Hello everybody, this is going to be a very strange, interesting journey tonight.
Before you ask, No, it's not gonna be here tomorrow. Yeah,
I just found out today, So don't send stuff and don't bombard otherwise.
Just have a hold on until until next week, all right. But
that following week my birthday day, August twenty eight, doctor Henry Eale and
doctor Artist will be here. But tomorrow. No, just found out today.
Okay, So moving on, let me go ahead and put this up
so you can see what I'm looking at. Bitch, get on there.
What the fucker just where I want you to be? Nope, that one,
there you go. Okay, So this is called homunculous Unveiled from the
channel mind Unveiled. Now I'm showing you a few things in the last couple
of you know, videos of mine from this channel that is not to be
misconstrued as me, I don't know, advocating and or promoting this channel in
a way that says I agree with everything that they say or do, because
that's not true. Number One, I would have to do more watching and
understanding of who these people are for me to ever say I vouch for these
human beings it's not something I would do or take the time to figure out.
What I'm saying is this information is interesting, so interesting that it's worth
a ponder, and that's what that's what we're gonna do. So this is
literally a freaking nine hour and fifty four minute video. Hell no, we're
not going to watch the whole thing tonight, but they're probably gonna get up.
And now let's look at all these ancient references to medicine, ready debunks,
spontaneous generation, secret societies and intro common homunculous themes, Medieval references in
intro John D. Hermes her medicism, Man Drake, very interesting this thing
right here, Golem Albertus Magnus, Egyptian alchemy, Paracelsus intro paracel Parascelsus di
Natura Rerum, and influential medieval authors Robert Flood, Martin Rulin the Elder,
and it goes on and on and on and on and on and on and
on and on. Arabic sources, human hermoculus, Arabic occult secret, occult
secrets, I Rosicrucian intro Rosicrucians, and Freemasons. That's probably right. War
will stop righting around two forty one o two. Maybe we'll touch a little
bit onto the templar intro. But then it gets even more and more fascinating
as it goes down here. So of course this maniac mind of mine will
need to listen to the whole thing, probably on my next drive to San
Diego or whatever, get another six hours of that in. But tonight we're
gonna listen to and review and ponder this strangeness that is this video. Now,
I can't play a straight off of YouTube because it's monetized, so every
ten minutes it'll get stuck on this thing where I have to hit skip,
even though I have a blocker on, it'll still make the screen turn gray
and it's going to have to wait a couple of seconds. So rather to
do that, I just download the video, so I'll go right from that.
But it's mind unveiled. I'm not confirmed or denying that they're good or
bad, so I don't know. I know sometimes it seems like they're way
of phrasing their words makes it seem like they're disappointed or or almost disappointed when
when when things don't get to evolve like experimentally, even though the horrible experiments,
and it sounds like there's sometimes sympathetic to like Luciferian occult ideas. So
I don't know what that means. I don't know if that's just my way
of perceiving something that's not what they meant by it. But that's just I'm
just leaving that out there, all right. Sometimes you have to hang out
with the weird and under to learn what the weird people think. Get this
video file up, man, everything's so slow. So I trying to type
in the whole shot of type in oh yeah, x as in all the
new stupid name for Twitter that we went over what I think about that in
a different video, But I clicked tea, thinking that's all I was gonna
need. So I had entered. I looked up in his fucking TikTok,
right, so I'm on, so I xed out of it, and then
in my in my in my headphones, I'm hearing some stupid public service announcement
through TikTok about with your TikTok, and it was layered in three different voices,
and that that tab was already gone and it wouldn't shut up. So
because I had already exed out of it and it was still playing. It
was like had taken over my computer. So I had to just restart my
computer before I started. This very strange. It's like a possession, except
it was not possession of a creature or human. It was a possession of
a computer, which is probably much easier that nearly Is it interesting? Welcome?
You just wait a minute, sir, You just wait a minute.
I'm doing stuffing. I'm talking here, all right. So if you didn't
notice yet, this is gonna be about alchemy. But it's not. We're
not talking about turning freaking metal into you know, metals into other medals,
and I'm talking about turning led into gold. Here. We're talking about the
creation of an artificial human through spontaneous generation. Possibly what the real alchemy was
all about when they had the veneer of this other you know, changing of
the elements. Thing has to do with bees. And I'm gonna tell you.
When I was in Salt Lake City, a symbol of the Masonic Order,
a symbol of the Mormons, a symbol of that giant Zion bank in
the middle of that city, is a honey. Is a beehive a beehive,
And that might become significant as you're listening to this and what they say
they can spontaneously generate through fermentation i e. Peutrefraction or petrification if you prefer
of you know, animal matter, cows, whatever. In this weird the
mixture of human semen and other weirdness of being better boom stirred in stirred in
sticking the Yemen for ten minutes at three hundred and fifty degrees And but uh,
you got a human monkey, animal human thing. I don't know.
So we're gonna we're gonna watch this and see if we can make sense of
it all. I'm gonna move my face out of the way for a moment
and we'll get started. And again, this is nine hours long, nine
hours and fifty four minutes long. We are no one going to watch about
two and a half of it tonight. But the two and a half is
super important. I think we're understanding what's possibly really going on. And once
again this should just hi right into the fact that, hey, these people
are absolutely insane and there's no reasoning with them that. Plus, this one
is not even as dark as the last couple. The other ones were really
dark. And if we even think that they are going to be humans that
we're going to be able to, Oh, I don't know, reason with
when they have everything aied up and drone, you know, weaponized, You're
not even getting to get to a human or active vinyl system. You're not
going to get close enough to a human to trying to reason with them before
you get like burned into a piece of dust on the ground. If we
allow it to continue the way it has unchecked without any type of upheaval,
and then they get to the point where they're already too far across the chessboard
and there's no beating them. Stop, Stop and think. Time in the
making, and we're really excited to present it today. We're diving deep into
the mysterious and strange world of the homunculus, a being that has captivated the
minds of alchemists, mystics, and philosophers for centuries. It has been referenced
throughout history by several reputable historical figures of science, such as Paracelsus and John
d But is this simply a made up story? The homunculus was said to
be a tiny, fully formed human created through mystical and oral chemical means,
But the question is was the homunculous ever more than just a myth. Was
it only possible to create tiny humans? What was this process of creating this
supposed miniature man? Or could this even be a reference to some type of
ancient form of cloning or artificial reproduction for full sized humans. The ancients were
known to be curious about the secrets of life in the natural world. Could
it be that they had devised a method to artificially create humans without the need
for sexual intercourse, an early form of a test tube baby that could lead
to the creation of a human being. Keep that question of mine as we
continue to explore. I want to give a big shout out to Juan from
the Juan on Juan podcast. He sent me some books and a bunch of
notes that really assisted us in creating this video, and I really couldn't have
created the video without him. He's the guy that knew the most about homunculous
in the communities. So finally, go check them out on Instagram, YouTube
and just go show them some love. Also, before we start, make
sure you check out the Cabbage Patch video series playlist as it connects with everything
we will be discussing. This video is a continuation of the series. With
that enjoy the show. Warning, well, you're about to watch is the
most insane video you ever see. Now is your chance to turn backing Nation
of midil hold On Entrepreneur. I guess two little bit, all right before
it gets started. If there can create tiny humans or other things, and
throughout this video they'll tell you how they can spend spontaneously generate certain creatures,
then maybe nano is created by things that are much smaller than us, because
how else would they have the dexterity to create moving parts and things if they
weren't scaled down to that size to do it. There's no effing way that's
something that's not even visible with the microscope could be possibly manipulated with any kind
of anything, doesn't matter. I don't care what people say. It's not
possible. There could be no moving parts in some kind of a mechanical machine
that's small, So I don't believe. So either a I don't believe nano
was a fucking thing, or it's not what they say it is, or
something much smaller than it with an intelligent brain is actually creating it. So
let's keep that in mind as we go along, because a lot of things
will trigger off in your mind as you're watching this, and how it relates
and connects to other things. At least I hope it does. It should
it really should. Most people in the modern day are very familiar with the
concept of a homunculous, the tiny artificial man created in a jar. It's
one of the most search terms on Google, and in twenty sixteen, the
term was revived due to viral videos under a Russian YouTuber who insisted he had
discovered the method of creating a homunculous. These videos convinced millions, but it
wasn't long until they were proven to be fakes. This ended up with the
term losing credibility and leading many to believe that this entire sub is just a
joke. The idea of the homunculous in the scientific community in the modern day
has been denounced as the mere fantasies or imagination of medieval writers in the seventeenth
century. Yet these mainstream historians are not willing to explore some areas of thoughts
on this topic, specifically esoteric secrets, as it is outside their expertise.
For this knowledge does into the science and art of the alchemist. Alchemy is
the foundation of modern science, so it's important for one to take the subject
seriously, especially when we can read with the scientists of that time actually wrote
on the subject. We must remember, as we begin to dive into this
material that the term homunculous may have dual fold meaning, meaning that it's not
so singular in its definition and may have multiple layered meanings. We know that
homunculus is Latin for little person cullus meaning little in homo for man or mankind.
Interestingly, the origins of the word go back to Proto Indian European term
dagomon, meaning of the earth, similar to the Old Irish DNA. Disconnects
to the clay references that we will see later, as the homunculus is also
said to be depicted as small statues made out of clay. One of the
earliest historical references to the concept of the homunculus is found in the work of
the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle. He explored the notion of a biogenesis, or
the idea that living organisms could emerge directly from non living materials. This is
reference to as spontaneous generation. In his work Degeneration and Emmalium, Aristotle examined
the belief that certain life forms like mice and maggots could spontaneously arise from inanimate
substances such as soil or grains. It gets really interesting because many, if
not all, the ancient Greek philosophers believed any form of this abiogenesis or spontaneous
generation. This is based off an ancient biological science known as preformationism. Preformationism
states that organisms develop from miniature versions of themselves. It's important to note that
preformation is believed that the form of the living thing exists prior to their development.
Will connect this later. Also, Pythagoras is credited as one of the
earliest thinkers to explain the origin of form in biological production, suggesting that the
father contributes the essential characteristics of the offspring, while mothers contribute only immaterial substrate.
It's important to note the similarity between supposed ancient Greek neoplatonic thought and the
magical systems used by the alchemists. The question is where the Greek philosophers secretly
alchemists and discussing a different type of biological production. This will all be brought
to question. Spontaneous generation can be found in ancient works by revered poets like
Avid. In Avid's Metamorphosis, he describes the creation of life throughout chemical elements
the earth, the air, and water bring a forth, suggesting that living
organisms originated from inanimate elements wind combined with fire. Another ancient Greek author on
the subject is Anaximander, who believed that life originated from a primordial mixture of
earth and water, and that simpler organisms emerged first, followed by more complex
life forms. This arguably is the precursor to modern evolution, as Anaximander suggested
that humans initially arose from a different type of animal, possibly a fish or
fish like creature, and that the early human ancestors underwent a process of gradual
development and adaptation to life on land. The key difference other than natural selection
being a Naximander believed in a primordial mixture in the concept of spontaneous creation.
There are other authors who speak on this. Interestingly, the Greek philosopher and
Pedocles, who lived in the fifth century BC, proposed that heavy rainfall mixing
with the earth would become fertile and spontaneously generate various life forms. He believed
that the combination of water and earth produced a wide range of organisms, including
insects and other small creatures. The idea is that these ancient authors, including
Aristotle himself, were just simply mistaken according to these mainstream historians. Interestingly,
in homer Zilia, there's a section in book nineteen where it discusses a body
being defiled by flies and the possibility that worms would come from them digging into
the wounds. What this shows is that they were well aware of the life
cycle of a fly, so obviously they were discussing some other matter here when
it comes to the spontaneous creation of other animals such as mice and frogs.
They knew about the fly life cycle, but it would take over two thousand
years from this first reference to supposedly debunk spontaneous generation. I'm not so sure
if I buy that whole story. Before we get into the details of the
homunculus, it's important to understand that there was an entire debate on this subject.
This is a matter that had already been discussed for thousands of years and
then took hundreds of years of debate. But even in the mid eighteen hundreds,
when Darwin published On the Origin of Species, his entire theory depended on
spontaneous generation, or, as Thomas Huxley termed it, a biogenesis. According
to the skeptics, the late sixteen hundreds experiment by Francesco ready supposedly debunked the
notion of spontaneous generation entirely. This really is an a fair argument, as
it's debatable whether or not this experiment completely debunked spontaneous generation as a whole.
First, it is important to note that Reddy was a Jesuit with a mission
to debunk spontaneous generation, a belief that was widely held at that time,
and interestingly, during the seventeenth century, around the same time as Reddy's experiment,
the concept of the homunculus began to fade from the mainstream scientific discourse.
Reddy is often considered a turning point in disproving the theory of spontaneous generation,
but the subject to spontaneous generation is not limited to simply flies and worms.
One, it was an experimental design, and it really was not comprehensive enough
to fully debunk spontaneous generation in its entirety, Yet it is constantly referenced in
that manner. It is possible to argue that this experimental design did not account
for all the possible scenarios. Two, there are numerous historical references to spontaneous
generation from respected figures such as many Greek philosophers and even Roman poets, yet
they were aware of the life cycle of the fly. Three. It really
is a subject of interpretation of the outcome of the experiment and could be argued
flowed completely. For example, the reason the maggots did not form in the
sealed jars is because the necessary conditions for the informations were just not met.
In many cases, the instructions for spontaneous generation are cryptic and ritualistic in nature.
Who's to say he performed the ritual directly. These experiments were in the
late sixteen sixties. It is an important experiment to note, as it initiated
further scientific study, but of course that's just a mainstream narrative. Ironically,
modern mainstream historians scoff at the idea of spontaneous generation, but in many cases
they are willing to consider alternative sci fi ideas such as pan spermia that suggests
life could have originated from extraterrestrial sources, which could be considered a type of
spontaneous generation. Dispresents an intriguing point for consideration, as there appeared to be
some contradictions within the mainstream explanation. The prevailing view is that alchemy began to
fade following Reddy's experiments in the increasing prominence of research using modern scientific methods.
Supposedly, these experiments started to challenge the ideas held by alchemists a few centuries
prior during the Renaissance. However, this time period was also known as the
Enlightenment. So which is it where the alchemist simply misguided? The situation seems
paradoxical because even after alchemy had begun to fade from mainstream science, prominent scientists
in these seventeen hundreds, such as Isaac Newton, remained interested in alchemy as
if it were a lost secret knowledge awaiting rediscovery. Why was Newton studying alchemy
even hundreds of years after it declined in scientific thought. He would even correspond
with Robert Boyle, the first chemist and one of the founders of modern chemistry,
discussing the subject of alchemy and secrecy. Not only did they keep their
interest secret, but it also became their life's work. Newton was the president
of the Royal Society for over twenty years. That's a pretty big deal.
And although there isn't any specific proof that Newton was a freemason, there are
many arguments to support that he could have indeed been connected or associated with a
secret order of some kind. I mean, the Royal Society itself, as
well as the foundation of modern science, was influenced by mainstreamry, so it's
a pretty fair question. We progress will be taking a look into the history
of secret societies and the use of cryptic occult symbolism. This will assist in
understanding how some of this information may have been lost or suppressed over time.
The Royal Society was founded by Robert Boyle, who we know was deeply associated
with alchemy, and by another figure named Christopher Wren, the famous English architect
responsible for rebuilding fifty two churches after the Great Buyer of What a Coincidence sixteen
sixty six, which that's the whole story of its own on how it was
possibly a set up by the Masons forgetting all that. It's well established that
Christopher Wren was a Freemason. Therefore, what we're looking at with this revival
of alchemy is that during this later time period of the early seventeen hundreds,
knowledge from a previous generation of elite brotherhoods were lost in discussed between the higher
echelons of society. In this case, the scientific elite of the later Enlightenment
period were attempting to rediscover or preserve this secret of the sciences of earlier brotherhoods.
So some people are willing to believe that in the present day that aliens
have the ability to clone, and we've seen this in many movies many times,
or that the government is secretly cloning individuals and that there are hidden underground
cloning laboratories. Whether this is true or not, if you're willing to consider
such possibilities in the modern time, well, it's only fair to consider that
similar activities may have occurred in the past as well. Cloning this could have
been the most closely guarded secret of the esoteric societies which were controlled by the
royal elite families during that time. Of course, some may argue that this
is because we possess a different technology and scientific understanding today. However, that
argument originates from a perspective fed to us by these royal societies or Secrucians,
Jesuits and Freemasonic brothers or the seventeenth century scientists unveiling new scientific advancement and technological
progressions. But many of these scientists, in their findings are funded by these
royally institutions, which can be clearly identified through their coat of arms. Even
if we trust the mainstream narrative in the level of technology presented for each age,
we should always consider that the highest forms of technology would be guarded by
the elite of its time. For example, something like the Ark of the
Covenant. Perhaps the science that an involved or depend on the need for modern
machinery or electronics, but instead it was an advanced occult art whose technique had
been guarded for ages. The homunculus can essentially be divided into multilayer definitions because
it simply does not refer to one thing. This will be clear as we
progress. The ancient practice of creating the homunculus far precedes alchemy, but will
highlight that the subject of the homunculus is deeply integrated with the deepest secrets of
the alchemical and hermetic tradition. Many have interpreted the Philosopher's stone as simply a
means for creating old from base metals, but the bigger secret is that the
philosopher's stone was used for creating artificial life. The homunculus represents far more than
just a tiny manner creature created in a jar. One. It refers to
a secret ancient art and knowledge of generation in combination with alchemy, or the
capturing and moving of souls. Two a secret occult double a double body,
another vehicle for consciousness. Three the capturing of a soul into a non living
object. Four esoteric secrets, which we'll get to towards the end. There
is much to cover in every definition will be explained, but this is a
huge subject. Because the homunculus and bodies humanities quest for forbidden knowledge and our
curiosity to uncover the mysteries of life. Many different subjects connect, especially when
we connect it with an understanding of alternative history false timelines into other subjects we
have covered in the past. In this investigation of the homunculus, we will
cover some of the most prominent subjects associated with this concept, shedding light on
their historical significance and impact on the development of modern science. We will focus
on the contributions of several influential scientists who were captivated by the mysteries of the
homunculus, and the principles of alchemy, and how their work significantly shaped the
course of scientific inquiry. I'm sure that most of you have heard about John
d Or the Real Seven, the adviser to Queen Elizabeth the First, who
was also known for his heavy association with the cult, attempting to communicate with
angels using an Enochian language which he claimed was used by supernatural beings. He
was deeply interested in alchemy and amassed a massive library of alchemical text for his
studies. He's a very interesting figure because it shows the connection between the governments
or elites at their time and how the courts were filled with high ranking figures
well versed in alchemy and the occult. He has claimed to be the founder
of the Rosicrucian Order, a secret society preceding the Masons, said to be
founded around this time period. But it's very likely that they are a secret
ancient Catholic order, and we will show this later. But it can indeed
be quite shocking, as the Rosicrucians are typically associated with Protestants after the sixteen
hundreds. But there is more to that story, much more to connect when
it comes to secret societies. Their ancestry and their relation to this knowledge.
The Rosicrucians were fascinated with alchemy hermeticism and blended these ideas with Christian motifs.
Some say that there's no evidence to suggest that d was a Rosicrucian, but
D's writings were responsible for an occult revolution in Europe. But the question is
did this interest in alchemy and the homunculous really all start in the early seventeenth
century, or does this tradition go back from before the creation of religion where
there's much more to that story, and there were many other prominent figures from
that time period who not only had a massive impact on science and history,
but we're deeply associated with secret societies. We have an entire section where we
dive into the Elizabethan era latter and explore his other associates. It would be
a great task to cover a cult philosophy and its entirety, but it may
be important to note for a moment some key points. Hermeticism in ancient philosophical
and spiritual tradition traces its roots back to the legendary figure Hermes Trismegistus, often
described as the founder of the tradition. Hermes is believed to have authored the
Emerald Tablets, a collection of texts that laid the foundation for Hermetic philosophy.
These teachings, which have persisted for centuries, delve into the concepts of duality,
the union of opposites, and androgynous symbols. At the core of Hermeticism
lies the Emerald Tablets, a series of writings that outline the key tenets of
the philosophy. Among these principles is the idea of the union of opposites that
suggests that everything in existence possess a dual nature. This concept of is further
explored through the symbolism of the Sun and moon, which represent positive and negative
forces respectively. In addition to the notion of duality, her Medicism also encompasses
androgynous symbols, signifying the perfect balance between masculine and feminine energies. This union
is often depicted through the marriage of the Sun and Moon, embodying the harmony
of opposing forces. Hermes Trismagus is said to be the messenger of the gods
and can be traced back to Thought, who was believed to be an Atlantean.
This ancient ancestry links for Medicism to a lineage of knowledge that dates back
thousands of years during the medieval ages, and sixty also pay attention to these
creatures that are half human or half human form with animal heads and things of
that nature. And hopefully that will remind you of what you saw in the
previous video when we were discussing the island of Doctor Moroan vivisection and things of
that nature, that in the blood transfusions that might help everything take And then
we look at what we're seeing here with this homunculus, or the creation of
some kind of spontaneous generation of life, and how they correlate with one another.
Maybe these things we were actually created teen hundreds, Hermeticism gained prominence among
scientists and thinkers who were intrigued by its ancient wisdom. The teachings of Hermes
Trismegistus were passed around and studied fielding a revival of interest in the Hermetic tradition.
This resurgence of Hermeticism had a significant impact on various fields, including alchemy
and the exploration of the homunculus. The homunculus embodies the Hermetic principle of the
union of opposites, illustrating how the fusion of opposing forces can give rise to
new life. Even the origin of the term hermetically sealed or the process of
creating an airtight container, which was crucial to the progression of the scientific enlightenment,
can also be traced back to Hermes. We're going to see a lot
of three symbolism in this video, as Hermes Trismegistus means thrice greatest Hermes.
This figure was believed to be the divine scribe credited with authoring the sacred hermetic
works that explored both the material world and the pursuit of spiritual perfection. Alchemists
or the leading scientists of their time were deeply interested in these subjects, and
they adopted Hermes Trismegistus as their patron. Another aspect to consider is a mandrad
as Interestingly, it's brought up many times during this period. But this lore,
although not exactly the same as the homunculus, is definitely connected and most
of us are well aware of this plant. But the mandrake has been associated
with this concept of the homunculus, and according to the cult tradition and alchemical
philosophy, the mandrake acts as a humunculus and can be sealed any bottle to
serve or represent the magician themselves. It's also said to have hallucinogenic and supernatural
properties. If uprooted, it would scream, killing anyone who heard it.
This is very similar to another story will hear later. It also seems that
this has that story of the mandrake is something that you'll find in a lot
of different really strange texts. It's not just him talking about it. It's
a plant that they used to use dogs to somehow tie something to it and
pull it out of the ground, and oftentimes it would kill the dog,
they said. But this plant was used for a lot of different bizarre things,
and it has a lot of folklore around it. How chemical applications in
the forms of potions and spells. In that the power of the man Drake
extended beyond ingesting it to use it as a fertility aid. The root could
be placed under a person's pillow or to be kept close to someone ill to
treat their condition. In the film Pans Labyrinth, for example, the heroine
places the root and a saucer of milk under her sick mother's bed. Roots
were sometimes carved to enhance their human form and could be carried on the person
as a charm or talisman, not only to help with conception, but to
help find love and bring good fortune. It has a long history of medicinal
use, and one of the oldest and most common uses was a fertility aid.
