Attention. You're listening to the Todd Huff radio show, America's home for conservative
not bitter talk radio. Be advised. The content of this program has been
documented to prevents and even cure liberalism, and listening may cause you to lean
to the right. Here's your conservative but not bitter host, Todd Huff.
So let's see. We've got Joy Behar who has called Chris Christie, one
of the Republican Republican candidates for president. She's called him, what is it
here, champion to the left. That's what she called him on a behind
the scenes podcast for The View. I don't even know how the View stays
on. How on earth are people tuning in to a behind the scenes podcast
of the nonsense and the hatred being spewed on a daily basis at The View.
So we've got that. We've also got Mike Pins out there, another
nominee or excuse me, another candidate I should say, for president for the
Republican Party. The nomination he's out there talking about we're trying to position himself
saying that populism is a pathway of defeat for the Republican Party. We'll get
into that and a lot of other things today, my friends emails, would
you want to be part of the conversations today, and of course why wouldn't
you? Todd at Todd huff Show dot com. You can also text three
one seven two one zero twenty eight thirty. It's good to communicate with those
of you that send messages in those channels and know that we are doing our
best to stay on top of those. Also on you know, social media
platforms. I'm gonna tell you and the good guys gonna hate me for saying
this. Some of you may hate this what I'm about to say, disagree
vehemently. We've started, we actually started recently a TikTok channel, which I
know, I know, but I'm going to tell you something. When I
see so much, so many people in government against TikTok, it makes me
think maybe that's the one platform. It's actually the one platform that censors us
the least. It blows Instagram out of the water, It blows face in
that regard Facebook, it blows YouTube out of the water. We have a
Rumble channel as well, where you can watch full you can watch you can
see that I do have a face for radio on Rumble. Anyway, you
can connect with us on those social channels. I don't talk about that much
because candidly, I like coming to you on this microphone. I like communicating
through our column, which we did something a little bit different on the column
yesterday, but you can sign up for that for free todoshow dot com.
I like those channels better. I like you communicating directly with us. Although
I did have an interesting dialogue with someone late last night it was late or
I should say, Tuesday night on TikTok that we might get to as well.
But I want to I want to start here today. I'm not gonna
play the the SoundBite. I'm just gonna kind of frame the discussion because I
think that this is relevant. Here we are in the still the early stages
of the twenty twenty four campaign. We have a candidate who is the it's
his nomination to lose. I see no way he loses the nomination he being
Trump. But you know, there's other things that are good about some of
these these candidates. I'm gonna say I'm not gonna say all of them.
In fact, when Joy Behart describes Chris Christy as what you say, champion
of the left or something like that, I'm not. I'm I tend to
think. Yes, I've said on this program, I think he's being funded
by people that are Democrats or leftists, and his job is I don't know
this, but this is just my hunch or he's at least encouraged by these
people. Maybe it's strategy. I don't know, but they like this,
They certainly like it. He's the only one that's really at this point directly
going head on against President Trump, and he pays for it massively in the
polls. To see someone to see someone polling like that and doubling and tripling
and quadrupling down on a tactic and strategy, it says to me that something
else is going on there, because it's not about trying to win the nomination.
There's no way this guy well. His net favorability rating, we talked
about it the other day amongst GOP primary voters, was very much in the
negative. Pinces wasn't much better. Pences was almost It was twenty seven or
some such things, negative twenty seven. I think Christy was higher than that,
maybe in the thirties. I can't remember the exact number. Negative,
meaning for example, that if there were fifty percent who had a positive rating
of him, that means or as suiting me a negative rating, that means
twenty percent had a positive rating, thirty percent fewer than had the negative ratings.
So anyhow, So but we've got this, the jockeying here going on,
you know, and Pence is in this mix. Pence, of course,
is not jockeying for position to be vice president. Pence is of course
not jockeying for a position in a Trump cabinet, should that be the case.
Pence is going for the nomination because he thinks he can win. I
guess I don't understand. I truly don't understand. I don't understand how you
get people to give money to this. I just how much. And look
he's he's from our state. I do not mean for this, None of
this is personal. I just please grant me the leeway who say my thoughts
without I'm not trying to be you know, personal with it with Pence or
anything. I've met him a couple of times, never been anything but nice
to me. Wouldn't even have remembered meeting me. It was years ago.
Anyway. The point is, it's what he's what he's trying to do.
