Attention. You're listening to the top Huff Radio show, America's home for conservative
not bitter talk radio. Be advised. The content of this program has been
documented to prevent and even cure liberalism, and listening may cause you to lean
to the right. Here's your conservative but not Bitter host Todd Huff. Greetings,
my friends, and welcome to this hour of the Todd Huff Show.
As always, it is a pleasure to be here. You know the routine.
If you want to be part of the conversation, email Todd at totofshow
dot com, or you can text three one seven two one zero twenty eight
thirty thoughts, questions, feedback, adoration, and praise always accepted at that
email and ext the dress. By the way, we also are gearing up
to take phone calls. I've gotten many people say, hey, do you
take phone calls? I don't take them. Well, we haven't been taking
them period for several reasons. One of which is when we when we travel.
Of course, it makes things a little difficult, which is still a
factor when we when we're able to get back out on the road with the
Truth Tour. But the other reason, well, the other reason, well,
we just it's it's tough to manage internally, but if you want to
call in, you're going to be able to do that as a member.
If you want to be a member of our inner circle. There's other benefits
as well. You can check those out at Todd Huffshow dot com slash join
and again, one of those is you'll get a private number, and we're
gonna eventually take some some phone calls from from members. We're not there yet,
but we're ramping up, and so that is something that is coming here
in the near future. Folks, who do you want Trump's v there's a
recent poll about that that I want to talk about. I want to talk
about here today. That's where I want to begin. There is again a
bunch of stuff in the stack of stuff that I mean a lot of stuff
today, a whole lot of stuff. And I always put again I always
put in the stack of stuff that's always on the website. If you want
to see what we're talking about, you want to reference it, if you
want to know. Sometimes I just touch on it and I'll mention it anyway,
that stuff's always on the website. Before we get rocking and rolling here
this hour, let me tell you a little bit about our friends at my
USA shop club dot com. MYUSA shop club dot com. They have over
four hundred and fifty non toxic household and personal care products, products that you're
already using. You're already using these products. They've also got products that support
your immune system. And this is a company that is not woke. Right,
They're not going to use the money that you give them for things that
you need, things like cleaning supplies or personal hygiene products, or laundry cleaning
stuff or whatever. You're not going to You're not going to find that they're
trying to elect people or push an agenda. They're not out there in favor
of DEI and all this woke stuff. This is a traditional American values company
and you should, I think consider shopping and getting your cleaning supplies, laundry
supplies, personal hygiene products, even products that support your immune system. Now
we get cleaning supplies from here, We get laundry detergent, shampoo, and
my daughter thinks that it smells like cupcakes. These cleaning products are safe,
they're non toxic. Our kids can use them while they're doing their chores.
That's right. We actually have a world of chores here in the huff household.
Do not mess with mom about that clean fresh sense in these products that
don't come with the toxins. Plus, this is delivered right to your door.
It's a convenient thing. Check it out my USA shop club dot com.
MYUSA shop club dot com. That's where you can connect with them.
Get the details on how you can shop these products my USA shop club dot
com. So let's start here. Who do you want? That's something you
can send me right. You can send me if you want, You can
text me. If you want who you want Trump's VP to be, you
can email me this. The texting number again is three one seven zero twenty
eight thirty. I'd like to hear your opinions. I haven't decided what.
I have a couple of ideas, but I haven't decided. I think about
this now in many respects, and this is not meant to be Oh boy,
I'm gonna say it. You just never know how people interpret things.
But I don't look at this as a big issue. It is a factor.
I mean, there are people that I think are undecided voters, and
I believe me, I have no idea how you're undecided. I was not
an undecided voter on election day. Well, whenever they told us that Biden
was president, I knew who I was voting for. You did too,
most of you. Some of you didn't. Okay, I mean I can
respect that to a point. But how in the world do we get through
three and a half years of pure hell in this country? Economically open borders,
international relations, things happening on the world stage, wars erupting, the
value of the dollar is worth nothing. This is why, by the way,
that song getting close to a year ago, now, that song by
Oliver Anthony went so well, went viral, went viral. I remember writing
about that in our column, in fact, one of the first things I
wrote wrote about in our column. But it's because the realities of the difficulties
in this world, in this America in twenty twenty four and twenty twenty three,
in twenty twenty two and twenty twenty one, those the difficulties we face
now, certainly individual difficulties. You can't blame Biden. That's not even my
suggestion or my point. The point is is that there are certainly difficulties that
all Americans are, the vast majority of us, have to deal with because
of the leadership in Washington, d C. There's no question about this,
no question about what's the name of that song, Oliver Anthony sung Oz do
you remember? I can sing it. I'm not going to sing it.
