Speaker 1: In a world of distinct telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act.
Speaker 2: It's the David Knight Show. As the clock strikes thirteen,
Speaker 2: it's Monday, the tenth of November, you have our Lord,
Speaker 2: twenty twenty five. Well, today we're going to talk a
Speaker 2: course about the shutdown and the chances of them ending it.
Speaker 2: But there's another shutdown that is living on the horizon,
Speaker 2: and we're going to spend a lot of time talking
Speaker 2: about out ai and what is the endgame for this.
Speaker 2: There are two ways that this can go. Neither of
Speaker 2: them look very good. One of them you certainly can
Speaker 2: hedge pretty easily as an individual. We're going to talk
Speaker 2: about both of those at this juncture of a fourth turning.
Speaker 2: As Ray Dalio is pointing out yet again, he doesn't
Speaker 2: use the term fourth turning, but he points back to
Speaker 2: the last one as an indication of just how bad
Speaker 2: things are. Right now, we'll be right back stay with
Speaker 2: us and joining us remotely. Today is going to be
Speaker 2: my son Travis, Travis here there, can you hear me?
Speaker 3: Yes? I can, I'm here, all right?
Speaker 2: Good. So he's going to be joining us and chiming
Speaker 2: in from Texas. But yesterday, I know if you saw
Speaker 2: this or not, Travis, But there's a lot of hope
Speaker 2: being sold that this shutdown may soon be ending. And
Speaker 2: of course the person who was laying this out on
Speaker 2: the Sunday talk shows yesterday was Lindsey Graham. I know
Speaker 2: it's difficult to listen to miss Lindsey, but he can't
Speaker 2: talk about this and how they got to stop this
Speaker 2: shutdown right.
Speaker 4: Now, take on the government shutdown.
Speaker 3: Are you expecting any progress today?
Speaker 5: Yeah?
Speaker 6: I think this madness is today.
Speaker 3: You know, the.
Speaker 2: Political terary actually did not end yesterday.
Speaker 6: Using shutdown airports, people not getting paid step benefits. You
Speaker 6: going away is backfiring.
Speaker 3: They want us to.
Speaker 6: Do two things by terrorizing the country, repeal the one
Speaker 6: point five trillion dollars in savings we had from the
Speaker 6: big beautiful bill making Medicaid more efficient. They want to
Speaker 6: change the prohibition against the legals getting healthcare that we
Speaker 6: had in that bill. And they also want us to
Speaker 6: continue for another year Obamacare, which is the biggest scam
Speaker 6: on the planet. Under Obamacare, insurance company's stocks have gone
Speaker 6: up about one thousand percent, Your premiums have doubled. The
Speaker 6: only winner under Obamacare is insurance companies. They signed people up,
Speaker 6: they get paid, and these people don't even make claims.
Speaker 6: One hundred and ninety thousand people were signed on Obamacare
Speaker 6: and didn't even know it. So it's a scam for
Speaker 6: insurance companies. It's not helping affordability. And Donald Trump gave
Speaker 6: us a breakthrough yesterday. Donald Trump, President Trump said yesterday,
Speaker 6: I will not accept continue to give hundreds of billions
Speaker 6: of dollars to money sucking healthcare insurance companies under Obamacare.
Speaker 6: I'm going to give money to the people so they
Speaker 6: can buy better and cheaper health care. And that broke
Speaker 6: the Democrats. Obamacare has been exposed for a scam. It's
Speaker 6: a reward to insurance companies at your expense.
Speaker 2: Yeah, about a dozen years ago.
Speaker 6: Open today because coreheads are prevailing on the Democratic side.
Speaker 6: Senator Shahenes, Senator Collins, Katie Bred and many others. I
Speaker 6: think we'll have a breakthrough today. Then we'll talk about
Speaker 6: how to change Obamacare to give the money to the
Speaker 6: people rather than insurance companies.
Speaker 7: Yeah.
Speaker 8: We saw President Trump's post on truth Social about that
Speaker 8: for sure last night.
Speaker 7: So just to be clear, you think today is the beginning.
Speaker 6: Of the reopening, Yes, today will the government will reopen today.
Speaker 6: We're not going to talk about healthcare until it doesn't.
Speaker 2: Well, actually did not.
Speaker 6: Donald Trump's going to lead this nation to change Obamacare,
Speaker 6: where all the money goes to the seven top insurance
Speaker 6: companies in the world. They have been in America, they've
Speaker 6: been enriched from five hundred to one thousand percent increase
Speaker 6: in stock, while premiums under Obamacare have overdoubled.
Speaker 3: Trump's going to end that.
Speaker 2: Well, this is something that we can hope that Lindsey
Speaker 2: Graham does kill Obamacare, right.
Speaker 3: Just kill it, kill it.
Speaker 2: Always looking for something to kill. This program should be killed.
Speaker 2: And of course who knew that Obamacare was going to
Speaker 2: be a gift to the insurance companies and a burden
Speaker 2: to the people. Well, we talked about that about thirteen
Speaker 2: years ago, and the Republicans have not done anything to
Speaker 2: stop it. Didn't do anything to stop it when they
Speaker 2: had the majority. They didn't do anything to stop it
Speaker 2: during the first four years of Trump at all. Now
Speaker 2: they're going to get serious about it. And look, you know, again,
Speaker 2: when we look at the difference in these things, it's
Speaker 2: always you have to consider not just the end goal,
Speaker 2: but the means to get there, and the end goal.
Speaker 2: I agree, got to get rid of Obamacare. Certainly should
Speaker 2: not be a welfare magnet for people. Illegal people here
Speaker 2: here illegally should not be getting government paid healthcare, end
Speaker 2: of story. That's a magnet to bring people in to
Speaker 2: live off the government. So I agree with both of
Speaker 2: those stated ends. However, you notice it has a really
Speaker 2: demagogic kind of ring to it. We're going to get
Speaker 2: the money to the people, not to the insurance companies.
Speaker 2: And it's I going to hear vague proposals like that
Speaker 2: my bs alarms or needles that start getting pegged, and
Speaker 2: so we'll have to wait and see what they're proposing here.
Speaker 2: But it is something that is as the Associated Press said,
Speaker 2: it really is the Democrats who shut down the government. However,
Speaker 2: if we look at this, when you look at what
Speaker 2: Trump has done in terms of fighting to keep people
Speaker 2: getting food stamps, trying to use that as a lever
Speaker 2: against the Democrats rather than you know, then it makes
Speaker 2: him look like he is initiating this shutdown and that
Speaker 2: he is using food for children as a lever against
Speaker 2: the Democrats. So it's very bad optics whatever it is,
Speaker 2: and I think that is the thing that's going to
Speaker 2: come back to haunt the Republicans, which I wish they
Speaker 2: would do things like end Obamacare. They have campaigned against
Speaker 2: it from its inception as an idea, and they failed
Speaker 2: to do anything about it time and time again, so
Speaker 2: we can hope that they'll do something about it. It
Speaker 2: really concerns me though, when I look at just how
Speaker 2: bad the public relations have been, just how bad the
Speaker 2: optics have been. It's like, how these people even get elected. Well,
Speaker 2: they're doing this kind of stuff. They've come across so
Speaker 2: increasingly arrogant and elitist, as I pointed out, the ballroom capitalism.
Speaker 2: They have to have known how this is going to look,
Speaker 2: how it was going to be played by the Democrats.
Speaker 2: And yes there's a lot of demagoguey involved in it,
Speaker 2: but there's a ring of truth to it as well.
Speaker 2: Saturday Night Live had this funny line in their opener.
Speaker 9: The people are saying, but sure, how will I afford
Speaker 9: my Thanksgiving turkey for my family? What good news is
Speaker 9: your family's not coming because all the planes are gone.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right. These are the two things, right, the welfare,
Speaker 2: food payments as well as the place. As we point
Speaker 2: out on Friday, as Guard pointed out from the very beginning.
Speaker 2: Why should the government be involved in running the air
Speaker 2: traffic controllers. There's absolutely no reason why government should be
Speaker 2: doing that function. That would be paid for by the
Speaker 2: airlines as part of the entire industry there. And why
Speaker 2: is it that the government doesn't want to give that up?
Speaker 10: I know, Dad, what you need to understand is without
Speaker 10: the government, there might be some kind of catastrophic thing
Speaker 10: that happens that cause the airline controllers not to be
Speaker 10: able to work, and who knows what kind of chaos
Speaker 10: that might cause. That's right, if something like that were
Speaker 10: to happen, we need the government there to make sure
Speaker 10: that the air traffic controllers are always at their job.
Speaker 2: You know, I think Travis, going back, I think the
Speaker 2: Republican reluctance to do this because even New Zealand did it.
Speaker 2: The New Zealand was very very socialist and they hit
Speaker 2: the wall, couldn't pay their people, even at their foreign
Speaker 2: embassy staff. They were having to pay for their own
Speaker 2: food and expenses and run up on their credit cards.
Speaker 2: So they very quickly turned in different directions of the
Speaker 2: first ones to privatize the air traffic controllers, and it
Speaker 2: worked so well. A lot of other countries did it,
Speaker 2: And as I pointed out, last time you had the
Speaker 2: first Trump administration, you had a Republican and the Trump
Speaker 2: White House had supported this to basically break off the
Speaker 2: air traffic controllers along the lines of how it's being
Speaker 2: done in Canada. They said, look, this is a working model.
Speaker 2: And they're not the only countries that have done this.
Speaker 2: A lot of different have done this. But I think
Speaker 2: there was a reluctance amongst the Republicans to get rid
Speaker 2: of that control that they had because at the very
Speaker 2: beginning of the Reagan administration there was a big strike
Speaker 2: by the air traffic controllers and he fired a whole
Speaker 2: bunch of them, saying your government employees, and you're not
Speaker 2: going to mess with this. And so I don't know.
Speaker 2: I think they love the control. I think the Republicans
Speaker 2: love the control as much as the Democrats love the control.
Speaker 2: And I think they're reluctant to give that up. So
Speaker 2: where are we right now. Did they end it yesterday? Well, no,
Speaker 2: perhaps they had an agreement to end it yesterday. It
Speaker 2: wasn't the end. It might have been the beginning of
Speaker 2: the end, like Churchill here, But the Senate is voting
Speaker 2: on the first steps in the forty day government shut
Speaker 2: down Sunday night, after a group of moderate Democrats agreed
Speaker 2: to proceed without a guaranteed extension of healthcare subsidies, angering
Speaker 2: many and the caucus who wanted to continue the fight.
Speaker 2: So the agreement that they're talking about where you've had
Speaker 2: some Democrats defect in order to open up the government,
Speaker 2: is that they're going to start paying military and air
Speaker 2: traffic controllers and other people like that that they've been
Speaker 2: forcing to work. They're going to pay them, and they
Speaker 2: will agree to have a vote on what to do
Speaker 2: about the Obamacare stuff. And there's no guarantee that they're
Speaker 2: going to keep the Obamacare or fund the Obamacare, just
Speaker 2: that they will have a future vote.
Speaker 10: On healthyrek here Obamacare, you can keep here Obamacare.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I know, why are we having this discussion now?
Speaker 2: A dozen years later and this is all decided and
Speaker 2: we knew where this is going to go, and it's
Speaker 2: gone to that direction and it has been sustained throughout
Speaker 2: the first four years of Trump administration. But now we're
Speaker 2: going to solve it this way. It's got to be
Speaker 2: done right now, and that always causes issues, you know,
Speaker 2: where there's also green transition or this.
Speaker 10: Yes, I'm sure that this was even understood back when
Speaker 10: Hillary Clinton was trying to take over health care. I'm
Speaker 10: sure people made all the same arguments and pointed out
Speaker 10: all the same problems because they're eternal. Yeah, they don't change,
Speaker 10: because it's the nature of human nature. You know, they
Speaker 10: are going to be the same throughout time, whether it's
Speaker 10: two thousand years ago or two thousand years into the future.
Speaker 10: No matter what, there is not going to be a
Speaker 10: utopia where these problems don't exist because they are rooted
Speaker 10: in humanity's nature.
Speaker 2: And it's also kind of similar to what we're going
Speaker 2: to be talking about, which is the neo Marxism, the
Speaker 2: idea that we have all the resources that we need,
Speaker 2: we just have to have the government allocate them fairly.
Speaker 2: And that's not true. You're going to be rationing along
Speaker 2: some basis because you do have finite resources in this world.
Speaker 2: And so that's the fundamental flaw behind all of this stuff,
Speaker 2: that we have infinite resources and we just need to
Speaker 2: redistribute the wealth. That is a kind of neo Marxism
Speaker 2: that informs all of these socialist big government ideas. And
Speaker 2: now the Republicans are just as caught up in this
Speaker 2: because of Trump, the Democrat from New York City. They're
Speaker 2: just as caught up in this neo Marxist fantasy about
Speaker 2: infinite resources. Just take a look, and we're going to
Speaker 2: take a look at his promises now to cut everybody
Speaker 2: a two thousand dollars check. Does that sound familiar? Does
Speaker 2: that sound like Trump version one again? Stimulus checks.
Speaker 10: This is really caught, yeah, between these two sides where
Speaker 10: the choice is gay race Marxism or imperialist warlike Marxism
Speaker 10: from the Republicans, who will eventually bring in the gay
Speaker 10: race communism too.
Speaker 2: Well, they're all going to converge. Yeah, they really are
Speaker 2: going to converge. I mean, we've got Silicon Valley out
Speaker 2: there now, even though it is prohibited to do, you know,
Speaker 2: to have a test to have artificially created kids, you know,
Speaker 2: the brave New World hatches, they're working on it. And
Speaker 2: you've got Steve Altman who is involved in this country
Speaker 2: a company doing illegal work. He and his husband. I
Speaker 2: just realized for the first time that Steve Altman was
Speaker 2: homosexual and haven't paid much attention to his personal life. However,
Speaker 2: all this LGBT stuff really does fold into this satanic
Speaker 2: agenda to have government control reproduction. It's the total population
Speaker 2: control depopulation, and will decide how many kids are going
Speaker 2: to be. Everything's got to be eventually under their control.
Speaker 2: They have to control every single thing. It is a
Speaker 2: satanic agenda, and LGBT provides them with a rationale. If
Speaker 2: people love LGBT enough, well then you do it out
Speaker 2: of compassion, you know, just like you got to have
Speaker 2: the robots to help the little ladies across the street,
Speaker 2: You've got to have a brain computer interface in order
Speaker 2: to be able to help the blind see and the
Speaker 2: lame walk. They'll always come up with a justification for
Speaker 2: these nightmare stopian technologies are coming from for the most part,
Speaker 2: DARFA and other organizations like that.
Speaker 10: Well, sure most of our viewers have seen it, but
Speaker 10: the movie Gatika, anytime we talk about these kinds of things,
Speaker 10: reminds me exactly of that. You have these designer babies,
Speaker 10: and you get to pick and choose the characteristics you want,
Speaker 10: and this leaves an entire underclass of people that are
Speaker 10: now physically in some ways inferior to these perfect specimens
Speaker 10: that they have specifically engineered to be smarter, faster, stronger,
Speaker 10: and where does that leave these people? And it doesn't
Speaker 10: leave them in a good place, at least in the movie,
Speaker 10: and chances are not in reality.
Speaker 3: If they get to move towards that future, well, you know, we.
Speaker 2: Talked to many times about Daniel Schwarz's Change, Change Agent,
Speaker 2: and the beginning of that is absolutely brilliant. The way
Speaker 2: he produces it shows a dialogue between the guy who
Speaker 2: is still working underground because it's still illegal, but you
Speaker 2: know he's doing it, just like say Altman is doing
Speaker 2: it and he's there's a discussion. There's a husband and wife.
Speaker 2: One of them is for it, the other one is
Speaker 2: reluctant to do it, doesn't want to do it, and
Speaker 2: so this guy who's selling them on it is making
Speaker 2: all of the arguments to push them into it in
Speaker 2: a kind of genetic arms race, saying if you don't
Speaker 2: do this, your child is going to be the dumbest
Speaker 2: kid in society. You know, they're going to be the
Speaker 2: dregs and everybody is going to be so much more
Speaker 2: advanced than them. And not only that, but if you
Speaker 2: do these genetic changes as a seed change from the
Speaker 2: very beginning, rather than changing the genetics of a mature individual.
Speaker 2: If you do it from the very beginning the seed
Speaker 2: change DNA, then that change will be permanent. And not
Speaker 2: only that, but it'll be those enhancements will be passed
Speaker 2: on to their offspring. So you're not just doing it
Speaker 2: for your child, You're doing it for your grandchildren, your
Speaker 2: great grandchildren, on and on. So he's making all these
Speaker 2: different arguments, and that's really how they move this into
Speaker 2: that sphere. Daniel Swore has always interesting novels in terms
Speaker 2: of understanding the trends that are coming. So they've got
Speaker 2: three former governors that have joined this move to end
Speaker 2: the shutdown. New Hampshire Senator she Shaheen, New Hampshire Center Hassan,
Speaker 2: and Independent Augustus King of Maine. They're going to vote
Speaker 2: to reopen the Senate, and yet I think they need five.
Speaker 2: I don't know how the math works out. I don't
Speaker 2: know if they had a vote last night. I forgot
Speaker 2: to look see if you can find out lance if
Speaker 2: they had the vote last night. And even the AP
Speaker 2: says Democrats voted for a shutdown and now they have
Speaker 2: to find a way out. Except Trump made it. Let
Speaker 2: them make it all about him with the different moves
Speaker 2: that he made. Again, it was the biggest pr blunder
Speaker 2: I think I've ever seen, taking something that even the
Speaker 2: Associated Press I call him associated propaganda because there's they
Speaker 2: leaned so far to the left of the Democrats, and
Speaker 2: even they say that the Democrats voted to do this,
Speaker 2: and yet Trump owned it in the worst possible way.
Speaker 2: And that's really bad news for us, because you know,
Speaker 2: he's out there doing the Robin Leech lifestyles are rich
Speaker 2: and famous. You know, Champagne dreams and caviar what is it,
Speaker 2: caviar Champagne dreams and caviar wishes. I think that's what
Speaker 2: it was. I'm in Leech.
Speaker 11: Yeah, they are going to be reconvening today at eleven o'clock.
Speaker 11: They had some short term bill yesterday that I'm not
Speaker 11: sure what that did if they have to meet again
Speaker 11: today to sign what it's about.
Speaker 2: So, yeah, it's not the end, it's not even necessarily
Speaker 2: the beginning of the end. But it is the end
Speaker 2: of the beginning, I guess. And which ending are we
Speaker 2: in now? In the tenth or eleventh inning? I think? Sorry,
Speaker 2: go ahead.
Speaker 11: They advanced a short term funding bill won by a
Speaker 11: razor Fin vote of sixty to forty is what this
Speaker 11: article said.
Speaker 2: And I think that's going to release money to kids
Speaker 2: in the military and to air traffic controllers and things
Speaker 2: like that. Americans in the midst of a Republican made
Speaker 2: healthcare crisis, said Schumer, except he did it according to
Speaker 2: the Associated Press, and they're right. He said Americans would
Speaker 2: suffer immensely and that the crisis will only get worse again.
Speaker 2: Schumer's team is going to turn to create chaos in
Speaker 2: order to fight, and imaginary emergencies that sound familiar. Both
Speaker 2: of the sides are doing this kind of stuff. Democrats
Speaker 2: have sounded the alarm, said Schumer, and will not give
Speaker 2: up the fight. Republicans have been working with a group
Speaker 2: of moderates as a shutdown continued to disrupt flights nationwide,
Speaker 2: threaten food assistants for millions of Americans, and leave federal
Speaker 2: workers without pay. And this is the other issue too.
Speaker 2: I think it surprised many of us to see just
Speaker 2: how extensive and permanent this welfare system has become. It's
Speaker 2: no longer a safety net. It's now the foundation of
Speaker 2: a welfare state. Forty two million people and more than
Speaker 2: the population of many industrialized countries I think, including Canada,
Speaker 2: are all dependent on government for food. I don't like
Speaker 2: that situation. I don't agree with that. I think that's
Speaker 2: a very very bad idea. It only serves government. And yet,
Speaker 2: if you have that kind of a situation, you can't
Speaker 2: just change it overnight. It has to be a transition
Speaker 2: period here in a sense, you have to when you
Speaker 2: just go cold turkey on things like this, when people
Speaker 2: are addicted to it. That's a big issue. And it's
Speaker 2: my criticism of these tariffs, going back and forth, back
Speaker 2: and forth. And when you look at what's going on
Speaker 2: in the snap program, they changed it five times last week.
Speaker 2: What was going to happen, same kind of stuff we
Speaker 2: have with the tariff. There is no plan, folks, you
Speaker 2: want to trust the plan. Trump doesn't have a plan.
Speaker 2: His plan is chaos and disruption. That isn't a plan.
Speaker 2: And when you have spent decades creating a supply chain
Speaker 2: that is distributed all around the world, you're not going
Speaker 2: to be able to rip that up in just one move.
Speaker 2: And it's complete idiocy to try to do that same
Speaker 2: thing as true in the welfare state. I mean, they've
Speaker 2: been putting this thing in since Lyndon Johnson's Great Society
Speaker 2: back in the sixties. Sixty years of this and you're
Speaker 2: just going to cut people off cold turkey. And remember
Speaker 2: there's a lot of kids that are on this as well.
Speaker 2: So many Democrats have worn their colleagues against giving in,
Speaker 2: arguing they can't end the fight without an agreement to
Speaker 2: extend the healthcare subsidies. So they are really trying to
Speaker 2: you know, the longer you leave something in, you know,
Speaker 2: like Obamacare. It's been left in now for a dozen years.
Speaker 2: And the longer you leave something in like that, the
Speaker 2: harder it is to get rid of it. And so
Speaker 2: it is going to be a difficult thing, and it's
Speaker 2: going to require if that Republicans don't want to lose
Speaker 2: everything and turn all of it over to the Marxist Democrats.
Speaker 2: They've got to be a little bit smarter about the optics.
Speaker 2: And they are bone headed, stupid. They're about as savvy
Speaker 2: as George Santos when it comes to what they're telling people.
Speaker 2: Democrats have now voted fourteen times not to reopen the government,
Speaker 2: says the Associated Press, as they have demanded the extension
Speaker 2: and tax credits that make coverage more affordable for health
Speaker 2: care plans offered under the so called Affordable Healthcare Act,
Speaker 2: also known as Obamacare. Republicans are refused to negotiate on
Speaker 2: healthcare subsidies while the government is closed. The agreement would
Speaker 2: fund parts of the government. That's what they agreed to
Speaker 2: last night, I think food aid, veterans programs, and the
Speaker 2: legislative branch, among other things, and extend funding for everything
Speaker 2: else until the end of anyway, so the legislative branch.
