Using free speech to free minds. You're listening to the David Night Show.
As a clock strikes thirteen, it's Thursday, the ninth of May, Year
of Our Lord, twenty twenty four. Well, today we're going to begin
by going back and looking at how we got here. It's been some interesting
connections to do some of our tech oligarchs and to the foundation of the Internet
and these families and people talk about the blood lines of Illuminati. How about
the bloodlines of the technocracy. We're going to take a look at that today
to begin with. And we're going to take a deeper look at this amazing
power grab going on in Canada put forward by Justin Castro. Yeah, the
spawn of Fidel. It's absolutely amazing. We have retroactivity there, we have
pre crime, we have life sentences for speech folks. We are losing Western
civilization very rapidly. We'll be right back. I guess we could call this
Bloodlines of the Technocracy. FBI file on Jeff Bezos's grandfather showing that he was
a DARPA co founder that's now evidently been destroyed exists. There are newspaper clippings
that talk about it. But of course if you file a freedom of information
request. As the individual who runs the Black Vault run by John Greenwald Junior.
He runs that and so he looks into the history of this dark government
that we have here, folks, that the pageant that you see out there,
the trials and tribulations of Trump, I mean literally as well as you
know, the CIA moves to take him out of anything. That's all just
for show. There's real competition in this game of thrones, and there's real
competition within the intelligence community. But the elections at the federal level don't make
a dime's worth of difference. And we'll talk about that as well today.
When we take a look at the efforts to get rid of Machiavellian Mike,
it's interesting to see how all of the conservative press, Bright bart wnd,
all of them, how they come after Machiavellian Mike and say, hey,
this guy. Hey, the Democrats love him. Nancy Pelosi supported him,
endorsed him for this, you know, keep him in there, keep him
in there. He works with him multiple times, and with a minority of
Republicans and all of the Democrats, he gets these things through. And so
people are rightfully upset with him and talk about the UNI Party. You know
what, they don't talk about the fact that Trump supported him. He wouldn't
have lasted a minute if Trump had opposed him, because we have a party
that's been reduced to a cult to personality, and it is a sham.
It is shadow boxing what has happened in Washington. But let's focus on the
bloodlines of the technocracy here. What's not widely known is that Amazon founder Jeff
Bezos's grandfather, Lawrence Preston Guys, helped form the Pentagon's super secret Advanced Research
Projects Agency ARPA that was renamed DARPA later on, and that goes back to
nineteen fifty eight. There's an interesting book by any Jacobson about DARPA. She
really starts to focus not so much on the she focuses on it after this
similar time, she starts to focus on the Jason scientists who the Defense Department
came to during Vietnam, and so they wanted to use Vietnam as a test
bed for their wars, their equipment, and that's one of the reasons why
we have a major reason why we have these unending wars. When we are
not attacked, they are test beds for their equipment and so years later,
of course, he says, describes it this way. DARPA developed the Internet,
internet, search, voice recognition, high speed networking, that type of
thing. Interesting that they leave out social media. That is the most important
thing, because if you look at the beginning of the Internet, as I've
said many times, anybody listens to this program knows how often I talk about
JCR Licklider and DARPA, and he was there at this time. As a
matter of fact, he overlapped with the time that Bezos grandfather was there.
JCR. Licklider was a psychologist and he proposed what he called the intergalactic Computer
Network, and it was the Internet. Now, they didn't have the technology
at the time to do it, they didn't have the hardware to do it,
but he designed it. It was designed by a psychologist at DARPA.
It was designed as a psychological weapon, as a weapon of psych warfare.
And as soon as the equipment started to catch up in the nineties, you
had all these organizations jump in big time into these venture capital firms. As
a matter of record, you can go look at how many of the intelligence
community executives were on the boards of these venture capital firms and the CIA even
went public with their own in utel. They do talk about Inqutel in here,
but it was social media more than anything, social media and the Internet
that was the key part of it. Those are the two components that had
to be there for psychological warfare and control. And of course they throw it
out there for free because they're funding it, because you're the product. Because
it was always about geospatial intelligence, all these things that they also don't mention
geospatial intelligence in here either. One year before his grandfather died, Bezos' grandfather
died in nineteen ninety five, Bezos found at Amazon in the garage of his
Bellevue, Washington home, and they say on zero Edge, or so we're
told, and they show the picture of a young Jeff Bezos setting at a
very simple desk. Pull that up, Travis, and on the wall is
something that looks almost handwritten Amazon dot Com. Yeah, that's the legend that's
there. Now. I've talked many times about how Bezos is so obsessed with
space, and he talks about the fact that he read Gerard K. O'Neill's
book High Frontiers, and how that was the idea that he wanted to put
these rotating colonies in space. You saw it, if you saw Lesium,
you saw GEARDK. O'Neil's ideas of rotating toroids. There it is. There's
a picture of Bezos setting in his the legend in his garage with the Amazon
sign there. But anyway, he was also extremely wealthy. He had all
these connections with but hey, that was all just tick coincidence, and he
also wanted to He also wanted to set up these space stations, and so
that's why he's got his what is it called Blue Origin, Yeah, Blue
Origins the name of his company there. But that's what his grandfather was into
as well. Space technology, ballistic missile defense nineteen fifty eight, nineteen sixty
one. Again, it was about sixty early sixties. I think it was
publicly well released by J. Cr Leckliner, I believed in sixty two.
But he was working on it while his father was there. Grandfather was there,
and so again the information has been scrubbed. But there are snapshots of
these documents as well as a snapshot of the foyer request where they said I
can't find it or it's been destroyed, and so as many people point out,
well we know that Facebook is also based on a canceled DoD program,
you know, the canceled life log part of the total awareness. Well,
we're going to keep a log of everybody's entire life. Everything they got there.
Well, it's even better. After people reacted to it, they said
that they shut that down the very next day. You have Facebook. But
of course Facebook, the advantage of that is that they don't have to hire
an army of people do data entry. You enter your own information in there
for them so they can see all of that stuff. One person commented on
this, there's long been long time been speculation that DARPA has been involved in
the creation of many popular big tech companies, using frontmen for the illusion of
a startup led by outsiders. Well, first of all, that's not speculation,
it's fact, as I've said over and over again. And yeah,
it is an illusion, and it is bigger than just the Internet. It's
social media, it's geospatial intelligence especially, And so another person said, we
know Facebook is a canceled program of the DoD. If you look at the
Bill Gates family, you find similar stuff, and you find connections to Planned
Parenthood as well. With the Gates family, he's always been about killing people.
Now we got we got these three factors up here, get one of
them down to zero, right, let's get the people down to zero.
Always been about that. Bill Gates is as much of a humanity hater as
Paul Erlick. Can we do it with disease? Can we do it with
war? Can we do it with vaccines? Always about that stuff. And
so there's also an article what I saw yesterday about gena haspital and Greg grew
Beanie did this on his substack. Now it's interesting to me that everything that
he talks about with Gina Haspbeal, who again, you know, if you
watch this program, I've talked about her frequently. But everything that he does
that he talks about is to defend Trump. And yet he scratches his head.
He says, does Trump not know this? This rhetorical question is it?
I mean, the question is is Trump a fool or a tool?
Everything you want to know about gena haspital he talks, begins by talking about
James O'Keefe sting ambushing a CIA officer Amajad bes I s if I pronounce his
name correctly, he titled it. CIA project manager says execs and directors of
CIA without information from Trump. See, it's all we don't care if there's
a secret government. We don't care. If there's a secret government, it
starts wars, it gets us involved, gets our soldiers killed, we don't
care about that. We don't care if they do a coup of our own
government. We don't care if they assassinate our own people. We don't care.
If they're blackmailing politicians, we don't care. If they're involved in the
demonic occult stuff that we know they're involved in. We don't care about any
of that stuff. What they do to Trump, that's what I want to
know. That's all I care about is Trump. This cult of personality drives
me nuts. As a matter of fact, it just took down Freedom Works.
They admitted it. They said, well, you know it was Dick
Army, who was a He was the majority leader. Excuse me, the
number two position when English was speaker. You had Tick Army was a leader
and he was a all right, coughing here. He was an economics professor
of the Austrian School Luke Gwigmond Mises and solid guy. Anyway, that was
the basis of Freedom Works. And then Trump came, and we don't care
about principles anymore. We don't care about economic principles, We don't care about
principles of liberty or any of that stuff. All we care about is Donald
Trump. So, how did Gina Haspell affect Donald Trump? Why did he
put her in the position that he did? As I've said many times,
So, Greg Rabini says, we learned some interesting stuff from this O'Keeffe expose,
especially regarding Gena Haspital and Mike Pompeo. He says, well, I
don't know, because I think he admitted from this thing some of the most
interesting stuff that we always knew about Gena Haspital, How she illegally tortured people,
how she covered that up, how she used the lies to lie us,
the lies from torture us that to lie us in to the Iraq War,
or the knowing politicians used what she presented themselves, how I didn't know
she was lying to me. They used that to give themselves plausible deniability to
get us involved in the Iraq War. Now, Donald Trump says we got
into the Iraq War based on lies about weapons of mass destruction. He said
that as a candidate, and yet as president, he takes the woman who
did that, and first he put her into the number two slot right underneath
Pompeo. Then he moved Pompeo to Secretary of State, and he moved Gena
Haspell to CIA director, from deputy director to full director. And so that's
this guy's looking at it. So, so why these people do they were
involved and all the skull douggery and framing of Trump. Gina Haspell withheld information
from Trump? Really wow? You think it's on a need to know basis
and he doesn't need to know everything. He's just the president. She's running
the government if she's in the CIA, right, James o'keef ads that Gena
Haspell blocked the release of a binder that was exposing herself in the CIA and
the fabricated Russian collusion hoax. You see, the Russian collusion hoax and her
role in that is more important to these Trump suckers than it is to the
fact that she led us into the Iraq war and then cover up the torture
and the rest of this stuff. Where was Gena Haspell in twenty sixteen when
all the spy operations on Trump took place? Well, she was in London,
and she was a CIA station chief in London, and we know that
all you know it was the London Langley access. As I've said many times,
she was the London side of the Langley axis. And on the Langley
side was John Brennan. He was CIA director in twenty sixteen. And he
says, this is really important. He connects these dots. This means that
Gena Haspell was reporting directly to John Brennan, who directed all the spy operations
against Trump. All we care about is Trump. These people can start World
War three in nuclear war, they can have a revolution here in America.
They can destroy our country, assassinate our presidence, blackmail every one of these
politicians all ways. But what do they do to Trump? These people,
these people, It's just amazing. The countries which helped John Brennan, Obama
and Hillary Clinton and the spy operations on Trump are England, Austria, Italy.
Gena Haspital was liaison to John Brennan and Obama for all of these spy
operations. So why then Trump hired Gena Haspital CEI director. He didn't know
three question marks. He didn't know that the British were spying on him.
He didn't know that Gena Haspital was a station chief in London in twenty sixteen?
Did he not watch my show because I talked about it all that time?
This is this is public knowledge. He knew, he knew. Do
you know who endorsed Gena Haspell when Trump nominated her as CIA director? John
Brennan and James Clapper Do we all know we're after Trump? Right? Yes?
The Obama guys Brennan and Clapper endorsed Gena Haspell and some more deep state
actors endorsed Gena Haspell too. So again the question is, and he doesn't
really get closer. Trump didn't know. That's as close as he comes.
No, the question is this we know that Trump knew? The question is
was he blackmailed? What do they have on him? Was it Epstein?
Other things that he did? He knew, He absolutely knew, and so
so. Was Gina Haspital involved in the planning of the January of the sixth
operation? Let's ask you that. Was she involved in the lockdown? Was
she involved in Dark Winter two when they finally activated what they'd been practicing since
two months before nine to eleven the other shoe to drop from nine to eleven.
See, all this stuff was an inside job. January sixth was an
inside job. It was an inside job not just from Gina Haspital. It
was an inside job from Donald Trump making two undred fifty million dollars on his
Save America. It was an inside job from Alex Jones, another CIA guy
who you know again, how many people Just ask yourself, you know,
you probably know a lot of people who have been injured with a vaccine,
But do you know anybody who is in the CIA? Do you know anybody
who has several family members in the CIA? You know? That's how many
CIA? How many people that you know are involved in the CIA who have
multiple family members in the CIA. Who talks about the fact that he has
multiple family members and the CIA Alex does? Who uses CIA sources or intelligence
community sources like Pachink and others and uses it in Lieutenant Colonel Anthony Schaeffer and
others like that at that time to lie to people about the sting and to
set this up and to make unbelievable amounts of money as well, and then
still using the Sandy Hook stuff. One point four billion dollar, billion dollar
judgment and he hasn't paid a penny. How many people do you know like
that that don't have to pay when they get a massive judgment against them.
How many people do you know that are protected by the deep state and the
intelligence community? Well, I know one personally. Anyway, when you look
at all this, was she involved in the planning of January sixth? I
ask yourself if Trump and alex and Pachennik and Roger Stone and Jack, but
Soviet and all these other intelligence military intelligence, typically these guys, it's not
monolithic, but they do work together. You know, we're supposed to believe
that Gena Haspal was on one side and John Brenner and Clapper were on the
other side. Trump supported Gena Haspeal? Did she support Trump? Did she
betray Trump? Did she direct Trump and tell him what to do? That's
really the question. Strange of this author doesn't mention anything about I rock or
torture, any of that stuff. Strange that he won't offer an opinion as
to whether or not he thinks Trump is a fool or a tool. So
that's that's where we are. People won't go there, and for obvious reasons,
isn't it When Trump hired Mike pompei with CIA director. In January of
twenty seventeen, he appointed Gena Hospital as CIA deputy director. This means that
Gena Haspeal was the true boss of the CIA for the entire four years of
the Trump presidency, because he later then moved her up to that. He
sees Pompeo as just a placeholding idiot, but he doesn't see Trump as a
placeholding idiot. Isn't that interesting? Yeah, people like this. All they
see is Trump, Trump, Trump, and they can't see or they won't
talk about the bigger picture, the bigger picture of Iraq, the bigger picture
of nine to eleven, the bigger picture of the pandemic and global governance and
moving the Overton window on global mark of the beast id, moving the Overton
window on universal basic income, moving the Overton window on everybody not having a
job, and all the rest of this stuff. So getting back to Jeff
Bezos, you know he moved to Florida and did a sixty million dollars initial
investment in lab meat. And now it's interesting that Ron DeSantis has just welcomed
this new immigrant to Florida by shutting down his lab meat effectively say you are
not going to sell this stuff here. May. I didn't know if he
blocked the manufacturing of any of that stuff in the Sunshine State, but you're
not going to sell it there. He signed the legislation into effect on May
first, casting it as a bid to stop the World Economic Forum's goal of
forcing the world to eat lab grown meat and insects. And I think it's
good as far as it goes, but I think that he misses the key
issue here. You know, there's a lot of good stuff that DeSantis has
done, a lot of stuff that nobody else has bothered to do. I
mean, he tried to focus people on big Brother digital money, but the
press shut him down. All they wanted to do was talk about Trump and
what's going on with Alvin Bragg and this trial that is happening, you know,
the hush moneyed hookers. That's all they wanted to talk about. He
does twenty minutes breaking down the problems of CBDC, and then all they want
to do is talk about Trump and his hookers. And so with this,
and then also with the vaccine, he's got his Surgeon general talking about those
DNA fragments. You know, the DNA fragments that are giving people cancer,
and you know the and it's not even that, it's just sloppy manufacturing and
cutting corners on manufacturing. They've got the part of the SV forty virus that
gives you cancer. They left that in, left all that stuff in,
and by the FDA's on definition, it's unfit to be sold. But they
look the other way. Canada looks the other way. But at least Ron
DeSantis and his attorney general said we don't recommend it. They didn't ban it
you. So that's what I'm saying. They speak out against it, they
go a certain way, but they won't go all the ways. Kind of
like what I talked about yesday with Senator Ron Johnson and this pandemic treaty.