In Genesis, the first book of the Old Testament, Jacob's wives,
the sister Leah and Rachel, compete to provide him with children with the help
of a mandrey. In the first century, the ancient Greek physician and botanists
Padania's Diascorides noted the human like form of the mandrake's roots and indicated its use
as an anesthetic for surgical procedures such as amputation. The gallum is also connected
with this. There are some differences, but it's important that we cover it.
A gallum is an anthropomorphic being crafted from lifeless materials clay or mud,
and it's brought to life through ritual incantations and sequences of Hebrew letters. In
many gollumn stories, the creature serves as a helper, companion, or savior
of an endangered Jewish community. However, in some tales, the gollum spirals
out of control becomes a threat to its creator. The most renowned Gollum legend
takes place in Prague and features the scholarly Rabbi Low. The first practical instructions
for creating a gollum can be found in medieval commentaries on the Supper Yetsra.
It is believed that fashioning a gollum was a means for medieval Jewish mystics to
draw closer to God. What's interesting, too, is if you dig deep
enough, you'll start to get this. I don't know if you want to
call it a rumor or not, but apparently there's an ancient Hebrew that's completely
lost, like they don't even there's nobody in that's living right now, post
Aluvian, post flood that knows a single lick of what the old Hebrew is,
and that the Hebrew that we're using now isn't Italy, isn't anything to
do with what that Other languages now that may be a complete fabrication or could
be the only the secret societies and the adepts and those who who covet data
and information know the true language, and that's what they're using for these types
of rituals. I don't know, because you would think that an artificial or
a lesser than language, wouldn't again, wouldn't possess the same magical properties in
their symbols than what was supposedly the original. The story of the Golumn of
Prague is set in the late sixteenth century, during the reign of Emperor Rudolph
the Second. At this time, the Jewish community in Prague was under threat
due to anti Semitic attacks and accusations of blood libel, whereby Low, a
respected leader in scholar i, ought to protect the Jewish community from these threats.
According to the legend, Rabbi Loo created the gollum using clay from the
banks of the Vitava River. He then performed a series of rituals, including
the use of divine names, to bring the gollum to life. The gollum,
named Yrsel was I don't know if you caught that, but there was
an upside down pentagram on that golem. Tasked with protecting the Jewish community from
harm yoursell, the Gollumn of Prague was said to be immensely strong and able
to turn invisible. It patrolled the streets of the Jewish ghetto at night,
protecting its inhabitants from anti Semitic attackers. And even boiling blood libel plots.
However, the gollum could not speak and eventually became uncontrollable, leading Rabbi Loo
to deactivate it. The gollum is brought to life by inscribing Hebrew words on
its forehead, such as the word emmet, which means truth and Hebrew.
To deactivate the gollumn, one could remove the aleph and emmet, changing the
inscription from truth to death met meaning dead. The history of the golem reaches
back to early Judaism and the talmud. Adam is initially created as a gollumn
when his dust is naded into a shapeless husk, just like Adam. All
golemns are cruated from mud by those close to divinity, but no anthropogenic gollum
is fully human. Essentially, it is a story, so basically it's golem
Golam Goldham I made juvad of clay give the magical power of the Hebrew language.
Its origins could be traced back to the Safarietsura, which is a book
attributed to the biblical Abraham. Medieval commenters on the Safarietsa have even believed that
Abraham and Jeremiah were able to utilize the knowledge within the book to create quote
living beings. The fact that Abraham was aware of these methods of creating artificial
life will be relevant later in the video. Albert Is Magnus, sometimes referred
to as Albert the Great or Saint Albert, was a German Dominican friar bishop,
philosopher, theologian, and scientists. He was born in Lowengen, Swabia
present day Germany, and was a well known figure in the intellectual and spiritual
spheres of the thirteenth century. Albertus Magnus was a prolific writer. His works
covered a wide range of topics, including logic, metaphysics, ethics, natural
sciences, and theology. He was a key figure in the development of Schlosticism,
a philosophical and theological system that sought to reconcile faith and reason by integrating
Aristotelian philosophy with Christian theology. Albertus Magnus is also linked to a very mysterious
piece of ancient technology, the brazen head. This mysterious head, supposedly made
of brass or bronze, was believed to answer any question and provide wisdom to
its creator. Some say Albertus Magnus was its creator, and others claim it
was the creation of Franciscan Friar Roger Bacon. Legend has it that Bacon built
the brazen Head to help him in the pursuit of knowledge and to uncover the
universe's secrets. Sadly, the Brazen Head was destroyed when Bacon didn't listen to
its advice, causing the loss of its wisdom and knowledge. In another story,
Albertus Magnus is said to have created a brazen Head that could speak and
answer questions. However, his student Thomas Aquinas allegedly destroyed the automaton, bearing
it was a tool of the devil. It's not entirely clear where the This
sounds like an early dabbling with either artificial life because he created the brazen statue
or something that they were able to communicate with some kind of supernatural power in
order to get this information from. But this might be the ancient AI that
we've been talking about that potentially is destroyed out of society, maybe on purpose,
because it's going to destroy society, so we destroy it first by means
of getting rid of all of our technology and choosing to go back to more
primitive times to save ourselves, but somebody always digs up some artifact, and
that AI influences them to rebuild that society again that is more suitable for the
AI, and the people go along with it because they're given promise. They're
given many things to make their lives much more enjoyable than the rest of the
people originated. Some people think it was inspired by the Greek myth of talas
a massive bronze automaton crafted by Hephaestus, the god of blacksness and artisans.
Others think that it may have come from the Jewish legend of the Column.
In a way, this can be seen as the ancient form of what we're
seeing today with chat gybt. Is this some historical reference to artificial intelligence that
they were using in the exact same way that we're attempting to do. The
difference is that modern AI systems are purely code and simulate the brain and most
of what we experience today, and language transformers have to be thoroughly trained manually
and depend on complex hardware. However, with the Brazen Head this would have
been powered metaphysically. With true artificial intelligence, this would be far more powerful,
as they essentially had the ability to speak with some type of all knowing
spirit. It literally involves the creation of a non human entity, or you
could say homunculous, capable of processing information, answering questions, and providing knowledge.
It seems to be the exact same thing as chatchypt but far more powerful.
And if it's possible that this may be a true story, then what
other kind of technology did some of these royals or secret brothers have access to?
So I guess you could say that the Brazen Head was an early precursor
to the idea of artificial intelligence. That's both aiming to create an entity capable
of providing knowledge and wisdom. However, the way that they were created in
the forces that powered them are vastly different. There's actually more to this story
and will come back in a later section. Alchemy confine its roots in Egypt,
with the term itself originating from the Arabic al chemia, and a possible
root is the ancient Egyptian word chemit, which refers to the black soil of
the Nile River valley. This fertile soil was associated with life and transformation concepts
that would later become integral to alchemical practices. Egypt was extremely occult, with
its rich esoteric symbolism and complex rituals permeating various aspects of daily life and spiritual
practices. Egypt was home to a complex pantheon of gods and goddesses, as
well as initiation ceremonies in the mystery schools, both of which showcase the cult
and alchemical aspects of ancient Egyptian spirituality. The moniker Hermes Trismegistus, an amalgamation
of the Hellenic deity Hermes in the honorific title Thrice It's Great, finds its
roots in the ancient Egyptian pantheon's thought, the divine patron of scribes and master
of sacred symbol So stopping right here again, and we're seeing these antipomorphic beings,
right. We have these animal heads, one of a what looks like
an alligator or crocodile here, and then we have the Anubis dog on these
people, and that's supposed to be taught right there. And what the argument
here is, were they using vivisection? Were they using some on the doctor
bureau type of experimentation to actually create these things? And somehow that gave them
some sort of additional supernatural powers when a ritual was conducted during the formation of
these people. And that's the argument that they're trying to put forth here,
that these things may not just be some symbol, they might actually have been
something that actually existed. And if that's the case, then there's been some
really strange, bastardizations of God's creation, if they want to call it that,
because these things would have been maybe either made completely without the use of
natural means, or they could have been alterations of God's creation, which would
have been a terrible hell for those who had to go through that process.
And if they're talking in this as Egyptian, then you have to remember that
this was all adopted by something much older Sumerian or possibly Prediluvian, prior to
the flood, which there is complete and well as far as what we can
believe from you know, court historian society and science and stuff like that,
that that there's evidence that they're most certainly was some sort of a flood,
some sort of a cataclysm reset, if you will, and some of the
stuff was lost and some of it wasn't, and how much wasn't I guess
it is determined by what those who jumped all over the data and tried to
hide it away from the rest of the people. Stay was lost in what
wasn't. So we're talking about the mystery schools, we're talking about the secret
societies. We're talking about the fraternal orders and what they know. Egypt's beliefs
surrounding the afterlife, rebirth and mummification further contributed to alchemical values. The preservation
of the body through mummification was essential for the survival of one's life force or
ka in the afterlife. We all know of the ancient astronaut theory. Mainstream
scholars and popular authors, for some reason conclude that aliens are involved with Egypt,
such as with the Dendera lightpel. Is this really a libel or is
it instructions for creating a homunculous The Dendera temple is dedicated to the goddess Hathor,
comparable to Mary. She was the mother of Poor and Raw, yet
also Raw's feminine counterpart Farming. An androgynous being, Hathor embodies both Mary Magdalene
and the Horror of Babylon, the Scarlet Harlot. She also helps souls in
the afterlife as they transition and is often uncompanied by another god. This god
is Hecate, the Egyptian goddess of fertility, who is represented in the form
of a frog. The symbol of the frog was their ancient symbol of fertility,
and it seems to represent spontaneous generation. The princess kissed the frog.
These gods often had to counterparts, serving not only as spouses but also as
divisions of a primary hermaphroditic deity, illustrating the duality and unity in their divine
nature. If we look at the full depiction, look this one right here.
That's a frog head right there. That's not something you typically see in
Egyptian depictions. They have the two knives here, but they're saying that this
may not be a light bulb. This might be the cask or creating a
homunculus. They're creating life, spontaneous generation. Possibly who's operating the ritual aquet
and this is all for Hathor The snake is being held by two hands,
and we see a snake inside the light bulb, or more likely a sperm
in a flask. This seems more likely to be in a chemical process of
the creation of an artificial life, rather than some type of light generator,
as Egypt was known for having tools to assist in the process of getting pregnant
and giving birth. Before going any further, we must go over Paracelsus born
Philippus Ariolas Theophrastus Bombastus von Hohenheim, the Swiss, the original mister Boombastic position
alchemist and philosopher who lived during the Renaissance period early fifteen hundreds. But shockingly,
he is literally the father of toxicology, so we know that all his
credentials check out. He was a revolutionary figure in the history of medicine,
challenging the traditional medical practices of his time and advocating for a more holistic approach
to healing. But beyond his contributions to the field of medicine, Paracelsus was
also deeply involved in the world of the occult and was a member of various
secret societies, such as the Brotherhood of the Rosy Cross or in other words,
the Rose Crucians. This brotherhood predates the Freemasons by hundreds of years and
back to the Knights Templar. A similarity in connection between them is evident in
their images and coat of arms, but this will be explained later in the
video he was a contemporary Leonardo da Vinci Martin Luther. Also he didn't say
anything, but in that one frame on the left hand side, under the
rose across is said, the rose gives the bees something. I didn't get
a chance to catch it, but remember for bees, because this is where
it gets extremely strange. Remembered the bees who was responsible for Protestant Reformation,
which shows how the Rosicrucians did have an impact and influenced the Reformation. Paracelsus
inspired an entire medical Enlightenment period. And the reason I'm going on about this
is because well Less delve into some of the lesser known aspects of Paracelsi's life
and work, particularly his connections to the homunculous and the darker, more secretive
parts of his writings. First off, most of his depictions are post human
portraits, and he's typically seen holding a sword and the prophet for the Rosicrucians.
But in one depiction there's something in the background, suddly place. It's
the head of a baby emerging from the ground. There's an open book with
a ripped document and key, as well as a fire in the background,
making it look as some type of ritual. Paracelsus believed that the human body
was a microcosm of the universe, and he sought to understand the secrets of
creation by studying the human body itself. In his quest for knowledge, he
turned to alchemy, which he saw as a means of unlocking the mysteries of
nature. Just you know, when they say that he was, you know,
looking into the human body and studying the human body, that could also
be a reference to vivisection, and definitely dissection and messing around with corpses and
things like that. So there's extensive study. When they say they're obsessed with
something, they don't just look on the outside of a living creature. They
may even kill something just so that they can look at it and examine it
further. One of his most famous quotes, let no man belong to another
who can belong to himself, speaks to his belief in the individual's ability to
harness the powers of nature in the universe. In his book De Naddo Rerum,
Paracelsis wrote extensively about the creation of a homunculous, a small, artificially
created humanoid. He believed that through chemical processes, it was possible to create
life from inanimate matter, and he detailed a specific recipe for creating a homunculus.
The process involved placing human sperm inside a glass of vial and sealing it
with a special alchemical seal. The vial was then buried in horse maneuver for
forty days, after which a small, transparent humanoid would allegedly begin to form.
Paracels has claimed that the homunculus would continue to grow and develop over time,
eventually gaining the ability to speak and perform tasks. He believed that the
homunculus could be used for various purposes such as healing, divination, and even
controlling the weather. His writings on the even controlling the weather you say,
junculus have been booked praise and criticized, with some scholars arguing that his ideas
were a precursor to modern genetic engineering, while others dismissed them as the ramblings
of a madman. So again, which is it? Well, let's take
a look at the writing of Paracelsis himself. But it's important to note that
some scholars, such as William R. Newman and his Promethean Ambitions, describes
this as pseudo Paracelsis. The text is genuine, but apparently another alchemist released
this under his name. Regardless, it's still classified as a book of Paracelsus
in his book denatorro rerum Or of the Nature of Things in nine books.
We will read what Paracelsis had to say, because many times, when looking
to the monkulust or watching documentaries on the subject, you're really just going to
quote from the experiment. But to put this more into context, we're going
to read the beginning of book one, which deals with generations. We're going
to take a look at a German version or reprint from fifteen eighty four.
We got this translated into a much more readable version, and there's an English
version published in sixteen fifty that can confirm the accuracy of the translation. In
book one, he first starts with the most important topic. It would seem
quote generations, but it's key to note that this is not limited to just
homunculi, but it's a part of a greater topic. Quote. The generation
of all natural things is twofold, natural and without art or artificial, and
visualized by the alchemist. Paracelsus tells us straight and simpol it's his first point
really future fraction is the key to the generation of all natural things. We'll
discuss this more in detail later, but listen to this part carefully. I'm
paraphrasing, but quote Book on Nature one. It may be possible for humans
to be born without natural fathers and mothers. That is to say, they
can be born not from a woman's body in a natural way as other humans
are born, but through the art and expertise of an experienced Bajuric alchemist.
A human may thus grow and be born, as will be further explained quote.
It is also possible in nature that humans can be born from animals having
their natural causes. However, it cannot happen without heresy. That is,
when a human mixes with an animal, and the animal like female, takes
in the sperm of a man with lust and desire in its womb and encloses
it. In this case, the sperm must go through decay and through the
constant warmth of the body. A human and not an animal, will be
born. For every time the sperm is sown, a fruit grows from it.
If this did not happen, it would be against the philosophers and against
the light of nature. For as the seed is, so a fruit grows
from it. From onion, seeds grow onions, not peas, not nuts,
not lettuce. So from various grains, different plants grow. This is
explaining to you what they were thinking to not only create humans without natural fathers
and mothers, but to be born without a mother entirely. Then he goes
further to explain how you can eat even birth these humans out of animals.
Okay, wait, what are we even talking about here? Quote. It
is also possible and not against nature, that a woman in a person can
give birth to an animal, and is not to be judged with a woman
in this like with a man. That is, one should not regard her
as transgressor as if she acted against nature, but rather attribute such things to
her imagination, For her imagination is often to blame for many things. For
the imagination of a pregnant woman is so great that she can transform the seed
in the fruit in her body in many ways. For her interactional forces act
so strongly and powerfully upon her fruit that they give an impression and influence.
Therefore, the child stands in the mother's body in the creation, and the
mother's hand and will like clay in the potter's hand, from oats to oats,
from barley to barley, and the like with all other fruits. What
has seeds and is sown. We will explain this more later, but he's
essentially saying that women have the ability to be alchemists and shape their babies through
the use of their imagination. But we must clarify that we're speaking of a
different type or tier of imagination, as will be further explained. Okay,
so now we're about to get to the full breakdown of this art of generation.
And let's remember it. This typically does not get brought up when discussing
homunculi, which leads many modern scholars to doubt the legitimacy of the claims.
But if we're diving deep into how detailed and vast this science really was,
they were playing around with the power to generate life artificially, but even more
importantly, they could influence the outcome quote five. And as you know now,
through puture faction, many and various things are born and become alive.
So now you should know that from many herbs, through puture faction, very
wondrous animals are born. As experienced people know It's important to note that such
animals which grow and are born from within decay all have some toxicity with them
and are poisonous. Some more powerful and stronger than others, and each is
shaped and formed differently from the other, as you can see in snakes,
vipers, toads, frogs, scorpions, basilisks, spiders, wild ants,
various worms, caterpillars, moths, beetles, all of which grow and are
born from within decay. And so right there, right there, there's something
because I mean, we got to ask ourselves how did things happen? First,
like what populated that creature us whatever prima the first time? Right?
When did that happen? How? And then the variety of life that's on
the planet, because evolution is a bunch of nonsense garbage, right, And
I think the Smithsonian even discredited them cells when they found three different types of
trilobytes that they claimed forever were different evolutions of the same trilobyte, but found
them in the same sediment layer and then buried that evidence as quickly as they
found it. But they basically discredited themselves because they could show that they were
all living at the same time, so they were different they were variations of
the trilobyte, but they were all independently produced. So when did flies come
by? When did bees arrive? And if we can generate these things,
this idea of them being or anything basically becoming extinct, it leaves that up
to question now, because couldn't it, with the right type of process be
generated. Again, this is very strange stuff. This is just I mean,
it plays with everything that we believe about reality. And then some quote
quote it is also no less true that many monsters are born among animals and
these are their offspring, which often happens that they give birth to an animal
or another monster from human seed, according to the strong imagination of the mother
on the child. They often grow from decay themselves and are brought about in
a glass. As has been reported, the same often appears in many and
wondrous shapes and forms so terrifying to behold, as often with many heads,
with many feats, with many tails, sometimes of many colors, sometimes worms
with fish tails or wings, and other strange forms the likes of which have
never been seen before. And think about that for a second, because when
we think of radiation causing deformations, well, what is radiation, it's a
vibration, it's a ray, it's light, it's some sort of information at
a very extreme level that wouldn't be natural for the development of something. So
that's influencing its development, and it's deforming it, and it's causing all types
of alterations in it. Well, if you can shine a laser through a
crystal with a frequency and print that frequency into a body and you can prove
that it does that well, or the experiment where they generated actual DNA through
a process of shining a light through something, How then can we not say
that this dusting of our skies with whatever alchemical metals they're putting up, their
plus chemicals, plus poisons and all this other stuff, shining the light of
the sun through that isn't changing us by the time the light reaches us,
because it's passing through that stuff first. And what is it doing to us?
And is that injection that we're getting somehow speeding up the process or working
in conjunction with what they're shining on us to make alterations. Are we in
our own little you know, our own little cask here in this firmament,
and are all the test subjects of this maybe they're growing something out of us
that we're not supposed to. We're basically just the vessels for we're the husks
for them to create something else with. And what is it that they're creating?
All very interesting things. Therefore, all these creatures are monsters that have
no parents, that are not born from other animals of their kind, but
rather grow from other things and are brought forth and created through art, as
you will see with the basilisk end quote quote. But it is not here
to deal with these homunculi, since they can be generated naturally and artificially,
as from the greater matter and the lesser matter, such as from man and
from monkeys, from horses, and from donkeys, and from many other animals.
End quote. Let's remember that donkey for later. But there you go.
In clear language, he'll explain what this is really about, generating any
animal you please, hybrids, and creating humans or any type of life in
a variety of different wounds. Again, ready to not debunk spontaneous generation or
the artificial generation of the alchemist. Remember who we were reading from. This
is from Paracelsus himself, one of the founders of the scientific method. There's
no reason to believe that this information is false, or at least it would
seemed that the author and many of his followers believed it to be true.
They could have been creating all types of different beings also on the basilisk.
It would seem that the alchemists during this time had a certain issue, which
will go into detail on as we progress, But to take a note,
the basilisk is considered as the feminine evil twin, some kind of feminine evil
that gets brought forth during the experiment, and this can manifest in different ways.
The basilisk is a type of homunculus created by the alchemists as a result
of the putrefaction of menstrual blood and thus female derived. Some scholars argue that
this was a form of early female medieval misogyny. There may be more to
it than just that, as we're dealing with two different qualities of results in
denaturrerum. Another reason why some scholars bring question to the author is because it
shares many similarities with older Arabic text and in Paracelsa's other work Dehimunculi, he
notice the owl above the furnace. There takes the approach to using a womb
instead as it seems the method of creating it in a bottle came with some
problems that needed to be solved. Now, before we leave denaturrerum or the
Nature of Things, I want to read the actual quote from the book of
the Experiment, because I'm going to show you how you really don't get the
full context if you try reading the English one from the seventeenth century, it's
still pretty difficult to read. You can understand the words, but it's more
difficult to process what's actually being said. So this is a translation based on
the German version and then checked by the English version. Quote. Now,
the generation of the artificial man is also not to be forgotten in its own
way. There's something to it, although such has been kept in great secrecy
until now and has been completely hidden and not without a small doubt in question
and secret of the ancient philosophers whether it is also possible for nature and art
that a human being can be borne outside a woman's body and a natural mother.
Quote. So wait, he's telling you straight up that this is the
biggest secret in its ancient in origin. Quote to this, I give the
answer that is not contrary to the art of the Spajerik in nature in its
own way, but it's entirely possible how such access and occurrence may be.
Its process is as follows, namely, that the sperm of a man enclothes
in a sealed curbit with the highest putrefaction in the belly of a horse,
is putrified for forty days, or as long as it takes to become alive.
Wo, So forty days, Huh? That might shed some strange light
on the forty days and forty nights in the desert thing. It's just I'm
telling you all this stuff is very, very odd, and moved and stirred
just like this, it becomes visible after some time. After such time,
it will appear to be somewhat like human, yet transparent without a body.
What it is then daily fed with the arcano a whitish substance, remember this
widest stuff there Later, and nourished until forty weeks have passed, and kept
in the constant warmth of a horse's belly, it will become a living human
being, resembling another child born from a woman, but much smaller. We
will call this a homunculous and it should be raised like any other child with
great care and attention until it reaches maturity. This is the greatest and highest
secret that God has allowed mortal and sinful humans to know. That it is
a miracle and a great work of God, a mystery above all mysteries,
and should remain a secret until the end of time, when nothing will be
hidden and everything will be revealed. Okay, then, so all these things
require male sperm, usually in this flask, so that would be the data.