Speaker 2: In other words, Congress voted to give money to itself.
Speaker 2: Of course, it would take Republicans take up Republicans on
Speaker 2: the long standing offer to hold a future vote on
Speaker 2: healthcare subsidies, with that vote occurring by the middle of December.
Speaker 2: They said the deal would reinstate federal workers have received
Speaker 2: reduction in force or layoff notices, reimburse states that spent
Speaker 2: their own funds to keep federal programs running during the shutdown.
Speaker 2: And while all this was going, Trump was demanding penalties
Speaker 2: and for the states that had disbursed the snap payments
Speaker 2: based on two court decisions saying that that had to
Speaker 2: be done, and then the Supreme Court over the weekend
Speaker 2: reversed that, and now Trump is demanding, and people in
Speaker 2: the Trump administration is demanding not only did that be
Speaker 2: paid back, but that they be penalized for using state
Speaker 2: money to give people for a snap. That's why I said,
Speaker 2: the way he has played this is just the most belligerent,
Speaker 2: bone headed moves I've ever seen from anybody. It would
Speaker 2: also protect against future reductions and forces through January, people said,
Speaker 2: and guarantee that all federal workers would be paid once
Speaker 2: the shutdown is over. Republicans released the final legislative text
Speaker 2: of three full year spending bills on Sunday. That legislation
Speaker 2: keeps a ban on pay raises for lawmakers, but it
Speaker 2: boosts their security by two hundred and three million dollars
Speaker 2: in response to increased threats. There's also a provision championed
Speaker 2: by Mitch McConnell to prevent the sale of some hemp
Speaker 2: based products. Oh, Mitch McConnell, he's still out there trying.
Speaker 2: That's the war that he wants to fight, the drug
Speaker 2: war and hemp. Again, George Washington grew hemp. We're not
Speaker 2: just talking about pot. So he's out there trying to
Speaker 2: stop that. Of course, Ram Paul also in Kentucky, has
Speaker 2: been pushing the legalization of HIMP, but Mitch McConnell is
Speaker 2: dead set against it. Republicans only need five votes from
Speaker 2: Democrats to reopen the government, so a handful of Senators
Speaker 2: could in the shutdown with only the promise of a
Speaker 2: later vote on healthcare. Around ten to twelve Democrats have
Speaker 2: been involved in the talks, with three people familiar with
Speaker 2: the agreement saying they had enough votes to join with
Speaker 2: the Republicans and to pass the deal. Even if the
Speaker 2: Senate were to move forward with funding legislation, getting to
Speaker 2: a final vote could take several days if Democrats who
Speaker 2: opposed the deal object and draw out the process. The
Speaker 2: first vote came last night Sunday evening to proceed with
Speaker 2: consideration of the legislation. So that's where they are now,
Speaker 2: but it's still going to take several days before they
Speaker 2: do this. There's no guarantee that the Affordable Care Act
Speaker 2: subsidies Obama Care would be extended if Republicans agreed to
Speaker 2: a future vote on healthcare. Mike Johnson said he will
Speaker 2: not commit to a healthcare vote again. He's going to
Speaker 2: if he's not going to, even they could vote it down.
Speaker 2: He's got a majority there but if he's not going
Speaker 2: to hold a vote, if he's going to hold it
Speaker 2: up like he's been holding up the Epstein document vote.
Speaker 2: And remember, as Thomas Massey pointed out, he said, they've
Speaker 2: had shutdowns in the past, but they've never had along
Speaker 2: with it a House recess. He said, we've always been
Speaker 2: here when there's been a recession. Why is that happening now, Well,
Speaker 2: Mike Johnson doesn't want the House meeting. He doesn't want
Speaker 2: to swear in the Democrat who's going to be the
Speaker 2: final vote to make sure that the Congress says, you've
Speaker 2: got to release the Epstein documents. He's trying to stop
Speaker 2: all that. And I guess he would like to keep
Speaker 2: it the entire country held hostage to the Epstein documents,
Speaker 2: because if he wants to throw his monkey wrench into
Speaker 2: the whole works and say, well, we won't even vote
Speaker 2: on Obamacare even when we're in the majority, you know,
Speaker 2: we'll wait and stall, and then the Congress will flip
Speaker 2: over to the Democrats in the midterm and nothing will
Speaker 2: happen with Obamacare yet again thanks to Mike Johnson and
Speaker 2: the cover up for the Epstein files. So they want
Speaker 2: new limits on who can receive the subsidies and argue
Speaker 2: that tax dollars for the plans should be routed through individuals.
Speaker 2: And again it's not clear exactly what this means. You know,
Speaker 2: when Lindsey Graham describes it as I said before, sounds
Speaker 2: like sheared demagoguery. We'll have to wait and see consequences
Speaker 2: of the shutdown or compounding as the US airlines are canceling.
Speaker 2: More than canceled more than two thousand flights on Sunday
Speaker 2: for the first time since the shutdown began. There were
Speaker 2: more than seven thousand flight delays, and Sean Duffy said
Speaker 2: on CNN that air travel a head of the Thanksgiving
Speaker 2: holiday will be reduced to a trickle if the government
Speaker 2: doesn't reopen soon. So more than two dozen states have
Speaker 2: warned in terms of the snap program of catastrophic operational
Speaker 2: disruptions as a Trump administration is demanding the states undue
Speaker 2: undue benefits paid out under Judge's orders last week, and
Speaker 2: as far as I can tell, this would even apply
Speaker 2: to state money that was done and to punish them
Speaker 2: for putting out state money even though they had a
Speaker 2: court order. So I'm saying they can't be gracious winners
Speaker 2: on any of this stuff, because they're following a very
Speaker 2: ungracious winner that's themselves, Donald Trump. Trump has completely restructured
Speaker 2: the GOP to guard pedophiles, to be belligerent, to pick
Speaker 2: fights domestic and foreign, and the Republicans are going down
Speaker 2: that path continually. So Capital Area Food Bank that provides
Speaker 2: more than eight million meals said that that is a
Speaker 2: twenty percent increase in terms of what they have seen before.
Speaker 2: So again, we can look at this situation and we
Speaker 2: can see that there's some really really deep issues in
Speaker 2: terms of how large the welfare state has become. Well,
Speaker 2: we're going to take quick break and we'll be right back,
Speaker 2: and when we come back, I want to take a
Speaker 2: look at some of the details that are happening with
Speaker 2: the shutdown and if there's any real reform that's being
Speaker 2: talked about. Has anybody besides Reason and a few libertarians
Speaker 2: brought up the idea that we need to get the
Speaker 2: air traffic controllers out of the control of Congress. Congress
Speaker 2: is constantly shutting down and what that is going to
Speaker 2: continue to do is to shut down transportation. And look,
Speaker 2: it's not just passengers, it's also freight that's going to
Speaker 2: have an effect on We'll be right.
Speaker 12: Back making sense. Comment again, you're listening to the David
Speaker 12: Knight Show.
Speaker 4: Interested in a curated list of the funnest classical music.
Speaker 4: Find it now at apsradio dot com.
Speaker 2: Well, welcome back, and Travis is joining us from Austin.
Speaker 2: He's gone back to He and his wife and young
Speaker 2: son have gone back to see family there for a
Speaker 2: week or so. So he's gonna be joining us remote
Speaker 2: and you have some comments there, Travis.
Speaker 3: I think that's right.
Speaker 2: I do.
Speaker 10: From bronx OPPERA one one one it says, like Zoe
Speaker 10: said on Saturday night, if the courts and jails are
Speaker 10: still open, the government isn't shut down. And that's a
Speaker 10: real function, right, and to keep us locked up and controlled.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think is one of the interesting things. One
Speaker 2: of them is to see just how many people are
Speaker 2: on welfare, and then the other one is to see
Speaker 2: that other than handing out checks and you know the functions,
Speaker 2: and of course that includes paying the federal employees, but
Speaker 2: the functions that most of these things are things that
Speaker 2: we don't really want or need, except for air traffic control.
Speaker 2: And there's absolutely no reason why the government needs to
Speaker 2: be involved in that. Yeah.
Speaker 10: Absolutely, And jam seven talk about air traffic control says,
Speaker 10: maybe airlines could take TSA under their wing.
Speaker 3: Also, that's right.
Speaker 2: Then, and then drop them at a thirty thousand feet. Yeah.
Speaker 10: Watch how quickly a company that actually has to make
Speaker 10: money gets rid of the TSA when they see what
Speaker 10: they're actually.
Speaker 3: Doing and how useful they are.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 3: Nope, can't afford this debacle.
Speaker 10: Nibaru nine to, quoting LBJ says, give them welfare and
Speaker 10: we'll have them voting Democrat for decades. Not quite an
Speaker 10: exact quote, but you know close, and I wouldn't say
Speaker 10: the exact quote, right.
Speaker 2: The welfare started out very very small under him, you know.
Speaker 10: Go ahead, and Steve evs SoSE twenty sixteen, give the
Speaker 10: reblood Likins the Senate. We'll get rid of Obamacare. It
Speaker 10: never happened. Now they promise a lot, and when do
Speaker 10: they deliver? I have yet to see it in my lifetime.
Speaker 10: Maybe maybe if I live long enough.
Speaker 2: Well, they have these wedge issues, right, and again that's
Speaker 2: more than just a wedge issue, but you know, they
Speaker 2: have these issues that they take ownership. But vote for
Speaker 2: us will fix this, you know, we'll fix something on
Speaker 2: my care, We'll fix the border or so forth. It's on,
Speaker 2: and they never do it because they don't want those
Speaker 2: issues to go away. They want to give you a
Speaker 2: reason to vote for them later on. And people will
Speaker 2: still do it because it's like, well, I know they
Speaker 2: didn't get it done last time, but you know the
Speaker 2: Democrats will make it even worse if I'll leave them there,
Speaker 2: so they it works for them.
Speaker 10: Yeah, I mean you can see that very clearly with
Speaker 10: something like the NRA. What does the NRA actually accomplish
Speaker 10: during its lifetime?
Speaker 2: Yeah, Well, the NRA has been very compromising on a
Speaker 2: lot of these things, like the bumstock stuff for example.
Speaker 2: They wanted to show that they were on the winning side.
Speaker 2: They didn't oppose it. Gun Owners of America opposed it.
Speaker 2: And then finally then after that, after it went through
Speaker 2: and Trump did gun control by executive order, then he
Speaker 2: did another one. He did the pistol brace thing. He
Speaker 2: did that before Biden did it, and then he pulled
Speaker 2: it back because it was that period of time between
Speaker 2: the election in January sixth and the NRA finally objected
Speaker 2: to the pistol brace, but the president had been established
Speaker 2: and so you had both the Gun Owners of America
Speaker 2: and the NRA pushed back against the pistol brace, but
Speaker 2: NRA took a pass on the bump stock, and that's
Speaker 2: where the precedent was set.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's the comments I have for now.
Speaker 2: Well, I got one here. Apossum King says, hold your
Speaker 2: maga hat out at some random street corner, and the
Speaker 2: Brewer of twenty twenty nine says, Emperor Trump's agenda to
Speaker 2: destroy the US financial system is still one percent on track, absolutely,
Speaker 2: And a big part of this, again is the chaos
Speaker 2: and the uncertainty. You know, whether you're a farmer working
Speaker 2: or whether you are somebody who's on food stamps, you
Speaker 2: don't know what's going to happen at any given moment
Speaker 2: because Trump doesn't you know, I don't think he's got
Speaker 2: a plan. But if he had a plan, he wouldn't
Speaker 2: want to tell you what it was because he rules
Speaker 2: by chaos. And there was actually an article how absurd
Speaker 2: at zero Hedge saying this has helped him a great
Speaker 2: deal with China because they don't know what he's going
Speaker 2: to do. Because some predictability has helped him with his negotiation.
Speaker 2: It's like, Okay, great, if that's the only thing that matters.
Speaker 2: But if the economy matters, if it matters that you're
Speaker 2: driving people out by the masses, the small businesses and
Speaker 2: small farms, you're killing them. But you get your deal through.
Speaker 2: Good for you. What is your real objective here? What
Speaker 2: is the end? Well, the US government can't even thought about.
Speaker 2: Over the weekend, we had to put some gas in
Speaker 2: the car. We're getting kind of worried about it, and
Speaker 2: a car that had been setting here for a long time,
Speaker 2: and I thought, well, I guess we've got enough to go,
Speaker 2: but let's put some gas in it. They have so
Speaker 2: broken the gas cans, even with government regulations. I mean,
Speaker 2: you can't use this thing when you've tried to tilt
Speaker 2: it up and put it in. You can't get it
Speaker 2: to poor because they've got so many different safety features
Speaker 2: on it. It's like, what do we say about a
Speaker 2: government that can even break something as simple as a
Speaker 2: gas can container and make it so it doesn't work anymore?
Speaker 2: Should we let them run everything in the economy. Well,
Speaker 2: if we do, it's going to go the same way
Speaker 2: that Trump's casinos half dozen casinos went right down the drain. Well,
Speaker 2: anxiety over the government shutdown is push consumer sentiment down
Speaker 2: to a near record low. The consumer sentiment index fell
Speaker 2: to fifty point three, down from fifty three point six
Speaker 2: a prior month, the lowest level since June twenty twenty two,
Speaker 2: which was the lowest level on record. So, folks, let
Speaker 2: me translating that for you, since market Watch doesn't seem
Speaker 2: to be able to figure that out. It's not just
Speaker 2: near a record low, it is a record low. The
Speaker 2: record low was June twenty twenty two, and this is
Speaker 2: the lowest. Well, this is near that, I should say,
Speaker 2: so it's not exactly a record I correct myself here.
Speaker 2: Wall Street Journal had expected that it was slipped to
Speaker 2: fifty three point zero, but it's slipped to fifty point three,
Speaker 2: so significantly lower, and it dropped much faster they thought
Speaker 2: it would drop just a little bit. This month's decline
Speaker 2: and sentiment was widespread, with one key exception consumers who
Speaker 2: had a large portion of holdings in the bubble stock market.
Speaker 2: So I guess how low will it go when the
Speaker 2: stock market bubble bursts. There's another thing to do. Over
Speaker 2: the weekend, we looked at went back and watched again
Speaker 2: the big short What a brilliant film. That is, it
Speaker 2: is an amazing story and brilliantly put forth because it's
Speaker 2: a real technical thing, you know, how do you do this?
Speaker 2: And so you've got these guys talking about what's going
Speaker 2: on in the market, and they'll do it a side.
Speaker 2: You know, they'll have a chef Anthony Bourdain who's now
Speaker 2: passed on. He explains this repackaging of mortgages and everything,
Speaker 2: kind of like a day old fish into a soup
Speaker 2: or something. And at another point they go so here
Speaker 2: to explain how this thing is working. Here is Margo
Speaker 2: Roby in a bubble bath. You don't see anything, but
Speaker 2: she's She's like, let me get your attention here, because
Speaker 2: you're going to have these, you know, two talking heads
Speaker 2: of guys talking about numbers, but instead we'll have Margot
Speaker 2: Robie put out this. So I thought it was really
Speaker 2: brilliant the way that they did the asides and to
Speaker 2: try to explain the technical sides of it. But it
Speaker 2: is something to go back and to think about. Yet again,
Speaker 2: by the way.
Speaker 10: The outlages, both that movie and Margin Call are dramas
Speaker 10: about the two thousand and eight market crash, and both
Speaker 10: are very good. I think Margin Call paints the investors
Speaker 10: and stock market people as a.
Speaker 3: Little bit too.
Speaker 10: They don't paint them as having any culpability. They paint
Speaker 10: them as kind of being like, oh, wow, gosh, this
Speaker 10: is happening. How could this have happened?
Speaker 13: Oh?
Speaker 10: It takes one analyst to actually go in and you know,
Speaker 10: he's a genius. He's got a giant brain, used to
Speaker 10: be a rocket scientist, so it takes him to figure
Speaker 10: it out.
Speaker 3: All these other people were just clueless.
Speaker 10: They weren't out there trading your future away knowing this
Speaker 10: was going to happen, and then banking on the fact
Speaker 10: that the government would come in and save them. It
Speaker 10: was just a it was just an accident.
Speaker 11: Guys.
Speaker 10: They're both good Margin call, in my opinion, a little
Speaker 10: less good because of that factor.
Speaker 2: Well, that's what I like about the Big Short was
Speaker 2: they make it very clear that you've got why was
Speaker 2: it like three different groups of people who suss this out,
Speaker 2: saw what was coming, and then they placed their bets
Speaker 2: right and it's time sensitive. That's why I said when
Speaker 2: Michael Burry, who was one of the key people in
Speaker 2: all this thing, when he has put over a billion
Speaker 2: dollars again about eighty percent I think of his current holdings.
Speaker 2: To short the current market, to short the AI bubble,
Speaker 2: you need to pay attention because timing is everything. And
Speaker 2: in this all the mortgages started going bad, and yet
Speaker 2: the ratings companies continued to keep the ratings up higher,
Speaker 2: and so they weren't getting their money because it was
Speaker 2: a bet against the insurance companies that were ensuring this stuff,
Speaker 2: and so they were playing with the It was absolute fraud.
Speaker 2: And that's what you see all three of these characters
Speaker 2: reacting to this. You know, Michael Berry is having to
Speaker 2: pay tens of millions of dollars a month I think,
Speaker 2: to keep his his puts in there and having to
Speaker 2: pay covering charges for that. It's costing him and it's
Speaker 2: all fraudulent. And you have these other ones go in
Speaker 2: and confront people publicly, confront regulatory agencies and credit raiding
Speaker 2: agencies privately so that you know this is bad. How
Speaker 2: can you see all these mortgages defaults exploding and yet
Speaker 2: you continue to raise the credit rating of these instruments.
Speaker 2: How can you explain that? Well, if I don't do it,
Speaker 2: you know at Standard and poorts, then you know Moodies
Speaker 2: will do it down the street. They'll just take their
Speaker 2: business down there. So you know that you're doing this,
Speaker 2: You know that it's corrupt. And it was everybody who
Speaker 2: was in on it. The banks were in on it,
Speaker 2: insurance companies were credit rating agencies were in on it.
Speaker 2: The government was in on it, of course, And so
Speaker 2: they show that, They show how everybody is in on it,
Speaker 2: even when it comes to the SEC. At one point
Speaker 2: they go into this girl who's with the SAC and
Speaker 2: the SEC and says, you're going to do something about this, right,
Speaker 2: She's not concerned at all. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 2: she's making connections and schmoozing people at this party that
Speaker 2: are going to hire her in private industry when she
Speaker 2: leaves the SEC. And so that was the key thing
Speaker 2: about the Big Short. It wasn't just how did this
Speaker 2: happen and what were these ridiculous instruments that they created,
Speaker 2: but also it really super high landed the corruption, the
Speaker 2: institutional corruption, and so anyway, the outlook has been gloomy
Speaker 2: for a while due to concerns about job and inflation.
Speaker 2: Despite these concerns, consumer spending has still held up. People
Speaker 2: are still borrowing money just like the government that they
Speaker 2: keep voting for and so the Supreme Court issued an
Speaker 2: emergency order to block the full SNAP food aid payments.
Speaker 2: As I said, had two judges who looked at this
Speaker 2: and said, well, no, this actually is an emergency this time.
Speaker 2: Unlike everything else that Trump has done, Trump is declaring
Speaker 2: everything to be an emergency. That is not an emergency.
Speaker 2: There's no emergency about fentanyl coming across the border from Canada,
Speaker 2: but he tried to use that as a basis for
Speaker 2: doing his arbitrary tariffs that he continues to change all
Speaker 2: the time. But this really is an emergency, and it's
Speaker 2: an emergency a contingency for which they had the emergency
Speaker 2: stuff there. So he had two judges say no, you've
Speaker 2: got to release that. And so they did an emergency
Speaker 2: hearing with Supreme Court, and interestingly enough, I wouldn't have
Speaker 2: expected her to do it, but Katanji Brown Jackson issued
Speaker 2: the order on late on Friday to pause the requirement
Speaker 2: to distribute full SNAP payments until the Appeals Court could rule.
Speaker 2: So this is kind of a procedural thing. In other words,
Speaker 2: they're not ruling necessarily, I think on the merits of
Speaker 2: the case. But this is one judge saying, well, we're
Speaker 2: not going to do anything until the appeals case is hurt.
Speaker 2: So she put a hold on that. And when you
Speaker 2: look at this now, this has allowed the Democrats that
Speaker 2: this is their other hobby horse. They want to pack
Speaker 2: the Supreme Court. And James Carvill said, when the Democrats
Speaker 2: take control, and they're going to do it really soon,
Speaker 2: he said, especially because the boneheaded way the Trump administration
Speaker 2: is doing the pr the public relations on this shutdown.
Speaker 2: When the Democrats get back into power, we're going to
Speaker 2: use it to pack the Supreme Court. Let's send to him.
Speaker 5: I'm going to tell you what's going to happen. The
Speaker 5: Democrat is going to be elected in twenty twenty eight.
Speaker 1: You know that.
Speaker 5: I know that he's going to be a Democratic house
Speaker 5: going to be a Democratic Senator. The Democratic president is
Speaker 5: going to announce a Special Transition Advisory Committee on the
Speaker 5: reform of the Supreme Court that we can have our
Speaker 5: third branch of government has lost the faith and trusted
Speaker 5: American people. And as president, I'm going to do anything.
Speaker 5: A lord, he's going to point a blue ribbon, maybe
Speaker 5: Judge Ludic and the Dean of the you know, just
Speaker 5: the usual fucking suspects, all right, and they're going to
Speaker 5: recommend that the number of Supreme Court justices go from
Speaker 5: nine to thirteen. That's going to happen, people, that's going
Speaker 5: to happen to you.
Speaker 2: They're going to win.
Speaker 5: They're going to do some Blue Ribbon panel of distinguished
Speaker 5: jurists and they are going to recommend thirteen, and a
Speaker 5: Democratic Senate and House going to pass it, and the
Speaker 5: Democratic president is going to sign it because they have
Speaker 5: to do an intervention so we can have a Supreme
Speaker 5: Court that the American people trusting you. So just keep
Speaker 5: that in the bag of your mind. And I would
Speaker 5: bet a lot of money if that's what's going to
Speaker 5: happen again.
Speaker 2: James Carvell, And although I disagree with him totally on policies,
Speaker 2: I think he is. He's got the idea of strategy,
Speaker 2: political strategy. Why thirteen, We'll just stop and think about it.
Speaker 2: We've got three liberal judges that are liably liberal on everything.
