Attention. You're listening to the Todd Huff radio show, America's Home for Conservative
not Bitter Talk radio. Be advised. The content of this program has been
documented to prevents and even cure liberalism, and listening may cause you to lean
to the right. Here's your conservative but not Bitter host, Todd Hoff.
All right, my friend, you have tuned in to America's home for Conservative
not Bitter talked I am your host, Todd Huff. For those of you
that are watching on the video stream, apologies, the camera was a bit
late today. I won't mention any names oz but anyway, we're streaming now.
If you haven't said that, that's on the website. We put that
on the website, by the way, and there's clips that we put in
other places. You can go and check them out. You can see that
I do in fact have a Phase four radio. Anyway, if you want
to be part of today's discussion, you can go to well. You can
email me Todd at tot up show dot com. You can also connect with
us by texting three one seven two zero twenty eight thirty three one seven two
one zero twenty eight thirty. Just make sure that you make it count and
add the appropriate amount of adoration and praise, which is a lot. Candidly,
just add at least ten or fifteen Actually right now you may need to
add twenty five percent, because I just feel like maybe I've earned it here
anyway, I'm dismissing my friend. It's good to be here. Look,
I want to start today by talking about this released this leaked audio, this
leaked audio of President Trump, allegedly President Trump. You know, there's problems
that I have with this. First of all, there's questions in today's world.
I was even alluded to this when I was talking with her about this
earlier. And I don't listen to me. I am not making an allegation.
I'm just who we know is in the media, with the forces that
we know that are against Trump, the the fact that they've proven beyond a
reasonable without any doubt, that they are willing to go to any lengths whatsoever.
I mean, is it a stretch it to have a question about,
you know, just the audio itself. I mean, is it is this
legit? Who was recording it? Who are the people I can't see.
I haven't seen the names of the people in the room, which I believe
there's two distinct voices besides Trump. I've listened to it a couple of times,
and this is this is a piece of audio that was leaked that had
President Trump apparently based upon what it I mean, you know, with I
just look, I don't know how to say this. I'm not levying the
allegation. I'm just saying I don't trust the people who are involved in this
at all. I don't trust the people who have constantly gone after President Trump.
And I don't think it's out of line to just wonder, to wonder
if this is in fact, if this is in fact legitimate, where did
they Where did they get it? Why did they get it? If you
remember, and I started to do a search, and I don't know if
if the good bad guy has taken taken I thought I had a search feature
on the website. I was gonna look to see when I searched or when
I posted in the stack of stuff an article that we just referenced the other
day. I remember just referencing it now in my mind the other day.
With the speed of time, the speed of business, a busy broadcast week
can be pretty fast. So this might have been could have been last week,
possibly the week before, but I seem to recall it was last week
and the judge, the judge personally or specifically instructed Trump not to release I
remember talking about this, not to release any evidence or information to the public.
It was directed specifically to Trump, and now it appears it needs to
be directed. Of course we knew this anyway, but it should be directed
at people who are on the other side of this particular case. So if
Trump would have released something or the Trump team, you know, the immediate
response, I should say reaction from the media from the Democrat Party would be
that Trump is trying to win the pr battle, He's jeopardizing the idea that
he can have a fair trial, and that this is he's trying to manipulate
the juror pool or whatever it is wherever this thing ends up. That's what
they would, you know, they would they would argue this, they would
say that it's inappropriate. It's another example of why Trump can't be trusted in
all these sorts of things. Meanwhile, I don't see any concern or question
about where this came from. And look, the authenticity of this with the
technology available today, it is conceivable and I'm not levying this charge. I'm
just saying I don't put it past him. If they thought they could get
away with this, and if further their attempt to politically get rid of President
Trump or physically criminally get rid of President Trump, I think that it's I
don't even think it's a question of an opinion. I think it's undeniably true
to say that they would pursue it. These folks stop at nothing, They
stop at nothing. They are terrified of President Trump being on the ticket.
