Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Thursday, the eleventh of January, Year
of Our Lord, twenty twenty four. Well, today we're going to take
a look at the what's going on SEC and Wall Street. Take a quick
look at the hack they continue to dream up risky derivatives and other tools to
rob an enslave us, like this natural asset company scam I talked about yesterday
where they're going to lock up all the natural resources and they're going to lock
us into fifteen minutes smart cities that they've been planning since openly planning since the
late nineteen nineties. And yet there is a referendum in Texas. It's part
of the GOP primary to have Texas not only legal tender for gold, but
to allow people to write checks on it from the depository that they've set up.
This will be very important if this happens. A lot of states are
trying to get this type of thing in So we're going to take a look
at that, hope. We'll also take a look at the ridiculous political show
as it gets more and more absurd every day. We'll be right back.
It has dated the beginning of the show because we've got these issues. I'm
looking at my sheet here that's got the different clips on it, and the
date is eleven of November twenty four. We've gotten the wrong month. Dravis
has gotten the wrong year in terms of thumbnails on a bit, shooting and
everything. We're having a difficult time with this calendar this year. Maybe it's
the Biden brain fog or something, but now fake news is what worries the
World Economic Forum the most, and we're going to begin with that because even
though the political primary season kicks off with the Iowa Caucus on Monday, what
is going on with the World Economic Forum is quite frankly, far more threatening
than even these politicians who will be marching in lockstep to the World Economic Form.
If it's regardless of who these people are, you see an evidence the
fact that they're buying into They oh, we don't like those globalists, they
tell the Republicans, and yet take a look at what they do, not
what they say. So this is really about the censorship every attendee, As
a Technocracy editor says, every attendee a Davos meeting should expect to receive marching
orders to kill free speech in twenty twenty four. As the World Economic Forum
points out in their publication online, they said, we're going to have a
tremendous number of elections this year and we have to control them, and that's
how they're going to do it with free speech. Now they raise the alarm
and say artificial intelligence is now available to the masses, and that's why we've
got to shut down their free speech because they're going to be lying to you
as if the people in charge have never used AI and bots and massive armies
of people and propagandists and the press the light of you. Of course they
always do. They say, the spread of AI driven misinformation has become the
biggest and the most urgent risk for Glas Molble business leaders. As UK voters
are expected to take to the polls as a general election this year, a
new study has revealed. They said, the reality is is that they will
be using artificial intelligence to lie and they will also be using artificial intelligence to
censor people. Censorship is going to go rampant this year. And what they're
not even talking about in these articles is how the censorship is going to spread
to podcasts. This is a very new aspect of it. One of the
reasons why podcasts are what most people listen to is because that's not been censored
yet, but that's about to change. A climate change leading to extreme weather
events remains the biggest concern for the World Economic Form, they said in their
annual survey, they take an annual survey of fourteen one hundred global risk experts.
Oh, you know the experts for these people? Are they telling them
the World Economic Form what they know they want to hear. They don't make
any bones about what they want to hear. Do they really believe this?
Or is the World Economic Form using a push pull? And this is kind
of like asking a highly partisan question of one of the two political parties in
the United States. They know what the answer is going to be, and
of course they don't want to allow anybody to question their climate alarmism. Again,
says their climate alarmism and censorship are the two biggest issues in the World
Economic Form and they go hand in hand with each other. They go on
to say, AI artificial intelligence is expected to fuel the spread of false news
and the rise of deep fake videos appearing on social media, and that'll be
for government as well, So you just got to listen to those sources.
Meanwhile, climate change remains a mammoth concern. Isn't that an interesting choice of
words. Mammoth concern, that's where they like to start. Yeah, we
used to have this ice age and look at all the global warming that's going
on here. What was it that killed the memos? If they had anyway
for business leaders with extreme weather events viewed as the most severe risk over the
next decade. Now the most severe risk over the next decade are the types
of financial tricks and games to rob each and every one of us of everything
that we've been talking about for the last several days. And if they can
lock up all of our natural resources, this is what stakeholder capitalism is.
We now see it. You want to know what stakeholder capitalism looks like and
how it's going to work, Look at the natural asset companies where they're going
to say, well, we've been given this fiefdom to control this national park
or this government property. It's one of the reasons why you shouldn't have government
property. That was what the Bundy Ranch thing was about. That was the
first time I'd ever asked to go on an assignment because I understood the principles
involved in that, and the Bundanes understood that as well. The government is
not supposed to own property. The Constitution says they should have forts and ports,
and that's it. They shouldn't own vast swaths of property. Every time
some territory would join the Union. Before the Civil War, before we completely
changed our government, whenever a state would join the Union, then they would
give the land to people. They would not have the government which held it
as the territory would then give it to the people. But after the Civil
War they kept it. And we've been going down that path for a long
time now. As in terms of the censorship, the American Psychological Association is
out there hoarring themselves to the federal government. We need more federal funding so
we can help you to curb misinformation. Yeah, it's like they're going to
Uncle Sam. Hey, you know, I know what you want, pay
me back. In twenty twenty one, the American Psychological Association took a two
million dollar grant from the CDC to push the COVID narratives. But that's just
a small part of it. As I said over and over again, what
Trump funded with the AD Council, you know, the people who nag you
that this is your brain on drugs, and you know, only you can
prevent forest fires and the rest of this stuff. They'd never had as big
a campaign in terms of cash, not even close as they did for the
COVID thing. Trump gave them the AD Council two hundred and fifty million dollars.
You saw it manifests itself in so many different ways. They were paying
influencers on social media, influencers on YouTube. They pay people like Curtis Chang,
who was a supposed, uh theologian. I guess I don't know.
I don't think you ever even had a church, but he he was bringing
and other pastors like Robert Jeffers, this Trump sycophant, and they were going
over the talking points to tell people how you were to you know, this
is putting together this stuff for other pastors to say. When somebody asks you
about the vaccine, you tell them they got to do it to love their
neighbor. They need to trust authority. God has given us science and so
we should use all this kind of stuff. And where did those arguments come
from? Came from a Yale psychological study, and I talked about that in
July of twenty twenty. And if you go back and you look, and
his website is still up there, Curtis Chang, and it shows where he's
funded. He gets a lot of money from the ad Council from that two
hundred and fifty million dollars. So they had all these different avenues out there.
And you know, the Yale study that came out in July of twenty
twenty had all of these different talking points in there that you heard these people
repeating, People like Robert Jeffries, people like Franklin Graham, people like Al
Moller. They all repeated these verbatim. Oh the moonshot, moonshot, ex
well, moonshot. It just shows what a wonderful accomplishment we can have if
we really put our mind to it with science and that type of thing.
Well it was a lie as well, just didn't kill millions of people,
tens of millions of people. The APA is now clamoring for even more federal
money as it declares psychology to be leading the way on fighting misinformation. And
I've said from the very beginning, the only science involved in the so called
pandemic was behavioral psychology. That was the science that was applied. They said,
the scourge of misinformation. Clinicians are now having to treat patients who are
subsumed, in their words, by conspiracy theories. In other words, people
are not happy with this. They're doing their own investigation while institutions and communities
are all allegedly suffering unspecified harm. And so us some money and we'll help
you with us, say the psychiatrist to the government. I think goverment is
just doing just fine. Have they been working on psychological warfare? Mind war
always publishing? I've had pieces about it. Back in the nineteen eighties you
had Michael Akino, the Satanists and his mind wars. They know exactly what
they're doing. So misinformation, they said, is getting messier and more important
than ever. So to position itself properly among those vying for funding an influence
by exaggerating the threat posed by misinformation as a new phenomenon, this is a
daily skeptic. APA actually states that with the election in mind fighting misinformation is
quote one of the top trends facing the field of psychology. In twenty twenty
four. They also came up with some recommendations first, shut up. Second
used trusted short sources, so don't repeat the misinformation. He use the trusted
sources altogether. Yeah, they've got eight recommendations, but we know what these
look like. We saw them back in July of twenty twenty collaborate with social
media companies to understand and reduce the spread of harmful misinformation and practitioners. They
said, should do this everywhere. We should do it in our labs,
we should do it in our communities, we should do it on our families.
Well, when we look at the spread of misinformation and the phony claims
about how they can't get their message out, let's look at the politics of
this just a moment here. Remember the Tennessee Three who actually led a large
violent insurrection at the Tennessee Capital. They wanted to push gun control measures,
and they had two Justin's, two black guys, and a liberal woman from
Knoxville who's now going to try to challenge Marsha Blackburn. These people just don't
know when they're licked, do they. But you know, they also think
they're going to get gun control through as I point out, a Mexican billionaire
who lives in New York cities, but together an organization they call that the
Tennessee eleven, and they're going to try to push a gun control agenda here
in Tennessee. Well, they're not going to get anything with the current elected
officials. But one of the Tennessee three said that he was silenced. Silenced,
he said, and here's what he has to say. Remember, they
took over the floor of the house and they would not yield, and they
had a megaphone, and it went on pretty much all day. And this
is after their mob broke through and started pushing and shoving. Legislators then started
pushing and shoving the state police, who used their bodies as a shield.
For these guys. Nothing happened to them, nothing happened to them at all.
To the credit of the state police, they didn't put on body armor,
they didn't come out there with shields and clubs and tear gas and escalate
things like that. The you know, on January the sixth in Washington,
d C. They did everything right, and they did everything except right,
except they didn't kick out the woman. But the other two guys are immediately
reinstated. So they need to think about how they're gonna handle that the next
time. But here's what he had to say. This is one of the
Justins, Justin Pearson to build a movement for justice, running in love,
and that means we're gonna get knocked down sometimes. They're gonna tell us to
be quiet. They're gonna try and pass these rig rules tomorrow. But we
are going to continue to show up because we believe in democracy, because we
believe, because we believe, our best day are still a here. So
please keep showing up, Please keep saying engaged. And I promise you,
as long as I got air in my lungs, as long as oceanhanda my
dog has hit me, I'm gonna use all the breath I've got to fight
alongside you and to fight with you because you matter, Our kids matter,
our schools matter, our state matters, and we're not going to let any
authoritarianism or dictatorship rule in this because this is who's house. Yeah. Well,
you know that a little bit of a clip there, you can kind
of tell who this guy is. He's a rabbel rousing demagogue, and that's
what he came from. You know, he was an activist and an organizer
and all this other kind of stuff. And as they took over the State
House. Other people there said, Hey, you got a grief grievance or
something, you want to do something. You're a state legislator, now file
a bill. But instead he claims that he was being silenced. Well,
the reality was tweeted out by one member of the state House. He claims
that he says, all these rules they got, all these attempts to silence
people, all these attempts to subvert democracy, when they were the ones who
came in with a mob and shut down the proceedings, refused to yield,
to ignored all of the procedures and all of the rules. They ignored the
rules. They're going to tell us to be quiet and try to pass these
rig rules to prevent speech. Hell, you you always see this projection from
these people, especially on the left, projecting what they did on two other
people. And so Jody Barrett, who's Republican here in Tennessee, said,
you know how long these guys got to speak? He said, the three
of them spoke combined seven hours and sixteen minutes. Nobody shut their speech down.
Unfortunately, he said, it's weird that the people who are whining about
being silenced are three of the top four members of the Tennessee General Assembly.
In terms of time spent speaking on the House floor, it's almost like nobody
else can get a word in edgewise. That's especially true when there's with a
mob that is screaming and shouting and they've got a bullhorn. Nobody else could
get a word in edgewise. And then he showed how much time they had
spent. So a Pearson spoke for three hours and forty three minutes. That
guy, he spoke the most of anybody, didn't have anything to say,
but he spoke a long time. Justin Jones spoke for two hours and twelve
minutes. Okay, so one hundred and thirty two minutes for that guy and
two hundred and twenty three minutes for the other guy. And then Gloria Johnson
spoke for one hour and twenty nine minutes. Okay, so she's got ninety
nine minutes. What was the fourth person, Well that was William Lamberth,
a Republican who spoke for forty minutes, so twound and twenty three minutes,
one hundred and thirty two minutes, ninety nine minutes and forty minutes. So
who are complaining about they got away with it too. The LAPD is planning
to include private cameras and a ten thousand strong surveillance network. And what do
you think about the fact that the militaries police really began with their gates La
Police department back in the early nineties. It really was an aberration. As
I've said many times, when Terry Gilliam did Brazil in nineteen eighty four,
nobody had swat team things like that, you know, And I don't know
exactly when Darryl Gates hues that. I know that in the early nineties when
they had the the Rodney King riots, he didn't use his militaries police and
swat teams and his armored vehicles and anything. He didn't use that to bring
peace and order except to protect the police departments and other government facilities. Everybody
else is on their own. But they began doing that sometime in the eighties.
It really wasn't something that was common at all, but it spread,
and this is something's going to spread as well. As I said, I
brought in Brazil and Terry Gillims dark comedy about the solitarian government. You know,
that was the way the thing began. Was this is over the top
rate, which now we see things that are much worse than that happening.
So Real Time Surveillance Center is going to utilize live feeds from home security cameras.
And then my question with this is they're hoping to be able to have
access to ten thousand private cameras. The question is are they going to even
bother to get permission or will they just go to Amazon and say, you
know, give us the ring feeds. Things like that. We'll have to
wait and see. But when we come back, we're going to talk before
we get into the pharmaceutical revelations that are coming, and there's more revelations coming
out every day with that, and we'll get into the horse race that's about
to kick off when we come back, though, Well, take a look
at what's going on with the SEC and the Bitcoin ETF and the hack of
the Bitcoin ETF. There's been some fallout from that as well. So we
will be right back. Whether you're feeling like the booze or bluegrass APS Radio
as you covered, check out a wide variety of channels on our app at
apsradio dot com. Making Sense common Again. You're listening to the David Knight
Show, Well, I say that the lawmakers are out for blood after this
hack of the sec x account. The Twitter account caused a big pump and
dump with bitcoin. And it's very interesting because, as I pointed out yesterday,
seven years ago, they had denied a bitcoin ETF and then some things
happened that made it clear that it looked like they were going to approve it.
And yesterday was a deadline, and somebody got a hold of their Twitter
account, their X account, and so that has been approved, and they
came back with an egg on their face and said it wasn't. And so
then you had this rash of people criticizing Musk and saying, look at what
a dumpster fied Twitter has become, and all the rest of this. It
turns out that they didn't do two factor authentication on the SEC account. They
didn't want to put a phone number, and there was somebody's gonna get called.
So they just dispissed with that and their account got hacked. It wasn't
anybody's fault but their own. At four to eleven PM on January the ninth,
the post was published to the SEC's x account announcing the approval of spot
Bitcoin ETFs, the type of financial product that would allow people to invest in
the crypto asset through a regular brokerage firm instead of going through coinbase or some
crypto thing like that. By four to twenty six pm. It took him
fifteen minutes. The SEC chair Gary Gensler, had issued a retraction, said
the agency's account had been compromised and that an unauthorized tweet was posted. But
the damage has been done, and so the SEC might be tasked. And
this is the interesting thing with investigating itself. Those are the government always does
I find that I did nothing wrong chickens over market manipulation. But since it's
classified as a commodity still in the United States, it comes under the jurisdiction
of the US Commodities and Futures Trading Commission, the CFTC, and then there's
also the Department of Justice. It's going to be you could say, if
it was a real investigation, be a circular firing squad. But no,
they're not going to do anything with this. The former chief operating officer at
the Commodities and Futures Trading things the idea of commodities regulator investigating the securities regulator
is unprecedented. There is no manual for this, and the Commodities Futures Trading
Commission said it has enforcement authority with respect to any alleged manipulation of bitcoin,
but it declined to confirm whether it would investigate this instance. In the minutes
after the fake post was published, the price a bitcoin jumped about two and
a half percent, and then well below two and a half percent of its
original price. All together, it led to a forty billion dollar swing.
