Attention. You're listening to the top Huff Radio show, America's home for conservative
not bitter talk radio. Be advised. The content of this program has been
documented to prevent and even cure liberalism, and listening may cause you to lean
to the right. Here's your conservative but not bitter host, Tod Huff.
Well, that is right, my friends, you have tuned into America's home
for conservative not bitter talk. It's a pleasure to be here today. I
want to talk with you a little bit about the lefts continued feigning outrage over
the war on our democracy. They want you, they want me, to
believe that the war on democracy is being waged by none other than President Donald
J. Trump and his henchmen in the Republican Party, conservatives all across the
fruited plane. This is what they want you to believe. They want you
to believe that the danger is in electing Trump. We've got some couple of
things to talk about regarding that today, including the real problem, the real
problem which is on display for anybody who wants to see. And we'll talk
about former CIA director John Brennan. We'll talk about the January sixth show committee.
We'll talk about Trump and his call with Raffinsberger from Georgia, and other
things of course in the news as well. But before we do that,
my friends, I want to tell you about one of our newer advertisers and
tell you that it's time to crush your vice. Nick Knack Naturals, one
of the newest advertisers on this program, is on a mission to help move
nicotine consumers away from combustion, away from all forms of tobacco, all forms
of vaping, and toward a less harmful alternative. Nicknack Naturals is one hundred
percent all natural and it's a non tobacco nicotine. There's no smoke, there's
no spit, there's no slimy pouch, no bad breath, no teeth stains.
It's discrete, it's odorless. My friend, is time to crush your
vice with nick Nack Naturals. You can visit their website today nicknack dot com.
That's n I c n AC kind of like that, Nick Knack,
nicknack dot com. Nickknack dot com. It's time to crush, crush,
my friends, your vice. So let us start today by well beginning here
with our looking at what John Brennan, what John Brennan is out there saying,
now, John Brennan, is when you think, well, when I
think deep state, when I think corruption at its finest, when I think
of people who are the poster child for what is wrong with our government,
when I think of people who epitomize what I refer to as the seven pillars
of propaganda, when I think about that, and of course, the seven
seven pillars of propaganda include seven general areas of I'll just say, our society,
our system at large here in this great nation. But one of those
pillars of propaganda is the government. That's right, my friends. The government
is engaged in actively gaslighting you. We have an administration that's I mean,
they have full time gas lighters, one hundred percent full time gas lighters.
And it didn't start with this administration, but it certainly continues with this administration.
So we've got the ex CIA head John Brennan, who is one of
those folks, one of those folks. Here's the headline. This is from
a story that published here a couple of days ago. I guess it would
have been boy Saturday. Xc This is RedState dot Com. XCIA head says
intel community might withhold sensitive information from Trump if he wins the nomination. Now
think about this. Think about this. Now you have someone who, of
course, Trump is on the brink of winning the nomination to president for president
of the United States, for the Republican nomination for president of the United States.
There are established processes and procedures as to what is supposed to be done
with candidates who may potentially be the next commander in chief. And one of
those things is giving them access to information. So now the narrative, of
course, the narrative, of course is that Trump is a danger to democracy.
Trump is trying to overthrow our government. Trump wants to establish himself as
king, and all this nonsense, and that it I say, all this
nonsense. But to a group of people, a subgroup of people in this
country, this is like it's red meat. There are people who eat this
stuff up, who consume this with absolute disregard towards truth, reality, anything
remotely close to anything remotely close to reality. They will reject it in favor
of this. And I don't know if it comes out of fear. I
don't know if it comes out of a desire to You know, there's a
saying that you'll often hear me reference on this program if you've listen for any
length of time. I didn't come up with it, but I think it's
brilliant, And it goes like this, the heart will ascume me, the
mind will justify with the heart desires. The mind will justify with the heart
desires. So the heart doesn't want Trump as president for whatever reason. Because
people, I mean, you could pick any number of things, but a
lot of these leftists hate this country as founded. They don't like concepts or
discussions like America first, what is that. They just don't like it.
