You're listening to Carrie Letz's Financial Survival Network, where you get valuable information you
just can't find anywhere else to thrive in today's trying times. You need the
Financial Survival Network now more than ever. Go to Financial Survival Network dot com
and get your free newsletter in gift Financial Survival Network now more than ever,
and welcome this. It is Financial Survival Network. I'm Carrie lets your host,
and John Robino is with us. And we've got almost too much material
and we appreciate all the emails and YouTube comments from all of you, and
we try to get as many as we can. John. It's hey,
it's the second week of May, and banks are doing good now, right,
we can forget about the banking crisis, move on to the next crisis,
right hey, carry Yeah, the regional local bank stocks are up now,
like like this whole thing is over. But unfortunately for them, it's
nowhere near over because they still have all those bonds on their balance sheet that
better down in price that they have a report, which means they have to
put out some bad numbers going forward. And commercial real estate has just barely
started to blow up, and it's a much bigger deal. Because those are
legit losses. You know, these these bonds they have on their balance sheets,
if they just hold onto them, will resolve. You know, they'll
a off at the end and they'll get the return with very little risk that
they expected. But commercial real estate can actually can go down so far that
the bank has to take a big hit on the loan. It might have
to eat half of the loan on an office building or something like that.
And that's everywhere out there right now. So these these regional and local banks
that do a lot of real estate landing are looking at massive losses on their
commercial real estate portfolios that that really aren't on the front burger yet. You
know, nobody's really paying that kind of attention because there haven't been big numbers
that banks have had to report, but it's just a matter of time before
they do, and when they do, the numbers will be terrifying. Yeah.
So, so the banking crisis will just move into another phase at some
point here, and it'll be a much scarier phase when it happens. Though.
It's a rolling bank crisis, goes from one sector to the next to
the next, and everything that's happening here presumably is going to be replicated around
the world. Right, Europe might be worse than the US in terms of
the situation that's banks are in, So it could be that they blow up
first, and that's the thing that restarts our banking crisis here. It's just
there's no way to know. It's a mess everywhere. And you know,
Japan, what can you say about you? And kind of like their cure
to insolve and loans is make more loans, right, yeah, China,
And you know, because they're a dictator ship, they're able to do that
really efficiently. They just tell the banks to start lending on a given topic,
you know, into a given sector, and it happens and that So,
yeah, China was able to engineer basically the biggest real estate bubble in
human history, even bigger than Japan's in the nineties and bigger than the US
and the two thousands. And it doesn't seem to be a solution for it
because something like seventy percent household net worth in China is tied up in real
estate. So they either keep the bubble inflated or their entire economy implodes.
And I don't think they really have any kind of an answer because first of
all, they're not market based people in charge of the country, so they
don't really have a sense of you know, how it works when hass a
prices change and that clears the market at some point because there's a price,
there's a market clearing prices, things like that. They don't really get any
of that, so they'll probably blunder into something big at some point, and
we just can't know when or how much new doubt will be created in the
process. Yeah, there's three or four great YouTube channels that deal with China's
bubble economy. What's called like China NCD or NTD something like that. There's
also Epic Times. They've got a couple of the YouTube channels and podcasts that
deal with it, and there's one called China Uncensored, And like, it's
just really fascinating to see the real story on the ground there because just like
everywhere else, you know, the China miracle came from increasing debt, increasing
money supplied geometrically, and just like we're seeing the limits of that in the
United States, where we're going to see the limits to it in China as
well. Yeah, you know, it's been a seventy year experiment and it's
blowing up on our faces. Right now, we get to live through the
end of the feed currency experiment, which nobody should have to go through something
like that, but it is fascinating. You know, this is a piece
of financial history that will live on as long as people are making decisions about
their finances because we did an experiment where we tried to see if it's possible
just to hand governments unlimited printing presses and in that way. You know,
the experts told us that if we just put PhDs in charge of the monetary
system, that they would manage things and we would have low inflation and strong
growth and stability forever. Turned out to be the opposite. You know,
We've got slow growth, spiking inflation, and growing instability because these idiots thought
they knew what they were doing and they actually didn't. Actually, on my
sub stack, I'm working on an article now about the failure of the experts,
because there's an argument going on in the comments section about what a people
got stupid in the last seven years and that's why they won't take their vaccines
and things. And my my take is going to be that, well,
you know, we put our lives in the hands of experts in nineteen seventy
one, and we got monetary inflation, you know, monetary and stability.
