Hello, very good afternoon this Monday, July 15th, at seven sixteen o
' clock at night. Welcome, everyone who' s connected here. Welcome,
Doctor Amen Hello. Good night, happy start of the week, you
sad ones. Welcome, Dear Fra Baby, hear girls who quickly left for
the weekend. I didn' t get a sigh, a sigh. It
went away very quickly, but well, it was good. We have to
take advantage of it. I walked a lot and did a lot of exercise,
but, well, here we are to talk today. First, speak
to us, Dear Ephraim, what happened to King Charles. Welcome everyone who
' s connected, and an apology had greeted us. Welcome all those who
are members of the channel, all those who are subscribers, of the channel,
all those who are here from Pasadita as well and all those who are
the podcast platforms. Thank you so much for being here. Thank you to
him and Knight Alisé who are here with us of moderate stars. We have
to invite him and Caballero soon so we can talk about his book. But
that' s how we' re going to do it Eventually we' re
going to talk about it, Ahorita, so this is what you sent us
from King Charles, because not even Charles who cleans himself with an egg all
happens to him, because now what they put on the island of Jersey,
woe to the Channel to celebrate what thing. There they were very happy for
the first time I was going to leave after all this thing that was wrong,
that was fine, I was going with my nightgown that we love her
very much, not true. That' s right. We already love her.
You have to forgive the cloud camila and then that my camila was eating
an ice cream. No, she was comforted, very happy, very quiet,
nothing happened, and they told her, ma' am, we have
to evict because there is a threat, there is one I love and you
see that she got ugly with the other. So they told him let'
s all go, they all went to the hotel at hand. Nothing happened,
but if they were scared, they were definitely in jail because they had
just been Trump' s, whatever it was. It was just about Trump,
because that' s what they' ve discussed. That' s right.
It is true that if it is a montage that if the poor boy
was finished, that if all the people were already seeing him when nobody stopped
him, that if the new lady of the secret service is of no use
that if he went to burto already aridatecha. Forget everything that has come out
and speculations that have existed there about this. But, well, it could
be tea. He' s gonna hurt his camila. Hey tell us,
tell us your embrain about we' ve been here talking about RBD and the
problem right now is in standby because the one hundred and seventeen audits follow,
well five or four or whatever, but the audits follow. They' ve
already changed lawyers as much as you want, but we' ve got that
on standby. However, there is something to say about RBD. On Saturday
I was going for the toy shop and I said my God there are the
miracle of Guadalupe' s rose. If there was the second strip of the
rebe dolls I brought the whole block I didn' t say leme all the
miércoluchis. If there was a second throw and I said well, they'
re going to do the commercial. It' s a rebedade because they love
each other very much. No, because they did it separate on your account
every team, well, but at least they said, I mean, nobody
' s fighting with their money Look. We don' t talk, but
let the exact business come out. They didn' t do it together and
they' re not gonna do it together or do it, as I'
d say from a theophyllites. I was hoping that all three of them would
come out with the dolls of all three, not each one with his mone
is over. That is who is the individuality here, because in a group,
yes, yes, it sounds ridiculous, but yes, but yes,
because there it is, already, there is the barbis. Well, they
' re not barbis. The RBD dolls. It' s enough for anyone
who wants to buy them, who wants to collect them, to go get
them and listen. And then it turns out that the weekend we are going
to talk about this topic, which seems to me super delicate, because it
is a topic that journalist Jorge Carvajal denounces on his YouTube channel in productions sixty
- nine, and then Jorge Carvajal a follow- up to the publications,
because it is not that he has taken it out of the sleeve that he
has said he hears who I am going to investigate today, not from certain
publications of Wendy Guevara, with Paola Suárez, Paola Suárez, with others of
the lost or with others of the lost, from the same things that Paola
Suárez Sola has published with others, with another, with their couples in turn
or with their leagues in turn? So to put it this way Jorge Carvajal
is given the task of investigating this and it is complicated And it is serious
because he discovers and brings out the light that could exist. Or it exists
because Jorge car Jal also presents in one of his videos a lawsuit that is
already against Paola Suárez and then presents this lawsuit that has been filed. It
seems to me that today and here the serious thing is that what accuses Jorge
Carvajal and that I insist he has investigated more things. But what we'
ve all seen is that if he went out with a little boy who accompanied
a young boy who was graduating from sebetis, but that means that the chau
is only about eighteen years old. Something like this and they start presenting a
video of Wendy with Paola Suárez laughing at an abuse of a person with disabilities,
because, because he is a person who lacks an arm and says I,
anyway, put him and one and describes some terrifying things and all that
denounces him to Jorge Carvajal and says here he is committing a crime, in
which, therefore, he is not wrong. Here' s the most interesting
and very dramatic thing going on. It turns out here that in many countries
of the world and it happens in Mexico, and well, on social networks
that' s when a person is so influential media because it' s popular,
because people laugh, because people ay ha ha ha that fun are the
losses. All then if you criticize him, of course you' re a
transphobic, of course you' re a tole and not here. It'
s not about that here, because things go beyond then, Paola Suárez answers
Jorge Jaroajal this way. I just saw that Cor Jorge Carvajal, who is
campaigning, of a campaign of despestrication. And that, then, is a
smear campaign. Well, I can' t say that. All right,
sorry about that against me. Do me a favor. That man who has
no life, who has no life, who doesn' t have one to
worry about his mom. Well, I don' t know He apologizes if
I' m screwing up. I don' t know if I have a
mom, I don' t know if I have a dad, if I
have a sister, if I have this. I don' t know if
anyone has to pay rent. I' m afraid you don' t have
life to be campaigning after me. So much is your courage with me,
what did I do to you? What did I do to you? So
much for your courage. It' s great that you talk about me that
this and the other. Why, because, for I lived in public lake.
