Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Tuesday, the twenty first of November.
You're of our Lord twenty twenty three. Well, we're going to begin today
by looking at the Ukraine War. The war is getting old, and so
are the people who are fighting it is. They're going to start taking people
up to the age of seventy men. It's going to become then a country
for no country for old men, because they've already eradicated so many of the
young men. They are filling the ranks now with old men and with women.
And so then as we think about what our genius war planners in Washington
have accomplished in Afghanistan, Ukraine all the rest of their losses, we see
that the war in the Middle East is also about to expand with Hudi piracy
takeover of a ship. This will be used, so we'll talk about that.
We'll also have Eric Peters as our guest today, and we talk about
how the car was one of our key lifelines in twenty twenty one of the
reasons why they want to take it away from us. We'll be right back.
Well, we've had the CIA director Burns as well as the secondary Defense
Austin have made separate urgent trips in the last couple of weeks to Ukraine indicate
that the war there is not going well, and Zelensky has been whining about
lack of support everywhere. I even tried to get into the limelight after October
seventh, wanted to take a trip to Israel so he could preen in front
of the cameras, and they were told him no, no, Well,
as Austin was there, one of the things that he had to say was
very concerning to those of us who want to see peace. I want to
see an end to this, but of course, like Afghanistan, this has
planned to be a forever war. We will stay there until we're thrown out,
as we were in Afghanistan. So Austin says, I'm here with a
very important message. We will continue to support Ukraine's battlefield needs and their long
term defense requirements. And so much emphasis was put on the long term aspects
of it. And as you see the competition back and forth between Israel and
Ukraine, who gets to feed off of the US government and the taxpayers here?
Well, the US government doesn't have any problem with it. We can
do both of these, right, just keep printing money. Who cares?
You know, the American exceptionalism is the Federal Reserve and our fiat currency.
So we can just do both words. Let's have a third one. Toot's
anywhere anywhere, big ones. Okay, We've got a half dozen conflicts that
have been going on for quite some time, simmering, many of them quiet,
secretive. So Austin said, I'm here today deliver an important message.
Will continue to stand with Ukraine and their fight for freedom against Russian aggression,
both now and into the future, until we're thrown out on our keysters.
Just last week, SEEI director William Burns also made a secretive, unannounced visit
to Ukraine the whole urgent meetings with Zelensky. Commentary in The Asia Times has
concluded this flurry of activity is in response to how badly things are going on
in this battlefield in Ukraine, tens of billions of dollars into a proxy war
with Russia and so Asia Times. So is it worth asking how come Burns
is on an urgent mission to Ukraine as he did a week or so ago.
The answer the question is Ukraine is imploding, they said. The crumbling
of the Zelensky regime is unsurprising. Ukraine has been sustaining far too many casualties
to survive for much longer. Ukraine either must find a way to make a
deal with Russia or face an internal rebellion, some kind of a coup.
And of course this was pretty obvious from the very beginning. Many of us
pointed it out. Gerald Slinty sign, you you think you're going to beat
Russia. The people who wore down Hitler, wore down Napoleon, the rest
of stuff. They take massive casualties and keep going. And it's a big,
big country, I think is the largest land mass in the world,
difficult to terrain to fight in. The Russian strategy is to bleed down Ukraine's
armed forces and create a political crisis in Kiev. Is that really that difficult
with somebody like Zelensky and power there to create a political crisis. The Russian
effort is ahead of schedule, said The Asia Times, which has surprised Moscow
as much as had has surprised Washington. The Wall Street Journal, not just
other papers. Wall Street Journal headline, It's time to end the magical thinking
about Russia's defeat. It was always magical thinking, because we've got to save
the magical thinking for the climate war, the magical thinking about unicorn farts,
the magical thinking that we've got to extract CO two from the atmosphere and not
just capture what we're making, but we got to extract it out of the
atmosphere. We got to now cut down trees which do extract it, and
we got to bury them. If this isn't magical thinking, I don't know
who it is. But yeah, there's been a lot of magical thinking in
Washington, a lot of fantastical thinking, you know, come to think of
it, why isn't that the perfect place for George Santos. Every one of
these government narratives is as ridiculous and incredible as George santos biography, every single
one of them. So you know, now we've got another war, this
one we could win against the Palestinians. It's not going to win the war
against Russia, right, but we might be able to teach those Palestinians of
US or two. Right. This is I think part of the pivot that
they want to do this. But of course, you know, it isn't
even about winning. It's just about sustaining conflict. Because when we sustain conflict,
no matter how much Americans lose in terms of blood and money, military
industrial corporations always win. This is a bankrupt country, not just financially morally.
It would be bad enough just from a pragmatic standpoint to take a look
at these wars apart from the moral considerations. But of course, the vast
majority of people in America want to murder children, ripping them apart. So
don't cry crocodile tears about kids being murdered by terrorists or murdered by bombs being
dropped when you are demanding to be able to rip your own babies apart,
limb by limb. Don't tell me that you care about life or babies.
Putin looks toward the second anniversary of his all out assault in Ukraine. His
self confidence, says Wall Street Journal, is hard to miss. I thought
he was dead. I thought he was dying. You know all these things.
Look at his hands are trembling or this, or that he's dying.
Well, we're all dying. Nobody's getting any younger. But he's doing a
lot better than bidness. Hasty is in possession of all of his mental faculties.
His self confidence is hard to miss, says Wall Street Journal. He
much anticipate Ukrainian counter offensive has not achieved the breakthrough that we give Kiev a
strong hand to negotiate. Putin has reason to believe that time is on his
side because it is at the front line. There's no indications that Russia's losing
what has become a war of attrition. The Russian economy has been buffeted but
is not in tatters. Putin's hold on power was paradoxically strengthened. Following you
have Gainy Progozen's failed rebellion in June. You know, the Wagner Group,
popular support for the war remained solid. Elite backing for Putin has not fractured,
so he hasn't had a coup against him. But to take a look
at what is happening in Ukraine, this is like their version of a Bob
Hope USO show how pathetic is this. Yeah, let's let's get in Margaret
out there something. If we get these guys, they're hating this, they're
reading their phones, and look at how old they are in general, pretty
amazing. Now, you know these may be officers, but I don't think
so. I mean, you could try to explain it away that way,
but I don't think that they're officers. As a matter of fact, America
and Britain, who are pushing this proxy war, who want to fight Russia
to the last Ukrainian, well they're getting pretty close to the last Ukrainians because
now they're saying you need to start drafting teenagers and men up to the age
of seventy. Drastic measures are needed to substitute for the heavy losses that Ukrainian
troops have sustained during their unsuccessful summer offensive. American and British curators. Curators,
what does that mean? This is like a museum or something. Museum
recommend that the Ukrainian leadership lower the minimum draft age to seventeen and increase the
maximum one to seventy. They could draft me, I got another year of
eligibility. Well, you don't want me fighting awards like the drop dead of
a heart attack, as well as call more women to arm it just this
is the insanity. This is the insanity. You know, war, war,
war, says American Britain. More war, more war. Remember when
Obama, who had started seven wars. He'd stand up there and he has
his progressive sign that says forward and so many pictures of him where they put
they positioned themselves to take the picture so that Obama was in front of the
d and just says for war. Well, that's what these guys were all
about. The Ukrainian media also reported in early November that as many as eight
thousand Ukrainians were facing criminal charges for draft evasion. I mean they had eligible
men who are eligible for the draft trying to sneak out of the country.
They were nabbing them as they were trying to get out. They've got eight
thousand that are facing criminal charges for draft evasion. It's like, you know,
we kicked out eight thousand for not for evading the jab Just anyway.
keV is also increasingly relying on women to fill the army ranks. More than
forty thousand women are serving in the military. But here's the key thing.
More than five thousand Ukrainian women are on the front lines of combat. Yew,
these people are up against it. That's not sexist to say that.
And the battle of the sexes. You take a look whether you're riding a
bicycle or whether you are you know, in battle, stamina is required.
Physical differences between men and women are quite obvious by now, aren't they.
I mean, we had this this nonsense for fifty years. We had this
nonsense that, oh, well, men and women are equal physically, you
know. And Billy gen King just showed that she could beat a man,
a retired middle aged man who through the game. It turns out Bobby Riggs
rigged that game. He had beaten a current professional tennis player pretty severely,
this retired middle aged guy did and that was real. And we're seeing that
all the time now with this transgenders and sports. There's just the reality is
that there's a difference there, a deal with it. It's not going to
stop trying to pretend that it's not there. And the magical thinking about that
as well. And so then they did this big thing afterwards, highly promoted
and he played Billy Jean King and through the game. His friends said he
through the game. And then after that there was another battle of the sexes
and tennis. You had Jimmy Connors and whoever was the ranking professional at the
time for the women, and it was he skunked her. So and now
we see this everywhere, everywhere. It's not even a theory. So they're
putting five thousand women and combat operations. The actions of Kivs show that it
is quote ready to continue to fight until the last Ukrainian in the name of
Western interests. Well, that's not the first time that's been said. This
is said at the very beginning. It was said at the very beginning by
a general from India who was looking at this as a neutral observer. And
so that's what the plan is. You know, they're going to try to
and listen to Chris Christie. Oh, this is great. You know we
have we've been able to wear down Russia and uh, it was only five
percent of our budget. And look at that, Look at how much we're
costing the Russians. He doesn't care about the cost in Ukrainian lives, He
doesn't care about the risk of a greater war, you know. Chris Christie
says, well, we need to double down on that. You know,
if we could destroy half of Russia's war fighting capability with only five percent of
our budget, using Ukrainians to fight this war for us, let's let's do
more of that, says Chris Christie. What an evil, evil man,
he is evil. It's just amazing. Just the older I get, the
more disgusted I get with these wars. And so when we as a matter
of fact, I don't want to leave Ukraine just yet. We're going to
There were some things that I did not get to with Ukraine. If this
thing will work for me, sometimes it gets really slow. It's a great
device, but it can be very very slow in terms of trying to switch
files here. Anyways, Zolenski is trying to project his incompetence in other people.
As a matter of fact, there's a lot of incompetence go around.
They had an open air ceremony giving themselves medals and packs, pats on the
back and that type of thing. And while they're out there celebrating artillery Day
and holding an open air field thing in the middle of a war, you
had Russia celebrate their artillery day as well by dropping bombs on these people in
the open field, all assembled together and so coming at this time, they've
admitted that nineteen soldiers died. It's probably worse than that, because this is
not the first time this kind of incompetence has happened. Zelenski blamed it on
the Russians. Yeah, well they fought, they fired the missiles. This
guy's a genius. He's a veritable Napoleon, isn't he. He blamed it
on the Russians. He said, well, we got a lot of people
in our military, and it's the Soviet legacy, the Soviet way of thinking.
Well, you've been at war before, this even happened for eight years
against your own people. Maybe you know, did you not learn anything from
that war? No, because you were not fighting an army, you were
bombing your own civilians for eight years after the CIA coup under Obama. And
of course Trump didn't stop that, did he. So I just keep it
the blame on what he called the Soviet legacy. Ukraine's terrible bureaucracy, he
said, it's holding the army back, and so I need to fire some
of these people. The problem is that this is already happened once before this
year, earlier this year. And eventually they got a count for the people
there, and it wasn't nineteen. It was between one hundred and two hundred.
Because again, you know, people lye and they cover up and there's
the fog of war things like that. But I suspect that this other one
was much higher than that as well. In June, just a few months
ago, Russian soldiers stood out in the open for two hours and I'm sorry,
this is a Russian this is a Russian thing. And so they put
the number of the Russian dead at one hundred two hundred, whereas you know,
when Ukraine does the same stupid thing, there's only nineteen people who died,
but you know, Russians it was ten times as many people. Again,
you can't get the truth from either side, and both sides are having
people stand out side while they get bombed. So meanwhile, the White House
of course is not encouraging Ukraine peace talks. And you know, you have
Austin and you have the CIA. Why would the CIA go there? Well,
because the CIA began all this stuff. The CIA began this under Obama
with a coup, and this is another one of these CIA wars. And
so the question is, you know, Ukraine is up against it. They're
running out of people and things are not working. They're locked in a war
of attrition with a much larger country, much larger Ukraine is pretty big,
but so is Russia. And so what would Roberty Lee do? He was
in a war for several years. They had been invaded, and they saw
this as a righteous and just war to defend themselves, but as a war
of attrition that they could not end. And after seeing so many people dying
on both sides, he called it quick to it. He called an end
to it. Right. But we don't have anybody in that caliber anymore.
We've burned and melted the statues of people like Roberty Lee, honored both north
and South for having the compassion and the wisdom to end that conflict. We
don't have anybody like that anymore. Again, we've melted their statues. Now,
we don't have men of character. We don't have men who have compassion
for other people. They don't see other people as people. They see them
as widgets, as expendable to be used for their little political machinations. Out
there, we've got a bunch of machiavellian rulers out there there. So we're
gonna take a quick break, and when we come back, let's talk about
how Israel is expanding their war, and then we'll get to some more pleasant
topics after we do that. So we'll be right back. If you like
the eagles, the Cars and Huey Lewis and the news. They say the
You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio, download our app or listen
now at APS radio dot com, Liberty It's Your Move, and now the
David Knight Show. Well, the Jerusalem Post quote say US general saying that
American troops are quote prepared to die for Israel. Wow, this guy is
Lieutenant General Richard Clark. I guess we're kind of like gladiators, right,
that's the way they see Americans. Those who are about to die salute you.
Well, gladiators were slaves, weren't they. They were not free men.
They were not even mercenaries. But I guess that's where we are right
now. Those who are about to die for Israel, salute you. The
Jerusalem Post says, as far as decision making, it is a partnership,
said Lieutenant General Richard Clark, stressing nonetheless that at the end of the day,
it is about the protection of Israel, because who cares about America.
Our borders are wide open. They don't care. Never have I said the
beginning of the Trump administration. You know, he starts, well, I
don't know. I have to see if Congress is gonna you know, I'm
gonna make I'm gonna build a wall. I'm gonna make Mexico pay for it.
He couldn't even make Congress pay for it. But I said, you
don't need to do that. I said that at the beginning of his administration.
Right away. I said, you said, you're also going to in
Afghanistan, and you rock bringing the troops home. So do that. Put
them on the border. Just have them sitting there be the most effective thing
you could do. Are we not allowed to bring our troops home? Put
them on the border as a deterrent. You don't have to attack anybody.
You don't have to build any walls. You don't even necessarily need to,
uh you know, put up Concertina one. Just put a bunch of them
there as a deterrent. No, I wouldn't do it, So I'll just
talk all talk. So Clark stressed nonetheless, at the end of the day,
quote unquote, it is about the protection of Israel, and if there's
a question in regards to how we will operate, the last vote will probably
go to Zevka Haimovich. Who is this? Did you elect Zevka Haimovich?
Matter of fact, you didn't elect Richard Clarke either an unelected bureaucrat. That's
what this general is, an not elected bureaucrat who's going to pursue this war.
And just like leon Panetta when he was questioned about putting troops on the
ground in Syria and Jeff Sessions said, well, you are a congressman.
You're going to ask us for permission? Right, Well, Congressman, we
will talk to our allies and our stakeholders, our allies and NATO and our
stakeholders, and we'll make that decision and we'll let you know what happens.
And so now this general says, well, we'll talk to this guy.
Zivka. I don't know who Zekiz. I don't care who Zeke is.
I don't want to know who this guy is. Why does he have control
of American forces? Those who are prepared to die, salute Zivka Heimovic Washington,
Israel, he says, have signed an agreement. You know, we've
got treaties with everybody everywhere. Tripwires get into every single war, don't we,
which would see the US company to assist Israel with missile defense in time
of war. And according to Himovic, he says I'm sure once the order
comes, we will find here US troops on the ground. There you go
to be a part of our deployment and our team to defend the State of
Israel. And those US troops who would be deployed Israel are prepared to die
for the Jewish state, brags a Jerusalem Post, Clark said, quote,
We're ready to commit to the defense of Israel. And anytime we get involved
in a kinetic fight, there's always a risk that there will be casualties.
But we accept that. As every conflict we train for and enter, there
is always that possibility. And so you know, here I am, I'm
going to send people into the war. They may die, but I accept
that they may die. That's forget about the Wi, the Royal Wi.
Uh. Those of us in the Pentagon and those of us in Israel say,
we are willing to accept the fact that you may die for our policies.