Speaker 2: If you add another four, that gives you seven, seven
Speaker 2: out of thirteen is your majority right there. So they're
Speaker 2: going to add just enough so that the Democrat president
Speaker 2: in twenty twenty eight can appoint four judges to give
Speaker 2: them a majority. Way this thing is going to work
Speaker 2: at some point in time, even if it doesn't happen
Speaker 2: in twenty twenty eight, but if they keep making the
Speaker 2: kind of mistakes that they've been doing in terms of
Speaker 2: the means at which they're pursuing ends, which I would
Speaker 2: agree with, but the means in which they're doing it
Speaker 2: are really awful. And then there's other things. You know,
Speaker 2: Trump is demanding that the Senate end the filibuster so
Speaker 2: they could end the lockdown. That's the only thing that
Speaker 2: you can think of to do. You're going to set
Speaker 2: a very bad precedent so that you can get immediate relief. Well, yes,
Speaker 2: of course, because that's the way this government operates, that's
Speaker 2: the way all of American society operates. We're going to
Speaker 2: go into massive debt because we need it right now.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: You see this when we come up with the AI.
Speaker 2: Steve Altman, Steve Aultman, Yeah, Steve Altman, that is first
Speaker 2: anyway at open AI. Sam Altman, thank you. It was
Speaker 2: Steve Altman. I think as a director maybe anyway, I
Speaker 2: didn't think the first name was right. Anyway, is that
Speaker 2: they want to get it, and they want to get
Speaker 2: it now, and they don't care how much debt they
Speaker 2: go into. They don't care how much debt the government
Speaker 2: goes into. Government obviously doesn't care. But you could have
Speaker 2: this immediate satisfaction. I want to change everything, and I
Speaker 2: want to change it now, and I don't care what
Speaker 2: I destroy and the process. We are going to move fast,
Speaker 2: and we're going to break things, and we're going to
Speaker 2: go into debt. That is the American zeitgeist right now
Speaker 2: at the moment, and that is going to destroy this country.
Speaker 2: It's already largely destroying us, and it is going to
Speaker 2: be the thing that kills us. I want it now
Speaker 2: and and I don't care how what it costs. Yes,
Speaker 2: go ahead.
Speaker 10: And of course the faster they move, the more things
Speaker 10: they break, the better it actually is for them because
Speaker 10: it allows them to turn around and say, well now
Speaker 10: we need more government. Now, we need another department to
Speaker 10: come in and fix this other thing.
Speaker 3: We need more control over your life, that's right.
Speaker 10: It gives them this continual excuse to creep forward and
Speaker 10: forward and forward.
Speaker 3: It's how they operate.
Speaker 10: The worst they are at their jobs, the more they're
Speaker 10: able to come in and say, well, I know we
Speaker 10: did it bad and wrong last time, but if you
Speaker 10: just give us more. We promise it won't be like
Speaker 10: that again. We promised this time we'll do it right.
Speaker 10: But you know, we've got so little time and everything's
Speaker 10: so bad. You've got to just sign up right now,
Speaker 10: because if we do nothing, it's going to be infinitely
Speaker 10: worse than if we do something. You got to let
Speaker 10: us do something that's right.
Speaker 2: And they do want to be able to rule by
Speaker 2: emergency and fiant. It's not just Trump. It was George W.
Speaker 2: Bush who said that famously said, you know, well, I
Speaker 2: kind of wish I was like the Chinese. I can
Speaker 2: just tell everybody to do it and they have to
Speaker 2: do it. And that's what Trump is doing with the emergencies,
Speaker 2: and he puts them on and he says, okay, now
Speaker 2: stop me if you can. And we see that on
Speaker 2: the left as well. I mean, look at Justin Trudeau
Speaker 2: talking about how his favorite country after Canada, of course
Speaker 2: has to say Canada's is for favorite country. His favorite
Speaker 2: country was China because they could just do whatever they
Speaker 2: needed to do. And the specific case he was talking
Speaker 2: about was the climate. Mcguffin, except we saw him doing
Speaker 2: whatever he wanted to shut down free speech during the
Speaker 2: COVID mcguffin as well.
Speaker 3: So think about that.
Speaker 10: Justin Trudeau is more at least he acts more patriotic
Speaker 10: than Miriam Adelson is. When asked, Justin Trudeau specifies, well,
Speaker 10: hated as my first but you know, if I had
Speaker 10: to pick another, it would be Cuba. Miriam Maidelsen, She's like, no,
Speaker 10: it's is real, it is real, not even gonna pretend.
Speaker 2: And Trump is fine with that.
Speaker 11: And the thing is, I don't think Trudeau actually likes
Speaker 11: Canada at all. It's not his favorite country. It's probably
Speaker 11: his least favorite country, given what he's doing to it.
Speaker 11: And same with all these politicians that say America is
Speaker 11: their favorite country.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 11: At least Adelson was being a little bit more honest
Speaker 11: about it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right. And Trump will just tell you right
Speaker 2: out in front, you know, hey, yeah, we're gonna put
Speaker 2: Israel first official is there more than a half dozen
Speaker 2: states confirmed that some SNAP recipients have already issued full
Speaker 2: November payments been issued full November payments on Friday. And
Speaker 2: so this is something I think after that happened, Trump
Speaker 2: got angry about it, and I think that it has
Speaker 2: something to do with his two thousand dollars stimulus check
Speaker 2: a bunch of posts that he put out about that,
Speaker 2: because if you stop and think about it, right, how
Speaker 2: are you going to claw that's? You know, people saying, hey,
Speaker 2: we paid out these snap benefits, we can't get them back.
Speaker 2: All right, Well, I'm going to penalize you somehow for
Speaker 2: doing that. And again, trying to maximize the pain is
Speaker 2: the way that the public is going to see this
Speaker 2: and understand it. And I think that's accurate. And so
Speaker 2: he looks at it and says, okay, so he can't
Speaker 2: claw this back. What if I give people tariff money,
Speaker 2: say this from the tariff, and then they overthrow the tariffs,
Speaker 2: how are we going to get that money back? Because
Speaker 2: they're already looking at a tremendous amount of money that
Speaker 2: has to be given back if the Supreme Court shuts
Speaker 2: down the tariffs for which Trump had no authority to
Speaker 2: impose them. And so that's a big argument to say
Speaker 2: that you a pragmatic argument as opposed to a legal argument.
Speaker 2: And Scott Bessant, the sous Soy boy, has been making
Speaker 2: that argument publicly and to the Supreme Court. He was
Speaker 2: there at the Supreme Court, although he didn't speak, but
Speaker 2: saying This is going to create all kinds of chaos
Speaker 2: if we've got to refund the money to countries and
Speaker 2: companies on the terraff if you overturn this, and so
Speaker 2: then they want to extend the tentacles of this thing
Speaker 2: by giving it to individuals to make sure they can't
Speaker 2: be overturned. But never forget that this is the largest
Speaker 2: tax increase that we've ever seen. This is bigger than
Speaker 2: the previous largest tax increase by a huge amount what
Speaker 2: FDR did in terms of tax increase back in nineteen
Speaker 2: forty two, and I think it was something like ten
Speaker 2: or twenty billion dollars and now it is equivalent in
Speaker 2: today's dollars to two hundred billion. And yet you had
Speaker 2: Caroline Lovett say we've made six hundred billion in revenue,
Speaker 2: So that would be three times the previous largest tax
Speaker 2: increase from FDR. That's why I say Trump is a Democrat,
Speaker 2: a Democrat socialist who wants to own have the government
Speaker 2: own countries companies. He's taking positions and Intel and others,
Speaker 2: a Rare Earth company as well. He's taking positions in
Speaker 2: these different companies. And we're going to talk more about
Speaker 2: this when we get into artificial intelligence. He's basically adopting
Speaker 2: the Chinese model of government ownership. It is not a
Speaker 2: good thing for us. We're not going to own anything.
Speaker 2: You and I as taxpayers, we're going to be paying
Speaker 2: for it. It's going to be public expense and private profits.
Speaker 2: And it is a corrupt form of fascism really and
Speaker 2: socialism that the Chinese have been indulging in for quite
Speaker 2: some time. It makes a lot of people into billionaires,
Speaker 2: you know, people like Steve Bannon's mentor Gho forget what
Speaker 2: his actual name is, but he goes by Guo Guo,
Speaker 2: and they know how that works. You can become a
Speaker 2: billionaire overnight with that kind of corruption.
Speaker 10: And of course we've kind of seen that the United
Speaker 10: States has been a very socialist country when it comes
Speaker 10: to businesses. Anyway, they're just being more open about it now.
Speaker 10: Anytime a large enough business gets into trouble, they run
Speaker 10: out hat in hand of the government and say.
Speaker 3: Hey, we screwed up.
Speaker 10: We were just talking about the two thousand and eight crash.
Speaker 10: That's what they did. They blew up the markets, they
Speaker 10: lost everyone's money. They went to the government and said,
Speaker 10: you really can't let us fail, because if you do
Speaker 10: what's going to happen. You just got to hand over
Speaker 10: the money and none of that went to the American people.
Speaker 10: None of that went to help alleviate their suffering, which
Speaker 10: they didn't cause, yeah, they were a bystander in this.
Speaker 10: They had their money taken and you know it disappeared.
Speaker 10: But these large companies got billions upon billions of dollars.
Speaker 3: And made out like bandits.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, that's right. Well, and so you know when
Speaker 2: we look at this, that's what we're going to be
Speaker 2: talking about with Aihow you've got Sam Altman and others
Speaker 2: are saying, we're going to have the government be there
Speaker 2: to help us to pay for these capital expenditures that
Speaker 2: we're going to be doing. We don't have the money.
Speaker 2: You know, we had that podcast where Sam Altman is
Speaker 2: talking about that, and he had a guy who was
Speaker 2: an investor called him out on that said, you got
Speaker 2: something like fourteen billion dollars in revenue, how are you
Speaker 2: going to do one point four trillion in capital expenditures
Speaker 2: over the next couple of years. There's a big gap.
Speaker 2: Yere that that's making sense. Intor's response was a non sequitor.
Speaker 2: It's like, well, hey, if you don't want your your stock.
Speaker 2: There's a lot of other fools out there who will
Speaker 2: buy it from the greater fool theory of the stock
Speaker 2: market bubble.
Speaker 10: I'll have you know, there's one born every minute. I
Speaker 10: could sell it like that.
Speaker 2: That's right. So you know this is where we're going in.
Speaker 2: You talk about the banks were too big to fail,
Speaker 2: so they got bailed out. Well, guess what artificial intelligence
Speaker 2: companies are bigger now. They quietly passed the entire banking
Speaker 2: sector in terms of especially the stock market that's going on,
Speaker 2: and so of course the government is going to bail
Speaker 2: them out. If it bailed out the banks, we're going
Speaker 2: to see all that stuff happening again. Meanwhile, food lines.
Speaker 2: Food lines are what we're going to see. These are
Speaker 2: food lines in one particular place. See this, people standing
Speaker 2: in the rain, and the line goes forever around and
Speaker 2: around the block. This is just one food bank that
Speaker 2: is there. But it also happens on the military bases
Speaker 2: as well. Look at this. This is on an Air
Speaker 2: Force military base in Las Vegas, Nellis Air Force Base
Speaker 2: on Friday, and people put this up and you can
Speaker 2: see all the people lined up at the Air Force
Speaker 2: base out of food to get food bank and they
Speaker 2: told us a point out on Friday, soldiers that had
Speaker 2: been stationed in Germany, We're told to go to German
Speaker 2: food banks to get food. You talk about stretching the
Speaker 2: empire to thin, isn't it? You know Napoleon said, an
Speaker 2: army travels on its stomach. Well, we can't even afford
Speaker 2: to pay our own people. It can't get organized enough
Speaker 2: to do that. It's pretty absurd. What is happening with
Speaker 2: all this? So you have several states that jumped in
Speaker 2: and gave the snap benefits to people, Wisconsin, Oregon, Hawaii
Speaker 2: that jumped in and paid fully for the month of November.
Speaker 2: Trump is furious about that and he wants to because
Speaker 2: it's going to be hard to get that back and
Speaker 2: he wanted to use it as a leverage. Officials in California, Kansas,
Speaker 2: New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Washington State also said they moved quickly
Speaker 2: to issue full snap benefits on Friday because the two
Speaker 2: court decisions. And again what happened is there was an
Speaker 2: appeal to get a quick decision. They went to the
Speaker 2: Supreme Court. Supreme Court said we're going to stop these
Speaker 2: judges' orders until the case can be heard by the
Speaker 2: appeals court. So something of a victory for Trump. Still
Speaker 2: it's not permanent. I mean, it could go back the
Speaker 2: other way, but he wants to penalize the states who
Speaker 2: spent their own money giving this to people. In both cases,
Speaker 2: the judge ordered the government to use emergency reserve fund
Speaker 2: that has more than four point six billion dollars to
Speaker 2: pay for SNAP for November, but gave it leeway to
Speaker 2: tap other money to make full payments, which cost between
Speaker 2: eight and a half and nine billion dollars each month.
Speaker 2: That's why I said the magnitude of the welfare state,
Speaker 2: I think is an eye opener for many of us
Speaker 2: who have not been keeping tabs on how big it
Speaker 2: has grown. Forty two million people and I think about
Speaker 2: twenty percent of children are getting fed through the welfare program.
Speaker 2: On Monday, the administration said it would not use the
Speaker 2: additional money, saying it was up to Congress to appreciate
Speaker 2: appropriate the funds for the program and that other money
Speaker 2: was needed to shore up other child hunger programs. So
Speaker 2: again putting their foot down, and it is not playing well.
Speaker 2: So it's Thanksgiving. Travel looms airport chaos threat could force
Speaker 2: Washington to end the shutdown, and I think that's exactly
Speaker 2: what's going on on me. That was the joke from
Speaker 2: Saturday night lighting that plate earlier.
Speaker 9: The people are saying, but sir, how will I afford
Speaker 9: my Thanksgiving turkey for my family? What good news is
Speaker 9: your family's not coming because other planes are gone.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right. When the planes are gone, that's what
Speaker 2: ends the shutdown. Previous longest shutdown, which was in the
Speaker 2: prior Trump administration, ended when you started having people air
Speaker 2: traffic controllers calling in sick after going for all over
Speaker 2: a month without pay. This time they managed the shutdown
Speaker 2: better so they able to keep juggling and spending the
Speaker 2: plates for a little bit longer. But it has finally
Speaker 2: taken because the air traffic controllers in an even larger
Speaker 2: amount now are having to take secondary jobs in order
Speaker 2: to feed their family. Because their primary job is an
Speaker 2: air traffic controller, they're not getting paid, so they're having
Speaker 2: to go out as uber drivers or whatever, and showing
Speaker 2: just how broken the system is. There. The record long
Speaker 2: government shutdown will end once FAA mandated flight reductions start
Speaker 2: forcing airport closures, and of course that happened over the
Speaker 2: weekend and double stacking the planes. Right now, we're taking off,
Speaker 2: but later flights are going to be hurting worse. Once
Speaker 2: airports closed, this thing ends. We don't all fly private
Speaker 2: like the people in Congress, said Brian Sullivan. And on Friday,
Speaker 2: the FAA told major airlines reduced daily flights by four
Speaker 2: percent at forty major airports, rising to six percent closures
Speaker 2: by tomorrow and ten percent by Friday. So they're rapidly
Speaker 2: shutting everything down. Secretary Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy warned that
Speaker 2: the flight reductions could exceed twenty percent if the government
Speaker 2: shut down were not resolved in the weeks ahead. By Saturday,
Speaker 2: forty two major airports had disrupted flights in twelve cities.
Speaker 2: It's only going to get worse two weeks before Thanksgiving,
Speaker 2: and you're going to see air traffic will be reduced
Speaker 2: to a trickle, said Duffy. Once airports close, this thing
Speaker 2: ends again, as Brian Sullivan said, because we don't all
Speaker 2: fly private planes like many in Congress. More than twenty
Speaker 2: two hundred flights canceled on Sunday alone. I met a
Speaker 2: nationwide air travel disruption and seventy five hundred flights delayed,
Speaker 2: So it continues to escalate very rapidly. Some travelers are
Speaker 2: completely in panic as they're trying to figure out how
Speaker 2: they're going to get home, if they've got to go
Speaker 2: to a wedding or something like that, how they get
Speaker 2: back and so flight away. You might want to pull
Speaker 2: this up lance that shows the map of they call
Speaker 2: it the misery Map of closures. They've got a chart
Speaker 2: there and they've got circles showing where the most closures are.
Speaker 2: And so again understand this.
Speaker 10: I'm glad to live in a time where we have
Speaker 10: something called the misery map to show us how how
Speaker 10: life is going in certain aspects.
Speaker 2: Well, I think since two thousand and one, whenever I
Speaker 2: think of airlines, I think of misery. It has just
Speaker 2: been it's like a metastasizing cancer what they have done,
Speaker 2: and look at how bad it god. In twenty twenty,
Speaker 2: they apply all of their pressure to the airports and
Speaker 2: it's the sort of thing. It's not going to be
Speaker 2: limited that. I mean, they're just using them as a
Speaker 2: to move the Overton window in people's minds as well
Speaker 2: as to practice their tactics. Because TSA is not about airplanes,
Speaker 2: it's about transportation in general, and we've seen that they
Speaker 2: have made moves, brief moves in the past to push
Speaker 2: into trains and buses and things like that, but they
Speaker 2: will continue to do. That's why they want to ban
Speaker 2: private cars and have all cars under control of corporations,
Speaker 2: big corporations that are going to work with them.
Speaker 10: So really incredible is how so many people younger than
Speaker 10: myself have no concept of flight as anything but this
Speaker 10: tremendous hassle, this gigantic nuisance to them, that's just normal.
Speaker 10: They have never experienced, you know, a pre nine to
Speaker 10: eleven world where flying wasn't a nightmare. You could go
Speaker 10: to the airport, you could. You know, it was still crowded,
Speaker 10: but it wasn't this you know pantomime where you have
Speaker 10: to sit there and pretend like, okay, me taking my
Speaker 10: shoes off is an important part of the procedure. Me
Speaker 10: walking through the X ray cancer machine very important.
Speaker 2: It was like that comedy the American Carol there making
Speaker 2: fun of all the stuff in it. I mean, that
Speaker 2: show wasn't that wasn't out. That movie wasn't out for
Speaker 2: more than a year before they did do the Underwear Bomber,
Speaker 2: and basically, you know, practically making you take your underwear
Speaker 2: off for all practical purposes, you know, to go through
Speaker 2: the scanners. I remember when they first instituted any kind
Speaker 2: of security checks, and that was in response to some
Speaker 2: of the Cuban hijackings and things like that. But that's
Speaker 2: very simple. I mean, just put your bag on a
Speaker 2: conveyor belt and let the thing run through. It wasn't
Speaker 2: the kind of invasive type of thing that we have now.
Speaker 2: So yeah, it always moving the overton window. Yeah.
Speaker 10: I always remember that flight we took where, you know,
Speaker 10: the TSA guy had been very you know friendly, you know,
Speaker 10: pretty kind, but then you said, well we're going to
Speaker 10: opt out, and the switch that flipped as soon as
Speaker 10: he heard we were opting out. I've been so nice
Speaker 10: to you, I've been good, and you're gonna do this
Speaker 10: to me. Yeah, and he immediately becomes just this officious,
Speaker 10: gree little bureaucrat.
Speaker 2: Yeah. The thing that really set them off was when
Speaker 2: I came back over there. You got separated from us,
Speaker 2: and you're going through separately, and I started filming the
Speaker 2: process and he told me not to and I said,
Speaker 2: now I'm allowed to do this, and that's when he
Speaker 2: really lost it.
Speaker 10: And again the government has this whole mentality of well,
Speaker 10: if you're not doing anything wrong, you don't have anything
Speaker 10: to hide, why would it matter if we're filming you
Speaker 10: at all times?
Speaker 3: But the second you flip that back.
Speaker 10: Around on any of their employees, watch how they scream,
Speaker 10: Watch how they moan, Oh, you're oppressing me.
Speaker 3: How could you film what I'm doing?
Speaker 2: Well, just I'll tell you in the audience. At the
Speaker 2: same time, in terms of driving a car here in Tennessee,
Speaker 2: they've just had a major scandal where they found out
Speaker 2: that the highway Patrol has got quotas in terms of
Speaker 2: arresting drunk drivers, and they've been arresting people who are
Speaker 2: completely sober and charging them with being a drunk driver.
Speaker 2: So I just want to give you a word of warning, Travis,
Speaker 2: as you're coming back through. It was picked up by
Speaker 2: I think a station out of Memphis. They had several
Speaker 2: people went to them and made the case that they
Speaker 2: were arrested in charge of drunk driving and they were
Speaker 2: not drinking at all. And then they had two highway
Speaker 2: patrol officers former I think I think they left blowing
Speaker 2: the whistle on it, saying that they've got quotas that
Speaker 2: they want them to do about fifty a month, and
Speaker 2: so it's crazy what is happening. And this is just
Speaker 2: a government out of control again, trying to make a
Speaker 2: justification for their jobs, just like TSA.
Speaker 11: Nice that those two former highway patrol officers found their
Speaker 11: integrity once they had nothing left to lose and were
Speaker 11: no longer employed.
Speaker 2: There, that's right. Yeah, I've talked many times the law
Speaker 2: enforcement against prohibition, and it's all judges and prosecutors and
Speaker 2: police officers former former now left or retired or whatever.
Speaker 2: Now they tell us all right, they won't tell us
Speaker 2: all they're there. But that's that's the way this thing
Speaker 2: always works.
Speaker 11: Out of course, some of that could be they are
Speaker 11: former because they had a conscience.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 11: It's the whole test of a institution is if they
Speaker 11: get rid of the corrupt people in it. Well, they're
Speaker 11: getting rid of the non corrupt people. So it's that's right.
Speaker 2: Well, again, as I said, it's not just the passenger flights, Okay,
Speaker 2: this is also our distributed supply chain. You know, our
Speaker 2: supply chain is distributed, you know, not just internationally but
Speaker 2: even within the United States, and so domestic flights in
Speaker 2: terms of transportation are going to be taking a big hit.
Speaker 2: And this is on top of the fact that because
Speaker 2: that UPS plane fell apart on takeoff, that horrific accident.
Speaker 2: I don't know if I should should have gotten the
Speaker 2: clip for but it's just somebody's dash can recorded it.
Speaker 2: And you see this wall of fire as the thing
Speaker 2: is like going across the ground because the plane engine
Speaker 2: fell off as it was going, caught a lot of
Speaker 2: people on the ground as well. And so as a
Speaker 2: result that make of plane McDonald Douglas MD eleven planes
Speaker 2: have been grounded and that's a big part of the
Speaker 2: fleet of UPS and Federal Express, so those have been grounded.
