1: Sure.
Speaker 14: As a couple of points, the first one has is
Speaker 14: that I find it very interesting that after about six years,
Speaker 14: and I know I've been calling in a long time,
Speaker 14: all of a sudden now things like deep states, deep state,
Speaker 14: and conspiracy theory and corruption and Biden's laptop is all
Speaker 14: common discussion. When you used to be called a wacko
Speaker 14: right on the assassination tempt.
Speaker 12: Here's the problem.
Speaker 14: We've got a military and a government, FBI, Secret Service
Speaker 14: and all those agencies. We can send a rocket to
Speaker 14: the moon. We can see a mouth part at five
Speaker 14: hundred miles in the pitch black. These things are way
Speaker 14: too easy. That's the problem. It's like everybody's wait a minute,
Speaker 14: how does this guy sit in a bushes.
Speaker 1: For twelve hours?
Speaker 14: They have infrared heat SAgs, we got drug dogs and
Speaker 14: dogs that can find explosive guns, bullets, cell phones, they
Speaker 14: can smell it. They're trained.
Speaker 4: I work with them.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and Dan, the music means are out of time.
Speaker 1: You raise obviously a lot of really important questions, and
Speaker 1: at top of the list right now is how did
Speaker 1: you know Trump was going to be there? And this
Speaker 1: twelve hours cell phone data twelve hours before? Who do
Speaker 1: you blame? How do we fix it? You're on the
Speaker 1: Dankplas Show.
Speaker 6: You're listening to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 1: If you had to be stuck at an elevator with
Speaker 1: either President Trump, Mike Panser, Jeff Sessions, who would it be?
Speaker 3: Does one of us have to come out alive?
Speaker 1: Really really funny coming. It's amazing And that's obviously dated.
Speaker 1: That's a flashback. But how often the left talks about
Speaker 1: jokes about political violence, right, because if you look historically,
Speaker 1: violence is a tool I'm talking about the left generally.
Speaker 1: You know, throughout world history, violence is a tool of
Speaker 1: the left. And we've certainly seen violence used in America
Speaker 1: by the left. I'm not talking Democrats versus Republicans, but
Speaker 1: by the left in America. And we've seen that frequently
Speaker 1: and very very very rarely from the right, and so
Speaker 1: I think we have to be realistic about that. All
Speaker 1: of this effort of the left right now to say,
Speaker 1: oh there's you know, shared responsibility, it's their rhetoric to
Speaker 1: blah blah blah. Now you look historically, because listen, the
Speaker 1: left can't win. They can't win on the facts, they
Speaker 1: can't win on logic, they can't win on morality, so
Speaker 1: they have to censor and then they have to commit
Speaker 1: acts of violence. I mean, it's it has been part
Speaker 1: of the playbook. Not everyone on the left, and again
Speaker 1: I'm not talking Democrat versus Republican, but the hard left.
Speaker 1: It has been part of the playbook historically. And so
Speaker 1: yet the Democrats and for a very long time, you know,
Speaker 1: have have just joked about or used that violent imagery.
Speaker 1: I am never going to to criticize anybody from either
Speaker 1: party or no party at all who uses kind of
Speaker 1: common words, common words in a political context. Hey, we
Speaker 1: got to fight, man, we got to take it to them.
Speaker 1: You know, we've got to win this war in this election.
Speaker 1: Things like that. I'm never going to criticize anybody for
Speaker 1: stuff like that. Right now, somebody might say something like
Speaker 1: that in a particularly exquisite context, say like an hour
Speaker 1: after the second assassination attempt on the president, and then
Speaker 1: you can view that differently in all fairness, but generally speaking, no,
Speaker 1: these kind of fighting war battle metaphors have been part
Speaker 1: of political discourse on both sides forever. What I'm talking
Speaker 1: about is stuff that goes beyond that, stuff that goes
Speaker 1: beyond that. And again, looking at the context first, before
Speaker 1: this first assassination attempt on Trump would listen any reasonable person.
Speaker 1: Any reasonable person when say certain things, could absolutely envision
Speaker 1: that it might trigger some kind of wacko to take
Speaker 1: action against Trump. I don't think there's any doubt about that.
Speaker 1: But here's I think a real important point we have
Speaker 1: to consider. We cannot become a society you know some
Speaker 1: people called a Heckler's meto. We can't become a society
Speaker 1: where all of a sudden, we can't say things because
Speaker 1: there might be some psychopath, some sociopath, some wacko, some
Speaker 1: homicidal maniac who might take a statement and then in
Speaker 1: a perverted way, twisted into a justification to go out
Speaker 1: and commit some kind of crime. We can't become a
Speaker 1: self censoring society like that. So I'm not suggesting blaming
Speaker 1: anybody for or limiting conversation when it's that political metaphorical
Speaker 1: kind of rhetoric. That's not my point. But can somebody
Speaker 1: explain to me a statement like this from Democratic Congressman
Speaker 1: Dan Goldman, And again this is a past statement, but
Speaker 1: not that long ago.
