Attention. You're listening to the Todd hf Radio show, America's home for conservative
not bitter talk radio. Be advised. The content of this program has been
documented to prevent and even cure liberalism, and listening may cause you to lean
to the right. Here's your conservative but not Bitter host, Todd Huff.
Greetings, my friends, and good news today for the fashion icon John Fetterman,
himself, the senator who wears shorts and carries on like a silly man
whenever he's asked about Biden being impeached. The Senate has officially done away with
the dress code for senators. For senators, I think if you want to
go on the Senate floor, you better be dressed appropriately. But John Fetterman
can go in there like he just rolled out of the rack. My friends.
So all is good and the Democrat run Senate. Of course it's not.
It's a disaster as everything else that they touched. But my friends,
is time to get to all sorts of things today. Greetings email should you
want to be part of today's conversation Todd at Toddhshow dot com. You can
also text us, that's right, you can text us three one seven two
one zero, twenty eight thirty thoughts, questions, feedback, opinions, Yes,
yes, yes, include that adoration and praise there as well. There
we go ahead to make a minor adjustment with the mic that is much much
better. So over the weekend. Over the weekend on Was It Sunday,
Trump was interviewed by is it Kristin Walker? Is she the one that took
over four yes, Oz is nodding yes for Chuck Todd. Chuck Todd no
longer the host of Meet the Press. Kristen Welker is the host now of
Meet the Press. She interviews Donald J. Trump. It aired over the
weekend. And before I say that I may have alluded to this yesterday,
I don't know if I did. But this Dean oba Dyer, however you
say his last name, it's radical leftist who's got a talk show again.
I'm still looking for the alternative, the leftist alternative to conservative, not bitter.
It doesn't exist, and it certainly doesn't exist with this guy's show.
This guy's bitter is all get out, but he is calling for I tell
you, it's just it's crazy to be It's crazy to people who are saying
when you see headlines like this, leftists call for me the Press, boycott,
cancelation of new host over Trump interview. So they're they're so upset.
And Olberman Keith Olberman's in here as well. I just, uh, goodness,
gracious, the anger and the rage. Here's Dean Obadiah or whatever his
name is. Kristin Walker. This is the tweet before. This was late
late last week, but before she aired that interview. Kristin Walker to interviewed
Trump for Meet the Press launch and that was a quote. Now this is
his tweet. Nothing like kicking off your new political show with a man who
attempted a coup and inside of the Jay excuse me, jan six attack.
It's as if corporate media wants fascism all capital letters plus she will lose liberals
forever. And of course the insane radical this you talk about. This guy
is the true alternative or the true He's anathetical, the complete antithesis to not
bid or anything. Keith Olberman, he's retweeting something. These folks cannot deal.
They cannot They are enraged, they are angry, they are furious,
they are seeing red. They are delusional. He said, she's already irretrievably
damaged. What a disastrous stenography job with Trump again, it goes on and
on. You get these liberals. They're upset. They don't want people watch
and meet the press, meet the press, which is of course a liberal
little utopia. It's not it's not media, it's never been media. It's
designed to again, like everything else in the traditional mainstream media, is designed
to push you, to push the American people whoever decides to watch this crap
in a particular direction. So and I'm look, this is not a defensive
Kristin Walker, nor is it an attack. I just I mean, we
know, we know what we're gonna get from whoever they put into this position.
They're not out there actively looking for the best journalist. That's not what
they're doing when they fill these roles. They are looking for a person that
they believe can move the needle for Biden, for the left, advance quote
unquote advance America towards progressivism, which, of course I refrain from saying that
this is how they frame it. It is regressive. There's nothing progressive about
their ideas at all. Their ideas were tried, have been tried. They
lead to poverty, They lead to disease and sickness and scarcity. They lead
to misery. They do not lead to prosperity and hope. They do not
build a future. They build a future for the few elites that can tell
the rest of us how to live our lives. But that's all it does.
Everyone else is equal. That's right, We're all equal, equal in
our shared misery. These are pathetic, terrible, sickening, disgusting ideas,
and they should be thrown on the trash heap of history. That's what should
be happening with these ideas. Instead, they're embraced by these lunatics. And
if someone like Kristin Walker even so much as interviews President Trump, and they
want her canceled, they want her to be done away with. They are
infurious, they are infuriated over this. They are ready to fight. How
dare again again It's I've said before that government is God to the radical left.