All the videos that are on social media are public and yes, you
can talk about me, but don' t talk about it with courage.
Don' t talk about it with courage. I don' t know what
I did to you. I don' t even know you in person.
I know you on social media, because you' ve just spoken ill of
me. You speak ill of Fulanita, of Sultanita, of Futsul breath of
how much messo looks to you in front of you. You' re no
longer waiting for someone to screw up to talk about that person. And terrible
what Paola says, because look what she says and that' s what a
lot of people say when you criticize her work, point out her job or
do one is that you talk bad about me. No and no one is
talking bad about his person, who is where to be talking about what she
does. Not because I' ve also been told you spoke ill of me,
because I didn' t talk about the work you presented on a screen,
because that' s what I' ve been doing for many years.
But here, in this case also blames. Jorge Carvaja tells him you hate
me no, don' t imagine, I don' t know how you
see him apart. He says he' s running a smear campaign. Well,
and besides, it' s hard for him to say the word.
I think she' s nervous. And what is a smear campaign, I
would say basically is something that, in effect, has the sole and exclusive
intention of harming a person by a personal animosity, that is, doing him
harm. And usually, because through lies, through inventing things of his person,
to perhaps distort some information or some conduct with the purpose of harming and
here what we are seeing What Jorge Carvajal does is a public denunciation regarding a
very serious and delicate situation, of which he has learned that moreover, Paola
has externalized. There are videos where he talks about it right now. I
think Fray is going to tell us a little bit and that it could not
or should not be let go as if nothing, because we are at a
time when awareness of this type of crime is more in the foreground than ever
before. So it' s not the same disparagement they report. It seems
to me like Ephraim exactly and notice that they always say that the agenda progresses
from there I don' t know how many things. This is the subject
of the other Age, the fact that Jorgito is part of the community and
so is she and we are part of this LGBT community and who knows how
many more lyrics this place gives to Jorge and that prestige to be able to
point out, for such a serious question of what is happening. That is
to say, the issue is not of disparagement and it is terrible that a
person like that obviously does not know how to discern what is good and what
is bad, because, because I do not think he knows it by having
such terrible actions with minor people, he does not know it. It'
s not a campaign of vestiges, it' s a denunciation, as Melisa
says. And the point is that Jorge, at the time, supported the
lost. But we cannot support such reprehensible issues and I will tell you one
thing. There are videos of Paola saying that she came to accompany her boyfriends,
to go get the ine out. I mean, he' s already
making a statement, so that' s already a car to pick up.
Yeah, by herself, she' s already said she likes kids. I
mean, there are things here that aren' t normal and not because that
' s part of the community that mentioned it. There' s Thursday we
' re going to apologize I mean, if something' s wrong and if
something' s a crime, if something' s reprehensible, it has to
be pointed out. And Jorge' s attitude is that of any serious journalist
he likes to investigate. Besides, I don' t see Jorge talking hate,
not commini. I don' t think it' s a personal matter,
either, because of the contract. I think he handled it in a
way that, despite the fact that the issue is heavy, because it is
a heavy issue, with a serious one, because that is a very serious
issue. Chavas or not it' s not like go and you don'
t have to point them out. It' s a very delicate subject.
But they know what happens to me about the other age of a person who
is trans doing this kind of reprehensible activities, because they are going to enter
into transphobia and homophobia, because this does stigmatize. Of course, all transs
are like this and for now they don' t realize what is the harm
their community is doing to them, flagging themselves saying that hatred here, there
is no hatred. Here' s a person who has enough jorgeito tantiates to
say what' s going on and no way and I do believe and do
and exhort people who are part of the LGBT community. Who knows how much
more than not to support reprehensible issues, although we are very serious that we
have fought for our rights and that if someone is doing something bad, as
Paola points out, it is not that clear, because it is not anything
here that is, here it is something delicate important that I do not see.