He got all forty nine Republican senators to say we don't support this, and
they wrote a letter to Biden saying we don't support this. But in that
letter they asked Biden to police submit this as a treaty so we can have
a vote on it. Well, they won't pass. They need to have
sixty votes. They would only have fifty one votes at most, even if
you might have more than that against it because some of the Democrats might push
back against it. I don't know, but it is an election yeer.
But they won't take the initiative to shut it down themselves. They don't need
to ask Biden to submit it as a treaty. They can say this is
a treaty, and you don't get to self ritify treaties, just like you
should not have been given, you know. But they took a pass on
it with Mitch McConnell. They didn't do anything with the Paris Climate Accord,
and so that looks like they're going to do that same type of thing again
again. They will go only so far. In Florida. They will say
I don't recommend I recommend that you don't take this vaccine because the contamination from
DNA stuff, But they won't say it's banned. Why not. We had
nine states ban a vaccine after a couple of people died a few decades ago.
States can do that kind of thing, States must do that kind of
thing. But all they'll do is say, well, I don't recommend,
I recommend that you don't take it. But they won't ban the sale of
something that can harm people. Why not they do that? All the time
with other stuff, and the Senate will not ban the presumption of this pandemic
treaty. They'll speak out, they'll write a letter about how bad it is,
but they won't do anything. You see this all the time, Jim
Jordan, always holding a hearing about this, holding a hearing about that,
never doing anything that he actually has the power to do. Do these people
even know what their job description is? Have they ever read it? You
know what is the purpose of Congress? So, well, it's to the
House allocates funding, and that's their major power, a really strong power,
said Scalia, rightfully, so, because everything that is done by the government
is done with blackmail, just like this Anti Semitism Awareness Act. Well,
we're not going to give you money. We'll give you money if you do
what we like. We won't give you money if you do what we don't
want you to do. So everything is about the money. And Congress has
those purse strings, but they won't use them. The Senate has the power
to approve or disapprove treaties, but they won't pull a vote. The state
governor has the ability and the duty, quite frankly, to stop this poison,
but he won't do it. Well, I wouldn't take that if I
were you, I don't recommend you you take that anyway. So what are
their not doing with the meat? Desanta says, Florida is increasing meat production
and encouraging residents to continue to consume and enjoy one real Florida beef. He
previously blasted, quote the global elites plan to force the world to eat meat
grown in a petrie dish or bugs to achieve their authoritarian goal. And so
I think the way to do this that would be better. What is the
goal? The goal is, we can see with this bird flu stuff,
is to shut down local production. It is to gain control of beef and
chicken and all that kind of stuff. It is to vaccinate all of our
food. Those are their goals and all this bird flu nonsense. So what
do we do to stop that? You know, they want to track and
vaccinate every cow, every chicken, everywhere. Lots of money for big pharmaceutical
companies. It pollutes the food supply, kills the population, makes us sick.
That's their goal. Depopulation for us, power and money for them,
attack our food supply, starve us, make it expensive. And that's the
other part of this. They want to make by culling herds, by culling
chickens and things like that. We got one PCR test here, Kill all
the cows on this ranch, kill all the chickens, right, and we
got one PCR test. Well, what's that going to do? And that's
going to raise the price of beef and chicken. And if they keep raising
the price of beef and chicken, guess what they can't lower. Right now,
the price of this lab meat is still extremely expensive. Besides being disgusting,
you want to instead of a tube steak, you want a tumor steak.
It's disgusting and quite frankly has a lot of questions about whether or not
is helpful and healthy. But when you look at the economics, you can
need to lower your cost or you can force the government. You can use
the government to force other people's costs up, or you can use the government
eventually to ban the other people. That's what they want to do. They
want to make beef and chicken more expensive, more expensive, more expensive until
a lot of people are not even getting it, and then they can ban
it and people say, yeah, I haven't been able to afford beef or
chicken for a long time. It's just those rich people that do it,
So let's get rid of it. So what should he do? Well,
I think what you want to do is instead of even better than banning the
lab meat, sure fine, ban the sale of it. I like to
see him ban the sale of these vaccines, but he doesn't do that.
And I think it's important to do it at this point in time because if
they wait until they are selling this stuff that it's going to be harder to
do it. It's just like a nuclear warhead. You want to get it
in the launch phase. So you want to get this in the launch phase.
So I'm glad that he's banning it, but I think it's even better
to allow alternatives that they want to shut down. And the alternative that they
want to shut down is local processing of beef by the people who own it.
Shutting down this attempt because this is another one of the goals of their
bird flu stuff, and that is to centralize meat processing even more so.
It's already highly centralized and under the thumb of the USDA, they want to
make it even more so that way. And so what you do is you
go the other way. You go. Everything that we do needs to be
focused on decentralization and local And so what do you do for the food supply?
We are to make it decentralized and local. You want allow people to
have farms and to grow whatever they wish. Leave them alone. If they
want to drink raw milk, leave them alone. If they want to grow
cows and slaughter the cattle on their own farm, leave them alone. That
would be the best thing that he could do. But I'm glad that calling
attention to this, and so he Bezos moved to Florida. The Bezos Earth
Fund, chaired by his girlfriend Sanchez, annow it'sd a hefty investment into sustainable
protein, including plant based, fermented, and cultivated meats, part of the
organization's larger one billion dollar commitment to expanding food production. Isn't it interesting how
these meglomaniacal billionaires all want to kill us. We need to feed ten billion
people with healthy, sustainable food throughout this century while protecting our planet. We
can do it, and it will require a ton of innovation, actually require
a ton of cash. Sanchez wrote in a statement, she didn't even give
the speech. She had somebody else write it and put her name on it.
So yeah, even Bill Gates has said, is it going to take
a lot of innovation? Even Bill Gates has said, cattle are the most
efficient way. Yeah, but we just can't have that because of their farts.
So we're gonna have to genetically modify them so they don't fart. Cole
is the most efficient way, but we can't have that either, because you
know, we got to pretend that we can't clean it up. They know
we know, and we know that they know that we know, but always
come up with oh, methane co two. Lab grown meat differs from its
slaughter free counterparts like impossible foods, and that lab meat is grown from real
animal cells, replicated scientifically. You notice how the New York Posts slips O
in there, slaughter free, slaughter free, cruelty free cosmetics. This is
slaughter free. I prefer my meat slaughtered. I don't want it moving around
while I'm trying to eat it. So yeah, slaughter free counterparts. We
need to not be uh intimidated by their you know what they say with this
stuff. But uh, let's let's understand. What they're talking about here is
eternal sale sell lines, you know, kind of like tumors, and we
need to talk about this. You know you want to. Would you prefer
to have ground beef or ground tumors? That's let's uh play their game back
at them. Slaughter free. I like my meat to be tumor free.
I don't like to eat tumors. What we are protecting here, says DeSantis,
is the industry against acts of man, against an ideological agenda that wants
to finger agriculture as the problem, that views things like raising cattle as destroying
our climate. All this fear about man made climate change. We should be
afraid of man made austerity and depopulation, because that's what they're really about.
We should be afraid of man made slavery. These will be people who will
lecture the rest of us about things like global warming. They'll say that,
you know, you can't drive an internal combustion engine vehicle. They'll say that
agriculture is bad means while they're finding to Davos in their private jests. So
he says all this stuff. We all know this. So this is really
a vision of imposing restrictions on freedoms of everyday people while these elites are effectively
pulling the strings, calling the shots, doing whatever the hell they want to
do in their own lives. And we've said in Florida, these folks like
the World Economic Form and Davos that they meet, they scheme those policies are
dead on arrival in the state of Florida. They want to basically eliminate meat.
They want to eliminate cattle, they want to eliminate chickens, all this
stuff. They want to create protein and laboratory so it's essentially lab created meat.
And their goal is to get to a point where you will not be
raising cattle, You're not be developing meat like we're doing for hundreds and hundreds
of years in the state of Florida. The elites know that if it was
put out there to compete with normal beef, they would lose. And that's
why they're trying to, you know, increase the cost by claiming that there's
bird flu out there. Now you say, they've got multiple mcguffins they can
use. They can use the pandemic, not just the climate mcguffin to destroy
our meat and dairy. You know, they are are associated meat and dairy
with the climate mcguffin. But hey, if they take meat and dairy away
because it's the pandemic. Mcguffin. Oh, well, it's not a plot
at all, is it. He says, I think part of being a
good steward of these industries, of the state of the public well being is
to think forward and to head off the threats before they even come again.
When he needs to do his focus on local, he needs to focus on
freedom. He needs to shut down and interpose against these captive agencies. The
USD is captive to these interests of this stuff, just like the FDA and
CDC are captive to the pharmaceutical industry. He says. Some people think that
Florida is the theme park South Beach and maybe some oranges, but they don't
really understand that. You know, we have one of the top cattle industries
in the country. Matter of fact, my dad's cousins had a big cattle
ranch in central Florida before Disney. I don't know what happened after Disney went
in and maybe they sold it. I lost contact with him, but when
I was a kid, I remember going out there the cattle ranch, and
but you know, Disney is there now, but they still have a lot
of cattle that's down there. Florida. Bill is similar to other legislation making
his way through the state of legislatures in Arizona, Tennessee, and West Virginia.
All of it concerns and industry that, at least to this point,
is commercially non existent, with the exception of sales at a couple of high
end restaurants, because it's incredibly expensive, so to make our meat and dairy
more expensive a CEO of a company that produces lab grown seafood. So I've
got more than enough challenges. I don't also need Florida to ban it to
make the market smaller, and so I'm glad that the Santis did it,
especially because there's plenty of seafood in Florida without having to go through the lab.
Meanwhile, going back to Zuckerberg and his fascist book, it comes out
and of course this is all in the context of trying to rig the election
against Trump, because that's all we care about, right Darpas Zuckerberg considered buying
the Associated Press, Why should that be surprising Because everything that ap Associated Press
is about, and everything that Facebook is about it is about peddling propaganda,
So they would be a natural match for each other. Frankly, we're going
to take a quick break and we're gonna come back and cover some other news.
On Rock Fan, Eric, thank you very much for the tip.
I appreciate that, he says, finally got to see the movie Brazil.
Great movie. Yeah, and I got to thank Guard again. He found
a book about it and send it to me, So thank you very much,
Guard. I haven't had time to read it yet. Unfortunately. On
rock Fan Michelle Obama, thank you also, he says Brazil was okay,
Yeah, it had you know. I mean, it's a It's like everything
else that Monty Python does. It has brilliant moments and then it has Okay,
this is kind of plotting here, but it had, uh I do
every time I go back and see it. Unfortunately, it looks more and
more like reality today, doesn't it, Travis, and they're shaking his My
kids don't like it, but I mean it made him say, I remember
watching it when we were fairly young and just being incredibly depressed when the movie
ended. The same thing with Dark Star. Yeah, yeah, they carried
me of any interest in space travel or any of this stuff. Nope,
I don't care about NASA. I watch Dark Star, but you got to
admit, you know this talking bomb. That was their smart bomb. He
was way ahead of his time with Dark Stars. Yeah, they got that
one right. Yeah. And you got to look at Brazil all the stuff,
the swat raids and all the rest. I mean, you know,
predated all that stuff. Unfortunately, very predictive, just like Orwell and HG.
Wells and oh Man, the uh when we look at whether we live
in nineteen eighty four or whether we live in a brave new world. Huxley
stuff, Huxley's brother, the transhumanism, I mean it's all there on Rock
fin Eco Taxi. Thank you very much for the tip. I believe he
said that everyone should listen to I perferably simultaneously watch some super set of this
about twenty two and a half minute a v in which Danish Desuza schools Michael
Schermer about what a supreme force for good, including but not obviously far from
limited to scientific technological good, that Christianity generally has always been worldwide and so
well, I haven't seen that, Travis, as He's provided a link to
the video on Rock Fan. Michelle Obama, thank you very much again for
another tip, and writes correction al Gore invented the Internet. That's right,
Yeah, yeah, not J C. R. Licklider or DARPA. Who
was Al Gore who did it? You're absolutely right. He took credit for
it anyway, whether or not he invented it. We're gonna take a quick
break and we'll be right back. If you're listening to the David Knight Show.
All right, Boy Scouts of America no longer boys. They're not men
either. You look at this, I mean, how could we have had
for more than one hundred years some organization that had the toxic masculinity to talk
about boys? Because you know, boys are so toxic and masculine, and
this was the thing that was that was holding them back as an organization.
So as jettison all this male masculinity and toxicity and all the rest of the
stuff. And I think it's very interesting. I've seen every one of the
conservative press rightfully complaining about this, but again, I've not seen anybody talk
about the Trump connection with all this stuff. Rex Tillerson. Rex Tillerson,
you know, besides being head of EXON, Rex Tillerson was head of the
Boy Scouts there for a while, and he ushered in a lot of this
LGBT stuff while he was there. You know, they were letting openly homosexual
scout masters go camp with the boys in the woods. They were letting openly
homosexual boys join various other things like that for quite some time, and he
was involved in that. I remember when the transition was happening and for Trump
because after the election, it was in December twenty sixteen. I took some
time off after the election, took it in in December as people are starting
to take vacation breaks, and Alex was talking about how he would text and
talk to Trump all the time. And so I saw the rumors, which
turned out to be true, that Rex Tillerson was going to be tapped for
Secretary of State, and so I started tweeting to Alex and that, and
that point in time, I had not been shadow banned on Twitter, so
I had far less people than I've got now, but I would get far
more impressions than I do now. And so I was tweeting at Alex,
and I was tweeting at Trump about Rex Tillerson. Do you realize this guy
is a radical Greenie? And then I got all these people saying, hey're
nuts. He was head of ex On. It's like, you don't understand
that is into the radical green agenda every bit as much as R. K
Junior, for example. You know, he better wake up folks how they
pull it off. But then I started talking about what he did with the
boy Scouts. Nobody pushed back on that except for Alex and he told me
to stop it. Why are you texting the stuff at me? It was
like, well, because I'm not there, And I thought you would want
to know how naive I was at that time anyway, But it was a
learning experience, just like what had happened just before the election. But yeah,
Rex Tillerson was always there. The Trump transition team turned out that that
was right. And you know, at the time, I didn't know that
Trump had been trying to sell trainees as part of his beauty contests. He
was all about that. He was the earliest adopters, just like General Flynn.
These guys have been on board with a training agenda from the very beginning.
I saw that some conservative tweet out said, well, the clip that
I played for yesterday of r. F K Junior where the guy really pressured
him about it, You're going to stop the mutilation of children if you're president
well, I don't know. I can't make that decision that I really don't
know what that's about. I really don't know. I don't know one way
or the other. You know, I can't. It's like, seriously,
you're gonna I'll leave it up to the to the parents. I don't want
to get the government involved. I think people need to be able to decide
what they want to do. But you're saying that these are children, that
these children are going to decide what they do with their own body. Seriously,
you know, And I would have I thought that the guy did a
great job of pressing him. The only thing I would have changed if I
had the time to think about. And I understand, you know, the
Monday morning quarterback this stuff, but I think the one thing that should have
been said to R. F. K. Junior is Okay, so you
say the parents can decide to mutilate the children, you know, I think
in general we ought to defer to the institution of the family. We should
not try to undermine it. We should support parental rights, but we should
also understand there's some horribly wicked parents out there. We have parents who will
abuse their kids sexually, physically, all different kinds of abuse, and this
is a kind of sexual and physical abuse. We should recognize it as such.