Notice the glaring and quite remarkable, and it's brazen, this lack of
any pretext of American troops in Middle East promoting American security interests whatsoever. But
of course we've had Nittan Yahoo go on now. First he went on with
Hanna Day and then he repeated the same talking points just more recently in the
last couple of days with Mark Levine. And according to net Yahoo, it's
not Americans who are there defending Israel. It's not Americans who are going to
die for Israel. No, Israel is protecting Europe in the United States.
Really, really, I don't think that's the case. I think what you're
doing is you're dragging us into this quagmar that you've created. So you're going
to be paying for the Israeli war. You'll also pay for the refugees,
says Ryan mc macon of the Mesa's Institute. And that is absolutely true.
This is like every war. So I played the little clip from the mouse
who roared. We pay if we win, and we pay if we lose.
The US regime has picked because we're still paying. I forget how many
billions now, and when I did that report, I had the number.
But we're still sending money to Afghanistan. Even though they kicked us out.
It wasn't enough for us leave behind palets of cash and who knows how many
weapons and all the rest of the stuff' know, we've got to continue to
send them money. The US regime has pick sides in this Israel Hamas Warren
has committed to funding Israel's ongoing bombing of non non combatant men, women and
children in the Gaza strip. Writes Ryan mcmacon, Northern Gaza's infrastructure is now
all but destroyed, with millions of Gazins displaced and homeless. Nearly ten times
more Gozens than Israelis have now died in this conflict. Many Gazans have fled
to the southern portions of Gaza, but homelessness and abject poverty await them there
By employing what is essentially the carpet bombing approach, Tel Aviv has made the
choice of adopting a policy that hassured to produce hundreds of thousands of refugees,
perhaps even more than a million. But that's not a problem for them because
they can export all these people to us, send them to America, send
them to Europe. That's what our Middle East wars have done. Our Middle
East Wars and things that we have been involved in there have been a real
driving force for illegal immigration, for the great replacement in Europe and also here
because people are coming from every country in the world through the wide open southern
border that Biden refuses to defend. As a matter of fact, it's not
a bug, it's a feature for him because his goal is to destroy America,
just like Netna, whose goal was to poison and vaccinate his own people.
You want to talk about somebody who is running a holocaust against Jews,
it's Netanyahu who's running a holocaust against Jews. For Pfizer, He's killed more
Jews than an experiment and on more Jews and Joseph Mingela ever did. So
let's put that in context. This is the guy who's running the war,
and the guy who's running the war on our side hates our people as much.
They've all been trained by Hydra to hate their own people. This global
contempt for their own people that we've seen openly displayed since twenty twenty. We
kind of knew it was there, we saw much evidence of it, but
it became a verified fact beginning in twenty twenty. Every country on Earth,
regardless of what they stated political philosophy, was every one of these leaders,
hail Hydra. What does Klaus want us to do? So these people,
it's going to bring all new meaning to the idea that the chickens come home
to roost, isn't it we start accepting massive numbers of refugees from Gaza.
These people understand our role in all of this as well. They don't just
hate Israel, they hate America. But of course the people like Ben Shapiro
don't really care about that, do they. He's always got someplace else that
he can go to after America is destroyed in go to Israel. Tel Aviv
has an air force, a deep reservoir of American funded weapons, and a
nuclear arsenal. The Israeli military can reduce all of Gaza to rubble, but
the ones that they don't kill, who are have been essentially weaponized by what
they've seen done to their people, will be sent to us to take care
of. Israeli mouthpieces are at work pushing the cost of foreign onto foreign taxpayers,
including American ones. This week, two Israeli politicians, one from the
militarist Lukud party another one from the center left party, took to the page
of the Wall Street Journal to demand that countries around the world quote unquote should
offer a haven for Gaza residents who seek relocation unquote. According to these politicians,
quote, the international community, not Israel has a moral imperative to resettle
Gazans somewhere outside of Israel and pay for it, not at Israel's expense.
Israel is going to talk about a moral imperative here? How dare them lecture
us on a moral imperative? We know what this is about. Here's another
thing. Has Israel even thought the Israeli government even thought about this long term?
If you fill America, look at the streets, look at what is
happening in the streets, and look at what is happening in the universities with
all of this hate stuff that is backfiring now in the ADL, in the
Southern Poverty Law Center. But you look at what is happening with the Palestinians
in the street. They hate America, they hate Israel. So you're going
to send more Palestinians here? What's that going to do for your long term
support from America? Do you even care about that? I guess not.
I guess Israel is willing to cut themselves off long term from the US because
they don't really need it. They have the capability to defend themselves. But
then much rather that we pay for it, that we do the fighting.
If they can get us to do it, and then to take the refugees
and pay for them if they can get us to do it. A lot
of short term thinking going on here, even from a pragmatic standpoint, But
forget about the moral imperative of any of this stuff. It is significant that
these claims appeared in an American publication. Tel Aviv is the latest welfare queen
regime, he says, just like Ukraine's Zelenski demanding free money. And it'll
probably work, says roy Making. Americans should get ready for planeloads of Gayza
refugees arriving in their cities, funded by the American taxpayers who can now barely
afford to keep up with the price of groceries. Because Biden wants to destroy
America, and you think Trump's going to be any better? Trump always puts
Israel first. Always. The US and his allies have settled into a predictable
pattern foreign policy over the last thirty years. Force the taxpayers to pay for
the regimes wars which involve bombing various poor foreign countries back to the Stone Age,
and then we lose. We lose these asymmetric wars, by the way,
then once the refugees start pouring out. The Americans have lost the war,
of course, or Western regimes then tell the taxpayers back home to cough
up even more money to pay for the resettlement of those refugees whose countries were
needlessly destroyed by the bombs dropped by West Washington and its allies. A twenty
twenty report from Brown University estimated that thirty seven million people have been made refugees
by the US led war on terrorism. It's just a war that just keeps
giving because it's a war against a tactic, and so it can be applied
to anybody in every one. It can be applied to people speaking at a
school board. Now. That's why Homeland securities making their lists as to who's
naughty and nice. By twenty sixteen, five point two million of them reached
Europe, and twenty twenty two alone, more than one hundred and fifty nine
thousand refugees arrived by sea into Italy, Greece, Spain, Cyprus, and
Malta. Thousands more arrive at the land borders of EU every year. Thanks
to the distance, we don't see those same kind of numbers, but we're
still seeing refugees coming into the United States fifty thousand to ninety thousand per year
since we began the war in Afghanistan. Ray mcmckon says it's also important to
remember that migrants who enjoy the legal status of refugees are not normal immigrants.
Ordinary immigrants arrive in the US at their own expense. The vast majority must
find work on their own if they wish to have an income. Now here's
where I differ with Ryan. What he fails to understand is that he's talking
about legal immigrants. Illegal immigrants get the same or better welfare benefits as you
see in California. Come into California, cross into here illegally and will immediately
put you on unemployment and you can collect three hundred dollars a week, which
is way more than they're making when they're working in Central or South America.
So why not come in? So he's completely discounting what's going on with the
illegal aliens. As a matter of fact, Biden's got new rules for illegal
aliens who come in and work and join a union, and they get superior
benefits to Americans. We've already seen that in terms of out of state tuition.
An illegal alien can get out of state tuition any state that he wants
to, or get in state tuition at any state that he wants to,
Whereas you have to have lived in that state for a certain period of time
and paid taxes there or your family in order to get that in state tuition.
So again, it's cost on average eighty thousand dollars a year per refugee
coming into the United States. Is Ryan mc macon says, it's not enough
that you pay for the bombs that create the refugees. You will have to
pay to resettle those refugees in your own home. And then they will be
used he doesn't say this, but they will be used by Biden and Sorrows
and other people to create chaos in your communities, chaos, crowding, you
know, just to turn the purpose is to you know, it's when you
look at it, it's not even necessarily great. Replacement doesn't really get to
the full impact of what is happening. The real intention is to level all
of all the nations into poverty. It's a leveling effect. The UN and
the World Economic Forum and all these leaders here in the US, they want
to level us down to the poverty that makes it easy for them to control
us. Look at how they've had their way in Africa. Keep people poor,
keep ripping them off, enslaving them. It's very easy to do that.
And so as all this is happening, you have the Hesbala leader saying
we're going to have to start attacking US forces. It's essential to stopping the
blood bath in Gaza, he says. So he says that Israel would have
collapsed within days of the seventh of October if it were not for the support
of the US. We'll know he's wrong about that, but they will attack
the US. Net Yahu says to Biden, you're wrong. There is no
way that Palestinian authority is going to ever run Gaza again. We're going to
completely clean it out, he says. And so when you look at how
this war is escalating, take a look at this. Let's clip here.
We have the hoodies. Just a couple of weeks ago, we're shooting down
a very expensive US drone, Reaper drone. And now they have used a
helicopter to take over a private, a commercial ship in the Red Sea and
take it back to Yemen. Here's some footage I have compressed some of the
time. So you'll see this is sped up a little bit and various places,
but this is footage that the you know, on the helicopter. You
can see the guys as they get out, have the hoods over their face.
A bunch of pirates. This is like, you know, the Barbary
pirates in the twenty first century. Their helicopter flies off, these guys with
their their rifles and everything, and the place is completely empty. I mean,
this is a big commercial ship which typically doesn't have doesn't need much of
a crew. They get to the bridge here the faces are blurred out,
but you can see the guy's T shirt when you see it looking at Grand
Tetons and so you know they've got these guys at gunpoint. This ship,
by the way, the Galaxy Leader, is actually operated by Japanese company,
but the Associated Press looked at it ownership and set it's owned by one of
Israel's richest men. So that's what they're saying, is saying that we're going
to capture this ship because it has Israeli connections. Now, what do you
think the response is going to be with that? That's going to escalate and
it's going to result in a direct attack against Yemen and by the Israelis,
if not by the Israelis and the Americans. This is the way this thing
continually expands. It's so stupid in terms of strategy. From the standpoint of
Yemen. It makes you wonder what is real and what isn't that you get
to a point where the incompetence is so great you just wonder, is it
really in competence? Elvis, the Beetle and the Sweet Sounds of Motown.
Find them on the Oldies channel at apsradio dot com. Making sense common again.
You're listening to the David Knight Show. I met a man who lives
in Tennessee. He was head and for Pennsylvania and some homemade popper and Sylvaina
folks that travelem down to Dixie's. Some show from a lady too. Gee,
the traffic is terrific. Oh yeah, let's ease up a little bit
here and Perry like blasts from the past. That's Perry. Yeah. Let's
talk about traveling on Thanksgiving, and let's talk about what it was like three
years ago Thanksgiving twenty twenty. Let's remember how the media was appressing and scaring
you about driving in a car. Don't drive in a car cross country.
You could die. Thanksgiving Day dilemma? Should you travel or stay at home?
Well, these are the little safety Nazis at MPR, and so this
is November eighteenth, twenty twenty. Thanksgiving Day is next week and usually means
long lines and crowded airports and traffic jams on the nation's highways. But that
probably won't be true in the recent huge spike in COVID nineteen cases has many
people rethinking their travel plans. How did that happen? How do we have
a huge spike? Was it real? No? No, it was a
Trump administration running this bs pandemic. For Alita Nissen and her husband Dave,
and their fourteen year old daughter, it's usually a pretty simple decision. They
pack up the car, they drive from Tennessee to Pennsylvania for some homemade punkin
pie. No, they actually go to Bend, Oregon, a three and
a half hour drive to Dave's mother's house, over the river and through the
woods to grandmother's house. We go in the southern part of the state.
But this year, this year, well, we've been back and forth for
about a month now, said she said. Alita, deciding where the night
is really doable. On the one hand, they make this same trip every
year, a three and a half hour drive, but with a rapidly spreading
coronavirus, it might not be worth the risk. I'm more of the mind
let's just skip it. Let's skip this year, she said. You know,
it's just one year, and you remember how they badgered us. Yeah,
fauci, Yeah, don't get together with your family and friends on the
holidays. Don't do it. Don't do it. Yeah, you die,
he said. But on the other hand, it's been a really tough year
and the family could benefit from getting away and spending some time with relatives for
a few days. But you know, there's relatives. They're like, they're
diseased, like leprosy or something. You gotta wear masks and gloves because these
people are filthy, dirty. You could get germs from him. It was
OCD America, too afraid to get out of their houses and engage with even
their family members. We haven't seen any of this fam of his family for
a long time, she said, adding that her daughter started high school this
fall remotely and really wants to see family. She said, It's this balance,
isn't it. The relationship and the mental health aspect of being able to
see the people you love, but still trying to play it safe. Well,
you know, love isn't safe, is it. It's not never Love
is never safe. You know you could get hurt physically, you could get
hurt emotionally if you love somebody, if you make yourself vulnerable, better put
on that mask and keep your distance from people. That's the kind of society
that Trump and found, She and Biden and all the rest of these people
wanted for us. Don't don't. Love is not safe. Liberty is not
safe. Get rid of love, get rid of liberty. She said,
well, we agreed that we'll go, but under one condition. If we're
going to do it, the only way to do it would be to get
all tested beforehand. And see the reason that NPR is putting this together.
You know, they're giving you a little narrative here, and they're giving you
that narrative because they want to use that to affect the way that you think.
Right, this is a push they're programming you to think like this.
But their little stories, you think that they would print something if they got
somebody who said, well, I'm not afraid of what Fauci and you're saying,
I'm going to go visit my relatives because I love them and I want
to spend time with them, and I don't know if we'll all be here
next year. No, they wouldn't put that kind of person there. Anybody
had any doubts about their narrative, anybody who was not cowed down by fear,
No, they're not going to put that there. They said, well,
we know that not all these people going to follow with their plans,
set a Triple A spokesperson because they said, you know, we estimate about
fifty million people are thinking that they're going to go out of town. But
we know that they're going to think this through. They're going to listen to
mister science Fauci and they probably won't do this. But you know, why
do they always go to the Triple A. How does the Triple A know
how many people are going to take a car trip? How could they possibly
know that? They might have some estimate about how many people are going to
be traveling on a plane because people buy their tickets in advance. I don't
know if they even used that data. But again, MPR and AP and
Reuters and all these people in the mainstream media understand how they operate. They've
got an article to write, and they've got a point of view that they
want to get across, and so they will look to find the people that
are going to say what that point of view should be. For example,
the Nissan family. All right, I like the way they're looking at this.
Let's use their story. And then when they want to talk about how
many people are going to be traveling every year, they go to the Triple
A. Wy does a Triple A know? No, they don't. They
don't have any idea. Yeah, they can say, well, I think
it's gonna be fifty million people, but then again, I think they're planning
on fifty million people right now are planning on doing this, but it won't
be that many. They're just making this stuff up, just like they do
with the climate, just like they did with the pandemic. Mcguffin, they're
just making this stuff up. Ap MPR reiters. They go to somebody who
has a title that makes them look like an authority, and so they go
to the Triple A because hey, these people, you know, they put
out you know, trip ticks or whatever they you call them. When you've
got a flat tire so they know what's going on. So we'll go to
them. All I want to have is somebody who is a credible source.
It doesn't mean that they know anything, and you're not going to question the
veracity of their data because you want to have a source to fill in your
article, to fill in the blank. How many people are going to be
travel Let's go to the Triple A and ask them. And so that's what
they do. They go Triple A and ask them so they can shove that
number in there, and it's like, well that's the Triple A said that.
You know, I don't know if it's true or not. I don't
have any way of verifying that. Of course they don't either, because they
don't have any data. They're making this stuff, but making this all up,
but you know, they're an authoritative figure. That's how we get into
this whole idea that authorities know when they don't know, when they cover up
their data, whether they lie about their data, or where they don't even
have any data at all. We go to these authorities to tell us what's
going on. And so this Triple A spokesperson at the time said, well,
know, not all of these people are going to travel, and that's
because they're reading the landscape. Reading the landscape. What does that mean?
It means they're consuming the lies and the bs from Fauci. Are they seeing
when they read the landscape? Are they seeing everybody in the neighborhood dropping dead?
No, No, that didn't happen. Are they seeing everybody getting sick?
Oh? No, they're seeing news like NPR and FAUCI, who were
telling them that they're not reading the landscape. They said. They went on
to say trip a spokesperson that NPR wanted to get out there. They're watching
COVID nineteen cases going up, going up where in their neighborhood. No,
on TV news, On the internet, they're watching the COVID cases going up.
That's going to stop people from making their decision to hit the road.
