1
00:00:05,160 --> 00:00:08,080
Welcome to everybody. Yeah, it's
glad. I'm glad to be back.

2
00:00:08,519 --> 00:00:11,480
Um, I did a lot of
reading last week. We've been brushing up

3
00:00:11,519 --> 00:00:14,000
and a lot of stuff. You
know, I did do a full I

4
00:00:14,000 --> 00:00:18,480
think we did an eight eight point
lecture, eight part lecture years ago on

5
00:00:18,839 --> 00:00:22,839
the entirety of the Republic. I
lectured through many of the dialogues, not

6
00:00:22,920 --> 00:00:26,280
all of them, because you know, of course, this is a lot

7
00:00:26,320 --> 00:00:32,000
of stuff. Plato has a vast
amount and Ariostota has also about the same

8
00:00:32,079 --> 00:00:36,159
vast amount in English that we know
about. So so we're gonna try to

9
00:00:36,159 --> 00:00:39,039
compact it as best we can.
We're gonna get get into it. This

10
00:00:39,079 --> 00:00:42,439
is gonna be very difficult. So
again, like we did last time,

11
00:00:42,520 --> 00:00:46,240
right now in your questions, and
I'll be happy to answer any of them

12
00:00:46,920 --> 00:00:49,880
when we get to the end.
Um, there's a lot fewer slides this

13
00:00:49,960 --> 00:00:53,679
time, and but that's not because
of a lack of material. That's because

14
00:00:53,719 --> 00:00:57,719
we're gonna spend more time on each
of the pages because there's just so much

15
00:00:58,079 --> 00:01:04,760
information here, so much to cover. First, we're gonna go into you

16
00:01:04,760 --> 00:01:08,719
guys, remember last time, the
last slide we talked about some of the

17
00:01:08,799 --> 00:01:14,560
questions that were left open for Plato
to deal with. Right, when Plato

18
00:01:14,640 --> 00:01:19,760
comes into the realm of philosophy,
he's taught by Socrates. One thing that

19
00:01:19,799 --> 00:01:23,760
we want to keep in mind is
that throughout the Platonic corpus, the main

20
00:01:23,879 --> 00:01:27,920
character will be Socrates. Socrates,
as far as we know, didn't write

21
00:01:27,959 --> 00:01:34,200
anything, and so it's going to
be Plato that is the recorder or the

22
00:01:34,280 --> 00:01:40,920
author, right, who's utilizing Socrates
as is key protagonist figure throughout the dialogues.

23
00:01:41,239 --> 00:01:44,439
This is going to be a unique
approach, a new way to do

24
00:01:44,519 --> 00:01:49,439
this type of of a of a
process of philosophy through a linktic method or

25
00:01:49,480 --> 00:01:53,799
through dialectical method question and answer.
So most of the dialogues are going to

26
00:01:53,840 --> 00:01:57,439
be a structured that way. There's
going to be interlocutors, there's going to

27
00:01:57,480 --> 00:02:02,879
be opponents, there's gonna be people
asking questions and trying to figure out get

28
00:02:02,879 --> 00:02:07,319
to the root of the issue in
all of these matters. And this is

29
00:02:07,319 --> 00:02:12,159
where we get that phraseology of dialectical
method, which is question and answer,

30
00:02:12,240 --> 00:02:15,560
cross examination and response, a link
goos or a linked us, a linkedic

31
00:02:15,639 --> 00:02:21,960
method is this method of pedagogy.
So remember we wanted distress as in the

32
00:02:22,039 --> 00:02:24,240
Q and A that we had last
time. Is that's different than a metaphysical

33
00:02:24,280 --> 00:02:30,120
idea of dialectical tensions. And if
anybody did get their Coppleston text book,

34
00:02:30,120 --> 00:02:35,960
you'll notice that Coppleston throughout the Plato
chapters mentioned that as well. He talked

35
00:02:36,000 --> 00:02:42,280
about Plato's dialectical considerations, and dialectics
is very important in history philosophy. It's

36
00:02:42,280 --> 00:02:44,360
going to come up a lot.
It's one of those things that we wanted

37
00:02:44,400 --> 00:02:47,479
to be aware of as a recurring
term because this is going to come up

38
00:02:47,479 --> 00:02:52,840
with marks. If you know what
I'm about dialectics and dialectical philosophy, we're

39
00:02:52,840 --> 00:02:55,439
gonna have a hard time understanding marks
when we get to krawl marks. We're

40
00:02:55,479 --> 00:02:58,240
not going to spend a whole lot
of time on krawl marks, but we

41
00:02:58,280 --> 00:03:01,719
do need to understand this, you
know, horrible philosophy because it did have

42
00:03:01,840 --> 00:03:07,879
such an impact, you know,
on the world in modern philosophy. But

43
00:03:07,120 --> 00:03:13,400
I'm just like hegel Marks, well
Hagel land Marks, both very interested in

44
00:03:13,560 --> 00:03:19,360
dialectics and dialectical philosophy. And this
does have its root in Greek philosophy.

45
00:03:20,199 --> 00:03:23,680
And so these are the questions that
the Presocratics left Plato with that, I

46
00:03:23,719 --> 00:03:27,120
told you guys to think about and
look for if you did get a chance

47
00:03:27,159 --> 00:03:30,360
to read the apology, you didn't
have to read it. I'm not going

48
00:03:30,400 --> 00:03:32,800
to grade you. It's up to
you. But I think everybody here wants

49
00:03:32,800 --> 00:03:36,759
to be here, and that's the
advantage of what we're doing here. And

50
00:03:36,800 --> 00:03:38,680
so probably hopefully some of you did
get a chance to read the apology.

51
00:03:38,719 --> 00:03:43,319
I didn't expect everybody to read everything. And you know, if you did

52
00:03:43,400 --> 00:03:46,439
get a chance to read the complas
and chapters on Plato, then you're way

53
00:03:46,439 --> 00:03:49,560
ahead of the game. So that's
good, and you'll notice a lot about

54
00:03:49,560 --> 00:03:53,240
to talk about is in those chapters. But also I did go pretty deep

55
00:03:53,240 --> 00:03:55,680
into the Republic. I don't know
how deeple get into that tonight. I

56
00:03:55,719 --> 00:03:59,360
do have a couple of slides on
it, but we'll try to get as

57
00:03:59,360 --> 00:04:01,800
deep as we can. What is
reality? What is man? What should

58
00:04:01,879 --> 00:04:06,000
man do? Can man know?
Can we give an account for what we

59
00:04:06,159 --> 00:04:11,919
know? What is knowledge? Is
knowledge different from opinion? Is it a

60
00:04:11,960 --> 00:04:16,079
lower type of knowledge? Can we
have objective certitude of knowledge? What about

61
00:04:16,079 --> 00:04:19,439
objects in the world? Do they
have identity over time? Do they have

62
00:04:19,480 --> 00:04:24,040
identity through change. What about the
problem of the one in the many,

63
00:04:24,120 --> 00:04:27,360
which we brought at last time,
which is so prevalent in the Presocratics.

64
00:04:27,360 --> 00:04:32,879
This is the question of how do
we predicate of particulars commonalities that they share

65
00:04:32,920 --> 00:04:35,600
amongst their class of things. In
other words, when I look at the

66
00:04:35,600 --> 00:04:41,040
dog, I say, the dog
is brown. Well, I point out

67
00:04:41,079 --> 00:04:45,560
that's a singular dog amongst a class
of things called dogs. And what is

68
00:04:45,560 --> 00:04:50,160
it that makes that thing particular,
that unique dog in contrast to the other

69
00:04:50,279 --> 00:04:56,199
dogs of which it is a class. Likewise, what is the common thing

70
00:04:56,839 --> 00:05:01,920
that those share amongst the class of
dogs? Is it dogness? Well,

71
00:05:01,959 --> 00:05:09,040
we'll see pantheism, atheism, materialism, empiricism, rationalism, monism, dualism.

72
00:05:09,079 --> 00:05:12,720
As we saw. Those are the
same issues throughout the Presocratics, still

73
00:05:12,759 --> 00:05:15,439
being discussed by philosophers today. In
fact, I'm looking over at my shelf,

74
00:05:15,600 --> 00:05:20,279
my philosophy shelf over there, and
I see prominently displayed a new newly

75
00:05:20,319 --> 00:05:24,160
released book, The Problem of the
One in the Many. So here we

76
00:05:24,199 --> 00:05:29,839
are two thousand and five hundred years
later, academic discourse is still discussing these

77
00:05:30,199 --> 00:05:36,360
very prevalent topics throughout the Greek philosophers
of ancient yore. Now we talked about

78
00:05:36,399 --> 00:05:43,680
dialectics not in a diological teaching sense
pedagogical sense. We talked about it in

79
00:05:43,720 --> 00:05:46,959
a metaphysical sense. And we want
to pay attention here because these are gonna

80
00:05:47,000 --> 00:05:51,160
be very prevalent, recurring, as
we said, and this came up in

81
00:05:51,199 --> 00:05:54,600
the Q and A, so I
wanted to highlight this a little bit more.

82
00:05:56,240 --> 00:06:00,439
We're gonna notice that throughout the Presocratics
and solemn Plato, and into the

83
00:06:00,439 --> 00:06:04,519
Neoplatonists as well, and even into
the debates. When we get through some

84
00:06:04,600 --> 00:06:11,199
of the patristic philosophers, the question
of determinism versus free will will arise,

85
00:06:11,839 --> 00:06:15,000
the question of the one in the
many which I just mentioned, the question

86
00:06:15,000 --> 00:06:19,680
of eternity versus time? Is it
better to be an eternity? Is time

87
00:06:19,839 --> 00:06:26,959
of a diminished status lesser than the
eternal? Right? Are these opposites?

88
00:06:27,120 --> 00:06:31,959
In many cases these are cashed out
in a philosophy of opposites. The one

89
00:06:32,040 --> 00:06:35,480
is the opposite of the mini.
Some philosophers will say that the Mini is

90
00:06:35,480 --> 00:06:41,399
trying to get back to that ultimate
unification as we saw with Empedocles. No,

91
00:06:41,879 --> 00:06:46,879
the Mini is more fundamental than the
one, right or the seeds of

92
00:06:46,920 --> 00:06:50,160
the logos everywhere, Right, that's
the mini that's preeminent in that idea.

93
00:06:50,759 --> 00:06:55,439
Perhaps eternity is something that we need
to get back to. And this realm

94
00:06:55,519 --> 00:06:59,279
of flux, this realm of time
is somehow worse, bad, lesser.

95
00:07:00,120 --> 00:07:02,120
Maybe who which one? Which one
is it? Maybe these are false dialectics,

96
00:07:02,199 --> 00:07:09,040
right, What about the notion of
order matter potentia excuse me, exc

97
00:07:09,040 --> 00:07:15,639
gonna order, which is the connected
to the principle of being eternality structure?

98
00:07:16,000 --> 00:07:27,160
Is that in dialectical tension with the
principle of matter chaos potentia Aristotle as when

99
00:07:27,199 --> 00:07:30,759
we get theirsol is going to use
the term premium material prime matter, which

100
00:07:30,800 --> 00:07:36,040
is a pure potential. Maybe that's
in some sort of battle, fundamental war,

101
00:07:36,600 --> 00:07:44,399
contrast contradiction, struggle with order in
any sense. Right, and we

102
00:07:44,439 --> 00:07:47,319
get to Plato, we're going to
notice that he's very clear on his view

103
00:07:47,439 --> 00:07:51,680
of a lot of these questions which
side he falls on. And we're gonna

104
00:07:51,759 --> 00:07:55,959
try to be as fair to Plato
as as we can, because Plato at

105
00:07:56,040 --> 00:08:01,839
least tries he wants to reconcile and
solve some of these dialectical problems that we

106
00:08:03,279 --> 00:08:07,160
saw last week in the Presocratics.
So whether he achieves that that, I'll

107
00:08:07,199 --> 00:08:11,079
leave that up to you in your
assessment of Plato. If you read the

108
00:08:11,079 --> 00:08:16,199
Copples some chapters, we know that
a Copplison himself had the very same critique

109
00:08:16,279 --> 00:08:18,680
that you're going to hear me give, which helps me understand that I was

110
00:08:18,720 --> 00:08:22,600
glad to get into this because I
had the same reading of the Republic and

111
00:08:22,639 --> 00:08:26,079
the same reading of a lot of
those that Copplison did so and I think

112
00:08:26,079 --> 00:08:30,160
he's a competent thinker, and that
lets me know that, you know,

113
00:08:30,199 --> 00:08:33,720
I didn't have some vast misreading of
these texts. There was a guy on

114
00:08:33,799 --> 00:08:39,480
the Twitter or some PhD guy a
couple of months ago who was just going

115
00:08:39,559 --> 00:08:41,799
nuts on me, saying that I
know you misunderstood everything. It's like you're

116
00:08:41,879 --> 00:08:45,600
wrong about all of it. You're
totally wrong. Well, I mean,

117
00:08:45,639 --> 00:08:48,279
if i'm you know, basically come
to the same conclusions of other, you

118
00:08:48,320 --> 00:08:52,600
know, competent guys who are widely
used, then I think I probably on

119
00:08:52,919 --> 00:08:54,039
good ground. And that doesn't mean
it's true. I may be wrong,

120
00:08:54,080 --> 00:08:58,639
but it's it's good to find camaraderie
in your readings. Now other things that

121
00:08:58,720 --> 00:09:03,360
pop up. This doesn't just relate
to abstract metaphysics. These dialectics might relate

122
00:09:03,440 --> 00:09:07,519
to the social sphere. And we're
gonna see that with Plato, because Plato

123
00:09:07,559 --> 00:09:11,159
will have debates about how should a
city be run, how should a republic

124
00:09:11,279 --> 00:09:15,120
be run, what's the ideal form
of government so that we don't fall into

125
00:09:15,240 --> 00:09:20,519
anarchy on the one hand of the
dominance of the many, notice that anarchy

126
00:09:20,679 --> 00:09:26,320
might be spilling over onto the side
of you know, too much particularization,

127
00:09:26,440 --> 00:09:31,559
too much individuality. In Plato's view, Oh, maybe we got Antifa out

128
00:09:31,600 --> 00:09:33,600
there, right, they're running there, they're going nuts. They're they're pouring

129
00:09:33,679 --> 00:09:37,840
piss and shit on everybody. They're
throwing locks in people's faces, right,

130
00:09:37,840 --> 00:09:41,200
because it's chaos, anarchy, that's
that's maybe that's what we need. Or

131
00:09:41,279 --> 00:09:45,840
no, wait a minute, what
if we need the dictator to squash all

132
00:09:45,879 --> 00:09:48,039
the Antifa bugs going nuts out there. So if we just had a strong

133
00:09:48,240 --> 00:09:52,480
dictator, man who could come in, you know, a big old daddy

134
00:09:52,559 --> 00:09:58,720
stalin, a big old daddy mao
right now, big dong. If he

135
00:10:00,000 --> 00:10:05,799
comes in and lays down the law, he can squish all these petty Antifa

136
00:10:05,879 --> 00:10:09,480
people, or is this a dialectic
and they both fall over into each other.

137
00:10:09,559 --> 00:10:16,440
Maybe there's some sort of intimate connection
between societies that go from tyranny into

138
00:10:16,480 --> 00:10:22,039
anarchy, or from anarchy into tyranny. That's in fact going to be one

139
00:10:22,080 --> 00:10:26,440
of the points that we'll notice in
the Republic. What about this idea that

140
00:10:28,120 --> 00:10:33,720
stasis, permanence, invariance, eternality, is that better than change in flux?

141
00:10:33,759 --> 00:10:37,879
Well, we saw us on the
prestocratics. One guy says permenites.

142
00:10:37,919 --> 00:10:43,480
Oh, everything is stasis, dude, Literally, everything is stasis. The

143
00:10:43,600 --> 00:10:46,440
things that you think are changing members
ENO's paradox with the arrow. That's all

144
00:10:46,480 --> 00:10:54,639
illusions, dude. Everything is pure
permanence and stasis. Or is everything flux?

145
00:10:54,120 --> 00:10:58,279
The other guy right, what her
clitis? All is flux? All

146
00:10:58,360 --> 00:11:03,840
is fire. Adams going wild,
going nuts, going buck wild, going

147
00:11:03,919 --> 00:11:11,519
crazy. Adams are constantly just having
a party. There's nothing stable. You

148
00:11:11,600 --> 00:11:16,120
got an Adam over here with the
freaking lamp on his head. You got

149
00:11:16,120 --> 00:11:18,279
another atom over here, he's tripping
acid. You got another atom over here

150
00:11:18,320 --> 00:11:22,600
he's trying to grab butts. I
mean atoms are going wild. That's all

151
00:11:22,639 --> 00:11:26,879
that it is. There's no order
which one is it? Or maybe there's

152
00:11:26,879 --> 00:11:31,320
something in between rationalism versus empiricism.
This is something that we said would come

153
00:11:31,399 --> 00:11:35,039
up. We're definitely going to see
Plato taking a side in this debate.

154
00:11:37,320 --> 00:11:41,039
If you don't know, I think
everybody probably has figured out Plato will side

155
00:11:41,080 --> 00:11:46,679
on reason. Reason is far superior
to empirical sense. Data sense data is

156
00:11:46,720 --> 00:11:52,080
not totally useless. It does tell
us some things. The sensible particulars he

157
00:11:52,159 --> 00:11:58,399
calls them, are not completely a
loser. They're not completely imaginary, but

158
00:11:58,480 --> 00:12:01,279
there are copies and imitation, which
we'll see in a moment. But for

159
00:12:01,279 --> 00:12:05,039
the philosopher, in Plato's mind,
reason is key. Reason is key,

160
00:12:05,080 --> 00:12:11,919
and Plato will take certain ideas from
presocratics and modify them and change. For

161
00:12:11,960 --> 00:12:13,799
example, he will be interested in
the one of the many questions, and

162
00:12:13,919 --> 00:12:20,279
he will take from both Parmenides and
from Heraclitis. You said, well,

163
00:12:20,279 --> 00:12:22,799
wait a minute, how it's got
to be either or right, I mean,

164
00:12:22,840 --> 00:12:28,159
everything's got to be flux or everything's
got to be permanent. Well,

165
00:12:28,159 --> 00:12:35,399
in Plato's either's two realms, one
characterized by permanence, one characterized by flux.

166
00:12:35,240 --> 00:12:39,399
So Plato, as we can see, will be a kind of synthesis

167
00:12:39,440 --> 00:12:46,320
figure between Heaclitis and Parmenides. Another
prominent dialectic that pops up here is the

168
00:12:46,399 --> 00:12:52,440
soul or the mind, and sometimes
these are equivalent identified, especially in the

169
00:12:52,480 --> 00:12:58,320
Greeks and in some of the Latin
Christian theologians like Augustine. Or is the

170
00:12:58,360 --> 00:13:01,399
body more pre emiti should we get
more of a pre eminence to bodily things

171
00:13:01,440 --> 00:13:05,200
since data the pleasures of the body, or are the pleasures of reason?

172
00:13:05,919 --> 00:13:13,120
Thought, logic? Doing math?
Is that better and higher than I don't

173
00:13:13,120 --> 00:13:18,600
know, having sexy time. Maybe
that's what we should be doing. Well.

174
00:13:18,639 --> 00:13:24,399
Again, these are questions the Plato's
grappling with, and they all come

175
00:13:24,440 --> 00:13:31,639
out of the Presocratics, and he's
not gonna reject them all or accept them

176
00:13:31,639 --> 00:13:37,519
all. So he's a as Copison
noted, a big leap forward in the

177
00:13:39,480 --> 00:13:46,200
notable but limited speculations and processes of
the presecratics that we covered last week.

178
00:13:46,240 --> 00:13:52,080
And not just in terms of the
immensity of the depth, the scope,

179
00:13:52,120 --> 00:13:56,879
etc. But the vast amount of
writings. I mean again, right,

180
00:13:56,919 --> 00:14:00,000
the plato works. I don't know
if I'm over here, but I mean

181
00:14:00,000 --> 00:14:05,679
they're big, old thick thing,
right, And so oh, I'm into.

