Speaker 1: I made a lot of money this summer. I made
Speaker 1: a lot of money, and it feels good. And I
Speaker 1: got a lot of support this month this year, a
Speaker 1: lot of views, a lot of followers. I'll tell you something,
Speaker 1: a lot of people are saying congratulations. I bet it
Speaker 1: feels good. I have lost any sensitivity to any of that.
Speaker 1: You want to know why, because when I was twenty
Speaker 1: one years old, I woke up one day and five
Speaker 1: hundred thousand dollars was frozen in my checking account with
Speaker 1: no explanation, and my face went pale as a ghost.
Speaker 1: Because four months after that, I tried to get on
Speaker 1: an airplane and they told me you're not allowed to
Speaker 1: fly today.
Speaker 2: And I was on the no fly list for a year.
Speaker 3: So now I'm.
Speaker 1: Getting a little bit of notoriety. I'm making a little
Speaker 1: bit of money. I'll tell you something. It doesn't make
Speaker 1: a fucking difference to me. I'm not doing it for
Speaker 1: the fame or the notoriety. I'm just doing it for pleasure.
Speaker 1: At this point, I am just doing it for the
Speaker 1: pleasure for being a human wrench thrown into the system.
Speaker 3: In the summer of twenty twenty, I was running a
Speaker 3: mortgage company out of San Diego, California, managing over one
Speaker 3: hundred million dollars playing beach volleyball three or four times
Speaker 3: a week. And then spring of twenty twenty, they locked
Speaker 3: us down. They shut down my beaches. They said I
Speaker 3: wasn't allowed to go outside and play beach volleyball anymore.
Speaker 4: Oh.
Speaker 3: Also, thanks to the lockdowns, they made it so that
Speaker 3: I couldn't possibly forecast what our economic system was going
Speaker 3: to do, Nor did I understand that they were going
Speaker 3: to turn on the printing press to the tune of
Speaker 3: multi trillion dollars four trillion approximately and completely distort market
Speaker 3: signals so as to the point that I couldn't possibly
Speaker 3: continue to deploy capital on behalf of my investors. So
Speaker 3: I shut down my mortgage company, multimillion dollar business. The
Speaker 3: bars were closed, the restaurants were closed, and that was
Speaker 3: just the beginning. Then after that they decided to keep
Speaker 3: the lockdowns but also mandate and untested serum and threatened
Speaker 3: to basically make you a second class citizen if not
Speaker 3: third class if not, put you behind bars if you refused.
Speaker 3: Many people lost their job during that wave. Basically, what
Speaker 3: I'm saying is, I'm a wrench in your fucking system.
Speaker 3: That is my joker origin story. We all have our own,
Speaker 3: and at this point, I just do it for the
Speaker 3: fucking pleasure. I do it for the pleasure of disturbing
Speaker 3: your oligarchy. You're a scientific emorl illegitimate rule. That is
Speaker 3: why I do what I do. We all have our
Speaker 3: joker origin story. We all come to the same place. Eventually.
Speaker 3: Millions more have since that period, Millions more have since
Speaker 3: the war in Gaza, millions more have since the complete
Speaker 3: wave of censorship that we all languished under during that period,
Speaker 3: or the newest iteration of that same censorious wave, which
Speaker 3: was speaking out in defense of the Palestinians. So I
Speaker 3: certainly don't do this for the fortune I made far
Speaker 3: more before you tried direct my life. I certainly don't
Speaker 3: do it for the fame. I've got an anxiety disorder
Speaker 3: and would greatly prefer not to have my face known.
Speaker 3: I certainly don't want to speak in front of people,
Speaker 3: and I do not want to be identified in public,
Speaker 3: And if that's the consequence of doing this show, then
Speaker 3: that's a tragedy. But I care about the message more
Speaker 3: than I care about any of that, and I think
Speaker 3: that's where a lot of us have gotten and I
Speaker 3: see that in Nick Fuentes. So despite our disagreements and
Speaker 3: our sincere deeply held differences of opinion, I respect the
Speaker 3: hell out of that. That's the energy I approach every
Speaker 3: day with. That's the energy that gets me out of
Speaker 3: bed in the morning, fucking fired up to go after
Speaker 3: these people, to dismantle the lies, and to deliver truth
Speaker 3: as best I can. Speaking of, here's the latest potential
Speaker 3: lie or potential sigh up that we're dealing with. Tragically,
Speaker 3: two National Guard troops were shot in Washington, DC yesterday.
Speaker 3: One of them has already lost their life. And the
Speaker 3: reports that the perpetrator was an Afghan national who immigrated
Speaker 3: here after serving under the US military in Afghanistan for many,
Speaker 3: many years, don't take my word for it. Here's what
Speaker 3: the head of the FBI, Cashpttel, had to say just yesterday.
Speaker 5: I also spoke to Director of the CIA John Ratcliffe
Speaker 5: last night and Secretary of War Pete Hexat. There is
Speaker 5: confirmation now that the subject had a relationship in Afghanistan
Speaker 5: with partner forces. We are fully investigating that aspect of
Speaker 5: his background.
Speaker 3: So you may be thinking to yourself, okay, so he's
Speaker 3: some Afghani who worked under the US military during the
Speaker 3: War on Terror, and he had a partner relationship with
Speaker 3: our troops over there. Let's just cut to the chase
Speaker 3: as to what that actually means.