I insist that there be a personal matter of Jorge Carvajal, because it
may have been anyone else, as the complaints not here. I think I
agree with you, that Paula doesn' t understand or know that she'
s committing a crime and that she' s published it in other words,
and that it' s very serious. So I think that instead of saying
that Jorge speaks with hatred and so on, he should check and partner with
a lawyer to explain to him that what he is doing, because it is
not right and she took out a like I say communicated. He says and
I think someone helps him make this statement because that' s where he'
s going to look at them. Let me have it here so I can
read it. He says with regard to the reports of journalists and communicators on
various digital platforms, what they do to me by accusing me of unlawful acts
in the name of minors. Resoundingly false when we' ve seen it,
we' ve seen it to my following audience I repeat, I don'
t have any complaints against me. This statement is from the weekend. Now
it' s day thirteen, Today we' re fifteen, it' s
Saturday thirteen and then she says she doesn' t have any complaints against her
of this nature or any other, because she hasn' t committed any crime
to journalists and communicators, of whom it' s not worth referring to their
names. I tell you I' ve always been and will be respectful of
your work. I am respectful of freedom of expression, opinion and criticism.
I know we all have a fundamental right to say what we think. The
points they make to me exercise their right to freedom of expression of criticism and
opinions. They should be based on verified factual data. I' m sorry,
but if she can' t pronounce discredit, I don' t think
she knows the word verifiable factual data. Free expression and criticism and opinion are
one thing. And again to abuse that freedom of expression, crossing the limit
of their reports, not for the purpose of informing, but with the unhealthy
intention of causing me harm and, therefore, those who engage in the work
of communication what they say are sources of civil liability and that they can give
rise to the payment of compensation when what they report has the sole purpose of
causing me harm. It does not take an expert to realize that they are
using freedom of expression improperly and abusively. Their intentions go beyond freedom of expression.
I mean, the joke is she says. Its purpose is not to
report. His purpose is offensive in nature because I am a trans woman and
that is already manipulation by Paula of his title even already recognized by the CNDH.
This has nothing to do with it and as a trans woman I have
the right not to suffer any discrimination. And this is not discrimination either.
Paula Suer is inciting hatred, not violence. Rejection of insulting mockery. But
if this has nothing to do with it. It also says that this does
not say, I say it is said by the National Human Rights Commission and
it is subject to complaint. Therefore, they are abusing freedom of expression when
it is clear that their sole purpose is to expose me to the hatred and
contempt of the public. I think Paula Suárez is wrong, because what we
have seen in videos is what Jorge is saying, because we have seen them
in the videos. You said it, he said his exact mouth appears here.
This is a letterhead that has the statement on the top right that says
leading legal solutions, so this has already been redacted to it by a law
firm completely out of place. With regard to the issue that has been being
discussed and arguing this whole issue that freedom of expression should not be used to
harm people, and it returns to the same question as if it were defamatory
what is being expressed and as if it were also in function of its public
identity and to which it has a right. And that is not at any
time what is being talked about, or what is being said, or anything,
but these videos in which she openly talks about the type of ties and
relationships and with which people she has them and that in front of that it
is difficult for a person like Jorge Carvajal, to edit himself to inform him
to remain silent because besides her, in his video where he responds to Jorge
Carvajar, tells him that if he has nothing to do, that if he
has no family to take care of. And there too, because she is
also out of place, because what he has to do, frankly, is,
then, communicate. That' s his job and then, when it
comes to communicating, he communicates all kinds of information that has to do with
entertainment issues. But also, when you encounter something of the seriousness and seriousness
of this matter, for more reason, there is a duty to denounce it
for the time being publicly and you will see what the people involved are going
to come from. Of course, really efryn. To me the subject comes
to the whore, it doesn' t bother me, it generates all the
uncomfortable emotions. That is exactly why, because those of us who have been
fighting for this type of minorities to have rights, we have seen from an
honorable vision people like Paola come to bring everything to the fore and really that
in his statement he wants to incite the population to think that Jorge' s
attitude to tell the truth and denounce a crime is transphobia. It' s
just that it' s totally really, because there' s a lot of
trans people who are very respectable, a lot very respectable. This has nothing
to do with transphobia, forgiveness, Ephraim that interrupts you no and the fact
and it is very big, girls, because then what Paolo is asking us
is that we appeal to you reprehensible questions so that we do not tell us
that we are transphobic. And what do you think, Paola, I understand
your other age, because I' m part of the flag. Maybe not
my partners, a lot of people don' t, but me and Jorge
do and what you think. I completely reprove you and I, in particular,
turn my back on these kinds of issues and ask you, please,
to stop saying that it is transphobia, because it is not. It'
s not fanphobia, that' s manipulating public opinion with your power, please
stop misforming and if you' re going to send a statement, check it
out, because it' s more. I dare to think it' s
the subject of teresobia. I don' t even look at her, because
I don' t think the statement doesn' t write. No, of
course not. Of course not, and it' s an absolutely manipulative one.
