Speaker 1: Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the
Speaker 1: David Night Show.
Speaker 2: As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Monday, the nineteenth of August.
Speaker 2: You're of our Lord, twenty twenty four. Well, of course
Speaker 2: the DNC begins today, and they're making it all about abortion. Yeah,
Speaker 2: it is a big D and C is what they're
Speaker 2: trying to do. Even have an eighteen foot inflatable IUD
Speaker 2: at the convention. But it's also about setting up martial law.
Speaker 2: We will talk about that, but I want to talk
Speaker 2: about first the bipartisan effort to lock us all down
Speaker 2: again with yet another pandemic, and the lies behind this.
Speaker 2: These pictures that they're showing us folks are debunked two
Speaker 2: years ago. The monkey pocks pictures of children with sores
Speaker 2: all up and down their arms debunked a long time ago.
Speaker 2: We're going to begin with that. Yeah, we'll get to politics,
Speaker 2: but we're going to start with the bipartisan move to
Speaker 2: bring back martial law. We'll be right back. And I
Speaker 2: say bipartisan because we have Rand Paul out there pushing
Speaker 2: and pushing and pushing. Gain of function, gain of function,
Speaker 2: gain of function. And even if it were real, even
Speaker 2: if this is something that you know. Of course, it
Speaker 2: can create poisons, put them out. That's what we had
Speaker 2: with the gain of function. We'll talk about that about
Speaker 2: the mr Anda vaccine, No, he won't talk about that.
Speaker 3: That was the.
Speaker 2: Bioweapon that came out of a lab. He won't talk
Speaker 2: about that. But again, what is his proposal? Now? He
Speaker 2: went on with RFK Junior on a podcast and he
Speaker 2: is selling the idea that you know, and they've always
Speaker 2: grouped these together, you know, chemical, nuclear, biological, you know NBC,
Speaker 2: that's what they did, Like the network Nuclear, Biological and
Speaker 2: Chemicals order they usually put it in. And so what
Speaker 2: do you saying is yeah, biological warfare that's going to
Speaker 2: be like nuclear war. So we ought to have inspectors
Speaker 2: going around and checking all these gain of function lamps.
Speaker 2: Why don't you shut them down? What's the matter with him?
Speaker 2: What is the matter with these It's just bipartisan Egellian manipulation, folks.
Speaker 2: That's what Rampaul has been doing all along. He will
Speaker 2: rail against Fauci while he gets his wife to buy
Speaker 2: stock and rim desovir that Fauci is pushing and profiting from.
Speaker 2: Both of them are making money. Both of them are
Speaker 2: profiting off of the poisoning and the murder people. Rim
Speaker 2: Dezevir had been pushed by Fauci three different times. The
Speaker 2: third time was the charm. He pushed it for AIDS,
Speaker 2: he pushed it for ebola, and every time he pushed,
Speaker 2: everybody said, it doesn't do anything except kill people. So
Speaker 2: of course, you know when we came to the COVID thing,
Speaker 2: because it didn't do anything except kill people. All the
Speaker 2: measures that were put out there by the government didn't
Speaker 2: do anything except kill people. You know, whether you're talking
Speaker 2: about the ventilators or Remdzevie or the vaccines or what
Speaker 2: is all about murdering people. So yeah, let's bring Rem
Speaker 2: Desovie in here. What does Rand Paul do? He gets
Speaker 2: his wife, he knows this is coming. He gets his
Speaker 2: wife to buy the stock in her name. This is
Speaker 2: like what Zelensky did. They've got Shell corporation after Show
Speaker 2: corporation after Shell corporation. His wife is making these extravagant
Speaker 2: shopping trips on fifty thousand dollars. I think it was
Speaker 2: that she spent in Paris in just a few hours
Speaker 2: in shopping. And they've got these elaborate mansions all over
Speaker 2: the world, and they're nested in shell corporations in his
Speaker 2: wife's name, same thing Ran Paul is doing. He doesn't
Speaker 2: have the shell corporations, but the same type of thing.
Speaker 2: So Shasha Latipova says, talking about Rampaul is yelling of
Speaker 2: Fauci again zealously reciting the gain of function. She also says,
Speaker 2: the gospel of Fauci. Yeah, the other goof They're going
Speaker 2: to be world ending as nuclear weapons any minute now,
Speaker 2: all these viruses that they're creating and weaponizing. Look, I've
Speaker 2: said all along and again going back twenty fourteen when
Speaker 2: you had a series of articles are done by USA today.
Speaker 2: Allison I've talked about for so long now I think
Speaker 2: Alison Young, I think was her name. Anyway, she was
Speaker 2: a reporter who was doing it. In twenty fourteen, Congress
Speaker 2: had shut it down. This is just ridiculous. You're playing
Speaker 2: games with disease, with real disease, and so it's just
Speaker 2: shut it down. It's an incredible waste of money. Nothing
Speaker 2: good can come out of this. And so rather than
Speaker 2: shut it down, Fauci and Francis Collins continue They continued
Speaker 2: it at the University of North Carolina and in other places.
Speaker 2: And then they couple of years later they released their
Speaker 2: stuff and other scientists said, wait a minute, you were
Speaker 2: supposed to be doing that. Well, I decided to continue
Speaker 2: it on my own, said Francis Collins. And then in
Speaker 2: twenty seventeen, Trump said, it's okay, you can do gain
Speaker 2: of function. We'll pay for it. That's the part that
Speaker 2: Rampaul and these conservatives don't ever talk about, isn't it
Speaker 2: the fact that they brought it back in twenty seventeen
Speaker 2: when Trump took office. Oh don't want to talk about that,
Speaker 2: do you. So as a Sasha, a lot of povis says,
Speaker 2: we must stop them, says Brave Rand. And by stop them,
Speaker 2: he means give them more money and create a brand
Speaker 2: new bureaucracy to do oversight.
Speaker 3: She said.
Speaker 2: Let me assure you that I'm absolute one hundred percent
Speaker 2: for terminating any lab and biomanufacturing activity that could be
Speaker 2: characterized as gain of function. But examples of this I
Speaker 2: would consider be bioweapons, the vaccines be says she said.
Speaker 2: For example, my proposed policy would remove all vaccination requirements.
Speaker 2: It would strip the CDC and the HHS of its
Speaker 2: un constitutional powers and them cut all NIH and DOOD
Speaker 2: funding for the infectious disease research fire every one of
Speaker 2: these useless leaders, take down the buildings, rewild the space
Speaker 2: with forests so they can never come back. This way,
Speaker 2: we'll also achieve the green sustainability objectives, she says sarcastically. Look,
Speaker 2: she's absolutely right. You want to get rid of gain
Speaker 2: of function. Would to get rid of these biobiological threats
Speaker 2: and biological weapons, get rid of the NIH, get rid
Speaker 2: of the CDC, ban the NIH, just get rid of them,
Speaker 2: you know, but also ban the Department of Defense from
Speaker 2: getting involved in this kind of stuff. Look, this goes
Speaker 2: all the way back to the end of World War Two.
Speaker 2: They brought the Germans over Operation paper Clip, and all
Speaker 2: the rest is that they brought German scientists who had
Speaker 2: been experimenting on people and killing people. Same thing with
Speaker 2: Japanese who are doing it to American soldiers who were captured,
Speaker 2: and they put these people in charge of their new
Speaker 2: biological weapons programs at Fort Detrick and other places. It's
Speaker 2: just disgusting. They would they would put an American at
Speaker 2: the top of the program, but right underneath it to
Speaker 2: run it, they would have some Nazi from Germany as
Speaker 2: running his stuff and the same kind of stuff that
Speaker 2: you see them. They do this all the time, you know,
Speaker 2: but somebody right underneath it that is going to be
Speaker 2: running it. For example, what Trump did with the CIA,
Speaker 2: he puts in Mike Pompeo as the top of the CIA.
Speaker 2: But who did you put in for number two? And
Speaker 2: who ran the agency? Gina Haspital. And after two years
Speaker 2: Pompeo moves to Secretary of State and in Gina Haspital
Speaker 2: has made the official head. I guess you know, we'll
Speaker 2: put that input her in his number two. If anybody notices,
Speaker 2: we can always say she's number two. She's not in charge,
Speaker 2: it says. Nobody complained about it except me kind of.
Speaker 2: I really complained about it when we put her in
Speaker 2: his number one, but I did mention it. You know,
Speaker 2: why isn't she in jail? Why is she still there?
Speaker 2: Why is she number two? Anyway, because nobody complained about
Speaker 2: her for the most part, he makes her number one,
Speaker 2: and nobody complained about that either. Really again I did,
Speaker 2: but it's operation paper clip.
Speaker 3: That's what you do.
Speaker 2: You put in somebody who doesn't have this past that
Speaker 2: is so damning, and then you put the other people,
Speaker 2: the ruthless monsters. You let them run the program, but
Speaker 2: put them in the number two slot. Canada's warning residents
Speaker 2: to prepare for hypothetical virus. Well that's what they are.
Speaker 2: They're hypothetical, aren't They no evidence of its existence.
Speaker 3: And it's even worse than that, there's.
Speaker 2: No evidence to tie these pictures of monkey pox to
Speaker 2: actual monkey pox. What they called monkey pox anyway, a
Speaker 2: hypothetical virus. It could be worse in COVID. A return
Speaker 2: of lockdowns. Yes, the return of lockdowns will be worse
Speaker 2: every time they do it to us. This is from
Speaker 2: the Daily Mail, but Wine Press News picked it up.
Speaker 2: So the Center for Occupational Health and Safety rolled out
Speaker 2: a second edition of their hymnbook. It's called The Flu
Speaker 2: and Infectious Disease Outbreaks Business Continuity Plan. Well, I wonder
Speaker 2: what business is going to have continuity with plans like this. Well,
Speaker 2: the big box retailers that Trump likes, the Wall Street
Speaker 2: people will have it. The pharmaceutical people of hospitals who
Speaker 2: made so much money, they'll have business continuity. No continuity
Speaker 2: of business for anybody else, right, so says in their
Speaker 2: new edition, released in June, the Center for Occupational health
Speaker 2: and safety focuses on a quote, hypothetical virus. You know,
Speaker 2: that's the same thing that Dark and Vache did for
Speaker 2: twenty years, going back to Dark Winter. Two months before
Speaker 2: nine to eleven, they had a hypothetical virus. They called
Speaker 2: it germ games. They practice this stuff. That's what they're
Speaker 2: doing with this right now. A future pandemic quote will
Speaker 2: come in two or three waves, about three to nine
Speaker 2: months separating each outbreak. It adds, well, how they know that?
Speaker 3: How do they know that?
Speaker 2: It's kind of like Redfield, Trump's CDC guy who says, well,
Speaker 2: it's inevitable that bird flu is going to be like,
Speaker 2: you've got to get my pandemics straight here, bird flu
Speaker 2: is going to jump to humans and it's going to
Speaker 2: be twenty five to fifty percent case fatality rate. How
Speaker 2: do you know that, Well, because he's going to tell
Speaker 2: you that when it happened, he's going to make it
Speaker 2: all up. These people know it's going to come in
Speaker 2: two or three waves, about three to nine months apart,
Speaker 2: because that's the way they're going to lie to us
Speaker 2: about it. It's their invention, it's their game, and they're
Speaker 2: going to roll this thing out where they lie to
Speaker 2: us or this big disinformation campaign, make me disappear all
Speaker 2: the rest of the stuff. They're going to do that,
Speaker 2: and they're going to do it in three waves, about
Speaker 2: three to nine months apart. They can say that definitively
Speaker 2: because they're making this stuff up. It's all a fantasy
Speaker 2: of theirs. Hypothetical virus could also last in these cycles
Speaker 2: for are as much as two years. Why did they
Speaker 2: say that, Well, because they've already gotten away with that.
Speaker 2: And this is very similar to the game that they
Speaker 2: played with us. Oh, now we've got we've got a
Speaker 2: new variant. Now they're calling them clades. They've got to
Speaker 2: keep changing the names of these things to keep people
Speaker 2: off balance. As soon as you figure out, oh that
Speaker 2: they're lying about that, Okay, now they come up with
Speaker 2: a new name about the same lie. So yeah, oh
Speaker 2: what we got Delta. Now we've got Omega.
Speaker 3: Now we got.
Speaker 2: A the's different ones. It's like animal house. They're all
Speaker 2: different fraternities here. U. It comes after Fauci recommended that
Speaker 2: people start wearing masks again due to a rise in
Speaker 2: COVID cases. Wait a minute, you got your herd immunity
Speaker 2: with your vaccine numbers anything, Why are you pulling this
Speaker 2: on us? He also is out there telling everybody that
Speaker 2: he's sick again, and so because he's been vaccinated with
Speaker 2: everything he says, and because he's sick again. But you know, hey,
Speaker 2: he doesn't really look sick. Oh that's because I got
Speaker 2: the vaccine. Maybe it's because you got the lies and
Speaker 2: he got nothing. But now he's out there lying to
Speaker 2: people and he's got the vaccine. So you should all
Speaker 2: be wearing masks. I guess to protect him. Your mask
Speaker 2: don't protect you, they protect Fauci, in which case I
Speaker 2: would definitely not wear one. He also told that he
Speaker 2: had contracted COVID about two weeks ago, So the World
Speaker 2: Health Organization is warning that this virus could lead to
Speaker 2: new mutations. Okay, well, let's let's see it. Do you
Speaker 2: have any you know, let's let's let them. They're making
Speaker 2: extraordinary claims, right, extraordinary claims about a pandemic. Show me
Speaker 2: the data, show me the isolated virus and all the
Speaker 2: rest of this stuff. We need to start demanding this
Speaker 2: again the way they should stop these people. And it's
Speaker 2: very difficult to do it, but you can show that
Speaker 2: they're lying, just like with a climate mcguffin. We said
Speaker 2: last week, I didn't have enough time to really go
Speaker 2: into it. There's a long article about this young girl
Speaker 2: who's now twenty two, and she is climate OCD obsessive
Speaker 2: compulsive disorder. And how did she get it. She got
Speaker 2: it from Al Gore's movie that he called an inconvenient truth. Well,
Speaker 2: it was a convenient lie that had absolutely no data
Speaker 2: to back it up. And that's why the group that
Speaker 2: I was with tried to get the data from Michael
Speaker 2: Mann and he fought tooth and nail and he won
Speaker 2: in court and Jod said, no, you're not to show
Speaker 2: him the data even though the data has You know,
Speaker 2: he's published that he collected all this stuff working at
Speaker 2: a public university. He did all the research at a
Speaker 2: public university, being paid for by taxpayers. He published his conclusions,
Speaker 2: and his conclusions were used to craft public policy, so
Speaker 2: the public paid for it and the public got his policy.
Speaker 2: And we just want to say, show me the data.
Speaker 2: He wouldn't show it. And folks, if they won't show
Speaker 2: you the climate data, if they won't show you the
Speaker 2: data to that isolated virus or any the rest of
Speaker 2: this stuff, it's not real. It's not real how many
Speaker 2: times they're going to pull this on us, not on us,
Speaker 2: but on the public. So they're saying that right now
Speaker 2: there's about five hundred people a week dying from COVID.
Speaker 2: Did you realize that you think that's true?
Speaker 1: Either?
Speaker 2: I'm just going to accept all this stuff here. I
Speaker 2: said the very beginning of all this stuff, when it
Speaker 2: was propaganda, was first coming out of China. So will
Speaker 2: they say that this is happening, and that's happening in China?
Speaker 2: Even if that were happening, it's not even an epidemic
Speaker 2: in China based on the numbers, but it certainly isn't
Speaker 2: a pandemic. And then, finally, can you trust any numbers
Speaker 2: that come out of China? Can you trust any numbers
Speaker 2: that come out of the CDC? They've lied to us
Speaker 2: on an annual basis about flu shots and flu cases
Speaker 2: and all the rest of this stuff. They lie to
Speaker 2: us about inflation, don't they right? You know they're lying
Speaker 2: about inflation. They lie to us about jobs, they lie
Speaker 2: to us about everything. Actually, what do we believe them
Speaker 2: about anything? I was part to you this. It's out
Speaker 2: of fear. You're afraid not to believe them. You're afraid that, well,
Speaker 2: what if it's real. It's not real, and we certainly
Speaker 2: know that by now, don't we. Covid Fauci's face mask
Speaker 2: guidelines long been criticized. You know, they're now illegal in
Speaker 2: a lot of places because nobody believes this stuff anymore,
Speaker 2: no matter how many times he or mass media tries
Speaker 2: to push it on people. And so you've got jurisdictions
Speaker 2: everywhere from Republican states up.
Speaker 1: To New York.
Speaker 2: I reported last week New York Nasau County said you
Speaker 2: can't wear a mask even if you're sick. Get a
Speaker 2: doctor's note. We're going to examine that, but the police
Speaker 2: will check that out because first thing they're going to
Speaker 2: do is arrest you. Why because they've got people who
Speaker 2: are mostly peaceful Palestinian protesters.
Speaker 3: Not mostly peaceful.
Speaker 2: And of course there's always the stuff about, you know,
Speaker 2: robbing banks with a mask. I'll never get over the
Speaker 2: fact that I was kicked out of the bank because
Speaker 2: I wouldn't wear a mask. That's upside down world. I
Speaker 2: mean I would have been I would have had the
Speaker 2: cops called on me if I'd walked into a bank
Speaker 2: wearing any other time in my life, including today probably,
Speaker 2: but you know then they were demanding.
Speaker 3: It, so he says.
Speaker 2: Fauci's even the Daily Mail says, well, a lot of
Speaker 2: people are saying that the face mask guidelines didn't work. Well,
Speaker 2: you know what, Neither did the ventilators. Neither did the vexes,
Speaker 2: Neither did the six foot magic number of social distancing,
Speaker 2: neither did the rim dezevir, except it made him and
Speaker 2: ran Paul pretty wealthy. And so the WHO is encouraging,
Speaker 2: i should say, urging, urging countries to enhance their pandemic
Speaker 2: preparedness and to produce the new vaccines. It's a press
Speaker 2: release from the World Health Organization Global Pandemic Preparedness Summit
Speaker 2: of twenty twenty four held in Rio dejian Naro, reports
Speaker 2: Wine Press News. Again, WHO Research and Development Blueprint for
Speaker 2: Epidemics issued a report urging a broader based approach by
Speaker 2: researchers and countries. We've got to get more people in
Speaker 2: on the fix, right. It's what they do with the
Speaker 2: climate stuff. You want to be taken seriously. You're a
Speaker 2: meteorologist and you don't believe in climate change.
Speaker 3: I'm sorry.
Speaker 2: You can't point at the map and read numbers to
Speaker 2: people anymore, we're going to take you off of that
Speaker 2: nice job. Oh, you don't believe in climate change, while
Speaker 2: you just lost your job at the university. You don't
Speaker 2: believe in the epidemics and the vaccines and the viruses
Speaker 2: and all the rest of the stuff, while you just
Speaker 2: lost your job in the medical profession or at the university.
Speaker 2: And so what they want to do is they want
Speaker 2: to get more people in on this. The reports authors
Speaker 2: likened us updated recommendations to imagining scientists as individuals searching
Speaker 2: for lost keys on a street. So looking for the vacs.
Speaker 2: They're looking for the virus the pandemic, of course, like
Speaker 2: they're on a dark street with a street light, and
Speaker 2: they're looking searching in the dark, looking for the keys
Speaker 2: to a car that they've never seen. That's the real
Speaker 2: analogy here. It's a car that they've never seen, and
Speaker 2: they've lost the keys to a car that they've never seen.
Speaker 2: Can somebody helping them as they grow in the dark?
Speaker 2: The blind leading the blind.
Speaker 3: It's just ridiculous.
Speaker 2: And they actually created a little thing showing a spotlights
Speaker 2: if you can find that on the article therek Travis.
Speaker 2: It's the article who urges countries to enhance pandemic preparedness
Speaker 2: as the first picture there, and so they got a
Speaker 2: spotlight shining down on the ground and there you go
Speaker 2: a little bit for there it is right there. We
Speaker 2: got to look across all these different families and everything.
Speaker 2: I mean, look at this kind of pablem really kind
Speaker 2: of makes you question the value of a university education,
Speaker 2: doesn't it. Yeah, the dark spaces in this metaphor include
Speaker 2: many regions of the world, particularly resource scarce settings. These
Speaker 2: places might harbor novel pathogens, but they lack the infrastructure
Speaker 2: and resources to conduct comprehensive research. You see, viruses now
Speaker 2: are everywhere. The viruses are hiding in the darkness. Be afraid,
Speaker 2: be very afraid. And you know, when I look at
Speaker 2: the way that they're pushing this stuff, what it reminds
Speaker 2: me of was what my sister back in the seventies
Speaker 2: would look at the news, and you know, she would
Speaker 2: look at the local news, which is sports and weather
Speaker 2: for the most part, sports and weather and robberies, murders
Speaker 2: and rapes. And there weren't enough robberies, murders and rapes
Speaker 2: where had lived in Tampa to go around. So they
Speaker 2: pulled their resources, you know, and so every night they
Speaker 2: would lead off before they got to the sports and weather,
Speaker 2: they would talk about the murders and robberies and rapes
Speaker 2: in other parts of the country, just so they could
Speaker 2: fill up the space. And every night, that's all this stuff,
Speaker 2: and it got her so afraid of everything, you know,
Speaker 2: And that's what It's not just her, everybody, you know.