Now media is not government, however, to the radical left. Even
though they would never admit this, media is a tool that should be used,
they would say, by the government to proclaim whatever it is that they
love. The things like the Ministry of Truth. They loved that concept.
They love the media who appears to have an unbiased position. Of course doesn't
have an unbiased position, but they want the media there to kind of buffer,
be the buffer between the radical decisions made by the people in Washington,
DC and in our state houses or wherever they reside, which is all over
the country. Now, the media helps to buffer those, explain those to
the masses, get the rest of us to comply, bring out the experts
that are going to direct us as to how brilliant these ideas are, and
so forth, and so, while it's not directly the God of government itself,
it is the mouthpiece of the God of government. I guess you could
say it would be akin as I'm saying this out loud, It could be
akin to how an Old Testament theologian would say God, of course as God
in the Old Testament, but he has his prophets and he uses his profits
to speak to the people. I would say that they would say the media
is like the prophet of the government of God, meaning they speak on behalf
of to help to explain things and to get the masses lined up and following
what needs to be done. And you can't be you cannot be interviewing the
guy who about caused it all to come down. Now they want you to
think that what he about caused to come down was the country itself in the
sense, in the sense that he was trying to overthrow it, cause an
insurrection, become a fascist. These folks cannot even define fascists. They have
no idea what fascism is, none whatsoever. They think that fascism just means
that you love your country, which is crazy. Fascism has an actual definition.
It actually is an ideology. It's an ideology, by the way,
that does not have any roots whatsoever in liberty. That's what's fascinating about this
whole thing is when people talk about fascism, and I vehemently disagree with the
traditional spectrum, so to speak, where you have communism at one end on
the left side of the spectrum, and on the other on the right end,
you have fascism and they say they both want to control, so we
got to find something some common ground in the middle. Well, I actually
think you have people who want to use government to control people on one side
of the spectrum, and then you've got people on the other end of the
spectrum, which I would say would be complete anarchists. They want no government
whatsoever, and so we need to understand that we need the least amount of
government possible to keep from empowering whoever it is, the communist, the fascist,
whatever, other sort of folks that don't care about individual liberty and freedom
and so forth. We need to be constantly vigilant against them. And they're
not hanging around the people. They're not down there hanging out with the founding
fathers. They're not out there a loving and respecting the principles laid forth in
the Constitution. They're simply not That's not who they are anyway anyway. But
this is not again the media wants you to think that again Trump's the fascist.
Trump tried to overthrow the country. Why is she interviewing him. She
needs to be canceled immediately, immediately. So that's kind of what let up
to this, to this interview. Excuse me as I look at the time
here in fact, I might take an early early break. Here we go
fall time. Occasionally have to deal with these vocal issues as we transition through
the seasons. But I'm gonna take a break, early break. Shocking,
I know, shocking, I know, but an early break is going to
be an order here because I don't want to get to these sound bites given
how much clock we have here for the first segment. So on the other
side of the break, what we're gonna do. I'm gonna play some sound
bites of this interview. Of course I can't play the whole thing, but
I'm gonna play a couple of sound bites. I want you to hear the
back and forth, and of course you're gonna hear some of the themes,
I guess themes or issues that are in the news, things that we've been
discussing on here. But I want you to listen to this and to enjoy
because remember, as we move toward the election, this is something I think
a lot of folks haven't calculated yet. You know, Trump, he did
his campaign in fifteen, got elected in sixteen, took office from seventeen,
and was out at the beginning of twenty one, and all that stuff that
happened, Impeachment's, Russian collusion, all this stuff right January sixth, just
a big mess of emotions for people. It's sensory overload with everything that was
going on there. And so then there was a pause, right and for
the he's still Trump still has his supporters. He never lost the supporters.
He could have had a rally at any moment in time after leaving the White
House and brought in tens upon tens upon tens of thousands of people, And
that's true, But there was still he wasn't dominating the news cycle. He
wasn't. I mean, in some ways he's always there, but he wasn't
right, he wasn't president. This is a different thing, and so some
of the focus shifted away from him, and this, I would say,
is something that the left has learned to really regret because now that means the
focus goes on Biden and he's out there saying all sorts of stupid stuff.