Speaker 2: And then in addition to that, you've got the other
Speaker 2: restrictions that are there. So it's going to impact a
Speaker 2: lot of shipping and transportation stuff like that, right before
Speaker 2: the big retail issues of Christmas time coming. And so
Speaker 2: that has nothing to do with the air traffic control,
Speaker 2: but it just exacerbates it as well. And they're saying
Speaker 2: the one saving advantages that a lot of the flights
Speaker 2: for UPS and FedEx take place at night where they
Speaker 2: don't have the restrictions on the air traffic controllers. But
Speaker 2: I can imagine that that would begin to happen as well.
Speaker 2: You know, if you can't pay the air traffic controllers,
Speaker 2: they've got to eat somehow and earn their way.
Speaker 10: Thinking maybe they're saying, well, thankfully, most of these happen
Speaker 10: at night, so hopefully there won't be someone around to
Speaker 10: record the next one.
Speaker 2: Well, they weren't around in that case either. It was
Speaker 2: a dash cam recording, you know, because a lot of
Speaker 2: the dash cams whenever there's some kind of a vibration.
Speaker 2: I bet there was a vibration when that thing was
Speaker 2: hitting the ground. It's fairly fairly close, and you know,
Speaker 2: if there's some kind of a jerk or something like
Speaker 2: that camera kicks on, it starts to record, and that's
Speaker 2: where they got that footage. So one guy who's a
Speaker 2: supply chain management professor at SYRACUSE said that the ten
Speaker 2: flight reduction, the reduction flight capacity and the grounding of
Speaker 2: these planes is they won two punch for cargo carriers.
Speaker 2: He thinks it could take weeks for them to get
Speaker 2: the MD eleven fleets back in service. They're going to
Speaker 2: have to do a thorough review of the condition of
Speaker 2: the planes because evidently there's some kind of a design
Speaker 2: issue of the engine is going to fall off like that.
Speaker 2: Both FedEx and UPS said many of the flights take
Speaker 2: place at night outside the restricted window. Both of them
Speaker 2: said they also had contingency plans to protect shipments of
Speaker 2: critical items like pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and essential manufacturing drugs.
Speaker 2: So you'll still be able to get your vaccines. Good
Speaker 2: news is we can still inject all the kids. They
Speaker 2: said that trucks are going to be called on to
Speaker 2: move things quickly, and there'd be a shift for that.
Speaker 2: They said, well, actually, you know, we've gotten pretty good
Speaker 2: at a meeting these challenges for short term disruptions within
Speaker 2: the last five years. Yeah, a lot of dramatic supply
Speaker 2: chain swings, so this won't translate to a simple one
Speaker 2: to one loss of capacity everywhere. Why have we had
Speaker 2: these dramatic supply chain swings over the last five years, Well,
Speaker 2: beginning with the Trump lockdown. Of course, Biden did his
Speaker 2: best to carry all that along. It's government in general
Speaker 2: messing up everything that it gets involved in.
Speaker 11: And of course they're going to be offsetting the danger
Speaker 11: of the lack of air traffic controllers by handing this
Speaker 11: over to these truckers that don't speak English, and having
Speaker 11: them bring the danger on the roads instead of the skies.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I know what a mess we're in. It truly
Speaker 2: is amazing. So the Trump administration again is going to
Speaker 2: try to snap defeat out of the jaws of victory,
Speaker 2: demanding that states undue the snap payouts. How are they
Speaker 2: going to do that? And warning of a catastrophic impact.
Speaker 2: The Trump administration is playing this really stupidly. They highlight
Speaker 2: the confusion, the uncertainty caused by the Trump Administration's shifting
Speaker 2: stance on the issue. So again, when there is a
Speaker 2: real emergency, they declared that it's not an emergency, and
Speaker 2: when it's non emergency, he makes it up so he
Speaker 2: can do whatever he wishes. So the Deputy under Secretary
Speaker 2: of Agriculture warned that states could face penalties if they
Speaker 2: did not comply. It was unclear if the directive applies
Speaker 2: to states that used their own funds to keep the
Speaker 2: program alive or the ones that were just relying on
Speaker 2: federal money entirely. The Department of Agriculture would not respond
Speaker 2: to AP to clarify that. Republican Senator Murkowski of Alaska
Speaker 2: said on Sunday that the directive is shocking if it
Speaker 2: applies to states like Alaska that used their own money
Speaker 2: to prop up the program. She said, it's one thing
Speaker 2: if the federal government is going to continue its level
Speaker 2: of appeal through the courts to say no, this can't
Speaker 2: be done with the money that's coming from the federal government.
Speaker 2: But when you're telling the states that have said this
Speaker 2: is a significant enough issue in our state and we're
Speaker 2: going to find the resources to backfill or the front
Speaker 2: load or whatever term you want in order to help people,
Speaker 2: those states should not be penalized. So again, just to
Speaker 2: leave this out there with uncertainty as to where that is,
Speaker 2: that in and of itself is stupid, and it'll be
Speaker 2: even dumber if they seek to penalize states who are
Speaker 2: using their own money.
Speaker 11: Gives a huge attack on state sovereignty and a major
Speaker 11: encroachment from the federal government.
Speaker 2: That's right, and it will be something that you can
Speaker 2: bet will be demogogued by the Democrats. There have been
Speaker 2: four different directives in six days. This is very much
Speaker 2: like the tariffs, right, tariffs based on a fake emergency.
Speaker 2: This one based on a real emergency that was created
Speaker 2: by the government, and yet they can't make up their
Speaker 2: minds and they can't come up with a reasonable explanation
Speaker 2: for this. So the governor of Maryland said, in the
Speaker 2: past six days, we received four different measures of guidance
Speaker 2: from the Trump administration. He fumed over the latest one
Speaker 2: that threatened to punish states if they aid full benefits.
Speaker 2: He said, this is chaos, and it is intentional chaos
Speaker 2: that we're seeing from this administration. And this is why
Speaker 2: I say, you know, it concerns me because, just like
Speaker 2: James Carvill, I think the Democrats are going to sweep everything.
Speaker 2: The Republicans are kidding themselves about this no King's Rally,
Speaker 2: I said, And you could see it in the elections
Speaker 2: that we just had, and you're going to see it
Speaker 2: in the midterms, and you're going to see it at
Speaker 2: twenty twenty eight. This is the Republicans are completely discrediting
Speaker 2: anyone who wants to talk about real free markets or
Speaker 2: any reform of the welfare state. They are poisoning all
Speaker 2: of that. And you know, whenever you turn around, you know,
Speaker 2: here's Trump attending another extravagant party at mar Lago as
Speaker 2: thousands hit the food banks amid the shutdown. This is
Speaker 2: the UK Independent and of course it's going to be
Speaker 2: spun that way. The optics are just so incredibly stupid.
Speaker 2: A Drudge had it at the very top of the
Speaker 2: Drudge Report. As matter of fact, he had this still
Speaker 2: of Trump as Marie Antoinette and said underneath it, let
Speaker 2: them eat steaks.
Speaker 4: Let them eat steak, or you fired.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's it. That's the Trump mode of government. We
Speaker 2: will rule by intimidation, by conflict, and by chaos. Trump
Speaker 2: attended his second extravagant party at mar Lago in a
Speaker 2: week as tens of thousands of federal employees go without pay,
Speaker 2: leaving some of them and many more Americans to turn
Speaker 2: to food banks amid the longest government shut down in history,
Speaker 2: even the military vestation in foreign countries. Another lavish event
Speaker 2: at mar Lago, and Trump was seen dining at a
Speaker 2: table surrounded by MAGA supporters, posing with his thumbs up
Speaker 2: next to women in ball gowns. The event also featured
Speaker 2: ice sculptures and an opera performance. Yeah, this is our
Speaker 2: ballroom capitalism.
Speaker 14: It is.
Speaker 2: Playing into all the stereotypes of corrupt crony capitalism that
Speaker 2: everybody has. And it is an idiotic tone death public
Speaker 2: relations blind to the optics of what's going on. Yes, last, so.
Speaker 11: Are these sculptures of people in masks with tactical gear
Speaker 11: and its ice sculptures that they had.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah, if you get too close, the sculptures will
Speaker 2: spray you with pepper spray. So that's it. Around the
Speaker 2: same time, on Friday, the Trump administration was allowed to
Speaker 2: continue only partially funding the SNAP program in order from
Speaker 2: the Supreme Court blocking the decision of a lower court
Speaker 2: which required the government to fully fund SNAP, otherwise known
Speaker 2: as food stamps. So one person that they talked to
Speaker 2: at the Independent was a bureaucrat lost their I used
Speaker 2: to be a grant's administrator, administrator of handing out grants
Speaker 2: across the federal government, in other words, giving people money.
Speaker 2: That's what the government does. The two things that we
Speaker 2: miss with a shutdown, and that's really what the federal
Speaker 2: government has become, handing out money to people and both
Speaker 2: the employees of the government as well as welfare recipients.
Speaker 2: And then the other thing is some functions that they
Speaker 2: can't manage to handle that are very vital and critical.
Speaker 2: And so we've really seen what government is. People should
Speaker 2: not lose sight of the reality of government. So you
Speaker 2: know when you look at the filibuster and Trump throwing
Speaker 2: temper tantrums to do the filibuster said, if they can't
Speaker 2: reach a deal, the Republicans should terminate the filibuster immediately,
Speaker 2: all upper case, and take care of our great American workers. Again,
Speaker 2: this is just another example of how he is willing
Speaker 2: to set very very bad precedents and or break things
Speaker 2: for expediency. Again. The Obamacare fix still not clear what
Speaker 2: it's going to be, but they say they're going to
Speaker 2: send cash to Americans and not to ensures. Why do
Speaker 2: we have to send our money to the federal government
Speaker 2: to have to have it sent back to us doled
Speaker 2: out to us like children on an allowance. Let's see,
Speaker 2: this is the Republican plan. Now we're going to give
Speaker 2: you money from the government. Again. What is that about.
Speaker 2: That's about control, It's about another form of welfare. I
Speaker 2: shouldn't have to depend on a government handout for food,
Speaker 2: or for health care, or for insurance or for anything else.
Speaker 2: Got to get the government out of this. I don't
Speaker 2: want Obamacare. And guess what, I don't want trump Care
Speaker 2: or lindsey Care or whatever they want to call it.
Speaker 2: And Trump is already working with these pharmaceutical companies, like
Speaker 2: how you know Affiser and Albert Borla to put in
Speaker 2: Trump r ex and that of corrupt crony capitalism right there.
Speaker 2: But both sides, both the Democrats and Republicans, are owned
Speaker 2: by the pharmaceutical companies. You know, they've got a lot
Speaker 2: of corporates. You know, foreign governments own them. Israel, Argentina, Ukraine,
Speaker 2: they are tied in with this because again they get
Speaker 2: kickbacks from these different organizations. You give them money, you
Speaker 2: give them the public's money and massive amounts, and they
Speaker 2: will kick back some of that money to these corrupt politicians.
Speaker 2: That's how the game works. Israel does it, Ukraine does it.
Speaker 2: I don't know how it works with Argentina yet, but
Speaker 2: that certainly is how it works with the big pharmaceutical companies.
Speaker 2: And so again that they're not going to really fix this.
Speaker 2: Trump Care is not going to be that much different
Speaker 2: from Obama.
Speaker 10: My theory on Argentina is that Donald Trump wants tips
Speaker 10: on hair from Javier Malai.
Speaker 3: I think that's why he did it. Your hair is incredible,
Speaker 3: it's so boovie. I can't get my to be like that.
Speaker 3: How do you do it? Hobby.
Speaker 2: Who does your hair? Yeah, who does your hair? That's right.
Speaker 2: I could guess, well, they have the Brazilian butt lift.
Speaker 2: I guess they got the Argentina hair lift. Maybe, so
Speaker 2: replacing it replacing insurance, but direct cash transfers to people
Speaker 2: would mean that no one but they're very rich could
Speaker 2: ever receive treatment for a chronic condition like heart disease
Speaker 2: or diabetes, or an expensive disease like cancer. Well, of
Speaker 2: course that's not going to be the case. That's a
Speaker 2: Democrat talking. They're going to hand out money to the hospitals,
Speaker 2: and they're going to get this done one way or
Speaker 2: the other. The issue is, why are we having another
Speaker 2: program that's going to depend on money from handouts from
Speaker 2: government in order to get something that is vital. We
Speaker 2: got to get government out of our life. It used
Speaker 2: to be that that was the rhetoric, at least of
Speaker 2: the Republicans. They don't even pretend that they want to
Speaker 2: get government out of your life anymore. And they're out
Speaker 2: there demagoguing saying, well, you know Obama's version gives money
Speaker 2: to corporations, We're going to give you the money directly.
Speaker 2: I mean, that sounds even more like the Democrats than
Speaker 2: the Democrats. And so Lindsey Graham says, this whole thing
Speaker 2: is backfiring. I'm going to end the shutdown today. That
Speaker 2: was yesterday. And I guess the question is who is
Speaker 2: at backfiring on? And you know, this is an amazing
Speaker 2: mess that we have. And Sean Duffy says that the
Speaker 2: air traffic control disruptions will live on long after the shutdown.
Speaker 2: But guess what he's not proposing to spend off the ATCs,
Speaker 2: the air traffic controllers. Nobody in the Republican Party is
Speaker 2: talking about getting, you know, cutting them loose to do
Speaker 2: their own thing under the control of the airlines. Nobody
Speaker 2: is talking about that at all. And it was even
Speaker 2: proposed in the first Trump administration, but nobody's proposing it now.
Speaker 2: Duffy said, when the shutdown began, he was already short
Speaker 2: of qualified air traffic controllers. Well, maybe people don't want
Speaker 2: to work for a government that is constantly playing these
Speaker 2: types of games. Well, we're going to take a quick break. Travis,
Speaker 2: you want to cover the comments? Do you have the
Speaker 2: comments there?
Speaker 3: I have some comments.
Speaker 2: Travis is joining us remote from Austin.
Speaker 10: That's right, a secret location outside of Austin, very very
Speaker 10: clandestine over here. But we've got a comment and a
Speaker 10: tip from DG eight. Thank you very much, DJA. We appreciate.
Speaker 10: Thank you so as David. The Trump's foreign policy. The
Speaker 10: Trump's foreign policies have evolved into a clone of George W. Bush,
Speaker 10: and his economic policies have evolved into a combination of
Speaker 10: Woodrow Wilson, a FDR and MAGA still claims winning unbelievable.
Speaker 10: That's right, we're winning, winning so much. And Stealth Patriot.
Speaker 10: Thank you very much, Stealth Patriot, We appreciate it. Says
Speaker 10: just like the lockdown government shutdowns effect on travel is
Speaker 10: going to have a devastating effect on the economy. Everything
Speaker 10: the government does is intentional. Is an intentional demolition of
Speaker 10: our way of living.
Speaker 3: That's right, that's right. Yeah, it's all about.
Speaker 10: Making us more poor, more willing to put up with
Speaker 10: whatever they do to us, just because we require them
Speaker 10: to survive.
Speaker 2: They've got a lot of ways to make sure that
Speaker 2: we own nothing. That's right, Yeah, continue, go ahead.
Speaker 3: These are those are the two tips that I had.
Speaker 10: Let me see if I've got got more comments readily available.
Speaker 10: We're still working on the system here, folks.
Speaker 2: But well, I've got a couple from guard and he
Speaker 2: says the GFP will never end government subsidized medical and
Speaker 2: they will remove Obama's name and continue the welfareism and
Speaker 2: subsidies to big insurance companies in some ways. Yeah, you know,
Speaker 2: you know the insurance company is going to be feeding
Speaker 2: at the table. They've got too much money, too much
Speaker 2: control of all these different congressmen that are out there.
Speaker 2: And he also says, you know what solves government shutdowns,
Speaker 2: bombing people in boats and handing weapons to genocide generators.
Speaker 2: That's absolutely right. When all else fail, they take it
Speaker 2: a war. They have the wag the dog thing that
Speaker 2: is out there. Jason Barker says, they sell replacement spouts
Speaker 2: for gas cans. They're like a black market on them.
Speaker 2: I want to replacement spouse. I want to replacement spout
Speaker 2: for the government. It's what I wanted for. Yeah, I
Speaker 2: guess we could probably three D some print something land
Speaker 2: As you could probably do that for me.
Speaker 10: It's truly amazing how through government interference they managed to
Speaker 10: make the jug unusable a simple container, something we have
Speaker 10: had worked out for thousands upon thousands of years.
Speaker 2: I think we have a new metaphor for how useless
Speaker 2: government is and the way that it destroys our life.
Speaker 2: We talk about how government was like kudzu. You know,
Speaker 2: you bring it in to solve a problem, before you
Speaker 2: know it, it's taken over everything. Well, I think that
Speaker 2: the gas can thing, it's probably the best thing we've
Speaker 2: come up with yet. Yea, that's even worse than you know,
Speaker 2: mandating that the toilets have got to be one and
Speaker 2: a half gallons. That took them a long time for
Speaker 2: the toilet manufacturers to be will catch up to that
Speaker 2: immediate mandate to get something to work that way, and
Speaker 2: maybe they still don't work as well as they used to.
Speaker 2: But this is just beyond the pale. It's it's the bucket, right,
Speaker 2: It's the government. It's the government is making us all
Speaker 2: poor and the strangest ways. And you can't really even
Speaker 2: pour this into the car at the which the thing.
Speaker 10: And of course you can find Guard Goldsmith during his
Speaker 10: Liberty Conspiracy broadcast at six pm on weeknights. You can
Speaker 10: check him out on Rumble and on Twitter at Guard Goldsmith.
Speaker 10: Jason Barker, one of the hosts of Knights of the
Speaker 10: Storm and go to Knights of the Storm dot com
Speaker 10: to find their schedule, Our schedule, Guard schedule, Tony schedule.
Speaker 10: They have a lot of different broadcasts listed there when
Speaker 10: and where you can watch, So go check out Nights
Speaker 10: of the Storm dot com and Guard Goldsmith Liberty Conspiracy.
Speaker 2: There's an interesting comment from Bulldog. He said, the company
Speaker 2: I worked for used to make gas cans, and they
Speaker 2: used to get sued because people had set them on
Speaker 2: their furnace, et cetera. See that coming.
Speaker 3: Some people just don't have common sense.
Speaker 10: Some people absolutely just they don't get the concept you
Speaker 10: don't put fire near the gas can.
Speaker 11: But has all these comments and more.
Speaker 2: Okay, you got those comments from us, Yes, I've got Okay, Yeah,
Speaker 2: Pasanovante is absolutely true. You know I didn't get anything
Speaker 2: into the car, spilled it all over the ground trying
Speaker 2: to use that, but go ahead, Yeah, Yescaulevante.
Speaker 10: I said, I spilled more gas with those environmental quote
Speaker 10: unquote gas cans, and I ever spilled with a spout.
Speaker 3: They make it utterly impossible. Yeah, I was.
Speaker 10: I remember for days, we were convinced we were just
Speaker 10: doing something wrong.
Speaker 2: All three arms and four hands or something. I could
Speaker 2: use that thing, but.
Speaker 10: We all took turns at one point or another just
Speaker 10: trying to figure out, Okay, this can't be how it works.
Speaker 10: It's it can't be this ridiculous and non functional. We're
Speaker 10: doing something wrong. And then eventually we all came to
Speaker 10: the conclusion that no, this is how it's supposed to be.
Speaker 10: It's this bad. Yeah, we've got Wally Walrice, that guy
Speaker 10: from the Big Short is shorting Palenteer at Big Time,
Speaker 10: that's right, Michael Berray.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, a shorting Pollentteer and in Nvidia. But in
Speaker 2: Vidia is like sixteen percent of the short that he
Speaker 2: put out there. Eighty four percent of it is Palenteer,
Speaker 2: And I don't know, you know, I look at it
Speaker 2: and I we're going to talk about AI when we
Speaker 2: come back, and I think that, you know, Palenteer is
Speaker 2: on the side of this where it is the government
Speaker 2: and using it as a weapon foreign and domestic. And
Speaker 2: I think that that is the use case of AI.
Speaker 2: And I think that's why they're going to give it
Speaker 2: whatever money they need. I mean, there's the big issue
Speaker 2: of the bubble and what it's going to do to
Speaker 2: the economy. That's very similar to what happened with the
Speaker 2: Big Short of course, you know history rhymes, it doesn't
Speaker 2: exactly repeat. That's the rhyming portion of it there. But
Speaker 2: then this is different in the sense that they really
Speaker 2: want AI as a weapon, a weapon to use against
Speaker 2: us and as a big part of their arsenal for
Speaker 2: the wars that they intend to start, which is also
Speaker 2: a war against us as well. So we're gonna take
Speaker 2: a quick break and we will be right back.
Speaker 15: Here is a little song I OWT. You might want
Speaker 15: to hear it in your part. You know nothing, and
Speaker 15: be happy. I got no cash, ain't got no car,
Speaker 15: not twenty four booster shots in your arm, Own nothing.
Speaker 2: To be happy.
Speaker 15: You can't even buy in the store because of your
Speaker 15: low social credit score. Own nothing. Be happy, you will
Speaker 15: owe nothing and be happy. Be happy at each a.
Speaker 16: Bugs, excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, Yet Laos, your annual Global
Speaker 16: Risk Report makes for a stunning and sobering read for
Speaker 16: the global business community. The top concern for the next
Speaker 16: two years is not conflict or climate. It is disinformation
Speaker 16: and misinformation, followed closely by polarization within our societies.
Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act.
Speaker 13: You are listening to the David Knight Show, Elvis the Beetle.
Speaker 4: And the Sweet Sounds of Motown. Find them on the
Speaker 4: Oldies channel at apsradio dot com.
Speaker 2: All right, welcome back, and Travis is in Austin today.
Speaker 2: He's not in the studio. He's got some more comments.
Speaker 2: I think that's correct. We have Jason Barker. He responding
Speaker 2: to Wally Waalrice says they will never get rid of
Speaker 2: gun control. Why would the NRAA make itself obsolete? They
Speaker 2: bring in too much money.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 10: People involve the na make a ton of money telling you, look,
Speaker 10: we've got to fight this. And they're right on the
Speaker 10: fact we need to fight this. But the NRAA never
Speaker 10: seems to accomplish very much when it comes to actually
Speaker 10: preventing anything or rolling anything back.
Speaker 2: I think the Gun Owners of America is much better,
Speaker 2: and you know they have business yea all along. And
Speaker 2: I always like Larry Pratt. He was very principled and
Speaker 2: he's now retired. His son, Eric Pratt. I think Eric
Speaker 2: is his son has now taken over and following along
Speaker 2: the same pattern of principles.
Speaker 3: Yeah, was it also National Association for Gun Rights?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 3: I believe they're good too.