Speaker 2: We don't don't want to go outside the house anymore
Speaker 2: because it's really violent out there. And there's viruses now too,
Speaker 2: So it just they magnify this and I say, you
Speaker 2: realize this is this is like in California. New York
Speaker 2: is not here, and they've got to fill up this
Speaker 2: space with you know, if it bleeds, it leads type
Speaker 2: of thing. History teaches us that the next pandemic is
Speaker 2: a matter of when, not if. It also teaches us
Speaker 2: the importance of science and political resolve, says Tedrose to
Speaker 2: the who, Well, of course science and political resolve. No,
Speaker 2: it is political science, it is manipulation, it is behavioral psychology.
Speaker 2: That's the only science in any of this. I've said
Speaker 2: that from the very beginning. Now maybe political science is
Speaker 2: a part of it as well, but I don't know.
Speaker 2: They don't really teach people in politicals I don't know
Speaker 2: what they teach people in political science really. I mean,
Speaker 2: you know, they should be teaching them Machiavelli. I got
Speaker 2: a master's in Machiavelianism, But I don't know if they
Speaker 2: teach them anything.
Speaker 3: That just kind of leave it up to them to
Speaker 3: absorb that.
Speaker 2: The who is engaging research institutions across world to establish
Speaker 2: a collaborative open research consort by the way, that has
Speaker 2: an acronym that spells cork, as in put a cork
Speaker 2: in it for each pathogen family. So as you saw
Speaker 2: on that thing, we've got to do this. We've got
Speaker 2: to search in the dark for all these hidden viruses
Speaker 2: and you know they're not bothering anybody if they're even there.
Speaker 2: I just know there's a boogeyman out there somewhere, And
Speaker 2: if there is, you know, why would if it's if
Speaker 2: it's not lethal enough to draw any attention to itself,
Speaker 2: why would you be out there trying to find it?
Speaker 3: Well for money, of.
Speaker 2: Course, and why would you expand this with a cork
Speaker 2: collaborative open research consortium. This is just about creating a
Speaker 2: massive bureaucracy of scientists who are on the take, so
Speaker 2: they could say, look, look at how many scientists we
Speaker 2: have that we're paying that say exactly what we want
Speaker 2: them to say. So the science equals paying jobs. And
Speaker 2: if you repeat the conventional, conventional wisdom, if you repeat
Speaker 2: the established lives, you make money. Otherwise you don't. And
Speaker 2: I said, this is a bipartisan thing. You know, we've
Speaker 2: got rand Paul that is out there pushing this, you
Speaker 2: know he really is. Rand Paul and Fauci are perfect
Speaker 2: example of a Galianism, aren't they. And then you got
Speaker 2: the people out there who see this as a business opportunity.
Speaker 2: That was the case with Info Wars and Alex Jones
Speaker 2: and with Health Ranger, Natural News, Mike Adams and stuff
Speaker 2: at the very beginning of this thing. And now you
Speaker 2: see doctor Peter McCullough unfortunately jumping in this.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 2: I had absolutely no problem with people buying storable food
Speaker 2: when Trump was busy paying everybody to shut everything down
Speaker 2: and creating all kinds of disruptions and supply changed, and
Speaker 2: we had shortages of food on the shelf while farmers
Speaker 2: were destroying the food they couldn't get to market on
Speaker 2: the farms and all the rest of the in sandy.
Speaker 2: So yeah, it made sense to sell people's storable food,
Speaker 2: but not to sell them fear to get them to
Speaker 2: buy more storable food. You know, if you're telling people
Speaker 2: that this whole thing is a bluff, but the government
Speaker 2: may harm you, that's one thing. But to tell them, oh, yeah,
Speaker 2: well that thing, it's got little hooks on it, and
Speaker 2: those little hooks are specially designed in wu Han, China
Speaker 2: with the Wu flu, the China flu, and it's going
Speaker 2: to hook on your the cells of your body. Oh
Speaker 2: it's why the people that said that stuff, I tell
Speaker 2: you in fo Wars, I had heard it. Somebody come
Speaker 2: on my show and say that once that's it, you're
Speaker 2: not coming back ever.
Speaker 3: Ever.
Speaker 2: I got to name some names, and I won't get
Speaker 2: into that right now, but the you know, this is
Speaker 2: the type of thing they're doing now. And so you know,
Speaker 2: doctor Peter McCollum selling some stuff to help people look ivermctin.
Speaker 2: I know a lot of people that have been helped
Speaker 2: by ivermactin. So it's anecdotal, sure, because they're not going
Speaker 2: to do the studies. So that's all we got is anecdotes.
Speaker 2: But I know a lot of anecdotes about people that
Speaker 2: have been helped with ibermactin. Fine, if he can get
Speaker 2: it for you, that's fine. It's absolutely reprehensible for him
Speaker 2: to sell these lies in order to sell more ivermectin
Speaker 2: or whatever it is that he's selling, and he's selling it. Now.
Speaker 2: Here's an op ed piece from doctor Peter McCollough from
Speaker 2: his substack, and he begins by talking about mutation L
Speaker 2: one zero eight F and mp x v is a
Speaker 2: gain of function mutation and all that sounds very scientific,
Speaker 2: isn't it. You got any proof of that? Well, I mean,
Speaker 2: you know, when we look at the article, the substack
Speaker 2: article certainly looks like doctor McColl it's got proof. See
Speaker 2: here's a picture, a nice, nice artist rendering. It's ai.
Speaker 2: It's a you know. Now, unlike the coronavirus that they
Speaker 2: were telling everybody existed. They had a nice little circular
Speaker 2: ball with a sphere with all these little spikes coming off.
Speaker 2: Well here this one is now football shaped. It's an oval.
Speaker 2: Oh so it's different, okay. And then he has these
Speaker 2: pictures up in a substack and what's that. Oh we
Speaker 2: see sores on somebody's hands. Oh, there you go, proof
Speaker 2: of monkey pox, is it? Is it. Where'd that picture
Speaker 2: come from? What is that a picture of? Has he
Speaker 2: bothered to look? Hmmm?
Speaker 3: Well actually no.
Speaker 2: Inn twenty twenty two, HHS Secretary of Sarah declared monkey
Speaker 2: pox of public Health emergency. Monkey pox occurred almost solely
Speaker 2: and gay or bisexual men with intense sexual contact. They
Speaker 2: ended up with blisters around the anus, buttocks or mouth. Well,
Speaker 2: wait a minute, those are different places. That's on this
Speaker 2: person's hands. He's got all these different sores there, right,
Speaker 2: And they got pictures of the little kids with sores
Speaker 2: all up.
Speaker 3: And down their hands and arms and stuff like that.
Speaker 2: But that wasn't what monkey pox was. They had blisters
Speaker 2: around the anus, buttocks and mouth. And they took the
Speaker 2: emergency declaration away in twenty twenty three. Now again, when
Speaker 2: I look at nine to eleven, I know that nine
Speaker 2: to eleven did not happen. With their explanation. We didn't
Speaker 2: have three steel skyscrapers just collapsed in their footprint after
Speaker 2: short fire and being hit by one of them. They
Speaker 2: didn't knock them down, you know. But you had a
Speaker 2: third one that wasn't even hit by a plane and
Speaker 2: it just collapsed free fall. Okay, So I know that
Speaker 2: the government story, official story.
Speaker 3: Is a lie. What happened?
Speaker 2: Was it pre planeted exploses? Was it some kind of
Speaker 2: you know, an energy beam or something. I really don't
Speaker 2: know a lot of theory about that. A lot of
Speaker 2: people said, well, look we got this that indicates that
Speaker 2: it might be such and such a thing. But I
Speaker 2: take no definitive position on the cause of nine to
Speaker 2: eleven except to say that the people who gave you
Speaker 2: the lie about it and used it to set up
Speaker 2: what they had planned to do, and the people who
Speaker 2: made money off of the collapsing buildings and all the
Speaker 2: rest of these, I think those are the people who
Speaker 2: did it. Now what they did and how they did it,
Speaker 2: I have no hard I have opinions, but not anything
Speaker 2: that I would I would nail to the wall publicly.
Speaker 2: And so the same thing is true of these so
Speaker 2: called pandemics that are here, because what they're doing is
Speaker 2: they're lying to us about this. It's obviously a lie.
Speaker 2: Doesn't anybody ever ask whould you get that picture? As
Speaker 2: of January the tenth, twenty twenty three, HHS stopped tracking
Speaker 2: this Claye two subtype, says McCullough. Most who died had
Speaker 2: advanced HIV disease. Oh okay, well there you go. There's
Speaker 2: your co morbidity. So you know whatever that is. And
Speaker 2: again he calls it HIV. It's AIDS, his aides. He's
Speaker 2: going with, you know, doctor McCullough is assuming that HIV
Speaker 2: causes AIDS. And it was Facci who first used the
Speaker 2: misused the PCR to make that connection. Yeah, it's uh,
Speaker 2: it's aides, it's a virus, and I'm going to come
Speaker 2: up with a vaccine all the rest of the stuff.
Speaker 2: And Carrie Mollis said, no, you can't make that connection
Speaker 2: with it. And so but Peter McCollough is convinced about that,
Speaker 2: and he's also convinced now that what happened to twenty
Speaker 2: twenty two almost certainly occurred because of a gain of function,
Speaker 2: mutation one or more genes within the monkey pox virus. Really,
Speaker 2: so please tell us in an article. So, as you're
Speaker 2: writing articles to sell product, why don't you write an article,
Speaker 2: doctor McCullough, and tell us what your evidence is for
Speaker 2: that assumption. You know, the old joke they write the
Speaker 2: word assumption or assume on the board says, when you
Speaker 2: assume things, you make an ass out of you and me, so,
Speaker 2: why is he assuming that this is a picture of
Speaker 2: somebody with monkey pox? Why is he assuming this is
Speaker 2: a gain of function, mutation and genetic Doesn't he understand
Speaker 2: that it's circular logic that's involved in all of this stuff.
Speaker 2: Doesn't he understand that this is These things are done
Speaker 2: with best guests, computer modeling of genetic sequences. They pass
Speaker 2: those things around, they don't isolate anything, and then they
Speaker 2: use a PCR test like Fauci used it for HIV.
Speaker 2: They use a PCR test to make people think that
Speaker 2: they're actually doing observation and measurement, that they're doing real
Speaker 2: science when they're not.
Speaker 3: They're not.
Speaker 2: They're abusing the PCR. They're using it as a beard.
Speaker 2: That's why Carrie Moas called out Fauci. It was the
Speaker 2: genius of Fauci to make something that was not observable,
Speaker 2: not measurable, not isolated, to make it appear that he
Speaker 2: could observe and isolate and measure it and do real science.
Speaker 2: And he used the PCR to do that. He abused
Speaker 2: the PCR in order to do that. So, you know,
Speaker 2: getting back to this, let's go back to the monkey
Speaker 2: pox of twenty twenty two, and thank you for sending.
Speaker 2: Somebody sent this to me. I'd not seen this article.
Speaker 2: And this is an excellent article by doctor Robert Young,
Speaker 2: who has been doing a lot of this stuff. He
Speaker 2: is his specialty is electron my cross copy. And so
Speaker 2: again he's looking at this stuff and he says, show me,
Speaker 2: show me the proof of this. The CDC admits that
Speaker 2: they have no documentation for the existence of the monkey
Speaker 2: pox virus after freedom of information request. And so going
Speaker 2: back to August eleventh, doctor Robert Young, and remember how
Speaker 2: they define this. They said it was, you know, just
Speaker 2: a few individuals were involved with the monkey pox stuff.
Speaker 2: They were involved in intense sexual contact, homosexual contact, and
Speaker 2: they had sores around the mouth and the anus and
Speaker 2: things like that, right, and that was it. And so
Speaker 2: then you have, you know, pictures that are put on
Speaker 2: the CDC website like this visual examples of the key
Speaker 2: pox rash. Pictures of sores close up and they look
Speaker 2: kind of different. I mean, you know, look at those,
Speaker 2: they look none of them look the same. And then
Speaker 2: this also on the CDC, uh visual examples of the
Speaker 2: monkey pox rash. And we have it on somebody's back shoulder, blade,
Speaker 2: have it on somebody palm with somebody's hand palm, one
Speaker 2: that's on a thumb, and another one looks like I think,
Speaker 2: on somebody's wrist. One of them. Now those are our source.
Speaker 2: I don't know where those real sores. But do we
Speaker 2: know that those are monkey pox?
Speaker 3: No, we don't.
Speaker 2: And so to prove his point that they're not doing science,
Speaker 2: doctor Robert Young sent freedom of information requests to the CDC.
Speaker 2: So where did you get those pictures? I just showed you?
Speaker 2: And so they got back and they said, he said,
Speaker 2: They said, they have absolutely no documentation whatsoever regarding the
Speaker 2: pictures of the so called monkey pos virus they had
Speaker 2: that was posted on their websites. It's got the CDC
Speaker 2: down there. It's like behind my logo there, but they
Speaker 2: don't have anything that you know, that's their official site
Speaker 2: that was on the CDC. It's right there underneath my logo.
Speaker 2: It's got the CDC websites hard to see, but they
Speaker 2: don't know where that picture came from. It's kind of like, finally,
Speaker 2: after years and years of this six foot distancing thing,
Speaker 2: a say, years and years it seemed like eternity, three
Speaker 2: years of it, finally had somebody in Congress as Fauci, So,
Speaker 2: where did six foot rule come from? Well, I don't know, Congressman,
Speaker 2: I don't know. Ask Francis Collins. I don't know where
Speaker 2: that came from. They've had a story about some kid
Speaker 2: who was doing a science experiment and Sandy Labs maybe
Speaker 2: latched onto that whatever. That's not legit anyway, And so
Speaker 2: they don't know where the six foot rule came from.
Speaker 2: They don't know where these pictures of monkey pox. It's
Speaker 2: scary when you look at it. I mean there's sores
Speaker 2: all up and down, kids arms and hands and everything.
Speaker 2: But that's not what monkey pox was two years ago.
Speaker 2: They were in very different locations and it wasn't involving kids.
Speaker 2: So they replied, and they said, well, we have no
Speaker 2: documentation whatsoever regarding the origin of the so called monkey
Speaker 2: pox virus image posted on our website, and we don't
Speaker 2: know anything about the methodology used to get that image.
Speaker 2: We don't know where it came from. We don't know
Speaker 2: anything about the source. So since they couldn't provide any documentation,
Speaker 2: he instead quoted the guy that responded to all this
Speaker 2: at the CDC instead quoted claims that were allegedly sent
Speaker 2: to him by some unidentified man or woman at the
Speaker 2: National Center for Emerging Zoonotic and Infection Diseases. The guy's
Speaker 2: name was Roger or Roger would not disclose whether or
Speaker 2: not the skin tissue that was used in the image
Speaker 2: had been stored end quote virus transport medium unquote something
Speaker 2: that would contain fetal bovine serum. So, in other words,
Speaker 2: he takes some skin, he put it in fetal bovine
Speaker 2: serum and everything, and then you get a blister or something.
Speaker 2: How was this transmitted, How was it kept prior to
Speaker 2: the imaging, Who performed the imaging? Where this came from,
Speaker 2: we don't know. August eleventh, twenty twenty two, some anonymous
Speaker 2: man or woman working in the Legal services department at
Speaker 2: the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control confessed that
Speaker 2: no one there had a new record of any alleged
Speaker 2: monkey pox virus being found and bodily fluid tissue of
Speaker 2: any alleged host and purified in order for it to
Speaker 2: be sequenced, characterize, and studied with controlled experiments also known
Speaker 2: as science. They suggested that my colleague explore many resources
Speaker 2: available on PubMed and Google scholar well, Google it go
Speaker 2: to doctor Google. That's my cardiologist said to me, My gosh,
Speaker 2: some of the stuff he's doing. He says, oh, you've
Speaker 2: been reading doctor Google. You know, eve been licking this
Speaker 2: stuff up, googling this stuff up doctor Google. As I
Speaker 2: said before, I didn't say it, and I thought, well,
Speaker 2: one of us needs to be informed if it's not you.
Speaker 2: Gray Bruce Health Unit out of Ontario confessed, despite announcing
Speaker 2: to the community in July they had a case of
Speaker 2: monkey pox virus that have been confirmed, they actually have
Speaker 2: no proof of this at all. They don't even have
Speaker 2: any record of anyone on Earth finding the alleged virus
Speaker 2: and any bodily fluid tissue and purifying it so that
Speaker 2: science could actually take place. And this goes on and
Speaker 2: on and on, page after page after page, where he's
Speaker 2: contacting people in Canada, contacts people in Utah, the Assistant
Speaker 2: Attorney Journal's office there in New Zealand, Sweden, California, Washington State,
Speaker 2: the Florida Department of Health, the Massachusetts Department of Health,
Speaker 2: asking anyway, where did this come from? You got any
Speaker 2: evidence of the virus, you got any evidence of where
Speaker 2: these pictures came from? Can you tell me about the
Speaker 2: providence of this and where this came from. But these
Speaker 2: people who are all about fake news, Where did that
Speaker 2: picture come from?
Speaker 3: Now? What's that about? Boy?
Speaker 2: They just don't think anything at all if it's coming
Speaker 2: from one of these agencies like the CDC or some
Speaker 2: foreign agency or Toronto Public Health. All these are people
Speaker 2: that he has talked to all over the world about this,
Speaker 2: and nobody has any evidence and they don't know where
Speaker 2: any of these pictures came from. And that's all they have.
Speaker 2: They don't have any isolated virus. They can't do science.
Speaker 2: So the WHO declares impos being an international emergency last
Speaker 2: week and X was a news says on what grounds?
Speaker 2: Because here we are two years later and it's back,
Speaker 2: and it's back like a bad Hollywood sequel, because it
Speaker 2: is Hollywood. The WHO first declared that to be a
Speaker 2: public emergency of international concern in July of twenty twenty two.
Speaker 2: On Wednesday, Tedros announced there was an upsurge and Africa
Speaker 2: was going to be under the International Health regulations of
Speaker 2: a public health emergency of international concern. So two vaccines,
Speaker 2: are you ready? That explains why it's back, and they're
Speaker 2: recommended by the WHO. See The reason I talk about
Speaker 2: this is because you've got to realize that the emperors
Speaker 2: have no science. They have no science, they have no proof,
Speaker 2: they have no evidence. They don't know where any of
Speaker 2: these things came from. Where are the six I don't
Speaker 2: know who started? Who decided that we got to wear
Speaker 2: a mask?
Speaker 3: I don't know? And what kind of mask? Is it?
Speaker 2: An N ninety five mask? It doesn't matter, any kind
Speaker 2: of mask will do you know? It could be your
Speaker 2: red Writer super lone Ranger mask, or it could be
Speaker 2: an N ninety five mask which you gotta wear one.
Speaker 2: And it doesn't protect you, of course it even says
Speaker 2: that on the box, but it doesn't say in the
Speaker 2: box that it protects other people. That's that's so stupid.
Speaker 2: They didn't even address that. But that's what we were told.
Speaker 2: Your mask doesn't protect you, it protects other people. They
Speaker 2: have no science. This is naked tyranny. It really is,
Speaker 2: these scientific emperors. And so you could say that this
Speaker 2: is a bluff and the buff. That's that's your your
Speaker 2: naked tyranny of science, a bluff in the buff. The
Speaker 2: vaccines distributed are called genio's in some countries, mvamune or
Speaker 2: envenex and others, and it's a smallpox vaccine which they
Speaker 2: claimed is effective against impos. However, the smallpox vaccine is
Speaker 2: neither safe nor effective. The small fox vaccine, says doctor
Speaker 2: Merril Nass, when used routinely in babies, was considered to
Speaker 2: be the most dangerous vaccine available. It led to the
Speaker 2: deaths of several people per million administered, she said. In
Speaker 2: twenty twenty one, the CDC perhaps inadvertently admitted that it
Speaker 2: had no reliable evidence for either safety or efficacy for
Speaker 2: this vaccine. A few months later, doctor Gert van den
Speaker 2: Bosch warned that young children should not be vaccinated with
Speaker 2: any type of smallpox vaccine. The monkey pox vaccination campaigns
Speaker 2: that are currently kicked off are not only likely to
Speaker 2: have a detrimental impact on individual health, but should also
Speaker 2: be considered at risk of provoking a true public well emergency,
Speaker 2: you know, like everybody like young people dying of myocarditis
Speaker 2: and things like that. See, here's the fallacy of this.
Speaker 2: And let me just say that we can argue the
Speaker 2: fallacy of this by staying within their paradigm of vaccines.
Speaker 3: And viruses and all the rest of this stuff.
