And right now. We' re talking to the lawyer. I want to
ask Hector' s lawyer and the Court' s decision to grab a legal
technicality to try as a minor a people who on the day of commenting on
a crime turned eighteen. How do you like your opinion? I want to
go to a lawyer because I think I left you friends here. People here
talk a lot about that no, that the prosecutors, not that the lawyers
are bad, the lawyers of their work will not stay. He' s
a lawyer. He' s a law technician. Let' s say.
When I say technical, I mean he' s a guy who' s
dedicated to knowing the laws, he has to use, to resort to them
to defend or build a case. Whatever the type, then the lawyer is
formed in that matter sentence you similar cases and how they ended up in the
archives and build a defense theory that they take to the Tribunal and if it
is logical, if it is stuck to the right and logic of law,
because the Tribunal cannot say you are wrong. Lawyers aren' t bad.
It' s his clear job, that' s like the one with the
injection. Lethal You can' t say that Pandelelin Jechu pops you in a
jail, you' re a bad pussy person. That' s your clear
job now. But if already, the judge' s work is different,
because the judge is the one who has to admit as the impartial desire.
If the legal argument presented by the lawyer has as he says if he has
where to put it good that he is. This one must know the laws
must not know us or must be attached. That I don' t doubt
the ability to analyze a person who serves as a judge. I had the
opportunity, well, we had the opportunity to meet on a Thursday, to
a place that we go to Eduardo and I and last hours there talking.
Ora, a judge has to read half a sentence library when he' s
going to make a sentencing decision. That is what lawyers call when they are
already decisions made by the Supreme moyalama juris prudence that is called. That has
to go to the same court. Let me see I have a question.
Let me see what he' s decided. If there are cases similar to
this that the sentence has emanated, it has been final of the Supreme,
to see if the decision protected by the law that I am going to make,
it makes sense or not, because they are human beings who do not
want to make a mistake either. But you have to see what time the
fact was and what time he was born. That' s, that'
s the argument the defense lawyer has put forward. That' s the argument.
I' m a lawyer, the guy was born at three o'
clock in the afternoon, done, picked up the exact twelve, I mean,
he wasn' t eighteen. But that' s a vacuum of the
law, because if the law doesn' t say it has to be when
the year comes, the lady talks about the day. We need to see
what the Children' s Code says and what other laws in the country say
and whether there are similar sentences, because if there aren' t, or
similar decisions in the courts. If there isn' t, then I can
imagine that I' ve come or you have to say no, either it
' s wrong or it' s wrong or I' m wrong, magistrate.
The point is, a guy who comes out decides to take a gun.
Hey, hey, how was the story. The birthday guy with a
group of friends. I decide I went out He' s up for good,
for there, for a dichotheque, romos babies with those who stole in
the process. They' re docking. A couple who get hit by an
engine and a crowd. When they' re docking, that couple throws the
cart up the guys who were in an engine and the graves. I shot
her with a burst of fire and there was the lady going out with her
daughter and shot the girl inside the vehicle. Hey, hey, hey,
hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey,
hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey,
hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey,
hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey,
hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey,
hey, hey, hey. There' s still everything that means that
this shit with eighteen, if they condemn it to the maximum, which is
five to twenty- three, we have well formed pulidium, with experience,
more insecurity in the Dominican Republic. So here are the politicians who have to
sit down seriously to change the Children' s Code. Here we must change
the Code of Minors in this respect, in particular if they want their age
of consent to twenty- five years. But here it can' t be
possible for a fourteen- year- old fuck with a sixteen- year-
old gun to go out and rob people that their prize is three years in
prison that were laws imposed in Latin America by the United States, because the
first thing he did when he arrived was to repeal that law in El Salvador
was over. It' s that teen who links, teenager who goes three
months for a jail and then loose for the street. That' s over.
And the first country to realize that they fell on a hook with that
law was Colombia. Look for the story there because I' m the one
about it. In two thousand four I spoke here that I was with Marty
Petter at the time. I talked about that news in Col Mbia when they
decided to change that part of the law that had at the same time in
force that had Dominican Republic five years. And in the process of discussion they
lasted two years, between the two thousand I give the two thousand four,
and in the two thousand four they changed the law. Uribe was already two
years ruling Colombia. And what happened in Colombia in the ninety- seven and
the two thousand two that with two begins the argument that was triggered multiplied by
a hundred the number of teenagers in the age of fourteen, fifteen and sixteen,
seventeen years that were dedicating themselves to the hit man, who were devoting
themselves to the trafficking and trafficking of drugs within the same country and to all
kinds of crimes to all kinds of criminal acts, and that they were going
out with three months in prison, one year in prison if it was a
murder, and they realized that they had to put a brake on that problem.
Here it can' t be possible for a 16- year- old
fucker who' s right to take all the little faces he wants from the
neighborhood or to read the whole world' s drug to smoke two trucks of
marijuana. We drive thor and hopefully does that goose every minute in every corner
you tell me no, he doesn' t have a conscience to commit a
crime. We can' t double- victimize the person. He' s
not an antisocial who has a remedy and has to end up recast for life
in jail. Those who caused Signa' s death cannot spend less than thirty
years in prison, because that' s what the Code says. If I
were a dictator, the first thing I do is change that part of the
Code. I say here that he commits a voluntary crime is a hundred years
without parole, No yes, but he also committed a lot of crimes in
that right there, also because he was, for example, illegal, etcetera.
But that guy for more crime than you read his machine. There'
s summation, which is a guy who if you apply what the gun law
establishes, it' s going to be forty years It' s going to
be five at the top of twenty- three A killer like those who killed
the carajito gang that killed a cabbie. Everyone' s free. That'
s all of the two adults who went to you for twenty years and twenty
- five who convicted him. That' s not possible. Dude. You
have to find a prosecutor to do, for example. Well, there'
s the story and the capon, the capons couldn' t get prisoners for
one crime, but they grabbed him for the other. The air is exactly
hand- made. Then do it. So, okay, I don'
t remember. This way we' re gonna get him. This way.