And so I would ask RFK Junior, so would you be okay if
the parents wanted to get involved in incest with their minor children? Is that
the parent's decision? Where do you draw the line and say this is not
appropriate parental behavior? Right? And I'm not again, CPS has been very
abusive. However, you know, I don't think that we should be naive
enough to think that there aren't parents out there that will abuse their kids for
their own satisfaction. And a lot of this trends stuff is for their own
satisfaction, for their own gratification, for their own social credit, amongst their
sick peers. Don't tell me, you don't know what's going on. RFK
jr the most. And so I saw people pit that up and say,
well, you know this, this should be the end of RFK JR.
Well, it wasn't the end of Michael Flynn to push that kind of stuff.
It wasn't the end of Donald Trump to push that kind of stuff.
And there's still you know, Donald Trump is still pushing it at mar Lago.
So anyway, they have a new name, not Boy Scouts of America,
but Scouting America, I think is the new name. And I thought
it was kind of I remember when I was a kid. I never became
a boy Scout or anything, but it was a pretty big footprint, you
know, back in the fifties and sixties, and their motto was trustworthy,
honest and brave. Trustworthy, honest and brave. Yeah, it's kind of
gone the way of duty, honor and country, hasn't it. That was
the America that I grew up in, or people aspiring to be trustworthy,
honest and brave, where soldiers talked about duty, honor, and country.
And now all that happens is people are, you know, should I wear?
What kind of dress? Says the man? Should I wear with these
red high heels? And what kind of makeup should I wear? We have
become so debotched. It's disgusting and we've lost any aspiration to these ideals.
Oh yeah, that stuff's corny, isn't it? Is it? Is it
corny? You're going to find out what kind of country we have when you
remove these corny aspirations like being trustworthy, honest and brave, duty, honor
and country. You remove that stuff. You find out what kind of country
you're going to live in, and you're gonna wish that we went back to
the corny stuff. So again, you know, why even bother to segregate
our Scouts by age? Why have girl Scouts and Boy Scouts? You know
why you segregate people by age? When you're going out and camping in the
woods. I mean, we're putting boys and girls together in the showers and
in the dressing rooms and all the rest of this stuff. So why you
bother to do that? New York Times noted that the club dropped the word
boy in twenty eighteen from its namesake program to allow girls to join. Moreover,
in twenty twenty, the organization announced a Diversity and Inclusion merit badge,
and they made earning it a requirement for becoming an Eagle Scout. That amazing.
In twenty thirteen, it ended its long standing policy of barring openly gay
youth from activity the This is probably all around the Tillerson regime. Here,
the Boy Scouts became synonymous with the infamous for habitual cases of grooming and pedophilia,
lots of lawsuits, lots of cover up, and I believe that also
went back to the the Tillerson regime, and so as winepress comments, they
said, you shouldn't have been sending your boy there anyway, as they continue
to cover it up for years. It's been an open secret about what's been
happening with that for quite some time. But there now you have to do
the diversity inclusion stuff, anything in order to get your merit badges, and
you're become an eagle scout. They are trans friendly. They want to push
people into looking at their authentic self. Meanwhile, the country that our politicians
want to have a war with, China, is training their young people militarily
from elementary school on up, while our boys are preening around in their red
high heels wondering what kind of makeup they should apply. You know, how
do how do we do a better job dressing and drag These guys are militaries
training for their kids, especially when you consider the fact this huge imbalance of
male the female that they created with their one child policy, that and of
itself would be something that would go the Chinese into military action, even if
we didn't have the murder suicide pill called the CIA that we have to swallow
here in the United States. The Chinese communist regime is drafted a law that
require military training for children all the way down to elementary school level. They
noted on Tuesday Nikai Asia. That publication said some high schools in China and
universities also already require students to participate in basic military drills, some of which
involve tanks. That's where they have protesters staying in front of the tanks and
they run them over as in Teneman Square, armored personnel carriers, hand grenades,
rocket launchers. Also, China's conscription laws were mended in May of last
year to make all university students eligible for the draft. It would be interesting
to see some of these protesters drafted. It almost be worth bringing it back,
wouldn't it. And so before we take a break, restoring history movement
to return Confederate linked names to schools Garner's traction. And of course this is
in the Shenandoah area where you had Jackson and Lee. But during COVID you
had the local school board just decide to do it without any input from the
public because you know, Trump had locked everything down. This is our opportunity,
and I think it may be our opportunity to take a look at what
these people are doing. We don't have to live by their rules, and
we don't have to live by what they have done. That does not need
to become the new normal. It does not need to become a president.
And this reply, this applies to so many different things. We need to
take back our history, we need to take back our culture. And so
Stonewall Jackson High School was renamed Mountain View High School, Ashby Lee Elementary School
was renamed Honey Run Elementary School, and the Shenandoah County School Board passes resolution
in July of twenty twenty. They said, this is about racism. No,
it's not. This is about Marxism. This is about racing a country,
erasing our history. And you know, I'm not going to defend everything
that was done by any historical figure. Nobody is perfect. Everybody had their
bad edges. So you take the good and leave the bad and speak out
against the bad. That's fine. But we also there's a reason that these
people were honored. Quite frankly, Stonewall Jackson is one of the worst examples.
If you want to try to hold forth the Southerners as racist, this
is a guy who when it was illegal to train to school blacks and how
to read at the time, he did it anyway. And when the churches
would not allow the black people to attend, he set up his own Sunday
school and church for black people there. And so is he perfect, of
course not, but he had monuments set up to him. Not about that
even, but because he was a military genius. I had a friend from
high school who went to West Point. He said, you know, they
still are teaching us Stowell Jackson's Shenandoah Valley campaign. It was absolutely amazing.
The guy was disciplined, focused, a genius, He had an iron will,
and yet he was compassionate. But see, we have to not allow
that. We've got to create animosity. We've got to have these simplistic characterizations
of everybody. You can't have somebody who resisted the invasion from Lincoln have any
edges of compassion to him. You got to reinvent him into a one dimensional
figure. Yeah, real history is a lot more interesting and a lot more
complex than their lives, isn't it. So Anyway, this decision was made
during the COVID pandemic. There was no public input into it. But they
have put out a survey and that has some very interesting results. They surveyed
more than eighty five hundred residents in this district, and of those who responded
those eighty five hundred, they had ninety one percent of the people voted to
go back to the names that were there. Now, you might say,
well, this is ninety one percent white. No, it is eighty five
percent white. And so there were non white people who wanted to go back
to those names as well. And so the one other on the other side,
they put out a census and they only had or they put out a
signature thing on change dot org. They only got six hundred and eighty signatures.
So instead of eighty five hundred people, six hundred and eighty people signed
a signature that said the heart of the issue is what history do we remember
and preserve? And I think that is exactly right. But they characterized it
as a history of massive resistance to integration. That was not what the history
was about. As a matter of fact, Stonewell Jackson said, this is
our second war of independence. That is what he called the Civil War.
They were not trying to take over and rule the Northern States. They wanted
their independence. They saw themselves as fighting a defensive war after aggressive invasion by
Lincoln. Lincoln who had instituted for the first time a draft, an income
tax, who had shut down Habeas Corpus, who had arrested politicians who disagreed
with him. Our reasoning is sound. Military leaders of the Confederate States of
America took up arms against the United States of America and fought to preserve and
expand this peculiar institution of slavery. Well, I guess it depends on what
history you remember and what history you preserve, and so I think there's a
different history that they didn't want to acknowledge. The Council on American Islamic Relations
Care is on the side of surprise, surprise, the radicals pushing DEI and
all the rest of this stuff. And finally, Freedom Works, as I
mentioned earlier, Freedom Works is closing. This is a a think tank that
was there. I had experienced with them back in two thousand and nine.
They had a contest that they put out and I was doing a lot of
contests, video contests in two thousand and nine. I won the contest.
It was about they needed like a two or three minute video talking about entrepreneurship.
So I talked about my family and history, my father, both my
grandfathers, and then we talked about what Karen and I had done with the
video stores put it in a video and we won. So we got to
go up to Chicago. We had a great time. I got to meet
the people that were running Freedom Works at the same time. Of the thing
that we remember the most though, was that it's just a vacation with the
two of us, and we got to we wanted I wanted to ride on
a Segway and we had a great time because it turns out that when we
bought the tickets, the guy did not have a typical segue tour. Instead,
he was showing somebody who was going to be a tour director, kind
of showing her the ropes, and so he was talking to her and taking
her all the different places and taking extra time. Our tour was about three
times as long as it would have normally been if we'd been with a regular
tour, and it was just the two of them and the two of us,
And while he was talking to her about other things, Karen and I
were like doing loops around different things and stuff. We went all over the
place in Chicago. We had a blast. Looked really really you know,
get on one of those things, don't ever look at a picture of yourself
on one of them. But it looked really stupid. But it was a
lot of fun. Still, remember that. That's what I think about.
I think about Freedom Works. I think about the Segway tours. But it
was nice and like I said, they paid for the trip and we won
some money off of it. Dick Army was running it at the time.
He was the number two guy under Newt gang Rich and as I said earlier,
he was an economist to Austrian school Mesus Politico is covering the demise of
Freedom Works, I said. Freedom Works, the once swaggering conservative organization that
helped to turn Tea Party protesters in the national political Force, is shutting down,
according to its president, a casualty of the ideological split in the Republican
Party dominated by Trump. We're dissolved, said the group's president, and Adam
Brandon. It's effective immediately. Why well, because principles don't matter, because
the GOP has become a cult of personality. And if you think principles matter,
you're not paying attention to what speaker Johnson is doing either. Freedom Works
laid off about forty percent of its staff last year after Trump took control of
the Conservative movement, Brandon said, the CEO president. After Trump took control
of the conservative movement, a huge gap opened up between the libertarian principles of
Freedom Work's leadership and the MAGA style populism of its members. Yeah I noticed,
Yeah, me too. Our staff became divided into Maga and into never
Trump factions. Well there you go. Mission accomplished by the Democrat Donald Trump,
the New York Liberal ally of the Clintons of Epstein, the tranny pushing
tyranny pushing gun grabbing, j six baiting, lockdown loving gene injecting Benedict Donald
and he has divided up this the Republican Party, between people who don't care
about principle anymore. All it matters is winning. Winning for d Chess.
Donors, he said, are saying what are you doing for Trump? Today?
And that's exactly what happens. Yeah, I mean, I've had so
many people contact me with hate about this stuff. I've had friends, he
said, Yeah, you know my mom, I really like I'd recommended your
show to my mom, who's older he's my agent. She really liked what
you're doing, but she hated it when he started attacking Trump. Doesn't listen
to it anymore. Yeah, I know, I know. So we're not
for or against Trump. He said, we're for Trump if he's doing what
we agree with, and we're against him if he's not. Huh, that's
funny. You've heard me say. That's exactly what I told Alex in October
of twenty sixteen, just before that first election. He said, what do
we do if Trump wins? I said it was easy. We're support him
when he does the right thing. We oposse him when he does the wrong
thing. Alex looks at me for a second or two. He goes,
h he walks out. Yeah, that wasn't what Alex was gonna do.
Alex is gonna support him regardless of what he did. He could lock us
down, he could he could roll out the FEMA camps, he could inject
us to depopulate the country and the world, and he'd still support it.
Why. Well, because he doesn't want to go the way of freedom works.
He knows what people want. He's going to give him what they want.
He knows what his handlers want him to push and he'll do that as
well. And so I think I've seen the erosion of conservative donors, said
the person there Freedom Works on the board. Others called to complain that we
weren't doing enough to help Trump. He said he resolved to keep a working
relationship with the pro Trump populists on issues that we agreed upon. But he
said this too created conflicts. Why because the MAGA people don't care about issues.
They're never going to make any changes. They don't have any principles.
What changes things. You know, the liberal anthropologists got it right. Things
are changed by a small group of determined people who focus around principles. It's
not changed by a mob that just floats around with whatever. This griffing,
opportunistic politician without any principles as to say at any given moment. Freedom Works
employee claimed the organization under this leadership had turned its back on its values while
Trump was in office. You know, we talk about Freedom Works sometimes maybe
what we should say is freedom matters. Here's a clip from a few years
ago when the Canadian truckers were protesting what Trudeau was doing. And you could
look at this and say, well, you know they're doing this because They
want to keep their trucks and things like that and be able to go back
and forth across the border, and they're making it impossible to do that.
But they understood that they could lose everything. They weren't doing this to protect
their jobs. They were doing it because freedom mattered. Not because freedom works,
but because freedom matters. Here's what this trucker said, are you prepared
your true Yeah, absolutely, come take my truck, do whatever you gotta
do. That's fine. Well, because it's just the material possession, right,
freedom is freedom is something much more than that. So take my possessions,
put me in jail, sue me, do whatever you gotta do.
Liberty it's your move. And now the David Knight Show speech, because that
is the essence of our freedom, in our liberty, it is the first
thing that they come after. They don't shut down our stores first, they
don't come up with their injections first. No, the first thing they do
is to take our free speech. And we look at what is happening in
Canada right now. It is absolutely astounding. Never seen anything like this,
certainly not in modern times. We've seen some of these types of some of
these types of things that were done centuries ago in Western civilization. We had
wars. A lot of people died to make sure we didn't have the kind
of society that's going to be imposed if this thing passes, this pet project
of Justin Castro, the Kami censor, if he gets this stuff passed,
we're going to see things that Western civilization has not seen for half a millennium
or more. Star chamber things, the retroactive prosecutions, pre crime, even
just raw tyranny. Folks, you can look at this. You start,
you arrest somebody before they do a crime. You arrest somebody for something that
wasn't illegal when they did it. You shut down people's speech, You let
people anonymously accuse them without penalty, and don't let them confront their accusers.
You do all these things. This is just a campaign of political terror.
That's all it is. And that's what is happening here with Justin Castro.
The draconian fines even worse for small startup companies than it is for established companies
like Twitter and others, and so as people are looking at this commenting on
it on social media, one person says, the investigatory powers are invasive,
they are rife rife for abuse. The Commission orders seem to carry the weight
of the works without being banned by the usual process of the courts. In
other words, there's no due process. As Benedict Donald said, just take
the gun and do the due process later. Well, that's not due process
and they won't do it later. And if they take the speech, you
won't get due process later either. Another person says the maximum quotes the maximum
penalty for violation is not more than six percent of the global revenue of the
person that is believed to have committed the violation or ten million dollars. Here's
the sticker, whichever is greater. So that means that if six percent of
your gross global revenue does not come out to ten million dollars, they'll still
charge you with ten million dollars. So what's this about. This is about
shutting down any upstarts or startups, right, this is about stopping any small
companies. If somebody thinks that they're going to go into competition with the big
guys, ten million dollar fine about that? Yeah, got something like gab
started by one individual. No, no, we'll hit you with a ten
million dollar fine. And because it's whichever is greater, not smaller. Uh
So it's capped at ten million dollars. Unless your revenue is greater, then
they'll go with a six percent figure. And I think another aspect of that
is perhaps maybe even to take away some of the opposition from the big guys,
because for two reasons. Number one, it could, uh you know,
it would shut down their competitors. They're always worried about shutting down their
competitors. If they only said the cap was six percent without the ten million
part, then a small startup could probably survive that. But by making it
the greater of six percent or ten million dollars, that'd kill a small startup,
but it would remain capped in order to protect large companies. So these
companies look at this and they say, well, first of all, it's
going to cut down on my competition. We're not going to worry about somebody
new coming in. That's what they're always worried about. That's why you have
so many of the regulations even at the local level, against starting up a
restaurant or something like that, because the established restaurants will use the local government
to keep competition out. It's the genesis for many of the regulations about safety
and emissions and all the rest of this stuff, and a fuel economy that
the big Detroit companies would whine about, but they could comply with it,
and they would work with the Congress to make sure that there was a timeframe
there that they could comply with it, and it would keep out of the
competition. And so the same type of thing that we see here an absolute
legal abomination, said another, even before considering the insane punishments. It is
at odds with liberal democratic foundational principle that you cannot legislate things retroactively. Another
says Canada might as well change its name to the People's Republic of Trudonia.