Someone who benefited from this x said that an unidentified individual had used a phone
number tied to their account to seize control because they did not have two factor
authentication enabled. And then, of course, they said, an alphabet soup
of investigations is likely to ensue. According to John Stark, let me suggest
they won't do anything. Did they do anything with the When the Dobbs decision
was leaked, the one that Scalia wrote about overturning Roe v. Wade,
somebody, a very few number of people who had access to it. Somebody
leaked that. I've said all along, and I still stand by it.
I think it was John Roberts, who is the most highly respected of all
of them according to a poll. We were told again, I don't know
if I'm believe any of these poles, I guess maybe I'm just an outlier,
but these polls, and I think maybe somebody's got an agenda they're trying
to push with these polls sometimes. But no, based on I'm not going
to go into it, but I said before, you know, based on
how he acted and what he had to say and other things, I believe
that it was him. And of course they never did investigate that never So
according to a guy who served as an attorney for eighteen years with the SEC,
he said, it will likely involve separate inquiries the SEC itself, the
US Department of Justice, which we'll focus on trying to identify the hacker.
But then, as they point out, perhaps it was somebody who was an
intern there. Maybe it's an inside job. Maybe since they approved it the
next day, since they proved it yesterday, maybe they had this thing all
set up to go and somebody hit send too early. Who knows. So,
X replied Twitter, we can confirm that the account was compromised, and
we've completed a preliminary investigation. Based on our investigation, the compromise was not
due to any breach of X's systems, but rather due to an unidentified individual
obtaining control over a phone number associated with the government account through the third party.
We can also confirm that the account did not have two factor authentication.
We encourage all users to enable this level of security. Nevertheless, the journalists
continued to say it was all Elon Musk's fault. I'm sure that's what the
investigation will find, don't you think? Says one wonders if it was even
really compromised or if it was just an in turn accidentally hitting send on a
post. They said, if this was indeed, said James Seifert, And
he said, if this was indeed a compromise of the account, the person
who compromised the account screwed up could have made a lot more money tweeting about
the bitcoin ETF being denied because everybody believed that it was going to be approved,
so you get as short at it. So again, what was the
If somebody was smart enough to do all that, why didn't they take it
the other direction? And then with just in a few hours after all that,
they had the SEC say that today the SEC grants approval for the bitcoin
ETFs, are listing all registered national security exchanges and there's more than a dozen
applications for people to do what it's essentially another one of these derivatives. And
I used to put my IRA and a gold etf until I realized the issues
with these paper derivatives that are out there. By the way. I see
a comment here from Mark on rumble it s as I mentioned the natural asset
companies and what a scam they are and how this pulls all this control you
know, give the control to and the New York Stock Exchange is a partner
in a scam, along with the Rockefeller Foundation and so forth, and the
SEC's about to approve it. January eighteenth is when they say they're going to
announce their decisions. So make sure you speak up about this. Not much
time and it may make a difference if you speak up. But also don't
just write to the SEC. In yesterday's interview that we had with Courtney Turner,
we had the links there where you could see the comments link to where
you could comment yourself. But also, you know, send a short little
thing just talking about how opposed you are and how dangerous it are is,
or somebody that you may want to use some of their arguments to try to
define it for your congressional representative or your state representatives, because they may not
know a lot of stuff they don't know about and they're slow to catch on
as matter. I didn't know about this until just recently, but Mark says
nacs were discussed on the big local area radio station yesterday, so said word
is getting out rapidly. Well, we need to get this word out rapidly.
What they will do again is to take all natural resources, land,
farmland, private public water, all these different things, and they will give
control of it to a company and that company will then be able to earn
money off of it. What an amazing scam, you know, because of
climate there'll be good stewards of it by locking it up and locking it down
and making it off limits to everybody, which is what the un has declared
they wanted to do in the twenty first century anyway, And this is how
these people with their stakeholder capitalism get paid. If it's public land that is
turned over to them by a government, they will put fifty percent of it
into a public trust, but they'll keep fifty percent of the money. And
what did they put into it? Nothing? What are they doing with it?
Nothing? Are they managing it. No, they're managing to keep you
off of it and having any use of it, locking it up, locking
it down, and this kind of public private partnership to steal everything from us
and then to limit us into their megacities. That's always been the plan.
And here's the financial mechanism. This is how they get paid. They finally
revealed it, and again this is reported on by Forbes. Quietly, most
people didn't pick it up two years ago. But it's just now that the
SEC is making its ruling on whether or not this is going to be allowed
that people are starting to talk about it. Hackers have gotten sensitive data from
two hundred US police departments again and another major security breach. The group that
has done this has done this before. It's a very radical left wing group.
Trainees are involved in it and the rest of this stuff, and they
have done this before as part of their blue leaks. The group calls itself,
let's see where is it. Here's dds. They want to d D
secrets right, kind of like a denial of service type of thing, but
they call it d S secrets. Distributed denial of secrets is what they're saying.
And so the leak files not revealing significant police misconduct. Instead, they
primarily consist of emails and internal memos that show how police departments in the FBI
have monitored protests across the US, especially those that followed the death of George
Floyd. They also reveal that law enforcement agencies, including the FBI, have
been actively monitoring social media accounts. Well, I think that's wrongdoing. I
think that's significant wrongdoing. And of course it also has data from the Fusion
centers, which are set up to do that type of thing, part of
the police state. Those ushered in after nine to eleven, the Fusion centers,
it was a fusion center in two thousand and nine. After the two
thousand and eight elections. I mentioned many times before that told him be on
the lookout for sovereign citizens. And he spot these sovereign citizens, well,
they might likely have a bumper sticker supporting Ron Paul or Chuck Baldwin who ran
as the Constitution Party candidate the year before. Highly politicized police state. And
so this distributed denial of secrets says that it plans to act as a publisher
of leaked information like wiki leaks, while maintaining the anonymity of the hackers involved
and alleges that it was not involved in the actual data exfiltration. You know,
we go back to the Pentagon papers and the same people, amazingly enough,
the same people who did movies about the Washington Post in the New York
Times and Hollywood Establishment did a movie about I forget what it was called,
talking about the Pentagon papers and doing it from the perspective of the discussions that
were going on within the Washington Post. In New York Times, can we
publish those papers? And they charged Daniel eldred Ellsberg, who they charged him
with stealing them, but the Supreme Court said, no, you can't charge
the papers for publishing them, and that was the principle under which all journalism
has been going. They realized that that would shut down the free press.
But in the last couple of years they've overturned that. And a big part
of the overturning of that was to come after Julian Assange, who came after
Julian Massage. Bill Barr, Bill Barr, Donald Trump's attorney general, Bill
Barr, who was the attorney general for George H. W. Bush.
Bill Barr, who was the right hand man of George H. W.
Bush when he rebuilt the CIA after you know, the Church hearing is really
kind of devastated their reputation and some of their capabilities, the two of them
rebuilt it. So you understand where Bill Barr is coming from. He wants
to kill Julian Signs because he wants to kill anybody knowing any government secrets like
war crimes that are committed. And so to come after Julian Signs, they
maintained the I believe fiction that he was involved in the hacking. To get
around this, they will probably do something like that to denial, the distributed
denial of secrets people. And so because already we see that on X that
account has now been suspended and disappeared. When we come back, we're going
to talk about Trump allies demanding accountability for Fauci, but completely ignoring Trump.
I was so encouraged to see somebody this is a real clear politics reporter,
somebody that was his headline. It's like, finally, finally somebody else is
talking about this. The hypocrisy of the Republicans holding a hearing and grilling Fauci
as they should, but never ever involving Trump. People who had just endorsed
Trump, coming after Fauci for the evil that was done. Who was it
that put him on the podium, Who was it that kept him there?
Who was it they gave him metals. We're going to talk about that when
we come back before we leave on rock fans. Steven Patterson, thank you
very much. That's very kind. He said, I chucked you one hundred
dollars yesterday. Here's another one. He says, you're decent. Thanks well,
thank you, Stephen. I appreciate that very much. We're going to
take a quick break. We'll be right back. If you like the Eagles
on the cars and Healey Lewis in the news, let this say the You'll
love the Classic Hits channel at a p S radio, download our app or
listen now at a p S radio dot com. Welcome, you're listening to
the David Knight Show. Here's the headline. Trump allies demand accountability from Fauci,
not the former president. Thank you, Philip Wegman of Real Clear Politics,
Thank you for doing this. I am so sick and tired of watching
this blatant hypocrisy, these hypocrites. And there you know the Trump commercial hitting
DeSantis for following his own orders, for doing what Trump was bribing everybody to
do. Uh, you know, DeSantis' entire popularity was based on the fact
that he opened it up more quickly. So what does Trump do. He
comes after him, tries to make him look like he was the lockdown king.
No, you were the one who was the locked king. Trump,
The responsibility ends with you. The buck stops at the President's desk, the
highest guy responsible for this stuff. He's responsible for everything that Fauci did,
and he also financed everything that all these governors did, Democrat and Republican.
The this delusion is so incredibly strong, it's insane. They remained silent,
however, about Donald Trump, the former president who stood by the architect of
the lockdown strategy. They were so eager, he said to cross examine Fauci.
It's time for doctor Fauci to confront the facts and address the numerous controversies
that have arisen during and after the pandemic. That Ohio Republican brad Winstrop,
I think it's time for you guys to confront what DeWine did. He was
one of the leaders in this and he was a Republican. That's the other
thing I s hear from people Oh, well, that's not Trump, and
it's not even the Republican governors. It's just the Democrat governors. Yeahs,
not only Trump, it's also these GP hypocrites who act as if they didn't
know. Seriously, you didn't know until just now, And what are you
going to do about it? Nothing? You're going to hold these show hearings
and they got nothing from Fauci. They just want to show that somehow that
they're on our side. You know, when DeSantis and Brian Kemp were starting
to open up in April, after Trump had done an executive order to lock
us down two weeks earlier, two weeks to fight in the curve, they
started opening up. I strongly disagree with this. He is still saying that
the lockdown closures saved lives. He's still saying that his poison saved millions of
people, though he has killed tens of millions of people. That's the truth.
Nine Republicans set on the sub committee, all of them love to loathe
Fauci. Four of them have already endorsed Trump for this reelection, including Marjorie
Taylor Green, who's publicly said that the doctor should be in jail. Well,
that's kind of interesting because you know, when I go the Daily Skeptic,
they have had this at the top of their website for quite some time,
and I looked at it the other day and I, you know,
I thought it was funny, and at first I didn't think it was a
real thing. I thought it was just a Daily Skeptic making a political commentary.
But it's a game called Whack, and it's got some very crudely drawn,
you know game characters. There. Trump with the blonde hair and the
red tie, Fauci with a mask and epidermic needle, I guess in his
aunt and a big hypodermic needle. And it's called Whack. It says stop
Fauci and Trump escaping on prison. So I clicked on it, and this
is what it looks like. This is the game, and this is legit,
you know, Google Play bring this thing up. For ninety nine cents.
You can buy Whack and you can shoot Fauci in Trump in their jail
sill. I'm tempted to buy it, but of course they all wanted to
put Trump in jail, as Marjorie Taylergreen says, but they will not even
mention or they won't put Faucian jail. They won't even mention Trump. Fauci
was the face of the White House COVID task Force, says Philip Wegman in
his article here, and he's right. But Trump stood at his side,
as I said you before. Trump put him on the podium, Trump made
him president, occasionally even grousing about him publicly on Twitter. Trump did,
but in the end, Trump still awarded Fauci a Presidential accommendation for his work.
Weguin's got it all the way down the line, he understands. And
he did it on the final day, even though the MAGA crowds and a
few, you know, the few rallies that they had right before the election,
they're begging him to fire Factory. Well, I don't know. We'll
see, maybe we'll see. Didn't do it. Gave him a medal on
the last day. He said. The focus on the decisions the fact she
made, and not on the president who empowered him has exasperated rivals like DeSantis,
who said, are we going to have some type of accountability here?
He asked in a recent interview with again Real Clear Politics, he said,
are we going to have a reckoning for this? Or are we just going
to act like everyone did such a great job. Yeah, what's what we're
going to do. All these Republicans they just now finding it out, and
you know, so they'll have a show trial, but they will still do
about it. Still nothing about it to keep it from happening again. Representative
Debbie LESCo of Arizona, John Joyce of Pennsylvania, Ronnie Jackson of Texas.
We'll also get a chance to cross examine Fauci. Each of them has criticized
the doctor, all of them still endorsed Trump, who presided over this during
his tenure, and none of them returned Real Clear Politics request for comment.
Lusco, as a matter of fact, said of Fauci, he will once
again I'm sorry of Trump. Trump, she said, well, once again
put America and Americans first. In a statement two days after Christmas to announce
their endorsement of Trump, who oversaw Fauci as he prescribed lockdown as a mask
mandates from the White House podium. Yeah, it's President Trump. You're not
spelling it right when you referred to him as the former president. He's the
former precedent. He said these kinds of things. Never in my life would
I have believed that they would get away with doing lockdowns in America. That's
the kind of passive slave mentality that is pervasive now. And how effective their
misinformation, their censorship, their propaganda has been and will be even more so
as they continue to add new technological capability with artificial intelligence. And that's why
I say these natural asset companies are so dangerous. You look at the scam
and this guy, who would ever fall for that? The American public will
fall for anything and everything if you look at what happened, and it truly
was unprecedented, and it was a crime the likes of which we've never seen
in America before. But nobody wants to hold Trump responsible. Why Why won't
they do it? Because the only thing they care about is themselves. Chris
Christie's dropped out and he said that about Trump. He said, you know,
I've known Trump for a long time, and I can tell you if
it comes to a situation where America's interests do not coincide with his, he
will go with his interests. Guess what, I watched Chris Christie do that
too. I watched Trump do that. I watched Chris Christie, I watched
all the Democrats and all the Republicans and all the President's men do that for
the last several years, and they're still putting their interests ahead of the interests
of the country when they endorsed the guy that did this stuff to us.
He will not put America first. He will put himself first, just as
he did with all the Jay Sixers, everything that he did at a Fauci's
testimony Monday, the Arizona Republican retweeted a post on the subcommittee calling for serious
answers. It's time for serious answers, she said, answers from Falci,
not Trump. Yeah again, you know, stop them from escaping from prison.
Please, will somebody tell the truth put them in prison. Scott Atlas,
who was appointed in that summer by President Trump, he was somebody who
was telling the truth about some of these measures, talking about how they were
garbage and nonsense, and he was opposed by everybody else on the committee,
but he had this to say about Trump, who appointed him. He said,
for an executive who's widely known for being able to fire people, he
said, it was shocking that this president allowed the incompetence of the nation's Task
Force advisors to continue. So it's when he allows it to continue. Right,
he's complicit with it. He's approving what Fauci did and did it over
and over again. But he tells a different story. Trump said last summer,
he said he insisted that he once listened to Fauci, but quote whatever
he said, I did the opposite. Liar, you, liar, bull
faced, lying Trump. He said he wasn't allowed to fire him. Fauci
wasn't a big player, he said, in my administration anyway. Liar,
unbelievable. He had him doing daily briefs and giving him the podium while he
was doing these extraordinary, unlawful, unconstitutional things to people. Pressed by Megan
Kelly and why he awarded Fauci a presidential commendation, Trump pled ignorance. I
don't know who gave him the commendation. I really don't know who gave him
the commendation. Someone probably handed him a commendation. Philip Muggman of Real Clear
Politics rites. Multiple former Trump officials found that answer far fetched, and they
have publicly said that any type of commendation would require a signature from the president.