Speaker 7: Just unquestionable at this point that that man cannot see
Speaker 7: public office again.
Speaker 3: He is not only unfit, he.
Speaker 7: Is destructive to our democracy and.
Speaker 3: He has to be he has to be eliminated.
Speaker 1: Yeah, eight five to five for zero five A two
Speaker 1: five five text d an five seven seven three nine.
Speaker 1: I don't know that you can read anything into this
Speaker 1: one word extremely serious, but in this context as a guy, Yeah,
Speaker 1: in this context, I think this word is probably meaningful.
Speaker 1: The FBI saying that they view this as an extremely
Speaker 1: serious assassination attempt. I don't know if that implies. And
Speaker 1: I know at this point authorities are denying any evidence
Speaker 1: of another party being involved, et cetera. But that language
Speaker 1: used today suggests to me just that there's going to
Speaker 1: be additional evidence we don't know about yet showing how
Speaker 1: carefully planned this was and how likely it was to succeed,
Speaker 1: you know, had it not been for this sharp eyed
Speaker 1: agent doing a very good job there. But let's face it,
Speaker 1: after what happened in Pennsylvania, and arguably before what happened
Speaker 1: in Pennsylvania, Trump should be getting the same kind of
Speaker 1: protection as a sitting president and there is no way
Speaker 1: that street should have been opened yesterday. Raziel in Denver,
Speaker 1: you're on the Dan Kaplas show. Welcome.
Speaker 15: I mean, insanely infuriated with a yellow journalist media. But
Speaker 15: this has been to betake that this was going.
Speaker 16: To happen again, and it's going to continue until someone
Speaker 16: has a malls to stop now now the system. I
Speaker 16: actually have a short list of people that I would
Speaker 16: like to recommend for Trump's cabinet when he wins. You
Speaker 16: and Michael Brown of course are anothers You as Attorney general.
Speaker 17: We have a great future homemation security. Second, what's my
Speaker 17: job going to be director of CDC? Dan Bongino as
Speaker 17: director of the Secret Service? King House because he's worked
Speaker 17: there and he's got people there. And of course Tulsa
Speaker 17: Gabbard as a Secretary of Defense.
Speaker 1: And what job for Ryan?
Speaker 13: What's up?
Speaker 1: What job for Ryan shooting?
Speaker 8: Uh?
Speaker 1: Come on, you can come up with one. Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: he would do a good job and anything, but but
Speaker 1: thank you, Rosie, I really appreciate you. Behind the scenes
Speaker 1: is like comms director. You know who would do a
Speaker 1: great job in the administration is Michael Brown?
Speaker 10: Yes, he would, he has done I think I don't
Speaker 10: want to misquote him, but that if he were to
Speaker 10: be asked, he would serve.
Speaker 1: And I am un begging. I'm sorry, I'm just done begging.
Speaker 1: But I would be a great Press secretary for President Trump.
Speaker 1: That would be entertaining. Yeah, I would rab much rather
Speaker 1: do that than be ag. Really, you know who should
Speaker 1: be a g And this is unfair because you've got
Speaker 1: a million things going on back there. If you had
Speaker 1: time to think about it here, yet you'd get it
Speaker 1: in a blink of an eye, HARMI dyllon Andy McCarthy, Well.
Speaker 10: Yeah, because he'd be kind of a consensus building candidate, right,
Speaker 10: he's not like really pro Trump, but he's very pro constitution,
Speaker 10: you know, and a very good lawyer.
Speaker 1: Obviously extraordinarily qualified. Correct. Yeah, and even though he doesn't
Speaker 1: like Trump, he has been the best defender of Trump
Speaker 1: in so many different ways. But yeah, I'm sure we'll
Speaker 1: be spending a lot of shows after election Day talking
Speaker 1: about Trump's cabinet today. Though I really would love your take,
Speaker 1: President Trump, I thought, in very carefully chosen words, it
Speaker 1: came out and blamed the rhetoric of Harrison Biden for
Speaker 1: yet this second assassination attempt, and he had alluded to
Speaker 1: it as well in the so called debate. Right, So
Speaker 1: do you agree with the president on that? Do you
Speaker 1: think anything's going to change from the left and us
Speaker 1: I got that question out, I realized I just wasted
Speaker 1: four seconds of your time that you will never get back.
Speaker 1: Of of course, it isn't going to change what the
Speaker 1: left does. If anything, they're going to intensify it.
Speaker 4: This is the.