182
00:14:05,279 --> 00:14:09,559
The reason I have that diagram there
is that this will be a fundamental

183
00:14:09,600 --> 00:14:16,159
to Platonic theology, and this is
a triad or a triangle, but for

184
00:14:16,360 --> 00:14:20,720
Plato's purposes, there will be a
lot of triplicities that will be present these

185
00:14:20,799 --> 00:14:26,679
triads. They're not all triangles.
Triangles are triadic, but there's other kinds

186
00:14:26,679 --> 00:14:30,159
of triads there. Will notice when
we get to the republic, there's a

187
00:14:30,200 --> 00:14:35,879
triad of how this city should be
governed in a three tiered structure that corresponds

188
00:14:35,919 --> 00:14:39,399
to the body of a man.
Because the city, he'll say, is

189
00:14:39,399 --> 00:14:43,960
like a big man and it has
a three tiered structure of mind, heart,

190
00:14:45,000 --> 00:14:50,320
body. The triads and Plato will
pop up quite a bit, so

191
00:14:50,360 --> 00:14:54,960
we should be looking for that.
And in this system, again borrowing from

192
00:14:56,000 --> 00:15:03,159
Pythagorean ideas, you'll have a movement
that is primarily described numerically of a movement

193
00:15:03,200 --> 00:15:07,799
from the monad to the diad to
the triad, from one to two to

194
00:15:07,960 --> 00:15:11,039
three. And the reason that he
thinks that is that, well, if

195
00:15:11,080 --> 00:15:16,360
you have a monad and then you
put another circle there where if there's a

196
00:15:16,440 --> 00:15:22,320
movement from one point in the center
to the next point in another circle center

197
00:15:22,720 --> 00:15:28,200
the bestica pieces. Then you get
this overlapping line where you can now start

198
00:15:28,200 --> 00:15:33,480
to draw a triangle in the middle
of that, And so the monad produces

199
00:15:33,519 --> 00:15:37,919
the diad. It's not drawn there, but you could see right between one

200
00:15:37,960 --> 00:15:41,600
of those top halves of the bestic
pieces, you could you could draw a

201
00:15:41,720 --> 00:15:46,919
triangle there if you connected right,
if you connected them equally, speed on

202
00:15:48,399 --> 00:15:52,279
the and the side's equally you know
what I'm saying. So the monad,

203
00:15:52,279 --> 00:15:58,080
the diad, and the triad are
the fundamental principles and structures that make up

204
00:15:58,120 --> 00:16:02,000
everything, and even in the realm
of the forms, and even in the

205
00:16:02,039 --> 00:16:03,200
realm of the here and the now, which we'll get to in a minute.

206
00:16:03,240 --> 00:16:10,039
So everything in the world is constructed
on the basis of these geometric archetypal

207
00:16:10,120 --> 00:16:17,279
forms and patterns. And again a
lot of borrowing and overlap here with Pythagoras

208
00:16:17,320 --> 00:16:22,000
that we talked about last time.
And these triads are not just things that

209
00:16:22,440 --> 00:16:26,759
point us to the higher realm in
Plato, they also are the fundamental structure

210
00:16:26,799 --> 00:16:30,919
of this realm. And I didn't
have time to really get a lot of

211
00:16:30,919 --> 00:16:34,480
the stuff relating to the Tamaus.
It can be its own really long lecture

212
00:16:34,480 --> 00:16:38,960
because it's a very complex, very
difficult dialogue. But the Tomaus will make

213
00:16:40,000 --> 00:16:42,480
a lot of use of these triangles. I wanted to build up what are

214
00:16:42,480 --> 00:16:47,879
called the platonic solids. So if
you've you've heard of this idea in ancient

215
00:16:47,919 --> 00:16:51,639
Greek metaphysics or the or geometry.
I think this is pretty well known.

216
00:16:51,759 --> 00:16:53,320
You know this. You get to
the polygons, the octagon, etc.

217
00:16:53,879 --> 00:17:00,759
Those are the platonic solids, and
those in Plato's cosmology, his idea of

218
00:17:00,799 --> 00:17:04,319
the structure of the universe and the
origin of the universe is cosmogeny. Those

219
00:17:04,519 --> 00:17:10,400
are fundamental to all of reality.
All of reality is built up and structured

220
00:17:10,880 --> 00:17:17,160
in these mathematical and geometrical forms,
everything even down to the smallest atomic level.

221
00:17:17,519 --> 00:17:21,119
So he will borrow from some of
the atomists this idea of atomism,

222
00:17:21,519 --> 00:17:23,079
but he doesn't he's not a materialist, so it doesn't believe that all of

223
00:17:23,119 --> 00:17:29,839
it exists as atoms. But he
thinks that these structures of geometric forms and

224
00:17:30,000 --> 00:17:33,480
order are not just at the macro
scale, they also go all the way

225
00:17:33,519 --> 00:17:38,480
down to a microscale. Let's look
at some of the important terms that we're

226
00:17:38,480 --> 00:17:42,440
going to need to know for tonight
and what they mean on a very basic

227
00:17:42,559 --> 00:17:48,279
level techne. I'm sure you've heard
Richard talk about techne in this system.

228
00:17:48,359 --> 00:17:55,920
In this area, primarily we're looking
at not the arts and crafts, but

229
00:17:56,119 --> 00:18:02,839
the doing of some art or the
creation of some artifice. So in Plato's

230
00:18:03,480 --> 00:18:08,160
idea, the city needs to be
run and structured in an artificial an arctifice

231
00:18:08,200 --> 00:18:12,279
type of way. So, even
though Plato's not strictly speaking a technocrat in

232
00:18:12,319 --> 00:18:19,119
that he doesn't necessarily believe in computers
running everything, the idea in Plato which

233
00:18:19,119 --> 00:18:25,160
we'll see in the Republic very clearly
about mathematics being the model for the state.

234
00:18:26,000 --> 00:18:32,559
That's an proto technocratic view. And
thus Plato is a proto techne teacher,

235
00:18:32,680 --> 00:18:38,519
right. He believes in techne as
a form of not just a governance.

236
00:18:38,559 --> 00:18:42,960
But the philosopher himself, right,
is doing the art of philosophy,

237
00:18:44,440 --> 00:18:47,799
which is the highest of the arts
according to Socrates. And one of the

238
00:18:47,839 --> 00:18:51,680
dialogues that we'll talk about, and
I think that's in Fieto Infieto, he

239
00:18:51,720 --> 00:18:55,200
says that, well, I tried
to do some poetry Socrates does. He

240
00:18:55,240 --> 00:18:57,519
says, my poetry pretty much sucked. So then I realized that when I

241
00:18:57,519 --> 00:19:00,599
went to the Oracle Delphi, that
I should just be a philosopher, because

242
00:19:00,599 --> 00:19:03,920
philosophy is way better than poetry anyway. So he kind of he says like,

243
00:19:03,960 --> 00:19:07,079
I tried out poetry, and then
he dishes it like he negs poetry.

244
00:19:07,119 --> 00:19:11,400
He's like, yeah, poetry kind
of sucks. He's like it's cool,

245
00:19:11,480 --> 00:19:14,920
but like philosophy is so much cooler, and he's like, by the

246
00:19:14,920 --> 00:19:23,119
way, I'm the best at that. So the art of philosophy, the

247
00:19:25,680 --> 00:19:27,440
art of doing philosophy, and the
reason that we're going to connect it with

248
00:19:27,480 --> 00:19:33,720
Techne is that in Socrates slash Plato, the art of doing philosophy for them

249
00:19:33,119 --> 00:19:40,920
is really close to being a mathematician, and that means structuring everything in the

250
00:19:40,960 --> 00:19:47,839
most rational, most formal, most
ideal, most logical way. I mean,

251
00:19:47,880 --> 00:19:52,000
I think we could probably call Plato
a kind of a Spurg, right,

252
00:19:52,079 --> 00:19:56,079
I mean we think of the Zuckerbergs
and these kinds of guys as the

253
00:19:56,160 --> 00:19:57,720
Spurgs, right, I mean,
and I'm not trying to be mean.

254
00:19:57,799 --> 00:20:02,160
I mean I probably have a good
Dosa sperg in me, Like was the

255
00:20:02,240 --> 00:20:04,599
Oban say I got a dose of
thetism. I probably got a little bit

256
00:20:04,599 --> 00:20:07,519
of that. Well. Plato did
too, right, and he sees he's

257
00:20:07,559 --> 00:20:12,839
a kind of a mechanistic style of
thinker. But I'm not saying that his

258
00:20:12,880 --> 00:20:18,400
philosophy is mechanistic. He doesn't see
the universe as this strictly mechanistic system.

259
00:20:21,640 --> 00:20:26,440
Next up is the apologia. This
is a defense. And if you read

260
00:20:26,519 --> 00:20:30,039
to Nice first lecture or Commune first
dialogue, the Apology again most probably the

261
00:20:30,079 --> 00:20:34,799
most famous essay in the history of
all philosophy, not very long, where

262
00:20:36,319 --> 00:20:40,599
Socrates on trial. Then you know
that it's called the apology because that means

263
00:20:40,599 --> 00:20:45,440
a defense. And for people who
have theological views, there's a whole whole

264
00:20:45,480 --> 00:20:51,160
domain of debate and theology called apologetics, which is the defense of one's position.

265
00:20:51,319 --> 00:20:55,799
So that doesn't just apply to theology. As you can see. You

266
00:20:55,839 --> 00:21:00,000
know, in the in the dialogue
you have Socrates. They're giving a defense

267
00:21:00,119 --> 00:21:03,640
of his position and the role of
a philosopher in society. And there was

268
00:21:03,680 --> 00:21:06,640
actually quite a few comedic parts,
if you guys got to read it,

269
00:21:06,680 --> 00:21:10,000
there were some funny parts, and
he kind of busts some jokes and busts.

270
00:21:11,519 --> 00:21:14,720
He makes fun of some of the
people in the city, so it's

271
00:21:14,759 --> 00:21:22,200
a there's an element of comedy there
as well. Hubris excessive pride or denying

272
00:21:22,240 --> 00:21:26,920
the gods with a use or function
of reason. I think probably anybody who's

273
00:21:26,079 --> 00:21:30,359
had any courses in college or the
courses on literature, you probably had the

274
00:21:30,400 --> 00:21:37,799
list of the key Greek literary terms. It is relevant here because there's going

275
00:21:37,839 --> 00:21:42,079
to be discussions of how the philosopher
needs to be to not have hubris,

276
00:21:42,319 --> 00:21:48,240
and Hubris did come up, I
think in some areas in what Homer and

277
00:21:48,319 --> 00:21:52,400
Hessia too, so it's part of
the poetic tradition too. But excessive pride

278
00:21:52,480 --> 00:21:59,279
in philosophy is dangerous because it will
blind and delude the philosopher from being corrected,

279
00:21:59,720 --> 00:22:02,519
and you know, the philosopher needs
to be able to learn. In

280
00:22:02,559 --> 00:22:04,359
fact, Plato in the Republic,
if I recall, he has this weird

281
00:22:04,920 --> 00:22:10,680
idea that like the philosopher king who's
going to be running the city. He's

282
00:22:10,680 --> 00:22:15,799
like kind of the autocrat of the
Plato's republic, the ideal city. He

283
00:22:15,839 --> 00:22:18,759
goes and studies geometry and math on
a mountain for like, you know,

284
00:22:18,799 --> 00:22:22,279
twenty years, and then he comes
back down to the town, and it

285
00:22:22,359 --> 00:22:26,200
is supposed to impress, you know, the mathematical knowledge, like onto the

286
00:22:26,240 --> 00:22:32,559
city. Right, So there is
this very almost ascetic view of mathematics,

287
00:22:32,640 --> 00:22:36,839
which who do we see that in
by aggress So there's a lot of influence

288
00:22:36,880 --> 00:22:42,319
there as well. Next term that
will pop up as useful is Idos is

289
00:22:42,359 --> 00:22:48,440
a Greek word that Plato uses oftentimes
for the forms, and it means idea

290
00:22:48,599 --> 00:22:53,839
or the form. This will be
central to Plato's metaphysic. The forms are

291
00:22:53,880 --> 00:22:59,359
the most popular and most famous,
most well known, most fundamental element of

292
00:22:59,440 --> 00:23:03,640
Plato's physical view. The forms aren't
the only thing that exists, but the

293
00:23:03,680 --> 00:23:07,920
forms have the most real existence.
Our world is not totally fake, it's

294
00:23:07,960 --> 00:23:11,599
not totally a dream, but it's
not as real as the realm of the

295
00:23:11,599 --> 00:23:15,920
forms. We'll get to that in
the moment. Archais is another term that

296
00:23:15,960 --> 00:23:22,079
pops up in Plato's philosophy and in
other Greek philosophers and in theologians and archi

297
00:23:22,400 --> 00:23:29,440
Here refers to archetype, exemplar,
or pattern. And if you are familiar,

298
00:23:29,480 --> 00:23:33,079
for example, with Carl Jung's archetypes, same idea. Right now,

299
00:23:33,160 --> 00:23:37,480
Carl Young kind of does his own
thing with literature and this kind of stuff.

300
00:23:37,519 --> 00:23:41,640
But he's getting the idea of archetypes
from Plato, from Platonic philosophy,

301
00:23:41,720 --> 00:23:47,240
so there is an overlap there.
They have a similar origin in Christian theology.

302
00:23:47,519 --> 00:23:51,799
A lot of theologians in early Church
we'll talk about reality being created on

303
00:23:51,839 --> 00:23:56,160
the basis of divine ideas. Even
Augustine he makes a lot of use of

304
00:23:56,200 --> 00:24:02,119
this idea of divine exemplars that is
also from Plato. And we'll also be

305
00:24:02,160 --> 00:24:06,160
present when we get to the neo
Platonists. And if you guys do want

306
00:24:06,200 --> 00:24:08,119
to go above and beyond, there
is a book that is a very small

307
00:24:08,200 --> 00:24:12,759
readable book by RT. Wallace,
which is kind of the standard academic introduction

308
00:24:12,799 --> 00:24:17,880
to the neo Platonists. So and
well, I'll talk about them in a

309
00:24:17,920 --> 00:24:23,200
little bit, but they have a
specific reading of Plato into the early centuries,

310
00:24:23,319 --> 00:24:30,559
for second third century eighty, so
this will be many centuries after Plato

311
00:24:30,559 --> 00:24:34,559
and Aristotle. The neo Platonists,
Middle Platonists, and neo Platinists, they

312
00:24:34,559 --> 00:24:41,519
will have a specific reading of Plato
that's probably normative back then, but nowadays

313
00:24:41,480 --> 00:24:45,839
in academia have all kinds of readings
of Plato. Right, So for example,

314
00:24:45,920 --> 00:24:49,440
some philosophers and scholars will debate,
oh they played to really believe in

315
00:24:51,160 --> 00:24:56,720
the God that he talks about or
is it just a symbolic form? So

316
00:24:56,279 --> 00:25:03,039
apa facis aipacis. This is another
important idea in Plato or sometimes called apiphatic.

317
00:25:03,559 --> 00:25:07,799
It might be used in theology,
it might be used in Platonism,

318
00:25:07,119 --> 00:25:11,200
it might be used in other Greek
philosophy. And this is referred to in

319
00:25:11,200 --> 00:25:15,440
the Middle Ages as a via negativa
or the way of negation. And what

320
00:25:15,519 --> 00:25:18,160
that means is that some things,
by the nature of what they are,

321
00:25:18,799 --> 00:25:26,480
are so difficult or impossible to define
that the best attempt at definition that we

322
00:25:26,559 --> 00:25:29,559
have is to do it by negation. So, for example, in the

323
00:25:29,599 --> 00:25:33,319
Middle Ages, some of the theologians
and philosophers will talk about, well,

324
00:25:33,359 --> 00:25:37,720
we don't know what divine omniscience is
in a strict definitional sense, so the

325
00:25:37,759 --> 00:25:44,079
best definition that we can give is
what it is not that is by negation

326
00:25:44,319 --> 00:25:48,480
or apophosis. And this comes up
even and I think in mathematics too.

327
00:25:48,559 --> 00:25:49,960
I'm not a mathematician, so don't
hold me to this, but I think

328
00:25:51,000 --> 00:25:56,400
mathematics sometimes uses this where you have
concepts like zero well, what is zero?

329
00:25:56,519 --> 00:25:59,160
Can you define it? Well,
you know, it's not quantity or

330
00:25:59,279 --> 00:26:00,319
one or two or three or four. Right, So it's kind of this

331
00:26:02,200 --> 00:26:08,039
abstract negation. And it's the same
with for Plato, the way that we

332
00:26:08,079 --> 00:26:12,759
will try to speak of the highest
form, or the highest one, the

333
00:26:12,880 --> 00:26:18,160
highest good, which is the beautiful, which is the God, and it

334
00:26:18,240 --> 00:26:25,880
is perhaps apyrone or beyond being and
known apophetically or via negation. What does

335
00:26:25,920 --> 00:26:27,119
that mean? Well, it's not
this thing, it's not that thing.

336
00:26:27,160 --> 00:26:30,359
It's not that thing, it's not
that it's not any of these things.

337
00:26:30,799 --> 00:26:33,640
It's the beyond of all those things. And remember, you know, a

338
00:26:33,680 --> 00:26:40,319
couple of the Presocratics use this idea
of the oponne, the boundless, the

339
00:26:40,359 --> 00:26:48,000
beyond in precisely that way apatheia.
This is important for the Greek philosophers and

340
00:26:48,119 --> 00:26:56,839
Greek thought and a view, A
trait that they held highly esteemed in humans,

341
00:26:57,039 --> 00:27:03,119
especially very thoughtful humans and philosophers,
was to achieve apatheian. Now,

342
00:27:03,160 --> 00:27:07,119
this does not mean passion the sense
of like, you know, my marriage

343
00:27:07,160 --> 00:27:10,440
is cold and we don't love each
other, and it's faith. We're not

344
00:27:10,480 --> 00:27:15,279
talking about passionless in that sense.
Passionless in the sense of you're not governed

345
00:27:15,319 --> 00:27:18,799
by the body's passions, you're not
governed by lust, you're not governed by

346
00:27:19,640 --> 00:27:23,799
your stomach, you're not governed by
pride. Right, so that you can't

347
00:27:23,799 --> 00:27:30,519
be taught anything any of the passions, the vices that might govern us,

348
00:27:30,559 --> 00:27:36,119
that distract us, blind us,
and keep us from focusing on the transcendent,

349
00:27:36,200 --> 00:27:40,119
focusing on numbers, focusing on doing
our math homework, learning our time

350
00:27:40,160 --> 00:27:44,319
stables. Right, I mean you
want to the essence of Platonic philosophy,

351
00:27:44,759 --> 00:27:48,759
you need to be doing your time
stables and not jerking off. Okay,

352
00:27:48,799 --> 00:27:52,880
that's the kind of philosphy that you
would get from Plato and Socrates. And

353
00:27:53,039 --> 00:28:00,799
I'm being serious here. Why is
he saying the sexuality is bad or that

354
00:28:02,039 --> 00:28:03,119
you having a wife is But no, no, he's not saying that.

355
00:28:03,160 --> 00:28:11,680
He's saying that any of the pleasures
have the potentiality of enslaving us to the

356
00:28:11,759 --> 00:28:17,119
point that we are no longer able
to really control and use our reasoning faculty,

357
00:28:17,559 --> 00:28:21,519
which is what should govern us.
So he's not being like this kind

358
00:28:21,559 --> 00:28:25,480
of weird ascetic in the sense that, oh you should be you know,

359
00:28:25,680 --> 00:28:29,359
celibate or and he's not saying that
he's saying that it needs to be under

360
00:28:29,359 --> 00:28:33,559
control. And there's that famous image
of that from the one of the dialogues

361
00:28:33,559 --> 00:28:37,160
where you have the rider on the
horse, and you know, Plato's saying

362
00:28:37,240 --> 00:28:45,119
that the horses right are like the
bodily passions, and if you don't have

363
00:28:45,480 --> 00:28:51,000
a rider who can control and steer
the horses in the chariot, then the

364
00:28:51,079 --> 00:28:52,759
chariot will just go wild and the
gulf of cliff right. So you got

365
00:28:52,799 --> 00:28:57,400
to have a rider, and the
rider represents reason. The rider is your

366
00:28:57,480 --> 00:29:00,839
reasoning faculty. It is or use
of reason, your use of logic,

367
00:29:00,880 --> 00:29:08,160
your use of critical thinking, to
govern your life in every year of life.