By the way, there's a SoundBite that I might get to time permitting today
where he said something else offensive from the microphone and then the White House communications
team change the actual transcript of what he said so that it would seem less
offensive. It's just crazy. But they don't like the limelight on Biden,
but they also don't like it on Trump. But now as we move into
this election season, as we're about to kick off the primary season, all
of this it's going to I think it's going to reinvigorate people are going to
realize, Oh, now that he's in the news every day, it's a
different feel. It's a different feel than when you're just hearing news stories about
indictments here and Trump on Trump over there talking about something where not every eye
in this country is on him. But that is coming, and that is
evidenced in part by this interview, and of course by the fact that Trump
is dominating the current Republican field. So it will change. The feeling will
change. I think some people will be warmed up to Trump by virtue of
what's about to happen, just having him go out there and realizing there's a
reason for the things that he says and does. And that's some of what
i want you to get from this interview that I'm gonna play on the other
side of the break, So timeouts in order, my friends, Sit tight.
You are listening here to conservative not bitter talk. Still looking for the
leftist and liberal alternative that isn't full of hatred and rage and bitterness and divisiveness
and candidly hopelessness. Those things are not present here, my friends, So
sit tight. We'll continue on the other side of the break back here in
just a minute. Back my friends, by the way, By the way,
you know that we are heading quickly into the fourth quarter of two thousand
and twenty three. It's hard to believe here in a couple of weeks that
will that will begin. And so at that time of year, a lot
of folks are reviewing who to potentially talk with about changing health insurance options,
whether that be individual plans or whether that be plans at the company. And
if you own a company, if you are an individual looking to change plans
or at least review your health insurance options. Maybe you're tired of these premium
hikes. You just want to make sure that you're getting the best deal.
Whatever the case may be, I encourage you to reach out to my friend
Eric Wilson and I sell health. Eric has been a supporter of this program
for some time. He's helped clients throughout the country since two thousand and four.
Two thousand and four, that's a long time. He knows a lot
about this stuff. He's been a guest on here, but also on other
programs Fox News and other places as well, talking about health insurance, talking
about Obamacare, talking about what's wrong, how to fix it. The guy
can help navigate those very complicated waters. And that's whether you need individual health,
group health, maybe you need help with Medicare. He can help with
that as well, and help you plan a tax free retirement. And while
he's not necessarily a fan of the Affordable Care Act, he can certainly help
you navigate it as he is an expert in knowing what to do about that.
So give Erica call eight one five three seven two thirteen sixty three eight
one five three seven two one three six three for a free consultation absolutely no
cost, or you can visit him online at i sell health dot com.
Be sure to tell him you heard about him here on the program. So
I mentioned before the break that we want to play some soundbites. This is
Trump with Kristen Welker, her first episode of Meet the Press. She interviews
Trump. This is upset the left, as we've covered in the earlier segment,
and now it's time for her to well to get after it right.
She Look, this is her trying to make a splash. You know,
she's got the biggest name. No matter what these crazy leftist thing there is
no person that she could bring on her show that is going to drive more
attention to her program, that's going to drive more anticipation that folks are going
to be looking forward to the inevitable fight because she of course, she of
course is part of the mainstream media. These are folks that are effectively the
pr firm for the Democrat Party, and so fireworks are expected when these sorts
of things happen, and people like fireworks, and I'm not there's a lot
of good that can happen when you have fireworks that are revolving around actual differences
of opinion and not just personalities, which of course is about personality with Trump,
but it's about what Trump stands for. So she brings him on.
Of course, we're taught or she's talking, or we're talking nationally about what's
happening with the Joe Biden impeachment, the inquiry into the possible impeachment. We've
got the Hunter Biden indictments that we talked about yesterday. All this stuff comes
together, and so they want to talk about this. As I've said before,
and as you know, as you know, this is now the point
in time where the defense begins. And we went through a series of possible
ways that they're going well, not even possible predictable ways that they're going to
try to defend President Bribery as he moves into this impeachment inquiry. And so
there's a whole plethora of things that we went through yesterday. But one of
the things I don't even think I mentioned yesterday in regards to the potential or
the expected defense of Biden is this idea that we talked about earlier, which
is the politics politics of payback, the politics of retribution. I remember,
I remember after January sixth, when Biden took office. I remember coming to
this microphone and saying to you, the era of payback politics has begun.
The politics of retribution is now in full effect. This is what the politics
of retribution looks like. And so we've seen that for a couple of years
now. And so Republicans regained the well control of the House of Representatives earlier
this year, they started an actual investigation into something of substance, instead of
making pretend fantasy sorts of investigations as the left did with the January sixth Commission
and Kensinger's tears and all that sort of stuff. So now we have an
investigation into Hunter Biden and the connection to Joe Biden. There's actual legitimate evidence,
there's evidence, there is clear evidence. Now someone can still say that
the evidence that has been provided or discovered at this point may not prove anything.