They don't like this country as it was created to exist. And if they
had their choice, they would completely eradicate that and establish it as something much
more ironically authoritarian, much less concerned with your liberty, with your freedom,
with your choices. They would be much more content and having a leftist style
of government, whether that be socialists, whether that be all out stalinistic and
communist. It's that's that's again. The continuous is quite simple. You know,
the political continuum. You've got the right side of the continuum, and
in my mind, the complete white right side would be absolute anarchy and no
rule, no order, no no government. And then you begin to move
from the fringe, and you reach the point where there's, okay, we
want a government, but we want it to be as small and as manageable
as possible, not one ounce larger than that. And then you continue to
move left and you'll hit other political ideologies. But as you move left,
as you move left, what it is is a more there's more focus and
more power given to a centralized government and less power given to the individual,
less choice. And these folks like John Brennan, these folks that are part
of the deep state, these folks that are embedded in Washington, d C.
They are to the left. There's just no denying this. And so
it comes as no surprise the people that are in charge of the government apparatus
what I call this pillar, this governmental pillar, and I say that they
are a pillar of propaganda. There's no doubt why. Because they're trying to
deceive people to move from our natural state of desiring to be free, to
be in control of our own choices, our own destiny. And they want
to deceive us into believing if we just take little steps to the left,
little steps to the left, they will take care of things for us.
They will make sure that we're safe. They will make sure that if we
trade a little bit of our liberty, that they're going to give us ultimate
security, or in this case, they're gonna protect us from the dangers of
Donald J. Trump knowing allegedly about as the Republican nominee knowing about some sensitive
information. Now, this could extend long past, long past the nomination process,
and this is something Trump battled to some extent when he was President of
the United States. I mean, there are forces that there are individuals and
forces working within our government that are that don't want any oversight whatsoever. You
know, it's it's ironic, really, they want to take away your freedom,
your autonomy. But yet even though they are employed by you, the
taxpayer, they are empowered to exist through well supposedly through the constitution, through
our representative form of government, through our through our constitutional republic. That's where
they derive their power from the consent of the governor. At least that's way
it's supposed to be. But now, ironically, they don't want you having
oversight of them. They want to have oversight of you. They want to
have control and a power and authority over you. But yet they want no
oversight in return, and that's where this bureaucratic state that they build, that's
where this is very effective, because it creates all these nooks and crannies where
they can hide, where they can exist outside of the spotlight, outside of
being in the public the public eye. And so now Brennan's out there telling
folks, here's what he says. This is let's see if I read down
in this article again at RedState dot com. This is in today's stack of
stuff. By the way, here is what Brennan. Brennan told Nicole Wallace,
which of course she is. She's on MSNBC for Starters, so by
virtue of being there, you know that she is an absolute She's hysterical about
the possibility of Trump being president once again. So he's on there talking with
her. They're talking about this Politico article that talked about how intelligence officials are
allegedly planning to brief Trump but have reservations according to the article here due to
quote his handling a classified information. No word on whether or not they have
concerns about Biden's handling of classified information. Sitting there next to his classic Corvette
in a garage somewhere in Delaware, but this is what he said to Nicole
Wallace. Now, I'm pretty certain that my former intelligence colleagues will provide briefings
that are not going to do any type of damage to sources and methods in
terms of providing information to Donald Trump that he can misuse. But they will
provide analytic overviews and briefings about some of the world's hotspots, letting Donald Trump
know what the assessments are at this point. So they got to keep a
hush hushed, They got to keep it from Trump. Now, if they're
going to do this during this particular part of the process, which admittedly,
I guess you could say is a little bit of a gray area because you
know, a nominee is not the president yet they've got to win the election
and so forth, is it not fair to ask the questions that they're doing
or thinking these same things when hopefully he's president of the United States Again.
Brennan continues here, he said, I think it's going to be analysis that
will be devoid of the sources and methods, the sensitive things that we are
most concerned about, the types of things that were in all those documents that
he had in the bathroom. Remember, Hillary had the email server in her
bathroom, Clauset. She thought putting four walls in a door around that thing
would keep it secure, if you remember that back in twenty sixteen. But
anyway, and he talks about just what Trump was, the materials that Trump
had at at Mar a Lago, and of course we know what's happened,
the FBI raid, the charges and so forth that stemmed from that. But
they're out there saying we had to keep you safe. We can't tell Trump,
we can't tell him specific information because he's not to be trusted. This
is such hogwash. These these people, these people are just it is chasing
a narrative at all costs, and it is indicative of what Trump faces if
and when, hopefully he rewins wins again reelection here to the presidency. It's
it's part and partial of what he's dealing with. He's going to have to
fight these battles day one. There are going to be embedded opponents completely antithetical
to the cause and leadership of Trump, embedded in our federal government. And
that's not the way it's supposed to be. You know that these organizations,
these these you know, these the acronym soup here they are supposed to report
to the President of the United States. Now again, I know we're talking
about his uh the time before he would be re elected, but none less,
it is very fair to ask, especially in light of what we saw
his previous term as president, how much of this nonsense going to be happening
again, I mean, this is why the calls to eradicate complete departments of
the federal government. Then one of the reasons one of the reasons why,
because this sort of nonsense is going on so anyway, there's that there's other
things as well. The j sixth Committee is allegedly suppressing testimony, which I'll
get to in a minute, But before I do that, I want to
tell you a little bit about four patriots. My friends. I know,
as a conservative, you are someone who wants to be prepared. You want
to be prepared to take care of your family financially. You want to raise
your children, raise help raise your grandchildren, provide leadership, provide an example
that can help them the next generation start off on a better foot. Everything
you do, you think about what is my responsibility a my covering that responsibility?