We got almost World War three kicking off here. We got open borders and
so the border towns in the US are being just submerged in the tide of
illegals coming in. And we've got big Pharma basically able to take over the
government and run or force us to take experimental medicines. Now, so you
know, all in each case we had experts from the same class, you
know, ivy League educated, very well off, very in tune with the
wants and needs of other people in their class. We have them take over
and basically what they did is served the interests of their class. It's not
that they were incompetent as much as they were basically doing things with one set
of people in minds. So monetary policy is no matter what happens. Monetary
policy is lower interest rates and increased government spending, which serves the rich at
the expense of everybody else. And foreign policy is, hey, let's send
him a bunch of our soldiers off to die in every war that we can
think of in order to enrich the military industrial complex. It goes on,
and unlike on healthcare policy, is whatever makes the pharmacentical companies richest. So
we basically got a small class of people in charge of everything. Now they're
the expert's bay of the PhD is and the people who think that's a good
idea are wondering why nobody trusts them anymore. And you know, so it's
an interesting story again another experiment. You know, we're we going to have
fiel currencies. Let's try that. Are we going to put the world in
the hands of a handful of PhDs and just let them run the show.
Let's see how that turns out. Well, none of it turned out.
Well, it's it's been a disaster almost across the board. And you can
trace it back to this idea that a handful of smart people are capable of
ruining big sections of the economy and afford policy when in effect, in healthcare
policy, when in effect, they are absolutely unqualified to do stuff like that.
Can you give them that power and they screw up everything? And I
will trace this back to the Kennedy regime, the Kennedy administration. They brought
on these guys, they call them the eggheads, and Kennedy said, hey,
the way to run this government is get the smartest people in every profession
and just give them free reign. And yeah, it do it well.
During the Vietnam War. We had the best and the brightest running the Vietnam
War and they screwed everything up. But you know, you can trace this
even further back to Plato's Republic, Yeah, where they conclude that the best
form of government is a philosopher king, when you take the smartest, best
person, give them absolute power, and they will run things right. Well,
we did a mini version of that here where we didn't we didn't take
the best person, but we took the smartest groups of people and put them
in charge of everything and assumed that they would do a great job because they're
the smartest people. And you know, it turns out that life is more
complicated than the human brain is, and you can take the smartest person in
the world put them in charge of something, and they'll still be swamped by
the complexity of the thing you want them to run. Only markets, which
is millions of free people, each making a decision on whatever it is you're
doing in their own self interest that in the aggregate comes up with good policy.
That's the only way to get good policy, even though it's a messy
process. But you cannot just put people in charge and expect them to understand
and manage a system is complex as the global financial system work, or global
politics or virology. None of that's plausible with just smart guys making decisions,
So it has to be run by markets and super learning all this. Now
we're figuring out that you can't have people in charge of the currency, So
we have to go back to sound currency, some kind of a gold standard
or other commodity standard, where markets dictates the price of money and interest rates,
and we'll have to have new politics in which people basically get to vote
with their feet and with their pocketbooks, and lots of different countries get to
compete on more or less level playing field, and policy evolves from that.
It can't be dictated from above and imposed on everybody. We have to have
policy become an emerging, an emerging characteristic of the system, not something that's
imposed by some dictator, you know, some philosopher king. So this is
a big revelation that's coming here, and it feels like it's coming fairly quickly,
certainly in monetary policy, but if we survive our attempts to start World
War three here pretty soon, maybe we'll find out that competition is better than
dictatorship in global politics too. So true, so true. Well, obviously
something's going on here. Banks aren't out of the woods. Now. In
Q one we see central bank gold buying up one hundred and seventy six percent
year over year. Yeah, So what that is is that that's the central
banks of the world realizing they screwed everything up and they see an end to
their currencies and coming very quickly, So they're trying to load up on an
asset that historically holds its value while currencies misnaged currencies just evaparade. So the
central banks of the world are realizing they've screwed up, and they don't want
to come out and admit it because with a currency system, all you've got
is faith. So they can't admit that this experiment is ending catastrophically because that
will bring it about instantly, would become a self fulfilling prophecy. But what
they can do is load up on assets that will hold up during the monetary
reset that has to come. So you're seeing central banks it's become a situation
of don't listen to what they say, but watch what they do, because
they are acting as if we've got ever you know, tsunami of inflation coming,
the collapse of these fiot currencies and gold and silver surviving and thriving and
becoming the basis for the next monitor system. That's how they're acting. So
don't listen to their press conferences where they say the banking system is sound and
we see inflation as being well anchored. That's all just focus grouped nonsense that
they trot out when they need to manipulate the markets. But their actions say
they're terrified, and that's what we should be getting attention to. Yeah,
they ignore their news speak as they as George Orwell would call it. It's
all news speak and none of it has any truth to it what soever.