I've been selling my soul for working all day overtime hours for bull crap pay.
That's the edited version anyway. But people feel it. And it's if
they feel it so much that a song like that goes goes viral, goes
from an unknown artist. And I don't mean that in a bad way.
He's just he wasn't known at the time. But this issue of selecting,
choosing the vice president of the United States, it is important. And there
are people out there who still for some reason, have not decided who they're
going to vote for, and there are people that might vote for Trump based
upon who this vice presidential candidate is. So there was a poll recently done
and by the way, I'm looking here, what is this? This is
the Dailycoller dot com poll reveals headline here poll reveals which president sued me.
Vice president pick helps Trump with voters the most. So Daily Caller says this.
A recent poll found that voters say they would be more likely to support
former President Donald Trump. If Republican want to pause your final guesses. If
you've not seen this, you can tell me, or you can just tell
yourself. Three two one. South Carolina Senator Tim Scott is the one that,
apparently, according to this poll, would help Trump the most. Scott
leads the field of possible vice presidential contenders, including former Republican presidential candidate Vivek
Ramaswami, Republican Florida Senator Marco Rubio. I've not seen his his name flittered
around much, but Marco Rubio, Republican Representative Eleased Stefanic of New York,
and former Independent Representative Toulci Gabbard, former Democrats of Hawaii. She was remembered
she ran for president according to a Harvard Harris pole. Now this is a
little deceiving because they make it sound like it's conclusive. Scott Scott. Tim
Scott drew twenty five percent among voters who said they were more likely to vote
for Trump if he was on the ballot, followed by twenty three percent for
Ramaswami twenty two percent for Rubio. Stephanic pulled the lowest across all voters,
with only thirteen percent reporting that they would likely vote for a Trump Stephonic ticket,
while Gabbard received nineteen percent support. Also mentioned as possible picks to be
Trump's running mate include Republican Governor Christinom of South Dakota. Remember but, folks,
she's not going to be the pick. She between telling the stories of
shooting her dog and not answering questions about what was the question she was avoiding?
Oh something? In her book, remember that we talked about that on
this program, she wrote about an encounter she had allegedly with Kim Jong un
along the DMZ, the Demilitarized Zone in Korea. She said, she's stared
down that little tyrant, just like she stared down those little tyrants when she
was working as a Sunday school teacher, children's director or something in a church
where the kids, of course were the little tyrants, according to her book.
I mean, that's not gonna help her out. But she had sixteen
percent, and then Republican Governor Doug Bergham of North Dakota was favored by fifteen
percent of those polled. So, I mean, we'll see where this turns
out. I don't know who do you who? Do you want? Oz?
Do you have a preference. OZ does not have OZ does not have
a present a preference. So we'll see, we shall see. But that
is something that's coming up. And you know, I think that I don't
know when these picks are normal, and I have to go back and look
specifically, but I feel like, you know, summertime is when these picks
are traditionally made. I feel like Pince was chosen, I want to say.
And I don't know. I feel like it might have been June,
maybe July. But with the debates the debate schedule being earlier, it might
push this to be a little quicker because because there's going to be a vice
presidential debate. The conventions are not until August, when the candidates will be
officially nominated by their political parties. But things might get bumped up a little
sooner because of this debate schedule. The debates, by the way, the
first debate is just a month away. It's just a month away. I
can't wait. I can't wait for that. Didn't watch I didn't watch a
single I might have watched a couple of minutes, and I mean like two
minutes of a Republican debate. I didn't I didn't watch them because it was
irrelevant because, like I said at the time, and I stand by it
today, Trump was Trump is and he was the the obvious nominee. Everybody
else was playing for a distant second the place, a very very distant second
place, and Trump wasn't on the debate stage. He didn't have need to
go there. So there you go. That's what a poll shows. Tim
Scott, Tim Scott, Marco Rubio, avek Ramaswami are the ones who apparently
helped Trump the most. But it's it's so razor tight within a margin of
error. I don't know that what you can really ascertain from that, but
those are some of the names being bantered about and kicked around. So but
that's going to be coming fairly soon as we start to gear up for the
final stretch, the beginning of the final stretch of this of this campaign.
