WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.360 --> 00:00:04.559
<v Speaker 1>In that position if you stress and only believe in transcendence.

2
00:00:04.919 --> 00:00:08.640
<v Speaker 1>The Orthodox view following Hebrew Revelation does not believe that

3
00:00:08.720 --> 00:00:11.720
<v Speaker 1>God is only transcendent. He is also imminent, and there

4
00:00:11.759 --> 00:00:15.160
<v Speaker 1>is analogical predication. Analogy means that you can predicate on

5
00:00:15.199 --> 00:00:19.879
<v Speaker 1>the basis of similarity, not a one to one correspondence similarity,

6
00:00:20.280 --> 00:00:23.600
<v Speaker 1>but there's also dissimilarity. But we believe that God can

7
00:00:23.719 --> 00:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>condescend to speak to us, to make things clear to us.

8
00:00:28.440 --> 00:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>So we don't have a problem with anthropomorphic language, and

9
00:00:30.839 --> 00:00:33.320
<v Speaker 1>we don't have a problem with Theophanes. They think the

10
00:00:33.359 --> 00:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>two go together. But for the text that you're asking for.

11
00:00:36.439 --> 00:00:40.039
<v Speaker 1>In Philippians Too, Paul says that Christ, who is and

12
00:00:40.159 --> 00:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>has the form of God equal to God Philippians Too,

13
00:00:45.640 --> 00:00:48.520
<v Speaker 1>made himself of no reputation, taking on the form of

14
00:00:48.560 --> 00:00:51.640
<v Speaker 1>a bond servant, meaning the form of humanity, coming in

15
00:00:51.679 --> 00:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the likeness of men. He humbled himself and became obedient

16
00:00:54.840 --> 00:00:57.479
<v Speaker 1>to the point of death. Deathn't across, so he didn't

17
00:00:57.560 --> 00:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>surrender his divinity. It's a both and and not in

18
00:01:00.679 --> 00:01:04.319
<v Speaker 1>either or, So there's no contradiction between the divine nature

19
00:01:04.319 --> 00:01:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and the human nature. God is not opposite the world.

20
00:01:07.200 --> 00:01:09.359
<v Speaker 1>God created the world, and he created the world and

21
00:01:09.439 --> 00:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>mankind in his image, in his likeness. Even the Quran

22
00:01:12.760 --> 00:01:15.480
<v Speaker 1>says Adam was made in the image and likeness of Allah. Well,

23
00:01:15.519 --> 00:01:17.680
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, I thought, there's no likeness at all

24
00:01:17.719 --> 00:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>to Allah. You see. So both Judaism and Islam have

25
00:01:21.760 --> 00:01:25.599
<v Speaker 1>this principle in their systems, and then they grapple with

26
00:01:25.680 --> 00:01:29.079
<v Speaker 1>it in trying to make sense of this when Christianity

27
00:01:29.159 --> 00:01:33.040
<v Speaker 1>alone is consistent with the Hebrew revelation that the second

28
00:01:33.400 --> 00:01:36.599
<v Speaker 1>person has always been manifesting and stepping into time and space.

29
00:01:36.640 --> 00:01:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Why is it impossible for God? If God creates time

30
00:01:39.400 --> 00:01:41.719
<v Speaker 1>and space, why is it impossible for him to manifest

31
00:01:41.760 --> 00:01:43.120
<v Speaker 1>in time and space? Says who?

32
00:01:44.719 --> 00:01:47.439
<v Speaker 2>So even unless it like the second person of the

33
00:01:47.480 --> 00:01:51.280
<v Speaker 2>God had manifest like, you know, as Jesus, Like, no, he.

34
00:01:51.319 --> 00:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Is Jesus, not manifesting as Jesus. It is Jesus.

35
00:01:54.519 --> 00:01:58.239
<v Speaker 2>That's Jesus, right. So, like when he's like walking around,

36
00:01:58.439 --> 00:02:02.359
<v Speaker 2>is he as to all knowledge? Is he's still a mission?

37
00:02:02.640 --> 00:02:03.239
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely?

38
00:02:03.920 --> 00:02:06.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean the text here says that he is equal

39
00:02:06.200 --> 00:02:09.439
<v Speaker 1>with God in John one. When John says in John

40
00:02:09.479 --> 00:02:12.479
<v Speaker 1>one that he was walking around with us in the flesh.

41
00:02:12.680 --> 00:02:15.199
<v Speaker 1>John says he was also in the bosom of God

42
00:02:15.319 --> 00:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>as he was walking around, because he never surrendered or

43
00:02:18.000 --> 00:02:19.439
<v Speaker 1>loses his divine nature.

44
00:02:20.719 --> 00:02:24.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so, howcome in the Gospel of Mark, you know,

45
00:02:24.439 --> 00:02:25.080
<v Speaker 2>he's hungry.

46
00:02:25.120 --> 00:02:26.280
<v Speaker 4>I think it's chapter eleven.

47
00:02:26.560 --> 00:02:29.199
<v Speaker 2>He's hungry, and then he sees a fig tree, and

48
00:02:29.400 --> 00:02:31.439
<v Speaker 2>you know, he tries to go for fruit, but he

49
00:02:31.479 --> 00:02:34.319
<v Speaker 2>sees that there's it doesn't have anything but leaves, And

50
00:02:34.360 --> 00:02:36.360
<v Speaker 2>then he did how come he didn't know that there

51
00:02:36.439 --> 00:02:37.639
<v Speaker 2>was no it was not the season on?

52
00:02:37.719 --> 00:02:39.360
<v Speaker 1>How come he didn't know the ap No, that whole

53
00:02:39.400 --> 00:02:42.080
<v Speaker 1>point of that passage is an object lesson because he

54
00:02:42.120 --> 00:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>curses the fig tree because the fig tree is a

55
00:02:44.039 --> 00:02:47.039
<v Speaker 1>symbol of Israel. It's not a lack of knowledge. He's

56
00:02:47.199 --> 00:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>making an object lesson for his disciples to say, you

57
00:02:50.719 --> 00:02:53.120
<v Speaker 1>see this fig tree, how it has no fruit on it?

58
00:02:53.159 --> 00:02:55.159
<v Speaker 1>The fig tree is a symbol of Israel. Israel no

59
00:02:55.240 --> 00:02:57.599
<v Speaker 1>longer has fruit because it is barren because they're about

60
00:02:57.599 --> 00:02:59.159
<v Speaker 1>to kill her Messiah.

61
00:02:59.240 --> 00:03:01.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I know, I get that, But the text itself,

62
00:03:01.360 --> 00:03:03.280
<v Speaker 2>it says Jesus was hungry.

63
00:03:03.479 --> 00:03:05.039
<v Speaker 4>So he's so if.

64
00:03:05.479 --> 00:03:08.199
<v Speaker 1>Jesus has a fully human nature and he willed to

65
00:03:08.280 --> 00:03:11.039
<v Speaker 1>have that right. So, in other words, as a divine

66
00:03:11.039 --> 00:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>person or subject, when he assumed human nature, he assumed

67
00:03:14.120 --> 00:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>it with all of its weaknesses and imperfections on purpose

68
00:03:17.719 --> 00:03:20.199
<v Speaker 1>to raise it, to deify it, and to heal it.

69
00:03:20.240 --> 00:03:21.039
<v Speaker 3>That's the whole purpose.

70
00:03:21.199 --> 00:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>So he absolutely got tired, he absolutely got hungry, he

71
00:03:23.560 --> 00:03:27.199
<v Speaker 1>absolutely got thirsty, he wept. All of those things are

72
00:03:27.199 --> 00:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>proper to humanity because he's he's fully human.

73
00:03:30.919 --> 00:03:31.560
<v Speaker 4>No, I get that.

74
00:03:31.639 --> 00:03:33.280
<v Speaker 2>So, but the thing is that, you know, he has

75
00:03:33.319 --> 00:03:36.560
<v Speaker 2>the properties of human nature. But he's hungry, and he

76
00:03:36.599 --> 00:03:38.680
<v Speaker 2>sees the fig tree, so he goes to find if

77
00:03:38.719 --> 00:03:41.800
<v Speaker 2>it has any fruit, and that he sees it right,

78
00:03:42.039 --> 00:03:44.199
<v Speaker 2>But then it doesn't have any and then he ends

79
00:03:44.240 --> 00:03:46.080
<v Speaker 2>up cursing the fig tree because then he said that

80
00:03:46.120 --> 00:03:48.000
<v Speaker 2>it's like it kind of represents Israel.

81
00:03:48.319 --> 00:03:50.280
<v Speaker 3>But he explains that it represents Israel.

82
00:03:51.560 --> 00:03:54.719
<v Speaker 4>Yes, yes, he explains that represents Israel.

83
00:03:55.000 --> 00:03:58.719
<v Speaker 2>But my point was that if he's hungry, right, and

84
00:03:58.759 --> 00:04:01.599
<v Speaker 2>he knows that the fig tree doesn't have any fruit,

85
00:04:01.719 --> 00:04:03.960
<v Speaker 2>just why doesn't he just go there and curse the

86
00:04:03.960 --> 00:04:04.400
<v Speaker 2>fig tree?

87
00:04:04.400 --> 00:04:06.039
<v Speaker 4>Wise he like going there.

88
00:04:05.840 --> 00:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>For fruit because in many places throughout the Gospels, the

89
00:04:10.479 --> 00:04:13.879
<v Speaker 1>message and the intention is to show us his full humanity.

90
00:04:14.400 --> 00:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Just like when he's in the garden and he prays

91
00:04:16.839 --> 00:04:19.399
<v Speaker 1>to the Father, right, he says, let this cut pass

92
00:04:19.439 --> 00:04:21.759
<v Speaker 1>for me, yet not my will, but thy will be done.

93
00:04:21.839 --> 00:04:24.839
<v Speaker 1>In our understanding of that, he is intentionally subjecting his

94
00:04:24.959 --> 00:04:27.480
<v Speaker 1>human will to the will of God the Father, because

95
00:04:27.519 --> 00:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>he wants to show us and to be an example

96
00:04:30.040 --> 00:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to us, that he really is fully human. And so

97
00:04:33.160 --> 00:04:35.399
<v Speaker 1>he went through the whole range of human experience from

98
00:04:35.399 --> 00:04:38.360
<v Speaker 1>being born as a child to maturing into a full adult.

99
00:04:38.439 --> 00:04:41.519
<v Speaker 1>So our explanation, our exposition of a lot of these

100
00:04:41.519 --> 00:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>passages that it is absolutely intentional to show us that

101
00:04:44.720 --> 00:04:45.519
<v Speaker 1>he's fully human.

102
00:04:46.600 --> 00:04:46.959
<v Speaker 5>I see.

103
00:04:47.000 --> 00:04:49.319
<v Speaker 2>So like I think it's also in the Gospel. Maybe

104
00:04:49.319 --> 00:04:51.959
<v Speaker 2>it's Matthew and Mark Reigi doesn't know the hour, and

105
00:04:52.000 --> 00:04:54.839
<v Speaker 2>I think it was John Krisostom who says that, I

106
00:04:54.879 --> 00:04:57.160
<v Speaker 2>think it's like a form of expression. So would you

107
00:04:57.279 --> 00:04:59.120
<v Speaker 2>quote it that same interpretation of that past.

108
00:04:59.319 --> 00:05:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Yes, if you read if you read Saint Basil's letter,

109
00:05:01.680 --> 00:05:03.519
<v Speaker 1>I think it's two thirty five or two thirty six.

110
00:05:04.240 --> 00:05:08.199
<v Speaker 1>As I explained in the debate, Jesus oftentimes utilizes this

111
00:05:08.279 --> 00:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>form of exaggeration or rhetoric where he expresses things in

112
00:05:12.279 --> 00:05:15.920
<v Speaker 1>an extreme way. There's no one good but God? Right

113
00:05:16.120 --> 00:05:18.079
<v Speaker 1>does that? Does he literally mean no one is good?

114
00:05:18.160 --> 00:05:20.079
<v Speaker 1>So he means He's not good? And other prophets are good.

115
00:05:20.079 --> 00:05:20.519
<v Speaker 3>No, it isn't.

116
00:05:20.600 --> 00:05:23.360
<v Speaker 1>He's saying in an exaggerated way, there's no one good

117
00:05:23.399 --> 00:05:27.639
<v Speaker 1>but God. So likewise, no one knows this but the Father, right,

118
00:05:29.160 --> 00:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's Basil has many other examples. If you read his.

119
00:05:33.800 --> 00:05:35.800
<v Speaker 3>Letter, it's two Ory five or through thirty six. But

120
00:05:36.480 --> 00:05:37.360
<v Speaker 3>there's a there's.

121
00:05:37.160 --> 00:05:38.800
<v Speaker 1>An article on this if you want it, let me

122
00:05:38.800 --> 00:05:57.399
<v Speaker 1>find it now. Some people, some of the church fathers,

123
00:05:57.399 --> 00:06:02.319
<v Speaker 1>expressed exposited it as a pertaining to the human nature.

124
00:06:03.120 --> 00:06:07.240
<v Speaker 1>It can be interpreted either way, but ultimately it doesn't.

125
00:06:07.240 --> 00:06:10.480
<v Speaker 1>We're not worried about it because their countless passages to

126
00:06:10.600 --> 00:06:13.560
<v Speaker 1>talk about the son also possessing omniscions.

127
00:06:13.759 --> 00:06:15.800
<v Speaker 3>Right, Jesus knew all things.

128
00:06:15.839 --> 00:06:18.240
<v Speaker 1>He knew what was in the Thaniel John two, So

129
00:06:18.279 --> 00:06:21.199
<v Speaker 1>we don't have a problem saying that. Yeah, you could

130
00:06:21.240 --> 00:06:24.519
<v Speaker 1>interpret this as a limitation that was proper to the humanity.

131
00:06:25.160 --> 00:06:28.360
<v Speaker 1>For example, in Luke, when it says Jesus went to

132
00:06:28.600 --> 00:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>argue with the scribes and the Pharisees in the temple

133
00:06:30.800 --> 00:06:33.319
<v Speaker 1>when he was a young man. It says that he

134
00:06:33.439 --> 00:06:36.439
<v Speaker 1>grew in wisdom and stature amongst God and in favor

135
00:06:36.439 --> 00:06:40.480
<v Speaker 1>amongst God and men. So those are properties that could

136
00:06:40.480 --> 00:06:45.199
<v Speaker 1>only apply to humanity. Right, the sun does not grow

137
00:06:45.240 --> 00:06:48.160
<v Speaker 1>in stature, Jesus, I'm saying the subject, the divine subject

138
00:06:48.160 --> 00:06:51.120
<v Speaker 1>of the sun, does not increase or diminish his divine nature.

139
00:06:51.959 --> 00:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Divine nature doesn't come in partition. It's not half. It's

140
00:06:54.879 --> 00:06:58.040
<v Speaker 1>not the percentages Jesus in the fifty percent divine, fifty

141
00:06:58.079 --> 00:07:00.680
<v Speaker 1>percent human, he's a hundred percent divine, hundredcent hum And

142
00:07:00.720 --> 00:07:02.519
<v Speaker 1>so the passage in Luke where it says that he

143
00:07:02.560 --> 00:07:05.399
<v Speaker 1>grew in wisdom and stature in favor, is applicable to

144
00:07:05.480 --> 00:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>his human nature. And many passages in the scriptures are

145
00:07:09.759 --> 00:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>this way, where sometimes, for example, if he said, if

146
00:07:14.920 --> 00:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>he's doing a miracle, we said, the miracles are evidences

147
00:07:18.519 --> 00:07:21.399
<v Speaker 1>of in demonstrations of his divinity as divine power, divine nature.

148
00:07:22.079 --> 00:07:25.639
<v Speaker 1>Only God could change water to wine, only God could

149
00:07:25.639 --> 00:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>walk on water. But other passages demonstrated that he's fully human, crying, eating,

150
00:07:31.079 --> 00:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and they're intentional. It's not that his divinity lacked, but

151
00:07:34.560 --> 00:07:38.759
<v Speaker 1>as again, Philippians said, he willingly chose to be in

152
00:07:38.759 --> 00:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>those states. It's just it's the same thing with the

153
00:07:42.240 --> 00:07:46.399
<v Speaker 1>question of God answering prayers and reciprocity. How does if God,

154
00:07:46.959 --> 00:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>how does God answer prayers? If he's all knowing, what's

155
00:07:50.800 --> 00:07:55.199
<v Speaker 1>the point of praying? Well, as doctor Bradshaw argues very lucidly,

156
00:07:56.000 --> 00:08:00.879
<v Speaker 1>God willingly condescends to have reciprocity with his creek. So yes,

157
00:08:00.920 --> 00:08:03.839
<v Speaker 1>he's all knowing, he knows what you're gonna pray. Well,

158
00:08:03.839 --> 00:08:05.680
<v Speaker 1>then why is it because he wants us to have

159
00:08:05.800 --> 00:08:12.920
<v Speaker 1>a reciprocal prayer with That's why cryptos.

160
00:08:24.160 --> 00:08:29.480
<v Speaker 6>Hello, Yeah, so I'm a Christian, but I'm in the

161
00:08:29.680 --> 00:08:34.840
<v Speaker 6>classical situation where I cannot you know, I just said

162
00:08:34.840 --> 00:08:38.559
<v Speaker 6>to conclude with what dogma would like to follow, you know,

163
00:08:38.960 --> 00:08:40.919
<v Speaker 6>so how do I process?

164
00:08:42.120 --> 00:08:43.399
<v Speaker 1>What? What do you mean? What church?

165
00:08:43.440 --> 00:08:43.879
<v Speaker 3>What do you mean?

166
00:08:44.480 --> 00:08:45.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, like denomination?

167
00:08:47.120 --> 00:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>What's your background?

168
00:08:49.240 --> 00:08:53.440
<v Speaker 6>Well, I'm Greek, so it's only Orthodox churches in hands.

169
00:08:53.440 --> 00:08:55.159
<v Speaker 1>Well, you got it easy. What do you mean?

170
00:08:56.200 --> 00:09:01.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, look, you know you're Orthodox, but you're right, because.

171
00:09:02.320 --> 00:09:08.320
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, you know, it's because I don't have a family background.

172
00:09:08.440 --> 00:09:13.720
<v Speaker 6>So it's not really like many people have blind faith,

173
00:09:13.840 --> 00:09:14.679
<v Speaker 6>even if it's.

174
00:09:14.559 --> 00:09:15.120
<v Speaker 4>True or not.

175
00:09:15.720 --> 00:09:18.320
<v Speaker 6>But when I go to the chess, I like the

176
00:09:18.480 --> 00:09:21.840
<v Speaker 6>liturgy and stuff, but a lot of the times, you know,

177
00:09:22.399 --> 00:09:26.039
<v Speaker 6>with many traditions, it's very weird to me.

178
00:09:26.159 --> 00:09:27.000
<v Speaker 4>You know, because of.

179
00:09:26.919 --> 00:09:30.840
<v Speaker 6>The additions not being in the Bible lend you know

180
00:09:30.879 --> 00:09:35.360
<v Speaker 6>how like like the stuff Protestants say, you know, like

181
00:09:35.480 --> 00:09:39.320
<v Speaker 6>that's going on through my mind and I have to

182
00:09:39.840 --> 00:09:42.480
<v Speaker 6>look at every single thing like I cannot.

183
00:09:42.720 --> 00:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Well, like there's a there's a if you want to.

184
00:09:44.639 --> 00:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>The simplest thing I could think of is there's a

185
00:09:46.399 --> 00:09:49.799
<v Speaker 1>three volume set by doctor Clark Carlton, The Way, the

186
00:09:49.799 --> 00:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Truth and the Life, and it's it's three volumes, two

187
00:09:54.120 --> 00:09:58.039
<v Speaker 1>of which are one again once against Protestantism, once against Catholicism,

188
00:09:58.080 --> 00:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and one is for Orthodoxy. So maybe check that out

189
00:10:02.279 --> 00:10:04.279
<v Speaker 1>would be a good place to start. That's the easiest

190
00:10:04.360 --> 00:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of like three volume thing I could think of

191
00:10:06.519 --> 00:10:10.039
<v Speaker 1>that would deal with that. So people asking I did

192
00:10:10.080 --> 00:10:13.200
<v Speaker 1>not say God is irrational or illogical? I said he's

193
00:10:13.240 --> 00:10:18.080
<v Speaker 1>supra logical. That's what I said. So there's a difference

194
00:10:18.120 --> 00:10:23.039
<v Speaker 1>between saying something is transcends logic and logical categories and

195
00:10:23.080 --> 00:10:29.960
<v Speaker 1>saying that it contradicts logic and logical categories two different things.

196
00:10:33.159 --> 00:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Boom again. I mean Muslims have the exact same issue

197
00:10:49.320 --> 00:10:52.159
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the relationship of all his attributes

198
00:10:52.159 --> 00:10:55.320
<v Speaker 1>to the essence, and they've been debating it for centuries. Again,

199
00:10:56.080 --> 00:10:59.159
<v Speaker 1>we've covered this countless times. When they act like it's

200
00:10:59.200 --> 00:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>not a debate, there lie, it absolutely is a debate.

201
00:11:02.559 --> 00:11:04.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can go watch doctor Khalil and Jake

202
00:11:04.960 --> 00:11:07.639
<v Speaker 1>debating this issue. So what do you mean it doesn't exist?

203
00:11:07.840 --> 00:11:09.679
<v Speaker 1>And then they'll say she had, don't count? She had?

204
00:11:09.720 --> 00:11:10.279
<v Speaker 1>Don't count?

205
00:11:11.039 --> 00:11:12.600
<v Speaker 3>It says, why don't she account?

206
00:11:12.639 --> 00:11:14.159
<v Speaker 1>What do you mean? And by the way, it's not

207
00:11:14.240 --> 00:11:18.799
<v Speaker 1>just shea the other Creeds. Remember when this guy acted

208
00:11:18.840 --> 00:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>like he didn't know what akdah meant? So you understand

209
00:11:21.799 --> 00:11:24.440
<v Speaker 1>we have totally different approaches to this kind of stuff, right,

210
00:11:24.519 --> 00:11:28.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, for Christians, we aren't really supposed to be

211
00:11:28.480 --> 00:11:32.200
<v Speaker 1>deceptive right now. I'm not saying that there aren't deceptive Christians,

212
00:11:32.200 --> 00:11:35.080
<v Speaker 1>of course there are, but I think it's much more

213
00:11:35.200 --> 00:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>acceptable from their perspective, at least in my experience, that yeah,

214
00:11:40.639 --> 00:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>you can lie to Christians. Because I asked him explicitly

215
00:11:44.279 --> 00:11:46.960
<v Speaker 1>what his akita was and he wouldn't say, which is

216
00:11:47.000 --> 00:11:51.240
<v Speaker 1>being intentionally deceptive. Yeah, soon he's debated as well. Exactly

217
00:11:51.679 --> 00:11:54.559
<v Speaker 1>the relationship of Allah to his essence is. I've got

218
00:11:54.720 --> 00:12:00.679
<v Speaker 1>multiple books from various creeds of Islam debating it, and

219
00:12:00.720 --> 00:12:02.639
<v Speaker 1>they act like it's not a debate. Now. When I

220
00:12:02.639 --> 00:12:04.120
<v Speaker 1>brought this up on Twitter, I said, what do you miss?

221
00:12:04.120 --> 00:12:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Not a debate? I kid you not. The answer was

222
00:12:06.639 --> 00:12:10.639
<v Speaker 1>from many many Muslims, Well, we all think Allah is one. Okay,

223
00:12:10.639 --> 00:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>So because you use the word one, right, well we

224
00:12:14.159 --> 00:12:18.000
<v Speaker 1>all say all as one. See we don't disagree. Yeah,

225
00:12:18.120 --> 00:12:20.799
<v Speaker 1>I know you use the word. The question is what's

226
00:12:20.799 --> 00:12:24.639
<v Speaker 1>the meaning? And you guys have gone to war over this,

227
00:12:25.480 --> 00:12:27.919
<v Speaker 1>So what are you talking about? Okay? QD. If he

228
00:12:28.039 --> 00:12:30.200
<v Speaker 1>destroyed me, I want you to come on and I

229
00:12:30.200 --> 00:12:33.559
<v Speaker 1>want you to give some examples of where he answered

230
00:12:33.559 --> 00:12:36.480
<v Speaker 1>my objections and destroyed me. For example, makes sense of

231
00:12:36.840 --> 00:12:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Muslim Lantern's argument about Allah's attributes and the dependence relationship

232
00:12:42.679 --> 00:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and his shirt analogy and how are their analogies when

233
00:12:47.519 --> 00:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Allah is nothing like creatures? I mean, how slow are

234
00:12:51.039 --> 00:12:56.039
<v Speaker 1>you guys to not understand this objection? And in the

235
00:12:56.120 --> 00:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>comments in the last few days, I realized they don't

236
00:12:58.240 --> 00:13:00.960
<v Speaker 1>know what the word analogy means. They're literally saying he

237
00:13:01.039 --> 00:13:03.720
<v Speaker 1>was making on that logy. Yeah, exactly, do you know

238
00:13:03.759 --> 00:13:08.759
<v Speaker 1>what the word analogy means? Likeness or similarity? So QD,

239
00:13:09.440 --> 00:13:11.919
<v Speaker 1>where are you at, buddy, come on and debate. If

240
00:13:11.919 --> 00:13:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to come on in debate, then just

241
00:13:14.240 --> 00:13:16.080
<v Speaker 1>boot these people. It's not it's not a place for

242
00:13:16.120 --> 00:13:19.759
<v Speaker 1>people to just spam gibberish. And in the comments of

243
00:13:19.799 --> 00:13:24.879
<v Speaker 1>the Muslims who do think that Muslim lantern one. I've

244
00:13:24.919 --> 00:13:27.600
<v Speaker 1>asked every one of them that I see, maybe I haven't.

245
00:13:27.720 --> 00:13:28.679
<v Speaker 3>There's tons of comments.