Speaker 6: You know, he was part of this CIA backed elite
Speaker 6: Afghan unit recruited and trained by the CIA to fight
Speaker 6: against the Taliban.
Speaker 3: So Lockinmoll was not just recruited and trained by the
Speaker 3: US military, he was actively recruited and trained by the CIA.
Speaker 3: He has now come back to America and tooking out
Speaker 3: two National Guard troops in Washington, D C. There's additional
Speaker 3: oddities to this that I'm only going to sparsely cover
Speaker 3: because I can't verify the legitimacy of this. But there
Speaker 3: was again search history spikes in Google trends for both
Speaker 3: the perpetrator as well as one of the victims in
Speaker 3: both Washington, D C. And Israel in the days and
Speaker 3: hours prior to the attack. I don't know what to
Speaker 3: make of that. Laura Logan is covering it. She thinks
Speaker 3: that it's basically proof of a false flag. I'm not
Speaker 3: going to go that far because I'm not sure that
Speaker 3: that Google trend search history is as legitimate, as a
Speaker 3: lot of people think it is. It may very well be.
Speaker 3: I don't know, But if that is accurate, and I mean,
Speaker 3: he has such a unique name, if he was being
Speaker 3: searched in DC and Israel in the days prior and
Speaker 3: then the day of the morning of, that is unbelievably strange,
Speaker 3: to put it mildly. But the overarching point in all
Speaker 3: of this, just as I've been doing with the coverage
Speaker 3: of the Charlie Kirk assassination, is that you just have
Speaker 3: to be very patient and very reticent to go along
Speaker 3: with the government's narrative on these issues, especially in the
Speaker 3: immediate aftermath of attacks like this, because oftentimes we don't
Speaker 3: know the truth. In fact, we never know the truth
Speaker 3: and the immediate aftermath, and there's always an urgency to
Speaker 3: basically force through additional government powers and diminish your rights
Speaker 3: and your liberties in the aftermath of a tragedy like this,
Speaker 3: and I think that's exactly what we're witnessing here. The
Speaker 3: National Guard troops having already been deployed on American soil
Speaker 3: is concerning in its own right now that one of
Speaker 3: these National Guard troops has suffered a casualty two casualties,
Speaker 3: one loss of life. I think that it's very important
Speaker 3: that we wait to get the full story before we say, oh, sure,
Speaker 3: now bring in the one hundred and first airborne whatever,
Speaker 3: just posse camatatis, throw it out the window. We just
Speaker 3: need be kept safe, you know. And just for the record,
Speaker 3: even if this isn't a false flag, even if this
Speaker 3: is just a Afghani guy who worked for a CAA
Speaker 3: death squad in Afghanistan, which is what he did, and
Speaker 3: then he was permitted to come here after the war
Speaker 3: ended because he had served us for many years and
Speaker 3: ultimately they thought that they owed him that and he
Speaker 3: just lost his mind and he decided to attack Americans. Okay,
Speaker 3: that's still blowback. That's still a definitional blowback to interventions
Speaker 3: that we should have never been a part of. And
Speaker 3: this is ironic because just a couple of days ago,
Speaker 3: Congressman Dan Crenshaw got into a beef out of nowhere
Speaker 3: with Dave Smith, and he was basically saying, you know
Speaker 3: what I fought for, You know what I fucking fought for.
Speaker 3: No more nine elevens. That's what I fought for, Dave Smith.
Speaker 3: And it's like you fought in Afghanistan in a rock,
Speaker 3: two places that had nothing to do with nine to eleven.
Speaker 3: And you think that that prevented another nine to eleven,
Speaker 3: really damn, when in truth we've lost many multiples more
Speaker 3: American service members as a consequence of their serving in
Speaker 3: those wars, not even in combat, but by their own
Speaker 3: hand in the aftermath. Or the millions of innocent lives
Speaker 3: lost in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Somalia, all over the Middle East.
Speaker 3: And now if you take this story at face value,
Speaker 3: you've lost multiple National guards men. For those that aren't familiar,
Speaker 3: this is such a common occurrence when we were allied
Speaker 3: with the Afghani fighting forces, we called it green on Blues.
Speaker 3: It would be basically, our allies would randomly turn against
Speaker 3: American Marines or army and take them out. And if
Speaker 3: you can imagine the psychological torture that that would be
Speaker 3: as a young American man or woman for that matter,
Speaker 3: serving in Afghanistan, in Iraq and having your allies who
Speaker 3: you've worked alongside for years just suddenly opened fire on
Speaker 3: you from behind. This happened all the time. Here's what
Speaker 3: former CIA officer Alyssa. Slatkin had to say about the
Speaker 3: National Guard being deployed in America just prior to this attack.
Speaker 7: As a CIA officer, the idea that intelligence officers could
Speaker 7: be asked to target Americans turns my stomach, and it
Speaker 7: would shift us into a modern day surveillance state. Turning
Speaker 7: the federal government against Trump's enemies goes hand in hand
Speaker 7: with his use of force in American cities, both federal
Speaker 7: law enforcement and the military. As of today, the President
Speaker 7: has attempted to deploy more than seven thousand National Guard
Speaker 7: members across five cities, including right here in Washington. Many
Speaker 7: are masked, not wearing uniforms, and driving unmarked cars. For
Speaker 7: those of us who served abroad, it feels like another
Speaker 7: country and it's only a matter of time before things
Speaker 7: get worse. By my estimation, we're about two weeks away
Speaker 7: from a bloody incident that spirals out of control, and
Speaker 7: this is just the kind of incident that Trump wants
Speaker 7: to justify more force coming in.