But I don' t think she wrote it in any way. No.
But it is totally manipulative and using many arguments that have nothing to do
with the matter and that video that makes it also very unfortunate, because it
takes it to a level of personal litigation without reason and it is nothing at
all about that. Yes, yes, he points out, in an absurd
way carrying that, I believe that whoever writes the statement to you, Paola
or Avisen the paula, that whoever wrote the statement to him, should also
help him understand that what they have said in videos, what they have manifested
in videos of their life voice, is not right. So I think maybe
a little bit of' cause I know they' re right now in the
moon horns are the most popular, or the most popular ones in the famous
houses. In the case of them they are super wow, by wend and
by all they are super nice. This is so much fun. But that
' s wrong, and no matter how popular you are, he' s
not father, not exactly not. No, there' s no father.
It' s not transphobia and forgiveness. And so because I did think about
it, it' s well, peacefully, passively violent in your video,
of course, absolute, absolute and just like she says transphobia, which is
not transphobia. I am going to point out to my Paulita that her attitude
is totally violent. And now a lot to Jorge that if he doesn'
t have anything else to do and he reminds the family and so on,
that' s super violent, not for anymore. It seems to me of
such an inflated ego, to say, there is a smear campaign against me,
because, then, at what levels you have reached power. What are
you Paola Suárez about so that Jorge Carvajal, who has millions of s good,
millions of followers and who sees them all and has twenty zero connected live,
would like to dedicate ah Mira, is super good, but I am
going to dedicate myself to Paula Suárez because it is at the top of power,
because it is not that you said. It is a consecrated figure,
it has a history, a resume, it has a trajectory, since the
trajectory dates from about a year ago. No. I think Jorge Carbajar was
responsible for organizing a smear campaign for a character who has fifteen minutes in the
middle. No. And besides, as you' re telling us here,
psychologist Alcalixto, and that we' ve already said that effectively, is to
expose inappropriate behaviors. And that is not contempt and contempt, nor fame to
slander lying. If it were Jorge' s saying, nothing more and it
is still we would have to wait for the best. He says and then
I' ll show you the evidence. Besides, it' s Jorge,
but it' s not Jorge' s saying. It is what is there,
what has been, is what we have seen, It is what we
have seen, indeed, hear, for the subject and another of the things
that happened the weekend, that was intense and intense, I look I stayed
this way of or, Maiga, Mister Doctor, that is dedicated, because
we have already talked here about Marta Gareda, islinder Bes and Suguru who,
as ended up calling, neither cure them anything like that put the tot.
Then we take this back because, besides, the doctor abela to the communicators
and take this See it with great pleasure because to see, he says that
Marifercen, he says I will talk about Marifer Centeno, who said that with
graphology you can lose weight and then Marifer Centeno says no. It' s
not that, it' s not true. I never said it and that
was a meme. That' s from the direct message to Mr Doctor who
showed it and then it' s not true. Sure, yeah, of
course you did, you said it in two thousand eighteen. Of course you
said it and then says Mr Doctor. And what a coincidence that the next
day, because there were no more his videos Channel WOW. And that'
s when we touched on this Thursday, that they had entered Marifer Centerno'
s office and deleted everything that was a little complicated, unless someone had access
to your Internet and YouTube keys, for example, and they wouldn' t
have to go into your office to delete your videos. He can do it
from home. If you have the key, you don' t have to
go to because the type computers go to those no longer exist. A long
time ago and you can read an email here or in China. You'
ll get it anyway. Well, I don' t know if China is
on Google. I don' t think you can see it, but you
can. Yeah, there are others that do, but come on, I
was wrong country, you can see it. In Finland you chose exactly,
fuck exactly the one that has me in and then it turns out that,
because she says marifera to me they hacked me and bad and then you can
' t watch my videos. But the doctor says, but since I'
m very cautious and a great researcher, I have it. And then,
there the video where Marifer Centenois that can be lost weight with graphology, that
especially using blue ink, because it gives you peace of mind that, besides
writing certain phrases and repeating them for twenty- one days, I think that
three times a day you will also lose weight. Another thing that Mari Fer
says is that, well, among other things that the doctor says is besides
that it is graphólo, because that' s how Manifercente started not being a
graphologist. Now read the red, or now also the face, but also
the body language, but also the clothes you wear. But I mean,
not anymore. And now, then, with this nutrition thing. And good.