The way they're going down some Marx Brothers farce. That's what it is.
They're going down the path of adopting People's Republic of China inspired policies. Trudeau
is known for admiring the power of Chinese style dictatorship, and they quote it.
He says, this is Trudeau. There's a level of admiration I actually
have for China because their basic dictatorship is allowing them to actually turn their economy
around on a dime. Having a dictatorship where you can do whatever you wanted.
I find that to be quite interesting, he said, And more than
once he's said that, you know, which country do you admire? I
know, other than Canada, which I know you're going to say. But
other than Canada, which country do you most in mind? Well, China,
because they can do whatever they want to save the environment and they don't
have to get tied up in all kinds of legal hassles and anything. So
now he wants to shut down people's speech, and he has this bill that'll
let him do that without getting tied up and all these kind of you know,
legal details and things like that. If you look at another aspect of
this house, arrest for people who have been who are deemed to be likely
to commit hate crimes in the future, So they can get you for what
you've done in the past before the law was written. They can arrest you
for not even having violated their law because they think that you might do it
in the future. In other words, you're a political enemy. Yeah,
the people who are most likely to offend. I guess you get voted,
you know, instead of who's most likely to succeed, who is most likely
to offend. Well, maybe we need to start saying who's most likely to
secede? Is it Alberta? Is it some other providence that's out there.
I used to have a t shirt said, if at first you don't secede,
try try again. Hate speech, Yeah, the end of Western civilization
a blank check for tyranny. And so they want to crack down on cyberbullying.
They're talking about trends agenda there, and they're talking about religion with that
as well. And again we should remember that speech is never a crime if
you have free speech, speech is never a crime, but censorship is always
a crime. The legislation goes on to define harmful content as content that quote
expresses detestation or vilification of an individual or a group of individuals based on their
race, national, ethnic origin, color, religion, age, sex,
sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, marital status, family status, genetic
characteristics, and disability. So you better just shut up. If they don't
like your politics, they're going to put you in jail or put you under
house arrest because you might say something about that. So I guess have house
churches because everybody, all the Christians, will be under house arrest, won't
they for greater certainty and for the purposes of defining quote content that fements hatred
unquote, the bill says content does not express detestation or verification solely because it
expresses disdain or dislike, or discredits, humiliates, hurts, or offends.
So it's even broader than that. Right, and so this snowflake tyranny or
if you hurt or offend somebody with what you have to say, well now
you go to jail. Well now you get a massive fine. It's like
what Alan Dershowitz, that's tyrannical Harvard lawyer that hurted you. We sue,
right, you hurt my feelings. I'm going to sue you in court,
gonna you know, bankrupt you with legal fees and all this other kind of
stuff because I don't like you. And it's it's this is why I say,
you're either going to have free speech, and if you have free speech,
some people are going to be offended. Too bad, Too bad.
I really don't care. Frankly, we got to get over this. You
know, they have intimidated us, and a lot of it, a lot
of the worst of it is with Christians. Oh let's let's not offend anybody.
Let's be win some so that we can win some to Christ and all
that I've heard, all that stuff. It's like, No, you need
to focus on the truth. You need to focus on the free exercise of
religion. You need to focus on you know, do it as as as
lovingly as you can, but never run away from the truth. Never.
So the legislation doesn't explain how the words like offend or hurt, or humiliate
or discredit or dislike or disdain or detest or vilify. How would those to
be interpreted? And are they embedded in some kind of a hierarchy of seriousness?
In other words, is it more serious to discredit somebody than it is
to disdain somebody or to detest or vilify them? Which of those are more
serious? Well, we'll just decide when we get to it. Creating a
new standalone hate crime offense and granting judges the power to put someone under house
arrest if they feel that they are likely to engage in hateful conduct. Now
we've gone beyond Brazil in nineteen eighty four and Brave New World, in a
novel take on dystopian science fiction concept of pre crime. If a judge believes
that there's reasonable grounds to fear a future hate crime may be committed a judge,
not a jury. By the way, the guilty until proven innocent party
would be brought before a provincial court to determine whether they were a probable offender
likely at some point in the unspecified future, whether they were likely to generate
hate propaganda. That's what they taught it, hate propaganda. An offending thought
criminal would then have to wear an electronic monitoring device, return to and remain
at their place of residence at specified times, and would have to abstain from
the consumption of drugs or alcohol or any other intoxicating substance. The Free Speech
Union says presumably this is in case these substances might loosen their hateful mouths.
Failure to comply with these restrictions would result in a present sentence of up to
a year. In a title, the Attorney General Rif Vani of Canada has
now also been given an Orwellian title that George Orwell would be proud of Justice
Minister, Justice Minister, and in his capacity they describe this measure of putting
people under house arrest because they might commit a hate crime in the future.
He calls this a peace bond. Yeah, total Orwellianism. He said,
it could prove be very very important to restrain the behavior of somebody with a
track record of hateful behavior. He said, if there's a genuine fear of
escalation, then an individual or a group could come forward and seek a peace
bond against them and prevent them from doing certain things. He said, what
is really critical here is it gives the judge, not a jury, the
judge a wonderful range of sentences. This is the complete totalitarian mindset of these
people. How can we give freedom to our prosecutors, not how can we
protect people from an activist tyrannical government. You see, everything has flipped.
The mindset has flipped upside down, just as it has in the trade off
between security and liberty. There is no trade off between security and safety on
the one hand, and liberty on the other. There isn't. There isn't.
They can keep you safe in a jail cell, but they don't have
any liberty. And that's where you ultimately go. Every time you slice off
some of your liberty for the promise of safety and security, to that extent,
you become more and more of a slave of a prisoner to these people.
And so they want to have a wonderful range of things that a judge
can do to people without a jury of their peers present. And you can
have any individual come forward and essentially initiate an indictment, a prosecution against somebody,
and there is no penalty for that. If it is frivolous or false,
they don't have to pay for the defendants' legal fees. I think they
can even do it anonymously. In addition to creating this new criminal category of
pre hate crime, Bill C. Sixty three establishes the offense of communicating hate
speech, it amends the Canadian Human Rights Act because you know, we can't
have any human rights in Canada if Trudeau gets his way, making online hate
speech a discriminatory practice, and establishing a tribunal to be known as the Canadian
Human Rights Tribunal, which will address complaints of online hate speech as well as
hate speech perpetrated by other means of telecommunication. This part of the legislation it
appears to apply retroactively, meaning a person can be brought before the tribunal for
any material posted online, regardless of its publication date. Anonymous accusations secret testimony
are also permitted at the tribunal's discretion, right, that's why. Look,
none of this stuff is new, folks. We're just being brought back to
the days of the star chambers and the bridge of size and all these tyrannies
that we have seen. We have the things that are in the Bill of
Rights for a reason that you should be able to address the charges against you,
confront your accusers, have a jury made up of your peers, not
face excessive fines or punishment, and all the rest of this stuff. And
these people have been slicing this stuff away and it's all gone now, it's
all gone. And even worse than that, the mindset of most people as
such that they don't even understand why we had those guardrails there and the importance
of them. But let me tell you, these people who are writing these
laws, these judges, these ministers, this justin Castro, they understand exactly
what they're doing. So anonymous accusations, secret testimony, all the rest of
this stuff permitted at the discretion of the tribunal. And that's not their only
discretion. You know, they have maximum fines, but then of course,
you know, the tribunal can go beyond that if they wish. The National
Post points out this is a process that quote financially incentivizes complaints at essentially zero
cost to the other people. Complaints are free to file and at the conclusion
of an inquisition, that's what it is. The panel, if they find
you in relation to a discriminary practice, you can be ordered to pay compensation
to the person who filed this accusation against you for free. You can have
to pay them twenty thousand dollars. Up to twenty thousand dollars to any victim
identified in the communication that constituted the discriminatory practice, if that person created or
developed in whole or in part the hate speech to which the complaint relates.
If the panel considers it appropriate, they can increase that twenty thousand dollars fine
to fifty thousand. Because there is no limit to the number of complaints that
can be made against you, there is no cap to the compensation a person
might be required to pay. For example, if you've got a dozen online
posts found by the tribunal to be hateful, you can get a fine of
six hundred thousand dollars. Small Wonder, then, says Free Speech Union in
the UK. Small Wonder then that Jordan Peterson, who is in Canada psychologists
and author recently sanctioned by his professional regulator, the College of Psychologists of Ontario,
for what it described as degrading online posts about justin Castro, about climate
change, hysteria about trans ideology, says that under Bill C sixty three,
his criminalization and presumably bankruptcy would be a certainty. They can take all of
his money, drum and jail for life. Jordan Peterson, then I like
him. This is full on tyranny. This is medieval tyranny, secret anonymous
accusers, incentivized with cash to come after people, and this star chamber process.
The Canadian journalist and gender critical feminist Megan Murphy has also expressed concern about
how the new tribunal system will affect somebody like her, whose criticisms of gender
identity and ideology ideology already are considered to be transphobic hate speech by the government
funded Canadian Anti Hate Network. Last year, for instance, she had an
event that she was booked to speak at and it was canceled by the venue.
They cited concerns that the purpose of this event is to promote or would
have the effect of promoting discrimination or hatred for any group of person on the
basis of sex, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, or any
other similar factor. She said there had been no indication or evidence that there
would be any discrimination or hatred express at the event. It was entitled Inclusivity,
gender Identity, and Women's Rights. Yet I had essentially been accused of
pre crime because she was a feminist who was pushing back against the transgender agenda.
But it will be especially effective at coming after Bible believers churches house arrest
for even being a Christian. Preemptive gagging of a Christian pastor who is likely
to offend somebody. Yes, christ is an offense. We know that always
has been in prison Christians for their hate speech. That will be one of
the outcomes for certain of this expressions of bify an individual or a group based
on prohibited grounds of discrimination or likely to fement, detestation, or vilification.
This is not just an infringement of free speech. This is an assault on
christ in the Church because they are not going to distinguish between the sinner and
sin. They identify themselves by their sins. That's one of the reasons why
we say, look, we don't hate the center we're trying to We're trying
to tell the center how they can find Christ. Grace is free, and
we just tell people, don't turn your back on God. He's got a
way here for you to remove this. God will remove this as far as
the east is from the west. You'll never hold this against you. You
can have a new life beginning now. You can have eternal life. But
you have to turn from your sin. You have to reject. You have
to hate your sin and turn from it. So we're trying to save the
sinner, but we're not going to embrace the sin. The problem is is
that the government and a lot of these people identify themselves by their sin,
and that is their addiction, It is their idol, it is their God.
They spend all their waking moments thinking about their drugs or their porn,
or their cross dressing or whatever it is. That is their identity, that
is who they see themselves as being. And so these people are going to
take this as an attack upon them. This is about policing morality according to
a secular progressive standard while silencing any objection to sexual immorality so that perverts can
deaden their consciences against the pervasive call of repentance, and it threatens the very
heart of religious expression and dialogue. It threatens the very heart of Christianity.
As I said, I felt sorry for Trump because looking at these old clips,
when he's asked multiple times in multiple interviews the people, he would always
avoid it. They would come back and press him on the issue. Have
you asked God for forgiveness? He doesn't think he needs it. That is
the heart of the good news, the heart of the You know, you
have to understand that you're a sinner in need of forgiveness, but you're also
the good news is that there is a complete forgiveness available to us for what
Christ has done. But they're going to shut that down completely with these laws.
This bill does nothing to protect people. It only harms people and spiritually.
And you know, it challenges all the principles of the free exercise of
religion, all the principles of free speech, and of course it challenges all
the principles of due process, a fair trial, resumption of innocence. All
of this stuff is thrown out the door. And why is this important?
Well, because when you look at Europe and you look at Canada, you
see that first of all, they're coming after. Elon Musk at this point
is not on board with this, and so you know they're trying to shut
him down. Anybody that doesn't do this is a part of This is a
global governance move because the Internet is global. So you've got Canada, you've
got EU presumably after the election of the United States, will be coming after
anybody who supports free speech on the Internet. They'll use it as a weapon.
And when you see this happening, as bad as it is, this
is not limited to Canada. Remember, Trudeau is one of their stars.
Justin Trudeau is one of the people that they've chosen to carry the torch for
them. He is, you know, the shock troop going out there taking
this stuff out and they will whatever he gets through, that's going to find
its way to other places as well. So that will eventually come to the
United States as well, because it is a global agenda, and they're just
using Trudeau and Canada as a test case. They're using him to move the
Overton window. They're moving him to shut down Western civilization. We're going to
take a quick break and we're going to come back with Tony Ardaban and we're
going to talk a little bit about what's happening with gold. We have some
interesting things, interesting phenomenon that are happening in China at the retail level.
We'll tell you about it when we come back. The common Man. They
created common Core and dumbed down our children. They created common past track and
control us. They're Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the
communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But
each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That
is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away.
Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to
know everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's time to
turn that around and expose what they want to hide. Please share the information
and links you'll find at the Davidknightshow dot com. Thank you for listening,
Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us
in your prayers. The Davidknightshow dot Com. All right, welcome back and
joining us now is Tony Rderman of Wise Wolf Gold At Tony has set up
David Knight Gold that'll take you to his company and let him know that you
came through me. When you get there, you can buy gold or silver,
large or small transactions. Tony can handle it. He also has a
way for people to gradually save on a regular basis. It's a group buying
program and calls it Wolfpack, and so you can get into that, have
the you know, just set aside a certain amount that you're going to accumulate
each month. A great savings program to do that as well as get the
advantages of a group buy. So thank you for joining us, Tony.
Good to see you again. Good to see you, David. Thanks for
having me back. You know, we were talking in the break about these
gold beans in China. You've heard about that as well, and it's become
you know, part of that is the retail trade that they're talking about,
but they've actually created a little instrument there and you know, people are getting
i think the thirteenth of an ounce in the form of a gold bean very
popular. Well, it's popular, it's convenient, it's affordable, and the
people of China they're crazy about gold. There's sixty thousand gold mines in China.