And do I have some something set aside that would allow me to navigate
some difficulties should those difficulties arise, And so the question is have you thought
about a possible food shortage in the same way. Right, So, there's
natural disasters. We've seen natural disasters of all types hit this country. Power
outages. We had a power outage this weekend. Wasn't a long one,
but we've had some long ones in the past as well. And of course
food shortages that could be caused by any number of things, including a federal
government that mismanages everything that it touches. And so it's wise to be prepared.
It's wise to be prepared in the event of a natural disaster or a
power outage, some sort of a supply chain problem, food shortage. Why
not take a look at four patriots dot com slash huff. You can check
out their most popular item, which is a three month food supply includes breakfast,
lunch, dinner options stackable toads. Twenty five years is how long this
food supply can be stored. Go to four patriots dot com slash huff that
will give you access to their latest deals and discounts. They've also got things
like generators, solar phone chargers, freeze dryers, water filtration systems and RB
and camping gear four patriots dot com slash huff. That's my last name for
Patriots dot com slash huff. So let's talk a little bit about about what's
happening here with this testimony, this testimony that has been allegedly suppressed hidden regarding
the j sixth Committee. This is Foxnews dot Com. You may have seen
Liz Cheney go to Liz Cheney go at it with I think Mark Levin on
Twitter because he caught her out on this, and rightfully so. J sixth
Committee allegedly suppressed testimony showing the Trump administration pushed Ford National Guard presence on January
sixth. This seems pretty relevant, right. It seems like something that you
would want to make sure that you if you were really conducting an investigation focused
on digging up and finding the truth. It seems relatively obvious to me that
if someone was testifying that Trump was trying to get his administration was trying to
get a presence of the National Guard on January sixth in our nation's capital,
it seems like something pretty relevant. Now. That's, of course, assuming
that the j sixth Committee was interested in truth and not just in a political
narrative. Remember, this is the same committee that had nothing but Democrats,
well democrats plus Liz Cheney and Adam Kinsinger, both by the way, are
no longer in Congress, Thank goodness. These are make believe Republicans. Remember
Kensinger up there, Fox crying on the stand or at the when he was
sitting on the committee, asking questions, listening to the testimony. This was
all designed for consumption. This all is designed for what we've been talking about,
even the last talking about John Brennan saying the intelligence community is going to
keep things away from Trump. This is all designed to fuel that narrative.
Trump is terrible. It's bad enough to make a former well former congressman at
the time, current congressman cry, couldn't even take it. Someone who was
a veteran of the Air Force, someone who served in the military up there
crying, this must be bad. Adam Kinsinger's in tears over this. It's
all supposed to fuel the concept, this idea that says, hey, Trump
is a menace to society. Trump is absolutely unqualified to be president. Trump
can't be allowed to step back into the oval office because bad, bad things
happen. Now, how many troops did Trump want if this testimony is true.
In fact, here's what it says. The former J six Committee apparently
withheld mister or Nato, mister Ornato's testimony critical witness testimony from the American people
because it contradicted their predetermined narrative. The testimony proves what mister Meadows has said
all along. President Trump did in fact offer ten thousand, ten thousand National
Guard troops to secure the US capital, which was turned down. Now that's
what Representative Very louder Milk of Georgia said in a statement on on Friday.
