Speaker 1: In last week's video, we broke down the character Philip K.
Speaker 1: Dick and his insight connections with Silicon Valley as the
Speaker 1: likely source as to how his novels were so precient
Speaker 1: and how there was so much predictive programming packed within
Speaker 1: his stories, and in particular the breakthrough film in nineteen
Speaker 1: eighty two by Ridley Scott, Blade Runner. And in this video,
Speaker 1: we're going to break down Blade Runner twenty forty nine,
Speaker 1: the sequel and what its meaning is.
Speaker 2: I've already had numerous.
Speaker 1: People texting me, messaging me saying, please explain.
Speaker 2: What the meaning was.
Speaker 1: And this is interesting because the sequel pretty much confirms
Speaker 1: that everything that I wrote in my analysis as correct.
Speaker 1: You're interested in a full breakdown, you can also subscribe
Speaker 1: to guy A TV where you can watch my show
Speaker 1: co created with Jay Widner, Hollywood Decoded. In the latest episode,
Speaker 1: we break down with Precision and app the original nineteen
Speaker 1: eighty two Blade Runner by Ridley Scott that's available now
Speaker 1: by streaming and on Amazon Prime through Gaya.
Speaker 2: In the sequel, we have the character of Ka or
Speaker 2: the Ryan.
Speaker 1: Gosling character later called Joe, who is on the case
Speaker 1: of a faction of replicants that are upgraded, so they
Speaker 1: don't got the upgrade from the Nexus six to Nexus eight.
Speaker 1: He's tasked, of course with shutting them down.
Speaker 2: And we are told from the beginning that he.
Speaker 1: Himself is also a replicant. His job is to retire
Speaker 1: the remaining faction of revolutionaries, and this is crucial as
Speaker 1: to why they're revolutionaries, and then as a result, put
Speaker 1: an end to any possibility of.
Speaker 2: There being replicants.
Speaker 1: What we have in this story is a reverse telling
Speaker 1: way of the story of Moses. This is a biblical
Speaker 1: theme that's repeated many times in the scriptures. In the
Speaker 1: case of Moses, of course, we know he was rescued
Speaker 1: from the attempt at extermination of the Jews on the
Speaker 1: part of Pharaoh by his parents putting him in a
Speaker 1: basket and floating him down to the river.
Speaker 2: Moses was then, of course raised.
Speaker 1: In Egypt as an Egyptian, and by the time he
Speaker 1: came of age, of course, everyone i think hopefully knows
Speaker 1: the story of Moses, he rejected the paganism and returned
Speaker 1: to his people to become a leader and thereby to
Speaker 1: in many ways give himself as a liberator. And he's
Speaker 1: of course given the law at Mount Sinai. In the
Speaker 1: new film, the Moses story takes on a weird inversion
Speaker 1: where we have the replacement of Tyrrell by the character
Speaker 1: of Niander Wallace played by Jared Leedo. Once again, the
Speaker 1: demi Urge is given deformed eyes, and we are to
Speaker 1: assume I think that he's had some sort of modification
Speaker 1: and has as a result, bionic vision like Jordie LaForge
Speaker 1: in Star Trek or something, and as a result of
Speaker 1: this he's able to What he's trying to do is
Speaker 1: upgrade humanity to where he can have an army of
Speaker 1: replicants made after his own image. So he very clearly
Speaker 1: is a creator god, but he's also pictured as a
Speaker 1: tyrant and a weird villain, just like the creeper weirdo,
Speaker 1: just like Tyrell.
Speaker 2: Was in the original series.
Speaker 1: Neander Wallace specifically invokes the number nine and Initiation and
Speaker 1: angels and angelic orders that seem to have fallen from
Speaker 1: his ranks, and by that he means the original Nexus
Speaker 1: and then the late Nexus eight rebels. These rebel angels
Speaker 1: are described specifically again as Luciferian, and this is why
Speaker 1: in my analysis I specifically mentioned that Roy Batty was
Speaker 1: a Luciferian kind of gnostic savior. The film The New
Speaker 1: One twenty forty nine absolutely proves my thesis as correct.