From a campaign perspective is of course strategic. He's saying, Look, there's
populism and then there's principled conservative policies and so forth, and I want to
talk about that today. So in other words, Trump has become kind of
the standard bearer of populism amongst the Republican nominees, although I would say De
Santis has kind of piggybacked on that as well. Some people would say De
Santis is more of a the principled conservative. Trump is not. I'm gonna
say, don't misunderstand what my word are saying here. Trump's not coming at
this from a ideological perspective. Trump comes at this from a perspective of common
since we've been through this before. He comes at this U through the perspective
of this is this is how I think things should be done, and he
does. He has he has a reverence for the Constitution. And I know
people, I know people don't think that, but I mean, why else
he has a reverence for liberty the individual and the constitution. Why else do
you cut taxes? Why else do you weaken the bureaucracy? Why else do
you stand firmly on things like well, some of these conservative ideals he's standing
on he's in supportive conservative policies without being a constitution or a conservative I should
say, ideologue, if you will. Pence is saying that, that's populism.
Pence is saying and let's pause there, Let's let's talk a little bit
about populism. Now. This is this is interesting because, as it is
with most terms, the definition might might differ depending upon who you who you're
asking. But populism, populism, the concept is really to say, look,
we're not coming at this from a strictly ideological position or perspective. We're
trying to govern accord in accordance with the popular will of the people. And
so ideas are talked about more in a practical sense, not so much an
ideological sense. But it does not mean and this is important, I think
for the context here, someone can be a populist in a sense but also
still adhere to a particular ideology. In this case, in our case,
in this country, I'm telling you it's still conservative principles. There are so
many people in this country today and I know names, monikers, labels,
they people cringe when you try to apply them, especially when they don't like
the label themselves. Or they have a negative connotation, but the majority of
these people live more. The majority of people in this country live their lives
as conservative people. We simply do. We simply do, and for some
reason we are hypnotized. I know very smart people who believe that somehow you
get a group of people in charge of the government or in positions of political
power, and suddenly they've got some sort of a crystal ball, a magical
wand somehow they can defy everything that applies to everyday life, that the rest
of us follow, the principles and so forth, that the rest of us
follow day and day out. And they people think, well, you get
into government, and government, can you know, just make things happen,
snap their fingers and things. For example, do you remember when we were
this was this was floated a couple of years ago. People were saying,
well, we've got all this trillion dollars of debt, why don't we just
why don't we just mint a coin out of whatever it was, titanium or
some some precious metal and say the coin is worth a trillion dollars. Who's
gonna say that we can't? And then we we cash it in and suddenly
it becomes you know, reality, it's really worth a trillion dollars or whatever
the number is, and we can just pay down our debt lickety split,
no problems whatsoever. And that's not the way that reality reality works, right,
And that's that's where people outside of government we have to say they don't
have they don't have a magical want. They don't just because they don't like
the way that things are in real life on planet Earth. They don't like
human nature or whatever. You can't just say, well, we're not going
to follow those rules and accept that reality when we're in positions of government.
But we've allowed that, we've allowed that to happen. But most people the
point is, most people live their lives as conservative people. For starters,
we don't have a printing press or a digital way to create currency just out
of thin air, well not legally anyway, and say, hey, you
know what, I've got fifty trillion dollars in the bank. How to get
there? Todd, don't ask those questions. Just let me pay with my
funds. That's what the federal government does. And by the way, that's
why there's inflation. They've overproduced the money, the amount of money and the
money supply, which is something I was talking with someone on TikTok. Never
thought I would utter those words late last night anyway. So there's this difference
between conservative the ideology someone who's a conservative ideologue coming at issues from a very
methodical position, and then populism. Populism says, hey, these are things
that are popular with the American people. Let's use those things. I see
nothing wrong. Let me say this as a person who would consider myself,
I would say a practical ideologue meaning meaning I don't think. I think that
we need to look at moving the needle back to the Constitution and conservative principles
and so forth. It's not an all or nothing proposition. We're going to
have to get there. It's a journey. We might not get as far
as we would like at a particular point in time, and we've got to
throw aside, throw aside this idea that says, hey, it's either perfect
or nothing, because if we stay where we are, we're closer to the
radical left's crazy positions in worldview. We just have to move back methodically and
some things people aren't ready to accept yet. And as much as I might
not like that about a conservative truth, the constitutional principle. I'm not saying