246
00:13:28.720 --> 00:13:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I've got to all of them, but I asked them,

247
00:13:30.639 --> 00:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>please give some examples of where and how he answered

248
00:13:35.039 --> 00:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the argument and refuted me. And they don't. They don't

249
00:13:38.080 --> 00:13:40.279
<v Speaker 1>have any way to explain it. They're just spamming stuff

250
00:13:41.639 --> 00:13:45.159
<v Speaker 1>because they know in they sense that maybe this is

251
00:13:45.159 --> 00:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a weak position. Boom, what's up?

252
00:13:53.320 --> 00:13:54.440
<v Speaker 5>Elogi Drek? Can you hear me?

253
00:13:54.519 --> 00:13:54.759
<v Speaker 1>Yep?

254
00:13:55.960 --> 00:13:59.399
<v Speaker 5>Okay, I just have a question regarding your Bible. Do

255
00:13:59.440 --> 00:14:01.320
<v Speaker 5>you hold to the position that your Bible is infallible?

256
00:14:03.120 --> 00:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>H yeah, but I don't know what you think that means.

257
00:14:06.120 --> 00:14:07.759
<v Speaker 5>I mean that it cannot contain error.

258
00:14:08.679 --> 00:14:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, again, I don't know what you think that means,

259
00:14:10.519 --> 00:14:12.639
<v Speaker 1>because that can mean different things. There, we have it.

260
00:14:12.720 --> 00:14:15.320
<v Speaker 1>We believe there are ascribal errors, sure.

261
00:14:15.120 --> 00:14:16.559
<v Speaker 5>Okay, are there contradictions?

262
00:14:17.559 --> 00:14:17.799
<v Speaker 4>Uh?

263
00:14:17.919 --> 00:14:22.440
<v Speaker 5>No, okay, can you flip to Monthew sixteen four?

264
00:14:22.879 --> 00:14:23.200
<v Speaker 4>All right?

265
00:14:23.240 --> 00:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>What are what's your position on the Bible.

266
00:14:26.600 --> 00:14:29.320
<v Speaker 5>I'm not a Christian, I'm a Muslim.

267
00:14:29.799 --> 00:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, And are you going to answer the Muslim dilemma first?

268
00:14:34.519 --> 00:14:35.919
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I'm just here to ask a question.

269
00:14:36.240 --> 00:14:38.000
<v Speaker 1>No, you're not. You're here to debate.

270
00:14:39.039 --> 00:14:40.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I'm here to debate you on the Bible right now.

271
00:14:40.799 --> 00:14:40.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

272
00:14:41.159 --> 00:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Well, but first we're going to talk about the

273
00:14:43.480 --> 00:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Islamic dilemma. Can you do that first? Because you're going

274
00:14:47.919 --> 00:14:50.639
<v Speaker 1>to argue the Bible's corrupt and has contradictions? So why

275
00:14:50.679 --> 00:14:52.399
<v Speaker 1>does the Quran tell me many places to go to

276
00:14:52.399 --> 00:14:53.240
<v Speaker 1>a book that's corrupt?

277
00:14:55.519 --> 00:14:59.360
<v Speaker 5>Okay? So is this how is this how like you deal.

278
00:14:59.159 --> 00:15:00.759
<v Speaker 1>With the contra I'm to say, I'm going to let

279
00:15:00.799 --> 00:15:02.759
<v Speaker 1>me grant you that there's contradiction. Okay, there's contradictions in

280
00:15:02.759 --> 00:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the Bible. So why would Allah direct me to go

281
00:15:05.000 --> 00:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>to a book that's full of contradictions?

282
00:15:07.879 --> 00:15:10.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah? So you're granted me that there's contradictions.

283
00:15:10.039 --> 00:15:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Correct, for the sake of the argument. You don't know

284
00:15:11.840 --> 00:15:12.399
<v Speaker 3>what that means?

285
00:15:13.080 --> 00:15:16.080
<v Speaker 5>Okay? So I mean if an atheist came to you,

286
00:15:16.080 --> 00:15:17.240
<v Speaker 5>how would you deal with the contradiction?

287
00:15:17.279 --> 00:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Would you say, I'm going to argue tag I'm not

288
00:15:18.960 --> 00:15:20.879
<v Speaker 1>going to argue Bible texts with an atheist.

289
00:15:21.159 --> 00:15:23.840
<v Speaker 5>Why can't you just defund the text without like simply,

290
00:15:24.039 --> 00:15:25.759
<v Speaker 5>you know, like running to my book. I don't don't

291
00:15:25.799 --> 00:15:26.879
<v Speaker 5>understand why Christians do that.

292
00:15:27.000 --> 00:15:28.559
<v Speaker 1>Well, you want me to believe in the Koran, right,

293
00:15:29.840 --> 00:15:31.759
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily, you don't want me to believe Why are

294
00:15:31.759 --> 00:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>you debating if you don't want to believe in.

295
00:15:32.799 --> 00:15:34.960
<v Speaker 5>The Koran in the sense that I want you to

296
00:15:35.000 --> 00:15:37.200
<v Speaker 5>become a Muslim? Is that what you mean? Or enough argument?

297
00:15:38.159 --> 00:15:41.279
<v Speaker 1>Of course, that's what I mean. Why would Allah direct

298
00:15:41.320 --> 00:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>me to so I'm going to grant you for the

299
00:15:42.840 --> 00:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>sake of argument that Okay, the Bible's full of contradictions.

300
00:15:45.039 --> 00:15:47.159
<v Speaker 3>Why would Allah direct me to a book full of contradictions?

301
00:15:47.240 --> 00:15:47.279
<v Speaker 4>No?

302
00:15:47.320 --> 00:15:48.879
<v Speaker 5>But I mean you're shifting. You're granting him for the

303
00:15:48.919 --> 00:15:50.919
<v Speaker 5>sake of the argument. That's not not your position, right,

304
00:15:50.960 --> 00:15:53.360
<v Speaker 5>I want to alter your position academically.

305
00:15:52.799 --> 00:15:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so alter it by explaining to me why I

306
00:15:55.480 --> 00:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>should believe in a book that tells me to look

307
00:15:57.240 --> 00:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>to a book full of contradictions.

308
00:15:59.320 --> 00:15:59.919
<v Speaker 5>Okay, we're not.

309
00:15:59.879 --> 00:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Just yeah, so you won't answer that, right, So no, no,

310
00:16:02.240 --> 00:16:04.799
<v Speaker 1>Muslim can't answer this. Okay, what's answer?

311
00:16:05.200 --> 00:16:05.519
<v Speaker 4>Definitely?

312
00:16:05.879 --> 00:16:06.360
<v Speaker 3>What's answer?

313
00:16:06.639 --> 00:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>What's answer?

314
00:16:07.960 --> 00:16:10.240
<v Speaker 5>Okay, I'll okay, I'll go go ahead.

315
00:16:10.279 --> 00:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Show me where, Show you where? What?

316
00:16:14.960 --> 00:16:17.360
<v Speaker 5>Show me where? It tells me to go back to

317
00:16:17.399 --> 00:16:18.960
<v Speaker 5>a book with contradictions and to.

318
00:16:18.919 --> 00:16:21.679
<v Speaker 1>Follow that book does allah in many places? You want

319
00:16:21.679 --> 00:16:23.159
<v Speaker 1>me to pull up the different lists.

320
00:16:22.919 --> 00:16:25.679
<v Speaker 5>Of the texts, Go ahead, please, all right?

321
00:16:26.600 --> 00:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>M five forty six, two, two, eighty five, six, one,

322
00:16:33.080 --> 00:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>fifteen and eighteen twenty seven for example, this is your shotgunning.

323
00:16:36.559 --> 00:16:37.440
<v Speaker 5>Can we do one at a time.

324
00:16:37.600 --> 00:16:39.200
<v Speaker 1>You don't know these passages? They're well known.

325
00:16:39.240 --> 00:16:41.120
<v Speaker 3>They come up in every debate between Christians.

326
00:16:40.799 --> 00:16:42.840
<v Speaker 5>And muslim I agree, but we got to do one

327
00:16:42.840 --> 00:16:44.440
<v Speaker 5>by one. This is called galloping. Can we do.

328
00:16:44.720 --> 00:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not gish galloping. Just you know these answers, You

329
00:16:47.200 --> 00:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>know these topics. You know this situation has come up

330
00:16:49.360 --> 00:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>for years. So I don't want to walk through every

331
00:16:53.000 --> 00:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>single passages. It will take twenty minutes to do it.

332
00:16:55.360 --> 00:16:56.799
<v Speaker 1>Just tell me what the answer is.

333
00:16:57.360 --> 00:16:58.879
<v Speaker 5>Okay, which one do you want to go with first?

334
00:16:59.080 --> 00:17:01.200
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter go with any of them because they

335
00:17:01.200 --> 00:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>tell me to go to the prior revelation? Do they not?

336
00:17:04.440 --> 00:17:06.559
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I disagree, but I'm gonna.

337
00:17:06.400 --> 00:17:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, what well? What okay? What do they tell me

338
00:17:08.240 --> 00:17:09.319
<v Speaker 1>to go to if they don't tell me to go

339
00:17:09.359 --> 00:17:09.599
<v Speaker 1>to that?

340
00:17:10.359 --> 00:17:10.640
<v Speaker 4>Okay?

341
00:17:10.640 --> 00:17:12.839
<v Speaker 5>Perfect, I'm gonna I'm gonna read you the verses you said,

342
00:17:12.920 --> 00:17:20.440
<v Speaker 5>Chapter five, verse forty six crow perfect, Okay, no? Can

343
00:17:20.880 --> 00:17:21.640
<v Speaker 5>can you hear me still?

344
00:17:21.640 --> 00:17:22.400
<v Speaker 4>By the way, yep?

345
00:17:23.839 --> 00:17:27.160
<v Speaker 5>Okay, I'm curious if you've read, like the verses that

346
00:17:27.200 --> 00:17:28.880
<v Speaker 5>came after. I mean, have you read two verses that

347
00:17:28.920 --> 00:17:29.279
<v Speaker 5>came after?

348
00:17:29.480 --> 00:17:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I haven't pulled up right here? Okay, none of

349
00:17:33.160 --> 00:17:36.480
<v Speaker 1>those None of those verses refuw the point that's being made.

350
00:17:36.559 --> 00:17:37.640
<v Speaker 3>In fact, they back it up.

351
00:17:38.960 --> 00:17:41.440
<v Speaker 5>Okay, let's see about that. So the verse you brought

352
00:17:42.119 --> 00:17:45.000
<v Speaker 5>to to prove that the hard confirms the Bible, it

353
00:17:45.039 --> 00:17:47.279
<v Speaker 5>goes as then in the footsteps of the prophets, we

354
00:17:47.319 --> 00:17:49.160
<v Speaker 5>sent Jesus son of Mary confirming the.

355
00:17:49.160 --> 00:17:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Tora reveal What tora is that.

356
00:17:52.720 --> 00:17:55.079
<v Speaker 5>The tora that was revealed to Moses, thank.

357
00:17:54.880 --> 00:17:59.440
<v Speaker 3>You, And what tour is that in the seventh century, It's.

358
00:17:59.279 --> 00:18:01.279
<v Speaker 4>Not going to be I don't how do you know that?

359
00:18:02.559 --> 00:18:04.799
<v Speaker 5>Because we have supposed that says that the.

360
00:18:05.720 --> 00:18:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to know how you know that? You're You're

361
00:18:07.759 --> 00:18:09.559
<v Speaker 1>had these assert that how do you know that?

362
00:18:10.640 --> 00:18:12.759
<v Speaker 5>I mean, there's many contradictions in the Old Testament.

363
00:18:13.000 --> 00:18:14.759
<v Speaker 1>So wait a minute, So now we're being told to

364
00:18:14.799 --> 00:18:16.039
<v Speaker 1>go to a book with contradictions.

365
00:18:16.079 --> 00:18:17.480
<v Speaker 3>Like I said to begin with, where is it?

366
00:18:17.480 --> 00:18:19.119
<v Speaker 5>Where is it telling? Where is it telling me to

367
00:18:19.160 --> 00:18:21.000
<v Speaker 5>go to this book where I don't really see that

368
00:18:21.039 --> 00:18:22.319
<v Speaker 5>it's just confirming the book that was.

369
00:18:23.960 --> 00:18:27.759
<v Speaker 1>Again other passages to two eighty five, six, one, fifteen, eighteen,

370
00:18:27.799 --> 00:18:30.839
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven will say that you can confirm will say

371
00:18:30.839 --> 00:18:33.319
<v Speaker 1>that you can confirm this revelation by what came before.

372
00:18:33.680 --> 00:18:35.640
<v Speaker 1>But are you telling me that before we do that?

373
00:18:35.680 --> 00:18:37.599
<v Speaker 1>Are you telling me that all those words can be corrupted?

374
00:18:39.000 --> 00:18:43.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah? When you say corrupt, oh means the Wait a minute,

375
00:18:43.839 --> 00:18:46.599
<v Speaker 5>God's words says that the God's words cannot be corupted.

376
00:18:46.640 --> 00:18:49.200
<v Speaker 7>But exactly to understand you have to be you have

377
00:18:49.279 --> 00:18:52.559
<v Speaker 7>to understand what is meant by that? Okay, okay, So

378
00:18:52.839 --> 00:18:54.839
<v Speaker 7>the hold on makes it very clear that God's words

379
00:18:54.839 --> 00:18:58.200
<v Speaker 7>cannot be corrupted. And what that means is that you

380
00:18:58.240 --> 00:19:00.839
<v Speaker 7>cannot change God's decree. You can not change what's in

381
00:19:00.839 --> 00:19:03.240
<v Speaker 7>his low head fold, which is the tablet with him.

382
00:19:03.720 --> 00:19:06.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I know, so you're gonna apply it to the uncreated.

383
00:19:05.880 --> 00:19:07.119
<v Speaker 5>Right one second?

384
00:19:07.160 --> 00:19:07.319
<v Speaker 4>No?

385
00:19:07.319 --> 00:19:10.240
<v Speaker 5>No, no, can I finish? Please? I'm giving you my reasoning

386
00:19:10.279 --> 00:19:11.240
<v Speaker 5>and you're cutting me off.

387
00:19:12.200 --> 00:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Because we've heard all these arguments a million times. They

388
00:19:13.960 --> 00:19:14.880
<v Speaker 1>don't address the topics.

389
00:19:14.920 --> 00:19:16.759
<v Speaker 5>That's one ano there millions. You can hear it a

390
00:19:16.799 --> 00:19:17.640
<v Speaker 5>month and your.

391
00:19:17.559 --> 00:19:19.160
<v Speaker 1>First time it's okay, I go for it.

392
00:19:19.640 --> 00:19:22.759
<v Speaker 5>Okay, thank you. So, according to the verse for bringing right,

393
00:19:22.759 --> 00:19:25.079
<v Speaker 5>the Oran cannot be corrupted. Right, what this means is

394
00:19:25.079 --> 00:19:27.400
<v Speaker 5>that you cannot change God's to creep and you cannot

395
00:19:27.440 --> 00:19:28.880
<v Speaker 5>change what's in his preserved tablet.

396
00:19:29.000 --> 00:19:31.720
<v Speaker 7>Rather, what is being corrupted, According to chapter two over

397
00:19:31.759 --> 00:19:34.880
<v Speaker 7>seventy nine, it is people writing something new with their

398
00:19:34.920 --> 00:19:37.119
<v Speaker 7>hands and saying that it's from God seeking a fleet.

399
00:19:37.160 --> 00:19:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And that text also presupposes that the Torah at

400
00:19:40.920 --> 00:19:43.359
<v Speaker 1>this time is not corrupted. Do you understand that we

401
00:19:43.400 --> 00:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>have we have to listen, we have Torah and gospel.

402
00:19:47.079 --> 00:19:49.720
<v Speaker 1>You understand that predate that.

403
00:19:50.000 --> 00:19:50.519
<v Speaker 3>Listen to me.

404
00:19:50.799 --> 00:19:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Do you understand we have texts that pre date the

405
00:19:53.000 --> 00:19:53.839
<v Speaker 1>seventh century?

406
00:19:55.039 --> 00:19:55.279
<v Speaker 4>Sure?

407
00:19:55.279 --> 00:19:57.279
<v Speaker 5>I don't. I don't. I don't disagree with that yet.

408
00:19:57.279 --> 00:20:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Okay, but again this is so what text would they'd

409
00:20:00.319 --> 00:20:02.400
<v Speaker 1>be understond In other words, we know what text they

410
00:20:02.440 --> 00:20:04.599
<v Speaker 1>could go to in the seventh century to check it?

411
00:20:05.920 --> 00:20:06.680
<v Speaker 5>Sorry, repeat it.

412
00:20:07.440 --> 00:20:11.359
<v Speaker 1>We know we nowadays know already what text the Jews

413
00:20:11.359 --> 00:20:13.599
<v Speaker 1>and Christians at this time in the seventh century had

414
00:20:13.640 --> 00:20:16.039
<v Speaker 1>to go and look at we have those texts. You

415
00:20:16.079 --> 00:20:16.640
<v Speaker 1>understand that.

416
00:20:17.000 --> 00:20:19.440
<v Speaker 5>I don't know how this relates to what we're talking.

417
00:20:19.279 --> 00:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>About, because it because that's what they're going to look to.

418
00:20:22.440 --> 00:20:25.200
<v Speaker 1>You're the slow What do you mean look towards? Oh

419
00:20:26.519 --> 00:20:29.240
<v Speaker 1>you can? It says you can confirm the new revelation

420
00:20:29.359 --> 00:20:32.279
<v Speaker 1>on the basis of the old and how could we

421
00:20:32.359 --> 00:20:35.359
<v Speaker 1>do that if if Allah's words could be It does

422
00:20:35.440 --> 00:20:37.920
<v Speaker 1>say that. Then the other verses it says that.

423
00:20:38.160 --> 00:20:40.240
<v Speaker 5>Can I please reply? Can I please reply? It's just

424
00:20:40.279 --> 00:20:44.559
<v Speaker 5>like a monologue. Okay, I appreciate that. So the Quran,

425
00:20:44.880 --> 00:20:46.599
<v Speaker 5>the revelation, I know that.

426
00:20:47.400 --> 00:20:52.039
<v Speaker 1>One second, the Kuran tells you to confirm it by

427
00:20:52.039 --> 00:20:55.039
<v Speaker 1>the previous revelation. You just admitted that you just admitted

428
00:20:55.079 --> 00:20:58.599
<v Speaker 1>that you already admitted that Allas. You already admitted that

429
00:20:58.599 --> 00:21:01.279
<v Speaker 1>Allah's previous words can be corrupted. And you said that

430
00:21:01.400 --> 00:21:04.599
<v Speaker 1>is the tablet with him. You haven't explained it. I

431
00:21:04.720 --> 00:21:08.799
<v Speaker 1>let you talk. What was the explanation because you're not

432
00:21:08.839 --> 00:21:11.880
<v Speaker 1>explaining it. You're just talking around and telling your stuff. Okay,

433
00:21:11.880 --> 00:21:15.279
<v Speaker 1>what is the what is it? What is the what

434
00:21:15.400 --> 00:21:20.359
<v Speaker 1>is the unwritten tablet? That whatever? You said?

435
00:21:20.400 --> 00:21:21.920
<v Speaker 3>The uncreated tablet with Allaw?

436
00:21:22.960 --> 00:21:26.039
<v Speaker 7>It's it's it's it's the preserved And where is that?

437
00:21:27.720 --> 00:21:28.599
<v Speaker 7>That's where he's at.

438
00:21:28.640 --> 00:21:31.480
<v Speaker 1>What do you mean so there's an uncreated eternal tablet

439
00:21:31.519 --> 00:21:32.000
<v Speaker 1>with Allaw?

440
00:21:33.039 --> 00:21:34.200
<v Speaker 5>Did I say it was eternal?

441
00:21:35.319 --> 00:21:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Is all as is all A's Quran? Eternal? His speech?

442
00:21:39.960 --> 00:21:42.359
<v Speaker 1>So he doesn't have so he doesn't have uncreated speech.

443
00:21:43.759 --> 00:21:44.599
<v Speaker 5>It is uncreated.

444
00:21:45.519 --> 00:21:46.200
<v Speaker 1>You just said, no.

445
00:21:47.559 --> 00:21:49.920
<v Speaker 5>Did you know that things can be generated into existence

446
00:21:49.920 --> 00:21:50.640
<v Speaker 5>and be uncreated?

447
00:21:52.839 --> 00:22:02.359
<v Speaker 1>This is retarded. Something can come into existence and be uncreated.

448
00:22:03.160 --> 00:22:07.400
<v Speaker 1>This is the stupidity of this stuff. And they have

449
00:22:07.440 --> 00:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a problem with the eternal generation. Right, what does five

450
00:22:12.400 --> 00:22:15.400
<v Speaker 1>forty seven say. Let the people of Gos of the

451
00:22:15.440 --> 00:22:19.559
<v Speaker 1>Gospel judge by what Allah has revealed in it. Those

452
00:22:19.599 --> 00:22:23.079
<v Speaker 1>who do not, judged by what Ah has revealed, are rebellious.

453
00:22:23.720 --> 00:22:26.079
<v Speaker 1>We have revealed it to you, the Book of Truth,

454
00:22:26.839 --> 00:22:33.359
<v Speaker 1>confirmation of the previous scriptures, the very versus right here

455
00:22:33.400 --> 00:22:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that we've walked through a million times. We don't need

456
00:22:36.000 --> 00:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>you to make up new Exejesus and to say stupid

457
00:22:39.039 --> 00:22:43.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff like something can be created that's eternal into existence,

458
00:22:44.799 --> 00:22:49.279
<v Speaker 1>generate into existence that's eternal. So it's an uncreated creation,

459
00:22:49.519 --> 00:23:04.359
<v Speaker 1>is what you're saying. Kings. It does not say that

460
00:23:04.440 --> 00:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>you can check the previous with the new. It does

461
00:23:06.519 --> 00:23:08.200
<v Speaker 1>not say that. It says it right there in five

462
00:23:08.359 --> 00:23:12.839
<v Speaker 1>forty seven, King, What's up?

463
00:23:14.359 --> 00:23:15.160
<v Speaker 5>Hey, what's going on?

464
00:23:15.240 --> 00:23:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Jay?

465
00:23:15.519 --> 00:23:16.920
<v Speaker 8>I've just been listening to you for a little bit.

466
00:23:19.359 --> 00:23:20.079
<v Speaker 9>Is this this is a.

467
00:23:20.039 --> 00:23:22.160
<v Speaker 4>Debate about religion or is it also about the sneak

468
00:23:22.279 --> 00:23:23.200
<v Speaker 4>and Tate situation.

469
00:23:23.720 --> 00:23:27.559
<v Speaker 3>It's just religion, all.

470
00:23:26.759 --> 00:23:27.279
<v Speaker 4>Right, gotcha?

471
00:23:27.400 --> 00:23:27.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

472
00:23:27.640 --> 00:23:31.359
<v Speaker 4>No, okay, no, yeah, I'm just I'm not hearing Israel

473
00:23:31.400 --> 00:23:31.680
<v Speaker 4>right now.

474
00:23:32.000 --> 00:23:35.640
<v Speaker 1>That's fine. We're gonna move on the topic. Is Islam

475
00:23:35.799 --> 00:23:37.680
<v Speaker 1>in those things? And I put sneak O in the

476
00:23:37.880 --> 00:23:42.319
<v Speaker 1>title because I was on the sneak O channel debating

477
00:23:42.400 --> 00:23:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Muslim lantern two nights ago.

478
00:23:45.400 --> 00:23:45.960
<v Speaker 3>Father Moses.

479
00:23:45.960 --> 00:23:50.839
<v Speaker 10>You want to say something, I'm Jay Kuran. We talk

480
00:23:50.880 --> 00:23:54.480
<v Speaker 10>about today, but I noticed that you have not astrology

481
00:23:54.599 --> 00:23:57.079
<v Speaker 10>as a topic. I want to ask you questions about

482
00:23:57.119 --> 00:24:00.440
<v Speaker 10>the trology Koran that's not in the listing for you.

483
00:24:02.200 --> 00:24:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, there's an eternal, uncreated Quran that is with Allah,

484
00:24:06.400 --> 00:24:09.559
<v Speaker 1>that's different from Allah, but it's also are. It's also

485
00:24:09.599 --> 00:24:11.119
<v Speaker 1>a creature that comes into existence.

486
00:24:11.720 --> 00:24:14.599
<v Speaker 10>What about create eternal athrology as.

487
00:24:18.559 --> 00:24:18.720
<v Speaker 4>Well?

488
00:24:18.759 --> 00:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess since astrology is based on fatalism, yeah, we

489
00:24:21.279 --> 00:24:24.680
<v Speaker 1>could say that Islam is in many schools or excuse me,

490
00:24:24.759 --> 00:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Akida's creeds fatalistic.

491
00:24:27.759 --> 00:24:30.000
<v Speaker 10>I just want to ask you a question about topics

492
00:24:30.039 --> 00:24:31.440
<v Speaker 10>you don't have listed on here.

493
00:24:33.119 --> 00:24:40.559
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Joseph, what's up? Appreciate that, Joseph. I'm you

494
00:24:49.200 --> 00:24:52.119
<v Speaker 1>think about this too, just from the bantage point of

495
00:24:53.920 --> 00:24:58.079
<v Speaker 1>the seventh century hearer, right, So imagine I'm a seventh

496
00:24:58.119 --> 00:25:00.680
<v Speaker 1>century Jew, are Christian, and I got saying no, no,

497
00:25:01.079 --> 00:25:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the Koran is not telling you to go check this,

498
00:25:04.680 --> 00:25:07.160
<v Speaker 1>even though it says very clearly in these passages.

499
00:25:06.720 --> 00:25:07.839
<v Speaker 3>That I can go check it.

500
00:25:08.119 --> 00:25:08.240
<v Speaker 4>Right.