Speaker 1: In the original story, of course, we had the woman
Speaker 1: who was, as the film describes, seduced by the serpent,
Speaker 1: and that she receives pleasure from the serpent. This is
Speaker 1: an image of the fallen woman of Eve as she
Speaker 1: has fallen, and then as a result, in the.
Speaker 2: New Blade Runner, there's going to be a new Eve, a.
Speaker 1: New kind of virgin birth, if you will, although the
Speaker 1: virgin birth is not virginal, it's actually Rachel, and God
Speaker 1: looks upon Rachel with favor and has a child. In fact,
Speaker 1: in the very scene where Niander interacts with Decker, Niander
Speaker 1: explains that God looked upon Rachel and remembered her and
Speaker 1: opened her wound that she might conceive. In this case,
Speaker 1: Niander is speaking a course of Rachel from the original
Speaker 1: Blade Runner, the sean young character. If you remember, Rachel
Speaker 1: was seen in the Almost Palace, you could say of
Speaker 1: Tyrell with a lot of fascist imagery and with the owl.
Speaker 1: So you have very obvious references to like Me and Grove,
Speaker 1: and a lot of the transhumanist Star Wars defense initiative
Speaker 1: type ideas were birth actually at Bohemian Grove. I think
Speaker 1: this is all conscious. You have, of course, the usage
Speaker 1: of the owl in masonry very prominently, and the owl,
Speaker 1: of course is the Tyrell logo. It signifies in a
Speaker 1: way kind of panopticism and surveillance. And it's interesting that
Speaker 1: throughout the original Blade Runner eye imagery was prevalent, and
Speaker 1: it's the means by which one is identified as a
Speaker 1: replicant or not in the new film, which is curious
Speaker 1: because certain characters, for example, will have their eyes removed
Speaker 1: as a way to avoid detection.
Speaker 2: We'll also see scenes in.
Speaker 1: The new film where even statues appear with one eye.
Speaker 1: And this is all intentional, of course, because as I've said,
Speaker 1: the entire plot is an illuminous plot. And you might
Speaker 1: think that what does that mean illuminist, Well, it means scientism.
Speaker 2: It means the ability or the.
Speaker 1: Attempt to transcend nature through technology, and this is completely
Speaker 1: obvious in the new film. The whole message of the
Speaker 1: film is that Rachel is in many ways a new
Speaker 1: Eve or a new Mary, in that she has a
Speaker 1: miraculous birth, all right right, the birth of the Revolutionary
Speaker 1: Sun of the mutants. It's almost in many ways a
Speaker 1: kind of X Men story. An interesting side note, too,
Speaker 1: is that we learn that Deckard is hiding out in
Speaker 1: Las Vegas, and there's a scene where there's actually a
Speaker 1: shootout near the Luxor. And that's curious because this was
Speaker 1: of course filmed prior to the events of the past
Speaker 1: few days of the attack in Las Vegas. And that's
Speaker 1: precisely why the film is said to be scaled back
Speaker 1: in its twenty forty nine or in its Las Vegas release.
Speaker 1: As I said, the film is also dominated by the
Speaker 1: idea of a new coming humanity, the new stage of evolution.
Speaker 2: Which will be the new race.
Speaker 1: Based around transhumanism. As I said, it's basically the X
Speaker 1: Men mythology, and the idea here is again based on
Speaker 1: trans humanism. And you need to look no further than
Speaker 1: globalist Jacques Attalie's book A Brief History of the Future.
Speaker 1: In fact, Atali says on page two sixty and two
Speaker 1: sixty one that the vanguard, that is the tip of
Speaker 1: the spear of the hyper democrat, that is, the Luciferian revolutionary,
Speaker 1: is precisely the transhumanist. Why is that because the transhumanists
Speaker 1: are all going to be joined in a giant hive mind.
Speaker 1: He explains on page two sixty one, Audily says that
Speaker 1: it's women who will more easily join with transhumanism and
Speaker 1: the Luciferian promise of the future because they are more
Speaker 1: herd like. In fact, this is precisely why the film
Speaker 1: gives you the great twist that it is not Joe
Speaker 1: that is the special miraculous birth, but it is rather
Speaker 1: a woman who is the New Seed.