Yeah, yeah, we're going to use load our articles up with a quote
some people who don't know anything tell them they need to stay home. Three
years ago, on cars dot com, they said nearly half Americans are planning
to travel for Thanksgiving, seventy two percent of them by car. Again,
they don't know that, but they do know that most people travel by car.
If you were to take that down they mean that thirty six percent of
the population. If that were true, I don't know if it is,
but if they're right, I would mean six some of the population is going
to be traveling by car Thanksgiving twenty twenty while the whole world was dying,
supposedly from a pandemic. We've been watching consumer travel habits since the onset of
the pandemic, and when people do travel, the majority travel by car because
of the safety and the freedom that cars provide. Safety from the government is
what it's more likely because any other form of transportation that you take, you're
going to have the COVID cops out there controlling what you do on a bus,
on a plane, or on a train, but not in your car.
And that's why this freedom to travel is so important for them to take
that away. Don't ever lose sight of the importance of them taking away that.
How important cars are to your liberty, how important cars are to escaping
their control. It's like gold to escape the financial controls of these people.
Your car is like gold, and so treat it as such and try to
protect it. We don't want to lose the ability to have cars anymore.
We don't to lose the ability to have gold and do what you can to
keep this thing going again, you know, Davidnight dot Gold and you know,
make sure that you do what you need to keep these kind of petty
tyrants from doing this kind of control surveillance approach with the money aspect of it,
that is so key. So COVID nineteen continues to affect travel plans.
I said in twenty twenty, while forty seven percent of Americans still plan to
travel for Thanksgiving, it's down from sixty eight percent in twenty nineteen. From
sixty eight percent down to forty seven percent. They said, the car again,
who knows. Do they cite any sources for this? No? Do
they do any poles? No, they say, well according to Rasmussen pole
or this or that. No, they just put those numbers out there,
just made them up, just like they made up all this stuff about the
climate crisis. One more, don't travel this Thanksgivings as an LA publication.
But if you have to, if you absolutely must, here are some tips
for doing it safely. Listen to what they're telling people to do. It's
beyond belief. So if you do travel again, they go back to triple
A. So here's what Triple A is telling people Triple A shilling for this
establishment pandemic. Plan ahead, Check with state and local authorities to find out
what restrictions may be in place. Obey your government. This is like Maus
America. Isn't it? Obey your government? Do what your government tells you
to do. Next one, follow public health guidance again. Isn't this redundant
state and local authorities, but also public health guidance? Observing a social distance
of at least six feet wearing a thing mask, play it safe, they
said, Triple A. Uh, call the hotel before you go. Ask
about what precautions they're taking for guests, what social distancinger mask policies you'll need
to follow. H Yeah, I guess I should have called ahead before I
got thrown out of a couple of hotels. I was staying in town because
we're doing around the broadcast on twenty twenty elections, and I went into the
lobby of this hotel, gigantic lobby, completely empty. It was like something
out of Brazil, the Terry Gilliam movie or a Kafka novel. And there's
one person standing there. She's got a mask on, she's young, she's
got a mask on, and she's surrounded with plexiglass. And I walk in,
I'd like to book a room tonight, and you got to put on
a mask. You got to put on a man. You know, I'm
six feet away from her because of all the plexiglass, and she's on the
other side of plexiglass and wearing this massive room lobby, completely empty, and
she won't talk to me, absolutely will not talk to me unless I put
on a mask. As I walked out in disgust, I don't have a
mask. Well I got one here. Well, your dirty hands have been
on it. I you know, I'm OCD too, right, I'm not
putting on any masks for anybody anyway. It doesn't realize, you know,
do you realize I'm kind of beard even if that thing were effective. It's
like they don't have a seal anyway. They go on for people who are
doing car rentals. Listen, this is triple a call around an agency to
find out what they do to disinfect their vehicles. Then either way, wipe
down all the door handles and the steering wheel and the shifter and the control
panels. Wow, ocd OCD. It's like these people carried cloth around with
them to wipe off phones that they would talk on back in the day and
everybody didn't have their own personal phone. But yeah, crazy, And of
course for air travelers, Wipe down your chair, says Triple A. Wipe
down the arm rest, wipe down the belt buckles and the trays, and
all of this is being put out there by Triple A. This is long
after all of this, Oh this is going to spread by touch. That
was completely debunked by a guy in Germany. I remember reporting on it.
Of course, mainstream media did not want to pick up on his report.
He said, we went into this place where everybody was sick with respiratory disease
in this family. We tested him and tested positive for COVID and go.
So I went in and I ran tests on all the hard surfaces everywhere see
if I could find any any positive tests with this COVID. I couldn't find
any positive tests, completely debunked all this wipe everything down nonsense. So here
we are today in twenty twenty three. Everything you need to know about traveling
this Thanksgiving Triple A. Again. They go to Triple A. This is
WABC out of New York goes to Triple A to find out what Triple A
says projects this year's traveling. They don't know, but they're saying is going
to be the third highest Thanksgiving forecast says they began tracking this stuff back in
two thousand. I don't know they're tracking it. They don't ever give any
information about this. But again, the media feeds this idea of experts who
pretend to know something that they don't know, and they never question any of
this stuff. They don't even know if these people have data. They don't
know how the data has been collected and all the rest of this, but
they continue to go to them. And so you know, we're back to
the old crazy, which is what you go through if you go to the
TSA. The foods that have to be checked into your baggage. Put the
cranberry sauce in there with your clothing. Make sure that doesn't open up.
Also, liquids like Whiny champagnehere. You're gonna have some real interesting clothes when
you get there. After they throw the luggage all around, canned fruit or
vegetables, preserves, jams and jellies. That's all got to go in your
bags. And then just hope that TSA baggage handlers don't steal it because you're
not allowed to lock your bags from any valuables. Of course, you know,
people don't. I remember my brother in law traveled about twenty years ago
and they had just as before cell phones became the ubiquitous way of recording video
everywhere. And so they're taking a family vacation. Kids were young, and
he bought a new cam quarder and they would not let him. You know,
well, I guess he didn't have it. He didn't think to carry
through. It was still in the box. He put it in the luggage
because he's a democrat to trust the government, and they stole it. And
the thing is, they opened it up, they opened up the box,
they took the cameround, and they put the box back in empty. So
he gets there and you know, just I guess to buy themselves more time
and more plausible deniability, we didn't take it. Look how long it has
been since the sky came back. You know, he probably lost it somewhere.
He still got the box. Yeah, he was furious and he wouldn't
listen to me. When I told you about the government, I told you
about the TSA. So this year you can download the free my TSA app
and it has a handy what can't I Bring feature to find out what is
allowed in the land of the fee and the home of the slave? What
can I fly with? This is why we need to have cars, right,
because it just keeps getting worse. So again, they probably won't steal
your food there. But the whole purpose of this exercise is they're coming after
the cars because they don't want you to have liberty. But they're also coming
after the cars because they don't want you to own anything. And the third
thing I will point to is a very big move that's happening at the moment,
from product to service. I have a friend he says, every product
is a service waiting to happen. If you think about it, I mean
your cell phone. Why do you want to own your cell phone? How
many of you own your cell phones? How many knows if the company owns
it. It's actually not a lot. I mean you want the function,
you want the service, right. Why do you want to own a cell
phone if you can just lease it? And if you lease, why why
shouldn't you lease your refrigerator or your washing machine or your dishwasher, or why
do you want to own it so that they don't have to pay for it
always and perpect. Look, it's always been known that one of the easiest
ways to get wealthy is to rent something forever, right, And it's you
know, you want to be the guy who owns the apartment so you can
rent it to people, or you want to rent this, or you want
to rent that, and you make more money renting stuff. That's one of
the reasons why the car companies have been pushing people do leases and everything.
But yeah, that's the reason. I want to own it so I don't
keep paying for it forever forever. And that's why they want you to lease
it from them, so that you will keep paying it forever. That is
a big part of it. That's their economic thing. But it's also about
the control to take away that freedom of mobility that we had even three years
ago during the height of insanity. As we were looking at Thanksgiving twenty twenty
on roachfan Ronald Atkins, thank you very much for the tip, he says,
thanks for integrity. Well, thank you. I'd love to hit the
tail of the dragon with you this spring. After I recover from my motorcycle
actsent I had an I seventy five in September. Well, I hope you're
doing better. I've never been to the tail of the Dragon. I've always
read about it, and all the years that we came, we would come
in a different direction and not go through that area. And it's always been
something I thought I might like to do with the Meata, But I just
never get out anymore. I mean, I am so tied to the desk
with all this stuff. It's become crazy at why. I got to take
a couple of days off for Thanksgiving this week, and we'll take Thursday and
Friday off. We'll have some replays that I think you're going to like.
And but yeah, I've never been down still haven't been down there. Been
here for a year, I haven't been down there. Rock fann Angus Mustang.
I remember Pennsylvania was saying that you had to wear a mask in your
own car driving the interstate passing through. Yeah, you know, keep it,
keep it from you know, coming out of your car somehow with the
windows up circulating through there. I guess it is insanity, isn't it.
I remember driving around with Karen we had the top down, no mask of
course, and stopping at a light looking over and there's a couple there and
they got the windows up and both of them are wearing masks inside their car
with the windows up. And that happened more than once, by the way,
Rumble three Little birds. It's all based on the sustainable development goals,
all policies in every industry. Yeah, rock fan Jerrem mcguffin. I think
all that BS is just to deter people from traveling and to make it inconvenient
as well as to keep family divided over the holiday. That's it, Divide
and conquer. You're absolutely right. Well, we're going to take a quick
break and we come back. We want to talk about some other division that
is happening. And it's not just the division that is going back and forth
over Israel versus Palestine and everything, but it's also the cancel culture that is
being embraced by the right, not just the left, but the right's got
their own version of it as well. Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio
skill and have access to the best channels anywhere from country to blues, classic
hits to news. APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy.
Get details at apsradio dot com. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
It's like a couple of examples of cancel culture. One of them is from
the left and it's centered around Christmas decorations. Another one is from the right,
and it is an attempt at self censoring essentially, what Christians say because
somebody else that we don't like said it. Let's take a look at the
Christmas decorations we have and this is from wnd A government lists acceptable Christmas decorations.
And then they got a letter from the opposite of the ACLU. You
know, we've seen this run my entire life. Somebody put up a Nativity
scene in a public space and the ACLU write some letter, and now we've
got an organization that has set itself up to do the opposite. Originally,
they're only going to allow non religious things like snowflakes, and we're talking about
actual representations of snowflakes and not the people themselves. Snowflakes, greenery and northern
lights whatever that means. And so then Liberty Council sent city officials in wah
wah Tosa, Wisconsin a letter and they quickly backpedaled on their demands. But
listen to the way that they what they first said to do, and then
how they rephrased this. The Liberty Council pointed out the requirement for a non
religious decorations exhibited hostility to Christianity, which is illegal. You see it.
The free exercise of religion by people, even if they are city officials,
even if they're doing it at work. The free exercise of religion is protected.
It's not an establishment of religion. Establishment of religion is when the government
says this is the official religion, and you will attend these services, these
religious services, church services, whatever, and or pay right. And that
was the situation when the non establishment clause was put there. You had all
these different states, each of them did have an official state religion. They
did not want to have an official religion for the entire United States because they
all had their different denominations, and so they put that in there, but
that did not stop them from having an established state church that continued on in
Massachusetts into eighteen forty and similarly in another I think it was Connecticut. And
then there were other issues like that that you know, we would see the
ACLU all over today, but it was about religious toleration, not religious suppression,
and it was about stopping an official state established religion that would in many
cases would require attendants. And some of these states you were required to attend
that church, but some of them they did not require and to give them
money. And some of them they only required you to give them money.
And I've raised this in more than once, probably about a half dozen times
really, and Colonial Williamsburg when you would have the Jefferson an actor talk about
that, and you'd be talking about how proud he was of religious toleration that
he had put in. And I made the analogy of government schools. I
said, you, you know, referring to Jefferson, you supported the idea
of government schools. But do you not see that it's the same thing that's
being done. There is a worldview, a religion that is being taught in
the schools, and to say that people have to both attend it and financially
support it, as was the case when I was growing up, it's not
much better when you say that people don't have to attend it, but I
still have to pay for this religious indoctrination in the schools today. Same type
of thing. That's the establishment. That's the establishment. When you have to
pay for it, or you have to pay for it and attend. Anyway,
back to this small town in Wisconsin. They told employees in an email
that the Christmas decorations in the events had to be inclusive and equitable. And
they use that phrase nine times in this email. Yeah, so this is
about Despite acknowledging that Christmas is a significant holiday for many, the administrators stated
the need to foster a more equitable and inclusive community quote unquote for those who
don't celebrate Christmas, said Liberty Council. So you're not going to be allowed
to do free exercise of your religion or your holidays or whatever you want to
do. You see, this is when you look at this, you know,
everybody says, oh, this war on Christmas stuff backing, Do you
understand that the war on Christmas is like the bump stock issue or the pistol
brace issue, because they'll go from the bump stock, which nobody really cares
about. You know, it's like, oh, you know, I can't
put up Rootolf the red nose reindeer here. Oh, well, you know,
I don't care about that kind of stuff. I don't even care about
the religious aspects of it. I don't you know I celebrate Christmas. We
celebrate Christmas in our family, not because we think that was the time that
Jesus was born or that we're required to celebrate, but I we don't require
it. We celebrate it because other people tell us we can't. I have
to stand up for those. It's just like the bum stock. You know,
I didn't go out and buy a bump stock, but you know it's
this thing that in and of itself is not any importance, but it's a
very important precedent because if you allow them to do the bump stock, then
the next thing they do is to say, well, now we're going to
take the pistol braces. Does that work. You're not going to do anything
when I take your pistol brace. Okay, next thing is I'm gonna come
for ammunition or I'm gonna come for particular guns. I'm just gonna keep banning
stuff until you tell me to stop. You see, let's say tell them
to stop right away. And it works that way with First Amendment as well.
When they censor us, even if it's for something trivial, we should
not stand for that. When they sense for us, even if it's somebody
that we disagree with. That's a real jerk and totally wrong. We should
not allow that, even if it's hateful, even if it's anti Semitic,
we should allow that. Is so, first they came for the Christmas decorations
first. First they came for the Nativity scene. Then they came for Santa
Claus and Rudolph, Winter Wonderland, snowflakes and snow people. They don't want
to say a snowman, right, snow people, that's the way they put
it. And other non religious symbols associated with winter. Those are allowed,
lights and greenery in a It's interesting they don't mention Santa clausa so many of
these secularists think that Santa Claus is some kind of religious figure. Of course,
is making Kelly point out, we all know that Santa Claus is white.
Oh do you what do you know about Santa Claus making? Please tell
us it's important. This is what Fox News is all about. And this
year again you know they're having and it is kind of reading. Target has
all different ethnic groups dressed as Santa Claus and they put them in a wheelchair.
That's kind of you know, anyway, must have fallen when he was
going down the chimney. I don't know. Festive lighting and greenery can create
a warm, welcoming atmosphere without specific religious connotations, said the memo. Northern
lights draw inspiration from the Awara borealis, and they incorporate colors like blue,
green and purple. By the way, they did not want you to use
red and green. I don't know what the significance to red and green at
Christmas time is. You know, other people have said, well, you
know, we copy the Christmas from these Hagan things Saturday neely and that was
red and green. So that's where we get the rent. I don't know.
I don't care. I don't care quite frankly, again, if it
gives me an opportunity to talk about Christ and his incarnation, and if you've
got some uh, some person's got their nose been out of shape and think
that this is some kind of religious holiday to me, so therefore they're going
to stop me from exercising it, well then I will exercise it good and
hard. Liberty Council's letter to the city said the Christmas holiday ban violates the
US Constitution by showing hostility towards Christianity. First Amendment does not permit the city
to eliminate Christmas holiday symbols or expression, be free expression, exercise and a
misguided attempt to be inclusive by eliminating other people by eliminating this stuff. We're
going to be inclusive, so we're going to ban, which you've there.
Officials immediately corrected their memo. They claimed the email was not quote a policy
directive. They said, a requirement to direct, decorate or not decorate in
any certain way. Telling employees that they cannot bring their full full selves to
work by this place is not crazy the way they talk, telling employees they
cannot decorate their individual workspace, telling individuals how to decorate their homes or businesses.
