Let' s go then with the lawyer this Friday giving us a little bag
of aprol No pu Zaparigi, Mrs San lost his face. In the Dominican
Republic we know more about ball than about our laws to talk about laws and
a little clique ball. Morning rhythms. Juan Arturo reciprocated this lawyer. We
' re going to report with us. Juan Arturo Recio, the son of
Doña Mairaposito trinar was in the background. No. No. No. No.
One of the beds we bought is called the catalog of beds we bought
from Kans between$ 1, 500 six years ago. Year, I do,
Roberto financed it. He gave me three thousand five hundred dollars. It
was weird, you complain, how weird, Leonardo? Is it weird?
You' re already going to get a pod here in this country There are
three companies that aren' t cativan money in production elements, which are Grupo
Medrano. The other two no longer exist. Here you pay money for the
hard diment. I' m not knowing what happened to the ventura so potty
lawyer. Gentlemen, happy to be here this Friday. Again let me tell
you that once this story is well known. On the radio ten thousand dollars
were given for a catalog of I don' t know how much, five
or ten zero ore in the nineties and there was a small dispute between two
people over a record of effects. But here, when they were ginging the
male announcer in that he knows that harming mine if Victor Basketball really couldn'
t because to fix it they had to pay again. I was going to
give my hands myself and lead the voices. You failed that deceiving would no
longer have to even Brazil made winged products and the same owner of the company
received me and took me. H there was once you had a Marco Antonio
Solis ticket contest. I' ll never forget, because you all sang a
piece of the song. No Roberto there didn' t include me in that
one. Yes, I did, and you know why I remember, because
it' s just you, you said, I' ve made some changes
in my pussy. Now it was good time, because that' s why
there was money. Now you have to ask for it about artifical intelligence.
Yes, yes, that give me a hundred dollars a listener to be able
to pay me there was a form of tug eh loving advocateis about starting in
the section giving a quick recommendation. If you' re going to have deadpoll
the movie that' s out there you' ve seen. No, no,
he didn' t give her yet why she' s going to be
this year' s Halloween costume. He doesn' t dress up like yours
He' s fat because there' s a salami coming up and out of
it. No and all rite, the molta molta, the molta of monkey
ne this week has to leave in those programs that you go, because it
is already hurting you this week, because it has been made public knowledge that
the Chamber of Deputies has approved a project and that it seeks to regulate the
feeding in the school campuses in broad features. It is this project that seeks
to publicize and raise awareness, but simply one with respect to healthy food and,
therefore, definitively prohibit the sale of processed foods and drinks based on sodas,
refer to it and the word ban. I am not going to go
to her the first thing that comes in this unconstitutional project of entry, because
you are regulating an area that escapes the competence of the State, which is
the private sector and private schools. You can' t limit the freedom of
association of a private school to want to negotiate with anyone who wants it to
go by the company exactly, including sorites, ropes and all this kind of
food that perfectly can provide the services, and you can' t limit them
to the right of association and you' re not to soda in a law
in the whole country. Exactly. It' s as simple as that.
In addition, the project and I believe that this will apply more to the
public sector, because for the private sector, the public sector does, but
also the public sector which is more easily exactly because obviously, in the state
it has direct control of the plants. How you' re going to oversee,
for example, the New Horizon College. I don' t know if
he' s still there from the deadbeats to the lost band that to have
to have a public health battery, or here he sends him to supervise supervisors
so he can control what the stable law is. And this project even requires
that you have to build spaces so that, in most cases, it is
you yourself who cooks the food, so that you are forcing the plants to
have to look for more people you imagine. Everyone sets you some parameters of
how big they have to make the kitchen. There, in the case that
by team you can no longer have. So, in the case of public
schools, particularly, a public contest is going to open to the lines of
you finding state suppliers that are what your food supplies. That exists, but
that' s the point of the law for me. There is a directive
that created education, where it established and there is everyone who knows. To
someone who supplies meals, the n knows that the one who is going to
participate has to meet minimum requirements to install a kitchen. They' re regularly
supervised. Every once in a while they go through a surprise inspection, they
evaluate the food, they send them to a laboratory and they carry out quality
checks. I know a number of people who give the service. It'
s not easy. It is very hard work, especially in the schools here,
in the most urban areas of cities like La Vega, Santiago, San
Francisco, etcetera. What they are food suppliers for schools is an odyssey that
because they are very demanding and that I recognize and they live with that more
to skirt the bow and the subject of what type of food and preparations,
how to comply, with what they analyze to see if they have enough,
balanced, healthy, etcetera. On the other hand, I believe that the
list as the one that is the ante of the feeding drain in the schools
and is the one that is requiring the service, can put the correct parameters
and the limitations look. I don' t go to those boys with flour
with egg, Isao, Guizan, the eggs and you knew clear, clear,
good, onion, well, that' s not because of this,
that' s why, for me it' s perfect, of course,
but to go further for that cartu In that sense, esco and create more
obstacles and bureaucracy, because in the end, the state what must be made
more effective and more efficient, because efficiency, inevitably brings much less cost.