That's a fair I guess I don't know that it's reasonable, but someone
could come that that's a possible alternative or possible outcome of looking at the evidence.
But there is evidence. And so she's trying to say, if you
get into office, are you going to be engaging in politics of retribution?
So that being said, I want you to listen to this exchange. This
goes on for a minute, but take notes because this is why I just
wish more politicians would be like this. I really do, because Trump is
not afraid. He's not afraid to go at her. Here. It is
Trump answering having this back and forth with Kristin Walker about the politics of retribution.
You mean by retribution, are you looking to appoint an attorney general who
will prosecute the people you tell them to prosecute. I'm looking to appoint an
attorney general who's going to be tough, one crime and fair, very simple,
and go after your political enemies. No, no, I wouldn't have
a do that, but Biden has done that. That is a beautiful thing.
Notice how she threw in Remember remember she knew the reason I started off
this program by telling you that the left wanted to cancel her. They were
throwing her under the bus. They were disgusted with her. How can you
bring in someone who tried to overthrow our country, Kristin Walker, we just
can't do it. This is unbelievable. She's immediately trying to win back their
good graces. She's saying, hey, I'm one of you. This,
I brought this guy on here to getting right. I'm going after him.
And so when she asks him about if you are reelected and you have an
attorney general, you go to a point an attorney general, which, by
the way, kudos to Kristin Walker for pointing out that the attorney general is
in fact a part of the executive branch, is a part of the president's
authority. This is one hundred percent accurate. We have tried to create some
level of separation between Department of Justice and the president directly, especially when the
Department of Justice has to look into something that the president may or may not
have done to violate you know, crimes or just investigations in general, and
I would say to not much success because it is in fact ultimately under the
executive branch, and it kind of has to be that way, but it's
important to point it out. It is the Biden Department of Justice right now,
the Biden Department of Justice hasn'tdicted Trump. There is no arguing that.
There is absolutely no way for them to get away from this. Now.
What they're gonna say, and what they have said, is that, well,
he's just given this to Merrick Garland. He's given it, who,
of course, in turn has given it to Jack Smith. And they've washed
their hands, they've shut the door. They don't want any reports. You
don't even tell us what's going on because we don't want to know. Bologney.
That is not That is not how this works, my friends. All
is fair in love and war and politics. Right, That's how the left
looks at this. Believe me, and you know this. This is one
hundred percent about the twenty twenty four campaign. This is not about seeking justice.
This is not well, it's a little bit about retribution. It's about
getting rid of the guy that threatens them more than anyone else in Washington,
DC, or or elsewhere. It's a lot about that as well. But
they can live with anything in the past. They can they can deal with
that as long as it doesn't come back again in the future. And so
that is what this is about. But she had to throw in that little
jab there, right, and to get after your go after your political enemies.
And Trump does a masterful thing. He says, Look, that's what's
happening right now with Biden. And he's one hundred percent correct, as you
well know. So timeouts in order. I want to play more of this
on the other side of the break, my friends, But the clock is
telling me it's time to take that break. Sit tight. You're listening here
to conservative not better talk. I am your host, Todd huff back in
a minute, Matt, my friends, I want to return to this sound
by We're gonna recue it. We're gonna recue it. Here is I'm little
battling analogy, I guess, or a seasonal deal when the season's change.
But anyway, so Kristen Walker asking Trump about when he appoints an attorney general
should he be elected president of the United States again in twenty twenty four,
are you, mister President, going to appoint a an attorney general who you
want to go after the people who are your political enemies. Is that what
you're going to do, mister President. That's so pathetic of you. And
look, I'm on here saying that this shop absolutely should not be should not
be done. Politics of retribution is a bad thing for a nation to engage
in. However, However, that does not mean that if your political enemies
are absolutely breaking the law, that they have some sort of immunity from being
investigated and dieted, prosecuted. I know it's folks, that's why these things
become tougher and tougher. The more dishonest the media is, the more corrupt
our politicians are. I know this is a complicated thing. It's tough to
manage, but I mean, we all know that to be true. That's
the thing. Everyone knows that what I just said, it's exactly the right
thing. You don't want to target your political enemies, but you also don't
want to give them immunity to be able to act without any sort of consequence,
breaking the law, doing things that are damaging to the country, potentially
taking bribes, potentially violating the integrity of the office. I mean that in
the country. If that's what's where this ends up with Biden. By the
way, there's an old video Greg Kelly on his show had it on I
don't know, maybe last late last week, where there's a video of showing
exactly the sort of thing that looks to be like them for the Biden administration.