So more I want to get to here, but I want to remind you,
my friends, my Pillow is still having their twenty five dollars extravaganza.
They've been canceled by box stores, they've been canceled by shopping channels, and
so they are providing products directly to you. They've always done this But now
that they've had those other avenues taken away for how they deliver their products to
you, they're building up. They're growing their presence of direct sales, which
you can get their products by going to my pillow dot com slash Todd.
And of course you're gonna save when you use my name Todd during checkouts for
starters, you'll be able to be to get us a whole bunch of products
under this twenty five dollars Extravaganza promotion. And there's a lot of products again
that you can find at my pillow dot com slash Todd. On top of
that, if you use my name Todd, you're gonna get free shipping on
your entire order eight hundred five four four eight nine three nine. You can
call that number as well. Again, use my name Todd at checkout,
it's gonna get your free shipping eight hundred eighty nine thirty nine my pillow dot
com slash Todd for the MyPillow twenty five dollars extrava Ganza. So get back
to the stack of stuff here. I want to shift gears a little bit
here, a little bit here. As we go through the news of the
day, my friends of course, we just talked about who apparently Republicans want
or who might help Trump be the most in the upcoming election. Something else
that is going to help Trump quite a bit, help Trump quite a bit,
is, of course, the state of the economy. The state of
the economy. Biden is now out there blaming the state of the economy on
quote corporate price, goallenging. Now, now pause for a moment. Specifically
when he's he's blaming not just the overall economy. He's going to tell you
the economy. The economy is good. They want you to believe. By
the way I was thinking about this, friends, you don't need to be
convinced the economy is good. If the economy is good, let me say
that again, because I think that that's a nuggative truth that we need to
that we need to accept and be prepared to proclaim and defend. We as
Americans, You as an individual, me as an individual, do not need
to be convinced the economy is good. If the economy is truly good,
it's remarkable what happens. I see this on a regular basis. You probably
do too, if you follow this closely. When Republicans are president and the
economy is good. The American public is subjected to a narrative by the media
where they are attempted to be convinced by the media. The media attempts to
convince them, the American public, that the economy is not as good as
they think it is. This happened during Bush's term. I mean, they
were clamoring for a recession. They were begging for a recession. They talked
about recession constantly, even when things were good. Oh man, things are
so good, it's going to have to come to an end. There's going
to have to be a recession. That's kind of how it was framed.
I mean, you can go back and look at this. I studied this
at the time I was being taught and I was navigating this stuff by the
late Great Rush Limbaugh. I remember it happening. It absolutely is how they
did it, and it's what they consistently do. So when Republicans are in
office, they want to convince you the economy isn't as good as what it
really is. When Democrats are in office, they want to convince you that
the economy is better than it really is. Again, you don't need to
be convinced if the economy is good because you experience it. You experience it,
and that's ultimately you know. A versu of the Bible has popped into
my head. The Bible says, taste and see that the Lord is good.
And ultimately, if we want to if we want to know, spiritually
speaking, biblically speaking, if we want to know that God is good,
certainly we can read the Bible. But there's a lot more you learn from
a personal relationship with Him, with the creator of the universe. That words
can certainly communicate. I'm not minimizing the words of the Bible, but taste
and see that the Lord is good, experience it in a similar fashion,
In a similar fashion, we can taste and see that the economy is not
good. We can personally experience. In fact, Oz sent me last night.
I wasn't prepared to share this, but let me go to this.
She I don't know where did you share this from? Oz? Where'd you
get this? She got it from Instagram? So we got to believe these
numbers are one hundred percent accurate. But I mean, you get the idea.
