Hey, I almost decided to have a section this week. I guess with
last week' s reported avalanche, it was hard to identify the muddy ones.
Or let' s be positive, let' s also say that maybe
it' s that we' re improving and being more aware. In other
words, I wish I only caught a mistake with which I also felt possessed
by the great petrist eloquence. As you know, last week, the fourth
meeting of the Conference on Science, Innovation and ICT of the Economic Commission for
Latin America and the Caribbean was held in Bogotá. The sepal an honor for
Colombia, no doubt, and all the more so as soon as our Minister
of Science, Eseña Hello, was appointed to preside over the board of that
conference for the next two years. To develop the approved agenda here in Bogotá.
However, here it seemed a bit like an honor and we wanted to
expand the virus of life by the stars and the universe and once again declare
Minister Olaya as President of ECLAC. By decree, what a shame with the
Secretary- General of ECLAC, who is still the Costa Rican, José Manuel
Salazar, whom we dislodged from the executive direction of ECLAC with our own President.
The delirium, fortunately, passed us soon and we corrected the headline for
the rest. All the ears of this week were limited to differences of opinion
or conspiracy theories around what we published, which, well, are not really
faults or mistakes. It' s the differences of judgment and some obfuscation,
because we don' t say what they want to hear and nothing else.
What we did have were interpretations of what we said or even about what we
were going to say, that they even looked for legal ways, assuming that
if we had said it first it was around a note that analyzed the political
flirtations in which the petro government walked with the churches and crossed it with the
activities of the religious benches in Congress. And several complained because within this explanation
of the government' s rapprochement for some eight hundred churches in Colombia to begin
to be state contractors, carrying out some activities that are related to submission,
as the agenda of the parties and congressmen representing churches in Congress was revised,
and the article reviewed the whole agenda the issues that promote, some in favor
of the government, others against. But for appearing in that account, as
several interpreted that we were accusing them of something that the article nowhere said or
implied, and then demanded that we take their names or images out of the
article, which made no sense, because they were based on things that the
article did not have and were being interpreted. But even more unusual was an
attempt at prior censorship. He has no other name for a gringo lawyer than
for some questions that were asked for an investigation, as he decided to send
a threat of lawsuit in the United States and we published the article because he
assumed we were going to say some things that he considered to be a dragonflies
under American law. Of course we published the article with the information we had
and could sustain and we are sure to be able to defend in the lawsuit
that says it will put us in there in the United States. Well,
it' s no more. We' ve had cha.