What we have to admit. They want emit want they want to capture to
offset. But this is again, this is dominated by about one seventh of
the world. So one seventh of the world is marching down this path.
The other sixth seventh really isn't. They're trying to develop on a normal fashion
and use hide recovering fuels. But this is a zero thing is going to
come crashing down. It's going to take a couple decades. But there are
many, many reasons at point to that, and so that that would be
what we need to discuss. You are listening to Carrie Let's Financial Survival Network,
where you get valuable information. You just can't find anywhere else to thrive
in today's trying times. You need the Financial Survival Network now more than ever.
Go to Financial Survival and Network dot com and get your free newsletter and
gift. Financial Survival Network now more than ever, and welcome. You are
listening to the Financial Survival Network. I'm your host, Carry Lutz. Hey,
with little more than a month ago, figured we'd bring you a little
skepticism. You know, we are professional skeptics on Financial Survival Network, especially
when it comes to the government trying to do something that many of you obviously
don't want or when it comes to the government's policies on energy, we're especially
skeptics there. And person you're about to hear from author of four books form
of engineer, entrepreneur, business owner, and this book just came out August
first, called Green Breakdown The Coming Renewable Energy Failure. I'm not sure about
the title. I think it's already here, but maybe the coming realization of
the coming of the current energy renewable energy failure. His name is Steve Garham.
Steve, thank you so much for coming on the show. Hey,
if you got a question for Steve or myself, shoot me an email,
hatel whatever you know. I realize you guys, many of you out there
don't like to hear shade thrown upon your head climate cause. But Steve,
Hey, the failure is already here. It's just that we're not going to
know it for two or three years. Right. Well, Kerry, I
don't think it has quite failed yet. Been great to join you. The
world is spending about just about a trillion dollars on renewables to try and stop
the planet from warming. We have more than one hundred and eighty heads of
state that say they believe that humans are causing dangerous global warming. We have
all of our major universities, are leading Fortune five hundred companies, the newest
media, so also signing up to the theory. The United Nations are scientific
organizations. So the world is still more is very much marching down this path.
And the goal is to be what they call net zero by twenty fifty,
basically zero carbon dioxide emissions from well on processes. And what we have
to admit they want emit, they want they want to capture to offset.
But this is again, this is dominated by about one seventh of the world.
So one seventh of the world is marching down this path. The other
sixth seventh really isn't. They're trying to develop in a normal fashion and use
hyde recrubbing fuels. But this zero thing is going to come crashing down.
It's going to take a couple decades. But there are many, many reasons
at point to that, and so that that would be what we need to
discuss. Look, the reason why I say it's a failure already is thus
far the best guestimate. We have spent five trillion dollars on so called renewables,
renewable energy, and for our efforts, four percent of the global energy
is now produced by renewables. So it's failed already dollar for dollar. You
know, when you talk sustainable energy, the most sustainable form of energy that
has ever been created, besides nuclear power is petroleum, right, petroleum based
energy, hydrocarbons, natural gas. What's more sustainable than that? It fed
this great leap forward of technology, of economics, of civilization, lifting many
of you out of poverty. Isn't that the definition of sustainability? Yeah,
a few plot global energy use or global hydrocarbon energy use and gross a national
product. You find it very highly correlated matterfactor. If you plot curbon dioxide
emissions with gross domestic product from the world, those are very highly correlate.
That's probably the best indicator of human prosperity that we have, if you want
to take a metric. But now, as we say we have we have
a most of the wealthy world that is actively trying to suppress car suppress the
use of hydrocarbons, and so we're we are merging down this road. The
thing is that we are going to have a breakdown, and we're go to
have about three or four main things on the breakdown. The first is we're
going to have much higher electricity prices and much higher energy prices. The second
is we're going to have blackouts in our electricity system because we're putting an intermittent
wind and solar for always on coal, nancial gas and nuclear power. So
we're gonna have blackouts that are coming along. We've seen some already. We're
going to have a loss of freedom because we have a number of governments,
including our own ask government, telling us that we most by an electric car.
We must get rid of our gas too. We must take all of
our power plants and convert them to a carbon capture or window solar. And
then the fourth thing is we're going to have transnational energy shocks, and we've
seen the first of those, and these are based on green energy. We've
seen the first of those in Europe over the last two years. The price
of natural gas still remains twice as high as it was two years ago,
and the price of like tity is three or four times as high, and
Europe has taken a step function down on it in their standard of living.