There is a saying that says remember that we here are very happy,
beautifiers. There was one says the one that covers a lot little squeeze.
You can' t be so specialized in so many things and be good.
And then the doctor says to see, because let' s see where Maripercente
studied, which was the same thing that Jorge Carvajal did with someone recently who
took out his cellular. I don' t remember, but he says no.
Not to see she studied the Law Career in a tech, but her
card took her out on the 23rd, just like Marifer Centeno' s mom.
I didn' t know he worked with the mom. On the other
hand, it says the difference. There' s a big difference in being
a graphologist and a sécographer. Doing good said graphology or graphoscopy. I'
m already like Paula group to well, so you say a fraud, because
she offers you a course that lasts for fourteen months or eighteen months. I
don' t remember, and that you' re going to pay two thousand
dollars and you' re going to go out being an expert in graphology,
that it' s going to be that you' re going to be able
to work even in the prosecutor' s office and forgive, because in the
prosecution, which looks at me I like very much. Marifer also likes the
doctor, the doctor, I don' t like to know him personally,
but everything the doctor was saying, because you' re beating up if you
' re right, if you' re a lawyer and what' s true,
because I know if lawyers take Latin lessons. Yeah, if they take
Latin lessons, because I ever even shared some class with some lawyer, but
not that kind of graphology. So it' s a pseudoscience. The doctor
says he' s promising things that don' t have official recognition. And
because it goes very hard against Marifer rye and says you cheat people and maybe
this is my opinion, Marifer handle his as a matter of entertainment and no
more. But you can' t claim it' s something that can cure
you, because she was also talking about curing anxiety. She also said that
the only thing that makes you fat is the anxiety that when I cry that
Maffer has never been fat in his life. But making statements to see who
wants to start. Oh, there' s so much to say. I
would say, first of all, that there is a disagreement because she says
there, he spent several videos where she says I am a woman of science.
I work through science. And that' s where it' s the
first dismantling by the mster doctor. Why does it tell him that, indeed,
graphology is not a science, which is even considered there for you to
see an area discredited in the field of psychology and is among the five pseudosciences.
Let' s say that and it says and this I also say in
peace, because it says, for example, that the British Society of Psychology,
which is one of the most recognized in the world, equates it with
astrology and gives it scientific validity. Zero. So, yes, because here
too we have talked and consider that there are things that serve for entertainment and
for and for everyone to believe what they want to believe, but you cannot
give it a character of science, because it is not. So here'
s a discrepancy when she says this thing that points to that she' s
a woman of science, when she handles a technique that isn' t.
The difference with graphoscopy, which is used, as it is used to cross
- check signatures, to detect counterfeits, frauds. That' s another thing.
But already this that through writing one can modify aspects of health physically to
the emotional is a bit complicated. The reason is that I would like to
say that as I think she is understanding it, it is or as she
is proposing it is an opposite thing. Let' s say the other way
around, for example, one that the doctor really likes to talk about cognitive
or behavioral therapy. Doctors in general like it a lot because it is a
very good form of therapy, as there are so many others that are great,
but in this case because it offers a relatively quick result to treat punctual
problems and, in that sense, cognitive behavioral therapy seeks to modify thought patterns
to achieve changes in behavior. Here it seems as if what she proposes is
the reverse to modify a behavior that is the way to write the words that
you write the ink you use, as if the other way around modifying that
behavior, then you modify something internal, but not only at the thought level,
but even at the biological level in the organism. And that' s
as bold as it is inaccurate, and that' s where there' s
a confusion of order, where it looks like an effect is a cause.
And it' s not like that. So he says, for example,
people with emotions leave you food, but altered emotions like this people write pointy
and write messy, of course because he already has an internal conflict that makes
his behavior reflect it, but not because you put him to write calm and
exact right. She says do the long letter and then they' re going
to start slimming. And so on. And there' s one thing.
I remember that when I weaved something it was very significant, when you were
stressed, pure and so on, because you weave much tighter. When you
' re relaxed, you weave much more loosely and you notice the tissue you
notice in the fabric, how it is one and the other, because the
writing is the same. Writing is the same, but inversely it is not
the structure that modifies you. You modify your writing now and she' s
going to say it, I could say, but you can, I mean,
you could force yourself to knit more open even if you were deliberately anxious.