They said, that's not what it was about. They said, it
was about asking our employees to consider all members of our community before deciding how
to decorate public spaces and city owned government buildings. You know, somebody is
offended by a Nativity scene or Santa Claus or something like that. I just
like, we'll get a life, you know. I mean, you can't
live your life if you have to to cover up some anything that anybody could
be offended about. Because they are crazy people out there, and there are
people who are just curmudgeons and they're offended by everything, and that is not
the way that we should have to live our lives. So anyway, the
officials have now backtracked. The original email clearly warned employees to refrain from using
traditional Christmas decorations, including red and green. The new communication now states that
employees are free to decorate in the manner they've historically decorated, or to alter
their decorations to be more inclusive at their own discretion. Well, book T
do, isn't that wonderful? And when we look at on the right there
is And this is also on WND. This is an article from Michael Brown,
and he says, what did Candice Owens mean by christ Is King when
she quoted that Bible thing? Now this is back and forth, and was
she directing that at Ben Shapiro? You know, because she puts that up.
They're having this debate back and forth about Israel and Palestine and things like
that, and you know, and attacking each other over their their positions.
I thought was funny Bablin b does this photoshop thing and puts them both in
a T shirt. I forget what the phrase was, you know, this
is our our get along T shirt or something like that. Maybe they do
that to kids. We never did that to our kids. If they were
if the boys would fight with each other, they were about the same age,
if they would fight with each other, we would make them hug and
say they're sorry. And they hated that more than they could have said about
anything else when they were young, so that they kind of put the kebash
on that. But anyway, Michael King is looking at this, and so
she puts this Bible verse out there, and when Ben Shapiro says, well,
if working here is getting in the way of you following your God or
something, then quit, she says, how it's so much like you to
read yourself into everything that I put out there and everything. And so at
the end of the Bible verse she put Christ as king, and so I
said, well, I don't know, maybe that was directed at him.
Does she typically put out Bible verse? I don't know. But Michael Brown
has a problem with her using the phrase Christ is king, and Michael Brown
is it's a pastor I think somewhere, and because he writes on WND all
the time about religious issues, and so he says, I agree with Shapiro's
concerns on Israel, and I want to focus on Owen's posting the words Christ
is King on Twitter, and so that got my attention. And he says,
for those wondering what could be wrong with proclaiming Christ as king if you
are a Christian, the unfortunate reality is that this beautiful, biblically based truth
has been hijacked by elements of the extreme religious right, often with anti Semitic
implications. Okay, so what so? What so? Now this guy,
a Christian, Michael Brown, wants to purge the phrase Christ is King because
it's been adopted by Nick Flintes and his mob or some other anti Semitic people.
Because he does talk great deal about something he saw with a rant that
Nick Fuentes was doing. It was anti Semitic ku Klux Klan, as I've
said before, hijacked the cross. So do we have to lose that as
a symbol because the cook Coloxan or do we oppose the ku Klux Klan?
So should we oppose Nick Fuentes or should we just give up whatever he wants
to steal? Do we oppose the ko Klux Klan? We just give it
up? Whenever they want to steal a symbol, you know, if they
want to steal the cross or the Confederate flag, we just give it up.
We did that with a Confederate flag, not doing it with a cross.
He says, I point this out of my August article denouncing an anti
Semitic rent by Nick Fuentes or he said, to rousing applause and shouts of
affirmation. Word is getting out. But let me just say this about Nick
Quintes. I can't stand what this guy does. Absolutely cannot stand it.
Alex love to have him on because you know he can be all things to
all people. You know, Alex can cheer Israel and then have Nick Fuentes
on. You know, he straddles everything, and if it's somebody who is
big, he brings them in. And so when I was at in for
Wars, he'd bring Nick Fuente's in. Several times. I would not interview
this guy. Uh, he's disgusting. He's a sleeves bag. He's like
Kanye West, Andrew Taate or Milo at the time. Yeah, I mean
it's just what anyway, Yeah, it's just just filled with hate. It
was just pandering to a particular demographic because that's what Alex does, and he
just you know, keeps flip flopping around from famous person to famous person.
He doesn't care what they're about. As long as they can bring an audience
to his show, he doesn't care. So so Michael Brown said in August,
and I talked about an anti Semitic rent by Nick Fuentes where he said,
to rousing applause and shouts of affirmation, quote, word is getting out
that we've got to get rid. We got rid of Jewish power in America.
And despite them doing everything in their power to stop it, censoring and
canceling and killing, we're here to say that America is not a Jewish nation.
In America is a Christian nation. And Michael Brown says at the time,
I said, you know, you've got to see this video for yourself.
But to paint the picture here in words, he said, at this
point in the speech, on the screen behind him, giant angel wings are
flapping on his right is left, as if this was some kind of as
if he were some kind of an angelic messenger. It wasn't just the right
wing that was flapping. His mouth was flapping, and he had a left
and a right wing that was flapping behind him as well. He says,
it really does seem like a sick attempt at satire, but it was not.
In fact, says Michael Brown, in response to his proclamation that America
is a Christian nation, not a Jewish nation, the crowd began to chant
Christ is King. Christ is King, and in his view and in the
view of his followers, Christ is king over the world and therefore king over
America, not just in a spiritual sense, but in the sense of,
let's take this country back from the Jews. Okay, So how do you
approach bad or false speech like that? Now? Michael Brown's idea is that
because of this, you know, this little twerp Nick Flintays and his hate
and his hateful group using the phrase Christ is King, it's now tainted.
We can't use it. Candace should never have used that. Don't you use
it? I wonder what else he's going to steal from us that we don't
want to take back. What a pathetic way to react to things. But
understand that this is the same type of tactic that Ben Shapiro. While we're
talking about Candace Ow, let's talk about Ben Shapiro as well. The same
kind of tactic that Ben Shapiro used with Lewis Ferrikhn. I've played that clip
multiple times. Where as they were pushing the Trump shot, Lewis ferri Cohn
said, well, be careful of this. You know this is gonna he's
not tested. And he went down a whole litany of reasons why you should
not get that shot and why you should be suspicious of a government trying to
shove that down your throat, shove it into your arms. And fair Con
was one hundred percent right about that. He's pretty much wrong about everything else.
And he's a very clownish, hateful figure. And so Ben Shapiro,
who was trying to push the jab. The ultimate propaganda machine for Ben Shapiro
was to show somebody that was hateful, anti Semitic, clownish racist like Lewis
Ferrikhn, and to make and to put him out there as the face of
vaccine resistance. You see how they do this, And do you see what
is happening here as well? Michael Brown may not be realizing what he's doing,
but he's putting out nick flints as you know, this example, this
face that we need to be afraid of. So if Nick Flintees is against
If Nick Flintes is embracing Christ the King, then we need to reject it,
just like if Lewis Ferkhn is rejecting the vaccine. Ben Shapiro says,
you need to reject Louis fair Khn. Do you understand how they're controlling speech
in the narrative. This is bigger than what you think about the vaccine or
I mean, it's not bigger about I'm saying. The general principle here applies
to everything. This is the way these people operate. This is the way,
a very effective way that they propagandize you by putting, by grabbing somebody
that you don't like, that you don't agree with, and if you can
hear them, get them to say what you want them to say, then
it's tainted. Whatever that person says is now tainted. So fair CON's opposition
to vaccines. Now, opposition to vaccines is tainted because it's fair cont If
Fwinte says Christ is King, now it's tainted because Fwine said it. You
see, I'm not going to be a part of that. I'm not going
to let this guy hijack a biblical phrase, biblical idea, I'm not going
to let him associate it with evil and be quiet. I think it's reprehensible
to do that. It's chicken to do that. And June Flinte is advocated
for a Catholic Taliban rule in America, explaining that such a regime would ban
same sex marriage and contraception. His followers, known as Groper's or consistent presence
at anti vaccine and anti abortion rallies in twenty twenty one, often holding aloft
crucifixes and chanting Christ as King. So, now, do we drop opposition
to abortion? Do we drop opposition to the vaccines? As you know Ben
Shapiro was trying to get us to do by using Lewis fair Kine. Do
we drop all that? Do we drop the phrase Christ the King? So
he goes on to say that chant is now a calling card and Nick Twenty's
in America first a podcast, conference and community within the broader white Christian nationalist
movement. It also happens to be a core proclamation of Christians throughout the centuries.
Okay, well, then what you need to do is not try to
find every single false thing that's out there Michael Brown about Christianity. But you
need to present an authentic version of what Christianity is your pastor so tell people
what Christ the King means. Know, we're coming up to Christmas time,
so we're supposed to get rid of all of our Christmas decorations, and more
importantly, we're supposed to get rid of Christ the King. Or anybody that
uses it is now suspect and has to explain themselves and announce Nick twenty's.
Now, I'll denounced Nick twenty's all the time, but I don't have to
explain myself when I say something is true, and I don't have to announce
Lewis Farrakahan to talk about the truth about vaccines either. It's really crazy logic.
But this is how they control us, and this is how he ends.
I certainly hope that this is not what Candace Owens means. A clarification,
however, is certainly called for. He said, we do not mess
with such sacred words. Well again, who's messing with it? You know?
If she's using as a political dog whistle like you know, and look,
and I understand his concerns because Candace Owen, did you know sign up
for Kanye West. It was an anti semitic idiot. I think it was
simply skin color issues there with her. How in the world could you take
somebody who is as dumbed down and sexually depraved as Kanye West. How could
Candice Owen support him? Well, simply, you know, skin color,
And so that discredited her in my opinion. She was also discredited when she
started to challenge Trump and then back down on the vaccines right, started to
question him about that, but she was afraid. It's like she is not
afraid to jump into a fight and with a Ben Shapiro over Kanye West during
this other stuff. But she did not want to kill herself commit political suicide
by criticizing Trump, because you see, Trump is king in her world,
just like he is in the world of most of these people. I'm going
to take a break here and come back. I want to talk a little
bit about Howavia Malai. I want to moderate some of the things that I
had to say about him. I've seen some of the clips of what this
guy is doing. I'd just been reading his statements about economic because this guy
is an unbelievable character, pretty entertaining, but I'm going to keep him at
arms link at the very best on Rock fan Douglock, thank you very much
for the tip. And on Rumble KWD sixty eight, I'm looking forward to
the Baphomet trees that the Bidens did this year. Well, you know they
did have mal on Christmas decorations in the Obama White House. That was Rumble
Billy the Kid Part two. And they all worship Trump the dump. Yeah,
they all think that Trump is the king. Okay, we're going to
take a quick break and we'll be right back. The David Knight Show is
a critical thinking super spreader. If you've been exposed to logic by listening to
The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it.
Financial support or simply tell the others about the show causes this dangerous information
to spread. Father people have to trust me, I mean, trust the
science. Wear you mask, take your vaccine, don't ask questions using free
speech to free minds. It's the David Knight Show. Whether you're feeling like
the booze or bluegrass, APS Radio has you covered. Check out a wide
variety of channels on our app at apsradio dot com. All right, let's
take a look at Javier at Malai. I'm look at what he's saying about
in the Central Bank. It's like, right on, that's great, that's
exactly, and we need to have people that are exactly the opposite of the
socialist Parentistas and all the rest of this stuff. But there's some other baggage
that comes along. I was laughing about the fact that the Wall Street Journal
was just focused on his hair, but it appears that Javier Malai is also
focused on his hair and some other really strange things that he's focused on.
He's made some very strange statements. I'd seen some of the comments that he
had made about the Pope, and of course the Pope is not representative of
traditional Catholicism in any way, shape or form. I mean, I've seen
Life site news constantly, you know, and conservative Catholics are saying, this
guy is a pope Catholic. Well, no, they say, not a
rhetorical question anymore. And so you know the fact that he criticized the Pope
because the Pope is pushing climate change and other things like that that I knew
that he opposed. And so if the Pope is going to get into politics,
he's fair game to criticize his policies and what he asked to sack but
it was pretty harsh. But as we see in the aftermath of this election,
now people are looking at him even more closely. And I just dismissed
a lot of this stuff. Is the leftist, socialist mainstream media looking at
a way to take down somebody who identifies as an anarcho capitalist, and so
of course he's going to be their enemy. But he's not seeing some really
strange behavior his victory dance here, he's kind of a frenetic character. Okay,
well there not definitely not a white Anglo Saxon Protestant response to a wasp
response to a victory that he's jumping around on stage, his hair is flying
and all the rest of this stuff. It's like, okay, that's his
victory dance. And then he is talking about what he's going to do to
the social programs. And again this is in his native language. I don't
even know what they speak in in Argentina. Again, I guess I'll have
to go to war with him so I can find out what language they speak.
So I'm an American, I don't know anything about these other countries,
and I don't care either, quite frankly, for the most part. I
think it'll be interesting to see what happens here because of the economic and political
conflicts. That's why I was covering it. But he has a board setup
where he's got the names of these different agencies here it is point and he
says out and he's got it's like a magnet board, right, and he
pronounces the name of the agency, and then he rips it off the board
and says out out, Ministry of Women, Genders and Diversity out, good,
Ministry of Public Works whatever that is out, And he goes to all
these things right, Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation out, Ministry of
Labor and Employment Security out, Ministry of Education. In doctrination, he says
out, Ministry of Transport out, Ministry of Health out, my history of
social development out. Livery of politics is over, long live liberty. And
so again, you know, you look at this stuff and it's like,
Okay, that's a little bit intense, but you know for politics, but
wakes people up and good for that. But then you know he's also got
his program where all he does is just scream profanity. Well it's very much
over the top. Okay, Well, you know that's his style, not
my style for sure, but you know it could still be okay, I
guess, And then you have this that shows up here. He is his
association with the World Economic Forum, and as other people are putting out on
social media, so many people are so excited about this new guy. They
don't understand the law long game being played on them by those pulling the strings.
He's a classic case of when the people need a hero, one will
be provided to them. Well. As a matter of fact, he has
dressed up like a hero himself. Here he is singing to the tune of
La Traviato and dressed up as his favorite superhero. This sign they'll see this.
And I know they're going to cut back and show this guitar player.
But the guy back there playing guitar, I can't really play guitar. He's
standing there and tight with big bulging thigh muscles. This is all about the
visuals. Okay, okay, So this guy is kind of if you look
at his personal life and you look at his stunts, and you look at
all the rest of this stuff, he's kind of a strange combination. Everybody's
you know, Trump, and yeah, he's got trophy wife that he uses
and he talks about how he is a tent tric sex master and all the
rest of this stuff. And she left her husband just within the last year,
her husband of twenty two years, she left to shack up with him.
She's the new first lady. I guess you put the lady in quotes
air quotes there. But you know, so there's that kind of stuff,
very Trump like, and you know, the hair and the trophy wives and
stuff like that, and then there's the clownish stuff like Alex Jones. So
he's kind of a combination of Trump and Alex Jones and then other people like
Andrew Tait and Kanye West in terms of sexual depravity and the two of them.
But then unlike Andrew Tate and Kanye West, who are anti Semitic,
he is apparently an Israeli puppet. Here. He is at a rally and
he gets rid of the flag of their country and he's flying the Israeli flag.
He says he's going to move the embassy to Jerusalem, and he wants
to become Jewish. He says, so again, you know, what is
going on is this We'll have to see what happens with the politics, but
I'll just say this, you know, maybe we should start looking instead.
We don't want to look for politicians to be saviors or superheroes. Number one.
Number two, maybe we should focus on people who have character rather than
people who are characters, because who is he? You know, he's playing
these different roles. He's dressing up as this, so who is what is
he really about? What is he really about it? And who's he going
to really take orders from? Is it going to be the World Economic Form?
Is it going to be Israel? Who's he going to take orders from?
With all this stuff? What's his real agenda? You know? The
bottom line is is that this guy is you know, you look at his
personal life, you look at the manic way that he acts and what he
is. You know, they got people up there saying you don't tread on
me flags that's everywhere and Argentina's first libertarian president. Well look, you know
that all that stuff looked good, But it's very important to have character,
and it's important to not have pride, arrogance, profanity, sexual depravity.
These are not things, you know, want to tie yourself to. The
American founders they didn't have any of that stuff. I mean, if there
was something private going on with these guys. They didn't make it public.
They didn't make a prey out of their sin. Why are we continually focusing
on this? Do we really want to have statesmen? Or do we want
to have entertainers? And so I look at this. The other thing is
we're coming up to Thanksgiving. Understand that our founders who had a character,
they weren't characters. They had character. They saw liberty as a blessing from
God. That's why George Washington said, let's declare day of Thanksgiving. That's
why Benjamin Franklin said, well, God has pulled us victoriously through a war
with the superpower of the world. He didn't use those terms, and he
said, you'd have to be blind not to see God's providence and protection.