Speaker 1: One that weaponized, not me. She weaponized.
Speaker 11: I probably took a bullet to the head because of
Speaker 11: the things that they say about me. They talk about democracy,
Speaker 11: I'm a threat to democracy. They're the threat to democracy
Speaker 11: or the fake Russia Russia Russia investigation.
Speaker 8: A lot that went nowhere.
Speaker 1: Amen, And you know he was making a great point
Speaker 1: because the third debate are in there on the Aharis
Speaker 1: side interrupted him on that. By the way, I love
Speaker 1: seeing this, just love seeing this. Trump just announced he's
Speaker 1: going to attend the Alabama Georgia football game. I love
Speaker 1: seeing that. I think that's what not this weekend, the
Speaker 1: next weekend. I love seeing that. Just get right back
Speaker 1: out there, front and center. And you saw his post,
Speaker 1: Ryan right the h to two post zero dash two
Speaker 1: for over two on assassination attempts. But listen, we know
Speaker 1: more are coming. Right and again, I think that is
Speaker 1: a testament in many ways to how great he has
Speaker 1: been for this country, because you've got Iran openly right now.
Speaker 1: Iran's trying to kill him. The administration knew that before Pennsylvania,
Speaker 1: before what happened yesterday. I'm not saying Iron's linked to yesterday,
Speaker 1: though that obviously has to be investigated. But Roan, we
Speaker 1: talked about it a year ago on the show. Aroan
Speaker 1: put out a video showing Iran killing Trump at his
Speaker 1: golf course. So we know there are more assassination attempts coming.
Speaker 1: What political impact do you think that's going to have?
Speaker 1: And do you think this Biden administration will finally do
Speaker 1: what they should have been doing a long long time
Speaker 1: ago and give him a presidential level of security? Who
Speaker 1: do you blame? How do we fix it? You're on
Speaker 1: the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 6: And now back to the Dan Kaplass Show podcast. I
Speaker 6: just don't even know why there aren't uprisings all of
Speaker 6: the country, and maybe there will be.
Speaker 1: People need to start taking to the streets.
Speaker 14: This is a dictator, you know.
Speaker 7: There needs to be unrest in the streets for as
Speaker 7: all as there's unrest in our lives.
Speaker 10: Enemies of the state, show me where it says that
Speaker 10: protests are supposed to be polite and peaceful.
Speaker 1: Do something about your dad's immigrational practices effect less time
Speaker 1: they go low, we can how do you resist the
Speaker 1: temptation to run up and ring her neck?
Speaker 13: Biggest tariff red in this country is white men, most
Speaker 13: of them radicalized right up to the right.
Speaker 1: I thought you.
Speaker 18: Should have punched him in the face this and even
Speaker 18: if you lost, he insulted j why he's on the
Speaker 18: escalator in a called Mexican's Rapist immersed He said, well,
Speaker 18: what do you think I should done?
Speaker 7: So?
Speaker 15: I think you should push him in the face and
Speaker 15: then gotten out of the race.
Speaker 1: You would have been a hero. I'd like to punch
Speaker 1: him in the face.
Speaker 18: I said, if we're in high school, I take you
Speaker 18: behind the gym and beat the hell out of them.
Speaker 1: You know, and there's so much more of that, right,
Speaker 1: But we hear this from the left all the time.
Speaker 1: I'm not talking about typical metaphorical stuff in politics. Never
Speaker 1: criticize anybody. Fay, we got to fight, we got to win.
Speaker 1: This is the war to save the country. I'm talking
Speaker 1: about something else, another level. It's like obscenity. You know
Speaker 1: it when you see it. Interesting text here. If Jason
Speaker 1: Crow is part of the investigation, it's a joke. He
Speaker 1: is soft on crime, he loves illegals in this country.
Speaker 1: So I thought. I saw Jason Crow this morning saying
Speaker 1: he's part of the investigation, so nothing's going to be found.
Speaker 1: It's interesting. Trump campaign ting just put out a partial
Speaker 1: list of Democrats who they say have made violent threats
Speaker 1: or have engaged in rhetoric that could lead to violence,
Speaker 1: and Jason Crow is on that list. The quote they
Speaker 1: attribute to him is Trump is an extreme danger to
Speaker 1: our democracy. So you tell me, should that kind of
Speaker 1: statement without more be condemned as inciting people to violence?
Speaker 1: I don't think so. Now. I don't agree with Crow
Speaker 1: on that, not one little bit. I think that the
Speaker 1: people Jason Crow supports are extreme threat to our democracy.