Liar, again, you lying New York liberal crony friend of the Clintons
and Epstein and all the rest of these people, and they bound down and
worshiped this guy with a kind of idolatry I've not seen before with anybody,
including Obama. Regarding the suggestion that fact you be fired, however, several
former officials told real clear politics, that's easier said than done. You can't
fire these people. Why not? He's president, right, why can't you
fire them? He can? But here's the reason they said he couldn't.
They said the COVID Task Force had a quote resignation packed unquote. If one
person was fired, they would all resign. Is that a problem? Everything
they were doing was wrong and we knew it. Get rid of all of
them. And by the way, isn't that a conspiracy? Aren't they breathing
together on this whole thing? Aren't they black mail you? Get rid of
us on that's going to be a big pr problem for you. Oh well,
because Trump is thinking about himself, thinking about his image. He doesn't
care about all the mom and pop mainstream businesses that he destroyed and lives that
he destroyed, and the dangerous martial law president president that he set. Atlas
was the only dissenting voice from the group. It could have easily appointed.
Let them all resign and we got some new people. Just that simple.
No, Atlas called for a different strategy than was and that strategy was not
adopted by the Trump Fauci COVID committee. Scott Atlas's different strategy was adopted by
DeSantis, and it caused him. As Philip Weigman points out, that's why
he rose to national prominence is for that very reason, which makes it so
incredibly hypocritical for Trump to try to portray him. Then, of course it's
exactly what you would expect a demagogue like Trump to do, and to lie
about him, to portray him in exactly the opposite way of it, to
take his strength and to try to turn it into a weakness. Desanteles rose
to national prominence largely because of how he handled the pandemic. He regularly railed
against Fauciism on the campaign trail and still does. Nevertheless, he's lagging behind
Trump by double digits in each of the early primary states according to Real Clear
Politics average poll. And you know, he didn't just rise to national prominence,
he rose to international prominence. So one of the reasons why when you
daily skeptic in the UK was very excited when DeSantis did it because they had
been covering what DeSantis were doing in terms of taking the lead. Again,
I would have liked to have seen more done. I would have liked to
have seen it done earlier, but he was still leading the pack in terms
of pulling it back, and he's still saying that it was wrong, and
so Daily Skeptic was very excited when he ran. And as you can see
from this ad at the top, they are no fan of Trump and they
understand that it was a Trump Vauchi scam. The only person missing in jail
there is Klaus Schwab, because they were marching in lockstep to what the UN
and the whow all and the World Economic Forum all wanted the twenty first century,
said DeSantis. He said, the twenty first century the three biggest events,
number one nine eleven in the wars that followed, Number two the Great
Recession, and number three COVID, he said, And the third one has
a broader impact than the other two events combined. And yet here we are,
and we're not even discussing that unless we lie about it, unless we
misdirect people away from Trump and to Fauci, and then unless we misdirect people
away from the vaccine into the wuhn lap. It's always this red herring approach.
Same thing that Hillary Clinton did, you know, when she was creating
this document dump as a part of their probably payoff schemes and making it available
to everybody at Clinton emails dot com. She gets caught doing that, and
what does she do? Russia, Russia, Russia a red herring to distract
everybody from what she had done. And of course this is what the politicians
always do. You know. The interesting thing is that when Desantist talks about
the three big issues nine to eleven, the Great Recession, and then the
so called pandemic, that pandemic and nine to eleven began at the same time
two shoes. One of them dropped, you know, in two thousand and
one, the other one dropped in twenty twenty. And the one that dropped
in twenty twenty bigger than the other ones because they worked on it and rehearsed
it and practiced it and laid the legal foundation for twenty years for that to
happen. He goes on to say Trump's compounding legal troubles and his vow to
deliver retribution upon his enemies. Also seems to overshadow any questions of accountability concerning
his handling of the so called pandemic. I put in the so called stuff.
He's not questioning the pandemic. He's questioning Trump, and he's questioning the
Democrat, the Republican's response to it. But again, notice that the revenge
aspect, it is not just Trump's self interest. Well, I don't want
to Firefaccher because what a pr problem I would have if all of them quit
on me, They would say I was killing everybody. I don't want that
fight. His interest, his self interest, and now it's about his revenge,
and everybody is on board with them, all the Republicans living vicariously through
this guy. The Trump campaign said a spokesman. He said, anybody who
is spokesman's with a campaign said, anybody criticizing Trump's handling of COVID couldn't manage
a Little league baseball team, let alone manage a global pandemic crisis caused by
China. Well, you can manage to lie, can't you, Trump campaign
spokesperson who isn't name who it is. How about this, instead of trying
to manage us, could maybe you manage following the Constitution and the rule of
law instead of overthrowing it all with medical martial law. How about that?
What if we did that? And I think it's really telling that again he
shifts the blame to China. Let's not talk about Trump's lockdown, Let's not
talk about Trump's vaccine. Let's talk about Wuhan and China. You know,
the problem is that when he tries to push it to China, Ram Paul
and these other Republicans are not coordinated on this memo because they're trying to make
it about the Wuhan lab with Fauci. And so if you want to make
it about China, the uncomfortable truth for Trump if that were the problem,
and it's not the problem. But if that were the truth, if that
was the problem, then the reality is that Fauci in his department funded it.
They're the ones who ultimately created it. There, so even that doesn't
really add up. But don't expect any Republicans, especially the ones out there
giving money to Trump and voting for him, don't expect them to understand that.
Look, it's not the president's job to manage a pandemic like this.
There's no authority in the Constitution for him to make health decisions for people.
There's no authority for the Constitution for these public health organizations to exist at the
federal level. They shouldn't make these arguments. There's no authority under the Constitution
for the president to give tens of billions of dollars to these pharmaceutical companies to
develop an experimental vaccine mRNA technology and then deliver it with the military. What
does he give the authority for any of that stuff. Why don't you try
to manage staying within the bounds of your office and the Constitution. What a
pathetic excuse. He knows that this is a president who's out there funding drugs
and telling people through FAUCI they've got a lock down, they've got to wear
masks, they got to keep distant from each other. All he doesn't know
anything about health. He doesn't know anything about the Constitution or care about the
Constitution. Quite frankly, he doesn't know anything or care anything about our public
health either. An epic failure. And yet when he completely ignores the Constitution,
liberty, and the law, we have a Victor Davis Hansen, historian
going on Tucker Carlson just before Christmas saying this lawfair against Trump is a pivotal
moment for us and it could be the end of democracy. Let me tell
you, the lawfair that's going on against Trump is wrong, but it pales
in comparison to the law fair that Trump ran against us, this color of
law warfare against us. He didn't have the authority to do any of this
stuff, and he went to war with us. Sanctions are an act of
war, and everything that he did was a sanction. And then of course
he created the rest of this stuff. And when you want to talk about
the end of democracy, let me tell you when democracy ended. We've got
an exact date. Friday the thirteenth March Friday the thirteenth, twenty twenty.
That's when democracy ended. That's when the elections were made a moot point.
Who cares if the president can turn this all over. There's some CDC flacky
like Fauci or an IH fac an IH flak like Fauci. If you can
turn it over to some bureaucrat and let them destroy this country. If you
can then spend trillions of dollars and everybody goes along with it, we don't
have a democracy. We were ruled by a bureaucracy. Democracy ended a long
time ago. We've got taxation without representation, regulation without representation, lockdown without
representation, vaccination without representation, or authority creating these vaccines, mandating them for
people. We don't have a democracy. This is a clown show. And
it's not a clown show because they finally came after Trump. These criminals,
these thieves who have stolen our country from us. There's no honor among thieves,
and they're after each other. Now. You know, they'll work together
for a long time to keep other people off the ballot. And yeah,
let's just keep this little thing between the two families here, the two crime
families. So let's just work together to keep this thing going. And then
after a while one of them makes a move. Now there will only be
one. It's like Highlander, right, It all work together for a while.
But ultimately, you know, even though we're partners that work to fight
these other people, eventually it's going to come down to you and me and
we're going to fight this thing out. That's who we are right now or
the final stages of this stuff. Don't talk to me about law fair after
twenty twenty. Don't talk to me about the end of democracy after twenty twenty.
There's not even any reason to vote for these people in Washington. They
have absolutely no interest in the rule of law. It's all ended by executive
order. So, uh, let's get back to the vaccine Daily skeptic kind
an interesting comment. Take a look at this woman who is the chief scientist
too. You know, created we see Albert Boll all the time, he's
the face of Pfizer, but she's really the face of vaccines. Look at
this as she is doing this interview for cancer, and as they pull back
and they talk to her, fear that she's obviously got Bell's palsy for cancer
or to change in cancer. Now they're selling the idea they've got a vaccine
that's going to cure cancer. You know, scientists are they got They've got
a vaccine for depopulation, sterilization, and murdering people. And biology has so
many secrets and you only find about out about them when you enter this unknown
territory on which we which we have been navigating since three decades now. Yeah,
yeah, yeah, Well, you know three decades ago she did not
have that Bell's palsy. Nah, And they began the story in Teley Sykeptic.
We all know the Hans Christian Andersen's story the Emperor's new clothes. I
maybe we should change it to the Emperor's new presidential term. That's what we're
on right now. Right Who's going to besides Philip Wegmann and myself, who's
going to point out that this Emperor Trump has no clothes? And I'm not
talking about the Epstein tapes. I'm talking about the naked tyranny that we lived
under in twenty twenty. The emperor who parades Stark naked through the Epstein mansion
and I'm sorry, in front of his subjects, but no one dares mention
it. The much celebrated Turkish German co creator of the Pfizer vaccine, whose
face has been featured in The New York Times, on the BBC and innumerable
other international media, who clearly suffers from partial face paralysis, a widely reported
side effect of the drug, but nobody dare mention it. The facial paralysis
or the Bell's palsy is, for instance, flagrantly obvious. In that interview
that I just played for you, they said it is more or less obvious
in all the video instill images of her, including the somewhat iconic New York
Times photo that they show in the article. Pull that down and show that
So why does nobody talk about this? They said, Well, reports a
partial facial paralysis following an oculation with a Pfizer Biointech vaccine or so widespread that
the adverse reaction has become a veritable meme. Justin Bieber famously announced that he
was suffering from the disorder in June twenty twenty two after his shot. Case
report of Bell's palsy following an oculation with a vaccine can be consulted, they
have a link to it. The FDA's December twenty twenty briefing document on the
drug contains the following curious passage, acknowledging four cases of Bell's palsy in the
clinical trial, all of them in the vaccine group. So why is she
a victim of her own drug? Dayli Skeptics says, Well, the answer
to that question is definitely no, for earlier images of her show that she
was already suffering from facial prolysis several years before the development and the rollout of
the COVID vaccine. However, to a lesser extent, they say, could
she, however, have somewhat developed the disorder in connection with her laboratory work
to develop it. Well, we don't know, they said, but you
can see from a photo they have right there in the nineteen nineties that as
a younger woman, she had no trace of facial prolysis. Look, it's
not even just this one there she is there as a young woman. It's
not just this vaccine. It's the characteristic of a lot of vaccines. I've
known people who've had this. As a matter of fact, back in the
early nineteen eighties, friends of ours who got married and she got the vaccine
to travel abroad and meet his family. He was from England, and so
they got married and then they're going to go to on their honeymoon to the
UK, and the vaccine cost her to have Bell's palsy. Fortunately for her,
it was temporary. But she says, they go over there and she's
got to meet all the relatives and her faces like hanging down. And I've
noticed that with many people that I've known, and that is something that has
been around for a very long time with all these vaccines. But getting back
to fauci As, these truth seekers, these Republican congress critters who don't want
to talk about Trump and they don't want to take back any of the usurped
power that he gave to people like Fauci. They questioned him and he said
he didn't recall over one hundred times and closed door testimony. So you know,
we look at this and the bell's palsy there. I wonder, does
does Fauti have brain fog from his COVID shots. Of course, you know,
he probably didn't get any COVID shots. I think he knows better than
to do that. So I don't think it was his brain fog, but
we could always ask the question. I think it's the brain fog of the
Republican lying politicians and the people who support them. The face of our nation's
response to the world's worst public health crisis does not recall key details about either
the origins of COVID nineteen or his pandemic error policies. R House Coronavirus Select
Subcommittee Chairman brad Winstrop of Ohio said in a statement money night. He said
the potentially preventable pandemic ultimately resulted in the deaths of nearly one point two million
Americans, said the Ohio Republican. Do you see how deep he is into
this lie? Still, it didn't kill one point two million people. Trump's
medical murder protocol killed people. It was not a preventable pandemic. It wasn't
a pandemic at all, and it should have all been prevented if they would
have followed the law. But they all decided otherwise. And the fact that
you got the House Coronavirus Subcommittee is still selling all of these lies under a
Republican majority, under Republicans who are running this stuff, and all they do
is the same stuff that Rampaul did. They're going to hold a show trial
where they yell and scream at Fauci, and then over on the other side
of the Capitol building they have a show trial where they yell and scream at
Hunter Biden and they don't do anything about any are they yell and scream at
majorca for the border. It's just unbelievable to see this country just right,
and you're not going to get any help in Washington. You're not going to
get anything change. Look at Speaker Johnson, what he's become. You know,
the the conservative Republicans who by the way, are still covering for Trump,
like Marjorie Taylor Green is still covering for him with his lockdown everything.
But they got upset with him because when he does the budget bill with Chuck
Schumer, he is back to sixty billion dollars for the IRS, which is
what McCarthy had negotiated, and they call it massive cuts in the Republican press.
I look at this stuff and it's like, how are people fooled by
this stuff? Biden wanted an eighty billion dollar increase, Kevin McCarthy that I
saved twenty billion dollars, and now Johnson is saying the same thing as speaker.
But the reality is this is that you're looking at a situation where Biden
wanted to The current total budget of the IRS is thirteen billion, so you
had Biden who wanted to increase it by more than sevenfold. Kevin McCarthy and
now Johnson want to increase it only five and a half times. Good for
them, and they call that a cut. You increase the size of the
IRS by five and a half times, you have the audacity to call this
a cut. And the media says he's pulled in massive cuts. What a
great speaker. He is no different than McCarthy. And they lie to you
about something like that, you better believe they're going to lie to you about
being partnering people to do mass murder. Of course they're going to lie about
that. They're just as guilty as Trump is. And they're still supporting everything
that he did and pretending that none of this happened. Fauci admits under these
hearings that the COVID six foot social distancing guidelines lacked any scientific basis. Well,
of course, it was all made up nonsense, and it lacks the
basis. By the way, pull up that article and that classic picture of
Fauci setting in an empty stadium where he tells everybody they can't go, and
he's got his mask down and laughing, while the other two people got their
masks up. Yeah, cloth masks too, by the way, that's what
Fauci's got on the other two people can't tell. But you know where did
this come from? They said? Fauci confess to lawmakers on Tuesday that the
six foot distancing, which again he's not wearing a mask, He's not six
foot distance in this thing here, it was not based on scientific data.
Well, then, It's not science, is it. If you don't have
data, if you're afraid to show the data, if you don't want to
put a study up, we'll not even haven't even begun the scientific process.
You know, if you put your you've got a conclusion about something, you've
done some experiments or some tests, or you measured something, you put the
data up there, you get people your conclusions, and people look at it
and they question your data, and they questioned your conclusions, and you have
a debate about that. That's science. Facci's the antithesis of science. All
of this. He conceded that the guidelines quote sort of just appeared unquote,
that's what he said. They sort of just appeared. Well, let me
help him on that, because there were many studies that happened at the same
time. They said, you know, fourteen years before we did this superstitious
rule. You know, it's like, don't step on a crack, you'll
break your mother's back. You got to stay six feet apart, and all
the rest of stuff. It was high school students science project in Albuquerque,
New Mexico that kicked this off fourteen years they said before. And actually it
was a little bit more than it's like fifteen years before that she did this
science project and her father worked for the Los Alamos Labs I think is the
one that's there in New Mexico. And she won a science contest for this
and she came up with that six foot number. And then she gets a
call from Homeland Security Director chirt Off at the time, and two thousand and
five is on Halloween, two thousand and five. How appropriate, Hey,
we could do masks as well, you know. He gets a call from
her that she gets a call from him, and she gets to go to
Washington explain it, and lo and behold, they roll that into this plan
that they prepared for twenty years again, Dark Winter two months before nine to
eleven, the false flag anthrax attack one week later, and then the Modical
Model legislation for all the states to do exactly what they did twenty years later
and then practice that thing every year, locking everybody down, rushing a vaccine.
