If there is one thing that really traumatizes me from Dominican society, it is
that people want justice to be relentless with others, but that when it touches
them it is as benign as possible and if it is possible, that it
is nothing, that there is no law enforcement. If the case affects me,
it affects a particular one of mine. For some time now we have
been talking about the Dominican Republic and, above all, the media of the
latest cases that have occurred here in the country. Disproportionality and abuse of prison
as a coercive measure have been discussed. He' s accused of anything.
Let' s say Elisabet Silverio. Elisabet Silverio is a woman who had a
center for the care of minors, with what they call now they are no
longer called autistic children and does not call her. I don' t know
what' s going to happen. No, no, not neurodivergent neuros pods
for neurodivergent children. That' s the expression. Now it' s politically
correct and they' re sending Elizabeth Silverio six months to me. But because
you have to send a person if they separate me from me for shit.
Thus, when there are seven measures of coversion that establish the code of criminal
procedure that must be applied to this type of person. No, but a
mob that understands in pretrial detention an advance of the sentence due to that person,
which is abusive and violent constitutional principle called the presumption of innocence, must
be calmed. All people are presumed innocent. They accuse the Aine that seven
hundred million were stolen and in nivereenin they write a novel of twelve zero pages
next to bull Son camacho and a group of vague prosecutors in the deep and
send almost two years to that man for hayo, besides making life impposibili and
all kinds of evils in prison, because they have to be happy to society
when they accuse two individuals, in this case in Monte Plata. I don
' t know what the ARRISPET code is. I' m not a lawyer,
because I' d be good with a lawyer. Tell me they'
re in a leather engine. I' m going to tell you no,
because this is what they get, because the law applies to the one who
gets used to the excuse of saying they' re not the first thing they
do. But Dominican society also has to say that when things are disproportionate,
when things are abusive, it has to be said. These two guys come
out on a Witter engine in a Monteplata field. These tigers hear me give
me train tigers and two years and twenty- five years, called Leonardo Gómez
Morel and Jorge Amado Martínez. They walked in leather on a motorcycle through some
streets of Juan Pablo Duarte Park, the night of a couple of weeks ago
in savannah, Grande de Boya and Monte Plata. The first thing that to
arrive a week Big Boyaica arrives to Mount Silver and Mount Silver, that nothing
more is okr day away. First and veil, first I reveal. Then
what does the judge do? Well, three months in pre- trial detention
for these guys. This is why I don' t know what kind of
crimes. They did exhibit, exhibitionism, yes, but that' s why
I say I don' t know, because I' m not a lawyer
but it doesn' t seem excessive to that judge and it' s not
excessive that this one for this crime, which is a misdemeanor, let'
s say exhibitionisms send a person three months to jail. How much pain h
chir was encouraged by the Dominican Republic, but let' s ask ourselves honestly.
You think it' s fair that two uprooted people are sent three months
to jail. In Monteplata. It doesn' t seem fair to me.
That doesn' t seem fair to me. That doesn' t seem fair
to me. Here we had in the year two thousand four, two thousand
three, about four middle class high- soul pink middle class boys who ran
into and walked in Lincoln, up the street down the street And these boys
beyond having them in the police palace, no judge touched it and I'
m not saying that in this case it doesn' t apply what law commands,
because the law is the law. He said good for everything, but
he doesn' t believe the judge. Or the judge should not think that
three months of pretrial detention is excessively abusive, especially when a person is being
charged with an offence that is easy to prove, that he can be sent
to trial and that this person, in that trial, exercises the defense of
what is being charged and that the prosecution does its job and then applies to
what the law orders, without prejudicing him, because it is an advanced sentence
that everyone is doing cursed, abusive judges. And you talk about this and
I had a bunch of assholes saying you' re defending what they' re
doing? You' re minimizing what that guy did or didn' t do.
I' m seeing it. As it is, that cannot be treated
the same as an attempted rape. Or like a rape of a minor or
an attempted murder, or a murder or murder. It' s just not
the same crime. It' s just that the Mardito law criminalizes the crimes.