Speaker 3: So you've now got an American senator, Melyssa's former CIA
Speaker 3: for six years, who's warning about things boiling over and
Speaker 3: becoming violent in the next couple of weeks. She said
Speaker 3: that a month ago. Then you have this attack in
Speaker 3: DC against the National Guard. Obviously, the implication she was
Speaker 3: making is that it was going to be the National
Speaker 3: Guard opening fire on American citizens. In fact, it ended
Speaker 3: up being the inverse of that, it was an Afghanian
Speaker 3: national who opens fire on the National Guard. But I
Speaker 3: just want to remind you one, Cia always Cia. If
Speaker 3: you think she's not read into black ops and things
Speaker 3: that they're doing, I'd be surprised. So was it a
Speaker 3: false flag? I don't know. I do think that it
Speaker 3: actually happened, and I do think that it's a tragedy,
Speaker 3: regardless of what the impetus for it was. But just
Speaker 3: very important that we reserve judgment, be rational, think calmly.
Speaker 3: Do not green light additional police powers and protective orders
Speaker 3: and things of that nature from the executive or from
Speaker 3: local government in response to these crises, because until we
Speaker 3: know what happened, they have absolutely no right to strip
Speaker 3: you of further liberty. And this isn't the only obvious
Speaker 3: narrative lie that we're being force fed right now. We've
Speaker 3: got a congresswoman pushing obvious bullshit when it comes to Venezuela,
Speaker 3: as that's the next war that they're trying to get
Speaker 3: us into.
Speaker 6: Because Maduro is the head of a transnational criminal organization.
Speaker 6: Maduro is not the legitimate president of the country. So
Speaker 6: we're not invading a sovereign country that has a free
Speaker 6: and fair, elected democratic president. No, this guy is a
Speaker 6: thug and he's good.
Speaker 2: Friends with Zbolan.
Speaker 6: They are giving uranium to Hamas and to Iran and
Speaker 6: to North Korea, to Cuba and to Nicaragua.
Speaker 2: Come on, it's.
Speaker 6: Time for the United States to do what we need
Speaker 6: to do, and thank god that Trump is doing it.
Speaker 6: And I'm telling you that these people, the Venezuelans, have
Speaker 6: the largest reserves of oil in the world.
Speaker 2: More than Saudi Arabia.
Speaker 6: We're talking about this is going to be a windfall
Speaker 6: for us when it comes to fossil fuels.
Speaker 3: Oops, you said the truth there at the end, lady.
Speaker 3: So first off, she's just making up whole cloth fiction
Speaker 3: that Maduro is sent uranium to Hamas in North Korea
Speaker 3: and basically every list of enemy country to America. But
Speaker 3: then she also says, oh, and by the way, it's
Speaker 3: got the most oil in the Western hemisphere and we're
Speaker 3: gonna take it. It's gonna be great for this country.
Speaker 3: It's like, holy shit. So we're pushing a wmdly to
Speaker 3: go after natural resources of one of our neighbors. Look,
Speaker 3: I'm not fond of Maduro. I certainly don't like communism.
Speaker 3: I'm not in defense of the regime of Venezuela, but
Speaker 3: I am adamantly opposed to intervention there. I don't buy
Speaker 3: for a second. In fact, factually, it's just totally inaccurate
Speaker 3: that the fentanyl crisis is stemming from Venezuela. It's a lie.
Speaker 3: But does that stop Donald Trump and his White House?
Speaker 3: Does that stop our congressional members? Does that stop our
Speaker 3: media from pushing the lie? No, it doesn't. Are the
Speaker 3: American people privy? Are they awake enough to recognize the
Speaker 3: instant replay of the propaganda push that got us into
Speaker 3: so many wars that ultimately benefited us, not at all
Speaker 3: devastated our country. Let's hope. Let's hope.
Speaker 2: And here's what you recognize. The people of Great Britain
Speaker 2: are going through a series of crises and they're all
Speaker 2: internal drug use, alcohol use. Their appearance has changed. People
Speaker 2: are longer as well kept the streets. The landscape is
Speaker 2: not tidy anymore. It's got lots of litter and graffiti
Speaker 2: in some places, and to technocrats, these are not meaningful
Speaker 2: measures of anything. Who cares if you've got graffiti? Does
Speaker 2: that affect GDPH, Well maybe maybe not, but it's definitely
Speaker 2: a reflection of how people feel about themselves. All Western
Speaker 2: cities are filled with litter and graffiti and people who
Speaker 2: look like they didn't bother to get dressed this morning,
Speaker 2: but are instead wearing their pajamas and Walmart. It's not
Speaker 2: just in your town, it's everywhere in what we refer
Speaker 2: to as the West. The point that underlies all of
Speaker 2: this is a really obvious one that too few people say.
Speaker 2: This is the behavior of a defeated people. This is
Speaker 2: what it looks like when you lose. This is what
Speaker 2: it looks like when you're on your way out to
Speaker 2: be replaced by somebody else.