501
00:25:09.519 --> 00:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>No, No, it's not telling you that. It's telling you

502
00:25:11.359 --> 00:25:16.119
<v Speaker 1>that there's a corrupt Bible. But there's a real true Bible,

503
00:25:17.000 --> 00:25:19.839
<v Speaker 1>even though we have the existing copies of the Torah

504
00:25:19.880 --> 00:25:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and the Gospels from the seventh century and earlier. No, no,

505
00:25:23.319 --> 00:25:28.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a secret one that's not corrupt. Well, the hearers

506
00:25:28.279 --> 00:25:30.839
<v Speaker 1>couldn't go to a secret one. You see how silly

507
00:25:30.960 --> 00:25:33.559
<v Speaker 1>this is? How could I go and check? By the way,

508
00:25:33.839 --> 00:25:37.200
<v Speaker 1>how many times do they argue that Muhammad is predicted

509
00:25:37.640 --> 00:25:40.119
<v Speaker 1>in the Bible? How am I going to go to

510
00:25:40.160 --> 00:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the Bible when you say it's corrupt? This is how

511
00:25:42.799 --> 00:25:45.160
<v Speaker 1>stupid this is. Then they turn around and say, yeah,

512
00:25:45.279 --> 00:25:48.200
<v Speaker 1>it proves the Koran in all the places where it

513
00:25:48.200 --> 00:25:51.160
<v Speaker 1>agrees with the Koran. This is how stupid this is.

514
00:25:51.279 --> 00:25:53.839
<v Speaker 1>So I can go to a corrupt book to prove

515
00:25:54.119 --> 00:25:55.319
<v Speaker 1>the one that's not corrupt.

516
00:25:56.279 --> 00:26:00.640
<v Speaker 4>You see that, I ask you a question.

517
00:26:00.759 --> 00:26:02.519
<v Speaker 11>One of the things that's come up a few times

518
00:26:02.599 --> 00:26:07.799
<v Speaker 11>recently on Twitter here has been the issue of the

519
00:26:07.920 --> 00:26:11.519
<v Speaker 11>ever virginity of the Theo Toko, which we obviously know

520
00:26:11.680 --> 00:26:13.599
<v Speaker 11>was the firm by the Church fathers, was even a

521
00:26:13.680 --> 00:26:19.079
<v Speaker 11>firm by Calvin and Luther. Are there other I know

522
00:26:19.160 --> 00:26:21.640
<v Speaker 11>that there's some references in the Old Testament right of

523
00:26:21.799 --> 00:26:22.799
<v Speaker 11>the gate that has been.

524
00:26:23.119 --> 00:26:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Ezekiel forty four we see as our reference to.

525
00:26:27.559 --> 00:26:32.119
<v Speaker 12>The virgin okay, and there's are there other arguments or

526
00:26:32.200 --> 00:26:34.440
<v Speaker 12>do we mostly just rely on the historical record and

527
00:26:34.440 --> 00:26:37.440
<v Speaker 12>the fact like, look, this was literally accepted for fifteen

528
00:26:37.559 --> 00:26:38.240
<v Speaker 12>hundred plus.

529
00:26:38.200 --> 00:26:42.039
<v Speaker 4>Years and is like was never really even questioned, well

530
00:26:42.200 --> 00:26:42.480
<v Speaker 4>a lot.

531
00:26:42.880 --> 00:26:45.440
<v Speaker 1>So Jerome has an essay and I noticed in the

532
00:26:45.480 --> 00:26:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Pomazanski book actually I was reading this last night. Pomazanski

533
00:26:48.680 --> 00:26:51.039
<v Speaker 1>has a whole section on it as well, addressing the

534
00:26:51.680 --> 00:26:55.319
<v Speaker 1>Protestant objections to ever virginity. So if people have a

535
00:26:55.599 --> 00:26:59.440
<v Speaker 1>proto presbater of Michael Pomazanski's book Orthodox Dogmatics, it has

536
00:26:59.480 --> 00:27:02.880
<v Speaker 1>a really good section on this. This brief but the

537
00:27:02.960 --> 00:27:06.880
<v Speaker 1>classic refutation is still Saint Jerum's perpetual virginity of Mary,

538
00:27:07.680 --> 00:27:11.079
<v Speaker 1>and he deals with the Exegesus where they say, well,

539
00:27:11.960 --> 00:27:16.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, brothers of the Lord, and then that she

540
00:27:16.799 --> 00:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>was the word till is a big deal, and he

541
00:27:20.119 --> 00:27:21.960
<v Speaker 1>says that you know, Jesus says I will be with

542
00:27:22.079 --> 00:27:24.640
<v Speaker 1>you until the end of the world. On the Protestant

543
00:27:24.680 --> 00:27:26.640
<v Speaker 1>ext of Jesus, then we would have to say, oh, well,

544
00:27:26.680 --> 00:27:28.559
<v Speaker 1>so Jesus won't be with us after the end of

545
00:27:28.599 --> 00:27:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the world. So the word till does not necessarily mean

546
00:27:31.799 --> 00:27:33.599
<v Speaker 1>that after that it changes.

547
00:27:33.680 --> 00:27:34.480
<v Speaker 3>Does that make sense?

548
00:27:36.039 --> 00:27:38.319
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, that's that's the argument that I continue to use,

549
00:27:38.359 --> 00:27:40.839
<v Speaker 11>which is like the children stack quietly.

550
00:27:40.559 --> 00:27:43.319
<v Speaker 5>Until the teacher arrived, Yes, exactly, and it's like, well

551
00:27:43.319 --> 00:27:43.799
<v Speaker 5>then they didn't.

552
00:27:43.839 --> 00:27:47.359
<v Speaker 11>Or somebody said, the man on the desert island ate

553
00:27:47.480 --> 00:27:48.400
<v Speaker 11>no food until he.

554
00:27:48.519 --> 00:27:50.960
<v Speaker 9>Died, and it's like he didn't eat a big meal on.

555
00:27:50.960 --> 00:27:54.440
<v Speaker 1>The last day of his life, right, Yeah, Yeah, Drum

556
00:27:54.519 --> 00:27:56.720
<v Speaker 1>does exact same thing, with a bunch of other examples there,

557
00:27:56.720 --> 00:27:58.079
<v Speaker 1>and that's in the in this essay.

558
00:27:58.079 --> 00:28:00.319
<v Speaker 3>I've got the essay pulled up here where he goes through.

559
00:28:00.279 --> 00:28:02.279
<v Speaker 4>Many of these and I can just google it all

560
00:28:02.319 --> 00:28:02.640
<v Speaker 4>find it.

561
00:28:03.079 --> 00:28:06.319
<v Speaker 1>It's called Against Helvidius The Perpetual Virginity of Mary by Jerome.

562
00:28:08.720 --> 00:28:11.200
<v Speaker 1>That's about a ten page essay that Saint Jerome wrote.

563
00:28:11.200 --> 00:28:14.079
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of like a perennial classic. But thank you

564
00:28:14.160 --> 00:28:16.039
<v Speaker 1>for that, Joseph. Did you want to say something, By

565
00:28:16.079 --> 00:28:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the way, I don't mean to boot you. If you

566
00:28:17.200 --> 00:28:18.640
<v Speaker 1>want to keep talking, you're welcome to come back.

567
00:28:20.440 --> 00:28:23.400
<v Speaker 13>No, that's fine, Jay, Sorry, if I was not at

568
00:28:23.480 --> 00:28:25.519
<v Speaker 13>the mic when you initially.

569
00:28:29.039 --> 00:28:29.559
<v Speaker 9>I've been.

570
00:28:31.319 --> 00:28:36.759
<v Speaker 13>I'm Catholic, and I've been trying to like interact with

571
00:28:37.279 --> 00:28:41.240
<v Speaker 13>Catholic groups that perish again and one of the things

572
00:28:41.319 --> 00:28:49.480
<v Speaker 13>that I have run into again is how like people

573
00:28:49.640 --> 00:28:58.720
<v Speaker 13>seem to there seems to be no awareness of like that,

574
00:29:01.240 --> 00:29:04.680
<v Speaker 13>how easy it is to fall into spiritual delusion or

575
00:29:04.839 --> 00:29:11.240
<v Speaker 13>self delusion. It's like there's no and like Catholics are

576
00:29:11.279 --> 00:29:14.519
<v Speaker 13>getting into I don't know if this is because of

577
00:29:14.720 --> 00:29:20.319
<v Speaker 13>the Vatican Two or whatever, but like Bible studies and

578
00:29:22.000 --> 00:29:26.759
<v Speaker 13>subjecting yourself to the text of it. I've even heard

579
00:29:27.519 --> 00:29:30.599
<v Speaker 13>people describe the documents of Vatican two this way, like

580
00:29:30.720 --> 00:29:32.960
<v Speaker 13>you have to meditate on them and let them speak

581
00:29:33.039 --> 00:29:38.119
<v Speaker 13>to you and sort of like it's almost like you're

582
00:29:38.279 --> 00:29:42.079
<v Speaker 13>asking a text to take over your mind.

583
00:29:44.759 --> 00:29:48.960
<v Speaker 3>Like yeah, I mean that might be just because of

584
00:29:49.240 --> 00:29:53.240
<v Speaker 3>the Protestantization of Vatican two. I mean that's uh.

585
00:29:53.519 --> 00:29:55.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, we focus and talk a lot, you know,

586
00:29:55.519 --> 00:29:59.359
<v Speaker 1>about the texts and no stra tatan lemagentium relating to

587
00:29:59.480 --> 00:30:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Muslim and Hindus and all that, but we can't overlook

588
00:30:02.799 --> 00:30:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the Protestantized elements of Vatican Two. For example, the Novasorto

589
00:30:08.559 --> 00:30:13.240
<v Speaker 1>liturgy was quite literally concocted with a bunch of Protestants,

590
00:30:13.440 --> 00:30:14.960
<v Speaker 1>so you know what I mean. So it's like the

591
00:30:15.039 --> 00:30:19.319
<v Speaker 1>liturgy itself of Vatican two is written by a Lutheran

592
00:30:19.400 --> 00:30:22.599
<v Speaker 1>an Anglican Banini who was a Mason, and a bunch

593
00:30:22.640 --> 00:30:27.880
<v Speaker 1>of other you know whoever, So there's this protestantization that happened,

594
00:30:28.519 --> 00:30:33.119
<v Speaker 1>and you can also see it in the official acceptance

595
00:30:33.160 --> 00:30:37.799
<v Speaker 1>of Charismaticism from the Vatican post Vatican two, and those

596
00:30:37.839 --> 00:30:41.519
<v Speaker 1>two components together. It doesn't that's a recipe for prelust

597
00:30:41.599 --> 00:30:41.920
<v Speaker 1>for sure.

598
00:30:43.319 --> 00:30:46.559
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, And I the only reason I know about prelist

599
00:30:46.720 --> 00:30:50.240
<v Speaker 13>is listening to your show. I had never even heard

600
00:30:50.279 --> 00:30:52.079
<v Speaker 13>the word before, and i'd heard of.

601
00:30:54.440 --> 00:30:56.319
<v Speaker 4>I guess discernment of spirits before.

602
00:30:56.559 --> 00:30:59.440
<v Speaker 13>Right, that's something that discussed a lot in the Catholic

603
00:31:01.559 --> 00:31:04.480
<v Speaker 13>you know, I guess the illusions or social theology. But

604
00:31:04.680 --> 00:31:11.960
<v Speaker 13>they don't they don't get into like the the real danger.

605
00:31:12.160 --> 00:31:15.079
<v Speaker 13>Like if you this this idea that you can open

606
00:31:15.200 --> 00:31:19.359
<v Speaker 13>up the Bible and hit there's a thing. You know,

607
00:31:19.480 --> 00:31:22.000
<v Speaker 13>you've probably heard of Alexio Didena, And I suppose there

608
00:31:22.039 --> 00:31:27.960
<v Speaker 13>might be a or no Alexio Didena where you sit

609
00:31:28.119 --> 00:31:29.839
<v Speaker 13>with a passage of scripture and.

610
00:31:29.920 --> 00:31:30.200
<v Speaker 4>Let it.

611
00:31:32.160 --> 00:31:35.920
<v Speaker 13>Impact you a certain way, and then I think it

612
00:31:36.039 --> 00:31:40.799
<v Speaker 13>was invented in monasteries or something, but after a Vatican too,

613
00:31:40.839 --> 00:31:42.440
<v Speaker 13>it became popular to do.

614
00:31:42.559 --> 00:31:43.880
<v Speaker 4>That in like groups.

615
00:31:44.319 --> 00:31:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, yeah, I mean that that could be a recipe.

616
00:31:47.400 --> 00:31:49.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I wouldn't say that there's anything inherently wrong

617
00:31:49.359 --> 00:31:52.720
<v Speaker 1>with meditating on the passive Scripture, but I think it

618
00:31:52.839 --> 00:31:57.640
<v Speaker 1>could be a recipe for, you know, something nefarious creeping

619
00:31:57.680 --> 00:32:00.359
<v Speaker 1>in for sure. So I appreciate that we're to move on.

620
00:32:00.519 --> 00:32:04.200
<v Speaker 1>But so there's a guy who wants to come debate,

621
00:32:04.240 --> 00:32:05.279
<v Speaker 1>who's non denominational.

622
00:32:05.359 --> 00:32:08.240
<v Speaker 3>He's going to destroy me. I look forward to it, so.

623
00:32:08.440 --> 00:32:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I welcome him, and the link is in the chat,

624
00:32:12.240 --> 00:32:15.119
<v Speaker 1>so please tell him to come. He's more than more

625
00:32:15.200 --> 00:32:19.960
<v Speaker 1>than welcome. Here's the link again, and if you want

626
00:32:19.960 --> 00:32:21.680
<v Speaker 1>to support the stream by a superchat, you can do

627
00:32:22.000 --> 00:32:25.240
<v Speaker 1>so at the super chat link. I have to go

628
00:32:25.440 --> 00:32:27.720
<v Speaker 1>to the little Lady's room. I have to tinkle really bad,

629
00:32:28.440 --> 00:32:30.440
<v Speaker 1>so I'm gonna go sit down on the toilet because

630
00:32:30.480 --> 00:32:33.920
<v Speaker 1>that's the traditional masculine way according to the Hideth, to

631
00:32:33.960 --> 00:32:34.559
<v Speaker 1>go to the bathroom.

632
00:32:34.680 --> 00:32:37.039
<v Speaker 3>Just joking, but I will still sit.

633
00:32:37.000 --> 00:32:39.559
<v Speaker 1>Down in honor of Tristan. Tristan's here shout out to him.

634
00:32:40.359 --> 00:32:42.200
<v Speaker 1>He's probably gonna leave now because I'm giving him a

635
00:32:42.200 --> 00:32:44.279
<v Speaker 1>shout out, but I will sit down the toilet to

636
00:32:44.279 --> 00:32:46.559
<v Speaker 1>pee in honor of him, and I will be right

637
00:32:46.680 --> 00:32:51.799
<v Speaker 1>back with more of your challenges, questions and debates. And

638
00:32:51.920 --> 00:32:58.599
<v Speaker 1>I hope my non denominational destroyer manifests and meaning in

639
00:32:58.680 --> 00:33:02.359
<v Speaker 1>the sense of appearing manifesting demonic entities. You know what

640
00:33:02.440 --> 00:33:05.079
<v Speaker 1>I mean. But while I go t t while I

641
00:33:05.160 --> 00:33:08.279
<v Speaker 1>go tinkle, I have a little bit of a message,

642
00:33:08.839 --> 00:33:11.279
<v Speaker 1>and that is our show sponsor, which is chalk dot Com.

643
00:33:11.960 --> 00:33:12.720
<v Speaker 3>Please listen to this.

644
00:33:12.799 --> 00:33:13.559
<v Speaker 1>I will be right back.

645
00:33:13.880 --> 00:33:17.480
<v Speaker 14>Chad Mode is your ultimate natural pre workout designed to

646
00:33:17.599 --> 00:33:21.079
<v Speaker 14>take your performance to the next level. Chad Mode is

647
00:33:21.160 --> 00:33:24.799
<v Speaker 14>for natty beast alphas only. Whether you're hitting the gym,

648
00:33:25.200 --> 00:33:29.599
<v Speaker 14>invading a favella, conquering a small village, gambling, burning the

649
00:33:29.680 --> 00:33:34.119
<v Speaker 14>midnight oil, mogging on your coworkers, or getting banned from Facebook,

650
00:33:34.559 --> 00:33:37.640
<v Speaker 14>chad Mode gives you the competitive edge you need. It's

651
00:33:37.680 --> 00:33:39.960
<v Speaker 14>as simple as mixing one or two scoops of our

652
00:33:40.039 --> 00:33:43.920
<v Speaker 14>fine powder into water or juice, providing you with a delicious,

653
00:33:44.079 --> 00:33:48.000
<v Speaker 14>energizing beverage featuring a burst of sweet organic fruit flavor.

654
00:33:48.880 --> 00:33:51.839
<v Speaker 14>Chad Mode will give you the extra edge you desperately crave.

655
00:33:52.559 --> 00:33:58.640
<v Speaker 14>Chad Mode stands out from the crowd by excluding artificial flavors, preservatives, sweeteners.

656
00:33:58.519 --> 00:33:59.039
<v Speaker 12>And dyes.

657
00:34:00.000 --> 00:34:03.279
<v Speaker 14>Even avoided so called natural flavors, ensuring a clean and

658
00:34:03.359 --> 00:34:07.200
<v Speaker 14>effective formula. Only soyboys and Beta's guzzle blue dye and

659
00:34:07.319 --> 00:34:11.760
<v Speaker 14>sucralose further tanking they are already low testosterone levels. Chad

660
00:34:11.840 --> 00:34:15.360
<v Speaker 14>Mode is made in America. Unlike your common TikTok peasants'

661
00:34:15.360 --> 00:34:18.639
<v Speaker 14>pre workout powder, it does not contain Chinese lab made

662
00:34:18.679 --> 00:34:23.400
<v Speaker 14>caffeine and artificial sweeteners that soyboys so often crave. Experience

663
00:34:23.480 --> 00:34:26.320
<v Speaker 14>the pure goodness of chad Mode with Blue Magic registered

664
00:34:26.400 --> 00:34:31.599
<v Speaker 14>trademark organic blue Spirillina extract, organic lemon cherry and organic

665
00:34:31.679 --> 00:34:36.280
<v Speaker 14>maple crystals. Forget synthetic caffeine. Embrace the natural power of

666
00:34:36.440 --> 00:34:40.039
<v Speaker 14>organic green coffee bean extract. Each dose of chad Mode

667
00:34:40.159 --> 00:34:42.159
<v Speaker 14>mirrors the caffeine kick of a cup and a half

668
00:34:42.239 --> 00:34:46.679
<v Speaker 14>of coffee, delivering a surge of energy. Alongside essential vitamins, minerals,

669
00:34:46.800 --> 00:34:50.440
<v Speaker 14>amino acids, and herbal extracts. Chad Mode will allow you

670
00:34:50.559 --> 00:34:53.280
<v Speaker 14>to fire your boss and mog on anyone who opposes

671
00:34:53.360 --> 00:34:56.960
<v Speaker 14>you Chad mode will give you a dominant and aggressive edge,

672
00:34:57.400 --> 00:34:59.880
<v Speaker 14>like a lion hunting a gazelle, where the gazelle is

673
00:35:00.159 --> 00:35:02.280
<v Speaker 14>TikTok Jim Zuomer macro gus.

674
00:35:03.480 --> 00:35:11.639
<v Speaker 1>All right, we're back. So uh now, who is the

675
00:35:11.840 --> 00:35:14.239
<v Speaker 1>non denominational person that wants to debate? Do we know

676
00:35:14.360 --> 00:35:21.079
<v Speaker 1>who he is? Let me check discord because maybe maybe

677
00:35:21.119 --> 00:35:29.800
<v Speaker 1>there's something in here. Where's the non dnom guy, non denominator?

678
00:35:31.199 --> 00:35:31.320
<v Speaker 4>Uh?

679
00:35:41.280 --> 00:35:47.519
<v Speaker 1>Judah? Oh no, if his name is quote Judo, we

680
00:35:47.599 --> 00:35:52.440
<v Speaker 1>know we got a serious Hebrew Israelite, Hebrew roots man.

681
00:35:53.719 --> 00:35:58.559
<v Speaker 1>Here's the link. Where's he at? Yo?

682
00:35:59.239 --> 00:36:08.360
<v Speaker 3>Okay, he says, yo here you are, come debate dude, yo?

683
00:36:08.559 --> 00:36:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Yeah. All right, So we're waiting on Judah to

684
00:36:12.000 --> 00:36:19.079
<v Speaker 1>show up until he gets here. Let's see Midwest. No

685
00:36:19.199 --> 00:36:22.840
<v Speaker 1>wait here he is hold on Midwest. So we're going

686
00:36:22.880 --> 00:36:27.639
<v Speaker 1>to go to uh, we're going to get destroyed. Judah

687
00:36:27.679 --> 00:36:30.960
<v Speaker 1>says he's going to destroy me in a debate. Good,

688
00:36:31.039 --> 00:36:39.119
<v Speaker 1>I asked for someone to come destroy me. Please, you

689
00:36:39.199 --> 00:36:46.599
<v Speaker 1>got on? Mute man? Yeah, cub, what's up? I'm mute.

690
00:36:51.719 --> 00:36:57.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm mute man, Judah, you're on, I'm mute. Yeah, Huda,

691
00:36:57.440 --> 00:37:08.480
<v Speaker 1>what's up. We're waiting for you to unmute. Mini's Mani's Yahoo,

692
00:37:08.519 --> 00:37:08.880
<v Speaker 1>what's up?

693
00:37:11.320 --> 00:37:11.519
<v Speaker 4>Hello?

694
00:37:12.000 --> 00:37:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Yep, yep, Yes, where's my destruction? I'm ready for it,

695
00:37:19.440 --> 00:37:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Come destroy me? All right?

696
00:37:22.679 --> 00:37:26.519
<v Speaker 3>So once yeah, you're eating.

697
00:37:28.039 --> 00:37:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's funny, right, it's really funny.

698
00:37:30.480 --> 00:37:32.880
<v Speaker 5>So the only reason I think you're wrong is because

699
00:37:32.880 --> 00:37:33.719
<v Speaker 5>you don't read the Bible.

700
00:37:33.960 --> 00:37:34.599
<v Speaker 1>Oh is that right?

701
00:37:34.679 --> 00:37:37.519
<v Speaker 3>We literally just lectured through the Bible for the last

702
00:37:37.559 --> 00:37:39.800
<v Speaker 3>two hours. All this doesn't.

703
00:37:41.320 --> 00:37:44.559
<v Speaker 1>Troll? Where is that funny? No bro, no bro, bro,

704
00:37:45.719 --> 00:37:47.679
<v Speaker 1>boot him from discord when you're wasting my time with

705
00:37:47.719 --> 00:37:51.639
<v Speaker 1>this nonsense. Oh, why you guys, somebody needs to get

706
00:37:51.639 --> 00:37:52.440
<v Speaker 1>it back in the discord.

707
00:37:52.519 --> 00:37:52.840
<v Speaker 4>And like.

708
00:37:56.239 --> 00:37:58.800
<v Speaker 3>Dan, these idiots, see, this is.

709
00:37:58.800 --> 00:38:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Why we have the hard hand did in the in

710
00:38:03.039 --> 00:38:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the old days, we had the iron fist rule in discord,

711
00:38:07.320 --> 00:38:09.519
<v Speaker 1>and it needs to come back because these people just

712
00:38:09.599 --> 00:38:15.679
<v Speaker 1>waste every time. And you notice that people they can't

713
00:38:15.719 --> 00:38:17.880
<v Speaker 1>even talk, right, Like the people who come on like

714
00:38:18.000 --> 00:38:21.519
<v Speaker 1>this with a bunch of damn food in their mouth, giggling,

715
00:38:21.599 --> 00:38:28.480
<v Speaker 1>they can't even talk. There is a vibe on get

716
00:38:28.519 --> 00:38:31.239
<v Speaker 1>the food out of your mouth, get the get the

717
00:38:31.320 --> 00:38:33.719
<v Speaker 1>hot pockets out of your mouth. First, okay, swallow your

718
00:38:33.760 --> 00:38:41.480
<v Speaker 1>hot pocket and then make your argument. Hello, they done

719
00:38:41.480 --> 00:38:42.000
<v Speaker 1>for the meter.

720
00:38:43.800 --> 00:38:45.960
<v Speaker 9>You Are you drunk?

721
00:38:47.079 --> 00:38:48.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm drunk, even though I don't drink and I

722
00:38:48.719 --> 00:38:50.239
<v Speaker 1>hate alcohol. Totally drunk.

723
00:38:51.320 --> 00:38:53.159
<v Speaker 4>You kind of sew in the intoxicated.

724
00:38:53.639 --> 00:38:56.079
<v Speaker 1>That's because I was impersonating the previous idiot.

725
00:38:57.400 --> 00:39:04.519
<v Speaker 15>Oh so I heard you. You just finished debating a

726
00:39:04.639 --> 00:39:10.840
<v Speaker 15>sneaker and the Muslim Lantern. What's your after thoughts on that?

727
00:39:12.639 --> 00:39:14.559
<v Speaker 1>I felt like the clip that I put up of

728
00:39:14.639 --> 00:39:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the seven minute section on the attributes was the worst

729
00:39:17.400 --> 00:39:18.039
<v Speaker 1>part for him.

730
00:39:20.800 --> 00:39:22.440
<v Speaker 4>Do you feel like you got the better off the

731
00:39:22.679 --> 00:39:24.199
<v Speaker 4>debate or on Yeah.

732
00:39:24.039 --> 00:39:28.119
<v Speaker 1>And I think the seventy plus percent audience reaction agrees

733
00:39:28.159 --> 00:39:28.480
<v Speaker 1>as well.

734
00:39:30.440 --> 00:39:37.920
<v Speaker 15>Okay, yeah, interesting because the other site thinks you lost

735
00:39:38.719 --> 00:39:40.480
<v Speaker 15>what you talked about that well.

736
00:39:40.559 --> 00:39:45.280
<v Speaker 1>As I said, I gave about twenty different options for

737
00:39:45.400 --> 00:39:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Muslims to come explain where he actually made a good

738
00:39:48.280 --> 00:39:51.119
<v Speaker 1>response or a good arguing, a good critique, and none

739
00:39:51.159 --> 00:39:53.480
<v Speaker 1>of the people who I've asked that to have actually replied.