So let's begin with a prayer of thanksgiving. Let's ask for God's guidance in
writing this constitution. Now, the other people didn't join along with him,
but they understood that they had not achieved this through their strength, which is
why they didn't do this. First of all, you know, it wasn't
that they would have flipped their wig. He's got hair that looks like it's
a wig. But it's not a wig, so he can jump up and
down like that. But you know they didn't do the grand standing stuff.
They didn't promote their pride, their arrogance. They also did not brag about
their sexual depravity and do it with profanity. The bottom line is that if
this even works for him, it'll be interesting to see what happens. Will
he be able to get through his economic policies, but his life about more
than economic policies. Is life about more than politics? What does it profit
Javier and Malai or you to gain the whole world and lose your own soul?
You know he's having a run now. But you know we've seen that.
And many times I look at people like Bill Gates and they say,
well, you know, God could bring things about in Bill Gates' life that
would humble him as he did for example Nebican Ezer and get him to see
the bigger picture of life, to understand that life is temporary, that he's
going to have to stand before God. He could do that type of thing
to Bill Gates. And it scares me to see somebody who is getting away
with the kind of stuff that Bill Gates is getting away with. Or pick
your favorite villain, Klaus Schwab or whatever. We need to see them as
victims. We need to see them as captives in this spiritual war. And
it is frightening to think what they will become. And so we don't do
this type of stuff. And it disturbs me to see that because it is
becoming more and more of a pattern here in America as well as abroad.
God will not honor that. And if he does succeed, and he may
very well succeed, you know, God is honoring Gates. God is leading
Gates to the slaughter quite frankly by not slapping him down. Harps says,
it's Spanish Trump, Spanish Trump and Spanish alc all rold in one person.
Yeah on Rock Fan Audi Modern retro radio. Hey Addy, if he wasn't
owned by the w EF, he wouldn't have won. Yeah, that's probably
right. You know, we look at that and I don't know, you
know, it's they do want to have him in or they would not have
allowed that to happen. So again, we don't want to get too focused
on elections. We want to focus on what is real. We want to
focus on what we can you know, and that is your relationship with God,
your family, your community, preparing for things. And so when we
come back, we're going to take a quick break, and when we come
back, we're going to talk about that, talk a little bit about what
is happening with money and how you know you need to be aware of that
so that you can make some preparations for that. Will be right back using
free speech to free minds. It's the David Knight Show. Tell Alexa to
add the APS radio skill and have access to the best channels anywhere from country
to blues, classic hits to news. APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for
you to enjoy. Get details at apsradio dot com. Well, you may
have noticed the last couple of days, this soap opera that is happening with
open Ai, the company that Sam Altman got kicked out of, is on.
I guess he's one of the founders of this and the board of directors
there kicked him off, and then the CEO of Microsoft through a fit because
they're doing things with a chat GPT. But the stock market also was impacted
by this. Why well, just to underscore how artificial the stock market is,
take a look at what they do with artificial intelligence. If it wasn't
for the AI stocks this last year stock market would not have done that well.
And after you look at what happened with a back and forth with personnel
and Sam Altman with open AI, futures were flat after an open AI train
wreck. Is markets brace for Nvidia earnings. The US stock future is eased,
erased earlier losses to trade flat as Microsoft gained two percent in pre market
training, sending it to a new all time high after it said that Sam
Altman will now lead the software developed new in house artificial intelligence team. So
this is big economic news. This all happened yesterday. And why well,
because AI doesn't just stand for artificial intelligence, it also stands for the artificial
inflation of the stock market in twenty twenty three. And so if something is
going to happen to open AI and Sam Altman, who's been at the epicenter
of all this, it shakes the markets. As of eight thirty am,
SMP futures were flat yesterday, following three weeks of gains that push the index
nearly ten percent higher and propelling it to an eleven week high. Because this
is completely it's like virtual investment. It's completely detached from reality. What is
real is based on a hype narrative for these people, and so you need
to focus on something that is going, especially for the financial stuffocus on something
that they're trying to When you look at AI. My concerns about AI whether
or not this is going to be a big business venture. You know,
Gerald Splint, he thinks that this is going to be huge. I think
it's maybe a bit early. You know. I think they've already had three
of these things built up and collapsed, and so I think it's a good
chance that this is being oversold. Gerald thinks this time is going to be
the charm, regardless of what you think about that. And he says,
look, I'm not saying that I like it. He's saying, I'm just
saying that it's going to be a big financial success. And he says,
and because he's aware as what I don't like about it is the surveillance and
the control aspect that it's going to give people. That's what it's going to
be useful. It's going to be used for censorship. And you look at
what Sam Altman is doing with his world coin and his ORB that he'll get
your you know, he'll give you a little bit of you know, he'll
pay you on his cryptocurrency if you let him scan your retina to put into
his global ID base, because he's trying to set up a global idea.
It's all about surveillance and control. You see, those are not two separate
things. World Coin is not different from his AI venture. They both feed
the same thing, artificial intelligence. They've got cameras everywhere watching everything that you
do. They're looking at the Internet. All of social media was set up
to be a massive database about you. You know, the security state wanted
to set up a total information awareness. Everybody said, we don't want you
doing that. The government should not be tracking that kind of stuff. So
they shut down and immediately you had Facebook open up because that's what it is,
so lifelog, you know, they said, they said, we're going
to have total information awareness. We're gonna have to have this program. It's
going to be lifelog. Everything that you do is going to be tracked.
Well, they shut that down and then Facebook opens up, and not only
do they have all the data there, but you put it there for them.
They don't even have to go to the trouble of collecting it. They
just scrape it off of there. And so how do they scrape it off
They've got so much information that they have saved on all of us. They've
taken all this information, they've saved it on their systems to be data mined,
and now the engine to data mine all that stuff is coming along.
So, you know, General may be right about all this stuff in the
sense that the governments are going to pay big money just for that app,
that application, and they'll be able to use it to move a police state
there. That's why you need to get out of these control structures that are
being set up through the internet. All of it is about surveillance and control.
You need to start thinking about the Internet as a smart city and so,
you know, get outside of that. Davidknight, Dot gold again is
one of the best things that you can do. Now. Don't get caught
up into their virtual world of investment, you know, banking on AI.
Because I saw this stuff happen in nineteen ninety nine and two thousand. It
was clear that they had the you know, and I personally I lost a
lot of money on that because I looked at it and it's like, okay,
so there's a big gold rush coming on the Internet because now the switching
stuff is up to speed, and so it's reasonable to invest in the Internet.
But am I going to put money into pets dot com or some other
startup? You know, the only one that made it was Amazon. If
you bet on Amazon, that was that was huge. I should have listened
to the advice. And there was an Apple developers conference that I went to
because I was a certified developer for Apple, and guy was there, and
all he wanted, the Apple guy, all he wanted to talk about was
how what a great investment Amazon was. Well he got he was right about
that, But I didn't want to invest any of those companies. I thought,
well, you know, you look at the gold rush in California.
Who got rich the people who were selling the tools. Not that people went
out looking for the gold mine, but that all crashed. All the tech
stocks crashed, Intel crashed, everything crashed in two thousand. So that doesn't
mean that just because the AI stuff is going to be used, just because
the government's going to spend a lot of money, doesn't mean that it's going
to continue to escally. So again this stage of my life, I'm a
lot more conservative and I want to have something that's real, and I want
to have something that is going to exist outside of this virtual world that they're
creating to control us. And CBDC is a big part of that. The
IDs are a big part of that. Nikki Haley people like that are big
part of it. But of course so as Altman AI as well as world
coin World idea. He's working actively on to raise billions from some of the
world's largest investors. He's gone to Saudi Arabia's public investment fund that I mean
the government investment fund, soft Bank Group, and other things like that.
Zeroee says, is this why the Open Ai board fired him? Because he's
working on AI focused hardware device that he wants to develop in tandem with the
former Apple design chief Johnny Ive. This is a guy who was there when
Steve Jobs was there, very effective in terms of his design. I thought
he was working on the appearance of this stuff, but maybe he was working
on some of the architecture as well. I don't know. Altman's pitch was
for a startup that would aim to build what they call tensor processing units TPUs,
designed to handle high volumes specialized AI workloads. The goal is to provide
lower cost competition to the market leader in video. Custom design chips like TPUs
are seen as one day having the potential to outperform the AI accelerators made by
Video which are coveted by artificial intelligence companies by the timeline for development is long
and complex, and these things are like ten thousand dollars these graphic cards each,
So again, don't lose sight of the fact that this is all a
virtual reality trap of surveillance control for totalitarian government. He says. Open AI
is a chief operating officer said, we can say definitely that the board's decision
was not made in response to malfeasance or anything related to our financial, business,
safety or security privacy practices. So it was a breakdown in communications between
Sam and the board. What we have here is failure to communicate. That's
why he lost his job. Right, did the board get its noseman out
of shape or the lack of input of Altman strategy? Because who would not
want to hear what a deep state censorship ZRs thought, because that's one of
the other people on the board, and so they're trying to read the tea
leaves here, But it just shows you how how AI has become this outsized
thing in terms of our economy that somebody put up a meme uh JP organ
Microsoft slash open Ai and then they put control altman delete. So he's the
intersection between Microsoft and open Ai. So anyway, control altman delete. How
is everybody else doing with all this stuff? Right? We've pumped up the
stock market. That is all that really seems to matter. That's all that
really mattered to Trump, right, seems to be the only thing that really
matters to Biden. And of course that is doing great on the opium of
artificial intelligence. And yet you know, the artificial inflation of the stock market
is one thing, but there's actually real inflation. When we look at real
inflation, it is at about eighteen percent on average, much worse on many
things. Rent has gone up the three years that Biden has been in It's
gone up by twenty percent. A new car average price for a new car
has gone up by seventeen percent. Gasoline has gone up by fifty six percent.
Because Biden wants to make that very scarce and rare and uncomfortable to be
able to pay for that. He's even said that. And so even though
these people are saying, well, the consumer Price Index in October went up
less than expected three point two percent. They said it went up three point
one percent. And of course they're cooking the books, just like they did
with the COVID stuff. But the reality is is that things on overall have
gone up eighteen percent since Biden took office, regardless of what happened in the
last month. And of course they revised these figures on a monthly basis to
their advantage to show a trend that is in the direction they want. Eggs
are up forty seven percent since Biden took office, Coffee is up twenty eight
percent, Staples overall were up thirty three percent, white bread was up by
four hundred percent from fifty cents to two dollars a loaf, and increases of
about twenty two percent for bacon, sirloin, and chicken. But Biden has
got an inflation reduction packaged together, and how does he do that well?
With a modern monetary theory. What that means is that he gives money away
without any limitations to his friends, and then if inflation starts to kick in,
what he does is he taxes his enemies and he taxes his enemies and
he squeezes them with an IRS army. That's what the Inflation Reduction Act is
all about. We'll have to see what the Republicans are going to do about
this. But this is the pocketbook issues, and understand that when you come
up to the election. I think the elections are rigged, but certainly you
can look at public opinion. The pocketbook issues did not win it for the
GDP. For the GOP you can spell it GDP. But you didn't get
a red wave. And I don't know that you're going to get a red
wave this time. If you go Trump there, you might just wave it
bye bye, because the Independents are not signing up for that. And I
think there's a long way to the election about that. Also on rumble,
thank you very much for the tip. And I don't see a name there.
If I be lifted up was a common phrase in Rome. It was
known to be identified with crucifixion. Jesus said he'd be lifted up. I
will drag men to me. That's right, that's really what the draw means.
It really means drag. The name was Keaped said that well, thank
you very much for the tip. Thank you very much for the thought.
We're gonna take a quick break and Eric Peters is ready to join us with
ep Autos. We're going to talk about all things transportation. I'm going to
get his comments on some really strange things that I've seen happening in the UK,
very or welly in things. But we'll begin with some of the stuff
that Eric has been writing about on his site, Eric Peters autos dot com.
We'll be right back after this break. H If you're listening to the
Damed Night Show looking for a better information. Apsradionews dot com features articles and
commentary along with audio from all the top news from around the world. Apsradionews
dot com. All right, welcome back and joining us now is Eric Peters
of Eric petersautos dot com or ep audos dot com. And it's always great
to have Eric on. I wanted to get him on before the traveling begins
on the holidays and earlier today. Well, thank you for joining us,
Eric, appreciate you coming on. Thank you, Oh, thank you,
David. And let's enjoy our problem all we can still travel, that's right.
Yeah, earlier today I talked about I got some articles from just before
Thanksgiving in twenty twenty MPR and all these other people trying to scare everybody to
death. Don't go see Grandma, You'll die, and all all the rest
of this stuff. And make sure if you rent a car that you wipe
everything down that the fear in the paranoid We must not forget that, you
know, we must not forget how they scared people to death so they can't
do it again. Well, not only must we not forget, I think
we also shouldn't forget. They've got data to apologize for any of that.
That's right. To acknowledge that, you know, assuming good intentions, that
they were bamboozled and fooled, and to acknowledge that and to say, gosh,
you know, we're really sorry that we that we involve ourselves in this,
and that we helped to enable this, and this must never happen again.
And until they until they apologize, I'm not going to forgive them for
it, that's right. Well, you know, it's always been a rule
of thumb for the government that they would make two mistakes rather than admit to
one. Right, But I don't think this is a mistake. I think
it was malicious, and you know, I think that they really do want
to take everything from it, so that we own nothing and we go nowhere
and we have no life. I really do think that they all signed on
to that World Economic Form agenda. And yeah, we got two months into
the you know, the so called pandemic gough cough. You know, at
that point, you know, initially I would be willing to cut them a
little bit of slack because this thing just sort of happened out of nowhere,
and you know, Okay, maybe we should err on the side of caution.
But within a couple of months it was apparent, clear factual that this
thing was being hyped, it was being exaggerated, and that there were malicious
lies. You know, you and I have talked repeatedly in the past about
the way they endlessly hourly talked about the cases, the cases, not explaining
to people that there's a big difference between a so called case, i e.
A positive test and somebody admitted to a hospital, let alone somebody who
actually died. But they wanted to conflate those two things to convey the impression
that every day thousands of people were essentially dying from this sickness, which was
a believing lie. And they knew it was a lie, so it begs
the question why did they lie? And as you say, they did it
because they're malicious, that's right. Yeah, Kerry Mollison won the Nobel Prize
for inventing the PCR. Things said, you you can find anything if you
magnified enough, and of course they were magnifying it by one point one trillion
times with a number of the cycle fees. You know, right now we're
seeing the same kind of thing manifests with regard to the climate change toysterea that
I've written about. They're trying to conflate this idea of a fractional increase in
the fraction of the percent of the Earth's atmosphere that is COEO to, which
is zero point oh four percent roughly, But somehow this tiny, tiny constituent
background non reactive gas, there's a slight fractional increase in that amount, let
alone, whether that's caused by motor vehicles, somehow that's going to cause a
catastrophic climate crisis. And it's absurd as trying to pathologize a virus that didn't
kill ninety nine point eight percent of the otherwise healthy, non elderly population.
Yeah, that's right. As a matter of fact, you know, I
saw this coming because I've been fighting with them over the climate thing, and
they were covering up their data and lying about it. We got their emails.
But of course I came up with this T shirt here mcguffin. I'll
just plug this shamelessly here because I talk about Hitchcock and the mcguffin. You
know, he says, it doesn't really matter what the mcguffin is. It's
what everybody is chasing, right, It's just whatever motivates people. And so
we've seen you know, global freezing, global warming, we've seen a pandemic.
All these things are to motivate people. It doesn't really matter. And
so you know, we create this T shirt so people can wear that,
and people say, what's the mcguffin. Ultimately, the common denominator here is
here? Yeah, you know they have weaponized here. Of course, that's
something that governments have specialized in from time immemorial. Get people scared, and
as they can put it, they will be clamorous to be led to safety.
And that's ultimately what this is all about, even if safety means their
insurferment and their impoperation. That's right, but it was so important, wasn't
that that really cars really were our lifeline in twenty twenty, because otherwise they
would have really had us in their little fifteen minute city or less right,
they would have had us locked in our living rooms if it hadn't been for
the cars. And even then on Thanksgiving they were trying to scare people away
from using the cars because that was the lifeline. They want to get rid
of cars because in that way they can control wherever you go, with the
planes, trains and buses that are left, or you know, if you
don't have a private automobile, and if it's you have to rent the automobile
by the ride, they got you there too, you know. So it's
about making us dependent and having us under complete control. That's what getting rid
of cars is ultimately going to mean. Sure, it's so much easier to
line down the populace when you don't even have to literally lock them down.