Because when YOU have to add up the sens of unnecessary supervisions and unnecessary requirements,
you' re going to have to shrink into expenses that are going to
make you more expensive for operativity. That' s even what the En-
read project is about. One of his articles states that whoever you go to
buy him the food has to be from the territorial environment of the village where
you have the ok All right, yes, I' m going to set
an example for you in terribly good view. In good sight, there'
s a best friend of my niece' s. He has a company that
supplies food to schools along with his mom. They have this business. They
take food to several schools in Yamasa. Why people with good eyesight from villameya
bring food to Yamasa, Because in that environment there is no one who can
meet the requirements of INHABI to provide that service to students. And they won
that bid and they' re several years old. They were a company in
fact, and he' s doing pretty well. And they came neither by
wedge, nor by aniguism, nor by anything. It was in the past
government and they are still in this and no one has appeared in that environment
who wants me to comply with that sheath. How can you exactly hail.
So that' s going to be one of the things that have to take
this bill into account, and I wanted to have the collation, because you
would run what you would do. One week we got involved in a debate
about how I said that children don' t legally belong to parents. You
didn' t say that in literal terms. I didn' t speak figuratively
anymore. What happens is that I wanted to generate the debate because, like
people, many times not unlike the figurative the literal. That' s why
the argument came. Which is why you' re giving up. I told
you out of the air, I' m defending a cause. I'
m not right, because I' m not debating a lawyer they know that
if I wanted to make it clear that you were raising something that a lot
of people can confuse. Sure. The state is the 100% guarantor of
the child' s welfare, as well as he is the guarantor of the
cor de The relationship that can be given between me and Adrian is a negotiation.
He' s not the one who' s coming to say don'
t wait. You cheated adrena with this clear and how you cheated on her
the hardship you were told to cheat on them this basically what you were saying
exactly. I mean, when we deal with that discussion with a lot of
people that my children do what I want, whatever I want, I'
m the one who establishes when you see that these kinds of projects are approved
and those same people celebrate incarnately. Mentero tends to be a pineapple at that
time and when he leaves tomorrow he has to be taught comprehensive sex education,
which is neither education nor sex, nor integral in schools. Then, when
they' re going to say yes, because the state has to educate me,
he told me no. The state has to teach your children nothing about
sexuality, which is not merely a hundred you and attached to empirical and factual
data, not theories invented by three psychotics with pedophilic and effebophilic proscrivity, about
what right sexuality should or should not be. Not that. So, in
the case of what you say I saw it I also said in this country
lost Yes, then and I will enter into a discussion of how far the
state regulation can go and I would say and set the example what happened in
New York City in two thousand. I was in that year. First time
I went to New York. There was the dispute between the mayor' s
office and the companies in the justice system. That had gone into pause,
but many businesses had already stopped selling a few cups of sixty- four vaginas,
so they saw more drinks, more sugary ones, more than sixteen eleven
exactly couldn' t be sold in New York City and at the end that
ended up making the Court and Herman New that wasn' t the reach it
gave him. The exact one. The law can' t get into people
' s private sphere in such a way that it can do the law and
that' s what I agree with, because we already do it here.