368
00:29:08,720 --> 00:29:15,079
So the philosopher is principally the person
who achieves apatheia, that is in

369
00:29:15,119 --> 00:29:18,519
the sense of passionless, in the
sense that he is not dominated or ruled

370
00:29:18,559 --> 00:29:22,519
by any of the vices or the
passions. Rather he is dominant and ruled

371
00:29:22,519 --> 00:29:27,200
by reason. Logos obviously is a
very important term. As we said,

372
00:29:27,200 --> 00:29:30,359
that would pop up. And in
the context of Plato, I think there's

373
00:29:30,400 --> 00:29:34,680
a really good uh if you want. The Cambridge Companion of Plato is an

374
00:29:34,680 --> 00:29:40,400
excellent book. There's a whole entry
in that that I read some years ago

375
00:29:40,480 --> 00:29:45,400
about logos and Plato, and it's
really good if you want more source material,

376
00:29:45,480 --> 00:29:51,759
and it goes into how for Plato, logos is intimately connected not just

377
00:29:51,960 --> 00:29:56,279
with reason or explanations in terms of
logic, but law like logic. So

378
00:29:56,319 --> 00:30:02,640
there's there's a law character too.
Lo ghosts as well in Plato. Going

379
00:30:02,680 --> 00:30:07,359
from memories a few years ago when
I read that, But another term that

380
00:30:07,400 --> 00:30:10,000
comes up, which is might be
referring to the plural. This will be

381
00:30:10,079 --> 00:30:17,480
very commonly used later on in Byzantine
theology is loge, and that's the plural

382
00:30:18,200 --> 00:30:22,599
of logos, and so there this
means many reasons, multiple reasons, or

383
00:30:22,039 --> 00:30:27,200
ideas. So we might be referring
to by logoss mind or the faculty of

384
00:30:27,240 --> 00:30:32,920
reason mind itself, or the faculty
of reasoning, or the laws of logic

385
00:30:33,240 --> 00:30:37,279
in some metaphysical sense, they govern
the universe. And then if we see

386
00:30:37,279 --> 00:30:41,000
the term loge, we might be
referring to the many reasons by which this

387
00:30:41,160 --> 00:30:45,480
or that occurs, or the many
ideas that man or God has about this

388
00:30:45,599 --> 00:30:49,319
or that thing. Ontology is an
important term that we should know, and

389
00:30:49,319 --> 00:30:53,480
that is really just simply the study
of being, what bees, what does

390
00:30:53,480 --> 00:30:59,400
it mean for an object to be? To exist? Other Sometimes ontology is

391
00:30:59,440 --> 00:31:03,200
just kind of a stand in for
metaphysics. But metaphysics might deal with all

392
00:31:03,279 --> 00:31:07,960
kinds of things like free will,
the you know existence, what is love

393
00:31:08,160 --> 00:31:11,920
right? These kinds of things,
But ontology is a little more specific domind

394
00:31:11,960 --> 00:31:17,200
and metaphysics where we're just concerned with
being itself and that relates to the Greek

395
00:31:17,240 --> 00:31:25,759
word for being too o num.
Let's move to the apology. So this

396
00:31:25,880 --> 00:31:30,240
is where we want to start in
Platonic philosophy, as we said, because

397
00:31:30,279 --> 00:31:37,359
it kind of kicks Platist philosophy off, and it's kind of them as we

398
00:31:37,480 --> 00:31:42,480
said, like the philosophical texts par
excellence. And uh, it's also in

399
00:31:42,559 --> 00:31:48,640
a literary way, appreciated for its
literary elements. Right, It's it's a

400
00:31:48,680 --> 00:31:53,000
well written story, it's got some
humor. Uh, it's dealing with a

401
00:31:53,039 --> 00:31:56,519
lot of you know, high minded
ideas, all of that into an excellent

402
00:31:56,599 --> 00:32:04,920
presentation. And I got actually quite
a bit of notes on. So this

403
00:32:05,000 --> 00:32:12,359
is uhum Socrates again, Plato's teacher. Here is the protagonist, and here

404
00:32:12,400 --> 00:32:19,039
we have the righteous man, the
righteous philosopher is accused by his interlocutors here

405
00:32:19,759 --> 00:32:28,839
of two maybe three two main problems
you got, you gotta you're doing court,

406
00:32:28,920 --> 00:32:32,240
dude, you're indict they indict him. Why do they indict Socrates?

407
00:32:32,279 --> 00:32:42,240
Well, the charge is you are
teaching atheism and corrupting the youth, and

408
00:32:42,559 --> 00:32:47,880
you are teaching new gods. So
these are the accusations they're seeking. Are

409
00:32:47,880 --> 00:32:53,319
really mad, They're seeking some kind
of punitive or penal damages, perhaps even

410
00:32:53,400 --> 00:33:01,680
death for whatever. Is this dangerous
thing that philosophers do. And hence the

411
00:33:01,759 --> 00:33:06,440
idea of the apologia, right,
the apology the defense. Okay, well

412
00:33:06,519 --> 00:33:09,240
let me give you my defense.
Now, we notice that as we read

413
00:33:09,319 --> 00:33:14,880
through the defense, and this is
great because we'll notice that what do we

414
00:33:14,920 --> 00:33:19,480
say in Lecture one? What did
philosophers do? They question things, they

415
00:33:19,519 --> 00:33:24,319
consider presuppositions, They cross examine and
look for contradictions. Right, remember that

416
00:33:24,359 --> 00:33:29,039
from Lecture one? Well, guess
what Socrates is going to do all the

417
00:33:29,119 --> 00:33:31,200
above. And he says, well, I wait a minute, let's consider

418
00:33:31,240 --> 00:33:35,359
your charges against me. He says, first, you say that I am

419
00:33:35,400 --> 00:33:38,440
an atheist, but then you said
I teach new gods. Well, if

420
00:33:38,480 --> 00:33:42,640
I believe in new gods, then
I can't be an atheist. So immediately

421
00:33:42,640 --> 00:33:46,319
he points out a contradiction. So
there we see the philosopher is cross examining.

422
00:33:46,559 --> 00:33:51,920
He's looking at the arguments that are
being used against him. In this

423
00:33:51,960 --> 00:33:54,319
case, it really is against him, not just against his theoretical position,

424
00:33:54,359 --> 00:33:59,799
but again against him because they want
him, they want him hung right there,

425
00:34:00,039 --> 00:34:02,559
really, Matt And he says,
well, let me give you a

426
00:34:02,599 --> 00:34:07,000
defense of my lifestyle, because you
seemed to be saying that you think I'm

427
00:34:07,079 --> 00:34:10,679
corrupting the youth. And so if
I'm corrupt, then wouldn't you expect to

428
00:34:10,719 --> 00:34:16,280
see a corruption in my life?
And he says, but none of you

429
00:34:16,280 --> 00:34:20,920
can actually point to anything corrupt in
my life. I didn't do this for

430
00:34:21,039 --> 00:34:28,199
money, he says. I taught
openly. I taught not for filthy gain

431
00:34:28,360 --> 00:34:32,039
and lucre. And he says,
don't you think if I just was in

432
00:34:32,119 --> 00:34:37,840
it for the money, I would
have become a politician. So even in

433
00:34:37,840 --> 00:34:39,960
two thousand, five hundred years ago
in Athens, they knew to make fun

434
00:34:40,000 --> 00:34:47,199
of and laugh at the hypocrisy and
corruption of politicians. And that's his principal

435
00:34:47,239 --> 00:34:52,400
example of a corrupt person. He
says, Look, if I would really

436
00:34:52,400 --> 00:34:53,559
wanted to corrupt the youth. I
would have become a politician. I could

437
00:34:53,599 --> 00:34:59,599
have done that. But did I
do that? No? And he says,

438
00:34:59,639 --> 00:35:06,159
so I didn't corrupt your use by
asking them questions. In fact,

439
00:35:06,159 --> 00:35:08,039
I didn't just go to the youth. He says, I went to all

440
00:35:08,119 --> 00:35:13,639
different strata people in society and I
asked them questions. I cross examined them.

441
00:35:13,639 --> 00:35:17,320
I questioned their presuppositions. And that
ended up making a lot of people

442
00:35:17,360 --> 00:35:22,119
mad. So I went to the
politician, I went to the artists and

443
00:35:22,159 --> 00:35:27,840
the craftsman. I went to the
musicians and those kinds of people. And

444
00:35:28,000 --> 00:35:31,800
the funny thing is socridy, says
everybody who I asked, what is wisdom?

445
00:35:32,920 --> 00:35:36,519
What is you know? Justice?
What are these things? What's the

446
00:35:36,559 --> 00:35:39,000
purpose of life? Etc? These
philosophical questions, they all kind of just

447
00:35:39,239 --> 00:35:45,559
identified their own profession with it.
Oh, well, wisdom is you know,

448
00:35:45,679 --> 00:35:47,920
doing politics? Oh, wisdom is
being good at you know, ship

449
00:35:49,000 --> 00:35:54,440
building? Right? Oh, wisdom
is you know whatever? And he said,

450
00:35:54,480 --> 00:35:58,920
you know, I would just ask
a few rhetorical questions, that cross

451
00:35:58,960 --> 00:36:01,480
examination thing that we do as philosophers, And he said, I found that

452
00:36:01,559 --> 00:36:06,480
in most cases, the more questions
I asked they just got mad and they

453
00:36:06,480 --> 00:36:08,880
couldn't really tell me what wisdom is. And he said, I don't see

454
00:36:08,920 --> 00:36:14,079
how I'm corrupt by seeking the truth. That's all I was doing. I

455
00:36:14,119 --> 00:36:16,559
was asking and wanting to know what
truth is. And he says, I

456
00:36:16,599 --> 00:36:22,960
didn't assume that I knew what wisdom
is. So he thought, so he

457
00:36:22,000 --> 00:36:27,920
says, why wouldn't I just go
to people that probably how are wise and

458
00:36:28,079 --> 00:36:30,840
probably have more wisdom than me?
And I didn't restrict it to one strata

459
00:36:30,920 --> 00:36:36,880
or ara of society. I went
to everybody, and what do we find?

460
00:36:36,920 --> 00:36:39,559
Well, he of course says in
the defense, that nobody seemed to

461
00:36:39,599 --> 00:36:42,840
know. So when I went to
the oracle at Delphi, I went to

462
00:36:42,920 --> 00:36:49,400
this sort of religious mystical element,
the oracle, and the oracle says,

463
00:36:50,559 --> 00:36:55,800
because you said that you didn't know
Socrates, you are the wisest man in

464
00:36:55,840 --> 00:37:00,119
Athens. And he says, maybe
that's what's made you all mad. Right,

465
00:37:00,159 --> 00:37:04,000
So they're kind of like probably a
little jealous, right, I mean,

466
00:37:04,000 --> 00:37:07,480
we don't exactly know, but probably
they're a little jealous, and probably

467
00:37:07,519 --> 00:37:12,960
they're mad because they didn't like being
asked these difficult questions which they could not

468
00:37:13,039 --> 00:37:19,320
give a coherent answer to And so
this method of questioning, this method of

469
00:37:19,400 --> 00:37:24,800
seeking a good account, is very
important because as we get into Plato's works,

470
00:37:25,280 --> 00:37:29,480
Plato will be one of the first
philosophers to raise the question of what

471
00:37:29,679 --> 00:37:34,800
counts as real knowledge. It can't
just be opinion. It's got to be

472
00:37:34,840 --> 00:37:37,800
something more than that. And in
saying that we need more than mere opinion

473
00:37:38,360 --> 00:37:44,000
to have true knowledge, we begin
to ask the questions that are known as

474
00:37:44,119 --> 00:37:47,679
justification. Now that's not used at
this time per se, but later on

475
00:37:47,800 --> 00:37:52,400
philosophy develops these branches in these terms, remember last time, under the domain

476
00:37:52,440 --> 00:37:58,079
of epistemology. In modern philosophy,
especially after the Enlightenment, the question of

477
00:37:58,199 --> 00:38:02,840
justification for our epistom logical belief or
commitments is going to be very important,

478
00:38:04,199 --> 00:38:08,519
but it's already anticipated in Plato.
Plato will be the first to talk about

479
00:38:09,119 --> 00:38:15,599
justified true belief and what that entails
in terms of giving an account or grounding

480
00:38:15,679 --> 00:38:22,000
for our beliefs. We'll also notice
that here we have something unique to Western

481
00:38:22,000 --> 00:38:25,079
thought, in Western philosophy, which
is the rise of the individual. And

482
00:38:25,159 --> 00:38:29,880
some think mini thinkers actually have pointed
this out. This is the idea that

483
00:38:30,320 --> 00:38:32,639
the individual is present here in a
unique way that we may not have seen

484
00:38:32,760 --> 00:38:40,719
in other previous philosophical discussions and traditions. The individual here is is able,

485
00:38:42,199 --> 00:38:47,280
we see here to determine and come
to truth in an objective way that is

486
00:38:47,400 --> 00:38:52,719
not determined by social consensus or by
the court. Right. So, maybe

487
00:38:52,719 --> 00:38:57,599
prior to this most people would have
thought, well, what's true is just

488
00:38:57,679 --> 00:39:02,800
simply what the authorities decide. If
the court in Athens says that Socrates is

489
00:39:04,320 --> 00:39:06,960
guilty and a bad man, then
it's got to be true, because they're

490
00:39:06,960 --> 00:39:10,480
the authorities, and who are we
to go against the collective or whatever.

491
00:39:10,639 --> 00:39:15,599
Right. Well, here we have
a notion that no, actually an individual

492
00:39:15,639 --> 00:39:20,039
can be right and everybody else wrong. That's one of the implications and one

493
00:39:20,039 --> 00:39:24,960
of the early notions of Western philosophy
that will be unique and will characterize Western

494
00:39:24,960 --> 00:39:30,960
philosophy for minutes. Not in every
philosopher, obviously, mal obviously Marx.

495
00:39:30,119 --> 00:39:34,840
Some of the philosophers will completely reject
that idea or they don't like that idea.

496
00:39:36,519 --> 00:39:40,559
The philosopher questions, and he does
not just go along with the collective

497
00:39:40,599 --> 00:39:45,320
or with the mob. Again,
this is something important to Plato, the

498
00:39:45,320 --> 00:39:50,480
philosopher King the ideal philosopher, the
ideal man, the just man is somebody

499
00:39:50,519 --> 00:39:58,119
who's committed to what's true and not
just to pragmatic practical just get ahead.

500
00:39:58,159 --> 00:40:00,119
Oh, I'm just gonna go along
with everybody. I mean, And let's

501
00:40:00,159 --> 00:40:04,079
think of an example where this was
necessary. I mean, didn't quite a

502
00:40:04,119 --> 00:40:07,519
few people take the stabby in the
last couple of years just to go along

503
00:40:07,599 --> 00:40:12,000
and get along. Well, we'll
keep my job, so they're good.

504
00:40:12,039 --> 00:40:14,639
You stabby, he'll do something my
dub. But I want to keep my

505
00:40:14,760 --> 00:40:15,519
job. Okay, Well, what's
why are you gonna do? You gonna

506
00:40:15,559 --> 00:40:20,199
do your job when you're dead?
Well more dub, But I want to

507
00:40:20,239 --> 00:40:22,639
lose my job. I mean,
I'm not trying to be mean. I

508
00:40:22,679 --> 00:40:25,360
don't. I'm not hating on the
people, but I'm saying this is illustrative

509
00:40:25,400 --> 00:40:30,960
because you know, if you had
been into philosophy, you would have known,

510
00:40:30,079 --> 00:40:34,000
well, hey, well maybe I
shouldn't just go along with what everybody

511
00:40:34,000 --> 00:40:39,159
else is doing. Right? Did
Socrates just go along? Now? He

512
00:40:39,239 --> 00:40:45,320
didn't. Because whether we disagree with
everything he taught or agree with everything you

513
00:40:45,400 --> 00:40:51,079
taught, the point is that here
what he's doing is illustrative for us.

514
00:40:51,280 --> 00:40:55,599
The lesson here is that we should
critically think, we should not live the

515
00:40:55,719 --> 00:41:04,280
unexamined life. And he's setting that
example here by living and examined life and

516
00:41:04,360 --> 00:41:07,480
saying, oh, wait a minute, let's examine your accusations against me.

517
00:41:07,599 --> 00:41:12,159
You said I'm a corruptor of the
youth, I'm an atheist teaching new gods.

518
00:41:12,440 --> 00:41:15,760
Those things don't make sense. Those
are contradictions. If they're contradictions,

519
00:41:15,800 --> 00:41:22,079
then they can't be true. And
I think what we're now some people might

520
00:41:22,119 --> 00:41:27,159
read this as an arrogant claim,
right, because when he went to the

521
00:41:27,639 --> 00:41:30,960
oracle, the oracle says, you're
the wisest man attens, right, because

522
00:41:31,039 --> 00:41:36,519
you didn't know, and you knew
that you didn't know, so you were

523
00:41:36,559 --> 00:41:40,880
wise enough to try to ask and
learn from everybody. And so I read

524
00:41:40,920 --> 00:41:46,559
this as a treatise against and critiquing
humorists, because the politician, the artisan,

525
00:41:47,360 --> 00:41:55,079
the poets, the accusers in the
courtroom, they're possessed with pride and

526
00:41:55,159 --> 00:42:00,000
humorists. And why is that Well, because they're not committed to what's true.

527
00:42:00,159 --> 00:42:04,960
They're simply out for their objective,
for their ends. We've got to

528
00:42:04,960 --> 00:42:15,000
get this Socrates guy. You know, whatever it takes right, And so

529
00:42:15,079 --> 00:42:20,679
I read this as an attempted critique
of Hubrists. The philosopher is the one

530
00:42:20,760 --> 00:42:24,599
that is truly humble. Why because
he wants to be corrected, He wants

531
00:42:24,639 --> 00:42:28,679
to learn. He's the one saying, I don't know, teach me,

532
00:42:29,119 --> 00:42:32,639
hey, teach me hey, teach
me right. He wants to be corrected,

533
00:42:34,400 --> 00:42:39,320
and that a continual process of wanting
to be corrected in the dialogue,

534
00:42:39,360 --> 00:42:45,199
I think is what leads him to
the attainment of truth. That's the point

535
00:42:45,199 --> 00:42:50,719
of the dialogue. Then he says
and gives a defense. And this will

536
00:42:50,719 --> 00:42:54,079
get more and more controversial in terms
of the readings that scholars have of both

537
00:42:54,800 --> 00:43:00,519
the apology and Socrates and Plato in
terms of the theology. So another argument

538
00:43:00,559 --> 00:43:05,679
that Socrates makes is that you know, I wasn't commissioned to do all of

539
00:43:05,719 --> 00:43:09,480
this on my own. He appeals
to a deity. The deity, he

540
00:43:09,519 --> 00:43:15,000
says, sent me to do this
mission to teach philosophy to you people in

541
00:43:15,079 --> 00:43:21,239
Athens, and that is I'm impelled
to do that by my damon. Now

542
00:43:21,280 --> 00:43:23,519
this doesn't mean a demon in the
sense a Christian sense of a you know,

543
00:43:23,639 --> 00:43:28,679
malicious spirit that makes your head spin
and you split up PCU. This

544
00:43:28,760 --> 00:43:32,199
is a damon in the sense of
a higher guide, sort of a guardian

545
00:43:32,559 --> 00:43:36,960
entity. Amused, right, these
are these are the ways that the Greeks

546
00:43:37,039 --> 00:43:40,559
viewed decided of damon. And he
says, I have dreams and visions from

547
00:43:40,559 --> 00:43:45,039
a damon. Uh, that is
a damon sent to me by God.

548
00:43:45,119 --> 00:43:51,440
And I've been commissioned to teach you
people these things. That's his claim.

549
00:43:51,480 --> 00:43:54,280
So whenever you think of that,
that's one of the claims of the defenses

550
00:43:54,480 --> 00:43:59,800
that he offers in his apologetic he
also says, now, if you kill

551
00:44:00,119 --> 00:44:05,320
me and I am who I say
I am, and I'm telling you the

552
00:44:05,360 --> 00:44:09,400
truth, it's worse for you,
not for me. So you may think

553
00:44:09,480 --> 00:44:15,480
you're getting at me and you're taking
me out, and you're this troublesome gadfly

554
00:44:15,719 --> 00:44:17,960
who is asking all these annoying questions
will be gotten rid of. But this

555
00:44:19,039 --> 00:44:22,239
is going to be actually worse on
your soul for doing this. And so

556
00:44:22,239 --> 00:44:27,519
Socrates notes that for the sake of
philosophy and truth, he is willing to

557
00:44:27,559 --> 00:44:31,239
be a martyr. And this is
because he he says, I thinking if

558
00:44:31,280 --> 00:44:34,719
iedo the other one of the other
dialogues, he says, well, I

559
00:44:34,840 --> 00:44:38,239
have to be willing to accept the
death, because if I don't willingly accept

560
00:44:38,280 --> 00:44:42,519
death without fear, then it kind
of undermines all the philosophy that I've been

561
00:44:42,519 --> 00:44:45,199
teaching all these years, which is
that we shouldn't have fear death. The

562
00:44:45,360 --> 00:44:49,519
righteous man, the just man right, And we'll see who the righteous just

563
00:44:49,679 --> 00:44:52,119
man is in Platonic philosophy in a
minute. He should not fear death.