Speaker 2: As we saw on my video last week.
Speaker 1: On the original Blade, it was Roy Batty's purpose to
Speaker 1: awaken Decker to his real destiny, and in the new
Speaker 1: film we find the exact same model of Ryan Goslin's
Speaker 1: character Joe going on a journey inward into his mind,
Speaker 1: into his implanted memories, something that the Deep State has
Speaker 1: actually been working on through DARPA. I cover that in
Speaker 1: the first video if you've missed it.
Speaker 2: The discovery, of course, is that.
Speaker 1: The mysteries of his origin, that is, the character Joe,
Speaker 1: were partly true and partly false. He was not the
Speaker 1: coming New Seed or Messiah, but he was part of
Speaker 1: this seed. And in many ways you could argue that
Speaker 1: the scale that Deckard finds in the original blaeb Runner
Speaker 1: signifies the seed of the serpent. It is in fact
Speaker 1: the rebel angels that Roy Batty refers to right the
Speaker 1: seed of the Serpent, the serpentine falling angels who follow
Speaker 1: Lucifer in their rebellion against in their view, demiurge creator Tyrell,
Speaker 1: and in this case, the new Tyrell of Niander Wallace.
Speaker 1: So what we have is a Luciferian enlightenment, an illuminism
Speaker 1: that is the journey of the character of Joe. As
Speaker 1: a result, the end is the plan of a new race,
Speaker 1: the wiping out of the old race.
Speaker 2: Precisely what every one.
Speaker 1: Of the globalists literally says in their writings. The offer
Speaker 1: of technological transcendence of transhumanism as promised by the globalists
Speaker 1: is in fact a scam, and even within the story
Speaker 1: itself you can deduce that it's a scam. The synthetic
Speaker 1: operating system that Joe falls in love with, who is
Speaker 1: a kind of feminine gnostic sophia principle that leads him
Speaker 1: along the way, was in fact designed by the corporation
Speaker 1: to lead him to where he needed to go. In
Speaker 1: other words, he was a tool the entire time until
Speaker 1: he stepped out of the system. So within the mythology
Speaker 1: of the original and the sequel, you have even the
Speaker 1: revelation that those who think that they are on their
Speaker 1: own quest are being used, and especially when it comes
Speaker 1: to technology and the promise of technology. Indeed, what does
Speaker 1: the film offer everything that you want Joe through insertion
Speaker 1: into the synthetic virtual matrix. That's precisely what the trick
Speaker 1: and the trap of transhumanism is. It's a mimicry. Again,
Speaker 1: all of the presentation the biblical stories here are mimics
Speaker 1: and they're inverted, they're reversed. And so even from a
Speaker 1: film that is in many ways gnostic and a perversion,
Speaker 1: can still come away with the idea the truth that
Speaker 1: this is a deception. Thank you for watching my video
Speaker 1: and subscribe to Jaysonalysis dot com and you can also
Speaker 1: get the signed copies of my book There Esoteric Hollywood.
Speaker 1: You're listening to Jay's Analysis. This is the introduction to
Speaker 1: the jays Analysis podcast. The only authoritative source for Jay's
Speaker 1: analysis is jays Analysis, Film Philosophy, Geopolitics, The Esoteric and
Speaker 1: much much more satire and comedy too. Now added bonus
Speaker 1: for free with the coming release of the new Blade
Speaker 1: Runner film, I thought would be appropriate to go back
Speaker 1: and do an analysis of the original Blade Runner from
Speaker 1: nineteen eighty two, which does constitute a pretty popular chapter
Speaker 1: in my book Esoteric Hollywood. If you don't have a copy,
Speaker 1: I would encourage you to go ahead and get one
Speaker 1: from my website. Jay's analysis Esoteric Hollywood made it to
Speaker 1: the number one spot in Amazon's Film and Hollywood Industry category.