Speaker 1: And they proved it. They just opposed as sitting president,
Speaker 1: and by the way, Jason Crowe had encouraged that. Right,
Speaker 1: They just opposed as sitting president who is the party's
Speaker 1: duly elected nominee. They obviously didn't depose him as president
Speaker 1: though I think as a practical matter, we don't have
Speaker 1: a president whose name we know right now. But they
Speaker 1: certainly deposed him as the duly elected nominee of the
Speaker 1: party in a back room deal at night and then
Speaker 1: installed their own candidate. And Jason Crowe supports all of that.
Speaker 1: So you want to talk about threats to democracy, Yeah,
Speaker 1: but no, I would not condemn Jason Crowe for that
Speaker 1: statement or suggests that that statement Trump is an extreme
Speaker 1: danger to our democracy is something Jason Crow should not
Speaker 1: be free to say because he's concerned it's going to
Speaker 1: cause somebody to kill Trump. No, I would. I would
Speaker 1: defend Jason Crow's right to say that, as wrong as
Speaker 1: he is on it. Now, when you talk about from
Speaker 1: the highest levels a sustained campaign, a sustained campaign saying
Speaker 1: that Donald Trump and his supporters represent this existential threat
Speaker 1: to our nation, you know that that's when that's when
Speaker 1: you start to to have real questions, right too, much.
Speaker 18: Of what's happening in our country today is not normal.
Speaker 18: Donald Trump and the Marga Republicans represented extremism that threatens
Speaker 18: the very foundations.
Speaker 1: Of our republic as a.
Speaker 18: Republican party today is dominated, driven and intimidated by Donald
Speaker 18: Trump and the Marga Republicans, and that is a threat
Speaker 18: to this country.
Speaker 1: And then you look at the context, right, and there's
Speaker 1: much more. You remember it when when Biden got all
Speaker 1: those those color out that resembled I'm not saying that
Speaker 1: it was his intent Nazi Germany. And then this dark,
Speaker 1: dark setting, I think it was in Philadelphia and he's
Speaker 1: talking about Trump. Is this extreme threat to democracy? You know,
Speaker 1: there are there are different levels of this. But I
Speaker 1: would defend Jason Crow's right to say what he said there.
Speaker 1: But how does anybody defend this? This is a Democrat.
Speaker 1: Congressman Dan Goldman.
Speaker 7: Just unquestionable at this point that that man cannot see
Speaker 7: public office again. He is not only unfit, he is
Speaker 7: destructive to our democracy and.
Speaker 3: He has to be he has to be eliminated.
Speaker 1: Let's go to Mike, not Michael Bennett. You're on the
Speaker 1: Dan Kaplis Show. Welcome Mike.
Speaker 9: Oh, great to talk to you, Dan, Thank you. Hey,
Speaker 9: you were asking how we can straighten this up. I'm thinking,
Speaker 9: if the Fox is watching the Hen House right now,
Speaker 9: which is Biden and his U Vice president are watching
Speaker 9: over Trump to make sure they didn't get killed, and
Speaker 9: Trump being the hens, that doesn't seem very fair. I
Speaker 9: think that maybe we can pass a bill on the
Speaker 9: House floor that states that if you've been attempted fascination,
Speaker 9: that maybe you can tick three of your own people
Speaker 9: to lead up your secret Service detail and not from
Speaker 9: the government. That way, there's not that false look at
Speaker 9: the government. You've got your own people running the security
Speaker 9: around you, and you should have the government running your systems. Yeah,
Speaker 9: otherwise they're always they're always going to be pegged as
Speaker 9: the ones doing the bad job.
Speaker 1: Yeah, thank you for that tremendous point, Mike, and we
Speaker 1: talked about that after Pennsylvania. Wait a second, you're letting
Speaker 1: Trump's political opponent determine his level of protection. When when
Speaker 1: the political opponent, Biden, knows that Iron is actively trying
Speaker 1: to kill Trump, and then Trump ends up with this
Speaker 1: really pitiful, really pitiful approach to his protection in Pennsylvania,
Speaker 1: you know what could possibly go wrong? Right, and I'm
Speaker 1: not saying that Biden wanted Trump killed. I'm not saying
Speaker 1: that Biden set it up so Trump would be killed.
Speaker 1: But in a nation where where we have to get
Speaker 1: along well enough to be a nation, we have to
Speaker 1: trust each other well enough to be a nation, allowing
Speaker 1: the political opponent to determine how much security the other
Speaker 1: political opponent gets his political opponent gets, especially when the
Speaker 1: sitting president knows that Iran is trying to assassinate his
Speaker 1: political opponent, and then you end up in a situation
Speaker 1: where every honest person agrees the level of protection was foreseeably,
Speaker 1: foreseeably pitiful and inadequate. We just can't have that as
Speaker 1: a nation. That's got to be a different system. So
Speaker 1: who do you blame for this? How do we stop it?
Speaker 1: You're on the Dan Kapla Show.