You can just sort of throw a switch and prevent their vehicle from being operational
and at that point perpectively locked down, you know, and it isn't even
necessary to do it for the car per se. What they want is essentrally
managed a form of power that is entirely under their control. So they can
meter the electricity, they can turn it off, they can turn it on.
So even if you could control the car, what uses it to you
if they control the electricity. That's right, Yeah, and talk about that,
you know, with Thomas Massage put this thing together, try to stop
this kill switch thing, and he couldn't even get support amongst the GOP for
that. What does that tell us? Well, you know, I think
it's because they succeeded in framing it, and it was brilliant. Again,
I have to give these authoritarian leftist credit for the way they frame things.
They put it in terms of an impaired driving switch technology. In other words,
they conveyed the idea that this is about preventing people who are drunk or
otherwise impaired, whether by alcohol or drugs, from driving vehicles. And it's
very difficult for anybody to oppose, is that, because after all, you
are you are you for drunk driving? You know that's you know, when
was the last time you beat your wife? It's the same kind of an
argument. Of course, Massey took the time to deconstructed and pointed out that
the actual language in the government decree talks about driver performance, which is a
very different thing from impairment. You know, what they want to do is
to characterize your driving if it's outside of the parameters that the government decides are
acceptable. That's got nothing to do with whether you're drunk or high or whatever.
It is. Simply if the government decides that the way you drive is
outside of the parameters that the government likes, that will constitute effectively impairment,
and then that will be the pretext for controlling your driving by basically, in
effect, the car will pull itself over. You don't need cops anymore.
The car will really stop working. And you know, I also point out
to people this isn't something that's coming in twenty twenty six. It's already here.
It's been here for a number of years. Practically every new car that's
available right now has one degree or another of the foundational technology that is going
to comprise the whole system when this thing is fully enabled, already embedded in
it, and it's just a matter of turning it all on. Yeah,
that's right, and you go back and you look at it. You know,
we've talked many times about how with surveillance and control. They can automatically
issue you a ticket, they can automatically increase your insurance rates and everything because
hey, you stopped too quickly, or you took that turn too quickly,
or this or that. You know, not even about the speed, but
they can micromanage everything about the way that you're driving. And it's like,
well, I don't like the way you did that or this, and so
I'm going to give you a ticket, I'm going to raise your insurance rates,
and now they can just cut the thing off right, yepah. The
idea is to make driving as unpleasant as possible, in addition to making it
impossible to drive, so that you just won't want to. And people think
that this is exaggerated. Talk to you a value drives commercially. Talk to
anybody who drives a big rid These guys are micromanaged to the nth degree.
If you've ever wondered why. When you're out on the inner State and there's
a semi in the left lane and there's ay in the right lane, and
the guy in the left lane is kind of just barely creeping by the guy
in the right lane who's maybe doing fifty seven miles an hour, and the
other Semmy is going maybe sixty two miles an hour trying to get around him.
The reason is because if he goes any faster, he's going to lose
his job. So he has to drive within these parameters. And that's it.
And they've already bet attested it with commercial drivers, and they're going to
do it to us. They've already embedded the stuff in the car. So
I've written a couple of articles about, for example, what they call advanced
driver assistance technology, and I love how they always call it assistance, and
assistance is synonymous with control. It's about controlling you, it's not about assisting
you. I don't need assistance to know what the speed limit is or how
fast I'm driving. But what the system does advanced speed limit assystems technology is
that it correlates the speed that you're driving with the posted speed limit on the
road, and the car knows that you're driving faster than the speed limit,
and then a little icon flashes in the dashboard for now, just saying,
oh, look you're speeding. But in Europe it pushes back on the throttle
on the gas sedle to prevent it from skieding. Now you can still kind
of push through that, meaning if you push harder on the gas will override
it. But the implicit point is that they have the ability to literally throttle
your vehicle to prevent you from driving any faster than whatever the speed limit is
on any road that you have to be driving on in real time. And
that's just one aspect of this technology. That's right. And when you talk
about them putting it on in terms of selling it like an impaired driver,
that was a way that they were selling. Is this the same device so
they were selling before saying we're going to mandate that everybody get a breathalyzer or
something like that in order to start. Is that a part of it?
Is it extended beyond that or they have they changed. It's definitely a component
of it, though it's not merely that they want to have some sort of
passive alcohol detection technology in the car meeting that you know, your hand,
let's say, touches the gear selector, and that it has the capacity to
sample your skin and somehow determine whether you've been drinking as a result of that,
that's merely a facet of it, and it's the way that they're marketing
and presenting it. And an aspect of it that I think is very critical
to exam eminent to understand is that it was once the case is this country
that you had to have been convicted of something before you got punished for exactly.
Yeah. You know, like if you were pulled over because you were
weaving all over the road and you had your day in court and you were
convicted of drunk driving. One of the things that typically would result from that,
if they allowed you to drive again, would be that you would have
to have your car fitted with an interlock system, a BA interlock system that
required the convicted drunk driver to show that he wasn't drunk before he could drive
the car. Well, now we're all to be presumed impaired and drunk drivers
without anybody having been convicted of anything, just the same. And it's all
of the piece that were now all presumptive terrorists if we wish to fly commercially.
Yeah, yeah, Well that's the way the regulatory state works. I
mean, you have a regulation with that representation, we have taxation with that
representation, and of course they are rules. They say, you don't have
any due process, you don't have any presumption of innocence. There's always about
that, you know, prove that you don't own me taxes, prove this
and prove that, and so that's what it's going to be about it.
We've also eric had a civil asset forfeiture where they could confiscate your car,
confiscate your home, confiscate your cash without even charging you with a crime,
let alone finding you guilty. And so yeah, this is this is where
they operate. I just look at it from a practical standpoint. If they're
going to start monitoring people for uh, you know, being drunk and driving,
I'm just wondering, you know, if you're going to get a false
reading because the alcohol in somebody's perfume, if they put it on a bit
heavy because there's a lot of alcohol im perfume. It'spartly possible. Yeah,
it's a new scenario, the scenario that I see unfolding. You know,
we use the word kill switch. I think it could potentially be the kill
switch for the car industry. The more people figure this out, understand what's
happening. Would you want to send forty or fifty thousand dollars on a car
that effectively is under the control of someone else, some corporate entity that's spying
on you constantly that the government could shut off at any time. Probably not,
And of course I guess that's kind of what they want. But you
know, the car industry has got to you know, I wish they'd riddle
it out, reason it out, and think to themselves, g you know,
our products are becoming recently untalkover and people aren't going to want to buy
them. How are we going to continue to make money? It seems like
they haven't made that connection yet. Yeah. Yeah, they need to start
lobbying in favor of freedom, as you know the gun industry does. But
you know, when we when we look at how this is moving and now
they don't want us to have any choice in all this. You've got an
article it's not about saving you money. Talk about that. The fact that
you have a very good example about Toyota Camras, the you know, the
non electric version and then the hybrid version. Talk a little bit about that.
What the government is forcing. Let's set the stage. You know,
the regulatory apparat will say that it's going to issue some new mandate, as
for example, the corporate average fuel economy requirement, in order to compel the
automakers to produce more fuel efficient cars, and implicit in that is that there
aren't fuel efficient cars already available, which of course is a demonstrable lie.
What they're trying to do is essentially force engine cars off the market in favor
of battery powered cars. That's the real purpose of CAFE what they've done with
regard to this particular case. You know, Camri is I think the best
selling family car on the market. Toyota sells something like three hundred thousand of
these things every year, and it's currently the last car of its type that
you can still get with a V six engine. But they used to be
common, used to be able to get them in Honda, Cords, Hundai,
sonatas practically any kind of a car. Well, the V six engine
is becoming kind of like a V twelve engine was twenty years ago. In
other words, it's an exotic power plant for the ultra affluent. I mean,
even fifty thousand Mercedes and BMW's no longer come with a six cylinder engine
standard. You have to pay extra to get it. They typically with a
little two point zero liter four cylinder engine. And the reason for that is
there's simply no way for a V six to average close to fifty miles per
allen, which is what the latest round of CAFE mandates requires, and then
go into effect in twenty twenty six. So it's so extreme that not only
did Toyota have to take the V six out of the lineup, it's no
longer even just a four cylinder engine. It's a four cylinder hybrid engine that's
going to be the standard power plant going forward. And you know, on
one hand, the government says, well, isn't this wonderful. This thing
is going to get close to fifty miles per gallon and see how much money
we save you, But they don't tell you that the thing is going to
cost you five or six thousand dollars more to buy relative to an equivalent camera
without the hybrid technology. How long are you going to have to drive it
to earn back that five or six thousand dollars Leaving aside, okay, you've
also lost the opportunity cof to that money that you had to spend upfront on
the car. And it also assumes you can afford your budget is such that
you can just expand your your budget to afford to finance a car. That's
now thirty five thousand dollars rather than twenty seven thousand dollars for twenty eight thousand
dollars. There's an incredible arrogance there. And you know, the hybrid camera
is already available for those who want the higher efficient model and are willing to
pay a little extra money to get that. But that's never good enough for
the government. For the government, good enough is something that we never get
to because if we did get to it, then the government would have to
say, okay, mission accomplished, we don't need to continue to regulate you,
and that will ever happened, just like with the zero COVID stuff.
You know, if even one person has the sniffles, we still have to
have all of these policies in force. That's right. Yeah, that's a
great point that you made too, and you made that in the article.
The fact that look, we've already got a Toyota hybrid as well as a
six cylinder engine, and you know, people have a choice already. It's
not like this doesn't exist. It exists. The government doesn't like consumers having
a choice. They're not pro choice. And you know, when we go
back and we talked about this for years as well. What they're going to
do with the evs and electric vehicles, and they're already talking about it.
You know, their kill switch is to basically set up a way that they
can suck the juice out of the car battery that you put in there when
they need it for their grid. So they're going to use these evs as
a backup for their grid. And that's really going to be a kill switch
for the EV's. And you get to pay extra to get an electric vehicle
so they can use it as the battery for the grid. You talk about
the power pla you know, the six cylinder power plant, but they're putting
emission regulations on grid electrical grid power plants as well. And this is new,
this is something that's just happened this year. So when we look at
this, they're absolutely shutting everything down. And that is the plan. That's
what Biden is doing. It's not just you know, zero emissions is zero
mobility, zero that you own, zero food everything. They want to zero
it out because they want to zero out the population and they want to zero
out our freedom. It's kind of interesting too. I came across a couple
of articles I want to get your comments on this. I've seen in the
UK they've had the National Health System has decided that they're going to spend sixty
five pounds in order to make electric emergency vehicles electric. Yeah, exactly,
good luck with that. Well, we'll be there in a couple hours when
we get this thing charge. They already tried this in New York. New
York decided they were going to do electric snowplows, and then they ran into
what you've talked about and other people talked about, Nicole Weather. The batteries
don't last too long when they're doing really heavy work, they don't last too
long. And since they need to have these snowplows do like twelve hour shifts,
these things could at best get like two hours out of it. But
that was putting a happy face on it. It's pretty amazing to see this
insanity, and they're running up against some very real world opposition. Whether or
not people are going to oppose them. The laws of nature are going to
oppose these regulatory fiats, aren't they. Yeah, well, the truth is
going to oppose them. They manage it as far as they have with regard
to electric vehicles, because most people don't understand the electric vehicle, and you
know the limitations of the electric vehicle and of electricity as a portable storage power
source and what it takes to make that work in a vehicle, in the
setting up a motor vehicle. But the truth about that is getting out there,
and as a result of the truth getting out there, there's beginning to
be opposition to it. It's no longer like, well, you know,
this is a one for one spot and hey, it'll be fine, it's
good for the climate whatever. I'll be able to continue as before. I'll
have a vehicle that functions essentially as beforetress happens to be electric. People are
beginning to realize now you're actually you're going to have to accept a great diminishment
in terms of your flexibility, your mobility, as well as what it's going
to cost you. And as a result of that, this whole ev juggernaut
is running up against a great a great bit of what you might call hesitancy
in terms of people buying them. The things are being built because the manufacturers
are under the pressure of the mandates to produce them, but it doesn't mean
people have to buy them yet. You know, nobody's being at in their
back telling them they have to go buy an EV and this is this is
setting up a dynamic where I think what's going to happen next is that the
government is going to start doing whatever it has to do to eliminate the alternatives
to the electric vehicle. They're going to they're already pushing non electric vehicles essentially
off the market in terms of new vehicles, but then they're going to go
after the ones that we already have. They're going to they're going to try
to figure out ways to make them inconvenient, if not illegal to use.
It's entirely possible that they could do things like pass the mandate requiring that gas
pumps operate more slowly, for example, so that it takes you twenty minutes
to put five gallons of gas in your car, so that there's sort of
a parody there between your non electric car and the electric car that has to
sit there tethered to that pump that the charge pump for twenty minutes to get
a partial charge. Or they could just use environmental regulations to say we can't
have these gas stations everywhere, we're going to close them down so that gas
I think that'll be I think that's very likely, you know, because you
look at all the paranoia about it, and of course, you know some
of the old gas stations they do have to dig them up and repair the
underground tanks and things like that from time time. But look at the paranoia
that they've had. You know, those those little the little sleeve that they
put around the nozzle when you pump the you know, the vavor guard,
Yeah, to keep the gas from getting out of the because we're all going
to die if that happens, right, you know, they could always do
something hamfisted, like, you know, impose really heavy taxes in the name
of stopping climate change on gas. You know, I gas sits to be
ten or fifteen dollars a gallon, and all of a sudden, an electric
car looks more attractive. And I think that they are going to have to
do this because their goal of getting and what is it. I think it's
it's at least fifty, if not seventy percent of the cars fully electric by
twenty thirty, I think is the goal. Correct, that's not going to
happen. We're all, you know, we're not that far away. It's
almost twenty twenty four, so six years from now, they think that more
than half and perhaps two thirds of the cars on the road are going to
be electric. It's simply not going to happen, certainly not unless they can
figure out a way to get two thirds of the cars that are already circulation
out of circulation. Yeah. Yeah, Well, when you look at the
making the gas more expensive and artificially inflating, and Biinden's been working at that
very hard from day one, you know, shutting down resources to get stuff
there, but also you know the sanctions that he's done. And when you
look at the price of gasoline. Just before you came on, I was
talking about how prices have gone up in the three years of Biden on average
about eighteen percent across the board, some things more than others. But the
thing that went up the most was gasoline prices up by fifty six percent,
So it's about triple what the average is for everything else. And that's by
design. That's not an accident, that's not you know, that's that's deliberate
action by Biden to make that happen. But David, we're supposed to be
really grateful that the gas is down. It what is it fifteen cents Overtheless,
Yeah, it's really, it really is remarkable with people's memory. It's
so short. You know, three years ago, four years ago, gas
was sort of about two dollars a gallon something like that, and now we're
supposed to be happy that it's only three dollars and twenty or three dollars and
forty cents. I put forty dollars worth of gas in my old muscle car
the other day, and that was enough to put half a tank into it.
Forty dollars. Wow, eighty bucks to fill the thing up. Wow.
Wow. I saw you doing the peel out with that. You enjoyed
that. I remember the day at the end of the day when I was
in high school, I went to too many tires doing that. I finally
learned my lesson. But now it's not just the tires, it's a gasoline
that you when you do the burnout, you're burning cash in two different ways.
So it reminds me of a great movie Free Parts. You remember there's
a scene where they're having the funeral and the older guy says to the little
boy. You know, they're playing outlawed tunes on outlawed pipes. Remember that?
Yeah? Yeah, And I feel that when I almost far. Yeah,
those are those are soon going to be outlawed pipes, just like they're
outlawing the people rolling coal on things. You know, did you see that
they're coming out? I was it. I think it was eBay. They
wanted to hit them with massive fines for each and every one of those things
that were sold on eBay, you know, for people to put on their
trucks so they can roll coal. You know, I mean it's it's a
phenomenal amount and nothing is too far or too absurd for these people. Everybody
lays down and dies whenever they say it's to save the climate or the you're
talking about cherry picking the inflation numbers. I've seen this from all the way
through. That's what climate gate was always about. Climate gate was about cherry
picking your starting points so that you can get the trend that you want.