Speaker 2: Yeah, we did some work with them. Yeah, and I
Speaker 2: thought they were very principled and they also got it
Speaker 2: and they understood what important things were and they weren't
Speaker 2: going to sell out. And so yeah, you have a
Speaker 2: couple of different gun organizations out there besides the gun all.
Speaker 10: Right, Yes, and a couple of them actually understand what
Speaker 10: it means when they say shall not be infringed, just like, well,
Speaker 10: you know, a little infringement here and there, what's the
Speaker 10: big deal, guys, Come on, it's only a little infringement.
Speaker 2: I can't remember. I can't remember his fell The first
Speaker 2: name was Dudley at the National Association of Gun Rights.
Speaker 3: And I don't say Brown, but I don't think that's right.
Speaker 2: I'm not sure anyway. Yeah, during the break, we're trying
Speaker 2: to worked out what my mind was clicking with With
Speaker 2: Steve Altman, we're going to talk about Sam Altman here
Speaker 2: as a guy who did soundtracks. I think that might
Speaker 2: be where I got it from, but I.
Speaker 11: Didn't recognize any of the movies he did soundtracks for.
Speaker 2: Well, we're going to we have a very interesting thing
Speaker 2: that Lance came across that we're going to talk about,
Speaker 2: and it is You've got about a dozen different companies
Speaker 2: out there that are working on ways to scan your
Speaker 2: brain non invasively and then to be able to read
Speaker 2: your mind and to reconstruct what you are looking at.
Speaker 2: Truly amazing technology, and I can see no good purpose
Speaker 2: for this at all. I can see a lot of
Speaker 2: evil that can come from this, but not a good purpose.
Speaker 13: This is a.
Speaker 2: Reconstruction from MRI, a form of MRI called fMRI. We're
Speaker 2: going to talk about that coming up, but we're going
Speaker 2: to talk about the AI stuff. First. Do you have
Speaker 2: Is that all the comments or do you have no?
Speaker 10: We've still got a couple more finish Brian and Dev
Speaker 10: McCartney says, Brian has on his David Knight Show shirt today.
Speaker 3: Well, good good, that's great.
Speaker 2: We got another one in the works and we're going
Speaker 2: to be doing some more commercials. Lance has been putting
Speaker 2: together some stuff for to make the AI generation stuff
Speaker 2: more efficient for us. It's he's been very rarely consuming
Speaker 2: and so that's been his extracurricular project that he's working
Speaker 2: on and so hopefully that'll that'll help us to get
Speaker 2: some of this stuff out. We've got some interesting projects
Speaker 2: products and the and the works here and kind of
Speaker 2: waiting for commercials that we could put out there.
Speaker 10: Let people know that and real Jason Barker says, if
Speaker 10: families do get two k from the tariffs, it won't
Speaker 10: go far at all the grocery prices. Yeah, it's not
Speaker 10: gonna get two to three trips and then realize, wait
Speaker 10: a minute, I'm all out.
Speaker 2: That's right. I think the purpose of that though, is
Speaker 2: twofold number one. Just like the stimulus checks, they want
Speaker 2: to get you accustomed to government checks. Same thing they're
Speaker 2: talking about with the insurance stuff. Right. We want to
Speaker 2: pay you directly. We want to have cash transfers directly
Speaker 2: to you. They want everybody hooked, just like all the
Speaker 2: institutions have been taken over. They've got to take over everybody.
Speaker 2: They want us on the universal Basic take UBT, right,
Speaker 2: so that we're all getting a check from the government,
Speaker 2: and we're all dependent in one way or the other
Speaker 2: on the government, not just the people who have government contracts,
Speaker 2: the businesses who have government contracts. And saw how that
Speaker 2: worked with a vaccine thing, right, So anybody that had
Speaker 2: a direct job for the government, they worked for the government,
Speaker 2: or they worked for a company that worked for the government.
Speaker 2: They could extend those things. So now they've got to
Speaker 2: get it the tentacles out there into each and every
Speaker 2: one of our lives. But it also puts strings and
Speaker 2: tentacles into this program that makes it hard to end.
Speaker 2: That's why Trump is so upset about the Snap stuff,
Speaker 2: and he wants to punish the states that went ahead
Speaker 2: based on the two court cases and gave SNAP benefits
Speaker 2: to people. He wants the claw that back.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 10: Jason Barker also says, just like the stimulus check people
Speaker 10: were cheering over, it came nowhere close to what people
Speaker 10: lost due to lockdowns.
Speaker 2: And I remember Trump's Treasury secretary at the time, Steve Manuchin, saying,
Speaker 2: we can't do another it was like six months or
Speaker 2: seven months or something. They've done a twelve hundred dollars
Speaker 2: stimius check to people and we can't do another one.
Speaker 2: It's like, what do you think people are going to
Speaker 2: be able to live for more than six months off
Speaker 2: of twelve hundred dollars. That's the kind of mindset of
Speaker 2: these guys. You know, the guy that was posing with
Speaker 2: his trophy wife at the Federal Reserve where they had
Speaker 2: massive sheets of dollar bills that they were physically printing
Speaker 2: there and the two of them went there and posed.
Speaker 2: So that's the kind of mentality of these people.
Speaker 10: Well, yeah, none of the people in power have any
Speaker 10: real concept of what it actually costs to live anymore.
Speaker 10: It's been away for decades. I mean, you've talked about it.
Speaker 10: What I believe it was the George Bush Senior who
Speaker 10: went to the grocery store and didn't know what a
Speaker 10: scanner was.
Speaker 3: He's like, Oh, wow, what's that.
Speaker 2: They live in a different world, you really do.
Speaker 10: They have people that do their shopping for them. They
Speaker 10: have people that buy everything for them. They say I
Speaker 10: want this, and someone else goes and buys it. They
Speaker 10: don't have to worry about the price, they don't have
Speaker 10: to worry about anything related to that. Everything is taken
Speaker 10: care of for them. He's completely and utterly different.
Speaker 2: World, nobody more so than Donald Trump.
Speaker 11: Yes, what lance the people that are, you know, orchestrating this.
Speaker 11: The only reason that you can't live off of that
Speaker 11: twelve hundred is because you're going over your budget of
Speaker 11: three articles of clothing and don't leave your house, don't
Speaker 11: travel more than fifteen minutes, et cetera, et cetera. They
Speaker 11: just live within their means, the means set by these
Speaker 11: people in the ballrooms on their private jets, then everything
Speaker 11: would be fine. You could live forever on just that twelve.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 11: Check.
Speaker 2: That's why you know. I look at these people who
Speaker 2: are freaking out over mon Danny, and it's like, you
Speaker 2: never freaked out over the CD forty, which is put
Speaker 2: together by a socialist Marxist right, a socialist Bloomberg and
Speaker 2: a Marxist Sadik Khan and a Muslim Marxist Muslim right,
Speaker 2: and so they never they never paid any attention to
Speaker 2: the C forty thing, all these establishment politicians. So I
Speaker 2: don't think that's about anything other than a pushback against
Speaker 2: his anti Zionism that is there. So yeah, yeah, we
Speaker 2: all know.
Speaker 10: We all know how heavily Jewish New York City is,
Speaker 10: so it makes a lot of sense. I don't have
Speaker 10: any more comments at the moment, but briefly, I would
Speaker 10: like to remind people that it's because of your support
Speaker 10: that we are able to continue doing this broadcast. We
Speaker 10: cannot thank you all enough for how you have supported
Speaker 10: us so far, and if you would like to continue
Speaker 10: to support us, there's multiple avenues do that and go
Speaker 10: to David Night dot news and see all the ways
Speaker 10: their subscribe Star dot com forward slash the David Night
Speaker 10: Show is a very good way to do that.
Speaker 3: It's a fire and forget sort of thing.
Speaker 10: You sign up at a tier that fits your budget
Speaker 10: and then you don't have to worry about it until
Speaker 10: your card expires or anything else happens. That's the only
Speaker 10: thing you have to worry about is card expiring, are
Speaker 10: no longer being valid. So it's a great way to
Speaker 10: support us, and we really do appreciate all the people
Speaker 10: on subscribe Star who already do so, thank you all
Speaker 10: very very much. And Davidknight dot news has all the
Speaker 10: other ways that you can support us as well, And
Speaker 10: we want to make sure that you check out Homestead
Speaker 10: Products dot shop. They have all kinds of high quality,
Speaker 10: made in America America products that may help you with
Speaker 10: something that you're working on or need. They've got things
Speaker 10: like storable food, whether it's freeze dried eggs that you
Speaker 10: can just add water to and there you have a meal.
Speaker 10: They've got really good hot sauce. I'm not kidding when
Speaker 10: I say I really enjoy it. I stole that bottle
Speaker 10: and I have almost completely used it all up, so
Speaker 10: I'm going to have to order more for myself.
Speaker 3: Their hot sauce is delicious.
Speaker 10: They've got high quality made in America products, and you
Speaker 10: can use promo code Night ten percent off Homestead Products
Speaker 10: dot shop. And the economy the way it is is
Speaker 10: a good time to start looking into gold or silver.
Speaker 10: You can do that at Davidknight dot gold. Tony Arderburn
Speaker 10: has graciously set that up and you can sign up
Speaker 10: for Wolfpack and he will send you gold and silver
Speaker 10: or gold or silver on a monthly basis, depending on
Speaker 10: what tear you sign up for. So check out Davidknight
Speaker 10: dot Gold as well.
Speaker 2: Yes, and as we were, we're going to talk a
Speaker 2: little bit about how they want to transform society. But
Speaker 2: you know, we're talking about this gas can thing. Reminds
Speaker 2: me of a video that I had with an article
Speaker 2: that we didn't get to in the passage. Still in
Speaker 2: the deck here a refrigerator add from nineteen sixty five.
Speaker 2: You know, Corey Doctorowe, science fiction writer, coined the term
Speaker 2: and shitification, talking about how software is continually getting worse
Speaker 2: and worse, and some of the gadgets that we have
Speaker 2: are getting worse and worse. Take a look at this
Speaker 2: refrigerator for example. Right, we now have refrigerators that as
Speaker 2: you had David patri when he was at the CIA
Speaker 2: saying we're going to have smart appliances and your refrigerator
Speaker 2: is going to be listening to you. And we talked
Speaker 2: about that after he mentioned it, and people said, you're
Speaker 2: a bunch of conspiracy theorists. That's not true, and it's like, well,
Speaker 2: the CIA guy said it was, and now we see
Speaker 2: it's there. So you've got refrigerators that will spy on you,
Speaker 2: but are they really good for the purpose that they
Speaker 2: were designed for. Here's a refrigerator from nineteen sixty five.
Speaker 2: It's got a lot of nice features that you might
Speaker 2: want to have in refrigerator today, except you're not going
Speaker 2: to get it. One thing it doesn't do is spy
Speaker 2: on you, which is a feature in and of itself.
Speaker 14: Not with the most ingenious door in any refrigerator. It
Speaker 14: has special places for a bottles, spreadable butter, Jesus, even leftovers,
Speaker 14: and a big picture window hydrator for fruits and vegetables.
Speaker 14: It tilS down to show you your supply at a glance,
Speaker 14: and it also lifts out so you can take it
Speaker 14: over to the sink when there's a fresh supply to
Speaker 14: be washed and put away.
Speaker 3: But that's just the door.
Speaker 14: Think of all you can store in here on these
Speaker 14: big firm shelves that roll all the way up to you,
Speaker 14: so you can get at the food and back without
Speaker 14: moving anything in front. And how about your frozen things.
Speaker 14: Oh yes, there's a place for them too in this big,
Speaker 14: big food freezer. Even your ice cubes have a special
Speaker 14: place for storage right here. And watch how they get there.
Speaker 14: You just take out a tray, turn it over and push.
Speaker 3: You get a shower of.
Speaker 14: Ice cubes, all frosty, dry and ready to use.
Speaker 2: Now, why didn't we think of that. It's kind of
Speaker 2: the same thing that's happened to our government now. You know,
Speaker 2: it was designed and worked a lot better than it
Speaker 2: does now. Everything we're looking at, but the people who
Speaker 2: see the future now it's a future that is focused
Speaker 2: on surveiling you. Sam Altman has denied that up an
Speaker 2: Ai needs a government bailout. Instead, he just wants massive
Speaker 2: government subsidies. This is the article from zero Hedge about
Speaker 2: a month ago when the Magnificent seven stocks were screaming
Speaker 2: higher every day without a care in the world, and
Speaker 2: before the masses that even considered, who would fund the
Speaker 2: trillions of dollars in future capital expenditures needed once the
Speaker 2: organic cash flow topped out, something that they had discussed
Speaker 2: in their article, AI is now a debt bubble that
Speaker 2: quietly surpasses all banks to become the largest sector in
Speaker 2: the market. We explained why attention would very soon turn
Speaker 2: to AI companies issuing gargantuan amounts of debt. Again, whether
Speaker 2: you're talking about the tech companies or government or American consumers,
Speaker 2: it's all about the credit card mentality. I want it,
Speaker 2: I want it now, don't care how much it costs,
Speaker 2: and I don't want to have to pay for it now.
Speaker 2: I want to pay for it later, much later. Hopefully.
Speaker 2: AI revolution has turned into an arms race, But the
Speaker 2: most important aspect of this is the access to energy.
Speaker 2: Around the time the companies realized that they'd no longer
Speaker 2: be able to rely on either equity or debt capital markets,
Speaker 2: US government itself if it wanted to win the war
Speaker 2: with China, where the state directly subsidizes local data centers
Speaker 2: and AI figures, would have to step in and provide
Speaker 2: the required capital. Remember, all these hearings that we had
Speaker 2: from Google, where we had Google and you had open Ais.
Speaker 2: Sam Altman go before Congress and saying, you know, we're
Speaker 2: going to fall behind, and this is so important, it
Speaker 2: is so dangerous. We've got to get this right. We're
Speaker 2: the only ones who should be doing it, and we
Speaker 2: have to get it right for the survival of the country.
Speaker 2: They've been selling this fear, this fear porn for quite
Speaker 2: some time, and this is the purpose because they knew
Speaker 2: they were going to need to have and they wanted
Speaker 2: to have access to government capital because a lot of
Speaker 2: this stuff, folks, is coming from ARPA and that ILK
Speaker 2: and the federal government. It is an arms race. It's
Speaker 2: an arms race for war that is both foreign and domestic.
Speaker 2: AI's killer use case, folks, is surveillance and control of us.
Speaker 2: And that's why the government is going to be so
Speaker 2: desperate to fund it whatever it takes. If you want
Speaker 2: to know why gold and silver and bitcoin are soaring,
Speaker 2: it's the debasement of the dollar in order to fund
Speaker 2: the AI arms race, they said. And of course energy
Speaker 2: is the reality factor in all of this. That's where
Speaker 2: it gets real. And that's one of the reasons why
Speaker 2: Bill Gates and others are moving back away from the
Speaker 2: climate mcguffin, the plandemic. Mcguffin gives them all the justification
Speaker 2: that they need, and they need to have this surveillance
Speaker 2: control and ID the control grid that is there. They
Speaker 2: need to have that, and they need to have artificial
Speaker 2: intelligence to run that. So they're pulling back from that
Speaker 2: because in order to have the AI control structure, they've
Speaker 2: got to have massive amounts of energy. So I think
Speaker 2: this is kind of interesting. You know, when we look
Speaker 2: at this, the reason gold and silver and bitcoin are
Speaker 2: all going up is because they're rapidly devaluating the currency
Speaker 2: in order to fund this arms race, which is really
Speaker 2: about energy. And you know, when you look at what
Speaker 2: the government is doing, so many times you can see
Speaker 2: the evil that they're engaged in, like Palatineer, for example.
Speaker 2: I don't want to invest in Palateer. I don't want
Speaker 2: to fund that. I don't want to be a part
Speaker 2: of that. But this is the way if you invest
Speaker 2: in gold, silver, bitcoin, things like that, that's a way
Speaker 2: for you to profit from what they're doing without supporting
Speaker 2: what they're doing. That's one of the other reasons I
Speaker 2: like it, and of course you can go to David
Speaker 2: Knight Diye Gold and I'll take you to Tony Ardaban
Speaker 2: and It'll help you to profit from this without supporting
Speaker 2: what they are doing. The money is not the problem.
Speaker 2: AI is the new global arms race, and the capital
Speaker 2: expenditures will beventually be funded by governments US and China.
Speaker 2: If you want to know why the goal silver bitcoin
Speaker 2: is soaring, it's the debasement to fund this arms race
Speaker 2: because you can't print energy. That's the real issue. Meanwhile,
Speaker 2: you have open ais CFO, that's the chief financial officer,
Speaker 2: Sarah Fryar, with all the finesse of a bull and
Speaker 2: a China data center. Zero Hedge slammed the growing market
Speaker 2: skepticism that AI would cure cancer, sliced bread, and lead
Speaker 2: to universal utopia. She said, I don't think there's enough
Speaker 2: exuberance about AI when I think about the actual practical
Speaker 2: implications and what it can do for individuals. Well, I
Speaker 2: look at what it can do two individuals, and that
Speaker 2: is a really concerning thing. And of course that was
Speaker 2: in response to the exchange I talked about last week
Speaker 2: where Sam Altman went on a podcast and a fellow billionaire,
Speaker 2: Brad Gersner, asked, how can you you have a company
Speaker 2: that only has three thirteen billion dollars in revenue, how
Speaker 2: can they afford one point four trillion in capital expenditures?
Speaker 2: And he said, well, if you don't want to share,
Speaker 2: sell your share. If you want to sell your shares,
Speaker 2: I'll have no trouble finding you a buyer, because you know,
Speaker 2: there's plenty of greater fools to go around whenever there's
Speaker 2: a bubble like this. And for example, you could take
Speaker 2: even my own CEO, who believes in all this, Sarah
Speaker 2: Fryar said, and what promptly spooked the market on Wednesday.
Speaker 2: What she said is a mingled explanation of where the
Speaker 2: one trillion dollar plus is required. Funding is going to
Speaker 2: come from, said open AI is quote looking for an
Speaker 2: ecosystem of banks and private equity unquote in order to
Speaker 2: support this ambitious plan. But what triggered the selling is
Speaker 2: when she explicitly said that the US government would have
Speaker 2: to quote backstop the guarantee that allows the financing to happen.
Speaker 2: So you know, when we look at the big work,
Speaker 2: there were insurance companies that are backstopping all the securitization
Speaker 2: of these bad mortgages. You know, they take all these
Speaker 2: mortgages that were subprime, they were you know, rated f
Speaker 2: or whatever, and if you put enough of them together
Speaker 2: then somehow that becomes a rated.
Speaker 10: It reminds me very much of what they're doing with
Speaker 10: stable coin, where you're just packaging the dollar in something else.
Speaker 3: It's like, now it's stable.
Speaker 10: We've removed at one level from the dollar, and we
Speaker 10: know how shaky the dollar is, but now it's a
Speaker 10: stable coin, so it's totally fine invest fye.
Speaker 2: Theyasically call stable coin the securitization coin to hearken back
Speaker 2: to the real estate issue that was there.
Speaker 10: I remember the first time I did some you know,
Speaker 10: we were talking about stable coin and did some googling
Speaker 10: on my own. It's like, surely there's they're not just
Speaker 10: repackaging the dollar. Surely if they're calling it stable coin,
Speaker 10: there has to be something. No, it's their typical rigamarole,
Speaker 10: their game. It's the Patriot Act. It's the stable coin. Guys,
Speaker 10: it's stable, it's safe, you will want it.
Speaker 2: They are making some purchases because people see that they
Speaker 2: are making some purchases into gold and into real estate,
Speaker 2: but I think I don't know if that's going to
Speaker 2: be if that's really just window dressing virtue signaling about
Speaker 2: that if it's substantive or not. But yeah, if it's
Speaker 2: going to be a way to repackage treasury notes that
Speaker 2: they can't get foreign governments to buy anymore, they want
Speaker 2: to sell it directly to individuals. And I think that's
Speaker 2: basically what stable coin is. It's not anything that you want.
Speaker 2: Plus it's still a digital coin, which means that it has
Speaker 2: all of the surveillance and control aspects of a central
Speaker 2: bank digital currency. It's just a decentralized digital coin that
Speaker 2: does all the things that a CBDC did. All the
Speaker 2: other sources of funds dried up. Clearly a scenario where
Speaker 2: the company is considering that the company is considering, judging
Speaker 2: by the response of the chief financial officer, the company
Speaker 2: would then have to come to the US taxpayer. Federal
Speaker 2: loan guarantees would really drop the cost of the financing,
Speaker 2: he said, enabling open ai and its investors to borrow
Speaker 2: more money at lower rates. And Sarah Head says, right,
Speaker 2: because there's nothing like a company with fourteen billion dollars
Speaker 2: in revenue and one and a half trillion dollars in
Speaker 2: a trillion dollars in evaluation and one point four trillion
Speaker 2: in commitments. There's nothing like that, or then loading up
Speaker 2: to the gills with government backstopped debt. If only Enron
Speaker 2: and Layman could do the same, both of them would
Speaker 2: still be around. And again this is Trump is the
Speaker 2: perfect president for all this. He's the guy whose entire
Speaker 2: business life was based on racking up debt and then
Speaker 2: using that massive debt to blackmail his creditors. He is
Speaker 2: the ultimate and the perfect present for the technocracy to
Speaker 2: put in this particular move, which is what they've done,
Speaker 2: and it is debt and crony socialism, I think is
Speaker 2: what we should call it. We've had crony capitalism, but
Speaker 2: this is crony socialism. He's even going out there and
Speaker 2: taking positions in various companies, and this is what the
Speaker 2: zero hydarticle is pointing out. Said, well, the investors in
Speaker 2: Nvidia and these other companies need an open AI need
Speaker 2: to think about the fact that the government is going
Speaker 2: to take a position in this, just like they did
Speaker 2: recently with Intel and others. So her comments from Wednesday
Speaker 2: afternoon immediately spooked the market, and Vidia shares suffered their
Speaker 2: biggest weekly drop since April, and the reason for the
Speaker 2: drop is precisely the fact that open ai was clearly considering,
Speaker 2: what do we do when the money to fund the
Speaker 2: trillions in spending, first cash from operations than debt, then equity,
Speaker 2: and the circular deals all dried up. These circular deals. Course,
Speaker 2: that is where you've got Nvidia out there loaning money
Speaker 2: to the people who are consuming its product so they
Speaker 2: can buy more of Nvidia's product. Yeah, circular deals, and
Speaker 2: that's what they're doing right now. And then they report
Speaker 2: that as big sales booming, it's looming IPO opens. Looming
Speaker 2: IPO will come just as the AI bubble truly peaks,
Speaker 2: So the pump it up people buy into it because
Speaker 2: it'll go public right now, it's closed because Sam Altman
Speaker 2: took this nonprofit that Elon Muskets set up, he turned
Speaker 2: it into a for profit corporation, and then when he
Speaker 2: does an initial public offering, they will put their money in.