China is breaking all kinds of records importing gold manufacturing, and that's been
the trend since the beginning of this century. China has been buying and you
know, it's interesting, China's been buying gold off the books, which is
an open question. Why why are they buying gold? Often wouldn't they want
the world to know what their gold reserves are? And kit Ko has talked
about this before. There's some journalism and some studies to China's gold reserves,
and no one really knows how much they have. It's an open question,
and they could actually have more gold than the United States, who hasn't been
a buyer since the nineteen fifties. We supposedly have something around eight thousand and
a half tons or so. It's estimated that China may the government may have
somewhere around sixteen thousand. We don't know. This is again it's speculation why
they would be buying off the books at the beginning of the century. But
you go back to the people and using the small fractional gold that's the only
way you can use gold almost anymore. If you're a regular person. It
close to twenty four hundred dollars an ounce, David, and it makes sense
to have fractionalized tradable pieces that you can use. We do that with with
wolfpack. I buy the large sheets of one hundred gram bars and we break
them apart, so you have a gram bar of gold that's an easily weighable,
tradable, fractionalized piece of gold. But I think you're going to see
more and more of this, and you even do that with silver. I've
gotten some of the silver breakable, you know, things that you can break
them down into smaller quantities as well. And then you know, we also
have the gold backs and things like that. It's important because you know,
one of the things about these little gold beans that they wrote the article about,
it's about a thirteenth of an ounce, so right now, it's about
eighty bucks that these people are doing. So it's small, incremental things,
and sometimes you need to go even smaller than that. That's why you got
the kind of the little chick lit breakoff things that are there. And that's
one of the reasons why you would have silver, because one of the key
things that we're looking at is the fact that we want to be able to
survive when they crash this financial system. You know, that's what the local
Tennessee legislators like Frank Nicelier looking at when they say, well, you know,
if they really screw this saying up, if they have an accident and
they blow the system up, or if they do it deliberately, we need
to have some way that we can continue the business of the state. You
know, Well, we need to have that at an individual level as well.
We need to be able to continue. We have to have some medium
of exchange, we have to have some wealth that has been retained in some
liquidity. And so that's what all this stuff is about. So I think
we're going to see more and more of this, of these small things showing
up. I think, well, I think this is the key, is
being able to have the actual physical gold in your hand when the system resets,
because that's what they're doing. It's a great reset. They're telling you
what they're doing. Yeah, and countries around the world. The trend right
now, it's absolutely amazing. If you look at the charts going back to
two thousand and nine day but there was almost no central bank buy almost zero
central bank buying of gold. Now it's off the charts. The IMF is
warn that countries are getting off of the dollar for national security reasons. This
is the IMF, the International Monetary Fund, is talking about countries abandoning the
dollar system for national security reasons. Saudi Arabia has put out a probe trying
to figure out how they're going to decouple themselves from their Western holdings because of
security reasons. They just recently joined bricks. By the way, they're the
extra s and bricks. This is not good for our system. I think
people have normalcy bias. They're very myopic. They're looking at the old systems
and Wall Street and the way that it worked. It doesn't It's not going
to work that way in the future, especially when all the deed dollarization around
the world is happening, David, And that's why. I mean ten years
ago, five years ago, the Chinese people weren't buying massive amounts of fractionalized
gold and trading in it. India always has been a gold buyer, but
not like it is now. It's really a phenomenon. It's accelerating in I
think what's happening is gold is retaining its natural place, supplanting the dollar as
the world's reserve currency. Okay, and I think countries are figuring out how
to do cross border payments, and that's part of the new brick system.
Zimbabwe's doing that. It's it's using a digitized fractionalized gold system. They've also
gone on the record, Now this is government saying this. I don't believe
them, but they're saying they're not going to create more digitized units than they
have reserves in gold, because you know, its way. It was always
the joke. You know, they have the trillion dollar notes, but I
think the lesson learned since nineteen seventy one Nixon took us off the gold standard.
All these you know, most all other countries followed suit and went to
a fiat currency. The last holdout was Switzerland in two thousand and two had
a silver back currency, and then after that it's a free fall. They
we've had fifty times fifty two times more currency printed since nineteen eighty exists today,
fifty two times more currency on earth since nine eight. So you have
this this fiat debt bomb that's going off. Yeah, and there's going to
be a revaluation of everything, especially since the dollar is losing so much ground.
It's kind of interesting to hear that from Zimbabwe. Yeah, we're not
going to print more of these things than we got gold back. And that
was the life from Brettonwood's one, wasn't it. They're recycling that thing,
you know, and then everybody realize that they're bluffing. You know, they
do have gold and Fort Knox. We don't even know if there's any golden
Fort Knox anymore, certainly don't know how much is there. Just like you
were talking about China, you know, nobody knows that these these countries keep
everything secret. You know, that's their their secret hand in this game of
poker. How much gold do they really have? We're not allowed to see
the chips that they got on the table because they're not on the table.
They're under the table somewhere. You know. It's a And then we've talked
about this before, the secrecy of where their gold is held, and they
don't make a big deal about it. And of course governments, you know,
we always have these national ad campaigns. The government never tells you like
make sure you have a little bit of gold and silver on hand in case
inflation really kicks in. What do they tell you? They tell you to
feed the pig. They have feed Thepig dot org. They tell you to
feed your piggy bank with fiat currency. They don't tell you to go get
gold. And of course the Federal Reserve and the Central Bank here we don't
buy gold. We don't do that here in the United States. But because
again, if gold demand drives the price of gold up, the dollars at
war with gold. It's its natural enemy since becoming a fiat currency. And
I think that's what's happening around the world, David, that the countries are
moving away from the dollar, they're getting into gold reserves, they're looking at
cross border payment systems backed by something else. So the dollars in real trouble.
We're watching this in real time, and it's it's truly amazing. Yeah,
you know, when this article where they're talking about the little golden beans
that are there, it's actually from the New York Times. That's how mainstream
this has all become. And we're not even talking about this is not a
by Gold publication type of thing. This is not even a financial publication.
This is a New York Times talking about this. And one of the things
that they said was they said, you know in the New York Times that
they said, there's been a fifty percent increase in the global price of gold
since late twenty twenty two, and they said gold prices went even higher last
month because people were concerned about what the FED was doing. But they said,
now what's driving it is what's happening in China, What is happening with
the central bank in China, and what is happening with the people who are
out there buying the gold beans or whatever. They said, the flow of
gold into China has gone from solid to an absolute torrent. And that was
a whole point of this article to talk about that, and then to talk
about, well, this is this person, this is what they do for
a living. You know, they've got a kind of a middle class job
or whatever, and they're going down and have been accumulating these little gold beans
and all this kind of stuff. I guess, you know, we're laughing
about this during the break and said, yeah, kind of. They're bean
counters. Now, they've got their own personal accounting system. They're counting the
little gold beans that they've been saving up. But it's literally being counters that
they've got. Now everything comes back around, doesn't it. It truly does.
And if you if you watch the headlines It's funny. We used to
watch the Federal Reserve. You look at the Central Bank United States, look
to see what they're doing with interest rates. What's going to happen to the
market. Are they going to lower are they going to stay this? Are
they hawkish? Are they going to raise interest rates? And then you look
at the Bank of England and the Bank of England, the Bank of Europe
central banks. They've kept rates the same, so is the United States.
But gold moves on. Isn't that interesting? They've kept rates the same and
it doesn't follow what they do anymore like it did. I mean, that
was the big that was the big push to see what was going to happen
with metals and David because of central bank gold demand. And I think maybe
finally the mainstream networks are catching onto this. There's there's something happening outside of
of our own markets, and it's it's gonna it's macro. It's huge,
the macro consequences. And you mentioned why did they all start buying gold at
the end of twenty twenty two, Well, it's because of the invasion of
Ukraine by Russia and then then the massive sanctions by the United States and the
swift system and all the punitive measures taken by our government in the West in
general. And I think a lot of these countries took notice. They started
abandoning the dollar. They wanted to get off. They saw the vulnerability that
they have if they have to deal with the dollar. And so you see
the amount of crude oil that Russia is just going direct to China, going
direct to India, moving around the sanctions. This is massive shifts geopolitically,
David, and I think we're only going to see more and more of it
as the dollar declines. I agree. Yeah, this New York Times article,
they don't they mentioned both those things. They say, well, you
know, it was the thing that really kind of kicked this off was when
the United States had these sanctions. They don't say Biden. They're partisan,
so they're not going to name him, just like the Conservatives won't name Trump
with any of this stuff. But you know, they won't name Biden about
that. But they say, yeah, that was kind of changed everybody's mind
and started kicking this off. And then another place will say and since twenty
twenty two, it's gone up by fifty percent. The price of gold is
you know, you get right to the point and say that's because those two
things related. They don't make that kind of connection there. But then elsewhere
in the article they talk about the fact that China is divesting itself of American
dollars. They said, what they're using, what they're doing now, they
are buying their gold with American dollars to get out of it gradually. And
the fact that China has reduced its treasury holdings for more than a decade.
They said, as of March, China had about seven hundred and seventy five
billion dollars worth of US debt, down from one point one trillion and twenty
twenty one, so in three years they've dropped it thirty percent. So they're
gradually. They can't sell everything off all at once because they'll, you know,
crash their own investment in it, but they're getting rid of it at
a pace about ten percent a year, you know, that's what they're trying
to mark it down with. Yeah, at one time the Chinese held about
three trillion in treasuries and now they hold about seven hundred billion and are declining.
So if nobody's taking part in this, it's like tinker Bell, right,
if you don't clap. She dies. This is the dollar. If
you don't use it, if there's not money velocity, it dies, it
goes away. That's and I think that's what people don't understand here in this
country, is there's a reason why you haven't had hyperinflation. Even with all
the stupidity and on purpose controlled demolition in Washington, d C. It still
survives. It still continues because people around the world still have a demand for
it, even though it's fake. It's psychological. They use it. It's
in circulation. It's something called money velocity. I don't understand it completely.
I don't pretend to. I just know that history teaches me that all paper
currencies backed by nothing go to zero without exception. So if I know this,
going into what the everything else is window dressing. It's it's just like,
you know, speculative, what's to happen in the intern But we know
that fiat currencies go to zero, and especially since the dollar has been so
abused, we probably could have lasted a lot longer given the strength of our
economy and our position in the world, but we just on purpose tanked everything,
you know, geopolitically, economically, internally, the corruption levels off the
charts, and even Biden's own economic advisors, David one of them, who
wrote an article for The New York Times, said that we should lose the
world's reserve currency status to be better off for our economy. Who are these
people? How would you get away with that? How would you have a
massive loss of purchasing power and retain a strong economy? It's impossible. So
I don't know how this ends, especially for you know, our country,
But I do know that people that are reliant on the system and saving fiat
currency. I think it's Michael Saylor recently, the bitcoin advocate. He said,
what do you call people who save fiat currency? We call them poor?
Yeah, that's right, that's right. When you look at the statement
that just had there from the guy in the Biden administration, and be better
if we don't have the rules reserve currency status, It's like, how in
the world could they even say that, because that's really their superpower, right,
that's the way they control everything, even internally domestically. Joe would just
print some more money, and we'll give it to you if you do what
we say. We'll take it away from you if you don't do what we
say, but that has been their superpower to do whatever they wish as the
government. So you have to look at this and say, are they really
that stupid or are they really that suicidal? And both of those things are
really frightening. And it is something that is not limited just to the Biden
administration. You got it made it a lot worse. And of course all
the stuff about the sanctions that they kicked off on Russia, that's one hundred
percent on him. But the foundation of this, whether we're talking about the
commercial real estate stuff or whether we're talking about bank collapses and stuff. And
of course the bank collapses are happening now because of the Federal Reserve rapidly raising
the interest rate. Never seen it go that fast, that high, that
fast in history, and so these banks could could not respond to it.
So now we're looking at a lot of banks that are perhaps going to be
failing very soon. I got a management consulting firm warning that a half dozen
banks would fail in just a few weeks. And he said that back on
April the thirtieth, So we'll see if that happens. But he's got a
proprietary way of looking at a lot of different metrics and balance sheets of these
banks and that's really what they do. And he made that statement of the
Bank Holding Company Association Spring seminar. So we're in a really shaky position.
And the question is is it because they're so stupid or because they are really
trying to execute their great reset on us and they don't care if it hurts
their power as long as they can destroy the American middle class in America as
a financial and a military stronghold. Think that's the proper question. Because the
people that run this country hate this country. I think that's pretty apparent,
or that we'd be a lot better off. What was it? Strove Talbot.
Back in the nineties, Secretary of State for Bill Clinton said the nation
state was irrelevant. Now this is the Secretary of State. The nation state
is becoming irrelevant. They're one world government Devotas for Davos, these are people
that are working for the World Economic Forum. This is the elite, and
of course they all run in the same circles. And Gobett all said,
it's not a conspiracy if they all think alike, but it certainly is a
conspiracy. You go the commercial that the World Economic Forum had in twenty sixteen.
It's like, what was the first opening phrase of that commercial, Imagine
a world where the United States isn't the loan superpower anymore. It had this
planned and the calls are coming from inside the house. It's not that hard
to figure out when you have so you can't be that monumental of an idiot
rise to that high of advising the president on economics and thinking that you can
take away, you know, trillions in circulation and usability of a currency and
dump it back into the United States, devalue it and still have a strong
economy. I think they've already built their life boats, they have their golden
parachutes. They know exactly where they're going. This is to take out and
neutralize what was left of the strength, the heart and soul of the United
States of America. And it started with de industrializing the heartland, making it
the rust belt, taking away our pride and making the ability to have living
wage jobs and have families and all these things in stability, being able to
be self sufficient. It started with that. And again you look at the
last year we ran a trade surplus was nineteen seventy three. It was the
year that they created the Trilateral Commission. We've not run a trade surplus since.
And of course that was on the heels of not only the taking us
off the gold standard in seventy one, but the birth of the World Economic
Forum opening China. These things all go together and by you fast forward to
two thousand and one, David at the ninety days after nine to eleven,
on the anniversary of the day that Hitler declared war on the United States,
George W. Bush gave China most favored trading status of any nation. Yeah,
you know for the wto declaring war in the United States declaring war,
right, that was sixty years to the day that Hitler it was December eleventh.
I don't know, That's why where my mind goes. I always think,
Yeah, I'm a key in on dates and things. I know they
traffic in that. I kind of followed the elites. That's well, I
think there's a lot to that. You know, you go back here,
look at the first Bilderberg meeting. It was ten years to the day of
the last victory of the Nazis at the place where they had their last victory
right there, you know, the Bilderberg Hotel was right there where that bridge
too far was and it was you know, headed by by the Prince and
also by Lord Carrington who had been instrumental and causing that defeat of Allied forces
and that victory for the Nazis. Yeah, just all a coincidence. I'm
sure They've spent decades since the end of World War One with the Council on
Foreign Relations and you know, the Cecil Roads Roundtable intervention into our system.
They've slowly just whittled away at the power structure the United States, which was
supposed to be free markets, sound money, economic nationalism, nationalism in general
orders, things like that, and look at what we've become. It's just
this flailing empire that's schizophrenic. You know, we want to support and prop
up Taiwan after we've given We've cut diplomatic relations with Taiwan in nineteen seventy nine.
It doesn't even make any sense. We don't have a border, but
we're going to guard the borders in Ukraine. This is all just to confuse
us, because it looks like, you know, it just doesn't make any
sense anywhere on paper. It does, though, if you're trying to bring
us down from the inside, and I think this the lifeblood of our country,
unfortunately, is Fiat currency and it is our dollar, and a lot
of people are going to get hurt when I think they're going to pull the
rug out from it. I think that's right. It may be, David,
I don't want to be an alarmist, but it may be what we're
watching might be a gradually then suddenly it might just be that fast. I
don't know. I'm hoping that it does. I'm hoping we just got to
get some more time and people can get acclimated, because I think more people
are starting to understand what fake money is because of inflation. They're just starting
to ask questions they never asked before because it went to they went too fast.