And then in two thousand and five, chirt Off and these other people
put through with the Bush administration, they create the PREP Act, which create
a whole new level of protection for the murder that they were going to do
with the vaccines. The PREP Act that was done at the same times on
two thousand and five, the prep Aact. They call them this high school
girl that becomes the basis for them doing their six foot social distancing and everything
and all the rest of it. Yeah, they we know where all this
stuff came from, and we know that it was all made up. It
is no question about its origins, and I know no questions about it,
like the origin of the bat soup and all the rest of this stuff.
So again, FACTI says the six foot social distancing is not likely not based
on data, Well, then it's not science. And none of this stuff
was based on data, including the vaccine that Trump is so proud of not
doing the tests. But it's not going away. When we look at what
happened in Japan with the earthquake, right, you got buildings knocked down and
people having to sleep out in the open, and you have elderly people who
are sleeping out in the open during winter and they're required to wear masks in
order to reduce the COVID risk. This just happened. This is why it
is so horrific that these Republicans won't do anything anything to pulling this stuff back.
Instead, they'll try to score cheap political points by going after despised figures
and frauds like Fauci, But they're just as big a fraud, just as
big. The FDA commissioner, by the way, is now promoting off label
use of drugs. Wait a minute, wasn't that what all the ivermectin stuff
and the HCQ stuff was about. Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquind have been used for many
decades, fifty sixty, seventy years, and they knew what the safety profile
of it was, and it's always been allowed for people once they know the
safety profile, if you want to have it for an off label use,
say well, we can try for that. There's you know, because we've
already looked at the safety profile of it. So maybe it works, maybe
it doesn't, but you know, we know how hard they came down and
ivermact and a nate CQ and now these hypocrites again, Now this is hypocrites
on the on the Democrats side. During his first stint as FDA Commissioner during
the Obama administration, doctor Robert Califf propose allowing companies to advertise their products off
label, and that kicked off a lot of anger from the Democrats, people
like Senator Markey at Massachusetts, and so when Biden becomes president, he decides
to bring this same guy back, and as soon as he comes back,
he starts pushing off label promotion again. And his critics are take a pass
on this, And what is he promoting off label? Well, he's promoting
COVID vaccines for kids. That's off label. Why Well, because they have
not tested its efficacy or the rest of this stuff or safety for kids are
testing. Listen to this, promoting the COVID vaccines for children to use against
long covid. Boy, is this twisted like a pretzel or what? We
all know that long covid was this thing they made up to excuse away the
symptoms of their vaccine. And as we see now the people who are suffering
from long COVID, they say, yeah, we can see these spikes still
in your system and there was never any reason to give them to kids at
all. And so now they're saying, well, kids who have got long
covid should get more of the vaccine in order to get rid of that symptom.
Truly amazing. And then the adjuvants aluminum adjuvants In this article from Children's
Health Defense, aluminum adjuvants used and these covid vaccines may increase risk of serious
respiratory disease. They said, Uh, you know, very very low amount
of this is making serious respiratory illness after exposure to new virus strains. What
thought? We were told that there really wasn't much in terms of adjuvants at
all, because this is the Trump vaccine, right, very weak attenuated classic
viruses with a very low amount of adjuvant in it. Very low amount sugar
water for folks. Yeah, sugar water. A little bit of an attenuated,
microwaved or radiated urb of a deal abs a freaking legally. That's why
Trump is taking control of the process. Yeah, there you go. Trump's
saving us, right, very low amount of aguvant, nothing to worseorry about.
It's just sugar water. It's just going to irritate your immune system a
little bit. Maybe you'll get long term immune disease, but you know,
probably not because this is Trump's vaccine. Nothing bad is going to come from
Trump, right. Well, disabled vet started noticing everybody around him dying suddenly,
and so he started doing some research. Steve Connolly, had disabled,
a Rock War combat veteran and recovering alcoholic in Massachusetts, was horrified by the
number of deaths amongst his friends an alcoholics anonymous meetings starting in twenty twenty one
as they're rolling out the Trump shots. Experts said that he made an astonishing
data discovery that corroborated the work that's been done by Ed Dowd and Pierre Corey
on vaccine induced excess deaths in all fifty states. So again he's going to
these AA meetings and he starts seeing this in twenty twenty one. He is
a sixty one year old disabled VET, a retired social worker who cared for
the most severe and violent mentally ill patients in Massachusetts where he worked. He
said the formerly routine AA meetings became scenes of more suffering and carnage than he
had seen in war, amongst the worst of the worst in mental hospitals as
well. So he'd worked in mental hospitals, he'd been at war, but
he said this is even more horrific. Here's what he saw. He said,
in all my time, I've never seen this many people that I know
dropped dead in this short span of time, not in war. Even this
is a war against us, and began with sanctions, and it expanded to
poisonings. Vern was in his seventies. A friend of his, Vern,
relatively healthy and stable, commonly said he was coughing on a Sunday, dead
on Monday. Big Rob was in his thirties, a little obese, and
he died from myocarditis. Ali was in her thirties, a heavy girl,
but healthy. She got the JAB, had serious gallbladder issues, and had
it removed. She was found dead when she didn't show up for work.
A physician who was in the alcoholics anonymous group known as Doctor Michael, debated
Conley about the JAB. He said, I tried to explain it to him,
but he didn't believe me. Two weeks later he got the booster.
He died from a heart attack a few days later. Then they killed my
friend, and then I started to investigate. He said, Hey, you
know, it's just sugar water. That's all it is, is sugar water.
So children of self defense, he told them. The defender, he
said, he is driven by anger, by pain over the unexplained scourge of
deaths around him. He poured over thousands and thousands and thousands of obituaries,
he said, and discovered that deaths reported as quote suddenly or unexpectedly on legacy
dot com, where they have habituaries, right, So he go this public
source, everybody posting up their habituaries, and that's where he looked at it.
He said, it soared more than sixty two percent across the US after
the rollout of the vaccines. Scroll back up where people can see it.
Look at those two spikes and they're in twenty twenty one and twenty twenty two,
and then thankfully now with twenty twenty three, it came back down to
normal, to the baseline, but it was huge, essentially doubled. But
they said sixty two percent looks from the graph almost as if it doubled.
His data trove assembled to the health of a Massachusetts systems engineer and vaccine death
investigator, John bod Doin Senior, matches to a remarkable degree the unprecedented rise
in US excess deaths and disabilities and government data reported by former black Rock hedge
fund manager Edward Dowd and also by doctor Pierre Corey and others. Said Corey,
So we see this, how many different times and how many different ways
do we have to see this. We've seen it from insurance company data.
We've seen it from habituaries, We've seen it from funeral home profits, and
all the rest of stuff. The excess death, all of it beginning in
the third quarter of twenty twenty one, timed with a rollout of the Trump
shots and the lies and mandates of Biden. An Embalmer survey in twenty twenty
three, this is from Steve Kersey said, over seventy five percent are still
seeing these novel white fibrous clots. These clots were never seen before COVID,
he said, And the COVID vaccines and the CDC isn't at all interested in
investigating. After all, it's only in around twenty percent of the cases,
or about six hundred thousand Americans. It's no big deal, right, It's
a ray, right, only twenty percent. Well, they said, nearly
eighty percent of the Embalmer's surveyed are reporting these And he said, again,
just like we saw with the diet suddenly. So the good news is that
in twenty twenty three, just twenty percent of the cases had these novel clots,
down from thirty percent of them in twenty twenty two. It seems highly
likely. He says in summary that these cases are caused by the COVID vaccines.
Twenty percent of deaths is roughly about six hundred thousand Americans a year from
the Trump sugar water and then I mentioned this the other day briefly. Doctor
Pierre Corey is an article up on Brownstone talking about how a whistleblower went through
and did a freedom of information request in New York County Westchester County, New
York, and they wanted to see how many times they had the phrase vaccine
in their EMS message system and what they found, said doctor Corey. He
says, as difficult as it is at this point, further distressed me with
data on the toxicity of this stuff and the lethality of the mRNA platform.
He said, this data set still managed to further distress me and surprise him.
He said. The issue, of course, is not new. We've
seen a lot of information about this and the Informed Consent Network they did a
four request from the CDC found that seven point nine percent of all ten million
vaccine recipients reported requiring medical care to treat a vaccine adverse effect. Of those
requiring medical care, about eleven percent eighty seven thousand, seven hundred people had
to go to the emergency room or hospital. Why doesn't this stop this again
when we talk about the Boeing seven thirty seven Max or whatever. Can you
imagine if we'd had eighty seven thousand, seven hundred people after they flew on
a Boeing seven thirty seven Max, had to go to the emergency room check
in there? What would they do? Would they dismiss it and keep flying
that plane? Of course not. Why is this treated this way? Well,
it really tells us something about the corruption in our government. There was
an increase of more than twenty five percent of the number of ambulance calls in
response to cardiac arrests and acute coronary syndromes for young people in the sixteen to
thirty nine age group between this COVID vaccine rollout and Israel where they were Netanyahu
use his own people as Lamb rats. And then this anecdote on social media,
which I wonder if this is a handy that we know. I'm a
paramedic in the Greater Atlanta area. He said, I wish they would use
our MS nine to eleven data like Israel did. We're seeing exactly the same
scenario here, with one difference. Cardiac related calls are now overwhelmingly young males
eighteen to thirty years old, typically early morning. We arrive at a suburban
home only to find the entire family in severe distress. This is what we
hear, save my baby. Over and over we find these young people,
these young men, still in their beds dead. Most appear to be sudden
cardiac deaths. We're obligated to ask was he recently vaccinated, to which the
reply is always yes, I was an army medic. Yet I've never seen
such carnage as we are currently experiencing. The Israel study is the strongest signal
for the data I've seen yet. For God's sake, stop the shots.
But for Trump's sake, they won't. For Pfizer's sake, they won't.
For the global depopulation agenda, they won't. This is anti God to me.
The most shocking discoveries that Pierre Corey I made when reviewing the documents is
that I found evidence of five different occasions where calls were made to the Westchester
County MS dispatch to have the ambulances on standby. And this is being done
by vaccine clinics and it shows up in the records here. We will be
administering the COVID vaccine today to two hundred and twenty people. Please be ready
to stand by and come. And as I said before I talked about this,
it was big news and the alternative media when we had a nurse who
was an interview I did with a nurse who was in pediatric ICU unit and
preborn right, premature babies. And so they have these premature babies and they
had their formula that you know, after a certain number of days after birth
or whatever, even if they're being treated, they're going to give them the
shots. But they knew that with the premature babies, they were so immature,
so underdeveloped, that it was going to put them into an emergency situation.
So she said, we would do it by schedule, and we would
call the intensive care unit and tell them get ready, we've got some babies
who are coming, and they would do it anyway. Why would they do
that, that was before the COVID shots, because the medical system for years
has been captured by the drug companies, especially the vaccine stuff, and they
will religiously follow that timing schedule without any regard to the health of the patient.
They knowingly did that, They knew that was going to happen, and
they did that, And isn't that disgusting? And isn't it disgusting Somebody like
Alex Jones, who had that on his own platform, would lie to you.
It's like going to the parents and saying, well, we're going to
vaccinate all the premies today. Don't worry. It's like sugar water. It's
like sugar It's great. We do it all the time to kids, and
then you go and inject them and they die. You know, it was
necessary to have both Biden and Trump. It's necessary to have one guy roll
it out and another guy administer it. Wasn't it. You had to do
it that way. It had to be bipartisan. If everything had been you
know, if Trump had created the vaccine and rolled it out, I guarantee
you that the Democrats would have used that against him. But by having a
bipartisan cooperation and all of this, everybody covers for everybody else. You're going
to have some despicable people like Fauci or despicable people like Trump that are going
to be focused on and criticize for things that they do, but they're not
going to change anything. You know, you have the abrasive characters that are
going to be singled out and focused on, but they're really not going to
change anything. It was essential for this whole process to be bipartisan so they
could cover it up. It was essential for it to be bipartisan so they
could deflect the blame to the other guy, which is what I see all
the time from these Trump supporters. We're going to be right back. We're
going to have Tony Yardman who is going to join us, and we're talking
about some of these financial issues that are in front of us. Stay well,
us will be right back. If you like the Eagles on the cars
and Healey Lewis and the news they say, then you'll love the classic Hits
channel at APS Radio, download our app or listen now at APS radio dot
com. The seed in our home, my boys, then and go where
all can see me and with our devotion. Boys call it the Liberty Tree.
It's all old tree and the storm old tree. And we are the
sons. Yes, they are the sons, the sons of liberty. Liberty,
it's your move. You're listening to the David Knight Show. All right,
folks, welcome back and joining us now is Tony Ardeman of Wisewolf Gold.
And Tony has been a big supporter of this program for a long time.
He's set up David Knight not Gold, so he knows if you're coming
from us and I want to talk to you. We got a lot of
economic issues that are happening right now. We got to budget deals, we
got massive inflation. But it's all fixed now, isn't it, Tony.
We're not worry about We got the soft landing that's coming in, but we
still haven't landed. Were still and as we look around, it looks like
the door's blown off on side of the plane, doesn't it for you?
For you and I I thought that was that Alaskan airline's flight. That's a
pretty good analogy for what's happening to this the Western economy in general. But
hey, but now David, we have a bitcoin etf Everything is fine.
That's why I can get black Rock to buy your bitcoin for you. I
am so confused by the interest in this, and it's I understand that a
lot of the crypto traders and people say we'll go into FIAT and we'll get
into the system, it'll become normalized. I'm thinking, well, that's the
last place you want to go, but okay, you know, we'll we'll
go ahead and let this ride. Yeah, And I've seen an article one
person saying, well, I think that one bank, And now an analyst
at one bank says he thinks a bitcoin is going to hit two hundred thousand
dollars after this CTF approval. I don't know. I've seen a lot of
volatility. I don't like volatility on something that I've invested in. It's like,
seems to me like it's kind of like a crap shoot, which is
everything that's in the stock market. And once you roll the bitcoin stuff into
ETFs and make a derivative out of it and then trade it on the gambling
floor, I don't know that's a good thing or not. My favorite part
of the whole thing was the of the sec board and what the holdouts that
didn't want this to happen. And they're mostly on the left, and they
believe that that bitcoin finances terrorism, that it's used for criminality and money laundering,
and I think it's nothing. It's nothing compared to what the US dollar
is are you paying attention? And of course they know that, but it
just really exposes the establishment's love and lust for unlimited fiat currency. And you
know, I fan of bitcoin. I mean, that's not what I do
primarily, but I started buying bitcoin when it was three hundred and eighty dollars
back in twenty sixteen, putting it in my bitcoin ATM. So I know
a little bit about it, and I think right now we're going through a
phase where it's there's going to be a lot of interest pique now because of
the ETFs, but it really isn't the point of it. I think that's
the funny part about the whole thing, is that it's a completely different system,
but you're still still interested in what the fiat banking system thinks about it.