Speaker 2: Okay, so you're telling me that we have to have
Speaker 2: reformulated boosters, except a lot of times, even though you
Speaker 2: got a new strain, you've got to have a booster,
Speaker 2: even though the booster hadn't changed. But then they told
Speaker 2: us that the boosters were changing in order to address
Speaker 2: the different strains. And they can't keep their stories straight
Speaker 2: or logical. And now they're telling us that they have smallpox,
Speaker 2: they got monkey pocks, and they got new variants of
Speaker 2: monkey pocks. But don't worry because the same vaccininue does everything. Really,
Speaker 2: you understand that tributing lied to right. None of this,
Speaker 2: none of this stuff hangs together just as simple logic,
Speaker 2: just within their own paradigm. Forget about arguing over whether
Speaker 2: or not the vaccines, whether or not the viruses exist
Speaker 2: they haven't isolated them or whatever. But you know, just
Speaker 2: staying within their paradigm, none of this stuff makes any sense.
Speaker 2: We've got all these new variants, so you got to
Speaker 2: go get boosted again with the same vaccine, or we
Speaker 2: got new variant, they're going to have a different vaccine.
Speaker 2: Or we've got monkey pox now, but don't worry. Even
Speaker 2: though we got monkey pox, so we've got a new
Speaker 2: deadly variant. It's all covered by the old smallpox vaccine.
Speaker 2: It's all just about selling their shots. And they don't
Speaker 2: care what they do to people if you die. They
Speaker 2: don't care kind of you know, like Laura Lumer when
Speaker 2: people are talking about the Trump shots, Well, I didn't
Speaker 2: take it. If they took it, it's on them. I
Speaker 2: don't care. Vote for Trump? Yeah, yeah, So what is
Speaker 2: really happening with impox? A problem in a small number
Speaker 2: of African countries, A small problem, and a small number
Speaker 2: of African countries has killed about the same number of
Speaker 2: people this year that die every four hours from tuberculosis,
Speaker 2: but it is now dominating international headlines.
Speaker 3: You find that suspicious. I do.
Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, I saw one of these clips.
Speaker 2: I'm not going to play it for you, but you
Speaker 2: know they're they're talking about, well, now we've found impacts
Speaker 2: in the Democratic Republic of Congo, which is neither democratic
Speaker 2: nor Republican's dictatorship. That's where they send the kids into
Speaker 2: the minds to dig out the oh what is it,
Speaker 2: one of the rare earth metals of the cobalt. Cobalt
Speaker 2: to dig out the cobalt with their bare hands. Slave labor,
Speaker 2: unbelievable poverty, congestion, you know, just filth the area, and
Speaker 2: the camera is going through there and weaving its way
Speaker 2: to this, Oh, we found a new disease. And it's like, yeah,
Speaker 2: how widespread is this. You've got a few people who've
Speaker 2: got a disease and conditions like that. It could be anything, folks,
Speaker 2: It could be anything and everything. And again, the small
Speaker 2: number of people is about the same as it die
Speaker 2: every four hours from tuberculosis. But let's shut down the world.
Speaker 2: Let's do article after article after article on the Guardian
Speaker 2: and the New York Times and the Washington Post and
Speaker 2: all the usual propaganda outlets. It's caused by a virus,
Speaker 2: they say, And this is David Bell at Brownstone. It
Speaker 2: is caused by a virus thought to be thought to
Speaker 2: normally infect African rodents such as rats and squirrels. Well,
Speaker 2: you may want to not just swallow these fairy tales whole.
Speaker 2: Oh it's a little fairy that's out there and he's
Speaker 2: coming around and he does this, and it's like, oh, okay, well, yeah,
Speaker 2: the person who told me that fairy tales got a
Speaker 2: stethoscope and a white coat. So I'm just gonna pass
Speaker 2: that on to everybody as if it was fact. Come on,
Speaker 2: you know, get skeptical about some of this stuff. How
Speaker 2: many times you have to be lied to before you
Speaker 2: start asking some questions about this, especially if you're a
Speaker 2: journalist and an opinion writer at Brownstone David Bell, Come on,
Speaker 2: you're gonna just pass. It's caused by virus thought to
Speaker 2: normally infect African rodents such as rats and squirrels, and
Speaker 2: it frequently passes to and from humans. And humans this
Speaker 2: affects range from very mild illness to fever and to
Speaker 2: muscle pains, to severe illness with a characteristic skin rash,
Speaker 2: and sometimes death. It's got a wide variety of things
Speaker 2: that it causes. Maybe it's a wide variety of things.
Speaker 2: Maybe it's not that at all. So again, it's rats,
Speaker 2: not bats, So history doesn't repeat itself. But it rhymes
Speaker 2: bats rat, So they're eating rat soup instead of bad
Speaker 2: soup or something different.
Speaker 3: Variants called clades. See there you go.
Speaker 2: We've got a new name for variants produced slightly different symptoms.
Speaker 2: This is aids part due folks. Let's come on, and
Speaker 2: you know they just they keep running these scams on us,
Speaker 2: and it disgusts me to see quasi conservative, quasi scientific
Speaker 2: journals taking this stuff at face value. Then finally we
Speaker 2: have this article from Brownstone Media exacerbates the avian flu crisis. Yeah,
Speaker 2: that's true, But the angle coming from this particular one
Speaker 2: as a fact that they talk to a seasoned veterinarian
Speaker 2: of decades is a veteran veterinarian, I guess you could say.
Speaker 2: And so they talked to this guy's name is doctor
Speaker 2: Max Thornsberry, a leading dairy caff veterinarian who chairs the
Speaker 2: Animal Health Committee.
Speaker 3: And so he.
Speaker 2: Said, I was very skeptical about all this bird flu
Speaker 2: and cows and stuff. But then he saw a presentation
Speaker 2: from a fellow veterinarian, doctor Barb Peterson of Texas, and
Speaker 2: he says, well, now it's time to correct the record.
Speaker 2: He said, what's going on here is that they've overstated
Speaker 2: this for the risk to humans, but they have understated
Speaker 2: the risk to dairy cattle. Oh, so we got to
Speaker 2: shut down meat and milk right away, right, got to
Speaker 2: you know, tag them and track them and all the
Speaker 2: rest of this stuff, right, and let's shut down raw milk.
Speaker 2: All this is stuff right. Well, first of all, here's
Speaker 2: a situ. If you're going to get a presentation from
Speaker 2: doctor Barb Peterson of Texas, then maybe you might want
Speaker 2: to see if this is marketing or science. Is this
Speaker 2: something that she's been paid to put together? You know,
Speaker 2: who is she doing this out of her own research?
Speaker 2: What is her invested interest in this?
Speaker 3: Number one? Number two?
Speaker 2: You might want to ask what her assumptions are about
Speaker 2: this stuff? They said, for whatever reason, the media and
Speaker 2: the USDA have really downplayed the impact of this virus
Speaker 2: on dairy farms while misleading the public on human risks.
Speaker 2: Are they really what is he basing this on?
Speaker 4: Well?
Speaker 2: He said in the Texas Panhandle, after the big fires,
Speaker 2: he said, they began to notice a decrease in milk
Speaker 2: production and a few lactating cows. Initially, symptoms are thought
Speaker 2: to be connected to the fires until some cows began
Speaker 2: discharging thick yellow milk. About the consistency of Elmer's glue.
Speaker 2: What could still be due to the fires?
Speaker 3: Right?
Speaker 2: Do they inhale something as part of the burning?
Speaker 3: Right?
Speaker 2: Chemicals around there? What were the causes? So they started
Speaker 2: doing tests for mastitis. They came back negative. As other
Speaker 2: symptoms began to present and a small percentage of the
Speaker 2: regional dairy herd. Now, this is a respiratory thing that
Speaker 2: is supposed to have passed it, but they don't have
Speaker 2: any respiratory issues, and they don't have any fever issues.
Speaker 2: They have problems with milk. And so this veterinarian of Texas,
Speaker 2: doctor Barbe Peterson, according to her presentation, about twenty percent
Speaker 2: of the Texas dairy herd that she oversaw. Okay, how
Speaker 2: about some scientific context here. How many cows are those
Speaker 2: and what percentage is.
Speaker 3: That of that area?
Speaker 2: And why isn't this happening in other areas? And have
Speaker 2: you done some tests to see if you can transmit this?
Speaker 2: You know, when I was talking to doctor the doctor
Speaker 2: Bailey's Sam Bailey and Samantha and I think it's Mark Bailey,
Speaker 2: And you know, they talked about the fact that in
Speaker 2: the UK they had set up a special project to
Speaker 2: try to determine how cold and flu were transmitted. And
Speaker 2: so for fifty years, I think it's forty five exactly,
Speaker 2: but for you know, about half a century, they would
Speaker 2: have people spend ten days there and they'd have well
Speaker 2: people come in and sick people come in. They put
Speaker 2: them in close proximity to each other. Okay, they're not
Speaker 2: catching the cold. Okay, let's let's let's take some mucus
Speaker 2: from the sick person and we'll have it stick it
Speaker 2: in the mouth and the nose of the well person. Well,
Speaker 2: that didn't do it either, and they finally shut this
Speaker 2: thing down after half a century. They could never reliably
Speaker 2: get transmission, and so maybe their theory was wrong after
Speaker 2: fifty years of that. And of course, the same thing
Speaker 2: happened the famous nineteen eighteen flu. The doctor had a
Speaker 2: large project there. He's tried to transmit that nineteen eighteen
Speaker 2: flu to other people, same types of stuff, you know,
Speaker 2: passing on mucus and all this other kind of stuff one
Speaker 2: person to the other. Couldn't do it. And so when
Speaker 2: you look at this and you got you know, I
Speaker 2: don't know. This is twenty percent of the dairy herds
Speaker 2: that this veterinarian that she was overseeing. And but she
Speaker 2: hasn't done any science on this. She hasn't said, well,
Speaker 2: let's test this and see, you know, how this is transmitted.
Speaker 2: And again it doesn't match any symptoms of respiratory illness with.
Speaker 3: This, And so.
Speaker 2: I said before no fever, they did have five percent
Speaker 2: of the twenty percent exhibited significant symptoms such as high fevers.
Speaker 2: But that's really small. That is five percent of twenty
Speaker 2: it's like one percent of the cows that are there.
Speaker 2: Could it be something other than bird flu? Why, yes,
Speaker 2: it could. And so she's racking her brain trying to
Speaker 2: think of everything that she could and doing some tests
Speaker 2: on a few things. And so when she gets to
Speaker 2: the end of her rope and she can't find anything
Speaker 2: that comes back positive, some kind of a disease that
Speaker 2: she's going to focus on, she said she sent in
Speaker 2: samples to be tested for avian flu. Well where do
Speaker 2: you think she sent them? It doesn't say, but she
Speaker 2: would have sent them in to the CDC or the
Speaker 2: US Department of Agriculture, and lo and behold they found it.
Speaker 2: They positively identified that it was bird flu. Do you
Speaker 2: see how phony the science is. She doesn't do any
Speaker 2: experimentation about this stuff. She tries to come up with
Speaker 2: theories about what it might be, and finally, out of desperation,
Speaker 2: she sends it to the CDC and they say, bird flu, Bingo,
Speaker 2: we got it. Did they ever try changing the diet
Speaker 2: of these animals or whatever they ever do? Any of
Speaker 2: that kind of stuff. No, they actually didn't do any science.
Speaker 2: They never said well, let's do this to this one
Speaker 2: group and we'll have a control group over here and
Speaker 2: see what happens.
Speaker 3: Oh, they do that.
Speaker 2: They just send a sample to the CDC, which lo
Speaker 2: and behold found it. The emperors have no science. It
Speaker 2: is naked tyranny. It is bluffs in the buff folks,
Speaker 2: and they're going to try to lock us down again.
Speaker 2: And it doesn't matter if it's Trump or La La,
Speaker 2: They're going to still try to pull this thing. And
Speaker 2: it's going to be Trump or La La, because both
Speaker 2: of them are useful idiots that will go along with
Speaker 2: whatever the government tells them to do. And the government
Speaker 2: is the bureaucracy and these alphabet agencies, and they'll comply
Speaker 2: with that and go along with it. You're talking about
Speaker 2: whether they're evil or stupid? Yeah, both both. We'll be
Speaker 2: right back.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: Well, we're going to get into politics, and that's what
Speaker 2: everybody's waiting to hear about. But look, what I just
Speaker 2: talked about for the last hour is politics. The pandemic
Speaker 2: is politics. And I've got a real brief thing here
Speaker 2: that I want to talk about with the vaccines, because
Speaker 2: that's politics as well.
Speaker 3: It truly is.
Speaker 2: And I'll play the equip for you later. Five years
Speaker 2: ago when Laala was running for president, and you know
Speaker 2: she didn't. She dropped out before the first primaries because
Speaker 2: she had no support. No poll ever showed her with
Speaker 2: more than one percent, zero support, and so they have
Speaker 2: now just lifted her in and selected her to run.
Speaker 2: But it's part of that. She said some interesting things.
Speaker 2: One of them was what she would do about patents
Speaker 2: the pharmaceutical companies that have been paid by the government
Speaker 2: to develop these certain things if they didn't do what
Speaker 2: she wanted them to do. And it's got the left
Speaker 2: saying she's a communist, and yeah, she is a communist
Speaker 2: commie lalla, She's a dumb communist. She's a useful communist
Speaker 2: idiot kami lalla. And yet, and yet, when you look
Speaker 2: at what is behind all this stuff politics is what's
Speaker 2: going on with the military industrial complex, big pharmaceutical companies,
Speaker 2: big Agra companies, coming after our food, coming after everything
Speaker 2: that we have. You need to understand where the real
Speaker 2: threats are. You need to understand what the real government is.
Speaker 2: And even Joe Rogan is starting to get a clue
Speaker 2: about this. Almost fourteen thousand people in Britain are seeking compensation,
Speaker 2: saying that the Trump shots COVID shots. Actually there's a
Speaker 2: lot of it and most of it is astrazenica, but
Speaker 2: they do have fires remo dirnt as well that the
Speaker 2: shots left them disabled. Well, I wonder how many more
Speaker 2: were left disabled that haven't filed. How many more were
Speaker 2: killed from these shots? Here's one example. Because you know
Speaker 2: statistics like fourteen thousand, that's just a number, but one
Speaker 2: death is a tragedy. Well, here's a tragedy. Subsenders the British.
Speaker 2: British Champion flat race jockey has been fighting on behalf
Speaker 2: of his wife Leona, who was left hospital down after
Speaker 2: three COVID jabs, but their claim was rejected. His wife,
Speaker 2: Missus Sanders fifty two, who suffered from the rare autoimmune
Speaker 2: disorder granular motosis, which causes inflammation of the blood vessels,
Speaker 2: was told that the job would not interfere with her
Speaker 2: condition and if anything, it would be ineffective because of
Speaker 2: her impaired immune system, but she went ahead even though
Speaker 2: they told her that they thought it might be ineffective.
Speaker 2: She went ahead and had her first AstraZeneca JAB in
Speaker 2: February twenty twenty one, followed by a booster in April.
Speaker 2: It was only a day or two after she collapsed
Speaker 2: in the bathroom. Her left leg had given way, but
Speaker 2: we weren't blaming the injection because nobody had warned us.
Speaker 2: So it never put two and two together, said mister Sanders.
Speaker 2: And so the condition left her unable to walk for
Speaker 2: seven months, and in spite of a brief remission the
Speaker 2: summer time two, her condition has continued to deteriorate, and
Speaker 2: so they are in the process of trying to get
Speaker 2: compensation for this. She said, I don't like being made
Speaker 2: to feel like I'm a liar, and it has destroyed
Speaker 2: my life.
Speaker 3: And so.
Speaker 2: We had Francis Collins confronted by somebody who was damaged
Speaker 2: by his little game that he plays. You know, they
Speaker 2: played these games again. The first game was two months
Speaker 2: before nine to eleven, and they pushed out the model
Speaker 2: legislation to get the States to enact the authority so
Speaker 2: that when they had practiced it for another twenty years,
Speaker 2: you could have some useful idiot like Trump passed the
Speaker 2: money along to them and pay them to do what
Speaker 2: they had put into state law twenty years earlier. And
Speaker 2: so Francis Collins was at a restaurant. He was confronted
Speaker 2: by a person.
Speaker 4: Doctor Collins, you and Ralph Eric and Tony Fauci deserve
Speaker 4: to be imprisoned for the rest of your lives. You
Speaker 4: have so much blood on your hands. I hope you
Speaker 4: sleep well at night. And remember the name Brian Dressing
Speaker 4: because you left her stranded after she was severely injured
Speaker 4: by the COVID vaccine in your study. Yeah, you do
Speaker 4: know her name is Brian Dressing.
Speaker 3: Have a good money.
Speaker 2: Yeah, somebody needs to do that to Trump. Somebody needs
Speaker 2: to do that to all of these people. Not that
Speaker 2: they care. He will care one day. One day he
Speaker 2: will stand before God. I know Francis Collins says he's
Speaker 2: a Christian. He doesn't believe it if you look at
Speaker 2: this stuff that he passes out there for. I mean,
Speaker 2: he spent most of his life with his Christian organization
Speaker 2: so called, trying to destroy Christianity and so and replace
Speaker 2: it with science as a religion. And that's what you
Speaker 2: wind up with. Pro vaccine journalist Jane Henson dies from
Speaker 2: a brain tumor three years after proudly announcing her Pfiser
Speaker 2: injections online. A prominent Australian journalist who bragged online after
Speaker 2: getting vaccinated is dead at the age of well, we
Speaker 2: don't know, just says in her fifties, she got injected
Speaker 2: with Pfiser feeling exceptionally blessed. She said on July fourteenth,
Speaker 2: twenty twenty one, feeling exceptionally blessed to have received my
Speaker 2: first Pfiser vaccine today, not a single side effect, enhancing
Speaker 2: community with a glass of red. Thank you science. Well,
Speaker 2: you know, when she got that in July July fourteenth,
Speaker 2: twenty twenty one, we had had about seven months of
Speaker 2: adverse effects that had blown up the yar's database and
Speaker 2: so she was completely evidently unaware of that or didn't
Speaker 2: think those types of risks would apply to her. So
Speaker 2: just you know, play Russian. That same day, she tweeted
Speaker 2: again that she was glad I got in for Pfizer,
Speaker 2: Lots of people lining up to do their bit. About
Speaker 2: a year or so after getting injected with Pfizer, she
Speaker 2: was diagnosed with a quote vicious brain cancer unquote that
Speaker 2: consumed her body rather quickly. Again from Australia Gold coast
Speaker 2: of Australia, a twelve twelve year olds could be getting
Speaker 2: this new impox vaccine and the EU if approved. Remember
Speaker 2: I just said one of the most dangerous vaccines out there,
Speaker 2: and are they going to prove it? How do they
Speaker 2: know that it works? They don't even know what they're treating.
Speaker 2: You know, where did these pictures come from? Well, you
Speaker 2: got some pictures of a little boy with sores on
Speaker 2: his arm, So we should vaccinate all the twelve year
Speaker 2: olds in the EU, even though we don't know where
Speaker 2: that picture came from and it doesn't match any of
Speaker 2: the descriptions of bucks our government's whole of society rule.
Speaker 2: This is from Aaron Kyriot at Brownstone. He says, if
Speaker 2: we really want to understand what is going on in
Speaker 2: American politics, it's necessary to understand a key term. It's
Speaker 2: usually not found in US civics books, but it is
Speaker 2: central to the new playbook of power, and that is
Speaker 2: whole of society. And remember we've talked about whole of
Speaker 2: government approaches. When a good example of it is Biden
Speaker 2: in March of twenty twenty two when he put out
Speaker 2: the document saying that every government agency and again all
Speaker 2: of the three letter government agencies are all under the
Speaker 2: Office of the President. Think about that if you support Trump.
Speaker 2: And so they're all under the president. And so he
Speaker 2: put out a whole of government directive and he said, okay,
Speaker 2: so I want you know, the Treasury Department and some
Speaker 2: of these others. I want you to completely redesign the
Speaker 2: financial system. And then we've got some other people who
Speaker 2: are into information processing and stuff. We want you to
Speaker 2: come up with a code for a CBDC. Then the
Speaker 2: people who are in the law enforcement, we want you
Speaker 2: to figure out how you're going to force people to
Speaker 2: use this stuff. And then the rest of you come
Speaker 2: up with ways that we can complain about the amount
Speaker 2: of power being used by crypto. This is before the
Speaker 2: explosion and power by AI. So you put that and
Speaker 2: he said, everybody, get your stuff back to me in
Speaker 2: six months, and so they did. But that was a
Speaker 2: whole of government approach towards CBDC. Now we're going to
Speaker 2: redesign the financial system, create this code, force it on people,
Speaker 2: and how we're going to market it to them, and
Speaker 2: so with a whole of society approach. As Aaron Carrioti says,
Speaker 2: the term was popular as roughly a decade ago by
Speaker 2: the Obama administration. You know, they spent a lot of
Speaker 2: time on behavioral psychology. Remember, you know the way nudge
Speaker 2: was pushed by them, and you know that was the
Speaker 2: term they didn't create. It wasn't created there, but they
Speaker 2: latched onto it, and so all of a sudden, everything
Speaker 2: was nudge this and nudge that in the Obama administration.