I mean this is someone has taken the time to put together prices from
menus of fast food restaurants McDonald's, Taco Bell, Chick fil A. They've
got prices at the end of twenty nineteen, the prices today middle of twenty
twenty four. McDonald's Medium French Fry twenty nineteen price a dollars seventy nine.
Mid twenty twenty four price four dollars of nineteen cents. That's a one hundred
and thirty one or thirty four percent increase. What about the McChicken. I
don't go to McDonald's. Nothing wrong if you do, I mean, I
guess you can do it too much. But McChicken back in twenty nineteen,
end of nineteen price is a dollar twenty nine for the McChicken. Now it's
three eighty nine. That's a two hundred and one percent increase. The Big
Mac boy. That reminds me When I was a kid, there was a
commercial of McDonald's and they listed a bunch of products. Big Mac mcdilt a
quarter pounder with some cheese. I could sing it back in the Day's why
I remember that Big Mac three ninety nine into twenty nineteen. Is this right?
Seven forty nine today eighty two percent eighty seven per I need glasses eighty
seven percent. Ten piece McNuggets four forty nine and at twenty nineteen now it's
seven fifty eight. That's a sixty eight percent increase. And the whopper and
this is not I mean no pun intended there, and I know that's Burger
Kings whopper. I'm not trying to give the tip of the hat to McDonald's
competitor. But the cheeseburger here, cheeseburger was on apparently the dollar menu at
the end of twenty nineteen one dollar. It is now three dollars and fifteen
cents, two hundred and fifteen percent increase. The same happens at Taco bell
Alm with some of the biggest let's see the biggest increase here would be on
the beefy five layer burrito. Twenty nineteen was a dollars sixty nine. It's
gone up two dollars to three sixty nine. That's one hundred and eighteen percent
increase. Chick fil A, Chick fil A's increase overall, well, their
average increase is higher, but they're they don't have some of these products of
spiked Chick fil As are more consistent. It looks like increase. Let's see
the biggest increase they had was the eight eight piece Chick fil A nuggets in
twenty nineteen or three h five. Now today they are five ninety nine and
ninety six point four percent increase. Biden, did that, my friend?
That that is inflation. Now, not every time a price goes up can
it be blamed on inflation. We've been through this a lot. Inflation is
a specific phenomenon that says. Inflation is a specific phenomenon that says that prices
go up because the value of the dollar has gone down. It takes it
basically takes more dollars to buy the same product because the the Fed, which
is I mean, it's a complicated thing, but the government effectively is printing
more money than the economy is creating through true value, and so it basically
steals from the dollars that you already have, the dollars that you are working
for. It makes them worth less, not completely worthless, though we're headed
in that direction, but it's not because of corporate price gouging. It's so
ridiculous, tell me you know nothing about economics without telling me you know nothing
about economics. So that is not how that works anyway, My friends,
more to say on this, but I'm gonna have to take a break here
in a moment. But I sell health, my friends, my friend Eric
Wilson, and I sell health. He's here to help you navigate the complexities
of the healthcare market. Premiums are talking about inflation. Premiums for healthcare slated
to go up five to eight percent in twoenty and twenty four. You may
have felt that already, it may be coming, but regardless, it might
be a great time to review your health plan for you yourself, personally,
for your family. If you're part of a group plan and are looking to
for other options, consider talking with Eric Wilson of i cel Health. He's
an expert on the Affordable Care Act. He's been featured in lots of places
where he shares his insight and opinion and experience. He's knowledgeable, he knows
how to navigate this stuff. He's here for a free, no obligation,
no cost consultation and you can call him eight one five three seven two thirteen
sixty three eight one five three seven two one three sixty three, or if
you prefer, visit him online at iseellhealth dot com. Plenty of other things
to get to my friends in the stack of stuff, and we will do
that in due course, but I've got to take a quick time out.
You're listening here to the home of Conservative not Better Talk. I am your
host, the one, the only, the benevolent dictator here behind the microphone,
Toddhoff back in just a minute. Welcome back to my friends. I
said to me during the break something about Trump not being able to pick Rubio,
and it occurred to me that, yes, they're from the same state.
Why is he in this poll then that we reference in the top of
the hour. I don't know. But it's a complicated scenario, actually a
really complicated scenario. So there's a clause in the constitution that prevents, well,
again, as it's interpreted. These things can always go to court.