Speaker 1: It also has about ninety to ninety five percent five
Speaker 1: star ratings across Amazon Goodreads US UK markets. So go
Speaker 1: ahead and avail yourself of the full three hundred and
Speaker 1: sixty three pages and four hundred and four footnotes, which
Speaker 1: of course also led to my tea TV show with
Speaker 1: Jay Wiedner Hollywood Decoded on the Gaya Network, So check
Speaker 1: those out for a lot more of the information. In
Speaker 1: a similar vein of what you're going to hear in
Speaker 1: this video, Ridley Scott's Blade Runner presents us with a
Speaker 1: prescient dystopian future based on Philip K. Dixon novella Do
Speaker 1: Android's Dream of Electric Sheep, and we'll see in the
Speaker 1: film that this is not only an accurate prediction of
Speaker 1: the future's general landscape, but it also tends to be
Speaker 1: suffused with occult imagery and deep esoteric and symbolic themes.
Speaker 1: It also raises crucial moral and social questions. The film,
Speaker 1: I think operates on several levels. You could argue the
Speaker 1: immediate story itself, there's also predictive future analyzes with various
Speaker 1: social critiques. There's the level of covert operations and mind
Speaker 1: control MKO Ultra, I think is present in this film
Speaker 1: very clearly. And you also have a kind of deeper
Speaker 1: union mythology and archetype level with the alchemical symbology that
Speaker 1: we're going to see from the character of Gaff, as
Speaker 1: well as the background imagery behind characters like Roy Batty.
Speaker 1: So all these levels I think have to be integrated
Speaker 1: to grasp the full import of the film insofar as
Speaker 1: Ridley Scott conveys it. It's also interesting that Philip K.
Speaker 1: Dick himself had some very esoteric, bizarre, fringe views about
Speaker 1: the end times and so forth, and he kind of
Speaker 1: felt that we were stuck in some kind of culd
Speaker 1: de sac of history, and that history had stopped at
Speaker 1: the point of like Acts eleven or twelve, the Book
Speaker 1: of Acts, so we were in some kind of weird
Speaker 1: time loop side story that was accidental and not intended
Speaker 1: to happen, and so unfortunately, I think mister Dick, for
Speaker 1: all of his great writings and for hanging out with
Speaker 1: the Silicon Valley crew in his days and getting a
Speaker 1: lot of insights as to what was coming in the future,
Speaker 1: probably did a little too many drugs and got a
Speaker 1: little confused. But regardless, the works as a whole are
Speaker 1: all packed with a lot of predicted programming, and again
Speaker 1: this I think has to do with his close connections
Speaker 1: to many of those in Silicon Valley in that time.
Speaker 1: The film, of course, begins by showing us the eye,
Speaker 1: presumably of Decord, and the eye is wreathed in flame.
Speaker 1: This is going to be very prominent as a theme
Speaker 1: throughout the film, the Eye, and that's for many reasons.
Speaker 1: On one level, it's signifying the genetic DNA identification that
Speaker 1: tells the difference between the synthetic replicants and the actual
Speaker 1: human beings. But it also signifies the occult and Masonic
Speaker 1: themes that are prevalent throughout the film and the idea
Speaker 1: of as we're going to see the gnostic elements of
Speaker 1: retelling the story of creation and the fall and the
Speaker 1: sort of Promethean rebellion against the creator embodied in the
Speaker 1: character of Roy Batty, who's this kind of Luciferian savior.
Speaker 1: We see the twenty twenty landscape of Los Angeles, we
Speaker 1: see the eye viewing this landscape, and the eye represents
Speaker 1: the viewer in many ways, and as we discussed in
Speaker 1: my analysis of Eyes of Wide Shut and the reviewing
Speaker 1: of that film, we are going through a kind of
Speaker 1: initiatory experience on the part of the viewer. The viewer
Speaker 1: is going to be shown in many ways the elite plan,
Speaker 1: and most of what we see is actually still I
Speaker 1: guess you could say hidden from the public, even though
Speaker 1: it's explained throughout so many instances of fiction and predictive programming,
Speaker 1: the public is still busy with their eyes wide shut,
Speaker 1: And for the masses, I think there's no ability to
Speaker 1: make this kind of deeper level connection and to associate
Speaker 1: these ideas, symbols and archetypes. And that's why so much
Speaker 1: of this Hollywood imagery functions as a kind of whodoo
Speaker 1: spell put over on people. So this all kind of
Speaker 1: is downloaded into your subconscious, but you don't ever really
Speaker 1: realize that what you're witnessing is a fictional presentation of
Speaker 1: in many ways, what's going on in the real world.
