The Ham Radio two point zero audio podcast rip. Thank you for downloading and
listening to this podcast. So basically what I do is I take all the
audio clips out of my videos and upload them to spreaker, and then from
there they're spread out to iTunes and SoundCloud and now Amazon Audible as well.
But I want to welcome you and thank you for joining the audio section of
this series on Ham Radio. I hope you enjoy it, and I would
appreciate you leaving us a comment or review on whatever podcast service you're listening from.
Thank you. In seventy three, hope you enjoy it. More crackdowns
on CB radio interference and this time they've issued a citation twenty five dollars fine
to a man in Rockford for willfully interfering with CBE radio transmissions. You don't
even have to have a license to transmit on CV it is citizen's band,
but you can still get fine for it. Check this out. This story
comes from Rockford Scanner dot com and I went and found the FCC notices and
FCC sections that it talks about in here. The title is FCC has been
in town and charges the Rockford man for jamming the airwaves. I read another
story recently about someone transmitting more power than they were supposed to, and they're
looking at that right now as well. More to come on that later.
Read the article in full here, and it basically just kind of quotes the
article. And this website looks like a Ham Radio Club website because it's just
kind of like front page two thousand looking. So we're gonna go over here
and look at the FCC Communications. We propose a penalty twenty five thousand dollars
against Jamie or Heimi maybe he pronounces it Heimi. John Leon, referred to
as Leon the owner and operator of a Citizens Bands radio service in Rockford,
Illinois, for apparently engaging in unauthorized operation and violation of Section three on one
of the Communications Act of nineteen thirty four, as amended in sections ninety five
dot nine three three and ninety five dot nine five seven. Part ninety five
is the FCC part that regulates the CB radio service. So I went and
looked up sections ninety five dot nine three three and ninety five dot nine five
seven. Ninety five dot nine three three talks about right here. In addition
to the prohibit, the prohibited uses set forth in nine five dot three three
three nine five dot nine three three, which is the one we're talking about
today. Station must not use a CBRSCB radio station to transmit one way communications
other than those permitted. One way communication is basically to use it as a
broadcast station, like you would turn on your AMNFM car stereo and listen to
a one way transmission. You're not allowed to just key down and start talking
about whatever anything and just not It's it's made for two way radio, it's
not made for one way transmissions. Kind Of hard to determine that sometimes,
but that's that is what the rules say. To advertise or solicit the sale
of any goods or services, to advertise political candidate, to communicate with stations
in other countries except the General Radio Service and stations in Canada. Now,
I would have questions about that. When I read that, I was like,
wait a minute, hold on a second, because people shoot skip on
CB all the time and talk to other countries all the time. When I
used to be heavy back into the CB when I was in college, we
would talk to South America and other countries all the time because they were on
the air and the bands were open propagation was up. HF bands were hot,
and we would hear them and communicate with them all the time. In
fact, you would always if the skip was up, that would be a
thing, and like working DX and HAM radio, So that kind of surprise.
I would have to read more into that about Part D section nine to
five dot three three Part D to communicate with stations in other countries. I
don't know what that means exactly, so more to come on that later.
And here's the part. F. E is to transmit communications of live delayed
broadcast on radio, so, in other words, to retransmit copyrighted material.
F is to transmit music, whistling, sound effects, or any other audio
material to amuse or entertain. And G is to transmit any sounds effects solely
to attract attention. So that's that's the one they got him on right there.
And it also details part ninety five ninety five to seven, And that
part right here, nine five seven has three parts. Except as specified in
B and C of the section. The operator must limit each on our conversation
with operators and other CBS to no more than five minutes. That's a rule
they don't enforce if you are keyed up on the CB and you have a
ten fifteen to twenty thirty minute conversation with someone, an hour long conversation with
someone, no one's gonna come knock on your door. I think they used
instances of this where they can cite people for doing other things. Okay,
they're like, well, technically it says you're not supposed to keep up for
more than five minutes, so you're not supposed to have conversations for more than
five minutes on air conversation. It's not that he keeped down and didn't let
off the key for five minutes. It's that he limit each on air conversation
with operators of other CB radio stations to no more than five minutes. I've
done that a thousand times. Not recently, but I've done that a thousand
times. So I think that's probably something they just have on the books where
they can say, Okay, well you did this, so you're in violation.