Speaker 2: Just propaganda. But the term whole of society popularized also
Speaker 2: by the Obaman administration, which liked that its blannd technocratic
Speaker 2: appearance could be used as cover to erect a mechanism
Speaker 2: for the government to control public life that can at
Speaker 2: best be described as Soviet style. Here's the simplest definition. Individuals,
Speaker 2: civil society, and companies shape interactions in society, and their
Speaker 2: actions can harm or foster integrity in their communities. A
Speaker 2: whole of society approach asserts that these actors interact with
Speaker 2: public officials and play a critical role in setting the
Speaker 2: public agenda and influencing public decisions. They also have responsibility
Speaker 2: to promote public integrity. Public public, public, collective, collective, collective.
Speaker 2: It takes a village to raise your kids, and all
Speaker 2: the rest of the stuff get over the idea that
Speaker 2: you even own your kids. You don't own anything, including
Speaker 2: your kids. You're going to turn them over to the government.
Speaker 2: Can I rent them every once in a while from
Speaker 2: the school? Maybe no, you'll be paying the school. But
Speaker 2: whole of government approach it is a Soviet style. In
Speaker 2: other words, the government and acts policies and then enlists corporations, NGOs,
Speaker 2: even individual citizens to enforce those policies, creating a three
Speaker 2: hundred and sixty degree police force made up of the
Speaker 2: companies you do business with, the civic organizations you think
Speaker 2: make your communal safety net, even your neighbors, like the
Speaker 2: hotline that Tim Waltz set up in Minnesota. What this
Speaker 2: looks like in practice as a small group of powerful
Speaker 2: people using public private partnerships. There's that hateful word again,
Speaker 2: phrase to silence the constitution, to sense their ideas they
Speaker 2: don't like, to deny their opponent's access to banking, credit,
Speaker 2: the Internet and other public accommodations, and a process of
Speaker 2: continuous surveillance, constantly threatening cancelation, and always exercising societal control.
Speaker 2: The whole of government, meaning the elected officials visible to
Speaker 2: the American public, who appear to enact the policies. You know,
Speaker 2: they talk about the whole government. The government though, is
Speaker 2: this veneer? Yeah, that's why people look at it. It's like O,
Speaker 2: who's running the country now, same people that have been
Speaker 2: runding the country for decades, the ones you don't vote for,
Speaker 2: or who's running the country. That's what I said in
Speaker 2: twenty twenty, I, Alex says, running around with the stop
Speaker 2: to steal, We're going to stop buying. Whatever it takes,
Speaker 2: send me your money. We're all going to go take
Speaker 2: the place over in January the sixth or something.
Speaker 1: Is that?
Speaker 2: First of all, that's all a lie. All that stuff
Speaker 2: was a lie. All that stuff about the sting and
Speaker 2: all the rest of this stuff. They've been aligned to
Speaker 2: you from the very beginning. But I said, first of all,
Speaker 2: why does it even Why does the election even matter
Speaker 2: to people? I said it before the election, I said
Speaker 2: I wasn't going to vote for Trump. That'd got a
Speaker 2: lot of the info wars. People really angry at me,
Speaker 2: the audience, the audience, And I said, so you tell me,
Speaker 2: what did he do that helped you this year? With
Speaker 2: all the lockdowns and the masks and the banning of speech,
Speaker 2: the banning of medication, the total eradication of a doctor
Speaker 2: patient relationship. You tell me what he did that helped you.
Speaker 2: You tell me who was running the country. Was it
Speaker 2: being run by public health departments? Do the people that
Speaker 2: you elected they do anything or they just turn everything
Speaker 2: over to the bureaucrats at both the state and the
Speaker 2: federal level. Yeah, So why why am I bothering to
Speaker 2: go vote an election if everything's being done at the
Speaker 2: public health level that isn't going to solve anything. There
Speaker 2: are things that we can do, and there are things
Speaker 2: that we can do at the local level, and so
Speaker 2: you know, we can get better people in there, but
Speaker 2: we can also work at the local level to try
Speaker 2: to shut down these health so called health departments. But
Speaker 2: it's going to be done from the grassroots up. It's
Speaker 2: not going to be done from the top down. The
Speaker 2: money is coming from the top down, and you don't
Speaker 2: have any leverage with these people. I mean, the billionaires
Speaker 2: are going to wipe out any influence that you've got.
Speaker 2: The federal Reserve is going to keep supplying this money
Speaker 2: to the tyrants at the state and local level. You're
Speaker 2: not going to affect anything at the Washington level, and
Speaker 2: you're not going to affect anything.
Speaker 3: And so.
Speaker 2: The reality is is that the people that you see,
Speaker 2: the people that you vote for, are not the government,
Speaker 2: and they're not set in policy. They are controlling you.
Speaker 2: They're there to keep you busy. They're fidget spinners. Okay,
Speaker 2: we focus on these people, and we focus on the
Speaker 2: that they're talking about, and yet the reality of what
Speaker 2: the government does is determined by the unelected bureaucrats they
Speaker 2: remain from an administration to administration. Siegel explains the historical
Speaker 2: development of the whole of society approach during the Obama
Speaker 2: administration's attempt to pivot in the War on Terror to
Speaker 2: what he called CVE countering violent extremism. The idea is
Speaker 2: much like the pre crime unit depicted in the film
Speaker 2: Minority Report, to surveil the American people's online behavior in
Speaker 2: order to identify those who may, at some unspecified time
Speaker 2: in the future commit a crime. Well, this is all true,
Speaker 2: but it goes way way way back before the Obama administration.
Speaker 2: This is something that was the purpose of the internet
Speaker 2: to start with. Psychologists and all of the true government,
Speaker 2: the military industrial complex, the CIA, the intelligence agencies, especially
Speaker 2: the intelligence agencies, all got involved with picking these people
Speaker 2: who are going to be running the search engines and
Speaker 2: the social media and all the rest of this stuff
Speaker 2: in the late nineties. So this has all been there
Speaker 2: for quite some time. And you want to talk about
Speaker 2: pre crime detection like Minority Report, they actually called it AI,
Speaker 2: but not artificial intelligence. It was anticipatory intelligence to profile people.
Speaker 3: That's what.
Speaker 2: The pallanteer it's all about. It's all about anticipatory intelligence.
Speaker 2: It's been there for a long time, and it's not
Speaker 2: connected with the Obama administration per se. Again, it's these corporations, NGOs, bureaucrats,
Speaker 2: they're your government, all the rest of this stuff. With
Speaker 2: Trump and La Law. We can have a debate about
Speaker 2: what society should look like, but regardless of what they
Speaker 2: promised to you, you know that they're going to do
Speaker 2: something completely different and it's going to be totally totally
Speaker 2: different when they come in. And even even Joe Rogan
Speaker 2: is starting to get a clue about this. Listen to
Speaker 2: this discussion he had back and forth with Dennis or
Speaker 2: Randy Quaid. I can never remember the guy who just
Speaker 2: did the Reagan movie.
Speaker 1: They were emboldened by the fact they were essentially running
Speaker 1: the country without a president for the last three years.
Speaker 2: Yes, because he's he's not he's not there, not there really.
Speaker 1: And since he's decided that he's not going to run again,
Speaker 1: he's gone, he's vanished.
Speaker 3: It makes me who's running it now exactly? You know.
Speaker 3: And then the thing isma like that, who's gonna who's
Speaker 3: will be running then? Because they I really can't see
Speaker 3: her like being in charge.
Speaker 5: No, it's a figurehead, that's all it is.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And it's been going on a lot longer than Biden.
Speaker 2: Isn't that amazing? Yeah, he just did a thing about
Speaker 2: Reagan right now.
Speaker 3: You know.
Speaker 2: Reagan when he was governor and he was younger, but
Speaker 2: he had a lot of influences as well. And when
Speaker 2: he ran for president, the guy who was his campaign
Speaker 2: manager was wild Bill Casey from the OSS World War
Speaker 2: II Intelligence Services and he, you know, one of the
Speaker 2: founders of the CIA and all the rest of this stuff.
Speaker 2: And it was wild Bill Casey who said to the Iranians,
Speaker 2: you know, when the campaign was going on, Casey was saying,
Speaker 2: you're gonna not release them until after the election, as
Speaker 2: a matter of fact, not until after Reagan is inaugurated.
Speaker 2: Then you'll release them. And in regard to that consideration,
Speaker 2: we will give you spare parts for your We'll sell
Speaker 2: you spare parts for the American fighter jets that the
Speaker 2: SHAW had purchased. And then they took that money and
Speaker 2: they set up the Contras and Central America on and on,
Speaker 2: and from that they get into the Intelligent services getting
Speaker 2: the crack cocaine EP. But I make this long thing,
Speaker 2: and at the same time that Reagan is running the
Speaker 2: war on drugs and really escalating it with Ed Meese
Speaker 2: and all the rest of this stuff, it's fake, absolutely fake. Now,
Speaker 2: I don't know what happened to Reagan. Maybe that assassination
Speaker 2: attemp at the beginning was a warning shot to him.
Speaker 2: Maybe they really tried to take him out, but he
Speaker 2: was never really a challenge to them at any point
Speaker 2: in his presidency. Again, you know, Bill, he's surrounded by
Speaker 2: CIA handlers. He puts in George H. W. Bush CIA
Speaker 2: to as his vice president, and then he's got his
Speaker 2: campaign manager run the campaign. Is this CIA mastermind? And
Speaker 2: he's lucky to escape alive as long as he'd let
Speaker 2: them do what they want to do. I guess he was, Okay,
Speaker 2: this has been going on forever. But as somebody said,
Speaker 2: leaving Biden in there, that's waiving a big sign that everybody,
Speaker 2: you know, actors and Joe Rogan can all like, Oh, well,
Speaker 2: I guess there's nobody. I guess the president's really not
Speaker 2: running the show. So who is running the show? And
Speaker 2: do we have Should we have somebody running the country
Speaker 2: out of Washington? Or is a country capable of running itself?
Speaker 2: If somebody is running us quote unquote running us, don't
Speaker 2: we already have a Soviet style system? If they are
Speaker 2: quote running us, if they are running the country, what
Speaker 2: does that mean? Well, one such feature of this kind
Speaker 2: of scheme would be that it's impossible to prove or
Speaker 2: disprove that it's working. Imagine all the crimes that didn't
Speaker 2: happen because we did that or this or whatever. Let's say,
Speaker 2: when they say we're going to shut down, we're going
Speaker 2: to anticipate and promptively shut down crime. And of course
Speaker 2: that's something that Obama would do. One of the things
Speaker 2: that he did when he started talking when he was president,
Speaker 2: they put out a unemployment.
Speaker 3: Report and he.
Speaker 2: Said jobs created or save wait a minute, jobs saved.
Speaker 3: How do you measure.
Speaker 2: That they just made that number up? And of course,
Speaker 2: even the jobs, the new jobs that were created, new
Speaker 2: people that were hired, that isn't something that President's Republican
Speaker 2: or Democrat can take credit for.
Speaker 3: You.
Speaker 2: Yet President's Republican and Democrat always do take credits. When
Speaker 2: somebody else puts their labor and their capital on the
Speaker 2: line to expand their business and create jobs, they take
Speaker 2: credit for it. Now, they didn't take that risk, they
Speaker 2: didn't create that job. They can create conditions that make
Speaker 2: it impossible to do that, and that's usually what business,
Speaker 2: what government does. So a little bit of credit to
Speaker 2: them for not getting in the way of people who
Speaker 2: are actually doing the work and taking the risk and
Speaker 2: making the products the whole society. Strategy remains attractive regardless
Speaker 2: of his outcomes because it extends the party's authority over
Speaker 2: what were formally independent centers of power. We call it centralization.
Speaker 2: The founders of this country called it consolidation, and I
Speaker 2: think that's actually a better term. It is consolidated. The
Speaker 2: Soviets centralized control of everything. So it is a tautalitarian, authoritarian, communist,
Speaker 2: fascist approach to this. And so there really isn't anything new,
Speaker 2: especially when we're talking about evil and human nature. There
Speaker 2: certainly isn't anything new in that. We're going to take
Speaker 2: a quick break and we'll be right back.
Speaker 1: Analyzing the globalists. Next move the Deevid Nutshell.
Speaker 2: Well, we are going to talk a little bit about politics,
Speaker 2: but before we do, I wanted to get to the
Speaker 2: important stuff today, and the important stuff is the pandemic,
Speaker 2: the pharmaceutical stuff. And before we get into politics, the
Speaker 2: important thing is our supporters, because the show would not
Speaker 2: even be here without your assistance. And so we really
Speaker 2: do appreciate that. We want to acknowledge that. And some
Speaker 2: interesting comments from some many of the people who have
Speaker 2: sent things by mail. This is coming from Minor Mike,
Speaker 2: and so I.
Speaker 3: Really do appreciate that.
Speaker 2: And he said that please address missus Harris by her
Speaker 2: proper name, Commie law Harris.
Speaker 3: I agree.
Speaker 2: I like the I was absolutely surprised and disappointed myself
Speaker 2: that I did not see the Commi aspect of it,
Speaker 2: since they're so focused on you know, don't call her Kamala,
Speaker 2: call her Colm a law right communist, and I focused
Speaker 2: on the LA law space cadet thing, you know. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 2: that's but you know, the communist part of it really
Speaker 2: is very important and very true. And this is a
Speaker 2: nice card. You are inscribed on the palm of his
Speaker 2: hand from Isaiah and so thank you very much.
Speaker 3: This is Sue from Burke.
Speaker 2: And says, thanks for continuing to remind me not to
Speaker 2: vote for Trader Trump or is that tramp? How much
Speaker 2: it could be either unfits there no matter what ps
Speaker 2: do you recommend at least a right end just to
Speaker 2: fill in the space. Well, you can put my name in.
Speaker 2: They won't count it, though it depends on jurisdictions. I
Speaker 2: was looking at that today and like here in Tennessee,
Speaker 2: they just had the deadline for submission and you don't
Speaker 2: have to do much to get on the ballot for
Speaker 2: president here. I think it's something like two hundred and
Speaker 2: fifty signatures. And so RFK Junior is on the ballot,
Speaker 2: which I would not suggest, but the Constitution Party is
Speaker 2: with Randall Terry. That could be a protest vote. I mean,
Speaker 2: at least he is solid on abortion. If they're going
Speaker 2: to make abortion the number one issue, I might show
Speaker 2: up to cast a protest vote for him. Certainly my
Speaker 2: vote's not going to make any difference here in Tennessee.
Speaker 2: This is this is Maga Central around there's like throughout
Speaker 2: the Pigeon Forge in Gatlinburg area, there's several different Trump stores,
Speaker 2: so you can go. I've not gone in because I
Speaker 2: probably couldn't control myself. I just have to buy everything
Speaker 2: in the store, you know when I saw it, so
Speaker 2: I have not visited them to see what kind of
Speaker 2: wonderful merchandise is there yet. But yeah, it is definitely
Speaker 2: Trump center here and the people and that's the thing
Speaker 2: that you.
Speaker 3: Know, they they've.
Speaker 2: Got it on the issues, but they are projecting all
Speaker 2: of these issues on the guy who doesn't who has
Speaker 2: essentially repudiated them in his first four years plus come
Speaker 2: up with some novel incriminations on it.
Speaker 3: So yeah, I don't know. I don't know.
Speaker 2: Who to suggest that are there. As I said in
Speaker 2: twenty twenty, when I was talking to the guy I
Speaker 2: think his name was Ken Block, and he was hired
Speaker 2: to audit the votes. He's hired by the Trump campaign,
Speaker 2: and he said there was also a guy who did
Speaker 2: exit polls and another guy who said, well, we looked
Speaker 2: at some of the ballots and he said there were
Speaker 2: a lot of people who voted down ballot, but they
Speaker 2: didn't vote for president, which is really the opposite of
Speaker 2: what you would expect to find if people were patting
Speaker 2: it for Biden just vote for president and wouldn't vote
Speaker 2: vote down ballot. But there were a lot of people
Speaker 2: who didn't like Biden or Trump four years ago. I
Speaker 2: think it's going to be even more people in that
Speaker 2: category day. And I don't think a lot of people
Speaker 2: are going to see law Law as anything other than evil,
Speaker 2: which she is. So this is from Stacy. I love
Speaker 2: how you go back in time and link everything together
Speaker 2: in the present.
Speaker 3: Well, thank you. I appreciate that, And I.
Speaker 2: Would just say that you can't if you don't have
Speaker 2: historical context for what's going on, you really don't know
Speaker 2: what's going on. You know, just like earlier when we
Speaker 2: were talking about those those supposed monkey pox pictures. First
Speaker 2: of all, they you know, where's your evidence that you've
Speaker 2: isolated the virus? None, where's the you know, the providence
Speaker 2: and the authentication of these photographs. Well, I don't have
Speaker 2: any I don't know where those photographs came from. But
Speaker 2: you're showing everybody that's the photographs of what monkey pox
Speaker 2: looks like, and you don't know where any of these
Speaker 2: pictures came from. So we have to we have to
Speaker 2: go back and we have to look at the context
Speaker 2: of where this stuff is, or we're just kind of
Speaker 2: operating in the blind and we just think all these
Speaker 2: things just happened. No, they didn't happen. They were planned,
Speaker 2: and it was a long chain of all this stuff.
Speaker 2: Alex Newman did a great job of that with education.
Speaker 2: For example. I had him when we talked about the book,
Speaker 2: and he traced it back to the early eighteen hundreds.
Speaker 2: These utopian communities or communist communities. Actually some of them
Speaker 2: called themselves Christian communities, but they were communists, and the
Speaker 2: efforts to have society raise the kids, to have the
Speaker 2: village raise the children rather than the parents, to move
Speaker 2: the parents out of the way. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 2: some of these failed utopian societies said the reason it
Speaker 2: failed was because these parents were not on board with
Speaker 2: this and they weren't raising the kids right, you know,
Speaker 2: that type of thing. And so you got conservatives who
Speaker 2: wanted the same thing from the schools. You know, the
Speaker 2: kids just aren't being raised right by their parents, so
Speaker 2: we need to take over and do that. Well, they
Speaker 2: were successful in taking it over, but then guess what
Speaker 2: the Marxist through the institutions, and the conservatives never saw
Speaker 2: it coming. That's what Antonio Gramsey had proposed. And he
Speaker 2: was the guy that Pete Boutigay's father spent his entire
Speaker 2: life studying and honoring that Italian founder of the Communist
Speaker 2: Party in Italy, Antonio Gramsey, And that was his idea.
Speaker 2: He said, rather than you know, having a violet revolution
Speaker 2: like we saw with the Jacobin Revolution and the Russian Revolution,
Speaker 2: let's just take over the institutions from the top down.
Speaker 2: Everybody looks at how did all these communists wind up
Speaker 2: in charge of all of our companies, on our universities
Speaker 2: and all the rest of the stuff. And it's like,
Speaker 2: by design, that's how they did it. By design, that's
Speaker 2: how they wound up doing that. They had a plan
Speaker 2: wild Billy on ex Twitter, Karen saw something that that
Speaker 2: he had done, and she responded to it, and then
Speaker 2: he responded back to her and says, Karon, Hello, my
Speaker 2: name is Bill. As you may have guessed, I assume
Speaker 2: you're the wife of David. I really just want to say,
Speaker 2: if you are, please tell David that I'm a huge fan.
Speaker 2: I love his passion, the way he delivers his news.
Speaker 2: I liked him more than Alex and I was really
Speaker 2: bummed when he was no longer there left a hole
Speaker 2: in my heart anyway, glad to have him back, have him,
Speaker 2: have him back in my days as I drive a
Speaker 2: truck and support a show. God bless you and him.
Speaker 2: Watch this be not who I think it is David's
Speaker 2: wife and if I'm wrong, well hey, I like David
Speaker 2: and Night as a media host in the style. God
Speaker 2: bless you all. He had lost crack of the show
Speaker 2: since I left and are fired in December of twenty twenty,
Speaker 2: so nearly four years.
Speaker 3: He didn't know where I was.
Speaker 2: That's why, folks, if you will please like the watching
Speaker 2: this show. The only help I can get from social
Speaker 2: media is from you. And so if you like the show,
Speaker 2: please like the show. And wherever you're watching it, whether
Speaker 2: you're downloading it as a podcast or you're watching it
Speaker 2: on a video platform or on social media, please like
Speaker 2: it and that will help us to get it out.
Speaker 2: One last one here, This is from Jessica Subscribe Star
Speaker 2: and she said she really likes the news article links
Speaker 2: that I posted for the week. And that's Travis who
Speaker 2: started doing that. I send him the links every day
Speaker 2: and of course, there's a lot of news that I've
Speaker 2: read that I don't have time to go over. So
Speaker 2: he started putting up the stuff that I have. I
Speaker 2: have about three hundred pages worth of articles each day
Speaker 2: that I have there, and I don't have time to
Speaker 2: go over all of that with everybody. So he puts
Speaker 2: it up so that it's kind of a links to
Speaker 2: it for the people who are on subscribe Star. She said,
Speaker 2: I can't tell you how much I love this. I
Speaker 2: was recently lamenting not having a reliable, readable news source,
Speaker 2: and you knocked it out of the park. I feel
Speaker 2: like this is a luxurious, curated news site just for me. Brilliant.