So the more we push intermittent renewables, the more we're going to see these
these four effects. All right, so is there a climate crisis that needs
all this? Well, that's that's another thing. Yeah, the fommendation of
all this is really on a faulty basis. The idea that humans are causing
dangerous climate change by emitting a trace gas into the atmosphere carbon dioxide. The
theory is plausible, there's a greenhouse effect, and by putting CO two in
the atmosphere, we're warming up the atmosphere. The problem is that human emissions
are a tiny part of all the overall greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, and
both the greenhouse effect and global warming is dominated by natural factors, not man
made emissions. So it's unlikely with all these efforts to transition, we're going
to be able to produce a measurable effect on global temperatures. Okay, so
it's all based it's all based on the faulty, faulty premise, and I
actually call it the the greatest modern superstition in history. Yeah, put it.
But you know the idea that if you can say that, that you
believe if we change the lap bulbs we can save polar beers, and if
we all drive electric cars, we can stop the oceans from rising, and
if we build wind turbines, we can make the storms less severe and less
frequent. That's the closest definition to superstition that I can think of. All
right, so well, let's talk about that. We're now experiencing the so
called hottest summer on record, and now the temperature the oceans, you know,
off the coast of Florida, it was like one hundred degrees, like
hottest ever. But then the media forgot to tell us that there is a
major undersea volcano I think in the Pacific someplace that basically heated up the oceans.
And yet even with the oceans being so hot, you know, it's
the middle of hurricane season in Florida, we haven't seen any yet. Yeah,
that's right, it's it. We may hit a zero hurricane landfall this
year, which does happen every once in a while. Twelve years, twelve
years of a year, right went without you know, twelve years. Yeah.
The headlines in July were that we had the hottest month in one hundred
thousand years, which was complete nonsense. I can show a mountain of evidence.
There's a whole bunch of sites, including my own Steve goream dot com.
But there's much much evidence that we had warmer temperatures on the Earth about
a thousand years ago during the mediaval worn period, when the Vikings settle southwest
West Greenland, which at the time had trees twenty feet high. Now there
are no trees and there's nothing but scrub grasses. Two thousand years ago when
the Romans conquered the Mediterranean in short Skirts, and then four and eight thousand
years ago. We've had walt century long periods in the past ten thousand years
that have been warmer than today. Today's climate is not historically warm. In
one piece of evidence, in an ocean of evidence, there's a glacier in
Switzerland called the Ruined Glacier. I don't know if you've ever seen it.
The Rhone River runs out of it. It's kind of a wall to the
wall between the mountains. Well that has been receding for more than a century.
But every time it recedes, they find things like wagon wheels under it,
and they find horse bridles, and they find wood that's four thousand years
old, and all of it is evidence that it was warmer in the past
and it is today. Naturally long before we had SUVs or power plants,
and there are just many, many instances of that. Another one has better,
of fact, the state high temperature records. If you and there's a
site that the National Shanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAH keeps the street the State Streams
site, and if you go to that, you find that twenty three of
the state high temperature records were set in the nineteen thirties, twenty three out
of fifty and if in a thirty six, seventy percent of them were set
before nineteen seventy. Wow, So they're just there's just much much evidence that
we've had naturally warm periods in the past. It's about one hundred degrees there
today in Chicago, which is it was just very warm. But our state
high temperature record was in Illinois was in nineteen fifty four. There was one
hundred and eighteen fahrenheit. And I've never seen anything like any anywhere close to
that in my lifetime of seventy years or so. So a lot of this
press is just rung. But Steve, what about the oceans. They're they're
getting higher and they're gonna, you know, Florida's just gonna basically be overwhelmed
with all the water coming in and it'll cease to exist. Isn't that true?