Between Hunter and Joe Biden. This goes back to like two thousand and
five. Basically, there's a conversation after Biden gives a speech. After Joe
Biden gives a speech, people come in and they're asking about Hunter's law firm,
as though they want to engage with Hunter's law firm. I've said this
before, What is the business If it's Hunter's law firm, If he's provided,
what is why are people flocking him? What is he the expert in?
Because from where I sit, the only thing he appears to be the
expert in is connecting people with his politically connected father. That's what it looks
to me. But anyway, at least that's what the evidence suggests as a
very valid possibility. So then the video shows the gentleman and Hunter talking and
they break off and they start talking business, and that's on the stack of
stuff if you want to see that, and in a nutshell, that's really
what this is all about, is that what was happening is that is that
what was going on on a regular basis with President Well at the time,
Vice President Bribery and Hunter Biden's business associates. That is not good for a
republic. Everyone knows that. Everyone knows that. But you shouldn't target them
to go looking up, which is what happened to Trump. You shouldn't just
say, hey, that's our political opponent, let's go see what they're doing
wrong. But if there's legitimate evidence of wrongdoing and there's something there that is
worth prosecuting or investigating, you also have to be able to do that.
I know it's complicated and tough demand, but that's we all know that to
be the right way to do that. Anyway, So back to this conversation,
I want you to hear how Trump pushes back. This is what most
politicians cannot do. He's not afraid of whatever she comes back with Kristin Walker.
He continues to push back, and he says, no, you're wrong.
There was a lot of things to be concerned with about the twenty twenty
election and He keeps pushing back, and she tries to say it's over and
done with. You know, it was been debunked, and he says,
no, it's not been debunked. No one's even thought about talked about this
and so forth. But I just I love this exchange, and I think
it's worth listening to, and I think it's worth This is worth emulating for
all other politicians, and some have by the way, but this needs to
be done more frequently. Here it is again we're gonna pick up where I'm
going to replay the beginning part, but it goes on a little bit longer
as well. Kristin Walker asking Trump about really the politics of payback here it
is I mean by retribution, are you looking to appoint an attorney general who
will prosecute the people you tell them to prosecute. I'm looking to appoint an
attorney general who's going to be tough on crime and fair, very simple,
and go after your political enemies. No, No, I would never do
that, but Biden has done that. Look, Biden, these are an
indictments against me. These are Biden indictments. This isn't God coming down,
And very fairly said, Yo, you spoke badly about an election. The
election was rigged. There's no question about that. There's so much proof on
it. Even if you go to the more modern day proof with the they
go at Twitter files, FBI and Twitter, or you take a look at
the Amazon stuff for the Google stuff, or you take a look at two
thousand mules. You take a look at all of the ballot stuffing that's on
tape. You take a look at the fact that the legislatures didn't approve a
lot of the things that were done in the elections, and they had to
prove. And we could go on forever. We could go on forever,
but no, I want somebody that's going to be strong, respected, tough
and fair. Just to go back to a couple of the points you said,
the ballot stuffing, that's something that's been debunked. It has as you
know, let's on camera, but let's I do want to keep moving forward.
It's on camera, hundreds and even thousands and thousands of people. You
take a look through the vote, take a look. It's on camera.
But mister President, have thousands of conficials. Person, you can't say thousands
of pictures people. I know you have to say that for your network.
But you shouldn't say it, because that's the problems. The news has lost
such a power. Let's stay on track, though, mister President, you're
saying it hasn't. We have thousands of essentially motion pictures of people stuffing the
ballot boxes, mister pens of thousands. You're not stuffing the ballot boxes,
and you've been told that by your top law enforcement officials. But let's stay
on track because we have so much ground to come. The people that went
to ground and voted to come in one place, another place, another place,
as many as I understand, in twenty eight different places in one day,
with seven eight nine ballots a piece. They can't do anymore because it
would look too phony. These were professional people. They were stuffing the ballot
boxes. It's it's there. I mean, it's there. A lot of
people were like, look at sixty different cases all across the country. You
lost that, But let's stay on track. We lost because the judges didn't
want to hear them, mister President. But if if this were ever before
a court, we would win so easy. There was so much evidence at
the election was rigged, and you may not even put the section on your
show and you'll have to decide what you want to do. But people know
it was rigg. Look the media when I first got involved in ballots.