to abandon it or anything. I'm just saying, if you can't get it
done, get what you can done, and see the view this as a
long game, and populism is a way that you can do that. I've
even said on this program, and I'm going to take a break here,
but I've said on this program that this is this battle is never going to
end. Reagan said it best when he said that freedom is always a single
generation away from extinction, and it is up to us to make sure that
the next generation receives it, understands it, and then carries it on to
the next generation. That's how this works. It needs to be passed along
to the next generation by getting them to understand. That's why we have to
proclaim truth. Wrote about this a little bit in the column that went out
yesterday. But we have to get people who understand. We have to communicate
what the truth is. We have to identify it. Then we have to
explain it, articulate it, make sure that people are able to receive it,
understand it, and then we move on so that they can accept greater
truths. I mean, these are things that are good for individuals, good
for our nation, good for the world. We clean up things here,
there will be there will be an effect outside of our borders. But we
can't start trying to change everything. And I'm say I don't mean that in
some you know way where we're forcing our will upon people. I just mean
through prosperity, through the promotion of ideas that lead to liberty and freedom for
people around the globe, being ambassadors and for the light of truth that is
embodied in conservative principles. Like those things are good, but we can't start
there. We've got to clean house. We've got to see those things and
and be accepted here. We have to make some progress internally. And what's
so bad. I would ask to former Vice President Mike Pence, if the
vehicle by which we get there is populism, I would say that that's exactly
where you should start. You should start where there's the most agreement. You
should start on the things that people largely agree about. Folks. That's a
foundational principle for what I talk about on this show every day. I think
eighty percent of the country would agree with eighty percent of the things I say,
and the vast majority of those folks would not consider themselves principled conservative conservative
ideologues. And so the question is why because those ideas are popular, those
ideas are popular. They may not know them, you know, or think
of them the same way as a conservative scholar would, but they still see
the value and still accept it and still know it to be true. And
so what is wrong with starting there? Why must we split hairs and say
no, no, no, you've got to be too Again to Mike Pence's
comments here saying that he's it's important we can't be having the Republican Party led
by populace, I just I don't agree with that. I don't agree with
that, especially especially when the ideologues are so far away from being able to
meet people where they are and communicate in a way that they can understand,
connect with people, personally, articulate things, and so forth. Who cares
if Trump doesn't articulate it exactly the same way that a conservative ideologue is if
we end up at the same place. I mean this again, when you
look at this as a continuing push towards truth and towards what is good for
liberty and humanity and so forth, It's not like you just check it off
the list and you're done. You've got to continue to educate. Maybe Trump
is only articulating it ten percent of what it needs to be, but we
don't have to be at one hundred percent today if people are ready to implement
it. I just don't understand this. Populism is not something that we should
shy away from. Vice President Pence is absolutely wrong here. In fact,
if you're too scholarly, if you're too boring, if you're too far away
from where the common person is, they're not going to want to join you
in what you're trying to accomplish and the mission that you're on. We need
someone who can connect. We need someone who understands the things that we can
get done easiest and first, and we move, we move anyway. Timeouts
in order a little bit long in this segment, my friends sit tight listening
to conservative not bitter talk. Caution, my friends, My vast, vast,
vast teaming of attorneys has reminded me. But I've got to tell you
that listening to this program can cause you to lean to the right. So
exercise extreme caution. If you're operating heavy machinery or driving a vehicle today,
you've been warned my friends back in just a minute. Welcome back, my
friends. I've alluded to this just really quickly here. I've alluded to this
a few times on this program. I think I told a story about this
as well. But we have joined a radio network called Audio One, and
I'm very excited about that. We'll have some more news about some I don't
know, just some some new things that we're doing here expansion wise and so
forth with the program. Get some news to come in short order there.
So as we expand, I wanted to share with you that part of just
really quickly here. The part of that is that I've got to I've said
this before, as we started this in a closet. I mean, I've
had to do all of the parts of this. I had to learn out.
I never had any idea how to do these things with the sound board
and all these things, audio files and everything else. But one of the
things I used to do exclusively I was the only one for a while,
was talking with our advertisers what you hear during the breaks, and I still
know many of them. But we've built a team and part of what's made
that part possible, which helps us to expand into these other markets. Is
the help I've been given by Crispin Crews and his team at Sales Arbiter.