740
00:39:53.599 --> 00:39:57.159
<v Speaker 1>So tell me where Muslim Lantern gave a good response

741
00:39:57.679 --> 00:39:59.880
<v Speaker 1>or in what way his answer on the attributes was coher.

742
00:40:01.400 --> 00:40:03.239
<v Speaker 15>I'll be honest, I've just seen clips, you know, but

743
00:40:04.360 --> 00:40:07.840
<v Speaker 15>I've seen that is why I'm just asking you your thoughts.

744
00:40:07.599 --> 00:40:10.239
<v Speaker 1>You know again, I mean I felt like it was

745
00:40:10.280 --> 00:40:16.960
<v Speaker 1>a blowout. So have you seen the poll? Have you

746
00:40:17.039 --> 00:40:17.719
<v Speaker 1>seen the poll?

747
00:40:19.519 --> 00:40:22.679
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, I've seen multiple poles. Some pools say you on,

748
00:40:22.800 --> 00:40:23.920
<v Speaker 15>the other pools say you lost.

749
00:40:24.079 --> 00:40:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, this was the poll they created, right, The poll

750
00:40:26.360 --> 00:40:29.639
<v Speaker 1>they created which they only wanted sneak Go's largely Muslim

751
00:40:30.000 --> 00:40:34.559
<v Speaker 1>audience to vote in, ended up being Jay seventy three percent,

752
00:40:34.880 --> 00:40:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Muslim Lantern twenty six percent.

753
00:40:37.679 --> 00:40:41.400
<v Speaker 15>Interesting. Yeah, the thing is what I've seen so far,

754
00:40:41.760 --> 00:40:44.480
<v Speaker 15>I feel like Christian's sided with you, and then the

755
00:40:44.559 --> 00:40:45.519
<v Speaker 15>Muslim sides with him.

756
00:40:45.639 --> 00:40:48.440
<v Speaker 1>So that's what I've Okay, Well, so that's why you

757
00:40:48.559 --> 00:40:50.800
<v Speaker 1>have to actually watch the debate and see who made

758
00:40:50.840 --> 00:40:53.559
<v Speaker 1>the better arguments and go and figure out. Now, go

759
00:40:53.679 --> 00:40:54.719
<v Speaker 1>figure out whether.

760
00:40:54.599 --> 00:40:58.280
<v Speaker 3>He answered on the attributes or not, because that part

761
00:40:58.440 --> 00:41:19.719
<v Speaker 3>was pretty comedic. Landon, Hey Jay, can.

762
00:41:19.639 --> 00:41:19.920
<v Speaker 1>You hear me?

763
00:41:21.440 --> 00:41:22.440
<v Speaker 4>Hey brother, how you doing?

764
00:41:23.239 --> 00:41:25.320
<v Speaker 16>I got a couple of things to say. I'll try

765
00:41:25.360 --> 00:41:28.679
<v Speaker 16>to be uh those groups as possible, But uh, I

766
00:41:28.760 --> 00:41:32.719
<v Speaker 16>play uh, I play music for a living. I started

767
00:41:32.800 --> 00:41:35.599
<v Speaker 16>out in the church and all that stuff. Now I'm

768
00:41:35.679 --> 00:41:39.800
<v Speaker 16>kind of doing find some fairly large like pop acts,

769
00:41:39.840 --> 00:41:43.840
<v Speaker 16>but like that's fun fact for everybody, wasn't musicians. Most

770
00:41:43.880 --> 00:41:45.079
<v Speaker 16>of the musicians behind.

771
00:41:44.880 --> 00:41:48.239
<v Speaker 17>Like pop stars and stuff like that that came from church,

772
00:41:48.360 --> 00:41:51.599
<v Speaker 17>predominantly Black church really but man, like a lot of

773
00:41:51.639 --> 00:41:56.599
<v Speaker 17>my co workers and stuff, I've just realized, especially since

774
00:41:56.639 --> 00:41:58.840
<v Speaker 17>becoming like an inquirer into Orthodoxy.

775
00:41:58.440 --> 00:42:00.400
<v Speaker 4>And whatnot, these do It's.

776
00:42:01.800 --> 00:42:04.519
<v Speaker 17>Most of them, most of my like buddies who I

777
00:42:04.559 --> 00:42:04.920
<v Speaker 17>play with.

778
00:42:05.960 --> 00:42:08.039
<v Speaker 4>I do not believe that Jesus is God.

779
00:42:09.079 --> 00:42:13.199
<v Speaker 1>And uh and you're saying they're like evangelical praise and

780
00:42:13.239 --> 00:42:14.360
<v Speaker 1>worship people's everything.

781
00:42:15.039 --> 00:42:17.079
<v Speaker 17>Oh hell yeah, Well I live in Georgia, so it's

782
00:42:17.119 --> 00:42:20.159
<v Speaker 17>like good, okay, it's outside of Atlanta.

783
00:42:20.159 --> 00:42:21.440
<v Speaker 4>I was like, six flags over.

784
00:42:21.440 --> 00:42:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Jesus is what they call, right, But they're all like

785
00:42:24.079 --> 00:42:28.039
<v Speaker 1>they're like evangelicals who don't even know that Jesus's divining.

786
00:42:28.079 --> 00:42:31.360
<v Speaker 17>Is that you're saying, yeah, yeah, no, it's it's kind

787
00:42:31.400 --> 00:42:34.599
<v Speaker 17>of terrifying, But I just I don't know that all

788
00:42:34.760 --> 00:42:36.800
<v Speaker 17>kind of goes into Like I talked to a couple

789
00:42:36.840 --> 00:42:39.440
<v Speaker 17>of the pastors that I had thought were cool to

790
00:42:39.920 --> 00:42:43.239
<v Speaker 17>seek counsel from, especially since st firing into Orthodoxy.

791
00:42:42.760 --> 00:42:47.280
<v Speaker 4>Over the past year, and Uh. A common thing that's

792
00:42:47.400 --> 00:42:48.079
<v Speaker 4>been said to.

793
00:42:48.159 --> 00:42:51.079
<v Speaker 17>Me is, uh, whenever I bring these questions up to

794
00:42:51.159 --> 00:42:54.920
<v Speaker 17>these dudes, most of them will look.

795
00:42:54.760 --> 00:42:56.199
<v Speaker 4>At me like I have three ads. But the other

796
00:42:56.239 --> 00:42:59.639
<v Speaker 4>ones will be like, I think there's a common uh

797
00:43:00.400 --> 00:43:05.320
<v Speaker 4>desire for all of us to just want more, you know, and.

798
00:43:07.000 --> 00:43:09.599
<v Speaker 17>Which I just think is a stupid response because it's like, well, yeah,

799
00:43:09.719 --> 00:43:12.679
<v Speaker 17>I don't feel like I'm getting I don't feel like

800
00:43:12.880 --> 00:43:14.639
<v Speaker 17>it's not about getting things, but I don't feel like

801
00:43:14.800 --> 00:43:19.000
<v Speaker 17>I'm experiencing what this whole thing is. So of course, ione,

802
00:43:19.079 --> 00:43:21.480
<v Speaker 17>but have you ever heard people like say that that

803
00:43:21.679 --> 00:43:23.800
<v Speaker 17>argument or that response that was a really my question.

804
00:43:23.920 --> 00:43:27.480
<v Speaker 17>I guess like if there's a response to yeah.

805
00:43:27.360 --> 00:43:30.679
<v Speaker 1>I think it's very common for evangelicals, non denominational people

806
00:43:30.800 --> 00:43:33.039
<v Speaker 1>to get sort of burnt out and to feel like

807
00:43:33.719 --> 00:43:36.119
<v Speaker 1>they're not really getting anything out of that, and it

808
00:43:36.400 --> 00:43:39.480
<v Speaker 1>has no essential connection with history, it's not rooted in anything.

809
00:43:39.920 --> 00:43:42.960
<v Speaker 1>It's an authentic Yeah, I think that's a I would

810
00:43:42.960 --> 00:43:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I would say that's actually the experienced probably a most

811
00:43:45.559 --> 00:43:49.079
<v Speaker 1>megachurch non nominational people, because I mean this was some

812
00:43:49.239 --> 00:43:50.800
<v Speaker 1>years ago. If you look at the studies, it was

813
00:43:50.800 --> 00:43:54.039
<v Speaker 1>like Pew research studies from some years ago, like megachurches

814
00:43:54.159 --> 00:43:58.360
<v Speaker 1>have a really low retention rate. So they'll make these

815
00:43:58.440 --> 00:44:02.000
<v Speaker 1>quote conversions, They'll have huge numbers of converts and church

816
00:44:02.679 --> 00:44:05.719
<v Speaker 1>joiners or whatever, and then within two to three weeks

817
00:44:05.760 --> 00:44:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the majority of them leave. So I think that's very common.

818
00:44:09.840 --> 00:44:13.360
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not surprised to hear that Protestant Evangelical, non

819
00:44:13.360 --> 00:44:19.239
<v Speaker 1>nominational megachurches are essentially abandoning basic Trinitarian theology and the

820
00:44:19.280 --> 00:44:23.679
<v Speaker 1>deed of Christ. Robert Hunter, I feel I frobatherly dike it.

821
00:44:23.719 --> 00:44:26.039
<v Speaker 1>Feel free to chime in anytime you want.

822
00:44:28.280 --> 00:44:34.519
<v Speaker 4>Thanks. Yeah, that's we just brought that up the other day.

823
00:44:34.519 --> 00:44:38.239
<v Speaker 4>I was talk with some prishioners because I forget how

824
00:44:38.280 --> 00:44:42.920
<v Speaker 4>the megachurch was was coming up, and I just think

825
00:44:42.960 --> 00:44:47.880
<v Speaker 4>about this, Like you said, Jay, its primary focus is

826
00:44:49.360 --> 00:44:53.840
<v Speaker 4>common consumerism and entertainment. Yeah, and that's only going to last,

827
00:44:54.360 --> 00:44:57.480
<v Speaker 4>like anything in life, for for a little bit, for

828
00:44:57.519 --> 00:45:00.000
<v Speaker 4>a little bit, and then they find that they're not fulfilled,

829
00:45:00.119 --> 00:45:02.559
<v Speaker 4>they're not changing, and they leave, which is probably why

830
00:45:03.480 --> 00:45:07.320
<v Speaker 4>you're seeing a high retention rate. To Another critique of

831
00:45:07.440 --> 00:45:10.559
<v Speaker 4>it is it's usually associated, as.

832
00:45:10.960 --> 00:45:12.440
<v Speaker 3>You mean, a low retention rate.

833
00:45:13.119 --> 00:45:17.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, sorry, excuse me. It's also associated with like kind

834
00:45:17.000 --> 00:45:18.079
<v Speaker 4>of a cult personality.

835
00:45:18.880 --> 00:45:26.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the superstar pastor. Right, yeah, yeah, exactly. Somebody had

836
00:45:26.599 --> 00:45:27.000
<v Speaker 1>a good.

837
00:45:26.880 --> 00:45:29.679
<v Speaker 3>Comment here something about megachurches.

838
00:45:31.039 --> 00:45:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh, many of the non denominational and megachurch stuff, as

839
00:45:36.519 --> 00:45:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the commenter here has noted, are are openly like warming

840
00:45:42.079 --> 00:45:44.000
<v Speaker 1>up to the skittle stuff.

841
00:45:45.800 --> 00:45:48.199
<v Speaker 4>Who was the first one that kind of one of

842
00:45:48.239 --> 00:45:49.440
<v Speaker 4>the major guys.

843
00:45:50.519 --> 00:45:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Rick Warren?

844
00:45:50.960 --> 00:45:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Did I think Rick Warren?

845
00:45:52.119 --> 00:45:54.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that was when the Orange County he was like

846
00:45:54.480 --> 00:45:58.880
<v Speaker 4>one of the first guys, and you know, by Protestant standards,

847
00:45:58.960 --> 00:46:02.280
<v Speaker 4>he started off kind of run of the mill, kind

848
00:46:02.280 --> 00:46:08.000
<v Speaker 4>of right lower Orthodox, and then he started bringing in

849
00:46:08.079 --> 00:46:09.239
<v Speaker 4>some wacky stuff too.

850
00:46:09.639 --> 00:46:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah, around the time that he joins the Council

851
00:46:11.960 --> 00:46:15.360
<v Speaker 1>on Foreign Relations and then it becomes pro Obama. He

852
00:46:15.480 --> 00:46:20.400
<v Speaker 1>does that stuff. Do you remember that wasn't I'm pretty

853
00:46:20.400 --> 00:46:22.800
<v Speaker 1>sure Rick Warren? Right, So he when he writes Purpose

854
00:46:22.880 --> 00:46:27.519
<v Speaker 1>Driven Life becomes this huge book selling hit. Then he

855
00:46:27.639 --> 00:46:31.800
<v Speaker 1>joins Council Form Relations or right after or whatever right before,

856
00:46:31.960 --> 00:46:34.920
<v Speaker 1>and then I think I think he was like pro Obama,

857
00:46:34.960 --> 00:46:37.000
<v Speaker 1>which surprised everybody, and then.

858
00:46:37.159 --> 00:46:37.760
<v Speaker 9>It was really weird.

859
00:46:37.800 --> 00:46:39.599
<v Speaker 4>He brought in Muslim speakers.

860
00:46:39.320 --> 00:46:44.320
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and then he's like, oh, by the way, now

861
00:46:44.360 --> 00:46:45.519
<v Speaker 3>I'm pro Skittle's marriage.

862
00:46:45.599 --> 00:46:48.760
<v Speaker 1>So that's when he flipped on that, which.

863
00:46:48.679 --> 00:46:51.400
<v Speaker 4>Is wild because if you if you know anything about

864
00:46:51.679 --> 00:46:53.840
<v Speaker 4>you know, I don't know exactly what it is today

865
00:46:53.880 --> 00:46:57.840
<v Speaker 4>because things have changed. But Orange County, California was always

866
00:46:57.960 --> 00:47:01.400
<v Speaker 4>kind of a Republican, strongold right in a very blue

867
00:47:01.480 --> 00:47:08.000
<v Speaker 4>state you have from Richard Nixon, and so I was

868
00:47:08.079 --> 00:47:11.440
<v Speaker 4>kind of odd that he and bold that he took

869
00:47:11.519 --> 00:47:14.119
<v Speaker 4>that move. But if his handlers said that's the way

870
00:47:14.119 --> 00:47:14.800
<v Speaker 4>he's gotta.

871
00:47:14.599 --> 00:47:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Go, yeah, that's what I was thinking, Like, Yeah, they

872
00:47:16.880 --> 00:47:21.880
<v Speaker 1>basically said you're gonna do this now, Rick. And you

873
00:47:21.960 --> 00:47:26.480
<v Speaker 1>know that could have been because there's compremont, compromont or

874
00:47:26.679 --> 00:47:28.280
<v Speaker 1>money could be either one.

875
00:47:31.239 --> 00:47:33.440
<v Speaker 3>Uh remember that one path who was that?

876
00:47:33.519 --> 00:47:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Remember that guy that got busted with He was w's

877
00:47:37.960 --> 00:47:41.639
<v Speaker 1>George Bush's mentor pastor, megachurch guy and then he gets

878
00:47:41.679 --> 00:47:44.239
<v Speaker 1>busted with meth and and three oh.

879
00:47:44.280 --> 00:47:45.800
<v Speaker 3>Four's remember that guy?

880
00:47:47.679 --> 00:47:48.440
<v Speaker 4>Now what was his name?

881
00:47:50.360 --> 00:47:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Uh, somebody in that chat will remember him Bush spiritual advisor,

882
00:47:59.119 --> 00:48:08.360
<v Speaker 1>mega church, meth metha church, megachurch, meth prostitute. Yeah exactly,

883
00:48:09.280 --> 00:48:10.599
<v Speaker 1>Ted Haggard, that's him.

884
00:48:12.039 --> 00:48:14.159
<v Speaker 3>Ted Haggard. So remember Ted Haggard.

885
00:48:13.840 --> 00:48:17.760
<v Speaker 1>This guy with this he's got that weird uh creepy

886
00:48:17.800 --> 00:48:25.719
<v Speaker 1>evangelical smile. Let me pull him up here. Yeah, this guy.

887
00:48:32.519 --> 00:48:35.360
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, it wasn't just meth. It was

888
00:48:35.920 --> 00:48:38.480
<v Speaker 1>meth and male young young males.

889
00:48:40.639 --> 00:48:40.880
<v Speaker 4>Wow.

890
00:48:41.159 --> 00:48:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, accidentally shut down my stream here, hold on a second,

891
00:48:47.360 --> 00:48:53.840
<v Speaker 1>let me pull it back up. So pulling up Ted

892
00:48:53.880 --> 00:48:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Haggard was too much cancer for the stream. The whole

893
00:48:58.920 --> 00:48:59.840
<v Speaker 1>stream collapsed here.

894
00:49:00.719 --> 00:49:03.280
<v Speaker 4>And then the other big one too is Greg Glory

895
00:49:03.360 --> 00:49:04.320
<v Speaker 4>and the Harvest Crusade.

896
00:49:05.480 --> 00:49:06.320
<v Speaker 3>Remind me of what's this?

897
00:49:06.440 --> 00:49:07.440
<v Speaker 1>What's going on with that one?

898
00:49:08.599 --> 00:49:16.360
<v Speaker 4>So if any of you seen The Jesus Revolution with yes, yeah, yeah,

899
00:49:18.880 --> 00:49:22.360
<v Speaker 4>and interesting enough about that film, it's I mean, it's

900
00:49:22.360 --> 00:49:24.679
<v Speaker 4>supposed to be about pastor Chuck Smith.

901
00:49:24.440 --> 00:49:27.519
<v Speaker 1>And that's Kylary Chapel, right, that's COVID Chapel.

902
00:49:29.400 --> 00:49:33.400
<v Speaker 4>And so I guess you could argue maybe they really

903
00:49:33.480 --> 00:49:36.159
<v Speaker 4>were the seeds, the kind of proto.

904
00:49:36.199 --> 00:49:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh mega, oh yeah, yeah, good point.

905
00:49:38.920 --> 00:49:44.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. So, uh, Greg Glory was the kind of protege

906
00:49:44.559 --> 00:49:48.280
<v Speaker 4>of Chuck Smith. I went to you know, school with

907
00:49:48.400 --> 00:49:54.039
<v Speaker 4>his son, and he started this Harvest Crusade is kind

908
00:49:54.079 --> 00:49:59.159
<v Speaker 4>of a base name a Crusade. It's like totally on PC.

909
00:49:59.800 --> 00:50:03.119
<v Speaker 4>But they would have it like the Angels Stadium, these

910
00:50:03.480 --> 00:50:07.920
<v Speaker 4>huge like revival they bring in like Crystal Lewis, and

911
00:50:09.440 --> 00:50:13.639
<v Speaker 4>I remember Mel Gibson came to one and it's just

912
00:50:13.679 --> 00:50:16.039
<v Speaker 4>a big show. And then, of course is that.

913
00:50:16.079 --> 00:50:17.440
<v Speaker 3>When he was promoting the Passion.

914
00:50:19.280 --> 00:50:21.519
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, you're probably right, yeah, yeah, I remember the

915
00:50:21.920 --> 00:50:24.760
<v Speaker 1>mega churches were inviting Mel Gibson to come talk about

916
00:50:24.760 --> 00:50:25.679
<v Speaker 1>the movie when it came out.

917
00:50:25.800 --> 00:50:30.079
<v Speaker 4>Remember that, And then there's this big ultar call and

918
00:50:30.840 --> 00:50:35.119
<v Speaker 4>people go up. So I think that's probably the beginnings

919
00:50:35.159 --> 00:50:38.320
<v Speaker 4>of the megachurch because that was Harvest Crusade was prior

920
00:50:38.400 --> 00:50:41.639
<v Speaker 4>to Rick Warren's Saddleback Church and someffing like that.

921
00:50:44.159 --> 00:50:52.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's see who's next now, guys, Remember it's

922
00:50:52.320 --> 00:50:55.440
<v Speaker 1>not Orthodox fa Q Day. You can always reach out

923
00:50:55.559 --> 00:51:02.719
<v Speaker 1>to your people doings for those kinds of questions. We're

924
00:51:02.760 --> 00:51:08.840
<v Speaker 1>looking for people who disagree. Topics are Protestantism, Catholicism, Islam,

925
00:51:09.880 --> 00:51:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and then I listed some others Bible church history, Patristics, councils,

926
00:51:13.840 --> 00:51:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Quran revelation, Evangelicalism, arianism called Hebrew roots, black hebeers are lights,

927
00:51:20.320 --> 00:51:23.119
<v Speaker 1>all of those are on the table. So we're not

928
00:51:23.199 --> 00:51:30.000
<v Speaker 1>doing atheism today. We're not doing Orthodox catechists today. Theophilis,

929
00:51:30.039 --> 00:51:30.440
<v Speaker 1>what's up?

930
00:51:38.800 --> 00:51:38.960
<v Speaker 4>You know?

931
00:51:39.000 --> 00:51:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm mute?

932
00:51:41.880 --> 00:51:43.000
<v Speaker 4>Did you hear me, sir?

933
00:51:43.840 --> 00:51:46.599
<v Speaker 18>I think I guess of the short quis I'm Orthodox,

934
00:51:46.880 --> 00:51:49.280
<v Speaker 18>but I retally have been struggling in my faith because

935
00:51:49.360 --> 00:51:53.119
<v Speaker 18>of the you know, it is like the Latinizer Ortholatinisers

936
00:51:53.119 --> 00:51:55.760
<v Speaker 18>like you know, Jonathan Hill and Alan Brown and those guys.

937
00:51:58.079 --> 00:52:01.679
<v Speaker 18>I wonder if you can comment on the conferensal to

938
00:52:01.800 --> 00:52:04.320
<v Speaker 18>theseus and what it seems to play about infant damnation.

939
00:52:05.360 --> 00:52:05.599
<v Speaker 4>Thank you.

940
00:52:06.000 --> 00:52:08.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I don't think it teaches infant damnation. I think

941
00:52:08.239 --> 00:52:11.639
<v Speaker 1>it teaches the deprivation of grace, and the deprivation of

942
00:52:11.719 --> 00:52:15.920
<v Speaker 1>grace does not entail damnation. This is why most of

943
00:52:15.960 --> 00:52:18.559
<v Speaker 1>the Eastern Church fathers are pretty consistent in saying that

944
00:52:19.320 --> 00:52:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the infant is not guilty of any actual sin. Well,

945
00:52:22.440 --> 00:52:25.840
<v Speaker 1>if actual sin is what places you under judgment, what

946
00:52:26.079 --> 00:52:29.800
<v Speaker 1>actual sin have infants committed? There is a deprivation of grace,

947
00:52:29.960 --> 00:52:33.360
<v Speaker 1>but a deprivation of grace does not entail damnation. So

948
00:52:33.519 --> 00:52:36.440
<v Speaker 1>when the texts say uh, and I would say, read

949
00:52:36.440 --> 00:52:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Paulazansky's book because father of Paulinzansky and is Orthodox Dogmatics,

950
00:52:41.960 --> 00:52:44.239
<v Speaker 1>has a whole section on why we don't believe in

951
00:52:44.280 --> 00:52:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the Augustinian doctri original sin. And again remember the Augustinian

952
00:52:47.880 --> 00:52:50.400
<v Speaker 1>doctri original sin is premised on the idea, as we

953
00:52:50.519 --> 00:52:53.039
<v Speaker 1>covered about an hour ago in here, the notion that

954
00:52:53.199 --> 00:52:55.599
<v Speaker 1>all men are in atoms in an archetype. Right, So

955
00:52:55.880 --> 00:53:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the doctrine is massive dam nata, and the count the

956
00:53:00.599 --> 00:53:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Carthage Canon does not say mouse damnata. It says that

957
00:53:05.159 --> 00:53:07.880
<v Speaker 1>for the remission of original sin, that doesn't mean they

958
00:53:07.960 --> 00:53:11.360
<v Speaker 1>have guilt. You can speak of the effects of sin

959
00:53:11.559 --> 00:53:14.920
<v Speaker 1>as if it's the sin, okay, So an infant having

960
00:53:15.880 --> 00:53:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the effects of adam sin can be called original quote sin.

961
00:53:20.039 --> 00:53:25.239
<v Speaker 1>But that does not entail inherited guilt, and nobody teaches

962
00:53:25.320 --> 00:53:30.519
<v Speaker 1>inherited guilt except for Calvinists. Even Roman Catholics have discarded

963
00:53:30.559 --> 00:53:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the doctrine of inherited guilt. So the only way that

964
00:53:35.519 --> 00:53:37.719
<v Speaker 1>we would ever come to this position is if we

965
00:53:38.239 --> 00:53:41.639
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind the Confession of Toscythius and those documents

966
00:53:41.760 --> 00:53:45.480
<v Speaker 1>around that time, the other confessions. If you read the

967
00:53:47.360 --> 00:53:50.519
<v Speaker 1>Norman Russell book on the Translation of the Palomite Synods.

968
00:53:50.840 --> 00:53:52.840
<v Speaker 1>In the first chapter I think'st the introduction, it says

969
00:53:52.880 --> 00:53:59.599
<v Speaker 1>that Docitheus reprinted and republished the Palamite Synods to show

970
00:54:00.239 --> 00:54:04.199
<v Speaker 1>that they're reaffirming the Palamite doctrine. Palamas does not believe

971
00:54:04.280 --> 00:54:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that infants are guilty of actual sin. Okay, So in

972
00:54:07.599 --> 00:54:12.159
<v Speaker 1>other words, it's not teaching Latin doctrines of inherited guilt.

973
00:54:12.920 --> 00:54:18.679
<v Speaker 1>The promulgation of the Palamite doctrines by Docithius himself proves

974
00:54:18.760 --> 00:54:19.400
<v Speaker 1>that he.

975
00:54:19.599 --> 00:54:21.239
<v Speaker 3>Had no intention of latinizing.