They are terrified of the connection President Trump has with his base. Now,
these things are not mutually exclusive, meaning look in theory, and I'm not
talking any specifics here because I'm not doing that yet. In theory, what
I just said about the media, the radical left, the Democrat Party,
the political establishment can be absolutely true, meaning that they would do anything to
get rid of Trump. And it doesn't mean that Trump And I'm not saying
that this is what happened, but I'm just saying logically the options that that
doesn't preclude the other option from being true. That Trump could have could have
broken some law that justifies this. I do not think that, by the
way, I'm just making a statement that these things are not. It can't
be. It doesn't have to be one or the other, right, I
mean, it doesn't have to be that, just like just like it could
be that they are held it on getting rid of President Trump, former President
Trump, candidate Trump here in the twenty twenty four campaign, Republican front runner
President Trump here in the campaign. It's perfectly conceivable and logical that they they
the media, they the political establishment, they the I mean, take it
any the deep state. By the way, do you remember maybe I pull
this sound bite up? Do you remember several years ago Chuck Schumer speaking with
I think it was with Rachel Maddow at MSNBC and Trump or excuse me,
Chuck Schumer said, you don't cross the Intelligence Agency because they have six ways
to Sunday to get back at you. Do you remember that? Just I
feel like that's irrelevant thing to at least be aware of as we venture down
this road. And again, I'm not making allegations, I'm just having conversation.
I'm just pointing this out. When I heard audio, that was one
of my first questions was is this legit? It sounds like Trump, but
there's potential ways that it may not be. It could be fabricated. I'm
not suggesting that it is. I'm just saying that's a question I have.
The other the other thing I begin to think is why is this released?
And why is the media? Why is the media just eagerly ready to share
this information. Of course we know why. But if Trump and his team
had released evidence that helped his case, so to speak, at least in
the public's eye, we know that somebody in the media somewhere would take some
fake foe make believe moral stand somebody like Don Lemon. It's even in I
don't think he's in get fired at seeing or where was he last wherever it
was he I think he got can maybe maybe not. He's not relevant other
than to say he's one individual that thinks and behaves from my position and estimation,
like basically all the rest, and so some of someones, one of
these foe make believe journalists, is going to take some position that's going to
say I cannot in order to maintain a trial that has you know, unbiased
people involved and so forth, we don't want to further the circus of this,
of this show trial. We don't want to give President Trump what he
wants. You can see this happening, right, I mean, it's already
happened. It's already happened when Trump makes remarks. When he made the remarks
the day that he was arraigned, the media was very happy to follow follow
it all the way up and talk about it all the way up to when
he got to the podium. And then they had to protect you all.
They had to protect you from hearing from Trump. That's what it means now
to be a defender of democracy, not to be not to be a platform
someone in the media that allows people to share their beliefs or arguments or whatever
said they want to silence the other side. True media would have covered that
and let Trump say his piece and bring on your pundits and explain why Trump
was completely wrong. But see, they're afraid. They're afraid of the impact
Trump has when he goes straight to the American people for obvious reasons. I
mean, look at the following Look and the people that are going to hate
him are gonna hate him. I get that, but that this is this
is not about finding the truth. This is about stopping a political opponent.
That is one percent what this is about. Now, I'm going to play
the audio and due course I'm not going to get to this segment. I
think the soundbout I have might I don't know, is it two minutes,
I'm not sure, something like that, but but I have. Again,
the immediate questions are is this authentic? Not suggesting it's not, But I
don't I don't trust the people. If you don't trust the people who are
bringing you the information, can you trust the information? And I say no,
And then of course they're gonna say, wow, that's because Trump got
you all stain. No, Trump didn't stir me up into this. I've
been onto the game of the leftist, insane radical media members for a long
long time, a long time. It's not because Trump called them what the
enemy of the people and fake news and all that. Those were nicknames that
they were that were earned, candidly, that's what that was about. And
they, of course act like that's an assault on the First Amendment. Give
me a break. These people are the biggest wosses on the face of planet
Earth. They do not want to have an actual debate about the meanings of
these words, the allegations. They don't want to have to answer for these
things. They don't want to have to explain to you why they will take
this tape and push it out for all their viewers or readers or whatever to
consume. The last week or two weeks ago, whenever it was, they
were sharing a story from the judge who basically was wagging his finger at Trump
saying, don't don't be sharing this information. Don't be sharing evidence out there.
But it's okay when it's leaked allegedly from from the state. So that's
a problem to me. The other problem is who are these other people?