Sales Arbiter helps us train and manage the sales team. Like he's literally in
the meetings doing the coaching. You know, there's some great sales trainings that
are available out there as well, and Crispin provides the training. But it's
not just the training, it's the coaching, which sometimes is a missing link
because people may understand in theory what to do, but then where the rubber
meets the road, there might be a difficulty. So anyway, I just
say this, if you have a business, if you manage a sales team,
if you work at a company where you know, hey, our sales
team needs some help, I highly recommend Crispin Cruise and sales Arbiter, give
them a look, give them a chance. They've helped our team tremendously,
tremendously to a rep, they've helped everyone. You want to find that more
information, visit them online Sales Arbiter dot com, Sales Arbiter that's sales a
arb I T e R. Sales arbiter dot com. Be sure to tell
Crispin that you heard him out, heard about us here on he heard about
him here on the show, and give him a hard time for me as
well. But let's get back here to this issue of the issue of populism
versus just this this concept of being a principled conservative, because it does,
it matters, and how we're going to take steps step forward. I remember
in twenty sixteen, and even during Trump's presidency. I'll say his first term
because I'm hoping for a second term, but I remember, I remember talking
about the idea that there is a great amount of commonality. There are many
things that many Americans are on board with that they know needs to happen.
And Trump was, in a lot of ways, I think, uniquely positioned
to help them accomplish that, or to help us accomplish that. And this
is exactly why they demonize the guy. This is why they try to stop
him in so many, so many ways. Is because they know that it's
effective and they know that it resonates with people. And so that's why we
have this world of superficiality, That's why we have the world of identity politics.
All this is used against us because I think that they know that there
is unity on some of these key principles, dare I say, principles that
are conservative, and so that's why they want to separate, divide and conquer,
create envy between classes. I don't like the term classes of people,
because in my mind we're all equal. But I guess, for the sake
of painting the picture here different socio economic groups of people and so forth,
if you get one group to hate the other, then they're not going to
want to work together for the common good. You make them skeptical of one
another, You demonize one group or both groups, pit them against each other,
make everything about race and gender and ethnicity and all of these things.
At the core of all of that tension and disagreement is this idea that I
mean, they know that they're dividing and conquering us. That's what they know.
That's what they know, and they're content to do that. And I
say, we've got to stop it. We've got we've got to get past
that. And I think people are ready to get past that. I think
the average person, in fact, it's one of the next things you'll hear
about in the column, but one of the average person is tired. It's
done with identity politics. It is so poisonous, so venomous. It can
be weaponized so easily. It's used as a way to silence people who have
political who are in the political opposition, who have a different political opinion.
You attack someone's idea, you attack someone someone's idea who's a leftist, if
they are a minority, they're there. You're not allowed to say it.
You're called a racist or a homophobe or whatever it is, when in reality,
all you're trying to say is, look, I'm just talking about their
ideas. You're the ones that are bringing these things into it. It's it
got to do with anything. And of course we've gotten to the point in
our society where that's all the matters to people. Superficiality. It's sick,
it's sad, it's unfortunate, and it's used as a way to drive a
wedge between the American people. But populism in and of itself, especially given
the truth that people are naturally inclined to conservatism, when we understand that and
accept it, we know that populism can be a tool to advance this country.
So Pence is wrong, He's strategic. I mean every the campaign,
it never had a chance to begin with, it's crazy to do this.
I don't know why people give money to his campaign. I don't even think
he would well, I'm almost certain he wouldn't be the nominee even if Trump
was out of the race. It's just it's been very, very poorly run.
It's not helpful. And meanwhile, there's real problems out there that need
to be addressed by someone who's willing to, I mean, to just fight
for these things. So to me, the choice is clear. But the
Republican Party, the two that we've talked about today, Christie and Pence,
you know, not the greatest ways, I think to either be described in
the case of Chris Christie by Joy Behar as a whatever she said of Darling
of the left or something. I can't remember the phrase exactly, but basically
the left likes him, which means we shouldn't not personally, but we shouldn't
be behind it. And then for Pence to come out against populism when conservative
values, at least a lot of the core bedrock American principles are widely accepted,
I think people are dying to see that. Return to criticizing populism makes
no sense to me as well. So timeouts in order other things to get
to today. Sit tight, my friends back here in mere moments, Welcome
back, my friends. I mentioned that I had a bit of a discussion
I used to call I used to call them Facebook faceoffs. But that's back
when Facebook actually let people share their ideas. I don't even know if that's
allowed. Let me get you shut down in and of itself. But Facebook
faceoffs happen on different platforms, and I had an individual on TikTok. We
basically the good bad guy public health experts agree there we go, sorry about
that triggered the next break. So but the good bad guys said that,
Well, he pulls clips of the show, puts them on social media.