Speaker 2: It'll peek up, just like Trump's cryptocurrencies, and then maybe
Speaker 2: the not only will that bubble burst, but maybe the
Speaker 2: entire AI bubble will burst. Be a massive pump and dump.
Speaker 2: The fact that US taxpayer is basically the source of
Speaker 2: that money is a little truth that the market hasn't
Speaker 2: wasn't ready to hear just yet. The reaction set off
Speaker 2: fire alarms and prompted sam Altman to publish his longest
Speaker 2: yet post, clocking in at almost eleven hundred words, in
Speaker 2: which he meant to quote clarify a few things unquote,
Speaker 2: namely that his chief financial officer Friar, had misspoken, and
Speaker 2: that chat GPT maker was not seeking a bailout for
Speaker 2: its infrastructure commitments, and contrary to what his CFO mentioned,
Speaker 2: he quote does not have and does not want government guarantees.
Speaker 2: Only he does, said their hedge, but you just don't
Speaker 2: call it a guarantee or a bailout, he said. Friar's
Speaker 2: comment was a carefully planted trial balloon, one meant to
Speaker 2: not only gauge the market's reaction to what is obviously coming,
Speaker 2: but also to plant the seed of expectation that one
Speaker 2: day Sam Altman would to the White House and tell
Speaker 2: them that open Ai is now too big to fail,
Speaker 2: as it would not only take down the market, but
Speaker 2: twenty percent of GDP growth. And that's what many people
Speaker 2: have said. You know, this is a company that could
Speaker 2: take down the global economy. But you know, there's a
Speaker 2: lot of trial balloons like that. I think that the
Speaker 2: Trump pardons, the rumored pardons about p Diddy and whether
Speaker 2: if he does that, as well as a pardon for
Speaker 2: George Santos and some of these other high profile pardons
Speaker 2: of despicable characters, I think those are also trial balloons
Speaker 2: to see how people react and to prepare the expectations
Speaker 2: for his pardon of Glain Maxwell as well.
Speaker 10: It should also just make people so much more infuriated
Speaker 10: about what he did with the January sixth people. Yeah,
Speaker 10: that's right, You're going to pardon these obvious criminal scumbags,
Speaker 10: these people.
Speaker 2: Like Jeg Tusher's father in law.
Speaker 10: Yeah, these people that have used and abused the American
Speaker 10: people the legal system in every way they can.
Speaker 3: But you're loyal supporters.
Speaker 10: The people that trusted you the most went to d
Speaker 10: C because they were mad that you you had the
Speaker 10: elections sole and you're going to ignore them and just
Speaker 10: leave like, oh, well, you know, whatever happens to them happens.
Speaker 10: They're not one of my billionaire friends. They're not going
Speaker 10: to give me any more money. I've soaked them for
Speaker 10: everything they've got.
Speaker 2: So he did that me. At the same time, he
Speaker 2: turned his back on them and refused to pardon them
Speaker 2: before he left office, subjecting them to four years of
Speaker 2: personal hell. That's when he pardoned Jared Kushner's father in
Speaker 2: law for really heinous crimes. Go back and look it
Speaker 2: up and truly is amazing. But it really is about
Speaker 2: It's about that, and I think he's preparing the ground
Speaker 2: for that as well. But getting back to the AI stuff,
Speaker 2: Trump's tech and AI advisor David Sachs said, quote, there
Speaker 2: will be no federal bailout for AI. If one of
Speaker 2: them fails, others will take its place. Zo had said, Well,
Speaker 2: he said, refusing to let what had met by now
Speaker 2: become the biggest and most uncomfortable market narrative. In other words,
Speaker 2: why does the company at the forefront of this very important,
Speaker 2: very profitable AI revolution, why do they need government guarantees
Speaker 2: or bailout? I mean, stop and think about this. The
Speaker 2: stock market has been driven by the expectations for artificial intelligence.
Speaker 2: Why does the leading company talk about the fact that
Speaker 2: they're running out of money and they're going to need
Speaker 2: a government bailout. Shouldn't that be a warning sign about
Speaker 2: the bubble? If ever there was one. So and it
Speaker 2: got even worse when it emerged that sam Altman was
Speaker 2: once again just like just ask Elon musk I said,
Speaker 2: lying after it was revealed revealed on October twenty seventh
Speaker 2: that Open AI's chief Global affairs officer, Chris Lahane had
Speaker 2: submitted a document in which they advocated for including data
Speaker 2: center spend within the American Manufacturing ULLAM. And they have
Speaker 2: the article here in zero Hedge where they've highlighted what
Speaker 2: he sent them. Said a AI server production and AI
Speaker 2: data centers, broadening coverage of AMIC will lower the effective
Speaker 2: cost of capital, de risk early investment and unlocked private
Speaker 2: capital to help alleviate bottlenecks and accelerate the AI build
Speaker 2: in the US. So they've already put it in writing
Speaker 2: that this is what they want, and sam Altman is
Speaker 2: lying and say we never did that. They said, we
Speaker 2: have to do this to counter the People's Republic of
Speaker 2: China again keeping up of the Joneses, and I can't
Speaker 2: fall behind in this arms race by de risking US
Speaker 2: manufacturing expansion to provide manufacturers with a certainty and the
Speaker 2: capital they will need to scale production quickly. Again, the
Speaker 2: credit card society, the credit card mentality of immediate gratification.
Speaker 2: We can't wait to do anything right right, including electric cars,
Speaker 2: you name it. We've got to change it just like
Speaker 2: that and go into debt to put out massive fields
Speaker 2: of windmills and solar panel and so forth. The federal
Speaker 2: government should also deploy grants, cost sharing agreements, loans or
Speaker 2: loan guarantees to expand industrial base capacity and resilience. And
Speaker 2: yet Sam Altman said they hadn't done that, And then
Speaker 2: somebody found the letter that was actually written about that.
Speaker 2: You see, it's not anything new actually, because Trump was
Speaker 2: talking about this on day one of this administration. Remember
Speaker 2: he brought in the Stargate project. He had the Japanese
Speaker 2: bank soft Bank, He had Larry Ellison there and Larry
Speaker 2: Elson is a CIA made billionaire. Ifever there was one
Speaker 2: and there's a whole article that which we won't get
Speaker 2: to today. But you know with Stargate, what was he doing.
Speaker 2: He was putting together mRNA plus AI. I guess we
Speaker 2: should just call it mr and AI. Just keep adding
Speaker 2: letters there likely do the LGBT stuff. Right. So now
Speaker 2: we've got MRNAI and that was going to combine artificial intelligence.
Speaker 2: With mRNA to do genetic modification of people. It's all
Speaker 2: there except for the nanotech. Except the nanotech is a
Speaker 2: part of the actual injections as well. You know, we
Speaker 2: have that acronym grain, genetics, robotics, artificial intelligence, and nanotech.
Speaker 2: And when you look at what Trump is proposing, if
Speaker 2: you had any doubts, this guy is a shill, a
Speaker 2: front man for the technocracy. Just take a look at
Speaker 2: that very first project Stargate. It had all of it
Speaker 2: there except for robotics. And of course robotics is coming
Speaker 2: in later on, but maybe they'll have robots, will be
Speaker 2: running machines that administer all this stuff. But again, they
Speaker 2: want to build their own power at their facilities, and
Speaker 2: that's what Trump is saying on day one as well.
Speaker 2: He said, yeah, all these companies are out there, they're
Speaker 2: going to build their own power plant right there at
Speaker 2: the facility. Because you don't want to rely on the grid,
Speaker 2: said Trump, because he said the grid is getting really old,
Speaker 2: it's unreliable. Of course, they're not going to fix that
Speaker 2: for us. It's going to be like the decaying infrastructure
Speaker 2: of the interstate system and our roads and our bridges,
Speaker 2: and so we're going to be here stuck with this
Speaker 2: decaying infrastructure for power while these people build their own
Speaker 2: super highways. They're going to have their own nuclear reactors
Speaker 2: at their own data centers. I think the way to
Speaker 2: think about all this is to you think that won't
Speaker 2: happen in America. Just take a look at the American
Speaker 2: railroad business.
Speaker 7: Right.
Speaker 2: We used to have the best railroads in the world
Speaker 2: in the eighteen hundreds, a very extensive network, state of
Speaker 2: the art. Look at how we have fallen behind. Look
Speaker 2: at how the rail system is just crumbling. It's the
Speaker 2: far ahead of the interstate system. And of course they
Speaker 2: don't want to maintain the roads for us to travel
Speaker 2: on either. And so now we can add to all
Speaker 2: that to the decaying railroads into the decaying highways. We
Speaker 2: can add to that now the decaying power infrastructure. But
Speaker 2: they will have a power infrastructure and it will be
Speaker 2: separate from ours. Open AI had in fact asked the
Speaker 2: Trump administration to revamp a Chips Act tax credit as
Speaker 2: Biden's to help lower the cost of AI infrastructure. As
Speaker 2: open AI was exploring additional ways that the US government
Speaker 2: can support an industry wide data center build out for AI.
Speaker 2: So again from day one, Trump, the corrupt puppet of
Speaker 2: the technocracy, talking about how we had to have data
Speaker 2: center build out at the site of their power at
Speaker 2: the site of their data centers. So caught up in
Speaker 2: the latest web of circular lies, this self congratulating echo chamber,
Speaker 2: Altman had to publish at another explainer to discuss just
Speaker 2: how he sees his relationship with the government. Now that
Speaker 2: this very touchy topic was all that anyone could talk
Speaker 2: about at the end of the last week, not to mention,
Speaker 2: he was hammering the envied the Nvidia stock, which has
Speaker 2: long been the barometer of sentiment toward the AI bubble.
Speaker 2: So again Sam Altman is putting the stuff out. Beginning
Speaker 2: on Friday and over the weekend we see he wrote
Speaker 2: to the degree that the government wants to do something
Speaker 2: to help ensure a domestic supply chain. Great, but that's
Speaker 2: super different than loan guarantees to open AI and we
Speaker 2: hope that that is clear. Says yes, it is super
Speaker 2: different because what Sam is asking for is subsidies, which
Speaker 2: is precisely what China is bestowing upon its companies. The
Speaker 2: only difference is that in China all companies are effectively
Speaker 2: state owned and as they point out that is a
Speaker 2: difference that is disappearing under the Trump administration. That is
Speaker 2: what he is doing. He is moving in the direction
Speaker 2: of China and that kind of corporate fascism, corporate corruption.
Speaker 2: And they know that full well because people like Steve
Speaker 2: Bannon and the corrupt billionaire that he attached himself to,
Speaker 2: that Chinese billionaire Guo. That's how he became a billionaire
Speaker 2: overnight as well. Which is not to say that OpenAI
Speaker 2: hasn't done its homework. The US has a prototype for
Speaker 2: loans and loan guarantees for strategic industries. Is it offered
Speaker 2: these incentives to the semiconductor industry as part of the
Speaker 2: Chips Act. So by the end of January this year,
Speaker 2: only five and a half billion of up to seventy
Speaker 2: five billion have been awarded per the Commerce Department report.
Speaker 2: There's one thing for sure, go ahead and demand, but
Speaker 2: be prepared to compensate the government by handing over a
Speaker 2: sizable chunk of equity so that everyone can participate in
Speaker 2: the upside and not just be stuck with the soaring
Speaker 2: costs for electricity and water which are needed to fund
Speaker 2: the explosion of these data centers across the country has
Speaker 2: already happened with Intel, which gave up a major equity
Speaker 2: check to US taxpayers in return for US government support.
Speaker 2: Here's why part was zero hedge. I'm sorry, I don't
Speaker 2: have any equity in Intel. You know, the federal government does.
Speaker 2: We're not going to see any benefit from that. This
Speaker 2: is not taxpayers getting any equity in it. This is
Speaker 2: the politicians who are getting a lever to control Intel,
Speaker 2: and they'll use that to get donations from these people.
Speaker 2: This is not going to be any kind of public investment.
Speaker 2: This is not like a sovereign wealth fund, nothing at
Speaker 2: all like that. It happened to the rare earth minerals
Speaker 2: company MP Materials as well, and to all other companies
Speaker 2: that the US has directly invested in now as part
Speaker 2: of Trump's new industrial policy. This is not a new
Speaker 2: industrial policy. It's new for the US. But this is
Speaker 2: something that has been the hallmark of state capitalism for
Speaker 2: a very long time, and so I think that it
Speaker 2: is crony socialism, I think is the best way to
Speaker 2: describe this. We have to become the Chinese monster that
Speaker 2: we compete with in order to defeat China. According to
Speaker 2: these people, Sam Altman said it's not a loan guarantee.
Speaker 2: It's just a government In other words, tax payer onboarding
Speaker 2: the risk for your expansion and the growth of your
Speaker 2: equity value. So that's that's what zero Hedge said to
Speaker 2: Sam in sarcasm. So what do taxpayers get in return?
Speaker 2: Intel gave them an equity stake? Will open AI do
Speaker 2: the same or is it just higher electricity prices that
Speaker 2: we'll get from this? But as I said before, taxpayers
Speaker 2: are getting nothing. We don't get anything. The government does.
Speaker 2: And the politicians who are broking these deals get power
Speaker 2: out of this. They get power, they get influenced, they
Speaker 2: get leverage with these companies which they can use to
Speaker 2: get donations from them and shake them down. So it's
Speaker 2: still public investment and private profits, and it'll be private
Speaker 2: profits and it'll be private power for these people in government.
Speaker 2: Altmanor stole in cacabole value by working at an Elon
Speaker 2: Musk funded nonprofit for years with all the inherent benefits
Speaker 2: of such an organization as opposed to a traditional corporation,
Speaker 2: before he uprooted his corporate structure and transformed it into
Speaker 2: a traditional corporation, one in which he plans to have
Speaker 2: the biggest chunk of ownership. Now he is doing it again,
Speaker 2: only this time he hopes to benefit from taxpayers generosity
Speaker 2: as Trump pushes to accelerate AI infrastructure, and again, nothing matters.
Speaker 2: We've got to get that AI. I don't care what
Speaker 2: it costs. I don't care what I have to break.
Speaker 2: I don't care what precedence I have to make. We're
Speaker 2: going to get to the poll First. Power demand from
Speaker 2: computing is forecast to more than double in the US
Speaker 2: by twenty thirty five. Utilities are worrying about straining the
Speaker 2: grid and the increasing bills if the AI boom falters.
Speaker 2: Think about that, if we have an AI bubble bust
Speaker 2: and everybody starts pulling back on their plans to build
Speaker 2: these data centers. Meanwhile, the utility companies have gone out
Speaker 2: there and invested in all this surplus. What's that going
Speaker 2: to do to your electricity rates? They're going to soar. First,
Speaker 2: American Nuclear plans to build self sustaining reactors in Indiana
Speaker 2: to power data centers. The plant will begin with natural
Speaker 2: gas in twenty twenty eight, then shift to a two
Speaker 2: hundred and forty megawatt liquid metal fast reactor by twenty
Speaker 2: thirty two, they can reprocess its own spent fuel. The
Speaker 2: company aims to deploy six such systems, enough to power
Speaker 2: one and a half million homes or maybe one AI
Speaker 2: data center. When you look at this, so in terms
Speaker 2: of inflation, eggs, gas, and women's clothing are down, beef, smokes,
Speaker 2: and electricity are up in twenty twenty five, and of
Speaker 2: course electricity is going to continue to soar, and so
Speaker 2: it's all begun. It's the one to two punch of
Speaker 2: net zero and AI and what it's going to do
Speaker 2: to power bills and so cheap power is a secret
Speaker 2: to winning the AI arms race, is what they're saying.
Speaker 2: And as they're looking at it as an AI arms race,
Speaker 2: that really is what it is. They leaned heavily into
Speaker 2: this military aspect of it, and it's not just the
Speaker 2: military aspect of it, but it's also the police surveillance state,
Speaker 2: a digital ID state, and control grid that they have
Speaker 2: set up as well. And so here's the example in Virginia,
Speaker 2: because it's already a lot of big data centers in
Speaker 2: Virginia close to Washington have big tech now is reportedly
Speaker 2: gobbling up land for massive data centers in the suburbs
Speaker 2: because you know they're going to get financial help for
Speaker 2: AI from the government, but nobody's talking about doing anything
Speaker 2: really to help people in terms of housing. For example,
Speaker 2: right in the past, government had a goal of making
Speaker 2: sure after a World War two that American families could
Speaker 2: own a home, and they set tax structure up around that.
Speaker 2: They even had subsidies, loan subsidies and other things like
Speaker 2: that to help home ownership. They're not focused on you
Speaker 2: and I owning a home. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 2: they want to make sure we don't own anything, especially
Speaker 2: a home. So now the financial help is not going
Speaker 2: to be for individuals owning home homes. It'll be for
Speaker 2: AI and for their data centers. Here's an example.
Speaker 11: Idea of oh, well we need someplace to put this,
Speaker 11: let's buy a whole bunch of residential properties in this
Speaker 11: housing market. That's where they're.
Speaker 2: Going to get the land. Yeah. Oh, they inflated prices,
Speaker 2: but of course it doesn't matter because they've got money
Speaker 2: to throw away, these big corporations. But they're going to
Speaker 2: throw it away so quickly that they're going to need
Speaker 2: the printing presses of the federal government to help them
Speaker 2: as well. That's an amazing thing when you look at
Speaker 2: these companies. They've got more resources than any companies have
Speaker 2: ever had in history. They got richer people than anybody
Speaker 2: he has ever been in history, and yet they're spending
Speaker 2: money so fast they can't even keep up with They're
Speaker 2: going to have to tap in to the money printing
Speaker 2: presses of the federal government. Amazon reportedly inked a seven
Speaker 2: hundred million dollar hotly contested acquisition of land in Virginia
Speaker 2: for future AI data center. Locals raged against the prospect
Speaker 2: of a data center and Doublin Tech Park for years,
Speaker 2: and they're saying that the impact is going to be
Speaker 2: tremendous on both the water system as well as the
Speaker 2: power grid. They really don't care. But you know, we're
Speaker 2: talking about Sam Altman as being at the center of this,
Speaker 2: and you know the games that he played with a
Speaker 2: nonprofit seizing control away from Elon Musk, going to Congress
Speaker 2: and talking about how it is an existential project for
Speaker 2: the superiority of America and all the rest of the
Speaker 2: stuff to weasel out money and lying about the fact
Speaker 2: that he's going hat in hand to the American government.
Speaker 2: He's also up to something else. I think Sam Altman
Speaker 2: is competing for the title of doctor Evil, being the
Speaker 2: most evil of the billionaires out there. Now he's involved
Speaker 2: with genetically engineered babies. It's banned legally, but they're trying
Speaker 2: to do it anyway. Startups funded by some of the
Speaker 2: most powerful billionaires in Silicon value pushing the boundaries of
Speaker 2: reproductive genetics, hoping to prevent disease. That's how they'll sell it,
Speaker 2: as well as to improve chances for high IQ and
Speaker 2: other preferred traits. So we go back to that story
Speaker 2: that I was talking about earlier. You know, Daniel Schrrez's
Speaker 2: change agent. You know, they would come in and say, well,
Speaker 2: you know, they have different things that you get, different
Speaker 2: enhancements that you could get a la carte, right, See
Speaker 2: one intelligence that's one package and that cost this amount.
Speaker 2: If you want physical superiority, strength that's another one. Longevity
Speaker 2: that's another one. You know, so they had different You
Speaker 2: pick which enhancements you wanted for your child, limited only
Speaker 2: by the amount of money that you wanted to spend.
Speaker 2: So for a Mons, a small company in San Francisco, Cisco,
Speaker 2: has been pursuing a secretive project, the birth of a
Speaker 2: genetically engineered baby, backed by open Aiyes, Sam Altman and
Speaker 2: his husband again he's a homosexual. Didn't know this about him.
Speaker 2: Along with coin based co founder and CEO Brian Armstrong,
Speaker 2: the startup called Preventive has been quietly preparing what would
Speaker 2: amount to be a biological first. They're working towards creating
Speaker 2: a child born from an embryo that has been edited
Speaker 2: to prevent a hereditary disease. Just understand that, you know,
Speaker 2: we look at this, Sam Altman and his homosexual husband.
Speaker 2: This is how I said before, how LGBT dovetails precisely
Speaker 2: into this. For the longest time they have, they've called
Speaker 2: parents breeders, right, and it's all you're needed for is breeders.
Speaker 2: Then we'll take over your kid, you know, We'll put
Speaker 2: your child in our school and we will turn them.
Speaker 2: We will take your children away from you. They even
Speaker 2: did songs mocking that whole idea because it is true.
Speaker 2: At the San Francisco Cisco's Men's Gay Men's Choir, remember
Speaker 2: that we're going to take your children. Yes, you said it.
Speaker 2: Now it's true, We're going to do it, and they
Speaker 2: really are doing that. As a matter of fact, I've
Speaker 2: got a clip here if I can find this somewhere. Yeah,
Speaker 2: this is what this one woman said about this whole
Speaker 2: transgender thing.
Speaker 17: There's a reason that my seventeen year old boy needs
Speaker 17: to get my consent from the school before he goes
Speaker 17: even to a pumpkin patch or takes a pill that's
Speaker 17: an advil. And that's because I am the parent and
Speaker 17: the school recognizes that. And yet we are willing to
Speaker 17: disrupt the permental relationship with school official thinks that it
Speaker 17: has that kind of authority that is not constitutional, and
Speaker 17: it doesn't serve a compelling interest, nor is it narrow Taylor.
Speaker 18: So.
Speaker 10: You're suggesting that what constitution demands the permission for the
Speaker 10: pumpkin patch.
Speaker 17: I'm suggesting that that practice in and of itself, which
Speaker 17: is I mean, we can every time they play a sport.
Speaker 17: I mean, all the different ways that this plays out
Speaker 17: all through adolescence is a reflection of what the common
Speaker 17: law has been and what the American tradition is and
Speaker 17: is a constitutional right. Under the fundamental right, I have
Speaker 17: the right to direct my child's education and my child's upbringing.
Speaker 2: Let me just say this has nothing to do with
Speaker 2: the Constitution. You know, you're saying that the Constitution demands
Speaker 2: that the school get a permit for your kid to
Speaker 2: go to the pumpkin patch. Not at all. As a
Speaker 2: matter of fact, you know, so said over and over again.
Speaker 2: Government doesn't grant us rights. The Constitution doesn't grant us rights.
Speaker 2: We have rights because we are humans created by God.
Speaker 2: They are God given rights. That's the essence of America.