And then they're saying, just recreate the basically, recreate the conditions of
a womb, and then this would occur. This is very odd, but
it also makes you wonder if there is such a thing as an atlantis,
if there was such a thing as this being so ancient that it predates the
flood. Man, oh Man, this whole corruption of the blood thing starts
to make a whole lot more sense, because these things may have run wild,
been a rampant that people may not have been able to control themselves because
they had this power to do this thing, so they just kept on doing
it and doing it and doing it, not a requestioning or stopping to see
whether or not they should, because they were too transfixed on whether or not
they could. And maybe that's why I had to go underground because maybe it
wasn't Maybe it was right out in everybody's face at one time, just causing
chaos everywhere. They were creating humans without a mother. It resembled any other
child born from a woman. Okay, So it's and when you think of
like Oanis and all of these other creatures that then come popping up in ancient
civilization with these very strange attributes, these animal astributes, these fish like attributes,
like like Dagon and Owanis for just a name. Two, they taught
people many things and helped create agriculture and society. And that's that could be
throwbacks from when these things were created and they survived whatever cataclysm to rebuild society.
Again. Wow, not just a tiny human and then they could raise
these things, it seems. But let's remember what he said. This is
the greatest and the highest secret, the secret of generation and puture faction.
There is another component to this, as we said, there are multiple layers
and we will cover them all. But he does continue to say that these
simunculus then go onto change to become magical beings of different kinds. The blair
between the actual and physical have led many modern scholars to perceive this is mere
fantasy, but there really has no reason to conclude that. Just yet,
we must take into consideration that Paris tells us, being one of the founders
of modern chemistry and one of the earliest experiment with tumunculus was specifically being cryptic.
That's important to note because it allows one for interpretation. But furthermore,
it explains on why this is still a mystery, because whoever was looking into
this stuff at the time truly did not want to to be unveiled in detailed
to society. Their methods are never clear, but almost as a cryptic message
to inform other brothers, and we are left with the remainders to piece together
the puzzle. Well, it's clear that Paracelsus is bringing importance to the subject
of generation and that there are two forms, natural and artificial. This would
essentially mean that a homunculus is a science and art of artificial generation, guided
and directed by an experienced alchemist, and the variety informs therein are numerous and
they can be combined with any animal. Now, the deeper level is that
he's actually discussing how to use natural chambers or wombs or the artificial creation of
a homunculous and he's saying, yeah, you can do this with a lot
of different animals. This will be confirmed as we look through more sources,
and we're not just talking about making more animals by artificial insemination. It's actually
different and much more occult. They're talking about the creation of chimeras, like
literally growing a human in different wombs from different animals. What kind of minds
are we dealing with here, because this doesn't make sense to be just some
mate of fantasy. There are many details to this process. Don't believe it,
Well, let's continue. So the main quote from Paracelsis on the homunculus
is literally a recipe where he uses a horse as a surrogate mother of the
homunculus, and the semen of a human male is left inside the womb of
the animal to putrefy for forty days, then the homunculus is born. Paracelsus
also makes reference to the phoenix as an alchemical symbol. Quote paracelsis his way
for the raising of a dead bird to life and for the generating many serpents
of one, both which are performed by future faction. A bird is restored
to life, thus is take a bird, put it alive into a gored
glass and seal it hermetically burned into ashes in the third degree of fire.
Then put fight in horsetung into mucolagenious flim, and so by a continued digestion,
that flim must be brought into a further maturity, being taken out and
put into an oval vessel of just a bigness to hold it by an exact
digestion, and will become a renewed bird, which saith Paracelsus is one of
the greatest wonders in nature and shows the create virtue of puture faction. Cut
a serpent into small pieces, which put into a gourd glass, which you
must hermetically seal up. Then putrify them in horsetung, and the whole serpent
will become living again in the glass, in the form either of worms or
spawn of fishes. Now, if these worms be in fitting matter brought out
of the putrefaction in norrist, many hundred serpents will be bred out of one
serpent, whereof everyone will be as big as the first. And as it
is said of the serpent, so also many other living creatures may be raised
and restored again. Now We're going to look at historical authors in s time
period who wrote on the homunculus, because this will prove that multiple minds had
time to debunk this supposed theory and put it the rest. But that's not
what happened. Cornelius agrippa, renowned German polymath and occult writer, was born
of a noble family, and he had several influential texts that played a pivotal
role in the culture of the Renaissance. Interestingly, many scholars take note that
he was not only a secret agent, physician, and legal scholar. Supposedly,
he set up a secret society in Paris devoted to the occult. In
his three books of occult philosophy, he alludes to the monculus in many ways.
He first tells a story of a hen giving birth to a man in
a strange way. Also, domestic birds are not without some agorias for a
cox, by their crowing, promote hope and the journey of him that is
undertaking. Moreover, Livia, the mother of Tiberius, when she was great
with him, took a hen egg, and it hatched in her bosom,
and at length came forth a cock check with a great comb, which then
Araguries interpreted that the child that should be born of her should be a king.
End quote. We can confirm that Agrippa is not telling us everything when
he discusses the nature of blood and the basilist special abilities, which was discussed
by Paracelsus, so we know that he's read his work. He mentions the
basilisk over six times. This is a symbolic reference as well to the homunculous.
At this time it was hush hush, so they had to be more
cryptic and fantastical. But they considered this to be one hundred percent reel.
The basilisk is an alchemical creature. Quote. They say also that the blood
of a basilisk, which they call the blood of Saturn, hath such great
force and sorcery that it procures for him that carries it about him good success
of his petitions from great men and power, and of his prayers from God,
and also remedies of diseases and grant any privilege end quote. He's just
only covering the negative twin of the homunculus. Quote. Again, in the
vapors of the eyes, there is a great power that they can be which
and infect any that are near them. As the coquetris or basilius killing men
with their looks end. I'm not saying that every person that mentions the basilisk
is being symbolic, but it's safe to assume that Agrippa was well aware of
the homunculus. Rubbert Flood, or renowned English paracels in position, held at
divers array of interest that encompassed both scientific and occult domains. As a prominent
figure in the early seventeenth century, he delved into various fields such as astrology,
mathematics, cosmology, Kabbalah, and Rosicrucianism. His pension for exploring the
esoteric side of knowledge often led him to engage with contemporary scientists and thinkers of
his time, notably engaging in a series of exchanges with the esteemed astronomer Johannes
Kepler. Flood's rich contributions the fields of occult philosophy make him a significant figure
when examining the concept of the homunculus. He's remembered as an astrologer, mathematician,
cosmologist, combolist, and Rosicrucian. Now it's interesting because we'll see this
double fingered pose with these figures associated with secret societies. Also look at the
coat of arms of the Hidden Knight. We're going to come back to Flood
because he was associated with John and d and studied with the Jesuits, even
went to Oxford, and his father was a high ranking government official, the
treasurer for Queen Elizabeth the First. A collage of twelve coat of arms of
Flood's ancestors are shown in the painting above his right shoulder. His paternal arms
goes back to rid Flade, whose names originates from Welsh meaning bloody or red
wolf. Martin Ruined the Elder fifteen thirty two to sixteen o two was a
German alchemist, physician, and writer. He authored several works on alchemy,
and he's best known for his lexicon ALM, a comprehensive dictionary of all chemical
terms and concepts. Quote A monculi are small images which contain within themselves an
invisible, starry human being made in the likeness of humans. Small human portraits
or images made of humans that have the invisible celestial human in their brain.
Ende. That's a rough translation, but he does bring it up, also
connecting the images comboted. Jean Battista de la Porta fifteen thirty five to sixteen
fifteen was an Italian polymath, scholar and author known for his various works and
scientific fields, including natural philosophy, optics, and cryptography. He was also
interested in alchemy. His book Natural Magic is a book that we've brought up
in the past, and it definitely deserves its own video, but for now
that probably takes too much time. However, there are some interesting things discussed,
such as the generation of hybrids and monsters, but not just that.
It goes into a sort of animal husbandry that involves the mixing of animals to
create new streage creatures, as the author puts it. There are also several
historical accounts in the book from notable authors, where he not only agrees with
Paracelsus, but references several ancient Roman and Greek authors. These authors include several
reputable sources such as plenty, Avid and Aristotle, all discussing the nature of
puture, faction and generation. He makes it clear in the prologue that Natural
Magic is the top in the complete faculty of natural science. It's important to
note this because modern science, although the child of alchemy, has completely left
out the most important part of its application, the knowledge and understanding of magic.
This may be outside the scope of the video, but it's important to
understand, and we will cover this as magic is the father of all sciences.
It continues to say that the knowledge in the book unveils the secrets and
history of this natural magic. Then in chapter one, which deals with faction,
saying essentially the same as Paracelsus that new creatures can be generated through puture
faction, but he details the history, stating that Porphyry thought that living creatures
would be gotten of the bowels of the earth, soaked in water and quickened
by the heat of the sun. Of the same mind, where Archaelius,
the Athenian an, Exagoras, Causomeneus, and Euripides his scholar Cleodemus, and
after him Theophrastus thought that they came of purified water mixed with earth, and
the colder and fowler the water was, the more unfit it was for their
generation. Diodorus and many other good philosophers hold that all living creatures did arise
a puture faction. Not explain future faction to us who may not understand what
we're discussing. The best way to think about it is fermentation. But when
these alchemists are referring to this process. They really mean, like a fundamental
aspect of our reality, that puture faction is the transformative process that occurs within
matter. Naturally, all things go through decay in transformation, even in a
controlled environment. The alchemists ought to understand the mechanics of future faction, or
in other words, the secret workings of the universe. Why do things break
down and go under change? They truly believed that they had found this secret
to this process and how to influence it. For now, I'll leave it
at that. There's no direct reference to Monkeylus and his work, but he
discusses the secret thought process behind it, and it's a good reference to see
how serious they were about this subject, and also that they were the leading
thinkers of their time, instructing others who also believed it to be true.
The only reason this could be, as clearly stated in the book, is
that certain rituals and processes of generation were evident to these alchemists. I'll bring
this book up blitter, but we shall proceed. Oswald croll or Croleius fifteen
sixty three to sixteen o nine was an alchemist and professor of medicine at the
University of Marburg, and he said Germany a strong proponent of alchemy in using
chemistry and medicine. He was heavily involved in writing books and influencing thinkers of
his day towards viewing chemistry and alchemy as two separate fields. Now that may
be the case, but that doesn't being he thought they should be separated.
As from his book Basilica Chemica, they are a clear Rosicrucian and alchemical symbols,
showing the cryptic nature of the art. He even makes mention to Paracelsus
saying, quote, but none of the mortals with the true word of pardon
in the whole of philosophy and medicine. Also notice that is with a C.
But Kabbala Theologica across the top of that, with undoubted heavenly favor,
has known such hard and hidden secrets and brought them into public domain. As
Theophrastus that Paracelsus, a man and philosopher of all eternity, memory and honor,
most worthy, whose skill no one has yet been found, who can
touch, much less surpass the true monarch of medicine, and the first physician
of the microcosm endue. This is another credible source verifying the works of Paracelsus.
Johann Hartmann fifteen sixty eight to sixteen thirty one. In sixteen o nine
became the first professor of chemistry at the University of Marburg. His teaching dealt
mainly with pharmaceuticals. Quote in Extra twenty three The econom of Hermes Philosophy,
Sindivogius says that there are two types of dissolutions, although there are many other
useless dissolutions. One is only truly natural, and the second is violent,
under which all others are included. The natural one is such that the pores
of the body are opened in our water, so that the digested seamen is
emitted and placed in its matrix. Our water, however, is heavenly,
not wetting the hands, not of the common people, but almost like rain
water. The body is gold, which gives semen. Our moon is not
common silver. It receives the semen of gold and treats ten of the new
light of alchemy. Saturn, having accepted the vessel, drew the water parts
ten times, and immediately took the fruit of the solar tree and placed it.
And I saw the fruit of the tree consumed and dissolved like ice and
hot water. This water is like a woman to this fruit. And no
other thing can the fruits of this tree putrefy except in this water. Nor
can any other water penetrate the pores of this fruit except this one. And
know that the solar tree also comes from this water, which is drawn from
the rays of the Sun and Moon by the force of the magnet. Therefore
it has the great harmony between them. Just in case he wasn't making it
clear that he's hinting towards something, he continues quote and the dialogue of mercury
regarding this feminine seed or adepths dissolving waters. We have decided to discuss with
you the dissolving waters at this moment. This alchemical treasure is indeed great and
immense. But for everyone who does not possess the individual keys to the storehouse,
without which not even the adepts themselves could dissolve or coagulate the bodies,
it is completely inaccessible. If you're ignorant of the dissolution of our body,
there is no need to work Warrens Dionysus Zacharias. Whoever knows the art and
secret of dissolution reaches the secret of art. Michael Meyer fifteen sixty eight to
sixty twenty two was a German physician and counselor to Rudolph the second Habsburg.
He was a learned alchemist, apigrammist, and amateur composer. He also happened
to be Imperial Count Palatine. He doesn't actually mention homunculous directly, but in
his book Atlanta Fugions, the entire thing is a metaphor for him pursuing golden
apples. It's based on the Greek myth of Atalanta, a virgin hunter who
was raised by bears, but it is more so a reference to the race
when Hippomenes dropped apples in front of Atalanta, unable to resist, she lost
our race because she picked up the apples and was forced to marry Well.
This is a symbol for these alchemists, and each one of these emblems is
a secret one of them. Emblem twenty one specifically deals with the homunculus.
I'm sure that many of you guys have seen these engravings before. It's been
seen by many eyes. This is a secret code for the development of the
homunculus or artificial generation quote emblem twenty one. Make a circle from the man
and woman, than a square from that triangle. Make a circle, and
you will have the philosopher's stone. A program twenty one. Let the man
and woman be united as one circle from which a square rises, having equal
sides. From here drolly triangle that is rounded on every side. In two
weeks sphere, then the stone will be borne. If such a thing does
not come to your mind soon, If you understand the doctrine of geometry,
you will know everything. There are a few more references in here that equally
could be considered, but we will show a few of the emblems and then
continue on. Not only are there several occult alchemical symbols such as the hermaphrodite,
they even have missliberty, floating cubes in the sky, the lion of
venice, mermaids, and even an early freemason candle symbolism which we'll see this
repeated many times. It's also important to mention that yes, around this time,
there were many charlatans and frauds. True alchemists disguised and encoded their secrets
with mysterious symbols, as it was against their order to reveal anything to the
uninitiated. The fake alchemists are the ones who spent too much time on the
Philosopher's Stone were trying to promise some method of producing gold. This has led
modern scholars and historians to believing that these alchemists were simply madmen and misinformed scientists.
However, another interesting aspect to this is literally the government of the time
believed it to be true, and there were literal laws passed as with to
read the force edict against reproducing gold and silver, So why make laws against
it? Then? In fourteen oh four, Parliament passed a statue called the
Act against Multipliers, making alchemy, or more specifically, the multiplication of gold
and silver via alchemy illegal. We continue with exploring a fundamental text known as
the Theatrum Chemical or Chemical Theater. It's a compendium of early alchemical writings in
Latin. Published in six volumes in six decades. It was the most comprehensive
collective work on the subject of alchemy ever published in the Western world. The
physician and philosopher Sir Thomas Browne possessed a copy, while Isaac Newton filled the
margins of his copy with annotations there's even a letter from Roger Bacon on the
secret works of art in nature. Now, there are many books in this
work, and although there's no clear homunculous reference, it is a crucial work
referenced by several other important figures that go over this secret of making one,
although it does not use that terminology. Also there's a section from Aristotle and
alchemy. But interestingly there's a Theatrum Chemicum Britannicum, which was done by Elias
Ashmore, another publisher. In this book, the cover is clear homunculus symbolism,
which will break down later, But this book is a little bit too
cryptic to really gain that much value. Right now, we're going to continue,
but as mentioned, we're nearing the seventeenth century, so of course the
people writing books on this subject became increasingly secretive, not to mention that Paracelsus
was already cryptic to begin with. The next alchemist on our list is a
little bit different. Johann Ambrosius Ziebmaher, a German heraldic artist and copperplate engraver
who made heraldic multi volume books of armorial bearings of coat of arms for the
Holy Roman Empire. This shows how the Rosa Crucians were deeply integrated with the
church, implementing the tactic of divide and conquer by controlling both Catholic and protest
inside. And if you see the double headed eagle, that's also the Gillian
dialectic, but that's been a symbol for a very very long time, and
it was definitely a Roman symbol as well. That's outside the scope of this
video, but there is a reason that heraldry is involved, and it has
to do with these Palatine rulers actually hiring alchemists as their personal physicians and guides.
He has a book on alchemy with these very interesting depictions. It's essentially
a divine hand emerging from a floating triangle in the sky. It's holding a
torch as it lights the candle or flame of this heart, which could be
representative of the act of a love approcreation. It could also be the symbol
of Prometheus or Lucifer, bringing the bringing the light, bringing the fire demand.
It's really a reference to why alchemy only works for the advanced practitioner.
It has to do with the timing and collection certain spiritual or etheric powers.
This will be examined more as we progress. Next, We're going to continue
but kind of go into the spontaneous generation debate as well as starting on Johan
Baptist van Helmont fifteen seventy nine to sixteen forty four who was a Flemish chemist,
physiologist and physician. He is known for his work on plant growth in
the chemical composition of water. He even coined the term gas and is considered
the founder of pneumatic chemistry. He was a disciple of Paracelsus, so no
doubt he had read all of his works. Even the Helmont coat of arms
is the hidden Knight, and you can even see the dual symbolism with his
portrait. He also has the Rosicrucian finger pose. There's no reference to the
homunculous, but this is another important scientist who was not only well aware of
the subject, but most likely was keeping a secret. He even wrote instructions
on spontaneous generation, saying quote, when water from the purest spring is placed
in a flask steeped in leavening fumes, it putrefies, engendering maggots. The
fumes which rise from the bottom of a swamp produce frogs, ants, leeches,
and vegetation. Carbon indentation and a brick, Fill it with crushed basil,
and cover the brick with another so that the indentation is completely sealed.
Expose the two bricks to sunlight, and you will find that within a few
days, fumes from the basil, acting as a leavening agent, will have
transformed the vegetable matter into veritable scorpions. It took into the late seventeen hundreds
to really completely denounce spontaneous generation, because so many reputable sources for thousands of
years were adamant that it was not only possible, but obvious to anyone who
was aware of nature's secrets. It's not possible for such men to be simply
mistaken. They are either wilfully lying in being cryptic, or they're telling you
what they know and they believe in spous generation to be true. Both support
the case that the subject deserves more investigation. And no, it's not possible
that we're dealing with these minds simply misunderstanding the phenomena. That could be argued
with some writers who suggest spontaneous creation with bugs, as Aristotle does with lice,
but it cannot be argued with a generation of other animals, such as
mice and scorpions. These scorpions will be mentioned again later. Oh and let's
not forget philosopher and father of modern chemistry Robert Boyle, perhaps most known for
Boyle's Law. Boyle did reject Paracelsis theory on elements and substituted for atomic theory,
but he, like Isaac Newton, was still interested in discovering the philosopher's
stone. Boyle had his own thoughts on the generation of animals and contributed to
the start of redefining spontaneous generation. The soul changed because of the microscope.
The microscope is would allow Boyle and his associates, the famous Robbert Hook from
the Royal Society and the Jesuit Marcello Malpigi, finally putting to rest this whole
idea of spontaneous generation. The idea was that Robert Hook, with his discovery
of the cell and micro organisms, had found evidence that debunked spontaneous generation.
Basically because the microscope allowed them to look closer into objects, they saw that
in non living matter, such as a quirk, there were tiny little organisms,
and so this proved that living beings weren't just popping out of non living
matter. They were living things in it. But how does that debunk spontaneous
generation. It doesn't. It's just that at this time, especially after the
development of the Royal Society, which was freemason. It may also add more
credit to base Champ's polymorphic microplasma that can take the form of whatever the body
needs it to do in the German aspect, in the human body. But
if you're giving data to something that has sperm and clean water or whatever,
and this flask may also be able to generate life. Nic in origin and
Hook was one of the leaders and had to have been associated with Masons at
the time, that may not seem relevant. But then you tell me the
need to put coat of arms and secret symbols on these published discoveries, connecting
all these scientists to Palatine Roman rulers who were in control of the resicructions.
You really think the telescope was invented in the seventeenth century. This is kind
of weird. They don't even know the real inventor of the telescope, or
at least it was shrouded in mystery since its origin. It's more likely that
the knowledge of optics has been shrouded in mystery and secrecy similar to the subject
of alchemy. I mean, think about it. We're discussing the eye,
light, images, imagination. These are all subjects of alchemy. Therefore,
it is safe to assume that the subject of optics would have been crucial to
the alchemist. The story doesn't add up with the telescope, okay. So
in sixteen fifty five, a Dutch diplomat, William Burial, tried to solve
the mystery of who invented the telescope. Okay, so not a good start.
Already in sixteen fifty they had a telescope and had to initiate a process
in rediscovering who was the inventor. Okay. He had a local magistrate in
Middleburg follow up on Burial's childhood and early adult recollections of a spectacle maker named
Hans who he remembered as the inventor of the telescope. So wait, we're
going off of a memory. The magistrate was contacted by a then unknown claimant
Middleburg spectacle maker, Johannes Zachariason, who testified that his father, Zacharias Jansen,
invented the telescope and the microscope as early as fifteen ninety. This testimony
is seemed convincing to Boreo, who now recollected that Zacharias and his father Hans
Martin's must have been who he remembered. Burrell's conclusion that Zacharias chance an event
of the telescope a little ahead of another spectacle maker, Hans Liberche, was
adopted by Pierre Borell in his sixteen fifty six book De Vero Telescope inventur So
to get this straight, The mainstream story says that the microscope and telescope was
invented after the sixteen fifties, but they also have this weird story on how
it might be from the fifteen nineties. But that doesn't really add up because
in the second century, almost fifteen hundred years prior, Claudius Ptolemy, a
second century Greco Roman mathematician and astronomer, wrote a significant treatise on optics,
So we had extensive knowledge of refraction and optics for over a thousand years,
but nothing happened until the seventeenth century. That doesn't really make sense, especially
since the Romans were also expert glassmakers. In fact, even Roman emper Nero
used a glass globe of water to magnify text in order to read books,
so they were well aware of magnification. The reason it wasn't mentioned in their
books is because what they teach us about the era of the ancient Romans and
Greeks and the supposed medieval ages are actually the same era and there was essentially
a reset. But that's outside of the scope of this chapter, and we
can come back to that in a minute. The reason, yeah, even
if that's not the case, there's also the case to be made that a
lot of things that they attribute to the Romans having built I don't think they
did it at all. I think that's been structures that were there a long,
long, long long time, just like the pyramids. It's reinhabitants.
You know, if you own your own house, did you build it or
did you just occupy it? Did you buy it from someone else? So
someone else was the originator. That type of thing that bring this up is
because this one not only to be a top priority for their time, but
also one of the highest kept secrets, as this would have been one of
the primary tools of the astrologers and an alchemists. We know for a fact
that this knowledge was known before the eleventh century by Arabic astronomers and physicists of
the Islamic Golden Age. Al Hasan or al Hassan even al Haytham is referred
to as the father of modern optics. He even wrote a book on the
topic and was cited by Newton, Kepler, and Galilea. During his time,
there was no separation between alchemy, chemistry, and science. It was
all under the science of the Wise, or really alchemy. He also assisted
in the development of the camera obscura, which is another component to this that
has been shrouded in secrecy, as there have been suggestions that this is another
tool that was used by the elites to control the power of art. Whoever
controlled refraction, projection and images had the ability to control population, as we
will see the Royal Palatines. We're using astrologers to read the stars and make
changes the curve from a distance, things killing the signal. Hold on.