You can see my mug on there again, seeing that I got a face
for radio. But it was Rush used to say it was a he said,
a throwaway line. Now, of course, we don't have any throwaway
lines here. Every line is designed to matter and count. But it wasn't
central to what we were talking about. But it just it was a short
sound bite of something that was I was talking about inflation, and I was
referencing the Inflation Reduction Act, which we had just gotten. What we just
passed the one year mark here recently of that law being passed, and I
was just referencing that, and I was also going back in time to the
Congressional Budget Office, the CBO. They had given some financial numbers on that
particular issue, or that particular bill, I should say, and they came
to the conclusion that the Inflation Reduction Act never actually reduced inflation over ten years.
And I said that in the clip. And then of course some people
say some things that, well, why did it go down? Well for
starters, how about this for starters? If you look at the history of
inflation, let's go back to Trump or even back slightly before that, you'll
you'll see the inflation is typically between in recent times, and there's been times
you go back, I think over history, it's been three point something three
point eight, I want to say, I just read this. But over
Trump's term, it was in the neighborhood of one to two percent. I
think it was over two percent a couple of times, but it was in
the ones quite a bit, quite frequently. So Biden comes into office and
within a couple of months inflation is literally at what eight or nine percent or
some such number. Now that sounds. So when you're talking about percentages,
you can talk about the growth as a number of percentage points. So for
example, you can say from two percent inflation to eight percent inflation, you
can say is a six percentage point increase. But that is not really explaining
the magnitude of the problem. That's really say from two to eight is quadrupling.
It's quadrupling the amount of inflation because it goes from two to eight.
And sometimes it seems insignificant because you're talking about smaller numbers. Just like some
people, it sounds insignificant the differences between million billion and trillion, even though
trillion is what a million, million millions? Right, So I think that's
right, Yeah, that's right. So anyway, the point is there is
a misunderstanding just because something is called the Inflation Reduction Act. When it was
scored by the Congressional Budget Office, they said that in the first couple of
years inflation would actually tick up a little bit from the effects of the bill,
the effects of the legislation, and then over the next I forget seven
or eight years, whatever it was they do these In ten year, they
look at a ten year period of time, they said it would come down
a little bit over those years, but if you look at the net effect
from beginning of end over that ten year period, there would be no effect,
no noticeable effect on inflation. I said that it's factually accurate. That
was the report. You can go back and look Congressional Budget Offices initial or
might have been their final analysis of the Inflation Reduction Act. And I said,
why are we calling something of course I know why, but why do
we let them get away with the calling something the Inflation Reduction Act that has
nothing with reducing inflation. In fact, if you listen to what they've been
saying out on the i'm gonna say campaign track, even though it's coming from
the administration, from I forget which one it was. It wasn't it wasn't
blinking, it wasn't. I can't remember which someone in the administration was talking
about. The real benefits quote unquote benefits of the Inflation Reduction Act were that
it was a massive expense into grain, energy and stuff like that. It's
a massive bill that's that paid for a bunch of a bunch of stuff,
which is not how you reduce inflation. Inflation go back and study Milton Friedman,
who's much much much smarter than I on these on these issues, and
others like him, other economists, but Milton Friedman, he's since passed away,
but just a brilliant man. He says, in no uncertain terms,
inflation is caused by federal governments. It can't even be caused by state governments
because state governments don't have the printing press. And I know the printing press
is an antiquation, did notion, because we're moving into you know, electronic
transfer of dollars and eventually it's you know, the digital currency stuff, which
we haven't talked about a ton on here. But the point is, the
point is that these the Inflation Reduction Act was never designed to reduce inflation.
Now, but inflation has come down. In fact, the most recent numbers
they actually ticked back up slightly. But the annual numbers ending in August,
I think is I want to say three point one eight. It's just over
three percent the year ending in July. The month before was like two point
something two point eight or nine. So they're getting back down to close to
what it was when Trump was president. We're still higher than that. In
fact, if it's at three percent and Trump's were all on the two percent
range. It's one percentage point higher, but it is fifty percent, right,
fifty percent higher. The rate itself is from two percent to three percent
anyway, So inflation, my friends, is not decreasing because of the Inflation
Reduction Act. In fact, even the media, even the media cannot they
don't even try to spread that lie, which means it's apparently. It's so
apparent they don't even think they can get away with it. Now. This
goes back about a month or so, three weeks anyway, headline ABC News
dot Go dot com. Yes, inflation is down. This is ABC.