That' s why, if not all the crimes here had the same
penalty and the same treatment. But now we have the judges book Beu,
because here everyone put you for their like and pass viu and so you can
not. But what do the laws say? That' s the question I
' m asking myself. Not to suppose, because how much is the sentence
that exhibitionism can have, five years in prison and care, what is the
investigation, because it is supposed that and this is how simple people must understand.
The measures of coversion are seven, as I understand it, the penalty
of sending people is a measure of exception, extremely exceptional. And that'
s the norm in a country where 80 percent of the prison population is waiting
to be convicted. And here they send you to the street. He'
s buying redon for jail. He' s down the street cupirredon. And
when you defend that, you' re telling the abusive judge, you'
re telling the abusive prosecutor to keep abusing because that' s yours. The
intention behind the measure of coversion is that the subject should not abstain from the
process and put ban do mardito uprooted as an eto. Please, two racers
to leave have a private day in the huero. They are not going anywhere,
nothing that a shackle or periodical presentation or payment of a bond cannot resolve.
Not three fucking months to jail, because it' s not doing what
it' s like to reciprocate. What is appropriate is to win applause from
the public, because the judges are mounted in the wave of influence. Everyone
here wants their fucking like and their fucking viu with pleasure to the public who
knows nothing about laws that that' s the big deal. And when you
explain to people that, in these cases that' s abusive, because when
a judge abuses a citizen like this, he' s trespassing or you'
re three fucking months, two people who look like a goddamn engine and then
they don' t want that and then they want people to have faith in
justice they can' t have it, because you have some damn lead glove
accusers for those who have nothing and very lax like those who have the means
to solve it like that. You can' t. If you can'
t really not, and it' s not that you' re not convicted
of the crime you committed. But three damn months, but why is that
time supposed to be the time taken by the public ministry to investigate, establish
evidence of his accusation, etc, establish witnesses, blah blah blah, blah
blah no and bring to justice in very timely and very exceptional cases than those
who should be sent to jail. Not here, the world goes three months
for you, three months for Monteplata prison, three months for victory. Three
months for vega jails, three months for rafal. It' s just that
here all damn three months how big you get three months, but it lasts
longer. A tripe lasted three months, two years, two years. That
' s right. That' s because the leaf where I was in jail
was lost. Ah look how cute and it happens a lot. That'
s a lot, that' s where they' re giving him three months
in any jail, but then they last one or two years, eight months.
So you do this pointing out and there' s a creep who doesn
' t even sit around and talk to a lawyer and listen to what'
s the judgment he has on these of these abusive and disproportionate practices to tell
you not you, whatever you agree with what I did. Look, if
you ask me to walk in a street choir, it shouldn' t even
be a crime, according to my judgment. But the law is the law,
well. I don' t know. There you go. For the
first time, there are two more things than the prosecutors, the judges.
Here there is little lawyer who defends the mind, because this one if the
law says it' s three months, well, there' s supposed to
be a process to be carried out. A game. You can' t,
you can' t grab a tiger and present and give him three months
without a defense. Yeah, the game, even if you defend it,
as you define it, sends you three months, I DIDN' T Well,
if it says the law, that' s what you wanted to do.
If they do, but they say it because you defend it and carry
the budgets that you carry. If Thursday dis you go three times to jail,
you go three months to jail? Well, if that' s what
the lik says, then it has to stick to what you' re going
to. I mean, the law allows you three months in prison under certain,
certain criteria. You understand that' s what the lawyer has to defend.
But if the judges do what they want and there is no society to
control them, they do what they still do what they want to do.
And within the same community of judges, there are judges who are very critical
of that. In fact, there is one of them that he writes and
the subject he touches on is exactly that, the issue of the abuse that
some magistrates have, of the measure of coversion, of deprivation, of the
freedom of the prisons of the Dominican Republic as the only measure of coversion.
Then the conversation here must be honest. We have abusive judges and prosecutors who
abuse and nobody wants to take care of that. We' re coming to
the rhythms of the morning.