Welcome to the Agenda. Hello everybody, my name is Edward Zol and this
is the agenda. What's on the agenda today, twenty thirty agenda. What's
the agenda? Liberal Agenda. The w EF have been upfront about the agenda
for us, it's my agenda for you. We's all's condi issues on our
agenda. This agenda. This agenda applies to every nation in the world.
It's a universal agenda. To the next subject on the Agenda. Episode two.
Thank you so much for joining us on our last episode of the Agenda.
It was a great episode. People loved it, got about two hundred
thousand views on Twitter. You know, we're looking to continue to inform the
public through the dietsden the platform. We're very happy that you chose to join
us for a second. One other thing, we didn't get banned from YouTube,
so we didn't that's right, So we survived you too. We need
to up the game a little bit and get a little bit more aggressive that
algorithm. Let's see Rumble. We're on there as well on Rumble, but
we're crushing it on x so we'll continue and thank you for viewing that.
Share this. Tell your friends we've got exciting news today. Yes, Well,
today's agenda we're going to be looking into predictive programming. So the weekend
had honestly a very dark day for this country. Still we don't know all
the facts, and we're about a week now from the actual assassination, and
of course I'm talking about the attempt to kill President Trump in Pennsylvania. Now
we're going to have on the program here shortly, JAYE Dyer, who is
an expert on predictive programming, on esoteric Hollywood narratives. I mean, he's
someone that's looked into that there's not just the facts the abuse and all the
other weird things in Hollywood, it actually has an agenda behind it. Yeah,
he's very well versed in it. He's written two books. It looks
like he's writing a third book. Been wanting to talk to him for a
while, so I'm excited to talk to him. Uh, this is a
subject that a lot of people will say, come on, you know,
you're tell me The Simpsons, know you're telling me these these you know TV
shows, The X Files predicts it. It's happening too much right this where
there's smoke, there has to be some fire. So I I think that
in this in this spiritual world we live in, there are evil entities that
govern people and will use them like the Holy Spirit uses us. We want
to be driven and be guided by the Holy Spirit to do His will,
and so we come together and a union to profess Christ and be used in
that body. The same thing with the evil plans. They're going to be
governed and use. So are they given extra knowledge to to tell us their
plans? Well, the devil has been attempting to imitate God since the beginning
of time. We know that God has prophecies. We know that God foretells
the future. He's told us how it ends. I think that the devil,
the devil, he lied to him and Eve. He tried to tell
God how job was going to act. He's tried to predict the future in
a lot of ways, try to imitate it because there's a certain lesser magic
to that. And if you don't think that stuff's real, I'm going to
show you some things today with Matt that I think is going to change your
mind. The first thing, by the way, the subject of killing President
Trump. We know for the other side that's not anything new in the sense
that they've been wanting to kill him since twenty sixteen. But there is something
I think that is relevant to this past weekend. You may or may not
know this, but there is a card deck that they call him the Illuminati.
Of course, the secret society group, way worse than Freemay. It's
kind of like the game Magic before. I think this was before Magic nineteen
ninety four. I think these decks the original deck was conceived in like seventeen
seventy five, nineteen seventy five, rather nineteen seventy five. But we're talking.
The latest sideration was some updated art is nineteen ninety four, so well
before. But there's an article here in the Daily Express. This is from
twenty seventeen. It reads Illuminati card game that four told nine to eleven and
Diana's death predicts trump assassination. Okay, this was twenty seventeen. Yes,
the beginning is February thirteenth, seventeen, so twenty seventeen. They are aware
of this, right, yeah, Trump, let's see, yeah he was,
he was right before his presidency, right, twenty seventeen, and they
are showing these cards. And when I saw this card, my first thought
was that picture of Trump. This picture. It's the I mean, you
told me it looked like the devil. Okay, yeah, but for me
that looked like Trump. Oh, it definitely looks like Trump, so much
so that the Daily Express made that connection. And again, this photo of
President Trump is from twenty eleven. Right. The photo on the left is
one of the cards in the deck. Enough is enough, and the card
reads, actually this is from the article, and we have the deck here.
We verified this. At any time, at any place, our snipers
can drop you have a nice day. So their prediction twenty seventeen, in
nineteen ninety four was an originally predicted or used that card? Who would have
foresaw Trump in twenty twenty four, that a sniper would try to kill he?
Who would have thought he would be a president? Right nineteen ninety four.
Yeah, So then essence, well this card so twenty eleven mirrors this
nineteen ninety four image. Now we go to twenty twenty four. Boom,
we have an assassination attempt on him, you know. And it's interesting about
this assassination. I was reading through this article that was written in twenty seventeen,
and it spoke about the last assassination attempt that was kind of attempted to
be carried out against President Trump, and it reminded us we'd forgotten this.
There was a British citizen, Michael Sandford, who tried to try to grab
a policeman's gun at a rally in Las Vegas. And this guy had autism.
Oh yeah, I remember the autistic felt I remember that. Yeah,
so this this was an interesting thing here. And look, I bring up
this card game just to kind of lead us down this route of a lot
of these things. The enemy, the devil, especially the Satanically, they
love to plan things out in the public eye. Now, we were looking
into this subject today because there's a lot on the subject of predictive programming or
revelation of the method. Sure, and you know, I was going through
this. There is an interesting article from a left wing outlet. And again
these aren't like white right wing kooky outlets, you know they like they like
to call us. Now, this is is the left wing out like that.
It's considered to be reparable CounterPunch. It's like a communist outlet. Actually,
they were looking into the subject in April twenty nine, twenty twenty two,
the subject being revelation of the method. Now Broadberry. He actually quoted
a CIA director, William Casey, is saying that he said this to Ronald
Reagan. Will know our dense information is complete when everything the American public believes
is false. Now, of course this quote has never been confirmed, but
it actually is right in line with what we think the CIA is up to.
Now I was reading through this. This is actually quite an interesting read.
And this speaks directly to the concept of manipulating the public. So I'm
going to read through some of this for you. They said here fast forward
thirty years and there's no piece of fiction. The masses will not swallow.
Now, I think, right now, Matt, Right now, we look
at news, we look at information. Generally speaking, the public they do
not trust anything that comes out of the mainstream media, even though of the
government, and rightfully so. And the reason is is because most of their
narratives in these whose catastrophes seem to be false when you look at it,
what the original narrative was, doesn't the facts don't equal out, or this
such a disparity like nine to eleven. You look at all these war games
going on, these norad was called down. You look at OKJFK almost everybody
believes that it was some kind of inside job or conspiracy to kill him.
So what they've what they've done, right, is muddy. The water is
so much that we can call it something. It is not like we don't
believe the narrative, right, but it's no one could get a concise viewpoint
on it. That there's no truth. The truth is now gone right,
The truth is not a consensus anymore. Their truth is their truth. And
then you have these conspiracy theorists. Then now that's their truth, right.
Well, and when it comes down to that, I think many people they
didn't think that the government or intelligence agencies operate like this. Well CounterPunch was
pointing out this is straight from the manual for the intelligence agencies. And two
things are inch important here. First, well, this is right after the
vaccine mandates, so left wing people were impacted by the mandates just as bad
as the right wing folks. So I think a lot of people start waking
up cause it mentions in here the COVID Change Society. But one I wanted
to point out. It also even gave a definition for this predictive programming.
It's actually very apt, says predictive programming is the theory of a hidden hand
operating the levers of reality, a sort of reality adjustment bureau, obstucating real
world events through film, literature, and media manipulation. It says a form
of psychological conditioning that reduces people's resistance to the acceptance of planned future events and
encourages them to swap concrete reality structures for static constructs, until eventually our inherited
worldview is replaced by mythology and archetypes. So we see this like in film
No Doubt, and you think about how could they get it so right?
Right? Like, how did they how did this this movie nail it ten
years beforehand? Uh? And then you think, well, who was involved
in the in the script writing. You look at Stanley Kubrick's films. We
look at the moon landing with these and we know that these were government officials
involved with the filming In some of his movies. We look at the Minister
are goats, right, and this was derived from an army sciot program,
Right, So then they make a movie about it. Now it's in our
in our Lord, it's in our and we can relate to it and see
it. Uh. Everything is like you blur the lines of reality and fiction,
right, and it becomes what is real now? Right. But the
one thing is for sure is there are people who are orchestrating our reality through
entertainment, through film well, and when it comes to us, it's an
effective medium. And that's, you know, probably the greatest conversation we can
have right now, past obviously breaking down the holes in the official story of
President Trump's attempted assassination and honestly talking with Jay, you know, I'm really
looking forward to this conversation with him. What we need to be doing is
we need to be thinking past the false reality that's being painted for us.
There is predictive programming and worseness. Revelation of the method afoot. That revelation
of the method is is simply the concept that the elite, the enemy,
they have to show you what they're about to do, and by doing so,
they've gotten your permission to commit violence against you. Yeah, there's a
form of witchcraft to this, for sure, and it's do they gain more
power if they tell you and put it out in the either like we're going
to do this now, please, minions and all these demons or whatever like
work forward towards this and it brings more power. It's very esoteric, but
we do know it's real because we see it play out well with no further
ado. We're going to bring in our guest, Jay Dyer. He is
an author, comedian and now quite quite an analyst. Do you host the
fourth ab info us? And now who's joining us here on the ejecta.
It's a day I think many of us are are trying to just weave through
the various plots of disinformation that have been set. Look, when something like
this happens, you start. I started gathering information everything. We need to
just get all because sooner or later things are going to disappear. Narratives are
going to change, things are going to be erased. So it's just like
gather everything now and kind of we through it and see what it is.
And when we had the thought of having Jay on, well this didn't this
transpire, The shooting had not happened. So we're going to talk to him
about predictive programming. But this is actually perfect because we're in the middle of
something that could have been predicted and we've been programmed to believe narratives as we
the collective not mean you were Jay, because we've seen through this. But
yeah, Jay, first of all, what are your thoughts this give us
kind of the breakdown on what you think, what your analysis is on everything.