You know, people would gradually go, well, I remember when you
could do such and such for five dollars, and you can't do that any
wasn't it Isn't it like a five dollars sub at subway is like thirteen dollars
hour or some something crazy? Oh yeah, yeah, you had As a
matter of fact, the the viral clip somebody reacting to Jamie Demon of JP
Morgan saying, oh yeah, middle class is fine. They're still flush with
all that COVID cash really twelve hundred dollars, you know, living off that
twelve hundred dollars that we got several years ago, four years ago. So
it's like, and I remember when Steve Manuchin, the Goldman Sachs banker that
Trump had there as a treasury had he said, well, I don't think
people need another, you know, twelve hundred dollars. Check one's enough.
I think that's we don't want to spoil them something like that. But I
think last week when you were doing the show last Friday, and thank you
for doing that, thank you for giving me some time off. But I
heard you say you quoted somebody. I think if this was stupid, if
it was a mistake, eventually they'd make a mistake in our favor. But
they never do. And I think that's all. It was the first Secretary
of Defense who was pushed out of a window, but as the Naval hospital.
He told that to Joe McCarthy, by the way, and then I
think it was picked up later by Gary Allen who wrote, none, Derek
call it a conspiracy. Yeah, yeah, so that's it. I think
that's a good metric. I think that's a good description of both the Trump
and the Biden administration. I think it's a good description of Congress under both
Pelosi and Johnson. I think, you know, hey, if this was
not a plot against us, eventually they would do something in our favor,
just by accident. But they never never do. Yeah, statistically, it
would happen that, oh we we actually that we really lucked out on that
one, you know, high five in each other, that now now we're
doing much better. That never happens. It's just this gradual you know decline,
watching the you know, the the republic pass away. All you know,
our freedoms is the freedom of speech, the Bill of Rights, and
then of course our economic power. I was talking about Travis fall of politics.
I can't even follow politics anymore. I don't know what what are they
doing? Is it just a trial of Trump and then Biden is yeah,
they had. Yeah, the big news this week that everybody's focused on is
Stormy Daniels describing their encounter. But I was talking about that eventually they do
something in your favor. You're talking about, you know, eventually flip heads
or something like that, and Travis was laughing. He said, yeah,
that the play rosen Krantz and Guildenstern. The guy's flipping a coin. It
just keeps coming up. Was a heads or something? You know? Over?
Oh? Heads again? Heads again? I guess that's rosen Krantz and
Guildenstern are dead, and so is the United States. It's government because just
keep flipping this coin, it keeps coming up heads. So yeah, it's,
uh, they've suspended reality, but we should believe it because it's the
way it actually is. Right, Oh man, Absolutely, it's it's the
way it actually is. And I think the more that you can internalize that
and come to peace with it and then starts figure out what do you do
next? I mean, it's we're at the next level very soon, and
the world is changing rapidly. I don't think you're definitely not going to hear
this kind of discussion on MSNBC or Fox or any kind of They're just gonna
they're gonna run that play all the way to the end, and it's going
to be about the election. I don't even know what the election is about
anymore. Well, the debates, I mean, yeah, the issues don't
matter because we don't have any debates. So if the issues don't matter,
you don't even have debates, but you know when we look at this,
Yeah, we've seen this kind of inflation before. We've seen the inflation kicked
off by attacking our energy supply and things like that, and we know that
results some kind of a stagflation or maybe this time, as SILENTI has said,
a dragflation. But you know when so we've seen that type of stuff
before. We've seen our government destroy the currency. What we haven't seen before
is them destroying the reserve currency status of the dollar. We've had that through
the lifetime of pretty much everybody, because even before the end of World War
Two, the United States was still kind of a de facto standard because its
economy was so strong compared to everybody else, even during the depression. But
then there's another factor that we haven't seen before, and that's the move to
the digital cashless society. And one of the biggest banks in Australia is going
to go one hundred percent cashless this month, and the country of Australia is
set to be functionally cashless by next year, which is just a few months
away. And what I thought was interesting about this Tony was the fact that
in this article they had a reprint of the different stages because the bank was
going to do it gradually, and so they said, well, here's what's
going to happen. You know, beginning at the end of May May twenty
this month, you won't be able to access over the counter services at the
banks. You won't be able to deposit this is one bank, it's called
Macquarie, if I'm pronouncing that correctly. You won't be able to depositor,
collect checks, you can't order new checkbooks. And then by November first,
you won't be able to write or deposit any personal checks, deposit or request
bank checks. You won't be able to deposit cash or checks over the counter,
and you won't be able to make a contribution or payment via check.
And so gradually they're going to pull this out. And they left one little
caveat there to say, but we'll still let you get cash at the ATMs.
We're going to stop all these services. We want cash checks, we
won't accept checks, we want deposit checks, but we'll still let you take
out cash. But then what is happening is throughout the the country you have
all these retailers saying we're not going to take cash anymore. And so this
is the kind of gradual, progressive, iterative process that I think we're going
to see in every country, but running out in Australia, they're a little
bit ahead of this. Just like Candidate's taking the lead on shutting down all
free speech Australia, seems we're taking the lead on this cashless society aspect.
Well. It's interesting, David. I bought the other day some collections in
the State sale. This is a one dollar note from nineteen seventeen. They're
a lot larger than the modern day bills, and I think this would I
mean the purchasing power of this to be about two hundred dollars to day,
at least given our gold price in what gold was in nineteen seventeen. This
is kind of interesting the evolution of cash. You know, first you get
these are notes that are backed by gold, you can turn them in at
the gold window, and then it becomes a federal reserve note, right and
all that language goes away. I had a twenty dollars bill in here recently
that had said this is redeemable and lawful money. Not that the note itself
was lawful money, but you can redeem it in lawful money with nineteen fifty.
I think, what all that language goes away? So it's gradually,
it's like a magic trick. They just start slowly taking away the props and
slowly taking away everything until you're left holding nothing. And that's what the central
bank digital currency is all about. You'll own nothing, and you'll be happy,
right, You'll be happy with our control, and we'll monitor everything that
you do, and we'll be able to contract and expand the money supply in
real time. But let's go You talked about the bank failures and what that
stems from, and of course so they're predicting that. And we talk about
how these economic advisors, how could they even you know, how could they
even think about us losing the world's reserve currency status. Well, let's think
about what the endgame here is. I mean, other than we're going to
I think they want to neutralize the United States. They want to put it
into a second rate, third rate power, so it gets it off the
world stage the way that we've been at least in the last one hundred years.
But the other aspect of that, in my opinion, is the ushering
in of the central bank digital currency. So the crisis precipitates and brings in.
Uh. The you have to ask for it. You have to let
the vampire into the house. Do you have to let evil in? Uh?
And that's that's it's some kind of of karmic rule. And so we
have to let it evil in. And so we're going to ask for the
central bank digital currency and it's going to save us, David, that's what
It's going to save us all and we just have to download this wallet.
But that is the trend, you know. The World Economic Forum put out
a well headline about a week ago saying they were celebrating and clapping for ninety
eight percent of countries around the world adopting a central bank digital currency blueprint and
having a plan in place. That's what doggos celebrates. That's that's their end
game is to control everything you do through the money supply. Unfortunately for us,
and what I'm watching and I think you're watching too, is that this
isn't the same country and this isn't the same world that it was ten years
ago. I think there's so many more people conscious of what this is,
what this plan is, and maybe they don't have all the information and all
the pieces and they're they're not you know, they're not tuned into the David
Night Show. But there's people that are absolutely aware that our money's fake and
they're getting outside of the system. And I think that's why crypto is popular.
Decentralized crypto, not fed coin, not fed now, but you know,
the real free market stuff. And of course gold and silver, precious
metals. The demand around the world is up, so they've got I don't
think it's going to be an easy transition for them, and they just may
implement it and it might not be as effective as they thought it was going
to be. It's coming. All these countries are going to implement the central
bank digital currency. It's just what they do. I mean, this is
what the bankster class does. So we're going to have to put up with
this, and we're gonna have to fight it. The battles far from over.
Even if it's implemented, it's far from over because we're building a different
system, we're building a parallel to and we're outside of it. So I
think, regardless of these kind of headlines, and I know it's depressing,
since here's another headline for you, the debt of the United States. We
pay one million dollars or two million dollars a minute, two million dollars a
minute on the debt, two million dollars a minute. So that's the kind
of headlines you see before they say, well, folks, we had a
really good run. It's time for you to download and get your biometrics into
the fed coin and you know, send your regards to Janet Yellen and you
know, and Jerome Pale because they're going to control everything you do with your
money at that point. And so I think people are I think people though,
are starting to understand that, and that's the key thing, and that's
why they're so focused on speech, because they don't want people to be aware.
As you point out, a lot of people are becoming aware of it.
I began the program yesterday talking about a lot of these grandiose plans,
like the Saudi Prince's, you know, one hundred and one hundred and five
mile long city in the desert, that kind of stuff. But you know,
they got these grandiose plan. Everybody's got a plan, as they all
say, until you get punched in the face. And sometimes we don't even
have to punch them in the face. Sometimes their own plans punch them in
the face, and so you know, they're not the wisest people. They're
not all powerful. God has to say for sure, and all of this
stuff. But I think it's one of the things that's so key for them
is that they can keep people in the dark. And so if we can
keep a free speech alive, if we can get the messages out and get
people to understand what their plans are, we have very good chance of defeating
them. I think we can even defeat them if people are slow to wake
up, because there are so many of us, and so I think that,
you know, the longer we wait to react, the longer we wait
to wake up to what their plan is and start to do something on our
own, then the tougher it gets for us. But I'm optimistic because I'm
a Christian and I know that God is in control with all this stuff.
But I think it's very important. I really do appreciate what you do.
You got to show that comes on follows this show imediately right today, yes,
sir, just right after your show on Rockfinn and Freeworld dot FM that
I have the Arderburn radio transmission, which is once a week. I still
go out on some radio stations once a week and it's a it's a hodgepodge
precious metals prepping all that good stuff. Pair of politics. Good Uh,
it's just stream of conscious and we'll see what I'm going to talk. I
don't usually know until about five minutes prior. We'll just we'll just go through
some headlines. But it's a lot of fun. That's great. I got
a comment here for you as well. This is on rock Fan from Michelle
Obama and thank you for the tip. It says, h I love the
silver going silver coins you send me, Tony. They make me feel like
a dwarf king lording over his treasure and lord of the rings. I love
it. Yeah, you get more silver coins and need to. That's the
funny thing. That's what we used to do with the with the kids when
they were little. You know. It's like, well, would you rather
have one of these five dollar bills? Or would you would you rather have
four of these ones? You know? Uh so that's the kind of thing
or fine. I'm pretty meticulous on the on the invoices and I should probably
publish it sometime. I work with with Yaka. Yeka helps me and she's
got her own show and she does shows on carnivore or diet and other things
which she works for wise Wolf and helps me put the invoices together, and
we were just really meticulous, like what do we have and what would look
you know, what would what would I want and in that particular tier package.
And we always do comparisons. We go to the other like the big
websites, and we check out their prices and I'm like, my goal is
always to beat them. So if you're part of wolf Pack, it's a
it takes about an hour or so maybe a little bit longer to go through
all the invoices to see every tier for every week. So it's we pay
attention to it. And when you're getting those coins, like I thought about
what coin you're going to get, I thought about how many goal backs to
put in. I thought about that, I thought about what products, and
of course a lot of products come through, Like yesterday I bought another close
to five hundred ounces of silver at the shop in Branson that immediately goes into
a wolf Pack and like it was some really nice one ounce silver rounds from
a private meant and they are the replicas of what a mercury dime would look
like if it was that big, So like it took the Mercury dime Lady
and Lady Liberty or the Goddess Mercury and they put it on a sill around
and that's just that's just some of the neat stuff that comes out of world.
Yeah. Yeah, So, I mean that's a mind boggling amount of
work to have to decide on. How many different tiers have you got with
wolf Pack. That's a great question. I'd have to like name them because
we have the starts out with the kids, you know, the Wolf cub
at thirty five, Lone Wolf, Warrior Wolf, Alpha, Wise Wolf,
and then the Sage at a thousand, and then we have different tiers of
Zen and that I'm not doing anymore. The next thing that we're gonna do,
we're gonna do in ach where you can put in electronic check to save
on fees, and we're also gonna accept bitcoin. I'm working on that.
I should have that done hopefully by next week, and I'll announce that maybe
I can next week when I come on. We'll talk about that. But
we're also going to add a few key things, and I don't want to
spoil it. But we're gonna add some things where you can just buy direct
to a certain type of product and I'll try to do the lowest price that
I can. So like we just we're going to change the price daily,
like going in the morning, look at how the trades are going. If
you want to get you know, and you talked, we talked about the
beans this morning. We're going to do something very similar to that with with
gram bars, so like you can buy them one at a time and instead
of having to get the whole wolf pack or something. But I'm more I'm
trying to make it more and more convenient, and I'm learning as I go.
That's good, that's good. Well, yeah, and it's going to
we're gonna need something like that if we're going to be able to use the
gold and silver for as Katherine Austin Fitz says, uh financial transaction privacy to
be able to do that private, and that is a key thing about gold
and silver as well as the fact that it's been around there as a store
of value. You know. It was interesting that the back and forth the
debate that was set up on on zero hedge between Peter Schiff and Rubini on
the one side for gold, and then on the other side you had Scaremoucci
and somebody else, and so they're talking about, you know, the debating
gold versus bitcoin. I think it's great that we've got multiple things that are
out there, and you know, the more things we've got that go against
the Fiat currencies and central banks, I think the better, quite frankly,
because it's more targets for them to go after. There's only one thing,
it's pretty easy for them to try to shoot that thing down. But the
more things that there are out there, then the better for us to counterac
them. So but absolutely it's an interesting back and forth with that. But
anything else you want to tell us about what's going on at wise wolf this
week, Well, it's just a busy time and you know, we're we
crossed over. I think we have a close to eleven hundred members of wolf
Pack and we're just thankful for that. I'm looking to to put different types
of products in so it's always staying on top of the invoices. It gets
it gets harder the more people that joined to have to have to move faster
on stuff, and I'm really watching the supply chain. I do think that
it's weak. I do think that you could crack at any time. And
I watch how overloaded the exchanges are. This is just some insight information.
If you watch the exchanges, how the lag time and them paying me for
products or them processing products. It's as sounding a lot of people. And
I think a lot of that gold is flowing out like we're you know,
some of the people are cashing in because of record prices of gold and that,
but the demand is still up. The demand is coming from somewhere.