Speaker 3: It's the hallmarks of a defeated people. Really really profound,
Speaker 3: and I have a lot to say about it. Before
Speaker 3: we do that, I want to have his guest give
Speaker 3: his perspective. That's Piers Morgan.
Speaker 4: You're saying that our culture has changed because we've had
Speaker 4: other cultures come in vital position.
Speaker 2: It's not my position, it's a fact, and you just
Speaker 2: said it. Think I think it's better. So what about
Speaker 2: British culture didn't you like and has been improved by
Speaker 2: new cultures?
Speaker 1: Oh?
Speaker 2: Tell me what didn't you like before? What are you
Speaker 2: glad it's gone from the Brittany?
Speaker 4: Let me if you came to London in the fifties
Speaker 4: and sixties the food was crap.
Speaker 2: Absolutely well, it was that way in the eighties. Right
Speaker 2: now we have some of the best guests of the
Speaker 2: amazing and one the most expensive too. I wonder is
Speaker 2: everyone eat there?
Speaker 4: I can take a thousand dollars FI, you're a wealthy
Speaker 4: man leaving a very wealthy lifestyle. Tell me to brick Lane,
Speaker 4: telling me to Brixton. I'll give you a properly love
Speaker 4: it and you and I will go to the tough
Speaker 4: parts of town't eat straight food, but I can give
Speaker 4: you a great man. Are you really saying that?
Speaker 3: So? Giving Carte Blanche to detail out the entire list
Speaker 3: of all of the benefits of multiculturalism and the unmitigated
Speaker 3: immigration flood that has breaked havoc in the UK, what
Speaker 3: does Piers Morgan convey as the top reason that he enjoys,
Speaker 3: or appreciates, or in fact thinks that this current iteration
Speaker 3: of British culture is superior to the prior one. Well,
Speaker 3: there's a curry good food, Okay, As if you need
Speaker 3: to allow millions of people into your country in order
Speaker 3: to have additional cuisine options. Now, I personally would argue
Speaker 3: that the increase in attacks via machete or rape or
Speaker 3: sexual assault, those things would probably outweigh the additional restaurant options.
Speaker 3: But that's just me. Anyways, here's the I'm gonna cut
Speaker 3: to the chase. Because Tucker won't say it, Peers certainly
Speaker 3: won't say it, the vast majority of people won't say it.
Speaker 3: And it's just the truth. So I'm gonna say it,
Speaker 3: even though my libertarian audience doesn't like it when I
Speaker 3: talk about it. But it's the truth, so why not?
Speaker 2: And both of us are on exactly the same page.
Speaker 2: Where I lose you is your whole world is crumbling
Speaker 2: around you. I'm worried that's gonna happen in my country,
Speaker 2: which is why I'm hassling you.
Speaker 4: My whole world's great.
Speaker 2: If I couldn't be, the restaurants are better. I totally
Speaker 2: get it.
Speaker 4: If I know you're intell i'd have taken you to
Speaker 4: the Emirates Stadium to watch my football team, Arsenal beat
Speaker 4: on North London Land. It is the most joyous, magnificent experience, immentionable.
Speaker 4: You would have seen a multicultural crowd mooring as once.
Speaker 2: It's incredible.
Speaker 4: Jews, Muslims, white, black, love it, gay, love it straight,
Speaker 4: all joined as one as Arsenal fans.
Speaker 2: It's what the church used to be. They charge you admission.
Speaker 2: I get it. I know what Breton's circus. Why aren't
Speaker 2: you more panicked than thousands of people, thousands by their
Speaker 2: own admission, the admission of the of the discovernment arrested
Speaker 2: every year for saying words, not threats, words express So
Speaker 2: why doesn't someone try to overseew the government. I don't understand.
Speaker 2: How can they treat you like slaves?
Speaker 8: If they they don't carrying it out thousand, they will
Speaker 8: be voted out of the Yes, that's what Winston Churchill
Speaker 8: was a part of Europe, the same content you were
Speaker 8: not part of.
Speaker 2: I called bullshit on that in nineteen forty. You were
Speaker 2: not part of you. You're definitely not part of the
Speaker 2: continents of Europe. You are not on the content. If
Speaker 2: you're an island dude off the continent, separated by a
Speaker 2: body of water. Do you know what it's called between
Speaker 2: you and France. It's called the English Channel. You were
Speaker 2: not part of Europe, that is not sure. The insistors
Speaker 2: lived here.
Speaker 8: You were not.
Speaker 2: You were England part of Europe. France was considered exotic
Speaker 2: and crazy. That's where the prostitutes and the cheese eaters lived.
Speaker 2: It's only the brainwashing of Tony Blair and all these
Speaker 2: technocrats since you've convinced you European. You're way better than European.
Speaker 2: You're an ancient Germanic Celtic people who ruled the world.
Speaker 2: Do you remember that in your wooden ships? Human rights
Speaker 2: are evaporating in your own country. And it's cool because
Speaker 2: you have soccer games with foreigners at them and good
Speaker 2: broad And I'm just saying maybe something about the heroic
Speaker 2: British spirit has been diminished with time.
Speaker 3: In nineteen sixty five, there was a bill pass called
Speaker 3: the Heart Cellar Act, and that basically opened up our
Speaker 3: doors to immigration from the Third World and basically everybody
Speaker 3: all across the world. Prior to that time, in nineteen
Speaker 3: sixty four, the American population was constituted by predominantly Christians,
Speaker 3: and over ninety percent were white people of European heritage.