What is the context? There's no context given. Is he meeting with I
mean it said staff staff or when I read this article, But is it
Is it a staffer? Is it someone who's legal counsel that I mean,
that's that's a different story legal counsel gets to. I'm not suggesting it is.
I'm just saying I don't know if it. I've not seen who this
person is. There's a clear intention here by the media, and again it's
not mutually exclusive from whether or not Trump is guilty or not. I'm gonna
let let let that play out. I have my opinion, you know what
it is. I'm just simply saying they are trying to win another battle here,
and that is the battle for the narrative, the battle for the for
the political discourse. They see proverbial blood in the water, just like the
other candidates who jumped into this race. In fact, I was thinking about
that yesterday. I was thinking, did they did they potentially know more about
this? It's I mean, I find myself asking those questions. Did someone
share this evidence with them and say, hey, wink wink, you might
want to think about getting into the into the race. I mean, you
could do this with any number of things. But the problem is when you
have nefarious actors in the government who are so hell bent on stopping Trump at
any cost. They have clearly clearly shown us time and time again that that
is what they're prepared to do. So now, once I know that,
once you know that, we have lots of questions and questions candidly, we're
never gonna get answers to because the folks that we are asking either are not
being held accountable by the media or the media is complicit in helping them develop
a fake news story, a fake narrative to either not really answer the question
or to do some sort of a head fake and misdirection for the American people.
And so we're sitting here just trying to make make some sense of this.
Now I've got other questions as well, But I'm gonna play this.
I don't know if a lot of other hosts are playing I don't. I
don't know. I don't listen. I don't listen to anyone else. Um,
but I do. I do think it's important to play it and at
least hear what if you haven't heard it, to hear the continent, well,
there's no context, but to hear what they're actually allegedly saying on the
tape, so or the recording. I guess I'm I'm an eighties child.
It was tape. Sometimes you'll hear me say it's on film. Um,
that's that's just the era, my friends. So it's on video, or
it's on audio, it's on some sort of recording device, supposedly, supposedly,
I don't know. Anyway, we're gonna talk about that. We're gonna
play it. We're gonna relate it to the case at hand. We're gonna
talk about it in terms of what some of Trump's defense has been, not
legal defense, but kind of in the market play said the public square,
so to speak, the way that he's been arguing his case from that perspective,
or his legal team has been arguing it from that perspective. Anyway,
all that being said, I'm gonna take a break here a little bit long
in this first segment, sit tipe plenty more to get to my friends.
You're listening to conservative not bitter talk. I am your host, the one,
the only, the beloved Todd huff back in just a minute. Welcome
back, my friend. Another little interesting tidbit that came out in the news
yesterday. Apparently this stuff is just I don't know this, it's just poetic.
Apparently, the only living president as of right now, the only living
president who is not going to be if we see the left continue to push
this crazy notion of reparations, the only one who really not even by their
argument responsible or should be on the hook financially for reparations. The only living
president, which is the only president that they could not find a connection to
slave owners in America is President Donald Jade Trump. From the reports I read,
every other president, every other living president, i should say, has
family connections to slave owner or to slave owners in their families so if not,
don't expect there to be any logic to the way that this reparation stuff
is going to be addressed and argued by the radical leftists and the lovers of
big government and the race baiters candidly, but don't don't don't think that there's
logic that's going to be applied to that. But if they only held the
people accountable who are related to individuals who owned slaves, Trump will be off
the hook, the only one off the hook for reparations. So just let
that sink in for a moment. That has to drive them absolutely positively bonkers.
By the way, so last segment, we talked about this audio recording.
This I'm looking here in an article from The Hill. This audio recording,
according to The Hill, a former President Trump discussing a secret government document
at his New Jersey club dealt. The article says, the latest blow to
his evolving and growing defenses against charges over his retention of classified information. So
I want to play this clip. I think it's it might be a couple
of minutes. I don't know, but it is. It's well, there's
it's a little bit different than some of these other charges that have been levied
against Trump. So I want to go through this. I want to play
it, I want to address it. I think it's important to to hear,
to understand, to get actual context, to to just know what's what's
out there. And of course I raised some questions last segment, but to
me, the biggest, well, there's obvious questions about how is this truly
authentic? Who are we taking at their word here? I mean, some
some legitimate questions, concerns and problems with that, But you know, the
biggest another big question besides that is what we said last segment as well,
which is what why is this happening? I thought the judge who, by
the way I said he previous segment, I thought, when I said he,
it's a it's a female judge. It is a female judge. And
why presume she's appears to be based upon the name, and from what I
can tell by appearances, I don't no one's asked her, to my knowledge,
how she identifies. But this judge had made an uh basically told Trump's
team to not be releasing anything into the into the media without permission and so
forth. But this is apparently okay. I don't know if the other side
was was warned about this. That seems to be awfully, awfully convenient,
wouldn't you say? And again this is this is made for your consumption.
