Jay Diary of Jay's analysis, and today I want to talk about the solar
eclipse mass religious deception and some of the history of the way that the state,
the way that the deep State cults had utilized religious deception, the idea
of signs and wonders events to dupe the public, to corral them and control
them, and to maybe even distract them from authentic Christianity from the real authentic
religious experiences out there, utilizing a lot of tricks, a lot of scams,
and a lot of skullduggerid we go back to the early days of the
Christian Church, after the Apostles and their death. The Church, as you
guys know, is pers you could about the Roman Empire, and I'm not
going to be talking a whole lot about deep theological stuff. I did want
to talk a little bit about it because it's going to relate to where we
are today and the commonalities amongst odd groups, cults and sects that are the
source oftentimes for the delusion that most people believe in the religious fear, including
in the so called Christian sphere. In the early days of the Church,
when the Roman Empire was persecuting it for the first three centuries, there were
at least as far as we know, many many, many countless martyrs.
At the same time, though, there was a lot of groups that sprang
up that had a lot of odd, bizarre beliefs that were contrary to the
doctrine of the teaching of the Apostles that was handed down. A lot of
these groups believed in esoteric things like the Gnostics. There wasn't one Gnostic group.
There was a whole myriad of Gnostic groups. And if we read the
text well known text from Saint Irenaeus of Leon written in about one eighty called
Against Heresies, the first two or three hundred pages of that books actually detailing
all of the Gnostic sects that he was aware of by ONEADAD. Now he
was a bishop in the Orthodox Church of that time, and so he is
our earliest witness to this myriad of cults. The amazing thing about how the
Gnostic sex and cults of that time was that many of the beliefs that they
had then still are present today. I don't think there's like one group that
survived, but a lot of the errors, a lot of the mistakes that
they held to, such as the idea that the created world is inherently evil,
that it was created by a gnostic demiurge, that we need to escape
the creation, or perhaps we need to embrace degeneracy. There's all kinds of
different gnostic groups and sex. Some are very austere, kind of like Brahmins,
almost mandating no marriage, mandating not eating meat, veganism, these kinds
of things all the way to the opposite extreme of groups that believed in full
and total indulgence. And right around that same time we had the rise of
a group called the Montanists, and Montanus was the, according to his own
claims, the voice of the Holy Spirit. He said that he was really
the new Oracle, and that we didn't really need the scriptures so much.
They might have a real elements, but the voice of the Holy Spirit was
now this living guiding oracle man Montanus, And he actually drew quite a few
followers away, and he ended up being the first so called charismatic or maybe
kind of Pentecostal that you could think of in the early Church. Other grips
rose like the Aryans, not Aryan, like a neo Nazi an Aryan in
the sense of Arii in who believe that Jesus was the first thing that God
created, foundation of the world, the son of God being an early,
early, pre eternal creation. And since Jesus was a creature, he couldn't
be divine, he couldn't be worshiped, he couldn't be a real savior in
any significant sense. He was more of a moral example. But the Arians
were not just an odd, random political or excuse me, a theological opinion.
They were actually a group promoted by certain members of the state. And
the reason that the state has always preferred in many cases, not always,
but in many case has preferred certain heresies is because they make the state kind
of a de facto god. So a lot of heresies, believe it or
not, are actually useful to the state, not all of them. Sometimes
there are heresies that arise that are contrary to the state, and they have
to be suppressed. But sometimes heresies are very useful cults, groups, sects,
and the imperium or the state, if they're smart enough, they might
try to use them, co opt them, and spin them to their own
designs. And we're going to look at a few of those examples as we
progress through this discussion today, as we move into the permeation of the Roman
Empire by the Christian Church, we see less and less of the kind of
wilder sects, and we get more and more of these kind of specified sects
that focus on disputes about the Trinity or disputes about who the person of Jesus
is. And this is around the time as we get up into the fifth
sixth seventh century, we get the rise of a new cult that takes over
a large portion of the Middle East and other places, and that's Islam.