It's coming from the internationally, it's coming from central banks. So we're really
watching everything close, David. But yeah, you can go to Davidnight dot
gold. You can look at wolfpack any transaction, no matter how big or
how small. And remember the I RAS four one k is all that we
can roll that over into physical precious metals. So go to David Night dot
gold. And you know, if you want to, if you want to
call and talk to me, you absolutely can't. People, And I answered
the phone all the time. People who are surprised I answered my phone like,
well, why wouldn't I that's my bit. That's great. I know
you're really busy, and I know it's a it's going to be more and
more challenging as our financial system gets more and more challenging. It's always great
to talk to you, Tony. Thank you so much. Thank you for
doing the show last week. Always interesting when you do the show, I
think. And again, his show is going to be immediately following this one
today, his weekly radio show. And you have a regular Ardborn transmission that
you do on a daily basis as well, but there's one that's going to
follow this show immediately afterwards. Thank you so much for joining us, Tony,
appreciate. Thank you. All right, folks will be right back making
sense common again. You're listening to the David Knight Show. Well, welcome
back, and I want to talk a little bit about the what is happening
on the various campuses. And I think it's interesting because you know, whenever
they want to run through their program of censorship, they've got the liberals all
on board, don't they. And now how do we get the conservatives on
board so that we can do censorship? Well, Q the pro Palestinian Marxist
mob on these different campuses, and at George Washington University. I remember last
week I showed you how they had to face and graffiti and put stickers and
everything on the George Washington statue there at George Washington University. George Washington,
the colonizer, and how evil he was. And now you've got these people
out there, campus leaders running a little show trial here and it's a bunch
of women wearing their little masks from the pandemic in this particular case, as
an active rebellion and to anonymize them. But they're out there calling for the
campus leaders to be beheaded. And by leaders, what we mean are the
administration, the president, the provost, the board. They want them to
be executed. They want them to be beheaded guillotine. You know, they're
out there doing their little thing. Here's the charges against so and so,
and you know the person's name. What do you say, guilty? Guillotine,
guillotine? Are they consciously going through the Jacobin Revolution? I said this
at the very beginning. I said, you know, why are these people
these elite universe so these in other universities that are not particularly elite. Whyre
they surprised about this? I mean, these people are Marxists, they're Jacobins.
And I said this about the people who had been funding these universities fine
with what they were doing as long as they were coming after white people,
for example, Ory, and that was okay until they eventually come for the
people that organize them, right, the Jacobins. And so you got here,
you've got the People's Tribunal being live stream, and they're calling for the
president of the provosts, the school board and all the rest of the people
who have been training them. They call for them to go to the guillotine.
Here's a little sample of it. Won't play the full thing because it
really is annoying. Guillotine, guillotine there. So there's the Palaestindian flag and
guillotine, guillotine. Bring up the next person, students. True, this
is amazing how juvenile these people are, these kids, youthful idiots, Marxist
idiots, Jacobin idiots, of having a vested interest in the genocide of Palestinian
people, as they profit off of dinast weapons and purchases that you refused to
divest them apartie, as they line their pockets at the APOPHI. Yeah,
you get the idea that I won't subject you to any more of that.
But yeah, the mob coming after the people who have organized the mob.
If the students hurt any of these people in any way, the university will
be completely at fault, said one person who who saw the stream and recorded
stew that you saw his information there on that. But no, actually,
if the students hurt any of these people, these people will be completely at
fault. The president, the provosts, the board. They were the ones
who were doing all this DEI CRT, weaponizing this group for hatred, and
then they just came after a group that they had not thought that they would
hate. Right, you're supposed to just hate the white people. The crowd
shouts guilty. Then guillotine, guillotine, guillotine. By the way, when
you see this, all women, all women, Future Congress is right there,
Future Congress with all women? What was it? John Knox who wrote
a time in English history where we had a couple of bloody queen Mary's and
a Queen Elizabeth, and he wrote something about the monstrous regiment of women,
talking about how he didn't want to be ruled by these women queens because they
were maybe more ruthless even than the kings were. No, they're just two
pathetic. The thing is, I was kind of when I saw that I
thought, well, let's see what they do with a guillotine. All they
did was shout guillotine, guillotine, guillotine. They did not actually have the
ability. They're just too pathetic to actually build a mock guillotine and do a
mock execution, are they. I mean that would take a little bit of
skills. They don't have any skills. They don't know anything. They can't
even build a fake guillotine into a fake execution. That's how pathetic they are.
The crowd calls out for the President Grandburg as well on the charges of
using our tuition dollars to fund genocide and sell out students to ZONUS interests.
That people find you guilty. Guillotine guillotine. So there you go. That's
and what is even more pathetic than that, it is the fact that that
would scare conservatives into attacking the First Amendment with the Anti Semitism Awareness Act and
with other things. Every day it comes out. Got another idea from Alan
Dershowitz as to how he's going to punish the speech of idiots like that that
he doesn't agree with. Isn't that pathetic? Now we can easily be controlled
through reactionary means like that to those Marxists, And of course that's how they're
really being used, still being used by the people who have run these institutions
for so long, the President, the provost, the board of directors in
the Department of Education that has been funding all this. We want to run
this stuff. We want to have these radicals out there so we can use
them to get your consent to shut this down. In the same way that
when you have all of the open borders, what is the big solution that
we keep seeing over and over again from so many conservatives, Well, we
just need to have an id for everybody so that these people who sneak into
our country can't participate in the economy, so they can't participate in voting and
all the rest of the stuff. We don't want them voting, and I
don't have any problem with having an eye for voting, But they want to
make this about making a mandatory approval from the federal government to get a job.
That's what mandatory e verify is. Another example, you know, the
scaring the parents about pornography, and you should be scared of pornography. I'm
not saying that the open border is not a problem it is a problem.
They do create problems. These people are a problem, but they always want
you to accept their solution. There's only one solution, and that means that
you're going to have to give up some of your freedom. We've got artificial
intelligence out there and it's making fake stuff, so you're going to have to
prove that you are real. We don't have to have the artificial intelligence identified,
so no, you will have to do it. We have porn sites
that kids can go too, so now everybody needs to have an idea in
order to use the Internet all the rest of this stuff. So one more
clip, I'll show you of these people on George Washington University campus. Here
they are doing their daily flag ceremony. Oh wait, that's not the American
flag Alahuac bar. Yeah, yeah, that's right. And we got Trader
Machiavelli and Mike giving three and a half billion dollars not to protect our border,
but to bring more people like that to the United States, people who
hate this country. Well, I said we had one more, but actually
there's still one more video I want to show you. This is at a
different university. This is a Case Western Reserve campus in Cleveland, and These
are some protesters who have sprayed graffiti all over a wall where they are standing
still still standing. I should say, well, they're standing still as well.
They're not moving, but they are standing in front of their wall that
has graffiti on it, and the university has called for some contractors to come
and paint over it. And these painted protesters refused to move. And so
the guy he's doing his work, he says, you need to move or
you're gonna get sprayed. Well, they decide they're going to stay there,
and so he's got a job to do, and he just prays right over
them. This person puts a shield on. They still got all their protective
masks and face shields and anything left over from COVID. Wasn't that convenient We
had all that stuff with COVID. And so he's just painting over them.
Right now, he's going to paint over the next person in line. It
says students assaulted by contractors. Now they're not being assaulted by contractors. They've
made the conscious choice to get in the way. He says, you know,
move, I'm gonna I'm gonna paint this. And if you decide that
you're going to refuse to move. Well, then you decide that you want
to get painted. It's just that simple. One person said, we knew
heroes didn't all wear capes. We weren't aware that some of them carried spray
guns. Whoever makes this paint or this primer should add a new feature to
the can. This covers stains, fading, water damage, and whiney dweebs
and just a single coat. We're just here, that's the copsy. We're
just here. We're just here. There's no assault here they you know,
you've chosen to stand there and try to cover the wall with your body,
so you'll get your body covered with paints, right, And I think this
is an appropriate response to these spoiled brats, you know, not attacks on
free speech. Just paint them, you know, ain't over them, take
them off or whatever if they're because so much of what they're doing is not
speech. And when they start blocking people from going into classes, when they
vandalize property or whatever, we're not talking about free speech. So why would
Mike Johnson and Mark Levin and people of that ill, why would they come
after our free speech? As a matter of fact, why would a foreign
government like Israel do that to us, our friend, our best friend in
the world, Israel wants to take away our first Amendment. What does that
tell you, these attacks on free speech in order to pander to a foreign
government. Well, we're going to take a quick break and we're going to
come back and take a look at an update to the pandemic and pharmaceutical news
as well. So I want all those people watching me at Vimeo to take
me down. I've got a segment coming up just for you, So stay
with us. We'll be right back to offend you. But unlike most revolutions,
whether people rise against the real economic oppression, in our case, here
in Boston, we are fighting for purely an abstract principle. It is,
however, not nearly so abstract as a young gentleman supposes. The issue involved
here is one of monopoly. Today, the British government will monopolize the sale
of tea in our country. Tomorrow it will be something else, liberty.
It's your move. You were listening to the David Knight Show, Well we
have Pfeiser Stock got hit after a boy dies of cardiac arrest during a gene
therapy trial. I was really surprised by this, not that Pwiser would kill
somebody, but that they would actually do a test and then admit that somebody
died. That, I guess is the unusual thing about all this, Just
like it was very interesting and surprising that Astra Zeneca admitted that people were dying
from their JAB and took it off the market, the same people that I
was talking a week ago about, and I got my video taken off the
market, so to speak, by Vimeo after young receiving Young men receiving experimental
gene therapy for a form of muscular dystiphery died during this trial, according to
News. Stat News, by the way, is a pharmaceutical publication, and
they seem to be pretty objective. Actually, I've seen some interesting things come
out of stat News. First of all, they're talking about this trial where
someone died, but they were also the source for that information about how Peiser
was blackmailing Brazil and Argentina and a third unnamed South American country that wanted to
be anonymous because they eventually succumbed to the blackmail of Pfiser. The fact that
this was a global agenda that nobody's going to go in or out of your
country allowed this multinational corporation Peiser to blackmail governments and to say you're going to
hold us harmless not only for the design of our vaccine, but even for
any negligence that we have in terms of manufacturing or shipping or whatever. Nothing
that we do will we be held responsible or liable for. And you will
protect us, and you'll even protect us with assets outside of your country.
And so that was picked up by stat News again a pharmaceutical trade publication,
and it was reported in a lot of places outside of the United States.
Where I saw it picked up was when it was echoed by some Indian press.
But anyway, stat News as affsors confirmed the boy suffered cardiac arrest and
they are pausing crossing over patients in its randomized phase three trial of the treatment.
So I wasn't surprised that they killed somebody with their genetic treatments. I
was just surprised that they were still doing tests because now the FDA, it
is so totally captured, it just rubber stamps everything they want to do anymore.
They said, it's notable that we had the first time a person was
publicly identified as having died during a clinical trial for gene therapy was back in
nineteen ninety nine Jesse Jelsinger, and it caused the FDA to shudder human genetic
research at Penn's Institute for Gene Therapy. Well that was then. However,
this is now, and they won't do anything about it, but the stock
market will react to it. Perhaps the people in the stock market thought that
the FDA might actually regulate them not going to happen. I mean, this
is not like you know, building jets that fall apart or crash and kill
people. If you're doing that with a vaccine, that's just fine. Well,
we'll just move along. One of the things that I thought was really
interesting out of a Children's Health Defense was an article talking in detail about how
pediatricians are paid to vaccinate children. And the thing that I thought was most
interesting about this was, you know, you look at this and the guy
said, well, we get kickbacks of up to two hundred and forty dollars
per visit. Well, I don't know how much the vaccines are, but
the kickbacks, the incentives as well as the disincentives, the punishments for not
getting kids vaccinated. A lot of those are running through the insurance company.
And I didn't realize that. He said. This is doctor Paul Thomas,
a Dartmouth trained pediatrician, and the question is asked by the Defender of Children's
Health Defense. That's what they call the publication. They said, can pediatricians
afford to even run their medical practices without the kickbacks that they get for vaccinating
every child? Well, doctor Paul Thomas said, you can't stand business if
you're not giving pretty close to the CDC's vaccination schedule. He ran a general
pediatric practice. He had fifteen thousand patients and he had thirty three staff member
and so he knows what he's talking about. He actually wrote a book,
the Vaccine Friendly Plan, Doctor Paul's Safe and Effective Approach to Immunity and Help
from Pregnancy through your child's teen year. And he gave this to parents in
his practice, and he said he gave them a choice. He said they
could vaccinate their children on the CDC schedule. They could vaccinate them more slowly,
not giving them a bunch of a cluster of vaccines all at once to
challenge their immune system. But you know, stage it out do it when
their immune system, you know, when their body is a little bit more
mature, their immune system is a little bit more mature. They started vaccinating
newborn babies who don't even have an immune system that could respond to that.
If you agree with their theory of vaccines, which I don't, but he
says, so he gave them a choice. You can use the CDC schedule
and give them all the vaccines at the time the CDC says, or you
can do it more waiting for the child's immune system to develop, or you
cannot vaccinate at all if you don't want to do it at my practice,
he said. But then what he found out was it more and more patients
decided that they didn't want the vaccines when it wasn't being pushed on them by
a pediatrician. We had that done with us with our kids. Fortunately,
we didn't get our kids vaccinated until they were much older. We didn't take
them to the doctor unless they were sick, and then when one of them
got sick, we took both of them in and the doctor just had a
fit that we weren't on fluoridated water, and so we're not going to do
that because I knew better than that. I'd grown up not being on floride,
so I knew about floride. I didn't at the time know about the
vaccine stuff, and they were I guess about four or five years old,
you know, one of them is four, the other one was five.
They're eight months apart. So the anyway, he had a fit that they
weren't vaccinated, and so he did some vaccine. And Travis has always had
reactions to the vaccines. It got worse. You know, we did them
again when we traveled and that was really bad. I had really bad reaction
to it then, and I think it's manifested itself now with some autoimmune disease
that he's suffering with. But anyway, they gave parents the option to not
do that, and since some of them were not doing it, he said,
as they started refusing vaccines, he said starting to have a big financial
impact on his practice. He and his staff conducted a thorough analysis of their
billing records to examine the income generated from vaccine administration fees, markups and quality
bonuses. This is from the insurance companies. The quality bonus tied to vaccination
rates. He said, we were losing over a million dollars and vaccines that
were refused. Isn't that amazing? Again, he had was it thirty three?
He had fifteen thousand patients. He said, it's very expensive to run
a pediatric office. You need multiple nurses. He had thirty three staff,
multiple nurses, multiple receptionists, multiple billing people, medical records. It's a
huge operation, and of course, a big part of the expense is trying
to keep up with the insurance companies, dragging their feet, trying to get
them to pay you, and all the rest of that stuff. So I've
seen we found a couple of physicians that will not handle insurance at all.
They operate on a cash basis and they don't. And and when you look
at what this guy says the insurance companies are doing about the vaccination stuff,
you may want to look to find a physician who operates on a cash basis
so that he doesn't because they have a lot of losses from this in these
insurance companies and stuff, and it's a big hassle, and that requires a
lot of staff to constantly keep up with us, and then the insurance companies
financially push them to do certain things like vaccinate kids. He said. Pediatricians
received several types of financial incentives for administering the vaccines. He said. The
first one, of course, is an administrative fee. He said, that
is a thank you for giving the shot. He said physicians typically receive about
forty dollars for the first shot, first vaccine they give, and then twenty
dollars for each subsequent antigen. He said, let's just say a two month
well baby visit, there is a DPT. He says, that's three shots,
three antigens, and then we give them some other things. Hepbe prevnar
polio RTA. He says, that's about two hundred and forty dollars. The
second way that pediatrician profits is through a small markup on the cost of the
vaccines themselves, but he said that's minuscule. Then the third and most substantial
financial incentive is one that I never knew about, and that is what they
call a quality bonus. It's tied to vaccination rates on a per physician basis.