Liz Cheney's out there saying it's false, This is not accurate, that witnesses
weren't to be believed in all this sort of sort of stuff. But the
bottom line is you didn't know. I mean, well, you know it
because you followed. The American people don't know this. The American people,
the American people were told by the J sixth Committee that Trump wanted to overthrow
the government and stop a completely justified process from happening. When Biden was being
confirmed or I guess formally elected by the Electoral College and the vice president would
accept those electors. Trump was trying to overthrow that throwart our democracy. That's
what we were told. Who knows about all this other stuff. Why would
Trump want ten thousand National Guards members there? If in fact, if in
fact everything was what the media tells us, what Liz Cheney told us,
what Adam Kinsinger told us, that was a show trial, my friends,
from the very very beginning. The deep state is a problem. The Seven
Pillars of Propaganda is a real thing, and the government is actively working against
us, my friends. They're not there to any longer to protect our liberties.
There apparently ostensibly there to infringe upon those liberties. It's a sad,
sad day, and they're at war with us in lots of different ways.
Talk more about that after the break. I'm going to tell you here as
we're wrapping up this segment leading into the next, that I sell health.
Eric Wilson, my friend there. He's been a supporter of this program for
several years now. He is here to help provide individual and group health plans
to you, to our listeners. He's been serving clients throughout the Fruited Plan
across the Fruited Plain since two thousand and four, so that's twenty years.
In case We've got a Bernie Sanders supporter out there tuned in who isn't good
with math. That's twenty years now, twenty years. He's an expert in
the Affordable Care Act. He knows how to navigate the complexities provide people with
options that make the most sense for their wallets and for their needs. You
can call Eric today for a free, no cost consultation eight one five three
seven two thirteen sixty three eight one five three seven two thirteen sixty three,
or visit I sell health dot com. So I'm gonna take a break here.
When we get back, I'm going to continue a little bit in this
discussion on the real problem here facing well, the real war being waged against
what folks call our democracy. I say it's our constitutional republic. And we're
going to continue with some of the things happening out there today, including this
phone call between Trump and Raffinsburger. But I've got to take a break,
my friends. So you are listening here to the home of can Conservative not
Bitter Talk? Be back here in just a minute. Welcome back, my
friends. So we're continuing this conversation on the ways that the government is the
real threat to our quote unquote democracy, which of course is more accurately stated
our constitutional republic. But I'll let it slide for the sake of just just
highlighting that, just making sure that we blame the right individuals here. So
before the break, we talked about Brennan, We talked about the January sixth
Committee allegedly suppressing testimony. By the way, that testimony has, as I
understand it been released, I have not read it yet in its entirety,
but so this information is out there. You know that, remember this committee,
the Jason Committee, had the opportunity, They had the opportunity to be
transparent with the American people from the beginning. They chose not to be They
absolutely, positively, unequivocally chose not to be transparent. They didn't release all
of the video footage that we have since had released thanks to Speaker of the
House Mike Johnson. They did not release that there's video that shows Capitol police
taking actions against people that weren't doing anything, I mean, shooting tear gas
into the crowd, things like that, things that could clearly be viewed as
acts of unnecessary provocation that was withheld from the American people. Why why were
these things with help, because the answer is of course obvious. They had
a narrative to sell, they had a midterm election to win. They weren't
interested in the truth, my friends. They were trying to damage Trump in
every conceivable way, through every against the Seinfeld Newman strategy, whatever it takes,
as long as it takes them, so long as it takes Trump away
from the White House. That was the plan, the strategy. That's what
they were, That's what they're continually doing. So we got that constantly going
on in different ways. But but but but the other thing I want to
talk about here is this phone call. This phone call between Donald Trump when
he was president of the United States, and you'll remember hearing I'm not going
to play the call here that you'll remember when he spoke with Georgia's Secretary of
State Brad Raffensberger, and Trump said, I just want to find eleven thousand,
seven hundred and eighty votes. Now, this phone call, this recorded
phone call, was one of the key pieces of evidence that was used by
none other than Fanny Pack herself. Fanny willis who you talk about a train
wreck in every conceivable way. I haven't even really discussed that, and I
don't have time to do it right now. But you talk about an embarrassing,
corrupt mess, the way that Fulton County District Attorney Fanny Willis has conducted
herself allegedly. I mean you've if you've watched the trial, if you've watched
the just the things that, well, she had this love. I don't
want to get into it. She had this lover, She had money that
was going to this guy that was helping with the investigation. She wore her
dress backwards. I mean you've probably followed that a little bit. We just
I haven't talked about it much. I mean, it's right up my alley,
the sorts of things and the sorts of things that entertained me. But
it's what's interesting to me is that is that these are the folks that like
to stand on the moral high ground. They come in, they want you
to think that they're here to take care of the real culprits, the real
threats, the folks who are really the danger and menace to society. But
yet they often turn out to be those very things themselves, in fact,
even in much to a much greater degree than those that they're trying to go
after. So Fanny Willis. Fanny Willis, she one of the key pieces
of evidence is she's basing this her charges against Trump on these rico prosecution charges,
where she's prosecuting Trump on these rico allegations. The big piece of evidence
was this phone call. Well, it turns out that this phone call and
this is in the stack of stuff. I'm looking at it here, bombshell,
this is the headline RedState dot com infamous Trump Raffensberger call at heart of
Fanny Willis prosecution was illegally recorded. It was illegally recorded. Now now there's
questions as the weather or not, can this can this be used? Well,
look, I'm not an attorney by any stretch of the imagination. I
think I've told you that I went to a pre law program at American University
in d C. I loved the program that decided the world had one too
many attorneys as it is, so I didn't I decided I didn't want to
pursue it. It's actually the beginning of my interest in pursuing this a back
twenty some years ago now. But I remember, even in that early stage
of you know, kind of a pre law program, there is a concept
what's it called I is it the fruit of the poisonous tree? Right,
So you don't want if something has been illegally obtained from by law enforcement.