Who knows what the actual interpretation would be by a court. The electors from
that state cannot vote for both the president and the vice president. They wouldn't
be able to do that, so they'd have to choose one or the other.
And so technically, technically, normally what happens is the president and the
vice president get the same number of electors because they run on a ticket.
But if the Florida electors cannot vote for Rubio. My goodness, this is
complicated. Then thirty Trump could be elected president. But if he didn't have
at least a thirty electoral vote cushion, meaning Rubio would get those electors from
another state, then there would be a problem. I mean, it's a
massive problem. I don't want to get into this because I really wasn't prepared
to talk about this. But Ozrai's is a good point. I don't know
why he was even in the poll, but he's up there. So Rubio
could change his residency. That's an obvious, obvious option. I don't know
if that's a good idea. I'm not suggesting it. That is an option.
But if he still resides in Florida, then you got this problem.
And if he doesn't get to the vote, don't get to two seventy.
So Trump could get to two seventy, Rubio, if he's the vice president,
may not, which then puts the choice for vice president. Man,
this is just this is the sort of stuff in today's world that we have
to at least talk about. Now. This is an avoidable situation if the
campaign says, look, it's way too risky to do this, unless,
of course, Rubio changes his residency, which would create its own series of
problems. But anyway, then the Senate would get to pick The Senate would
get to pick the vice president from the top two finishers. So if Kamala,
it could be Kamala and Rubio. But the Senate is going to be
at this point in time, it's controlled by the Democrats. Even if Republicans
win, this would be a Senate that's currently in session, so it would
be the Democrat controlled Senate. And to make matters even more complicated, this
issue of choosing the vice president is subjected, it is believed subjected to the
filibuster, which would mean the Senate would actually have to come up with sixty
votes instead of a simple majority to determine the vice president. I don't think
that that's going to happen. I'm just saying, boy, that opened a
can of worms that I was not. Once I stopped to realize they were
on the same in the same state, I thought they can't run together.
But some of that, some of that was I knew, but some of
it I didn't know. This is a that could be a complicated scenario.
Anyway. I just mentioned that to me after or during the break, and
I just wanted to kind of share that, share that with you since Rubio
is in the is in the poll. So what else do we have?
Again a bunch of stuff here in today's stack of stuff, since we're talking
about the Constitution. We've hit this briefly before, but this is there's a
longer, more comprehensive article in today's stack of stuff if you want to look
at this headline here says that Jack Smith's appointment violated the Constitution. Some legal
experts argue, so basically, basically, we have a scenario where Merrick Garland
in the appointment of Jack Smith's special counsel to investigate Trump for again, it's
a political witch hunt. But that was not There was no one that it
wasn't taken for approval. This was just basically done by Merrick Garland. So
let me read this to you. Days before Merrick Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed
special counsel of Jack Smith to investigate former President Donald Trump, experts who'd been
following the Justice Department investigations questions its necessity. Mister Smith was appointed on November
eighteenth, twenty twenty two. Would the appointment of an independent, independent lead
prosecutor undermined the Justice Department's own appearance of independence from politics. This is silly.
Of course, it's under the executive branch. The Department of Justice,
let's say it together, is under the executive branch, no matter how much
they want to make you think it's not. One is. The Attorney General
of the United States is appointed by president by the President, by Joseph Robinette
Bribery. He appointed Merrick Garland. By the way, this is a good
moment for me to just remind you you remember Obama nominated Merrick Garland for the
Supreme Court in twoenty and sixteen, in February after the passing of the late
Great antonin Scalia. And that's when McConnell. It's one of the few things
that i've agreed with Mitch McConnell about. He stood in opposition to the president
the Republicans had controlled the Senate. He said, we're not going to well.
He basically said, the responsibility of the Senate here as well of the
President, is that you can appoint somebody to the vacancy. As the Senate
we have a role to advise and consent, and our advice we advise that
we will not give you consent. We're going to let the American people vote
on a candidate this fall that's going to then choose the next Supreme Court candidate.