I'm not. I'm looking at parallel economies and what we do moving for
away from this. Yeah. Yeah, they're saying, yeah, we're going
to get institutional money, and as you point out, is that you're looking
at these institutions that are failing and corrupt. But and that was the thing
that I didn't read what the left said about it, but that was the
big question mark in my mind about it. It's like we've been. We
had this campaign from Elizabeth Warren, we got to destroy all crypto, the
competitors to our CBDC right now, and yet you know they on the SEC
they approve this again. You know, it really kind of surprised me.
But you might even look at this and saying, so are they trying to
sabotage it like they did with their derivatives and the real estate market? You
know, real estate is good stuff, but look what they did with their
derivatives. Is that what they're going to do to bitcoin now? With these
derivatives, I'm not real for the dot com bubble? Yeah, exactly are
you sabotaging it from the That's a great question. It's an open question.
Or maybe it's just because there's an inevitability of cryptocurrency in the face of what's
happened globally. I mentioned maybe on your so last week on my show,
fifty two times more currency today in the world than there was in nineteen eighty.
Hm. Right, that's a bubble of all bubbles, something we've never
seen before, and it's going to crash. Yeah. I was talking to
you off air about the Swiss National Bank. There's a systemic banking crisis on
the horizon for twenty twenty four and beyond. I think we've seen that last
year with Silicon Valley Bank and First Republic. But the Swiss National Bank two
years in a row. Now again this is this is Switzerland, where you
go for a banking safe haven. The Swiss lost money at the Swiss National
Bank level two years in a row. But they made money on one thing,
and that's the gold they purchased that they have in their holdings. And
that is a little bit ironic, but that's what we're seeing around the world,
is that you know, these central banks are buying gold, but the
fiat currency system is imploding and they're all moving away at different systems, and
especially you know again, unfortunately right here the US dollar is on its way
out and it's not going to happen tomorrow. But we're seeing the signs.
And of course, you know, inflation. They're telling us inflation has been
licked now because of the election, not because of any data. And you
know, you see the data from Chick fil a price has increased in two
years. But that's not even the worst of it. Take a look at
what you say at the grocery store and other things, and they can manipulate
the price of stuff like fuel, and they can do that temporarily for the
election. But we know what the trend is for the longest time. We
know that Biden does want to destroy it for the long term. But they're
going to profit from it in the short term, and they're going to use
it to profit in terms of politics in the short term when we I don't
know, of course inflation. I think they're going to do everything they can
to pull every manipulation they can this last year, but it still remains this
next year, the selection year, but it still remains to be seen if
they can really do anything about it or if it's going to blow up in
their face. Well, these financial products that we are so ubiquitous today for
a one k's iras, just the amount of advertising that you see open up
a stock buying account, all these things, in my opinion, were put
in place after nineteen seventy one, so you wouldn't pay attention to the fact
that your dollar buys less and less every single year. The purchasing power is
diminishing. And yeah, the inflation rate, they always pegg it. It's
a seven percent, it's eight percent we're getting it. We have now they
have the what Jerome Palet referred to as the terminal rate, which I think
that's more apropos to what they've done. But you have to think math isn't
political. Math just is it exists outside of the realm of what you believe.
You know, it just it just is going to reinforce reality. And
I think that's what happened with you know, the last three or four years.
You have eighty percent of all the dollars ever created in history, in
the United States history made in the last forty eight months. And that's going
to create inflation. It's an inflation of the money supply, and that makes
the cost of goods go up. And of course you don't even factor in
a lot of these retailers like Chick fil A. It's not just the rising
cost of goods. But you have to recalculate what your profit margins are.
That's a whole other that's a that's an entirely different calculation because when the prices
increase, guess what else increases? Fees get credit card fees. Most consumers
don't know the entity that makes the most at your gas pump. It's not
the gasoline retailer. It's the credit card company. The credit card company makes
more per gallon than the person who owns the store. Yeah, oh,
I promise you that it's at three dollars a gallon. That's three cents on
every that's nine cents a gallon. That goes to Chase Manhattan, or it
goes to Blackrock. Okay, that doesn't go to the person who owns the
convenience store. So you add those fees in, so there's all sorts of
hidden fees anytime the prices increase. And I will tell you something, folks,
if the big banks thought inflation was a problem for them, then they
would be talking about fighting inflation and wanting to do something about monetary policy and
budget policy. But they don't. They like higher prices, they make more.
Yeah. Oh yeah, yeah, we had our You had the experience
of having been involved to a gas station. You know what those margins are,
and our retail operation, the credit card fees are just crushing, you
know, and there really wasn't anything that we could do about it, you
know, as everybody would move to a plastic you know. That's another reason
to use cash is to cut out these big credit card companies and big banks
that are working on ways and how they can debank us and and take our
money and steal our money from us. You're you're feeding those evil institutions that
are out there, and it'd be better for you to feed the local businesses
that you're dealing with and then also keep your anonymity. But it's just the
convenience of the credit card for the consumer, and that's the way this thing
has been going. You know, there's Mike Michael Mahari who is with a
tenth Amendment Center. I've interviewed him many times, but of course he also
talks about gold. He said, there's three things that have been driving a
bull market in gold into the new year. He said, there's the demand
factor, the FED factor, the January factor. He said, as far
as demand goes, he said, gold has been up thirteen percent this last
year, and that's what you're talking about in terms of the one thing they're
making money in Switzerland with. But he said, there's also the January factor,
and the fact is that gold makes these big price increases in January.
For the most part, it goes up. Have you noticed that I do,
And you know, Michael's right about that I read that article on the
Wise Wolf Golden Crypto show on Monday, and I think he's spot on.
I follow his work. He's now over at Money Metals. Smart guy,
and you know, I think he's right about historically and about January he did
there was a couple of asterisks there that I think it is twenty twelve or
a couple of different years that that didn't happen. But we're seeing a bump
and I think, you know, right now, gold's trading a little under
two and thirty dollars per troy ounce, but we're in a lull right now.
There's been a lot of profit taking, but it does it. I
don't think it takes a psychic or anybody with any sort of skills to look
into the future and say that Gold's going to break its all time high again
in twenty twenty four. I think that. I think the horses out of
the barn. You look at what happened in the last quarter of twenty twenty
three, and I think that's nothing compared to where we're going. There's been
a lot of delayed reaction to David. This is something I study every single
day, and it's in my business it's my life. And I remember back
in twenty twenty when gold hit its all time high. Before that, there
was a lot of reports coming out in major financial institutions. They don't talk
about this anymore, but they were just throwing out easily gold at three thousand.
This was like City Bank and other major corporations and making institutions. That
was kind of put to bed because there was I think again gold it is
an enemy of the Federal Reserve. Gold is an enemy to the FIAT banking
system. The more that the price when you see the price of it go
up and there's something wrong with the currency, and so I think they constantly
try to keep that in balance. And those wheels are coming off. Is
because the bricks nations and these other nations, like we're just talking about the
Swiss, they want to see their gold holdings go up. And if the
pricing model is tagged to what the West has now, which has been for
decades, it seems odd like what is happening. Why don't these prices move,
especially with the loss of purchasing power. I think we're seeing the beginnings
of what the reset is actually going to look like, and the price of
gold will go up. I'm not giving you investment advice. We make that
clear. It's not an investment. The price isn't really going up. It's
just your dollars losing purchasing power, that's right. Yeah. And you know
we're talking about Michael Maherry and his big interests are Gold in the tenth Amendment,
you know, trying to get power away from Washington, and we talk
about that inherent competition between the Federal Reserve and Gold in general. It's very
interesting to see what's happening in Texas. You've got a primary coming up in
March, and so they put a lot of ballid initiatives in the primary,
and that can come in from the grass kind of the grassroots Republicans, but
they still involved in the political party, but it's fairly large, and so
they've pushed in some things like you know, the Texas Secession, that's one
of them that they keep putting in there. But they've had in the past
things like, you know, a ballid amendment for the primary to show the
Republican support for protecting kids from transmutilation stuff, for example, and those have
frequently found their way into legislation by the Republicans because it's a Republican state,
heavily Republican, and if they see that there's a lot of support on these
particular issues at the primary level, there's a chance that they'll put it in
enact that policy. And so they've been able to get a ballot proposition onto
the Texas Republican primary that'll be in March that would have the Texas government use
the Comptroller's office to start a program to quote administer access to gold and silver
through the Texas Billion Depository for use as legal tender. And we're seeing this
happening, as you know, and as I've talked about in the past,
we're seeing this happen in a lot of different states. Here in Tennessee,
we've got Senator Nicey and some others who have been working on trying to get
a first They call it a state bank in the state, and the local
banks thought that might be competition to him, so he wisely renamed it a
Tennessee Reserve System to get them to understand that this is something to get away
from the central control of the federal Reserve and then also to set up a
depository like Texas as they are the only ones who have that right now.
But the real issue is going to be if you can deposit and keep gold
and then write checks on it. That'll be an interesting move and it'll have
consequences. I think if the first state that does it is going to be
a breakthrough, and I think a lot of other states are poised on this
and talking about it. I think they'll probably follow through on that as well.
What do you think about that? How is that going to affect this
competition between the federal Reserve and the states who are trying to pull power away
from it. Well, if you recall, I think it was about mid
twenty twenty three, the Texas legislature was also considering a digital gold currency that
will be run by the state of Texas. I'm all for states exploring this
and having boillyon banks. I think you need to be cautious when you talk
about the state running anything that would resemble a currency. I don't know that
I like that. I don't think that's needed. But if there's a way
for the state to at least enforce the gold and silver or legal tender,
I think that's great. This is part of the decentralization process. This and
I think if you put it to a vote, just looking at Costco,
David looking at Walmart, we know that they're selling gold bars and they're running
out. The public is hungry for something different. There needs, they want
some stability and a gold and silver are always been a safe have, and
I think people are starting to pay attention again, especially when you're talking about,
hey, you're it hits you where it hurts. It hits you where
your chicken sandwich. You know, your chicken sandwich went up twenty five percent.
People start paying attention eventually, and my dollar is starting to look like
a waffle fry. You know, it's the holes in it, and it's
a shrink inflation. You're like, well, there's not enough chips in my
bag of chips anymore. All that stuff that hits people and that they're starting
to pay attention. So I think this will be part of our's part of
our future. It needs to happen on a state by state basis, branting
you know, legal tender status to gold and silver, even throwing things like
bitcoin. There's some states that allow you to even use some of your crypto
to pay for property taxes. I think Ohio does that. There's a couple
of hates to do that. I think this is important, especially moving to
the future. What you have to be cautious about, and what you mentioned
is is creating another fractional reserve banking system out of the state. This this,
this get a greed always creeps in. I don't trust politicians. I
was on a ballot in Texas about what was it ten years ago or so,
so I was in that same primary ballot was one where they you could
vote to initiate the Texas secession. They actually had something on there. It
was like a preliminary test model. And I think there's any kind of ballot
there again this year tanks well those that's growing to see. You know,
ten years ago when I ran for Congress in Texas, even in like deep
East Texas, when I when I would say we need to end the FED,
people didn't know what I was talking about. But now they do see
this is like I was. This was you know, Ron Paul's book in
the FED. I was on that. That was part of my plank,
like right up on the top of my campaign website is auditing and ending the
Federal Reserve. I wanted audit. I want to figure out where the money
went, and I want to you know, create a new sound money system.
And I think that was a little bit over people's heads at the time,
not everybody, but right now that would be a huge thing, like
if you were and you don't see many people doing that, but I think
that will be part of the future too, is that And I think that's
the key thing. I think what you're saying, people's awareness of the federal
system, you know, the federal reserve system, and that's really what's behind
the thing they called a Tennessee reserves. It's not like they're going to set
up some kind of a fiat currency fractional reserve system thing here. But they're
saying, you know, for those small banks away, it's worked in North
Dakota. They have far more small banks and local banks there than they do
anywhere else, and so it's a move to try to decentralize and keep competitive
the financial situation. So you know, it's cutting some loans and things like
that and kind of backing up the loans with a some of the things that
type of thing. But I think, you know, regardless of the details,
and of course, the devils are in the devil is in the details
on these bills. You know, the Texas thing. But what it shows
is that there's a tremendous amount of awareness of the untrustworthiness of the fiat currency
and that there's a lot of demand at the grassroots level to try to move
to something that is legitimate, like gold, that's constitutional money, you know.
And so there's an effort to try to get away from the central,
centrally controlled, corrupt, manipulating financial system, trying to get back to honest
money. And that's at a grassroots level. I think that's a big takeaway.
I don't know what the details are in the proposal or and again you
would have to see what they actually proposed if they do something in the legislature,
and the details will be very important. But what we can see right
now is thisroot, grassroots demand to get away from this corrupt, centrally controlled
system. And I think that's really what's driving all these efforts where you're talking
about Florida or Oklahoma or Texas or Tennessee, it's to get away from this
federal reserve control. Well, it gives me a little bit of joy.
You have to realize that somewhere a bankster is has a lot of anxiety over
this simulation. Wait, wait, that wasn't supposed to happen. It's they're
supposed to beg for the to be biometrically scanned and give up all their data
and their freedom for this central bank digital currency, this CBDC. They're still
going to implement it. There's still I mean, this is still we're on
the path for central bank digital currency. But will it when it lands,
will it be inert that's the question. If enough of us and the grassroots
and the States continue to make give you, you know, outs, give
you a way out of it, or a parallel system, then it's toothless.
Yeah, And I think that's that that should be the goal. It's
not that we can completely stop the central bank digital cred currency, because they're
going to implement it. I mean, you're talking about BIS, the Bank
of International Setup. It's IMF. This is coming from the top down.
They're going to do something with it. But if we continue to see this
trend, which I'm very excited about, I think, you know again,
and it may even hurt my business. I don't I don't know. Some
of it may hurt me. I don't care. I think freedom and liberty
are the most important things. I want to you know, this is this
is our legacy, is what we fight for. So I like the fact
that, you know, make gold legal legal tender, make silver legal tender,
you know, and I think people would rather trade in that once you
can become familiar with it, David. Once you know, once people start
using gold and silver on a daily basis or to trade amongst themselves, then
you'll you won't use dollars. Now you made big steps along those ways.
We had a lot of states that I have taken off, you know,
capital gains tax on the sale of gold and silver and things like that,
so that you know, they're not treating it as a commodity. And so
that helps to facilitate people being able to use it to you know, in
private exchanges to buy and sell stuff. And so we're seeing these these steps
being taken, and I think that awareness of you know, all these different
things, regardless of you know, how they might ultimately work out, it
really shows us that people are aware of the dangers of this centralization. And
you were talking about how how sensitive they are to criticism of the Federal Reserve.
Is just this week that I realized that when this wonderful life came out,
the FBI was putting out, and it's been publicized by a lot of
people how much they hated that movie. They called it a communist movie.
They started investigating people that were involved in it. We that explains a lot
of the censorship that I've seen with that one report, because you know,
just to criticize bankers, not even the Federal Reserve, but just to criticize
bankers in general. Oh well, then you are a communist if you don't
like mister Potter in that thing. This guy is a villain, and you
know, the FBI is not interested in what he did with the money that
he stole from that's grand large, especially in those days. Eight thousand dollars.
I think it was more than he quoted for the price of the house.
He said, you know, George, you can have like a five
thousand dollars house. So you know, there's a substantial amount of money,
even today, but especially back then. But they're not worried about that crime.