But yeah, there's no way that they can admit that they were wrong about
this, But they don't have to. We're on to the next. The
next crisis will be so serious that no one will remember the last one.
That's kind of where we've been heading, John. Each crisis is more serious
than the last, and therefore there's never a discussion about why it really happened.
What enabled it to happen, and then we just move on to the
last one until we get to the point where they can can't be kicked down
the road anymore, and it looks like we're growing ever closer, and then
nobody will remember, we won't need to have a discussion, and they'll just
transition, right. Yeah, well that's what they've done so far. Every
time they cause a gigantic cransis the same guys get chosen to fix the crisis.
So there's no reason to think that the next one will be light back.
Well, they'll they'll engineer something. It'll be another pandemic, or it'll
be a cyber attack, or it'll be an EMP attack, or you know,
any number of things. A gigantic command crisis is alien aliens. The
aliens might show up and say you have to go back on the gold standard,
you know care that would be good. Now. It's interesting, isn't
it that the aliens are now official, officially in existence. The government says,
yeah, there's ufoslah blah. And at the same time that artificial intelligence
has emerged as a real thing in the sweep of human history. It's just
very interesting that those two things would emerge in the same decade, maybe even
the same year. We could actually meet those meet the aliens at the same
time we meet and artificial intelligence that is self aware and it's it would be
a surprise to me if that was a complete coincidence. It is just an
awfully big coincidence of it happens. So we'll see, we'll see what that
means in the future. But I don't know, well, unrelieved that Kamala
Harris is heading the government's AI task force. Do you think she'll really be
heading it? Or we'll chat bpt of four point five running it. We've
got to get some video of this because we're going to have a human who
cannot pass the Turing test talking to a machine that can pass the Turing test.
So it's a it's going to be embarrassing for our species, okay,
but it's the idea of naming Kamala Harris to be bizarre of something is a
good way to hide it. We've seen put her in charge of the border
and she never went to the border. She never expressed an idea of any
kind about immigration policy, and maybe that's the same thing they're going to do
now. They'll they'll put her in charge of AI, and that'll just bury
this issue. You know, like Obama, Hey, he needed somebody to
check up on Ukraine, he put Biden in charge of it. At least
Biden had the good sense to cash in on it and make sure that all
the members of his family were plush. You know, it bothers me when
I see a politician and can't recognize opportunities where they can cash in for themselves
and their family. That's just not a good politician. So if we can
talk a bit about this on YouTube, that's awesome, because it is fascinating
that, you know, they took a guy like Biden, who is just
this old school, totally corrupt politician who's in it to enrich himself and his
family, and they gave him a portfolio that included Ukraine, one of the
most corrupt countries in the world, and those guys just got together and milk
that country. You know, it's it's coming out now where the where the
money came from that flowed into the Biden family accounts. And obviously Ukraine was
a big conduit, but so was China. So if all of this stuff
comes out, I think we're going to be shocked on one hand about the
size of the numbers, and not shocked in any way on the other hand
that this guy was doing stuff like that because he's just that kind of a
guy. You know. He's just an obviously corrupt politician, you know,
so it shouldn't be a surprise, you know. You give, with Donald
Trump in charge and he's talking about buying greenland, there's something white that which
is reasonable because he's a real estate guy. So I clear you, yeah,
yes, much better idea than the Ukraine War. But you put Biden
in charge, and obviously he's going to solicit bribes all over the world and
that's apparently what he did. Isn't this going to be funny? In this
next election, we could have, for the first time ever, a presidential
election between two candidates who are both under indictment at the time of the election.
It's a time for firsts, I guess. And they might be in
jail running their campaigns from prisons, like if they're in Atlanta or that other
place Marry in Indiana that's the supermax, and they have to have the presidential
debate in the prison courtyard or the prison cafeteria. Right, this is a
movie that's correct, Garry this. You know, HBO could do a movie
movie with that plot where they both of the candidates end up in the same
Supermax and gen pop of the same Supermax prison, and they have their debates
in the you know, in the cafeteria. I like it. I think
I think it could make it in today's Hollywood. You know, but obviously
it wouldn't. They wouldn't be able to have two white guys be the candidates
here. We'd have to multiculture lies. Well, Denzel would Denzel Washington for
one of them? Yeah? Yeah, because he could play a bad guy.