And of course at the time, they were saying, oh, this
guy is the most middle of the road guy you could possibly imagine. You're
displaying politics. This is a fair nominee. We're not going for a radical
leftist. We're going for a middle of the road guy, easy going.
Everyone's going to love this guy. You can't do that, Mitch McConnell.
Mitch McConnell stood firm. It's shocking, I know, but he stood firm.
And it was a factor. It was a factor in the twenty sixteen
election. It was a factor that some conservatives who did not want to vote
for Trump thought, at least we're going to have well, the worst case
scenario is we would have justices that would a justice nominated that was as liberal
as Hillary's justices would have been, but it wouldn't be any and so people
thought, well, some people thought, you know, I might as well
take my chances on Trump. And of course Trump came in with some fantastic
of course, you never know what these these justices, but he came in
with a fantastic pick. I mean, Neil Gorsich was the first one and
he is from what I can tell so far, Neil Gorsich is a solid
dude. I'm very pleased with how he's. Out of the three, he's
the one I'm the most impressed with, and that would be Neil Gorsich,
Amy Cony, Barrett, and of course Brett Kavanaugh. Anyway, So,
but we were told back then that Merrick Garland was just this completely unpolitical sort
of guy. Now he's out there appointing Jack Smith. He's appointed Jack Smith,
He's weaponized the Department of Justice. Just imagine what we avoided by Mitch
McConnell's, honestly is resilience. There. I commend the guy when he needs
to be commended. It's probably the only thing you're gonna hear me commend him
on. I hope it's not the case, but unfortunately more times than not,
it is. But he did the right thing there. So, going
back to the article with the appointment sorry, yeah, with the appointment of
an independent lead prosecutor underminded the Justice Department's own appearance of independence from the politics.
With the newly appointed prosecutors slow down the case. Those concerns have now
materialized, though not for predicted reasons. On June twenty second, US District
Court Judge Eileen Cannon will hear arguments on a motion to dismiss the classified documents
case against President Trump based on the unlawful appointment of the Special Council. Experts
who advanced this legal theory have told the Epic Times that's where this article is
written, that they plan to participate. That's what the Latin phrase. I
don't know how to pronounce that exactly, but friends of the Court, that's
how they plan to participate. So basically, this explains that the process,
what the argument is as to whether or not this was an unc institutional appointment.
Therefore, if it is unconstitutional, the work he has participated in in
this political witch hunt he Jack Smith would be null and void. So that's
a possibility. That's that's going on out there as well. So I wanted
to alert you to that that's in the stack of stuff if you want to,
if you want to read it in its totality. So, my friends
Nick knack Naturals, I told you about Nicknack Naturals. If you're using tobacco
based products. If you're smoking, if you're vaping, if you're chewing tobacco,
you're currently using nicotine, you're twenty one years of age or older,
and you're looking to crush your vice. You're looking to get away from the
smoke, the spit, the slimy pouches, the bad breadth, all the
other stuff that comes with that, the tar, the messiness. And if
you're looking for a cleaner form of nicotine that's naturally better than those alternatives,
those alternatives that I listed there, I encourage you to check out nick Knack
Naturals. It's a mint. It fully dissolves in your mouth, so you
don't have to deal with that smoke and bit and all that messiness. Go
to Nicknack dot com, in ic nac nicknack dot com. He's my name,
Todd. You'll save fifteen percent during checkout. You know, every time
I talk about this, or most of the time, I'm reminded of how
my grandfather had shared how that desire to have a cigarette. He had smoked
most of his life, I mean from the time he was I think a
teenager, and he shared with my mom that that was the desire for a
cigarette. He quit smoking cold turkey, but he said the desire was always
was always there, So I know it's powerful. My friends, Why not
find a better alternative than the smoke, than the spit, than the slimy
pouches Nick knack dot com promo code todd save fifteen percent when we get back
for the last segment. A few others that well, I can't get into
a few, but there's a few other things in my stack of stuff that
I want to review and see which one I want to share with you in
the final moments of the program. We'll do that when we get back in
just a minute. Ah. Yes, welcome back to my friends. Since
we're talking about Department of Justice and talking about just well everything going on with
the government, here's a little bit of information that should be interesting. This
isn't interesting to me an interesting development. We know that Heritage and we know
that Judicial Watch has requested have put in a fo YOU Freedom of Information Act
request for the Department of Justice to release President Biden's interview with the Special Counsel.