You know, there's no evidence of that. We give so many different mendous
evidence. I want to talk about what. I'm paused that this goes on
for minutes. They went on for a minute there, But notice what happens,
and I gotta take a break here. Notice what happens. She lets
him talk to her, credit, she lets him talk about these whatever whatever
he's saying, ballot stuffing, you know, people voting multiple times, multiple
you know, I think he said twenty eight times in one day or some
such thing. And he says these things, and she tries to then she
lets him say it, but she said, that's been debunked. And he
says it hasn't been debunked, and she's like, and it's again, it's
the typical talking points. It's been debunked. You know this your own administration
and acknowledges that this has been debunked. No, we haven't. There's evidence.
He uses the word proof. I would use evidence, but to each
his own, I guess. But there's certainly is absolutely evidence that there are
problems folks, what is it that the number of the percentage of Republicans who
don't trust the results of the twenty twenty election is astonishingly high. Maybe I'll
look at that during the break. I don't have that in front of me,
but it's astonishingly high. You know, a legitimate government, a government
that cared about its people, what address that head on? They would they
would address that head on, even if even if you were in the other
political party. Right, if let's say Democrats truly thought that the election was
stolen, They've been told it was stolen in twenty sixteen for a million times.
But even then, there are certainly those who believe it on the fringe,
but not like Republicans believe it in this sense, because there's actual evidence.
It wasn't some crazy story, some crazy narrative that said that Facebook ads
tricked people into voting for Hillary, or excuse me, Trump, that we're
going to vote for Hillary. It's just patently stupid. I said at the
time in twenty sixteen. If you want to still an election, what you
do is you go in and you somehow interfere with the counts. You either
stuffed the ballot boxes or you somehow find a way to change the computer counts.
Right. This is how you would do that. You wouldn't do some
ad campaign. It is so patently stupid to me that people fall for this.
It is I don't even know what to say to people who think that
there's more evidence that Trump stole the twenty sixteen election than Biden stole the twenty
twenty election. And you can conclude that both neither one did. Fine,
but the amount of evidence that's there and she's acting like there isn't Kristen Walker,
and Trump doesn't let her get away with it. She says, Okay,
mister president, let's stop talking about that that's been debunked. He does
not let her have the last word. I love this. I absolutely loved
this, because this is what people who are convicted do. They don't simply
say, well, whatever you want to think, because she's influencing millions of
people, crazy though that might be. She's influencing millions and millions of people.
So timeouts in order, quick time out here, my friend will come
back and continue the discussion in just a few minutes. Welcome back, my
friends. I do think that the more we see Trump, the more it
is going to energize the base. I think the more it is going,
he is going to impact the narrative. He will push back incredibly, incredibly
strongly on all of these again, fake narratives and everything else. The game
will change. The game will change the more that we see Trump, especially
if it becomes a Trump versus Biden situation. Again, imagine if we've got
a debate. Remember they hid Biden from a lot of those debates. Didn't
one of those debates? If I think, first of all there are only
three, then one of them got canceled due to COVID, if memory serves
me correctly, So the game will continue to change. I love this.
I love just that part of the interview. Other parts were good as well,
But I don't have time to get to that. I do want to
get to this though. I do want to get to this. NASA scientists
discover evidence of life on planet over one hundred light years away. So they've
discovered evidence of life on a planet that's one hundred light years away, And
so anytime I see stuff like this, I think, what is this?
What is this that actually makes them say that? And apparently they have found
evidence that there is a molecule called dimethyl sulfide on the distant planet and here
on Earth that can only be produced by living things. And I mean,
maybe I don't know. I don't have all the answers here, but I
do know this. The only thing that has a heartbeat in the womb,
or the only thing that has a heartbeat period, is a living thing.
I wonder if the same scientists were clamoring about dimethyl sulfide on a planet one
hundred light years away, are all pro life? Quick time out, my
friends, back in just a minute. Welcome back, my friends. Not
a lot of time left here today, but I did want to go back.
I do want to go back to something I referenced earlier here. I
see some polls that suggest that I posed the question of how many Republicans questioned
the results of the twenty twenty election, And there's a poll from twenty twenty
two that shows sixty one percent of Republicans believe Biden didn't win fairly. I
think it may be even slightly higher than that with more more recent polls.
Anyway, about sixty percent or so. But I've got to go, my
friends, have a great day. Thank you for listening. SDG