And Islam is a mix, you could say, of a lot of different
ideas, and even according to the Oxford Handbook of Islam, many of the
early Church fathers, who say John Damascus, who wrote in the Days of
the Rise of Islam, they accused it of being a mix of Nestorian forms
of so called Christianity, Aryan forms of Christianity, latent arapaganism, as well
as Jewish traditions, Tamudic traditions, and pseudopographic Christian traditions. So Islam is
a sort of odd mix of all of these things, and that's I think
one reason why it's very confusing to a lot of people. And so in
the case of Islam, we get the first widespread, large scale rejection of
the notion of Christ as the son of God. In Islam, Allah has
no sons, can have no sons. Allah is a master and you are
a slave. You are not a son of God. That's a totally different
that's a different idea. So in Islam we get this market turn away from
even the earlier forms of Christianity that were heterodox or pseudo Christianity, black arianism.
We get a more warrior spirit and more radical idea of what John in
his Epistles calls Antichrist. John says that Benny Men denies the logos in the
flesh that the Son of God has come in to the flesh. He says,
that is spirit of Antichrist. And so Islam is an Antichrist movement.
Even though it might recognize Jesus as a nice man or a prophet or something
like this, really it doesn't matter because that's not what is necessary. What's
necessary, as Jesus says in John seven eighty nine, is that he's the
way of the truth and the life. He is the son of God,
He's the only way. So this religious movement, other scholars argue, not
just a mix of kind of early heresies. There were also powerful state figures.
Eventually you get shakes, you get sultans who realize the power of this
religion, this newly created what we say is a schism or heresy of Islam
to be used by the state. And in my view, that's why you
get, for example, the burning and of many Korans in the early phase
to give the appearance of one Koran. There was always one Koran. Likewise,
we get the usage of Islam in a lot of different versions and sects
throughout these centuries by multiple state actors ottomans, sult you know, sultan rulers
and so forth, the Celdruk Turks. And what happens is that this takes
on a lot of different forms, but it's very useful, especially to certain
of the Ismaili sex. For example, in this RAWI added a video many
years or maybe a year ago on the assassins, the hashashin, and they're
techniques for training assassins and using things like high powered drugs hashish to dupe young
guys into thinking that well if you basically they would drug them, show them
this little garden of paradise that the very cunning leader had created. There would
be virgins and wine and food. And while these guys are basically tripping balls.
When they come down, he says, Aha, you see, I've
taken you to paradise. And if you become an assassin for me, your
this is your afterlife, right. It's a freak golf in the afterlife.
And so that obviously is an early version of mind control and the creation of
a kind of an assassin. But that's just one example of the variations that
we see. I would say the same thing goes along with the late early
Medieval usage of the templars. We get the templars, who you might think,
well, aren't they the enemy of the the Muslims and the assassins.
Well, something happens with the templars. We don't exactly know what in the
Middle Ages, but they at some point become entranced with something beyond Christianity or
papal Christianity. If you look at a great historical texts, there's a good
book that I recommend from Papadaccus and mayandor if This is a newly produced historical
text covering the Middle Ages, and it discusses early on that you get the
Gregorian papal reforms in the eleven hundreds in the West. And what that does
is really change is the structure of the church. You get a new ecclesiology
where the pape, you see, the pope kind of kind of calls the
shots on everything. He's above all the world rulers. He's above every emperor.
Every emptor must submit to him. He can call standing armies. We
see this with the Borgia popes. He can actually communicate anyone that doesn't fight
in his armies, as Alexander the sixth threatens to do. He has now
become basically the Quiza's hat or rack. He's the god emperor. And at
the same time you get these secret orders of warrior monks. Now, in
earlier Christian canon law or church law, for example, the Council of Calcidon,
you have canons that say that people who choose a monastic style of life
to renounce the world, they can't be a functionaries of the state. They're
not supposed to be. They can't go into battle, they can't do this
kind of stuff. And yet we have the papacy saying in this eleventh century,
in the Gregrowing reforms, now I'm going to have warrior monks. Now
I'm going to have essentially secret society networks that will fight for me against this
or that person, or this or that enemy. The problem is that this
then creates the pattern for secret society networks. And I'm not trying to relay
all the blame on the papacy. I think other groups were involved as well.
There were other groups with secret society networks. Muslims had secret society networks.