And you know, because they go back, if you look at the Arctic
cores and things like that and really have a legitimate starting point, you can
see that the industrial revolution is not affecting the climate anyway whatsoever. So they
cherry piket to try to get the data that they want. But you know,
when you're talking about how they are manipulating this for a particular technology.
I think it's interesting. Then the UK they're going to have some para Olympic
Games and Toyota is going to make three thousand vehicles available for these Paralympic Games
that are all going to be zero emission, five hundred of them. One
six of them are going to be their hydrogen fuel cell evs, right,
So you could when you talk about and I think this is an interesting thing
because it has a lot of parallels to the pandemic mcguffin. The climate mcguffin
is the same way in the sense that not only can you not see the
data, not only are playing games with it and all the rest of the
stuff and creating a false fear campaign, but it's also that only after they
create the fear campaign, there's only one approach that's going to be allowed.
And so when you look at this hydrogen versus battery electric vehicle thing, I
think that's very telling because you know, we don't have time. We got
a race to this solution or we're all going to die. And you can't
have the hydrogen fuel cell, You've got to have the battery fuel cell.
Of course we know what that's about. It's about creating dependence on the grid.
Well, the other shoot that's going to drop is that for now they
allow the pretense to stand that these things are zero emissions vehicles, which of
course they're not. Everything has emissions to one to be or another. Particularly
you're going to define carbon dioxide and a non reactive gas as an emission point.
Is they're letting that. They're holding that back for now because it's useful
to them for now to have this stalking horse of the EV as the vehicle
for getting rid of other vehicles. But I assure you I will make a
prediction that if this thing proceeds and there's nothing available but electric vehicles by twenty
thirty, then all of a sudden they're going to find that there are missions
with those things too, and then they're going to start regulating and shutting those
things down too, so that again almost nobody except the extreme lead at the
very apex of the pyramid are permitted to have personal vehicles. The key to
fighting this is to understand that these people's motives are not malicious, and to
not engage them on their terms. Everything that they bring out, whether it's
the pandemic, whether it's this climate stuff. It's malicious and disingenuous, and
you're going to get absolutely nowhere debating them on their terms. You have to
attack them at the core of this issue, which is about they are using
these things as excuses, as justifications to tyrannize people, to impoverish people,
to increase their control over the population. And that's it, that's the bottom
line. It's to shut people up. Just like if you have anything to
say about if you raise an objection about the policies of the Israeli government,
for example, I'm going to touch the third rail right here. That makes
you anti Submitic, And oh, now you have to cringe because you don't
want to be a Nazi. Dude, you don't want to be anti Semitic.
You can't do that, you know, that's that's what they want.
Or you know, if you raise your hands, you know, I think
it's kind of not right to deny people admission, even to consider them for
admission to college on account of their race. Well, that means you're a
racist obviously, and you're a member of the Klan, and a lot of
people will cringe, and oh, I can't say that publicly stop it enough.
We have to say it. You know, if you know, you
know in your hearts you're not a racist, you're not an anti Semite,
you're not in favor of pouring oil into the gutter. Don't let them put
that mantle over your shoulders that you're somehow a bad person for questioning them.
We have got to start questioning them and demanding answers. And I think you
keep part of that, you know, again, we get back to the
mcguffin, you know, and I keep part of that is too. It
makes me cringe when I see people coming out and saying, yeah, but
this would actually be more effective in terms of cutting down SEA. It would
actually have less emissions. And then your proposal and everything, it's like,
don't fight on their battlefield. Right. The whole thing is a false construct.
We've got to get to the root of the lie instead of saying,
well, I think you know you're being a little bit too harsh and we
need to have a little bit more time to comply with these things and so
forth, and have a debate on that area. We're going to lose that
debate if we let set the terms, if we let them create this fantasy
world about magic unicorn farts that are going to kill us all we lose,
right, and so you got to point out the emperor has no clothes and
they have no foundation of this by the way, you know, Travis,
pull up the article there of the wooden version of Tesla's cyber truck. Okay,
Now the question is okay, because it got Bill Gates wants to go
around and cut down trees. Now, after we had to pay billionaires money
to plant trees, whenever we committed the sin of having emissions with some activity,
we would have to pay an indulgence to be able to have that emission
or that energy use by having them plant trees. And after they've run this
scam for a long time, now they want to go out and cut down
trees and then bury them. And so is Bill Gates going to want to
bury this wooden Tesla cyber truck? Well, meanwhile, how many how many
millions of tons of carbon dioxide in the recent launch of the Mega rocket produce?
That's okay? Oh yeah, oh yeah, absolutely. I think it
is kind of funny though, because in a way I've seen people criticize,
Uh, you got automotive engineers who design body styles, and they said,
well, this is obviously designed by an amateur because all these panels are dead
straight and flat, and that's going to be impossible to get a good fit.
It's going to be really difficult to manufactory. That's why they don't have
flat panels on this thing. But you know, if you're going to do
it, and would maybe that works to have swarm it more readily. You
know, it's amazing with regard to a cyber truck that they didn't learn the
lesson from Delorian. Delorian also tried to make stainless steel bodied vehicles, and
you know, the idea was, well, you have a stainless steel body,
it won't rust, you don't have to paint it, which is true.
The problem is stainless steel is extraordinarily difficult to form, particularly in round
type forms. You know, it's fine to have right angles and things like
that, but that's the problem in Tesla has with the cyber truck. You
know, it's forty years after the Dolorean and this still the manufacturing process is
necessary to take stainless steel and make a curved fender, let's say, you
know, and make tolerances of what people expect the new cars. You're not
going to do that with stainless steel. Yeah, oh yeah, absolutely.
And I think that if I remember correctly, I think there was a lot
of complaints at the time when the Dorian came out. People were complaining about
how difficult was that showed fingerprints and all this other kind of stuff. It
was a real hassle to try to keep the saying looking good because if you
touched it, you've got all kinds of fingerprints left on the body there.
It's kind of but I think that Elon Musk does admire that he did going
Doors on one of his vehicles, right, so, you know, going
doors, and so he's pulling back bits and pieces of it. I think
he maybe, you know, saw TV pictures of this thing and never really
investigated the practical aspects of the Deloreans, which I like. I mean that
we came here one year and Pigeon Forge they had a convention of Deloreans and
it was pretty cool. You were telling me, Yeah, yeah, it's
pretty cool to see all these things. I'd never seen one up close and
personal, and they were all over the place. But you know, I
think he's looked at it from Afar and tried to incorporate aspects of it,
because everybody looks at it and thinks, you know, what a cool innovative
thing, and so it's got that sizzle that's there, but maybe not a
practical aspect to it. Well, the thing that furiates me about it.
You know, if you were just an entrepreneur like Dolorian was, and you
know, offering this vehicle for sale, fine, the people who want it,
let them buy it. That's that's fine with me. But here we
have yet another one of these battery power atrocities for the uber ultra rich.
This thing is a six figure vehicle, so once again the average person is
having a pie thrown in their face. You know, this is for the
people who are able to afford it, and people like you are going to
be driven out of being able to drive cars by these smug, smarmy,
virtue signaling elite people who prants and prene and talk about how green they are
while are driving these six figure, overpowered, overweight, gratuitously energy consumptive electric
vehicles that suck as much energy as a VA muscle cars just a different form,
and expect you and I to subsidize it. It's as outrageous as me
somehow leveraging the government to make you subsidize the purchase of my trans am and
the gas that it burns. It's beyond insufferable. Oh yeah, yeah,
this article, it's going around talking about how one percent rich with their private
jets and all the rest of the stuff are using or generating as much as
CO two or carbon or whatever you want to call as sixty six percent of
the rest of the population. Again, this is going back to it's good
to point out their hypocrisy by their own standard of measurement, but it's also
important when we recover stories like this to point out I know, by the
way, nobody should care about how much CO two anybody uses. You know,
I said years ago, this is some insight baseball. You remember when
the cheating scandal broke with Folkswagen over the emission certification tests and their TDI engines.
Oh yeah, and I talked about it a lot. I pleaded with
some people that I know in the company. Guys, you should put some
money toward explaining people what's going on here and demand that the government produce evidence
of actual harm costs, not contest. Oh you cheated on the certification tests
as if somehow that means somebody was harmed, So what who cares? That's
like saying I cheated by not buckling up for safety when I went out for
a drive this morning. You know, I really think one of the keys
to solving this problem is when some activists or politician or regulatory bureaucrat comes out
with a proposal demands that X, Y or Z be done. That in
the first place, it be established as fact that there is a need for
this because there is a harm, actual human beings being harmed, not people's
feelings being hurt, you know, not some rule being affronted, but that
there is an actual harm, and then whatever the solution is should be proportionate
in cost and imposition to whatever the harm is. It's insane to harm a
population of three hundred and thirty million people over a hypothetical that you know,
it was a single human being put forwards. And was there any proof adduced
that even one person was harmed by Volkswagen's TDI diesels And the answer is no,
yeah, oh yeah? And how many? How many people have been
harmed by denying the access to a vehicle that you could have bought for twenty
two thousand dollars that had a seven hundred mile range and got fifty miles per
gallon. That's that's a real harm. We've been denied that all of those
great Volkswagen diesels are no longer available because they cheated on emission certification tests.
And I remember when that was happening, and you and I talked about this
and we said, look, you know, we've had situations with the pintos
or they cut corners and people died, and they said, well, it's
going to be easier for us to pay off these people who died than it
is for us to make this change. And it's a clear mercenary calculation that
caused people to die. And you look at you know, that was a
lot of attention drawn to that, but you look at the penalty that they
paid, that Ford paid for that, it was nothing compared to what they
did to VW. And you look at the airbags, that Takada airbags.
We talked about that as well, and you know, this is something killed
you know about a dozen people, well actually I think about eighteen or something
like that now, and yet they didn't get that kind of treatment as Volkswagen
did. Volkswagen supposedly quote unquote cheated on it. Well, you know,
from one standpoint, everybody cheats on this. They adjust the shifting points on
the automatic. Yeah, they they mess up your transition. I'm sorry.
They tune their vehicles to meet the test. And this happens on time in
the car industry. And typically when it happens, when the government finds out
about it, what they might do is, you know, require that the
manufacturer makes them change. They never in the past, not ever, did
they arrest and frog mark frog march an executive in chains before a judge and
charge them criminally. This was the first time that ever happened, and it
happened for a reason, and it happened because of the timing. If you
go back to twenty fifteen or so, that was when this electric vehicle push
really began to get on ahead of steam, and they understood that the TDI
diesels that Volkswagen was selling for twenty two to twenty four thousand dollars presented an
existential threat to this agenda. It would have been extraordinarily difficult to try to
tell people, Hey, buy a fifty thousand dollars Tesla with a two hundred
and eighty mile range that you'll have to sit at a fast charger and wait
an hour to get a partial charge back into. Or you could drive this
twenty two thousand dollars Jetta for seven hundred miles and refill the thing in five
minutes and be back on. I mean, nobody's going to do that,
I mean, for in any meaningful way. So they had to get rid
of these sensible, affordable alternatives to the electric vehicle, and Volkswagen was the
biggest defender in that regard, and that's why those vehicles had to go oh
yeah, yeah. And you look at the way that they turned them.
It's kind of like when I saw that happening, it reminded me of what
happened with Bill Gates, who lied and cheated and stole his way into essentially
a monopoly, and they came after him for antitrust violations, which clearly he
had violated those things. And you remember seeing the the him as he's being
deposed doing his deposition, and he's rocking back and forth in his chair,
you know, and they they, you know, they didn't make any major
issues with it. But ever since that point in time, Microsoft has been
Wetted Wetted, to the Surveillance State, to DARPA and all the rest of
them. They run NewsGuard and Election Guard and everything. They run all that
through Microsoft. Microsoft is going to be running their Coalition for Content, Providence
and Authentication, which is going to put an idea on everything that you or
I do and allow them to shut it down before it even gets posted.
And so you know, they've had they've owned Microsoft because of that. And
they did the same thing with Voltswag. They were able to put the fear
of government in these guys. And now you know Volkswagen is out there,
you know, with taking the lead and all these EV things, and you
know they dropped all the diesel stuff and then took the lead really in EV
stuff. They know how to turn people around. It's amazing how they can
do that. Oh they do. And you know another example, you know,
after the near bankruptcy and the actual bankruptcy Forward and General Motors back in
nine, the government came in and saved the day, rescued them from bankruptcy,
provided lots of government money, with lots of government strings. And it's
not accidental that after that point General Motors became government motors and did exactly what
the government wants and became in fact indistinguishable from the government. You know,
these corporations now used to be sort of a separate thing, and here was
the government and they were kind of at loggerheads sometimes and they would fight with
each other. Now they're partnered with each other. They're both trying to do
the same thing, and we're the targets of the suffort. Yes, you
know, I look to see what is happening frequently in the UK because they
really are a couple of steps ahead of us, and we're both going down
the same World Economic Forum agenda, but they're doing it more rapidly. You
know, they're banning cars in many different cities. They've done that. They've
got their ultra low emission zones. They even charge if you've got a diesel
car. They hit them so much they will put a fee on you even
if you park it and you're not driving it. And so we see all
this crazy stuff that's happening there. The Daily Mail had an article that was
about twenty four pages long talking about all the different types of speed cameras,
kind of giving people heads up warning on it. And they've got these ultraspeed
cameras are now being chopped down by vigilantes, and so these people are actually
going out and sawing down the poll that this thing is on. These people
are they're getting so angry about this, and of course we've seen this with
the ul Z, the ultraloy emission zone, things that the city can put
up to. You know, if you come into my area with a car
that is not a zero emission car, we're going to charge you like twelve
or fifteen dollars a day. And so you had a lot of these people
going around, you know, like vigil andes taking this stuff down. Some
of them got caught because they weren't even trying to hide their identity and they've
got cameras everywhere. But at least you know they're there. That's at least
they're fighting back. That puts me on a list, I guess we're saying
that, but that's fine. That's the way I feel. At least these
people are fighting back and destroying this. They take the cameras, they take
a poll sometimes and they just point it at the sky, you know,
and just push it up. They don't destroy it, they just reposition it
so I can't see what's on the ground. Well, one man's vigilantes,
another man's freedom fare, right, I mean, what was robin hood?
You know, they put us, they put our backs to the wall.
They leave us essentially no choice, you know hl Menkin, who I've admired
since I was in high school. So that, you know, point comes
when you have to sit on your hands and hoist the black flag. You
know. There, they've effectively turned us into criminals, so we might as
well embrace it and just proceed accordingly. It's all to have to say that,
but it's the truth. You know. You can't honest decent people can't
be honest and decent anymore. You can't function because your honesty and decency will
be used against you. And don't let them make you feel bad about doing
the right thing because they say it's illegal, you know, because they're trying
to use their apparatus to punish you for things that involve no harm to anybody.
These cameras are outrageous. All of this stuff is outrageous and it needs
to be put out, root and branch and thrown into a bonfire. It's
high time. Yeah, yeah, well they pretty much did that. The
thing was up on a metal pole and they cut it down with an angle
grinder, and normally, yeah, it's great. You know, they've got
all the equipment and tools. You know, they come out there and they
have at it. You know. I sometimes make myself a cup of coffee
and watch those videos to make myself feel better. That's right. They're also
removing the ballards that they've set up, you know, for their fifteen minute
cities to prohibit you from traveling into certain zones. The people are going out
and taking this stuff down, and so I'll tell you, yeah, go
ahead. I was going to say there's something else I think that's going to
happen that's related to this, and you're probably following this as well, the
way these insurance companies now are jacking up people's premiums to the point of unaffordability,
you know, whether it's home insurance or car insurance or whatever it is
that you're obliged to buy because of government FIAT, because the government and the
insurance companies are in bed together. And I think at a point, a
point's going to come where people are going to say, you know, if
my choice is to stop driving or to not eat and pay insurance. I
think I'm just going to stop having insurance and drive and eat. I'm going
to stop paying it. There's going to be mass refusal to go along with
this anymore. They're really pushing people to the point where it's no longer just
well, this is annoying and I don't like this. This is becoming an
existential question for a lot of people. Just like with cars, if they
take away your non electric car, particularly if you live out in the country
as I do and you do, they're telling you, effectively, you know
you're going to be stranded. You're not going to be able to go anywhere
because you don't have an EV and an EV is in practical They're not just
saying you're not going to have car. They're saying you're not going to have
your house in the country or your suburbs even you know, you're pushed to
living in some kind of an apartment or whatever. Inside their fifteen minute freedom
sies, this is an existential threat. I think. Begin to understand that
you know they're going to They're going to come to grips with their innate desire
that most non psychotic people have. I'm not looking for a fight. I'm
not trying to get into a fight. But if you keep on pushing me
and you keep on hitting me, I'm going to defend myself. Yeah.