Speaker 2: Thank you with sincere appreciation. Jessica, Well, thank you. I'm
Speaker 2: glad that you enjoy that, and you know, I'm glad
Speaker 2: that Travis put that up. You're still doing that right, Yeah,
Speaker 2: he's not in his head. Yes, And you know, we've
Speaker 2: had other people have asked us for things and Travis
Speaker 2: has been able to do. Somebody asked if we could
Speaker 2: put up a subtitled caption thing for the deaf, and
Speaker 2: actually there is a feature that he was able to
Speaker 2: find an Adobe and so that is on Rumble. He
Speaker 2: has a version there that has subtitles if you have
Speaker 2: somebody who is hearing impaired. Let's take a look at
Speaker 2: the d n C which begins today, and it truly
Speaker 2: they have truly made it about abortion. And so again
Speaker 2: we talked about D and C dilation and cure tage.
Speaker 2: That is the method that is commonly used for abortions
Speaker 2: in the first trimester. As they describe it, a procedure
Speaker 2: to remove tissue from inside of your uterus. That's the
Speaker 2: way these people look at babies. Tissue inside your uterus,
Speaker 2: just cut it out. And that's what they're celebrating at
Speaker 2: the d n C. What irony, I guess or maybe not.
Speaker 2: And so they had free abortions. They had a van
Speaker 2: that is going to be providing not they have it
Speaker 2: now mobile clinic that's been provided by Planned Parenthood and
Speaker 2: it's going to be parked there the DNC to celebrate abortion.
Speaker 2: Because you see when they talk when they say abortion rites,
Speaker 2: they don't spell it r I G H t S.
Speaker 2: They spell it r I T e s. It is
Speaker 2: a religious ceremony for them. We've seen this over and
Speaker 2: over again. We saw it with the protests in Texas.
Speaker 2: You know, they're they're yelling Hail Satan and all the
Speaker 2: rest of this stuff. I mean, these people it is
Speaker 2: a religious right. Are it a religious practice for them?
Speaker 2: They worship it, they celebrate it. It is the essence
Speaker 2: of their being. It isn't something as they liked this
Speaker 2: as a politicians like say, well, I really don't like abortion,
Speaker 2: but you know, sometimes it's just this unfortunate thing that
Speaker 2: we get. No, they celebrate it, they love it. A
Speaker 2: mobile clinic offering free abortions and vasectomies outside the d
Speaker 2: n C in Chicago is now fully booked. As of yesterday,
Speaker 2: Planned Parenthood sending a mobile clinic to Chicago. The clinic
Speaker 2: will offer a free of viseectomies and abortions on Sunday,
Speaker 2: the day before the convention was set to begin. Planned
Speaker 2: Parenthood announced quote all free of visectomy and abortions are filled.
Speaker 2: Conservative pundits are calling it an abortion bus. One person,
Speaker 2: Columbia Bugle, said the average Democrat man is masked, vaxed,
Speaker 2: and rendered and fertile via Planned Parenthood abortion food truck.
Speaker 2: Another Peachey Keenan, said Democrats busy deleting their next generation
Speaker 2: from existence, and.
Speaker 6: Is they don't need to have kids, because they'll just
Speaker 6: Republicans will turn their kids over to them in the schools.
Speaker 3: That's right, Oh yeah, exactly.
Speaker 2: They call us breeders, and you know, because we breed
Speaker 2: the kids, we have them, then we turn them over
Speaker 2: to them to raise them.
Speaker 3: You know, yeah, exactly right.
Speaker 6: Remember that insufferable woman who was a kindergarten teacher. That's
Speaker 6: who's teaching your kids. If you send them to school.
Speaker 6: There is no other option. So that's who is there.
Speaker 2: And you know you can get a good teacher. I'm
Speaker 2: not saying all the teachers are bad, but you don't
Speaker 2: know who they are.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Again, you're playing Russian roulette.
Speaker 2: It's like the vaccines, except you know, you're playing with
Speaker 2: your kid's life here as well. You really don't know
Speaker 2: who these people are. You know that they have been
Speaker 2: hired as teachers and experts by the system. And when
Speaker 2: you look at the kind of people that Travis just
Speaker 2: mentioned there, how good a job are they doing vetting
Speaker 2: these people? Maybe that's exactly the kind of person they're
Speaker 2: actually looking for.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: So yeah, I mean I've talked to some teachers who say, yeah,
Speaker 2: I see that as my mission field, and so they
Speaker 2: kind of like you know, secret Agent center and there
Speaker 2: they find them to kick them out. You know, I'm sorry,
Speaker 2: you're not using the preferred pronouns and that type of thing.
Speaker 2: So I have to be undercover, and there are some
Speaker 2: who do that. But again, you know, when you look
Speaker 2: at the big picture, that's not what the institutions are.
Speaker 2: The institutions have been captured, and so Peechee Keenan says, oh, okay,
Speaker 2: they are deleting their next generation from existence, and then
Speaker 2: follows it up and said, well, I mean, okay, really, really,
Speaker 2: you're okay, you're okay with murdering show if their parents
Speaker 2: are from a political party or something. Murdering children is
Speaker 2: not excused because their parents are of some political cult
Speaker 2: or the other right. I mean, it takes us back.
Speaker 2: I guess maybe this guy who was cheering the branch
Speaker 2: Davidian thing where they went in and murdered men, women
Speaker 2: and children because they don't like their politics or their
Speaker 2: religion or whatever. Marjorie Taylor Green said, when I saw
Speaker 2: this news, I thought it was fake about the mobile
Speaker 2: abortion van, but she said it's not planned. Parenthood is
Speaker 2: going to provide free vsectomies and abortions. Then they're all
Speaker 2: filled up. It's hard to even comprehend this. She said,
Speaker 2: it's truly heartbreaking. Being a mother is the most precious gift. Well,
Speaker 2: you know, yeah, it's when the Republicans are out there campaigning, though,
Speaker 2: Do they really say that, Do they really hold children
Speaker 2: up as a blessing? Did they talk about mom and
Speaker 2: apple pie or that kind of stuff anymore?
Speaker 3: No, they don't.
Speaker 2: And they talk about the babies as if they are human.
Speaker 2: They talk about them as some kind of a problem,
Speaker 2: some kind of you know, tissue that we got to
Speaker 2: get rid of. It's a matter of I wanted to
Speaker 2: play this way. I didn't get to it last week.
Speaker 2: I had this and the thing from Thursday. This was
Speaker 2: out of This was sent to me by handy, by
Speaker 2: the way, and as being passed around on social media.
Speaker 2: It was out of Brazil. And this is a thirty
Speaker 2: two week old baby still in the mother. This is
Speaker 2: ultrasound four D ultrasound, so you can see the movement.
Speaker 2: And they're watching the monitor and the father starts to
Speaker 2: talk to the baby. And when the father starts talking,
Speaker 2: the baby smiles.
Speaker 3: Look at this. They near the pie.
Speaker 7: Well, they left doctor, they.
Speaker 1: Jean to the.
Speaker 7: Deal they near the pie.
Speaker 3: That's wonderful.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 3: New York Post had that.
Speaker 2: Actually, Uh, you know when you look at that, why
Speaker 2: don't we focus on something beautiful like that?
Speaker 3: Why doesn't the Republican Party do?
Speaker 2: I mean, we don't have to show the horror of
Speaker 2: the d n C, the dilation, the cartage. We do
Speaker 2: not have to show that. We could show the beauty
Speaker 2: of life. We could show baby Samuel's hand, or we
Speaker 2: could show that smiling baby. Why won't they do that?
Speaker 2: Why won't they show the beauty of babies and family
Speaker 2: and motherhood. It disgusts me, and we are not going
Speaker 2: to win this war with politicians.
Speaker 3: Folks.
Speaker 2: They don't care about anything except winning whatever that means
Speaker 2: to them and their definition of it. They don't care
Speaker 2: about grinding up babies. Nothing phases these people. They are
Speaker 2: so focused on themselves. They will never solve the problems
Speaker 2: of our society. It's going to come from you and me.
Speaker 2: It's going to come from the ground up. It's time
Speaker 2: for you Christians to do something about it. Time to
Speaker 2: take the lead in this and to show some of
Speaker 2: this stuff. If you really want to change society, show
Speaker 2: the truth that we're talking about a baby. Here we're
Speaker 2: not talking about fetal tissue that we do DNC two.
Speaker 2: But again, these Democrats are worshiping the second aspect of everything.
Speaker 2: Here they are. They've got an inflatable IUD eighteen feet high.
Speaker 2: This is going to be featured there as you walk
Speaker 2: into the DNC. It's all about that.
Speaker 3: You know.
Speaker 2: It wasn't even that way when I covered the DNC
Speaker 2: back in twenty sixteen with Hillary. I mean, they were
Speaker 2: not just totally focused on sexualizing kids and focused on
Speaker 2: their sexual practices and everything else like they are now.
Speaker 2: It is one hundred percent what they're doing. And so yeah,
Speaker 2: I think Trump's going to lose because and the Republican
Speaker 2: Party is going to lose, and they deserve to lose
Speaker 2: because they won't meet the challenge of this this sexual
Speaker 2: obsession that the Democrats represent, and it is a societal sickness.
Speaker 2: And again I don't look to the politicians to win
Speaker 2: these wars, but it's where the culture is and the culture.
Speaker 2: Politics is downstream from the culture. Culture is downstream from
Speaker 2: your spiritual relationship to God. And so this is not
Speaker 2: something that politicians are well equipped to handle. As we
Speaker 2: can see, they're not doing anything with it. So as
Speaker 2: this is going on, we have Missouri is going to
Speaker 2: have on the ballot a right to abortion at any
Speaker 2: time of the pregnancy, full term, because Missouri has had
Speaker 2: some very restrictive abortion laws. So they had a group
Speaker 2: that came together, got a lot of outside funding, and
Speaker 2: decided that they're going to put a motion on the
Speaker 2: ballot to erase all restrictions on abortion. Will the GOP
Speaker 2: defend this? Will they show pictures of a smiling baby?
Speaker 2: Even of course they won't. So it's time for the
Speaker 2: Christians to get involved in Missouri if you don't want
Speaker 2: to see this happening. Missouri is Amendment three and it's
Speaker 2: a group that was put together called Missourians for Constitutional Freedom.
Speaker 3: But they're not.
Speaker 2: It's not money that's coming from Missouri's coming from Planned Parenthood.
Speaker 2: It's coming from the ACLU. It's coming from these big
Speaker 2: interests that are outside of Missouri. A yes vote will
Speaker 2: enshrine the right to abortion at any time of pregnancy
Speaker 2: in the Missouri Constitution. Additionally, it will prohibit any regulation
Speaker 2: of abortion, including regulations designed to protect women undergoing abortions,
Speaker 2: and prohibit any civil or criminal recourse against anyone who
Speaker 2: performs an abortion and hurts or kills the pregnant woman.
Speaker 2: That's according to Missouri Secretary State John Ashcroft's website. That's
Speaker 2: the summary of it. He says, a no vote will
Speaker 2: continue the statutory prohibition of abortion in Missouri, again being
Speaker 2: funded by the usual suspects outside of the state, Planned Parenthood, ACLU,
Speaker 2: and others. It's draped in the language of health and
Speaker 2: freedom and your choice about your body, which again the
Speaker 2: Republicans won't tackle be because the Republicans were on the
Speaker 2: wrong side of that issue during COVID when they took
Speaker 2: away what you and your doctor decided was right for
Speaker 2: you about you making decisions about your body, and that
Speaker 2: really was simply your body. This is not your body,
Speaker 2: this is some body else. And so they said, how convenient.
Speaker 2: They will leave the viability of the baby and of
Speaker 2: course allow no time limit on it, just a question
Speaker 2: of whether or not the baby is viable. That will
Speaker 2: be left to the good faith judgment. That's the way
Speaker 2: the amendment states it. It'll be left to the good
Speaker 2: faith judgment of the doctors who profit from these procedures. Yeah,
Speaker 2: you go back and you take a look at Kermit Gosnell,
Speaker 2: for example, he was joking, well, you know, that baby
Speaker 2: is big enough. He could have walked that. I just
Speaker 2: killed big enough that he could walk to the bus
Speaker 2: station or whatever. And he did get convicted of murder
Speaker 2: because when the survived in abortion, he set him over
Speaker 2: on the side what they call comfort care, let him die.
Speaker 2: He didn't do that. He actually actively killed the baby.
Speaker 2: The abortion and expert from Planned Parent had explained to
Speaker 2: the jury that that was called comfort care. What they
Speaker 2: were supposed to do just let the baby die. But
Speaker 2: because he didn't let the baby die, because he actively
Speaker 2: killed it, they got him for two murders. Plus they
Speaker 2: got him for the death of a mother that was
Speaker 2: who was performing an abortion on She was a woman
Speaker 2: of color, she was an illegal immigrant, just the type
Speaker 2: of person that they say they put at the top
Speaker 2: of the list, and Democrats didn't really care about that.
Speaker 2: And part of the problem with that was that there
Speaker 2: wasn't enough oversight and there wasn't even the ability for
Speaker 2: them to be able to get a gurney through the
Speaker 2: narrow passageways of this horrific little abortion clinic that he had.
Speaker 2: As a result, you had a lot of different states
Speaker 2: like Texas and others say we're going to make sure
Speaker 2: that these abortion clinics are going to have to have
Speaker 2: egress and everything of somebody who is having a medical emergency.
Speaker 2: They're gonna have to be able to get the emergency
Speaker 2: stretchers through there. And they said, well, wait a minute,
Speaker 2: we don't have that. That effectively will shut us down
Speaker 2: until we get that done whatever. And there was a
Speaker 2: big fight about that in Texas. That was when you
Speaker 2: had the Democrat party show up and start chanting Haile Satan,
Speaker 2: you know, as part of that. And the woman who
Speaker 2: led that protest and Texas ran for governor as a Democrat.
Speaker 2: We called her Abortion Barbie. Our name wasn't Barbie, but
Speaker 2: you know, she was young and attractive, and I think
Speaker 2: running against Abbod. I don't remember who it was that
Speaker 2: she was running against, but she got shellacked. So and
Speaker 2: they have a very restrictive abortion law in Texas now
Speaker 2: very restrictive. Of course, Texas had surrendered to the Supreme
Speaker 2: Court with Roe v. Wade seventy three, should have said
Speaker 2: you have no jurisdiction even way in on this, but
Speaker 2: they played that legal game and they appealed it.
Speaker 3: They went to the Supreme Court.
Speaker 2: Supreme Court decided that they could determine when life begins.
Speaker 2: Just like later on, they determined that they would decide
Speaker 2: the definition of marriage, and they would overrule every single state.
Speaker 2: Every single state had either in their constitution or in
Speaker 2: a referendum, they had determined what the definition of marriage was,
Speaker 2: and they ever wrote it everywhere.
Speaker 3: Well, let's talk about.
Speaker 2: The kami part of Kami law COMMI la law. And
Speaker 2: as one person said, this is the most terrifying thing
Speaker 2: I've ever heard a presidential candidate say, what possibly could
Speaker 2: that be? This is Lalaw talking about what she would
Speaker 2: do if she didn't like what somebody who's the business
Speaker 2: that somebody was doing, what they were doing with their patent.
Speaker 2: She would just take the patent away.
Speaker 5: I will snatch their patent so that we will take over.
Speaker 5: And yes we can do that, Yes, yes we can
Speaker 5: do that. Yes we can do that. It's the question
Speaker 5: do you have the will to do it? I have
Speaker 5: the will to do it.
Speaker 3: She has a will to do it. She has a
Speaker 3: will to take away your guns too.
Speaker 6: She's going to seize the means of production.
Speaker 2: That's exactly right. I think that's pretty close to the
Speaker 2: Babylon b headline too. That's coming up here. But yeah,
Speaker 2: she's going full communist, right. I don't care about the
Speaker 2: patent or and the rest of this stuff. That video
Speaker 2: was taken in twenty nineteen. I don't think she's changed
Speaker 2: in the last five years. As part of her failed campaign,
Speaker 2: and she was in Iowa and she dropped out before
Speaker 2: the Iowa imaries or New Hampshire primaries. The Iowa caucuses
Speaker 2: and the New Hampshire primaries. I think the Iowa is
Speaker 2: first every time, and she didn't even make it to
Speaker 2: the very first ones. But maybe that's why. Maybe she
Speaker 2: went against the big interests of the pharmaceutical companies. I
Speaker 2: don't know, but she's just against the interest of private property.
Speaker 3: Really.
Speaker 2: She was discussing the pharmaceutical industry. That's the context. Well,
Speaker 2: if you're going to come after the pharmaceutical companies, don't
Speaker 2: come after their patents, come after them and throw them
Speaker 2: in jail. They really do need three hots and a cot.
Speaker 2: That ar K Junior was talking about because you know,
Speaker 2: nobody was being killed by the people who are posing
Speaker 2: climate change. That was not killing people. But these vaccines
Speaker 2: are killing people and maiming them. She said, prescription medications
Speaker 2: that are born out of federal funding for the research
Speaker 2: and development of that drug, your tax payer dollars. So
Speaker 2: for any drug where they fail to play by.
Speaker 3: Their own rules.
Speaker 2: Wait a minute, la, la, don't you realize that there
Speaker 2: are no rules for pharmaceutical companies. You know, when Children's
Speaker 2: Health Defense said, you're putting polyethylene glycol and you're putting
Speaker 2: the stuff that you're injecting here and casing it and
Speaker 2: PEG it's pegilated. People are going to go on anaphylactic
Speaker 2: shock if you inject that into them, and they contacted
Speaker 2: the FDA, and the FDA said, well, call Pfiser, tell.
Speaker 3: Them I'm not going to do anything about it.
Speaker 2: They call Pfizer. Of course, Pfiser is not going to
Speaker 2: do anything about it. There are no regulations for these people.
Speaker 2: There are no rules for them. They rule the FDA.
Speaker 2: So she said, were they failed to play by their
Speaker 2: own rules? If the drug came out because of federal
Speaker 2: funding for what is called R and D, I will
Speaker 2: snatch their patents so that we can take it over. Yes,
Speaker 2: and we can do that. Yes, we can do that.
Speaker 2: The question is do we have the will to do it.
Speaker 2: I have the will to do it, she says, Well, again,
Speaker 2: you know this writer who put this end that is,
Speaker 2: you know, the pharmaceutical companies have been absolutely reprehensible, but
Speaker 2: that's not the solution to take away patents. If they
Speaker 2: engage in criminal conduct, their fines and penalties, and it
Speaker 2: should be jail time criminal charges for that.
Speaker 3: You know, we've had.
Speaker 2: Situations where people adulterated their food because of unsanitary conditions.
Speaker 2: Then you had two or three people die that happened
Speaker 2: with Bluebell ice cream, and so they got massive fines
Speaker 2: and they had criminal charges to send the CEO to jail.
Speaker 2: That's the way that type of stuff should handle. But we're
Speaker 2: talking about a lot more than two people that have
Speaker 2: been killed with this FDA stuff. They're not going to
Speaker 2: do anything about it. And yet this writer still cheers Trump,
Speaker 2: who gave the money to the pharmaceutical company. So she's
Speaker 2: talking about here. She says, Hey, if we gave them
Speaker 2: the money to do this stuff and it's not right,
Speaker 2: then we take away their their ownership of Well they
Speaker 2: shouldn't have ownership of it anyway, if it was paid
Speaker 2: for by the tax payer. Why are we paying for
Speaker 2: stuff and giving them private ownership. See it's not as
Speaker 2: clear cut as the conservative writers would like to make it.
Speaker 2: Because once you start with centralized planning, once you get
Speaker 2: involved in crony capitalism, what do you call it? Crapitalism?
Speaker 2: Whether you're talking about the drug companies or you're talking
Speaker 2: about the green agenda and all these electric bus companies
Speaker 2: that she loves so much. Yeah, what do we do
Speaker 2: about that? How do we get our money back for
Speaker 2: those electric bus companies that were making the school buses
Speaker 2: for like a million dollars apiece and then went bankrupt
Speaker 2: after getting all that government subsidy. Is there any jail
Speaker 2: time for those people, any fraud involved in that? What
Speaker 2: are the politicians who gave it to them? Will we
Speaker 2: keep electing these Democrat politicians who give the money to
Speaker 2: pharmaceutical companies and to the green agenda? We keep electing
Speaker 2: the Republicans who do the same thing as well. But
Speaker 2: I just want to know when is crony capitalism a
Speaker 2: conservative value that needs to be supported. I don't support
Speaker 2: the pharmaceutical companies. If we paid for these drugs, I
Speaker 2: don't support them being able to not only sell it
Speaker 2: for a profit, but then also be protected from any liability,
Speaker 2: which is what Trump gave them during the pandemic. Does
Speaker 2: nobody realize this or remember this? Come on, conservatives, how
Speaker 2: do how do you justify cronty capitalism, liability protection, massive subsidies,
Speaker 2: and mass murder? How do you justify that when we're
Speaker 2: talking about pharmaceutical companies? Yeah, La La is an arrogant,
Speaker 2: empty headed communist. What's Trump? What's Trump? Well, as you
Speaker 2: were saying, Travis, it's almost exactly quote the Babel and
Speaker 2: b headline, La La Harris. We must seize the means
Speaker 2: of production and execute the boucheoisie. That's exactly the headline.