Speaker 1: So if the viewer has eyes to see, I think
Speaker 1: you can argue that they're actually seeing the future itself,
Speaker 1: and that's why characters like Philip K. Dick are so important.
Speaker 1: It also shows the ruling ideology of the upper so
Speaker 1: called class, or the scientism of the elite, and we're
Speaker 1: going to be looking at this in more depth as
Speaker 1: we go through the works one by one of Bertrand, Russell,
Speaker 1: Jonah Salk, Jacques Attalie HG. Wells, and many of the
Speaker 1: actual globalists who describe their religion as one of scientism.
Speaker 1: But here we see the ie overlooking the La city scape,
Speaker 1: the giant, multi cult dystopia that has been created as
Speaker 1: a result, presumably of monopolistic capital control. The global government
Speaker 1: appears to be here, there's no question, and it is
Speaker 1: run by the Tyrel Corporation. So you see that there's
Speaker 1: no distinction between fascism, communism, and monopoly capitalism in this
Speaker 1: future dystopia. They're all blended into the same system because
Speaker 1: they all lead to the same final destination. And it's
Speaker 1: significant that we were presented with the eyeshots above a
Speaker 1: zigarot or a pyramid without a capstone. This is obviously
Speaker 1: Egyptian symbology, which comes.
Speaker 2: Up frequently throughout the film.
Speaker 1: You can't mistake the owl symbology, which is very prevalent
Speaker 1: Bohemian grove imagery within the Tyral corporation itself. And this
Speaker 1: Egyptian and owl symbology quite clearly represents the ruling class,
Speaker 1: the elite. This all seeing eyes flashed between images of
Speaker 1: the pyramid, as I said, in this connection, in this sense,
Speaker 1: in this context is quite obviously the idea that the
Speaker 1: elite are gods precisely because of the technology that they possess.
Speaker 1: So I think what we're looking at here is a
Speaker 1: kind of magical worldview in the sense of alchemy as technology,
Speaker 1: and that's really where we're going with the gnosticism in
Speaker 1: this film. In many ways, it embodies Arthur C. Clark's
Speaker 1: third Law, which is that there's really no significant distinction
Speaker 1: between technology or advanced technology and magic. The god who
Speaker 1: controls things in this worldview is the quote god who
Speaker 1: has the upper hand in genetic engineering and artificial intelligence.
Speaker 1: And I want to show you really quick an interesting
Speaker 1: passage from Bertrand Russell back in nineteen thirty one. Bertrand
Speaker 1: Russell member of the Fabian Society as well as the
Speaker 1: inner clique of the Royal Society, basically the controlling establishment
Speaker 1: of the Western power structure of the Atlantis's power structure.
Speaker 1: Russell wrote back in nineteen thirty one, that is two
Speaker 1: years or a year or two prior to the publication
Speaker 1: of Braveney World by Aldus Huxley. Russell wrote on page
Speaker 1: one sixty nine of the Scientific Outlook that in the
Speaker 1: future world government there will be eugenical regimentation such that
Speaker 1: the complete sterilization of the feeble minded will be practiced,
Speaker 1: and that as a result, embryos will be directly operated
Speaker 1: upon while they are a fetus, so basically GMO babies
Speaker 1: is the government of the future. As a result of this,
Speaker 1: Bertrand goes on to say the technocracy of the future
Speaker 1: will be run by completely megalomaniac technocrats, and he ac
Speaker 1: says this explicitly in chapter fourteen of the book. After this,
Speaker 1: we see the viewer approach the pyramid, as we said,
Speaker 1: and it's engulfed in a sort of golden sunlight, conjuring
Speaker 1: up the images of raw in Egypt. The mysteries of Egypt,
Speaker 1: of course center around the godlike philosopher king or pharaoh,
Speaker 1: and the material manifestation of autum Ra thus mirrors the
Speaker 1: spiritual hierarchy as above so below, so on Earth you
Speaker 1: have the Emperor, essentially the Egyptian Pharaoh, being the incarnation
Speaker 1: in the mirror of what's going on in the divine
Speaker 1: spiritual plane. And this is relevant because in Blade Runner
Speaker 1: you have the character of Tyrrell sort of embodying that
Speaker 1: pheyonic figure, but he's an old, decrepit, almost evil, gnostic
Speaker 1: demi urge creator right as opposed to the kind of
Speaker 1: creator that the Biblical presentation gives. So it's again the
Speaker 1: gnostic presentation. So the light then is enlightening the viewer,
Speaker 1: i would say, in this scene, inviting him along for
Speaker 1: the ride in the flying car to the top of
Speaker 1: the pyramid.