And where the rubber meets the road is really going to be at the local
level, you know, at local and state government. That's where we can
stop this stuff. It can become worse as we saw in twenty twenty,
or you can make it better at that level. And a good example of
this I like to point back to is this pistol brace thing done executive order
gun control, like Trump set the president with a bump stock, and so
then Biden does it with a pistol brace. But of course Trump tried to
do that in his administration with a pistol brace as well, started it in
twenty nineteen and then ended it in twenty twenty, and then Biden immediately brought
it back. But here, the way they handle it here in Tennessee was
I talked to a Tennessee state senator and he said that Senator nicely, he
said, well, we've got that taken care of. He said, First
of all, we passed the law that says that if something is legal here
in Tennessee, they can't make it illegal at the federal level, and we're
not going to help them to enforce any of this stuff. And then we
said, and oh, by the way, pistol braces are legal. So
even before, even while these guys are wrestling with this thing in court challenges
back and forth, and let's take it to this level of the court challenge
and so forth, they'd already cut this thing off at the you know,
where the rubber meets the road, at the local level, in this particular
case, at the state level. But you can do that kind of stuff
at the local level as well. And so you can have sheriffs that are
going to stand the gap and not going to force, not going to enforce
the governor's rules about masks and things like that, or they can get real
horsey and they can be worse about it. You know, it makes a
big difference. I tell people, we got that we've got the whole political
concerns upside down. We need to understand that these people in Washington are trying
to destroy our lives. But the way that we can fight back is really
at the local level, don't you think. Oh? I absolutely agree,
And you know, I'll preface what I'm about to say with what Groucho Marx
once said about not wanting to join a club that would have him as a
member. And what I mean by that is I am loath to consider running
for office. But I've actually been thinking about running locally for school board and
on the motto vote for Eric and he'll leave you alone and won't take your
money. And you know this is as you say, this is the sort
of thing that we need to do minimally, even if someone like myself stands
little if any chance of actually getting elected. By making the run, you
at least get the alternative point of view out there. And it's no longer
this uniparty dynamic between the red sheep and the blue sheep, and they're both
in agreement on the fundamentals. Let's have something different for a change. Let's
actually talk about not less taxes, but no taxes. Let's talk about leaving
people alone, period, not only leaving them alone here, interfering with them
there. Because you're on this side of the political hound, you think it's
okay to interfere with people in this way, but the other side things it's
okay to do it that way. Let's get away from that. Let's get
back to just voluntarism and if somebody is not causing harm to anybody, leave
them be. Yeah, you know this is this is ultimately the long term
goal. And if I have to run for school board, I'll do it.
That's my contribution if I you know, such as it is, well,
yeah, and you might be able to actually participate and they might have
still have debates there. You know, when you look at what is happening
with the debates. And I was involved with third parties and tried to you
know, we had ballot access for the LP that we would get on,
you know in North Carolina. But even after all this, you know,
it's like Sisyphis, you know, rolling the rock up the hill every every
two to four years. But even after you get on the ballot, they
would find some way to keep you out of the debate. They didn't want
to have the debate. And now we see this happening with Trump, we
see it happening with Biden. They don't want to debate anybody. It's pretty
obvious why Trump and Biden don't want to debate anybody, because it's not they
don't want to make any of this stuff about any issues. It's got to
be about them. Personally. And you know, so you know the other
guy. You hate that other guy, don't you. Well, you don't
hate me as much as you hate him. But let's talk about the issues
because really, on the existential issues, there isn't any difference between them.
So why have a debate about that when that would just show that they're on
the same page. Absolutely exactly, And I think we can have a great
deal of impact and influence at the local level. We take back our communities,
and if we take back our communities, we take back our states,
and we can take back our country in time. I know the authoritarians.
The authoritarians didn't succeed overnight. It took them generations to make the games that
they made, and it may take us that amount of time to make them
back. I agree, it's and we have to understand. And the reason
that we talk about what is happening globally while we talk about what is happening
in Washington isn't because we can do anything about it. We can't. As
a matter of fact, I had the guy who wrote the book the Tuttle
Twins, you know series, and he's out of Utah, and he said
he helped to he was in politics, and he helped to get Mike Lely
elected. He says, I, you know, criticized him for what he's
done or hasn't done, because you really can't get much done even as a
senator. And he said, I found that we've spent all of our effort
trying to fix things in Washington where we have the least amount of impact and
leverage, and then we focus on the presidency where we have absolutely zero impact
on that. But he said, he started getting involved in state politics and
he was able to get a whole bunch of different laws passed that we're going
to make things freer for people in Utah. So that's why, you know,
when we look at that, it's important to keep that in mind and
to understand as the liberals have always said, I've always heard all my life,
you know, Tip O'Neil, another Democrats said, all politics is local,
that's where it really happens. And you would hear the people pushing for
world government would always say, think globally, act locally. All the Greenies
and all the rest of the Communis would all do this, and that's what
we need done. We need to understand what their global agenda is. We
need to understand the directions that they're coming after us, what the endgame is
with all this stuff, and then we need to fight them locally. That's
that's where we got to fight them locally, each and every one of these
agendas. We can even fight them at at a lower level. That's on
executive word. Excuse me, I've had too much coffee this morning. But
you know, at the family level. I had the discussion earlier today with
a friend of mine who's telling me about he's training his daughter how to drive,
helping her room how to drive, and he encouraged her to use her
eyes and her brain rather than be a mindless automaton that just follows the rules.
So at a red light, if it's safe to go, it's okay
to go, And if the law says don't go, it's still safe to
go. They're respectable with the law. In fact, it's safer because if
you become a rule following automaton, you might decide, well, the light
screen, I can go, as opposed to looking to see whether somebody's about
to run that light and run right. Use your brain, learn to think,
you know, it's empowering, and the more people that are that are
that are taught to think. The more empowered they become, the less fearful
they become. This is really important. You know that these authoritarians depend on
fear. You know, they want you to think that, oh my gosh,
I have to wait to be told what to do by somebody who knows
what to do, by an authority figure, as opposed to, you know,
let's evaluate the facts, look at what's going on, what's the situation,
and let's decide what the right and prove and course of action is on
our own use our own judgment. We do that, and we find that
we have less and less need for these authoritarian know it all busy bodies.
Yeah, oh absolutely. It's interesting, you know, to go to foreign
countries, especially third world countries, but even you know, some places like
France where you look at roundabouts and they don't have lanes define and you know,
you look at the Arch of Triumph and everything, and all these people
are zipping around there and there's no lanes. Everybody's got to be on the
lookout for what they're going to do, you know. And and if you
go back and you look at old videos, let's say the nineteen forties or
something, like that, you know, in La and there's no lanes anywhere.
Everybody's just kind of doing their own thing, kind of like it still
is in France in some places and other things like that. We have these
little lanes and lines and lights that are set up and signs that are set
up, and we think that if we follow this precisely, that we're going
to be safe, when in reality we're not. You know, if you
didn't have these, my dad got t boned and would have been seriously injured,
except you didn't have his seatbelt on. It's a bench seat Cadillac,
and it totaled. The Cadillac came in on the driver's side, knocked him
across the car. Fortunately he wasn't trapped in there. But you know,
it was somebody who ran a stop sign at a high speed. And you
know, some back roads and anything, well, imagine if you didn't have
stop signs anywhere, and every time you saw an intersection there, you would
like you be on the lookout for somebody that's coming your way instead of thinking
I've got the right of way, you know. So there's a passage of
the two that relates, and that is the incipity of it. You know,
they use these terms like assistance that we were talking about earlier, and
that's insulting. You know, I don't need assistance. I'm confident I can
handle things. It's as if somebody he perfectly capable of walking and they present
you with a walker or a wheelchair because you're in need of assistance as opposed
to being an able bodied person who can walk. You know, I'm a
person who's perfectly competent to drive a vehicle. I don't need steering assists,
I don't need break assists and all these other forms of assistant. Stop trying
to parently. Stop treating me as if I'm an idiot. Yeah, I
can I deal with these things on my own. Yeah. Yeah. When
we look at what is happening too, you know, there's the deliberate neglect
of our real infrastructure. An example of this, and I don't know what
the figure is here in the United States, but they said in the UK,
four hundred and fifty one people have been seriously injured or killed by incidents
involving potholes and just a period from twenty eighteen to twenty twenty two because they
don't fix these things, right, I mean, you see videos, even
Arnold Schwarzenegger, who I can't stand any of his politics. You know,
he's going out there virtually. Secondly, because it's like, okay, I've
had enough of this. We're going to fix the pothole ourselves. And you
know, you see these vigilanti pothole fixers from time time. Kind of reminds
me of Brazil, where you know, Robert de Niro is the guy going
and fixing the air conditioning things because nobody can get the government doesn't got a
monopoly to actually do it, so people go out there and fix this stuff
in the government will get very upset in places like California if you go out
and you've patched the road yourself, you know, And there's there's something about
that that that we should talk about these electric vehicles because of their weight,
Oh yeah, that pophole problem even worse. A typical EV weighs about a
small one weighs about forty five hundred pounds, and some of the trucks weighs
six thousand pounds and more. So you can imagine the effect on the road
over time if loss of these vehicles are out there pounding on those roads and
we're all going to pay for that in the form of these these gaping potholes
that will swallow your entire car all fold. Yeah, it's uh yeah,
they're gonna have to. They're talking about redesigning, having to redesign the parking
garages as well, because so much more weight. They didn't design it for
that. It truly is amazing, and you know, but they don't care.
It's full speed forward. We don't care. We're going to do this
at warp speed. It's always as I said, it's a mcguffin. You've
got this crisis. You've got to act now. There is no time to
get it right or to test it to see if it works. We've got
to go with this technology or this injection and we're all going to die and
just shut up. And if you're in the way, you're a problem,
you're a terrorist. We see these rolling out over and over again, even
when the evidence is to the contrary. You know, if we assume that
there is a climate crisis, let's just for the sake of discussion, assume
there's a climate crisis and it's caused by motor vehicles and by carbon dioxide emissions.
Well, if that's the case, then why are they pushing or why
are they allowing I should say, these gratuitously energy consumptive six thousand pounds evs.
Wouldn't you think if there's a crisis, we're all going to die there's
a crisis, that the only allowable evs would be minimalist EV's, the most
basic, lightest, most energy efficient, least power consumptive vehicles, just whatever
was minimally necessary to transport you from A to b U. And the reason
that they don't do that, of course, is because the affluent virtue signalers
would never want to be caught dead driving a car like that. If they
want to drive around there in there you lu proceeed ultra exotic, ultra luxurious
electric car. They don't want to drive around in the electric equivalent of a
Soviet era travant. You know, it just gives the lie to all of
this nonsense. If there were a crisis, this would not be what's happening.
So we know that their motives are are disingenuous, dishonest, and malicious,
and we know that you know, these are going to be the cars
that the stakeholders will drive, that they the private public partnership will drive,
and and so you know, they're they're they're they're setting this up so that
only the elite will have cars. That's another part of it as well,
as you're pointing out they don't want to drive it themselves, but they don't
want you to have anything. But they're going to have their cars, just
like they'll have their private jets and their yachts and all the rest of this
stuff. It is amazing. And you know, we talk about people even
being killed by potholes. Yesterday they had an article from the World Economic Forum
talking about a day of Remembrance for road traffic victims. And then as if
that's not enough, because they've got the vision zero that they've been using as
part of their twenty thirty Agenda and Smart City agenda. We're going to have
zero traffic deaths. And of course the way you're going to do that's have
zero cars and or they're going to be traveling at zero speed, which means
you're not going to drive them anywhere. But you know, their vision zero
thing. But then they take it to this direction. Eric they say how
a global road safety crisis harms women's rights does years ago they had National Lampoon
had a joke headline and it said end of the world tomorrow. Women are
minority's hardest hit. Yeah, this is this headline is literally saying the same
thing. First of all, you know, let's or a day of rememberance
to go to war with cars because they're killing everybody and then it's killing women
worse. It's a little too early to drink. Is there's never any end
to it? Well, you know what else have you got? At Eric
Peters Auto's dot com, we talked about the safety and the fact that it's
not actually saving you any money. You also talked about now you talked about
the end of the there's one vehicle that's left, the last six cylinder that's
standing. You got to remember that. Yeah, yeah, yeah, And
you know that gets into what we've been talking about it the way the regulations
are being used to force the V six engine off of the market. But
there's something else. If I could, I'd like to just ship a little
bitause I know it's fine to short that that that ties into this electric vehicle
thing, which is the CDD thing, CBDC thing. Yes, you can't
pay cash at a fast charger. You know, this is something that people
should be aware of. In order to use these fast chargers, you have
to use digital money. Typically, you have to have a credit card that's
tied to an app on your phone, and if you don't have that,
you won't be able to charge your ev Very interesting, and so slip the
way. At many supermarkets and other kinds of retail establishments, they have windowed
down the cash registers that accept cash to almost a mile and they're trying to
control and push you into using this digitized electronic currency. And that's telling and
again it's another mechanism by which the electric vehicle is going to control you.
You know, they're going to know whether you bought electricity, how much electricity
you bought, and more to the point, whether you're allowed to buy electricity
at these these fast chargers. That's really important for people to understand that.
And it's always been about control. It's always been about that we've got to
have you can again, you can't have a hydrogen electric vehicle. We're not
going to work on that technology. We're going to say that's not allowed because
we've got to have something that's going to only be chargeable off of the centrally
controlled electric grid. And now we're going to have the centrally controlled finances that
are out there, and people are getting banned by the thousands now in the
UK. That's another place where they are slightly ahead of us. Is happening
here. I mean I got kicked off of PayPal and Veno after five months
on there. But you know they're doing the de banking thing and they're ramping
that up. It is an ever tightening news. That's why we have to
work on how we can get outside of their system that they plan. And
you have to know what system they're planning and how they're going to shut things
down so that you can make plans to exist otherwise. You know, if
they're going to shut down all your banking system, well then you need to
figure out how you're going to operate on a cash or gold or silver basis
with people. That's the key thing to understand where they're coming at you.
Yeah. Well, and one thing that you can do right now, and
it may seem fastile on the individual level, but use cash insists on it.
Yes, yes, if a merchant will not accept other than cash,
then don't do business with that business. That's right, And the more of
us do it, just as more of us were shoes to wear the mask
and didn't take the job. That can have an effect as it scales,
but you know, it starts with you and me and every other person out
there. Stop being gulled by the convenience of electronic transactions. I understand it's
a little more difficult to spill out a piece of paper from your wallet and
for the coins as supposed to swipe in your card, but it's really important
to not let them get control of our money. If they get control of
our money, they control everything. And it will actually help you keep you
from going into credit card debt too. Absolutely, if you have one hundred
dollars in wallet, that's all you can spend. You can't spend more than
that. If you have a card, you can't outspend. What's your ability,
what you're able to pay? You know. Pierce Corbin I interviewed him.
He was in the UK and he had that video that went viral where
he goes into all these and they said, no, we're on cash list
now. And so to make a point, you know, he gets some
strawberries and leaves the cash there and they say he can do that, you
know, and they called the police on him. There wasn't he's paid them,
you know, And I don't know what the situation is in the UK,
but here in the US got to have something or you really want to
make the point. It says on their legal tender for all you know things,
and so you got the law on your side with that. If you
really want to press it with these people, you can. And you know,
if you got the cash money, they got to take the cash money.
That's that's what it's really about. Always great talking to you, Eric
ep autos dot com to find out what is happening with mobility and that is
tied to our liberty in such an important way. And before we close,
let me think Angry Tiger, good to see you there, Nights of the
Storm, and of course Tiger and Snake Report, thank you very much for
the tip. And Dystopian Dissident thank you as well. He thanks us,
but we thank you, thank you so much for that, and thank you
Eric. We'll see you. Thanks, take care. Okay, let me
tell you the day to night show you can listen to with your ears.
You can even watch it by using your eyes. In fact, if you
can hear me, that means you're listening to the David Knight Show right now.
Yeah, good job, and you want to know something else. You
can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at
the Davidnightshow dot com. That's a website. Elvis and the Sweet Sounds of
Motown find them on the Oldies Channel at apsradio dot com.