Well, I did an interview with Roger Stone for the fourth hour of
Alex John's about six months ago exactly, and we batted around the possibilities of
what they would roll out as the election drew near, and we felt like
one of the cards would definitely be a potential assassination attempt. And of course
that's obviously I think what we saw the other day. There's a lot of
questions about the event. We've seen already two witnesses come forward saying that they
had alerted the police. We've seen multiple former CIA people from the Secer service
noting that it's very bizarre that you wouldn't have the most obvious, yes,
location for somebody to perch themselves to be checked and so that according to former
c A, unless Larry Johnson suggests either will full complicit uh planning perhaps or
just insane levels of negligence. Maybe we have too much de I we've got
too many uh fupa gunted women out there trying to be secret services. I
don't know, but yeah, it's always looking. That was all I don't
tell you. Yes he is not. Is that that mindset of me and
you? But yes, probably can't talk about that on your show. No,
No, you can't, truthful hair, I just don't know, yes,
but I mean could I mean it probably could have taken a few of
those bullets I guess to protect Trump. Okay, guys, it's just a
frontal area of upper upper Yes, So let's get into kind of this,
uh, this discussion of predictive programming then and and oh what the what the
reason we had on was because in Hollywood we see these things and you've written
two books about it, and what do you how how can you relate that
to this? Is there anything that you've seen? We have we should we
have seen this coming. We're going to talk about these Illuminati cards that that
came out in nineteen ninety four that are very eerie. Let me put this
question to you, because I'm very curious how you see it. Do we
live in a world of life imitating art? Or is the art imitating the
life? Which which? Which? How do you weigh that? Yeah,
I've been asked that many times since I wrote the first book, and I
think it's a symbiotic relationship between both, so you're going to have influence from
the world of art and then art influencing you know, the real world back
and forth. I do think there's a lot of key, you know,
films that have kind of pointed out this sort of a scenario. There's the
Parallax View, which has Warren Beattie back in the nineteen seventies kind of being
a mind controlled patsy for a political assassination at a rally. We have I
think Stephen King's Dead Zone with Christopher Walking, while right, you've got Walking
predicting through premonitions that somebody might engage in an assassination at tap against a politician.
There's the Marky Mark movie what's it called Shooter, where he's a patsy,
and a lot of these I think pull from probably the narrative around Oswald
as a patsy and not the actual planner and you know, mind behind the
JFK operation. And I think, you know, most Americans nowadays have already
through polls, admitted that they don't believe the official story of the JFK event.
There were subsequent inquiries after the time of the Warren Commission, there was
going to be a whole nother commission that got shut in down because information to
come to life that there were certain organized crime figures who had been cheering on
the fact that the Kennedy's had been taken care of. So I think people
kind of are figuring out that a lot of what we've been told probably isn't
the real true story, and that times at times that's reflected in fiction.
But also fiction does seem to curiously have that predictive quality or feature. And
that's kind of what I investigated in my books was it's not totally My books
aren't totally dedicated to programming, but it's a big part of what I talk
about because in some cases I think there's coincidence, you know, dates that
come up in movies and this kind of stuff. But in other cases,
I do think there is a pattern and a real technique of perhaps softening up
the public two ideas that you want to ease them into or inculcate them with,
ideas relating to the acceptance of technology, the acceptance of propaganda. Even
on a really kind of basic level. Probably people are familiar with product placement.
I mean, product placement is not exactly predictive programming. But it gives
us a window into the way that you know, companies might pay to have
subliminal messaging even or overt messaging to push an agenda, and likewise the government.
By the way, just last point here, there was a FOI request
some years back. I put it in my second book where they had declassified
several thousands of pages of documents actually relating to intentional propaganda that various government and
intelligence agencies had paid for in countless TV shows going back several decades. And
this included TV shows as innocuous as Cupcake Wars, where basically the military had
paid to have you know, positive military messages, recruitment messages. CEEIA obviously
has done this for a long time as well to Cloyd's Hollywood, going all
the way back to the OSS was very intimately involved in helping directors like John
Ford win an Oscar. So that's the predecessor to the CIA. So this
is a long fascinating relationship. It's a rabbit hole I tumbled down in grad
school that I didn't expect to be so vibrant. I guess you could said.
So one thing is we tend to look at these things to the lens
of evil, because a lot of these things are them projecting what their plans
are for us. Per se the movie Topia we put we cut a trailer
to it for Diet Suddenly because it was basically the same premise, and I
didn't even know about the film at the time, and co director Nick pointed
it out. It's eerily similar to a madman wanting to sterilize the world to
a vaccine. The component of the mockery of the victim as a show of
macab arrogance, when done in a veiled or symbolic fashion and deliciting no significant
response of opposition from that victim, is one of the most efficacious techniques of
psychological warfare. Your father created a world changing, not world ending, world's
changing, world improving omnivirus. The event to a one scenario is fictional.
Created a panic. And now everybody's speaking for the vaccine. No, no,
no, demanding it with all the entitlement of a first world country.
Yes, and now we have exactly what we want, hundreds of millions of
Americans lining up, offering us their arms and letting us give them our creation.
I'm pretty sure when every vaccinated person starts dyingle trace back. What we
are doing is far bigger than death. Tell me this, what have you
done today to earn your place in this crowded world? We've got that stabilize
the population. So what's wrong of the population. I mean, we're too
many people. That was the amazing epiphany we had. We didn't have to
kill to accomplish our goal, which is what we intend to stop human reproduction
for three generations. Busy, endless global assembly line of babies. We'll grind
do all they're sterilizing people. In the first five years, we'll start to
see major birth rate declines as teenagers vaccinated today in their child bearing years.
I've been doing high risk obstetrics for forty three years, and I've seen death
and destruction like I've never seen before, Twelve one hundredfold increases in menstrual abnormalities.
Japan's Prime minister has warned that the declining birth rate is putting the future
of the country at risk. You're controlling the future and civilization. One hundred
years ago, the global population was one point seven billion. Two thousand eleven,
it reached seven billion. Global warming, mass extinctions, food water shortages,
all these problems can be boiled down to one thing over population. You
can't just decide people won't have babies because I didn't. And it is an
ancient rule of both the moral and the common law that silence cannotes ascent.
They bragged to us about what they've gotten away with, and we're thrilled by
it. That's our only response. It's thrillian that and then wait for the
next thrill. This is collective suicide. Of course, how much as a
fellow Christian can you think maybe that God is allowing us to peek inside of
this and to maybe give us clues right in the divine intervention of foreshadowing some
of this thing so we can warn the public. And there is something to
that. I think that's perhaps divine providence or maybe even you could say a
kind of spiritual clairvoyance, holy spirit kind of giving people premonitions. A classic
example this would be the famous Orthodox Christian writer Fido Dosievsky. He wrote a
book called The Possessed it's also alternately titled Demons, and in that book,
this is a few decades before the Bolshevik Revolution, when the radical Marxist socialists
basically killed what would eventually be sixty or so million people, and one of
the characters in the novel says that they will have to bring about their revolution
on a giant mountain of millions of skulls. So it kind of predicts this
coming bloodbath revolution. Other things that Doscioevsky wrote, but probably his most famous
section would be the chapter Grant Inquisitor, where he predicts a kind of a
massive falling away in the church, particularly the Roman Catholic Church, and that
example. And so I think that sometimes fiction can just have that unique quality
of being kind of prophetic, and other art works as well, And don't
want to restrict it to just you know, authors or novelists, but there's
also in the history of film and novels as well, because a lot of
for example, intelligence writers, they'll take the stories that they learn in the
real world and then they'll go and put it into fictional film accounts, and
so you have, you know, stories that spies would write. For example,
I wrote my masters. I did my master's work on James Bond and
Ian Fleming, and a lot of Ian Fleming's real world operations he would put
into his Bond stories and kind of change the details a little bit kind of
make it into something kind of, you know, kind of a little cartoonish
and ridiculous, but there's a lot of truth in those. For example,
you mentioned the idea of a sort of a scientific a man trying to cleanse
the earth and repopulate it, and that's kind of the plot of Moonraker in
the novel. It's a guy who wants to get revenge on England for World
War Two, and he's a national socialist, a minded person's names Hugo Drax.
He's kind of the Bond villain who wants to depopulate He wants to do
a great reset on the West in revenge. Now, in the movie version
of it, they make it very kind of star warsy with Bond being up
in space and all that, and they actually make the villain and Moonraker into
somebody who wants to not just cleanse the earth and depopulate it, but repopulate
it with his own offspring. So I was going to say, exactly like
Epstein. It's like Epstein got his idea from Moonraker or something exactly crazy.
As me and Edward we are in New Mexico that they Epstein killed himself supposedly
and to interview Congressman Maclas mcclowsky. So Congress of mcclowskey had a little bit
too much to drink, and we was like, we can't interview him today.
So we me and Edward we went over to Zora Ranch and we we
we went two miles through a desert up his hill and we went on the
Zora Ranch property the day that he had killed himself. And you can just
feel have you ever been somewhere where you just feel that could press the heaviness?
Yeah, it was a dark place. You could feel that we were
on ground and the ground felt like it felt it was like a like a
cemetery. I feel like therapy in the beautiful lush thing. But yeah,
I flew a drone into the thing and it was a surreal moment. But
uh yeah, there there you go again where maybe he didn't have moon Breaker
on his repeat and got the idea, but that same I would say,
maybe not demonic presence, but that oppression, that same kind of whatever that
is that that wants to uh push those ideas and move in our in our
in our world. They grab a hate to these people and you see it
in film and you see it in and with Kubrick, you know, and
a lot of his work, but pertaining to this, so we look at
I want to I got to ask you this too, because this is like
the cliche thing with the Simpsons. Have you done what is the what's your
thought about the Simpsons? Is it just random things they get right? Or
and if they do get anything these things right, where does it come from?