He's done that before. He's good. And maybe Tom Hanks or something
like that get him in making an aw shucks country politician. Okay, hey,
we're radio a winning screenplay. You watch this happen Now, somebody's gonna
hear this. They're gonna make a screenplay two years from now. Yeah,
better idea. I'm going to have a chat, GPT write the script.
Oh you can. You can get it to an agent in weeks if you
do it. That lay right? Okay, do it all right? All
right? Give me give me producers credit, that's all. I like your
co creator credit. Okay, sure, we came up. We hatched this
scheme together, and you know, maybe Keana Reeves and Denzel he's not old
enough. I guess his age doesn't matter just because our two guys are really
old, it doesn't it doesn't have the two old guys in the script.
Meryl Streep, then let's make her one of them, or no, they
can't be in the same Um. Okay, Denzel declares himself to be female
right before he gets um put in prison and in Meryl Streep or in the
female prison, the women's prison. Yeah, okay, all right, Well,
then then we cover virtually every minority in every interest group, so they'll
all pay to see it. Yeah, it's it's a diverse capist, it's
a Netflix. Yeah, I think we got it. Well, Hey,
getting back to real TV. That seems to be imitating art if you take
it. A look at the Fox ratings. I mean they are plunging down
faster than than Joe's favorability ratings. Um. Tucker Carlson was the only reason
a lot of people ever tuned into Fox, and they're just finding that out
now. His old slot is down by seventy five percent. Fox is now
smaller than MSNBC. This has got to be just killing him. You know,
there used to be in the six hundred pound guerrilla in cable news,
and now they're they're approaching CMN numbers, which is you know, Sanna is
going to cease to exist pretty soon unless they turn things around, and Fox
is approaching that level of viewership, and especially in the what is it eighteen
to thirty four to fifty four the demographic that does all the spending. That's
all anybody cares about, is that demographic. And that's where you and me,
Yeah, that's what fuss. We're not we can be funny, who
we're old? Yeah, now we just buy guns and silver coins. Now
we're not useful for a an audience life. But um, what was I
going to say? I forget what I was going to say. Something to
that effect though, that that that they're imploding. And they can't asked Tucker
Carlson to come back because they've already burned that bridge. They don't have anybody
that anybody else is watching right now. So this is a huge deal.
This is the the Budweiser of news right now. Right it could do a
deep fake. They could have a deep ai fake of Tucker because he's still
under contract, so I guess he can't say anything. Well, you know,
he can walk away from It was like twenty million dollars a year that
he'd be walked away from. But the minute he set up um his own
whatever, you know, he's he's on YouTube channel. If it would be
five times as big as his audience was at Fox, can probably make him
three or four times as much money. You know, he'd be making Rogan
kind of money. So there's no reason to stay at a Fox because he's
not giving anything up. He's actually making money by leaving. So I think
that's probably what will happen. He could do a presidential debate that that that
would be you know, he would be the draw. So people who wouldn't
normally watch a presidential Today debate would just tuned him to watch Tucker Carlson.
So he's on the next he is the next Russian Limbaugh. They put up
a lot of people, but it's proof that it's he is the one.
And in addition to what you said, John, that all of his viewers
left on mass dumped box. In addition, there's people who were upset because
he was a quote unquote truth teller, and they just piled on because they
just said, we want no part of this corporate outfit. What should really
scare you is how many they lost twenty thirty billion dollars worth of value potentially
by firing Tucker Carlson. And they had to know this was going to happen,
or have a good idea, but the fact that it was done anyway
to scare everybody because you know, his truth telling and silencing him trumped all
the financial interests that are built into the capitalist system. That's scary. Yeah,
it is funny when you start talking about why they fired him, it
turns out there's like eight different reasons that are completely valid from the point of
view of Fox. That because he had u RFK Junior on and they trashed
the Ukraine War and Big Farma and he said that. Did he say the
cia Ia killed his own k probably mother too, Yeah, So so all
of them he said all of that on Fox and Tuger Carlson. You know,
he himself was opposed to the Ukraine War. He was kind of an
anti Fax or he was anti Big Farm month and that right there is enough
to get you fired from any major news channel in the country. But then
there's the story about he had dinner with Rupert Murdoch who's like ninety two years
old, and was engaged with Rupert Block and his wife, and that at
the end of the thing, the wife said the Tucker Carlson was a messenger
from God, and that freaked Rupert murdochile so much that he dumped his fiance
and fired gun. Yeah, so there's a lot of stories that all seemed
plausible given the general insanity in the mainstream media market. Rernue Hey, it's
a it's a wonder, but yeah, he Tucker came out and said there
was a certain three letter agency and he got it on authority for somebody in
the government that was involved in JFK's assassination. Take it for which it like.