I'm not sure we're at like zero right now as far as signal, so
I'm not sure where you guys are seeing on your side, but I'm going
to give it a few seconds because we have this crazy storm going on and
it looks like it's knocking out the internet. I also had a bunch of
people just come home, so maybe they're jacking up the signal, but they
should be on a different I have two different internet's going on at this house.
Unfortunately. Let me see if I can just verify that they're not using
it, because it looks like it's dead. I don't know if you guys
are seeing anything. If it's just like a very shoppy blur, it should
usually this clears itself up quickly, but it's not. Hold on stand by.
I don't want to play it because I don't want you to miss information.
Here. Did you guys make sure that you're on what everything is?
What did you realize gonna say the Internet? Yeah? Yeah, because it's
it's just torpeted the other All right, Well, I'm not sure what's going
on, but it's not coming back it is. Connection is unstable. If
you're on WiFi, try playing into the rudder moving closer. Shut up.
It's on hard line, so I don't I don't know what's going on right
now. It could be the storm, could be an outage, but crap,
all right, where we're at here is only and now I'm fourteen into
it. I'll just have to mark that when fourteen thirty four is where we're
at, and we'll pick this up some other time because right now, I
unfortunately not allowed to use my spectrum to keep going. That would have zero
problems whatsoever, but I can't. I can't do anything with this computer the
way it is, where it has windows deactivated and all kinds of nonsense going
on. So I do apologize for that. It's kind of annoying because we
we most certainly have some interesting stuff here that I really was hoping to get
to at least a two and a half hour mark, but it just decided
to crash just now. Maybe it's just coincident that everybody came home, but
they're using spectrum. They're not even using the the century length that I'm on
right now, so I don't know. I want to give it a few
more seconds just in case. If it comes it's just that dead son of
a bitch hold on video is still playing for me. Okay, well,
let's let's see, let's see what happens. I need I need, I
need some feedback though, guys. All right, when I hit play here,
if it's still going, fine, we'll keep going. But if if
the degradation is so bad that you can't see the images or anything like that.
You have to tell me right away so we don't miss any information.
Okay, So in the in the live stream chat, I'm gonna be monitoring
it. I'm gonna hit play. I already have my time stamped marked in
case we it does go into crap, we can just overlap on the next
video. But let's give it a shot, because right now this is telling
me that it's absolute garbage signal, like the lowest of the low. All
right, let's try it the future in the stars as well, So tell
me what you around the near end of the seventeenth century, Hook and mal
Piggy, we're using this newfounded invention which was released in approved by royalty to
port their findings and quell all talk on alchemy in Paracelsus. But they never
debunked spontaneous generation. And it's strange because even Boyle was still using terms like
plastic power or plastic force. They were desperately trying to remove metaphysical definitions in
philosophies from their work, but it's clear that they still depended on them.
Plastic power can just be another term for ether or even an orphic field that
assists in the development of matter. With Malpeggy, he also debated and argued
with other proponents on spontaneous generation. During his time. Malpeggy could be argued
as an atheist because he tried to explain anatomy in terms of a machine and
with explanations completely devoid of reliance on the soul. So essentially, these guys
all teamed up and decided to put spontaneous generation to rest. Yet they never
debunked it. They just provided evidence that challenged it, and even during their
time, it still wasn't over just yet. This just initiated the debate and
they were back and forth on the subject. After the works of Malpiggy and
hug Flippo Banani, another Jesuit, interestingly was a ski shell collector who fought
back on their points and released a new experiment in which he tried to show
using a three lens microscope. In his work were published in sixteen ninety one.
That's spontaneous generation was posthusible and Animals without Blood and a Heart, in
contradiction of Francisco Ready's experimental work. Even more interesting is that Bonani defends Aristotle
and metaphysics, and even references Ready's experiment, stating that he finds Ready's assertion
that spontaneous generation never happens ridiculous for some reason, even though the microscope in
the discovery of micro organisms was relatively in new discovery, but Nanni's scientific experiments
on spontaneous generation were dismissed and even considered an inexcusable transgression. I don't think
that we can conclude that they were attempting to attack or even challenge the ideas
of Paracelsus or the alchemists, because it's really the same exact people. They
just moved into a new phase where they decided to be hush hush about their
secret knowledge. Ready actually eventually responded to Banani later that year. His book
had to do with the generation of parasitic worms, and Ready provides within his
treatise a continued defense of his claims that all animals originate from eggs. The
first response came from someone who was influenced by Bananni, Trioni Fetti, who
argued that not all life comes from seed, that some plants don't come from
seed or eggs, but have other center leaves or foliage. Many years later,
Bananni replied in sixteen ninety one, stating that he defended his work and
that spontaneous generation could happen without the use of seededs. This actually left Malpiggy
with no argument, and so he went to Boil for a response, and
ultimately they never really finished the debate. Even after read experiments, they really
never debunked anything. It would seem that this is right around the time that
the Jesuits, Reseicrucians, and Secret Brotherhood's left the Aristotle philosophy, but there
were still some scholars left over that were dedicated to the original science. So
since Malpiggy couldn't debunk Bonani, he ended up going to the count and literally
just complained about him and just put words in his mouth. It seems that
Bonani didn't really want to talk bad about Maulpiggy, or he just wanted to
make amends, as they were both students of Kircher. Even Robert Hook purposely
avoided even mentioning spontaneous generation. They were just playing a game of semantics because
some methods of spontaneous generation describe it as arising from non living matter. But
that's not really the point. The point is that they were generating creatures through
ritual It doesn't matter if it actually spawns from some source, and it most
likely did. And even Bonani defines spontaneous generated animals as quote are those living
beings whose matter is able to be moved, even by itself, in just
the same way that the seed usually moves in the generation of other animals end
quote. I don't think the proponents of spontaneous generation were literally saying it's non
living, as in no life source or living components, but more so that
it was not moving or animated. It was not a living creature, And
so they were speaking of specific techniques and lost rituals that were used since ancient
times to generate these creatures. As we've already shown you multiple alchemists who thought
this knowledge was obvious. But this is kind of weird. The debate was
still not over Almost sixty years later. In seventeen forty five, interest in
spontaneous generation was renewed when a Roman Catholic John Natum came out with new microscopical
discoveries showing that large numbers of organisms subsequently developed and prepared infusions many different substances
that had been exposed to intense heat and sealed tubes for thirty minutes. It
took over thirty years to respond to this argument, and the answer came from
another Italian named Lazaro Spolanzani, where he supposedly repeated them and said that Needam
just didn't hit his tubes long enough or didn't seal them correctly. But he
lost this exchange because the most influential nationalist of his time, George Lewis Comte
de Bouffon, supported the work of Needham and believed in spontaneous generation, suggesting
that organic molecules could assemble to form simple organisms under certain conditions. Interestingly,
it seems that basically there was some back and forth. They were really trying
to debunk the spontaneous generation, but it just wouldn't go away, even to
the point where after a number of further investigations had failed to solve the problem,
the French Academy of Science has offered a prize for research that would throw
new light on the question of spontaneous generation. So they literally funded the research
with the desired outcome already set. How scientific, They weren't even really interested
in getting to the bottom of the truth. They just wanted spontaneous generation to
die and be done with. But they couldn't do that without someone coming in
and debunking it. The person who would respond to this challenge is Louis Pastor,
which was really crazy that he ties into the story. I don't want
to say anything directly why, but it will become evident as we procede.
He developed an experiment using flasks that were coated with a sugar g solution to
a variety of conditions. He demonstrated that the creatures are developed were from microorganisms
in the air, not from the air itself. Now, it never explains
how he conclusively shows this, and in fact, this wasn't actually proven until
eighteen seventy six with John Tendall, who devised an apparatus to demonstrate that the
air could carry particulate matter. Finally, after Tindall and Pastors, where it
combined, it finally put the subject to spontaneous generation to rest or did it?
First? Let's bring up one of the main issues in the debate semantics.
Many of the times the evidence brought forth is really just debunking one definition
of the term of spontaneous generation, usually that it is life emerging from non
living matter. But spontaneous generation has two forms, generation from non living matter
also called a biogenesis, and generation from living matter called heterogenesis. The reason
why spontaneous generation was being rejected in the early eighteenth and late seventeenth century is
because this was a period in time where they were trying to understand biology and
its processes. Obviously, the answer of generation from nonliving matter would not suffice
as an explanation. Therefore heterogenesis became their main concern. But interestingly, heterogenesis
would not work as a complete doctrine and the explanation of the generation of life,
as by eighteen fifty nine it was almost completely discredited as the experiments with
pastor and the understanding of parasites continued. It was the very breakdown between organic
and inorganic matter that led to the dilemma. The issue became clear with the
release of Darwin's The Origin of Species. For any evolutionary theory resting on natural
causes logically demands the acceptance of a biogenesis. The term was coined by Thomas
Huxley, so I've come full circle. Literally. Their theory depends on the
notion that life can evolve or emerge from non living matter at some point.
Oh and also Thomas Huxley is depicted with a glass bottle with what appears to
be a homunculous in the famous nineteenth century fantasy novel Water Babies. This book
is really crazy. We're gonna have to break it down in the future.
But apparently Thomas Huxley is mixed up with a bunch more staff. A biogenesis
is also related to the concept of the primordial soup theory, which is another
attempt to try to explain the mechanics of a biogenesis. They never debunked spontaneous
generation, they just changed the name. Now. This is an interesting character
because the encyclopedias started to call him an amateur. However, Andrew Cross was
an important scientist in the history of Britain. He's most famously known for his
experiments on electrocrystallization, which were conducted in eighteen thirty six, during which insects
appeared, in other words, spontaneously generated. Around the age of twelve,
Cross persuaded one of his teachers to let him attend a series of lectures on
the natural sciences, the second of which was on the subject of electricity.
This was the cause of his lifelong interest into the subject. Cross Ross began
experimenting with electricity during his time in the sixth form when he built a leaden
jar, and after leaving school, he studied at Brasenose College, Oxford.
Andrew Cross seems to be more than just an amateur, as he had many
contract fusions to science and participated in advanced experiments for his time. One of
his prominent undertakings involved creating an extensive setup to explore atmospheric electricity. This setup
employed an insulated wire measuring initially one point two five miles and later shortened to
eighteen hundred feet, that was hung from poles and trees. Through this,
he determined the polarity of the atmosphere under varying weather conditions. His findings were
later published by his friend George Singer. Cross, along with Sir Humphrey Davy,
was among the early pioneers to construct large voltaic piles. One such described
battery consisted of fifty jars with a coated surface area of seventy three square feet.
Using his wires, Cross could charge and discharge it around twenty times per
minute, creating noise is almost as loud as a cannon. This led to
his local nickname the thunder and lightning man. In eighteen thirty six, Cross
attended meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science in Bristol. There
he presented his discoveries, including electrocrystallization and atmospheric experiments in improvements to the voltaic
battery. His further works included separating copper from ores using electrolysis, experimenting with
the ectrolysis of seawater, line and brandy for purification, and studying the effects
of electricity on vegetation. The year eighteen thirty six also marked a controversial phase
and Cross's career. During an electrocrystallization experiment, he observed the formation of what
he described as a perfect insect on the twenty sixth day. Over the next
few weeks, hundreds more such creatures, identified as members of the genus Ocarus,
were observed. This incident, when reported by a local newspaper, led
to public outrage, with Cross accused of attempting to play god. However,
his work remained unpublished due to the controversy surrounding Cross's experiment. The skeptics have
a hypothesis that the insect were just embedded in the samples, so the mainstream
does not take his work very credible. Despite all that Mary Shelley's Frankenstein was
inspired by Cross's experiments, some say that it's unlikely, as the novel was
published almost twenty years prior to cross His experiments. However, Shelley did no
Cross through a mutual friend, and it's reported that she attended a lecture by
Cross in eighteen fourteen. In the year eighteen thirty seven, during his electrocrystallization
experiments, Ai Cross observed the unexpected emergence of insects under conditions that would typically
be fatal to animal life. Cross had been conducting experiments involving a mixture of
water silicate of potassa and hydrochloric acid dipink onto electrified porous vesuvius rock. His
intention was to produce crystals of silica, which ultimately failed. However, on
the fourteenth day of the experiment, Cross noticed small white growths appearing from the
middle of the electrified stone, which further enlarged on the eighteenth day and developed
long filaments. Notice how we're talking about a stone. These formations were clearly
distinct from the artificial minerals Cross sought to create. In defied explanation at the
time, so Cross identified these insects as Ocarus electricus, later known as acari
Cross and sought the opinion of entomologists, who confirmed their classification as mites from
the genus Ocarus. The origin of these insects remained elusive, with speculations ranging
from hashed over deposited by airborne insects to the influence of electric action. Cross
replicated the experiment multiple times, achieving similar results, including observing the insects growing
below the surface of electrified fluid. However, the insects exhibited no signs of
vitality when trapped in a chlorine atmosphere. Despite Cross's attempts to understand the phenomenon,
he refrained from forming any conclusive theories. It would seem the release of
his findings without his authorization led to public outrage and the accusations of blasphemy,
causing Cross to withdrawal from society. While subsequent attempts to recreate Crosses experiments have
reportedly been unsuccessful, the mystery surrounding the appearance of these insects remained unsolved through
cross His life. They would definitely seem that they were playing with underground experiments
and electricity. Consider this chilling scene from eighteen eighteen Scottish chemist Andrew Ur standing
next to a recently executed murderer's body at the University of Glasgow. Here they
performed a very strange demonstration, armed with a two hundred and seventy plate voltaic
battery and two metallic rods. Yours shocked the attendees as the lifeless body convulsed
and contorted in a horrifying spectacle brought about by the electrical stimulation of the corpse's
nerves. There are actually modern studies in support of spontaneous generation. Any study
from the seventies, Sydney W. Fox showed how inorganic molecules or the assets
that he called proteinoid microspheres, would actually grow and divide. When he did,
he created the world's first protocel out of protenoids and water. Fox It
was a proponent of a biogenesis, the creation of life from non living matter.
Interesting that he heated it in water, similar to the alchemist. Now
we're prepared to get deep. We know the history, the main arguments of
both sides. Now it's time to really dive into this material. Because we're
just getting started. We're going to begin this section with maybe one of the
most insane and strange books ever to be written, but it's also extremely rare.
Let's do a disclaimer. I'm going to tone down the graphic details,
but there's no getting around how weird and disgusting this book is. The book
we're discussing is the Book of the Cow or lieber Vagey, named after the
experiments contained within. Interestingly, this book is actually attributed to Plato, or
it was believed in referenced by several others who considered it to be from Plato's
Book of Laws. The name in Arabic is called ketab al Noamas, which
translates into the Book of Laws, but it's also translated as the Book of
Sacred Secrets. It was also called liber and iguimis a translation of Noamas.
It's important to note that they consider this to be pseudo Plato, which,
as we brought up some questions, especially with the timeline, there are arguments
that suggest that Plato and Aristotle are not from the timelines that they give us.
But regardless, they say that in the twelfth century a Latin translation was
copied in Spain with a different title Libre and aguimis. The ones that do
exist or handwritten difficult to read, and even some authors were suggesting that some
of these works have been purposely altered in ordered a hide information. There are
many references to this book in other works. Even one breakdown gives this table
of contents of the book. Quote. This is for a nacher and leader
Plato. I have seen two books by him. The name of one of
them is the Greater Book of the Laws, and the name of the second
is the smaller Book of the Laws. In the greater book, he speaks
of affecting by means of images abominable things like walking on water, causing the
appearance in whatever shape you may wish, of the forms of composite animals which
are not found in the world, causing rain to fall at time unseasonable for
its falling, or causing it to be obstructed at time proper for its falling,
making meteors, shooting stars and the lights appear in the sky, lightning
bolts to descend at unreasonable times, and the ships of one's enemies or whatever
one wishes at a great distance to burn, walking in the air, causing
the stars to rise at unseasonable times, and seeing them when they have fallen
from their heavenly places to the center of the earth, conversing with the dead
end quote. This is disgus us in David Pingrey's book on the subject.
Now it becomes clear that this homunculus is just a subcategory of a much larger
and higher science, artificial generation or even spontaneous generation, connecting to an even
higher science, the occult arts that allowed the practitioner to cause real world change.
Obviously, we need to discuss the blur between the astro and the physical,
and we can discuss that, but some things do become evident. They
were not playing around with just artificial creation, but wombs and literally quote,
creating any type of creature they wish. Now, we can't go into everything
right now, but it's important to take note that the alchemist, who we
know for a fact worked for the only Roman Church and her Palatine rulers.
Well, they woulieve this information to be true, including the ability to make
meteors, shooting stars, and lights appear in the sky. I mean that
sounds pretty specific. How about burning whatever you want from a great distance?
That sounds familiar. If they didn't believe it to be true, then why
were they hiring these alchemists to work for them? It would seem the ideology
behind this is Greek metaphysics, but a more esoteric form in which you would
actually move your soul or a soul into other material bodies or objects, that
the soul is what allows things to move. Now, this is where it
gets interesting, and this also takes an occult mindset. But otherwise scholars typically
begin to see this as allegorical, but it's not. It's based on philosophical
concepts. But I argue that's not only allegorical but literal on multiple levels.
They just viewed the soul differently, and we can use different terms for this
spiritual power or ether. Now, the secret here is that this soul contained
any form, or the spiritual power of the magician was synonymous with an image.
Literally, by viewing an image in your mind, you were in capsulating
a soul, if you will, into that form, creating an image.
But that image represents something or is attached to something, a soul. This
is the philosophical concept behind the alchemists. But they believed literally that the imagination
was a real thing that just by imagining something or creating an image in the
mind, you were constraining a soul or consciousness to that image. This is
the process of implanting. A magician can take certain spiritual powers or souls not
of the magician, for example, planets, and implant them in two objects,
goals, or desired outcomes. It must be noted that this was not
something they believed or hallucinated, but this was the beginning of the scientific method
itself. Ancient magicians, through trial and error, undeniably prove the ability to
affect the material world through the power of focused thought. Open any book on
magic and this is what you find, and this is what is that question?
Did these scientists in the sixteen hundreds actually have the ability to cause these
real world effects through the combination of an early physical and spiritual science that was
revived from an even more ancient source. Things to consider other strength the will
of the magician. This includes a variety of factors such as focus and desires,
but also to consider the type of spiritual forces implanted and into what body
and at what time. This is the foundation, because in order to understand
homunculous, we have to understand the greatest science behind it. Homunculus is simply
the name for the experiments done by the medieval scientists trying to revive the ancient
art of artificial creation. But this process and science is much older and goes
by many different names. So the Book of Cow does have a vast amount
of miracle type spells and cosmic or heavenly transforming events causing changes to the earth's
happiness. Sphere describes how to perform miracles similar to the Bible, to turn
a staff into a snake, or to walk on water similar to Jesus.
But there's something clear to note about the Book of Cow or kitab al Nowamas,
and that is it covers the concept of artificially creating rational and irrational animals,
or in other words, this book teaches how to literally implant souls into
the creation and generation of plants, animals, and men, each of which,
according to Aristotle, has its own type of soul. The author of
the Book of Cow claims that animals can be created by artificial means. That's
important to note as it expands the subject beyond a singular humanoid creature or tiny
human in a bottle. It's crucial to make that distinction because as we explore
this phenomena further, the more doors that will open, as what we're dealing
with is an ancient science of allowing semen from a male animal to develop within
an artificial womb. But I find it fascinating that in the Book of the
Cow there's a detailed ritual for the manufacturing of artificial bees. Now, on
one level, this is interesting from whether they really did find a way to
generate Okay, a couple of things. Thought. Creating anything is manifestation,
and that is something that they try to keep from us because when they manipulate
our minds to think a certain way or about a certain thing in a distraction,
we're manifesting that thing to be real, and that's something that is a
power they don't want us to know that we have. The other thing is
the bees. Now again I mentioned this in the beginning. The bee hive
is a symbol. It's it's in the sidewalks in Salt Lake City, Utah,
home of the Mormons, home of the Freemasonic Order. There's lots of
Freemasonry going in there. If you know anything about the Mormons. No Adam
Smith and the Freemasonic connection there, and this idea of this generation of artificial
bees. Maybe the reason why that symbolism is used, and that's what I
wanted to point out here before we go any further. Insects using spontaneous generation
outside of just growing baggots. The ritual involves a young female cow who is
slaughtered and her blood is placed along with some of its body parts. Again,
this stuff gets kind of graphic. But they take this organic substances from
nick cow and they put it in an enclosed chamber. They let it rot
for seven days, and for some reason, a dog penis is thrown on
top. Then after another seven days, worms start popping up. Now like
it's weird because dinner instructed to feed these worms with a fistful of dead bees
on a specific timeline of every fourteen days. This is mind blowing because it
also gets into other strange worms subjects because they're also androgynous, so they play
into the so called symbolism. But after two weeks, the worms will grow
wings and turn into bees. Now at same there's a reason that worms are
used, and this is really interesting because the answer actually lies with the Aristotle
where he claims in d Anima that ants and bees possess a special power or
faculty, that they have a complex soul. So what that means is they
can't just be grown through spontaneous generation. That alchemists actually have to grow the
worms first, since they have a different type of soul and they can be
produced using spontaneous generation. Then the next step is using the ritual and the
dead bees, the alchemist transfers the soul or implants that soul into a new
vehicle, creating rebirth. This also explains the fascination with bees by secret societies
and royal coat of arms. You can see it everywhere in old alchemy symbols,
Rosecrucan symbols, even in this old engraving of a supposed collection, which
really doesn't get that much attention, but on closer inspection we can see that
this is an early Freemasonic alchemy library, as we can see even humans in
the bottles and the occult be symbolism. The author of the Book of Cow
states quote, whoever wishes to make a rational animal should take his own water
a qualm, swam while it's still warm. This water is a seman,
and Aristotle believed that this seman contain his soul, but only while warm.
One should mix this warm aqua with an equal amount of the stone, which
is also to be called the Sun's stone. Interesting that's important to note for
later. Also the sun is the father in astrology, but also signifying God's
son. Here is a quote from the book, quote one should look out
for a you or a cow, whichever of these one chooses, and insert
the mixture in her womb and plug up her genital with the Sun's end quote.
It would then seem okay, so we have the bees, we have
the hive, we have the hive mind. And then we hear this and
we see this picture of the I guess you would call that a woodcarving maybe,
or was a scatchewn of the library that was potentially a three Masonic library
with humans and jars. So if they're saying that they start with the worm,
because the worm is manipulate, it can be manipulated, but the bee
is too complex. How many more steps after the bee do they make a
person? And that's where I think this information is heading. It's step by
step from one polymorphism to another thing. They take blood from the cow to
provide or pleomorphic I don't know whatever, but you understand what I mean,
nourishment for this new created being. Although primitive This seems to be a reference
to some type of ancient occult ritual involving male fluid of a magician that would
be put on a stone, some type of special sunstone that then would be
used in well artificial insemination. But not just that that it creates a chamber
in which this mixture can putrify or grow, a hermetically sealed chamber. Then
they take this cow and lock her in a house with no sunlight. This
is to be the second womb. Now listen to this another translation from the
book quote. While awaiting the birth of the animal, the magician mixes a
powder made of crushed sunstone, sulfur, magnet, and green zinc stirred in
with the sap of aqua semen of a white willow. This is some type
of mixture upon which the cow gives birth. The creature is placed into this
powder and is instantly clothed in human flesh. Now, this newborn tiny humanoid
is kept in a large glass or vessel for three days until it becomes exceedingly
hungry. It is then fed for seven days on its mother's blood and develops
into a complete animal with which other marvels can be performed. For instance,
it can be placed on a white cloth with a mirror in his hands and
suffumigated with the previously mentioned powder mixed with human blood. Then the moon will
appear to be full on the last day of the month. Or it can
be decapitated and it's blood collected. If the blood is given to a man
to drink, he will assume the form of a bow vinery sheep, but
if he is anointed with it, he will have the form of an eap.