Yeah, how you deliberately say it, but that' s a matter
that you' re forcing your hands to move very differently. But the basic
problem is not being solved. I mean, it' s not like that,
it' s not exactly like that. Now, Ephraim, you about
all this stuff about what it' s called me, I didn' t
shut up, and I waited because there they stepped on my cannon, and
when it starts on my street, it' s already worth wiping out girls.
Then there' s Marifer Hang on,' cause I' m just
as fighting as you are. And then, I do, I' m
going to back up my actors and I' m going to tell them why.
Because first of all, what I see is this lady' s irresponsibility
to go out and stigmatize a disease such as obesity and overweight in a super
irresponsible way. Why, because she' s starting with a decalogue saying what.
Fat people are fat because they don' t want to, I mean,
you' re fat because you' re anxious you' re fat,
I mean, fat people don' t want to be fat, Marita,
and not all the things about obesity or being fat or being overweight are about
overeating. They' re called heart- bathologies. Many people are obese overweight
because they have some pathology that is totally out of their hands. And even
if you write in purple, yellow green red or go from here to China
on your knees, you can' t control that because it' s totally
out of your control. And to start speaking from that place of stigma of
overweight and obesity for a woman decisive German son, is that irresponsibility. How
responsible. That' s the first, second all the time talking about food,
and I' m talking to you about marifer. Not only does food
gain weight, he' s right, but what do you think. There
has to be a whole circuit of various things for pathology to lead us to
a result. And I don' t want to insist. Fat people don
' t want to be fat and I' ve had thousands of patients here
that I tell them it' s no longer with me, because the endocre
and it' s the next, I mean, it' s hormonal.
I' m either leaving or it' s with the psychiatrist, it'
s with the psychologist. Check over here, review the subject over there with
mariferio And what makes me totally reprehensible is that she presents herself as a woman
of science stigmatizing a disease of which the lady is not well documented. I
mean, if she wants to talk about a disease that is documented first of
all, because she has no idea and really, girls and I tell you
how the program is with all peace, she has no idea what people who
have some pathology are suffering from, about you idea of some metabolic syndrome that
they want to lose weight and really can' t, because it gets out
of their hands completely. And I have patients eating a grape girls go up
five kilos or it' s really a c C. Of course, that
' s what she says. No, well, look, you write twenty
- one months. I' m thin, I' m peace. I
' m no, no, no, no, nothing. No. That
' s not who I was I also said who I was This is the
line of sight. So had she. But it' s from the team
ahead, that is, if you want you to come here talking or you
' re from the affirmation team. Let' s see, then there'
s also one thing to say. It is true that at a given time,
when you are in a good treatment, call yourself for obesity, for
anxiety, for what it is, that you have and are in the right
hands of a specialist doctor, if you have to carry out a nutrition plan,
because with a specialist nutritionist, if you have been told to work on
a therapy, because in fact, your stress levels are very high and you
have to manage it as well. That' s all very well. And
then, if you feel comfortable with it and decide to use positive statements,
how good, because he' s a father, not because he' s
also being criticized. But I repeat, the problem comes from within, it
' s not from outside. I mean, if you criticize yourself, you
disqualify yourself, you insult yourself. This isn' t going to change in
a way. Let' s say like outside, like cosmetics, not like
a makeup on the outside to make it look nicer. And then now I
talk nice if I' m not really feeling it inside. That' s
why problems have to work from the inside to exactly. I think you'
re that sorry and since you do that then of course it' s very
good, that your statements and your posts and your little drawings and what you
want is perfect. But that' s not the solution. Of course,
the problem with mariferrez because Marifer' s career is a career in law.
He doesn' t have a career or medicine. He' s got nothing
I was saying. But, besides, she also doesn' t have a
career that refers to the behavior that has to see wave, so she doesn
' t have that either And I think that to see I think maybe Marifera
we' re going to assume that what she wanted to say wrong or cursed,
is that you must have an attitude, and one thing is to have
an attitude and to get up in the morning and say now yes, I
can without falling into the toxic positivism that we talked about here, Juan y
salazar and I or Juan y las armas well has talked to us and has
exposed this issue of toxic positivism in creating your life. They can go get
him one thing That' s what you say. Well, now I'
m gonna get it day by day like they do. I don' t
know someone who' s in recovery. Well, one day at a time
I' m gonna make an effort. I can' t. And another
thing is that you think I' m leaving. I' m gonna put
on my samboles pie right now while I' m writing. I' m
skinny, because that doesn' t happen. Thank God there' s no
more lupi tea. Thank God yesterday you don' t have or thank God
you don' t have there. Don' t do anything to them.
Girls. The point is, she presents herself as a woman of science.