Speaker 3: Today that figure is beneath seventy percent. So it was
Speaker 3: north of ninety percent now it's under seventy percent. It's
Speaker 3: very hard to get accurate figures because the illegal immigration
Speaker 3: obviously isn't documented very well, So depending on how many
Speaker 3: illegals are here, it would change that percentage dramatically. But
Speaker 3: assuming it's just shy of seventy percent, that's still over
Speaker 3: a twenty percent reduction over a fifty or so year period,
Speaker 3: and that's pretty dramatic shift. It's a very rapid shift.
Speaker 3: It's a shift that the domestic population wasn't really prepared
Speaker 3: for and certainly hasn't been able to acclimate to. But
Speaker 3: I think even more importantly, it has not allowed the
Speaker 3: immigrants that are coming here to acclimate. Now why do
Speaker 3: I say that, Well, if you have a really well
Speaker 3: regulated immigration system and you have a very limited inflow
Speaker 3: of new people, there is a far greater impetus to
Speaker 3: assimilate into American culture if you come over and you're
Speaker 3: coming like for instance, with these Afghanis or the Somalian
Speaker 3: immigration population, It's like that comes in such a huge
Speaker 3: wave that if you're coming across with hundreds of thousands
Speaker 3: of your countrymen into a new land. What incentive do
Speaker 3: you have to become an American to learn to speak English,
Speaker 3: to ultimately throw off your prior cultural frameworks and start
Speaker 3: to embrace American ones. The answer is, well, you don't
Speaker 3: have much of an incentive. Now, this is a common
Speaker 3: practice for immigrants far before the Heart Seller Act, So
Speaker 3: I'm not implying that this is an unheard of phenomenon.
Speaker 3: This is very common that you know. This is why
Speaker 3: we have a Chinatown for instance. Like people come across
Speaker 3: and they want to be around people that look like them.
Speaker 3: That's just human nature. And it's also much easier to
Speaker 3: get a lot along with people that are new to
Speaker 3: the country. They speak the same language as you, or
Speaker 3: at least the first same language as you, and you're
Speaker 3: all kind of in this together. But the obvious problem
Speaker 3: is that if you have millions of people that are
Speaker 3: coming into your country and they are choosing not to
Speaker 3: become American, to not throw away or throw off their
Speaker 3: Somali or their Chinese or whatever heritage that they're coming
Speaker 3: from that they're fleeing from. Usually it by its very nature,
Speaker 3: dilutes the American cultural framework. It dilutes the American freedom
Speaker 3: of framework that we all, I hope love, And this
Speaker 3: is not accidental. This is a very concerted and conscientious
Speaker 3: effort to bolster Democrat voting tallies because first generation immigrants
Speaker 3: and second generation immigrants by and large have historically voted Democrat,
Speaker 3: and the poor the immigrant the better because they need
Speaker 3: more state assistance and therefore they're going to almost certainly
Speaker 3: vote for the Democrats. So the incentive structure for the
Speaker 3: Democrat Party to open up our borders was that we
Speaker 3: are going to bring in the most downtrodden, the most destitute,
Speaker 3: because they are going to be the most needy and
Speaker 3: therefore the most reliant on the state, more specifically reliant
Speaker 3: on the Democratic Party. Now, to be clear, this is
Speaker 3: not exclusively a Democratic issue either. The Republicans, because many
Speaker 3: of them have very large corporate donners. They like the
Speaker 3: cheaper labor. Corporations want to have cheaper labor than the
Speaker 3: domestic population, which is going to require probably six figures
Speaker 3: in order to do the jobs that they need filled,
Speaker 3: whereas they could have a newly imported H one b
Speaker 3: person who's willing to do it for sixty or seventy thousand. Well,
Speaker 3: if you multiply that by ten thousand employees, you're talking
Speaker 3: serious money in serious savings. So that's additional profits that
Speaker 3: go to your bottom line. So it's a left right problem.
Speaker 3: This is very very bipartisan. Now it's not discussed that way.
Speaker 3: It's always basically formulated as a purely left right issue,
Speaker 3: in the left being the ones that are four open
Speaker 3: borders and the right being opposed to it. But that's
Speaker 3: actually a relatively new phenomenon. In the two thousands, the
Speaker 3: George Bush administration, they were talking about amnesty. Ronald Reagan
Speaker 3: was responsible for the largest amnesty in my lifetime. So
Speaker 3: it was really with the advent of Donald Trump that
Speaker 3: the immigration issue even became a talking point, or at
Speaker 3: least we finally had a politician that was willing to
Speaker 3: reflect the demands of the people, primarily the blue collar,
Speaker 3: middle class, working class people in the center of the country,
Speaker 3: in opposition to the coastal elites and their demands and
Speaker 3: their wishes and their benefits. Just to give you a
Speaker 3: quick story, you know, I live in Miami and I
Speaker 3: like it here. I'm not hating on it by any stretch,
Speaker 3: but like I can go days, if not weeks at
Speaker 3: a time without talking to someone who is like white,
Speaker 3: domestic born, first language English, Like, think about how crazy
Speaker 3: it is in an American state, and it's like, I
Speaker 3: am the odd man out. It's very unusual. Now if
Speaker 3: you go to the middle of the country, that's not
Speaker 3: nearly as commonplace, but certainly in the coastal areas it's
Speaker 3: very very common. And the food here is great, night
Speaker 3: life is great, and the energy and the multiculturalism it has,
Speaker 3: it's over you know, it brings out look, it's not
Speaker 3: all bad. So I'm not trying to be like fully
Speaker 3: xenophobic and fully American centric. I'm just saying that there
Speaker 3: are downsides that come with that that if we're not
Speaker 3: going to be honest about them, I think it's a
Speaker 3: major mistake. And here's some statistical facts that will get
Speaker 3: you in a lot of trouble, but it's the truth.