The Rabbinical Jews had different types of secret society, secret networks and secret
teachings as well. And so a lot of different groups have the same type
of exoteric Christianity, which is for the masses and an esoteric inner secret Christianity
for those initiated. And the groups that we're talking about, the Knights Hospital
or the Templars, these become breeding grounds for these kinds of secret society networks.
And we all know that the Templars discovered a lot of well we don't
know exactly why they discovered, but they stumbled upon the idea of usury and
fractional reserve banking and this kind of stuff, and they gained a lot of
power and a lot of wealth. And then they had other people like the
papacy and the King of France come after them in the thirteen hundreds of the
Council of the End. So that's where they're accused, for example, of
being gnostic heretics. Now, whether they were really into kissing the butt of
Satan and worshiping the head of a cat or whatever they're claim to be involved,
I don't know if that is the case. I know that interestingly,
the Vatican, I think maybe ten fifteen years ago esposally apologized to the Templars.
But what's fascinating is that the Templars do continue their tradition that seems to
more and more focus on odd things like worldly power, geopolitics again, secret
society type networks, and the radical devotion to Mary beyond what most Christianity prior
to that had seen as normative. For example, if you look at famous
paintings in relationship to the character of Bernard of Clairvaux, he was one of
the founders, I think of the Cistercians and the monastic orders related to fighting
in the Crusades, some of the warrior monks look to Bernard of Clervaux.
You'll find these bizarre paintings of Mary and milk coming out of her breast into
the mouth of Bernard. I think all of this is again a lot of
weird gnostic tendencies that we're seeing in the Latin West, again through these sort
of secret society networks that were sort of the direct armies of the papacy at
the time. This is why we get yeah, there we go. I
don't know if you see the squirting milk teat picture there, but it's a
famous picture of Pernard, but it expresses what we're talking about, and you
get the same types of tendencies and the Renaissance papacy, and they're focused on
a lot of alchemy and hermeticism and what is really neoplatonic philosophy and not really
Christianity. Again, I'm not laying all the blame on the papacy. There's
a lot of players, a lot of people involved in this, but these
are examples of Christianity or religious ideas deviating off into weird pseudonostic hermatic traditions.
And it's always tied with these secret society networks operating in the underground because at
this time there was a lot of legal prohibitions on people exercising, say witchcraft
in public or exercising sorcery and public. Yeah, there's the squirting teat image
there, which is very odd. I don't think any this would never be
seen in any any Orthodox church. But this is this Renaissance period when again
things are getting a little weird in the West and we get a lot of
chromatic artwork. I used to think that, you know, Dan Brown came
out with his book, which I think is ridiculous. But you know,
I remember thinking that, oh, there's no hermetic artwork in the Vatican.
That's that's ridiculous. Well it turns out no, Actually, Rome has quite
a bit of chromatic and no chemical and neoplatonic art, and it's not so
much actually at the Vatican. Although Bernini did utilize this geometry and this sort
of esoteric architecture all through Saint Peter's and whatnot, the majority of this is
actually over in the Vatican Museum, which is the old Borgia papal apartment.
So it's maybe not so much of it's in the Vatican itself or Saint Peter's
Cathedral, but over in the Vatican Museum, and it's full of really weird
occult so Turk stuff, and so these secret society networks, these traditions,
a lot of these ideas they pass into the Venetian nobility. A lot of
the Venetian power structure utilizes these secret society networks as well as the idea of
debt based currency usery based currency. And this is interesting because this has formerly
been forbidden in Christendom as a whole. So you weren't supposed to exercise or
utilize usery principles in the first thousand years of the Christian imperium. Byzantium for
a long time forbade usury. Until the last period before Byzantium fell they began
to accept the use of usury. The Latin West also forbade it until the
Papacy, I think in the Renaissance. In this around this Borgia Renaissance period,
the papacy begins to lighten up and say, no, you known,
there's cases where we can begin to do this. And this opens the door
really to the rise of So it becomes the Vatican Bank, as we know
in Operation Gladia, that becomes the key bank for a lot of black operations.