And then, in particular, it gives me a lot of laughter, because
a woman of science would respect the other sciences. I, Ephraim, would
not dare to talk about hormonal issues until I am not clear, I,
I, I would not dare to talk about quantum physics i e, I
am not very theologian, or to talk to me about food telling me that
you would, I will not talk about acting i e forgiveness marifer but limit
yourself, Queen, limit yourself to getting into the areas of health. It
' s sacred, because you' re talking about people' s health and
forgiveness. Yeah, I' m sorry. It' s clear. Scientific
authority has the lady to talk about this. None Yes. Yes, yes,
it becomes very serious. He wanted to tell me something and well,
he did also mention that she has. She mentioned the mster, the doctor
she has several books. One of those books I think is called the dark
side of the mind and again, that is, stepping on unknown grounds,
because she is a lawyer and law is not an area that deals with the
study, the mental functioning and the light of its dark light, that is,
it is something else. Then, also well, it disqualifies the famous
diploma that you mentioned from where you can train as an expert, because this
they teach in their own institution, and it says that you don' t
need previous studies, that is, you don' t even need the prepa.
And that gets a lot of attention because, on the one hand,
he says he' s a graduate and then he says with him other capital
letters. This isn' t a diploma, this is a specialty. You
can' t have a specialty without a bachelor' s degree. Period,
you can' t have. You can' t have a specialty if you
don' t have a bachelor' s degree. Me or everything I studied
in gastronomy could not be a specialty because I am not qualified as a pedagogue.
It' s the truth. But the study you can have and you
can have done it like this, but it does not exist, there is
no such specialty, but you can have, but there is no recognition.
It' s called the Mexican College of Grafology. I think that and what
I think leaves us or thinking about this issue that makes me very important is
and because you just talked about Paola Suárez, we just talked about Marifer Centeno.
And yes, is it true, very true what the statement says?
Right? How true did I make Paol' s Communiqué? It' s
the responsibility of those with a b, but that should be a little bit
for a reflection. Paola' s case, not an analysis of what you
' re saying, because that' s precisely the responsibility you have to have.
Then what' s going on here. I think that often the influencers
do not all have this responsibility, not all have this preparation. And I
' m talking about open television and social media, I mean, I'
m not talking about any more Internet networks. Not also on television we hear
terrible barbarities, but the fact is that we validate them because the character is
famous, because it is on TV because millions of people see it. So
he' s probably telling the truth And no and it' s not true
and it' s not interesting what he tells us already nin Hernández says when
I worked as a bank cashier, I received three trainings in graphology, or
maybe it was graphoscopy, because yes, in a back you have to collect
signatures and that kind of stuff, and I imagine it was for that,
and it' s very good, because it' s a necessary resource,
but not for everything else we' re saying to solve problems of mental or
metabolic functioning and everything else, because no, no, it' s not
like that and it' s not from the area, because it' s
not specialty and it doesn' t make any sense all that. Now what
I would like to say is nothing more, what I do not like about
the Mister Doctor, who also already that personal style and everyone who indisputably leads
to his channel as he wants to carry it. But I did get a
little strong that very early on, if they use a few strong words.
All of a sudden he does say this bitch says I say well, I
think it wasn' t necessary, but I understand it' s his way
of talking. He says he' s the niurca of medicine. He'
s always said that. Let' s see, Mr Doctor hasn' t
always said, and I think every communicator has his own style. Here'
s what' s going on here. What happens is that Mr Doctor received
many attacks on social media. I saw them at least on Twitter. In
this regard, policies also wrote Sandra Curvantes, that is, they write people
supporting Manifer Centeno. And it' s not about supporting or wanting a person
or not wanting them. The point is, then, to see if what
Mr Doctor is saying is not true. Well, then make an appointment and
I spoke face- to- face. Mariferi defends your point points, but
of course we know perfect and says Mr Doctor, and repeats it you know,
you didn' t know with whom you sold others. But why there
' s a prior assault on Mr Doctor. That' s the truth,
because I saw them, I saw them and that' s not father.
Ephraim. I' m going to tell you because I want to be a
doctor, because finding this word in the health sector and I don' t
know if it' s happened to you that' s the word humility.
There isn' t, I mean, there' s no doctor for nutrient
psychiatrists, nothing, no one, that is, all of us in health
believe that we have the voice of truth and then, if we' re
not a little humble with my servator, there can be questions like Angel and
Cavale, who for a long time were methrologists and mitrologists in between, until
he realized that the subject was with an endopinon because yes, it was completely
hermonal. So the subject of what Marife is doing is a lot of calluses,
because it' s something that' s happening a lot in the health
sector. I want to cure the patient from my knowledge, but it is
no longer up to me then what my serducts denounce always fascinates me, because
he is very emilito with that theme of saying. Every specialist in his place
and yes and I like his style so I like forgiveness, no yes,
yes, I like it and I send a kiss in his mouth more.