Finally, if the animal is fed for forty days on a diet of
blood, milk, and semon, then its guts are extracted from its belly
and rubbed on someone's hands and feet. He may walk on water or traverse
the dietameters of the earth in the winking of an eye. End quote.
Now this is very interesting because at first many may think that this is all
hallucinated, or one could say, some type of actual magic if you're going
to be traveling at such speeds and performing miraculous feats. But on another level,
there may be something else going on with this book. The homunculus is
a soul that has been placed into an artificial body. As we'll see,
it's not detailed in this book. But there's another component to the homunculus that
must be considered. The reason that this being is magical is because it's an
artificially created being that was manifested in accordance to astrology. But more importantly,
the magician could implant the Now they're saying astrology, and that would have to
do with the frequency that you're getting from the cosmos, right, So who's
to say they can't artificially create that would the electromagnetic radiation ie radio waves five
g wi fi of other natures and give the create the atmosphere that they need
without the need for the planets or the stars to be in a certain position,
because they can pretty much blot that out and cause the same type of
frequencies that they're requiring to manipulate whatever you want to call it DNA or this
development. And when you as we listen to this, they're going to say
that they get a whole lot more success when the thing is rotating, as
if it was a planetary object rotating or spinning. Now, I know a
lot of people here don't think that that happens, and I probably agree with
you, but it is interesting that gyroscopically, if you want to call it
that something spinning as more positive results of this development. And if you look
at the DNA, if that, if that, if that diagram is even
real, or if it's there's anything to it. It's a spiraling staircase,
right, it's a ladder. Well, it's spinning. It's twisted right like
a noodle. It's a twisted noodle. Soul of the planets themselves into this
new artificial body. We will discuss that more later as it may complicate things
now, but we can't deduce that this is false just because miracles and strange
events start occurring. It may seem impossible, but we're dealing with different states
here. The next part of the book makes a subject even more insane.
The next chapter in the Book of Cow covers the artificial generation of a rational
animal by similar ritual with the cow, but this time it's with a female
ape. It says that her offspring undergoes quote appropriate manipulations. Is this where
monsters and encryptids come from? Even different type of deformed humans like the one
legged man. This directly connects the monstrous beings from Christianity to the alchemist and
artificial creation. Could this knowledge have been wiped. The Book of the Cow
was very difficult to find, and there are no full English translations. They
would literally create mythical beings whatever they wanted, and they would sculpt, shape
and create these deformed beings physically, like merging different pieces from different bodies,
and then doing this at such an early stage so that the being would then
grow into all sorts of creatures. Think about it. The basilisk, monsters
with human heads, even the demons from Gamars, these are all different types
of homunculus. In the book, it also discusses how one can take the
organs of the creature and rub them into certain spots to gain the powers of
that organ. Since the homunculus is a magical creature, the organs that are
magical and are connected more in tune with the astral and therefore they can see
and communicate with spirits. By rubbing the eyes of the homunculus into one's eyes,
the ability would be gained to be able to see all spirits and demons
like the homunculus can. Henry Cornelius Agrippa actually references Plato, but scholars say
that he's not speaking of the actual Plato, but of the same author as
Picatrix in the Book of the Cow as an authority on the manufacture of magical
lamps. Again, why would these alchemists? The people who were writing the
earliest versions on the book, say Plato, and then this was also believed
by Agrippa. The Book of Laws or also known as lever Numic the Hebrew
translation, we can see clearly that Agrippa references the artificial generation of monsters and
how they are not according to the laws of nature. The Book of Cow
also interestingly has other extraordinary rituals that can cause the moon to split in half
and also to cause the appearance of giants. Is it possible that someone could
create a giant homunculus. There's a phenomenal paper by Leona Saye called The Cows
and the where she really dies into the Arabic sources and the differences contained with
the Book of the Cow in comparison to Pingree's analysis of the book concluding that
it was an example of neoplatonic thought, she breaks down some really crazy sources.
But first we need to discuss the bees. If we haven't seen the
Ancient Cloning Factories video, go check it out, as it's going to start
really connecting here. There's bee symbolism throughout masonry, occult brotherhoods and royalty,
not to mention alchemy. Yes, even the postcards. Now we know what
they're referring to, because this ritual disgust in the Book of the Cow or
Lieberback Guy is actually an ancient ritual of spontaneous generation that has been practiced for
thousands of years supposedly. Again, I have different views on the timeline for
forgetting never. Now, the Book of the Cow and the Latin translation are
dated around the twelfth century, but the original Arabic sources could be of an
earlier age. However we can find Okay, I'm glad I got to stop
right here. That's Mithra, right and you see the stabbing of the bowl
in the throat. That's a traditional Mythraan depiction. And Mithra was one of
twelve gin or genies if you will, who over time became the most significant
genie because he was accredited for being able to give you your desires and all
this other stuff. And that's why the Mythra cult is still alive and well
and was a big part of Rome. And obviously it came from Persian descent,
but the stabbing of the bowl may not just be the end of the
era of Taurus anymore. It may be a reflection of these processes that they
were doing to spontaneously generate life, utilizing the dead putrific future faction of a
cow, just like the Book of the Cow was telling us to make these
strange creatures, or these maybe regular creatures, but with very strange means and
methods. A reference to this exact same ritual into ancient Rome, which we
now know was used to create some type of demon homunculous one that was prophetic
in nature. The proof is contained in book four of Virgil's Georgics, which
is a famous poem. Virgil was an ancient Roman poet who played a vital
role in shaping Latin literature. In lines two eighty one through three fourteen,
we get instructions very similar to Librevacky, but a thousand years earlier. For
those of you who can't read that, it says, it has been shown
that these experiments of generating bees from cows are a continuation of the ancient art
of bugonia she mentioned earlier described by Virgil, which involved beating and whipping cows
to death and sealing their orifices with the purpose of generating bees. Quote.
But if someone's whole brood has suddenly failed and he has no stock from which
to recreate a new line, then it's time to reveal the famous invention of
Aristeus the Arcadian Master, and the method by which in the past the adulterated
blood of dead bullets has generated bees. While that line on the stock was
a little suspicious, they had to recreate a new line. But let's continue.
What we're looking at is an ancient reference to alchemy. But it just
wasn't called that yet. Now. That was from my later translation. It
says a dead bullets, But in the original Latin it goes. First,
a small and contracted place is chosen and adopted for the purpose, and they
press the walls of the narrow roof with tiles and add four hides at the
corner, four slanting windows for the winds. Then a calf, already curling
its two year old horns on its forehead, is saught. The double nostrils
and breadth of its mouth are stopped up with many obstructions, and having been
killed by blows, its intrails are loosened through its intact skin, so they
leave it lying in a confined space and put broken branches beneath the rib bones
in fresh thyme and cassia. This is done when the west winds first drive
the waves, before the meadows blush with new colors, before the chattering swallows
it spins its nest from the rafters. Meanwhile, the moisture heated in the
soft bones seethes in the miraculous animals that are to be seen by the modes,
first prior of feet, then buzzing with wings mixed together, and more
and more skim the thin air. So hold up, that's alchemy. And
they're even using herbs and timing references. They even are hermetically sealing the cow.
Will come to find out. There's actually a name for this ritual.
It's called the ancient art of Bogonia. This was an ancient ritual on the
generation of bees. And they even try to say on the wiki that it
was more just poetic or some learned trope rather than an actual practice. I
think that seems like a cover up because it's clear that this is not poetic.
This is the exact same ritual that's mentioned in lieber Vacki. It's also
found in Byzantine Geoponica. Perhaps the earliest mentioned is by Nikandor of Colophon.
The Hermetic Kirandes reported that worms are born after one week, in bees after
three weeks, which again confirms without a doubt that is what we were dealing
with in the Book of the Cow, but it specifically ties the creation of
the homunculous. The far more earlier origins, especially would consider the queen bee,
with Diana of Ephesus quoting Ovid's Metamorphosis sixty one to sixty eight. Florentinus
of the Geoponica reports the process as proven an obvious fact quote. If any
further evidence is necessary to enhance the faith, and things already proved, you
may behold the carcasses decaying from the effect of time and tepid moisture, change
into small animals, go and bury slaughtered oxen. The fact is known from
experience. The rotten entrails produce flower sucking bees, who, like their parents,
roam over pastures, bent upon work and hopeful of the future. A
buried war horse produces the hornet end quote. So let's keep in mind that
he mentioned the oxen and a horse. He's literally saying to have faith in
it because it is a fact known from experience. We didn't mention this,
but John Baptista de la Porta and natural Magic brings this up and goes into
way more detail. The fact that Aristotle did not mention bogna yet does have
a section on bees, I've led scholars to believe that bognia wasn't real.
Well, the authors discussing this were not just being poetic but also cryptics,
similar to the alchemist. Aristotle could have left that out because it's far too
ac cult. Even Celsus, who spoke of the ancient Hyperboreans, was against
the practice. This was a secret art form or a cult ritual which was
only known to the adepts of the order. Mark Elais calls bees the factitious
progeny of a decaying ox, and in De Agricoltura, written by Marcus Gatto
also known as Gauto the Elder in one hundred sixty BC, the conversation between
vast and another character touches upon the concept of bugonia, or the belief in
the spontaneous generation of bees from the carcass of an ox. The Greek term
bogs born of an ox is used to describe these bees Okay, so it's
not mentioned for like a thousand years, and then out of nowhere it just
pops up again in Liebervaki or Book of the Cow. Interestingly, it doesn't
seem that the two are directly connected, but Petrote Crescenzi, an Italian jurist,
agronomist and author, refers to Bogna around thirteen o four in the Book
of Rural Benefits. Also, Boggia is very close to Bologna. I wonder
if there's a connection there. In fourteen seventy five, Conrad of Meegenberg,
in the first German Book of Natural History, claimed that the bees are born
from the skin in the stomach of an ox. Michael Herring gives a detaileds
cryption of Bognia drawn from Geoponica Johannesh Koletisch, whose book constituted the book of
reference for many generations of apiarists expressing the same belief in Bogognia. The method
appears even in European apriculture books of the seventeen hundreds. So you're telling me
that this was an ancient practice in Rome, referenced by several reputable sources,
But mainstream scholars tell us it's just poetic. Then over a thousand years passed
by, and then it's referenced as a very real thing by Italian and German
writers on agriculture. It was still referenced and discussed as a practice up to
the seventeen hundred. So even Goatto the Elder makes reference to the Bible that
has a story or allusion to this quote. Out of the eater came forth
meat, and out of the strong came forth sweetness Judges fourteen in the Book
of Judges, where Samson puts forward the riddle of out the strong came forth
sweetness, referring to a swarm of bees found inside of a dead lion.
There are several commenters, including Vassius, who cited this illusion to suggest to
Varrow that while he might not know nothing much about cattle, his attempt to
deal with the subject might prove some useful discussion. This reveals that obviously this
was a secret practice that will become more clear as we will proceed. Okay,
so let's go back to the Book of the Cow or Lieber Vacky and
take some more notes. So, essentially, this strange book discusses how to
use blood or sperm to produce an artificial or spontaneous generation of a magically powerful,
rational animal that can tell the maker anything that it would like to know.
This tends to lead people into thinking that it's just fantasy, but this
just dies into deeper aspects of the occult that are not known by most people.
This book is essentially showing you how to create a god being. Some
type of prophet are not giving the full details and being cryptic, but we
will see more examples of this as we proceed. They wanted to create an
intelligent being that can learn, talk, and even give wisdom, but there
became an issue because this was grown outside of the womb of the mother.
It would seem this leads to dark and negative manifestations, as the homunculus were
turned demonic in nature. Some scholars argue that it's evident that Paracels has read
the Book of the Cow or Liberva Gay and it had influenced his writings.
The fact that he didn't bring it up shows how well preserved the secret is.
The author of the original Book of the Cow seems to view this being
as demonic in nature. But interestingly, there are other techniques described where the
adept can get around this issue and make a holy new species, including for
instance, a girl with the face of a boy, or even with a
bit of luck, a being with prophetic powers. They were discussing how to
literally cause changes in the way it looks, even the face. Okay,
now this is insane. Inside the text, it begins to discuss a method
in which you can get around the issue, how to create a non demonic
homunculus. The text explains, by placing the glass vessel that contains the being
in a large metal rotating sphere designed to simulate the effects of the crystalline sphere
that rotate about the Earth itself. Okay, so there you go. Then
we're talking about gyroscopic measures to try to change, try to change the demonic
nature of the homunculus. WHOA what none of the later alchemists mentioned this device
whatsoever? And think about that, we're getting really deep in this fantasy.
If it's all just imagination they literally were designing imaginary machines, or is it
possible that this was actually a real device? Very strange. So there are
more methods for creating a more pure homunculouser than in this text. They knew
exactly what they were trying to achieve. Also, some early alchemists who referenced
or wrote on this text explain how the female seed is not necessary at all
to contribute to generation. All that is needed is the male seed. We
should also mention that the book does cover some extraordinary rituals, such as how
to cause the moon is spleaded in a half, and also how to create
giants. It would seem the subject of giants may be related here, as
Paracelsus even makes reference to this. So what do we know so far?
While it would seem this libre backeye book is discussing experiments that require sex with
an animal, the creation of a human like being and or monster like being
depending on the variables at play, and also some type of skin that can
be made from alchemical powder, in which the creature is placed in this growing
skin. It's quite detailed. Then it continues explaining that different abilities and powers
of these beings. In this case of the cow, it would seem all
holes must be closed and the female animals private parts plugged. But there's another
component to this powder skin. They had other methods. Now this is insane,
so prepare yourself. But literally the text discusses how you can actually design
a skin or a costume for the creature and which to place it in,
and it will grow and form into it. Basically, once you have the
early form of the creature, as the animal gives birth to this rotting,
tiny creature, then they use this powder and or create an artificial skin that
they designed literally with different animal parts into or heads. Then this outfit would
wrap around the newly created being. So now let's look at the work that
inspired the Book of the Cow, because on its own, it doesn't really
explain too much and it seems as if it may just be one rare example.
But that's the point I'm trying to make clear. It isn't. And
the reason that we don't see more examples of this is because it was literally
a secret art and they only spoke about this between members of the Brotherhood.
Why do we know this well, because they literally were translating this by hand,
and it was kind of a thing that would be shared between the bros
where they would copy the text, and they were even found in Christian monasteries.
So what were the monks doing with this information? Even John d is
said to have owned a copy. What were the monks doing with the children
with this information? This is what I would ask. What happened is these
actually come from older Arabic sources, and around the twelfth century they began translating
and exchanging this text between elite members. However, this led to the text
eventually being released to the public as there are some in private collections. Thus,
start off with Nabaty and Agriculture, a tenth century text by Ibnwashia.
This is a very important text and claim to be the most influential, literally
the first text or book on agriculture really, and even the author claims that
it's based on a twenty thousand year old Mesopotamian text. That's interesting a note,
because that means they got it from somewhere else. There is a chapter
on the Abraham Tree where the author gives instructions for artificially generating an extraordinary creature.
He described it as having the form of a winged, two handed fish.
This account is actually repeated in multiple text The generated animal has special occult
abilities which are used to cause certain effects in the sky and stars. The
author even clearly states that these were secret operations. Okay, so we've got
to bring up Picatrix, which is suspected to be the first grimoire or the
first major release on magic. This Arabic text inspired all other grimoires from the
Western tradition. It was the foundation for the Western alchemical tradition. Picatrix is
a Latin name. The original title is Gayat al Hakim, which most scholars
assume was written in the eleventh century, though arguments have been made to place
it in the first half of the tenth century. The name of the book
translates to the aim of this sage or the goal of the wise, and
there are some interesting things to take from the book. It's not so graphic
as the Book of the Cow, but we bring it up because it's actually
its counterpart, and some scholars argue that they were written by the same author.
One recent study in Studia Islamica suggests that the authorship of this work should
be attributed to Kasim al Kurtubi, who, according to Ibn al Farati,
was a man of charms and talismans. The Picatrix reveals how to create talismans
using astrological influences and in a sense, capture their energies into an object.
Now. Although there's no homunculous mentioned, there is a part on artificial generation.
The Picatrix does include examples for the artificial generation of both rational and irrational
animals, not by penetration, but how to create green scorpions and snakes,
which shows Paracelsus had been reading these earlier texts and others like Della Porta.
He also mentions that the Indians are masters at this art and I thought that
was interesting because of all the references from ancient Greek historians and philosophers discussing as
a fact that India was full of highbrid like creatures and monsters such as werewolves,
blemmyes, and the one legged bakefoot human. There's another Arabic text named
katab All Summum. We find a description for creating a rational wild animal,
which is a beast with a human head, a tail, and four feet,
two of which will be huffs. By looking at the creature, it
can cause death. Well, that might be our early sounds a little bit
like the evil reliest basilist reference. It's just a slightly different variation. Interestingly,
there's only one instance for the generation of animals with the heads and bodies
resembling different creatures, and it only survives in one single manuscript. It's called
oh yun al hakal ik, so that one is supposed to be blurry that
you're looking at right now. I think they blurt it out for YouTube for
some reason. But when you're looking at these types of creatures being created,
and they mentioned snakes in there. A lot of these texts from ancient religions
talk about their hero character, and sometimes that would be Ball or Marduk.
Not saying Ball and Marduk are exactly the same, because I think there are
some differences. But they go through these trials or tests where they have to
fight and destroy these certain creatures, and they're all chimeras, all of them,
and some of them are serpents with multiple heads and things of that nature.
And then they have to fight a god or two to prove their worth
and share their dominance, and then they're exalted and given a pantheon. And
this is potentially the rounding up and I guess rastling of these types of creatures
that were created artificially maybe or in the strange, the strange manner, getting
a little out of control. And it could be also leaning towards this concept
of a previous reset and the throwbacks from that era having to be cleaned up
to restarted. Saif gives us information on this. In her The Cows and
the Bees, the text translates to the sources of truth and the explication of
paths. A text on the magical practices, which contain twenty six chapters that
correspond to the sections and Librivakai disc gives us a glance into the Arabic reception
of Kitab al noamis. Quote of the Arabic texts which bear some relation to
Librivaki. All the iraqis Akik corresponds most closely with the content of the Latin
translation end quote. She doesn't provide a full translation, but we do have
the original text. It would just take more time to research. However,
we do know that the text references the instructions on how to generate scorpions and
snakes. Quote description of the fermentation of snakes. If you want this,
take as many big spiders as you can, put them in a glass bottle
and overwhelm them with genet milk enough to merge them, and leave it in
manure for four weeks. A red snake will be generated from it. If
instead of spiders, a big tarantula is placed, a snake like a serpent
will be generated from it. If it stings a human, it kills her
hymn on the spot and in the same hour, having no antidote. This
book is really strange, and it has all sorts of creatures and hybrids,
perhaps their methods in which one could create their own monster. There's even a
human like creature hybrid with horns. So if makes the argument that these writings
correlate both with the Picatrix and Librivack Eye the Arabs were the Saracens, this
would hint that the Saracens revived this art and then it was erased. They
were also connected with the Templars. They obviously did not want this to be
known. Did they have the ability to create hybrid creatures, It would explain
more clearly why they have hybrid symbols on their churches. We'll come back to
that. The author of the Picatrix was greatly influenced by even Whileshia's Nabatie in
Agriculture and Jabir ibn Hayan. He's an even earlier Paracelsus and is the author
of an enormous number and variety of works in Arabic, often called the Jabirian
Corpus. The works that survived today mainly deal with alchemy and chemistry, magic,
and Shia religious philosophy. The original scope of the Corpus was vast and
diverse, covering a wide range of topics, ranging from cosmology, astronomy and
astrology, over medicine, pharmacology, zoology and botany, to metaphysics, logic
and grammar. We know this because several authors throughout history have made references to
his books. Jabir ibn Hahan is one of the most brilliant and intelligent scientists
in the Golden Area of Muslims. He is famous for inventing various instruments for
chemistry experiments. He discovered new chemicals which include hydrochloric acid. It was the
first to produce sulfuric acid and nitric acid. Soul feric acid is used in
car batteries today. Heyan was a prolific writer, authoring more than three thousand
research articles and treatises in his life, and more than seventy books were translated
into other languages. There's even some debate about whether he was actually able to
complete that many works, or if he even existed. This tends to lean
towards the idea that they were actually manipulating the timeline and creating false figures to
represent bodies of knowledge, and then compiling that under a pseudonym or figure.
Forgetting that, Heyan is well referenced and considered to be one. I like,
how it makes a bold statement. Then he goes, but forgetting all
that, forgetting that, Let's forget that for now. It's like, how
can you forget that? That's really intriguing. One of the founding fathers of
chemistry. In his works, Yan says that artificial generation of minerals, plants,
and animals is the art of imitating nature, and that he also relates
it to the Greco, Egyptian and Hermetic practice of animating statues. We're going
to talk about that in a little bit, Hey, Y'allan argued that you
could not only mimic God in his creations, but also produce one's never seen
before. Hey, y'all, even refers to an experiment with elements familiar to
us by now. Whoever takes a bull, it is best if it is
red, then leads it into a house, throws leaves of hashashiah to it,
shuts the door through which it has entered, opens four windows above it
and around the house, and abandons the bull until it dies and putrefies.
As a result, bees will generate from it. Jabir ibn Hayan describes experiments
of his own and his Kisab al Tajmi using sperm and blood. He placed
the medium in study's sphere that contained the image of an animal to be generated.
Now this is insane because we're getting into more details on these device is
now, So if you're a really crappy artist and you throw a picture in
there, that's gonna be what it generates, it's gonna it's gonna look a
little weird. It'd be a good artist if you do that. This is
what makes Hayon's work different from others is he actually describes this thing as some
type of apparatus with concentric half spheres in which you were to place your mold
or in some translations, the image of what you want this being to be.
It was a homunculous tissory machine, more so like some type of advanced
our millary sphere to mimic the cosmic system in the homunculous in its artificial womb
would be rotating within a sphere within a sphere. Hayon's works goes into how
to change the face or to give it different genders and different levels of intelligence.
He even discusses different schools or methods in which you could create a winged
man by mixing the sperm of a man and a bird. I don't know
about you, but I feel like this deserves more attention, because not only
is this the foundation of all the other alchemists we brought up earlier, but
it shows the deeper, disturbing aspects of this art. It's quite shocking to
realize that this is what some of the most influential minds of history we're actually
getting into. To explain more, Hayon discusses this in more detail. This
homunculous device was created to solve the issue of the demons manifesting. They wanted
to literally create an intelligent human. So the works of Hayon and al Kurtubi,
the alleged writer of Picatrix in the Book of the Cow, prove the
subject of boggia is connected to artificial generation in the creation of a monkulus.