A lot of the deep state structure funding things like Gladio around contratied to
the Vatican Bank. Weapons sales tied to the Vatican Bank. All of this
because this is really the most secretive bank in the world. That's why you've
seen so many banking scandals related famously in mainstream news for the last thirty forty
fifty years to the Vatican Bank. But again, I'm not laying all the
blame on the Vatican Bank because there's other players as well. So a lot
of people would lay blame on Jews for a lot of this, but you
could never have had usury in the West due to the fact that Jews didn't
have a lot of power. Even though Jews supported usury, they were not
the ones calling the shots throughout the medieval Latin period. So how do we
get to this point where usury becomes prominent. Well, it couldn't have happened
without the dominant powers in the West, the state power, and the Vatican
beginning to eventually concede to these things. So we have to be careful where
we lay this blame because it's well known. It's been demonstrated by multiple scholars
that the Vatican is actually the one that changed its position on usury. Now,
if we look at the period of the Reformation, as we move up
into church history in the West, we get a lot of these cults and
groups that spin off of the abuses of the Latin papal Church. And certainly,
I would agree that a lot of the objections of Luther and Calvin and
the Reformers were legitimate. They had a lot of reason to complain with,
a lot of superstition, a lot of ignorance amongst the Christian people and nations.
There was a lot of abuse of clergy with multiple wives and girlfriends and
all kinds of stuff because they were supposedly supposed to be celibate. I mean,
a lot of absurd, you know, ridiculous things, the abuse of
indulgences, then the idea that you could donate to have your temporal sins remitted,
and then that the pope can free people from purgatory. A lot of
the things that Luther complained about Martin Luther in the ninety five theses, they're
legitimate criticisms. But one thing that happened as a result of Reformation was this
other element of the Reformation that you might or might have heard of, called
the radical Reformation. So if you think about the Reformers, we think about
Luther, Calvin, Zwingli. There was a whole other group, all other
branch that the classical Reformers of Lutheran calvin actually fought against and had many of
them killed. And the radical Reformers are the sort of the forefathers you could
say, of the Amish, the Mennonites, the hutter Rights, which you
think, well, they're not very well known. Nobody really cares what Amish
and Mennonites are up to unless they're selling dairy that's not legal according to the
state or whatever. Then they're like a terror cell, right, But really
the Amish Mennonite theology morphs into other things. This is where we begin to
get Baptist theology. The Baptists that we know about today in America, and
that's a big portion of the Evangelicals. They come out of the Anabaptists,
who were one of the radical Reformation movements. And so it's interesting to me
that we think about classical Reformation theology of the quote traditional Presbyterian or Lutheran or
Methodist churches or even the Anglican Church. They had a close relationship to the
state. A Luther, for example, couldn't have had his Reformation without the
support of the German princes because they didn't want to go along with the pope
and his geopolitical power. So there's a lot of state power behind the Reformation.
When we look at the Puritans, right, they attempted to kind of
set up a sort of a theocracy, which is another kind of state power
type of institution as well. And the boy is here is not to say,
oh, they're all good, they're all bad. It's just to look
at the patterns of history and see how this relates to there we are now
with the upcoming supposed solar eclipse and all these end time speculation and people freaking
out and people getting into the sensationalism of it. And my point is going
to be very clearly that a lot of this is used to manipulate the socially
engineered people. But the Reformers, as we said, are not a monolithic
group. You get the radical Reformers who are made up of a plethora of
kind of odd balls. You have people that are the Quakers and the Shakers,
and I think the Shakers still exists. There's like three people there's like
three old guys in Pennsylvania somewhere and one woman or something like the last of
the Shakers, which is a split of the Quakers. I'm sure you've heard
of Quaker oats, right, and these again, these are all these weird
Yeah, here we go. Was a bunch of people who thought that well
Lutheran Calvin didn't go far enough. And again, you think if you look
at these lists of beliefs here, some of them were communistic, some of
them were pacifists, some of them believed in a direct speaking of the Holy
Spirit. And we didn't really worry about anything to do with tradition or sacraments
or baptism, the Word Supper, or the Bible. It's just this inner
swelling up where God directly moves me and talks to me. That's a big
portion of that group. And that's relevant because I would argue that what we
see in America the delusion part of Christianity. It's not so much the classical
quote unquote Protestant churches. Those are pretty much dying. They've been sterilized and
committed to a plan of death and dying out for many decades. Going back
to the mainline Protestant churches accepting Rock Capriller funded liberalism since the twenties and thirties,
so they've been confessionally liberal and on the path to the acceptance of sterilization
through skittles, marriage, through female quote bishops and ministers, that's all a
path to sterilization. And the statistics actually this out. Most of those mainline
Protestant churches are projected to die out in the next twenty thirty forty years because
they're not reproducing, they're not making converts, they're really just boomers and people
that are attached to that tradition for whatever reason. And so the mainline Lutherans,
for example, I think, are projected to die out in twenty thirty
forty years. And so this is the consequence of those churches becoming controlled,
manipulated, and steered by powerful entities like the Rockefeller Foundation. Foundations that give
millions of dollars to decide who will be in their seminary. Really true,
in fact, more often than not, it's against the fact of what's the
case or what's true, and that's again for the benefit of the state.