But if you're out there just having a casual conversation, they're not going
to come knocking on your door send you a letter in the mail over that.
I don't think when a CB operator is directly participating in emergency communications it
does not have to comply with paragraph in the section and link the transmissions.
When an operator is using CBE radio station to assist a traveler, it does
not have to have to comply. Okay, so except for assistance of travelers
and emergency communications, doesn't have to comply with that. But regardless of that,
I've still done that hundreds, if not thousands of times, because more
than five minutes conversations take place on the CBE radio all the time, or
at least used. If you're driving down the road and there's another truck driver
near you and you guys strike up a conversation, those those conversations many many
times last longer than five minutes. So I thought that was a strange thing
to be in the regulation. But okay, okay, again, it's just
it's like spitting on the sidewalk. They're not going to find you for that,
but if they see you do that, they can say, oh,
well, you broke the law. So let's take a look in your car
and see if we find any weed or pot illegal substances in there. Hopefully
that won't be a thing much longer. The Commission's rules authorize the operation of
cb radio stations without the grant of visual license. Citizens band does not require
license it used to back in like the seventies, sixties, and seventies.
They removed that a long time ago, conditioned on compliance with all applicable regulations,
subject to limited exceptions, not applical in this case. The Commission's rules
generally prohibit the use of CB for one way verbal communications in other words like
radio style broadcast transmissions, limit conversations to five minutes in length, with which
again I think is kind of a little bit of a gray area at the
very least, and prohibit the transmission of music, sound effects, et cetera.
Yeah, so all those toys, all those Cebe radio toys that you
hear on Channel nineteen all the time, those are all illegal. Does anyone
care? Ah, Channel nineteen's a dumpster fire on CEBE radio anyway? And
and GMRS is getting to be that way sidestep that comment, But does anyone
cares that Channel nineteens a dumpster fire? Ah? Some people might, I
don't know. Leon apparently violated the Act and the Commission's rules by using a
CBE station to make one way transmissions and send nonverbal, indecipherable sound effects over
long periods, thereby avoiding his operating authority. Leon also apparently caused willful and
malicious interference in violation of Section three thirty three of the Act. Such illegal
operations pose a danger to the public because they can disrupt authorized CB uses such
as travelers, needing assistants, warnings of hazards and conditions, were pointing accidents,
et cetera. Moreover, CB can be used by public service providers and
first responders during natural disasters without infrastructure and damage and non existence. So Channel
nine we talked about that in the video a while back. Does anyone still
use Channel nine? I would think so. This statement goes on for a
while. I'm not going to read the whole thing to you guys, but
I'm gonna pick out the pieces I want, and I will link this in
the description below so that you can go and read about this violation if you
want to. Now, if you want to, if you want to learn
more about violations and just general overall radio regulations, visit hamradioprep dot com,
where you can save a twenty percent discount on all of their courses to get
your hand radio license with the coupon code of Jason twenty Ham Radio Prep offers
license courses for Technician, General, and extra all three levels of Ham radio.
They offer a Balfing Basics course. They offer a new HF course that
tells you how to operate HF, how to find frequencies that are clear and
whatnot if you want to get on the air for like parts on the air
or de expeditions or something like that. Really good courses handradioprep dot com.
They are a supporter of this channel and I thank them for sponsoring this video.
But if you want to learn all about Ham radio and HAM radio courses,
visit the link below and be sure to use the Cooplan code adjacent twenty
to save a twenty percent discount. This section here got my attention. Leon
has a history of non compliance with Commission regulations. On January nineteenth to nineteen
ninety nine, the Commission's former Consumer and Information Bureau released a forfeiture order imposing
a fourteen thousand dollars monetary penalty against Leon for the transmission of obscene and decent
or profane words or language or meaning, and for failure to make his station
records available for inspection, both violations of this Commission's CB rules. Leon did
not respond to the forfeiture order nor pay the forfeiture amount. Okay, I
wonder how well these citations and fines are regulated or how well they're enforced.
Subsequently, on March first to twenty eleven, twelve Freakin years later, March
first to twenty eleven, the Enforcement Bureau issued a notice of violation to Leon,
stating that the Bureau agent monitored continuously transmitting music and sound effects from a
CB station install installed in a U haul vehicle, the same type of behavior
at issue in the case in violation of the Rules Affecting Obscene and decent profane
language Paragraph bait. We find that Leon apparently will feel repeatedly violated Section three
oh one of the Act of these sections, although section ninety five three or
five author raates of person operation CB without the grant of an individual license nine
Zho five of the rules provide that such operating authority is automatically voided by the
violation of any applicable rules. On June twenty first and twenty twenty two,
Leon apparently violated these sections again and the section we talked about today, by
using his station to make a thirty minute one way transmission comprised of nonverbal indeciperable
sound effects. September twenty eight, twenty twenty two, Leon claimed the source
of the unauthorized transmission was a milk crate containing a battery operated CB placed by
an unidentified third party in the at the corner near his house. Okay,
so he's blaming his Oh, someone put a CB in a milk crate on
my property and that's what's causing those transmissions. Okay. Yeah, You've got
like twenty four years here of interfering on CB and apparently the FCC has done
nothing about it. Some of these comments on these videos I make, they're,
oh, the FCC is never going to do anything. Well, they
do, they just don't enforce it very well. So I don't know.
I don't know. If this guy ever wants to go get a passport and
he sees these fines from the FCC on his on his record, there's no
way he'd be able to get a job that requires some sort of background check
or high secret clearance with the government. You know, he's pretty much screwed
himself from doing that at all. Even if he never pays it. He's
got these citations on his record. So there's gonna be some sort of something
where this is going to come up later on in life, assuming that he's
not eighty five years old and just a grumpy old man today, which maybe
he is. But the conclusion is accordingly. After applying the Forfeiture Policy Statement,
Section one dot eighty of the Commission's Rules and the statutory factors, we
have determined that Leon apparently wilfully and repeatedly violated these sections. Violated sections three
I one three thirty three in the sections of ninety five nine through three ninety
nine fifty seven of the Commissions Rules. As such, Leon is apparently liable
for four fture of twenty five thousand dollars. In order for Leon to pay
the proposed furniture, he will have to notify the Office of Field Director feel
at FCC dot Cove his intent to pay. Real protent invoice will be posted
to the Commission's registration system at this URL. Upon payment, Leon shall send
electronic notification to payment to the office. Payment a forfeiture must be made by
credit card. It's payment by wire transfer, so it tells him how to
pay. The Commission will not consider reducing or canceling the forfiture in response to
a claimable inability to pay unless the petitioner submits the following documentation. This PDF
file doesn't necessarily say what happens if he doesn't pay at all? What's the
point? I mean, Hey, go to this guy's house, knock on
his door, ask for payment. If he doesn't pay it, put him
in jail. How are you going to enforce these types of citations and notifications
and violations? How are you going to enforce this if you just issue a
statement saying you have to pay this money? Okay, see, it'll be
twenty three years later you still haven't paid it. You know. I think
that the FCC needs to make an example of one or two of these of
these guys who do this kind of crap. Here's what we're gonna do.
We're gonna actually put you in jail. I don't know. I mean,
do you think this guy should go to jail? Do you think they should
be more hardcore about actually citing him and collecting that money? What do you
think? I'd like to know what you think? Put a comment blow Thanks
for watching today