This is because they are part of the same science and art of encapsulating a
soul. As mentioned earlier. This encompass many different works on magic, including
talismans and causing change from a distance. Aldo Kurtubi also speaks on the necessity
of the planets and the infusion of their energies during spontaneous generation. This is
something that is crucial to the process, but not brought up by later authors
on the subject, and that they do mention it, they left details out
and or were being cryptic. This seems to be one of the most crucial
aspects to the art. The one who is ignorant of making talismans cannot artificially
create life or the homunculous. That's not to say the homunculus is just a
talisman, but they are connected. But keep that in mind that the generation
of animals require fermentation or future faction. Also in nevity and agriculture. Even
while Sheia tells us that the astrological elections are essential and artificial generation quote,
none of these operations of generation can succeed without making sure that the moon is
waxing and safe from malefics. Also, the tale of the Dragon cannot be
in its no nor any crooked sign, nor the end of signs. These
creations and generations follow the same course as talismans where they need elections and making
good the moon in the same manner as these talismans require end quote. All
Kutubi defines paffen as creating a quote moist material at the location of generation,
and they utilizing the receptivity of images and form end quote. One of the
authors that influenced Saber another author under a pseudoname, apparently Napoleonist Sir Al Kalika.
The Secret of Creation a work that discusses on how at the moment of
conception when semen and blood congeal the resulting embryos. Now, that looks either
Arabic or Indian right there, But that's also how Awanas and dagon are sometimes
represented with the fish body. This one looks like it's being eaten by one,
but it's not. It's part of its body stays still for an hour,
then it undergoes fermentation. The heat of the fermentation initiates its development,
and one of the experiments of artificial generation related in the Gaia, which produces
a semi brew sheib haiawan by inserting human or other animal semen inside an egg.
The process of fermentation is referred to also as heat anah incubation. So
wait, is that the story that Agrippa was referring to. So they were
inserting human seeds into eggs to hatch. Where have we seen that before?
Also in his work Nabata and Agriculture, even when Sheia elaborates further on the
theory of artificial generation, particularly of plants, he emphasizes the benefit gain from
the practice in it quote. Okay, so that's kind of funny because there
was just some one called the Cabbage Patch Kids, and they were talking about
how there might have been a repopulation event after some sort of cataclysm or deliberate
reset in the past, and this happened in the early eighteen hundreds, and
they showed all these different types of postcards that showed these babies and patches and
then like putting one on a carriage for a wealthy family to carry off and
make it their child or whatever. What's really strange about that is another really
strange thing that kind of happened to me. I had a very odd experience
one time where I was basically told that, you know, if you're eating
chicken, you're kind of accountable, which I found was I didn't understand what
to make of that when I heard it, But now I'm looking at this
information and it's kind of kind of strange. Kind of the chapter with the
greatest benefit. It is superior to rafting because it leads whoever knows it to
achieve the generation of taqween of fruitful trees and the generation of tolied of pulses,
herbs, beneficial medicines and harmful poisons. The process called taqween, tarlied
or tafine, requires the power known as the nature of natures tabi al al
tabi al, which humans are able to reproduce. This is a gift bestowed
upon them by the gods. Every plant originated from an ancestor generated by an
ancient inventor, al Khadim al Makhtari, who gave people the power to emulate
his actions. The most essential natural action for the process is fermentation tafen,
which requires the joining of moisture and heat in the soil. If standing water
remains stagnant, it will make the land around it wet. If the land
is wet, the moisture in its cavity becomes salty and is absorbed by the
soil. Moist and hot air hits it a soft heat, then the sun
heats it with the heat that is fiercer than the heat of the air,
and as the result, fermentation is achieved. If it ferments, it is
changed, and if it is changed, it is altered. The asalteration is
a transformation. Once it is transformed through fermentation, it forms the nature,
which is the power generated from the four qualities in the earth and the collaboration
of the two heats, air and sun overwhelming the two colds water and earth.
So this is important because it's connected to Aristotle's account on generation quiet mechanistic
and does consider the influence of planetary effusions and rays. Yet the Arabic sources
do, which makes no sense because some of these Arabic sources take on pseudo
names and credit the works to these Greek philosophers. This will lend to the
idea that Aristotle was leaving information out and or is from a different time period
than they tell us. In a later passage, even Moshea adds that fermentation
happens by constant exposure of moisture to heat, which leads the moisture itself to
be transformed into a state between water and oil. This is how a truffle
coagulates into a soft solid mass, then a second fermentation is required to initiate
growth. The Arabic sources go into more detail on the power of the moon.
The prominent astrologer Abu Masha Albaki notes the moisture and fermentation tafene are both
lunar effects. This influential tenth century coterie of anonymous philosophers known as Equon al
Safa the Breathrend of Purity, explain in their Audrisala al Jamal the Comprehensive Epistol
that the motion of the moon generates truffles and also some animals like bird its,
silkworms, and bees, adding that most of them are created in fourteen
days and emerge after nursing in twenty one days or this is the period of
the moon coursing from day of incubation until exiting from the sign. Basically,
what they're saying is that this is literally a natural process, not just that
yes, sexual intercourse happens naturally, but they're describing phenomena in which animals are
being generated due to astrological influences alone during certain conditions and or time periods.
This could spawn a variety of different animals. According to these ancient stages.
It has to do with these energies being the crucial component to artificially generating life
and that it actually occurs in nature without human intervention. Okay, so there's
actually another section of Nabatine agriculture where even when Sheia discusses the bee ritual,
but he mentions something else's time. Now this is insane. Even was she
discuss a spontaneous generation of fauna and a generation of bees from bulls. This
time we also learn about regions where humans and animals exist only through spontaneous generation.
For example, he relates that in the Indian Sea during springtime, sometimes
a hand emerged, which people reported and contemplated every year. This hand had
a different color, proving that the sightings related to many individuals, not just
one. In the same sea, mermaids and merman were reported to have been
caught in fishermen's nets. They were alive, sentient, and mobile. The
adult mermin had beards and were called the doctors of the sea tabib al Bad,
while those without beards had tiny teeth. Crap I missed it, but
that was a picture of dagon teeth like those of boys. Where that he
mentions that because there's barely any historic images of this bogo in your ritual the
bee from the cow ritual, and the one image that there is of it
literally shows mermaids. So I'm not sure what to make of that, other
than they're telling you what this actually was. Even what she continues and says,
humans or human like creatures can be artificially generated too. We're told about
this magos Uncle Botha, who described in his book on the subject how he
generated a creature which was like a human but lacked speech or understanding. Uncle
Botha received this information from a certain book on the Mysteries of the Sun by
Asclepius. Asclepius. Now here's the other fun part about the Asclepius is the
one who is depicted with the rod with the snake, right, the rod
of Asclepius is often misunderstood or misidentified as the could do right, And that
ties right into Venom, that ties right into Pharmakaea. It ties into an
awful lot of stuff. So that's just an interesting thing to point out there,
and that they're talking about generating humans and they've got the knowledge of the
mysteries Biasclepius, messenger of the Sun m Messenger of the Sun, Rassul al
Shams related how he created the cosmic man al and son al Khani. Anka
Buha asserts that the artificial generation of humans in the microcosm is a sublinary reproduction
of divine creation, even when she had admits that for his own part,
he failed to achieve an operation like this, Whereas anka Buha did not fail
due to the virtue of his knowledge in talismanic and magical works, because in
practice the method of generation is the same method of making talismans and mashing.
Whoever is able to make talismans, all the works of creation and generation are
easy to him. Now let's ask ourselves. Can a talisman just be a
changing of a frequency or implementing a certain frequency on to something so that you
get the desired result in its generation? And then the talisman may or may
not be that thing itself, just a different way of looking at what a
talisman would be. So look at this. These ancient alchemists, who supposedly
are the first sources, all write about earlier sources as if they did not
compare to the original masters. Supposedly the author failed in creating humans with intelligence,
but the author of the book that he got his knowledge from was a
master with even more wisdom, which proves that they had the art of creating
humans mastered before the source. Therefore, and even what Shia's works in both
kitab Alsumam and his Nebote and Agriculture makes it clear that the understanding of fermentation,
spontaneous generation, astrological influences, and occult properties is essential in performing artificial
generation or in other words, the creation of a homunculus. In these works
we actually also find a theory and operation which fit into the alchemical and magical
tradition that includes the Picatrix, libriback Eye and the works of Paracelsus. Understanding
this pru is that the Book of the Cow or librivack Eye and the Arabic
works connected to the Picatrix are a part of the same tradition. There was
an ancient Greek reference that we left out at the beginning because it's quite strange.
However, we now arrived at one of the earliest accounts of the homunculus,
Zosimos of Panopolis, a Greco Egyptian alchemists and gnostic mystic who lived during
the transition between the third and fourth centuries. Zosimus has created with authoring the
oldest known chemical literature, the chirik meta, a Greek term meaning things made
by hand. He is one of a forty authors represented in a compendium of
alchemical writings that was probably put together in Constantinople in the seventh or eighth century,
copies of which exist in manuscripts in Venice and Paris, and Evan's ah
Nadim's Kitab al Parist. Four books by Zosimos are mentioned, although attributed to
Doosimos, Dosimos, and Remos due to transliteration and consistencies for Zeskin, a
historian located Zosimos manuscripts in six libraries worldwide. Zosimo's works significantly influenced the Arabic
alchemical tradition, as it is referenced in several works. While Zosimo's conception of
the homunculus differs from the traditional alchemical version, renowned psychologist Carl Jung identified it
as the first instance of the homunculous idea in alchemical literature. In his work
on Virtue, Zosimos recounts a series of dreams that demands symbolic interpretation, providing
an intriguing glim into the early development of the helmunculous concept and its relationship to
alchemy and mysticism. I fell asleep, and I saw a sacrificer before me
on the altar in the form of a flask. The altar where the priest
was had fifteen steps. I heard his voice coming from above, say,
I have undergone the action that consists in descending the fifteen steps, radiating darkness,
and in ascending the steps sending forth light. The sacrificer himself is remaking
me by rejecting the thickness of my body, and consecrated out of necessity,
I am perfected as Numa. Having heard the voice of him who was in
the flask, I asked him to tell me who he was. I am
Ion, the priest of inaccessible places, where someone has come at the break
of dawn, running, and he has made himself my master, cutting me
apart with a knife, tearing me asunder according to the constitution of harmony,
and skinning my entire head with the sword that he clasped. He intertwined the
bones with the flesh, and burned me up with a scorching fire from his
hand. Until I had learned to become Numa by metamorphosing my body. Behold
the intolerable violence that is my lot. And as he was saying these things,
I was pressing him to talk. His eyes became like blood, and
he vomited forth his flesh, and I saw him change into a mutilated,
homunculous anthroparion, biding himself and wounding himself with his own teeth. Seized with
fear, I thought, is it not thus that the composition of the waters
is produced? And I was convinced that I had understood well End quote.
That seems way more than just a dream. And where did they get the
imagination for this type of stuff? Zosie was provided one of the first definitions
of alchemy as a study of the composition of waters, movement, growth,
embodying and disembodying, drawing the spirits from bodies, in bonding the spirits within
bodies. End quote. Why is the eye such a prominent symbol in occult
secret societies? Let us explore further, as the symbol should be quite clear
to see. Now, let's dive down the rabbit hole with an alchemical text,
and let's just break it down. We get about twenty minutes left of
this particular section, and then we're going to go ahead and call it for
the night, and we'll do it in second part if people tell me in
the comments that they want to hear it. The work Kabbala by Spiegel der
kunst Unnatur in Alchemia sixteen fifteen, which translates to Kabala mirror or art and
Nature in Alchemy and in this fascinating a chemical text authored by Stefan Michael Spocker,
a German alchemist, features four captivating engravings by artist Raphael Coustas. These
are very unveiling because the idea behind these works is that it would merge hermetic
symbolism, single point perspective and the concept of mirrors or a double self to
guide the reader through an alchemical journey of understanding. They literally put the meanings
into these images to be decoded. It's obvious when you see it. The
book attempts to use the concept of mirrors to understand the self, the mysteries
of alchemy and divinity. The emphasis on mirrors is also connected to a trend
during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries where several publications used terms such as the speculum
or spiegel. What's interesting is that this single point perspective was literally a device
in which they would communicate this secret meaning, think about it. Perspective was
just being developed during this time, so images with this technique, which revolutionized
art and visual representation, were believed to have a deeper mystical significance during this
time. It brings you into the image, you go into another world,
you go through the mirror. And they understood this type of symbolism extensively.
But the stranger part of all of this is their connection to a royalism well
human farming. Did you guys see that X? Did you guys see that
X in the background. People began to think that images drawn using the single
point perspective system could create magical mirrors capable of revealing hidden knowledge in truth.
They literally believe this to be a portal for demons and higher metaphysical beings,
including John d who scribing mirrors. And your cell phone tie into that,
and so does your flat screen or that thing called the lu lu Laman that's
Lulu used to be the the food grade human according to what the and Anoki
created, quote unquote, and this is all stitch and stuff, So I
don't know how much I want to buy from that but lululu or the slave
class and the food grade class. So Lulu Laman takes on a whole different
meaning when you look at it in that reflect That respect was known to use
magic mirrors, but also believed the single point perspective system could be a magic
mirror on its own. This idea was rooted in the belief that such images
could serve as a bridge between the material world and the spiritual realm, providing
glimpses into the mysteries of the universe in the divine. We must consider that
from this point on in our journey, we must look at this information from
a more occult or esoteric point of view. The knowledge of the alchemist is
secretly encoded within these images, and they're actually telling you within the text.
They're attempting to speak to the inner levels of one's psyche. This knowledge is
encoded within the image or speculum, the magic mirror. This is the only
way we can read between the lines of many of these writers on these obscure
topics. We begin the Hall of Mirrors with the cover of the book being
a tutor rose with the crown. There's also an emblem in the intro with
the plant stem coming out of a queue. After the book goes in detail
on the occult and alchemical philosophy, it even mentions the homunculous. Now,
we're not going to read the entire thing, but I couldn't find an English
translation of this text. Therefore we translated the original German text so that you
could check it out yourself. This was published in sixteen sixty three, after
spontaneous generation had already begun to be debated. Yet this proves without a shadow
of a doubt that they were being very secretive about this process. The book
doesn't directly say the term homunculous, but let's really bring up some of the
questionable quotes from this book before we get to the emblems. It's pretty clear
what they're discussing now that we know some history. The author begins with the
cryptic philosopher's stone, dating what a wise old stone, and that it is
threefold. Let's remember that he begins with his analogy of mirrors. After giving
praise to the royalty of his time. He begins discussing the secret, or
at least what they perceive to be the secret, of single point perspective.
He even makes reverence to the reader being compared to the prisoners in Plato's Cave
allegory, basically saying that the readers aren't on his level, or that they
couldn't even begin to understanding the forms that he's discussing. So that's kind of
the approach that these scientists were taking with this type of knowledge. But he
continues, He says, the purpose of giving this knowledge of the mirror for
those who could understand it, of course, is so that, according to
their desires, can create much fruit and benefit. Okay, so this is
about creating fruits. Interestingly, the author says he is unworthy of this knowledge
and the only way he can pass it on is through the secret art of
mirrors. He says, quote, through the understanding of this mirror, they
can achieve great benefits in various aspects of life, such as maintaining good health,
sustaining their bodies with abundant necessities, and nurturing their souls to find eternal
life. As seekers of knowledge and practitioners of this art, it is essential
to be open to understanding and learning, for only then can one grasp the
true essence of this mysterious and transformative discipline. End he begins discussing these mirrors
in comparison to alchemy. The first mirror represents the initial stage where the practitioner
works with the basic elements of nature, mercury and salt, to extract the
essential properties needed for the transformation. In this mirror, the author sees the
wise and murky in their salt, which are the initial substances to be worked
with. This could be seen as the mixing and combination of the elements.
The second mirror symbolizes the stage where the alchemists were with sulfur, another key
element in the alchemical process. Here the author sees the sulfur of the wise,
similar to the flower called chilodinaeum, which represents the transformative power of sulfur
in alchemy. The vegetable essence mentioned signifies growth and multiplication, which is the
goal of the alchemist. The third mirror stands for the final stage of the
process, where the alchemist combines the elements from the previous stages and refines them
further. In this mirror, the author experiences a fiery red substance that seems
to contain divine power and mystery. There's likely refers to the philosopher's stone,
or the ultimate goal of the alchemical process. Now he explains how the pictures
in the book or Mirrors, reveal the secret behind the process. He even
says to bring the three mirrors into one, you must go through these degrees,
connecting it to masonry. He finishes off in his concluded on this ancient
stone and that this is the foundation of the highest medicine of chemistry. He
even mentions aqua viscosa, which is a clear reference to Semen quote Aqua viscosa
is the first essence, as the wise teach you born from and through the
art of our nature, the highest tincture is created. End quote. Then,
just in case you had any question, towards the end of his conclusion,
he mentions the living chalice and horace maneuver. So it seems that this
is some type of secret manual. Now let's try to decode the images.
We begin with exaltation with a title Kabbalah. The first thing that draws our
attention is the fire breathing chimera with the old headwear that the popes used to
wear, and it had three tiers, so this is a hybrid pope creature.
And on its back is a flask that contains a raven, a peacock,
and a phoenix rising towards it's the sun creating the Philosopher's stone. At
the top of this flask we see a star emitting divine energies into the glass
bottle. This is to represent the importance of astrological influences, as we mentioned
earlier. I do find it interesting that they have this threefold symbolism with the
zodiac and they happen to put Taurus with a cow under this chimera. Leo
is the sulfur in this case, and Capricorn is the mercury, obviously leaving
Taurus at the bottom as the transmutation or amalgamation. Therefore, this is undeniably
a homunculous. The next page is called Mirror Art and Nature, and we
get some coat of arms symbolism. We see a phoenix or more likely an
eagle, with a book saying prima materia, this is the pillar of nature.
To the right we get a lion, the lion of Venice. This
is the pillar of art, and the book says all semi materia or the
final matter, the final product of the art of Alpamine. This begins to
show that yes, royalty and coat of arms is connected to everything we've been
discussing. We see the hidden knight's helmet because he's being cloaked and hidden,
crowned with a literal phoenix cap that resembles the ancient Hebrew and Mesopotamian Phrygian caps.
We also see the three spheres on his shield, and this is the
three mirrors in stages of the alchemical process. These can also be seen on
coat of arms. We continue to the middle section of this image, or
we see to the left a man carving his way through a tunnel into the
mountain and using a candle to help him lead the way. He also has
his cap and on the ground you can see the square encompass below at the
bottom we kind of have the I'm looking at the Caducius myself. I don't
know by anybody else, but that's what's catching my eye. Underground components to
the image. This is the underground laboratory. This is where the process of
distillation and purification occurs. It's also where the four slaves turn the dial that
makes the donut rotate in the Simpsons, so that Homework can go grab the
donuts and works. I don't know if you've ever seen that one. But
it's a bunch of slaves working underground, turning a big, huge wheel so
that the donut above just spins. Above, we see the methods in template
and which this takes place. We see that they're continuing with the symbols of
Mercury, Saturn, Mars, and Venus. They have laid this all out
geometrically and assigned the different arts. Then to the left we see the extraction
process with two snakes. In dealing with two processes of nature, it says
hot, dry, cold, moist. To the far right of this middle
section is the final output. It's showing you the successful process being supported,
ready for pickup. Then, when we get to the next image conjunction,
we see arrange the zodiacal rulers or personifications of the planets. The goal at
the very top is Mercury or Hermes. Even under we see a phoenix representing
the rebirth process and that it's all under a mountain, so is it hidden
beneath the earth or from plain sight. We see two men aspiring for this
goal. One is chasing a rabbit into a hole, one that most likely
goes very deep, and then the other man approaches the subject blindly and with
faith. There's an entire structure underneath this mountain, and this is the underground
process and art in which this occurs. Inside it seems to be a king
with a scepter and a queen with a rose. The man chasing the rabbit
down the hole could also be the profane now understanding the process, and the
one who is handicapting himself can still carry on the process because he's an adept
or a flower. Finally, the background is the zodiac, followed by the
four elements. Now we get to the end multiplication. This scene depicts the
resurrected Christ offering the water of life to the king and the queen, but
underneath them, underground, it would seem that we see the planets personified again,
but almost as if they were some secret cult group. They are waving
their bellows from below as they raise their arms to the fiery swords that seem
to be preventing them from proceeding, meaning these are the planets that have been
extracted or in other words, their influences, and that they've been personified in
or captured into a form. The alchemical process is beginning. We see Jesus
sitting in a fountain at the very bottom, crowned the Texan old German says,
the brown of the learned. Now, I'm not going to break that
down just yet, and we got a lot more to say on Jesus.
But if you've been paying attention, you should know what's going on here.
Also, the pool is filled with his blood, as he has a hole
on his right side. The next tier or level of the fountain is Mars
and Venus or Mary holding a heart in flames. The next level is Saturn
holding a baby, and Jupiter with lightning bolts and a scepter. It actually
seems to be Libertas. Finally, at the top Hermes or Mercury, representing
the transmutation process, with the staff or Caducius representing the balancing of both positive
and negative forces. Behind the fountain is a garden the fruits of this understanding
and art. This is the multiplication, the production or artificial generation of matter.
We also see another code which is most likely Rosicrucian in nature. We
see a dove, which is a well known symbol of the Holy Spirit.
In Christianity. The Holy Spirit is often associated with divine inspiration, and so
this is what guides the alchemist, but more so it represents the process of
transformation that this is also a spiritual pursuit. We see another compass or a
threefold symbol. The alchemists might believe that, but this is probably completely in
opposition to something that would be holy. I would imagine creating something that the
creator itself did not create. So I think they self delude a lawful lot
to justify their own actions so that they can pursue endlessly without any restrictions.
With a dove following a path between the tetragrammaton Jerusalem in the Fountain of Life.
This serves as a messenger between the physical and the divine. That's it
for this book. But in the following year of his initial publication sixteen sixteen,
there appeared a new addition in Latin that contained a dedication into the Rosicrucians,
which then unveiled the inspiration behind the work. The original German text does
not have this dedication, but this all chemical text that we've been breaking down
Kabbalah is clearly Rosicrucian in nature. Sixteen fourteen is when the Rosicrucian manifestos first
appeared. The Fame of the Brotherhood of the Rosy Cross was published, but
it was circulated in manuscripts among German occultists in sixteen ten. The goal was
the creation and founding of a secret brotherhood of similarly prepared It should be pointed
out that the people up on top of that roof, armed with shields are
holding feathers, not swords, feathers men. That is why they were publishing
these works, to find people who could see through these hidden meanings and recruit
more members. The manifestos made a promise of a universal reformation of mankind.
There is science that built on esoteric truths of the ancient past, which concealed
from the average man, provide insight into nature, the physical universe, and
the spiritual realm, which they even said would be kept secret for decades until
the intellectual climate might receive it. So the Roso Crucians where a branch of
Christian mysticism mixed with Kabbalah, hermeticism and alchemy. And we now know that
they were using some crazy symbols like the creation of a chimera hybrid homunculous with
a popat. We'll see more of these as we progress. But yes,
this points and makes clear the type of thinking that these minds had. There's
no reason to believe that it's just allegory just yet, as the details will
continue to add up. Before we go into deeper matters, we need to
discuss the importance of brotherhoods and symbols as it begins to all connect. Because
the Rosa Crucians are their predecessors to Freemasonry. Anyone who thinks it's mockery to
even bring up the Masons simply is unaware of the history of secret eternities.