976
00:54:21.800 --> 00:54:23.960
<v Speaker 1>These people are all really making an argument on the

977
00:54:24.039 --> 00:54:28.000
<v Speaker 1>basis of terminology and words. Even in the Pomazansky book

978
00:54:28.039 --> 00:54:31.320
<v Speaker 1>he says it's not a problem to use the word transubstantiation,

979
00:54:32.159 --> 00:54:35.880
<v Speaker 1>and what is it Doctheus also uses that term. It

980
00:54:36.000 --> 00:54:38.239
<v Speaker 1>just matters what you mean. So all of these people

981
00:54:38.440 --> 00:54:41.880
<v Speaker 1>hinge their arguments on word concept fallacies that this or

982
00:54:41.920 --> 00:54:46.159
<v Speaker 1>that Latin term necessarily entails and implies all of the

983
00:54:46.239 --> 00:54:49.639
<v Speaker 1>Roman Catholic baggage or the Augustinian baggage. But again, you're

984
00:54:49.719 --> 00:54:52.559
<v Speaker 1>not going to be able to find solace in Rome

985
00:54:52.880 --> 00:54:56.239
<v Speaker 1>because Rome doesn't teach this doctrine. So this is silly

986
00:54:56.440 --> 00:54:58.920
<v Speaker 1>ignorance from these people. If they want to try to

987
00:54:58.960 --> 00:55:02.079
<v Speaker 1>go to Rome, well guess what. Rome has even said

988
00:55:02.119 --> 00:55:05.760
<v Speaker 1>that limbo of infants, which was introduced to soften the

989
00:55:05.800 --> 00:55:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Augustinian doctrine, that's not even something you have to believe

990
00:55:08.760 --> 00:55:12.960
<v Speaker 1>in anymore in the Roman Gelic world. So this will

991
00:55:13.039 --> 00:55:14.360
<v Speaker 1>tell you what I'm talking about here.

992
00:55:15.559 --> 00:55:18.920
<v Speaker 4>And I want to point out to you this is

993
00:55:19.000 --> 00:55:23.239
<v Speaker 4>a part of a problem typically in the West. We

994
00:55:23.440 --> 00:55:27.880
<v Speaker 4>talked about this abstractionism, and you have to understand that

995
00:55:29.079 --> 00:55:33.159
<v Speaker 4>Orthodox season is a life, it's an etho, it's arch

996
00:55:33.159 --> 00:55:38.679
<v Speaker 4>Theology is not an abstract, propositional thing that can be

997
00:55:38.760 --> 00:55:41.559
<v Speaker 4>divorced from the life, all the way down to the

998
00:55:41.599 --> 00:55:47.519
<v Speaker 4>parish level. And I find it really interesting that when

999
00:55:47.559 --> 00:55:51.320
<v Speaker 4>you're in the parish, when you're going through catechises, none

1000
00:55:51.360 --> 00:55:55.480
<v Speaker 4>of the your priests and there might be an outlier

1001
00:55:55.559 --> 00:55:59.159
<v Speaker 4>or some weird guy out there, but doesn't that say

1002
00:55:59.239 --> 00:56:01.400
<v Speaker 4>something that none does the priests are teaching this Just

1003
00:56:01.519 --> 00:56:02.079
<v Speaker 4>the opposite.

1004
00:56:02.800 --> 00:56:06.400
<v Speaker 1>No, it's people who have no blessing to teach this stuff,

1005
00:56:06.440 --> 00:56:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and they're just running around the internet stirring out people

1006
00:56:08.519 --> 00:56:11.119
<v Speaker 1>and confusing them. And by the way, in uh, there's

1007
00:56:11.199 --> 00:56:13.280
<v Speaker 1>at least in the discord. We have at least two

1008
00:56:13.360 --> 00:56:19.039
<v Speaker 1>references to the liturgical documents which demonstrate that infants are

1009
00:56:19.079 --> 00:56:23.039
<v Speaker 1>not de facto downed. So even the liturgy tells us this.

1010
00:56:23.599 --> 00:56:25.119
<v Speaker 1>I can see if it's I know, it's pot in,

1011
00:56:25.320 --> 00:56:28.119
<v Speaker 1>it's pin in the mod chat. But let me see

1012
00:56:29.280 --> 00:56:31.400
<v Speaker 1>real quick, I can scroll back to it here.

1013
00:56:31.320 --> 00:56:37.360
<v Speaker 4>I think. But you have to. You have to keep

1014
00:56:37.400 --> 00:56:39.920
<v Speaker 4>in mind that there's all kinds of demonic temptations, and

1015
00:56:40.000 --> 00:56:44.840
<v Speaker 4>the one temptation is you're smart enough to figure this

1016
00:56:45.000 --> 00:56:48.400
<v Speaker 4>out by the text alone, apart from a life in

1017
00:56:48.480 --> 00:56:52.000
<v Speaker 4>the church, apart from the catos and the parish life

1018
00:56:52.119 --> 00:56:55.320
<v Speaker 4>and all these various things, and you'll be the one

1019
00:56:56.360 --> 00:57:00.159
<v Speaker 4>that figures out the true theology. And everybody include and

1020
00:57:00.199 --> 00:57:04.280
<v Speaker 4>all your priests are all heretics. I mean, it doesn't

1021
00:57:04.320 --> 00:57:07.199
<v Speaker 4>that sound demonic? And that's what these people, these Latinis

1022
00:57:07.239 --> 00:57:13.679
<v Speaker 4>are doing. They're out on their own, going thing through

1023
00:57:14.440 --> 00:57:20.440
<v Speaker 4>terry picking text contrast to the life and the consensus

1024
00:57:20.960 --> 00:57:23.360
<v Speaker 4>of the priests and the parish and the entire life

1025
00:57:23.440 --> 00:57:26.960
<v Speaker 4>is the orthodoxy, and they're going to correct everybody. So

1026
00:57:27.079 --> 00:57:30.480
<v Speaker 4>everybody should see that that that's clearly demonic. It's clearly

1027
00:57:30.559 --> 00:57:34.360
<v Speaker 4>a demonic temptation and these people phoning for it, and again,

1028
00:57:34.679 --> 00:57:39.599
<v Speaker 4>as Jade pointed out, no episcal blessing to teach whatsoever.

1029
00:57:39.840 --> 00:57:42.480
<v Speaker 4>So I don't I'm it's crazy that people will even

1030
00:57:42.559 --> 00:57:46.599
<v Speaker 4>listen to these people who are not even credentialed. I mean,

1031
00:57:46.599 --> 00:57:49.239
<v Speaker 4>it'd be one thing if like, hey, look the credential

1032
00:57:50.679 --> 00:57:54.280
<v Speaker 4>they have, you know, a theology or philosophy degree, but

1033
00:57:54.400 --> 00:57:58.280
<v Speaker 4>they don't have a blessing. Tho would still be wrong.

1034
00:57:58.440 --> 00:58:01.559
<v Speaker 4>But these people don't even have any formal training or credentials,

1035
00:58:01.679 --> 00:58:05.280
<v Speaker 4>and they're out there and everybody online seems not everybody,

1036
00:58:05.800 --> 00:58:08.920
<v Speaker 4>a large portion or substantial seem to be get stepped

1037
00:58:08.920 --> 00:58:11.760
<v Speaker 4>away and deceived by these people.

1038
00:58:12.639 --> 00:58:15.800
<v Speaker 1>So the Lenton Triotian and the Saturday Before meet Fair

1039
00:58:15.880 --> 00:58:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Sunday reads we should know that when baptized infants die,

1040
00:58:19.320 --> 00:58:21.840
<v Speaker 1>they enjoy the Paradise of Delight, whereas those that were

1041
00:58:21.880 --> 00:58:24.920
<v Speaker 1>not illumined by baptism, those born to pagans neither go

1042
00:58:25.000 --> 00:58:31.039
<v Speaker 1>to paradise nor Gehenna. And that is the Lenton Triyodian readings.

1043
00:58:33.199 --> 00:58:35.559
<v Speaker 3>And then there is the Lord's.

1044
00:58:35.280 --> 00:58:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Judgment on on baptized infants and their parents from the

1045
00:58:37.840 --> 00:58:41.159
<v Speaker 1>life of Saint Basil the Younger, and it reads the

1046
00:58:41.239 --> 00:58:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Lord looked upon them, the unbaptized infants, and was enraged

1047
00:58:44.920 --> 00:58:48.360
<v Speaker 1>on account of blindness, not against them, but against the parents.

1048
00:58:49.360 --> 00:58:51.239
<v Speaker 1>Then it goes on to say the Lord commanded a

1049
00:58:51.360 --> 00:58:54.199
<v Speaker 1>place of rest be created for them, and a very

1050
00:58:54.239 --> 00:58:57.480
<v Speaker 1>small enjoyment of eternal life, but not theosis.

1051
00:58:57.639 --> 00:58:58.039
<v Speaker 4>Is the key.

1052
00:58:58.559 --> 00:59:01.960
<v Speaker 1>So the speculation in the liturgy and in some of

1053
00:59:01.960 --> 00:59:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the church fathers on this issue is that they are

1054
00:59:04.559 --> 00:59:07.400
<v Speaker 1>not partaking of Theosis in the Escaton, but they are

1055
00:59:07.440 --> 00:59:10.400
<v Speaker 1>also not condemned, and so there is a potentially a

1056
00:59:10.480 --> 00:59:13.599
<v Speaker 1>place of natural felicity or beatitude. And I know that

1057
00:59:13.639 --> 00:59:15.760
<v Speaker 1>somebody's gonna say, well, that violates the statement in the

1058
00:59:15.800 --> 00:59:19.239
<v Speaker 1>canon that there's a third place. There's no third places.

1059
00:59:19.719 --> 00:59:23.360
<v Speaker 1>It's not a third place. It's a place of resurrection

1060
00:59:23.639 --> 00:59:27.199
<v Speaker 1>that is not theosis. So it's the same place quote unquote,

1061
00:59:27.519 --> 00:59:29.639
<v Speaker 1>but it is not a partaking of theosis, which is

1062
00:59:29.760 --> 00:59:35.239
<v Speaker 1>only applied to those who are baptized in Christ and

1063
00:59:35.320 --> 00:59:38.679
<v Speaker 1>who live the life and so forth. So it's not

1064
00:59:38.840 --> 00:59:40.920
<v Speaker 1>an either or thing. And the other thing that these

1065
00:59:40.920 --> 00:59:43.639
<v Speaker 1>people do is they read these canons in a mechanical,

1066
00:59:43.719 --> 00:59:46.320
<v Speaker 1>wooden way, and try to force.

1067
00:59:46.199 --> 00:59:50.039
<v Speaker 3>It into a Latin Augustinian framework.

1068
00:59:50.320 --> 00:59:52.480
<v Speaker 1>And all you need to know is that when you

1069
00:59:52.559 --> 00:59:55.280
<v Speaker 1>go to Bishop Irena, when you go to Orthodoxy Elogians,

1070
00:59:55.320 --> 00:59:58.199
<v Speaker 1>whether it's Pomazanski, whether it's Mayandorf, whether it's any of

1071
00:59:58.239 --> 01:00:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the priests that are out there of Father Michael Little,

1072
01:00:01.119 --> 01:00:06.400
<v Speaker 1>whether it's anybody else, the clergy, the they're all telling

1073
01:00:06.440 --> 01:00:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you that it's not the Augustinian view. So why are

1074
01:00:09.000 --> 01:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>you going to listen to random goobers on Twitter about

1075
01:00:13.280 --> 01:00:13.639
<v Speaker 1>what they are?

1076
01:00:14.000 --> 01:00:15.639
<v Speaker 3>It's just silly, like it's not a.

1077
01:00:15.679 --> 01:00:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Protestant thing where you go to random dudes, right, what

1078
01:00:20.199 --> 01:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>would you say to that farther deacon, like who should

1079
01:00:22.360 --> 01:00:23.079
<v Speaker 1>we be listening here?

1080
01:00:23.440 --> 01:00:24.880
<v Speaker 3>Anonymous Twitter profiles.

1081
01:00:25.800 --> 01:00:33.119
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's exactly why the prescription is live a life

1082
01:00:33.199 --> 01:00:35.639
<v Speaker 4>in the parish. Now that doesn't mean that the priest

1083
01:00:35.760 --> 01:00:39.840
<v Speaker 4>is infallible, but that's the prescribed way you learn from

1084
01:00:39.840 --> 01:00:45.679
<v Speaker 4>the priest. And again you don't learn. You're warned against

1085
01:00:46.639 --> 01:00:49.440
<v Speaker 4>learning from people who don't have a blessing to teach.

1086
01:00:50.400 --> 01:00:55.000
<v Speaker 4>And like you said, there's this consensus. So if you remember,

1087
01:00:55.599 --> 01:00:57.800
<v Speaker 4>and I won't name the name, but there there was

1088
01:00:57.880 --> 01:01:03.599
<v Speaker 4>somebody who was struggling with the same think Augustinian original Sin.

1089
01:01:03.719 --> 01:01:06.000
<v Speaker 4>And I said, what did you They came to visit

1090
01:01:06.079 --> 01:01:07.760
<v Speaker 4>the parish, and I said, did you talk to your

1091
01:01:08.679 --> 01:01:13.079
<v Speaker 4>to priests? You know you're you're a priest. If he says, well, no,

1092
01:01:13.199 --> 01:01:16.760
<v Speaker 4>because he's wrong, I said, well, did he talk to

1093
01:01:16.840 --> 01:01:20.519
<v Speaker 4>Father Russell, our priest? No, because he's wrong, I'm like, okay,

1094
01:01:20.599 --> 01:01:23.960
<v Speaker 4>so all the priests are wrong, and you're you're right

1095
01:01:24.320 --> 01:01:26.079
<v Speaker 4>because you were listening to this guy online.

1096
01:01:26.079 --> 01:01:27.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean yeah. And these are people, by the way,

1097
01:01:27.760 --> 01:01:32.039
<v Speaker 1>who are usually like new right, not everybody, but in

1098
01:01:32.079 --> 01:01:33.519
<v Speaker 1>the case of the guy you're talking about, and in

1099
01:01:33.639 --> 01:01:35.400
<v Speaker 1>many other cases, it's like, oh, I was a Roman

1100
01:01:35.440 --> 01:01:36.159
<v Speaker 1>Catholic last year.

1101
01:01:36.199 --> 01:01:38.480
<v Speaker 3>I just converted this year. Oh now I have this issue.

1102
01:01:41.239 --> 01:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Or I was a Protestant Calvinist and now I'm

1103
01:01:44.480 --> 01:01:45.320
<v Speaker 1>looking at the Orthodox.

1104
01:01:45.400 --> 01:01:45.440
<v Speaker 4>You.

1105
01:01:45.519 --> 01:01:46.360
<v Speaker 3>Oh, here's an issue.

1106
01:01:46.800 --> 01:01:49.159
<v Speaker 1>It takes time to understand and study through these issues.

1107
01:01:49.159 --> 01:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>They're not solved in a You're not going to solve

1108
01:01:51.320 --> 01:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these issues in a year, two years,

1109
01:01:53.519 --> 01:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>five years, okay. It takes a long time to know

1110
01:01:56.440 --> 01:01:59.559
<v Speaker 1>and understand the complexities and the nuances of these issues.

1111
01:01:59.599 --> 01:02:00.719
<v Speaker 3>And let me give you another.

1112
01:02:00.519 --> 01:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Example of this if you go to the Roman Catholic

1113
01:02:02.840 --> 01:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>website right Christian Vatican Bea and you look up the

1114
01:02:07.039 --> 01:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>infant Limbo Dogma document that I'm talking about right here,

1115
01:02:11.519 --> 01:02:15.159
<v Speaker 1>approved by Ratzinger, Hope for the salvation of infants and

1116
01:02:15.239 --> 01:02:18.239
<v Speaker 1>those who die without being baptized. You will notice that

1117
01:02:18.519 --> 01:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the document itself from the Catholics. Which is the stupidity

1118
01:02:22.480 --> 01:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>of all this is that these people are actually saying

1119
01:02:25.440 --> 01:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>that we ought to look to the Roman Catholic position,

1120
01:02:27.679 --> 01:02:30.199
<v Speaker 1>not realizing that the Roman Catholic position has evolved past

1121
01:02:30.239 --> 01:02:33.239
<v Speaker 1>the Augustinian position. This whole document is about how they

1122
01:02:33.280 --> 01:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>don't accept the Augustinian position anymore, and that you can

1123
01:02:36.920 --> 01:02:41.920
<v Speaker 1>hope for the salvation of unbaptized infants. Now, the document

1124
01:02:42.079 --> 01:02:44.519
<v Speaker 1>goes through the history of the question and makes all

1125
01:02:44.599 --> 01:02:47.679
<v Speaker 1>the points that I made that the Greek fathers typically

1126
01:02:47.800 --> 01:02:51.039
<v Speaker 1>did not think that unbaptized infants were necessarily damned or

1127
01:02:51.119 --> 01:02:53.960
<v Speaker 1>had any inherited guilt. It then goes on to talk

1128
01:02:53.960 --> 01:02:57.360
<v Speaker 1>about how Augustine is the first to really stress inherited guilt,

1129
01:02:57.679 --> 01:02:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the very thing that we always argue. So the irony

1130
01:03:00.159 --> 01:03:04.719
<v Speaker 1>is that all of the locus of these people's focus.

1131
01:03:04.920 --> 01:03:06.559
<v Speaker 1>We ought to be listening to the Roman Catholics and

1132
01:03:06.559 --> 01:03:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the Latin Church fathers, the very Vatican people that they're

1133
01:03:09.960 --> 01:03:14.360
<v Speaker 1>looking to about this stuff. Make our point in this document.

1134
01:03:24.119 --> 01:03:29.159
<v Speaker 5>And what's interesting, Like you said, it's not even a.

1135
01:03:29.280 --> 01:03:33.239
<v Speaker 4>Roman Catholic mindset, That's what I'm saying, it's a Protestant mindset.

1136
01:03:33.440 --> 01:03:38.719
<v Speaker 4>Like well, I'm brand new, but you know what theology is.

1137
01:03:38.840 --> 01:03:42.039
<v Speaker 4>It's just an intellectual pursuit. And so I can just

1138
01:03:42.159 --> 01:03:46.280
<v Speaker 4>read through these texts and I'll show everybody else they're wrong.

1139
01:03:47.199 --> 01:03:52.400
<v Speaker 4>And but Orthodoxy doesn't work that way. Theology is not

1140
01:03:52.599 --> 01:03:55.159
<v Speaker 4>divorced from the ethos and the life and the virtues

1141
01:03:56.559 --> 01:04:01.760
<v Speaker 4>and a hierarchy, right, I mean this is it's ultimately Satanic.

1142
01:04:02.119 --> 01:04:03.360
<v Speaker 4>It's anti hierarchy.

1143
01:04:09.480 --> 01:04:29.639
<v Speaker 19>Stephen, what's up? Yeah, I'm mute man, I'm mute, man, Stephen,

1144
01:04:29.679 --> 01:04:30.079
<v Speaker 19>I'm mute.

1145
01:04:34.079 --> 01:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Ev thirty six dollars seventy four cents Orthodox to build

1146
01:04:37.000 --> 01:04:39.119
<v Speaker 1>the Old tradition as well support.

1147
01:04:38.840 --> 01:04:40.559
<v Speaker 3>The truthfulness of the Christian claims.

1148
01:04:41.039 --> 01:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Expound on this because I've seen some people ask how

1149
01:04:44.039 --> 01:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>you know what the old tradition is or that it

1150
01:04:45.519 --> 01:04:48.119
<v Speaker 1>was kept. Well, we know that it's kept at least

1151
01:04:48.159 --> 01:04:51.559
<v Speaker 1>as possible, because the scriptures were not written down from

1152
01:04:51.639 --> 01:04:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the time of as far as we know, right Adam

1153
01:04:55.360 --> 01:04:59.599
<v Speaker 1>to Moses. So how was that revelation transmitted? Well, as

1154
01:04:59.599 --> 01:05:02.159
<v Speaker 1>far as we it was transmitted orally, and then it's

1155
01:05:02.199 --> 01:05:04.719
<v Speaker 1>written down at the time of Moses. We believe by

1156
01:05:04.800 --> 01:05:09.559
<v Speaker 1>faith according to divine revelation. So God can preserve something

1157
01:05:09.960 --> 01:05:11.840
<v Speaker 1>in a written or an oral form. There's nothing that

1158
01:05:11.960 --> 01:05:14.599
<v Speaker 1>prevents God from preserving it. And then of course we

1159
01:05:14.639 --> 01:05:17.559
<v Speaker 1>would say that there's many places even within scripture that

1160
01:05:17.679 --> 01:05:22.079
<v Speaker 1>identify things that are oral or extra canonical or.

1161
01:05:22.079 --> 01:05:24.760
<v Speaker 3>Extra biblical as tradition. So something that's an.

1162
01:05:24.760 --> 01:05:28.119
<v Speaker 1>Oral tradition, by the way, also can be written down. So,

1163
01:05:28.280 --> 01:05:30.800
<v Speaker 1>for example, the liturgies are the best example of this.

1164
01:05:31.559 --> 01:05:34.119
<v Speaker 1>The Apostles didn't write in the New Testament what the

1165
01:05:34.239 --> 01:05:38.559
<v Speaker 1>liturgical worship is supposed to be. They complain about abuses,

1166
01:05:38.639 --> 01:05:41.239
<v Speaker 1>they warn about this or that, but there's no liturgical

1167
01:05:41.320 --> 01:05:44.840
<v Speaker 1>service in the New Testament. Well, God seems to care

1168
01:05:44.880 --> 01:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>in Leviticus how people worship him, so how do we

1169
01:05:47.480 --> 01:05:52.679
<v Speaker 1>know how to worship him? Well, I think providentially that

1170
01:05:52.880 --> 01:05:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the liturgies were not in scripture, so that we would

1171
01:05:56.039 --> 01:05:58.239
<v Speaker 1>have to go to the church, and that's in fact

1172
01:05:58.320 --> 01:06:01.599
<v Speaker 1>what happens is that the apostle in the various sees

1173
01:06:01.639 --> 01:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the Roman Empire create and draw up liturgies based on

1174
01:06:05.599 --> 01:06:10.199
<v Speaker 1>Jewish temple and synagogue liturgies for the churches. So by

1175
01:06:10.280 --> 01:06:13.679
<v Speaker 1>default you have to look to tradition for something like

1176
01:06:13.800 --> 01:06:16.599
<v Speaker 1>the liturgy, and that's one of the easiest best examples

1177
01:06:16.760 --> 01:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of an oral quote unquote tradition that eventually becomes written

1178
01:06:20.079 --> 01:06:25.840
<v Speaker 1>down or or an extra biblical tradition. Other ideas, too,

1179
01:06:25.920 --> 01:06:28.239
<v Speaker 1>would be how we know what books are in the canon?

1180
01:06:28.360 --> 01:06:30.559
<v Speaker 1>For example, how do we know that Matthew the Disciple

1181
01:06:30.639 --> 01:06:33.519
<v Speaker 1>wrote the Gospel Matthew, Well, it's part of the church's

1182
01:06:33.559 --> 01:06:35.679
<v Speaker 1>tradition that he did. So tradition plays a role in

1183
01:06:35.760 --> 01:06:40.199
<v Speaker 1>apostolic authorship, which plays a role in canonicity. Daniel Jay

1184
01:06:40.360 --> 01:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>ten dollars, you should do the review on a debate

1185
01:06:43.400 --> 01:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>with pints with a quinas. There was a Mormon named

1186
01:06:46.039 --> 01:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Jacob Hanson who debated Trent Horne on the Book of Mormon.

1187
01:06:48.920 --> 01:06:54.119
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to see you debate him on Trinity versus Tritheism. Yeah,

1188
01:06:54.159 --> 01:06:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm open to that. We haven't had any Mormons really

1189
01:06:56.760 --> 01:06:59.239
<v Speaker 1>in the debate space that I'm aware of. I mean,

1190
01:06:59.239 --> 01:07:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure there is somewhere a Mormon apologist or something,

1191
01:07:03.480 --> 01:07:07.079
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, that would be interesting. I'm not opposed to

1192
01:07:08.360 --> 01:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>to that directly. Ten dollars. What's the difference between the

1193
01:07:11.320 --> 01:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Greeks and the Russians, language, liturgical expression, different cultures. Noah

1194
01:07:21.920 --> 01:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>m five dollars. If performing a correct baptism is enough

1195
01:07:30.000 --> 01:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>for a valid baptism, I never said that. Again, there's

1196
01:07:37.519 --> 01:07:42.039
<v Speaker 1>no rigid formula for this in a case by case basis,

1197
01:07:42.119 --> 01:07:44.079
<v Speaker 1>And everybody who's a sperg or everyone who's a.

1198
01:07:46.280 --> 01:07:49.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, nerd, I'm not calling you a nerd.

1199
01:07:50.000 --> 01:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying that everybody who has this Roman Catholic mindset,

1200
01:07:53.920 --> 01:07:55.719
<v Speaker 1>they think there has to be a one size fits

1201
01:07:55.760 --> 01:07:59.719
<v Speaker 1>all answer for this across the board. And one of

1202
01:07:59.760 --> 01:08:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the positives of Orthodox views of canon law is that

1203
01:08:04.880 --> 01:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>we always strive to not have the legalistic spirit of

1204
01:08:07.920 --> 01:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the Roman Catholic Western mindset, where we think there has

1205
01:08:11.400 --> 01:08:13.400
<v Speaker 1>to be a one size fits all answer for every

1206
01:08:13.480 --> 01:08:17.199
<v Speaker 1>reception into the church. So I don't have any problems

1207
01:08:17.239 --> 01:08:20.239
<v Speaker 1>saying that people can be received back into the church

1208
01:08:20.359 --> 01:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>through purely through confession, or that the church can determine

1209
01:08:23.920 --> 01:08:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that if the Roman Catholic uh did it this way,

1210
01:08:27.199 --> 01:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>they can be received through chrismation, they can be received

1211
01:08:29.760 --> 01:08:32.159
<v Speaker 1>through uh you know, vesting or whatever.

1212
01:08:32.560 --> 01:08:32.600
<v Speaker 4>Like.

1213
01:08:32.680 --> 01:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't bother me because I'm not trapped in some

1214
01:08:35.079 --> 01:08:37.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of legalism or I think that the Church has

1215
01:08:37.960 --> 01:08:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to abide by uh, you know, canons, as if there

1216
01:08:41.840 --> 01:08:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the laws are made for men, not men for the laws,

1217
01:08:44.119 --> 01:08:46.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, since the exact same spirit as the Pharisees.

1218
01:08:47.199 --> 01:08:50.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Bishop Maxham and I was with dinner with him

1219
01:08:51.560 --> 01:08:53.720
<v Speaker 4>his grace a couple of weeks ago, and we're bring

1220
01:08:53.840 --> 01:08:58.199
<v Speaker 4>this up exact, this exact scenario. And I was talking

1221
01:08:58.239 --> 01:09:01.239
<v Speaker 4>in class about it that think about in terms of

1222
01:09:01.319 --> 01:09:06.079
<v Speaker 4>secular law, there's like the rules and laws, the canons

1223
01:09:06.159 --> 01:09:10.520
<v Speaker 4>on the books, right, like this penalty or every judge

1224
01:09:10.680 --> 01:09:14.560
<v Speaker 4>has the ability to look at all the details. That's

1225
01:09:14.600 --> 01:09:18.079
<v Speaker 4>like the framework right from which they then moved to

1226
01:09:18.159 --> 01:09:21.800
<v Speaker 4>consider all the details and they can adjust that they

1227
01:09:21.840 --> 01:09:27.640
<v Speaker 4>can suspend the penalty. They could, it's not breaking the

1228
01:09:27.760 --> 01:09:29.960
<v Speaker 4>canons to do that. And so Bishop Max and I

1229
01:09:30.000 --> 01:09:33.920
<v Speaker 4>were talking about this, and we were talking about what

1230
01:09:34.159 --> 01:09:39.319
<v Speaker 4>Saint Basil did when he decided that yes, we have

1231
01:09:39.439 --> 01:09:44.920
<v Speaker 4>this canon rule. But in this scenario it would be

1232
01:09:45.039 --> 01:09:50.680
<v Speaker 4>bad to apply that and lose these heretics, the utah Cans,

1233
01:09:50.960 --> 01:09:53.439
<v Speaker 4>and you remember the other ones too, and so in

1234
01:09:53.479 --> 01:09:58.359
<v Speaker 4>that specific scenario, Basil, in order to you know, win

1235
01:09:58.520 --> 01:10:06.039
<v Speaker 4>them over, we've decided to receive them through chrismation, not baptists.

1236
01:10:06.159 --> 01:10:08.239
<v Speaker 4>That's a perfect example. That doesn't mean you throw out

1237
01:10:08.279 --> 01:10:10.199
<v Speaker 4>the rule. It just means that's the rule in kind

1238
01:10:10.199 --> 01:10:14.239
<v Speaker 4>of guideline which you operate by, and you can adjust

1239
01:10:14.279 --> 01:10:18.199
<v Speaker 4>that given different circumstances, because we're not parasitical.

1240
01:10:17.920 --> 01:10:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Legalists, right yeah, I mean again, just look, the absertinity

1241
01:10:21.800 --> 01:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Romeancalitic position is evident in the fact that atheists,

1242
01:10:25.800 --> 01:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Muslims and Satanists can baptize you. So they divorce the

1243
01:10:29.720 --> 01:10:33.680
<v Speaker 1>notion of being catechized and given the faith from the baptism.

1244
01:10:33.960 --> 01:10:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Obviously we're speaking of adult tier. That's the Romecalolic position.

1245
01:10:37.000 --> 01:10:38.720
<v Speaker 1>So all these people who want all this Latin stuff,

1246
01:10:38.800 --> 01:10:41.600
<v Speaker 1>this latinizing temptation, and understand that you're saying where that

1247
01:10:41.680 --> 01:10:44.039
<v Speaker 1>position actually leads to and what the actual rome Mecolic

1248
01:10:44.079 --> 01:10:46.199
<v Speaker 1>position is. And most of these people can never even

1249
01:10:46.239 --> 01:10:50.560
<v Speaker 1>tell you what the three necessary elements are to Romancalic sacrament, matter,

1250
01:10:50.640 --> 01:10:51.279
<v Speaker 1>form and intention.

1251
01:10:51.359 --> 01:10:52.479
<v Speaker 3>They can't tell you what that means.

1252
01:10:52.520 --> 01:10:56.319
<v Speaker 1>They don't, They're just they're just being duped by other

1253
01:10:56.760 --> 01:10:58.960
<v Speaker 1>ignorant people on the Internet on the basis of so

1254
01:10:59.119 --> 01:11:04.199
<v Speaker 1>called translation. But said people can people can be malicious

1255
01:11:04.199 --> 01:11:07.199
<v Speaker 1>in their translations. Miloslaw five dollars. What about a pockets

1256
01:11:07.239 --> 01:11:11.439
<v Speaker 1>stasis in Saint Isaac the Syrians view after Origin? So,

1257
01:11:12.039 --> 01:11:16.359
<v Speaker 1>as I just checked, he died before six eighty one,

1258
01:11:17.159 --> 01:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the Third Documenical Council in six eighty one is what

1259
01:11:20.159 --> 01:11:27.199
<v Speaker 1>gives the definitive condemnation of the Originist view of the

1260
01:11:27.399 --> 01:11:30.479
<v Speaker 1>Origin's worldview. Okay, so there's an there's an Orthodox version

1261
01:11:30.520 --> 01:11:34.680
<v Speaker 1>of a pockets distosis, which is just means restoration. I've

1262
01:11:34.760 --> 01:11:37.119
<v Speaker 1>not read enough of Isaac of Syria to know if

1263
01:11:37.199 --> 01:11:42.560
<v Speaker 1>he teaches specifically universal salvation like Origin does, and that

1264
01:11:42.760 --> 01:11:45.560
<v Speaker 1>is condemned the Fifth Council, and that's condemned explicit. But

1265
01:11:45.680 --> 01:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the entire Originist system is condemned in the sixth Council,

1266
01:11:49.720 --> 01:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>which is after one year after Saint Isaac the Syrian's death.

1267
01:11:54.439 --> 01:11:59.560
<v Speaker 1>So if he held to the Originist position, we would

1268
01:11:59.560 --> 01:12:01.359
<v Speaker 1>just simply say he's wrong. And by the way, I noticed,

1269
01:12:03.319 --> 01:12:08.479
<v Speaker 1>Father Michael Palmazonski also mentions a couple other errors beyond

1270
01:12:08.600 --> 01:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>just a pocket ostasis that Gregor of Nissa held. Oh,

1271
01:12:11.560 --> 01:12:14.039
<v Speaker 1>Gregor of Nissa held to the erroneous view of the

1272
01:12:14.199 --> 01:12:18.000
<v Speaker 1>ransom theory being offered to the devil, and that view

1273
01:12:18.159 --> 01:12:21.239
<v Speaker 1>is later rejected by many church fathers. So yeah, we

1274
01:12:21.239 --> 01:12:23.680
<v Speaker 1>don't have a problem saying that Church fathers can make errors.

1275
01:12:24.319 --> 01:12:25.439
<v Speaker 1>Many of them make errors.

1276
01:12:25.760 --> 01:12:28.279
<v Speaker 3>It's a silly thing when Orthodox people try to have

1277
01:12:28.359 --> 01:12:29.920
<v Speaker 3>this position that the Church fathers.

1278
01:12:29.760 --> 01:12:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Never made theological errors. But I mean, they mean well

1279
01:12:32.600 --> 01:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>when they make this argument, but it's just simply not true.

1280
01:12:35.680 --> 01:12:38.560
<v Speaker 1>In Palmazonski lists many other mistakes. So we have a

1281
01:12:38.760 --> 01:12:41.159
<v Speaker 1>super chet here. Let me see where is it? Where

1282
01:12:41.199 --> 01:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to go? In Alan Siegel's book Two Powers in Heaven,

1283
01:12:45.000 --> 01:12:47.439
<v Speaker 1>there's a debate between Rabbi Akiva and Rabbi Ismael. Yes,

1284
01:12:47.479 --> 01:12:50.479
<v Speaker 1>I read this part about the way that heretics interpret

1285
01:12:50.520 --> 01:12:53.159
<v Speaker 1>the multiple powers in Heaven, et cetera and Earth. This

1286
01:12:53.279 --> 01:12:59.680
<v Speaker 1>distinction is used for the Sofia doctrine in regard to gnostics.

1287
01:13:00.119 --> 01:13:04.479
<v Speaker 1>Rabbis asserted the distinction. Do you think there's an intermediary

1288
01:13:04.720 --> 01:13:08.399
<v Speaker 1>of sines and the essencerity distinction in the Second Temple period.

1289
01:13:09.439 --> 01:13:12.680
<v Speaker 1>If you read David Bradshaw's book Ariosol East and West,

1290
01:13:12.840 --> 01:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>he works through the usage of the essencerity distinction by

1291
01:13:16.159 --> 01:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Philo and then by people in the first and second century.

1292
01:13:19.880 --> 01:13:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I don't think he mentions any

1293
01:13:22.800 --> 01:13:25.479
<v Speaker 1>rabbinical sources. He may, I don't remember. I can go look,

1294
01:13:25.600 --> 01:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>but that's a good question. I'm not well studied enough

1295
01:13:29.840 --> 01:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>on first and second century Rabbinic Judaism to actually know.

1296
01:13:36.800 --> 01:13:42.279
<v Speaker 1>Elias Mikias one dollar was the thirty second reputation of

1297
01:13:42.399 --> 01:13:46.319
<v Speaker 1>neo Platonic model of God, in which the one degrades

1298
01:13:46.399 --> 01:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>into emanations. I have critiques of Neoplatonism on my channel.

1299
01:13:51.680 --> 01:13:54.159
<v Speaker 1>You can find those old videos. Matthew twenty five dollars,

1300
01:13:55.199 --> 01:13:57.279
<v Speaker 1>thank you for being mean to strangers on the internet.

1301
01:13:58.199 --> 01:13:59.199
<v Speaker 3>Well, I seem to excel.

1302
01:13:59.279 --> 01:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I guess at the five dollars what It's a good

1303
01:14:02.840 --> 01:14:04.720
<v Speaker 1>thing that you recorded the debate with m L because

1304
01:14:04.720 --> 01:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Snico's team muted you, and then I um muted you. Well,

1305
01:14:08.680 --> 01:14:12.439
<v Speaker 1>to be fair, though on my side of it, you

1306
01:14:12.520 --> 01:14:14.479
<v Speaker 1>can hear that Sneko gets a phone call, So I

1307
01:14:14.560 --> 01:14:16.399
<v Speaker 1>don't think that he was actually trying to mute me

1308
01:14:16.439 --> 01:14:18.319
<v Speaker 1>in the open statement. It muted because he got a

1309
01:14:18.359 --> 01:14:20.239
<v Speaker 1>phone call, and I did hear the phone rings, So

1310
01:14:20.239 --> 01:14:24.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's not lying about that. S L

1311
01:14:24.479 --> 01:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I D eight B. Where's the Holy Spirit in the

1312
01:14:26.840 --> 01:14:29.399
<v Speaker 1>Old Testament. I just did a whole talk on all

1313
01:14:29.479 --> 01:14:34.439
<v Speaker 1>of the theophany references in the Torah. Took about three hours,

1314
01:14:34.960 --> 01:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and many of those referenced the Holy Spirit. So I

1315
01:14:37.840 --> 01:14:41.239
<v Speaker 1>mean you could just go to a just use a search,

1316
01:14:41.560 --> 01:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>do a Bible search of references to Spirit in the

1317
01:14:44.960 --> 01:14:47.239
<v Speaker 1>Old Testament, and you'll see all those references.

1318
01:14:47.279 --> 01:14:47.680
<v Speaker 3>There's many.

1319
01:14:48.439 --> 01:14:51.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean Moses lays hands on the elders and the

1320
01:14:51.319 --> 01:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Holy spirits. There numbers eleven Holy Spirit above the waters

1321
01:14:56.600 --> 01:14:59.520
<v Speaker 1>in Genesis, right, I mean, the Holy Spirit's all throughout

1322
01:14:59.520 --> 01:15:04.319
<v Speaker 1>the Old test does it? Probably maybe a dozen ish places,

1323
01:15:04.359 --> 01:15:07.199
<v Speaker 1>maybe more. I mean, we could look that up. Let's see,

1324
01:15:11.680 --> 01:15:16.199
<v Speaker 1>let's see there's a just just go watch my talk

1325
01:15:16.279 --> 01:15:18.279
<v Speaker 1>on this because we cover these now, we don't cover

1326
01:15:18.359 --> 01:15:24.439
<v Speaker 1>everything because I haven't gotten to the I've only done

1327
01:15:24.439 --> 01:15:27.479
<v Speaker 1>the Torah references. But the Torah, the spirits mentioned in

1328
01:15:27.479 --> 01:15:31.159
<v Speaker 1>the Torah in many places roll six five dollars. What

1329
01:15:31.319 --> 01:15:34.279
<v Speaker 1>is worse Muslim's calling in and saying the dumbest things

1330
01:15:34.439 --> 01:15:37.199
<v Speaker 1>like the young created can be generated into time.

1331
01:15:38.640 --> 01:15:41.680
<v Speaker 3>Into existence, or the brothers that say that Jews are

1332
01:15:41.760 --> 01:15:42.239
<v Speaker 3>not Jews.

1333
01:15:43.439 --> 01:15:47.039
<v Speaker 1>I think that Jewish is not a Jew, because I

1334
01:15:47.119 --> 01:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>think that's stupider than than what is being argued otherwise.

1335
01:15:52.800 --> 01:15:58.159
<v Speaker 1>Lerotheos Sliliakos eleven dollars eleven cents s Greetings, Jay, God,

1336
01:15:58.199 --> 01:16:01.600
<v Speaker 1>bless you for your work. For the Greek person that

1337
01:16:01.680 --> 01:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>called an earlier, I would be willing to discuss this

1338
01:16:03.720 --> 01:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>matter from Greek to Greek.

1339
01:16:05.640 --> 01:16:07.199
<v Speaker 3>Send a message to me on Facebook.

1340
01:16:08.239 --> 01:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>His name is I I E R O T h

1341
01:16:12.079 --> 01:16:16.600
<v Speaker 1>e O s Erotheos Soliacos. It's a super Greek name.

1342
01:16:17.159 --> 01:16:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Five ninety nine. What do you think about Putin and

1343
01:16:19.800 --> 01:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>kissing the Kuran? Well, I mean, have you heard me

1344
01:16:21.720 --> 01:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>making a huge deal about oh, Putin's super orthodox? I

1345
01:16:27.000 --> 01:16:30.199
<v Speaker 1>haven't made that, So it's unfortunate. I'm not surprised. I

1346
01:16:30.279 --> 01:16:32.239
<v Speaker 1>think that's sort of the spirit of our age, is

1347
01:16:33.800 --> 01:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>thinking that all the religions are kind of the same. H.

1348
01:16:37.000 --> 01:16:40.039
<v Speaker 1>But no, I'm not surprised by that. It's unfortunate. Robbie

1349
01:16:40.119 --> 01:16:54.039
<v Speaker 1>heck Music five dollars. Why don't you consider Catholics Protestants? Actually?

1350
01:16:54.479 --> 01:16:55.880
<v Speaker 3>Saint Justin Popovitch.

1351
01:16:55.600 --> 01:16:58.319
<v Speaker 1>Argues that they are the first Protestants, so that if

1352
01:16:58.359 --> 01:17:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you read his book Life in Christ, that's the whole

1353
01:17:00.199 --> 01:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>this whole argument of that European paganism and papism.

1354
01:17:04.960 --> 01:17:06.840
<v Speaker 3>Chapters in that book make that very point.

1355
01:17:07.119 --> 01:17:09.199
<v Speaker 1>Logan five dollars, keep kicking butt, Thank you so much.

1356
01:17:09.479 --> 01:17:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Rootner twelve ten dollars. What do you think about the

1357
01:17:11.560 --> 01:17:14.119
<v Speaker 1>Shroud of Turn? Is there anything that you take away

1358
01:17:14.119 --> 01:17:16.439
<v Speaker 1>from it? I never really have looked at this as

1359
01:17:16.479 --> 01:17:19.439
<v Speaker 1>a proof per se. I don't have any hard opinions

1360
01:17:19.479 --> 01:17:22.279
<v Speaker 1>on it. I'm fine with it being legit or if

1361
01:17:22.319 --> 01:17:25.479
<v Speaker 1>it's not. It really doesn't affect my theology or my

1362
01:17:25.880 --> 01:17:29.520
<v Speaker 1>faith at all. But it's interesting. But you know what

1363
01:17:29.600 --> 01:17:32.079
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I've seen people, so going back to when

1364
01:17:32.079 --> 01:17:36.319
<v Speaker 1>I was a Protestant, I saw Protestants trying to prove

1365
01:17:36.439 --> 01:17:39.079
<v Speaker 1>with this, and then I would see the even other

1366
01:17:39.199 --> 01:17:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Protestants debunking it. And so I've seen this back and

1367
01:17:42.680 --> 01:17:48.279
<v Speaker 1>forth for twenty five years. So I just I don't

1368
01:17:48.279 --> 01:17:51.159
<v Speaker 1>really find it that interesting, honestly, But I don't have

1369
01:17:51.239 --> 01:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>a problem with it. We went to it on our pilgrimage,

1370
01:17:56.720 --> 01:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>although you don't actually get to see it when you go.

1371
01:17:59.439 --> 01:18:03.199
<v Speaker 1>When you go there, uh, it's behind all these glass

1372
01:18:03.319 --> 01:18:06.319
<v Speaker 1>cases and you see a picture of what it looks like.

1373
01:18:06.520 --> 01:18:08.239
<v Speaker 4>So I don't know.

1374
01:18:08.279 --> 01:18:09.680
<v Speaker 3>I thought that was kind of lame.

1375
01:18:09.840 --> 01:18:13.840
<v Speaker 4>But it's like a national treasure, yeah, they say.

1376
01:18:14.079 --> 01:18:14.199
<v Speaker 5>Uh.

1377
01:18:14.680 --> 01:18:18.279
<v Speaker 1>Father Vladimir said they display it like once a year,

1378
01:18:18.680 --> 01:18:23.119
<v Speaker 1>and that's because supposedly it degrades when it's exposed to

1379
01:18:23.239 --> 01:18:24.159
<v Speaker 1>oxygen or something.

1380
01:18:24.279 --> 01:18:27.520
<v Speaker 4>So it was.

1381
01:18:27.640 --> 01:18:30.199
<v Speaker 1>I found the experience to be underwhelming, honestly, but I

1382
01:18:30.359 --> 01:18:32.439
<v Speaker 1>was also sick with like one hundred and five degree

1383
01:18:32.479 --> 01:18:40.439
<v Speaker 1>fever that that probably played into it. Patty Dog, what's up? No,

1384
01:18:40.560 --> 01:18:42.119
<v Speaker 1>maybe an one hundred five. I probably had one hundred

1385
01:18:42.119 --> 01:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and two fever would be one hundred and five, I'd

1386
01:18:43.760 --> 01:18:45.920
<v Speaker 1>be in the bed, but I did. I had a fever.

1387
01:18:46.039 --> 01:18:53.239
<v Speaker 1>But what's up, man, J it's up?

1388
01:18:53.520 --> 01:18:54.039
<v Speaker 4>Carry me?

1389
01:18:57.000 --> 01:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Yes, what's up? You got a bad connection, bro? So

1390
01:19:06.600 --> 01:19:09.239
<v Speaker 1>again today it's for objections. I know people want to

1391
01:19:09.279 --> 01:19:11.800
<v Speaker 1>call in with FAQs, but we try to keep it

1392
01:19:11.840 --> 01:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to people who disagree and objective. What's up, mel, I'm

1393
01:19:15.600 --> 01:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to go pretty soon, so let's get let's

1394
01:19:17.560 --> 01:19:21.680
<v Speaker 1>get these last few in. Yeah, I would. I think

1395
01:19:21.720 --> 01:19:24.159
<v Speaker 1>the highest I've ever had is one oh four when

1396
01:19:24.199 --> 01:19:26.279
<v Speaker 1>I had pneumonia, and I did have to go to

1397
01:19:26.560 --> 01:19:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the hospital when I had a one o four, So

1398
01:19:30.119 --> 01:19:32.039
<v Speaker 1>now it is probably more like one hundred hundred and one.

1399
01:19:32.119 --> 01:19:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I was, I was pretty bad. But what's up, man, mel,

1400
01:19:37.000 --> 01:19:37.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm you.

1401
01:19:38.920 --> 01:19:39.039
<v Speaker 4>Hi.

1402
01:19:40.239 --> 01:19:42.239
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I just wanted to point something out about the

1403
01:19:42.359 --> 01:19:46.479
<v Speaker 5>Muslim dilemma. I think that they don't realize that when

1404
01:19:46.520 --> 01:19:49.239
<v Speaker 5>they say, oh, we believe parts of the Bible that.

1405
01:19:49.319 --> 01:19:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Confirm the Koran, I could just easily turn that around

1406
01:19:52.720 --> 01:19:55.000
<v Speaker 2>and say the same and say, well, yeah.

1407
01:19:54.800 --> 01:19:56.479
<v Speaker 9>I confirm the parts of the Quran that are in

1408
01:19:56.560 --> 01:19:57.319
<v Speaker 9>line with the Bible.

1409
01:19:57.720 --> 01:19:59.960
<v Speaker 5>I know we're just had an impasse and that doesn't

1410
01:20:00.039 --> 01:20:00.560
<v Speaker 5>mean anything.

1411
01:20:01.279 --> 01:20:03.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a good point. You could you could argue

1412
01:20:03.359 --> 01:20:05.640
<v Speaker 1>it that way. I mean, and again, these passages are

1413
01:20:05.720 --> 01:20:10.119
<v Speaker 1>not ambiguous. We revealed the Torah. We revealed the guidance.

1414
01:20:10.920 --> 01:20:13.279
<v Speaker 1>Go to the Torah. We are ordained all this in

1415
01:20:13.359 --> 01:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the Torah again, five forty four, forty five, forty six,

1416
01:20:16.760 --> 01:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>forty seven. Let these people judge, we have revealed it.

1417
01:20:21.640 --> 01:20:24.319
<v Speaker 1>Look at the previous revelation. It's all in these passages,

1418
01:20:25.239 --> 01:20:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and so so either way they go on the dilemma

1419
01:20:28.800 --> 01:20:31.239
<v Speaker 1>like you're saying, it's a problem. But we could just

1420
01:20:31.279 --> 01:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>flip it around on them and say, okay, so why

1421
01:20:33.840 --> 01:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>can't I pick and choose out of your book what

1422
01:20:36.840 --> 01:20:40.279
<v Speaker 1>confirms what came before? And then they'll say, because the

1423
01:20:40.359 --> 01:20:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Koran is true, yeah, but that's what's in question. Yeah, yeah, yeah,

1424
01:20:46.000 --> 01:20:50.920
<v Speaker 1>great points, Thank you, Mely. This is actually a good

1425
01:20:50.960 --> 01:20:53.399
<v Speaker 1>point because people miss under that Muslims don't know how

1426
01:20:53.399 --> 01:20:55.319
<v Speaker 1>to debate, like ninety nine point nine percent. They don't

1427
01:20:55.319 --> 01:20:57.359
<v Speaker 1>know what to do in debate. Like do you notice

1428
01:20:57.359 --> 01:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>when Muslim lantern did his opening statement and he asked

1429
01:21:00.600 --> 01:21:02.359
<v Speaker 1>me a question in his opening statement? That's what you

1430
01:21:02.359 --> 01:21:05.159
<v Speaker 1>don't do that in debate, asking me questions like what

1431
01:21:05.439 --> 01:21:08.439
<v Speaker 1>you're okay now? But then when I start talking and responding,

1432
01:21:08.720 --> 01:21:11.039
<v Speaker 1>let's look at him talking, he will talk. He'll look

1433
01:21:11.079 --> 01:21:18.439
<v Speaker 1>at him talking interrupt. Uh okay, So but I mean,

1434
01:21:18.520 --> 01:21:20.439
<v Speaker 1>have you ever done a debate before? You know, you

1435
01:21:20.479 --> 01:21:24.399
<v Speaker 1>don't start asking Q and A questions and interrogation in

1436
01:21:24.560 --> 01:21:29.319
<v Speaker 1>your opening statement, right, So it's totally out of out

1437
01:21:29.600 --> 01:21:32.479
<v Speaker 1>out of a cord. Why do they come to you

1438
01:21:32.560 --> 01:21:36.960
<v Speaker 1>for judgment when they already had the Torah? We revealed

1439
01:21:37.000 --> 01:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the Torah, and then they have to come up with

1440
01:21:39.880 --> 01:21:42.279
<v Speaker 1>this ad hoc nonsense of, oh, there's a secret Tora.

1441
01:21:42.399 --> 01:21:45.159
<v Speaker 1>It's not the Tora that already existed amongst the Jews

1442
01:21:45.159 --> 01:21:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and the Christians. You see how stupid that is. Obviously,

1443
01:21:48.760 --> 01:21:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the hearers who are Jewish and Christian can't go to

1444
01:21:50.720 --> 01:21:53.359
<v Speaker 1>a secret Torah. It has to be the one that

1445
01:21:53.560 --> 01:21:58.880
<v Speaker 1>was revealed to them in their hands. Duh, this is

1446
01:21:58.960 --> 01:22:02.720
<v Speaker 1>so silly. It's it's like they it's this is so fundamental,

1447
01:22:03.760 --> 01:22:07.199
<v Speaker 1>and it's such a devastating point that they lose their

1448
01:22:07.239 --> 01:22:09.600
<v Speaker 1>mind and come up with all this nonsense. Oh well,

1449
01:22:09.640 --> 01:22:12.199
<v Speaker 1>actually it's all corrupted, so I'm supposed to go to

1450
01:22:12.239 --> 01:22:14.359
<v Speaker 1>a corrupted book. Oh and then then we see the

1451
01:22:14.359 --> 01:22:16.640
<v Speaker 1>problem with that. They say, no, there's a secret Torah.

1452
01:22:18.560 --> 01:22:20.600
<v Speaker 1>How are the Christians going to go to a secret Torah?

1453
01:22:21.319 --> 01:22:22.680
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, what is the evidence of a

1454
01:22:22.760 --> 01:22:25.159
<v Speaker 1>secret Torah? It's just you're just asserting all these things.

1455
01:22:27.119 --> 01:22:30.920
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, we have Torah and gospels from

1456
01:22:31.560 --> 01:22:34.439
<v Speaker 1>the seventh century and earlier, and they're the ones that

1457
01:22:34.520 --> 01:22:41.760
<v Speaker 1>we have. It's not that difficult. It's a very simple point. Seth.

1458
01:22:48.359 --> 01:22:53.039
<v Speaker 9>Can you hear me? Hi, Jay, Hi, father, and an As.

1459
01:22:53.399 --> 01:22:55.359
<v Speaker 9>I really appreciate both of you guys on you do.

1460
01:22:56.159 --> 01:22:58.319
<v Speaker 9>I guess my question is.

1461
01:23:00.079 --> 01:23:04.960
<v Speaker 20>I'm coming from a Lutheran perspective, but I generally from

1462
01:23:05.000 --> 01:23:07.039
<v Speaker 20>what I've from what I've seen in the Orthodoxy. I

1463
01:23:07.319 --> 01:23:09.800
<v Speaker 20>was raised Baptist and I've just been kind of trying

1464
01:23:09.840 --> 01:23:11.319
<v Speaker 20>to read the Church fathers more.

1465
01:23:14.279 --> 01:23:14.319
<v Speaker 4>My.

1466
01:23:14.560 --> 01:23:20.880
<v Speaker 20>I guess my question is, I don't know how to

1467
01:23:22.279 --> 01:23:26.439
<v Speaker 20>reconcile certain things like I'm willing to conceive ninety nine

1468
01:23:26.520 --> 01:23:30.840
<v Speaker 20>point like percent of the theological points like the ES

1469
01:23:30.960 --> 01:23:31.840
<v Speaker 20>and senergystinctions.

1470
01:23:31.840 --> 01:23:34.000
<v Speaker 9>I think it makes the Philly oquay make no sense.

1471
01:23:34.079 --> 01:23:34.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think that is.

1472
01:23:37.560 --> 01:23:41.079
<v Speaker 9>I genuinely do. I agree with that more so. But

1473
01:23:41.319 --> 01:23:43.439
<v Speaker 9>my contention is with something like.

1474
01:23:45.640 --> 01:23:49.680
<v Speaker 20>The Seventh Ecumenical Council binding the consciences.

1475
01:23:49.119 --> 01:23:55.680
<v Speaker 9>Of people to act to doing something that that could

1476
01:23:55.800 --> 01:23:57.359
<v Speaker 9>be idolatry. And I'm not saying that.

1477
01:23:57.600 --> 01:24:02.319
<v Speaker 1>Is that is what it is, because I understand, but

1478
01:24:02.439 --> 01:24:05.159
<v Speaker 1>anything could be idolatry, right, so reading the Bible could

1479
01:24:05.159 --> 01:24:09.039
<v Speaker 1>be idolatry. So the fact that something could be abused

1480
01:24:09.119 --> 01:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>has nothing to do with whether it's a legitimate principle

1481
01:24:12.039 --> 01:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>that is binding. So if you read John Damascus's little

1482
01:24:15.880 --> 01:24:20.560
<v Speaker 1>book Defense of the Holy Images and the book by St.

1483
01:24:20.600 --> 01:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Theodore the Student Own the Holy icons both of those

1484
01:24:22.600 --> 01:24:26.920
<v Speaker 1>are very short, small books. John Damascus's book focuses on

1485
01:24:27.039 --> 01:24:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the philosophical side of iconography, and the Saint theoord of

1486
01:24:30.680 --> 01:24:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the Studites book focuses on the crystological dimension of it.

1487
01:24:34.800 --> 01:24:40.159
<v Speaker 1>Those two books I think solidify philosophically and dogmatically why

1488
01:24:40.239 --> 01:24:42.640
<v Speaker 1>we would do it. And then the book I would.

1489
01:24:42.479 --> 01:24:44.760
<v Speaker 3>Recommend, actually don't have to read the book.

1490
01:24:44.960 --> 01:24:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Our friend Lewis made a documentary called Old Testament Worship

1491
01:24:48.680 --> 01:24:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and Orthodox Christian Orthodox Worship in the Old Testament Orthodox

1492
01:24:54.039 --> 01:24:55.880
<v Speaker 1>you Hata channel. It's a two hour hour and a

1493
01:24:55.920 --> 01:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>half documentary. That documentary is a summation of the Williams

1494
01:25:00.439 --> 01:25:04.800
<v Speaker 1>and Anstall book, Hugh Wybery's book on the Byzantine Liturgy, and.

1495
01:25:04.960 --> 01:25:08.840
<v Speaker 3>Basically it's just demist I'm gonna pull it up, man, Okay.

1496
01:25:09.239 --> 01:25:13.199
<v Speaker 1>It's just demonstrating that the the liturgical worship in the

1497
01:25:13.279 --> 01:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Orthodox Church is literally derived from the temple and synagogue service,

1498
01:25:17.880 --> 01:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and because it's derived from that, it is a natural

1499
01:25:20.880 --> 01:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>outflowing of having uh, having images of natural outflow of that, and.

1500
01:25:27.000 --> 01:25:29.880
<v Speaker 9>That includes kissing and prostrating.

1501
01:25:29.399 --> 01:25:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Before absolutely the Israelies prostrate before the temple and before

1502
01:25:33.920 --> 01:25:34.239
<v Speaker 1>the arc.

1503
01:25:34.359 --> 01:25:37.439
<v Speaker 20>Yeah yeah, yeah, I mean I'm definitely aware of that.

1504
01:25:38.880 --> 01:25:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, what I'm saying is that it's a holistic thing.

1505
01:25:40.920 --> 01:25:44.079
<v Speaker 1>So the the idolatry is something that's primarily and first

1506
01:25:44.079 --> 01:25:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and foremost internal. It can manifest externally, but what constitutes

1507
01:25:48.840 --> 01:25:51.800
<v Speaker 1>idolatry is not literally just the bowing, because we have

1508
01:25:52.000 --> 01:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>in scripture people bowing before Pharaoh, bowing before Joseph, bows

1509
01:25:55.560 --> 01:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>before Pharaoh, people prostrate before, bow before Enik andcuuse me

1510
01:26:00.039 --> 01:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>before Elijah. So it's the interior disposition to believe or

1511
01:26:04.800 --> 01:26:08.479
<v Speaker 1>think that created things are divine or uncreated. That's what

1512
01:26:09.560 --> 01:26:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Paul says idolatry is to ascribe to created things for

1513
01:26:14.600 --> 01:26:15.239
<v Speaker 1>divine nature.

1514
01:26:15.279 --> 01:26:21.600
<v Speaker 20>In Act seventeen right, I visited an antiochid Orthodox church

1515
01:26:21.760 --> 01:26:26.600
<v Speaker 20>with a friend recently, and I was I enjoyed all

1516
01:26:26.680 --> 01:26:28.359
<v Speaker 20>of it, but there was the part where we got

1517
01:26:28.399 --> 01:26:30.720
<v Speaker 20>in line to kiss the icons. And I got in

1518
01:26:30.800 --> 01:26:33.880
<v Speaker 20>line and I was ready to do it, but then

1519
01:26:34.000 --> 01:26:36.319
<v Speaker 20>there was like this one tiny part of me that said,

1520
01:26:36.720 --> 01:26:39.600
<v Speaker 20>I need to be one hundred percent certain before I

1521
01:26:39.720 --> 01:26:43.159
<v Speaker 20>participate in this, just in case I'm in the wrong,

1522
01:26:44.039 --> 01:26:45.960
<v Speaker 20>Because I'm not opposed to other people doing it.

1523
01:26:46.520 --> 01:26:48.359
<v Speaker 9>My question is the binding of the conscience.

1524
01:26:48.600 --> 01:26:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, Luther had no Luther didn't have any

1525
01:26:50.640 --> 01:26:53.119
<v Speaker 1>problem with this stuff, So I'm aware.

1526
01:26:53.119 --> 01:26:55.439
<v Speaker 9>And I'm not like a luther fanatic either.

1527
01:26:55.880 --> 01:26:59.720
<v Speaker 20>I joined the Lutheran Church in lieu of my Baptist

1528
01:27:00.079 --> 01:27:02.880
<v Speaker 20>around because I said, okay.

1529
01:27:02.680 --> 01:27:05.399
<v Speaker 1>Well, okay, I got it wrong. Well, you know I

1530
01:27:05.479 --> 01:27:08.720
<v Speaker 1>have I have two talks on iconography and the principles

1531
01:27:08.720 --> 01:27:12.399
<v Speaker 1>behind it. I have Lewis's documentary here pulled up. You

1532
01:27:12.439 --> 01:27:15.239
<v Speaker 1>can watch that, and that would be what I recommend.

1533
01:27:15.239 --> 01:27:17.319
<v Speaker 1>But those are great questions, and I understand you're not

1534
01:27:17.439 --> 01:27:20.279
<v Speaker 1>in a position that any of us haven't already also

1535
01:27:20.399 --> 01:27:22.640
<v Speaker 1>been in. I was Calvinist for many years, so I

1536
01:27:22.800 --> 01:27:28.479
<v Speaker 1>totally understand. I had the same sort of hesitancies when

1537
01:27:28.520 --> 01:27:33.159
<v Speaker 1>I was going from Calvinism to Catholicism. Remember the first

1538
01:27:33.159 --> 01:27:34.119
<v Speaker 1>time I saw a relic, I.

1539
01:27:34.159 --> 01:27:34.760
<v Speaker 3>Was creeped out.

1540
01:27:35.560 --> 01:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>But you know, after a while, it's not gonna be

1541
01:27:37.000 --> 01:27:39.039
<v Speaker 1>a big deal to at all. But yeah, those are

1542
01:27:39.039 --> 01:27:41.359
<v Speaker 1>the books I would check out. I got a few

1543
01:27:41.359 --> 01:27:44.000
<v Speaker 1>more minutes here Inspire. What's up?

1544
01:27:49.880 --> 01:27:50.079
<v Speaker 4>Hello?

1545
01:27:50.159 --> 01:27:50.560
<v Speaker 5>Can you hear me?

1546
01:27:52.560 --> 01:27:52.880
<v Speaker 4>All right?

1547
01:27:52.920 --> 01:27:54.079
<v Speaker 21>Hey, j big fan.

1548
01:27:55.439 --> 01:27:57.439
<v Speaker 4>I just wanted to ask for some clarification.

1549
01:27:57.600 --> 01:28:01.600
<v Speaker 13>I got kind of a little fight YouTube comments section earlier,

1550
01:28:01.880 --> 01:28:05.640
<v Speaker 13>and I was concused of strong your position and I

1551
01:28:05.840 --> 01:28:06.520
<v Speaker 13>really didn't.

1552
01:28:06.279 --> 01:28:07.319
<v Speaker 4>Mean to I'm just ignorant.

1553
01:28:07.319 --> 01:28:08.479
<v Speaker 1>I guess what.

1554
01:28:10.279 --> 01:28:11.439
<v Speaker 4>Could you explain to me the.

1555
01:28:13.359 --> 01:28:17.279
<v Speaker 17>On the concept of logic in God like logic or

1556
01:28:17.319 --> 01:28:18.359
<v Speaker 17>God being above logic?

1557
01:28:18.399 --> 01:28:19.399
<v Speaker 4>Can you re explain that?

1558
01:28:20.399 --> 01:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Right? So if you read Maximus, for example, he'll talk

1559
01:28:22.640 --> 01:28:28.479
<v Speaker 1>about the principles of the created order, like mathematics, geometry, logic.

1560
01:28:29.319 --> 01:28:33.439
<v Speaker 1>These are features and principles that are created now. They

1561
01:28:33.560 --> 01:28:36.199
<v Speaker 1>reflect the divine mind, and they reflect the Divine mind

1562
01:28:36.279 --> 01:28:39.279
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the uncreated low gie for those things.

1563
01:28:39.880 --> 01:28:43.000
<v Speaker 1>But we do not equate the laws of logic with

1564
01:28:43.680 --> 01:28:46.359
<v Speaker 1>God or with the divine mind. That's a Platonic position.

1565
01:28:46.520 --> 01:28:51.560
<v Speaker 1>So for example, Plato taught that universals are essentially identical

1566
01:28:51.680 --> 01:28:55.359
<v Speaker 1>to the ideal realm. We don't do that. Maximus says,

1567
01:28:55.520 --> 01:28:59.239
<v Speaker 1>universals are created and they can perish. This is a

1568
01:28:59.359 --> 01:29:04.600
<v Speaker 1>specific distinction to Platonism from our position. So when we

1569
01:29:04.720 --> 01:29:09.000
<v Speaker 1>say that God is supra logical. It means that the Triad,

1570
01:29:09.159 --> 01:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the Trinity, and the mode of existence that God has

1571
01:29:12.359 --> 01:29:15.239
<v Speaker 1>is beyond anything in the created order. There are things

1572
01:29:15.279 --> 01:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>that God can do and show us in the created

1573
01:29:17.640 --> 01:29:20.520
<v Speaker 1>order that are analogous or that reflect Him, but they're

1574
01:29:20.600 --> 01:29:22.119
<v Speaker 1>always pale and limited.

1575
01:29:22.439 --> 01:29:24.960
<v Speaker 3>And that's part of our apathatic theology, is part of.

1576
01:29:25.000 --> 01:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>The notion of divine transcendence, that there's nothing in the

1577
01:29:27.880 --> 01:29:32.039
<v Speaker 1>created order that perfectly matches up to the unique mode

1578
01:29:32.079 --> 01:29:34.840
<v Speaker 1>of being of the Trinity. And that's why a lot

1579
01:29:34.920 --> 01:29:38.199
<v Speaker 1>of times you can see this very clearly when you

1580
01:29:38.560 --> 01:29:41.319
<v Speaker 1>enter into debates with say Muslims, who will utilize the

1581
01:29:41.399 --> 01:29:44.600
<v Speaker 1>logical problem of the Trinity. They utilize the LPT to

1582
01:29:44.680 --> 01:29:48.520
<v Speaker 1>try to say that, well, logic and analytical philosophy dictates

1583
01:29:48.560 --> 01:29:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that you can only count in one way or name

1584
01:29:50.960 --> 01:29:51.640
<v Speaker 1>in one way.

1585
01:29:52.079 --> 01:29:53.600
<v Speaker 3>And we don't say that about the Trinity.

1586
01:29:53.640 --> 01:29:55.920
<v Speaker 1>We say that in terms of the Trinity, we're counting

1587
01:29:56.000 --> 01:30:00.319
<v Speaker 1>both by division and by identity. You see, so you

1588
01:30:00.439 --> 01:30:06.880
<v Speaker 1>cannot subject God to being defined by the categories of

1589
01:30:06.920 --> 01:30:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the created order, because then what ends up happening is

1590
01:30:09.000 --> 01:30:10.960
<v Speaker 1>you get people who say stuff like Muslims do or

1591
01:30:11.039 --> 01:30:14.720
<v Speaker 1>like a Roman Catholic like or a Neoplatonist that if

1592
01:30:14.800 --> 01:30:17.920
<v Speaker 1>God is absolutely simple outside of time and space, et cetera,

1593
01:30:18.159 --> 01:30:20.600
<v Speaker 1>he can't be in time and space. It's a contradiction.

1594
01:30:20.640 --> 01:30:24.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a logical contradiction. Or by the notion of Ariscitilian

1595
01:30:24.840 --> 01:30:27.800
<v Speaker 1>identity or whatever. Oh, God can't be a triad. It's

1596
01:30:27.840 --> 01:30:28.840
<v Speaker 1>a logical contradiction.

1597
01:30:31.840 --> 01:30:33.960
<v Speaker 4>Okay, thank you. That cleared it up for me. Right.

1598
01:30:34.000 --> 01:30:38.239
<v Speaker 1>So what we're arguing is that no God is above logic,

1599
01:30:38.479 --> 01:30:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and only in God could you ground the principles of logic.

1600
01:30:42.000 --> 01:30:45.319
<v Speaker 1>That's a different position than a rationalist position, which says

1601
01:30:45.399 --> 01:30:47.439
<v Speaker 1>something like God must submit to logic.

1602
01:30:48.800 --> 01:30:51.359
<v Speaker 4>Okay, I think that's where I was getting confused. I

1603
01:30:51.640 --> 01:30:54.159
<v Speaker 4>like your analogy that used Jane, like if you were

1604
01:30:54.199 --> 01:31:00.640
<v Speaker 4>to write an autobiography or if he wrote any or

1605
01:31:01.359 --> 01:31:06.199
<v Speaker 4>created a piece of art, it comes from you and

1606
01:31:08.359 --> 01:31:12.880
<v Speaker 4>it reflects who you are. But certainly you wouldn't say

1607
01:31:13.960 --> 01:31:17.920
<v Speaker 4>it exhausts you. Yes, that there's a one to one correspondence,

1608
01:31:18.039 --> 01:31:24.199
<v Speaker 4>that that's identical what you create and what reflects you

1609
01:31:24.319 --> 01:31:28.600
<v Speaker 4>is identical to everything that you are. I always I

1610
01:31:28.680 --> 01:31:30.159
<v Speaker 4>appreciate that you do that analogy.

1611
01:31:31.159 --> 01:31:32.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's I forgot about that.

1612
01:31:32.960 --> 01:31:36.720
<v Speaker 1>That's a helpful thing, right Like if I if I

1613
01:31:36.800 --> 01:31:39.880
<v Speaker 1>write an autobiography, it expresses things about me, but it

1614
01:31:39.960 --> 01:31:42.439
<v Speaker 1>does not exhaust me. I am more than the autobiography

1615
01:31:42.479 --> 01:31:44.399
<v Speaker 1>about me. And you can say the same thing about

1616
01:31:44.399 --> 01:31:47.359
<v Speaker 1>anything in the created order that reflects God or reflects

1617
01:31:47.399 --> 01:31:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that divine mind. It's always going to be limited in

1618
01:31:49.960 --> 01:31:56.560
<v Speaker 1>its scope. And even even logic itself will note that

1619
01:31:56.960 --> 01:31:59.880
<v Speaker 1>there are certain things that are paradoxes and a lot

1620
01:31:59.880 --> 01:32:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of that can't necessarily be solved, that don't necessarily contradict. Right,

1621
01:32:08.079 --> 01:32:11.359
<v Speaker 1>So like the tortoise, What's the thing? From Lewis Carroll.

1622
01:32:11.439 --> 01:32:15.199
<v Speaker 1>The tortoise and Achilles is an example of a logical

1623
01:32:15.239 --> 01:32:19.960
<v Speaker 1>paradox that shows that sets are limited, Logic is limited,

1624
01:32:20.960 --> 01:32:25.319
<v Speaker 1>propositions are limited. But even if they're limited and ultim

1625
01:32:25.439 --> 01:32:29.640
<v Speaker 1>ultimately end up being self referential, they don't become contradicted. Yeah,

1626
01:32:29.680 --> 01:32:32.000
<v Speaker 1>they don't become a contradiction just because they have these

1627
01:32:32.039 --> 01:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>limitations or become self referencing.

1628
01:32:35.000 --> 01:32:36.800
<v Speaker 3>And this plays into the Gurdell point.

1629
01:32:36.840 --> 01:32:39.640
<v Speaker 1>But if you go back to the just look up

1630
01:32:39.640 --> 01:32:46.439
<v Speaker 1>the tortoise and Achilles and the logic paradox that Lewis

1631
01:32:46.479 --> 01:32:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Carroll sets up. You can see that it is a paradox,

1632
01:32:51.680 --> 01:32:53.960
<v Speaker 1>but it's not a contradiction. And I'm just using that

1633
01:32:54.279 --> 01:32:57.159
<v Speaker 1>as an example from even within the created realm, even

1634
01:32:57.199 --> 01:33:00.880
<v Speaker 1>within the domain of logic, there are paradoxes that occur

1635
01:33:01.600 --> 01:33:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that are not contradictions. Is that correct? I mean, you

1636
01:33:04.960 --> 01:33:06.920
<v Speaker 1>know logic better than me, father Deacon. Is that is

1637
01:33:06.960 --> 01:33:08.119
<v Speaker 1>that correct to what I'm saying?

1638
01:33:08.880 --> 01:33:17.439
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, exactly, there's I mean, if you just break down

1639
01:33:17.479 --> 01:33:24.920
<v Speaker 4>the etymology of paradox, there's like a tension, but it's

1640
01:33:24.960 --> 01:33:28.319
<v Speaker 4>not a contract. I mean, contradictions are defined very specifically.

1641
01:33:31.399 --> 01:33:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a contradiction would be like, you know, denying a

1642
01:33:33.840 --> 01:33:38.439
<v Speaker 1>fundamental thing, like, uh, the dog is not a dog, right,

1643
01:33:38.520 --> 01:33:40.800
<v Speaker 1>so I'm denying the law of identity, right, that would

1644
01:33:40.840 --> 01:33:44.319
<v Speaker 1>be a contradiction. And to say that God, byas very,

1645
01:33:44.399 --> 01:33:49.600
<v Speaker 1>which is what we're told transcends logical categories, does not

1646
01:33:49.800 --> 01:33:52.920
<v Speaker 1>mean that he is a contradiction or that he's irrational.

1647
01:33:53.359 --> 01:34:07.840
<v Speaker 1>He is supra rational Thomas. So again, I mean for

1648
01:34:07.880 --> 01:34:11.159
<v Speaker 1>the people who are fussing about iconography, like are you

1649
01:34:11.279 --> 01:34:12.840
<v Speaker 1>ignorant of how the Jews worship?

1650
01:34:12.920 --> 01:34:14.640
<v Speaker 3>Do you not know they had images? Do you not

1651
01:34:14.800 --> 01:34:17.159
<v Speaker 3>know they had images.

1652
01:34:16.760 --> 01:34:19.039
<v Speaker 1>All over the place, They had an altar, they had

1653
01:34:19.159 --> 01:34:21.840
<v Speaker 1>an arc with angels, they had imagery all in the temple,

1654
01:34:22.640 --> 01:34:25.159
<v Speaker 1>and do you know they prostrated before the arc and

1655
01:34:25.279 --> 01:34:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the temple. You didn't know this? I mean you would

1656
01:34:27.760 --> 01:34:31.760
<v Speaker 1>call this idolatry because of your Protestant presuppositions. So your

1657
01:34:31.760 --> 01:34:36.560
<v Speaker 1>gnostic is your position. You think that idolatry is characterized

1658
01:34:36.600 --> 01:34:41.800
<v Speaker 1>by merely bowing and prostrating when multiple people in the

1659
01:34:41.880 --> 01:34:47.479
<v Speaker 1>Bible prostrate before other human beings, saints, patriarchs. You don't

1660
01:34:47.520 --> 01:34:54.159
<v Speaker 1>know this, Jay Carino. If you're not going to come debate,

1661
01:34:54.279 --> 01:34:56.960
<v Speaker 1>then then you can leave like it's this is not

1662
01:34:57.079 --> 01:35:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the place for you know, what did the arc represent? Yeah? So,

1663
01:35:02.399 --> 01:35:09.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean it defeats your purpose if they're reverencing things

1664
01:35:09.439 --> 01:35:14.359
<v Speaker 1>that image Christ, just like an icon images Christ.

1665
01:35:15.760 --> 01:35:21.840
<v Speaker 4>So shouldn't you stop kissing your family members if you're

1666
01:35:21.840 --> 01:35:29.039
<v Speaker 4>going to be consistent, because that's going to be idolatrous, right, Yeah, Well.

1667
01:35:28.960 --> 01:35:31.520
<v Speaker 1>When they dedicate, when they dedicate the temple, go read

1668
01:35:31.560 --> 01:35:34.439
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a Chronicles first Cornlics twenty eight. I

1669
01:35:34.479 --> 01:35:37.560
<v Speaker 1>think when they dedicate the temple, all of Israel prostrates

1670
01:35:37.600 --> 01:35:39.359
<v Speaker 1>read both accounts, because there are two accounts of it.

1671
01:35:40.119 --> 01:35:40.960
<v Speaker 3>In the Books of Kings.

1672
01:35:41.319 --> 01:35:43.880
<v Speaker 1>All of Israel prostrates before Solomon and before the Ark

1673
01:35:43.920 --> 01:35:46.920
<v Speaker 1>and before the Temple. So I guess they're all idolatrous.

1674
01:35:47.119 --> 01:35:49.439
<v Speaker 1>Even though the cloud with glory cloud the Holy Spirit

1675
01:35:49.520 --> 01:35:51.319
<v Speaker 1>comes down, they're all prostrated.

1676
01:35:52.439 --> 01:35:55.399
<v Speaker 3>I guess they're all idolaters. But you guys are just ignorant.

1677
01:35:55.439 --> 01:35:55.560
<v Speaker 4>Man.

1678
01:35:55.680 --> 01:35:59.319
<v Speaker 1>Look, go watch the documentary that we have here. Christian

1679
01:35:59.439 --> 01:36:02.840
<v Speaker 1>worship and the Old Testament. Everything that the Orthodox Church

1680
01:36:02.960 --> 01:36:08.600
<v Speaker 1>does literally comes out of the Apostolic tradition from the

1681
01:36:08.760 --> 01:36:18.359
<v Speaker 1>Jewish temple and synagogue service, except it's a Christianized versionwise Otherwise, again, guys, mods,

1682
01:36:18.399 --> 01:36:21.159
<v Speaker 1>if these people don't come to debate, if they're just

1683
01:36:21.199 --> 01:36:24.880
<v Speaker 1>here to spam, just boot these people. It's not a

1684
01:36:25.039 --> 01:36:27.760
<v Speaker 1>vehicle for you to spam your Protestant stuff for three hours.

1685
01:36:29.000 --> 01:36:35.960
<v Speaker 1>It's an open forum. Offer to come debate. Let's see

1686
01:36:36.319 --> 01:36:39.800
<v Speaker 1>next Andrata.