Yes, inflation is down. No, the Inflation Reduction Act doesn't deserve the
credit. And this article goes through and explains the inflation rate is dropped from
nine percent to three point two percent. Most economists say little to none of
the drop came from the law. So there's correlation and there's causation. Causation
means that X caused why. Correlation means why was doing its thing. X
was doing its thing, and they just both happened to say, in the
case of decreasing, they both decreased, or whatever the case may be.
In comparative terms, they both did their thing, and they didn't necessarily have
anything to do with one another. It wasn't one didn't cause the other.
So the Inflation Reduction Act did not cause the decrease in inflation. In fact,
I think it could be argued that inflation would be less without the Inflation
Reduction Act. I think that there's a strong argument to be made for that.
But I just wanted to say that it came up on social media,
and it's something that has been in the new since. We just recently surpassed
that mark, and there's this push to declare Bidenomics the greatest thing since slice
bread. And we have to make sure, friends, that we understand the
truth. Bidenomics is disastrous. Inflation Reduction Act was a ruse designed to trick
the American people into another massive spending bill that had absolutely nothing. Even the
media won't try to make the claim that it had anything to do with reducing
inflation. Timeout is in order, my friends. Now it's time to take
the break. Sit tight back in a minute. Here's a headline for you.
Had this in the stack of stuff. I wanted to get to this
today. We don't have a lot of time, but here we go.
You'll get a kick out of this national pulse. Jake Welch is the rider
here headline scientists, Oh boy, scientists exaggerated climate change threat to get published.
So of course this is not surprising. This, of course, is
why one of the reasons why we are in the mess that we're in today
as it pertains to climate change. What do I mean by that? I
mean the government's response. What the government is trying to get you to believe,
get me to believe, get us to do, get us to comply
with, get us to say, yeah, that sounds like a great thing
in order to save the planet. Who wants to say, who wants to
kill the planet? Who wants to watch baby's sea turtles die? I don't
want to be responsible for that stuff. I love the sea turtle, you
know. And then suddenly suddenly people can and I'm throwing a lot of things
into this mix. But the whole climate is the way that we approach the
climate. Do you remember a few weeks ago, I don't know that I
talked about this, but I had it in the stack of stuff, and
maybe a couple of weeks ago now, researchers found that plastic straws were actually
better for the environment than paper straws, which is music to my ears because
I've had the paper straws. That's the most disgusting thing that I've ever had
to endure while drinking a drink in a restaurant. Paper straws are absolutely gross.
And there's some states you can't get. I don't think you can get
a plastic straw in the state of California. There's obviously, when we were
in Florida, the same sort of thing. Of course, it's beaches you
don't want. There's plastic straws to end up in the sea and they go
up there. What are they What are they getting the turtles? Anyway?
Anyway, scientists exaggerated climate change threat according to this piece, in order to
get published scientists, I'm gonna read this first paragraph. Scientists are exaggerating the
impact of quote climate change on natural disasters. Obviously, this is what's happening.
Is this is apparent to any person who's lived any amount of time and
can just see how they talk about these hurricanes and everything else. But they've
been exaggerating the impact of climate change on natural disasters to have the research published
and prestigious scientific journals forcing them to intentionally omit other crucial contributing factors, and
of course that's where the money is as well. But timeouts in order,
my friends. Just want to share that with you. Quick time out back
here in just a minute. Welcome back to my friends. Not a lot
of time. There's other things in the stack of stuff, including a piece
from front Page magazine for wokeism to live, free speech must die. That's
exactly right, by the way. In order to get the rest of us
to go along with the crazy, insane things that they're trying to push down
our throats, they have to get us to shut up about it. That's
the only way to get us to go along with it. It simply will
not work any other way. We're not going to go along with it.
It's because it's insane, the things that they're trying to push down our throats.
Every person with a brain and experience knows these things are insane. The
only way to get away with it is to shut people up. Don't let
them express their true ideas, keep forcing these things upon them, eventually breaking
them. I say good luck to that whop. That's not gonna happen.
I've got to go, my friends, Thank you, for listening. We'll
see tomorrow. STG