This trial is an extension of everything else that we've witnessed during the Trump years.
And it's an extension of impeachment one, impeachment to Russian collusion, spying
on his campaign, all that stuff January sixth, and now and now this
now, assuming this audio is I mean authentic, I don't know. I
still need some more information about this, given given the actors involved, how
much they hate Trump, what they're willing to do. Just like, just
like yesterday we talked about the letter that was written by the fifty one intelligence
professionals. It was reported yesterday or maybe the day before. We talked about
it briefly yesterday. Those fifty one professionals would have known that the FBI had
already by the time they wrote their silly little letter, the FBI had already
decided or realized that the Hunter Biden laptop was legitimate. And yet these jokers
and clowns are out there writing an op ed that they all sign. A
couple of weeks before election Day twenty twenty. They published this thing. They
tell the American people that this has all the hallmarks of a Russian disinformation campaign.
It's just it's pathetic and ridiculous that this stuff works on people. It's
it's it's patently absurd. I just I question the critical thinking skills of people
that that that actually impacted. I just it's craziness to me that that that's.
Again, I know what we're dealing with. But so we have all
of these these things, and this is they're willing to do anything, I
mean anything. Boy that that's a whole other subject that I don't want to
get into right now. But I don't know that anything's actually I'm certain for
some of these totalitarians lovers of big government, nothing is off limits. Look
at how they dealt with the American people on on COVID and masks and vaccines.
I mean, it's it's remarkable what we've seen these past few years.
So that is a factor. But that said, let's just for a moment
assume that this is legitimate, which it very well may be. But let's
listen to this and let's see what all the hubbub is about, and then
we're going to kind of well compare and contrast. Well, not so much
compare and contrast. We're going to talk about the defenses or the way that
Trump and his team thus far have handled these charges and how that might be
impacted from this from least this leaked audio so here it is. I think
it's a couple of minutes long. This is supposedly audio that was recorded of
Trump in his New Jersey club talking about classified documents. Here it is.
He's a bit sick, louder. That was your cue, you know,
against you. Well, it started right at Milly's talking about oh, you
were going to try to do a cup. They were trying to do that
before you even were sworn in. That's right. Well with Millie, let
me see that. I show you an example. He said, paper stuff.
I wanted to attack a run. Isn't it amazing? I have a
big pilot papers. This thing just came up. Look, this was him.
They presented me. This is so off the record, but they presented
me this, This was him. This was the Defense Department in him.
Wow, we looked at him. This was him. This wasn't done by
me. This was him. All sorts of stuff, pages long. Wait
a minute, let's see yeah, pages yeah, it was amazing. This
totally wins my case, you know, except it is like highly secreted for
it. Look look at this your attack and Hillary would print that out all
the time, you know, she sent it to Anthony Winner, by the
way, is not incredible. Yeah, I was just saying, because we
were talking about it, and you know, he said he wanted to attack
Ron and what he's this was done by the military given to me. I
think we can probably I don't know, ye this President, I could have
deple No, I can't, you know, but this is isn't that interesting?
It's so cool. So look we heard ivan and you probably almost didn't
believe me, but now you believe me. It's incredible. Right now,
it brings So that's the end of the of the clip. Now, of
course, so what's that all about? Ultimately, so one of Trump's primary
arguments so far. Now, again, this has not gone into into the
courtroom or anything at this point. This is well, I mean, we've
gone through the beginning phases. There's not been a defense that's been actually mounted
in this particular case at this particular time. But the Trump team has been
talking about different things, and one of those things is that the president has
absolute authority to declassified documents. And so the argument goes, when he brought
those documents home, he effectively declassified them. I'm just telling you the argument
I'm saying. I'm not speaking to whether or not I think. I'm not
an attorney, so it doesn't really matter in that in that case. But
I'm just saying that this is one of the arguments that has been put out
there that he can declassify things. So this becomes a moot point. But
on the video or excuse me, the audio recording, he is saying.