Speaker 11: And what a bad faith argument that was, obviously is. Oh,
Speaker 11: so you're saying the constitution forbids going to the pumpkin
Speaker 11: patch is that they're taking on powers and then saying
Speaker 11: where in the government doesn't where in the constitution doesn't
Speaker 11: say that we specifically don't have that specific power. And
Speaker 11: of course she's equating this mutilation of children to going
Speaker 11: to a pumpkin patch.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. The point the woman was making was that
Speaker 2: the children don't have the judgment and we know that,
Speaker 2: and parents, regardless of whether the constitution recognizes parents or not.
Speaker 2: It'd be great if we had a parental rights amendment.
Speaker 2: And I worked with some people that did a commercial
Speaker 2: for some people over a decade ago, and I've played
Speaker 2: some of those commercials, and it would be good if
Speaker 2: the constitution explicitly recognized that right. But there are a
Speaker 2: lot of rights that the Constitution does not specifically recognize
Speaker 2: that we have, and we don't have them simply because
Speaker 2: the Constitution recognizes them. That would be government granted privileges,
Speaker 2: and the government neither the government nor the Constitution grants
Speaker 2: us privileges in these areas. The constitutions Bill of Rights
Speaker 2: was there to stop the government from trampling certain specific
Speaker 2: rights that they knew were going to be targeted by
Speaker 2: the government, such as free speech and free press and
Speaker 2: protests as well as the Second Amendment and things like that.
Speaker 2: So that's what the Bill of Rights is for, but
Speaker 2: it doesn't grant us those rights. You know, there's other
Speaker 2: institutions besides government, and there's an institution that was created
Speaker 2: by God, you know God that just creates us as
Speaker 2: human beings. But he also created the institution of family
Speaker 2: and of parents, and that's what we're talking about here.
Speaker 2: But all this time together, for the longest time, I said,
Speaker 2: you know, when we look at this transgender stuff, what
Speaker 2: is this about? Is this about normalizing pedophilia? Because if
Speaker 2: you say the kids that are minors that they can
Speaker 2: determine that they are a different gender that they have
Speaker 2: if you presume that they have that kind of maturity
Speaker 2: that they can mutilate themselves for life. Then of course
Speaker 2: you can say that you know, they can consent to
Speaker 2: having sex with adults, right, So you're you could see
Speaker 2: that right away they're pushing the pedophile agenda. As time
Speaker 2: went on and we start seeing this posthumanism and this
Speaker 2: virtual society and all the rest of this stuff, and
Speaker 2: the fact that they're pushing cyborgs and other things like that,
Speaker 2: I thought maybe that's how they're going to use the
Speaker 2: transgender stuff. But underlying all of that, it's the idea
Speaker 2: that they want to use LGBT in order and homosexual marriage,
Speaker 2: like Sam Altman is in and like sorouss Soy Boy
Speaker 2: Scott Bessant is in. They want to use that to
Speaker 2: make a case for why we need to have engineered babies,
Speaker 2: because the homosexuals obviously can't have babies, and so we
Speaker 2: must go for humanitarian reasons to this dystopian society of
Speaker 2: government hatcheries. I think that is ultimately what is behind this.
Speaker 2: They're working toward creating a child born from an embryo
Speaker 2: that has been edited to prevent a hereditary disease. Yeah, right,
Speaker 2: And of course you know, the brain computer interface that
Speaker 2: Elon Muski any other companies are working on. That's just
Speaker 2: there to help the lame walk in the blind to see.
Speaker 2: And the robots are there to help little old ladies
Speaker 2: get across the street. And the genetic baby hatcheries are
Speaker 2: there to help the poor LGBT people who just can't
Speaker 2: physically have kids. So we're going to create government hatteries.
Speaker 2: They'll always fit these narratives in for these types of things.
Speaker 2: And so that brings us to something at Lance found
Speaker 2: that I thought was very interesting, and that is the
Speaker 2: brain the brain interface transference. Here. That is a company
Speaker 2: that is called Hang on a second, I'll get it
Speaker 2: right here.
Speaker 11: The brain It.
Speaker 2: Brain It is their thing. And they're not the only
Speaker 2: company that's doing this. There's a lot of different companies
Speaker 2: that are doing this. And let's show people what this
Speaker 2: really looks like. Scroll down and show zoom in on
Speaker 2: those pictures. Now there's pairs of pictures and you'll see
Speaker 2: an image that the person is looking like looking at
Speaker 2: it says scene image. Right next to it is the
Speaker 2: reconstructed image, and look at that, there's a giraffe. And
Speaker 2: then right next to it is a giraffe. But the
Speaker 2: giraffe is standing in exactly the same position and same
Speaker 2: way and looked at from the same angle, looking kind
Speaker 2: of back over its shoulder.
Speaker 11: To be clear, the scene image is what the human
Speaker 11: is looking at. And then they're is sensors connected to
Speaker 11: the brain that's creating the reconstructed image. The computer hasn't
Speaker 11: seen this scene image. Only the human sees this, and
Speaker 11: this is entirely constructed from a brain skin.
Speaker 2: That's right, So they can sense what you are looking
Speaker 2: at and completely reconstruct it. And look at how identical
Speaker 2: these images are. Now, you know, you got to stop
Speaker 2: sign and it got to stop sign as well as
Speaker 2: the words stop. The only thing that's missing there is
Speaker 2: the four way thing underneath it. It didn't quite reconstruct
Speaker 2: that exactly. And then when you look at the pieces
Speaker 2: of pizza, it is a little bit more orderly in
Speaker 2: the way that it put the pizza together. That's there.
Speaker 2: But even when it gets some of the details wrong,
Speaker 2: it still has the basic orientation there. Scroll it up
Speaker 2: a little bit. The snowboarder that is there. Take a
Speaker 2: look at the snowboarder. So here the basic orientation is right.
Speaker 2: Even though the snowboarder has one leg up, the arms
Speaker 2: are still extended and still in basically the same orientation.
Speaker 2: It's going down the snow with a shadow of the's
Speaker 2: main cast. But it is truly amazing. Yeah, show the
Speaker 2: baseball one. That's another good one that's there. So the
Speaker 2: baseball thing, you've got three different people and they're all
Speaker 2: basically in the same orientation. The one again on the left,
Speaker 2: is the actual picture that the human is looking at.
Speaker 2: The one on the right is the reconstruction by scanning
Speaker 2: his by monitoring his brain. And then the computer is
Speaker 2: reconstructing that one on the right. And so you've got
Speaker 2: a catcher who is squatting and has got one arm
Speaker 2: extended out and that is captured again. And then the
Speaker 2: umpire behind him, who is in the same crouching position.
Speaker 2: Even though the colors change a little bit, it still
Speaker 2: has that there. And then moving up to the room,
Speaker 2: the motel room, look at that even has the same
Speaker 2: color bedspread there, and the one above it, we have
Speaker 2: the motorcycle still in the exactly the same angle. And
Speaker 2: it figured out there's a person in a racing motorcycle.
Speaker 2: Even though it got the colors slightly different on that,
Speaker 2: it truly is amazing.
Speaker 11: Interesting to me because it's little details that it gets
Speaker 11: wrong that if you were to remember this image, you
Speaker 11: would probably get a lot of these same details wrong,
Speaker 11: like exactly the color scheme of their clothes.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 11: It still gets the general color scheme across all three
Speaker 11: of them.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the three people staying there for the skiing thing,
Speaker 2: and again the jet a military jet. It gets a
Speaker 2: little bit of the details on the bottom that are different,
Speaker 2: but it basically has it all there, so it is
Speaker 2: pretty much getting the gist of it. Just as Lance said,
Speaker 2: you would remember that when you come back. Now, what
Speaker 2: is interesting about this, I think is the fact that
Speaker 2: it's not just one company that's doing this. There are
Speaker 2: at least eleven, we'll say a dozen companies that are
Speaker 2: out there. I bet you we didn't look this up,
Speaker 2: but I bet you every single one of them has
Speaker 2: got grants from DARPA or some federal agency, most likely
Speaker 2: DARPA in order to do this kind of stuff. You know,
Speaker 2: what is the use case for something like this and
Speaker 2: how did they put it together? Well, this particular company
Speaker 2: is bragging about how superior their method is. They use
Speaker 2: f m R I f MRI I, the MRI scanner
Speaker 2: that you have. They put you on the machine and
Speaker 2: you know, scan your brain and things like that. I
Speaker 2: had several loose. Now, this is functional MRI and what
Speaker 2: it does. Instead of looking at the structure of the
Speaker 2: brain and seeing you know, are there, you know, physical
Speaker 2: alterations to the brain after a stroke or something like that,
Speaker 2: it looks at changes in the brain that are happening
Speaker 2: dynamically over time. And so that's what the functional MRI
Speaker 2: is about. Rather than looking at the physiology or the
Speaker 2: structure of the brain, it's actually looking at the dynamic
Speaker 2: brain activity. And so to these models. One of the
Speaker 2: things that this company is bragging about is that they
Speaker 2: spend about an hour training it, and their competitors might
Speaker 2: spend forty hours training it, and they get far superior results.
Speaker 2: It truly is amazing when you look at how long
Speaker 2: they spend training it and how much better their recognition is,
Speaker 2: you know, being able to sense what you are seeing
Speaker 2: and thinking about and basically reading your mind. And so
Speaker 2: it is the brain interaction transformer they call themselves BIT.
Speaker 2: Now what they do, what is the training, Well, it
Speaker 2: turns out that everybody has these localized patch level image
Speaker 2: features and so they call them. They call them clusters, okay,
Speaker 2: and so they're looking at brain Vauxhel clusters, and they say,
Speaker 2: all humans have this, but these clusters will be located
Speaker 2: in different places, on different subjects, same thing, but it
Speaker 2: will be slightly moved around. You know, when you have
Speaker 2: a stroke. They call it brain plasticity. And so when
Speaker 2: you have a stroke, part of your brain dies, and
Speaker 2: if you get the functionality back, it's because another part
Speaker 2: of your brain has taken up that activity. They said.
Speaker 2: So some very very young children, maybe an infancy, might
Speaker 2: have a stroke that would affect, for example, their speech.
Speaker 2: And what they found is that even though that might
Speaker 2: reside on one side of their brain versus the other
Speaker 2: side of the brain, those young children, when they have
Speaker 2: the stroke that affects the side of the brain where
Speaker 2: normally speech would be, they found that as they learned
Speaker 2: to speak, the other side of their brain picks it up.
Speaker 2: And so that's what it's called brain plasticity. In other words,
Speaker 2: it can adapt and train that other side of the
Speaker 2: brain to take over those functions. So that's what they're
Speaker 2: basically looking at here with these Vauxel clusters. They know that,
Speaker 2: you know, certain things are going to be fired. They
Speaker 2: just don't know exactly where that's going to be in
Speaker 2: a person's brain. So they spent an hour mapping those
Speaker 2: things out and then they get very very accurate results.
Speaker 2: And what they do is they split it into two
Speaker 2: different aspects. One of them is the semantics, and I
Speaker 2: think what that does is kind of give them a context.
Speaker 2: You know, so when you look at how you got
Speaker 2: two people standing and they're kind of standing in this
Speaker 2: particular orientation, picks up that, and then the other one
Speaker 2: is about more about the details that are there. And
Speaker 2: then they run these two different paths to get so
Speaker 2: first they have programs that are looking at the Vauxel clusters,
Speaker 2: creating a kind of semantic context. The other one is
Speaker 2: creating a context for the features. And then they take
Speaker 2: the output of those two things and put them into
Speaker 2: something else that combines and sums those things together to
Speaker 2: give them that kind of image. It's pretty interesting in
Speaker 2: terms of technology that is there, but I think it
Speaker 2: is absolutely abhorrent. But they're doing this. I can't think
Speaker 2: of any reason for them to do something like this. Now,
Speaker 2: they'll come up with some kind of a fake justification,
Speaker 2: just like they're talking about with the creating babies with
Speaker 2: a hatchery. Oh well, we'll do it to save people
Speaker 2: from some kind of genetic disease. And they're leaning into
Speaker 2: that excuse, leaning into that narrative by calling their company preventive. Right.
Speaker 2: But these are the kinds of things, you know, when
Speaker 2: we look at this, actually, you know, Lance pull up
Speaker 2: the one that says it is titled brain Interaction Transformer
Speaker 2: and when you look at that chart, you'll see that
Speaker 2: in their chart when they're talking about the cross transformer module,
Speaker 2: they've got that listed there twice. And guess what they
Speaker 2: misspelled transformer. I'm being a little bit of a grammar
Speaker 2: nazi here, but I got to just say that, you know,
Speaker 2: we're talking about things like this, the little details matter,
Speaker 2: and I happens when you switch some of the stuff.
Speaker 2: You reconstructing things, and it's a critical mission.
Speaker 10: I don't know, to be honest, it sounds a lot
Speaker 10: more like a Decepticon ploy than the Transformers to me.
Speaker 2: But what do I know, Yeah, that sounds pretty crazy
Speaker 2: to me. Look at one last one here, and that
Speaker 2: is comparing their images to these other models that are
Speaker 2: out there. They're companies called brain It, and they compare
Speaker 2: it to some other companies, Mind Turner, mind I two,
Speaker 2: neuro Vla, and so look at this, So you have.
Speaker 11: The best mind reader on the market right now.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's absolutely right. So you know when you're you're interesting.
Speaker 11: One I think is the last one, the neuro Vla,
Speaker 11: because it always gets the object correct, but it gets
Speaker 11: it in a very different context.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right. Yeah. So that first row there you're
Speaker 2: seeing a bowl of some white stuff, maybe it's oatmeal
Speaker 2: or something, and you're seeing a banana right next to it.
Speaker 2: And then when you look at the Neurovla, they've got
Speaker 2: a bowl and then they've got a banana, but it's
Speaker 2: not at all in the same orientation and brain it
Speaker 2: was able to do that, and you see that repeated
Speaker 2: over and over again. They kind of get some of it,
Speaker 2: but they don't get all of it. And you know,
Speaker 2: it's kind of interesting. What it reminded me of was
Speaker 2: this mister Benman Ghostbusters, good guess but wrong that from
Speaker 2: Bill Murray and the mind reading thing opened up Ghostbusters.
Speaker 2: I wonder if they shock these people who created these
Speaker 2: models so they get it right.
Speaker 3: Tell me what you think it is?
Speaker 11: Is it a star?
Speaker 3: It is a star.
Speaker 2: And yet you can see from behind them that it wasn't.
Speaker 3: Think hard mm hmm. So called close square definitely wrong.
Speaker 2: Okay, all right, ready, what is it?
Speaker 5: M hm?
Speaker 11: Figure eight?
Speaker 3: Incredible? That's five for five.
Speaker 7: You can't see these you know that?
Speaker 3: Well, I swear they're just coming to me. Okay, nervous, Yes,
Speaker 3: I don't like this. You only have seventy five more
Speaker 3: to go. Okay, what's this one? There's a couple of
Speaker 3: wavy lines. Sorry, you got it right day.
Speaker 19: Yeah, get a little tired of this.
Speaker 3: You volunteered, didn't you. We're paying your well, yeah, but
Speaker 3: I don't know.
Speaker 20: You're going to be giving the electric shocks.
Speaker 21: What are you trying to prove here?
Speaker 10: Anyway, I'm studying the effect of negative reinforcement on esp ability.
Speaker 10: The effect, I'll tell you what the effect is.
Speaker 19: It's pissing me off.
Speaker 3: Well, then maybe my theory is correct.
Speaker 1: Okay, kick the five bucks I've had.
Speaker 2: I will, mister, keep the five bucks. I wonder why
Speaker 2: they pay these people. You go through an hour of MRI.
Speaker 3: It's a kind of resentment that your ability is going
Speaker 3: to provoke in some people.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so yeah, that's kind of interesting. But now they're
Speaker 2: doing it for real. Okay, they're going to use AI
Speaker 2: to read people's minds. And again, when they list out
Speaker 2: a table and they compare themselves percentage wise to these
Speaker 2: other people, you see that there are eleven of these
Speaker 2: companies that are out there doing this stuff. And who
Speaker 2: is paying them? I bet it's some evil organization like DARPA. Well,
Speaker 2: before we take a break, Travis, let's look at some
Speaker 2: of the comments that people have about this.
Speaker 10: That's right, Well, we've got big brit Is back again.
Speaker 10: These are a bit older. It's his donors for Trump's
Speaker 10: ballroom include Microsoft, Amazon, Metapalenteer, Lockheed Martin and that's just
Speaker 10: a few.
Speaker 2: Yeah, talked about that on Friday. And when we look
Speaker 2: at it, his ballroom began at two hundred million, it's
Speaker 2: now up to three hundred million. And guess what when
Speaker 2: you total up the contracts that these companies are done
Speaker 2: two hundred and seventy nine billion. It's like the rule
Speaker 2: of thumb that I've noticed over and over again, and
Speaker 2: that is, you give money to these politicians and you
Speaker 2: get a government contract back that's roughly one thousand times
Speaker 2: the amount of money that you gave them. It still
Speaker 2: holds up true it's a pretty good rule of thumb.
Speaker 10: No better investment. You've got a few hundred thousand dollars
Speaker 10: lying around. Maybe you can sidle up to Lindsey Graham.
Speaker 2: Yeah, ballroom capitalism.
Speaker 10: Yeahbru twenty twenty nine says the air traffic controllers issue
Speaker 10: is Reagan's gift to the nation back in the MAGA
Speaker 10: nineteen eighties.
Speaker 3: Thank you, Ronald Reagan. We appreciate it.
Speaker 10: Wally Wallrice says, this is one of the many reasons
Speaker 10: I don't fly. I like to control my own travel.
Speaker 10: Flying is a gigantic castle, and you were at the
Speaker 10: mercy of innumerable officious little bureaucrats the second you step
Speaker 10: into an airport.
Speaker 3: Audi mr R.
Speaker 10: And of course Audi is a faithful viewer of the show,
Speaker 10: and he has his own now called everything is a lie,
Speaker 10: damn It. You can find that on Rumble, So go
Speaker 10: check that out. Everything is a lie, damn It, Audi
Speaker 10: Mrr says. Once everyone figured out that Trump is protecting
Speaker 10: a global pedal ring, the powers that shouldn't be have
Speaker 10: cranked the chaosometer to one hundred and one.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it is, because.
Speaker 10: It's becoming a constant mess ever since the whole Epstein
Speaker 10: thing started to unravel the whole Gilain Maxwell Pardon has
Speaker 10: people on Edge and NIBRU twenty twenty nine says the
Speaker 10: airline hijackers the nineteen seventies were also CIA operatives. That's
Speaker 10: before my time. I'll have to take your word on that.
Speaker 10: I was not around during the nineteen seventies and AUDI
Speaker 10: mr RSIs Tennessee arrested seven hundred people in one year
Speaker 10: for bogus DOI charges. Add that to the long list
Speaker 10: of reasons that I don't trust law enforcement. And it's
Speaker 10: always a bit nerve wracking when you see a cop
Speaker 10: behind you. Don't frag me, bro. The powers that be
Speaker 10: are conditioning people to accept AI controlled remote flying and
Speaker 10: driving NGOs will destroy themselves in the process to help
Speaker 10: usher in the great reset.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 10: Guard Goldsmith and of course, as we mentioned before, Guard
Speaker 10: Goldsmith hosts Liberty Conspiracy at six pm.
Speaker 3: You can find that on Rumble.
Speaker 10: Says the Feds increase the burden on the truckers, block
Speaker 10: the ports, increased costs for fuel and then remove the
Speaker 10: lower priced labor who would take those.
Speaker 3: Jobs on the margins. Yeah, the Syrian girl.
Speaker 10: Did any of you see the reports in Northern Ireland
Speaker 10: against migrants, hundreds of thousands in the streets, migrant hotels
Speaker 10: burned down, lots of injuries, and some police taking the
Speaker 10: knee before rioters.
Speaker 2: Yeah. As a matter of fact, I've got a clip
Speaker 2: here the Irish protests and I haven't played yet, camping
Speaker 2: about a week and a half ago.
Speaker 3: The Irish have long been a very So here's the police.
Speaker 2: Yeah, here's the police protecting these people that have been
Speaker 2: violently attacking the community. Now the community is violently attacking
Speaker 2: the police. Here we go. Yeah, I tell you that,
Speaker 2: everybody's throwing stuff at them and they're standing there with Yeah,
Speaker 2: we're back to the Roman Empire.
Speaker 11: This has been in the deck for quite a while.
Speaker 11: I believe the start of this was they were releasing
Speaker 11: or had released an immigrant that had committed a rape.
Speaker 2: And yeah, they're up to They just said that they've
Speaker 2: accidentally released a couple one hundred people. Now UK government
Speaker 2: keeps doing that. They accidentally let them in and then
Speaker 2: when these people commit crimes they accidentally release them again
Speaker 2: as well.
Speaker 3: Whoops? How does that keep happening? Our mistake?
Speaker 10: Yeah, all right, we have real Jason Barker, and of
Speaker 10: course Jason Barker, as I said before, is a host
Speaker 10: on Knights of the Storm, which you can find at
Speaker 10: Nights of Thestorm dot com for the schedule for our show,
Speaker 10: their show, Guard Show, Tony show, mini shows. Go check
Speaker 10: out Nights to the Store dot com. He says, Everyone,
Speaker 10: go get a DK coin. They make great stocking stuffers.
Speaker 10: When they sell out, there will be a new one
Speaker 10: in the works with a different finish. Yes, go check
Speaker 10: out the David Knight Commemorative coin and David Knight dot news.
Speaker 2: We have not put it up yet, but we do
Speaker 2: have a bookmarker that looks like the commemorative coin that
Speaker 2: we had that was larger, that was colorized, and it's
Speaker 2: the same design on that, and we'll have a commercial
Speaker 2: ot for that and get that on the website pretty
Speaker 2: soon as well. So that's coming up as well.
Speaker 11: And each of these coins, each of these coins is
Speaker 11: a limited run, so that's right, get them there still available.
Speaker 2: Yes, Yes, thank you Jason, and thank you for your
Speaker 2: support and also Ryan for Love of the Road. Thank
Speaker 2: you for your support on that those commemorative coins as well.
Speaker 2: Appreciate you.
Speaker 10: And we have NIBRU twenty twenty nine. So is Trump's
Speaker 10: scandemic stimulus checks equals. The peasants got hundreds, the aristocracy
Speaker 10: got billions, which is true. The people got a pittance
Speaker 10: and those that were rich got obscenely richer assyrian girl,
Speaker 10: Oh the good old days. And those refrigerators lasted forever.
Speaker 10: People only change them out in order to change the
Speaker 10: color schemes in their kitchens.
Speaker 3: Is this progress? That's right.
Speaker 10: Nothing we own today lasts for very long. It's all
Speaker 10: meant to degrade and break down rapidly planned obsolescence.