Speaker 3: If you were to allow only say, black women to vote,
Speaker 3: Democrats win everything. If you allow gay people to vote,
Speaker 3: Democrats win everything. Women to vote Democrats win everything. If
Speaker 3: you allow only immigrants to vote, black people to vote,
Speaker 3: like basically any any subset of Americans. If you were
Speaker 3: to only allow them to vote. They would vote Democrat
Speaker 3: except for straight white men. That's it. That's the entire demographic. Now,
Speaker 3: now ask yourself, now that I've said that, once you've
Speaker 3: dealt with the trauma of hearing that reality, because it
Speaker 3: is true, why do you think it is that straight
Speaker 3: white men became the enemy of the Democrat Party over
Speaker 3: the past dozen or so years. Have you figured it
Speaker 3: out yet? I'll give you a hint. No, I'm not
Speaker 3: going to give you a hint. You already figured it out.
Speaker 3: That's what it is. It's because straight white men do
Speaker 3: not have nearly as much of a reliance on the state,
Speaker 3: specifically because they come from a cultural and heritage framework
Speaker 3: that says, not to the Christian framework or the Protestant
Speaker 3: work ethic. Basically, all of these European values that came
Speaker 3: across with the settlers, with the Pilgrims, which created the
Speaker 3: framework for America with its gun rights and its free
Speaker 3: speech rights and all of these things very unusual concepts.
Speaker 3: They're a little bit more common today than they used
Speaker 3: to be, but back then they were almost unheard of.
Speaker 3: And to basically say these rights come from God, not
Speaker 3: from the state, was just completely novel and a belief
Speaker 3: that the state doesn't owe you anything, it just needed
Speaker 3: to get the fuck out of your way was very,
Speaker 3: very novel. And this is not to imply that there
Speaker 3: aren't minorities that feel the same way. Obviously, there are
Speaker 3: many Americans that are not white, straight white guys that
Speaker 3: are fucking awesome. So that's not the point I'm making.
Speaker 3: I'm saying on collective numbers, when you take statistical breakdowns,
Speaker 3: there is one group of people that agrees with that
Speaker 3: more often than not. Everybody else disagrees with it more
Speaker 3: often than not. If you think that the Democrats or
Speaker 3: the state itself hasn't paid attention to that and oriented
Speaker 3: all of their tactics to that end, I don't know
Speaker 3: what else to tell you. Obviously they have, and if
Speaker 3: you expect to maintain those hard fought kind of cultural
Speaker 3: moras this framework that says we don't need an overpowering
Speaker 3: state or a social safety net or any of these things,
Speaker 3: you're going to have to embrace the fact that what
Speaker 3: I'm telling you is the truth and that those people
Speaker 3: matter a lot, because as long as we live under
Speaker 3: a democratic system, their votes are the only thing that
Speaker 3: are keeping you from being in a socialist, communist whatever
Speaker 3: hell hole, and that ladies and gentlemen, is why they're
Speaker 3: so reviled, Why I am so reviled, Why Hollywood and
Speaker 3: the DC elites and everybody else. Basically, college professors have
Speaker 3: demonized me to the end of the earth he can have.
Speaker 2: Never heard of.
Speaker 9: The University of Minnesota's Child Development program is warning about
Speaker 9: a whiteness pandemic an offering advice on how to reverse it.
Speaker 9: But first, obviously, what is a whiteness pandemic? Well, a
Speaker 9: page on the university's website says whiteness refers to culture,
Speaker 9: not biology. The centuries old culture of whiteness features colorblindness, passivity,
Speaker 9: and white fragility, which are all covert expressions of racism
Speaker 9: common in the United States. The web page then offers
Speaker 9: steps for how to halt and reverse the whiteness pandemic,
Speaker 9: explaining this, if you were socialized into the culture of
Speaker 9: whiteness during childhood, Oh, not to worry, it's not your fault,
Speaker 9: but as an adult, it is now your responsibility to
Speaker 9: self reflect, re educate yourself, and act.
Speaker 3: I represent a value framework, a system, a preference of
Speaker 3: these systems that they oppose with every fiber of their being.
Speaker 3: And it's not just a propaganda campaign to demonize straight
Speaker 3: white guys in America to permit additional immigration to bolster
Speaker 3: their voting ranks. It's also on top of that, it
Speaker 3: concerted financial operation to fund this immigration flood through the UN.
Speaker 3: I mean, you listened to the World Economic Forum, people
Speaker 3: talk about it. This is what they did overtly for decades,
Speaker 3: they were funding the immigration flood, and they were even
Speaker 3: describing it as essentially reparations for imperialism, that because of
Speaker 3: the pain and suffering caused by the British, or the
Speaker 3: French or the American Empire, you have a responsibility to
Speaker 3: take in people from these countries who have been abused
Speaker 3: by you. And here's the kicker, done with your tax money.