1687
01:36:42.800 --> 01:36:43.880
<v Speaker 3>This will probably be the last one.

1688
01:36:44.000 --> 01:36:45.239
<v Speaker 1>I wan to remind you guys who had to show

1689
01:36:45.279 --> 01:36:48.119
<v Speaker 1>sponsor who is chalk dot com the best in supplementation.

1690
01:36:48.239 --> 01:36:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Head on over to chalk dot com and use a

1691
01:36:49.640 --> 01:36:52.479
<v Speaker 1>promo code J forty four life to get forty four

1692
01:36:52.880 --> 01:36:56.520
<v Speaker 1>of those off those great products that will help you

1693
01:36:57.479 --> 01:37:02.680
<v Speaker 1>to become toxically masculine. We support toxic masculinity and Chalk

1694
01:37:03.079 --> 01:37:06.800
<v Speaker 1>helps you to become toxically masculine. The Performance Stack is

1695
01:37:06.840 --> 01:37:10.439
<v Speaker 1>great for guys. It's a great pre workout synergy product

1696
01:37:11.119 --> 01:37:13.359
<v Speaker 1>product that they have. This includes a ton cut a

1697
01:37:13.399 --> 01:37:15.359
<v Speaker 1>lee which boost test sauscerone. This includes the Action two

1698
01:37:15.359 --> 01:37:17.279
<v Speaker 1>point zero which gives you more energy, and of course

1699
01:37:17.319 --> 01:37:20.239
<v Speaker 1>the pre workout chad Mode, which is very strong. I

1700
01:37:20.359 --> 01:37:23.239
<v Speaker 1>recommend taking small doses of chad Mode if you're going

1701
01:37:23.279 --> 01:37:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to work out, or you will overheat and you'll lose it.

1702
01:37:28.359 --> 01:37:30.359
<v Speaker 1>So head on over there to Chalk dot com. Thelink

1703
01:37:30.479 --> 01:37:33.119
<v Speaker 1>is in the chat right there. C hoq dot com

1704
01:37:33.239 --> 01:37:35.359
<v Speaker 1>promo code j A y four four l a f

1705
01:37:35.439 --> 01:37:36.880
<v Speaker 1>E j A y four four l a f E.

1706
01:37:37.680 --> 01:37:39.960
<v Speaker 1>That is a subscription thing. You don't have to do that.

1707
01:37:40.039 --> 01:37:42.000
<v Speaker 1>If you want just the discount, do it j A

1708
01:37:42.239 --> 01:37:45.159
<v Speaker 1>y forty JAY forty to get forty percent off that

1709
01:37:45.199 --> 01:37:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Performance Stack. I know you're gonna like it. I utilize

1710
01:37:47.920 --> 01:37:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Chalk on a daily basis, big fan, and they've been

1711
01:37:51.159 --> 01:37:54.359
<v Speaker 1>the show sponsor now for two and a half three years.

1712
01:37:54.760 --> 01:37:56.680
<v Speaker 1>So shout out to chalk dot com. We loove chalk

1713
01:37:56.720 --> 01:38:00.840
<v Speaker 1>dot com andrat what's.

1714
01:38:02.600 --> 01:38:02.920
<v Speaker 4>Okay?

1715
01:38:03.119 --> 01:38:07.760
<v Speaker 22>So I am a Catholic and I'm calling in to

1716
01:38:08.039 --> 01:38:11.479
<v Speaker 22>kind of just ask the question about, uh, the Orthodox position.

1717
01:38:12.560 --> 01:38:16.000
<v Speaker 23>So I've heard one of the biggest Orthodox arguments that

1718
01:38:16.039 --> 01:38:21.319
<v Speaker 23>I've heard for Orthodoxy is that they maintain tradition and

1719
01:38:21.399 --> 01:38:22.680
<v Speaker 23>they do not change in the.

1720
01:38:22.760 --> 01:38:28.039
<v Speaker 22>Midst of societal change. But my question is, I don't

1721
01:38:28.600 --> 01:38:32.399
<v Speaker 22>I think that some sort of change is necessary to

1722
01:38:32.560 --> 01:38:38.840
<v Speaker 22>kind of encourage people to worship, like, for example, like

1723
01:38:39.199 --> 01:38:42.920
<v Speaker 22>the church teach like, for example, the Catholic Church teaching

1724
01:38:42.960 --> 01:38:43.760
<v Speaker 22>on the death penalty.

1725
01:38:43.920 --> 01:38:44.920
<v Speaker 5>Earlier in the.

1726
01:38:45.000 --> 01:38:48.359
<v Speaker 22>Church church's history they allow the death penalty, but now

1727
01:38:48.479 --> 01:38:50.960
<v Speaker 22>they condemn it because now we have other ways of

1728
01:38:51.079 --> 01:38:54.079
<v Speaker 22>treating criminals and punishing.

1729
01:38:54.279 --> 01:38:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, that just that just demonstra well, that just demonstrates

1730
01:38:56.880 --> 01:39:01.159
<v Speaker 1>the fallacy a round Catholicism because it was previously argued

1731
01:39:01.159 --> 01:39:03.439
<v Speaker 1>to be a principle of natural justice. If you read

1732
01:39:03.479 --> 01:39:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the Catechism of Trent, that's how they argue the death penalty.

1733
01:39:06.520 --> 01:39:09.439
<v Speaker 1>So what this actually shows is that the pope is

1734
01:39:09.520 --> 01:39:11.760
<v Speaker 1>above even the natural law right.

1735
01:39:12.199 --> 01:39:15.199
<v Speaker 3>So I think that's a preposterous argument.

1736
01:39:15.239 --> 01:39:17.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trying to be mean to you, but if

1737
01:39:17.159 --> 01:39:19.319
<v Speaker 1>the pope is above natural law and he can say

1738
01:39:19.399 --> 01:39:22.600
<v Speaker 1>that the death penalty is quote against the Gospel, you

1739
01:39:22.720 --> 01:39:26.159
<v Speaker 1>understand that that's not the argument that Francis makes. Francis

1740
01:39:26.239 --> 01:39:30.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't say that it's merely a brutal thing that needs

1741
01:39:30.800 --> 01:39:34.239
<v Speaker 1>to be replaced with more humane means of imprisonment or whatever.

1742
01:39:34.640 --> 01:39:37.039
<v Speaker 1>He says, it's actually against the Gospel.

1743
01:39:37.159 --> 01:39:38.520
<v Speaker 3>That's Francis's argumentation.

1744
01:39:39.000 --> 01:39:42.520
<v Speaker 1>That's way out of field from the Council of Trent

1745
01:39:42.640 --> 01:39:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and the Catechism of Trent arguing that the death penalty

1746
01:39:44.960 --> 01:39:48.399
<v Speaker 1>is a principle of natural justice. So I would argue that, no,

1747
01:39:49.880 --> 01:39:52.680
<v Speaker 1>we do not need to change our morals and update

1748
01:39:52.720 --> 01:39:57.399
<v Speaker 1>our morals, and the Romancalllic Church just demonstrates its contradictions.

1749
01:39:57.439 --> 01:40:01.439
<v Speaker 1>By then you notice the double standard here, right, because

1750
01:40:01.960 --> 01:40:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you guys will say that the Roman Catholic Church is

1751
01:40:05.640 --> 01:40:09.119
<v Speaker 1>the guardian of faith and morals of the Apostolic deposit

1752
01:40:09.279 --> 01:40:11.960
<v Speaker 1>But then it turns out, well, that can change when

1753
01:40:12.000 --> 01:40:14.960
<v Speaker 1>it needs to. So it's sort of like you guys

1754
01:40:15.359 --> 01:40:19.520
<v Speaker 1>allow yourselves the arbitrary ability to change whenever you want

1755
01:40:19.560 --> 01:40:23.199
<v Speaker 1>it to. Sell it. But then you'll argue against changing

1756
01:40:23.319 --> 01:40:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and trying to argue that your position is a maintainer

1757
01:40:25.880 --> 01:40:27.199
<v Speaker 1>of tradition when it suits you.

1758
01:40:28.680 --> 01:40:33.079
<v Speaker 4>Well, the thing is is that you know the pope. Well, okay,

1759
01:40:33.520 --> 01:40:35.920
<v Speaker 4>I will kind of see that for the sake of

1760
01:40:36.079 --> 01:40:36.720
<v Speaker 4>argument that the.

1761
01:40:36.720 --> 01:40:41.319
<v Speaker 22>Pope perhaps made the wrong decision and calling it a

1762
01:40:41.439 --> 01:40:42.560
<v Speaker 22>violation of the Gospel.

1763
01:40:42.640 --> 01:40:45.279
<v Speaker 5>But the kind of what I'm trying to get at

1764
01:40:45.520 --> 01:40:46.840
<v Speaker 5>is not.

1765
01:40:46.960 --> 01:40:48.680
<v Speaker 4>Necessarily the changing of the moral law.

1766
01:40:48.760 --> 01:40:52.159
<v Speaker 22>But for example, the novus oidl and the changing of

1767
01:40:52.239 --> 01:40:56.159
<v Speaker 22>the Latin Mass and how the church changes, like how

1768
01:40:56.319 --> 01:40:59.159
<v Speaker 22>it leads the mass and things like that. I don't

1769
01:40:59.159 --> 01:41:02.560
<v Speaker 22>necessarily see how that's like a bad thing to kind

1770
01:41:02.600 --> 01:41:06.199
<v Speaker 22>of change how we conduct the mass in subtle ways.

1771
01:41:06.560 --> 01:41:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, I would say, you know what, if

1772
01:41:09.600 --> 01:41:12.079
<v Speaker 1>you want that, go for it. I mean, if you

1773
01:41:12.199 --> 01:41:15.399
<v Speaker 1>want clown mouses, you want the all the things that

1774
01:41:15.479 --> 01:41:21.079
<v Speaker 1>attend the novasorto, the puppet masses, the guitar masses, hip

1775
01:41:21.119 --> 01:41:25.880
<v Speaker 1>hop masses, go for it. My new approach to Roman

1776
01:41:25.920 --> 01:41:28.399
<v Speaker 1>Catholicism is no longer to try to warn them or

1777
01:41:28.399 --> 01:41:30.119
<v Speaker 1>talk them out of it, is just to encourage them,

1778
01:41:30.439 --> 01:41:33.640
<v Speaker 1>because I feel like at this point I mean, if

1779
01:41:33.680 --> 01:41:37.159
<v Speaker 1>you're really dead set on that, I say go for it.

1780
01:41:37.279 --> 01:41:41.039
<v Speaker 3>You're you're choosing your own curse, so have.

1781
01:41:41.119 --> 01:41:49.039
<v Speaker 1>Fun with that. Lex last one, if people don't have

1782
01:41:49.199 --> 01:41:51.319
<v Speaker 1>the discernment at this point, then I just say go

1783
01:41:51.479 --> 01:41:56.800
<v Speaker 1>for it. So yep, hey ja.

1784
01:41:57.479 --> 01:41:59.520
<v Speaker 4>So I am Baptist.

1785
01:41:59.600 --> 01:42:02.560
<v Speaker 8>But over the last few months you have basically all

1786
01:42:02.680 --> 01:42:06.079
<v Speaker 8>my pre suppositions are just faded into mid air, followed

1787
01:42:06.159 --> 01:42:09.520
<v Speaker 8>up on you know, your books, your suggestive books, and

1788
01:42:09.560 --> 01:42:10.399
<v Speaker 8>your reading list.

1789
01:42:10.279 --> 01:42:11.600
<v Speaker 3>And that helped out a lot.

1790
01:42:11.720 --> 01:42:15.359
<v Speaker 8>But my question today is about order of theology. It's

1791
01:42:15.600 --> 01:42:17.439
<v Speaker 8>something that you bring up in your videos and you

1792
01:42:17.560 --> 01:42:20.359
<v Speaker 8>talk about how a lot of Protestants have an improper

1793
01:42:20.600 --> 01:42:23.800
<v Speaker 8>order of theology, saying that they start from their soteriology.

1794
01:42:23.960 --> 01:42:24.079
<v Speaker 4>Right.

1795
01:42:24.960 --> 01:42:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, actually many of them, if they're Calvinists, will start

1796
01:42:27.640 --> 01:42:32.399
<v Speaker 1>from the Divine Decree and then work to materialogy. Yeah.

1797
01:42:32.680 --> 01:42:35.760
<v Speaker 8>So I've noticed that's exactly right, and I think that's trying.

1798
01:42:36.000 --> 01:42:38.079
<v Speaker 8>What I'm trying to get at here is you mentioned that,

1799
01:42:38.159 --> 01:42:40.920
<v Speaker 8>like the Trinity is probably the first place to start,

1800
01:42:41.039 --> 01:42:43.760
<v Speaker 8>and then Christology and then everything should come out from

1801
01:42:43.800 --> 01:42:44.239
<v Speaker 8>the Trinity.

1802
01:42:44.319 --> 01:42:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, and it's not it's not accidental that the

1803
01:42:46.840 --> 01:42:49.039
<v Speaker 1>history of the Church providentially did that very thing.

1804
01:42:51.159 --> 01:42:52.039
<v Speaker 4>Oh okay, all right.

1805
01:42:52.199 --> 01:42:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean the acumenical councils begin with nicea and constantin

1806
01:42:55.800 --> 01:42:59.319
<v Speaker 1>uple one being Trinity, and you do Christ right, and

1807
01:42:59.479 --> 01:43:02.600
<v Speaker 1>then the all the successive ecumenical councils, even the seventh

1808
01:43:02.680 --> 01:43:03.840
<v Speaker 1>are all about Christology.

1809
01:43:05.239 --> 01:43:06.640
<v Speaker 8>Oh yeah, That's what I was trying to get at,

1810
01:43:06.720 --> 01:43:10.920
<v Speaker 8>is what principle do we use to properly find like

1811
01:43:10.960 --> 01:43:12.239
<v Speaker 8>the right order of theology.

1812
01:43:12.359 --> 01:43:14.840
<v Speaker 4>So would you say it's like a historical Well, I.

1813
01:43:14.840 --> 01:43:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Think, providentially it's that. But I think just even in

1814
01:43:18.800 --> 01:43:22.119
<v Speaker 1>terms of divine revelation, obviously God and His and the

1815
01:43:22.199 --> 01:43:26.279
<v Speaker 1>incarnation are first. I just I think divine revelation presupposes

1816
01:43:26.319 --> 01:43:27.199
<v Speaker 1>and reveals.

1817
01:43:26.880 --> 01:43:31.439
<v Speaker 8>That, okay, because it makes sense intuitive intuitively to me.

1818
01:43:31.560 --> 01:43:32.359
<v Speaker 1>Also, yeah, of.

1819
01:43:32.359 --> 01:43:32.880
<v Speaker 9>Course, yeah.

1820
01:43:32.880 --> 01:43:36.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean when Jesus comes the majority, especially in the

1821
01:43:36.159 --> 01:43:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Gospel of John, of his of his discussions are about

1822
01:43:39.800 --> 01:43:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the relationship of him to the Father and the Spirit.

1823
01:43:41.920 --> 01:43:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's we've already seen that. When I lecture

1824
01:43:44.640 --> 01:43:46.600
<v Speaker 1>through the totality of the Gospel of John, every chapter

1825
01:43:46.600 --> 01:43:50.079
<v Speaker 1>of the Gospel of John is a has references to

1826
01:43:50.359 --> 01:43:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the deedy of Christ and or the Trinity in every chapter.

1827
01:43:53.199 --> 01:43:57.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's the locus of John the Theologian's emphasis.

1828
01:43:57.680 --> 01:44:00.119
<v Speaker 3>And uh, you know it's the most.

1829
01:44:00.199 --> 01:44:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Quote trinitarian of the books, the Gospels. So yeah, I

1830
01:44:04.920 --> 01:44:08.800
<v Speaker 1>mean that the scriptures are our guide. Uh, that's where

1831
01:44:08.840 --> 01:44:13.359
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna start our theology. Now, how does Thomas Aquinas

1832
01:44:13.399 --> 01:44:17.039
<v Speaker 1>begin his theology? Oh, we've got five volumes of Zoomicundridge

1833
01:44:17.079 --> 01:44:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and telays based around philosophical speculations about simplicity and blah

1834
01:44:21.560 --> 01:44:22.399
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah blah.

1835
01:44:22.680 --> 01:44:25.119
<v Speaker 3>Where does John Damascus begin on the Orthodox faith?

1836
01:44:25.319 --> 01:44:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Trinity?

1837
01:44:28.199 --> 01:44:30.680
<v Speaker 3>First thing that he talks about on the Orthodox faith Trinity?

1838
01:44:33.000 --> 01:44:33.199
<v Speaker 4>Cool?

1839
01:44:33.239 --> 01:44:35.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, thank you very yeah man, thank you. Yeah,

1840
01:44:35.960 --> 01:44:38.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have to run. Thank you guys. Great discussions today,

1841
01:44:39.079 --> 01:44:43.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fun. Had some feisty, feisty Muslim talks.

1842
01:44:43.279 --> 01:44:46.000
<v Speaker 1>The beginning use of one dollar you help me convert

1843
01:44:46.079 --> 01:44:49.760
<v Speaker 1>from Islam. Muslims passed through Hell for certain amounts of time.

1844
01:44:49.840 --> 01:44:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I've heard this. I've heard some of them say that

1845
01:44:52.920 --> 01:44:55.800
<v Speaker 1>for like Christians and Jews, Hell is eternal, but for

1846
01:44:55.920 --> 01:45:00.239
<v Speaker 1>some people it's temporal. I have heard this is a

1847
01:45:00.359 --> 01:45:04.520
<v Speaker 1>verse in sur nineteen seventy one.

1848
01:45:04.680 --> 01:45:06.760
<v Speaker 3>Let's see you're asking, I'm not sure off top of

1849
01:45:06.800 --> 01:45:07.039
<v Speaker 3>my head.

1850
01:45:07.079 --> 01:45:18.039
<v Speaker 1>Let's look it up nineteen seventy one. So for those

1851
01:45:18.119 --> 01:45:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that are interested, I think Jamie, my wife is she's

1852
01:45:21.039 --> 01:45:25.119
<v Speaker 1>going to be doing a livestream on something. I forget

1853
01:45:25.159 --> 01:45:31.439
<v Speaker 1>what she says. I'm a conspiratoral I forget what Allah.

1854
01:45:31.640 --> 01:45:34.479
<v Speaker 1>Let's see, we alla truly know best. We truly know

1855
01:45:34.600 --> 01:45:41.680
<v Speaker 1>best who deserves the burning. There is none of you

1856
01:45:41.720 --> 01:45:42.760
<v Speaker 1>who will not pass it.

1857
01:45:43.840 --> 01:45:44.720
<v Speaker 3>This is a decree.

1858
01:45:45.479 --> 01:45:50.000
<v Speaker 1>We will deliver those who were devout, leaving wrongdoers on

1859
01:45:50.079 --> 01:45:53.920
<v Speaker 1>their knees. Yeah, I was. I was starting the Koran

1860
01:45:54.000 --> 01:45:56.239
<v Speaker 1>again the other day from the beginning, and it's it's

1861
01:45:56.279 --> 01:46:01.319
<v Speaker 1>interesting that it begins with eschatological things. So the Quran

1862
01:46:01.439 --> 01:46:03.159
<v Speaker 1>kind of begins talking about the end of the world

1863
01:46:03.279 --> 01:46:06.399
<v Speaker 1>and judgment and destruction. Sam Schmun has a great video,

1864
01:46:06.439 --> 01:46:10.399
<v Speaker 1>by the way, pointing out how which one is it.

1865
01:46:10.520 --> 01:46:16.039
<v Speaker 1>It's two, two and ten and eighty nine, twenty one

1866
01:46:16.079 --> 01:46:20.319
<v Speaker 1>to twenty three, and then the attending Hadiith eighteen.

1867
01:46:20.079 --> 01:46:21.199
<v Speaker 3>Forty of Sahi Muslim.

1868
01:46:21.239 --> 01:46:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I think all of that when you read those three,

1869
01:46:23.720 --> 01:46:26.479
<v Speaker 1>those two passages from the Kuran and then Hadith, they're

1870
01:46:26.560 --> 01:46:31.279
<v Speaker 1>literally cribbed, especially the Hadith word for word from Matthew

1871
01:46:31.319 --> 01:46:33.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty five thirty one to forty six. Now, if we

1872
01:46:33.840 --> 01:46:35.720
<v Speaker 1>follow the logic of the Muslims who called in to

1873
01:46:35.800 --> 01:46:39.840
<v Speaker 1>begin with Platonism, all the neoplatonisms they believe is not

1874
01:46:39.960 --> 01:46:43.319
<v Speaker 1>from Plato and the Neoplatonists. So in the same way,

1875
01:46:43.640 --> 01:46:46.720
<v Speaker 1>even though Matthew twenty five thirty one to forty six

1876
01:46:47.000 --> 01:46:51.399
<v Speaker 1>is centuries before the Quran and the Hagheith, h, no,

1877
01:46:51.520 --> 01:46:53.760
<v Speaker 1>these are not cribbed. I mean, it's it's that silly, right,

1878
01:46:53.800 --> 01:46:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously, if it's word for word cribbed from

1879
01:46:57.760 --> 01:47:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Matthew twenty five thirty one to forty six, and if

1880
01:47:00.640 --> 01:47:04.439
<v Speaker 1>this identifies Jesus as God and Jesus as a law,

1881
01:47:04.479 --> 01:47:06.880
<v Speaker 1>if Muslims are going to be consistent, then they have

1882
01:47:07.039 --> 01:47:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to recognize Jesus as God. Let me pull up the

1883
01:47:12.560 --> 01:47:14.199
<v Speaker 1>that was just something that popped in up that that's

1884
01:47:14.239 --> 01:47:19.319
<v Speaker 1>not related to this verse, but to this section. That's

1885
01:47:19.520 --> 01:47:23.399
<v Speaker 1>a separate argument. Let me find that because this is

1886
01:47:23.439 --> 01:47:26.640
<v Speaker 1>actually a really good argument. Now, not every Muslim would't

1887
01:47:26.640 --> 01:47:29.560
<v Speaker 1>necessarily go down this route, because they might take a

1888
01:47:29.640 --> 01:47:35.000
<v Speaker 1>different route. Because let's see, how can I find that?

1889
01:47:35.159 --> 01:47:39.079
<v Speaker 1>Let me find this This was a really strong argument

1890
01:47:39.760 --> 01:47:43.119
<v Speaker 1>that Sam Chumun had. Let me find it. Won't take

1891
01:47:43.199 --> 01:47:46.920
<v Speaker 1>a second. It's in my it's in my history. Here,

1892
01:47:47.279 --> 01:47:51.479
<v Speaker 1>let's see. I got it pulled up on my phone.

1893
01:47:51.560 --> 01:48:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I think. Let's see. Yeah, here it is.

1894
01:48:05.640 --> 01:48:07.520
<v Speaker 21>It's off of about luck, because that's what Jesus said

1895
01:48:07.600 --> 01:48:10.279
<v Speaker 21>he's going to do when he comes to judge everyone,

1896
01:48:10.319 --> 01:48:11.159
<v Speaker 21>including Mohammad.

1897
01:48:11.319 --> 01:48:13.439
<v Speaker 4>Matthew twenty five thirty one to forty six.

1898
01:48:14.279 --> 01:48:18.680
<v Speaker 9>Matthew twenty five thirty one to thirty six. This is

1899
01:48:18.840 --> 01:48:19.319
<v Speaker 9>Jesus speaking.

1900
01:48:19.319 --> 01:48:20.760
<v Speaker 21>If you want to read versus puils or he has

1901
01:48:20.800 --> 01:48:22.840
<v Speaker 21>no doubt that Matthew is recording with Jesus.

1902
01:48:23.359 --> 01:48:25.439
<v Speaker 4>This is not big gasps, right yep.

1903
01:48:25.960 --> 01:48:28.159
<v Speaker 9>Now going to John John would be the cremation.

1904
01:48:28.720 --> 01:48:31.920
<v Speaker 21>This is no funeral service. Johnazen Fratthey twenty five thirty

1905
01:48:31.960 --> 01:48:32.520
<v Speaker 21>one forty six.

1906
01:48:33.439 --> 01:48:38.439
<v Speaker 17>All right, Matthew, Chapter twenty five versus forty one forty six.

1907
01:48:38.720 --> 01:48:39.279
<v Speaker 5>I'll try this.

1908
01:48:39.319 --> 01:48:41.239
<v Speaker 1>Again, bro this one second. I'm trying to sho.

1909
01:48:41.920 --> 01:48:43.239
<v Speaker 4>I don't know what is about you and Hussey.

1910
01:48:43.279 --> 01:48:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to get this video. It's a really good

1911
01:48:47.680 --> 01:48:49.000
<v Speaker 1>argument related to this topic.

1912
01:48:49.960 --> 01:49:04.239
<v Speaker 4>Here it is. It's thirty six.

1913
01:49:06.000 --> 01:49:07.880
<v Speaker 21>That's Jesus speaking if you want to read Versus us

1914
01:49:07.920 --> 01:49:10.239
<v Speaker 21>or he has no doubt that nephew is recording with Jesus.

1915
01:49:10.800 --> 01:49:12.039
<v Speaker 4>It's not good Mass was read.

1916
01:49:13.199 --> 01:49:14.039
<v Speaker 3>Okay, there's the video.

1917
01:49:14.319 --> 01:49:17.319
<v Speaker 1>It's Sam Schumann with God logic heated Muslim panics after

1918
01:49:17.359 --> 01:49:20.159
<v Speaker 1>Christian per Jesus is God? Uh from the ones I

1919
01:49:20.279 --> 01:49:22.800
<v Speaker 1>listed there. All right, everybody, have a good night.

1920
01:49:22.840 --> 01:49:22.960
<v Speaker 4>Now.

1921
01:49:23.000 --> 01:49:25.560
<v Speaker 1>You can also come watch Jamie do her live stream

1922
01:49:25.680 --> 01:49:28.439
<v Speaker 1>on twentieth Century six six six ed it awesome. See

1923
01:49:28.439 --> 01:49:28.560
<v Speaker 1>got