Now we're working our way up through church history, and we're talking about the
Protestants, we're talking about the Anabaptists, the Radical Reformation, and how that's
overlooked as a really powerful influence in America because with the death of a lot
of the main line what we call classical Protestant churches from Luther and Calvin and
the Methodist of John Wesley and those numbers declining, what ends up being the
majority of so called christian in America is a lot of the Protestant will assume
a lot of the evangelical and charismatic groups. And I'm not trying to go
after or hurt anybody's feelings here, but I do have to point out that
what often goes along with a lot of these groups is the idea of an
early as soume coming return of Christ preceded by a rapture. And the problem
with the rapture doctrine is number one. If we look at the history of
the Church and the church that for example, put the Bible together in the
first seven centuries of Christianity, nobody ever taught the doctrine of a quote pre
tribulation rapture. This is actually an idea that was invented. Some say it
was some jesuit. I'm not sure I believe that, but it really goes
along with what we call dispensationalism and Dispensationalism is a heresy that pops up in
the late eighteen hundreds, promoted by a guy who split from the Church of
England and was part of a domination called the Plymouth Brethren, and his name
was John Nelson Darby, and Darby came up with this idea of kind of
charting out the history of prophecy and coming out with these different divisions in church
history and that God had different plans and ways to save people in different ways.
So in the Old Testament you'd be saved with certain types of works,
but now that Jesus came, it's all about grace, and there's grace as
set an attention against works, and now we can be saved in a different
way. But then when Jesus comes back, there'll be a new temple and
he'll reinstitute animal sacrifices and we'll get a thousand year reign of Jesus in Israel
and all of this sort of ridiculous nonsense, which is not true. In
fact, this is a huge delusion, and it's a delusion because number one,
the rapture is an idea that's intended to cause you to sit back and
wait and actually want the Antichrist to come. So rather than taking action and
rather than being involved, Christians are basically pacified and emasculated by thinking that,
well, there's no point because everything is destined to become really, really bad
and things never get better, and so we might as well just concede to
wickedness and become I don't know, some sort of some weird version of blackpill.
But when Paul talks about being caught up in the clouds in his letter
to the Thessalonians, there's no reason to think that this is any different than
the Second Coming and the general resurrection of all mankind. And that was always
what Christianity taught. So if that's the case, and if it's not,
really if the so called basis for the pretribulation rapture is very flimsy, like
John in the Book of Revelation being caught up to see the visions. Oh
that's gonna that's a tollness about the rapture of the Christians before the tribunal election.
No, John is seeing those events in his day. Okay, this
is prior to the destruction of the Temple in seventy eight eight. So if
John is seeing things that were contemporary and events that were going to happen to
the people he's writing to. Remember, he writes to seven actual churches in
Asia Minor, and he warns those actual churches about events that they're going to
experience. Okay, what use would it be to them if it's events that
are two thousand years later. I'm not saying that there's no application to the
end of the world in the Book of Revelation. I'm just saying that it's
out of the context of who he's writing to. But the real issue here
is not even that it's Well, then, what's the point of the rapture
doctrine and the idea of say, evangelical Zionism and so forth. Where does
this come from? Well, as I said, you got these people at
Oxford Cambridge, people in these elite British circles who happen to be also connected
oftentimes to the idea of British Israelite theology. And if you don't know what
that is, that's a weird idea that the ten lost tribes in the Old
Testament somehow might be people in Europe or perhaps the Scottish or the English,
they're part of these lost tribes. And who even knows that that's true.