Speaker 3: So you were being robbed to fund your own invasion,
Speaker 3: to fund your own replacement, to fund your own destruction,
Speaker 3: to fund your own conquest. And to say any of
Speaker 3: this was classified very early on as hate speech. Why
Speaker 3: would they do that to try and prevent you from
Speaker 3: talking about it, to try and prevent you from diagnosing
Speaker 3: it properly, to try and prevent you from I'm opposing it.
Speaker 3: When I realized those two things, I had seen enough.
Speaker 3: I knew that open border is going to be the
Speaker 3: destruction of my freedom and my country and my people,
Speaker 3: and I decided to reject it entirely. Does that mean
Speaker 3: that I will never want there to be any immigration
Speaker 3: again to America. No, doesn't mean that, But it does
Speaker 3: mean I am adamantly opposed to any immigration in the
Speaker 3: near term. We need an absolute freeze and absolute moratorium
Speaker 3: on immigration so that those that have come here illegally
Speaker 3: can begin to assimilate, and the vast majority of those
Speaker 3: people need to go home. They need to be remigrated
Speaker 3: out of this country. Cannot have fifty million people here illegally.
Speaker 3: And I haven't even mentioned the financial burden that it
Speaker 3: puts on the system, particularly because of the social safety net,
Speaker 3: which I also oppose. And don't get it twisted. I'm
Speaker 3: not forgetting about the fact that, yes, a lot of
Speaker 3: these countries were destroyed because of America's military industrial complex.
Speaker 3: But guess what, I don't know any fucking responsible for
Speaker 3: any of that. I oppose all those wars from the
Speaker 3: beginning too, So you're not gonna shame me into accepting
Speaker 3: millions of people that come here because we destroyed Syria
Speaker 3: or Iraq or Afghanistan or anywhere else. No, and at
Speaker 3: his core, really what is it? And this is probably
Speaker 3: the part I had the hardest time coming to terms with.
Speaker 3: But this is the truth is that it's self hatred.
Speaker 3: It's taught self hatred.
Speaker 2: That's my point. You're so passive. They take your human
Speaker 2: rights away and you're like, oh, defending your cred is
Speaker 2: so important. We're so proud to have defended Poland's territorial
Speaker 2: integrity eight years ago. It's like, great, I'm so glad.
Speaker 2: I'm very proud of that, apparently, but it's all a
Speaker 2: kind of displacement where you're taking your own frustrations with
Speaker 2: yourselves and your own cowardice and sort of living in
Speaker 2: this Walter Midi world. We're like, no, actually, we're brave.
Speaker 2: We're going to defend Ukraine. It's like, what about defend
Speaker 2: yourselves against the monsters from the king. It's like eighth
Speaker 2: on the list. Defend yourself, defend your human rights. They
Speaker 2: can't put you in jail for saying naughty words to period,
Speaker 2: So march on the capitol, get people out, scare them.
Speaker 3: It's that you are flawed, Even someone like me who's
Speaker 3: super anti woke and never bought into that shit. It
Speaker 3: still became very evident to me that I had been,
Speaker 3: I had imbibed of it against my will or accidentally
Speaker 3: or subconsciously, that there was at its core kind of
Speaker 3: a message that had seeped into me that said, to
Speaker 3: defend what I look like or who I am, or
Speaker 3: my people so to speak, is evil or hateful in
Speaker 3: some way. But then I realized, no, actually it's not.
Speaker 3: It's not hateful to say that someone who has a
Speaker 3: different culture, say they're Muslim, or they're from Africa or whatever,
Speaker 3: it's like they have a different culture. Do I prefer
Speaker 3: my culture to theirs? Well, the answer is obviously yes,
Speaker 3: or I would have fucking moved there. So because I
Speaker 3: prefer my culture, does that mean I hate theirs? No,
Speaker 3: Actually it doesn't mean that either teach their own. Does
Speaker 3: that mean I wish them harm? No, it doesn't. Actually
Speaker 3: I wish them peace and prosperity. But my primary concern,
Speaker 3: above everything, all the time, above all else, is that
Speaker 3: I maintain liberty for myself, my family, and my children,
Speaker 3: my progeny. And I want to maintain a economic system
Speaker 3: that is functioning to that end. And the truth is
Speaker 3: that mass migration, either legal or illegal, will destroy that future.
Speaker 3: In fact, it's destroying our present. And that's not to
Speaker 3: downplay any of the other nefarios shit that the state's
Speaker 3: done when it comes to central banking and printing and
Speaker 3: the inflationary process which ultimately made it so that domestic
Speaker 3: labor is far more expensive than foreign labor, which caused
Speaker 3: the hollowing out of the industry in our country. This
Speaker 3: is a very multi factorial, complicated issue, so I'm not
Speaker 3: trying to make it so simple. But you have to
Speaker 3: be honest about it if you want to stop it,
Speaker 3: and I do, and I'm not going to pretend otherwise.