Like what are your thoughts? Well? I think the best explanation for
that is kind of what I was mentioning a second ago, which is a
lot of people who worked in intelligence then they go and they write novels,
they write fiction and they write screenplays and this goes back as a long tradition
going back to what British intelligence operators would do. And they would do this
because in the UK they have a little bit more stricture on whether they can
and can't say after they have that service of time in the government, so
a lot of times they are because there's Secrets Act, they can't talk about
what they did, so they just write these stories into fiction. And a
lot of classic British writers famously you know that we know of that are famous,
like Graham Green or John Lecaara these characters, they were famously British intelligence
operatives. So the same idea goes on, I think with American cinema as
well, where a lot of people that formerly worked in the CIA will write
screenplays, or they'll they'll go and consult in Hollywood and so forth. So
that's I think part of the source of it. And in the case of
the Simpsons, I think what's going on is that a lot of those examples,
if you get if you dig into them, a lot of them are
kind of coincidental, but some of them do seem to be pretty odd and
prophetic, and I would say that the reason for that might be that the
writers and some of the writers and producers that have been there for a long
time come out of Evergreen College, and Evergreen College is a pretty famously known
kind of CIA connected school. So my guess would be that people have kind
of inside information that they then seed into the fiction that they write. Or
it's are you familiar with the bottom Mindhoff phenomenon frequency, I know about that
group. Yeah, Well, where you like, say you want avol though,
and then you just start seeing volvos everywhere. We tend to want to
see conspiracy a lot of times like what's happening now that poor woman who was
like she's like picking up her phone, Like, now where the manhunt is
for this woman? What does I mean? You studied psychological warfare at graduate
school, Jay, so maybe you can speak to us. Is that part
of the way to maniflc the public is also diversions? She has all these
little rabbit holes are people being sent down? Like again the video that Matt
is talking about, this woman's a single screen here. She they can't even
really make out what she's doing, and they say, oh, look she's
making a smirk or something like this. Look, at least from my perspective
looking at that, it's thought, maybe she didn't even know that there was
a shot that had gone out yet chaos. I've been to twenty of these
things covering it. I feel safe there because it's so well like secured,
and we when we checked our baggage in in the morning, the dogs they
snipped there. I would I was very secure when I was there. Then
I think something could happen. I thought maybe someone could rush him and make
a knife for some blunt object. The shooter they're claiming took the shot and
took several shots at the president and the rally. Uh, they're saying that
he was inside the inner court on like it's but in four hundred meters or
four hundred feet rather of the president. And first of all, that that
area, it's it's so secure, like you can't walk across the field with
a rifle, can't definitely can't go up into a building, the nearest high
rise building, you know, in relation to where President Trump was speaking without
there being a huge fury of of of officers and official see, especially at
points of vantage that a sniper might use. That's what's so crazy, and
that we have so much It's like, this is amazing because the before in
the sixties, we had this z Appruder film, right, that's it.
We were searching and we had one thing and they spliced it. Like now
we have all these angles and we're piecing together, and now the narratives get
spun and now it's like, how can we shape the narrative maybe to divert
what the actual story is. So we're trying to piece all this together,
and it look if you try to look at the facts, right, because
that's true. As one of the ways to beat the propaganda, Jay is
to try to really hone in on the things which are verifiable, you see,
right, and then and then we can argue with snarily one of the
things. I think Laura Ingram was pointing this out. And at this point
it's a confirmed fact that Quantago has the shooter's phone. They claiming they can't
break it, they can't get into it. Yet they've already concluded that he
was a lone gunman. He worked by himself, and how could they possibly
have concluded? Yeah, I have a question for Jay for this. So
me and and we've traveled a lot of together. We are in upstate New
York, and we said, let's go to Sandy Hook because I wanted to
see the route that Adam Lanza would took. Right. So we go there
and we drive and me and him are driving looking for the house. And
we're in his neighborhood, beautiful neighborhood, and we're driving up and down.
We can't find it. We see this is the address. The house was
bulldozed, and this the overgrown weeds. They didn't they didn't re make another
house on it, then sell it, just let it, let it go
back to nature. That's what by a neighbor in the middle of a neighborhood.
Right, So on this vein, on this whole thing, where are
you at? What is your initial thoughts? Because Sandy Hook was trending.
Yeah, oh yes, that's another Sandy Hook was trending. There's a reason
why. Right. Well, the first thing that's odd is that suddenly,
at least from the left perspective, now you can question events and say that
they're staged. So, you know, the left and the mainstream media has
browbeat everyone for a long time that you can't question these kinds of events because
it doesn't fit the narrative of course that the system establishment wants. So but
now you can, and now you're supposed to question this because it doesn't fit
into the idea that Trump would be genuinely persecuted, uh, and that they
might try to take him out. But again, we've been talking about this,
uh, you know, Alex Rogerstone, Tucker, myself, many people
have been saying that it's pretty obvious. I think I don't even think there's
any like special you know, prognostication involved. And I think everybody realized that
if Trump continued down the route of uh, you know, making all of
these anti establishment statements and whatnot that he that they might resort to something like
this, And it looks like if the law fair of the legal attacks didn't
work, this might be a final resort. That's my obvious. I think
that's pretty obvious that that's what's going on. And uh, you know,
as Alex has pointed out, they're going to continue to try to probably go
after Trump. Uh So it's not like everybody's kind of celebrating, which is
fine, but I mean they're gonna try again. I mean it's not like
they're kinda just let all this go. And I think we all feel like,
yeah, that's that's we've all thought that, right, because they at
least the virus, like I believe, you know, COVID was a coupe
to get mailing as say, usurped the system. Okay, then one,
what are they afraid of? Because Trump's been in office, he didn't lock
anybody up, the world income crashing down, he gives a second attempt at
it. What's the fear then? Yeah? Yeah, And I don't have
any problem. I mean I'll have criticisms of Trump as well. I think
the issue is that both of the the people that, for example, came
out with the UK think tank, I think the Integrative Initiative or whatever it
was called, that came out with the story of Russia Gate Pgate, all
that nonsense. They said in some of their white papers that the effect that
the audience of Trump hass to awaken too things much quicker than any other leader
or group. So it's not even necessarily Trump himself, but they're worried that
the Trump audience, the Trump Yeah, that that that the information circulates so
quick and then people wake up even quicker. I mean, you know,
you've all said that they would have to do anything they could to stop another
Trump administration because the quote global world order would be and collapse, and if
it happens, it is likely to be the kind of like the death blow
to what remains of the global order. And he says, and he says
it openly what you answer you asked part of your question though too. I
think maybe that is one of the things that they fear again, having someone
that you can speculate about President Trump's motives, the things he has go for
about that, I think again, he did get shot this past week and
he definitely was being prosecuted. So you know, as you kind of mentioned
Jay, this man doesn't have a lot left. You know that if if
you were to just drop outor if he were to be bought and paid for
in this manner, they've already kind of treated him as an enemy they would
kill. And secondly they also see him, I think, as he's a
bullhorn for the public. I like that. I agree with the pomp list
thing we saw on in France, how quick that turned around from a part
already the hendy been established and they and they were able to stop that.
Right. Even if Trump, you know, is again not a perfect candidate,
he still represents, as we said, the population in Middle America who
and they hate so they you know, the overall Uni party establishment hates Middle
America, They hate the Bible bell, they hate the South with a passion.
And I think we saw that with the reactions with a lot of the
leftists after this event, you know, pretty much cheering it on, wishing
that they had been that the shooter had been successful. And you can tell
that this seething sort of soy rage that they have is the desire to kill
the rest of us. And my concern is that that's the kind of spirit,
the kind of attitude that you see in a population before something like a
bullshit revolution, before something like, you know, a potential civil war kind
of sigh op that they might want to kick off. So my concern would
be that a lot of this is intended to kick off a quote civil war.
We saw the recent Alex Garland film that came out that was I think
a lot of propaganda civil war. There been many other films pushing this Obama's
right that produced uh world, Look, I got my wife, Mike,
my wife, big mic. But we told right about this predictive program.
Why would Obama get right into a Netflix contract? There's so much power there
right with with any documentary that comes out on because you know, that's my
forte is when it goes to Netflix. That's that's where they put their official
narrative. The Flight fifty seven or whatever, or the nine to eleven or
the Sandy Hook documentary. They pump out the documentary because then people will be
like, well I saw the documentary, and that's just how it is.
What's more powerful, isn't it? It's actually more powerful in all the political
positions. Well, look, look died suddenly. That the thing was so
powerful is because people got to see things that the mainstream was showing them or
the narrative that they're being fed, and they actually got to see real life
horror film come to life. Well, Jay, you, I would say,
were among the few that actually predicted in a way that the elite would
go to this extent, you know, try to kill President Trump. They
would actually make a shot at his life. Do you think they're going to
try this again? Is this at this point because it's a failed assassination,
let's just call it what it is right now, failed assassination. There's going
to be a grand inquirer investigation, probably a grand cover up. Will they
try it again? Or do you think President Trump is going to respond it
away to this, that he's actually going to tone down a lot of the
things which which led them to think that he's going to threaten their lives and
their their powers. Well, if we look at the past scenarios, this
would kind of be reminiscent of the Reagan attempt, right because Reagan was speaking
about the Council on Foreign Relations, the global elite, the you know,
steering committees above government that are the real power structure. And you know a
lot of people think that Bush Senior the Bush crime family that that was who
might have had a hand in a role in that warning. You could say,
so if the attempted hits don't work, then they function as pretty powerful
warnings. And so I would say yeah, and again I agree with Alex
that you know, if that doesn't work, then they'll move to something else
like uh, you know, poisoning or some you know, truck bomb or
something like that. Definitely, don't you believe that that would be creating a
mortar of like the high that would even if they're trying to avoid this populous
uprising or do you think they would want to disco chayo, No, I
don't think they are. Oh I seeious saying no, No, Well I
think that. I mean, they weren't concerned about creating a martyr h two
days ago, so now I think they they think that either either they think
that they could have put in you know, Nikki Haley or somebody else in
Trump's place, or they want to create some kind of civil war uprising scenario
which they think they could clap down and pretty much crush the populist movement.
Again, there were similar patterns to this at the time of Reagan. At
the time of very goldwater where candidates were beginning to question the global institutions of
power. They weren't getting everything right, it wasn't perfect. But then you
have these kinds of big moves like this that try to shut it all down
and try to scare everybody. The same thing was happening in the late eighties
and early nineties with there was a rise of populism and patriotism, and the
Oklahoma City bombing event shut all that down. Now we know Trump had the
FBI wired taps, we know that the Three letter agencies they were pissed at
him. We've never seen such a deliberate attack on a candidate that then eased
wire taps and all these things, these dossiers. How much danger we in
in this in this country specifically that we're allowing these agencies that produce mk ultra
and is this may be where we need to look at who the true culprit
is in this. Yeah, I think there's an embedded to break away security
establishment that works for the corporate banking elite that run the West. It's that
simple, That's who it is. And so it's not the CIA doesn't run
everything, but they're kind of like the worker bees that do a lot for
this establishment. They were set up by this establishment. The British intelligence operatives
that help set up the OSS and CIA are the worker bees for the Rose
Rothschild Milner Fabian elite that were, you know, the founders of the Royal
and Supernational Affairs, and that's the basis for the Trilateral Commission, the CFR,
et cetera. So these institutions are all Fabian in their ethos explicitly,
and they have an internationalist event. That doesn't mean that neo conservatism isn't also
part of it. They'll work with the neo conservatives who are basically just reform
Trotskyites anyway. So they're all part of the kind of the same monopoly capital
Fabian structure, and they want to impose a new type of technocratic governance.
And that's why you mentioned like mk ulture, that kind of stuff. If
you go into the history of mk ulture, it actually transitions away from h
drug research and that kind of stuff into transhumanism. It becomes MK search,
MK delta turns into implantable chips, nanotech basically what they do it like DARPA.
So so that's all public information. So so yeah, that's why ultimately
this relates to things like the Great Reset, because the Great Reset was about
kind of rolling out, or attempting to roll out, or testing the emerging
technocratic landscape that they want to present everybody. That's why Klaus's book or the
Those Revolution, the last third of that whole book is about Skynet and basically
the giant ai Con control grid. So that's the ultimate goal and everything we
look out for, the what the EMFs and the grid we're on. And
when that goal was, you know, he's people programming that this will happen
as cyber attack, as he as he's so much famously said, a comprehensive
cyber attack which would bring a complete hold see power line, copulation, hospital,
soviets our society. As a hope, the Kuba nine King causes would
be seen inspect as a small spill in comparison to a major cybert Well,
you mentioned those cards, those Eliminati cards. Yeah, I mean, I
mean, I don't put a whole lot of stock in cards. It's not
it's not like David Rockefeller and Savinia Presents, Ki and Klouds are all sitting
that with like the card deck in there. I'm gonna throw down the assassin.
Colord read the card with YEA. So we have this card. It's
up on screen to enough is enough? So we were shown this side by
side. It's it's eerie how this photo on the card, which was picked
in at least nineteen ninety four, it could be as far back as seventeen,
nineteen seventy five, but this picture looks a lot like President Trump's photo
in twenty eleven. Is you just seeing you on screen? And it says
on here at any time, at any place, our snipers can drop you.
Have a nice day, bro. I mean, like, I'm sorry,
I'm just like when there's smoke, there's there's fire around is and I
know this gets in the woohoo and all that, but it is real.
Just the person that created the card deck was like communing with spirits and then
like we us a report. I want to hear. Sorry. Yeah.
So by what I recall, many years ago, Alex interviewed somebody involved in
the creation of the card deck, Steve jack somebody connected to Steve Jackson,
who's the guy that created the card deck? And I think that the answer
is pretty clear that these these people had at some level summ I think tied
to I think LaVey's Church of Satan. I'm not saying that with Steve Jackson
himself. I don't remember exactly, but I don't think that the LaVey and
Satanism is actually involved in real like they don't believe in an actual They're not
theistic Satan, This are more atheistic. But it doesn't matter because again I
think that even that entity probably has had pretty close connections to the CIA as
well over the years. The CIA usually wants to be interested in and have
connections to every cult, every movement, every religious organization out there. Yeah.
So I think that whoever was creating the cards understood the world well enough
to know that these cards can be played. And that's you know. When
I was talking to Roger Stone a few months ago and we were talking about
this, we were speaking of it as if it's a card deck that you
can throw the cards down, when we were referring to the Illuminati card deck
as a joke, saying that you could throw down the assassination or throw down
the pandemic card, throw down the you know, banking crisis collapse card,
throw down the cyber attack card. So yeah, they can throw down any
of these cards. I think. I think, as we talked about predicted
prom I think they do in a sense. Do that event to a one
was basically the exact war game of what we saw transpire a month later in
October, they did it. Now now we're going to go into another war
game with the bird flu in October, so expect another round of what we
just went through. I think to what Jay you were talking about earlier,
with this advent to the Fourth Industrial Revolution, we have advanced AI, neural
AI networks. I've long wondered if you cause we talked about the wargames,
what a war games do the produces date lots of Like even this past week,
seeing how people responded to President Trump's potential assassination, they got to see
a lot of things, how people responded, what they're gonna say, how
they're gonna act. And I think that data it possibly gets fed into a
supercomputer when the supercomputer will be able to tell the elite that's what AI is.
It's this algorithms, that's all I think. That's what Yeah, I'm
sorry, yeah, but at a super level, we know the Utah computing
system in Utah, right, the houses all the storage. It's just being
fed to. They've already admitted this that they can shape through media our reality
to project what we'll do right in a eighty sixty percent. They know they
can have a good ad. That's what social media is. Social media is
nothing other than seeing what our reaction to things are and how susceptible we are
to narratives, false stories that lead them down there. COVID was the bell
weather for this to actually have people walk down aisles because it had a arrow
on it. That's where we're at. You think like they laughed at that.
They were like, wow, we're more ahead of this than we thought
because we've dumbed down this public so much. Yeah, it was all those
things. And you know, the Spars document was even more arguably prophetic than
even Event to A one. But there was a whole series of these.
I did a really deep, deep dive on all the different documents and war
games that came out. There was Clayed X, there was Crimson Contagion,
and there was you know, Event to A one. There was the Sparse
document, on and on on and this this makes sense too when you study
you know, things like nine to eleven or the London seven seven event drills.
They don't just provide information, research and data, they also can provide
cover for the actual event at times too. So I think you're right to
jade Helm, if you remember, in my opinion has always been that jade
Helm was a lot of research and data to see how people would react in
this kind of a you know, big event scenario, kind of continuity of
government collapse scenario REX eighty four. Going all the way back to the Reagan
era, there have been many of these drills and preparation scenarios for a mass
event of some kind. You know. One of the things I do a
lecture through the writings of these very people. So you know, a lot
of people don't know that most of these power elite published books and they basically
say what their worldview is, what their plans are. Now, maybe not
every single operation is written about or plan that we that we know of or
is mentioned in their books. But when we Rebresentske, when we read a
Rockefeller, when we read the Huxley's Virtual Russell Jaquat Lee, Arthur Kessler,
Carol Quigley, I mean, on and on on. I've lectured through about
fifty or sixty of these texts. We see how open they are and they
don't really seem to care that people know what they're up to or what their
plans are, and they're they're very candid about it. So yeah, what
if they openly write about it and it's kind of hidden in plain sight,
so to speak, it's not surprising that they would have public meeting places where
they go and discuss these things, like, yeah, they used to keep
them in the shadows, though right now it's very like weft is a very
open place. Before you know it. I did a deep dive and in
my film and through the Club of Rome and where the genesis of that was.
But it was always deep population. I mean, that's always what it
was over about. It was always too much of us. And if they
would promote their plans through an ice age, so be it. Promote them
through climate change, global warming, so be it. They always can kick
the can to whatever agenda they want and whatever way they want to push it.
And never before did these people when they were conceding these plans. Who
knows how long ago it was that an internet would be invented where we'd be
able to talk with someone like Jay in another state and start to think about
this and come up with our counter thought about what these oligarchs and world elites
are trying to do to us certain those matter. On a podcast in England,
was describing the way the world, like especially the neo cons think they
justify a lot of their actions traitress actions of that and not people like you
and I. We just can't be trusted to be able to to go through
information because they're so easily manipulated. Like that's one of the excuses. Well,
you don't have it is the degree? Well he does, he has
all the degrees. He went, he went there the proper channels. But
me where I don't have that degree? Yea, yeah, but there you
go. But it is it's something amazing that we get to like, that's
the that's the play they did. So my thing is they have to do
something with the Internet. There's too much freedom to and like Elon grabbing Twitter
at the time, that's a blessing right to think that. But then I
think, what if they just like categorizing and putting everybody in their little thing
because they'll ultimately have that you know, uh, what is that the the
fuck crime? Come up? You know? I mean if we're looking at
films and we're seeing this predictiveness of it, which they actually talk about and
have arrested people with that already in other countries. That are we just feeding
the beast to come to our own demise and put handcuffs on us. I
don't know, but I'm I want to keep talking about it, and I
know I want to keep talking to people like Jay and fight these bastards who
are doing this because they are evil and they hate humanity so much that they
do these things too much, and and for my kids sake, I'm going
to keep doing this, and I champion people like Jay, and I'm glad
I can be on his side and talk these things and know that we're doing
something at this time, at this moment than just trying to get paid and
live on the beach and just put everything out. This is a real battle,
no doubt, Absolutely I appreciate that. Yeah, I think you know,
if you look at classic movies and Hollywood that illustrate this point. You
could look at something like Gaslight, which is a George kuk or if nowhere
you have the principle of a guy who's really trying to deceive a woman out
of her wealth, and he uses all these kind of what you would think
would be insane techniques, but they work to drive the woman insane. It's
a really great analogy for the way that the psychopathic system and the elites that
you're talking about, the way they relate to us. Just look at them
like that psychotic character who's constantly gas lighting and doing all these tricks to try
to really, you know, screw up the mind of the public, to
really make them pliable and to go along with whatever they want. And we
know what they want, which is ultimately a massive depopulation, and that it
would include everything from the messing with our biology, our gender, all the
way to you know, the potentiality of trying to inoculate everybody with some with
something or a pandemic or whatever. All of those things are in the cards,
and they'll throw out any of these things because they're committed to that agenda.
As you know, if you've studied the Club of Rome and those documents,
the Kissinger twenty twenty five report under Reagan excuse me, excuse me,
under a Carter Global twenty twenty five, that was you know, Kissinger basically
laying out the American government's full adoption of the Malthusian dysgenics agenda. So prior
to that, they were very wealthy people in America that had funded and promoted
a lot of the dysgenics eugenics ideology, but have been adopted as policy.
Really Intel Kissinger and Kissinger was doing that twenty one agenda twenty thirties, kind
of going up that line, right. Yeah, those are more updated,
yeah, updated versions of what Kissinger was up to in the seventies, Lace
mid late seven, well class, that's his protege, Klaus Schwa. Kissinger's
protege is Klaus Swamp, which you can see in the grace where you said
to Johnny Bedmore's great reporting and they've had more and Whitney Webbit pointed out that
that was a CIA Harvard project to set up. Yeah, speaking with them,
I mean the Whitney is just like and she's such a she's Peter,
you know. Sitting with there for three hours is like rapid fire and you
just got to keep going trying to keep catch up with her. But two
other a freedom fighters and are such great allies to have in this. Well.
I appreciate your time today, man, I really do. Is great
talking to you. I've been one to talk to you for a while,
so I really appreciate your time with us. Yeah, thank you. And
if people are interested in more in depth analysis of I think I covered probably
fifty sixty different films. You can get Esoteric Hollywood one and two at my
website Jason Alsis dot com and I go into quite a bit of depth there.
Well, thank you so much for joining us, Jay, And that's
can you set a website one more time for the audience, but they can
find you Jay's Analysis dot com. That's my website. I have all of
my stuff there in my archive, lectures and talks and the Global Lead series
that I mentioned. I host the fourth hour of Box showns pretty much every
Friday. And then yeah, in the shop, you can get the signed
copies of my books. Lleen. Well, thank you so much, Jay,
and God bless you just said it's an honor you fight with you take
care likewise, Absolutely, that was an awesome conversation and it's gonna tee us
up quite well for the follow on now as we go into the depths of
the lies that are presented to the public. Matt, I really appreciate Jade,
but you know what I appreciate more. We got our first sponsor.
This is is pretty good. This is a big deal. Okay, the
show one episode in, We've got our first sponsor. It is Augusta Gold.
Now, Augusta Gold is a precious metals company. They offer gold backed
iras. I know for Augusta. I've seen them sponsor several shows, including
the Doctor Jane Ruby Show and look for Augusta. They don't just pick anybody
to put their money behind and put their sponsori behind. If you want to
check them out, go to dyed suddenlygold dot com that's died suddenlygold dot com.
What you can look into is both buying precious metals and looking into switching
over your IRA accounts, which the federal government right now is looking into taxing.
All right, the government, they're out of money, they're broke.
They're even spending money on things more than just missiles in Ukraine. They might
be spending it on death squads in the United States of America. We know
they're targeting you and I. We know that they definitely discussed they're disgusted by
us, and they've been discussing dealing with us for quite some time. You
need to protect your wealth for your future, you need to go to die
suddenlygold dot com check out a gust the precious most. If you call them,
we get credit. So please do, please do go to the website
and call the number that's on the page. Again it died suddenlygold dot Com.
And hey, it's it's just kind of a very celebratory thing, Matt
that we got our first sponsor. Pretty cool, right, Look, I
am super excited, and uh, this show only goes on because uh,
you know, we got to pay for these big fancy screens. So anyway,
thank you so much to them, and uh, bring some more.
We we will. We will promote things that we believe in. And that's
the that's the big thing, because I will. I want the companies that
we're you know, together with to to do well because we believe in them.
And uh, I wouldn't take my money out of any market like your
four to one K And who knows what will happen with any of these businesses.
I know gold been here forever, so sure precious metals are are considered
to be eternal wealth. And we know that the streets of New Jerusalem are
paved with gold. That's true. Yeah, they're not paid with dollars.
But we also know that the government is trying to find creative ways to get
rid of the wealth of the generation that's resisting and the generation that supported you
and I. And you know, one thing we went into a Jay.
You know, the government. First of all, we don't trust them,
not even as far as we could throw it, okay for that, And
we talked about this about how the predictive programming and how the revelation of the
method. They believe in that so much so that they even produced a card
deck that is either just a game or it has some a little bit of
a like a demonic prophetic This is the thing. We don't know where it
comes from, and that like you know, Jay talked about the guy who
who made it, and look, we we're not sure, but we do
know these things pop up and we have to notice and take notice of these
these abnormalities. That this card was made in nineteen ninety four, resembles Trump
and now has the undername. The usage of it is to use it in
the game for a sniper attack. Okay, it's it's surreal. And there's
another one charismatic leader that looks like President Trump at a rally. So they
could have chosen any hair color. They chose the wavy gold. He's got
the beautiful gold, charismatic leader. Here's another one. We found the Pentagon.
Uh. That's incredibly eerie, you know. And I need to pull
up the World Trade Center one. Yeah, yeah, because the Trade Center
one was very interesting. The Trade Center one actually showed the burning towers the
same way that we saw them a nine to eleven in two thousand and one,
but it didn't mention plans. Nonetheless, looks just like the scene,
the infamous scene that we saw on that fateful day in New York. And
again, an event that undoubtedly changed this world. I remember coming to this
country prior to nine to eleven, and the country was just a completely different
place. You know this. I'm speaking the choir of this. And there's
another event that is going to change our world, and of course it is
the assassination tenth on President Trump. Well, I'll tell you it's a miracle.
President Trump's alive. And what we know right now is the official story
regarding the young man that is said to have taken the shot to try to
end President Trump's life. Well, he's twenty years old. His name is
Thomas Matthew Crooks. You've probably heard that name a million times at this point.
Did you know? He woke up on Saturday with a glint in his
eye, a murderous thought apparently at his foot. He put on ten shorts,
He put on a T shirt with a name of a progum YouTube channel.
He grabbed his dad's AR fifteen. Not an expensive one at that,
just a very simple one. Got into his car, a man of sorts
loaded up with a explosives and then he drove about an hour to a field
where President Trump was hosting a rally. This is Butler, Pennsylvania. Upon
arriving at the event, he had a rifle on a backpack. He went
out and walked the grounds. He pulled out a laser range fighter. We
found out, and he's looking at different distances, looking at the building which
he's or portally used to it again plant this shot and plant the attack.
And then approximately thirty minutes after scouting out the locations, he was spotted actually
on site by a local sniper team. It took two photos of him and
upon identifying him as someone who's carrying a laser range fighter on the event of
a rally. They said, this guy is a suspicious character. Let's keep
an eye on him. They took photos of him, they circulated amongst the
Secret Service and the local police, and then they saw this man had climbed
onto a building using an air conditioningit we're finding out now he then decided to
place himself here. It ended up being the same building. That's the staging
location, local police. Very odd situation, Matt and that he bear crawled
in the position. The rest is kind of history. Well, I mean,
we now have okay, JFK, you had the Supruter film and they
overanalyze and analyze it. They interviewed a bunch of witnesses. A lot of
those witnesses winded up dead. So now we live in the age of everybody
has a cell phone and all this media is coming out. We now can
even time when the shooter was on that roof to when President Trump was shot
at. People are screaming it that he's got a gun, he's got a
gun. They're not adding up at all. And look, it doesn't take
much. We're not going to spend a ton of time on this part of
it, because you guys already believe that the guvernment's life. Isn't it crazy
that it's almost to the fact of like they accept like this is this isn't
adding up already? Oh sure, Look we're we're veterans at this, all
right, We're veterans are dissecting the enemy's agenda their lives. So I'm going
to go right to the point on this. There actually was a fella that
we saw probably at least one hundred times at various Trump events, various foreign
trips. Yeah, so in twenty eighteen, we covered the rallies, we
went to home, so we have a firsthand experience of going through the security,
going through all that, right, and you who were about to bring
up he was willing to check us in. Usually gave us press passing exactly.
He's the one that actually organizes the Trump's events and organizes security. He
would head it over to the Secret Service, but he understands the plan,
He understands the way they've secured the president at least three hundred times. This
is Andrew Riddau. He didn an interview with in Force and listen, this
man is the single most experienced expert on how much security should be at President
Trump's rally and how this rally lacked every aspect of security that was needed.
After building over three hundred events for the president, you know, doing quite
this exact layout, you know, there are some glaring issues that I don't
know why they weren't necessarily addressed. You're exactly right. A roof, especially
that close, would normally be manned by you know, at least a counter
sniper team, if not also you know, posted agents or law enforcement.
You know, they're on that roof and on the ground surrounding that building.
You know, they would also normally create visual barriers. You know, if
they're not able to incorporate that into the secure perimeter, they would have put
up blocking elements. You know, we've done it time and time again.
What is really alarming is he saw the failure at such a level that he
was like what happened? Like this should never have happened. So when we
look at the official story, right taking the kid did it? Okay,
I We'll say, this kid out of nowhere, who was a little scrawny
kid, just like the Sandy Hook kid. He came out of nowhere,
decided to shoot the president, okay, And he walked around the ground and
no one said anything, and no one tried to stop him. Okay,
so he did this, but how did he do it? Like, how
was he able to have marksman snipers on him for such a long time,
people screaming, and he wasn't taken down. Well, that's the facts of
the matter, is that at least two minutes they knew he was on the
roof with a gun, two minutes before shooting President Trump. At least thirty
minutes before he was, you know, seen on the grounds, They engaged,
they took photos, and they made sure to identify him. That's a
thirty minute block before President Trump's even gone onto the podium. Even in the
kill zone, we now know a police officer literally got up peaked his head
over the top of the roof to look at him. Allegedly, crooks pointed
the weapon and the guy dropped down and kind of fled from the situation.
But the worst part is the building itself was the staging ground for the local
police who had the basically the responsibility of maintaining that area and keeping it safe.
So he was literally on top of the henhouse. The fox was on
top of the heathouse. If they were any kind of private contractor, they
would be sued for violating and ignoring the most basic concepts of security, preparedness
and maintaining a perimeter. The fact that an armed man with a rifle got
within one hundred and forty yards of a Trump rally, was able to lay
down after positioning himself for minutes and take multiple aim shots to the point of
clipping Trump's ear, killing other people in the crowd is absolutely grotesque. It's
either, as I said in a Twitter post, it's either malice or malpractice
gross incompetence. I spent about seventeen years in the military, fourteen of which
just about fourteen of which we're at TIERO one special operations unit called JTF two.
Our sniper team has the world record for the longest confirmed sniper kill and
a huge part of our job while I was there, and while I was
a sniper, was doing close protection for VIPs up to and including the Prime
Minister when he would go to you know, dangerous countries like Iraq, Afghanistan.
The second I saw that aerial photo of what they were saying happened,
immediately made no sense to me. You cannot in broad daylight get onto a
rooftop within It looked like maybe a couple hundred yards. If at you can't
get into that position with a gun when there's a president speaking, it cannot
be done. It's it is quite astounding. And I've spoken to a lot
of good friends of mine who are within my sector. You know a lot
of former military guys, a lot of former police guys. I know some
former Secret Service guys, and everybody is sort of absolutely wrecking their brains as
to how this could have been allowed to happen. Hey, it was going
on everybody. I'm here to tell you why the shooting and President Donald Trump
yesterday, without a doubt in my mind, was a planned and coordinated attack
on the president inside our government, our local agency or police force. Here's
why. My name is Matthew Murphy, and I am a retired Green Beret,
retired from this special forces group. But I'm also a Level one sniper,
which means that I have graduated the highest level of training for snipers that
you can do in special operations. We're training. I'm going to avoid confidential
or classified terminology for training in assassinations and counter assassinations for the very reason case
appoint yesterday the shooting and President Donald Trump. So first of all, anywhere
the president's going to go, there are teams with a secret services that go
out days, if not weeks, not months before the president will ever be
at that spot, and they do a site security assessment and they do that
with a local police forces and agencies to ensure that every potential security threat or
vulnerability. I think the questions people have right now, either we want an
independent investigation first of all, I don't want a nine to eleven commission.
No, I don't. I don't want a war report, like like,
let's look get a real result. He should hire a zone vesk. We
need to get a real uh independent look at this. But I'm almost looking
at like Trump is like man is he is? He shaking a little bit
to be like I do I need to play ball a little bit, like
it's a weird mindset. Now he got up like a like a complete badass,
like a ball should stand it up. That was iconic. But now
do you think in the back of his head like, oh man, this
is this is a new game. Now. It was not in front of
his son, So I think the that's going through his head, and I
think his son and his wife Milania, when are reading her statement. It
definitely read that she got shook up. She doesn't often make statements in everything
I know. This is like another level, right, This is a level
of the game has changed, right, even as much bravado as you want
to have, the game's changed, right. But I want to find the
truth. That's what I want. The truth. Well, and the sad
part is is we may never get the truth. We have to first accept
that in regard to some of these events, the cover up again the second
after the shot ragout. I mean, we're now hearing that the FBI has
cracked the cell phones and there now figuring out certain things about this fellow.
But let's say the first thing is, did you know the way they found
out this man's identity Matthew Crooks is that they actually had his DNA on file.
We're in the process of doing the confirmation, and once we have the
confirmation, will release the name officially to the press. But at this time
we can't give any further information on the potential. No, it's a matter
of doing biometric confirmations. So there was no identification on the individual as an
example, So we're looking at photographs right now and we're trying to run his
DNA and get biometric confirmation on well, they didn't have they didn't have a
driver's license DNA. They had his DNA in a file, so when they
took a blood sample from them, they wanted to run that and figure out
who he was. That's that is some definite futuristic. Okay, right there,
they found the blood analysis right, ran that, but they pinpointed his
car there right, the car with explosives. Couldn't they have ran the tags
on that? But I mean they weren't right for the blood. I think
it's because they were looking around. That's a good point, because they would
have had his vehicle with the driver's plates. That's true. They could have
gone that route, but they said the way they did it was through biometric
data. Now the other thing too, I know this as a fact.
I think it's fair to disclose this because there are several trained snipers now who
are speaking out against the official narrative of what's being told. The FBI,
Secret Service and DHS were calling trained snipers minutes after the attack. A couple
of my friends got a call and they were asking them specifically, who have
you trained recently? Give us the list of everyone you have trained for long
range marksmanship, which is odd because you look at the shooting, it technically
wouldn't have required a well trained marksman. I initially thought that you definitely have
to someone as with expertise to fire from long range, and you saw it.
You actually texted me right after the shooting. I had to tweet up
that said, because again I was talking to people who would know it's a
sniper from the rear, and everyone at the time was thinking it was a
man in the crowd with a handgun, and we just wanted to wait.
But the thing is this, you talked to these people minutes after a minute
it happened, so they were on the phone that quick to the database of
snipers around the country. And the other part that's weird is you'll hear,
as you've heard watching the clip over and over and over of President Trump being
shot, they say audibly, after moving President Trump from the podium, that
the shooters down. So it is already kind of weird that the FBI,
to DHS, the Secret Service would be calling snipers because they why would you
need to do that if, again, you know, the guy's dead already.
But it's because they're they're trying to figure this out. And there are
a lot of good people in the Secret Service, a lot of good people
in governments. Still despite the vaccine man's, despite the DEAI hirings and all
these other things that people are really focusing on. What we wanted to focus
on is we looked at this. We want to see what the experts are
saying about it, and the experts are not talking about DEI hiring. What
they are talking about is how none of this security plan adds up, and
also that there might have been other shot locations, other places, and other
people that could have been involved. You know, the prienitor is actually established
by your threats that are in the area. So if I don't have any
threats outside of one hundred yards, okay, fine, I can court on
off a certain area. But if I have a building one hundred and sixty
yards perfectly adjacent to the stage, that's an obvious threat, especially when an
elevated position that has overwatching me. That's a sniper's paradise. And you know
we talk about egoss. You also have which no one talks about, but
the water tower, the fire and I just screamed, it's the sniper,
it's the sniper. And he was firing down forard the waterpower. And they
had been right by the fence where the other shooter was. There was one
I heard in the water tower. There was one buck Bess and still obviously
initial reports. But what we do to the gentleman behind me? We were
I was one seat, he was to the right of me. He could
see the sharpshooter on the behind Trump. He said, the sharpshooter shot to
the left. He killed the gentleman in the water tower. Here, he
killed the gentleman in the water tower. Here, he killed the gentleman in
the water tower. Here. Like every good conspiracy, there's always a second
shooter. This has some credibility, if nothing else. But they're genuine in
what they're saying, right, they believe they saw some money in the tower.
Corey Mills referenced the tower. So what do we do with this?
Well, I think that obviously the eyewitnesses, you know, they were hearing
from individuals, you know that there's somebody up with the water tower. They
were hearing that this person had been shot the water tower too. It is
chaotic on the ground, so you can't just attribute just to that. But
there's a question that was raised by several of those experts is we don't really
know yet who was shot, who shot where? And I'll tell you we've
got some evidence on this. We're not the only people talking about this.
When you first you look at the map, as you see on screen here,
the map is is a little bit daunting. You know, we see
that this individual crooks, he was able to get a clear line of shot.
Okay, let's look at this. Look at the podium, look at
that. Yes, look, President Trump can literally probably sees so the spot.
And when he goes to these rallies there's like a long stage. He
likes to like look at me, and he's like like pointing to the crowd.
This shot is very like it's foretelling. Right. That is literally the
site of the building that the kid was on looking that's where he would have
you know, been shooting at. Now we look at the map and that's
where that picture we look at Trump, that's where over there is where the
kid was up there. We don't have as the tower as a water tower.
And the water tower is interesting. We got aerial footage that we can
show on this. Now the ARA footage clarly shows a water tower shows the
open grounds. The water tower, as they were talking about in those clips,
is a better shot location. We're not here to uh to to dissect
where the assassin should have used a better vantage point. Were we are pointing
out is that not only was there no one at the top of this building,
which was the local staging grounds. By the way, the Secret Service
director said, the reason why no personnel were based on top of the shooting
location was because of the sloped roof that people would fall off it. That
it's protocol. Apparently it's good enough for the shooter. Though. Now there
also was no one placed on the water tower, two places which would have
been simple two places that Andrew as he was parting out, or places that
it's a normal protocol to place security. So you have to ask why did
they not place people there? Could it be to put President Trump in harm's
way? There's no other explanation for this. Now, the other thing with
this is that the concept of a second shooter not there. Only people talking
about that. International Business Times put out an article more than one shooter.
Second Shooter's role in Trump attacks sparks mystery and investigation. Now what this is
about is it turns out there was a pretty reppable analysis of the audio of
the gunshots. This was done by Catlin Gregorius and Cole Whitecotton from the University
of Colorado's National Center for Media Forensics. Well, they sound very established.
Well they got they got a big old title, and the title comes from
that. They've done forensic analysis for police and for the FBI on past shootings.
As it turns out this is from them. There were three initial shots
that matched a suspected weapon a weapon A, followed by five shots from suspected
weapon B. Turns out there was an extra shot from a weapon C.
Now why this is important, amb are likely the secret service station and the
shooter, but they have no idea who sees. So this has sparked a
very interesting conversation because there's a man who used to serve as the Deputy Undersecretary
of Defense in the United States. Big title, big title, Stephan Bryan
is his name. He's got a sub stack. He was writing some interesting
things here. This is the assassin, the Trump assassin attempt. A serious
audited investigation is urgently needed. Now, this man is not a kook.
This man has a record of being a senior government official. He has a
lot of interesting things to say in the past about foreign policy. In this
case, he has said very specifically that not only should there be an investigation
of this, but we need to find out very specifically who shot and when
and if there was an unidentified weapon that was used here. We need to
do an investigation now. He also said in the subtext something very interesting.
He said, it is worth asking whether Crooks was someone ripe for exploitation.
A person without friends can be open to manipulation and can feel a sense of
protection. He's talking about the fact this man didn't have any social media.
The media has had a hard time even finding anyone to interview who knew him
or liked him. You know, even his family was kind of separated from
him. Now, mister brand who's the again, the four former deputy undersectory
defense? Uh. He said that there is at least a sub position to
be considered that Crooks did not expect to die when he shot at President Trump,
that he planned to have a spectacular escape. That's why he had explosives
in his vehicle. Nonetheless, all these things point to dare I say,
a patsy or a man cheering, candidated or some kind of MK ultra or
who knows what, some manipulation of a young man who was trying to find
his way. When we were doing the film with Judith with a kill shot,
kill shot with when she said she was with Lee Harvey Oswald months before
and was involved in a bio weapon to kill Castro. She was young,
very intelligent, susceptible. And it's kind of them now. As as for
these shooters, these killers, they kind of get these people who are a
little bit off the beaten path. Nobody liked them. Loaners. Adam Lanza
from Sandy Houck was the same kind of nerdy kid, intelligent, might have
been on the spectrum of autism and all of a sudden decides to do one
of the most horrific things that we have seen. Well, in the odd
case of this, there are many parallels. We'll be going into this here
of the next next period of time. But one parallel is that they were
both stem students, both people in the computer has been the video games a
little bit too. Also, they had nicknames. The thing that's kind of
stranger the reality, as it turns out this shooter that took a crack at
President Trump, he actually had a nickname in high school. And this nickname
was it was school shooter. Oh are you look? Look that might be
a name now because I mean, look, that's in the binnacular. It's
like we wouldn't have said it because school shooting wasn't sure. But look when
I see some suspect kids, I'm like, okay, it looks like a
school shoot. People do say this, people do say this. So he
was creepy looking, he had the mo and as again he says, settle
to manipulations. As the undersecretary pointed out, the other thing we want to
point out here is that video games. You know, I know that the
younger folks they kind of glaze over their eyes roll when they hear us.
It's true though, and look they will admit to this. At least it
makes video games especially violent ones. They make people callous, They make you
acceptable to violence. And it turns out there actually is a video game out
there that trains people to kill President Trump. At least makes you kind of
say, it makes you normalized him. But this game is more of defending
Trump, right, it's not about killing Trump. And here it is,
this is called mister President. Yeah. They got Paudie Pie playing the game
is to stop the assassination, right, you take a bullet for the president.
Yeah, it's like the backwards of it. But what some people do
is they do situations where they're actually killing him. Oh, you can play
that role in what you as the bodyguard, you're the inside man. Well
yeah, like stopping it so well, but you can flip the role.
You can pretend to be the one that's a bodyguard, but then you can
also kill him. So didn't see it coming you see, So that it's
a very weird thing. The fact that these games existed on There was a
story online. We weren't able to verify this, so they've named as a
different person's photo on it. There is a report of an account that was
run by Matthew Crooks. Anyone can name a Steam account, that's what this
is platform video games. But nonetheless, on this account it said something along
the lines of this has trained me very well for what's to look the It
literally had Thomas M. Crooks as the avatar logo of this person, right,
and then of course yeah the picture was someone different, but it was
his name, and it had like a review of it, right, and
it was like I've been planning posted July thirteen to two, like the day
of assassination. Right, So but again it's like, this is in this
realm of like predictive programming, you have the ability to do this. This
is actually a game like of something that could happen in real life. So
who's to know? Who's to say? You know that, we don't know
that that wasn't wasn't him now the picture's not him, right, But it's
just odd. Again, it's just another possibility, right, we can only
it goes as far as our imagination. But this is the world we live
in now. You can play a game that you can stop a president assassination.
Well, something in addition to this that we've seen is that our imaginations
are sometimes made up of our experiences and sometimes made faked or fabricated experiences.
One of the craziest things about our experiences is that if you have the power
to beam things into our head through books, through movies, you can manipulate
our experiences. You can manipulate our reality. It goes back to that predictive
programming went over with Jay Dyer. The predictive programming, I think in regard
to mass shooting, it's been around for a long time. I mean,
one of the first big kind of examples this was the book Catcher in the
Rye. All right, Catcher in the Rye was a foundational kind of look
at a lot of shooters, from JFK to John Lennon to Rebecca Schaeffer.
You know, there's examples of each of the shooters in this case reading Catchers
in the Rye and being kind of inspired by it. In addition to this,
we've seen examples from the government where they tried to create what we consider
to be wind up shooters. You know, the mk ulture program was very
real, and the goals of this were to create the perfect assassin, create
the perfect spy that they could carry out a horrific act and he wouldn't even
realize what he'd done. Now, this would be one thing if it was
just inside the fantasy labs of the Pentagon, but it's not. There's been
several very public and real examples that involve a Manchurian candidate or an mk ultra
individual man we say mentoring candidate. This is a made up term, but
it's of a real concept. They presented on film too. Well. This
is again, did the film spark the CIA interest in this matter and they
wanted to create this program or was this something in the CIA already and somebody
knew about it and wrote a screenplay about it, because two movies have been
made about this the manchaeran candidate in nineteen sixty two, it was released.
I have a little clip right here. Why don't we play this clip and
see how close to reality this is. I want the nominee to be dead
about two minutes after he begins his acceptance speech, depending on his reading time.
Under pressure. You are to hit him right at the point that he
finishes the raise. Nor would I ask for any fellow American in defense of
his freedom that which I would not gladly give myself my life before my liberting?
Is that absolutely clear? Would you repeat it for me? Nor would
I ask of any fellow America in defense of this freedom that which I would
killed myself my life before my GiB before Okay, creepy, it's crimpy,
And and before that part, didn't she also, uh say, you tell
them to shoot the guy in the head, said you're gonna shoot the nominee
the president whole how she's going to stand up and putting in the air.
Yeah, Well, something like, no, she was gonna get kill him
I and then she was going to take over power in this whole thing.
So, uh, here's a clip right here. This is from a documentary
about the mk Ultra program, So check this out. In nineteen seventy three,
the mk Ultra program was terminated and some of the evidence of his activities
was systematically erased. The whole thing was basically discovered because of a whistleblower named
John Marx, who wrote the first book really about the program, called The
Search for the Manchurian Candidate. There were congressional hearings here in the United States
in the mid seventies after it had been exposed, and during those hearings,
the CIA finally admitted that this program existed. They admitted that it was probably
not the right thing to do, but they feigned innocence. But you actually
so this. She talked to him one point, right, And what did
he tell you? He said about that? He said the same thing that
he's consistently said. First, you know fifty years that he has no memory
of what happened that night. I started searching for coffee. That was all
what I wanted to do, and I found them in the kitchen area,
but where I don't remember. Some in a kitchen type room. I don't
remember where I thought it, but I remember getting the coup. It was
a shining larger and there was a girl there. I don't remember what happened
after that. You don't remember. I don't remember. Do you remember anything
other than the choking and the commotion. I don't remember that. So that's
first hand testimony. I mean, this is who we're talking about this MK
Ulture program. When I sat down with the interview with RFK Junior, he
told me it was the CIA. He did it, told me the name
with a man who killed his father and told me that he had recently died
in the Philippines. So look, we are in a world that this is
real, that that we are own government agencies and presidential candidates who happened to
be relatives, a son and a nephew of one is saying that inside this
government that he wants to be president of, they killed them like this is
this is this goes. We have to take some kind of like credence to
this and say is this a possibility? If it is what happened with this
one, is it any different? Well? Sure, I think that's when
it comes to RFK Junior. You know, it's a it's quite a legacy
of again death in that family. And in respect to presidential assassinations, I
mean that that was a high profile death. It changed the country, much
like what we're talking about here with there's many country changing events that we've got
over today. The concept of these assassins not having control their faculties and being
a little bit wild and crazy and unable to recall the heinous act that they've
committed. It speaks to what Corey Mills was saying, Carysmon Corey Mills,
you know, it's we just don't know much about this individual, the shooter
that we're being told, this man that could have changed the trajectory of this
entire nation. What we do know is that when it comes to the government
programs, there does exist the ability to manufacture a perfect assassin, someone that
won't look the way you think they will. And as you pointed out very
aptly, there is a parallel. They're usually nerds, they're usually strawing cast
they play videogames, someone who's not an alpha. Right. But here,
as you bring up Corey, let's listen to what he said and his you
know, questioning about what's really happening. You know, I sit here and
I scratch my head. Don't want to be the conspiracist. You don't want
to be that, I'm telling you because that's what that's what it's leaning to
you. No, I know. And and that's the issues that you walk
this fine balance of you're not trying to be a conspiracist, but you look
as you go how could this have gone? So? But it's one thing
if someone on the street says it, it's not that I mean you Cormil's
Member of Congress, former sniper you saying it, I mean, it makes
my eyebrows go up. What should be said when you say you're walking the
line on this intentional what the ditomy an investigation is necessary this point in Congress?
Arm services mean, I'll tell you this, a lot of people like
this are like neo conservatives. And if we're going to go there, we
have to say who is who is set to benefit if President Trump dies?
But it's not just Biden who set to benefit. It is the neo conservative
army of the Republic. Okay, there we go. We don't know there's
always who gets the benefit more but for him, as a sit in congressman,
to even question this and listen to the end and how she abruptly is
like like, what listen to others? You know, I look back at
I'm thinking all right, you know, for an individual, if you look
at the escalations and how they are trying to approach him, let's just say
that. It was like, Okay, first we want to censor in silence
you. Then we want to indict and imprison you. Now we're attempting to
kill you, and you let's let's slow down, pleas I'm hearing two things
from you. I don't want to jump ahead of things, but I'm also
hearing you jumping ahead of things. Well, actually, I'm just looking at
all the different possible capabilities. And you know, one of the things as
a military remember one of the things we'll wait. But one of the things
is a person who's running the Special Operations Committee before one of the people who's
actually done this, is that you look at all potential analysis, right that
Donald Trump and his team have said, do not no, I agree,
dial it back. Do not blame this on Joe Biden. Oh okay,
Well someone is to blame. It's the kid that you think they did it
well. And it's both sides are doing this to an extent. Like again,
it just did benefit Joe Biden says, and none of us are talking
about how poorly he did in the debate, right, And obviously it could
benefit him if there had to be a last minute standard candidate. But I'll
tell you the people that at least from my view, benefits the most,
they're the neo conservatives, the ones that are showing up the RNC, actually,
people like Corey Mills. If he would have been assassinated, if President
Trump was assassinated, they would have picked Nicki Haley at the convention literally the
following week the convention's happening, and you look at this, this this could
have been a legit way to switch out the candidates. I do people don't
want to go there right now because it's look, he didn't die, and
and look that we don't want to speak on behalf of the congressman. But
they have spoken now. They are pro Ukraine, their pro war. A
lot of these people are pro pro Israel. So we look at JFK.
Everybody thinks that Lee Harvey Oswald was a screaming communist, but we know from
firsthand account interviews with people who knew him, who slept with him, even
that he was a right wing, very conservative, and was angry that they
didn't go and finish the job with castro Oswell's sheep dipping his His being portrayed
as a communist was done out of Guy Banister's office, so he was sheep
dipped for months as a communist by giving literature Lee hand this out today,
this is your assignment. I came across the fact that Oswald, a private
in the Marines, had taken a Russian examination, and I knew the privates
did not take Russian examinations unless they were to connected with intelligence. So that
caused me to be curious about five point forty four Camp, which was the
address stamped on one circular that they gave out one time before. Obviously Banishter
told them Lee no more addresses. I saw him one time with a man
by the name of Guy Banister. And what Guy's role was in all of
this. I really don't know. That goes flies one hundred percent of what
the narrative we've been taught. We live in a world that the truth is
somewhere in the middle. It's usually not given to us in black and white.
But as he was saying, we got to look at both sides that
what you just said, No one wants to go there on the right,
like, are you kidding me? But JFK wanted to get out of Vietnam,
you know, LBJ he benefited extremely well from staying in office. That
would be a party on party hit. Everything's everything's in possibilities. Why because
things don't add up? Oh, because they let a kid go on a
building that was the exact place where you put a sniper and had three minutes
on him and let him take shots. We think back to many of the
most recent mass shootings and each of them have had a former FBI handler.
They've had fore knowledge. The Parkland shooter, for example, was visited by
a sheriff, and he pulled a gun on a sheriff. Okay, and
that was still Darkland. Weird thing to interview with the girl right after it
happened, since she was running down the hallway with him. Then as I
was going down the stairs, I heard it a couple shots fired. Everyone
was freaking out saying that it was a gun. And as we were walking
the whole class together, I actually was speaking to the suspect, Nicholas's curis,
and as I was speaking to him, he seemed very I don't know
what the word I want to say is, but he was trouble in middle
school. So I kind of joked to him about it and said, I'm
surprised you weren't the one who did it, and he just gave me a
huh. So, uh, that's really what happened. You were walking down
the hall, he had already fired at that time, Yes, sir,
with him. Weren't you scared in the moment. I wasn't because there was
obviously deaf shooter involved. But oh you think he was not the only one?
No, definitely not. Why do you say that, because when shots
were fired, I saw him after the fact, so and the shots were
coming from the other part of the building, so there definitely had to be
and seeing another shooter coming after them. Sure, this is where we're getting
to, like the fog of war and a lot of things. Even those
people they might have heard the tower, We don't know. Things are such
an at I don't know is because you do hear these clips come out and
they don't go with the narrative. They're trying to force down the public.
Well, there's millions of people that have been questioning this matter. I think
their guts, their instincts, their discernment, or from the get go were
being set off. You know what was trending the day of assassination Sandy Hook?
I remember I think I text you and said, Sandy Hook is trending
right now, and you have to say why? Why? I mean,
it's almost a word. You can't even say anymore, those two words,
right, Sandy Hook, because what happened with Alex right, that was like
you talk about this and you're done, right, But it was trending for
a reason because they don't believe the narrative. And there was a young kid
who was kind of autistic, didn't get along with anybody outsider, who all
of a sudden started wanted to do something so crazy like this. Well,
to this day, we don't know what Adam Lanza's motive was because he's dead,
right, he's killed. Same with this fella, We're never gonna know
what crooks really thought wanted to do. Didn't leave a manifesto behind, at
least not yet, and he's dead. He was killed and right, no
social media, no social media. No one knew the kid. His parents
never talked to anybody, His uncle never talked to his grand to his nephew
or his brother. It's like these people live in in a void. Right.
Well, you, you and I are thought criminals in this because we
refuse to forget things that don't add up. The same way these experts we
just played are pointing out some very credible holes in the official story and again
that this can't be an aptitude. Okay, it's the same way that we
don't forget some very glaring issues with the last major incident that paralleled this.
Now when it came to Sandy Hook, I cannot forget it. Can I
get out of my head that there were armed men in the woods. Yeah.
As we were putting this show together, we both were like, do
you remember hearing the live police scanners saying there's people in the woods. Yes,
And I'm gonna remind you of this, folks. It was not a
manifestation or your imagination. If you look this up and you tried to do
some search your own Google, what you will likely find is that all they
weren't armed, or it was ah, it was a mistake, or it
was some kind of miscommunication. No, the truth was there were men,
at least one man armed by the wood. Wooded a reportedly there was multiple
men going by the school. And lastly they were even arrested and held.
And someone even spoke to that individual and the person spoke back and said it
wasn't. There's footage of them, as we can show right here. This
was live footage of these men who they now they weren't. They were taken
to the custody, right, at least one they were detained, right,
and they were. This whole thing was so odd, and that's why I
think that's why they threw the book at Alex because I mean, don't question
this one, but there are some weird things that happen with this, okay,
So why can't we just ask the question. I'm not saying anything definitively,
but for sure there are eyewitnesses who saw people coming out of the building,
and there was police scanners who said there were two men running into the
woods. So let's play this saw him two shutters running pass the building past
the gym, which would be rear, two shutows running pass the building.
Those reports too, shoes, shadows running past the building. Then you cut
to this. These were the men who were running in the woods apprehended.
And then there was a testimony of a kid. I say testimony. There
was a reporter, they were asking questions. There was a kid, and
then there was another man who actually spoke to the guy who the guy spoke
to him. So what's what's the show them this to the firehouse. There's
a man pinned down to the ground with handcuffs on. They did walk a
guy out of the woods. I saw him walk a guy out earlier with
handcuffs. He walked by us and said he didn't do it. It was
a grown man, A grown man. Yeah, he's sitting in the front
of the police car over there now, So I mean he didn't ever gut
no, I didn't see any gun, just had him handcuffs him and he
walked by us and looked into a parent's eyes and said, I didn't do
it. How is he dressed camo pants with a dark jacket. You know
what's so interesting about that is that that man was clear to say that he
wasn't armed. And you know, you look at and you see this.
This is listed among one of the conspiracy theories that you can't talk about now
It took a little bit of digging, but we have found the definitive proof
that he was indeed armed. Now it's very odd. This has took us
going to the way back time machine. By the way, I don't know
much longer way back time machine. I don't know how long the Internet's gonna
last. I'm pretty sure they don't want us to be able to look these
kind of things up. This is the New Town b It's been around since
eighteen seventy seven. You know a search engine. I found it on HANDIX.
I didn't go to Rush one. I went to the Rush one and
we found that on there. So this was posted December twenty seventh, twenty
twelve. Now this is an article. You wouldn't think that this would have
any information of note about what we're talking about now because of the title Police
union seeks funding for trauma treatment. They're talking about how a lot of the
mergency personnel who responded, you know, out to the twenty eight deaths of
you got to get the pockets Fat Tragedy Council. They have PTSD all kind
of stuff. So they say this a lot buried at the bottom of the
article scrall all the way down right. Here, a man with a gun
who was spotted in the woods near the school in the day of the incident
was an off duty tactical squad police officer for another town, according to the
source. And it's dead there. That's it's literally So I don't want puts
out for just the second. Here we're first told it was like a hunter.
Right, you're told not to even question it to begin with. But
this is just like the the inconsistencies in Pennsylvania with President Trump, and usually
the truth comes out right afterwards, right, I want to say the most
information, right, you're just like before they come in and kind of like
scrub everything and that kind of comes out for the interviews on second, and
YouTube's crazy with their algorithm now goes right to the Big four of CNN for
like these you don't get weighted. You can't get those like on the ground
things. Now X you can, Right, That's the beautiful thing that you
have that ability. But YouTube used to be like that you could upload,
but now you search something and goes right to the narratives that they want.
Right, But this was stuck at the bottom of the page and stuck way
back in the way back time. Machine. It's a smoking gun. And
this is why, first of all, off duty tactical squad police officer from
another town, not for San Dirk, not for New Town, for another
town. That's the first thing. Two, he's armed, he has a
gun. Why wasn't he responding inside there? Why would he be in the
woods and not in the building trying to kill the little kid who was shooting
other little kids exactly. And the other thing too is we were told and
you if you look this up, I'm telling you, folks, what you
will find is, Oh, there was a hunter, unarmed hunter who's apparently
gonna behind elementary school. Yeah, and how is he gonna kill the barrel
of the gonna straggle it? Okay, who does that? But here's the
point. It's odd. It's already odd for someone with a weapon to be
by a school, but on the day of the worst mass shooting in US
history this place. That is crazy. So there was a really odd situation
that happened in January twenty thirteen. This is at the beginning of the year.
This is right after the shooting and Sandy Hooks Sandy Grin happened in December
of twenty twelve. So This is again January twenty thirteen, a school with
about two hundred and eighty students in Giles County. This is in a completely
different states in Virginia, in Narrows, Virginia, they called off school.
They canceled school and the day they're supposed to come back. Now, the
reason they did this is there was an interesting article had been posted by a
sleuth online named the next school massacre target and it had named this school in
Giles County as the location of the attack. Now, the county sheriff said,
we had to take this as serious information. We had to cancel school.
And they also mentioned in this in this article Matt from w DBJ seven
that it was in relation to the Colorado movie theater shooting that it happened the
previous month. So you remember there's a lot of shootings that were happening in
quick secession, and then what was happening after it was calls for God guns,
yes exactly, which, by the way, right after President Trump was
shot, the first thing that came out from Biden administration officials was we got
to do something about these guys. Look, they gave up very quickly on
that those shootings were happening, the one live on TV with the news anchor
and all. It was like one after the other, and you know,
it was like that's where I was like, man, there has to be
something to this because they have a motive right afterwards, and that's to take
your guns away, because ultimately in their plan, they have to take your
freedom to protect yourself from tyranny. Yes, their plan is to disarm.
Their plan is to take away the tools of resistance. Now, this article
got a little weird because again this is right on the heels of Sandy Hook
and you're asking, why is another school trying to shut downs? They thought
the whole school is gonna have another mass shooting. The reason why they thought
this map because there was a scene in the movie Batman, Dark Knight,
Dark Knight Rising. Now this had come out in July, so it was
a summertime movie in twenty twelve, and in that movie there actually was a
map. It's in one of the scenes and in this scene it actually had
both narrows. The town which this this sheriff was saying also Sandy Hook.
So this is very odd if someone made this is a scene from the Dark
Knight Rising. Yeah, so it's it happened so quick too, an hour
and a half into the movie. But on this map, Sandy Hook.
That's Sandy Hook. So as we move a little forward, they inverted it
so we can see it right, Sandy Hook. But okay, this is
so crazy movie predictive programming. This happened this, this came out before the
jil in July. Joh was when the movie came out. The shooting was
in December. Again, again, what are we saying is it's this their
their revelation of method. I don't know, I don't know. It's odd,
right, what we do know what we do because like, well would
you can't ports? And we were like, no, the sheriff of Giles
County so in this scene, yes, in the scene you see Giles as
well. So they're like, well, dang, maybe it's the calling card,
Like maybe we should pay attention. And that's what we're saying with this
whole program today. We have to pay attention to these things because what if
it is their way to do it, like they have to let you see
it in their predictive program one that we we maybe get conditioned to it.
Two we accept it because that's our reality. Or three this is part of
the deal, the pact with the devil. You could say that they have
to let you know what happens before they do. Matta, I know you
agree with me on this. I think the only true way to protect yourself
in this world is to be protected by the blood of Jesus Christ. Look,
there is literally no body armor, no secret service detail, there's nothing.
That's why the truth is like we search for the truth in the mire
of all this stuff. But whenever people come to me and they're like,
hey, I got the vaccine and I'm scared, I tell them, Look,
you took a vaccine that was an experimental vaccine that had dire consequences.
It was made to do what it's doing. Give your life to Christ.
Come to Christ. Even if the worst happens for you on this earth that
you die, the best thing will happen to you live eternity with Him.
There is truth. There is ultimate truth. In his name's Jesus. With
the shooting, we're seeing people say God had his hand in there. Absolutely
what a world we live in if he hadn't made that turn. We just
you know, he made the tour. God moved them. We don't know
divine intervention possibly, but we me and you know that, we do this
because we love Christ's children, that's it, and we want everybody to be
saved. And look, truth tellers at this day and age are fear and
far between because it's not popular. It's not popular to tell the truth.
It's not popular to go after and try to dissect and make sense of the
craziness of this world. But nonetheless, the Lord has placed this in a
very interesting position, a very important position at this time, and as we
will continue to do, we will expose to their agenda. Thank you for
being part of the agenda.