Certainly the story that we were spoon fed was a big should manure and
had zero truth to it. But we don't need to, like we've been
talking about this stuff. You would meet John for like fifty five years already,
right, so we don't need to get into it. But suffice it
to say, you're not supposed to say these things on primetime TV, and
the people that really run things did not take kindly to it. Yeah,
and if it was because they could have foreseen that their ratings were going to
go down, so they knew they were taking a risk. So whatever they
you know, whatever the reason was, it was something that was big enough
for them to risk what's happening right now. And as you said, what's
happening right now is they're losing billions and billions of dollars of revenue and of
enterprise value. So they had a really really compelling reason for doing what they
did. And hopefully whistleblower is going to come forward pretty soon, somebody who
has taken notes from the room or something like that when the decision got made.
Yeah. Yeah, And so because it's going to be interesting, I'm
very interested in in why exactly they did this, because it's hard to imagine
something that's worth, let's say, twenty billion dollars of enterprise value. It's
got to be a serious thing for you to sacrifice that kind of money,
which is what they did. And it doesn't look like there's any real solution.
They don't have any other shows, but that are going to be the
must CTV that Tucker Carlson was. They've got some guys with high ratings,
but nothing where the viewership and the following was was that loyal? I think
so, so this might be a permanent change for Fox and hopefully they had
a good enough reason, you know, to The brand was forty plus years
in the making, you know, millions of man hours, millions of dollars
to build this brand. Don't forget Fox News News Corp. Owns the Wall
Street Journal, they own multiple outlets, multi billion dollar company. But to
like destroy a brand in one day, literally bring it, bring itself to
its knees, is that companies just don't do that for no reason. All
right, Well, you know, more general reason that I think is possible
is that they have a certain outcome they're trying to engineer for the next election,
and they they concluded that Tucker Carlson would have made it harder. And
if you take the military industrial complex and the big banks and form a pharma
put them all together, twenty billion dollars in losses at Fox News may not
be that too high a price to pay in order to get the election outcome
they want. So interesting thought, Yeah, it's distressing. It's distress saying
because we've seen these kind of things happen. There's no allegations of sexual misconduct
with him, like there was with O'Reilly, and you know that it seems
like he's a total boy scout and these I don't know, if you saw
the leaked videos that they it's like the guy is like, of course,
he's pissed off, like they're screwing things up, they can't run their channels
properly, or you know, like he's surrounded by Charlottean's and conman and he's
weaving his way through with a with a laugh, with a cackle, you
know. Well, you know, they they went through every second of tape
that they had of him, and if that's the best they could come up
with, then that's shocking. You'd expect that any normal person who's on camera
all the time, like a news talking head is would have all kinds of
stuff that, taken out of context, would look really bad. But none
of this stuff made him look bad, actually made him look, if anything,
more relatable. Right. Yeah, he comes off as a regular guy
and definitely not a sexual predator or a fascist or a racist or anything like
that. So if that was their best shot, they might as well just
give up, you know. Except the outcome of the course that they've chosen
because he'll probably walk from Fox pretty soon. He'll probably start his own little
edia empire and it'll be massive, and that'll be that. It's just that's
the new world of media that Fox has created, so so so be it.
I think it's a better world really have or Ucker Carlson running around on
his own outside of the umbrella of a big media company. I think it's
way more interesting. And he and Joe Rogan out there in the world are
probably bigger than all of the mainstream media put together, and way more beneficial
for general understanding of set. Oh yeah, yeah, Well, he has
the ability to create the platform probably go podcasting and talk radio as well.
Right, That's that's kind of it. And you know, Limbo could have
done that at any moment. He could have just walked away from the radio
and just done online stream all right, and it wasn't even that big then,
but he had the ability to do it. He didn't do it because
he was loyal to talk radio. Carlson, he can do that and nothing,
there's nobody that could touch him, and people will pay. You know,
even though I say we have this term in the US over subscribed.
When you look through your credit card statement every month, idiotic subscriptions you have,
that's one that most people wouldn't have a problem with. My immediate response
if I have to buy a subscription to anything, any website, is no,
all right, and then it'll be proved to me why I need this.