But this theory also plays into the idea that you find in a lot of
European nobility and regal traditions that the Merovingians are the descendants of Jesus somehow,
or that the British kings and queens descend from Joseph of Arimathea. Right now,
they actually do kind of have this mythology there. I think it's complete
nonsense, but I think they use this myth as a kind of way to
prop up their status beliefs. And obviously, if you believe that the British
Isles and the peoples are a lost tribe of Israel, you can then begin
to appropriate the promises to Israel or Jews to you, and it becomes this
ridiculous sort of self propagating backing up of the state. And it's really an
Anglo version of Hebrew Israel ideology, right, which is absurd. And it's
like, no, no, the real Jews are random black people. Okay,
I'm not trying to be mean to anybody, but there was a meme
going around on Twitter, and it was various rappers and people saying, look,
here's the icons from the fourteen hundreds out of Russia. And look,
it's Jesus as black. No, sorry, Jesus was a Jew. He
wasn't a black guy. Nothing against black guys. Jesus even being a Jew
can still save anybody, right, So that's what he has to be a
Hebrew to fulfill the Messianic prophecies. Right. So you can't be the Messiah
and not be in the lineage of Abraham, David, et cetera. Okay,
you got to be. And so it's not going to be a dude
in the new media or a dude in Africa. So Jesus has to be
a Jew, has to be a Hebre to fulfill the prophecies. Right.
And that's why the Gospels, for example, include the genealogies. There weren't.
If it didn't matter, then they would have genealogy. Well, the
genealogy show that he's a descendant of Abraham and David. Anyway. Uh.
The point though, with the rapture and dispensationalism in the science idea of topic
up church history and the interjection of the pre millennial and pre tribulation, the
pre millennial idea of the kingdom, the introduction of the pretribulation rapture This is
really a neutralizing, masculating effect on Christianity. It's a heresy because it's a
completely new, made up teaching. It was never in the church prior to
that time of John Nelson Darby. But it's more than that because this odd
sort of not well known belief in the mid to late eighteen hundreds gets popularized
by a guy who creates a study Bible and his name is Schofield. The
Scofield Study Bible is produced by Oxford. Isn't interesting? Why would Oxford University
publish this bizarre, fringe idea of end time stuff study Bible that gets heavily
promoted in America as soon as it's published after Schofield puts it together. Well,
I can tell you what. The British Empire had a goal at a
strategy because they knew via the Balfour Declaration that number one, the establishment of
the State of Israel was soon to come. This dispensationalist minded Study Bible would
then inculcate America and the West, particularly Evangelicals and Protestants, with a lot
of these new ideas and new teachings, which kind of ultimately it's not their
only point, but I ultimately served to back up the re establishment of the
nation state of Israel, as if that was the fulfillment of some sort of
end Time's prophecy. So this was an engineered thing in my view. I'm
not saying that there won't be in Times stuff relating to Israel, and I'm
not saying that Israel doesn't play any kind of role in the d Times.
I'm not saying any of the I'm just saying that if you look at the
actual history of why they promoted the Schofield Study Bible and why it was so
popular in American evangelical circles, it's really the source of why America became an
evangelical Zionus promoting thing. So, whether you think that's right or wrong,
I'm saying that that seems to be how it came about. And the problem
here is that now the just like we saw, for example, with Puritans,
if you read the Puritans the way they speak of America, the purities
is viewed America like it was the church right and the American Constitution, or
or the city on a hill that's the church. If you're an evangelical Zionist,
there's not You don't really conserve with the Church. You actually believe in
Israel more than the Church. So that's now your sort of focus of everything.
And the point is that it takes the position, it takes the focus
away from the Messiah. We'll be back after this break. Welcome back to
the Austin Shower guests Jay Dier and Jay Analysis. And we're talking about the
usage of a lot of groups sex cults to promote various deep state power agendas.