I like this too. Yes I have seen it many times and I agree
with many of the things they do but well, I am also sincere and
I say to see I say I really think that sometimes it is a little
harder than it is required to defend the point, which defends it very well
with the arguments, but also, yes, it is very his channel and
very his style. And also, now with what he tells us lupita that
he was also being assaulted, because that probably also generates that kind of response
in him. But yes, his reasoning is impeccable, really. When she
talks about all these things to discuss, I also think that something she did
very important was when she comments on this that Marifer said that when she was
with Newurke and they had this terrible lawsuit on Adela' s program, after
her she said she was very scared of having a disease that she had told
her doctor because new Te of course is a lousy part of Marifer. That
' s terrible on Marifer' s part, and there wasn' t any
of that and it' s completely childish. What she said and I was
very scared of him Group why. And he exposes it too is that look
at mel look at you. For example, right now you said I didn
' t like the doctor' s aggressive style. The doctor was defending himself
against the attack on Bitch and Charlatan and everything he said, what Marifer said
about Nework is far worse. Yeah, without using any qualifiers. Hey,
but what was he gonna say to the little cowardly man, who' s
like the one who gives him the wire that went to tell him with this
little cowardly man? This is truly insulting to discriminatory. It' s terrible.
What he said to Nurca and Nurca Niurka in that show by Adela Micha.
What he claimed from Marifer Centeno is you start saying things about people who
aren' t in front of you, and then you do your analysis of
people who aren' t in front of you to defend themselves. And he
told her that. And in that he was right and marifel did it again
with the little man this yes and they told him something even worse and still
gives him air for the other to go on and she keeps asserting it.
That' s extremely violent. Of course it adds up because where you get
it from, that' s where you get it. Where do you dare
to say that Nurga is carrying a virus on her skin? How dare you
and how dare you say it disgusted you and gave you something to do with
it, how dare you. That' s a lot worse than what you
might have said, mr. Doctor. I then the incongruity of ending up
hugged with her, cheek to cheek, hears then why you hugged her if
you were so afraid, is that what is terrible and exactly why Marifer is
far away from the health sciences and probably very close to the humanities. I
don' t know, and it' s a virtue that we would have
to have all of us engaged in health sciences, which is empathy, because
empathy helps you not stigmatize Marifero and what you do in every sentence is stigmatize.
And it' s clear to me that and I understand the point of
why graphology is a subdoscience, because then if you have circulars written in such
a way and then also if niurca puts your buttocks here, it' s
supposed to catch you from something that' s not true and that' s
stigmatizing and that' s really wrong. In two thousand twenty- four and
the people who have worked in hospitals we know how reprehensible it is to generate
stigmatization in patients of whatever rank and in any person. Well, that'
s the way it is with this subject of Mr Doctor and Marifer Cente.
I don' t want to see if Marifer Cente isn' t going to
answer something to Mr. Doctor. If you suppose not, it' s
not right, if you' re wrong about something. I' d love
to know if that' s possible. Yeah, let' s see,
' cause I think he gives a lot of weight. Yeah, totally really.
Yes, I' m telling you, he does quite well and defends
very well what he speaks with all the truth and I don' t know
what he' s going to do now. Frankly, it' s complicated
for myfer I don' t think it' s very good. And besides,
right now you were saying about the little man who winds her up so
that she keeps saying all this about Niorca today I don' t know if
it happened just today. I suppose he does now talk to Nurka, because
materially mocking Marifeo of course, because what he does is what he does,
of course there is of that yes moral. It does tell him how Marifer
said this and this and this about you and Ninorca, very quiet, doesn
' t even hook up with that part. He never knows exactly who this
person is, but, well, a moment to say goodbye. Thank you
very much for joining us this Monday, 15 June, and thank you for
having been here discussing this issue. Thank you, Dr Abel, for thank
you very much and very interesting this. We' ll see what happens and
keep seeing each other soon was exactly. Thank you, Efra Baby girls Nice
to meet you. The week began Brava and Leo is coming. I think,
I think we do science. Leo' s coming in and he'
s gonna put this on like this and he' s gonna come to the
full moon already, uh, pretty soon give him an o. There'
s gonna be Harto, there' s gonna be Arto bringing in and,
like you say, whatever brings you in the soap. Come on. Thank
you all so much for joining us. Let' s go to history in
history Jack Trara, but don' t worry there we' ll be.
Thank you so much for joining us all and let' s go there and
watch the show we did regarding the famous crimes here on the channel and also
in history. You can see it. Any channel is open to the public.
You can go see him and well, see you here tomorrow with women
leaving Heya, let' s also go to history. In history. See
you guys later, let' s go to