564
00:44:52,719 --> 00:44:57,679
And so Socrates has these buddies who
are trying to convince him to run away.

565
00:44:58,000 --> 00:45:00,159
I will sneak you out of here. Come on, let's bring of

566
00:45:00,199 --> 00:45:02,639
jail like a you know, Ted
Bundy. He says, I'm not breaking

567
00:45:02,679 --> 00:45:07,519
out. In fact, I'm willing
to go to my death because it would

568
00:45:07,599 --> 00:45:10,679
undermine and would make me a hypocrite, because I've been saying all these years

569
00:45:10,719 --> 00:45:15,880
that the just man has nothing to
fear in death, and even says stuff

570
00:45:15,920 --> 00:45:17,599
like why would I fear death?
I get to go hang out with Homer

571
00:45:17,639 --> 00:45:22,519
and all these you know, cool
poets and people. So it's like I'm

572
00:45:22,519 --> 00:45:24,559
happy that he's like, that would
be cooler than hanging out with these you

573
00:45:24,599 --> 00:45:30,239
know, hubrist filled, boring ass
Athenians are trying to get me. You

574
00:45:30,239 --> 00:45:37,159
know, put in jail or whatever. And Socrates sort of goes on to

575
00:45:37,199 --> 00:45:40,239
point out that, you know,
my goal was just to help you guys

576
00:45:40,719 --> 00:45:47,320
think rightly and live rightly. That's
supposed to be live right, not life

577
00:45:47,400 --> 00:45:51,239
right. But so in other words, again we see that for Plato,

578
00:45:51,320 --> 00:45:54,360
put On and philosophy, metaphysics,
and ethics are intimately bound up together.

579
00:45:55,079 --> 00:46:00,599
You can't separate these their distinct things
in terms of our considerations and the way

580
00:46:00,639 --> 00:46:04,960
that we live and do these things. But in philosophy these things cannot be

581
00:46:05,000 --> 00:46:08,159
divorced because we're again we're going to
see, for example, the just man

582
00:46:09,719 --> 00:46:15,639
is the man who participates in the
form of justice. And I forgot to

583
00:46:15,920 --> 00:46:21,239
put that term a texas etche x
i s, which is important Greek term

584
00:46:21,480 --> 00:46:27,840
in Platonic philosophy for participation. So
it's not just the forms, it's not

585
00:46:27,920 --> 00:46:31,880
just humans that participate in the forms. All of reality in this world is

586
00:46:31,920 --> 00:46:37,199
in a participatory relationship to the forms. The forms do not come into this

587
00:46:37,239 --> 00:46:42,039
world. We partake of that realm
of the forms, but we are in

588
00:46:42,119 --> 00:46:45,760
a lower diminished status than the realm
of the forms. We'll get to that

589
00:46:45,760 --> 00:46:49,400
in a minute. Truth is objective, is another thing we learn here.

590
00:46:49,440 --> 00:46:52,559
That's one of the points that the
apology is that it's not a social construct.

591
00:46:52,760 --> 00:46:55,000
Right, what's true is not determined
by the majority. Even if all

592
00:46:55,039 --> 00:47:01,280
the Athenians decide that what Socrity is
teaching us false, it doesn't make it

593
00:47:01,320 --> 00:47:07,800
false. It may be false,
but it doesn't make it false by some

594
00:47:07,880 --> 00:47:15,719
majority opinion. So truth is objective. Truth is not a social construct.

595
00:47:15,840 --> 00:47:22,400
It's discovered and it's also not the
creation of the Athenian state. The state

596
00:47:22,440 --> 00:47:25,280
doesn't just get to make up truth
right now in our days, right in

597
00:47:25,360 --> 00:47:29,320
our day, it's really no different, is it. I mean, the

598
00:47:29,400 --> 00:47:34,480
state believes that it can decide and
determine truth. Right. Richard quotes the

599
00:47:34,559 --> 00:47:39,800
Richard the Karl Rove quote a lot. Right, we will say what's what

600
00:47:40,079 --> 00:47:44,440
is, and you will go in
diligently study, and we will continue then

601
00:47:44,480 --> 00:47:47,039
to keep making history, and you
will study what we do because it's what

602
00:47:47,079 --> 00:47:51,800
we make it and to be and
what we say it is. That's the

603
00:47:51,880 --> 00:47:59,000
opposite of what Socrates is saying.
Right clearly, and obviously too, it

604
00:47:59,039 --> 00:48:02,440
should be the case, it should
be obvious that truth is not a social

605
00:48:02,480 --> 00:48:07,480
construct. Right, This is ridiculous
I mean, just think about how and

606
00:48:07,519 --> 00:48:10,559
this is again something that we're going
to see that you know, Plato rejects

607
00:48:10,599 --> 00:48:15,800
when he goes against the Sophists,
where the Sophists are a kind of relativists,

608
00:48:16,199 --> 00:48:19,039
and they're gonna say, well,
I mean, you know, truth

609
00:48:19,159 --> 00:48:22,599
is whatever anybody individually thinks it thinks
it is. It's relative to every person.

610
00:48:24,119 --> 00:48:29,880
And for Plato this would be absurd. So you think that the laws

611
00:48:29,880 --> 00:48:32,920
of logic, the principles of geometry
are just what anybody wants them to be,

612
00:48:34,920 --> 00:48:37,320
or they're just a social So if
we all got together and decided in

613
00:48:37,360 --> 00:48:43,039
a social constructor that you know,
the number seven is now the number ten

614
00:48:43,719 --> 00:48:45,239
like that, wouldn't it would actually
change? I mean, you see how

615
00:48:45,239 --> 00:48:50,480
silly this is. Right, But
there's quite a few people who believe this

616
00:48:51,719 --> 00:48:57,559
truth is relative truth and social construct
whatever. And the state, by the

617
00:48:57,559 --> 00:49:00,039
way, the corporate state that we
live in today, is more than happy

618
00:49:00,079 --> 00:49:04,800
to have people believing this, because
that is a belief that enslaves you.

619
00:49:05,639 --> 00:49:07,760
If you can't come to truth,
if you can't reason, you're not going

620
00:49:07,800 --> 00:49:10,599
to be able to reason about and
figure out what's going on in the world.

621
00:49:10,639 --> 00:49:14,400
You're going to be a tool of
the propaganda, and you're going to

622
00:49:14,480 --> 00:49:16,920
be that guy saying, well,
good get to big Stein, so I

623
00:49:17,039 --> 00:49:22,920
can do my job even though I
might dot right, that's illogical. Yeah

624
00:49:22,920 --> 00:49:28,440
I might die, Yeah, I
might die a job. Or my favorite

625
00:49:28,440 --> 00:49:30,599
example of the last few years,
this one. I'll never forget this one.

626
00:49:31,360 --> 00:49:43,159
Two thousand scientists sign a statement that
the coronavirus doesn't affect Black Lives Matter

627
00:49:43,760 --> 00:49:52,360
demonstrations, but it does affect Trump
rallies. This is the greatest example of

628
00:49:52,519 --> 00:50:01,119
like the most ridiculous magical thinking from
so called scientists and propagandists, I mean,

629
00:50:01,559 --> 00:50:07,239
unbelievable, right, What better example
of the absurdity of this magical thinking

630
00:50:07,239 --> 00:50:14,320
of so that that truth and science
can be somehow a social construct, utter

631
00:50:14,360 --> 00:50:20,880
insanity. Next important dialogue we want
to look at is the fiat um um.

632
00:50:20,960 --> 00:50:24,960
And I've chosen a couple of these
just as selections, because there's many

633
00:50:25,000 --> 00:50:30,800
dialogues there's and there's many that are
very important. Some of them are not

634
00:50:30,840 --> 00:50:35,000
so important. Ion is a funny
one because they're he just has this brief

635
00:50:35,039 --> 00:50:38,679
dialogue with poets and musicians and he
basically says, you guys are nuts,

636
00:50:39,400 --> 00:50:44,639
and he says, we're not going
to have poets and musicians, you know,

637
00:50:45,320 --> 00:50:49,360
running wild in the republic. We're
gonna shut you guys down, he

638
00:50:49,440 --> 00:50:52,000
says, because you guys inflame the
passions, and if you let you guys

639
00:50:52,000 --> 00:50:55,599
go wild, you're going to destroy
society. Now, I think that's a

640
00:50:55,599 --> 00:51:01,800
little ridiculous, you know, his
idea, And it's also contradictory because I

641
00:51:01,880 --> 00:51:06,599
mean, here he's saying that he's
guided by his dame on, but then

642
00:51:06,599 --> 00:51:12,199
he says that the poets and the
musicians are possessed by the muse and so

643
00:51:12,440 --> 00:51:15,039
they're not you know, they don't
listen to reason. So it's a little

644
00:51:15,039 --> 00:51:20,280
a little contradictory and hypocritical there on
the part of Plato Socrates. But also

645
00:51:20,280 --> 00:51:25,239
at the same time, I mean, Plato himself is using poetics, using

646
00:51:25,639 --> 00:51:32,639
literary devices in his dialogues as he's
saying that, oh, we're gonna censor

647
00:51:32,760 --> 00:51:38,599
the arts in the republic. So
you see how this is again a little

648
00:51:38,719 --> 00:51:43,360
shaky ground here, a little contradictory. But well, we're gonna set that

649
00:51:43,360 --> 00:51:45,840
a cybermum. We're gonna look at
the Pieto because it is one of the

650
00:51:45,840 --> 00:51:50,800
more important dialogues that's that's great to
get into the metaphysics of Plato. And

651
00:51:50,880 --> 00:51:54,800
there's a few of these dialogues that
are really important for the forms. So

652
00:51:55,000 --> 00:52:04,000
there is Parmenides, there's Sophist,
there's Fiato, there is uh Meno.

653
00:52:04,159 --> 00:52:09,280
I think the or maybe I'm thinking
of Phato. But these in the Republic

654
00:52:09,360 --> 00:52:15,800
and part of the Symposium really and
the toma Us deal with the forms.

655
00:52:15,280 --> 00:52:19,199
So you want to get into Plato's
forms doctrine, those are the of the

656
00:52:19,280 --> 00:52:22,719
dialogues that we want to be familiar
with. Those are the ones that pretty

657
00:52:22,719 --> 00:52:27,920
consistently treat the doctrine of the forms. And that's why we're picking Fiato,

658
00:52:28,000 --> 00:52:31,440
because we're going to start again with
the most difficult area, which is Plato's

659
00:52:31,480 --> 00:52:37,119
metaphysics. Now we don't have we
in the in the Apology, we didn't

660
00:52:37,199 --> 00:52:40,320
have a lot of metaphysical stuff,
And that's why it's typically an easier introduction

661
00:52:40,360 --> 00:52:45,320
to Platonic philosophy because there it's this
you know, sort of I'm using entertaining

662
00:52:46,000 --> 00:52:52,719
read regarding his trial. But in
these other dialogues, we're getting into other

663
00:52:52,800 --> 00:52:58,000
territory. It's gonna get difficult,
it's gonna get more technical, it's gonna

664
00:52:58,039 --> 00:53:04,639
get more speculative, more abstract,
and even though they're dialogues, they're still

665
00:53:04,760 --> 00:53:09,159
difficult. And I want to stress
to everybody too that even plato experts,

666
00:53:09,800 --> 00:53:15,599
okay, struggle with areas of Plato. If you read the Coppleston text,

667
00:53:15,679 --> 00:53:20,920
there was that crazy page I don't
know what's he's and Coppleston even says,

668
00:53:20,960 --> 00:53:23,119
I don't know what he means by
this, Okay, So if you read

669
00:53:23,159 --> 00:53:30,159
pages one oh four, one oh
five, there is this wild discussion of

670
00:53:30,639 --> 00:53:36,800
mathematical proofs for contingency and non being. I don't know. I don't know

671
00:53:36,800 --> 00:53:38,719
what that means. I mean,
I think I understand what he's getting at.

672
00:53:39,840 --> 00:53:45,119
But even Coppleston says, you know, we'd have to ask some high

673
00:53:45,199 --> 00:53:49,360
level mathematicians or you know, people
that are specialists in Plato to help us,

674
00:53:49,519 --> 00:53:52,920
because this is hard to understand,
and there's a lot of areas of

675
00:53:52,920 --> 00:53:54,960
Plato that are hard to understand.
There's a lot of areas in Aerosola they're

676
00:53:54,960 --> 00:53:59,679
gonna be hard to understand. And
keep that in mind because even academics and

677
00:53:59,679 --> 00:54:06,960
school today struggle with understanding and grasping
some of the arguments some of the texts

678
00:54:07,000 --> 00:54:12,760
and some of the mathematical postulations and
claims doesn't mean they're not true. It

679
00:54:12,840 --> 00:54:15,400
just means that it's hard to understand
at times what they mean. And in

680
00:54:15,519 --> 00:54:19,519
some of the other philosophers that we
read, we're gonna we're gonna encounter hard

681
00:54:19,559 --> 00:54:24,800
parts. So what I'm saying is, don't get discouraged, because even though

682
00:54:24,840 --> 00:54:28,679
I put a lot of time into
this, I've read a lot of Plato

683
00:54:28,760 --> 00:54:34,760
over the years, I'm not a
Plato expert, and I still encounter difficult

684
00:54:34,800 --> 00:54:39,559
texts. So the Fieto is interested
in some of these metaphysical questions, such

685
00:54:39,599 --> 00:54:45,760
as the immortality of the soul,
and we have some arguments here which you

686
00:54:45,800 --> 00:54:47,639
know, we had seen in the
Apology. He said, you know,

687
00:54:47,679 --> 00:54:52,800
I have these dreams and visions,
and that's where this entity, this damon,

688
00:54:52,960 --> 00:54:54,519
speaks to me. And he says, you know, dreams and visions

689
00:54:54,559 --> 00:54:59,239
kind of suggest to me that the
body is not all there is. There's

690
00:54:59,280 --> 00:55:02,800
also a soul, and I think
that soul, because it's a higher form

691
00:55:02,840 --> 00:55:08,000
of reality he's saying, is immortal. And this leads him to the famous

692
00:55:08,599 --> 00:55:14,079
Platonic doctrine of the transmigration of souls
or reincarnation. So he says to me,

693
00:55:14,119 --> 00:55:19,719
it looks like dreams teach us that
there is a transmigration of the souls.

694
00:55:20,920 --> 00:55:23,639
There's more than just bottle existence,
because whatever the dream realm is or

695
00:55:23,639 --> 00:55:28,159
wherever it is, it connects to
some ideal realm or some formal realm,

696
00:55:28,760 --> 00:55:31,679
the noetic realm. Some Floster's letter
call it the mental realm, the idea

697
00:55:31,719 --> 00:55:36,880
realm, and dreams seem to connect
to that, and they show us then

698
00:55:37,000 --> 00:55:45,679
that there's a distinction between physical body
and mind or soul. The Fieto is

699
00:55:45,719 --> 00:55:50,239
interesting and unique too, because we
won't just get an obsession on, you

700
00:55:50,280 --> 00:55:52,800
know, like the Timaeus. Is
this really wild discussion of the origin of

701
00:55:52,840 --> 00:55:59,800
the universe and how the universe is
structure. The apology is about, you

702
00:55:59,800 --> 00:56:04,840
know, defending his positions as a
philosopher and argument everybody, Okay, but

703
00:56:05,039 --> 00:56:10,800
this is interesting because I Pieto is
an epistemological, metaphysical, and psychological dialogue

704
00:56:10,920 --> 00:56:19,320
explaining all of these views. In
Plato slash Socrates, we have a mentioning

705
00:56:19,400 --> 00:56:25,360
of the positive in terms of religion, where there are positive approbations given to

706
00:56:25,639 --> 00:56:31,280
the Apollonian religion. The Appollonian religion
is characterized by the priests of Apollo,

707
00:56:31,360 --> 00:56:37,400
who had devotion to the Son,
and not just the physical son, but

708
00:56:37,440 --> 00:56:45,000
the physical son is symbolic of the
intellectual son, which is the Logos,

709
00:56:45,519 --> 00:56:50,280
which is the One, the God, the monad, the divine mind.

710
00:56:50,960 --> 00:56:54,719
And so there's an approbation here,
and later neo Platonists of the same view

711
00:56:55,159 --> 00:57:01,119
that you know, religion is an
inherently bad religion teaches us that the Logos

712
00:57:01,159 --> 00:57:08,280
of the universe is kind of like
of the spiritual mental realm, is analogous

713
00:57:08,320 --> 00:57:19,400
to the Son of the physical realm. So hence the Apollonian Sun religion is

714
00:57:19,440 --> 00:57:23,920
something that Socrates and Plato make use
of, as well as later neo Platonists.

715
00:57:24,320 --> 00:57:29,039
And it's going to be very clear
in the Republic. I mean,

716
00:57:29,079 --> 00:57:36,159
he's gonna basically say that the God
is the One and is the light of

717
00:57:36,199 --> 00:57:40,599
the universe, and he or it
because he doesn't really conceive of it as

718
00:57:40,639 --> 00:57:49,159
personal per se. This God force
basically shines its rays into the created order,

719
00:57:49,199 --> 00:57:52,079
and these rays are kind of like
the forms, and then that gives

720
00:57:52,159 --> 00:58:00,119
rise to the physical reality. This
is not a docrine of creation, it's

721
00:58:00,119 --> 00:58:02,679
a doctione. More so, perhaps
of emanation, so the difference being that

722
00:58:02,760 --> 00:58:07,239
creation, for example, if you're
a Christian, Christian theology posits that God

723
00:58:07,280 --> 00:58:13,679
created the world at Exnlo out of
nothing. No Greeks taught that. The

724
00:58:13,719 --> 00:58:17,159
Greek philosophers thought that the existence of
the world in the play, in the

725
00:58:17,199 --> 00:58:24,679
Platonic and neo Platonic view is kind
of a never ending eternal begetting or an

726
00:58:24,760 --> 00:58:30,800
eternal coming forth from the One,
or an emanation from the One. In

727
00:58:30,840 --> 00:58:35,880
the Pieto, we learn that,
as we said, poetry is kind of

728
00:58:35,960 --> 00:58:40,079
dumb, but it seems to be
dumb because he's not good at it.

729
00:58:40,239 --> 00:58:44,079
He says, which is funny,
And he says, and by the way,

730
00:58:44,159 --> 00:58:47,920
but philosophy is actually better than poetry, because philosophy is the universal art.

731
00:58:49,199 --> 00:58:51,639
It is more universal, and so
therefore it is better. And so

732
00:58:51,800 --> 00:58:55,400
we see even in this argument about
the premisee of philosophy over poetry, that

733
00:58:55,599 --> 00:59:00,639
universality, the more universal thing is, the higher it is on. Plato's

734
00:59:00,719 --> 00:59:06,760
hierarchy, and Plato's metaphysical view is
a chain of being view, and it

735
00:59:06,920 --> 00:59:08,840
is a hierarchical chain of being view. We'll get to the chain of being

736
00:59:08,880 --> 00:59:15,679
in a little bit very important not
just to Plato, Aristotle, and the

737
00:59:15,760 --> 00:59:19,159
Church Fathers, but into the Middle
Ages as well. The chain of being

738
00:59:19,159 --> 00:59:23,320
will be crucial to the entire medieval
world view, in paradigm, in philosophy.