He's saying that he could have he could have declassified at as president, but
he cannot. Now he cannot. Now it's a shame. And so the
argument is obviously that hey, he knew when he was going through these documents
that they were not declassified. He admits it, and so the question then
becomes, now what now. What's interesting is, again, I'm not an
attorney. I don't even play one on the show. But what is interesting
is that the prosecution in this case, as Jack Smith, has decided to
use the Espionage Act as the law to base his case, primarily upon that
he did not go to the Presidential Records Act which, by the way,
the Presidential Records Act doesn't have does not have criminal punishments or whatever alongside of
it. It's not something that's designed for that. It's designed to kind of
give a roadmap as to how presidential records are supposed to be managed and maintained
in that process and so forth. So some people are saying, look,
this undermines that argument that defense is gone. But even if it does,
I mean, there's a whole bunch of other things that have to be proven
here, a whole bunch of other things. I had lunch with a friend
the other day and he basically assumed believes that Trump has done a lot of
people think this. People think he's going to be convicted. And again,
I put nothing passed. I didn't put nothing past them as far as what
they can can pull off here. But there's a whole lot more that has
to be proven from this. Now. I'm not minimizing this and saying it's
no big deal if that is Trump's Trump's defense, but it's there's this isn't
as cut and dry as that, right, There's there's actually a verse in
the Bible it says I'm paraphrasing, but it says, you know, the
basically, I'm really paraphrasing here, but the prosecution's side sounds correct when they
are at first presenting their case until the other side gets to speak up and
respond and deal with it and give their version or begin to interact and present
an explanation of events and evidence and so forth. So really long in this
segment, but I wanted to play that. Get that in there. We'll
continue to talk about this on the other side of the break. So type
my friends back in a minute. I'll come back to my friends. So,
I mean, this is this is going to be this trial that Trump
is in. This is going to be different than some of the other things
that he has been through. And I'm not predicting. I'm not predicting that
he's not going to walk through it. I still think that he can walk
through it. I still think. But again that's not you know, the
Left has an objective here. The objective is to keep Trump from winning the
presidency and having their guy, which at this stage is still inexplicably Joe Biden.
He may not know it yet, but he's still the guy. So
we have a situation where one side is prepared to do whatever and I mean
whatever it takes to prevent that. We are talking about some incredibly wicked,
deceitful, horrible people that are prepared to do whatever it takes. On the
other side, we've got a guy that is going to fight to the bitter
end. I mean, he's not going to give it. He's not he's
not going to stop. And so they on the one hand, the left
in the media, they don't care how this what it actually what piece of
this can actually prevent him from being the nominee or the presidential well, the
winner of the campaign in twenty twenty four, the elected president. There's several
ways that this can hurt them, the Trump campaign, but there's also,
as we've seen from polling, there's many ways, or at least one main
way that this can help them. And that's because people don't want to see.
And again, I had lunch with a good friend who said this.
He's not a Trump He's not a Trump guy. He's a limited government guy.
I don't know if I call him a conservative, but maybe in some
ways he's close to it. He's at least center right. He's he likes
he's a capitalist. He's not a leftist. He's not a liberal. He
might have some liberal views on some things, but he's he's certainly a reasonable
a person that doesn't want to see the government targeting the political opposition, and
that's what many people see here. In fact, he made a statement to
me, he said, you know, he said, a year ago,
you couldn't have convinced me that they would do. And I don't know if
he was talking about that targeting Trump politically or something else. But there's so
many crazy things going on it's hard to keep track. But the point is
is that I think more and more people are like my friend, who are
realizing that there is that is that this is all part of a strategy.
And whether again, whether they get him in handcuffs and a guilty conviction,
which they would love, that's the number one on their list. They will
would love that for many, many reasons. But even if that's not the
solution, if they can get him in the muck and the mire and it
prevents him from really winning the Republican nomination, again, I'm not predicting that,
but that's a possibility, if they can get it to effect his fundraising
dollars, if it can somehow create enough of an opportunity for someone and the
only someone that can beat Trump even remotely has a chance is the Santis.