The crime that they saw in all of it was criticizing bankers. That's
where we are those Alphabet agencies. You know, the Alphabet agencies have a
long history of connections to international banking, even go back to the founding of
the Central Intelligence Agency. You'll see a lot of connections these. You know,
there's a reason why in twenty nineteen, the last quarter of twenty nineteen
you saw the largest exodus of CEOs and history. You're telling me that the
multinational corporations and finance don't have connections to intelligence. Yeah, give me a
break. There was an article by the Mesas Institute kind of in that same
line of logic about the Secret Service and their history as an enforcer of the
Fiat currency system. They actually had some stronger language to it. But there's
an article that's up on zero Hedge. I think they called them a gestapo
and I I was reading over the article before we went live, and I
say, I knew that I'd read that before. There's a lot of criminality
in the banking system. I mean, there was a meme being shared and
I hate to debunk it, but there was a mean I liked a lot,
and it showed a kilogram bar of gold. Okay, so thirty two
point one three ounces of gold, and it said ten of these in nineteen
twenty would buy you a house, by you the average house. And then
it says ten of these in twenty twenty four will buy you the average house.
Well, it's supposed to be a ten ounce bar. Sorry I had
recalculated it. But they're exactly right, you know. So the crime again
they were right about the premise was right, but it's too much gold.
It's basically you need ten you know, of the bars will be two hundred
thousand instead of the they had like six hundred thousand. That's not the medium
price of a home. Yea, But the premise is right, and so
the crime is in that meme. Think of the crime of that, Like
you, how much wealth was stolen when they decouple the dollar from gold,
when they take the silver out of our coinage? How much crime is in
that? I mean, it's it's massive. You've you've created a completely new
class of people that are going to be dependent on government. That's what they've
done. They've they've made the American dream so far out of reach. I
was reading, was it ten percent of investors in America on ninety seven percent
of the stuff? Wow? Wow? That wealth disparity. That's because of
our fiat system. And you look at you know, the Federal Reserve,
and then of course also Wall Street, which ay concerns me. So much
this natural asset company thing. Right when you look at if they can just
go in and you know, ban gold or confiscate gold and set up central
bank Fiat currency and you know, wave their hands and make this happen,
and okay, this kind of derivative thing over here, you know that they're
perfectly capable of doing something like this natural asset company. Where you look at
the president's especially Trump, his metric of success was always what's going on with
the stock market? You know, he wasn't. And when you look at
what Biden is doing with jobs created, it turns out that about two thirds
of his jobs that were created. They now admit, we're not there at
all, but we always see that being done. They always come out and
manipulate the unemployment figures a cup a quarter or two down the road so that
they can create a new trend. Right the first they put stuff out and
say, look at all the different jobs that we created, even though they
didn't create them. And then next quarter or two quarters down they revise those
previous numbers so they can make this quarter's numbers look better. That is a
trick that they have always done, just like this whole thing going on with
this deal that's gotten some of the Conservatives upset with Johnson about them saying that
they had massive cuts to the IRS. Republicans achieved massive IRS funding cuts in
the spending agreement, says Daily Caller, Well, they didn't cut anything at
all. They cut the proposed increase, but they made it five and a
half times bigger. So these types of lines, that's why I think,
you know, the inflation stuff. Even though they say that they are going
to pull out all the stops for the election and appear to be trying to
do that, I don't think they're going to make any dent on this at
all. Really no. And it reminds me a lot of remember John Kerry,
what was it, the two thousand and four election, and it was
eighty seven billion that was in a defense budget and he's, you know,
you vote. He was for it before he was against it, the kind
of thing. And that's the way Trump ran against the stock market. I
remember this. Yeah, he said, it's a bubble, it's based on
nothing. We got to do. We got to goddit the Fed. There's
so much debt. And then he was elected and that was all about.
His presidency was all about how wonderful the stock market was, and I remember,
if you've paid attention to history at all, you're going to look at
the stock market and these numbers. And I opened up wise Wolf in twenty
eighteen. I was done in San Antonio. I had Fox Business on every
day, and of course I'm I'm completely inoculated against It doesn't affect me because
I'm just watching it just kind of hiss intel and I'm thinking, this isn't
gonna last. This is fake. But I would see the prices of metals
were down. I mean, gold was, you know, twelve hundred dollars
an ounce eleven hundred an ounce at sometimes, and you know that that is
so dirt cheap. And I would look at just what the price of the
dollar index and everything else. At silver, I was buying American eagles at
sixteen dollars. I mean that just seems like a quaint time. But where'd
all that so called wealth go? You know, it's it's all fake.
And yet they're going to have They've got, you know, three lowering of
rates in twenty twenty four, they got more planned for twenty twenty five.
Are they even going to I don't know that that can they plan monetary policy
anymore that far out, David, I don't think they can. I don't
know that even the so called experts really understand the implications of doing what has
been done to the dollar, not only through the expansion the money supply,
but through our arrogance and the sanctions, what we've done to weaponize the dollar
that belowback. That is happening, and it's happening. It doesn't just you
know, overnight all these nations rise up and start dumping the dollar. It's
just you know, gradually and then suddenly. And that's I think that's what
we're sing Yeah, yeah, it's true. And the ability to create these
fake illusions of wealth here and then remove them. That's why when I look
at these things like this bitcoin etf like the natural asset companies and all the
rest of the stuff, is like, I just don't want to participate in
this fraudulent fantasy football league. You know that they've got going, And that's
what it looks like increasingly to me, it's like there's nothing real about it,
but they can make it really miserable for you. They can manipulate even
something like real estate, you know, once they get people leveraged into that
they can do a ropodope and a pump and a dump, and they got
so many different tricks up their sleeve. And it really is concerning when I
see something like this, you know, just a last week, looking at
the great taking and looking at the natural asset companies, Well, I tell
you they've got some jumongous schemes on the horizon, which makes me want to,
you know, run to something that is private and something that I hold
that retains its value all the more. That's why I think gold I really
don't have a problem telling people about what valuable and secure investment gold and silver
are. And that's just it's just key, I think, to try to
get out of these schemes. Well. As a young soldier, the army
teaches you the motto is adapt and overcome. That's what I think we're That
is our charge in these coming years, in this decade of the Great Reset
of Agenda twenty thirty, is adapt and overcome the old system that we're watching
implode. Is to be there for you. I'm sorry, it's not the
history. If it's history is your guide. If every fiat currency goes to
zero and the United States dollar is the world's oldest living fiat currency. Okay,
since nineteen seventy one, be coupled from gold. The average lifespans twenty
six years for a fiat currency. We're fifty years plus on. Yeah,
this isn't going to end well. And I would say, can you have
the other countries transitioning away from the dollar system. This is going to affect
us on individual level how our economy operates. But you'll see. But the
silver lining to all of it, it's like just what we've been talking about
states decentralizing. You see the bitcoin even though they're they're looking at the ETFs
and I find it's silly, but that's it's opening up new interest. Yeah
much, I've got I've got a comment here from Amos Pool on a tip.
Thank you very much, Amos. I appreciate that. On why Fanny
said, I've heard with the bitcoin having halving, getting it in half right
in April, and the likelihood of the sec approval of ETF which has happened,
there will be a large rally in bitcoin and other cryptos. So yeah,
that probably will. I think it will go up quite a bit.
It's just I look at it, and I look at the volatility, and
I've I've and I'm old enough to have been in the stock market, had
massive paper gains that then disappeared and then some you know, the volatility scares
me. The virtual aspect of it is something that scares me. And when
I look. But the thing more than the investments, I think i'll get
your comments on it, Tony, But more than the investments, it's just
these these manipulations with CBDC and the NAC and things like that. I just
I want to get out of that system. I want to get out of
a digital system. I want to get out of a Wall Street system.
I just don't want to participate. And that's just my personal thing. Well,
I'm skeptical on so many fronts with this, because, first of all,
that's how you manipulate the price of silver and gold or through ETF,
through paper, that's right, So you're not actually holding bitcoin, and who
knows if they're going to have that. We've talked about that. Did they
really have that silver and gold in the Shanghai exchange or are they using the
Shanghai exchange to shanghai the price of gold and silver? Yeah, show me,
you know, And I've often I just wonder like counterparty risk, would
you rather hold it? I mean, because right now I can buy bitcoin.
You can buy it pretty much anywhere now, it's ubiquitous. Same thing
with gold or silver. I don't have counterparty risk if I have that that
gold coin or bar or silver bar, or if I have bitcoin and it's
my own wallet, not attached to an exchange. It's just again, this
is just the beginning. Though. You know that the crypto space was built,
you know, the cipher punks, the cryptographers back, you know,
the whoever Satoshi Nakamoto was after the two thousand and eight, two thousand and
nine debacle. This is what bitcoin was born out of that. And you
have to be for ten years they've been trying to get this ETF pushed through.
They finally got it, so I have to, you know, mixed
emotions on it. Fine, but I just I'm looking at the new systems
that are being created. It's actually exciting because there's a there's so much more
awareness now of what money is or what currency actually is. The two things
sometimes go together, but they're not. They're not exactly the same all the
time. And so I think, I think when you see people becoming more
aware. It's good. It's not going to be perfect, but I think
it's good that people are becoming more aware. I think that bitcoin and crypto
will rally. You need to be skeptical though, I'm not telling you that
this is not I'm not in that space to make anything. And you know,
I think that there's there's hope on it. I think there's there's it's
a it's a good space to be in. It's exciting, but be very
careful because there's going to be a lot of things and I think they're counting
on that too, by the way. I think they're counting on you know,
something like an FTX moment where they say, well, well we like
the digital stuff, but what we really need is regulation, and the best
way to regulate that is through the Central Bank, and here's your CBDs.
Yeah. Yeah, yeah. It is a prizing to see them in a
sense. You know, the community in general thought that they're going to approve
of the ETF thing, but it is surprising, as much as you know
the Democrats have hated, as you point out, to see that go through.
I kind of thought, well, maybe they'll stop it because they've been
at war with crypto all this last year. But again, tell us a
little bit about what's going on at Wisewolf dot Gold. Well, lot's going
on. We've been securing product going into this first quarter. It's weird out
there. The prices are strange. The premiums dropped a lot on silver,
so we're able to offer some lower prices right now on a lot of different
items, especially some of our ninety percent silver and other things that are pre
nineteen sixty five US coinage. But we've got a lot of exciting things that
the wolf pack is growing, so I'm happy to see that. You know,
anytime you join, you can go through David Knight dot gold and put
in promo code seventeen seventy six gets you some free constitutional silver, which is
going to be great in the coming months years when you know you've got a
silver dime. They made fun of Ron Paul because he said he could get
gasoline back down to a dime mcgallon and he said, actually, silver dime's
worth three dollars. So it's something like that I think you're going to see
in our new economy that's emerging after what the damage has been done to the
dollar. So we got the two locations Branson, Missouri and Dennison, Texas.
Both of them there just bricks and mortar to serve the general public.
If you're in those areas, we can take care of you there. Well,
you can go to David Knight dot Gold. We serve nationwide. A
lot of people right now, David are rolling over their four one ks and
iras getting into physical precious metals. That's something we can do. It's pretty
seamless. We've done a lot of them now. We made it a really
quick process. We've got a great partner that does all the legal called New
Direction Trust. They made stuff really easy. We can get in there and
roll over your paper. You got to be careful all this, even your
bitcoin. You go on the ETFs and you buying ETFs, it's paper.
You don't want that derivative, Yeah, it's derivative. And so a lot
a lot of good things are going on. I've opened up a lot of
supply chains and we'll just see what happens. Again, this is uh.
It's a privilege to be able to be here at this point in history,
to sponsor your show, to do what I do. We've got great things
going on also, you know the Freeworld dot FM, our new online station
is doing well. We look forward soon you'll be over there. We'll have
you broadcasting on Free World. It's just another we built a lifeboat for free
speech. That's something we've done with some of the money that we've made off
of Wise Wolf and wolf Pack. I'm just reinvesting into free speech and liberty.
And that's key because I think that's another part of it too. You
know, we look at the CBDCs and we look at the nacs and stuff.
Of course they're going to be weaponizing their censorship and AI is going to
give them all kinds of power that they haven't had before. So these other
outlets are going to really be key. So I really do appreciate you doing
that. And Tony, and thank you so much for your support to the
program. It's always great to have you on to get your insights. Thank
you so much. Thanks, thank you. Have good day, and folks,
we will be right back. Stay with us. In a world of
deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. You're listening to the David
Knight Show. Sometimes your day needs a little smoothing. Check out the Jazz
Channel and APS radio dot Com and the APS Radio app. And leave the
stress behind. I got the horse right hit. The name is Paul Revere.
And here's a guy that says a bowl with his clear can do?
Can do? This guy says the horse can do. If he says the
horse can do, can do? Can? I thank you all in time
because on the morning line, the guy has got him bigger than five.
Yeah, we're getting into the horse race aspect of this. We're about to
start the first uh heat. I guess we could call it coming up on
Monday the Iowa caucus. Are you gonna put your money on the horse called
Paul Revere? Is there a horse like Paul Revere in this race? I
don't think so, but yeah, Trump says James Carville will underperform expectations of
So he's I don't know, because he's still betting on that horse. Yes
he is. He still thinks that Trump will win. He says, well,
I'm going to take this opportunity, says James Carr. I'm gonna take
this opportunity to make a further fool myself and predict that Trump will underperform expectations
in Iowa. I'm not saying he's gonna lose, gonna win. Placer show.
But he might not win as much as expected. Quite frankly, I
think that is likely. You know, one of the games that they don't
like to do is to get expectations too high. We've seen the highest expectations
of any politician we've ever seen around Donald Trump in terms of these polls.
Are they real? You know, I mean the Trump people, it surprises
me. You know, they were always talking about, oh, look at
how wrong they were in the polls about Donald Trump in twenty sixteen. Well
are they wrong again? You know, pumping him up higher than they expect.
But either way, if they've got him sky high in the polls,
even if he wins and wins by a big marchin you know, the game
that's going to be played by his opponents and by many people as well.
You know, he just didn't meet expectations. So the momentum is with somebody
else. So who's the momentum with You just had a I guess you could
call it a debate. Watch it. It's just become about personal invectives.
It's not about policy typically, So I didn't watch the debate that had that
was last night with Nuki Haley and DeSantis they only had three people who qualified
for this final debate before the Iowa caucus according to the RNC rules. You
had Ramaswami did not qualify in terms of his polling numbers, and Chris Christy
did not qualify and he got out. Will play the clip of what he
had to say here in a second. So it was the only two people.
Well, they had Trump who qualified and he won't debate anybody. And
then you had Nuki Haley and DeSantis exchanging barbs and criticisms of each other.
Carvil said, so moderates did they show up? Well, so it probably
helps Hally more than sixty thousand move to Des Moines suburbs since the twenty sixteen
race. On the flip side, across the bottom down here, those are
the evangelical rural counties that Ted Cruz beat Trump in twenty sixteen. Trump is
expected to run it up there, but if DeSantis will surprise us, that's
where it will come. Homeschoolers, evangelicals. Right now, we're in a
pregame. That's what it is. It's all sports to these people. It
is a game. It is a game. It is a game like the
stock market is a game. All of this stuff is a game. Chris
Christy implorers GOP voters not to vote for Trump after dropping out, He says,
how much more evidence do you need? Here's his quitting speech. It's
not actually an acquittal, I guess. But you have people in this race.
All they will do is tell you how bad everything is, how angry
we should be. And there's certainly sufficient reason for anger at the failures of
the leaders we've selected. But they're doing it not for that reason. It's
not a moment of honesty and transparency. Believe me, it's not. It's
because they believe when we get angry, what we'll do is naturally relate to
the angriest voice in the room. Donald Trump wants you to be angry every
day because he's angry. He wants you to be angry so that you'll relate
to his anger and then to vote for him. Please understand this. I
have known him well for twenty two years, more than anybody else in this
race has known him, and I can promise you this if you put him
back behind the desk in the the oval office and a choice comes and a
decision is needed to be made as to whether he puts himself first. Where
he puts you first, how much more evidence do you need? He will
pick himself. And if that is what we have there, then people are
going to remain angry, remain divided, and become even more exhausted than they
are today. Well, you know I said before, that's what we have
from everybody there. We've seen that from Christy, we see that from all
the Republicans who want to come after Fauci, and he's just public enemy number
one, but no responsibility at all for Trump. And they're doing that.