And again it's often or typically or I don't want to use the word always,
because there's a myriad of factors and arguments that can be made I suppose
as to why something should be admissible and not be admissible. But I mean,
this was illegally recorded. So why was it illegally recorded? Well,
it was recorded Florida. Florida is a two. Both parties have to know
if a phone call is being recorded in Florida. Now that's not the case
in a lot of places. That's not the place or the case in a
lot of places. In fact, it's not the case where I am in
Indiana. Only one party has to know if a phone call is being recorded,
and of course, if you're the one doing it, then you can
be the one making the recording. This is not the case across across the
country, and it's not the case in Florida where Trump was when he was
on the phone call, So that should be a pretty big problem. So
again, but they don't care. That's the point. They don't care.
If I mean, remember, just remember all the things that they've done to
Trump his campaign, people who were with Trump. I mean, we can't
even cover them, We can't even cover them here today. But remember when
they spied on his campaign, Remember when they alleged that he was engaged in
some sort of a disinformation campaign with Vladimir Putin and the Russian government. Remember
this, I mean, this goes back to before the time he was even
president, before the time he was even elected as president. Back to the
time where they were at the well openly at least in front of the cameras,
mocking the idea that Trump could ever be president. Back when they were
doing that, they were actually doing a lot of things behind the scenes because
they were terrified of the guy. Terrified of the guy I've referenced. Well,
John Brennan's out there telling us that the intelligence community may withhold sensitive information
from Trump if he wins the nomination, which of course leads us to ask,
what else are they going to be withholding from him if he's president of
the United States. I mean, we've seen so many things happening against Trump,
the weaponization of the Department of Justice, how they've gone after him.
This Fanny Willis cases is an example of that. The mar A Lago case,
I mean, the situation that the civil case in New York, the
real estate thing. I mean, it's remarkable what has been done to stop
this guy. That's the real problem. That's the real problem that we have.
It's not the danger that Trump poses to the American people or the United
States of America. It's the danger that the people running our government post,
not just the Trump but to all of us. And that, my friends,
is is the bottom line here. So need to wrap up this segment.
But before we do that, I don't know if you've seen this.
I just saw this in since today's stack of stuff. Gold is at a
near all time high as investors are preparing for a potential cut in the interest
rate. So there's you know, when you when you look at gold,
there's a lot of factors. And I'm not here to predict or time,
time, the gold pricing or anything like that. That's not at all what
I do. But there's factors that influence the price of gold, including interest
rates, including inflation, and we've got a lot of those sorts of things
going on in our world right now, and so and so with gold moving
possibly here to an all time high. Possibly not making predictions, but that's
what There's articles out there that are saying these things. I'm wondering, my
friends, if that would make you interested in having a conversation with our friends
at Harvard Gold Group. Harvard Goldgroup is here to help you, help you
with your gold and precious metals investing purchasing. You can find out more by
visiting them online Harvard Gooldgroup dot com. That's Harvardgoldgroup dot com. Use my
name Todd, and you'll get a two hundred and fifty dollars credit on your
purchase. Harvard Gooldgroup dot com promo code Todd two hundred and fifty dollars credit
on your next purchase. So time is running out here. But next segment,
I want to talk about what a CNN punit recommends to be Biden's quote
unquot new campaign strategy. Fantastic stuff. Talk about it here and just a
minute, my friends sit tight back here in mere moments. Welcome back,
my friends. So I want to this is fantastic. Remember when we've talked
about this a lot. We've talked about the fact that this is going to
be an intense campaign it's something that, in fact, we talked about it
even yesterday. This is something that is going to be is going to make
twenty twenty look like a walk in the park if you ask me. So,
there's there's a and and right on time, right on time. There's
a CNN pundit named Kara Swisher. This is I'm looking here, MRC NewsBusters
so NewsBusters dot org. She's on CNN, good Old CNN, giving advice
to Biden and to his campaign what she thinks the campaign should be doing,
which ironically is what they've been doing all the time. But I just want
you to listen to how she frames and phrases this, because this is We're
gonna get more of this. We are going to get more of this.