739
00:59:27,159 --> 00:59:31,599
Just as we said there's a higher
principle, hierarchically ordered metaphysical structure to

740
00:59:31,639 --> 00:59:37,199
the universe, there's also a higher
order in man himself. The body is

741
00:59:37,320 --> 00:59:44,639
lower baser, it's subject to decay, flux, sickness, corruption, pain,

742
00:59:45,320 --> 00:59:53,000
attachment to vice, addiction, and
the mind, for the reasoning,

743
00:59:53,840 --> 01:00:00,360
is better to a higher ontological status. Higher on this chain of being,

744
01:00:00,360 --> 01:00:04,639
we could say, because it reasons
about, and perceives and talks about,

745
01:00:04,679 --> 01:00:09,880
thinks about, contemplates the eternal and
variant forms of things. So this is

746
01:00:09,920 --> 01:00:15,360
where we get introduced to the forms
doctrine. This is the fundamental metaphysical doctrine

747
01:00:15,360 --> 01:00:20,719
of Plato, and this is that
everything that exists is it exists on the

748
01:00:20,719 --> 01:00:27,239
basis of some form, pattern,
principle, or archetype, or exemplar,

749
01:00:27,599 --> 01:00:31,519
all words us used to mean the
same thing that exists in the one or

750
01:00:31,559 --> 01:00:38,159
in the mind of the one.
These forms are the true reality. They

751
01:00:38,199 --> 01:00:45,440
are truth proper, they're truly truth, and even they are kind of underneath

752
01:00:45,480 --> 01:00:50,760
the one, right, so you
have the One, the God, the

753
01:00:50,880 --> 01:00:53,760
monad, the mind, whatever.
All of these terms are used. Sometimes

754
01:00:53,800 --> 01:00:59,920
even uses weird terms like the captain. The Father is used at least one

755
01:01:00,119 --> 01:01:05,800
time by Plato. That's the god
thing, and from the God thing come

756
01:01:05,920 --> 01:01:12,880
these many forms. And these many
forms are the patterns, principles and archetypes

757
01:01:12,880 --> 01:01:19,280
behind the many particulars in our world. And that's all of the particulars.

758
01:01:19,320 --> 01:01:25,559
All differentia of our existence are patterned
on these forms. So there's a form

759
01:01:25,599 --> 01:01:30,880
of every particular. But it's hierarchical
because amongst the forms, they kind of

760
01:01:30,920 --> 01:01:37,039
point you up to higher level forms, and the higher level forms point you

761
01:01:37,119 --> 01:01:42,639
up to the one, which is
the good, the beautiful, the God,

762
01:01:43,559 --> 01:01:47,400
the Light, etc. All in
one. So you can begin to

763
01:01:47,400 --> 01:01:52,480
see how if you know anything about, you know, ancient medieval theology,

764
01:01:52,480 --> 01:01:58,199
a lot of this term the terminology
will be used by Christian, Jewish and

765
01:01:58,400 --> 01:02:01,840
Muslim theologians. Now they for in
their theological views that a lot of the

766
01:02:02,000 --> 01:02:08,159
terms are going to be used by
a lot of these especially medieval philosophical and

767
01:02:08,159 --> 01:02:13,159
theological thinkers. Right when we get
to Mimenides, if we talk about Mimenides,

768
01:02:13,199 --> 01:02:17,280
Aquinas and salm Scotus. Right,
A lot of these terms of medieval

769
01:02:17,320 --> 01:02:23,920
philosophers and theologians are coming out of
this tradition as well, this Greek tradition.

770
01:02:25,599 --> 01:02:29,239
All right, So the forms here
we are, we're getting into the

771
01:02:29,280 --> 01:02:32,000
forms another thing that we should I
don't. I don't know why I sucked

772
01:02:32,039 --> 01:02:35,119
us in there. I think I
was just going through my notes. But

773
01:02:36,039 --> 01:02:42,880
this is important to remember too that
there are differing disputes amongst the Platonists and

774
01:02:43,320 --> 01:02:49,280
historians of Greek philosophy or whatever,
that what is the real Platonic tradition.

775
01:02:49,440 --> 01:02:53,679
And if we take the Timaeus at
face value, we have this story that

776
01:02:53,880 --> 01:03:00,760
Solon, who was a statesman who
knew Socrates, went to Egypt, and

777
01:03:00,800 --> 01:03:07,000
when he went to Egypt, he
was taught the mysteries of Egypt by the

778
01:03:07,039 --> 01:03:12,440
priests of the Egyptian religion, and
when he came back to Athens, he

779
01:03:12,519 --> 01:03:17,440
taught that to Socrates. Socrates taught
that to Plato. So quite literally,

780
01:03:17,519 --> 01:03:23,679
in the Tomaus we have this claim, this perspective that the mysteries of Greek

781
01:03:23,719 --> 01:03:30,280
philosophy come from Egypt. Again,
many debate this, Oh, that's not

782
01:03:30,280 --> 01:03:32,440
true. It's just a myth.
I don't know, but that's what it

783
01:03:32,480 --> 01:03:37,639
says. Okay, so you can
interpret that however you see fit. It

784
01:03:37,679 --> 01:03:43,280
does seem possible to me. It's
very interesting. We do have throughout Plato's

785
01:03:43,360 --> 01:03:49,639
writings this tendency towards the mystical.
We even have tendencies towards secret societies.

786
01:03:50,159 --> 01:03:54,719
So it is very possible that Solon
really did go and learn and was initiated

787
01:03:54,760 --> 01:03:59,719
into the mysteries of Egypt. Now, let's not be crass and silly here,

788
01:04:00,159 --> 01:04:03,760
not equating that in a one to
one correspondence with modern Freemasonry. Yes,

789
01:04:04,320 --> 01:04:09,039
modern Freemasons. If you read Albert
Pike's Morals and Dogma, he will

790
01:04:09,079 --> 01:04:12,880
talk about Pythagoras, he'll talk about
Plato, he'll talk about soccer, He'll

791
01:04:12,880 --> 01:04:15,920
talk about a lot of this stuff. But that does not mean that necessarily

792
01:04:15,960 --> 01:04:21,559
than therefore there is a direct continuity
from ancient Egypt to sol On, to

793
01:04:21,760 --> 01:04:30,199
Plato to Albert Pike. Okay,
that that does not follow. So philosophy,

794
01:04:30,239 --> 01:04:33,079
though, is a tradition. So
this is something that's again controversial.

795
01:04:33,159 --> 01:04:38,679
It's it's it's it's fascinating because a
lot of people pass over this if you

796
01:04:38,800 --> 01:04:44,239
if you, I've had many college
classes on Plato grade classes that discuss this

797
01:04:44,280 --> 01:04:47,920
stuff. Do you know how many
of those classes mentioned anything to do with

798
01:04:47,960 --> 01:04:56,679
the Tamaus or the Fieto. Absolutely
zero. None. Now, if you

799
01:04:56,840 --> 01:05:01,599
were specializing in Plato, if you
were doing a PhD study in Plato or

800
01:05:01,639 --> 01:05:08,320
writing your thesis on Plato, maybe
then you would be exposed to the Pieto

801
01:05:08,519 --> 01:05:13,440
or what's in the Tamaus or whatever. But it just kind of amazes me

802
01:05:13,679 --> 01:05:16,760
that, you know, you got
all these professors who again, in the

803
01:05:16,800 --> 01:05:20,239
academic setting, especially nowadays. I
mean I was in a college twenty years

804
01:05:20,239 --> 01:05:25,639
ago, but nowadays it's way worse. I feel like the only reason that

805
01:05:25,679 --> 01:05:30,400
anybody is in philosophy classes and today's
university setting is to become a purple haired

806
01:05:30,400 --> 01:05:33,519
social justice where you're a freak.
I mean, that's all you're getting pretty

807
01:05:33,599 --> 01:05:40,239
much now, I think, in
these crazy state universities. But I'm sure

808
01:05:40,239 --> 01:05:45,679
there's some private Catholic schools or something
that if you did a PhD you might

809
01:05:45,280 --> 01:05:50,679
get into these really esoteric elements of
Plato. But they're there, so whatever

810
01:05:50,719 --> 01:05:57,679
you make of them. And even
Coppleston in the last section of the chapter

811
01:05:57,840 --> 01:06:02,039
on Plato's forms was very explicit.
This is pages we'll get to this in

812
01:06:02,079 --> 01:06:06,719
a minute, pages one oh seven
and eight. That Plato is very clearly

813
01:06:06,760 --> 01:06:14,400
still a mystical and theological teacher.
There is this element very clearly throughout many

814
01:06:14,440 --> 01:06:17,360
of the dialogues, especially the ones
to deal with the forms, and that

815
01:06:17,519 --> 01:06:24,880
is because possibly he is saying that
this is a theological tradition that comes to

816
01:06:25,000 --> 01:06:30,920
us Greeks from Egypt. So philosophy
here is a tradition. It is not

817
01:06:30,119 --> 01:06:36,480
merely speculative. But again we don't
know whether you know, Let's say we

818
01:06:36,519 --> 01:06:41,039
went to Plato's academy back in the
day that Plato was alive and walking around.

819
01:06:42,199 --> 01:06:46,159
Does this mean that literally Plato would
have inducted us into a secret society

820
01:06:47,400 --> 01:06:51,800
or is this a teaching device and
a symbolic thing in the dialogues and we

821
01:06:51,840 --> 01:06:57,480
would have just been sitting around and
doing math problems. Nobody knows. So

822
01:06:57,519 --> 01:07:00,800
these are areas of speculation regardless.
What we do know is that in Plato's

823
01:07:00,800 --> 01:07:08,199
philosophy he does adopt the Pagorian idea
that the forms are numbers. The forms

824
01:07:08,239 --> 01:07:15,480
are principally mathematical because mathematics can describe
everything. And because mathematics is invariant,

825
01:07:15,920 --> 01:07:20,639
it's abstract, it's unchanging, it's
clearly higher than the here and the now.

826
01:07:21,199 --> 01:07:27,719
But everything that exists right is dimensions, right, planes, surfaces.

827
01:07:27,760 --> 01:07:31,079
That's all geometry and numbers. This
is one book with four sides and right.

828
01:07:31,119 --> 01:07:38,360
So number goes into all of these
things and helps explain and give form

829
01:07:38,440 --> 01:07:47,480
to order to anything. Form orders, matter, and the discovery of truth

830
01:07:47,880 --> 01:07:54,960
in Plato's system is strictly speaking,
discovery of form, the forms, the

831
01:07:55,039 --> 01:08:01,559
ideal forms of everything. It is
not primarily knowledge of sense data. This

832
01:08:01,639 --> 01:08:06,039
is the most important point here.
Plato does not think that sense data is

833
01:08:06,079 --> 01:08:11,440
totally useless. He does not think
that everything in their sense data experience is

834
01:08:11,480 --> 01:08:15,840
an illusion. But it is not
the real reality. It is dream like,

835
01:08:16,399 --> 01:08:21,000
it is an imitation. It is
a copy of the aetos. The

836
01:08:21,159 --> 01:08:30,359
ideas which are more real, have
more being. They are truth, and

837
01:08:30,640 --> 01:08:38,600
they ground knowledge, not sense data
particulars. Not this cup versus this cup,

838
01:08:39,439 --> 01:08:48,079
but the cup, the God cup, worship the God cup. I

839
01:08:48,479 --> 01:08:50,920
think, if you when we get
to David Hume, I'm going from memory

840
01:08:50,920 --> 01:08:55,359
here. But he has this discussion
where he kind of laughs at this this

841
01:08:55,479 --> 01:09:00,039
idea where he critiques the causal chain
argument of like er Statle and Aquinas,

842
01:09:00,560 --> 01:09:05,119
and he talks about the great pumpkin. All right, and maybe this is

843
01:09:05,159 --> 01:09:09,960
something that you know, Charlie Brown
is joking about, right, the great

844
01:09:10,000 --> 01:09:14,960
pumpkin. And you know, David
he was making this argument that well,

845
01:09:15,000 --> 01:09:19,680
you wouldn't look from look at a
pumpkin patch and think that because pumpkins come

846
01:09:19,680 --> 01:09:25,039
from other pumpkins pumpkins, that back
in history there is the great pumpkin.

847
01:09:25,880 --> 01:09:30,079
And that might be a play on
Plato as well, because Plato thinks,

848
01:09:30,479 --> 01:09:38,960
he really does think that the forms
the ideas are self subsisting causes. The

849
01:09:39,119 --> 01:09:45,840
forms of the things that exist are
self subsisting causes of the particular objects that

850
01:09:45,920 --> 01:09:53,039
we experience. So quite literally,
there is a form of cup. It

851
01:09:53,119 --> 01:09:57,319
really exists. In fact, the
form of cup is more real than these

852
01:09:57,359 --> 01:10:04,840
cups. These cups participate in the
cup with a capital C, but these

853
01:10:04,920 --> 01:10:15,720
are not capital C cup. And
yes, presumably in this idea, your

854
01:10:15,960 --> 01:10:19,079
jockstrap cup would also have a form. There would be a form of that

855
01:10:19,239 --> 01:10:25,760
cup. And we do have critiques
where this does get a little odd.

856
01:10:25,880 --> 01:10:29,920
So is there the form of poop
is there the form of penis? I

857
01:10:29,960 --> 01:10:32,560
mean, these are some of the
criticisms the Ariosotle will give this idea that,

858
01:10:32,640 --> 01:10:34,960
well, so wait a minute,
so everything has a form, to

859
01:10:35,039 --> 01:10:40,800
the forms have a form. This
will be known as Arisotle's classic infinite regress

860
01:10:40,880 --> 01:10:45,319
critique of the form doctrine. The
other a critique that Aersolo gives famously is

861
01:10:45,359 --> 01:10:51,119
that he says, quote, Plato
separated form from object. But if you

862
01:10:51,199 --> 01:10:56,119
read Coppelson, you know that even
Coppelson says that this isn't really fair to

863
01:10:56,159 --> 01:11:00,840
Plato because Plato didn't consider the realm
of the forms completely separate. In fact,

864
01:11:00,920 --> 01:11:06,399
that doctrine of methexas m e t
h xis in the Greek means participation.

865
01:11:08,520 --> 01:11:14,079
So it's not the forms that are
like coming into our realm, it's

866
01:11:14,239 --> 01:11:19,039
our realm that is sort of grasping
for and participating in that realm of the

867
01:11:19,159 --> 01:11:27,119
ideal forms, because that's more real. So what kind of a philosophy characterizes

868
01:11:27,199 --> 01:11:33,199
Plato and Plato's doctrine the forms?
Idealism? Plato is an idealist par excellence.

869
01:11:34,800 --> 01:11:40,279
Many other philosophers will also be considered
idealists. Hagel is an idealist.

870
01:11:41,119 --> 01:11:45,239
Hegel is influenced by Plato, but
he's not identical to the system of Plato.

871
01:11:46,479 --> 01:11:49,359
But for example, one of the
things that Hagel will try to solve

872
01:11:50,319 --> 01:11:58,960
in Plato's idealism is Plato's difficulty with
change. Plato has a difficulty accounting for

873
01:12:00,319 --> 01:12:04,479
how flux occurs. Why is there
flux and change? And why is there

874
01:12:04,520 --> 01:12:10,880
the many of objects? If the
objects are ultimately geared towards and participate in

875
01:12:10,920 --> 01:12:13,800
the one, why do we have
many at all? If the one is

876
01:12:13,840 --> 01:12:16,039
the good and it's self sufficient,
etc. Then why do we even have

877
01:12:16,159 --> 01:12:20,479
the many? And if you read
Coppelson, Coppelison pointed that out that this

878
01:12:20,600 --> 01:12:25,199
has never explained, and probably Plato
didn't know right, so there were areas

879
01:12:25,239 --> 01:12:29,399
where he just couldn't deal with or
solve these, probably consider them insoluble,

880
01:12:29,479 --> 01:12:33,119
or he thought maybe later philosophy people
will solve it, And so you get

881
01:12:33,159 --> 01:12:39,159
people like Hegel who will try to, in his kind of Platonic process philosophy,

882
01:12:39,279 --> 01:12:45,680
give an account for change, thesis, sentenis, etc. The process

883
01:12:45,800 --> 01:12:48,279
of the world historical moving towards the
Omega point. All of these are ways

884
01:12:48,359 --> 01:12:57,000
for Hegel to try to account for
change. In his idealist philosophy. But

885
01:12:57,159 --> 01:13:00,760
note as well that we do not
mean idealism in some colloquial sense, like

886
01:13:01,079 --> 01:13:05,479
a twenty year old who wants to
convert everybody to Marxism. Okay, we're

887
01:13:05,479 --> 01:13:12,000
not talking about an idealistic youth.
We're talking about a metaphysical doctrine that all

888
01:13:12,079 --> 01:13:19,399
that exists fundamentally or that truly exists
or that really exists is idea. But

889
01:13:19,560 --> 01:13:23,960
we got to be fair to Plato
that he's not saying that this world is

890
01:13:24,199 --> 01:13:30,039
not real or is a simulation.
Dude, we lusimulation in that is a

891
01:13:30,279 --> 01:13:34,279
kind of bastardized version of Platonism.
But that's not really Plato's view, right,

892
01:13:34,359 --> 01:13:38,560
I mean, he does talk about
this world as if it's dreamlike,

893
01:13:39,319 --> 01:13:44,760
as if it is a pale imitation
and copy of the real world. But

894
01:13:45,000 --> 01:13:50,920
clearly there is a premisee given to
the hierarchy in the ideal realm to unity.

895
01:13:54,119 --> 01:13:58,800
So it's better to be ideal in
the realm of the forms. It

896
01:13:59,039 --> 01:14:05,079
is better to be one than many. But why well, as Coppolison noted

897
01:14:05,159 --> 01:14:09,560
as well, we don't know that
there's never really any answer as to why

898
01:14:10,520 --> 01:14:14,720
unity is superior to multiplicity, but
it is assumed to be the case,

899
01:14:14,800 --> 01:14:16,840
and he would probably give arguments from
numbers. Right, Well, all the

900
01:14:16,960 --> 01:14:21,800
numbers come from the number one,
so one has some primacy and superiority to

901
01:14:23,079 --> 01:14:26,039
two, three, four, five, right, Because remember a lot of

902
01:14:26,079 --> 01:14:30,279
this will rely on mathematics. It
is a mathe mysticism. It is,

903
01:14:30,359 --> 01:14:34,520
as a Coppolison called it, a
form of pan mathematicism all his math,

904
01:14:35,279 --> 01:14:46,560
much like Pith Aggresson. Thus moving
on to Intitus, numbers are discovered number

905
01:14:46,640 --> 01:14:51,199
and form, which the forms are
versions of numbers in different numerical constructs.

906
01:14:53,520 --> 01:14:59,760
Number forms are discovered by reason,
and particularly through this purification process that the

907
01:15:00,039 --> 01:15:04,079
loss for goes through, whereby over
the years, as he gets older of

908
01:15:04,319 --> 01:15:09,680
doing philosophy, doing reason, and
getting habituated to that, he is no

909
01:15:09,920 --> 01:15:14,920
longer enslaved to the bodies, to
the passions, right, and so he's

910
01:15:15,039 --> 01:15:20,640
purified, perhaps a quasi ascetic endeavor, and then he's much more able to

911
01:15:23,119 --> 01:15:27,640
align his mind with the realm of
the forms. And Plato will say that

912
01:15:27,760 --> 01:15:31,680
basically the same thing in the Republic, where he talks about something to the

913
01:15:31,760 --> 01:15:38,079
effect of, uh, you know, potential philosophy students in the Republic will

914
01:15:38,159 --> 01:15:42,760
be you know, basically doing math
problems on a mountain for twenty years,

915
01:15:42,840 --> 01:15:47,720
and then they'll come back right and
do civics. So so again, I

916
01:15:47,800 --> 01:15:50,680
mean, this sounds like on the
one hand, it sounds reasonable. Well,

917
01:15:50,760 --> 01:15:53,600
yeah, it does make sense,
So we want to, don't We

918
01:15:53,640 --> 01:15:56,880
want a mathematical or a logical guy
running the city. But then it sounds

919
01:15:56,880 --> 01:16:00,479
like a nightmare because like the mathsburg
who comes down from the city is going

920
01:16:00,520 --> 01:16:02,760
to be like Zuckerberg running every day. Everybody needs to be on a coumpine,

921
01:16:02,880 --> 01:16:11,399
right, That's what we're gonna get. Plato thinks that this he is

922
01:16:11,800 --> 01:16:15,560
at least partially resolving the one of
the mini problem, and as we know

923
01:16:15,960 --> 01:16:19,680
in Coppleston, couples gives grants him
that Okay, well, maybe in the

924
01:16:20,079 --> 01:16:25,279
domain of epistemology, he is solving
the one of the mini problem with the

925
01:16:25,359 --> 01:16:30,720
doctrine of the forms, because we
have many that share in commonalities essences or

926
01:16:30,880 --> 01:16:39,720
universals through the forms, and the
particulars are the sensible objects that we you

927
01:16:39,800 --> 01:16:44,760
know, I'm sensing and touching and
learning about this cup, and then I'm

928
01:16:44,800 --> 01:16:48,159
sensing and learning about this cup.
These are sensible particulars, and they share

929
01:16:48,279 --> 01:16:54,239
a compness, which is an ideal
essence or form common to both. And

930
01:16:54,439 --> 01:16:59,439
so they these objects share in multiple
forms in Plato, and that will be

931
01:16:59,560 --> 01:17:02,119
something that Arisotle will completely disagree with. Arisotle will say, no, no,

932
01:17:02,520 --> 01:17:08,600
these two things they don't share in
multiple forms. They can only have

933
01:17:09,119 --> 01:17:15,880
one common substance between them. That
is a doctrine that Arisotle will reject in

934
01:17:15,960 --> 01:17:24,199
Plato. So the compass and grants
that will perhaps just in the domain of

935
01:17:24,239 --> 01:17:29,319
epistemology, Plato has offered a step
forward from the pre Socratics and a kind

936
01:17:29,399 --> 01:17:31,239
of solution to the problem of the
one in the many, with the doctrine

937
01:17:31,279 --> 01:17:38,319
of the forms, with the doctrine
of the divine ideas. However, metaphysically

938
01:17:39,000 --> 01:17:43,720
they're still problems and they're not solved. We don't ever get an explanation in

939
01:17:43,960 --> 01:17:48,199
Plato as to what's the real notion
of this participation of our realm with that

940
01:17:48,359 --> 01:17:54,119
realm? Why do we have this
realm? Why do we have the many?

941
01:17:54,279 --> 01:17:58,960
If the perfect monad one was self
sufficient and perfect on its own.

942
01:18:00,039 --> 01:18:03,039
Of these kinds of questions ever get
answered or solved, and clearly a complisent

943
01:18:03,159 --> 01:18:08,039
argued of you. If you guys
read that he was struggling with these problems,

944
01:18:08,520 --> 01:18:12,079
his whole life knowledge then, according
to Plato and the Faeto, cannot

945
01:18:12,119 --> 01:18:18,520
be identified with sense data, and
so empiricism then is the opposite position to

946
01:18:18,640 --> 01:18:21,840
this, which is that all knowledge
comes through sense data. All we know

947
01:18:23,039 --> 01:18:28,640
is the empirical sense data. Plato
and Socrates would deride this. They would

948
01:18:28,720 --> 01:18:35,479
say, you are a low iq
euratard because empirical sense data is only telling

949
01:18:35,520 --> 01:18:39,399
you about the realm of flux.
And so if you think that's knowledge,

950
01:18:39,439 --> 01:18:42,479
you're an idiot. That's that's what
he would say. Right, you are

951
01:18:42,560 --> 01:18:48,079
a sophist, You are not a
good philosopher. The sense domain is in

952
01:18:48,279 --> 01:18:51,920
flux. How could that ever tell
you truth? Right? And this is

953
01:18:51,960 --> 01:18:56,119
where we get these classic exam I
don't know if you guys saw my debate

954
01:18:56,159 --> 01:18:58,920
with stuff on mol and you.
I'm not dissing on stuff on or anything

955
01:18:59,000 --> 01:19:02,640
like that, but we had a
debate where we sort of started kicked off

956
01:19:02,680 --> 01:19:06,640
the debate with this very question.
I was making this argument which is in

957
01:19:06,680 --> 01:19:13,880
the Fieto, which is that you
cannot identify the number seven with seven coconuts.

958
01:19:14,199 --> 01:19:16,560
And this is the argument in the
fieto. Now they don't make the

959
01:19:16,640 --> 01:19:21,239
coconut argument, but that's the it's
the same principle that's being argued in the

960
01:19:21,359 --> 01:19:26,359
fieto. So let's look a little
bit more at the doctrine of the forms,

961
01:19:26,399 --> 01:19:30,239
and we have there as a diagram. Pythagoras is tech tractus, right,

962
01:19:30,319 --> 01:19:35,840
the ten point pyramid. Illuminate confirm. Look at that diers illuminate if

963
01:19:35,920 --> 01:19:40,279
he's good, the pyramid. Look
at the words auci and I. Dude,

964
01:19:44,279 --> 01:19:48,720
it's just a geometry diagram. Dude, it's not illuminate confirm. But

965
01:19:49,159 --> 01:19:54,319
the Greeks talk about the Pythagoras talks
about this attractus. And you'll notice there

966
01:19:55,319 --> 01:20:00,920
let me move you guys out of
the way, and Mona the one in

967
01:20:00,000 --> 01:20:03,960
the top diad triad. And then
of course, in Pythagoras is to attract

968
01:20:04,039 --> 01:20:11,279
us. He argues that the rest
of the numbers also proceed from those prime

969
01:20:12,359 --> 01:20:15,359
those beginning principle one, two in
three, right, everything else comes from

970
01:20:15,439 --> 01:20:19,239
that. And thus you can see
that everything in reality is built up from

971
01:20:19,359 --> 01:20:26,439
these kinds of triads. And this
is also applicable and useful, useful in

972
01:20:26,760 --> 01:20:30,399
Plato's doctrine the forms as well,
because we want to be very precise here,

973
01:20:30,600 --> 01:20:34,520
not just on Plato's views of free
will or whatever Plato's ontology. What

974
01:20:34,760 --> 01:20:40,079
is Plato's doctrine of being? Well, the forms are numbers. So again

975
01:20:40,199 --> 01:20:45,439
this is from Pythagoras. The forms
are ideal in that they are not purely

976
01:20:45,640 --> 01:20:49,359
in the physical realm. They are
not identified with physical things or physical objects

977
01:20:49,439 --> 01:20:56,439
or what he calls sense particulars.
In fact, the forms exist transcendently as

978
01:20:56,800 --> 01:21:00,880
self subsisting causes of the world.
Now again this does not mean creation in

979
01:21:01,039 --> 01:21:05,279
some biblical sense of creation x neilo. It just means that whatever exists and

980
01:21:05,359 --> 01:21:11,880
has being derives that existence and that
being in a causal sense from the forms.

981
01:21:12,960 --> 01:21:18,439
The great cup in the sky causes
all the cups to be. The

982
01:21:18,600 --> 01:21:27,119
world of objects participates a texas in
et xis in this ideal world in some

983
01:21:28,119 --> 01:21:33,319
weird unitive way. But it is
not a perfect unity, because we're still

984
01:21:33,560 --> 01:21:39,479
distanced from We're still lower on that
pyramid, on that chain of being,

985
01:21:39,920 --> 01:21:45,479
which will see in a minute away
from the God form at the top of

986
01:21:45,960 --> 01:21:53,000
the pyramid, at the top of
the chain. And in the Neo Platonists,

987
01:21:53,000 --> 01:21:56,319
and I think probably in Plato two. You have this idea that all

988
01:21:56,399 --> 01:22:00,720
of the many that's down at the
sort of the fractal body of this pyramid,

989
01:22:00,760 --> 01:22:03,159
which is think of it like a
fractal that kind of like spins out

990
01:22:03,319 --> 01:22:10,479
from the one. All of those
minis are trying to get back to the

991
01:22:10,560 --> 01:22:16,760
one. They want to be reunified
with the one. And this is I

992
01:22:16,840 --> 01:22:20,600
think partly why, for example,
Plato will say that, I think the

993
01:22:20,640 --> 01:22:26,319
phrase is soma sama. The body
is a prison. The body, the

994
01:22:26,399 --> 01:22:30,960
physical body, it is a prison, and it is in the way of

995
01:22:31,119 --> 01:22:35,560
you getting back to the realm of
the forms. So even though Plato is

996
01:22:35,600 --> 01:22:41,079
not a he doesn't hate the world. He's not a sort of a Hindu

997
01:22:41,960 --> 01:22:45,279
yogi who's like rolling around and shit
to get away from the world, right

998
01:22:45,560 --> 01:22:51,720
and starving himself or whatever, there
is still this idea that this world is

999
01:22:51,760 --> 01:22:56,199
sort of a prison. This world
is a kind that's a prison, right,

1000
01:22:56,319 --> 01:23:02,079
this kind of The forms are transcendent, but they are not only transcendent,

1001
01:23:02,159 --> 01:23:05,479
which would cut us off from them. They are imminent in a lesser

1002
01:23:05,560 --> 01:23:13,359
way, because our realm is grasping
and participating in some diminished way in the

1003
01:23:13,479 --> 01:23:17,680
forms. The forms are eternal and
unchanging. They're not subject to time,

1004
01:23:17,920 --> 01:23:23,159
they're not subject to change, they're
not subject to flux. And thus they

1005
01:23:23,199 --> 01:23:27,640
are in contrast to what character what
are the key features and characteristics of time,

1006
01:23:27,800 --> 01:23:32,680
temporal existence, physicality, matter and
the here and the now, solidity,

1007
01:23:32,760 --> 01:23:36,199
etc. The forms and Plato reconcile
the one of the many, as

1008
01:23:36,239 --> 01:23:41,960
we just saw, and they become
a ground for knowledge in an epistemic sense.

1009
01:23:42,520 --> 01:23:46,680
So again we just covered that true
knowledge, knowledge specifically, is not

1010
01:23:46,880 --> 01:23:53,000
of material objects primarily, but of
the forms. So remember, just as

1011
01:23:53,079 --> 01:23:58,800
we have light which enters our eye, that comes from the sun, and

1012
01:23:58,960 --> 01:24:02,439
this gives us knowledge of things.
This is an allegory or an analogy that's

1013
01:24:02,520 --> 01:24:06,680
used by the Platonic philosophers, that
the mind is that the eye of the

1014
01:24:06,840 --> 01:24:15,319
mind truly sees the essences of things, in the forms of things, and

1015
01:24:15,600 --> 01:24:24,600
thus they are ultimately moving in their
mental movement towards the one, the son

1016
01:24:24,840 --> 01:24:29,399
or the logos of the mind,
the universal mind, the universal reason.

1017
01:24:29,920 --> 01:24:35,319
Do you see this analogy here?
In these two worlds, the one,

1018
01:24:35,840 --> 01:24:43,840
the highest form is beauty. So
this reconciles his esthetics. Is the good,

1019
01:24:44,119 --> 01:24:49,279
which reconciles and unifies his metaphysics is
the God. It is the ultimate

1020
01:24:49,399 --> 01:24:55,079
unifying principle. It is Father,
and it is cause of the forms,

1021
01:24:55,319 --> 01:25:00,000
which are the cause and the structuring
and ordering of our world. So again

1022
01:25:00,079 --> 01:25:05,479
do you see this, there's another
triad Father, God calls beauty one.

1023
01:25:06,239 --> 01:25:14,560
This thing is the cause of the
forms, forms, cause of our world.

1024
01:25:16,039 --> 01:25:20,920
So we've talked then about that is
that's the essence. To be more

1025
01:25:21,000 --> 01:25:26,920
confusing with more philosophical term, that
is the the locusts. That is the

1026
01:25:27,680 --> 01:25:33,159
primary things that we want to know
about Plato's ontology. What about Plato's epistemology

1027
01:25:33,680 --> 01:25:39,399
is view of knowledge. Well,
guess what it's intimately bound up with his

1028
01:25:39,880 --> 01:25:48,039
doctrine of ontology. This is doctrine
of being. And we've talked about those

1029
01:25:48,079 --> 01:25:53,560
dialectics. That little diagram is just
kind of illustrating that between being and non

1030
01:25:53,720 --> 01:25:58,840
being, there is becoming. And
so these are in dialectical tension. The

1031
01:25:59,000 --> 01:26:03,760
things in our world which are subject
to change becoming. They're striving to get

1032
01:26:03,840 --> 01:26:09,399
back to being proper, which is
the realm of the forms. But we're

1033
01:26:09,439 --> 01:26:15,079
also kind of always teetering over into
non being. Think about Marty McFly right

1034
01:26:15,159 --> 01:26:18,920
when he's uh, you know,
they have the picture and Marty's disappearing,

1035
01:26:19,039 --> 01:26:21,720
right, Marty, Oh, Marty, Marty Right, He's going back into

1036
01:26:21,800 --> 01:26:29,600
non being in Plato's epistemology because it's
intimately bound up with the ontology. We

1037
01:26:29,720 --> 01:26:32,880
need to understand that metaphysics first.
For most of the ancient medieval philosophers,

1038
01:26:32,960 --> 01:26:39,279
guess what, metaphysics comes first.
This is going to be a big departure

1039
01:26:39,319 --> 01:26:42,720
when we get to the Enlightenment,
because the Enlightenment guys they flip it.

1040
01:26:43,279 --> 01:26:46,399
They say, you know what,
all this metaphysical stuff that's secondary, if

1041
01:26:46,479 --> 01:26:49,399
even at all possible. In fact, we might not even do it.

1042
01:26:49,479 --> 01:26:53,720
David Hume says, throw out all
this metaphysics gibberish. It's all garbage and

1043
01:26:53,720 --> 01:26:57,720
gibberish, committed to the flames.
He says. They flip it, and

1044
01:26:57,920 --> 01:27:00,680
they say, first, you got
to tell me about your pistemology and justify

1045
01:27:00,720 --> 01:27:05,520
your pistemology before you tell me any
of this metaphysical jibberish gobbledegook. That's what

1046
01:27:05,640 --> 01:27:11,560
the Enlightenment guys will say. But
for the ancient medieval guys it's the other

1047
01:27:11,640 --> 01:27:15,359
way around. No, no,
no, no. Philosophy is essentially first

1048
01:27:15,399 --> 01:27:18,720
and foremost metaphysics. Then we can
talk about epistemology, then we can talk

1049
01:27:18,720 --> 01:27:24,199
about psychology, then we talk about
ethics and aesthetics or whatever. Knowledge must

1050
01:27:24,319 --> 01:27:28,520
be grounded. It cannot be mere
opinion. This is a very important section

1051
01:27:28,600 --> 01:27:31,439
in the Republic where we have these
discussions. It's in other dialogues as well

1052
01:27:31,479 --> 01:27:36,000
as to what counts us true knowledge? Well, in Plato and Socrates,

1053
01:27:36,119 --> 01:27:41,399
mind, it can't just be opinion. That's what the sofist said. Your

1054
01:27:41,439 --> 01:27:45,159
opinion, your opinion, man,
We're all toil doing all knowledge merely opinions.

1055
01:27:45,359 --> 01:27:50,199
Dude. Everybody who's a relativist,
guess what they have their analog in

1056
01:27:50,239 --> 01:27:55,960
the ancient world. The Sophist and
Plato and Aristotle, as we said,

1057
01:27:56,560 --> 01:27:59,960
have quite a bit of debate with
the sofists, and they think the sofist

1058
01:28:00,000 --> 01:28:06,479
are terrible. They they're destructive.
They're caught in that bodily existence of the

1059
01:28:06,600 --> 01:28:13,520
here and the now. They're attached
inordinately to matter and sense data, and

1060
01:28:13,640 --> 01:28:17,479
they can never rise above the sense
data. Thus they are relativists. Just

1061
01:28:17,840 --> 01:28:23,279
like the flux of this world.
All is change, all is flux.

1062
01:28:23,640 --> 01:28:27,479
They never get above it. And
so if you identify knowledge with sense data.

1063
01:28:27,840 --> 01:28:30,239
Plato and Urso will say, your
knowledge will not be grounded, it

1064
01:28:30,359 --> 01:28:35,680
will be like shifting sands, and
these people cannot give an account for knowledge.

1065
01:28:35,720 --> 01:28:42,000
So here we have the first idea
that will characterize epistemology and justification for

1066
01:28:42,079 --> 01:28:45,880
the next two thousand plus years of
justified true belief. What it is to

1067
01:28:45,920 --> 01:28:50,800
give an account for our knowledge,
and how it cannot be identified to or

1068
01:28:50,920 --> 01:28:57,159
reduced to in a reductionist way,
to sensible particulars. Sensible particulars are not

1069
01:28:57,239 --> 01:29:02,199
true knowledge, and thus empiricism as
a in other words, not just empirical

1070
01:29:02,319 --> 01:29:06,439
data because Plato. Of course Plato
would not deny that you learn things through

1071
01:29:06,520 --> 01:29:10,800
sense data, but he says the
knowledge that you learn through sense data is

1072
01:29:10,880 --> 01:29:15,399
intended to direct you to the higher
levels of the forms. So we're not

1073
01:29:15,479 --> 01:29:19,720
saying that there's no such thing as
empirical knowledge. It's just an empirical particular.

1074
01:29:20,159 --> 01:29:24,720
Knowledge of the sensible particulars is the
lowest level of knowledge, so it

1075
01:29:24,840 --> 01:29:31,039
kind of corresponds to opinion. But
you can through the rational process rise up

1076
01:29:31,119 --> 01:29:38,520
to the next level, which is
knowledge of math and the universals, and

1077
01:29:38,680 --> 01:29:42,920
they point you to the knowledge of
the forms and so in that way you're

1078
01:29:43,000 --> 01:29:47,680
moving upwards. Right. The intention
is to constantly move up towards the forms,

1079
01:29:47,720 --> 01:29:53,319
and that will grant you a justified
true belief and not mere opinion.

1080
01:29:53,920 --> 01:29:58,239
Opinions are like flux. They're unstable, they're tied to sense data. True

1081
01:29:58,319 --> 01:30:01,479
knowledge goes beyond the senses to the
mind, seeing the form in a direct

1082
01:30:01,600 --> 01:30:05,880
sort of perceptive intuitive flash. I
think he says something like that in the

1083
01:30:05,920 --> 01:30:10,680
Republic. He uses that language.
And as we said already, the analogy

1084
01:30:10,800 --> 01:30:14,239
is to the sun and its rays
coming up down to us giving our eyes

1085
01:30:14,279 --> 01:30:18,600
sight to the soul or the mind's
eye, seeing the forms in an intellectual,

1086
01:30:18,840 --> 01:30:23,960
rational sense. Purification of the philosopher
from the passions is what allows this

1087
01:30:24,119 --> 01:30:28,239
process, and that's why you have
to learn about a math. Opinion must

1088
01:30:28,640 --> 01:30:33,560
move from no grounding to being grounded
in a knowledge of the forms. Plato's

1089
01:30:33,600 --> 01:30:40,720
ethic will also flow from the metaphysic
and from the epistemology. Who is the

1090
01:30:40,800 --> 01:30:44,479
just man? What is justice?
As we said, those are going to

1091
01:30:44,479 --> 01:30:46,439
be questions that we came up with
earlier from Plato. Well, the just

1092
01:30:46,680 --> 01:30:53,239
man is the rational philosopher who ponders. There, you see the meme.

1093
01:30:53,520 --> 01:30:57,520
I like that meme of pondering my
orb. If you're if you're a fan

1094
01:30:57,560 --> 01:31:00,039
of memes, and I'm sure you've
seen that. There you go, right,

1095
01:31:00,439 --> 01:31:06,760
Plato's ethic is the meme pondering man
who ponders his orb right and right.

1096
01:31:06,840 --> 01:31:11,239
So you got to look into that, uh that Palatier ball there and

1097
01:31:11,319 --> 01:31:14,399
stare at it for a long time
before you I'm joking at me, silly,

1098
01:31:14,439 --> 01:31:17,760
But the just man is the rational
philosopher who doesn't just ponder, but

1099
01:31:17,880 --> 01:31:26,279
ponders rightly right towards the forms.
Um, there's no surprise that these philosophers

1100
01:31:26,359 --> 01:31:30,319
think that the best and most just
man is a philosopher. And so who

1101
01:31:30,319 --> 01:31:33,439
should who should run society? Well? Philosophers shit, right, I mean

1102
01:31:34,000 --> 01:31:36,840
obviously who else are going to be? All right? I mean we're the

1103
01:31:36,960 --> 01:31:41,279
best thinkers. Don't you want us
philosopher kings running shit? Well, of

1104
01:31:41,359 --> 01:31:44,000
course you do. Now I'm being
kind of silly, but I mean this

1105
01:31:44,159 --> 01:31:48,159
is really essentially what the teaching is. Well, why would we want philosophers?

1106
01:31:48,199 --> 01:31:50,399
I mean, these guys, these
guys are annoying, their nerdy,

1107
01:31:50,640 --> 01:31:54,000
you know, they spurk out.
Why do we want them running shit?

1108
01:31:54,279 --> 01:31:57,680
Right? Don't we want Joe Biden
and running? So I wouldn't we want

1109
01:31:57,760 --> 01:32:00,319
Judge don Trump running things? Or
don't we want I don't know? Why

1110
01:32:00,359 --> 01:32:05,560
do we want philosopher kings? Well, in Plato and Socrates, the philosopher

1111
01:32:05,680 --> 01:32:10,960
king is the most rational. And
so if reasoning is the higher faculty in

1112
01:32:11,079 --> 01:32:15,720
man, above the body and even
above the heart, right heart might correspond

1113
01:32:15,800 --> 01:32:20,720
to courage and valor, body corresponds
to physicality and movement, but higher than

1114
01:32:20,800 --> 01:32:27,000
both of those is the rational faculty. And what did we see was the

1115
01:32:27,079 --> 01:32:31,000
definition of the philosopher, the man
who lives the examined life, the man

1116
01:32:31,039 --> 01:32:35,439
who seeks wisdom. The unexamined life
is not worth living. So clearly you

1117
01:32:35,600 --> 01:32:41,159
want a philosopher king ruling, because
the philosopher is the one who's closest to

1118
01:32:41,279 --> 01:32:45,960
the realm of the forms, because
he's governed by reason. And to be

1119
01:32:45,239 --> 01:32:51,880
just is to participate in the form
of justice. And who does that better

1120
01:32:51,920 --> 01:32:58,640
than a philosopher who sits around and
ponders his orb, who ponders the justice

1121
01:32:58,760 --> 01:33:05,680
orb. The just man is just
because of his purification process that he's gone

1122
01:33:05,720 --> 01:33:09,479
through. In terms of Ian,
we're talking about the philosopher here the just

1123
01:33:09,680 --> 01:33:12,760
philosopher man, not just the just
man. But for any man who is

1124
01:33:12,880 --> 01:33:15,479
just, who may not be a
strict well, I don't really know if

1125
01:33:15,520 --> 01:33:17,560
that's even possible. But for a
man who is not so much philosophical,

1126
01:33:17,680 --> 01:33:21,680
we'll say he's a just man.
He at least has some degree of participation

1127
01:33:21,760 --> 01:33:26,479
in the form of justice. I
think is what Plato Ariosola was a Plato's

1128
01:33:26,520 --> 01:33:30,359
argive to say. The body is, as we said, characterized by the

1129
01:33:30,399 --> 01:33:33,439
passions and must be controlled by reason. And so this is not just for

1130
01:33:33,520 --> 01:33:36,439
the philosopher king, but for everybody. This is what everyone needs to strive

1131
01:33:36,520 --> 01:33:41,680
for. This is how we get
just a just society and justice in society.

1132
01:33:43,039 --> 01:33:46,439
Since data empiricists are bound by the
passions, and thus our sophists have

1133
01:33:46,640 --> 01:33:50,319
their opinion, and so they're not
fit to rule. We'll notice if you

1134
01:33:50,439 --> 01:33:55,079
read the Republic there are several areas
where argumentation is given that, look,

1135
01:33:55,159 --> 01:33:59,840
not everybody is fit to rule.
Some people are fit to be balms,

1136
01:34:00,600 --> 01:34:05,359
okay, some people are fit to
be janitors, some people some people are

1137
01:34:05,399 --> 01:34:10,600
not the philosophers, they're not fit. They're not bred to these things.

1138
01:34:10,960 --> 01:34:15,920
And guess what guess what that leads
to. In both Plato and Aristotle,

1139
01:34:15,319 --> 01:34:19,800
absolutely they are eugenesis. They believe
that there is a kind of breeding in

1140
01:34:20,279 --> 01:34:26,359
uh um. I'm trying to remember. Ariosol has a specific term where he

1141
01:34:26,960 --> 01:34:30,279
may just be bred. But you
know, he talks about people bred to

1142
01:34:30,439 --> 01:34:34,159
be noble, bred to be statesman, bred to be to lead the Polish,

1143
01:34:35,119 --> 01:34:39,760
and I don't think he thinks it's
completely biological, but he doesn't think

1144
01:34:39,840 --> 01:34:45,960
it's separable from biology and upbringing.
And I think Plato thinks something probably pretty

1145
01:34:46,000 --> 01:34:49,199
close to that as well, because
he does, if I recall, have

1146
01:34:49,359 --> 01:34:53,000
this discussion in the Republic that look, you know, some people are just

1147
01:34:53,000 --> 01:34:56,600
gonna be bombs, some people are
gonna be janitors. Uh. Some people

1148
01:34:56,720 --> 01:35:02,079
are fitted to be in the second
tier society, the guardians aka the warriors,

1149
01:35:03,279 --> 01:35:06,319
and then some people are more fitted
beyond that to be the philosopher kings.

1150
01:35:08,319 --> 01:35:15,199
So know your place. I don't
think that Plato's ideal republic is I

1151
01:35:15,279 --> 01:35:17,039
mean, it is a kind of
a strict kind of tier, but he

1152
01:35:17,159 --> 01:35:23,359
does discuss the possibility of you know, people being promoted to a tier like

1153
01:35:23,520 --> 01:35:29,039
the guardian class is recruited right and
raised in that way to be the guardian

1154
01:35:29,119 --> 01:35:32,000
soldier class, for example, and
you might have somebody recruited out those into

1155
01:35:32,079 --> 01:35:35,720
something higher. I mean the philosopher
king. You know, he may come

1156
01:35:35,760 --> 01:35:39,800
out of one of those classes,
or he may just be raised and bred

1157
01:35:39,880 --> 01:35:45,840
from birth to be a philosopher.
Right, But it is a fairly strict

1158
01:35:46,199 --> 01:35:53,479
strata caste society. I guess you
could say when we get to the republic

1159
01:35:53,520 --> 01:35:58,560
in a minute. Thus, laws
in a society, justice in a society,

1160
01:35:58,760 --> 01:36:01,600
order in a society must be based
on the forms. If you're going

1161
01:36:01,640 --> 01:36:08,199
to have laws or justice at all. Thus you have to have philosophers running

1162
01:36:08,279 --> 01:36:12,920
society. Now, there's a little
bit of a dispute and a debate between

1163
01:36:14,119 --> 01:36:18,880
Plato's Republic and what we get later
in Plato's Laws in the Symposium, there's

1164
01:36:18,920 --> 01:36:24,159
some weird changes where he comes with
this idea of the Council of Night,

1165
01:36:24,880 --> 01:36:29,800
which is weird. So maybe he
doesn't think that society needs to be run

1166
01:36:29,920 --> 01:36:32,319
by one philosopher king. Maybe we
get more of a counsel. I mean,

1167
01:36:32,920 --> 01:36:34,880
uh, well, that's a different
topic. We're not going to go

1168
01:36:34,960 --> 01:36:41,039
into the symposium and the laws.
But um, for our intensive I mean,

1169
01:36:41,079 --> 01:36:43,680
for our intents and purposes. I
mean, the republic is what influences

1170
01:36:43,720 --> 01:36:46,439
everybody anyway, right, I mean, for example, communist dictatorships, all

1171
01:36:46,479 --> 01:36:50,840
the all the Marxists and communists,
they don't look to the Symposium, they

1172
01:36:50,840 --> 01:36:55,279
don't look they look to Plato's Republic. Okay, so the Republic will be

1173
01:36:55,479 --> 01:37:01,680
very influential, not just on Marxists
and communists, but also on Enlightenment thinkers

1174
01:37:01,720 --> 01:37:10,680
who want to have a republic.
Enlightenment revolutionary republicanism looks to Plato. Fascist

1175
01:37:10,840 --> 01:37:16,800
dictators look to Plato. Imperial philosophy, and various empires will look to Plato.

1176
01:37:18,439 --> 01:37:25,359
Marxist communists will look to Plato.
What is the USSR, the Union

1177
01:37:25,399 --> 01:37:31,119
of Soviet Socialist Republics, They will
also look to Plato. So any system

1178
01:37:31,279 --> 01:37:39,520
of state governance that is intended to
be ideal, clearly will necessarily have some

1179
01:37:40,079 --> 01:37:47,359
relation to public two Plato's Republic.
All right, let's go to the Republic.

1180
01:37:48,119 --> 01:37:51,039
Now, The Republic is a very
difficult book. If we want to

1181
01:37:51,079 --> 01:37:55,119
go into a lot of specifics,
we can. I do have my copy

1182
01:37:55,239 --> 01:37:58,079
here. I've lectured, as we
said, through it. I know it

1183
01:37:58,199 --> 01:38:00,800
pretty well. I'm not an expert
in the Republic. Look again, it's

1184
01:38:00,880 --> 01:38:04,680
very difficult. There's there's areas that
people are still debating, like magic rings.

1185
01:38:05,399 --> 01:38:09,960
I'm not joking, like we get
these stories about it's it's a it's

1186
01:38:10,000 --> 01:38:14,319
a teaching device. Okay. I
don't think Plato literally is saying that there's

1187
01:38:14,359 --> 01:38:17,520
a ring that makes you invisible.
But we do have a magic ring that

1188
01:38:17,600 --> 01:38:21,319
makes you invisible, and it's there
in this story, I think, to

1189
01:38:21,640 --> 01:38:25,640
teach about virtue, right, Like, well, let's hear here's a story

1190
01:38:25,680 --> 01:38:28,199
about a guy who has a magic
ring, and well, what would you

1191
01:38:28,279 --> 01:38:30,880
do if you had a ring that
made you invisible? Well, a lot

1192
01:38:30,920 --> 01:38:34,399
of people would abuse that power.
And quite a few people have said,

1193
01:38:35,119 --> 01:38:41,159
yeah, Tolkien was clearly influenced by
this story, and yeah, I think

1194
01:38:41,199 --> 01:38:45,680
that's probably the case. But we're
not primarily concerned with the one ring.

1195
01:38:45,800 --> 01:38:50,560
And mister Frodos, so don't worry
about that. Who's got the ring?

1196
01:38:50,840 --> 01:39:00,399
He's So the republic is more or
they've taken the Hubbut to the republic,

1197
01:39:00,960 --> 01:39:08,039
as my legalist, their um the
ideal city. What is the ideal city?

1198
01:39:08,239 --> 01:39:12,000
How should the ideal city, the
republic be governed and ruled? How

1199
01:39:12,039 --> 01:39:15,520
do we structure a city, what's
the right way to do it? So

1200
01:39:15,720 --> 01:39:19,800
Plato is our first city planner.
It's if you've the nightmare of city planners,

1201
01:39:19,920 --> 01:39:23,439
right, well, Plato is the
first city planner. He said,

1202
01:39:23,439 --> 01:39:26,000
I'm gonna I'm gonna tell you how
to plan the ideal city. Now,

1203
01:39:26,319 --> 01:39:29,520
the ideal city, as we said
the forums all right there, So this

1204
01:39:29,720 --> 01:39:33,119
is the form of a city.
Plato doesn't think that you're in this world

1205
01:39:33,159 --> 01:39:35,720
ever gonna get the perfect city.
Okay, I don't. I don't think

1206
01:39:35,760 --> 01:39:39,640
he thinks that. So I think
he's, you know, he knows enough

1207
01:39:39,640 --> 01:39:43,399
about human nature to know that,
yeah, okay, humans are always going

1208
01:39:43,439 --> 01:39:45,159
to be, you know, messing
up, and you're gonna get corruption,

1209
01:39:45,319 --> 01:39:49,119
and so you're never gonna have this. But this is what we want to

1210
01:39:49,119 --> 01:39:55,840
shoot for. And the idol city
is kind of like there's gonna be a

1211
01:39:55,880 --> 01:40:00,119
lot of triadic models, triads right
that that are that are gonna pau up

1212
01:40:00,680 --> 01:40:04,399
kind of like three medals, right, Copper, silver, gold. Everybody

1213
01:40:04,439 --> 01:40:09,880
agrees that there's a you know,
levels to this. Copper's good, but

1214
01:40:10,239 --> 01:40:15,720
silver's battle better and gold's the best. Likewise, the city is kind of

1215
01:40:15,800 --> 01:40:21,199
like a big man. The city
itself is a collective guy. It's like

1216
01:40:21,279 --> 01:40:26,840
a big body of a macrocosm.
Sometimes in Greek philosophy this is called the

1217
01:40:26,920 --> 01:40:32,279
macro prosipis. This will pop up
in other philosophers as well. And Plato

1218
01:40:32,319 --> 01:40:35,800
says, think about it like a
man, and the whole city has to

1219
01:40:35,880 --> 01:40:42,359
kind of be governed like a good
just man governs himself. And if a

1220
01:40:42,840 --> 01:40:45,640
good just man can't govern himself,
well he sure as heck can't govern a

1221
01:40:45,720 --> 01:40:50,279
city. And if we you know, what would Plato say about you know

1222
01:40:50,439 --> 01:40:55,319
Biden, these people, Well they're
corrupt and you know they're not good governors,

1223
01:40:55,680 --> 01:40:59,640
right, He would say that,
you know, these are primary examples

1224
01:40:59,640 --> 01:41:05,079
of people because they're enslaved to their
passions in various ways. And Plato's answer,

1225
01:41:05,119 --> 01:41:11,119
of course is reasoning and logic and
mathematics. If Joe Biden had just

1226
01:41:11,279 --> 01:41:15,680
done his time stables and he'd had
just gone further into mathematics, he would

1227
01:41:15,680 --> 01:41:18,880
have been a great president. I'm
joking, but I mean this is I

1228
01:41:18,960 --> 01:41:24,479
think, you know, along the
words of what Plato would say. So

1229
01:41:24,640 --> 01:41:28,800
the ideal city is not just likened
to either of these three three tiers of

1230
01:41:28,920 --> 01:41:32,199
metals or the metallurgical analogy which is
very famous from their public It's also kind

1231
01:41:32,199 --> 01:41:36,840
of like the three elements of a
person. Humans human beings are kind of

1232
01:41:36,880 --> 01:41:42,920
tripartite in Plato's vow. And that's
because we have a body, right,

1233
01:41:45,159 --> 01:41:46,640
a boom doing I don't know what
I'm doing, but this is the body,

1234
01:41:46,680 --> 01:41:49,720
if you didn't know. And then
we have our heart, which is

1235
01:41:49,800 --> 01:41:55,680
a little better than the body,
and that might correspond to courage, valor

1236
01:41:56,439 --> 01:42:01,119
bravery. And then there's an even
higher faculty above that which is up here,

1237
01:42:01,760 --> 01:42:05,159
which is reason. So I think
we have this three tiered structure.

1238
01:42:05,199 --> 01:42:08,760
And Plato says, you know what, society maybe should be structured like a

1239
01:42:08,880 --> 01:42:13,399
dude, because it's like basically like
a big guy. And the head of

1240
01:42:13,520 --> 01:42:16,039
society. I wonder who that's gonna
be. Well, that's gonna be the

1241
01:42:16,079 --> 01:42:20,920
philosopher king, because he's closer to
the realm of the forms. Because he's

1242
01:42:20,960 --> 01:42:24,640
closer to the realm of the forms, he participates in a greater sense in

1243
01:42:24,680 --> 01:42:29,399
the forms, and he's going to
be there for more just because he's closer

1244
01:42:29,479 --> 01:42:32,840
to the form of justice and to
mathematics and to consistent logical reason, and

1245
01:42:33,079 --> 01:42:43,000
he'll be able to govern the body
of society like a reasoned man governs his

1246
01:42:43,159 --> 01:42:46,800
passions as an individual. But he
says, we're going to have this second

1247
01:42:46,840 --> 01:42:50,720
class of society who performs a specific
function and are bred and fitted to do

1248
01:42:50,840 --> 01:42:57,600
that. That is these these guardians. The guardians correspond to the heart,

1249
01:42:58,119 --> 01:43:01,960
the second tier, and they are
brave, their warriors, their soldiers.

1250
01:43:02,479 --> 01:43:08,399
And it gets even weirder their men
and women, So women on the front

1251
01:43:08,439 --> 01:43:12,039
line. Plato who wants his women
on the front line, But only the

1252
01:43:12,119 --> 01:43:16,880
guardian women. Only the badass amazonian
you know, Scarlett Johansson him kay,

1253
01:43:16,920 --> 01:43:23,840
ultra assassin chicks. Right. They're
bred for this guardian role, just as

1254
01:43:23,960 --> 01:43:27,239
men in the guardian role are.
And it gets even weird. Or guess

1255
01:43:27,279 --> 01:43:32,319
what, they share all things in
common, including each other. So no

1256
01:43:32,680 --> 01:43:40,840
husbands and no wives. The guardian
class pumps whoever they want. Now,

1257
01:43:41,000 --> 01:43:45,000
the guardian class can't go totally crazy
with this because they have to in some

1258
01:43:45,199 --> 01:43:48,760
way be a little better than the
proles and the working class. They can't

1259
01:43:48,920 --> 01:43:54,079
be completely controlled by their passions.
But we got to have a little more

1260
01:43:54,119 --> 01:43:58,479
of that going on with the guardian
class. And so because they're bred for

1261
01:43:58,800 --> 01:44:09,439
war and for policing and for you
know, being soldiers. We're not going

1262
01:44:09,520 --> 01:44:15,760
to have them tied down to the
things that the working class, the body

1263
01:44:15,920 --> 01:44:18,720
of the society is going to be
tied down too. So you have the

1264
01:44:19,119 --> 01:44:27,640
introduction of both a feminist idea and
an egalitarian idea and a communist idea with

1265
01:44:27,920 --> 01:44:33,199
the guardian class. And then that
lowest tier of the pyramid is the workers.

1266
01:44:33,880 --> 01:44:39,720
In Plato's system, the workers correspond
to the body that is the lowest

1267
01:44:39,880 --> 01:44:45,520
tier of this hierarchy here of this
pyramid. And this is you got to

1268
01:44:45,560 --> 01:44:47,720
have these people, right, We
gotta have a bunch of low iq dumb

1269
01:44:47,760 --> 01:44:50,680
workers out there. And in Plato's
view, yes, they have to have

1270
01:44:51,039 --> 01:44:58,039
their population controlled, they have to
be eugenically regimented. We have to know

1271
01:44:58,199 --> 01:45:00,800
you can't breathe with that dude,
You're gonna breathe this guy. So all

1272
01:45:00,840 --> 01:45:05,760
of these, again sort of communist
technocratic ideas, they find their route here

1273
01:45:05,800 --> 01:45:11,479
in Plato's republic. Now, I
think for Plato's vantage point, um,

1274
01:45:12,560 --> 01:45:17,800
he's not intentionally trying to create a
dystopia. I think he really thinks that

1275
01:45:17,960 --> 01:45:23,399
this is going to be the best
way to run society. But but you

1276
01:45:23,479 --> 01:45:27,520
know, good intentions can do That
doesn't mean that necessarily, I mean,

1277
01:45:27,560 --> 01:45:30,600
this can lead to hellish things,
right, So just because he has good

1278
01:45:30,640 --> 01:45:35,119
intentions, right, but I think
that trying to have the best understanding of

1279
01:45:35,239 --> 01:45:40,399
Plato in his system as we can. And remember when we started this all

1280
01:45:40,920 --> 01:45:45,239
this lecture or yesterday last week's lecture, we said, we want to try

1281
01:45:45,279 --> 01:45:50,680
to grant to somebody as much as
we can to understand their system. So

1282
01:45:50,760 --> 01:45:55,399
as much as we might be angry
about the eugenics and the population control,

1283
01:45:55,520 --> 01:45:59,199
which I don't believe in, um, we want to understand his system and

1284
01:45:59,279 --> 01:46:00,920
why he thinks that. So just
keep that in mind, so don't get

1285
01:46:00,920 --> 01:46:09,039
triggered by the fact that he's a
eugenesis. There's some other interesting elements that

1286
01:46:09,119 --> 01:46:12,560
we don't have time to I'm getting
ahead of myself. So it's so,

1287
01:46:13,000 --> 01:46:17,079
as we said, the Republic is
structured in a three tiered way, in

1288
01:46:17,199 --> 01:46:21,840
a triad, like a man is
structured and like metals are structured in a

1289
01:46:21,920 --> 01:46:28,039
three tiered way. And as we
said, the universe itself is kind of

1290
01:46:28,119 --> 01:46:30,960
also a perhaps a three tiered structure, where we have this world, this

1291
01:46:31,119 --> 01:46:35,159
realm, we have the realm of
the forms and then we have the one

1292
01:46:35,560 --> 01:46:41,079
at the top of that, the
god, the monad, the father or

1293
01:46:41,159 --> 01:46:46,119
whatever. So again, triads are
constant in Platonic philosophy. And if you

1294
01:46:46,199 --> 01:46:50,640
read my book Meta Narratives, you
know that even there were triads even in

1295
01:46:50,720 --> 01:46:58,039
the poets. Achilles shield is triadic. It's a triplicity, and it represents

1296
01:46:58,119 --> 01:47:02,439
the whole history of the Greek people. So it's a recapitulation on the shield

1297
01:47:02,560 --> 01:47:08,399
of Achilles itself of all of the
Greek people and their history and their essence

1298
01:47:08,520 --> 01:47:11,920
or so to speed. And it
has a three tiered layer on purpose,

1299
01:47:12,079 --> 01:47:15,079
because there's the underworld, there's this
world, and there's the gods. So

1300
01:47:15,159 --> 01:47:21,600
there's triplicities in the poets. There's
triplicities in Plato as well, or triads

1301
01:47:21,680 --> 01:47:26,159
or whatever terms you want to use. So, as we said, reason,

1302
01:47:26,319 --> 01:47:30,359
math and forms are also necessary to
govern society, just like reason and

1303
01:47:30,479 --> 01:47:35,439
math and forms govern the individual.
Just man. The just man unfortunately does

1304
01:47:35,520 --> 01:47:40,720
have to engage in the noble lie
if he's the philosopher king. So the

1305
01:47:40,920 --> 01:47:45,800
state has to utilize noble mythological lies
to control the citizens and to have order.

1306
01:47:46,920 --> 01:47:50,039
Yes, this is part of Plato's
Republic, it's called the noble lie.

1307
01:47:51,680 --> 01:47:57,000
Now what exactly that is in terms
of various societies could be different things.

1308
01:47:57,399 --> 01:48:00,680
I mean, for our purposes,
I think everybody can probably figure out

1309
01:48:00,920 --> 01:48:04,720
some of the noble lies. The
war on terror, right, probably many

1310
01:48:04,800 --> 01:48:13,159
neo cons would justify awards War on
Terry, semester Gash dominant a noble laf.

1311
01:48:14,520 --> 01:48:19,439
That's my that's my dub right,
I think I think to a lot

1312
01:48:19,520 --> 01:48:24,720
of geopolitical power players, right,
if we were to talk to the big

1313
01:48:24,960 --> 01:48:30,039
Brazinski life, I think they would
they would definitely say that sure, yeah,

1314
01:48:30,079 --> 01:48:34,279
well you have to have these lies
to govern and control society. Where

1315
01:48:34,279 --> 01:48:40,319
does this come from? It comes
from Plato's Republic. So let's be clear,

1316
01:48:41,119 --> 01:48:47,119
this is a statist text. Plato's
Republic has basically the state as God

1317
01:48:47,199 --> 01:48:55,720
on earth pretty clearly, and other
philosophers will follow in this train. Hagel

1318
01:48:56,239 --> 01:49:01,880
Hegel is also notoriously a guy who
says that the state is the march of

1319
01:49:02,000 --> 01:49:06,119
God in history and the deification of
the state, the state is God.

1320
01:49:06,239 --> 01:49:13,840
It is a status treatise, and
so we get other odd elements that are

1321
01:49:13,920 --> 01:49:19,920
subjects to dispute debate. A interpretation
it's very difficult the myth of Earth that

1322
01:49:20,199 --> 01:49:28,000
there's this really wild story at the
end about this vision of the afterlife and

1323
01:49:28,159 --> 01:49:32,279
this sort of the universe is a
big clock and souls are like going up

1324
01:49:32,359 --> 01:49:38,359
into the afterlife, but they're coming
back down if they choose to come back

1325
01:49:38,399 --> 01:49:42,319
to this life reincarnation. I mean
it's wild. I mean this is like

1326
01:49:43,560 --> 01:49:47,479
Joe Rogan DMT trip type stuff.
Okay, So I don't know exactly what

1327
01:49:47,680 --> 01:49:51,359
the myth of our means other than
it is perhaps too again bring in that

1328
01:49:51,520 --> 01:49:59,399
religious mystical element within Plato relating to
the transmigration of souls, which is part

1329
01:49:59,439 --> 01:50:03,600
of the way that Plato thinks he
can account for, Um, how we

1330
01:50:03,800 --> 01:50:09,079
have access to the forms in this
life right, Well, we're remembering our

1331
01:50:09,119 --> 01:50:13,119
past life in the realm of the
forms. Uh, and when we go

1332
01:50:13,279 --> 01:50:17,199
on and die, we go back
into this mystical realm. I mean it's

1333
01:50:17,239 --> 01:50:25,479
wild. I mean it's like again, there's hard, difficult passages in plato

1334
01:50:26,239 --> 01:50:30,880
um, and a lot of the
scholars are debating and and we just don't

1335
01:50:30,960 --> 01:50:36,159
know how literal it does Plato mean
this Is this just a teaching device or

1336
01:50:36,239 --> 01:50:40,439
does he really actually literally believe that
you know, when you die, you

1337
01:50:40,520 --> 01:50:44,439
go into this giant universal clock,
mysticism or whatever. I mean, we

1338
01:50:44,560 --> 01:50:49,039
don't know so, but that's what's
there. I think also secret societies come

1339
01:50:49,119 --> 01:50:51,960
up. I think that there's this
implicat I'm going from memory, but there's

1340
01:50:53,079 --> 01:50:57,640
I think it there's an implication at
one point in regard to I think maybe

1341
01:50:57,720 --> 01:51:00,800
maybe the noble lie that you know, will the noble like kind of requires

1342
01:51:01,399 --> 01:51:05,840
the Republic having this sort of secret
society involved in its rulership as well.

1343
01:51:06,840 --> 01:51:11,600
But regardless, a lot of that
sort of speculative and debatable. The philosopher

1344
01:51:11,720 --> 01:51:15,600
King, though studies geometry math for
many years. When he is ruled by

1345
01:51:15,720 --> 01:51:18,520
reason and not governed by his passions, he is then fit to rule.

1346
01:51:18,920 --> 01:51:23,399
He comes down from the mountain,
and so we see that. You know,

1347
01:51:23,920 --> 01:51:31,239
sometimes Plato's philosophies is characterized as overly
mystical and it's about the escape into

1348
01:51:31,279 --> 01:51:36,399
the beyond, or it's just about
the transcendent. Actually it's kind of practical.

1349
01:51:36,760 --> 01:51:41,479
Surprisingly, now, I don't think
he's right about this, but it's

1350
01:51:41,520 --> 01:51:47,000
Plato's intent to have the philosopher King
go get his PhD on the mountain.

1351
01:51:47,640 --> 01:51:51,920
Do all of his times tables and
then come back down to Earth, to

1352
01:51:53,079 --> 01:51:58,640
the city from the mountain and impress
those times tables onto the city and make

1353
01:51:58,720 --> 01:52:05,800
this damn city run. So the
philosopher King imposes form upon the city.

1354
01:52:06,319 --> 01:52:10,720
It's a kind of art, a
kind of craft. Thus, truth,

1355
01:52:11,079 --> 01:52:16,479
form, essence, justice are discovered. They're not created. They're discovered by

1356
01:52:16,520 --> 01:52:25,039
the philosopher King and imposed on the
republic. Intimately connected with this idea of

1357
01:52:25,159 --> 01:52:30,960
Plato's triadic structure is the chain of
being. This is going to be very

1358
01:52:30,039 --> 01:52:34,319
important in Plato. Excuse me an
Aristotle. Aristotle will be a Plato's most

1359
01:52:34,359 --> 01:52:41,439
famous student, and Aristotle will have
significant disagreements with his master, and we've

1360
01:52:41,479 --> 01:52:47,000
already alluded to some of those disagreements. Plato ariosol is not a complete denier

1361
01:52:47,159 --> 01:52:53,279
of the beyond or the higher realms, the celestial spheres of God. He

1362
01:52:53,439 --> 01:52:58,720
does believe in those things. However, he's much more emphatic about the importance

1363
01:52:58,720 --> 01:53:02,760
of the here and the now.
The deity in that system is primarily a

1364
01:53:03,000 --> 01:53:09,159
causal agent, not a governing agent
or something that you try to strive to

1365
01:53:09,319 --> 01:53:14,760
participate in. But he will retain, as Plato does, a form of

1366
01:53:14,840 --> 01:53:18,800
the chain of being, and as
some of the pre Socratics did, which

1367
01:53:18,920 --> 01:53:25,119
is that the chain of being being
the ontological structure of the universe, whatever

1368
01:53:25,199 --> 01:53:31,079
that is, is common to all. There's a continuous chain of being where

1369
01:53:31,359 --> 01:53:39,960
the gods, man, animals,
rocks, etc. They all exist on

1370
01:53:40,039 --> 01:53:45,119
this continuous chain, but in different
gradations. So what's at the top of

1371
01:53:45,159 --> 01:53:48,800
the chain of being? What's the
realist being? For Plato, it is

1372
01:53:49,079 --> 01:53:55,720
the God. It is the God
form, which is mind, which is

1373
01:53:56,000 --> 01:54:00,479
thought, which is the one,
which is the good, which is the

1374
01:54:00,520 --> 01:54:06,439
beautiful. So that God duded up
there at the top of that chain in

1375
01:54:06,600 --> 01:54:12,840
Plato's system, is the one that's
the highest, most real form of being.

1376
01:54:13,960 --> 01:54:16,039
Below that, in Plato's system there
wouldn't be angels, but there would

1377
01:54:16,039 --> 01:54:21,920
be sort of forms. And it's
unclear and debated whether Plato believed that the

1378
01:54:23,239 --> 01:54:29,359
quote gods were actual deities or just
symbolic of various forms. So, for

1379
01:54:29,479 --> 01:54:32,600
example, in the Timaeus he speaks
of the gods, but it's unclear and

1380
01:54:32,680 --> 01:54:38,239
debated as to what actual status the
gods have as sort of personal beings,

1381
01:54:38,680 --> 01:54:43,399
or whether they are just forms.
Underneath that would be the rulers. This

1382
01:54:44,520 --> 01:54:46,560
picture here is more of a medieval
idea of the kings and the queens.

1383
01:54:47,199 --> 01:54:51,239
But for Plato, obviously it would
be the philosopher king. Under the philosopher

1384
01:54:51,319 --> 01:54:57,880
king would be the guardians. Under
the guardians would be the commoners, the

1385
01:54:57,960 --> 01:55:02,680
proles, and then you would have
have animals, plants and rocks, and

1386
01:55:02,880 --> 01:55:08,640
then non being. So that's the
chain, right, And the further you

1387
01:55:08,760 --> 01:55:12,680
go down the chain, you're moving
towards non being. The further you go

1388
01:55:12,800 --> 01:55:15,960
up the chain, you're moving towards
being or true bearing being. And as

1389
01:55:16,039 --> 01:55:21,479
we know, in Plato's system,
because it is a participatory system, true

1390
01:55:21,520 --> 01:55:29,640
being is thought, is idea reality. And Plato's system in an Aristotle and

1391
01:55:29,680 --> 01:55:32,560
in the Presocratics, as we saw, is still unfortunately plagued with a monistic

1392
01:55:32,680 --> 01:55:40,159
or a dualistic tendency. Plato is
famously a dualist, and that whole idea

1393
01:55:40,199 --> 01:55:45,159
of the myths of Earth and the
transmigration of souls is primarily concerned with how

1394
01:55:45,239 --> 01:55:49,119
do we relate this immaterial, invariant
realm of the forms to this realm of

1395
01:55:49,159 --> 01:55:51,079
the here and the now. Even
though we're saying the here and the now

1396
01:55:51,199 --> 01:55:58,119
participates in the forms, it's still
a dualistic system. So there's fundamental problems

1397
01:55:58,159 --> 01:56:02,840
there about reconciling these two domains and
explaining the origin of our domain from that

1398
01:56:03,159 --> 01:56:09,520
higher domain. But regardless, Plato
still structures reality in this hierarchical form,

1399
01:56:09,600 --> 01:56:15,000
and this hierarchical structure will continue not
just into Plato or to Aristotle and into

1400
01:56:15,119 --> 01:56:17,960
the Church Fathers, into Christian theology, and into it will go all the

1401
01:56:18,000 --> 01:56:24,039
way up into the medieval philosophers as
well. This chain will not be significantly

1402
01:56:24,159 --> 01:56:31,239
rejected until we get to certain medieval
philosophers who are nominalists like Akam, and

1403
01:56:31,359 --> 01:56:36,800
then more explicitly in his descendants,
who are the empiricists. So the enlightenment

1404
01:56:36,840 --> 01:56:44,760
empiricists will draw directly from the medieval
nominalists, and they will essentially throw this

1405
01:56:44,880 --> 01:56:46,560
thing out. Now, get that
out of here. This is dumb.

1406
01:56:49,560 --> 01:56:53,560
Plato's forms, as we said,
are hierarchical as well, and so they

1407
01:56:53,640 --> 01:56:57,439
descend in this triadic structure from the
one who, which is the divine mind,

1408
01:56:57,880 --> 01:57:02,680
which in some way gives rise to
or causes these forms. But there's

1409
01:57:02,680 --> 01:57:06,119
actually a contradiction, to be really
precise here in Plato himself, because in

1410
01:57:06,199 --> 01:57:14,600
the Timaeus, the one is subordinate
to the forms, and so he structures

1411
01:57:14,680 --> 01:57:17,239
reality, our reality on the principle
of the forms that he's subordinate to.

1412
01:57:17,680 --> 01:57:23,680
But in other passages we have Plato
speaking as if the one causes the forms.

1413
01:57:24,279 --> 01:57:28,319
So how Plato reconciled this, no
one knows, and it's still debated

1414
01:57:28,359 --> 01:57:30,600
to this day. And perhaps he
couldn't. Perhaps it is still a problem.

1415
01:57:32,159 --> 01:57:36,720
So coming to the end of this, we got almost wrapping up here.

1416
01:57:40,000 --> 01:57:43,079
I don't know how long we've been
going, but I feel like we've

1417
01:57:43,079 --> 01:57:45,439
been going for a long time,
that we can keep going for for a

1418
01:57:45,520 --> 01:57:49,039
long time, but we gotta we
gotta encapsulated at some point. Coppleston admits

1419
01:57:49,079 --> 01:57:51,159
on page one, nine, six
and seven, as we alluded to earlier,

1420
01:57:51,239 --> 01:57:56,079
that Plato is still a mystical theologian. Remember that when we talked about

1421
01:57:56,119 --> 01:58:01,840
Pythagoras, he disagreed with quite a
few of his forbearers who were pre Socratics,

1422
01:58:01,880 --> 01:58:06,439
who were not theological or religious thinkers, and so there was this sort

1423
01:58:06,479 --> 01:58:14,319
of religious revival amongst the Ionians,
the Milesians represent representing in Pythagoras. And

1424
01:58:14,399 --> 01:58:19,239
I do think that pretty clearly Plato
being influenced by Pythagoras continues this mystical and

1425
01:58:19,359 --> 01:58:26,199
theological notion. Now, many modern
philosophers do not read Plato this way.

1426
01:58:26,239 --> 01:58:32,079
They read him in more of a
anti theistic rationalist way. It is possible

1427
01:58:32,159 --> 01:58:36,800
to read Plato that way, but
even those people who have that reading do

1428
01:58:36,960 --> 01:58:44,479
admit that there are quite a few
mystical and theological passages throughout the Platonic corpus.

1429
01:58:45,199 --> 01:58:48,359
And so Coppison goes into that and
admits that on pages one ninety seven.

1430
01:58:49,560 --> 01:58:54,319
And so the reading that I take, which when I read a lot

1431
01:58:54,359 --> 01:58:58,319
of these texts, and yes,
it's true that I could have just been

1432
01:58:58,399 --> 01:59:02,000
influenced by my theological subpositions. But
as I'm reading a lot of these Platonic

1433
01:59:02,039 --> 01:59:04,479
texts, I'm like, well,
this sounds like a kind of a theology

1434
01:59:04,560 --> 01:59:11,800
text. And so when we essentially
what I'm getting a Zycoplison admits that.

1435
01:59:12,000 --> 01:59:16,399
And that's relevant because the specific school
that will come out of Platonism later on,

1436
01:59:17,159 --> 01:59:21,560
the neo Platonists, they are known
for reading Plato in this way.

1437
01:59:23,439 --> 01:59:28,199
They will say, yes, this
is a religious text, and Plato should

1438
01:59:28,199 --> 01:59:32,760
be read as a religious and theological
mystic. The path of the philosopher as

1439
01:59:32,800 --> 01:59:39,600
we said, is one of pure
one of pure speculation, not of flighty

1440
01:59:39,760 --> 01:59:44,560
without a reason speculation, but reasoned, theological speculation. So for Plato,

1441
01:59:44,720 --> 01:59:48,319
theology and reason are not antithetical.
They're the same thing. And that's how

1442
01:59:48,399 --> 01:59:57,039
I understand him. So he doesn't
see mysticism as antithetical to reason. He

1443
01:59:57,159 --> 02:00:00,039
sees them as the same. And
this is a very difficult especially if we

1444
02:00:00,479 --> 02:00:04,680
think in terms of post Enlightenment thought, because the Enlightenment will hinge quite a

1445
02:00:04,720 --> 02:00:12,119
bit on feediism. Faith is antithetical
to reasoning and logic. That is not

1446
02:00:12,319 --> 02:00:16,640
Plato's view, and it's not the
view of a lot of Church fathers.

1447
02:00:17,000 --> 02:00:20,039
Now there's a few of the people
in the Patristic period who do think that.

1448
02:00:20,840 --> 02:00:25,439
For example, a famous a guy
who was a Christian apologist for many

1449
02:00:25,520 --> 02:00:30,479
years who ended up leaving Christianity,
Tertolian. Tertolian, ironically, who was

1450
02:00:30,560 --> 02:00:38,159
a famous apologist, had this view
that no faith theology, it's the opposite

1451
02:00:38,239 --> 02:00:43,439
of reason. Okay, So there
will be a pretty consistent debate later on

1452
02:00:44,640 --> 02:00:49,520
as we moved through philosophy as to
this relationship between reason and rationality and divine

1453
02:00:49,600 --> 02:00:55,199
revelation or dogma and doctrine in the
Bible. But at least in the neo

1454
02:00:55,279 --> 02:00:59,239
Platonic reading of Plato, which I
think is correct, Plato does not see

1455
02:00:59,319 --> 02:01:04,840
this as a kind of divide reasoning
is theology in Plato. In fact,

1456
02:01:05,560 --> 02:01:11,640
the path of the philosopher is not
just pure ratiocination and speculation. It is

1457
02:01:11,720 --> 02:01:15,680
to raise the mind to divine truths
and divine realities. It is a contemplation

1458
02:01:15,800 --> 02:01:21,760
of a higher mystical order. And
there is perhaps this idea of religious initiation

1459
02:01:23,000 --> 02:01:26,159
in Plato. What exactly that is
we don't know, but it is there.

1460
02:01:26,720 --> 02:01:30,520
The Timaeus, the Symposium, and
the Republic do contain many theological and

1461
02:01:30,600 --> 02:01:34,039
mystical elements and references, and so, as Compelson admits, this is a

1462
02:01:34,239 --> 02:01:40,840
break from pre Socratic atheism and materialism. However, it's not a total break,

1463
02:01:41,479 --> 02:01:46,239
because Plato does retain Heraclitus's view of
sensible reality as flux, but he

1464
02:01:46,319 --> 02:01:51,560
doesn't have reductionist view that all that
exists is sensible reality in flux. He

1465
02:01:51,760 --> 02:01:57,880
also has Parmenite's view that that realm
of permanence is just a higher realm.

1466
02:01:58,880 --> 02:02:03,800
Thus Plato is attempting to solve and
reconcile some of the dialectical tensions and issues,

1467
02:02:04,600 --> 02:02:09,359
and probably first and foremost it is
that question of the one in the

1468
02:02:09,399 --> 02:02:13,520
many. All right, So I
hope you guys enjoyed tonight's introduction to Plato.

1469
02:02:13,840 --> 02:02:15,720
Obviously it's a lot. We can
go way deeper. It goes way

1470
02:02:15,840 --> 02:02:19,479
way crazy. There's many, many
dialogues, but we got to start somewhere.

1471
02:02:19,560 --> 02:02:23,159
We had to focus on something.
So let's open it up to Q

1472
02:02:23,279 --> 02:02:23,439
and A.