They're doing that for their own good. And it's not even about putting your
interest first. It's about putting the rule of law first. Right. When
people look at this and say, well, what's in it for me,
you know I would I don't like these other people over there, or I
don't like what they're saying, or I'm afraid because I've been told that there's
a virus that's going around, so do something to protect me. No,
it has to be a broader position, and we don't even have you know,
nobody is saying that. We don't have any leaders who are saying that,
do we You have to look at this and you have to say,
well, even though I don't like what this person is saying, I don't
want to create censorship, and I don't want to create hate crimes, and
I don't want to lock people up because they say things that are not true
and hateful and because they hate other groups. Because I know how that's going
to be weaponized. And we don't even have to extrapolate. We see how
it's being weaponized by both Republicans and Democrats. Now the Republicans are onto the
hate laws and the censorship as well for their issues. And so this isn't
even about what is in my best interest. This is about, you know,
you can't the fact that you can't have freedom unless you give it to
other people. You can't have a rule of law unless you get your politicians
to abide by that and hold their feet to the fire and reject them when
they reject the rule of law. It's not about getting concerned about somebody because
the law is being inappropriately used to attack them. We've had the law used
to attack everybody. All of these politicians need to be bound down with the
chains of the Constitution. As Patrick Henry said, that's really what's wrong with
America, and none of these guys have got a clue. Jeffrey Epstein's brother
as making the rounds of the talk show. It wasn't that long ago that
he went on with Tucker Carlson, and just recently he went on News Nation,
a new left wing network. The anchor there Leylan vittered, I don't
watch it, so I don't know how his name is pronounced. But they
were talking about his brother, and he criticized Mark Epstein, brother of Jeffrey
Epstein, criticized Bill Barr for announcing in August of two thousand and nine,
eighteen, that his brother had died from quote an apparent suicide. He said,
when it really wasn't his position to do that, and he asked the
question, He says, so who was Bill Barr protecting? I think that's
an interesting question, especially since on News Nation they brought up the topic that
Tucker would not bring up, you know, the fact that the same guy
that Tucker interviewed about the death of his brother, he said, well,
you know, Jeffrey Epstein also told me that if the people knew, the
public knew what I know Jeffrey Epstein knows about Bill, about the Clintons,
and about Trump, they would cancel the twenty sixteen election. Well, Tucker
didn't ask him that, but the guy at News Nation did and so he
said, yeah, he had dirt on then presidential candidates Donald Trump and Hillary
Clinton. He didn't tell me what that dirt was, and I don't know,
But Tucker doesn't want to go to that. Again, the fact that
we have this bipartisan corruption there and now look at how corrupted the right wing
media has become. The governor who wants to be the wants to be Trump's
next apprentice. Well that's a good way to put it, because he is
essentially running. He doesn't vet these people, he fires them, and then
he taunts them and tries to destroy their lives afterwards. But the governor who
wants to be the next apprentice, of course, is Christinome, who is
actively campaigning for it in Iowa, campaigning for Trump, saying that she wants
to be vice president. As they said, every politician knows openly campaigning for
the job of vice president is bad form. But Christinome doesn't seem to care.
Yeah, again, captive to the establishment. This a person who as
governor would not even protect women's sports from the trends. Nonsense, not even
something like that, and they said, well, I can't sign that she
vetoed that because they might block us from being able to compete in NCAA tournaments.
If we do something like that, they might block all the South Dakota
collegists and being able to do that. That's how compromising she is. There's
absolutely no principles. That's why she's there as a matter of fact, as
PJR. Work who called Congress and the federal government in general Parliament of whrrors
And so she's there soliciting because we've seen what she is willing to do,
very much like Nikki Haley and these other politicians. But you know, the
question about who was Bill Barr protecting? This is something that when you look
at the people that Trump brings in, like, you know, is he
going to bring in somebody like Ristine Home. The entire Trump presidency was characterized
by horrific appointments that really only made sense if you understood as his lawyer said,
he's incapable of making a decision except out of his own perceived interest or
out of revenge. And that's the way that he does the hirings. And
he doesn't hire anybody who is principled. He doesn't hire anybody who agrees with
him in terms of what he says he wants to do as president, and
then when he gets rid of them, it's all about revenge. But I
remember Bill Barr when he came on board, and it was within a couple
of maybe not even two months, that he went after Julian Nissange. And
who was Bill Barr? You know, he was a guy who is deeply
involved with the CIA. And I said when he appointed Bill Barr, so
that says a great deal about Trump and the CIA. Remember it is not
a monolithic thing. You've got the left wing CIA that's represented by people like
Brennan and Clapper, and you know they're very clear about where they are on
this, but there's also a right wing CIA that's involved. And the fact
that Bill Barr was so deeply, so deeply connected with the Bush family that
Trump supposedly hated, but he would bring him in anyway, it really tells
you that he was a part of the you know, making these overtures to
the CIA. And there's other tells that we're going to get to here in
just a moment. Hunter Biden. Meanwhile, as they like to do these
show hearings. They had a hearing and they had invited I guess maybe commanded
him to come and speak to this House Oversight Committee, and if you call,
he had a press conference outside of the building and refused to go in
and talk to them. So then they decided they would come after him for
contempt charges. And at that point, as they're having the hearing, Hunter
shows up and he looks like this. He's got his arms crossed and he's
biting his lips and he's frowning and looking at them. I think that is
literal contempt that he has demonstrated. It's not just contempt in terms of refusing
to talk to them, but he shows up to just show how much contempt
he has. I guess contempt is not a strong enough word at this point,
and it really was a clown show. Quite frankly, there's no reason
for them to even do this because what can come out of this. As
I said before, they may refer him for prosecution to his daddy's Department of
Justice, which they all agree is so corrupt that they need to impeach these
guys. There's been to talk about trying to impeach the mayor Garland as well
as MAJORCA. So again they can refer the matter to the Department of Justice.
So this is all nothing more than just posturing and show pieces. And
you could see Hunter Biden posturing there as well. His unannounced appearance and his
sudden departure stoked anger from the committee's Republicans, and it's all pure theater.
I'm looking at you, Hunter Biden, as i'm speaking to you, says
Nancy Mace. And she said, I think that Hunter Biden should be arrested
right here, right now and go straight to jail. Yeah. Well,
great, lots of theatrics there, because of course that is no way that
that is going to happen on Rumble North American House Hippos says, I'll give
Bill Barr this much credit. He can play the bagpipes better than I can.
I want to buy a new set, but my wife won't let me.
That's that's funny. Yeah. Karen and I got married in nineteen eighty
and my idea was we had I'd graduated in December and didn't start my job
until March, and so we got married in January. Our anniversary is coming
up on Saturday, our forty fourth anniversary is coming up, and and so
we went to went to the UK. Had no money at all, you
know, and h but we were really scraping everything together. But I really
wanted to buy a pair of bagpipes and play around with them. And I'd
always wanted to do that since I was in a stage band that played brigadoon
and they had to bring a guy who had that. They brought a couple
of guys over for that that's set and the Learner and low I think same
guys that did My Fair Lady and Camelot. But they brought a couple of
guys over who played bagpipe, and at one point they had them go down
the aisles of the audience and everything. And when we were when we were
at Tress rehearsal, and they came in and they did their bit, and
then they march up on the aisles, march up on the stage, and
they go out into the wings. They didn't go outside, they're out in
the wings. And then they let the air out of these things and it
sounded like a dying hive of bees and bees, and I was just hysterical
laughing. Always wanted one of these things, for no other reason then to
make it a big whoopie cushion. I just thought it'd be great. So
well, we were in the UK. We went up to Scotland and we
went into As we were walking around there, there was a shop there and
it had all this traditional stuff. It had kilts and bagpipes and all the
rest of the stuff. It's like, oh, what was going here?
And I went in and I could not get the guy to even tell me
the price of a set of bagpipes. I guess looking at us, he
knew there's no way that I could afford hey, this stuff. And he
wouldn't say, well, just I said, so you don't want that.
You don't want that, lad, do you know you? He just kept
saying that until we left. You don't want that, you don't want that.
So I guess, you know, Bill Barr was a little bit more
fortunate with his bagpipe experiences. Getting back to this, or Green began to
speak, Biden stood up exited the room, prompting scoffs and cries of where's
he going from the panel. Well, he's showing you his contempt again.
What a coward, she fumed. You see, this is pure professional wrestling.
The heels and the heroes. I mean, really, you know,
seriously, you know, you look at this, you look at their screams
and all the rest of this stuff. This is just political theater and the
whole thing is set up this way. As a matter of fact. One
of the other things that Nancy Grace said to him, which is in the
headlines of article after article, she says to him, you are the epitome
of white privilege. Oh anything, just don't call me white privilege, you
know, to a democrat. And then she says, you have no balls.
Yeah, this is what it's come to, these kind of coarse clowns.
And that's what she is, he says, a coarse clown who supports
killing babies. And she tells Hunter that he has no ball. Hasn't she
seen the pictures that he published? I don't. I think he was trying
to convince people otherwise or so, I don't know what his motives were anyway,
Looking at the Civil war, civil war is all over the place,
isn't it. Do you find that interesting how often they talk about civil war?
You know they're trying to tell us something, and you know that they're
trying to push something on us. When they all talk about civil war all
the time, questions to the candidates, candidates bringing it up, and of
course in the last election cycle it began with Eric Swalwell saying, oh,
yeah, you got your guns. Well, we got a big military,
we've got planes, we can take those things from you. We're talking about
a civil war. And then that was picked up an echode by Beto O'Rourke
the trends Hispanic irishman who was running trying to make you think he was Hispanic
in Texas, and also by Biden. And now you see all these comments
about civil war. Democrats back the Trump ballot band and the gopc's civil war.
They openly talk about it, and I think that they're pushing us for
that. As I've said, I think that Trump is the Mason Dixon line,
if you will. He's a dividing line for everybody, and they're willing
to have a civil war one side or the other. Whoever wins is not
going to accept it. And they keep pushing this stuff. Republicans said,
well, if you want to kick him off the ballot, it could come
as a steep price civil war. Well, Trump had something else to say
about the civil war as well. You know, we had Nicki Haley,
and she gave that meandering answer, you know, said, well, I
don't know what the civil wars about. What do you think is about?
Type of thing. Roundly criticized for that, and so Trump jumped in on
it. And what he had to say was that he could have negotiated the
Civil war. He said that in an Iowa speech, if only Abraham Lincoln
had read the Art of the Deal, maybe we would not have had a
Civil war. Yeah, because he's a wheeler dealer. He could make anything
happen. He can end the Ukraine War and one day he could have prevented
the American Civil War. He could do anything. This guy is like God
in his mind and in the mind of his supporters. He says, so
many mistakes were made with a civil war. He said, I find it
fascinating. I'm so attracted to seeing it. What a strange way of expressing
himself. So many mistakes were made. See, there was something I think
I could have been negotiated. To be honest with you, I was reading
something. He did. He read something, and I said, this is
something that could have been negotiated. That was a that was a tough one
for our country. Civil war that was a tough one for our country.
If you had negotiated, you probably wouldn't even know who Abraham Lincoln was,
But that would have been okay. Well quite frankly, I don't know.
You know, again, this is this nebulous demagoguery that he's not specific about
anything. What would happen? I specifically said. It has been pointed out
that, you know, when they want to end the possession of slaveries.
You know, first the trade slave was ended by the UK because they were
a central part of it, thanks to the efforts of William Wilberforce, who
did it out of his Christian conviction. So they stopped the slave trade,
and then they freed the slaves in the Caribbean, and they paid the plantation
owners for the slaves and freed them. And it was less money than the
Union spent on ammunition in the Civil War. So yeah, it could have
been negotiated. Why didn't they do that? Well, because it was a
fourth turning. They'd already negotiated the nullification crisis that was brought on by what
they call the tariffs of abomination, all of those big economic issues in the
eighteen thirties, and yes, slavery was a big part of their economy.
However, even if you were able to grow the stuff, if the taxes
are going to keep you from being able to sell your product, it's kind
of a moot point. So the economics aspect of that were already addressed,
and they'd come up with a compromise because it wasn't time for fourth turning.
That's the time that we're in right now. That's why it's very important to
understand what a volatile time this is and to prepare for it. But it
wasn't just America that was going through that. As I've pointed out before eighteen
sixty one eighteen sixty five, our civil war and Italy's civil war, the
creation of a nation state, the transition from an agrarian society to an industrial
society. That was what was happening in European countries as well as here in
a country that was created by secession. That's what we did with the Decoration
of Independence. They made it about slavery so they could gloss over that aspect
of it. So anyway, he takes the indictments as a badge of honor,
tells them I am being indicted for you see this is why they keep
pushing him up there, some kind of a false savior, Messiah and that
type of thing. He warns again, a big trouble if he doesn't get
on the ballot. And as yesterday, we talked a great length with the
doctor Shivayah Dourey, who is also running for president. He's conducting a volunteer
signature campaign. Talked about how difficult the Republicans and Democrats have made that for
everybody else, and now they'res and Democrats like a couple of crime families,
are going after each other. That's what's going on with this. It's much
bigger issue in terms of whether or not there's going to be really a democracy,
whether there's really going to be an election. It's a much bigger issue
than what is just going on between Trump and the Democrats. And so Trump
in terms of talking about what's going on with the election, what happened when
the last election went on with lou Dobbs, who was fired from Fox News,
But now he is on the network of Mike Lindell, and so Trump
goes on there to talk with him because there's no censorship there. And what
he has to say is he says, well, he said, the question
that I get the most probably number two, after you know, do you
think the election was stolen the last time? Maybe Number one sometimes is how
do we stop them from cheating? People ask me, will they do it
again? Sir? Because you know, I'm in Florida now and I drive
to various locations in airport some places, and every house has a Trump sign
on it, Trump twenty twenty four. We got all the votes we need,
So he says, what's going to happen? He said, the risk
is what's going to happen during the election period. Used to be election day
or election night, that's say election night, But today you don't have that.
You have sixty days, forty days, thirty days some states where they
have eight days to count the vote after the election is over. How do
you have an election when you have to count the vote for you know,
the machines are supposed to speed up the process, right. We ought to
all go to paper, all paper, you know, and they now have
a water mark paper, a watermark paper. Where'd that come from? Did
they really? Or is he channeling what Cia Steve Chennik said two days after
the election with that steing thing, that he did with Owen on Info Wars,
say, we got these blockchain watermark ballots, and they were they came
from and the SISSA, the cyber security people put all this stuff together,
and we got twenty thousand National Guard troops that have fanned out all over the
place and they're resting people today. All of it was a lie. He
threw in quantum computing at every buzzword he could think of. And now Trump
is talking about this the watermark paper. Is that even a thing? I
don't know, but I think it was interesting that that he brought that up.
I mean, did he was? He was this a CIA thing that
he was in on you know, Bill Barne, these other PE awards,
the something that he heard because it was on Info Wars. And he's talking
about this. He says, but we need all paper the same day voting
voter ID and all the rest of the stuff. But he doesn't say anything
about the vote by mail, which was Trump's big contribution to corrupt elections.
We never had elections that were that corrupt before he brought that end. And
you notice what he's doing here. He's saying, well, because there's all
these signs around everywhere, everybody wants me. We've got all the votes,
and if I don't win, it's because they've stolen it. That's what all
this is really about. That's the big context. Forget about the details about
what he says about, you know, paper ballots and how long it takes
to vote. All that stuff is true. Why didn't he change any of
that? Why did he leave all of those aspects in place when he was
president? And then add to it one of the biggest pieces of corruption we've
ever seen, this vote by mail stuff in the past. When he's talked
about he says, we're going to do a better job of them in terms
of ballot harvesting. So he's not looking for honest elections, but he is
looking for some justification to uh and that's that's what his position there is about.