It is going to get more angry. It is going to get more divisive.
They are again, they're out of options. They can see the writing
on the wall, Trump versus Biden. They can see the polls, they
can see Biden's absolute deplorable economy, wide open borders, you know, terrible
State of the Union address. As much as they want to gaslight us about
that, telling us it was fire, telling us it was now going to
replace the narrative about Biden's cognitive abilities and so forth. Anyway, so now
they've moved on to this latest well, I guess new campaign here it is.
This is what's her name again, Kara Kara Swisher at CNN Here it
is enjoy this. He's going to be shameless, which is his greatest ass
at the shamelessness of him is then Biden has to get in there very hard
and go rapist, racist, fascist, over and over and over again,
and then the trials are happening at the same time. He's just had to
pay he's just ninety three million dollars for right now, and just hammer it
in with those three things. Rapist, racist, fascist, here's the thing,
thank you, that's truth. That was it. So the strategy here,
she says, which is the strategy along? She said, Look,
he's going to be out there. Biden needs to say rapist, racist,
fascist. That should be Biden's campaign now in one degree or in one sense,
I agree with her because well, not with these particular words, but
make the campaign about anything other than Biden, because there's nothing about Biden that
is going to attract voters to vote for him. There is nothing about Biden
that he has done. There is nothing about Biden that kind of inspires and
motivates. There's nothing about Biden that just makes you want to go out and
vote for him. Unluss, you can destroy your opponent and cause so much
fear by calling him a rapist, a racist, and a fascist. That's
the strategy. And I mean, in a way, she's letting the cat
out of the bag, But this has been the strategy from the beginning.
They want to do these things and then hide Biden in the base room,
basement closet. That's what they want to do. Hide him, get him
out of the public view. In fact, I don't know if you saw
this. It's in the stack of stuff. I was going to talk about
it a little bit more, but I kind of decided to change course a
little bit on today's program. But there's there's a I think it's a someone
who's a psychologist or a psychiatrist who's out there saying who's out there saying that
Biden was basically pumped full of some sort of a stimulant in order to go
out there and give his State of the Union address. This is at townhall
dot com. Psychiatrists suggest that Biden was given a stimulant to make it through
his ninety minute State of the Union speech. Now you can make from that
whatever you will. I've never been a big fan of people diagnosing others remotely
or just by watching him on TV or whatever. But bottom line is,
bottom line is there's reason to think that something like that may be going on
because we've all seen Biden in his regular day to day appearances. And while
he was anything but articulate and just you know, he didn't have that speech
that they told us he was going to have that was going to change the
trajectory of this campaign, he also was able to get through it without some
of I mean, he had his moments. There's no doubt. He froze
up and couldn't speak a couple times, and of course they'll blame that on
a stuttering problem, and if you make fun of that, you're making fun
of people with stutters and all this sort of thing. But he was definitely
different than we've seen him just in his day to day activities, which is
why they hide him in his day to day activities. And again this is
the strategy hide him. Call Trump a rapist, a racist, and a
fascist, and that should get should get the job done. So they think
so they think so I don't, my friends. I mean, it's it's
deception at its finest. This campaign is not going to be about anything Biden
brings to the metaphorical table here. This is not That's not what this is
about. This is about terrorizing people. It's about making them think, if
you vote for Trump, you're voting for the end of our democracy, the
end of our constitutional republic, the end of civilization as we know it.
That's what they have to do. That's the only way that they can get
through this. And I don't think they're going to be successful. But that's
why they're out there calling Biden, excuse me, having Biden instructing Biden,
telling Biden to call Trump a racist, a rapist, and a fascist.
It's all they've got, my friends, and this is all that I've got.
Time wine as well, time wise as well. Got to wrap up
here. Have a great day. SDG.