Speaker 2: That's the way they quote her. You know, we must
Speaker 2: abolish private ownership. Does that mean private ownership for big Pharma?
Speaker 2: Does that mean the royalties for Fauci? Do we get
Speaker 2: rid of those things? What about the stock perks for
Speaker 2: Fauci and for Rand Paul? What about the money that
Speaker 2: they made from insider trading on Gilead stock, the makers
Speaker 2: of rem dezevir. Yeah, what do we do about that
Speaker 2: kind of stuff?
Speaker 4: No?
Speaker 2: I don't think they're going to do anything. And then,
Speaker 2: while talking about communists, this is a person, a man
Speaker 2: who as a student had joined Tim Walls on a
Speaker 2: trip to communist China. This is alphanews dot Org has
Speaker 2: a story man who says he accompanied Walls on a
Speaker 2: trip to China. Calls him maliced to the core.
Speaker 3: And he really is.
Speaker 2: You know, when we look at these people in the
Speaker 2: Democrat Party, you remember the Plausio went to Cuba. I
Speaker 2: think it was for his honeymoon as well. Right, Bernie
Speaker 2: Sanders did a honeymoon in Russia. I think it's Moscow.
Speaker 2: What is it about these guys there? And when Bernie
Speaker 2: Sanders went to Russia it was when the before the
Speaker 2: Communist Party fell. I don't imagine he's got much use
Speaker 2: for Russia now, but you know, you got to Blasio,
Speaker 2: you got Bernie Sanders. They love communism. And you can
Speaker 2: put in that number ten Walls as well. And by
Speaker 2: the way, the person that was you know that the
Speaker 2: rumor was that Lalla Kami Lalla had narrated down to
Speaker 2: two people, Tim Walls and Josh Shapiro, who was the
Speaker 2: governor of Pennsylvania. And he was the one that was
Speaker 2: put out front as the most likely pick. And so
Speaker 2: I did a little bit of research on him. Turns
Speaker 2: out she didn't pick him. But what I found was,
Speaker 2: this is a guy who you know, grows up in
Speaker 2: New York and he's with you know, parents are very wealthy.
Speaker 2: He goes to Yale and things like that, and then
Speaker 2: he graduates Yale or Harvard, one of these Ivy League schools.
Speaker 2: He graduates and he went to wait for it, he
Speaker 2: went to Zimbabwe to teach economics. Zimbabwe that is famous
Speaker 2: for hyperinflation. You know the trillion dollar Zimbabwe dollar bill,
Speaker 2: you know, the trillion dollar. He went there to teach economics.
Speaker 2: Maybe that's what happened to their country. And he went
Speaker 2: there several years after that brutal communist dictator Robert Mugabi
Speaker 2: had taken over Zimbabwe. He went there to teach. It's
Speaker 2: like you want to live in this I At the
Speaker 2: point where he went there, you know, the communists had
Speaker 2: taken over. They were seizing stealing land from the farmers.
Speaker 2: People were starving, the economy was starting to roll in
Speaker 2: to a real basket case and everything. So he decides
Speaker 2: he's going to go there and teach high school. So
Speaker 2: that's the other candidate that Lonla was looking at for
Speaker 2: vice president. This guy a teacher for quite some time.
Speaker 2: And the student who went with him to China said
Speaker 2: it was almost a daily revelation of how much he
Speaker 2: adores the communist regime, the former student told Alpha News.
Speaker 2: For over a decade, Tim Walls traveled to and from China,
Speaker 2: first arriving in the country in nineteen eighty nine. Walls
Speaker 2: taught at a high school and partnership with a nonprofit
Speaker 2: program affiliated with Harvard. During his first trip, Walls was
Speaker 2: visiting Hong Kong when the Tieneman Square protests began in April.
Speaker 2: After the massacre, he later took a train to Beijing
Speaker 2: to visit the square. According to The New York Times,
Speaker 2: now I've been in China, I've been in Hong Kong,
Speaker 2: and you know, Hong Kong free, right, and it's also
Speaker 2: a long distance by train from Beijing, a long distance
Speaker 2: by train, and so he specifically wanted to go there.
Speaker 2: I mean, he's in Hong Kong, which again was one
Speaker 2: of the freest countries in the world. Milton Friedman did
Speaker 2: a series about how free Hong Kong was because the
Speaker 2: British really didn't care. They just kind of left them alone.
Speaker 2: So it was really really very much a las a
Speaker 2: fair economy until the Communist until the lease with the
Speaker 2: British ran out, and they just turned it back over
Speaker 2: to the communists and they started tightening down the screws.
Speaker 2: But this is nineteen eighty nine and it's still very
Speaker 2: much a very free place. And so he sees what's
Speaker 2: happening in Tieneman Square and he goes to visit it.
Speaker 2: Now is he going there because he is appalled by
Speaker 2: the news reports? Well, evidently not, because when he returned
Speaker 2: the United States after that first trip, he told local
Speaker 2: newspapers how much he enjoyed his time in China. On
Speaker 2: June fourth, nineteen ninety four, Walls married Gwen Whipple on
Speaker 2: the fifth anniversary of the Teneman Square massacre, and Gwen
Speaker 2: told a local newspaper that Walls quote wanted to have
Speaker 2: a date that he'll always remember, So the Timin and
Speaker 2: Square event was more memorable to him than his anniversary,
Speaker 2: I guess. The Wall Street Journal reported that the couple
Speaker 2: spent their honeymoon in China. Okay, so you got Bernie
Speaker 2: goes to communist Russia, Walls goes to communist China. To
Speaker 2: Blasio goes to communist Cuba for their honeymoons. And that
Speaker 2: was according to local reports at the time. Just think
Speaker 2: about this too. How designing this guy is. He was
Speaker 2: always preparing for his political career. How many teachers take kids,
Speaker 2: you know, it's part of a trip to a foreign
Speaker 2: country and then call up the press and say, let's
Speaker 2: do an interview about what I just did. Constantly promoting
Speaker 2: himself and putting this stuff in. But again, look at
Speaker 2: his connections to China. You know, one of the things
Speaker 2: that I said in twenty twenty, I said, if we
Speaker 2: have Biden in the White House, that will be war
Speaker 2: with Russia. I said, if we have a Trump, it'll
Speaker 2: be war with China. The Democrats Biden Walls, la la,
Speaker 2: They are friendly to China, and he loves it. You know,
Speaker 2: wanted to get married on the date of the Tineman
Speaker 2: Square massacre and went back to China. And so this person,
Speaker 2: he would take summer trips to China and then honeymoon
Speaker 2: there as well, and then would take summer trips to China.
Speaker 2: Walls said in a twenty sixteen interview he has traveled
Speaker 2: to China about thirty times as a teacher and as
Speaker 2: a member of Congress. The New York Post recently reported
Speaker 2: the Walls was a visiting fellow at a state run
Speaker 2: university in China as recently as two thousand and seven,
Speaker 2: and Peter Schweiker, who those books about, did a book
Speaker 2: about him, as well as a lot of other Democrats,
Speaker 2: has linked him to some of these Communist party So
Speaker 2: I haven't looked at that to see how legit that
Speaker 2: is yet, So I just mentioned it in passing. For
Speaker 2: several weeks, Walls and his group of students explored China
Speaker 2: together in the summer of nineteen ninety five, said the student,
Speaker 2: who asked that they not use his last name. His
Speaker 2: first name is Shadd. There's probably not that many people
Speaker 2: who have the first name of Shad who went to
Speaker 2: China with Tim Walls, unless they're using an alias for that. Anyway,
Speaker 2: he said, they saw a Teneman Square, they walked along
Speaker 2: the Great Wall of China, they traverse the country. However,
Speaker 2: the former student says he was struck by Wall's adoration
Speaker 2: of China and it's communist ideology. Yeah, I was too
Speaker 2: when we I was struck by how people remembered Mao.
Speaker 2: But then I remember how people remember Abraham Lincoln. This
Speaker 2: kind seems like if you go to war with your
Speaker 2: own people and you result you killed, you know, tens
Speaker 2: of millions, which if you normally aze a population for Lincoln,
Speaker 2: that's what happened. But it seems like these these horrible
Speaker 2: people who unnecessarily take us into war and get tens
Speaker 2: of millions of us killed, are celebrated by everybody. It's
Speaker 2: just amazing. It's a cult builds up around them during
Speaker 2: the wartime and it continues on. And so when we
Speaker 2: were in China, you know, we kept seeing all these
Speaker 2: places where they would sell pictures of Mao and the
Speaker 2: Little Red Book and caps and this and that. It's like,
Speaker 2: what is going on? These people don't have a clue
Speaker 2: list to what's going on.
Speaker 6: Victor writes the history.
Speaker 2: That's right, that's right, and Tim Walls sells the history
Speaker 2: that they wrote. So he's there and this college, this
Speaker 2: high school student that he's with said, I was really
Speaker 2: struck by his adoration of China's communist ideology. There was
Speaker 2: no doubt he said that he was a true believer,
Speaker 2: said Shad, I've been trying to tell people this for
Speaker 2: thirty years, and nobody wanted to listen. At night, we'd
Speaker 2: go out and we'd walk the street fairs and we'd
Speaker 2: be buying souvenirs and Tim was always buying Mao's Little
Speaker 2: Red Book. He said, he gave them his gifts. I
Speaker 2: saw him by at least a dozen on the trip
Speaker 2: that I was on with him. Wow, can't get enough
Speaker 2: of those, can't get enough of that little Red Book.
Speaker 6: People need to understand that mass death isn't an unhappy
Speaker 6: side effect. It's part of the plan for these people.
Speaker 6: They want you and everyone like you dead and gone.
Speaker 2: That's right, Yeah, that's right. So yeah, Mao's a political
Speaker 2: philosophy book. Just loves it, just loves it, and it
Speaker 2: is a program of death. You're absolutely right, he said.
Speaker 2: It would be like if we went to Germany and
Speaker 2: he was buying copies of mind kompf. That's a good analogy.
Speaker 2: Quite frankly, he said. If there was any doubt about
Speaker 2: what I'm saying, just look at the policies and active
Speaker 2: by his administration, like the country's worst abortion law, anti
Speaker 2: free speech laws, the riots. He is a Maoist to
Speaker 2: the core and should not be underestimated. Shad drew attention
Speaker 2: to the similarities between the messaging of Walls and of
Speaker 2: Commie La Law Harris, including phrases like the politics of
Speaker 2: joy and unburdened by what has been unquote right. This
Speaker 2: is similar to the propaganda materials used by mal People
Speaker 2: need to have their eyes wide open, said Shad the
Speaker 2: Snitch Hotline of Minnesota straight out of the CCP. Tim
Speaker 2: Walls is a very bright guy. None of this is
Speaker 2: by accident. So yeah, when we look at the means
Speaker 2: of political control, just take a look at La La
Speaker 2: Kamie Lalla's website. If you want to apply for a
Speaker 2: job with her campaign, and she's going to have lots
Speaker 2: of money. I mean she's going to spend like three
Speaker 2: hundred and seventy million dollars after Labor Day. Think about that.
Speaker 2: Let's just kick off of her campaign thing and just
Speaker 2: remind you again twenty four years ago, when George W.
Speaker 2: Bush was running against al Gore, George W. Bush spent
Speaker 2: one hundred million dollars in al Gore accused him of
Speaker 2: trying to buy the election. The entire campaign one hundred
Speaker 2: million dollars. Al Gore had seventy, so both of them
Speaker 2: combined and talking about the packs supporting the money that
Speaker 2: the RNC and the DNC were doing, the money that
Speaker 2: was contributed directly to them, and the packs one hundred
Speaker 2: and seventy million. She's got three hundred and seventy million
Speaker 2: dollars and that's just for the opening salvo of her campaign.
Speaker 2: So if you want to work for that well financed campaign,
Speaker 2: Laala Harris has on her website nine different pronoun settings.
Speaker 2: When you give her your name and you define your pronouns,
Speaker 2: and if that's not enough, you can write in your
Speaker 2: own made up pronouns. Well, this is straight out of
Speaker 2: the Totalitarian playbook as well, or Wellian two plus two
Speaker 2: equals five. The double think, the double speak. That's what
Speaker 2: the pronouns are all really about. And so you got
Speaker 2: a choice of nine of them, or you can write
Speaker 2: it in. And this is this is picked up by
Speaker 2: The New York Post said applicants can select from the
Speaker 2: more mainstream he and him or she and her and
Speaker 2: they in them pronouns, or you can choose less conventional
Speaker 2: gender neutral options such as x E slash x C
Speaker 2: M or ze slash h I r Z her or
Speaker 2: a M E y E M and h I r
Speaker 2: h I r that sounds redundant, or.
Speaker 3: H u h u. You can be her, her or
Speaker 3: who who.
Speaker 2: This is very much like they do in China and
Speaker 2: China they double up names, so it'd be like Tau
Speaker 2: tau or whatever. That was the name of our daughter,
Speaker 2: whomme dontor it's kind of like a nickname. I don't
Speaker 2: know why they do it, but I now they've got
Speaker 2: that with these pronouns her her or who who you,
Speaker 2: which indicates that a person wants to emphasize their humanity
Speaker 2: over their gender, and that would be what who who
Speaker 2: means human human or fay fair fae fa e r,
Speaker 2: which denotes that a person is fluid between multiple genders,
Speaker 2: but not masculine genders, and that is also presented as
Speaker 2: an option. Potential hires can also write in custom pronouns
Speaker 2: or choose to go by name only when filling out
Speaker 2: an application for the Harris campaign job portal. Wow, I
Speaker 2: mean they're just making this stuff up and they've got
Speaker 2: this whole mythology around pronouns. I mean it's like the
Speaker 2: sill Marillion or something, the silly Marillion. I guess this
Speaker 2: is what we could call it. And I've played for
Speaker 2: you many times that clip where she's setting there at
Speaker 2: a table. I am Kamala Harris, and my pronouns are
Speaker 2: she and her and I'm a woman sitting at a
Speaker 2: table wearing a blue suit. She had to look down
Speaker 2: to say what she's wearing. That's great, right. And finally
Speaker 2: in Chicago they began erecting miles of security fencing ahead
Speaker 2: of the Democrat convention. You see, they can do walls
Speaker 2: and fences and when they want to, and that's exactly
Speaker 2: what they're doing in city or Chicago. A lot of
Speaker 2: people are saying, you know, they're building these walls well
Speaker 2: away from the fences and everything, well away from the
Speaker 2: convention center. Maybe what they're doing is practicing how they
Speaker 2: can lock down an entire city with martial law. That
Speaker 2: could be what is happening, Or it could be that
Speaker 2: in the commercial district what they call the Magnificent Mile,
Speaker 2: that the people who have shops there are maybe kind
Speaker 2: of worried about these mostly peaceful Palestinian Democrat protesters that
Speaker 2: are going to be there May. They're mostly peaceful. Yeah,
Speaker 2: so we'll say it's going to be a real show,
Speaker 2: isn't it. And that's what this stuff is all about. Well,
Speaker 2: when we come back, we're going to take a quick
Speaker 2: look at how Trump is doing. You know, he's had well,
Speaker 2: I don't know, he's getting a lot of criticism even
Speaker 2: from his supporters because of the things that he is
Speaker 2: focusing on and the things that he's not talking about,
Speaker 2: you know, like policy issues or anything like that.
Speaker 1: We'll be right back, Liberty, it's your move, and now
Speaker 1: the David Night Show.
Speaker 2: I got behind on the comic on Rumble RCF twenty twenty.
Speaker 2: Thank you very much for the tip. I appreciate that
Speaker 2: he writes great stuff, David as always. William Casey when
Speaker 2: I was talking about Bill Casey and his relationship with Reagan,
Speaker 2: William Casey also said, we will know our disinformation program
Speaker 2: is a success when everything the American people believe is
Speaker 2: a lie. Well, I guess it's success now, right. He
Speaker 2: said that before social media, but social media gave them
Speaker 2: the tools to make that come true. Famous quote from
Speaker 2: Bill Casey. Thank you for reminding me on Rumble Conservative Thinker,
Speaker 2: Thank you very much for the tip. Says Proverbs thirteen
Speaker 2: three says, whoever guards his mouth preserves his life. He
Speaker 2: who opens wide his lips comes to ruin. The only
Speaker 2: censorship the Bible teaches is self censorship.
Speaker 3: Yes, that's right.
Speaker 2: I guess I've not guarded my mouth enough.
Speaker 3: Looking at this stuff.
Speaker 2: Yeah, there are people out there with knives on either
Speaker 2: there Rock finn Mark c thank you very much, so
Speaker 2: Tippy says, Comy is right, David, we'd be better off
Speaker 2: if Rhino's stopped using terms like woke, I hate that
Speaker 2: and DEI all day in the media and called it
Speaker 2: what it actually is, in your face, unabashed Marxism. Absolutely,
Speaker 2: you know again that interview, and we've played it as
Speaker 2: part of our best of the one I did with
Speaker 2: Shivan Fleet who grew up in China, who grew up
Speaker 2: under Maoism, and she wrote a book, Mao's America, A
Speaker 2: Survivor's Warning. She said, this is exactly what they did, exactly,
Speaker 2: same playbook. All this woke stuff, this anti racism is
Speaker 2: exactly what they did with struggle sessions and everything. It's
Speaker 2: not enough to be on their side. You have to
Speaker 2: denounce yourself. You've got to denounce your privilege, you've got
Speaker 2: to denounce your middle class existence and all the rest
Speaker 2: of this stuff. They played that same game in China
Speaker 2: where they had pretty much a homogeneous society there it
Speaker 2: wasn't one. But now they're exploiting again racial and ethnic
Speaker 2: differences as well. They'll exploit anything they can find if
Speaker 2: there's economic differences, educational differences, ethnic racial differences. And again
Speaker 2: I say racial, I use it in a popular term.
Speaker 2: We're all members of the human race. From a Christian perspective,
Speaker 2: from the Bible's perspective, there's no different races. We're all
Speaker 2: creating the image of God. God has made all nations
Speaker 2: of one blood. There are differences in culture, there's differences
Speaker 2: in language. There's different political differences. So we have nations, tongues,
Speaker 2: and tribes. But you know, there's really only the human race.
Speaker 2: And I love the quote from Kenham who said the
Speaker 2: difference is which direction people are racing. Are they racing
Speaker 2: to God or from God? It's the only difference. We're
Speaker 2: talking about races. But they exploit any perceived or manufactured
Speaker 2: difference or any real difference. They always exploit that. It's
Speaker 2: always about dividing and conquering. And so they didn't want
Speaker 2: to create a melting pot. They didn't want to have
Speaker 2: anything like that. He goes on to write, it's actually
Speaker 2: in your face unabashed Marxism. They always fall for their
Speaker 2: word games, and then the Rhinos do, and then they
Speaker 2: wonder why they lose. Yeah, even calling themselves red red.
Speaker 2: Now I grew up, we used to say better dead
Speaker 2: than red everybody else. That was the other thing she
Speaker 2: Van Fleet said. She said it made her so angry
Speaker 2: to see these people in red. She said, I thought
Speaker 2: they were communists anything, and then I realized they don't
Speaker 2: even know what they're they're doing. Everywhere in the world,
Speaker 2: red has been the color of communism, and so that's
Speaker 2: why the media assigned that to the people who would
Speaker 2: oppose communism.
Speaker 3: You see, it's.
Speaker 2: Exactly the same thing they do with Trump. You know, well,
Speaker 2: he's anti globalist. No, he actually did everything they wanted
Speaker 2: on Rumble Stealth Patriot, thank you for the tip. I
Speaker 2: really enjoyed your interview with Ryan on The Last American Vagabond.
Speaker 2: That guy is a phenomen Yes he is. I don't
Speaker 2: know how he can go on for four hours without
Speaker 2: hardly taking a breath. I really did enjoy being on
Speaker 2: the show with him, and I have to get him
Speaker 2: back on and hopefully we'll do some more stuff. If
Speaker 2: you go to The Last American Vagabond last I looked
Speaker 2: they still had an index to my interview with him
Speaker 2: where he interviewed me. I've had him on the show
Speaker 2: and then the interview that we had. He's got on
Speaker 2: his website right now as well. You've also got a
Speaker 2: link to it on my Twitter account, which is liberty
Speaker 2: Tarian on Twitter. If you're looking for it, and you
Speaker 2: will have to look for it, you will not find it.
Speaker 2: It will not if you follow me, you will still
Speaker 2: have to look for my tweets because it will not
Speaker 2: push the stuff forward to you. Before we get back
Speaker 2: into the news, I just want to remind you that
Speaker 2: we still are on Roku, and so if you would
Speaker 2: like to watch us on Roku, you can look for
Speaker 2: the David Knight Show. You can search forward on Roku,
Speaker 2: or you can look forward on the search engine of choice.
Speaker 2: And please, if you go there, please like the show,
Speaker 2: give it a high rating. That's very important for us
Speaker 2: to be able to find an audience there. Well, let's
Speaker 2: talk a little bit about what's going on with Trump.