Then there's the back and forth again, is people are pushing this towards
civil war. You got everybody talking about assassination. You got the Trump fans
talking about, well, I think Trump is going to be assassinated. Then
you've got the DC Circuit Court of Appeals asked the Trump attorney, you know,
a hypothetical question about assassination, And when they were talking about whether or
not Trump should be immune from any crimes. And I think it was kind
of interesting because when you look at this, he is soundly criticized by the
left wing media, by media height by Drudge, and the headlines are Trump
lawyer insists the former president didn't kill anybody. Also says that you know,
the president can assassinate whoever they want and you can't prosecute him. These are
the kinds of headlines that they're pulling out of this thing, and that is
not true as a matter of fact. So the argument that they made was
that all of his that anything the president does, you can't prosecute the president.
You have to impeach them and remove them from office, then you can
prosecute them, and that is what the constitution says. I really don't understand
why this is so controversial to these people. They pretend that. As I
said, when asked, if the president were to order Seal Team six to
assassinate a political rival, Trump's lawyer John Sower oddly argued, says the mediaite
oddly argued that the president would first need to be impeached and convicted by the
legislative body before he could be convicted of any criminal wrongdoing. Why is that,
oddly argued? That's what the constitution is there, That's what impeachment is
there for. And as they pointed out, you don't want to have the
president or any other officer tied down with endless charges at local jurisdictions as we
see now being done with Trump in this run up to the election, so
they can't do their job. You know, they're throwing everything they can at
him in all these different places so that he can't even run for office.
And so that's why the process of impeachment is there. And they think that
that is a strange thing. Now it's actually a wise thing. I was
surprised to see that. Jonathan Turley went on Fox News and, as Mediaite
says, he found the argument lacking. Well, I looked at what he
had to say, and he didn't give any reason for why he disagreed with
what the Trump lawyer said. But I think that is the way that this
has to be done. You have to remove these people from office, and
you can impeach them and have the trial and remove them even for misdemeanors,
and then the law kicks in. Jamie Raskin said, well, here's the
absurd logic of this, he could assassinate as an opponent and that they start
the impeachment. Says he could assassinate senators who are not going to vote to
impeach him, So you can't have that. This is obviously just nonsense.
Well, the one thing that Jonathan Turtley said, he said he didn't really
give it a nance. He said, well, I don't agree with that,
but he didn't say why. What he did say was, these are
just jump scares, jump scares. In other words, they're jumping the shark
with these arguments. They're just trying to scare everybody with these extreme examples.
But you know the real reality of all of this is that the president has,
you know, assassinated people all the time. You had Obama who assassinated
an American citizen in the Middle East, you remember that, and then assassinated
his son. They assassinate people all the time. Trump was bragging about the
fact that he assassinated this Iranian general. Were we at war with it with
Iran? Yeah, of course nobody would suggest that Obama or Trump should be
impeached for being murdering assassins. Nobody cares about that. And of course what
the reality is is that there you got situations like this guy who just got
sent to jail because he had a joke meme about Hillary Clinton. You see,
that's reality where we are. That's how out of helter the due process
is. That is far more important, and that is the reality. This
is not some kind of hypothetical case that's meant to scare people. You ought
to be afraid if somebody can be sent to jail for making a joke about
Hillary Clinton, and that has already happened. We're going to take a quick
break and we'll be right back. M h. You're listening to the David
Knight Show Here news now at APS Radio news dot com, or get the
eighth Radio app and never miss another story. We'll have a couple of comments
and tips on Rock fin a couple more. Angus must thang thank you very
much for the tip, he says, thank you David Knight family for the
work you do to keep us informed. Well, we couldn't do it if
it wasn't for your support, So thank you very much. Angus. And
James on Rock Finn, thank you for the tip. As a matter of
fact, as we're talking about listeners, I had some interesting letters in the
last couple of days, and I want to begin with this one because it's
kind of a humorous lesson and it's about being on a jury This is from
a listener, Bjay said, after watching your interview with Alex Lazarev of the
Canadian comedian who again he's ridiculing all this lockdown and this guy slammed his bicycle
into his car window and smashed it on video. The guy just couldn't handle
the ridicule because the guy was a part of the medical community that was locking
everybody down. That was his response. Just force, that's the way these
people are. But anyway, after watching your interview with Alex Lazarev, I
just had to share my experienced Wednesday when I went in for jury duty.
Yes, I had my pocket Constitution and I know all about jury nullification.
How could I not after listening to you, that's one of my hobby horses
there. I walked into the courtroom a little early and about fifteen to twenty
people were already there, scattered around the audience seating perfectly spaced out like its
COVID time. Dead silence reigned. I spoke up to the bailiff, Anasta
is this a library silence zone, and he said, no, you can
talk. So I sat down next to a woman who's immediately moved away and
got her mask out. And BJ is not a man but a woman.
They're not doing this because they think they put a move on them anyway.
After a brief discussion about how masks don't work, how their studies, etc.
I turned to the room in general, and I said what I have
said many times and gatherings like these and grocery store lines mostly, isn't it
interesting now here we are for the same time, and for the same thing,
and from the same from the same community, and we share so much
in common, and we all do our best to ignore one another. We
have so much in common. Maybe we have lived here all of our lives
or our families for generations, and we may work here, we may have
children going to school together. How much could we be discussing? But we
pretend we don't know each other? And she said, and then the dam
broke. The women around me started talking, People started sharing ideas and comments.
In the room sounded like a lively party instead of death. And I
won't say funeral, because at least there people talk in hushed tones and it's
not dead silence the COVID fearful woman moved a little closer as she told me
that her husband was a truck driver, and we talked about that until the
judge came in and got to business. There used to be a stick up
sign I had in the window of my truck panic, chaos and disorder.
My job is done here, hell. I have made it a personal mission
to engage people wherever I can, usually with humor. My favorite ploy is
to approach someone in a store with their hands full and ask are you ticklish?
And they usually ask why, to which I reply because you can't fight
back. Mostly they think about it for a moment, then they smile or
laugh and we go our separate ways. And so she finishes up by saying,
God bless you for what you do. Your blood pressure wouldn't go so
high if you didn't get so mad. Yeah right, she says, And
yeah, that's I don't know about my blood pressure. I can see where
my pulse rate goes up when I get upset about this. This is from
Eileen, and she says, you woke me up to Trump. She said,
I've been hearing you more and more say that you aren't sure how long
you will have of your program because so many of your listeners are not happy
of the fact that you tell the truth about Trump and they don't believe it,
or else they just overlook his transgressions. I wanted to make you a
that I'd been a Trump supporter in the day, and thanks to you,
was awakened to the fact that he's no different from the rest of the corrupt
politicians. What I'm guessing is there's a lot of your listeners that you've woken
up and they haven't come forward to let you know this. Someone with a
beef is more likely to air their dissatisfaction than a happy consumer of your news.
Well, thank you, Eileen. I appreciate the encouragement. You know,
it's not just that it's the it's you know, it is that I
do get a lot of people who are very angry about that. But and
I think that's going to increase. The reason I think it's going to increase
is because as we draw close to the election, you know, the phenomenon
that I've seen over and over again, a lot of people will say,
you know, about halfway through the primary cycle, they'll say, well,
I'm going to vote for the third party Canada. I'm going to vote for
the Independent. And then when you get closer, you get to the election
time and it gets really tight. Then they start looking at the lesser of
two evil thing. It's like, well, I really hate that other guy,
so I'm going to have to vote for this one. And then they
once they buy into that decision, then you know, it's like same thing
as criticizing somebody's car that they just bought. They bought into this thing.
You don't criticize the car, even if pieces are falling off of it.
You know, it's not you don't want to point that out, even if
the wheels are coming off, even if the wheels are coming off of their
candidate. Once they've made that decision, they're going to go into it.
But the other part of this that concerns me again is the weaponization of artificial
intelligence to be able to do more censorship. And you know, it's not
just that I tell Trump supporters what they don't want to hear. I say
things that the World Economic Forum and both the Democrats and Republicans don't want you
to hear about. And so that has been the case for a very long
time. I just want to say this is from a subscribe Star supporter,
and that is very important. It's a comment about skipping on the podcast.
It's the first time I've seen that. So if other of you this is
from Garrison. If you're having this problem, let me know. He said,
I know it'll be a long year for you, so I've decided to
increase my subscription. We'll thank you, Garrison. I appreciate that. Additionally,
I like to make you aware that the podcast is doing some weird skipping
around. I've noticed it a lot recently. For example, on the ninth
on January ninth episode, during the second hour, while you were reading the
Brownstone fictional story, it jumped ahead to you talking about Ruby Ridge. I've
noticed this a lot over the past month or so. Sometimes it'll even skip
back and replay a section. It won't stop me from listening, but I
want to let you know. So he says, praying for you in our
country and that we would turn back to the Lord. Well, that's the
answer for each of us individually and for us collectively. I just want to
say, these are the platforms that are available to me, and they're the
only platforms that are available to me, and that's part of the problem.
I don't know which one he's listening through, So Garrison, if you hear
this, let me know which one of those it was. I don't have
a lot of different options though, that's the key thing. But I do
want to thank you, and I want to thank the people who are on
subscribe Star, who I don't typically read names off for them, but it's
a very important base. And I just want to say that if you are
a subscribe Star supporter, make sure you check and make sure that you're still
supporting us, because if your card changes or something like that, they don't
typically give you any notification if there's some kind of a change on your credit
card or if it expires or something like that. And let me just say
real quickly, I want to thank some of the people who have supported us
on Zell from the beginning of the year. Mary M. Thank you very
much. Actually this is December of the twenty ninth, but you didn't mention
this with last time I talked about Zell, So thank you, Mary M.
Kurt O, Michael L. William W. Maurice W. Rogalio,
J David R. Scott, L. Kimberly, M. Adam D.
Mary M again, thank you very much, Madison F. Gretchen C.
Matthew M, Jeffrey c Armando M. Peter E. Regalio again and Sean
S. Thank you very much. And the one that we got yesterday,
Benjamin R. Thank you very much. He wrote Happy New Year, Mary,
Belated Christmas and it was a very generous contribution. I appreciate that,
by the way, kurt O said his first time giving longtime listener, I
really do appreciate that. Thank you so much for that. Let's talk a
little bit about a book that was sent to me, and I'm going to
try to get this author on because I thought it was a very We've been
talking about the lockdown and what happen and with a lockdown. This is the
book is a Scattering the Sheep and it has a foreword by Matt Trohala,
who I have interviewed many times about his book The Doctrine of the Lesser Magistrate.
And this book is about how we as individuals, but especially Christians and
churches, how they responded to the lockdown. And the foreword from Matt Trohala
begins with the executive order March twenty twenty. Now Therefore, I Donald Trump,
President of the United States, by the authority vested in me by the
Constitution, declare a national emergency, and by the presumed authority that he said
he had with the Constitution. Again, we all know that he shut down
businesses, and you know all the rest of the things that were done by
putting Fauci in charge Matt's. Shortly after that pronouncement, churches were declared non
essential by state governments across the nation. They were either ordered or strongly advised
to shut down. The compliance by churchmen was blithe, near monolithic. Approximately
ninety five percent of the churches shuttered their doors. Looking back, one wonders
how it was that the vast majority of churchmen and Christians could not see COVID
for the fraud that it was. So he said at Mercyse Christian Church are
assembling in Wisconsin. We were kicked out of our meeting place in March of
twenty twenty. The very next week, our church began meeting in homes and
we've never stopped gathering since. So that's the response to political persecution, which
is what that was. That's what we've seen in China. That is the
home church, the real church is not going to be shut down. And
I understand there were a lot of people who did not understand the did not
understand the germ games that have been practice for twenty years. They had a
genuine fear that people are going to die. That's what they were hearing everywhere.
They were not skeptical, as I think many of them are, of
what they were hearing on the news, both mainstream media, left wing media,
and even from a lot of people on the right who was at info
Wars, and we're scaring everybody about this. This is unprecedented. We never
seen anything like it. It's got the special hook and it hooks into you
and all the rest of it. I mean, I heard all of that
at info Wars, and so I understand that people were uncertain that they wanted
to play it safe. But as Matt said, you do not. He
said delivered a sermon on March the twenty ninth, twenty twenty, on COVID
and quarantine laws, and in that he said, I preached on Leviticus thirteen,
which has some quarantine stuff. Isn't it right? What do we do
when we have disease and we quarantine? And that's one of the things.
I think is interesting when you look at the Bible, nobody did anything like
that. That wasn't a common practice with the Egyptians. You know, most
of their medicines involved you know, you know, of some sort, and
they didn't do quarantine. But anyway, you do not quarantine the whole of
society, he said, You quarantine the sick, noticing God's law that the
rights and the freedoms of the entire population are not abridged just because of a
disease. In other words, there were instructions there how to identify a disease
and what they do, But that person outside the camp, not everybody else.
Please understand, he said, disease is always around in any society.
You can't spend your whole life hiding from germs and diseases. And yet,
he said, most churchmen spent months and months count howlling to government mandates and
man made edicts. Churchmen shut down their churches, appealing to a servile suppression
to the state or a nanny like desire to prevent their people from making their
own decisions about gathering. How was it that they could not discern that government
officials were using COVID as a tool for evil designs. How could they not
see it as a mole hill being made into a mountain. How could they
not see it for the fraud and the evil that it was. How could
they not see the COVID response as pure evil when it impugned God's created order
by preventing men from working. How could they not see it for the fraud
and evil it was when the churches were labeled non essential, but the abortion
death camps were labeled essential and remained open. How could they not see it
for fraud and evil? But it was when God's law makes it clear that
only the sick are to be quarantined, but government officials were quarantining the whole
of society. Why did it take months before some began to see it?
And why do many still believe it? Why were the churchmen putty in the
hands of wicked men who employed them to further convince the people that the COVID
response was not a lie, not a fraud, not a great evil.
How could they not discern that evil was afoot? He said? The answer
to all these questions is in part because the most wonded desire of your average
American churchmen is to be liked. He wants to be thought well of,
and he loves the praises of men in America. Therefore, the average churchman
wants to be a consensus builder, not a servant leader whose fealty is first
to the Lord and his law. I mentioned that because whether or not you're
a Christian, we have to look at this and say that. As I
was condemning the Republicans who were holding these COVID the COVID Committee, nonsense is
going on, and they want to bring Faucian, they want to tell him
off, but they don't want to say anything about Trump. Why because they
want the praise of men, because they're looking at what is in their interest,
and because they don't have any fealty to the Constitution or to the rule
of law. And quite frankly, folks, because they will all do it
again. There was never any authority for what they have done, but they
made that a precedent. And what they did was they not only got away
with it, and we're the ones who are guilty for it because in many
cases, you know, the vast majority of Americans sat down and complied.
I know many of you did not. I did not. But for whatever
reason, whether it was deception, lack of discernment, fear of man wanting
to be liked and to please other people for whatever reason, that was what
happened. And so, in a sense, these Republicans in Congress really do
represent the vast majority of Americans who want to just go along and not stand
for the principles that have made this country great and will accept the slavery that's
being put on them. Thank you so much for joining us. Sometimes your
day needs a little smoothing, check out the Jazz channel at apsradio dot com
and the APS Radio app and leave the stress behind. Let me tell you
the David Night Show you can listen to with your ears. You can even
watch it by using your eyes. In fact, if you can hear me,
that means you're listening to the David Night Show right now. Yeah,
good job. And you want to know something else. You can find all
the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at Thedavidnightshow dot com.
That's a website.