And we were talking about dispensationalism and end time stuff, and I wanted
to close on that point and move on to some other things related to the
eclipse and speculations about that in pointing out that so when you get the establishment
of the nation state of Israel, you get a period where many Jews do
want to return and immigrate there. And when Hitler comes to power, the
British actually ended up screwing over the Jews because they gave the impression that they
wanted this to be the case, they wanted to have people immigrate and to
leave, and yet they then revoked the ability of many Jews to actually immigrate,
and this led to Hitler being able to persecute many Jews, and Hitler
as we know. In my view, if you read Tragy and Hope,
there's multiple pages in Doctor Grow Quickly Sexure he talks about, for example,
in nineteen thirty I think it's thirty nine, Hitler was given two billion dollars
in gold Czechoslovakia and gold from the Bank of England. And this had to
do with their dual policy where they were the British were on the one hand
wanting Hitler to go to war, engage in these atrocities and whatnot, and
to cause World War two, yet at the same time telling the public that
they were opposed to Hitler actually screwing over the Jews, and this is what
led to the rise of the ear Gun and the opposition to the British mandate
on the part of the existing Jews in Israel that led them to the bombing
of the King David Hotel. Anyway, I don't have any position on any
of that necessarily applying to quote Prophecy, I'm just pointing out that it's a
really complicated history. And then you get the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem who comes
in and says that this is actually going to now be an entirely purely Arab
Palestine. And the problem is that the gram Moftyw of Jerusalem was actually an
agent of British intelligence. So we constantly see throughout this period a kind of
maybe in an inner struggle within the British power structure, who was trying to
play both sides of all these conflicts. They tried to play both sides of
the partitioning of the land of Palestine into Israel and into Palestine, and a
lot of the elites of the British had this bizarre obsession and fascination with Islam.
And I think that had to do with their imperial period when people like
Saint John philb and T. E. Lawrence and they went to become kind
of immersed in the Arab tribes to figure out how to best rule them in
an imperial way. And watch the Peter O'Toole movie Lawrence of Arabia where you
see this in the film. So interestingly, many of the British aristocracy and
elite were Philo Arabis loved they loved Islam and Arabic culture. I'm not saying
they were all Muslims. I'm just saying that many of them were on the
side of this. Some of them, however, were not some of them
were more on the side of the establishment of a zion estate, like Lord
Rothschhald and others. So there might have even been in the power structure in
Britain at this time, perhaps an inner st ruggle, but regardless, overall
it looks like they were trying to play both sides of this issue. And
that doesn't really have anything to do though with in my view, with necessarily
quote prophecies. But the danger is that because of the nation state of Israel
being set up and because of the recent wars. I'm not saying taking any
size, I'm just saying that the point here is that prophecy people will go
nuts over this. And we already see it and all the Red Heifer and
this and that, and I'm not saying that it's wrong to talk about this,
but I've been hearing the stories of the red Heifer since the nineties and
it's always the sort of like, oh, this is happening in the rapture
and then the you know, and none of that ever manifests. It may
this time it could. I'm like, I'm not trying to be I know
it all, but you know, when you hear the same types of warnings
and fear and threats and anxiety from this kind of you know John Hagey in
Times, Blood Moons type of stom but bo boons of Israel. Wait Jesus
if you don't remember, he actually wrote a book called Jesus Isn't the Messiah
based on his dispensationalism. I think he had to retract that book. But
this gives you an idea of where the sort of John hay You type characters
are coming from. And if you remember, Hal Lindsay wrote a book,
for example, saying that he thought the rapture would come in nineteen eighty eight
based on these goofy charts that he had come up with. And if I
recall, I did an interview with a friend of mine many years ago who
had done a deep dive into that and I think how Lindsay to the prophets
of that book and bought a bunch of real estate in Malibu, So clearly
he didn't think the rapture was coming. A lot of other groups and sects,
like Joe's Witnesses, for example, have predicted the end of the world
multiple times and when it doesn't happen, shocker. Judge judged somebody, I
forget his name, but one of the prominent Joe's Witness leaders after Charles Days
Russell. He also bought Beth Saram this a pretty I mean, it wouldn't
say it's a mansion, but it's a nice, multimillion dollar house in San
Diego. After his entime prediction didn't work out and all of his followers gave
him their money ended up buying a pad in San Diego. So we see
this pattern a lot with colts and sex who utilize the fear and the sensationalism
of end times prophecies and predictions. And we think about back to Y two
K. I mean I was I was still I think, kind of an
evangelical minded person in in two K. I was kind of starting to have
some doubts about evangelicalism at that time. But I remember thinking that, oh,
you know, the media is hyping this. It's gonna be the end
of the world. There's going to be everything collapsing, society's going to collapse
because the clocks on the computers won't flip over right or whatever. I mean,
it was kind of silly, but the media hyped it up, and
everybody kind of genuinely thought that it might be some big deal ended up not
being a big deal. And then if you think about through the two thousands,
we had so many inflated terror warnings, right, oh, it's orange
level terror. You know, we were talking about this on the the stream
with the all last night and Jack Pisobiac and non Elon Musk didn'tman. So
it was a wild conversation that we had. You hadn't watched that, Go
watch that on a Bandai video, and you know, then we had in
twenty fourteen ish, I remember there being a full solar collapse and I excuse
me, eclipse, not a collapse. I remember going outside and you know,
it was dusk. It was really cool. Like Alex was saying the
other day, it's like the birds get quiet, and I don't know,
it looks like a filter from blade Runner has put over your your visual array.