The insurance companies offer pediatricians bonus payments for meeting certain benchmarks, typically about
eighty percent of patients being fully vaccinated by age two. So this is a
push coming from the insurance companies. And so when I saw that, I
thought, h that makes sense. That's one of the reasons why that executive
from the big insurance company One America that was in Indiana. That's why he
said, you know, we've we got six explaining to his publicly traded company's
got to explain it to the investors. Yeah, we've had a rough time
here because we've had more insurance claims in the third and fourth quarter of twenty
twenty one, when the vaccines rolled out, We've had more insurance claims and
that amount of time than we would ever expect. Statistically, this is more
than three standard deviations away from the mean. And he said, this is
not something that you expect at all, is unprecedented, And he goes and
these are people that are not dying from COVID, and so he goes on
to say though, he says, however, we know they have to be
dying from COVID, and we further know that anybody that's vaccinated is not going
to die from COVID. Therefore, these are unvaccinated people who are dying from
COVID, and we're going to charge unvaccinated people more. Now. Somehow the
pharmaceutical industry in the government has got its hooks into these insurance companies because they
are telling these pediatricians, you get eighty percent of your patients fully vaccinated by
age two, and we'll give you a quality bonus. And that's a big
dollar contribution to them. So the insurance companies are in on this scam.
They're in on it's a payoff to kill people. With his practices, vaccination
rate only a at one percent, not eighty percent. He was giving people
a choice, he wasn't pushing it to them. I had one percent of
the people getting vaccinated instead of the eighty percent. He said, he was
at risk of losing up to fifteen percent of his overall revenue. And anybody
who's been in the business knows that if you lose fifteen percent of your revenue,
it's going to be pretty hard to even stay in business, you know,
lose twenty five thirty percent of swat I was saying. When they did
the lockdowns and said all right, well we'll let you open up you know
a little bit, you know, one day a week or something like that,
It's like, that's not going to do it for anybody, he said,
Really, it effectively means that a pediatric practice cannot survive using insurance without
doing most of the vaccines, if not all of them, said the doctor.
I think that explains the blinders. This is why doctors just won't go
there. Why doctors won't look at the act that these vaccines are causing a
lot of harm. The money, the love of money, the root of
all evil. Follow the money, Jerry, Yeah, that's what this is
really about. And then the interviewer with Children's Health Defense asked him about sudden
infant death syndrome. And before I play that for you, I just want
to play again that clip because you know, they started talking about sudden adult
death syndrome with these vaccines, and this is a mother who when they started
talking about SADS, it clicked as to why her baby died with sudden infant
death syndrome. You know, because something that's been going on for over forty
years just hit me. I had a child that died of SIDS in nineteen
eighty four. For people who don't know what it says is it's called sudden
infant death syndrome, where crip death was another one. I've been saying this
for forty years, over forty years. I don't understand this. He was
just the doctors two weeks before got his shots. He had the perfect health,
I mean, was great. And then last night I watched I'm even
to be watching this is g the Medical Examiner. I can't say it now
anyway, I watched her show and she says, what's that rise right now?
Is the adult a sudden adult syndrome, same thing as SIDS, but
it's for adults. What happened lately that was forced upon people that they had
to have and all of a sudden, the rise of these adults dying for
no reason is happening. And then it dawned on me that I poisoned my
kid two weeks before vaccine, that I was told to see what if that's
the cause of some if that's that's And they've been lying to us sommers time,
and they've been experimenting on our babies. So it's nineteen eighty four and
before, and it's just come to light because we get more education now,
we can get reached education. We're not just told whatever they want us to
tell. We can look research on on what if that's the cause of sins?
What if me doing what I thought was good killed my baby? And
it's just hitting me right now because I never put two to two together until
now tell me what you can think. Can't get cut off my rocker,
No, she's not off her rocker. Unfortunately, as this doctor pointed out,
got to get eighty percent of those kids one hundred percent vaccinated, or
you're gonna lose about fifteen percent of your practices revenue. This is why the
doctors don't want to look at it. But when they asked him about SIDS,
he says, when you hear the word syndrome, as in sudden infant
death syndrome, When you hear the word syndrome, it means we don't know
what it is or what causes it, but we actually have a pretty good
clue, he said. Six studies examined the correlation between SIDS cases and vaccines,
and one data set, ninety seven percent were in the first ten days
after the vaccine, just like her son. Only three percent we're in the
subsequent ten days. That is amazing. When you've got a ninety seven percent
correlation with something, it looks like a cause to me. Other studies showed
similar patterns, with seventy five to ninety percent of SIDS deaths occurring within the
first week after vaccination. He also highlighted the increased risk of neurodevelopmental disorders,
allergies, autoimmune diseases, and vaccinated kids. But again these it's the insurance
companies bribing the doctors to vaccinate all the kids. He said. We know
without a doubt that things like neurodevelopmental concerns, learning disabilities, add ADHD,
autism, these are clearly linked to vaccines. He said, the more you
vaccinate, the more likely you are to have these problems. The Amish don't
vaccinate, the Amish don't have autism. Vaccinated children are more prone to infections
and illness compared to their unvaccinated peers. It's the vaccinated who get more ear
infections, more sinus infections, more lung infections, any kind of infection you
look at, the vaccinated get more. Why well, there immune system has
been attacked. The risks associated with vaccines extend beyond childhood, he said.
We have the sudden death, a sudden adult death syndrome now because of the
COVID vaccine rolled out. He said. We see it on the news,
we see it in the ball fields, we see help the adults boom dropping
dead. And that has all happened since the Trump shots He says COVID jabs,
they're Trump shots. Trump wants to credit, give him the credit.
He pointed out that despite decades of research, mRNA vaccines have never been proven
safe or effective. He cited previous attempts to develop mRNA vaccines for RSV,
which consistently failed in animal trials, And we've talked about this before. When
they did the animal trials for mr anda versions of an RSV, he said
they would vaccinate the rats and then when they re exposed those rats, in
one study, one hundred percent of them died. He also shared a personal
story about his mother's experiences with pulmonary fibrosis after receiving three COVID vaccines. After
her third COVID shots, she started really running out of energy and then getting
short of breath. Within a month, her lungs had the appearance of ground
glass and so. He was also asked about the risk of vaccine shedding.
He said shedding seems to be happening and it's been documented in studies. He
said vaccinated individuals can expose others to spike proteins through body fluids and secretions.
He said, we can no longer go to our doctor and just say fix
me. You know. That was my cardiologist. I said, well,
I need to know more about this, and I think this other thing over
here, there's some issues with Oh you've been talking to doctor Google, and
I just said yeah. But in my mind, what I said, well,
one of us needs to understand and care about what's going on. If
you don't care to do the research, I need to do the research.
I should have said it to his face, but I just oh, yeah,
you know, and I never went back anyway. If ives are alone
made over one hundred million dollars, he said with this, so the power
that the public health machinery got to themselves with COVID has to be intoxicating to
them. I can no longer trust the CDC, the FDA, the NIH
he said, this is the doctor. Some good people work in these institutions,
but these institutions themselves have been captured. He said, when it comes
to vaccines, or when it comes to new pandemic illnesses, they are the
last people you want to trust. And so when we look at cancer mortality
again after the third vaccine doses, where he said, is moms had the
pulmonary fibrosis, her lungs looked like ground glass. All these health effects go
up exponentially with each successive dose. A new study out of Japan found a
significant increase in cancer deaths after taking a third Trump shot. Once we got
to the third Trump shot, cancer's started to go up, said doctor Peter
McCullough. Again, nobody calls him a Trump shot except for me and Donald
Trump. It's one thing that we have in common. I Trump, and
I want you to know that these are the Trump shots. Nobody else wants
to talk about them being Trump's shots. Doctor Peter mccallugh said, it's very
disturbing, and the Japanese data has shown that the mRNA vaccine could cause cancer
through multiple mechanisms. As we sit here today, all the evidence suggests that
COVID nineteen vaccines actually cause cancer. He said, every cancer registry in the
world is upright now. As I've said many times, Trump shots were the
shots sent around the world. He is guilty of crimes against humanity for funding
this, for protecting it, for propagandizing for them. He is just as
guilty as Pfizer, Maderna in these other companies. He says, there's roughly
four thousand papers showing vaccine complications and deaths. What we're seeing is just the
tip of the iceberg. This is a giant human experiment. Oh, I
got the FDA so mad at me. I just told me do this.
We don't have time to wait for this stuff. Yeah, warp speed was
a giant human experiment. We can't possibly know what is going to happen because
things were not properly researched ahead of time. In Japan, eighty six and
a half percent of the people took a third COVID JAB compared to only fifteen
percent of the people here in the United States. Well, I hope we've
had some effect now, even though vimeo and YouTube and people of that ILK
will kick off the program. I hope that you will push this out.
I hope that you will use this information to tell other people, tell family
members. We need to get this information out. People are dying because of
the lies and the disinformation. That's one thing they're right about. What they
don't say is that they are the ones giving us the disinformation, the mal
information that is out that the majority of people are vaccine hesitant, says Daily
Skeptic. And this is looking at France. They said, it's kind of
interesting that you know. Forty percent said fifteen percent of the survey respondent strongly
agreed with view that in the event of a new epidemic, mRNA vaccines will
be useful. Only fifteen percent thirty one percent agreed, of thirty five percent
don't know, ten percent disagreeing. So you had forty six percent of the
people agreeing with it or strongly agreeing with it, You've got thirty five percent
that don't know, and then you got nineteen percent who disagree or strongly disagree.
We got to get those numbers up. These people really don't understand what
is happening with us and the dire consequences of it. On rock Fan,
thank you very much, friend Edwards, thank you. And also on rock
Fan, Karen Carpenter says, my mom has never been the same since one
since one COVID legs went. She was doing great before got one COVID shot,
is what she's saying there. I'm so sorry to hear that again.
The best thing that we can do is to make sure that they don't fool
us again. In this particular study in France, they said sixty two percent
of the people agreed with a statement. There is a lot we don't know
about the long term effects of mRNA vaccines. Among those respondents, sixty three
percent people said there's a lot we don't know. Of course, he knew
nothing at all about them before, right except what we did know was extremely
frightening. This is going to reprogram your body, and it's you know,
going to then replicate itself, and on and on. It's like, well,
when does a replication stop? And when does it stop hijacking mysels and
reproducing itself. It sounds like the way they describe cancer or a virus or
something like that, how does that stop? Well, it turns out doesn't
seem to be stopping. Among these respondents that said that, we there's still
a lot we don't know about mr and A. Fifteen percent were unvaccinated,
fifty percent had doubts despite being vaccinated. Thirty five percent were vaccinated and comfortable
with it. See that's the other aspect. A lot of people really regret
having had the vaccine. One person that we know through my brother in law,
Keith, you know, and I've heard a lot of PEO people say
this, as soon as I got it, I could feel something happening,
and you know, she's now struggling with cancer. She said, I immediately
regretted it. I wouldn't take the second one. We have to head this
thing off before they pull any of this stuff again. It's one of the
reasons why I really think it's important for people to think about the lies and
the propaganda and the fear that is being pushed out there about this bird flu
stuff, because what they want to do is they want to put the you
know, they have burned themselves badly on this thing, as you can see
from these surveys, So they're going to come at us from a different way.
What's this way going to be. They're going to vaccinate our food,
and they're going to use the threat of bird flu to kill vast amounts of
cattle and chicken, and all of this is to attack our food, to
ban indirectly meat and dairy, to push us towards our lab meat, and
all the rest of this stuff. But the other thing that we should be
concern learn about is them vaccinating our food. We've got to push back against
this, and I think the most effective thing that could be done is to
try to get state legislators to push back against the USDA and even against these
state departments of agriculture. It was a state department of Agriculture up in Pennsylvania
that went after Amos Miller. It wasn't even the USDA, it was a
Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture. And so we need to get them in line,
and we need to get them to back off from people who are raising their
own food and not require them to vaccinate, not require them to send them
to a central processing factory because that central processing factory is going to require vaccinations.
That's what the USDA is doing right now. We're going to track and
vax all of the cattle. And if you don't have all your you know,
we're going to put an RFID tag on all the animals and you're going
to have to send them to our centrally controlled processing factories. And if they
them in and there's something that we don't like about their travel history or their
vaccination history, we're not going to process the animals. We'll just kill them
and bear them or something, you know, just like we'll put the CO
two in the ground or something like that. And so seventy eight percent of
these respondents supported vaccination overall entrusted science and doctors. Similar to the general population.
However, they've lost their confidence in government and health agencies and pharmaceutical industry.
This group, representing nearly two thirds of the French population, displayed skepticism
toward political and economic influences on science during the pandemic. And this is one
of the reasons why we have to get people to understand how you know,
the money is being used to influence all of this stuff. Trump bribed the
governors. The governors then bribed the local public health things. You've got the
insurance companies bribing pediatricians to vaccinate the kids. You had Trump and Biden bribing
the hospitals to put people on ventilators and rem dezevie, and then threatening them,
blackmailing them that if you take if you don't have your nurses vaccinated and
your doctor's vaccinated at the hospital, we're going to take away all that money
that we were giving you as bonuses. Let's talk in a little bit of
time. We've got here the eleven Republican heroes who stood up against the swamp.
This is the title from Breitbart. Only eleven Republicans, including Marjorie Taylor
Green, supported her in this resolution to remove Machiavellian Mike Johnson, and their
names are Andy Biggs from Arizona, Eric Berlinson of Missouri, Eli Crane Arizona,
Warren Davidson Ohio, Paul Gozar Arizona, Arizona, Good Thomas Massey Kentucky,
Alex Mooney West Virginia, Barry Moore Alabama, Chip Roy Texas, Victoria
Sparts, Indiana, and Marjorie Taylor Green, Georgia. These are the Republicans
who voted to against tabling the motion, other words, setting aside this motion
to have Machiavellian Mike vacate. So he had eleven of the GOP only thirty
two Democrats to oust Machiavellian Mike. And interesting, you know, it's always
about the money, isn't it. The guy gets twenty million dollars in three
months his first full quarter as a Speaker of the House. He calls himself
a wartime speaker. He broke the Hastert rule of going against the majority of
his own party, working with the opposition party to get his agenda through.
And so then we see these kinds of headlines coming from Breitbart, for example,
the swamp always wins Mike Johnson expects to lead the House Republicans even after
the election. And of course, you know they call him controlled up as
and it's not just Breitbart, it's many of all the conservative publications call him
can controlled opposition. The swamp is winning, the Democrats are supporting him,
He's working with the Democrats. He's part of the UNI Party. These are
the headlines that I see everywhere. And then there's this headline, Trump rebukes
Marjorie Taylor Green for trying to throw him out. And wait a minute,
Is Trump part of the swamp? Is Trump part of the UNI Party?
You better believe he is. You better understand that he is. Trump is
a Democrat rhino, just like Machiavelli and Mike Johnson. If Trump had called
for him to be removed, you better believe that all of the GOP would
have voted against them and they would have removed him. Nobody is going to
go against Trump because the GOP is no longer about principle. It's about it's
a cult of personality around Donald Trump. The GOP has become greed outside of
principle, That's what it stands for now. It's all about the money,
it's all about following Trump and doing whatever he wants, and he wanted Mike
Johnson there. Why do you think he wanted him there? Is it going
to help him politically? Or is it something that the CIA masters of these
two guys? And look both of them. He's the wartime speaker Donald Trump.
You know he puts in Gina Haspell, who is working hand in glove
with the arch enemies of Trump, Brennan and Clapper, all these people.
Do you understand how this is professional wrestling and how the people who are really
running the Speaker, the people who are running Trump and the two of them
defending each other. You understand that this is a control game here. I
hope you do. But if you don't, at least get the stuff about
the vaccines out. Thank you for joining us. Let me tell you the
David Night Show you can listen to with your ears. You can even watch
it by using your eyes. In fact, if you can hear me,
that means you're listening to the David Night Show right now. Yeah, good
job. And you want to know something else. You can find all the
links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at Thedavidnightshow dot com.
That's a website