Furthermore, they all share one same lineage, as we'll see. As if
it wasn't really interesting already, this is where it starts to kick off to
get even more interesting, because it's something that we can relate to that's actively
going on in our world, with these secret societies and these orders that we
can recognize. There is it's at two hours and forty minutes of the actual
video. The rest was stop starts in my intro at three thirteen. For
the time nobody's gonna watch specific is much longer, but I think that the
next seven minutes are important, So I'm gonna go ahead and play this and
then when we have it looks like we got our picture back too. The
it's not showing that stupid thing is being messed up anymore. But like I
said, this is nine hours and fifty four minutes long in total. We
can only go so far in one video. I'm not gonna sit here for
the next ten hours and probably you won't either, or the next seven or
whatever. But let's get a little bit more into it and then what I'll
do. And I want everybody who is watching this to please, if you
have, if you're watching it on something that you can type on, whether
it's on your phone or it's on your keyboard, reply back to me in
the comments and say, yeah, let's go a little bit longer, or
no, this is good, Let's do it again some other time, Okay,
thank you. This idea of the Rosicrucian Order inspired a lot of different
famous occultists, some of which already mentioned, such as John d. Most
scholars and historians are not willing to consider the possibility that there were invisible members,
members who did not publicly announce their allegiance to the cause, but were
simply inspired by it, and this gave rise to the Invisible College, which
was the precursor to the Royal Society founded in sixteen sixty. In fact,
even Robert Boyle wrote, the cornerstones of the Invisible or as they term themselves,
Philosophical College, do now and then honor me with their company. So
whether the skeptics believe the subject of secret brotherhoods means nothing. We know that
they were indeed having secret meetings on the secrets of life. That's Sacrucianism developed
into Freemasonry throughout Europe. There was a strong presence of the golden and rosy
cross in the ancient accepted Scottish rite what was first practice in France. The
literal eighteenth degree is called the night of the rose cross. Okay, I
finally got to pause on the right spot here. So it says that's rosa
appibus. Now it says the rose gives the bees honey the tuttle page of
Simum Bonum by Robert Flood, sixteen twenty nine. So now we hear a
rose symbol. We see a bee with a rose, Okay, and it's
tied into the rosa crucians. It's also tied in with bees. But what
did we see Where did we see a rose before? I can tell you
that in the first introduction of just in the introduction part of the Zohar,
they they liken Israel to a rose, and we say that this is also
tied into the Kabbalah. Right, they liken it to the rose. And
the single rose has been the symbol. And when I had Bill Cooper's old
broadcast playing on those several videos that I've done with his information, the single
rose is the symbolism of international socialism slash communism. But why is it that
symbol and why is that tied to Zionist or Kabbalistic or the idea of the
Zohar, which is kabbala and Israel right, very interesting and how it shows
up and pops up here now with the honeybee, which also ties into Freemasonry
and the Mormons. Just thought I point that out us. The two earliest
Freemasons were Sir Robert Moray and even Ashmole, the author of the chemistry book
that we went over earlier. Now there's no denying the connection, or at
least it's worth an investigation. That these matters are kept secret, and the
scholars showed no interest to connect this secrecy to the subjects of hidden arts and
sciences. Masons make it clear that their ancestry goes back to the Knights Templar,
and this is also clear in Roso Crucian philosophy and symbolism. However,
the Roso Crucians preserve this knowledge with a little bit more secrecy. This path
can be followed as a trail as we start to begin to see the similar
themes and symbolism. But even stranger, it would seem that the Templars were
well aware of the secret arts of alchemy. We'll come back to the Rosicrucians,
but first let's discuss how the Templars tie in with all this. I
highly recommend watching the Christmas video. It's much more than a Christmas video and
goes into some crazy stuff involving the Templars. But we shall continue and connect
it to this subject. The Knights Templar stand out as one of the most
controversial orders. Their legacy shouted in mystery has long been a debate among historians
and scholars. We now have arrived to one of the crucial connections. Before
we dive in, we must cover their history and also note the lack of
conclusive evidence for both sides of the argument. There seems to be two main
sides. One side believes that the Templars were accused unjustly, that they faced
a fake persecution on the grounds that they had reached such a state of wealth
that King Philip the Fourth and Pope Clement the fifth sought the strengthen their positions
by eliminating this supposedly powerful and independent organization. Well, hold on, they
were in debt to them, and that was the way of wiping out the
debt was wiping them out. Not a bad practice if they think we're in
debt, just saying because beings are evil. But we're going to take a
look at that again because there is another side, and it involves looking at
this order with new eyes, which many may have a difficult time doing because
it's Christianity's most popular military order. Countless video games, movies have been made,
and their influence on our culture is quite significant to many people. It
seems that we may be dealing with dogma. But interestingly, we will see
how this ties into alchemy and the creation of modern day religions. We'll discuss
more of that soon. But of course, if some of these accusations were
proven to be even remotely true, then this would bring some serious suspicions to
the Church as a whole. Let's try to keep an open mind, because
I believe there are some serious arguments to consider here that deserve to bring suspicion
to this powerful, elite group of assassins. Yeah, and that also ties
back into the Arabic thing too, the assassins. But let me just say
this real quick. When it comes to the persecution or the crusades and things
like that, or the atrocities take you know that the Catholics have supposedly done,
there was plenty going on on the Protestant side too, where they were
destroying villages full of men, women and children for no other reason other than
hatred. And so they're both guilty. And there's books out there that you
can find that Bill Cooper also read from in his broadcasts, and we'll tell
you that it wasn't to solve one sided. There were some atrocities going on
on both sides. Now, whether or not they represented the whole of Protestantism
or not, it's debatable. They could have just been a little bit too
over zealous maybe, and that's who conducted those things. But it just should
be mentioned. So that people don't think that this is an attack just on
Catholics or something like that. There was no completely squeaky clean person on either
side of the counter Reformation war, which we still find ourselves in the middle
of, by the way, and we as a country represent Protestantism because of
our founders. So they see us as something to be destroyed and put back
into slavery. And they are doing heck of a job at that right now,
aren't they? Bankers and literally pirates who were attempting to possess ancient antiquitec
The Knights Templar have this story that they were known as the poor fellow soldiers
of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon, that after the first so poor
that they were the richest people in the world. I like that type of
poor. Aftermath of the Crusades, the medieval Christian military order was foreigned so
that the poor fellow soldiers, starting from just a small group of nine Knights,
which was led by Hugh de Pain and Godfried as Saint Omer, they
had set off with the mission and took monastic vows to protect Christian pilgrims who
were supposedly being attacked by Muslims on the way to the Holy Land. One
of the strange things about this whole story is the whole donations stuff, because
what ended up happening is that they were literally donated massive amount of money and
architecture really for no apparent reason other than inspiring others because of their duties to
protect the knights. Templar derived their name from the location where they granted accommodations
by King Baldwin a second within his castle and above the supposed remains of Solomon's
temple. I'm not sure why he would do that, but okay. Then
the members of the Order took vows of personal poverty, yet the Templars as
an organization accumulated substantial wealth and influence, which is contradictory. In eleven twenty
nine, Saint Bernard of Clairvaux not only contributed a generous sum of money to
support the Order, but also played a pivotal role in promoting their cause.
Moving to their we all know Saint Bernard's simunculus was a dog right military prowess.
The Templars were entrusted with the responsibility of safeguarding and transporting funds for individuals
who were reluctant to travel with large sum of money fearing theft or result.
Let's remember that's the mainstream story, because similar to the Vanderbilts, we have
another rags to riches story. The Templars ended up gaining billions of dollars of
wealth. Literally, the Templars were the first massive bank. By the mid
twelfth century, the Order had established a network of preceptories regional headquarters across Europe.
In the hall, and apparently they like chess because it pops up here
again too, and they're calling them bankers. And you see this little chessboard
here. Somehow they're running it did in two dimensions rather than have it flat,
so you can see what they're actually doing. But that chesting comes back
up again, so does that board. Because the tiles of the Freemasonic floors
of the lodges are black and white. So are we performing a game of
chess in the lodge, so to speak? And who was it that they
continued to say was playing five D and four D chess that PSI up that
we know as QAnon, over and over and over again, so that people
are still saying it now. Yeah, and not to leave this out.
And one of the more recent republications of the alleged forgery. Forgery does not
mean fabrication, by the way, it's not the same word, and it
doesn't mean the same thing. Most likely a Jesuit written document. It was
the Protocols of the lettered elders Zion. That is a picture on the cover
of that book and the more recent publication of it of a chessboard in checkmate.
Pretty interesting. Moving on. Oh and by the way, yeah,
Trump was like the make America greater Israel again. These preceptories generated revenue through
donations, land acquisitions in agricultural production. As their wealth increased, the Templars
began to develop financial services that laid the foundation for modern banking. They offered
loans, issue letters of credit, and provided secure storage for valuables, which
allowed them to establish a rudimentary banking system. This system, in turn facilitated
trade and enabled the transfer of funds across Europe and the Middle East. So
they were their predecessors to the Dutch East India Company. You guys can tell
me if I'm wrong in the comments, but it wasn't it Templars that were
the ones that forced the signing of the Magna carta. I think so right.
The Templars were arguably the first transnational corporation, the Knight's Templar mass and
I Men's Fortune and a relatively short period, the mainstream story being that they
attracted both admiration and envy as their wealth grew. They became the first through
international banking institution, issuing promissory notes that would lay the foundation for modern banking
practices, including the origins of the dollar bill, which explains more of why
we see the symbols that we do today on our money. The Templars acquired
vast tracts of land in castles, solidifying their influence and power across Europe and
the Middle East. So wait, they started from protecting pilgrims on the roads
from Saracen thieves, and now they owned their entire fleet of ships, a
banking system that processes shipments around the world, including to Muslim territories, and
then became treasure hunters, seeking some type of the first PayPal right they are
processing payments the ancient artifact known as the ark of the Covenant. How does
that all add up? There's no doubt that they were funded and supported by
royalty. They owned much of the land in Europe and were the advisors to
the European monarchs. This gave them much political power behind the scenes. That's
why the reasons for the motive for prosecuting the Knights are still unclear. Many
secret societies in modern day orders claim ancestry to the Templars, and it is
fact that the original Templar Order, founded in eleven nineteen was created with the
assistance of the muslim Saracens or the Knights of Saladin, a fact that challenges
conventional understandings of their origin. While the subject of the Templars often evokes passionate
responses to impart by many secrets and shady dealings associated with the order that would
bring many things to question. So it's important to take a step back and
examine the facts. We've been discussing the amount of influence that alchemy has had
on medieval Europe, and we know that they share a similar Abrahamic bloodline and
tradition that will be shown soon. Although it is true that some confessions from
the Templars were allegedly extracted under torture, this does not discount the numerous other
pieces of evidence in scholarly research that shed light on the order's activities. So
the story is from the humble beginnings of the Templars as poor and monks,
represented by the iconic image of two knights sharing a single horse, but this
does not fully represent the tremendous wealth and power that they would eventually amass.
Their initial purpose to protect Christian pilgrims traveling to the Holy Land evolved into request
for the blood line of Jesus in securing of Jerusalem. The support of Saint
Bernard of Clairvaux, a prominent religious figure, further legitimized their cause and catapulted
the order to prominence. One of the most remarkable and unbelievable stories from the
Nals of the Templars involves a battle where a mere five hundred Night Templars are
said to have taken on Saladin's army of twenty thousand. That seems pretty unlikely,
but the story is that they were on the side of God. During
the Crusades, the Knights Templar played a pivotal role as a military order,
actively participating in numerous battles and campaigns. While their standard mission was to protect
Christian pilgrims and secure the Holy Land, their actions often resulted in severe consequences
for the local population. The crusades were marked by widespread bloodshed, with countless
atrocities committed by all sidides, including the Temples, and many instances they engaged
in ruthlessacks of violence, such as mass killings and pillaging Antello Christians alike.
Rumors and speculation about the templars true motives and alliances were widespread during this period.
Some accounts suggested that they were covertly working with the Saracens, collaborating with
their supposed adversaries to achieve their own ends. Theories about motivations behind such aliens
as varied, with some pointing to a mutual interest in securing valuable treasures or
access to the secret sites of the Holy Land. Another possibility is that the
Templars and their association with the Saracens had gained access to secret ancient knowledge,
including the mystical art of alchemy. This would have provided them with a powerful
advantage, as alchemy promised not only the ability to turn base metals into gold,
but also access to the secrets of immortality and spiritual enlightenment. As we
were discussing the origin of the Templars, cannot be discussed without the Saracens.
Let's give in mind that this secret order of supposed devout Christians were working together
in secret with the Muslims, which is really against the mainstream story that we've
been told. Furthermore, let's give in mind that the founding of the Templars
was in the twelfth century. The Saracens were the Muslims experiencing their Enlightenment period.
During this exact same time, they were in control of all of Europe.
This is undeniable, as is evident in our languages. Spanish has four
thousand Arabic words, English two thousand, in French five hundred. The Islamic
rule undeniably had a profound impact on European medieval culture, discussed earlier with the
Pica Tricks, another alchemical text, but of course, or told the entire
story of the Crusades. The dividing conquer tactic so frequently used throughout the historical
record, yet there's always a fingerprint. The fingerprint is the secret wisdom of
the secret societies. Therefore, we can easily conclude that this was the exact
time of liber Vackey. Actually, one of the first citations we have of
the Book of pow or Liebervackeye is cited in a Latin work by William of
Auverney in the early thirteenth century. William of Auverney was the Bishop of Paris
who was not directly a member, but he would have direct connections to the
Order in his capacity as a bishop. Recovered this in the Christmas video.
But Baphomet is connected to Mohammet, which is an old French word referring to
Mohammed. But most people don't believe that the Templars were actually secretly worshiping Baphomet
because the whole story is Filip the fourth of France began his campaign against the
Tears. Why did he do this, Well, let's say it's because Philip's
all rich target. So in the story we know that the Templars are obviously
very rich enough to get the attention of the king. So let's just say
it's true. Where did they get all those riches? Were they obsessed with
the blood line of Jesus? Were they known to be assassins? Also,
what's the need for collecting special relics. Furthermore, as we've stated, there
is no definitive evidence for either side on whether the accusations brought against the Templars
were true or not. So therefore we can move on from that aspect,
but it is crucial to note I'm going to agree to disagree with him.
I think there's plenty evidence, and I'm not saying that the Templars were saints
by any means. I'm just saying that I think the accusations brought on by
Philip were purely and completely Him and the bishop, I should say, were
political and they just wanted to get rid of them because they were pretty weak
in comparison to them and that threatened their power. And also they had a
debt and they didn't like the idea of being indebted to the Templars. That's
where I think it came from. So they had they had a drum up
in atrocity. Now, whether or not they were mixed in with the Muslims,
I don't think they so much adopted their faith, which is basically they
were. They were accused of worship being mohammed, and then some other thing
about Pino across or whatever. But I mean that could be drummed up because
that's a heresy, and then of course then the Church can come down and
kill you and burn you at the stake like they do. But I think
more of more or less, they were interested in these very strange mystics of
that culture that we're talking about, things like alchemy and homunculus and all their
fascinations with the sciences. I think that's what intrigued them more than some idea
of like converting or anything like that. I don't think that was in the
cards. I think it was more a mutual exchange of ideas that was going
on that they then other people pointed at that as saying that they were going
against God, their God because they were becoming Muslims or something like that.
That's I think they just misconstrued and conflated something to be something that it wasn't.
But they were questioned individually and the charges brought forth were very specific.
You could say they were similar to the witch charges, and we can discuss
that as well, because there's definitely a connection. But forgetting the accusations,
we still have every right to be suspicious of what they were up to based
on the mainstream story alone. But there's external evidence outside of the Templars persecution
that we can explore. The first is, as I mentioned, simply knowing
the history of brotherhoods and how Freemasons themselves claim they originate from the templars.
This is common knowledge, although scholars do consider it to be speculative for some
reason. Well, I can see why they would say that, because it's
allegedly who was the Masons that took them in to hide them, So they
would have to have already existed before them for them to have done that.
So it's not like they would birth originated from. They may have been populated
by those who they who they took in to protect and hide from others who
wanted to kill the rest of them. That's a possibility, and that's actually
something that did happen. But to say that they were originated from that's not
an accurate statement. I don't think. I don't know anybody who says that
except for him just now. There are some scholars throughout history who have investigated
this matter and connected the templars to even older traditions that are based on the
worship of generative powers. Thomas Wright's book goes in on the subject on these
ancient sex pols and how even after the introduction of Christianity, these secret pols
still survived and were even encouraged by the medieval clergy. Let's take a look
at what kind of earth they were into, and we can come back to
the trials in a moment. But I'm sure you guys know all about that
if you've gotten this far. But the key thing to note is that they
were accused of worshiping a demonic idol, regardless of it's true or not.
Let us investigate the matter. So there was actually a whole book on this
subject in eighteen eighteen by Joseph von Hammer Pergsta. He was an Austrian Orientalist
historian and is considered to be one of the most accomplished Orientalists of his time.
He wrote a book that translates into Mysterium Bafflemat Revealed or the Brothers of
the Military Order of the Temple Convicted of Gnostic apostasy, idolatry and impurity through
their own monuments by Joseph de Hammer Vienna and end this work. Instead of
relying on the testimonies as evidence is he actually just examines a number of the
templars artifacts, many of which are no longer accessible for viewing. There are
some that we're going to take a look at but this book is special because
it has a record of their artifacts and he's a reputable source on history.
Now, this book currently still has not been officially translated into English, but
using new tools, we have access to many old texts translated into English.
When he says new tools, he's referring to AI just so people understand what
that means. When he says that it's actually written in his description on the
YouTube channel that they used an AI translator to get to get the translations that
they needed to make this video so that we could take a look at the
importance of what is being revealed. We have tested it and it's around ninety
ninety five percent accuracy rate. There's only a few issues where it has difficulty
with words that are unique or in different language, which does happen time to
time in this text, but all show the Latin as well. Essentially,
I wrote a program for converting old books using the newest and most impressive language
models via the API. It isn't perfect, but you can check out the
Latin text if you want to and double check it and add corrections. This
is a big game changer for allowing us to do research and to look at
history from a new lens. We now have access to any historical document in
English. You'd be surprised how many important alchemical and historical texts have not been
translated into English. In this curious document written in Latin, it's a part
of a larger book entitled fund grubin Disorients, usually translated Treasures of the Orient.
The preface begins with this interesting phrasing of the Templars as an order of
assassins. He may be actually referring to another order altogether that is integrated with
the Templars. The first page is an introduction to the Templars, the accusation,
who would be the Arab assassins, which they were definitely integrated with.
They were partners, if he will, in a sense, because of the
knowledge of that area. So that's not really a revelation at all. The
assassins were along, We're around for a long time, and they grew out
of the mystery schools. And if there is a fertility cult involved too,
that would be a throwback from the Cannonites it's brought against them, and begins
to lay out his approach to dealing with the subject. He starts to the
Phoenicians I'm sorry, I'm going to talk over him. But the Phoenicians were
also part of the Cannonite lore, the same type of gods and deities and
Carthage most certainly did child sacrifice, and they may or may not be tied
into the seafaring Templars, who dominated the seas and were the greatest merchants and
the most wealthy. That was shared between them. He wished to discuss the
secret order of the Templars and the Assassins, both orders covering their ambitions with
a cloak of piety, either disregarding piety or subjecting it to earthly desire.
As long as their wicked discipline remained hidden, grew immensely in power, until
with their mystery of iniquity exposed, they were attacked by the Pope and king
with anathema and sword, expiating their hidden dogmas with blood and extinguishing the fire
with their own downfall. Endue that he makes it clear why is discussing us?
Is he the author was a specialist in Oriental history, and so he's
saying that the history of the Templars and their secret doctrine is more relevant to
the East, as that is where it was derived. He's actually discussing the
Canaanite, Phoenician, Babylonian religion that spawned near Syria. Bam. Like I
just said. He even says that this comes from the Phoenicians and Egyptians.
We're not talking about mainstream Egypt, as there's also a huge cover up with
the dating of many of these monuments as well, and that one percent agree
with when it comes to egypt inhabitants, not the creators of the builders.
He then discusses the traces of this secret philosophy, listing off some important order
names such as the Gnostic Doctrine of the Nassareans, and explains his sources that
have nothing to do with the Nagamadi text which was found in nineteen forty five.
This is eighteen eighteen, and he's referencing ancient Persian sources. Many modern
Christians have this argument that the entirety of the Nastic doctrine was created and forged
in the founding of these Nagamadi texts. Right, and why do we think
that Mythrayism has a temple in Greater England if this Persian influence wasn't there a
long long time ago. Because mythrayism. It's quite ancient, quite quite ancient,
and that's an Eastern religion. But argument relies on supply ignoring the history
of secret societies in their influence on the creation of religion. He also mentions
the system of the Druses and mutavilas the heresies of Manicheans and Ophites. He
then proceeds with a caution one that should be considered well following these traces and
making public the history of the assassins and the doctrines of the templars, which,
after the destruction of the Order have risen again in the Order of the
Architects, as at least as far as symbols are concerned. We know we
are walking on treacherous ashes through fires, and are aware of the risky game
we are playing if we dare to reveal the head of Baphomet to our readers,
something that has remained hidden for seven centuries the Order of the Architects.
I don't know if you guys are reading the screen, but this should also
show you their prejudice. Here says the mysteries of the of nosisle worked out
basically by the Kabbalah. So they're saying that the Cabbala fine tuned, didn't
work everything out for you. It's a book of mysticism. It's obvious that
the author is attempting to be subtle, but it would seem that this is
a clear reference to the Masons. No, he's about to dive in,
and I just wanted to give another warning. This kind of gets really insane
here. This is a historical source that not only is saying some shocking things
about the templars, he's showing their actual artifacts. He's taking their statues,
coffers emblems and symbols for everyone to see. The author makes it clear right
after this paragraph that he does not care and it's his duty to reveal the
true secret behind the order, because it is simply the truth and the right
thing to do. He first begins by mentioning the argument of both sides,
skipping the entire story of the persecution, as we're already very familiar with,
and begins to dissect the matter with his question quote, if we did not
wish to argue against them from betrayal of Louis le Saint and King of Jerusalem,
from the surrender of the castles of Karroc and Acre from the Aliens,
struck with the assassins from the connivance with the Sultan of Egypt. If we
did not care to give credence to the frequent confessions about the worship of the
idol, the spitting and the trampling of the cross, and the unspeakable crimes
committed are permitted, what prevents us from considering all these things not only as
probable but also true when we consider the nature of men in the times and
find a similar doctrine in similar customs in so many other sects of the Middle
Ages. He's basically saying, why are we to consider as the historians tell
us that these things are false, yet they have the exact same philosophy as
the orders of the Middle Ages. He believes this connection is the evidence,
but it takes one who can see symbols to understand them. Also, there
are more controversy that he mentions, like the unrestrained military conduct in various Eastern
sects, and especially in the famous Manicheans, Albaghnisians, Mazdians and assassins during
the wars for the recovery of the Lord's tomb, that the plague of this
doctrine in crime also crept into the society of Christian soldiers, whose founders could
not associate a single candidate with themselves for a decade until they took refuge in
the bosom of the Church, concealing the secret doctrine, according to all probability,
already existing at that time under the institution of Saint Bernard, which is
interesting if we consider the plaw and background of the Assassin crew games. But
this is history. The Assassins he's speaking of is an order that normally does
not get brought up when discussing the Templars, that this Christian military order was
doing secret business with the Nazari Isma'ili or the Assassins, a medieval Islamic sect
led by Hassan Sabah, which was operating in the same time period and found
a two hundred years prior to the Templars at the beginning of the millennium.