Speaker 3: I'm not going to pretend that, oh yeah, people, everyone
Speaker 3: from Mexico, come on in, and Venezuela and China and Somalia. Yeah,
Speaker 3: just come on in. It's all the same, we're all
Speaker 3: the same. We're not the same. We're not the same,
Speaker 3: and we have to be honest about that. It doesn't
Speaker 3: mean that I want to do these people harm. Quite
Speaker 3: the contrary. I don't have any ill will towards them whatsoever.
Speaker 3: But it does mean that I prefer the cultural framework
Speaker 3: that I grew up in. It's I prefer the cultural
Speaker 3: framework that I want to continue to live in, and
Speaker 3: I will defend it. And it is no accident that
Speaker 3: saying those simple words that I just said that I
Speaker 3: will defend the culture that I come from, became taboo.
Speaker 3: It became third rail, It became hate speech and racist
Speaker 3: and this and that. It's no accident why they did that,
Speaker 3: because a serious love infused movement that says, yes, I
Speaker 3: love America and Americans, and that doesn't mean just white people,
Speaker 3: it means fucking Americans. That is an impossible force to conquer.
Speaker 3: And therefore we must embrace it again, regardless of the
Speaker 3: labels that could apply to us.
Speaker 2: No, No, this isbal homo. It is this global homo.
Speaker 2: This is what you mean. I'm gonna tell you. I'm
Speaker 2: gonna tell you this is a concept that you need
Speaker 2: to understand. This is it, Yes, you do. This is
Speaker 2: the authoritarianism of the present and future. And it's not
Speaker 2: it's the feline, passive, aggressive female version that doesn't tell
Speaker 2: you what it is. They don't march into your town
Speaker 2: in jack boots and put a rifle against your face
Speaker 2: into the y for sure. It's much more straightforward.
Speaker 4: It's aul off of building suddenly, Oh you kill tons
Speaker 4: of people.
Speaker 2: You kill tons of people.
Speaker 3: I don't disagree.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, you do a lot. Yeah right, so let's
Speaker 2: stop with the killing people because you kill tons of people.
Speaker 3: But as you well know, so as Tucker so aptly
Speaker 3: described it, it's what we're up against his global hoomo. Now,
Speaker 3: that doesn't mean that you're opposed to gay people. That's
Speaker 3: not what it means. It means that, basically, it's a
Speaker 3: term that describes the soft authoritarianism of the woke mind virus.
Speaker 3: It's no accident that over the past twenty years we
Speaker 3: have been divided based off of race and religion and
Speaker 3: sexuality and everything else. It didn't start as overt hatred
Speaker 3: for white people or straight people or men. It started
Speaker 3: as pride for the minorities. It started as pride for
Speaker 3: I'm gay, I'm trans, I'm by, I'm whatever, I'm black,
Speaker 3: I'm indigenous. The list goes on and on. Right, But
Speaker 3: what does that do to a people, Well, it, by
Speaker 3: its very nature divides. It says that I am different
Speaker 3: from you, as opposed to leaning into what makes us similar.
Speaker 3: Despite the differences that we do have, be it sexuality
Speaker 3: or race or whatever else, we are all American. That
Speaker 3: was the unifying cultural framework that we functioned under. That
Speaker 3: we believed in free markets, we believed in self defense,
Speaker 3: we believed in free speech. These are all values that
Speaker 3: tied us together, regardless of our immutable characteristic differences. But
Speaker 3: if all of that becomes secondary to your personal subcategorization,
Speaker 3: be that your race or gender or whatever else, well
Speaker 3: then it becomes secondary. It becomes less important because the
Speaker 3: focus becomes what makes us different, not what makes us similar.
Speaker 3: And that was not an accident. We have been divided
Speaker 3: so that we may be conquered, and it's time we
Speaker 3: tell the fucking truth about it and we reject it entirely.
Speaker 3: And that's what I'm doing. If you enjoyed this episode,
Speaker 3: please do hit the like button, subscribe, shar it around.
Speaker 3: We are absolutely crushing on a level I never thought possible.
Speaker 3: We're doing over one hundred thousand viewers or listeners per
Speaker 3: show for like weeks now. It's amazing. So from my
Speaker 3: heart to yours, thank you, From my Thanksgiving dinner table
Speaker 3: to yours. I wish we could all sit down and
Speaker 3: talk shit about all this insanity. It'd be great. But
Speaker 3: the real American holiday, Happy Black Friday to every single
Speaker 3: one year, because that's what we really celebrate here. Anyways,
Speaker 3: I hope you guys had a great time with your families,
Speaker 3: and if you want to get some cozy for Christmas,
Speaker 3: make sure you go to mipullo dot com use promo
Speaker 3: code lockdown, get you some Micha Dell coziness for your
Speaker 3: family and friends, and support the show, or at liberty
Speaker 3: lockpot on X subscribe there I'll follow you back, or
Speaker 3: liberty lockdown dot locals dot com, or if you don't
Speaker 3: have any money, just fucking share the show. It's the
Speaker 3: easiest way. Love you guys.
Speaker 2: Please, we do not.
Speaker 9: Have any obligation whatsoever to anyone to allow them entry
Speaker 9: into our country and to all of the benefits that offers.
Speaker 7: We don't have any obligation to do that. And quite frankly,
Speaker 7: it's asini that we can't have a realistic policy conversation
Speaker 7: about how certain cultures are quite literally incompatible with ours.
Speaker 7: It should be okay to say that, and more importantly,
Speaker 7: it should be okay to base our immigration policy on that.