I don't know, but it was kind of cool. It lasted for
maybe ten minutes, and then at five minutes it was gone. So I
don't understand how this one would be any different than that one. Nothing happened
in that one, and at the time a lot of people were saying,
oh, it's into the world, blah, blah. If you've listened to
alternative conspiracy radio or whatever for a long time, Planet X, Planet X
is going to collide with us, and this and that, all of these
fierce scenarios end up ultimately never manifest. They're ridiculous, and there's so many
more that we could talk about. A lot of the time, what I
think is going on is that most of the time these are attempts to get
people agitated and in a state of constant anxiety and being kind of all kilter.
Then you're more likely to default to the system. And the whole point
of the War on terror was that to get everybody constantly afraid of everything and
not afraid of the real things. So you're focused on distracted with these absurd
things, blood moons and Ebola, and again remember Ebola. Nothing happened in
twenty fourteen percent, and Bola is into the world, but Bola's coming to
America from Africa. Nothing happened. So you notice the pattern here of the
media does the same thing that the goofy evangelical end times predictors do. Right,
Harold Camping, he would constantly predict the rapture and the end of the
world, and every time it didn't happen. He would just update his prediction
and say, oh, well I've missed calculated and by the way, or
like there Joe's witnesses, they would say it was a spiritual event that occurred
and you couldn't see it, but it really did happen, right, This
is con artistry. Is your convent the same stuff with aliens. There aren't
extra biological aliens. I'm sorry, there's no evidence of this. There's a
lot of weird stuff in the sky, But how does that lead us to
the conclusion that there's visitors from the Pleiades. Where's the heart of it?
I mean, maybe there are entities, but maybe their demons, Like what's
the what's the basis for it being some thing that flew here from the Pleiades
just to uh, you know, molest people in touch butts, whatever the
aliens do with their with their intrusions into various orifices. So this is a
lot of conspiracy candy. It's a lot of uh, causing anxiety, getting
you hyped up, paranoid awareness. Social engineers study this. In fact,
cass Unseen, who was Obama's one of his czars, who went on to
the NSA He wrote a famous paper, as I mean, about cognitive infiltration,
and this paper was discussing the way to infiltrate truth movements people that do
real research, come up with real information, and to seed it with fake
conspiracy. Just flood it with dumb fake conspiracies, get people arguing over things
that don't even matter or you can't even know, Tartario, there was an
ancient civilization of mud flood. I mean maybe, but like, how are
you You're not going to prove this, what's this going to do? It's
it's not you know, it's not like understanding the federal reserve right and the
solution of that being buying bitcoin. Right. So there's all these fake conspiracies
that distract from the real things going on, and the government wants you involved
in those things. The government, the system, they actually love fake conspiracies.
And it's a form of religious engineering, no different than the high priests
and Apocalypto, who are duping everybody into thinking that they have to sacrifice ten
thousand people and worship the state or the sun won't come back. Just go
watch Mail Gibson's Apocalypto. So anyway, that's my take on it. If
you want to support my work and go to my website Jasonelsis dot com and
get the books in the in the shop signed copies of my