Now this isn't Jack Smith, of course, this is the her report
that we're talking about, and Robert Hurr's interview with bi and has been a
subject that many folks are interested in because remember remember her report. Man,
there's so many things that happened, so many things that happened in this country.
It is hard to keep them all. It's hard to keep them all
straight, to be quite candid, I mean, these things happen and then
you forget about them because you've been enamored, hammered with everything else happening in
the news cycle. But if you remember, mister Herr found that Biden may
have broken the law, but he said, hey, there's no sense in
prosecuting the guy because he's so there's so many indications of just mental mental problems
that a jury would be sympathetic and would not convict him. And so people
said, well, he's basing this on on his interview that he had with
with President Biden. And of course the left got mad because they say,
why are you injecting interjecting this this opinion. You should have just said,
you know, I'm not recommending this to be prosecuted or whatever. Instead you
made these comments. So you said, he's not going to be I wouldn't
recommend prosecution, but that's because he can't. Really, he's just going to
appeal to the sympathies of the jury because of his inadequacies from a mental,
you know, a cognitive perspective, which of course brings all sorts of people
saying, well, what does that mean? So there's a there's a reason
that people would say, hey, this this is a government this is a
government run sort of deal. Here, we should be able to see the
government records. They have not released. They haven't released that interview yet,
or the at least the transcript of it or whatever. But now what's interesting
to me is that ABC, AP, CBS, and NBC they've all joined
Heritage. This is again I'm looking at the postmillennial dot com here, this
is in the stack of stuff. But they've joined with Heritage and Judicial Watch
in requesting, through a Freedom of Information Act request that the Department of Justice
release Biden's special counsel interview. Now you know that I believe, I firmly
believe that the media is one of the seven pillars of propaganda. It is
wielded by the left to further their agenda. It should be viewed as in
general. There are some exceptions of journalists out there, but they are notable
exceptions. The media at large is pretty much viewed as the pr firm of
the Democrat Party. So to have them join with Heritage and to join with
Judicial Watch conservative groups in basically asking or you could say, demanding the release
of this interview or the transcript or whatever they can get their hands on.
It's a peculiar sort of thing, because why you could say, well,
maybe maybe whatever people have conjured up in their imagination is worse than what this
actual interview will show us, So maybe it could in theory help Biden.
I mean that's possible. I don't think. I don't mean, I don't
know. Maybe that is the angle. I don't know. I'm just telling
you my thought process on this. The other thing would be, you know,
have they have they given up on Biden? Are the people that have
been saying for a long time that Biden won't be the nominee, that someone's
going to replace him at the convention? I'm not you know that, I'm
not a big believer in this, although I put nothing past them. I
don't think that's the case. But you know, if they've abandoned Biden and
they've got a candidate, did they convince Michelle Obama to run? And then
this is going to you know, this could be used to push Biden off
the ballot at the convention and insert Michelle Obama or Oprah Winfree or Gavin whoever
they've got, whoever they think, which again, they don't have any candidates,
and their dream candidate's Michelle Obama or someone like an Oprah Winfrey. But
I mean, I don't know that that's happened. That's always to me been
a very very unlikely scenario, though I wouldn't put it past them. I
just don't think that how much does it help them? But they may reach
the point where they just say that there's nothing salvageable about this. We can't
we're not going to be able to do anything with this information or with this
candidate, I should say, and so we might as well release the information
and let him go down and then see if we can pick up to pieces
that could be possibly what's going on. I don't know what's going on.
I know it's not that they've suddenly that they've suddenly had an interest in truth
and that they've suddenly had an interest in making sure that the American people know
news that is detrimental to their candidate. I know that that's not what's happened,
but specifically, I'm not sure, but it's definitely peculiar. It's definitely
interesting to find out that ABC, the AP, CBS, NBC, they've
all joined the Heritage Foundation in Judicial Watch. In their requests, they're a
Freedom of Information Act for the release of the Department of Justice Special Council interview
with Biden. So anyway, my friends, I've got to go have a
great day. STG.