There are several references to this. One popular account it's called the Old Man
of the Mountain, who was an assassin, that is referenced in the book
of the Marvels of the World by Marco Polo. There's a lot to break
down on the Assassins, but we can say this that the assassins were essentially
the Mystery Sect or Islamic version of the Christian Mystery sect, and both these
sects have very similar initiations and philosophies, and that's the main premise of this
book, Mysterium Baphomet Unveiled. Okay, but back to the book, Peristall
is saying that these religious sects were operating under the guise of religion. It
was just a front. So he starts off with the term idols because remember
our term Baphomet is what we use to communicate in terms of the possibility of
the deity that they worshiped. But he says it that way because typically Baphomet
is a headed demon, but there are other forms to consider. He does
this by looking at their artifacts, and this includes their mysterious cups or childices,
sculptures, and the coins of the templars. The Black Madonna's an interesting
part two. So hopefully they talk about this point ms line from the preface,
and we're going to dive into these symbols. Quote. For this reason,
bundles of original documents and processes seal to this day in Rome lie hidden,
which as all things were eventually brought to light, we do not doubt
will wonderfully agree with the monuments we've discovered and revealed when they become part of
public law. In the meantime, these stone and bronze monuments, taken from
the secret discipline and harmful doctrine of the brothers of the Military Order of the
Temple, will suffice to convince all who without prejudice seek the pure truth of
history. End quote. We're ready to look at their idols. He does
mention that they were using Arabic to make secret transcriptions, and the author goes
into detail on this, but basically these inscriptions are not actually Arabic words.
They were references to hitting gods. One in particular, which we'll discuss,
is meat, and the description says omnipotent meat. Now who is meat?
Meat? Or Meatus is a Greek Titan. She was the first wife of
Zeus, But that's not actually who the author is discussing right now, although
I do think there's some connections to be made, as Meetus is in Greek
mythology and she's swallowed by Zeus because he was afraid that his new child was
going to overpower him. But it seems that Athena just spontaneously generated from Zeus's
forehead as some type of homunculous. Also, there's another strange story with the
creation of Zeus from Chronos. The wife of Kronos had to trick him by
substituting a fake baby Zeus, and somehow Chronos falls for this, and then
Zeus lives and tries to figure out how to get everyone else out of Kronos,
and so he decides to poison his father and the person who gave him
this poison the Titan alchemists, which meet Us. But again, even if
it is connected, this is not the meat or meet Us that we're discussing.
So we're just going to use meat. But according to Paristal, meat
is some type of hermaphrodite deity, that is the personification of Sophia from Gnosticism.
He explains this in the book Inscription number fourteen on the Largest Marble Creator
see Tab two. Figure one Meat holding a figured hand and unfolding a membrane
on which these words are clearly legible. Quote exalted or omnipotent meat are germinating
root I in seven were you are one of the renegades? The return is
made quote. He then thoroughly examines these symbols and inscriptions and explains how we
got the translation. But wait, are germinating rude? What are they talking
about here? And take a look at this. This is from the book.
He referenced these diagrams constantly. This is the inscription that he was referencing.
But notice how he left out an important detail. This is exactly why
you have to look at these matters with new eyes. But do you see
what this is? This is the secret right here. It's going to take
the full video to explain it, but it's all right there. That is
a baby coming out of a vessel, and there is a sun above the
baby as if it is rising, So birth of a son or son,
and then we see some type of well also, they were saying that the
homunculus noted for it to be a positive creation and for it to be successful
ahead to be during the certain types of celestial movements and not during others.
Right, So that would make sense that they'd have the sun in the moon
here once I don't know, over here by the moon, and this one's
opening up and this is under the sun, and then there's a winged thing
that looks kind of like I don't know what over there, I started to
tell, but yeah, you could tell. You see that this might be
the formation of a homunculus here and this is the format for that, knowing
that the Arabic people were the ones that were giving this knowledge before. And
if you heard this earlier in the video, that's that's much more of the
most of the sources were coming from starting to startn't making a little sets here,
horned androgynous priest point to the inscription that was just translated. Peristyle says
that this is meat, and he believed that the Templars were secretly worshiping this
figure through their ancient philosophy of o fighte Gnostissism, a very dark and pessimistic
outlook on the world. And remember Ophie means snake O fight Opie that at
its entire core viewed the entire creation as some sort of prison cell. It's
important to note that this is some sort of ritual. And I'm just gonna
establish for the record that I think that a lot of the Gnostic belief is
one hundred percent on the money. I think this might be a prison planet,
and I think we might be regenerated into it and our energy sucked up
each time. So yeah, because the gnostics are where we get the idea
of the arcons from. So if people start talking about arcons and they're saying
they're this or that, well then you're tying in gnosissism with it. And
the gnocissism itself has a really bad name because of misunderstandings in a bunch of
crap that people later in the timeline have a sign to being gnostic. But
gnosis itself is just knowing, meaning you know your relationship with God and you
feel like you're being enlightened by that, and that you don't need an intermediary
human to tell you how to do things in order to be with that,
because you've already are with that and that thing already is or that Creator is
already influencing your life, so you don't need that filter of a man to
give you a sense of spirituality. So I don't think there's anything wrong with
Nooses, And I think that there might be quite a lot to say about
this quote unquote pessimistic view of the world. I think it is what it
is. We just have to deal with whatever the reality happens to be,
if we ever figure out what that is. Because that also ties in the
concepts of a matrix. They might want to lull us to sleep and tell
us in pet our heads, but apparently now they're so advanced with artificial things
that they don't need us anymore. And this can be further explained towards the
end as we're entering some more advanced occult symbolism. But we can summarize by
saying that this is a reference. We're harnessing the powers of the seven planets
in capturing those powers into a newly created homunculous are being. That's what this
lady to the right is doing with the pouring of the water or and if
you think about it, the bafflement is just another homunculous that was possibly created,
right, I mean, how would that not be a thing? It
looks like it's a vivisected vivisected meaning rearranged plastistis that we talked about with the
eye owned the doctor Moreau type stuff then maybe possibly also generated. So I
mean, if anything, it's just the one that happened to be wise,
just like the satyr was that they were talking about earlier too, with a
quote unquote Hebrew characteristics whatever that means for the Menorah. Perkstall is essentially saying
that the templars will worship Sophia through this figure, and this was their secret
ritual. As the entire story of Sofia and the Arcons is its own subject.
But we can summarize by saying that Sophia desired to achieve higher states of
flight or awareness, and in doing so, she actually fell, and she
was taken advantage of by some self willed lion power that then merged with their
enforced her to become pregnant, which is the birth of the planet and our
universe. But most importantly, these are the powers and or attributes that make
up our realm and Kabbalah, and these powers can be influenced or harnessed as
these energies literally make up our own. Ophite Gnostisism as a branch of Gnostissism,
a religious movement that emerged in the first and second centuries. The name
Ophite is derived from the Greek word ophis, which means serpent. This sect
held the serpent from the Biblical story, and that ties back into Asclepius too
of Adam and Eve in high regard, viewing it as a positive symbol of
wisdom, and spiritual insight. The idea being that the serpent never lied and
was attempting to give knowledge to humanity as they weren't even aware that they were
naked, much less prisoners in a garden. But this gets deeper as much
less prisoners on a planet. But I'll again, when I was talking to
I forget who it was. Maybe it was doctor Monzo. My thought there
was that maybe that sense of being naked was without the armor or protection of
God because they did something that almost looking like a drug, made them feel
self awareness into a sense of paranoia, and that was the reasoning for the
sense of embarrassment or hear of God and this fear of everything else or could
quite literally have been a very route awakening to the reality that they were in
because maybe that God in the garden wasn't the good guy, and maybe something
divine was trying to help them free themselves. I'm up in the air on
that, and I'm just collecting the data and listening and observing. At the
moment we discussed the alchemical origins to the Bible. Essentially, this gnostic sophia
has been translated over time into multiple different deities and is considered to be ingogynous.
He goes quite in detail on how the Gnostics viewed Sophia with both female
and masculine traits. The Ophites diverge from other Gnostics sects and their interpretation of
the Genesis story. While many Gnostics sects consider the material world to be flawed
creation of a lesser deity, the Demiurge, the Ophites believed that the serpent
in the Garden of Eden was a divine emissary sent by the true Higher God.
They viewed the serpent's role as providing humanity with the knowledge of good and
evil. And for those of you who out there want to hate me for
it, I lean more towards that explanation than anything else, buying them to
break free from the control of the Demiurge, who they identified with the Old
Testament god Yahweh. And that's the reason why, because Yahweh was the guide
of metallurgy from the Cananites. And this goes back into the the we'll just
call it Hebrew for lack of a better word, deception. I think that
the Demiurgus or the Demiurge is quite literally the tender who didn't create anything,
who did have us in slaves, and who is the quote unquote prince of
this world? And something divine did try to arouse our consciousness and get us
free of that completely blind servitude that we were under. This is a misthought
to have emerged around the second century, but much of what we know about
their beliefs comes from the writing of early Christian heresiologists such as Iranius, Hypolotis
and Epiphanius, who aimed to refute and condemn heretical teachings. As a result,
our understanding of Ophite beliefs maybe somewhat skewed, as these early Christian writers
were not impartial observers. The author continues explaining the ancient origins of this philosophy
and how it resulted influencing Arabic and Christian philosophy, discussing the concept of a
spiritual baptism or fiery tincture. So some of these depictions were carved on rats
or craters, which is Latin for mixing bowl. He says that this is
a secret rite and the proceeds to discuss the symbolism. Quote the infant any
crater or mixing bowl with flames meat is plate one figure fourteen second another boy
of this type, any flaming creator standing above the surrounded by a whirlwind of
flames and smoke see tap three Figure three, which we will better illustrate in
the following chapter on creaters. Quote. Creators or cups were used in all
the mysteries of antiquity, as is well known, but here will illustrate the
primitive meaning of these creators more clearly. There is a great crater in which
the ophytic orgies are carved in the upper part, and there is a double
creater figure that modestly prevents us from displaying here in print. Only to be
the needs of this commentary, we must say that the two creators represent both
sexes. It should also be pointed out that thing that looks like a hermaphrodite
with horns over there, and these pictures I keep showing is holding across male
congress at the female birth. Therefore, this creator represents nothing other than the
female sex as a symbol of genesis, which is also seen. And notice
that it's a T an uppercase T, which is what the actual crucifix would
have been to extend it over the top of that is not how a crucifix
was ever made, but it is a symbol of the patterns of celestial objects.
And I think that's where the pagan influence came in, so that the
church could draw in more of the Pagans to you know, except the same
teachings the feet of the three idols, but the difference that they're in place
of the phallus. There is a burning fire that is seen representing the generative
power. So in the idol see Table one, figure nine taken from the
Booklet of Curiosities, on the female side at its feet, it is noted
in another idol see Tab one, figure fifteen. A double crater is placed
with the bottoms facing each other, one of which is filled with fire that
is the symbol of the generative power, and the other shows an infant emerging
from the wound. The neck of the Creator is sometimes shorter, sometimes longer.
Shorter in the marble crater and in its figure Tab two, figure fourteen,
longer in the vase that has look up top for a second. Look
one two three in from the right, and you'll see that that bath matt
looking character is holding with capital letter T right the shape of a bottle commonly
called karoff, which appears to be the base of a two headed idol Tab
two figure nine and in the core of spiritual or fiery baptism ceremonies see Tab
two figure two, held by one of the ministers who was closest to the
pire. The letter G which is inscribed on the base of the two headed
idol, along with the Arabic word gnosis, is the best commentary on this
vase, which is the first symbol of ophide, ignosis and genesis. This
is some really strange symbolism if you ask me, and does still consider what
we were discussing at the beginning with spontaneous generation. So what are they talking
about here? What are these symbols? These clearly are not made up,
and we do see the same tools using alchemy, but also references to birth,
rebirth, astrological influence, and even a baby sprouting from a vessel.
The only conclusion would be to call it fake. But there is an interesting
detail. Notice that all of them have this same style of breast and also
this strange being that Perkstall was calling me. Well, we're about to see
this being everywhere, and now we have a direct reference connecting it to alchemy.
The homunculous and seecret order symbolism. We're talking about a squatting hybrid bat
horned demon with the exact same style, and this could be seen on the
Church of Saint Marie. Other interesting symbols that templar churches include skull and bones
and also the temple our cross within the Star of David. If the templars
pre Christians, then why do they feel the need to put these symbols on
the churches that were donated to them. Now we can't fold it dissect this
book right now, but we'll be including all the references and the translated books
in the description for everyone to see and study. Now, let's go back
to that earlier description of the baby with the sunhead and let's look at the
entire piece. We see a higher deity squatting with arms crossed with the head
of an owl, and it seems that the beak is also a snake,
so some type of chimera like being, and it is sitting on some type
of winged vessel. To the left, we see what looks like a male
genitalia pointing down into the vessel, which seems to be indicating the aqua of
the alchemist with the moon above. To the right, we see the baby
from earlier being born with the sun, new life, a new day,
a new birth. Oh, so there's more to the specific figure on tablet
too. To the far left is a scene where a bunch of these members
are naked in front of a large book. But it's as if you're seeing
behind the scenes and they're playing with snakes, but strangely it almost seems sexual.
This was one of the components of the orphic mysteries, which I'm sure
many of you have heard of. The orphic egg. Well, Orpheus was
supposedly a real person and started all of this from the Dionysus or Bacchus cults.
Orphism was practiced by the elites of ancient Greece, and it just so
happens that we see this scene Virginian cap The orphic mysteries are just another brotherhood
mythos explaining the story of Sophia. In another way, the orphic creation myth
is centered on the figure of Dionysus Zagreus, the son of Zeus and Persephone,
who was torn apart by the Titans. And yes, pay attention to
the assied to the harp that is Orpheus. For sure, Zeus then destroyed
the Titans with his lightning, and humans were created from the ashes of these
titans. The Meths suggest that humans possess both divine dionysis and the impure titan
elements, and the soul's goal is to escape the material world and reunite with
the divine. The idea is parallel to the Gnostic creation story, in which
a divine spark becomes trapped in the material world due to the actions of the
demiurge. In both traditions, the soul seeks to return to its divine origins
through acquiring secret knowledge and achieving spiritual yeah, but pay attention to defeat their
hoovesal transformation. This is what we're discussing with the origin of alchemy. But
the difference is that most scholars stop there and will see this only as a
spiritual transformation. Do you see the star? Do you see the hands and
legs? As if being I don't know, bound that way, but also
making the symbol of an act, not considering that it could also be true
literally. The first tablet features some of the strangest statues to be seen,
hybrid humans marked with the cult symbols, generative symbolism with animals for the generative
organs. We even see the formation of skins as these secret free Masonic aprons.
Interestingly, Masonic aprons were also made from lambskin. The figure is distorted,
right, because when a sheep is sheared, right, yeah, lambskin
lambs themselves. When they talk about lamb's blood, that's a cryptic way of
saying the blood of a Christian for Passover. That's what it came to mean,
and that's what it was utilized as. And there was a trade going
on in Rome of dried children's blood for the sake of baking into your matza
during Passover, for its magical proper And if you want to get a reference
for that, look up Simon of Trent at any strange fashion and to the
right, I'm not quite sure what that is, but it almost looks like
at night with its arms cut off, sitting in a line chair. As
you can see the priest or men in dresses. The one on the left
seems to be female and looks sad she had the fire creater. The next
statue is a priest strangling the snake. This is the harnessing of the snakelike
ariconic powers of the planets. But first tablet has some really weird statues.
We see a statue of Diana of Ephesus as some sort of templar, and
many of these priests look to have Hebrew influence. Interestingly, there's some weird
stuff here with this lady holding the child. Then yeah, there's this father
and this kid. And then to the right we see a statue of an
enrogynous man like woman basically a man in a dress giving birth but with some
type of burning chalice fire on top, and the baby comes out the bottom.
He is holding an unclike cross symbolizing rebirth, and behind him is the
sickle of Saturn in tablet IU, the one with the baby coming out of
the vessel. There's more to this tablet that we shall discuss, but we
know there's clear alchemical references, even a banyo or ritual bath of fire.
But there is something interesting to the right that I only cover briefly. What
we see as a child being pulled away from some type of creature. Then
we see more statues, and one in particular had a strange headlike radish,
but take a look at the body. Notice these strange emblems in front of
the genitals. It's almost like another mouth that'll be crucial to note for later.
And also on this tablet is a baby writing an eagle, which looks
very similar to the US seal. So we're on the last tablet and there
are only really a few more things. One is that there's clear Gnostic references
to the Garden of Eden and one of their depictions with a snake and saturn.
But instantly there is one that shows some type of hybrid sneak creature throwing
up or feeding on a baby in front of a king. The last thing
to point out is the cross legs of the Templars, because what we're dealing
with here is an ancient sect that wanted to become in a sense more like
a woman, so that they possessed both masculine and feminine traits like Sophia or
in androgynous God. In doing so, it was rumored outside of this book
that the Templars participated in castration rituals in order to become more like their God
is Meet. The reason this is brought up is because you can still see
this in Templar churches today, and it's like this mystery. Usually people are
saying that the Saracens did this, but now we have more contexts, perhaps
it's a part of a greater mystery. We will now move on to discussing
how the Templars gained their wealth and some of the activities outside of the persecution
that they have taken part in. Okay, I gotta call it. There
are four or four hours in ten minutes deep, so I'm gonna mark this
three hours, nineteen minutes and twenty one seconds. I guarantee you you'll probably
be the those who are watching right now are probably only wasn't gonna watch this
video because it's so damn long, unless you guys go on road trips with
your vehicle and just want something to listen to, which I do that,
so maybe that'll be a thing. Hopefully lots of people take lots of trips
because I want to see some views on this. It's pretty important stuff.
But yeah, I mean, I think we've covered a lot of stuff tonight,
and we'll go on to a second part soon. Yes, absolutely,
Yeah, I was just reading something there. Okay, so you guys know
where the description is. You guys know how to help about the show.
And no, well, just as I dwitched in the first part of this
video there will not sadly found out today and I really had an important thing
to talk to Doctor Artists about, so it kind of disappointed me a little
bit. But he will not be here tomorrow. He had to cancel for
whatever else he's engaged in. He does a lot of activities, He goes
a lot of places and does a lot of talk, so he probably just
isn't going to be back on time from whatever he did this weekend. But
we will be back here with Doctor Artists. I mean, I'll be back
whenever I have time to make a video. But on August twenty eighth,
my birthday, the Big four four for this guy right here in this chair,
I'm not even on the screen in my Jesus, the Big forty four,
I will be here doing a video with doctor Brian Artists and doctor Henry
Ealy, both of them will be here. Will the format still be Q
and A. I think it has to be. But just to understand that
my friend whose father is having an issue with his heart right now, that's
pretty important and pretty him and it like we need to take care of it
as soon as possible. He's going to get first cracks at the questioning.
You know, I'm going to bring him on directly to the video and then
he'll have doctor Henry Eally and doctor artists who field these questions with and I
told him to make sure he has all of us the medications, but his
eating habits are, and what the history of him and if he's got his
father with him. Great. This is a good, really good friend of
mine. He's also the person who took over the store when I departed,
and he's the person my wholesale too. He's become a very good friend,
and I want to make sure I can do whatever I can for someone,
I know, given the whatever resources I have to help anybody, but most
specifically, he's got something really important going on with his dad, so he's
gonna get first cracks at it, and then we're gonna right into the buy
me a coffee questions and whomever calls after that. So that's how that will
run on Monday, August twenty eight. Okay, thank you for everything.
Thank you for watching and do what all the cool kids are doing and support
the show so that I can get to the Rewaken tour and get some really
cool interviews to share with you guys. When I get back. That would
be awesome. You're gonna love it if you do. Roseanne Barr is going
to be there or whatever hell she calls herself. Now am I ability to
get in touch with that person? I know Artists is going to probably be
busy, but I have the I have the feeling because Christine is going to
be there too, his person behind the scenes. I'm probably gonna get introduced
a whole lot of people if I get there, and that's going to mean
a lot of really cool potential opportunities for foodage interviews, what have you,
photo ops, whatever you want to call it, networking that will help this
show out too. It's not why I'm doing it. I'm gonna go see
doctor Artists and shake his hand because it's been a long time since I've known
him and everything ever said seen him in person. It's been over a year
he's been on my show. He's been on over forty, like forty times
now, so'd be great to see him. And so if I get to
do that, it's only gonna make the show better. So I mean,
how about the show gives them go PayPal? You know where it is.
It's all in the description. I just spent four and a half hours here
with you guys. You know what I mean, all right, I did.
I did step away from the chair and say good night to my daughter.
And I'll like good stuff too. I'm not dick, of course,
good dead. I'm even wearing the shirt though. So Rebecca bought me this
because my daughter's number one, love's blue, the color blue, and she
was thinking about either Bluey, which I think is a very wholesome show.
If there's any show that's somewhat wholesome out there, Blue It's an Australian show.
It's really good. It's pretty good for kids. I mean, I
don't see fault in it yet, this however, being Disney, but it's
whatever she likes. Uh Leland's stitch right, speaking of homiculous creations of strangeness.
So we all had we all wear a shirt like this for the for
the party, so that we're kind of in costume for her party. And
we did that with different things throughout the years every time too, so it
was kind of cool. So the reason why I'm wearing this because hey,
laundry was just done and I thought, ah, what the hell, you
know, and then it's raining all day and I was so sore from the
gym yesterday. I was like, yeah, yeah, it makes sense.
Not today. Yeah, I didn't really do a whole lot scept my con
sauce. So have a good one. Have the show. The camera body
is like my biggest concern right now. But just get you know, the
place secured in you know, get getting the Rio hotel that I found that
was pretty cheap. Getting getting that set so that I can just drive out
there, that would be amazing, and then I can use my camera,
but it's just the audio is going to be not the greatest if it's loud.
That's why I was hoping to get the camera body that I could actually
put in the exterior shotgun shore microphone on it, which is pretty awesome.
All that stuff is in the description of the Gifts and Go, So there's
out of my list for the for the computer, and then there's the camera
body that I found, and then then the camera sorry, the the external
mic that would go with it to make a really good thing for taking on
the road to go do types of interviews that I will be doing, and
have had the experience with the previous red Pill XBO some of my footage was
had to be thrown out, So there were some There was some stuff that
I had to just it's not good enough to put into a video. So
no matter what I did with the audio, it was just if I raised
it. I didn't have tracks, so I couldn't eliminate the background noise.
It was just not good. So some stuff was was was lost, and
I didn't want to have that again, especially if it was important stuff.
So all right, good night and half a wonderful week. I will be
here probably in the morning anyway, after I bring my daughter to school and
see her off, I will probably come back here and do something, and
then I have to do two orientations over at the gym for you know,
first he did the orientation, then you say, hey, do you want
to do personal trainer whatever? All right, bye. I would love to
just spend all my time doing this and writing my book, but you know,
life is life.