Speaker 2: In other words, for.
Speaker 1: Those who can see you are about to see what
Speaker 1: they see. Next scene is the Voight komf tests, which
Speaker 1: is given to Leon, one of the replicants or the
Speaker 1: advanced AI bots created by the Tyrell Corporation. This test
Speaker 1: is designed to see if it is possible to tell
Speaker 1: the replicants emotional state.
Speaker 2: Recalls.
Speaker 1: Of course, Hitler's mind, which is manifesto, was devoted to
Speaker 1: struggle and the struggle of the Will Tyrell, we learn
Speaker 1: has been in the business of developing these assassin droids
Speaker 1: AI assassins, and yet some of these replicants do not
Speaker 1: know that they are programmed with false memories and false identities. Interestingly,
Speaker 1: this is an actual subject of study by DARPA. DARPA
Speaker 1: actually does work on the attempts to create implanted memories,
Speaker 1: and of course this has been going on for a
Speaker 1: long time in terms of research through the mk ulture
Speaker 1: program and then what would later become MK Search, as
Speaker 1: is detailed in John Marx's book The Search for the
Speaker 1: Mentoring and Candidate. It's within this perspective that the replicants
Speaker 1: seem to partly resemble the infamous plans of the various
Speaker 1: nation states, in particularly the US over the last fifty
Speaker 1: sixty years to create the idea of a super soldier
Speaker 1: or a mind control assassin. And ultimately we know that
Speaker 1: these programs really resulted not so much in the creation
Speaker 1: of a super soldier, and not even just in terms
Speaker 1: of studies related to mass mind control, but ultimately they
Speaker 1: devolve into studies related to transhumanism. And this is actually
Speaker 1: the last chapter of John Marx's book, which was again
Speaker 1: written in the seventies, and he's telling you, just like
Speaker 1: Philip K. Dick, that what was coming was the implementation
Speaker 1: of transhumanism. MK Ultra Subproject one nineteen was a literature
Speaker 1: review which included a summary of the existing techniques of
Speaker 1: the manipulation of the human organism by remote and electronic means.
Speaker 1: According to a report in Defense Electronics, this consideration was
Speaker 1: given to US non lethal weapons technology and it was
Speaker 1: used on David Koresh during the Branch Davidians. The Age
Speaker 1: of nineteen ninety three is a test case. Research on
Speaker 1: the ability of magnetic fields to facilitate the creation of
Speaker 1: false memories an altered states of consciousness was funded by
Speaker 1: the Defense Intelligence Agency through the project Kryptonym Sleeping Beauty.
Speaker 1: Sleeping Beauty was a Defense Department study of remote microwave
Speaker 1: mind influencing techniques. That's also mentioned in doctor Colin Ross's
Speaker 1: books on m KLTRA, Bluebird, and Artochoke. So we have
Speaker 1: many examples of characters like this, and in the Blade
Speaker 1: Runner instantiation, it's the character of Roy Batty, who kind
Speaker 1: of embodies this Nexus six model, right, the leader of
Speaker 1: the rebels the Replicants, who is himself a super soldier assassin.