Speaker 2: Trump obsesses over Harris's Time magazine cover.
Speaker 3: Again.
Speaker 2: They see this is coming from the Independent in the UK,
Speaker 2: and he declares that he's better looking than her. Now,
Speaker 2: I have not watched the hours and hours of what
Speaker 2: Trump had to say. This is a small part of it,
Speaker 2: but this is the narrative that's been picked up by
Speaker 2: the mainstream media and by the Drudge Report, and Trump
Speaker 2: should know that's what they're going to do if he
Speaker 2: starts going on this vamping on this idea, attacking the
Speaker 2: way she looks. And even if he is joking again,
Speaker 2: I said, I didn't look at the clip.
Speaker 3: So the.
Speaker 2: Mainstream media loves to take things out of context, and
Speaker 2: this may be out of context. But he laid this
Speaker 2: out there for them, and that's the key thing. Does
Speaker 2: he not know how they were going to use this?
Speaker 2: Donald Trump obsessed over Kamie La Law's appearance yet again
Speaker 2: during a campaign rally in Wilkes Bar, Pennsylvania on Saturday,
Speaker 2: this time declaring that he is quote better looking unquote
Speaker 2: than his Democratic rival and mocking those who call her
Speaker 2: quote beautiful. So it's all about for him when he
Speaker 2: says this, even if he's joking, it still is fundamentally
Speaker 2: about the crowds. It's about appearance, It's about celebrity. That's
Speaker 2: what this all is about. He's a narcissist. Time magazine
Speaker 2: doesn't have a picture of Harris. He said, they have
Speaker 2: this unbelievable artist drawing her, And I said, is that
Speaker 2: Sophie larn I couldn't tell, he told his crowd of supporters,
Speaker 2: and then he went on to criticize Wall Street Journal
Speaker 2: columnist Peggy Noonan for claiming Harris's beauty was an advantage
Speaker 2: in the presidential election. In a recent outpit, Trump said,
Speaker 2: so I decided to go back and reread, but I
Speaker 2: say that I am much better looking than her. A
Speaker 2: crowd of supporters erupted into applause, leading a Trump to repeat,
Speaker 2: I'm better looking person than Kamala. And you know that
Speaker 2: he's joking about this stuff, But the fact that he
Speaker 2: has focused on it, the fact that he would say it,
Speaker 2: Why is he spending the time talking about this? And
Speaker 2: he sets himself up for this type of thing, and
Speaker 2: he can't help it. He really can't help it. He's
Speaker 2: incapable of acting, said his former lawyer Taykob except in
Speaker 2: his own perceived self interest or out of revenge because
Speaker 2: he's a deeply wounded, narse assist. This makes at least
Speaker 2: the fourth time the president has mentioned the Time magazine
Speaker 2: covered during a speech, an interview, or a rally as
Speaker 2: he continues to make personal attacks against his political opponent.
Speaker 2: And yeah, it was a an amazing puff piece and
Speaker 2: She wouldn't even stand for an interview for Time magazine.
Speaker 2: They hire an artist to did you put the picture up?
Speaker 2: You can show people what the picture is in case? Yeah,
Speaker 2: it is right there her moment. I mean, it is
Speaker 2: a hagiography if ever there was one. And yet she
Speaker 2: wouldn't even sit with him for an interview. I mean,
Speaker 2: why should she if they're going to do something like that,
Speaker 2: And so, you know, that really sets him off, and
Speaker 2: he's got to just keep talking about about the personal issues.
Speaker 2: Trump asked his staff why an election is needed. He said,
Speaker 2: I'm leading in the polls. Well, you know, again he
Speaker 2: could the fact that she had that this whole thing
Speaker 2: has been engineered by the Democrat Party to embarrass Biden
Speaker 2: publicly and then to put pressure campaign on so that
Speaker 2: he's out and she gets placed in. He should be
Speaker 2: talking about that aspect of it, how they engineered that.
Speaker 2: But instead what he says, well, I don't think we
Speaker 2: need an election for me. He should be talking about
Speaker 2: how she's going to get in without having faced any voters.
Speaker 2: But instead, because of his outsized ego, he can't help
Speaker 2: but make it about himself, and he's shooting himself in
Speaker 2: the head. So again taking what could be a positive
Speaker 2: for him and turning it into a negative. Trump seemed
Speaker 2: to suggest that he doesn't need an election to become president,
Speaker 2: rather than suggesting that they think that's the way it
Speaker 2: ought to be for la Law. And so again, when
Speaker 2: you look at these two evil are they stupid? Yes,
Speaker 2: both of them. Both of them are both evil and stupid.
Speaker 3: Uh.
Speaker 2: Governor Sinunu a Republican in New Hampshire. And again I
Speaker 2: don't follow him. I'm not a but and I'm going
Speaker 2: to read you the comments from Snunu, from Nicki Haley
Speaker 2: and from Lindsey Graham. And I you know, I don't
Speaker 2: know anything about Sanunu for negative things about him, but
Speaker 2: I haven't really paid attention Nicki Haley and Lindsey Graham.
Speaker 2: I loathe and despise them, but they're right about what
Speaker 2: they are saying. In terms of the politics. These are
Speaker 2: people who know how to get elected, and they know
Speaker 2: how to manipulate public opinion if nothing else. I mean,
Speaker 2: they may be grifting machiavellian sleeves bags, but they know
Speaker 2: how to get elected. Obviously, says almost any other Republican
Speaker 2: candidate would be winning this race by ten points. And
Speaker 2: he said that in responds. He was on Fox News,
Speaker 2: or rather Nicki Haley was on Fox News, and he
Speaker 2: was asked about her comment on Fox News when he
Speaker 2: went on CNN with Jake Tapper. But here's what Nicki
Speaker 2: Haley said on Fox News. She said, one thing Republicans
Speaker 2: have to stop. Quit whining about her. The campaign is
Speaker 2: not going to win. Talking about crowd sizes exactly who cares.
Speaker 2: Nobody cares about that except Trump. It's not going to win.
Speaker 2: Talking about what race comie La La Harris is, it's
Speaker 2: not going to win. Talking about whether she's dumb, it's not.
Speaker 2: You can't win on those things. I gotta say, Nicky
Speaker 2: Hilly is right about that. You know, you focus. Trump
Speaker 2: is majoring on the miners, and he's not giving people
Speaker 2: a reason to win. You know, one of the things
Speaker 2: about Hillary Clinton, what was her campaign about? I'm with her?
Speaker 2: It was about me. It's about this election is about
Speaker 2: it's my turn, right, same thing they put up there
Speaker 2: with Lala Harris, it's her turn. Well, it was Hillary's
Speaker 2: turn and it was I'm with her, and Trump made
Speaker 2: it about make America great again. So in that first
Speaker 2: campaign in twenty sixteen, he focused on he talked about
Speaker 2: the felt needs of the electorate. Right, he says, well,
Speaker 2: here's what the problem is. The problem is open borders,
Speaker 2: and the problem is Obamacare and some other things like
Speaker 2: those are the concerns at the time, and he talked
Speaker 2: about those and Hillary talked about herself. Now we go
Speaker 2: eight years later, and all Trump wants to do is
Speaker 2: talk about himself. And even though La La talks about herself,
Speaker 2: if she because she is brand new to most people
Speaker 2: who don't really pay any attention the politics, and certainly
Speaker 2: don't pay attention to the vice president because she's a
Speaker 2: fresh face, she doesn't have to talk that much about policies,
Speaker 2: but she's talking about policies as well, and he's still
Speaker 2: focused on her, and he's trying to play this game
Speaker 2: of mocking people and giving him schoolyard names, and it's
Speaker 2: really kind of gotten old, because you know, we're now
Speaker 2: nearly a decade of that kind of stuff and it's
Speaker 2: not having the effect. So Nikki Haley says, stop with
Speaker 2: the personal attacks, start talking about policy. And so Jake
Speaker 2: Tapper has a Sonunu on CNN and said at a
Speaker 2: campaign rally, Trump said, I don't think I'm entitled to
Speaker 2: I think I am entitled to personal attacks. I don't
Speaker 2: have a lot of respect for her. I don't have
Speaker 2: a lot of respect for her intelligence. And I think
Speaker 2: she'll be a terrible president. And so Jake Tapper said,
Speaker 2: who's right here, Hayley or Trump? Sanu Nu said, well,
Speaker 2: it isn't Donald Trump in this case. Look as Nicky
Speaker 2: probably wouldn't point this out because she was the alternative,
Speaker 2: but almost any other Republican candidate would be winning this
Speaker 2: race by ten points. And so the message was very clear,
Speaker 2: if you stick to the issues, if you stick to
Speaker 2: what matters, this should be an easy grace for Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: It really should. The delta should be the delta that
Speaker 2: you're seeing right now. As Trump does better with males
Speaker 2: by about ten points. But where this giant shift in
Speaker 2: August has come in is with female voters. Frank Luntz
Speaker 2: pointed this out in his polling and he said, he's
Speaker 2: down now by ten to twelve points with females. They're
Speaker 2: going to come out and much bigger numbers than previously
Speaker 2: would have if Biden had been the candidate.
Speaker 1: So what do we do?
Speaker 8: You know?
Speaker 3: Do we this.
Speaker 2: Cave on this again? Politics or culture. Politics is downstream
Speaker 2: from culture cultures, downstream from our spiritual connection. Why isn't
Speaker 2: it that even Republican or conservative candidates don't go around
Speaker 2: with the proverbial kissing the baby anymore. They give the
Speaker 2: baby the back of the hand. I don't know if
Speaker 2: there are this many weeks, we don't want to deal
Speaker 2: with them. You know, they're my way there costs the
Speaker 2: election last time. Get rid of the babies. I don't
Speaker 2: want any babies around here, right, they don't kiss the babies.
Speaker 2: They don't talk about mom and apple pie? Why not
Speaker 2: that could be a winning issue And if it isn't
Speaker 2: a winning issue for them, then it's the problem is
Speaker 2: that we haven't made that a winning issue. So that
Speaker 2: was Nikki Haley, and that was Sununu. Now here's Lindsey Graham,
Speaker 2: another Republican that I don't like, but he certainly does
Speaker 2: know how to get elected. When you look at somebody
Speaker 2: like Lindsey Graham, who I think is completely out of
Speaker 2: step with the Republican electorate, and yet he continues to
Speaker 2: get electtion did over and over and over again. And
Speaker 2: Lindsey Graham said this the provocateur the show mayn May
Speaker 2: not win this election. He said that anyone on NBC's
Speaker 2: Meet the Press, he said, policy is the key to
Speaker 2: the White House, and of course having lots and lots
Speaker 2: of wars. Of course, Lindsay Graham ever saw war anywhere
Speaker 2: that he didn't like and want to get involved in. Well,
Speaker 2: Trump doesn't do policy, that's the problem. He doesn't do policy.
Speaker 2: He does demagoguery, he does celebrity, but he doesn't do policy.
Speaker 2: Graham said that Haley and other Republican politicians should join
Speaker 2: him and campaign for Trump rather than just giving advice.
Speaker 2: But ultimately, Lindsey Graham gave advice, so that's what he
Speaker 2: says that. Yeah, I don't think. I don't look at
Speaker 2: Vice President Harris as a lunatic. I look at her
Speaker 2: as the most liberal person being nominated for president in
Speaker 2: the history of the United States. And he's right opposer
Speaker 2: on policy. The problem is is that Trump really doesn't
Speaker 2: care about policy, and he really doesn't care about any
Speaker 2: conservative values or any conservative policies. He's a New York Liberal,
Speaker 2: he still is. I mean, when it comes to the guns, yeah,
Speaker 2: I don't worry about that. I can take care of
Speaker 2: the bump stock. Fortunately, I can ban that myself. Oh really, Okay,
Speaker 2: where'd that come from? Highlighting that his response came under
Speaker 2: an advisory capacity, Graham said, President Trump can win this election.
Speaker 2: His policies are good for America. And if you have
Speaker 2: a policy debate for president, he wins. But Donald Trump,
Speaker 2: the provocateur, the showman, may not win this election. And
Speaker 2: so he says, it's only eighty days left. He needs
Speaker 2: to focus on policies. He needs to define how he
Speaker 2: will fix the broken borders, how he will lower inflation
Speaker 2: and so forth. And maybe you know he needs this
Speaker 2: since we're talking about lindsay, maybe he needs a focus
Speaker 2: on war too. Write Well, when it comes to the border,
Speaker 2: he says he's going to fix the border. Okay, what
Speaker 2: was Trump doing this week when it came to the border,
Speaker 2: what was his policy? Well, Trump on Thursday called for
Speaker 2: increasing immigration. He said, we need more people in America,
Speaker 2: especially with AI coming. It's like, well, wait a minute,
Speaker 2: AI needs more people. You want to talk about stupid.
Speaker 2: I have never heard anyone anywhere, at any time say
Speaker 2: that AI needs more people. The whole purpose of AI
Speaker 2: that's been striking fear in the hearts of people who
Speaker 2: are paying attention to it. Is the purpose of AI
Speaker 2: is to replace people. Everybody has said that. Bloomberg said that.
Speaker 2: Bloomberg was, you know, trashing farmers, but he was doing
Speaker 2: it to trash the agrarian society and the fact that
Speaker 2: we had agricultural workers. Because then he turned around he
Speaker 2: trashed factory workers because he was talking about the industrial revolution.
Speaker 2: They said it now today, the smart ones of us,
Speaker 2: said Michael Bloomberg when he was running for president in
Speaker 2: twenty twenty, the smart ones of us are looking at
Speaker 2: how we're going to push everybody out of their job,
Speaker 2: and then we need to look at how we're going
Speaker 2: to provide universal basic income so they don't come after
Speaker 2: us with guillotines and Elon Musk the same thing. He's
Speaker 2: pushing AI and robotics, and he is saying, we've got
Speaker 2: to have universal basic income, Sam Altman, all of these
Speaker 2: people who are pushing AI are also pushing UBI universal
Speaker 2: basic income because they know the purpose of AI is
Speaker 2: to get rid of people, and so they want to
Speaker 2: have us around as controlled, pacified eloy while they find
Speaker 2: ways to kill us and get rid of us permanently.
Speaker 2: And yet Trump says we need have more immigration because
Speaker 2: with AI coming we're gonna need more people. We're gonna
Speaker 2: we're going to let a lot more people come in,
Speaker 2: said Trump, because we need more people, especially with AI
Speaker 2: coming and all the different things, and the farmers need
Speaker 2: everybody needs. But we're going to make sure they're not
Speaker 2: murderers and drug dealers. So please explain how that's going
Speaker 2: to work. Explain why we need to have more people here.
Speaker 6: Don't worry, we'll make sure they're not murders and drug dealers.
Speaker 6: They'll still destroy the economy though, of course, but you know.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, they'll still take your job. And so all
Speaker 3: the AI.
Speaker 2: I mean, it's like, so we're going to bring in
Speaker 2: more people to take your job, because we've also got
Speaker 2: AI come in.
Speaker 3: And to take your job. That's what he was talking about.
Speaker 2: He is as out of touch as Biden and La
Speaker 2: La I mean, all of them are in La La land.
Speaker 2: And that's why they're in the position they're in. People say,
Speaker 2: how is it that in a country as large as
Speaker 2: America we have these idiots that are always put up
Speaker 2: every time we have a presidential election. Well, it's because
Speaker 2: they don't want anybody who knows what they're doing. They
Speaker 2: want easily controlled puppets that are there, and they make
Speaker 2: it about the game. Trump's position on AI puts him
Speaker 2: to the left of Black Rock CEO Larry Fink, writes
Speaker 2: Information liberation and he's right. He's right, he says. Fink,
Speaker 2: who has spent years pushing open borders and mass immigration
Speaker 2: into America, told the World Economic Forum earlier this year,
Speaker 2: and I played that clip for you multiple times. He said,
Speaker 2: xenophobic countries with declining populations may actually be the big
Speaker 2: winners in a future dominated by AI and robotics. Why
Speaker 2: is that said, They've got all these people, and they've
Speaker 2: got nothing for people to do, and they're taking away
Speaker 2: control of our life, and they're very worried about a
Speaker 2: revolution and a civil war, and that's why they're ramping
Speaker 2: up all these control and surveillance and police state measures.
Speaker 2: And so what Larry Fink is saying, well, if you've
Speaker 2: got you know, you don't have a lot of people
Speaker 2: moving into the country, and you don't have a lot
Speaker 2: of people, then you know it's not going to be
Speaker 2: a real conflict when they, you know, start bringing AI.
Speaker 2: You're not going to have a lot of people fighting
Speaker 2: each other.
Speaker 3: He says.
Speaker 2: The social problems that one will have and substituting humans
Speaker 2: for machines is going to be far easier in those
Speaker 2: countries that have declining population. In other words, you look
Speaker 2: at Japan, They're very much about embracing technology. Now he's
Speaker 2: not using Japan as analogy.
Speaker 3: I'm using it.
Speaker 2: Japan is very much about embracing technology and staying on
Speaker 2: the cutting edge of it and everything. And they also
Speaker 2: have a collapsing population, and so they need AI because
Speaker 2: they are not reproducing. But in places where you have people,
Speaker 2: the AI is going to be taking those people's jobs,
Speaker 2: and they're not going to be happy about it. You know,
Speaker 2: when I was looking at asymmetric warfare back when Obama
Speaker 2: was doing all that, they were setting up asymmetric warfare
Speaker 2: training centers and various bases. The one that Joe Biggs
Speaker 2: and I went into was at what at that time
Speaker 2: was called ap Hill. They've purged all the Confederate General's names.
Speaker 2: Now I don't know and I don't care what it's called.
Speaker 2: But inside that fort they had a separate, secured area
Speaker 2: that was training for for asymmetric warfare. And it was
Speaker 2: a city. And we got in there and we walked
Speaker 2: around and they had you know, subways and got you know,
Speaker 2: office buildings and things like that, and very very detailed
Speaker 2: city street names. You know, we're at the corner of
Speaker 2: you know, first first Street and a Constitution or whatever.
Speaker 3: I mean.
Speaker 2: It was obviously not a bombed out city. It was
Speaker 2: something they were training to fight war in asymmetric warfare.
Speaker 2: And then they have other places that are rural. There
Speaker 2: was a marine base, and I forget whether that was
Speaker 2: rural or suburban, but they have all three where they train,
Speaker 2: you know, rural America, suburban America, urban America. And so
Speaker 2: they've been working on this for a very long time.
Speaker 2: And when I was doing the research background as to
Speaker 2: what they were saying they were trying to do with
Speaker 2: asymmetric warfare. It wasn't just about training for a type
Speaker 2: of war that they head in Iraq Afghanistan where we
Speaker 2: have a war we go on with shakun on, we
Speaker 2: take out the military and then we occupy the place
Speaker 2: for a long period of time and then there's resistance
Speaker 2: that comes in.
Speaker 3: You know.
Speaker 2: It was when they talked about it in those contexts,
Speaker 2: they said, we found that religion is really not what's
Speaker 2: motivating people. Initially, they turned to it later they said,
Speaker 2: what initially motivated them? He said, we look at these
Speaker 2: people who are leading the resistance in these areas that
Speaker 2: they are occupying, and he said it's he said, it's
Speaker 2: people who are typically in their thirties. They're well educated,
Speaker 2: they had you know, their upper middle class are better,
Speaker 2: and then all that was taken away from them and
Speaker 2: they have absolutely no control over their future. Now, what
Speaker 2: are we talking about? Universal basic income? And with AI,
Speaker 2: we're talking about taking the people who have done well
Speaker 2: or in a good position. They want to have a
Speaker 2: plan for their life, and you're taking all of that
Speaker 2: away from them. And that's why Bloomberg and Elon Musk
Speaker 2: and these technocrat overlords are so worried about it, why
Speaker 2: they want to pacify us with universal basic income, because
Speaker 2: they know that if they take everything from us, all
Speaker 2: this you will own nothing and you'll be happy type
Speaker 2: of thing. They know that if they take all that
Speaker 2: stuff away from us, that there's going to be more
Speaker 2: how do we descride The more engaged successful people are
Speaker 2: going to be looking at how they're going to overthrow
Speaker 2: that system. So that's why Larry Fink was saying that,
Speaker 2: and he said, I can argue that in developed countries.
Speaker 2: The big winners are going to be countries that have
Speaker 2: shrinking populations. He said that again at the World Economic Forum.
Speaker 2: We always used to think shrinking population is a cause
Speaker 2: for negative growth. But in my conversations with the leadership
Speaker 2: of these large developed countries that have xenophobic immigration policies,
Speaker 2: a meaning that they control their borders and they don't
Speaker 2: allow anybody to come in, so they have shrinking demographics,
Speaker 2: these countries will rapidly develop robotics in AI and technology.