Speaker 2: Were you doing our kitchen and you know, the nineteen
Speaker 2: fifties or whatever for that pale green and got to
Speaker 2: go get your avocado appliances now to match it?
Speaker 3: Exactly real?
Speaker 10: Jason Barker says, my smart coaster nags me about gluten.
Speaker 3: About gluten.
Speaker 10: During World War two, figure where it was, I think
Speaker 10: it was a place in France. They ran out of wheat,
Speaker 10: They couldn't have any bread. The rates of schizophrenia dropped dramatically,
Speaker 10: and after World War two, when they started getting bread
Speaker 10: shipments and wheat shipments again, the schizophrenia went back.
Speaker 3: To normal levels.
Speaker 10: So there's something, there's something in bread and gluten that
Speaker 10: the human body doesn't react well with me specifically very badly,
Speaker 10: but other people in general to a much much lesser
Speaker 10: degree that you might not notice.
Speaker 2: CIA dropping some acid LSD into the water supply there France,
Speaker 2: there a couple of towns that they did that with
Speaker 2: an experiment.
Speaker 10: Of our lovely CIA. You know, what would happen? What
Speaker 10: if we do this, let's find out. Apparently during the
Speaker 10: height of you know, when acid was new around the
Speaker 10: Manson murder time in the CIA office, it was considered
Speaker 10: a funny prank to dose.
Speaker 3: Your coworkers with acid.
Speaker 10: Oh yeah, it became such a problem that they had
Speaker 10: to make specific rules about it and start actually punishing people.
Speaker 2: Yeah, they were pushing out there Ken Kesey and his
Speaker 2: mand of Mary pranksters. And then there was the guy
Speaker 2: Olson I think this was his name, who blew the
Speaker 2: whistle on that and he wound up getting defenestrated and killed.
Speaker 2: They said that he jumped through the window.
Speaker 10: I have my doubts, but yeah, anything the CIA says,
Speaker 10: take with a hefty grain of salt, or maybe an
Speaker 10: entire salt mine guard Goldsmith's.
Speaker 3: As David nailed it. DARPA is heavily involved.
Speaker 10: One of their big eas is the f MRI I
Speaker 10: program at USC the Terby School of Engineering.
Speaker 3: That's right. You can kind of just assume with these people.
Speaker 2: Yeah, if it is something that is something only going
Speaker 2: to be used for evil, and it's a way over
Speaker 2: the edge of what anybody else would think about, you
Speaker 2: pretty much guessed that it's dark. But you know, there's
Speaker 2: an excellent book about DARPA by Annie Jacobson. The problem
Speaker 2: is is that she posits this as if this was
Speaker 2: all these horrible programs are all in the past and
Speaker 2: they've got their act together. Now nothing has changed. They're
Speaker 2: only more dangerous.
Speaker 10: The evil. If you don't clean house, it's not going
Speaker 10: to get any better. And no one has ever cleaned
Speaker 10: house at these places. No one's ever gone into the
Speaker 10: CIA or the FBI and said, you know what, clean slate,
Speaker 10: get everyone out now. Of course, personally, I would just
Speaker 10: say we're shutting the entire thing down. No more FBI,
Speaker 10: no more CIA, goodbye, so long, go find a real
Speaker 10: job somewhere else. But they haven't even gone in and
Speaker 10: tried to reform the institutions, so there's absolutely no chance
Speaker 10: these things have gotten better.
Speaker 2: That's right, Well, is that it for the comments there?
Speaker 2: We're going to take a back break. Then when we're
Speaker 2: going to come back and we're talking about robotics, because
Speaker 2: that other part of the nightmare equation genetics, robotics, AI
Speaker 2: and nanotech, we're going to talk about the robotics aspect
Speaker 2: of that when we come back. We'll be right back.
Speaker 13: Penny saved is a penny earned, though that's gotten tougher
Speaker 13: since they've stopped making them.
Speaker 22: Wait a minute, where.
Speaker 21: Am I sorry, Jefferson. The scoundrels who put America on
Speaker 21: Central Bank Fiat currency used our heads on their coins
Speaker 21: as some sort of trophy. Despicable.
Speaker 22: This is outrageous, Washington. I spent my life fighting centralized power.
Speaker 22: Now the Federal Reserve monopoly parades us around on their
Speaker 22: monopoly money. Tell me there's some good news to all this.
Speaker 21: Well, there is a coin they can't control, one that
Speaker 21: isn't backed by the FED, but backed by the fed up,
Speaker 21: the all new David knightsch Commemorative Coin. Now patriots can
Speaker 21: support a show that won't sell out with a limited
Speaker 21: edition coin that's sure to sell out quickly.
Speaker 22: They say, money talks, and this coin is something worth
Speaker 22: listening to. The truth doesn't need inflation, only support.
Speaker 15: If you like the Eagles on.
Speaker 4: The Cars and Huey Lewis and the news.
Speaker 20: They say the You'll love the Classic Hits channel at
Speaker 20: APS Radio, download our app or listen now at APS
Speaker 20: radio dot com.
Speaker 2: Well I want a job, ditch the degree and pick
Speaker 2: up a trade. This is an article from zero Hedge.
Speaker 2: Get real instead of virtual. Learn how to actually do
Speaker 2: things rather than compete with the AI in terms of
Speaker 2: white collar jobs. Except that the thinking about that. Don't
Speaker 2: think that they haven't thought about how to replace you
Speaker 2: with that. That's what the robotics are really about. They
Speaker 2: point out that over seven percent unemployment rate in Canada,
Speaker 2: the highest it's been in a decade, and for those
Speaker 2: under twenty five, the unemployment rate is fourteen percent. The
Speaker 2: usual rules for getting started on a promising career no
Speaker 2: longer seem to apply. A university degree does not open
Speaker 2: the doors the way that it used to. This is
Speaker 2: from epic times originally, they said. And then also they
Speaker 2: brought in so called temporary foreign workers into Canada to
Speaker 2: fill jobs that even in times of high unemployment, Canadians
Speaker 2: would not fill, for instance, agricultural jobs. Many of the
Speaker 2: more attractive jobs are now or soon will be replaced
Speaker 2: by AI. And of course you know there's a lot
Speaker 2: of talk from the people like Elon Musk and Rama Swami,
Speaker 2: Rama Slimy. Trump just endorsed Vivate the Snake in Ohio
Speaker 2: for governor. That should tell you everything you need to know,
Speaker 2: along with the fact that he's been working on self
Speaker 2: amplifying mRNA. He's got investments in that, just like JD
Speaker 2: Vance does. But remember when Ramaswami was running for president
Speaker 2: and he and Elon Musk were talking about how they
Speaker 2: need to have all these H one B visa people
Speaker 2: and because Americans just couldn't do the work. Well, that
Speaker 2: really isn't true in terms of the STEM stuff, and
Speaker 2: we talked about that for the longest time. A lot
Speaker 2: of the people that are being brought in H one
Speaker 2: B visas, they're hiding those jobs. They're making them available
Speaker 2: to people from India, for example, without making them available
Speaker 2: to people in America, simply so they can hire people
Speaker 2: at a lesser price. But there are a lot of
Speaker 2: jobs that Americans do not want to do. As a
Speaker 2: matter of fact, we tried to get some help in
Speaker 2: terms of doing some weeding that are really capable of
Speaker 2: doing anymore, and call the local college around here, and
Speaker 2: they said, well, no, nobody wants to do anything like that.
Speaker 2: You know, they might do lawnmowing if they've got a
Speaker 2: writer more or something, but they don't want to get
Speaker 2: down there and actually do the weeding. So there is
Speaker 2: a difficulty doing that.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 2: I don't know if you're going to I haven't seen
Speaker 2: Elon Musk making the case that his robots would do
Speaker 2: the weeding for you yet. But we're not in the
Speaker 2: market anyway. And so Elon Musk had a dog and
Speaker 2: pony presentation. But the bigger picture here is being laid
Speaker 2: out by the guy who is a Nobel Peace Prize
Speaker 2: winner and one of the founders of the AI industry,
Speaker 2: a prominent figure in that winning a Nobel Prize in that,
Speaker 2: Jeffrey Hinton. And basically he's saying the AI industry cannot
Speaker 2: be profitable unless it replaces human jobs. And so he says,
Speaker 2: to make money, you're going to have to replace human labor,
Speaker 2: and you're going to have to do that with AI
Speaker 2: and with robotics. And he said the future for AI
Speaker 2: in its current form, it's likely to be an economic dystopia.
Speaker 2: He said, I think the big companies are all betting
Speaker 2: on it causing massive job replacement by AI, because that's
Speaker 2: where the big money is going to be, he said.
Speaker 2: Asked by Bloomberg whether the jaw dropping investments could ever
Speaker 2: pay off without eviscerting the job market, his reply said,
Speaker 2: I can't believe. I believe that it cannot. I believe
Speaker 2: that to make money you're going to have to replace
Speaker 2: human labor. So Jathan Sadowski, in his recent book The
Speaker 2: Mechanic and the Luddite, said AI promises to solve the
Speaker 2: problems of capitalism by unlocking exponential growth, eliminating labor costs,
Speaker 2: de skilling workers, and optimizing efficiency and manifesting in a
Speaker 2: slew of other outcomes. Doesn't it sound like Marxism.
Speaker 11: A capitalism, are the government? It's not these things that
Speaker 11: he's a master, right.
Speaker 2: That's right. This is a Marxist take. And this is
Speaker 2: why George Gilder called the people in Silicon Valley, called
Speaker 2: them neo Marxist, and he'd hit the nail on the head.
Speaker 2: As far as I'm concerned, that seemingly irrational hype behind
Speaker 2: AI is really a hope that the tech will usher
Speaker 2: in a new era of social development which will finally
Speaker 2: make workers obsolete. If that comes to pass, the horrible
Speaker 2: consequences aren't set in stone, said Jeffrey Hinton. He says
Speaker 2: it's not like nuclear weapons, which are only good for
Speaker 2: bad things. He said, it will be tremendous good. And
Speaker 2: in fact, if you think about it increasing productivity in many,
Speaker 2: many industries, that should be good. Yet who benefits from
Speaker 2: that tremendous good depends on, he said, how we organize society.
Speaker 2: A comment which wouldn't sound out of place, says zero
Speaker 2: hedge if it were written in a certain nineteenth century manifesto,
Speaker 2: which one would that be? The Communist manifesto of course,
Speaker 2: right by Karl Marx and now an executive publishing magnet,
Speaker 2: Keith Riegert says that there's only two possibilities for AI.
Speaker 2: It's either going to collapse the economy if it doesn't
Speaker 2: work out, or if it does work out, the use
Speaker 2: case is to take everybody's job and make everybody's jobs obsolete.
Speaker 2: Not a good prospect if those are the two choices
Speaker 2: that are there. I think, though, that there is a
Speaker 2: third choice, and that is that the government maybe it
Speaker 2: won't take everybody's jobs, and maybe it won't collapse the
Speaker 2: economy because maybe the AI bubble won't burst, but we
Speaker 2: will live under a dystopian control surveillance grid because that's
Speaker 2: what the government will use it for. So there's a
Speaker 2: third alternative, and not any of these three alternatives or
Speaker 2: anything that I would like to see happen. And so
Speaker 2: when we look at what happened with the humanoid robots,
Speaker 2: we had a big dog and pony show with Elon
Speaker 2: Musk where he is talking about his use case for
Speaker 2: the robots, and it was part of his discussion as
Speaker 2: to why he deserves to get paid a trillion dollars.
Speaker 8: And you know, around out our engineering headquarters in Palo Alto,
Speaker 8: the robots are just walking around the office twenty four
Speaker 8: to seven with no one minding them. They just and
Speaker 8: then they go charge themselves.
Speaker 2: And do they do anything useful or they just useful
Speaker 2: useless eaters of electricity?
Speaker 8: The scale of optimists, I like, I said, that's really
Speaker 8: going to be something else. I think it's going to
Speaker 8: be the biggest product of all time by far.
Speaker 7: Yeah, so.
Speaker 8: Like bigger than cell phones, bigger than anything. I guess
Speaker 8: the way to think about it is that every human
Speaker 8: on Earth is going to want to have their own
Speaker 8: personal R two D two C three PO not me,
Speaker 8: so who wouldn't I mean, But actually Optimist will be
Speaker 8: even better than them, you know, like you know rt
Speaker 8: DT you it's kind of beep at you, and it's
Speaker 8: kind of hard to figure out what he's good talking about,
Speaker 8: you know, you see three field to translate.
Speaker 7: But Optimist is going to be like everyone's gonna want one.
Speaker 8: I think in terms of industry providing products and services,
Speaker 8: I think it's probably I don't know, three to five
Speaker 8: robots in industry for every you know one that's a
Speaker 8: personal robot. I think there could be tens of billions
Speaker 8: of Optimist robots out there.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 7: Obviously it's very important we pay.
Speaker 8: Close attention to safety here because we do we do
Speaker 8: want the the Star Wars movie, not the Jim.
Speaker 2: Cameron movie Terminator.
Speaker 7: I love Jim Cameron's movies, but you know, you know
Speaker 7: what I mean.
Speaker 2: A little bit of an evil laugh there.
Speaker 8: So yeah, yeah, so we're gonna so yeah, the fastest
Speaker 8: production ramp of any product of any large complex manufactured
Speaker 8: product ever.
Speaker 7: And was starting with building a million unit production.
Speaker 2: Okay, So Brian shall Hobby called him out on that
Speaker 2: at Health Impact News. He called it Elon Musk's worship service.
Speaker 2: He introduces the new Tesla cult belief system, and he said,
Speaker 2: to him it looked kind of like a Christian worship service.
Speaker 2: The first part of the meeting was about business matters.
Speaker 2: Once I concluded, it was time for the worship service,
Speaker 2: with Musk functioning like a pastor, giving his utopian vision
Speaker 2: for the future where there will be no poverty and
Speaker 2: that everyone can have anything that they want, where money
Speaker 2: won't even be Prisons will be eliminated because Optimist robots
Speaker 2: will get rid of all the crime. He said. It's
Speaker 2: not just a new chapter in the history of Tesla,
Speaker 2: but a whole new book. In other words, a new
Speaker 2: religion with his own new Bible, with the religious dogma
Speaker 2: described as sustainable abundance. Again, this is Health Impact News
Speaker 2: Brian Shawhave. He said, Musk defines this new religious belief
Speaker 2: centered around the Tesla Optimist Robots. He should have called
Speaker 2: them the Optimistic robots, he says. You'll notice that nothing
Speaker 2: was said about Musk failing to keep his promise from
Speaker 2: it earlier this year that there would be at least
Speaker 2: five thousand Optimist robots purchased this year We're here in
Speaker 2: about the middle of November, and so far zero have
Speaker 2: been sold. So this is a guy who is not
Speaker 2: just he is a failed prophet, but his profits with
Speaker 2: an F have not failed at all.
Speaker 11: Yeah. I'm not saying that these robots aren't going to
Speaker 11: be a very disruptive and probably negative thing, but right
Speaker 11: now they don't really exist.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 11: These companies. You know, there was the big news story
Speaker 11: of the first humanoid robot that you can buy, well,
Speaker 11: you can pay for it now and then they'll send
Speaker 11: it to you when it's ready, assuming they are on time,
Speaker 11: but the AI that runs it still isn't done yet.
Speaker 11: All the demos they had of this world's first humanoid
Speaker 11: robot was just a guy remotely controlling it with a
Speaker 11: VR headset and controllers.
Speaker 2: That's right. And we just saw that with a NEO.
Speaker 2: It was I think, and you know, it was this
Speaker 2: robot that was wearing a soft cloth that make it
Speaker 2: look nicer, didn't have hard plastic or metal, and it
Speaker 2: was going to be like a C three po, you know,
Speaker 2: a silent version of C threepo, because who wants to
Speaker 2: have a chattering gay butler hanging around them? The entire time,
Speaker 2: Like C three PO, I think they get pretty tired
Speaker 2: pretty quickly say so, yeah, these are silent butlers. And
Speaker 2: yet the reality is they admitted it that it's actually
Speaker 2: an Indian that kind of AI that's running it. It's
Speaker 2: actually humans probably in India, who are sitting there controlling
Speaker 2: this thing remotely and watching everything that you do. And
Speaker 2: if that isn't creepy, I mean, you know, you've got
Speaker 2: this bipedal robot walking around your house, but it's actually
Speaker 2: a bunch of other people somewhere else watching everything that's
Speaker 2: going on inside of your house. And here's another aspect
Speaker 2: of this. If they start to actually implement this, I
Speaker 2: can imagine that it's going to be a huge part
Speaker 2: of this is going to be the surveillance. They want
Speaker 2: the data that this thing is going to learn from
Speaker 2: you and from being in your home, just like they
Speaker 2: watch you on the internet and social media and all
Speaker 2: these other companies are all aggressively pushing to have access
Speaker 2: to that data. That's part of what this TikTok fight
Speaker 2: was about, you know, the big compute data. So that
Speaker 2: gives them an opportunity to start collecting information about you
Speaker 2: in the real world, about you maybe your politics and
Speaker 2: your religion, but other aspects that they can sell and
Speaker 2: monetize to AI.
Speaker 11: Yes, because this AI in the robot is never going
Speaker 11: to replace the human. It was always their end goal was, oh,
Speaker 11: well a human will take over when you give it
Speaker 11: a new task, and well the human will teach the
Speaker 11: robot how to do it, and then the robot will
Speaker 11: be able to do it from there on out. But
Speaker 11: you know, they'll always have a feed from your robot
Speaker 11: into your home. They will always have a person that
Speaker 11: will take over from time to time.
Speaker 2: Yeah, really really really creepy. And so we go back
Speaker 2: and we look at this, you know, the aspect that
Speaker 2: you know, when Elon Musk first came out with his robots,
Speaker 2: everybody was laughing about it because he had people in
Speaker 2: suits and they were jumping around everything. People that that's
Speaker 2: not a robot, that's a human. And so they've got
Speaker 2: this aspect it. But I want to show you this
Speaker 2: Chinese robot display where they went to great links to
Speaker 2: tell people that this robot which is walking, they have
Speaker 2: it filled out like a woman in terms of profile, right,
Speaker 2: and it's got this nice, you know, feminine walk that
Speaker 2: it has. You know, swinging hips and things like that,
Speaker 2: and so they go to a great deal of trouble
Speaker 2: to show this is actually a robot. Listen to this,
Speaker 2: it's all like a magic trick.
Speaker 19: Comes to prove it is itself. But I believe the
Speaker 19: future will prove that this self verification of the robot
Speaker 19: will promote the healthier and more vigorous development of the
Speaker 19: entire Chinese robot industry.
Speaker 2: If so, female forum and walking smoothly.
Speaker 19: And many intense arguments and discussions about how it can
Speaker 19: prove itself. Let's first invite the stuff. So we found
Speaker 19: a forced no away. We want to use scissors to
Speaker 19: open below the robot's legs. We will see that this
Speaker 19: robot has skin, muscles and bones. Before us, we ourselves
Speaker 19: have not tried cutting its skin and muscles while the
Speaker 19: robot is powered on.
Speaker 7: That sounds like when the last to do that.
Speaker 18: And gentleman before they were they were worried that might
Speaker 18: get damaged anyway, how about giving them a round of applause.
Speaker 19: They have never cut it open.
Speaker 2: Before the cutting the clothing, cutting bone and muscle and skin.
Speaker 2: It doesn't have bone, muscle and skin. You can see
Speaker 2: this as they cut sped this up and silenced it
Speaker 2: here that.
Speaker 19: The staff please step off the.
Speaker 2: Stuff that was just covering and there's nothing functional.
Speaker 11: It's just padding, a cloth cover in a.
Speaker 2: Clock cover and it calls it muscle, skin and bone.
Speaker 2: But now look we cut that away so you can
Speaker 2: see it's actually a robot because was walking very very smoothly.
Speaker 2: I mean it had some lumpiness on its legs there
Speaker 2: from the metal stuff that's there, but it is walking
Speaker 2: very smoothly.
Speaker 19: Don't need to prove anything else. It is definitely a robot, right.
Speaker 11: And the funny thing is they've got other videos of
Speaker 11: this robot where they show it walking around without the
Speaker 11: padding and the cloth cover for it, so clearly they
Speaker 11: knew they could have just shown that, but no, they've
Speaker 11: got to do this big reveal.
Speaker 2: You know, this reminds me of it's this magic trick
Speaker 2: that you've seen over and over again where they've got
Speaker 2: somebody leaning forward on a table and covered up so
Speaker 2: it looks like they've only got you know, a woman
Speaker 2: from the hips down, and they got like a short skirt,
Speaker 2: you know, nice legs and everything, and so it's just
Speaker 2: like two human legs walking along propelling this table. Everybody's
Speaker 2: seen that, and now they've done that same trick over
Speaker 2: and over again. Not such nice legs. But then they
Speaker 2: open up the table and show you, look, it's actually
Speaker 2: a guy who's laying down here. But that's what that's like. Oh, like,
Speaker 2: this is like a little magic trick, ladies and gentlemen.
Speaker 2: This has never been done before. We just thought of
Speaker 2: this just before this, and we're gonna show you. We're
Speaker 2: going to cut through all the skin and the muscle,
Speaker 2: and they didn't cut through any skin and the muscle
Speaker 2: is it is pneumatic actuators there with a metal skeleton
Speaker 2: that it's moving. So again, Musk wants you to believe
Speaker 2: that there will be a million of his new Robotaxis,
Speaker 2: a cybercab without steering wheel or brakes, starting next year.
Speaker 2: Notice the claims that will reach a million a year
Speaker 2: in production of Optimist robots, and that each successive year
Speaker 2: there will be a new and updated version of Optimists
Speaker 2: at the production level. That's right, Marky, Mark, thank you
Speaker 2: for the tip. Says shouldn't we have an intelligence gathering
Speaker 2: though other countries have spy agencies, don't we need one
Speaker 2: to Yeah, you know, we should take over our countries
Speaker 2: as well, we should do everything that they do, because
Speaker 2: I think that that's the only way to beat these
Speaker 2: monsters is to become a monster ourself. Thanks for listening,
Speaker 2: Have a good day. The common Man. They created common
Speaker 2: Core and dumb down our children. They created common Past
Speaker 2: to track and control us. They're Commons project to make
Speaker 2: sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future. They
Speaker 2: see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But each
Speaker 2: of us has worth and dignity created in the image
Speaker 2: of God. That is what we have in common. That
Speaker 2: is what they want to take away. Their most powerful
Speaker 2: weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything
Speaker 2: about us, while they hide everything from us. It's time
Speaker 2: to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
Speaker 2: Please share the information and links you'll find at the
Speaker 2: Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing.
Speaker 2: If you can't support us financially, please keep us in
Speaker 2: your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot com