Hi, I' m making baby this week. I' ll focus on
a few shape falls. The truth is that I feel that this debate of
the president' s journalism continues in his campaign stigmatizing the press, because I
already feel that we have reached absolute incommunicado. We talk about journalists protecting press
freedom and how dangerous harassment from government power is and turn it into an attempt
to evade the practical criticism of journalism. You can both girls. Criticism of
the press is not only valid, but much needed, but the stigmatization from
the official power to curtail their work, because it is not convenient. That
is all that has been raised. No one is looking for the bad practice
of journalism to go unpunished, yes, other than state power to determine that
it is right and wrong. In this practice there is much less when the
remarks come in reaction to critical contents, to that state power, that journalism
is obliged to monitor and if to point to journalistic failures. This is because
we had a couple of headlines this week that deserved fair claims. For his
part, One that we finally decided to change was about the results of the
audit. This one that did the contraloria on a series of contracts like twenty
of the complementary works to the first line of the metro. Our initial header
decides against it. There are millions and regularities on the first line of the
subway, which was unnecessarily scandalous, but it was also imprecise. Yes,
it has everything to do with the first line of the metro, because the
project is one of the feeders, because it is part of the first line
of the metro. But the findings are specifically about the opposites of these feeding
works and not about the specific contract of the first line of the metro.
But, moreover, in only one of those twenty contracts was where doubts arose
about the management of eighteen zero million pesos. The others are administrative findings,
so our headline, because it was quite yellow to say the least, and
so we decided to change the other one that put me to think and I
initially felt that I would be able to defend it. But the truth is
that the earring was more than just about that headline, because, strictly speaking,
I thought because it is possible that crime in a city falls, in
the overall crime, but that there is one of the crime activities that grows.
But not reading the article, the truth is that they were quite right
who asked us if extortion was not a criminal activity. Our title said crime
decreases, but extortion increases. And it is not that total crime, including
rising extortion, has fallen, but that his extortion and the other mistitled bar
crimes. It' s no more. He doesn' t see much.