Speaker 1: He's more human than a human. Tyrrel states, and we're
Speaker 1: not talking about the Rob Zombie song here, although I
Speaker 1: guess in a way Rob Zombie is talking about the
Speaker 1: retinal imagery in the scene of the Voiit comp test
Speaker 1: is in this case once again referring to Leon Kowalski
Speaker 1: and the identification of synthetic and the real Leon is
Speaker 1: given the tests and assassinates his tester at a certain
Speaker 1: point when the trigger words tortoise and mother are mentioned,
Speaker 1: signifying in a way a sort of mind control manipulation
Speaker 1: through symbols and union archetypes, which I think again is
Speaker 1: crucial in this film. The tortoise is associated with Hermes
Speaker 1: and Mercury, as we'll see here in a moment, but
Speaker 1: the Replicants, as we see, are given a four year
Speaker 1: lifespan which allows Tyrell to have total control over them.
Speaker 1: This keeps them from rebelling, and so there's a kind
Speaker 1: of implementation of death, and thus Tyrrell is pictured as
Speaker 1: a god, the father figure in the real world, our
Speaker 1: so called elite have always sought to control life spans
Speaker 1: of the populations through depopulation through regimentation of diet and food.
Speaker 1: As again Bertrand Russell and others characters like Charles Galton D.
Speaker 1: Darwin discussed in the Next Million Years. This is part
Speaker 1: of full spectrum dominance which I've done many talks on.
Speaker 1: It could also have a possible reference to something like
Speaker 1: a self destruct programming in the minds of those who
Speaker 1: have undergone in k If the notion of programming someone
Speaker 1: in terms of their mind to at a certain point
Speaker 1: engage in a suicide program, you need to look no
Speaker 1: further than John C. Lilly, one of the MKLTR doctors himselves,
Speaker 1: who in the book Programming and Metaprogramming in the Human
Speaker 1: Biocomputer mentions the possibility of wiping children's minds from birth
Speaker 1: and giving them a completely programmed reality through.
Speaker 2: The use of LSD.
Speaker 1: So who you have one of the top in Kaltra doctors.
Speaker 1: The guy who basically was involved in Flippery Flipper, is
Speaker 1: in many ways based on John C. Lily right the
Speaker 1: idea of giving LSD to dolphins, so forth and so
Speaker 1: on animals and seeing the effects of this very degenerate ideology.
Speaker 1: This radical scientism is just as guilty as someone like
Speaker 1: Alfred Kinsey. You know, Lily brags about and mentions wiping
Speaker 1: children's brains through LSD, so this is very possible. This
Speaker 1: is not really the realm of craze conspiracy theory. Interestingly,
Speaker 1: Lily also pioneered the idea of the deep induced drug
Speaker 1: state inside the isolation tank. It's floating inside the tank
Speaker 1: directly arises from the m culture program, and ultimately this
Speaker 1: is supposed to give you the impression that you are
Speaker 1: in a deep meditative state and seeing deep within yourself
Speaker 1: and other realms and all this kind of stuff. But
Speaker 1: ultimately this kind of stuff I think is quite deceptive.
Speaker 1: You've been watching my analysis of Blade Runner, very in depth,
Speaker 1: very esoteric, and based in a lot of dystopian realities
Speaker 1: that are unfortunately now coming to fruition, including the sex bots,
Speaker 1: and including as we'll see, a lot more bad news. However,
Speaker 1: it's not all bad news. There's a bright light at
Speaker 1: the end of this tunnel, and it is not the
Speaker 1: bright light Lucifer. If you'd like to see the rest
Speaker 1: of this analysis in video presentation, you can go to
Speaker 1: jay'snalysis dot com and subscribe at the PayPal links for
Speaker 1: four ninety five a month or for sixty dollars a year.
Speaker 1: You can also get my book Esoteric Hollywood Sex, Cults
Speaker 1: and Symbols and Film and you can also watch my
Speaker 1: television show on The guy a Network with Jay Widner
Speaker 1: called Hollywood Decoded. Now, this Blade Runner series is also
Speaker 1: going to be an episode of Hollywood Decoded, which will
Speaker 1: be different information, some of the same information, but different
Speaker 1: information of what I'm resenting here. So a lot of
Speaker 1: different angles that we're going to take on Blade Runner,
Speaker 1: but definitely check that out at jasanalysis dot com.