You can regulate the sugar content of drinks. How do I regulate the subject
of alcohol percentages in the sufferings here? An alcoholic drink, the greater the
percent you have more taxed, then a sugary drink, a life with soda
to a greater amount of that substance, you can force the taxing more and
around that has also appeared all this tax sheath. And all this supposedly with
the promise that consumption will be discouraged by cost. And the reality is that
and there are a lot of studies that were done when it appeared here in
a bill for those purposes, I started to study the case of countries like
Mexico, Australia, etc, and what had been the result of some States,
of the United States. In the end, don' t discourage anything.
What people do, they say well, costs ten cents bad soda and
buys it anyway. Sure, it' s just like the one who smokes.
The smoker goes on so he smoked her, because in the end you
have to leave her. In Australia they have done everything so that the people
of form have put the exa people with e ficete, but that we of
compo. We have a dispute. Listen to me that year was the plain
Packech, which is one of the most important cases of intellectual property, that
concerns him with tobacco, that they in the boxes, of the cigarettes and
I put the lungs cancerous. People died like that and we' re litigating
that fifteen- year- old has that law in Australia. Then we want
to poison others, for other countries, but let them come in man here
to us. But basically, that is the issue here is the scope of
what these can do. I do agree with the state to regulate that kind
of thing, because in the end you give the consumer the decision whether to
buy it or not, even if it' s more expensive is the sentence
of what you' re talking about New York. I read the link that
you shared in the end, judges reason says the merger of the state not
to be a citizen nanny or renani state. So they defined it in the
sentence. They say there' s no Nanny State. They are adults,
they can decide what they should be sufficiently informed about, or the State that
has an economic, public health burden must inform and guide, but that border
cannot pass. That in the case of the United States, where it is
well established as far as the scope of the state can go on certain issues.
The state can' t tell me how many steaks I can eat,
or how many times I can go to the bathroom in a day or how
many beers I can drink or how many women or men or animals I want
to sleep with. Well, here' s the sophilia. I think it
' s called bestialism spasm. They should let you occasionally give a horse and
a hardware, a sheath, a hen, a toba, a bull a
thing like that. But I' m one of those who thinks that even
that shouldn' t interfere and the state. If I want to fuck a
cow, then the state must ensure that the cow is well treated and pregnant.
I' m in charge of the product. She' s gonna get
pregnant. It is possible of the calf with head of Alberto Valga. They
looked at them but mutating. You don' t know that in my home
the price hike did work. And I was just talking to my son yesterday
because I was telling him you want us to have a table for you to
buy the snack in the cafeteria. They call me ay, no, Mommy,
I prefer to wear it in chera and I say me and because they
look at the counter, you can move. It tells me that the empanada
are at one hundred and sixty- five pesos, not entirely America empanada oberon
pana. You hear these questions that he asks interestingly, this friend says the
State can limit the right of each individual to choose his food. Such food
is prohibited outside educational establishments. Powerful soda and other food companies will stand idly
by. If I were a pepensa, if I were a péxito, if
I were a beb I would have my team of lawyers drafting an appeal of
unconstitutionality against that law, because it goes against exactly their interests And you'
re going to say Alberto, but you' re a bastard, because you
know that the cools get sick We' re going to do, as a
state, educational campaigns in schools so that the children know what they should and
that they should eat it and that they choose freely from the information they have.
I stopped drinking drinks, I must take reflex. Eighteen years ago I
didn' t drink soda and it was a personal decision. And it'
s not that I don' t take it, because first one for each
thing, a refreshment with the stock. Otherwise, I don' t take
the burden of regularity. I' m not a consumer. I can'
t drink a glass, I buy a combo. If there is something else,
a bottle of water, for my own decision, why, because I
come from a family, from a father who had kidney difficulties and I don
' t want to consume things that get me ahead of that and but you
lack beer. Ah I am aware of what I am consuming and the consequences
it has, but I chose to get out of my diet by choice.
I don' t drink right all the first question. Obviously, you said
the state can' t be a child. She' s a rights guarantor,
but she can' t be a babysitter. He can' t be
above people to the point where he points out that he can consume. Parents
are primarily responsible for the development and growth of senorities. What is born until
it reaches the age of majority point and is understood the laws and spirit of
the Constitution states that there is no one who knows what is best for you
than your parents. Now, yeah, in that activity of looking for what
' s best for you, they' re putting your life at risk as
a minor, so they' re already there. The State can then intervene,
because it has to save the rights of the weakest party in that relationship.