Speaker 2: In June, The New York Times reported that Trump had
Speaker 2: quote strikingly softened his language about immigration during a private
Speaker 2: meeting in Washington with a group of America's most powerful
Speaker 2: chief executives. Days later, Trump told a group of tech
Speaker 2: executives that he wants to dramatically expand immigration by automatically
Speaker 2: giving out green cards to anybody who graduates from any
Speaker 2: college with any degree at any level in America. So
Speaker 2: if you go to some community college and get a junior,
Speaker 2: get a two year degree or something like that, you
Speaker 2: get a green card. See, immigration is one of the
Speaker 2: key issues. Where is Trump on that key issue? One
Speaker 2: of the key issues is free speech, the right to life,
Speaker 2: and on and on I can go down the list.
Speaker 2: Second Amendment. Where's Trump on these issues? A wall, a wall,
Speaker 2: or completely on the wrong side. Twenty sixteen, Trumpet said
Speaker 2: I will end forever the use of the h one
Speaker 2: b Ashi labor program, and I will institute an absolute
Speaker 2: requirement to hire American workers. First, Well that was twenty sixteen.
Speaker 2: Now he's saying we'll give a green card to anybody
Speaker 2: that graduates from any school for anything anywhere. And he's
Speaker 2: saying we're going to have more people because of AI
Speaker 2: or whatever. A recent study found that the average IQ
Speaker 2: of undergraduate students today is one hundred and two, which
Speaker 2: is average. All this policy would do is to encourage
Speaker 2: more diploma mills. You know, these are not nothing special
Speaker 2: about getting a college degree anymore, except for.
Speaker 3: The debt that you have.
Speaker 2: So Trump is also pledged to restore Israel's lobbying power
Speaker 2: over Congress. And so you know, here's another example where
Speaker 2: he's taken something that could be an advantage, and that
Speaker 2: was the back and forth about stolen valor, the fact
Speaker 2: that Walls had avoided going to Iraq when his unit went,
Speaker 2: but also the fact that he had inflated and continued
Speaker 2: to inflate his rank one level higher than he had.
Speaker 2: They had moved him up to that rank, but he
Speaker 2: didn't complete his coursework, so they dropped him before he
Speaker 2: got out, but he kept the higher rank and kept
Speaker 2: referring to himself that way over and over again. But
Speaker 2: now what Trump has done is to lose that advantage.
Speaker 2: You see, you got Breitbart and all these Trump supporting
Speaker 2: media out there hammering the stolen valor anger angle of
Speaker 2: Tim Walls, and they're absolutely right about it. But rather
Speaker 2: than have that as an advantage, what Trump did was
Speaker 2: he brought in to celebrate Miriam Adelson, who was the
Speaker 2: widow of Shell Than Adelson. The two of them have
Speaker 2: given tremendous amounts of money to a Republican Party, especially
Speaker 2: to Trump, and they are totally pro Israel. And so
Speaker 2: he brings her in and he talks about the fact
Speaker 2: that he brags about the fact that he had given
Speaker 2: her a medal. And as he's vamping on this in
Speaker 2: his stream of consciousness and rambling on and on, he
Speaker 2: talks about how the medal that he gave her is
Speaker 2: actually better than the medal that military people win when
Speaker 2: they get injured or things like that, and so he's
Speaker 2: taken what was a big advantage for him, and he's
Speaker 2: now blown it, if not made it even worse. And
Speaker 2: then he doubles down on the fact that he wants
Speaker 2: to turn everything over to Israel again. You know, if
Speaker 2: somebody came in and you know, think back, since the
Speaker 2: Irish are not threatening anybody in America anymore, nobody's threatened
Speaker 2: to buy it. People were worried about so many of
Speaker 2: them came at one point in time about a century ago,
Speaker 2: but nobody is concerned about that now. But imagine if
Speaker 2: there was some guy who was Irish and he's running
Speaker 2: for president and said, well, maybe he's not even Irish,
Speaker 2: but you know, he wants to pander to the large
Speaker 2: Irish population, and he says, I'm going to give them.
Speaker 2: You're going to have control of me if I colected,
Speaker 2: and I'm going to make sure that you have control
Speaker 2: of Congress as well. And that's what Trump is doing
Speaker 2: with Israel. He says, you're going to have the president, okay,
Speaker 2: but I'm going to make sure that you've got the
Speaker 2: Congress as well. And so he not only does he
Speaker 2: detegrate the medals there were one hard won by people
Speaker 2: in the military but then he grovels before Miriam Adelson
Speaker 2: at the same time. It already said once before he
Speaker 2: said Israel used to own Congress and fully so he said,
Speaker 2: how is that rightful? How is it right for some
Speaker 2: other country to own our Congress. I don't care what
Speaker 2: that country is, it absolutely is not right. And now
Speaker 2: he's pledging, yeah, I will serve you if only Trump
Speaker 2: would serve America. But he's going to put Israel first,
Speaker 2: not America first. And he's going to put Israel before
Speaker 2: our interests, certainly as president, and he will do it with.
Speaker 3: The Congress as well.
Speaker 2: Now, one last thing here, Franklin Graham rails against evangelicals
Speaker 2: for Harris, and I agree with him. I don't understand
Speaker 2: how any Christian can support the policies of La La Harris.
Speaker 2: But as I pointed out, all these people who are saying, well,
Speaker 2: you can't vote for Democrats, right, I've talked about it
Speaker 2: on Friday. I said John MacArthur four years ago was
Speaker 2: saying you can't vote Christian, can't vote for a Democrat
Speaker 2: because of all these issues and everything. It's like, well,
Speaker 2: you know, four years ago when Trump was running, it
Speaker 2: wasn't just abortion, where people were being killed. It was
Speaker 2: Trump's lockdown programs, his ventilators, his rem dezevir is, withholding
Speaker 2: of medical care, his vaccines that were being prepared. We
Speaker 2: knew we're going to kill people. You know that counts
Speaker 2: as well, doesn't it. And so you know you've now
Speaker 2: got Matt Walsh saying the same thing. Franklin Graham over
Speaker 2: the weekend railing against this group called Evangelicals for Harris. Look,
Speaker 2: I'm not on anybody's side. I'm like tree Beard, I'm
Speaker 2: altogether not on anybody's side. Is there anybody that's on
Speaker 2: my side? None of these people serve the things of
Speaker 2: the interest that I'm interested in, none of the issues.
Speaker 2: So Franklin Graham shared a screenshot of Evangelicals for Harris,
Speaker 2: and again, evangelicals is just a meaningless label. And there
Speaker 2: is someone I think it's a granddaughter something of Billy Graham,
Speaker 2: So a relative of his that is totally into LGBT
Speaker 2: and all the rest of the calls herself an evangelical
Speaker 2: Christian and she's driving all of this. But look, here's
Speaker 2: the bottom line. These people are focused on politics. You know,
Speaker 2: Franklin Graham is focused on politics. He's not focused on
Speaker 2: Christ and this he's other telling. He says, my father
Speaker 2: appreciated his conservative values and the policies of President Trump
Speaker 2: in twenty sixteen, and if he were alive today, my
Speaker 2: father's views and opinions would not have changed. So I'm
Speaker 2: supposed to care. I don't care what any big name
Speaker 2: evangelist thinks about this. We evaluate this on our own.
Speaker 2: This is like a celebrity endorsement, and I'm supposed to
Speaker 2: care about this. Look, what is happening is these people
Speaker 2: are out there, whether they realize it or not. The
Speaker 2: evangelicals for Harris and the evangelicals for Trump are out
Speaker 2: there shouting, give us Barabbas. That's what they're shouting. We
Speaker 2: don't want this Jesus guy. Give us the thief, the robber,
Speaker 2: the murderer. That's who we want. I don't want Jesus.
Speaker 2: That's what these people are doing. They're putting the nationalism
Speaker 2: before the Christian Everybody wants to say, oh, Christian nationalism,
Speaker 2: the left, thanks, that's a threat. It's not a threat.
Speaker 2: Christian nationalism, where these people are so obsessed with politics
Speaker 2: to exclusion of everything else, is a threat to Christianity.
Speaker 2: It's a threat to our relationship to Christ. Because we
Speaker 2: look for we look for meaning in our life, we
Speaker 2: look for solutions in our life. Where do we look
Speaker 2: We look to the presidency, or we look to politics,
Speaker 2: but we don't look to Christ. So and you know
Speaker 2: when you talk and you're a Christian and your Franklin
Speaker 2: Graham or something, or you're some of the other preachers
Speaker 2: out there who are getting into politics that they haven't
Speaker 2: really paid any attention to to be charitable. I mean
Speaker 2: when you look at al Moller pushing the vaccines and
Speaker 2: all these people, you know, do it for do it
Speaker 2: to obey your government? Do it because science is so magnificent.
Speaker 2: Look at this science has given us a vaccine. Well,
Speaker 2: if you think it's a gift. And if you think
Speaker 2: that vaccine is a blessing, thank God, not fauci or
Speaker 2: it's fauci your God. That's what al Moher was pushing
Speaker 2: in And he's the president of one of the most
Speaker 2: conservative Southern Baptist you know, seminaries or whatever. What does
Speaker 2: that say? What does that say? But how are you
Speaker 2: going to pivot from Trump to Christ if you're Franklin
Speaker 2: Graham or are these people right? We look at Trump
Speaker 2: and his obvious hatred, his ego and his pride and
Speaker 2: his debauched life. How are you going to pivot to Christ,
Speaker 2: who is the opposite of all that? You know, the
Speaker 2: opposite of his hatred and disdain for people is Christ's love.
Speaker 2: Is the opposite of Trump's ego is Christ's selflessness, And
Speaker 2: the opposite of Trump's pride is Christ's humility and servant's heart.
Speaker 2: How do you pivot from that? Why are you attaching yourself?
Speaker 2: Why are you unequally yoked to this politician and grifter
Speaker 2: as celebrity. I'm not ever going to yoke myself to
Speaker 2: Donald Trump. I don't embrace any of his personal values
Speaker 2: and Trump doesn't embrace Christ's values either. They are two
Speaker 2: separate things that you can pray for Trump and maybe
Speaker 2: he will change. And so you know, when Franklin Graham says,
Speaker 2: my dad would have supported him. When Trump has been
Speaker 2: asked in the past, pointedly by Frank Luntz and others,
Speaker 2: well do you think you need forgiveness? You know, have
Speaker 2: you ever asked God for forgiveness? And they really had
Speaker 2: to press him on it because he started talking. Well,
Speaker 2: I know a lot of Christians out there, No, no, no,
Speaker 2: I'm not talking about do you know Christians? Do you
Speaker 2: hang out with Christians? Are some of your best friends Christians?
Speaker 2: You know, he hangs out with some Christians. He also
Speaker 2: hangs out with Jeffrey Epstein. Okay, so what do we
Speaker 2: make of that? And so he says, have you ever
Speaker 2: asked God for forgiveness? And Trump said, well, that's a
Speaker 2: tough question. I'm not sure that I have. I just
Speaker 2: don't bring God into that picture, the picture of being
Speaker 2: accountable to God. You don't see yourself as accountable to God.
Speaker 2: You don't think that you need forgiveness from God. You
Speaker 2: don't bring God into that picture. Okay, Well, if that's
Speaker 2: where Trump is again, pray for him. But why then
Speaker 2: would people like Franklin Graham and others Okay, John MacArthur, many, many,
Speaker 2: many people, why would they bring If Trump doesn't want
Speaker 2: to bring God into the picture when we talk about forgiveness,
Speaker 2: why would these big celebrity pastors want to bring God
Speaker 2: into the picture with Trump? Why they're using God and
Speaker 2: they're really saying give me barrabbus. You know, I agree
Speaker 2: that the Democrats are evil, and I'm not going to
Speaker 2: vote for him, never would vote for them. Not even
Speaker 2: as a protest vote. Would I vote for a Democrat?
Speaker 3: I can't.
Speaker 2: And you know, but when you look at Trump, can't
Speaker 2: you say the same thing about Trump? Is Trump not evil?
Speaker 2: Has he not murdered people? I mean, who knows how
Speaker 2: many people have been murdered? With this massive global cover
Speaker 2: up of the vaccine. We talk about the fact that
Speaker 2: under rov Wade we had probably sixty three million babies
Speaker 2: murdered in America. Well, you know, he might have gotten
Speaker 2: pretty close to that. Globally, it would still be less.
Speaker 2: But again, how many tens of millions of people do
Speaker 2: you have to kill before you're a murderer?
Speaker 8: Oh?
Speaker 2: I guess that makes you a political hero, right, like Mao,
Speaker 2: like Lincoln? If you murder a lot of your own people,
Speaker 2: And when you talk about your civic duty, well, you know,
Speaker 2: which one of the emperors do you like?
Speaker 3: Do you like Nero?
Speaker 2: Do you like the Mission? Do you like Caligula? Which
Speaker 2: one of them you're going to vote for? Because we
Speaker 2: got to have a Roman emperor in order to turn
Speaker 2: this country around?
Speaker 3: Right?
Speaker 2: Are you a Colligular guy or Nero guy? Which one
Speaker 2: are you all about?
Speaker 3: See?
Speaker 2: The thing is your life is much bigger than this,
Speaker 2: and there is a better life than what these people
Speaker 2: are offering you. Yes, you need to know what they
Speaker 2: are going to do, and you need to be aware
Speaker 2: of what their plans are, and you need to be
Speaker 2: able to expose their lies. That's why I spent the
Speaker 2: first hour of this show talking about these lies, about
Speaker 2: the pandemics that are and I say plural pandemics, which
Speaker 2: of them are all of them? People will talk about
Speaker 2: a poly crisis that they're going to kick out. You
Speaker 2: think they're going to kick off a poly pandemic crisis. Well,
Speaker 2: they may, but there are things that you can do
Speaker 2: about it. Besides voting for president and clutching your pearls
Speaker 2: and hoping that your guy or girl wins. There are
Speaker 2: positive things that you can do for your life and
Speaker 2: things that you can do to prepare, and there are
Speaker 2: things that you can do in your relationship with God
Speaker 2: that these people can't touch. And that's what's really important.
Speaker 2: This life is just a vapor. It'll be over in
Speaker 2: no time. And then what Because Donald Trump is going
Speaker 2: to stand before God, and so are you and I
Speaker 2: all of us are going to stand before God. And
Speaker 2: so if there's some area of your life that you
Speaker 2: just don't want to bring God into you might want
Speaker 2: to rethink that Trump is useful in the extent that
Speaker 2: we can. Obviously, his flaws are on display for everybody
Speaker 2: to see, and we can look at it and we
Speaker 2: can say, do I see myself in any of that stuff?
Speaker 2: Or we could say, instead of being proud about any
Speaker 2: of it, who can say, there, before the grace of God,
Speaker 2: go I right. But we don't have to buy into that.
Speaker 2: So what do you do to prepare?
Speaker 1: Well?
Speaker 2: Again, we've had all new record highs on gold went
Speaker 2: up over twenty five hundred. I didn't look to see
Speaker 2: what the price was today, but again, the price of
Speaker 2: gold is not really important. It's the price of things
Speaker 2: in gold is Gold is going to preserve your wealth.
Speaker 2: Gold is going to get you outside of the system
Speaker 2: that is going to be increasingly designed to surveil and
Speaker 2: to control you. They want to use that CBDC system
Speaker 2: to control everything that you do, everything that you eat,
Speaker 2: everything that you own. If you want to get out
Speaker 2: of that, start accumulating gold, and you can do that
Speaker 2: through David Knight dot Gold. I'll take you to Tony
Speaker 2: Rdaman wise Wolf Gold a great way to start accumulating gold.
Speaker 2: You can do it on a regular basis. You can
Speaker 2: get a group buying discount as part of wolf Pack,
Speaker 2: and you can buy into a certain amount each month
Speaker 2: and start to save that. Or you can just give
Speaker 2: them in order large or small gold or silver. You
Speaker 2: can roll over your IRA into that and preserve your wealth.
Speaker 2: I've been around for a while. I have no stomach
Speaker 2: left for doing roller coasters anymore, so I'm looking for
Speaker 2: I'm looking for just keeping what I have worked for
Speaker 2: and not trying to get rich quick on it stuff,
Speaker 2: because I've seen how that works out on rumble DA.
Speaker 2: Thank you very much for the tip, said David. Trump.
Speaker 2: Absolutely disgraced the military by giving the Congressional Medal of
Speaker 2: Honor to Miriam Addison. Yes, yes, belittling the price paid
Speaker 2: by wounded or dead military for a donor with foreign priorities,
Speaker 2: and to vamp on it in front of everybody too,
Speaker 2: because why what does it tell you? It's not just
Speaker 2: that he denigrated people's service. He did, but more importantly,
Speaker 2: who does he serve? Is he about America or is
Speaker 2: he about foreign billionaires and their money and serving their interests.
Speaker 2: It's no different from me to other people.
Speaker 3: I mean he's no.
Speaker 2: You know, again, they are different, but it is a
Speaker 2: distinction without a real difference when you look at these
Speaker 2: different candidates, Uh.
Speaker 3: Don't put your hope in these people. You know.
Speaker 2: Who had political leaders that were warned. Israeli political leaders
Speaker 2: were warned in the Bible. You know, don't trust in
Speaker 2: chariots and horses, don't trust in Egypt, don't trust in
Speaker 2: this and that, but your trust in God. God can
Speaker 2: is sovereign over everything and a sovereign over your independent
Speaker 2: life as you are living in this country, whatever happens
Speaker 2: to this country, you still have that relationship with God,
Speaker 2: and that is a fundamental thing that you want to
Speaker 2: focus on on rock Fan, Eric, thank you very much.
Speaker 2: I appreciate that. That's very kind. Well almost out of time,
Speaker 2: but let me let me throw this out in here.
Speaker 2: This is a person said I'd like to have you
Speaker 2: do an ad for me, and it's very unusual. He
Speaker 2: lives in an area where he's hoping that, uh, there's
Speaker 2: going to be in Oregon. He's trying to get people
Speaker 2: interested in moving to Oregon. And you know, there are
Speaker 2: conservative enclaves in Oregon. There's conservative enclaves in California. Whenever
Speaker 2: I talk about California, say just let them secede and
Speaker 2: go away. I get stuff from people in conservative areas
Speaker 2: in California it's like, no, no, we don't want to
Speaker 2: be left alone with these people. We want to be
Speaker 2: a part of And they're like, well, yeah, I understand.
Speaker 2: And you know, when I went up to the Pacific Northwest,
Speaker 2: it was I got recognized more up there than anywhere
Speaker 2: else I've ever been. I even had a guy call
Speaker 2: my name out when I was walking across a parking
Speaker 2: lot of a grocery store went in to get some
Speaker 2: stuff there. I was on actually that time, I was
Speaker 2: on a vacation and I was just walking. I had
Speaker 2: a hat on and sunglasses, and the guy recognized me
Speaker 2: from a distance. And but you know there, when you
Speaker 2: get into some of these areas like Oregon and Washington State,
Speaker 2: the conservatives that are there are really serious about their conservatism.
Speaker 2: It's kind of like Christians in a communist country like
Speaker 2: China or something. They get really focused on it because
Speaker 2: of the other things that are there. This area here
Speaker 2: is pronounced thay Nanda's a guy from Canada and a
Speaker 2: guy from Thailand who named it.
Speaker 3: They came up with.
Speaker 2: A kind of a medium between the two.
Speaker 3: He writes us.
Speaker 2: To me, he says, you know, Oregon is a dark place,
Speaker 2: but here and there there are points of light, says
Speaker 2: Are you renting an apartment now? Are you tired of
Speaker 2: giving your money to somebody who hates you and has
Speaker 2: content for you? Well, the people of Thai Nata.
Speaker 3: LLC.
Speaker 2: Know exactly how you feel. Are you thinking about making
Speaker 2: a move. They have a lovely town home and a
Speaker 2: gated community available for rent in Gresham, Oregon. They would
Speaker 2: rejoice to entrust their lovely town home to someone who
Speaker 2: is like minded, who respects them, and with whom they
Speaker 2: can respect. Call or text Bruce at nine seven one
Speaker 2: three seven eight six nine nine eight. That's nine seven
Speaker 2: one three seven eight six nine nine eight, and you'll
Speaker 2: never have to worry about voting, accidents or pronoun hospitality again.
Speaker 2: If you would really like to rent from like minded people,
Speaker 2: caller text Bruce at ninety seven one three seven eight
Speaker 2: six nine nine eight. Let us take counsel together. Please
Speaker 2: spread the word and tell your friends. Like minded followers
Speaker 2: need to stick together in these dark times, even if
Speaker 2: you're not interested in renting from them. The people at
Speaker 2: ty Nada. Would love to connect up with other David
Speaker 2: Knight listeners in Oregon, so call or text today. That's
Speaker 2: nine seven one three seven eight six nine nine eight.
Speaker 2: I hope that helps. It could be mutually beneficial, could
Speaker 2: be a win win situation.
Speaker 3: Thank you for listening. Have a good day.
Speaker 8: The David Night Show is a critical thinking super spreader.
Speaker 8: If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The
Speaker 8: David Night Show, please do your part and try not
Speaker 8: to spread it. Financial support or simply tell the others
Speaker 8: about the show causes this dangerous information to spread. Father
Speaker 8: people have to trust me, I mean, trust the science.
Speaker 8: Wear you mask, take your vaccine, don't ask questions.
Speaker 1: Using free speech to free minds. It's the David Night Show.