If that presents an opportunity for that in the you know, for that to
be the case, they're okay with that. They don't ultimately care. If
there's something that happens that prevents Trump from being able to win, or that
causes so much political damage that they don't think he can win, then they're
cool with that. The problem is, they know, they know the data.
These are not idiots. They might be morally bankrupt, they might be
completely evil and wicked to the core, they might be compromised in every conceivable
way, but they're not stupid, right, They're not. They're not idiots.
They're strategic and they've calculated the cost here, They've projected the risk,
and it is worth it to them to take these steps knowing that it's going
to drive more people to Trump. With that, that should tell you much
of what you what you need to know here. At the same time,
even while all those things are true, there are there's gonna be I mean,
Trump's attorneys, Trump's defense is going to have to contend with these things.
And there's there's two trials going on, right, there's the one in
the courtroom, and then there's the one in the public square, and that's
the one. They don't care which one that they win. They you know,
the left and the morally bankrupt folks that are fueling all this nonsense.
And then meanwhile, meanwhile, we literally have documents that show up everywhere else
Vice President Pence Obama's office that he's rinning in Chicago, Biden's garage, although
we're not supposed to worry about that because he's got his classic corvette in there,
so we should know that he's taking care of that thing. And by
extension, the documents that are strewn all over the back of the corvette on
the workbench. Who knows wherever those things are are located. That doesn't matter.
None of that matters. And to critical thinking people, I mean,
these there's numerous examples of a clear double standard here, of a clear double
standard. And then on top of all of that, to go after the
guy for the s bei Anaje Act, which the purpose of the Espionajact.
You'll see leftists and liberals that'll try to say, well, it's not just
about foreign spying. I mean, that's the whole initial premise of this thing.
Now, there are things that have been added over the course of time
to the Espionage Act, But are we really in making the argument that the
former president of the United States was engaged in trying to harm this country by
giving its enemies secrets? I mean, that's not what that audio indicated.
Right. Even even if there are questions he asked to answer, how is
it still espionage? Well, Todd, it's not just about I think that
that that's not accurate. Yes, there are some things in there that raise
questions and the Espionage Act, but that's not what this was about. This
was about records of the presidency. The Presidential Records Act applies. There's no
criminal penalties for Presidential Records Act disputes and so forth. That's where we were
with this. There was communication going on between Trump's team and the National Archives,
and there was again communication here. I think, I think there's still
multiple defenses here. But I mean, look, if this tape is or
this recording is accurate, I mean, there's legitimate things that the defense is
going to have to at least try to explain or deal with or something.
So anyway, time out is in order. My friends, sit sight back
in just a minute. Welcome back, my friends. So in I referenced
this verse in the Bible, and again, I just there's a lot going
on here in this case, and I think there are things that the Trump
team are going to have to address both in that courtroom and also also from
a well a pr perspective, the positioning of this whole thing. But right
now we're just getting one side of the argument. One side of the argument,
by the way, that's being leaked by someone who's not on team Trump,
and Team Trump was the one that was warned not to do it.
But it's Proverbs. Book of Proverbs, chapter eighteen, verse seventeen says this
in a lawsuit, the first to speak seems right, I said, the
prosecution, because in our system that is the first side to speak until someone
comes forward and across examines. And that's that's why we do it this way,
right, I mean, that's why our system is the way that it
is. Context matters. We can't just let one side and make the case
and not have anything else. That's why the system is beautiful system. American
system is a beautiful system. So, but there are legitimate questions this is
not the same as everything else he's dealt with, but it's still something that
I think he can he can get through and deal with. The times just
not on my side today. My friends back in just a minute. All
right, my friends, all the time that we have today, so buckle
up for this. We got what trial dates that are being potentially pushed from
around August the next say, six weeks away to the prosecutor Jack Smith wants
this to be tried beginning in around December eleventh, I think is what it
was. But this stuff's all coming and we're also going head first into the
campaign season, so makes a little bit more sense based upon that recording.
Why some of these folks through their name in the hat isn't enough to make
a difference. Time will tell. Context matters. We gotta let this thing
play out, but I've got to wrap up for the day. The music
is telling me it's time to shut her down. My friends, have a
great day. STG.