You're right, well, ocean ocean rice is the most hazardous forecast of
climatism, as I'll call it. And by the way, that was in
the title of my first two books. And now mister Trump and mister Ramaswami
are using the term climatism, so it's nice to describe the ideology. But
yeah, the former prices a voice President l Gore. Doctor James Hansen of
NASA predicted a twenty foot sea lettle rice in the year twenty one hundred and
sometimes when I present, I show a map which shows that much of Florida
would be flooded if we had a twenty foot rise. We had, we'd
have a big red everywhere on the coast. So what people need to know
about sea level rise is oceans. The first off, oceans have been rising
since the last day, say the last twenty thousand years NASA. You're gonna
go to the site with NASA and I'll show a chart that shows they've gone
up one hundred and twenty meters or three hundred and ninety feet in the last
twenty thousand years. There's so much oceans have gone on going up. No
scientists can, no climate scientists can tell you when natural sea level rice stopped
and man made sea level rice began. But our best tied gages today show
that the oceans are rising at about seven or eight inches per century, not
the twenty feet per century that some are projecting. So these are all based
on computer videl projections and not on historical data. Well, models are never
wrong, right, Well, the climate models appear to be wrong on there
are many many minions, as for example, in nineteen eighty, In nineteen
ninety and the first in the IPCC's first Assessment report. The IPCC is the
inter Governmental Panel and Climate Change of the United Nations, they predicted that we
can believe that the presence right, they predicted the temperatures would would be rising
three tenths of a degree celsius per decade, with a half of half a
per clesius and a low of two tenths so. But but thirty years later,
now we can take a look at the data, and our temperatures are
well below their low average and what the models predicted. So we're seeing a
very gentle rice. But the computer models. It's clear that they're wrong.
They're wrong. Huh. Okay, So what about this climate gate thing.
I'm sure you've delved into that a lot. It just got hushed, Yeah,
like it did never even happened. Well, I talked about that in
my first books, in my first two books, Climatism and The Bad,
Bad, Mad World of Climatism. The So what happened was that the hacker
got into the climate research unit in England at the University of East Anglia and
released about a thousand emails talking about conversations between the scientists, and there were
all sorts of things in there, talking about suppressing the scientific journals, about
trying to change the the rise and the fall of temperature curves, talking about
well if we just adjust this up here and we adjust this down here,
and we have to get rid of the medieval warm period, which you remember
I mentioned this was one of the warm periods in the past. So so
you know, it is. It is strange, and I do believe that
the climate scientists are sincere and they think that there is a problem, that
the world is warming. But then they say then it appears that their their
their position has said, well we have to you know the the the cause
is so important, but danger is so great that we have to be able
to we can even falsify data to allow us to present the right image.
And that's exactly what they did. As a matter of fact, a former
Vice President Gore has talked about that. He said, and I'm paraphrasing,
he said, you know, adjustment of the data or or a little bit
of exaggeration is okay. In a number of other scientists have said the same
thing. So it makes uh, it makes for We've also had the Noah
and and NASA have adjust to their temperature curse decades after the temperature the temperature
the aperture thermometer measurements were taken. So they're putting in all these adjustments in
addition to the original temperature readings from the thermometers. And so it's very tough
to to believe a lot of the data that you see. I do believe
we have had a little bit of warming, very small about one degree celsius
since eighteen eighty and the last one hundred and forty years, but that is
dominated by natural factors, not man made emissions. So that's explains the heat
wave, that one degree rise, that we're having this set set it well
this summer, you know we've got well, it gets hot in the summer,
and that's that's what happens. And again for most of the states.
I think you're in Florida. The record temperature in Florida was one hundred and
twelve. Let's see that was set back in nineteen thirty one. I don't
have the location, but they can look that out. Not let's see that
was ending like that since that was in Mana Cella or whereever the it is.
But yeah, so that is is in situation. Nevertheless, the press
as always talking about how everything is terribly hot and then humans are causing it
and that the planet's overheating it. It is. It sells papers, you
know, it sells news media, but people should really not believe it.
All right, Well, hey, we're skeptics about everything in anything the government
says or try to get it tries to get us to do. You should
be too. Tell us the book. Where do we find it? I
assume Amazon and wherever fine books used to be sold. Yes, screen breakdown
is it Amazon? It's a color paper back, two hundred and fifty six
pages. It will give people if you have a stove, if you have
a car, if you have its electricity, you really need to read this
book and see what's going on. There any books available as well on Apple,
Amazon, Google and the Noble or they can get one from our website.
I'll send them a sign copy if they're on order one. Steve Gorham
G O. R. E. H Am dot com. All right,
and I'm hoarding gas stoves. I've got a room where we've got six of
them now because I just don't trust them and I don't like cooking with electric
gas as far superior. There's no health issues for gas stoves. That's just
total nonsense. Hey, Steve, how'll shate you're coming on and go get
thank your Curry. Yeah, go get Steve's book. If you've got any
question for Steve myself kl at carry Lutz dot com. Make sure when you
go to the site Financial Survival Network dot com you sign up for your free
newsletter. Steve a pleasure, be well, good luck on the book.
Thanks Curry. Until the next time, Thanks for listening to carry Letts's Financial
Survival Network your solution to today's trying times. For the latest, go to
Financial Survival Network dot com. Financial survival Network now more than ever