And you know that if you if you want to go save some money,
just go through your credit card statement and see how many auto pays you
have every month raining your bank account what They'll be shocked, you know.
I think I think we're dedicated to the idea of alternative media, then there
are people we should support rather than just read their stuff for free. And
Tucker Carlson, I mean miss Glenn Greenwald and Matt Tayubeian and a personal favorite
of mine is Caitlin Johnstone. But Tucker Carlson would be on that list.
I would toss five bucks from Mind to a subscription for Tucker carlson stuff here.
And so let's say five million people agree with that, then that's twenty
five million dollars a month for Tucker Carlson. And that's completely possible. I
mean, if you look at how big the global audience is, what a
billion and some people speak English. So there's his potential audience and the idea
of ten million or five million or twenty five million or whatever out of that
big audience tossing him five bucks a month is shit that it's all be shocked
if it didn't happen. And then you know, or are you telling me
about simultaneous translation now with AI? Yeah? Yeah, invlated anywhere? Yeah,
yeah, So he might have a global market then where it's just instantly
translated to whatever language you you're listening via or speaking or whatever. And so
he's got the six billion people then yeah, and the what he could do
is he could take one sponsor. All he has to do is take my
pillow dot com Mike Lindell the only sponsor he needs. Everything else will be
subscription based and it'll work out great. Hey, one more thing. So
RFK and Junior running for president and he's been they've classified him as a conspiracy
theorist recently too because of his anti medical you know, vaccine and all that
stuff. But he's like twenty percent the poles now against the sleepy old Joe.
Where does this end? He's a really compelling candidate. Um there there
really isn't anybody on the list of Democrats that I wouldn't even think about voting
for. They just have such a weak bench right now. But this guy
is actually interesting enough that he might be a fun president because he's very brave.
You know. He'll go after big Pharma and he'll pull us out of
Ukraine and our heartbeat. So they'll do some some things that will will offset
the crazy economic stuff, but a left wing Democrat would do. But I
think he's he's got a chance. First of all, his name is Kennedy.
There, there's ten percent of right there, just name recognition. He's
um on the correct side of the pandemic debate for a huge number of people.
He's definitely on the correct side of a Ukraine thing for a huge number
of people. And if he's running against somebody who's on the wrong side of
all that stuff, which Biden is getting to, fifty one percent is not
that big of a stretch from nineteen percent right now, especially if they are
debates. Probably there won't be because they know they can't do it. So
whatever the Democrat National Committee has to do to prevent debates, they'll do it.
But they can still have debates. Kennedy and Mary Ann Williamson debate on
they could go on your show and debate. Hey, I'd love him.
Yeah, anyway, it would be an extremely interesting debate that would get a
ton of YouTube views and would give those guys the kind of exposure that a
third party candidate needs because really that's what they are now. They're running is
independence, even though they're like Ron Paul back when he was quote unquote a
Republican. These guys are running as independents with finn Democrat Party, but still
they're their third party candidates. And when you're a third party candidate, you're
starved for exposure. But this would do it. This would give them exposure
and or maybe Tucker Carlson could host those two debating. I would be good.
I love it. Hey. You know, when when you look at
it, if Trump is in jail anyway, then I guess RFK Junior will
have to visit to Leavenworth or wherever they're holding Trump in order to have the
debates, and Trump will the game because they'll give them a break from ping
pong or whatever they do in the evenings there before lights out. So you
know, it could be it really opens the possibilities. See even if neither
of them are going to be president. I would still love to see a
debate between RFK Junior and Donald Trump. That would be just potential train but
maybe really interesting too, with Tucker Carlson moderating. It's so that's a that's
a pay per view event, Yeah, where you pay thirty five bucks to
get it under your cable. Absolutely, man, and they'll be you.
Well, we'll be seeing those video clips for decades. So well that that's
great. Probably. Yeah, that is it for this week. Make sure
you go over to John's substack or Robino substack dot com link in the show
notes, and we'll pick up in a couple of weeks. For some reason,
John, I don't think we will have any shortage of material come next
time. Hey, you've got a question, shoot us an email right to
comment below on the YouTube channel. It's a kl atcarry Lutz dot com and
don't forget subscribe to your free newsletter Financial Survival Network dot com. John.
We'll see you in a couple of weeks. See you, carry Thanks for
listening to carry Lutz's Financial Survival Network, your solution to today's trying times.
For the latest, go to Financial Survival Network dot com. Financial survival network
now more than ever