That' s different and you know it' s the worst thing I
see people who attack the freedom or sovereignty to choose food, defending the legalization
of substances that are deeply harmful so that the individual is the one who decides
whether to consume it or not. So we have to choose, as you
said, at first, what the discourse we' re going to adopt if
we' re going to defend people' s sovereignty and freedom to decide whether
they want to use cocaine. I' m what you think that should be
the choice of the individual or marijuana or these or whatever. What I understand
is that if I give you the freedom to do whatever you want, you
' re holding me responsible for carrying the right consequence. You can' t
want the state not to penalize you, because you consume a certain substance,
which has profoundly harmful effects on your life and then I, as taxpayers I
haven' t chosen, and the state, as it is the one that
guarantees, distributes and all that shit, that has to take charge, with
a pension, with your food, with your medical care, because it is
that you are making use of your sovereignty and your freedom, and the word
freedom the first thing that brings. After freedom is said to be called individual
responsibility. Right, so they want freedom without responsibility. We' re going
to agree on the second question and berth the hair. It is giving effect
to the question no, the prohibition of beyond educational institutions that have not and
we have already seen in the past how companies that produce sugar and sodium-
based beverages have already sued the Dominican State for circumstances. We will remember that
San Miguel industry benefited because it was with the special regime law that for me
they should do it for fifty years in rosamento. I totally agree with you
for the positive impact it has had in that area where all these companies are
being installed. They must be set up there at the border. It is
not for them to benefit in those provinces that are economically depressed and so that
it was not the bonetas to make soap in exact gimanimaning then already in the
past these companies if they have sent the Dominican State, in the particular case
of the profits that it is obtaining at that time Industry of San Miguel,
that for the market, because they told it, they were practical from where
a distortion was a very recent discussion, five years ago, generated, therefore,
a distortion in the market and that, obviously, they were not competing
on equal terms, that is another of the rights that the State has to
ensure that the market is the same for all the world and that the difference
is as you manage in the market to increase or strengthen or reduce their sales.
So the project didn' t tell him uncontutional. You, who'
s listening to me, don' t have to say other people. No,
because the one who complains about it, because he is a bum and
doesn' t make him food tomorrow goes against writing, as I saw it
told to several people who were therefore from his realm discussing it. It has
nothing to do with that. It' s the fact that if your children
are yours for one thing, they have to be yours for everyone. You
want to know what' s sold and it' s very expensive in New
York and it' s sold just like the drug in the same way and
it' s really hard to get it. The frying, pileing or gutty
chain maybe I' ll explain it to you. You don' t know
the same thing you know that I' m going to explain this very li
from New York and that, because of a health issue, it has very
strict regulations and it' s forbidden in certain, under certain conditions that it
sells. That' s what' s made a fairly lucrative black market industry
emerge from selling cadeneta, buche you can officiores de porcos or cicos. He
doesn' t have you with those buckets in the trunks of the boxes like
a little thing. It' s a little test, chuffe ju see What
I' m doing to you when the hyperstate regulates what you' re creating
are black market losses. What am I going to do, as a student
and with this forecast, I will arrive with a backpack and a soda huacal.
Ah a hundred the bottle and you don' t know that being happy
the lady who understands the cafeteria and the corner of the school of coffee and
neither does anyone stop me from buying what I' m going to buy.
I' m telling you, I know her. That lady' s got
the canisters for a 20- weight frescue two out of ten. Now the
bs to sixty, of course inflating the economy. I can' t tell
me how to play recio em on all social networks and I also invite you
to follow behind the Hume, behind h the sports podcast of this server.
How you' re going to prepare this. Let' s just say get
me another one before this thing loves you. Come on, please, they
sent an Italian over here, in an Italian who doesn' t look Italian
Italian Italy. I thanked Valia. I was starting to be a year old.
I thought it was funny, too. I also watch vega a placado
bathed. That' s not Dominican. There' s no mountain record.
No. No. No. No. No. Not the tip. Who
' s got the one who' s got it? End of back treads
tattoo flow. I must say that attention to Roberto Santa Ella you remember all
the nonsense that I talked about the perol when we were in Colombia Brans